Cookies on CABI

Like most websites we use cookies. This is to ensure that we give you the best experience possible.

Continuing to use www.cabi.org means you agree to our use of cookies. If you would like to, you can learn more about the cookies we use.

Search this site
Sign up for the CABI e-zine Newsletter
Improving lives by solving problems in agriculture and the environment

Giving dyer’s woad the blues

Dyer’s woad is an ancient source of blue dye and was grown as a textile dye crop in Europe and Asia for centuries. It was introduced to North America by early colonists, but escaped cultivation. Today, it is recognized as a serious weed in the western USA. One reason for its impact is the absence of the natural enemies that keep it in check in its area of origin. CABI is searching for specialist natural enemies in Europe that could potentially be introduced for its biological control.

Project Overview

So, what's the problem

Dyer's woad (Isatis tinctoria) is a plant of Eurasian origin in the mustard family. It was introduced to North America by early colonists as a textile dye crop and then accidentally spread as a contaminant of crop seed. Today, it is officially recognized as a serious weed in 10 western US states. Unlike most other invasive plants, dyer’s woad can invade undisturbed sites. This makes it a particular problem in well-vegetated sites, such as rangelands, because it can readily invade and dominate them. 

Control is difficult. Chemical control is limited in rangeland and forests by often inaccessible terrain, the risk of undesirable environmental impacts and questionable economic returns. Cultivation can be effective against the weed in crop areas, but it must be repeated 2–3 times a year for several years to be successful.

What is this project doing?

In 2004, Mark Schwarzländer (University of Idaho, USA) and Jim Hull (Weed Superintendent, Idaho) invited CABI to participate in an initiative to investigate the potential for biological control of dyer's woad. We identified several potential biological control agents, which we subsequently studied to varying degrees. The aim was to identify species that are both specific to the target plant and cause sufficient damage to limit the weed’s impact and spread in the USA.

Results

Current work concentrates on two weevils: the seed feeder Ceutorhynchus peyerimhoffi and the root-crown miner C. rusticus. We tested them on over one hundred plant species, two-thirds of which are native to North America and include species of conservation concern. 

C. peyerimhoffi laid eggs and developed in only four non-target species in no-choice tests. Unfortunately one of them, Boechera hoffmannii, is a federally listed endangered species. However, additional tests suggest very limited risk of non-target attack on B. hoffmannii and other test species in the field. 

C. rusticus developed to adult in 11 species, nine native to North America. But dyer’s woad was highly preferred for egg-laying in field tests, so we believe C. rusticus will not have significant impact on non-target species. 

In impact experiments, up to 100% of seeds were destroyed by C. peyerimhoffi, while C. rusticus reduced seed production by up to 72% and plant biomass by 46%. A combination of both agents would be ideal to control dyer’s woad in North America. 

We have begun – with Massimo Cristofaro (Biotechnology and Biological Control Agency, Rome, Italy) and Radmila Petanovic (University of Belgrade, Serbia) – working on an eriophyid mite species in the genus Metaculus, which is probably new to science.

The team

Project Manager

Staff image of Philip Weyl

Philip Weyl  Research Scientist, Weed Biological Control

Rue des Grillons 1 CH-2800 Delémont
Switzerland
T +41 (0)32 421 48 76
E p.weyl@cabi.org

Project team

Staff image of Cornelia Cloşca

Cornelia Cloşca

Technical Research Assistant

Staff image of Hariet L Hinz

Hariet L Hinz

Country Director and Head Weed Biological Control