Cookies on CABI

Like most websites we use cookies. This is to ensure that we give you the best experience possible.

Continuing to use www.cabi.org means you agree to our use of cookies. If you would like to, you can learn more about the cookies we use.

Search this site
Sign up for the CABI e-zine Newsletter
Improving lives by solving problems in agriculture and the environment

What is biocontrol?

What is biocontrol?

Biological control – or biocontrol – has been used effectively against invasive species for over 100 years.

It is the use of living organisms, such as insects or pathogens, to control pest populations. It levels the playing-field by reintroducing some of the specialist natural enemies that help control the invasive species it in its native range. The aim of biocontrol is not to eradicate the invasive species, but control it in a way that it becomes manageable.  In other words, the method uses nature’s own in-built mechanisms to ensure equilibrium.

The safety process

It’s important that potential control agents don’t attack other beneficial or native plants and insects. A biocontrol agent is therefore only proposed for field release in the invaded range after intensive research and vigorous safety testing to ensure it’s specific to the plant or pest which needs to be controlled. 


Why biocontrol is needed?

Increasing trade and travel between nations has increased the number of plants and other non-native species arriving in new countries. Most of them come without the natural enemies that keep them in check in their native range. In the case of plants, almost all the insects, fungal pathogens or nematodes that would normally inflict damage on them are lost, giving the plant an unfair advantage over its new neighbours.

As a natural method, biocontrol doesn’t require the use of chemicals and machinery which can have a negative impact on the environment. It’s also economically efficient and sustainable, as once self-replicating and co-evolved natural enemies are established, they should provide control indefinitely without further cost or intervention. 

The advantages 

Environmental – Biological control is natural and doesn’t rely on the use of man-made chemicals that can adversely impact an ecosystem. It also allows the amount of herbicides required for weed control to be reduced.

Cost – After the initial research costs, once the agents are established and having an impact on the weed the only further expenditure required would be that used for monitoring activities.

Sustainability – It’s permanent, and therefore completely sustainable. The weed is continually under attack from an army of natural enemies.

Spread – The control agents, be they insects or pathogens, locate and affect most – if not all – populations of a weed until they’re stopped by physical, environmental or chemical barriers, just as they would in their native range.

Safety – Biocontrol agents pose no threat to human health, crop production or beneficial organisms.

Landscape – While the agents are doing their job, previously out-competed native species can gradually recover and recolonize areas without the need for extensive replanting.

The disadvantages

Control not eradication – A successful agent should not eradicate the weed on which it depends, but reduce it to acceptable levels instead. There may be costs associated with alternative control methods.

Timescale – It takes time. It can take between five to 10 years from release to achieve successful control.

Impacts – The complete impact on the target weed is not always predictable.


Other management options

Doing nothing – Invasive weeds will continue to have a devastating effect on native flora and fauna, damage the built environment and national economies, and affect people’s health.

Chemical control – Chemical herbicides can be effective where permitted, but using this method of control on a large scale is costly and could impact on biodiversity. Many of the worst invaders are aquatic or grow beside rivers where use of chemicals is banned or severely limited.

Manual control – Manual control methods are available for most invasive weeds, but are rarely viable on large scale invasions because they are labour-intensive and costly. 

Controlling the cabbage seedpod weevil in Canada

The cabbage seedpod weevil is a widely distributed pest of cruciferous crops in Europe and North America, causing substantial economic losses in canola crops in Canada. Current control measures still rely on applying broad-spectrum insecticides. We are collecting European distribution data for a parasitic wasp that is the weevil’s most effective... >>

Protecting leeks and onions from pests

The invasive leek moth poses a significant and immediate threat to producers of leeks, onions, garlic and chives in North America. The larvae mine the green tissues, reducing the marketability of crops. The pest’s distribution is expanding, with no signs of suppression by indigenous natural enemies. We are supporting an integrated pest management... >>

Biological control of brown marmorated stink bug

The brown marmorated stink bug is native to parts of East Asia and is invasive in the US, Canada and Switzerland. Here, it is a serious pest of many fruit trees, shrubs and other plants. Chemical control is often used but, with testing, parasitic wasps from China could be used in North America instead. So we want to determine what natural enemies... >>

Controlling earwigs in the Falklands

The European earwig has become a considerable domestic and public nuisance in the Falkland Islands, causing significant problems for local horticulture by decimating many garden vegetable crops. This population explosion is due to the absence of natural enemies that would normally keep them under control. To try and find a solution to this... >>

Controlling the noxious Russian knapweed in North America

Although native to Asia, Russian knapweed was accidentally introduced to North America over 100 years ago and is now causing untold problems across many states. Some decades ago, a nematode species was used in an effort to control the plant but it proved ineffective. Funded by a US and Canadian consortium CABI has been tasked with researching and... >>

Locating a biological control for tutsan in New Zealand

Tutsan, native to Europe, was introduced to New Zealand but is now a major invasive species. In 2011, CABI’s Swiss centre was approached by Landcare Research to investigate prospects for the biological control of tutsan. Surveys in the native range revealed a suite of insects and pathogens. CABI’s laboratories in the UK are currently conducting... >>

Azolla control

One of the UK’s most invasive plants, the fairy fern or floating water fern causes problems for anglers and water managers. It forms thick mats on the water’s surface which can double in size in a few days, blocking out light and killing aquatic flora and fish. Fragmentation of the fronds makes control by mechanical means virtually impossible.... >>