CABI Book Chapter
Invasion biology: hypotheses and evidence.
DescriptionThis book, containing 18 chapters, combines the hierarchy-of-hypotheses (HoH) approach with hypothesis networks for invasion biology. This book aims to further develop the HoH approach by inviting critical comments (Part I), apply it to 12 major invasion hypotheses (Part II) and explore how it can be expanded to a hierarchically structured hypothesis network (Chapter 7 and Part III). It is importa...
Chapter 16 (Page no: 147)
Propagule pressure hypothesis.Propagule pressure is a composite measure of introduction effort consisting of: (i) the number of individuals introduced per introduction event (propagule size); and (ii) the frequency of introduction events (propagule frequency or number). The propagule pressure hypothesis posits that a high propagule pressure is a cause of invasion success; in other words, non-native species with a high propagule pressure have a higher invasion success than non-native species with a low propagule pressure. On the basis of a systematic review, we identified 92 relevant empirical studies testing the propagule pressure hypothesis. These studies have addressed different aspects - that is, suband sub-sub-hypotheses - of the overall hypothesis. Independently of the specific aspects considered by each study, the propagule pressure hypothesis is largely supported by currently available evidence. About 80% of the 92 studies reported supporting evidence. Similarly, the propagule pressure hypothesis is empirically supported across major taxonomic groups, habitats and methodological approaches. This hypothesis is among the most influential ones in the field and represents the recognition that in order to understand biological invasions, one must consider humans and their actions as key underlying drivers.
Other chapters from this book
|Chapter: 1 (Page no: 3)||Invasion biology: searching for predictions and prevention, and avoiding lost causes. Author(s): Cassey, P., García-Díaz, P., Lockwood, J. L., Blackburn, T. M.|
|Chapter: 2 (Page no: 14)||The hierarchy-of-hypotheses approach. Author(s): Heger, T., Jeschke, J. M.|
|Chapter: 3 (Page no: 19)||Hierarchy of hypotheses or hierarchy of predictions? Clarifying key concepts in ecological research. Author(s): Farji-Brener, A. G., Amador-Vargas, S.|
|Chapter: 4 (Page no: 23)||Mapping theoretical and evidential landscapes in ecological science: Levins' virtue trade-off and the hierarchy-of-hypotheses approach. Author(s): Griesemer, J.|
|Chapter: 5 (Page no: 30)||A hierarchy of hypotheses or a network of models. Author(s): Scheiner, S. M., Fox, G. A.|
|Chapter: 6 (Page no: 38)||The hierarchy-of-hypotheses approach updated - a toolbox for structuring and analysing theory, research and evidence. Author(s): Heger, T., Jeschke, J. M.|
|Chapter: 7 (Page no: 49)||A network of invasion hypotheses. Author(s): Enders, M., Jeschke, J. M.|
|Chapter: 8 (Page no: 60)||Biotic resistance and island susceptibility hypotheses. Author(s): Jeschke, J. M., Debille, S., Lortie, C. J.|
|Chapter: 9 (Page no: 71)||Disturbance hypothesis. Author(s): Nordheimer, R., Jeschke, J. M.|
|Chapter: 10 (Page no: 79)||Invasional meltdown hypothesis. Author(s): Braga, R. R., Gómez Aparicio, L., Heger, T., Vitule, J. R. S., Jeschke, J. M.|
|Chapter: 11 (Page no: 92)||Enemy release hypothesis. Author(s): Heger, T., Jeschke, J. M.|
|Chapter: 12 (Page no: 103)||Evolution of increased competitive ability and shifting defence hypotheses. Author(s): Müller, C.|
|Chapter: 13 (Page no: 124)||Tens rule. Author(s): Jeschke, J. M., Pyšek, P.|
|Chapter: 14 (Page no: 133)||Phenotypic plasticity hypothesis. Author(s): Torchyk, O., Jeschke, J. M.|
|Chapter: 15 (Page no: 140)||Darwin's naturalization and limiting similarity hypotheses. Author(s): Jeschke, J. M., Erhard, F.|
|Chapter: 17 (Page no: 157)||Synthesis. Author(s): Jeschke, J. M., Heger, T.|
|Chapter: 18 (Page no: 167)||Conclusions and outlook. Author(s): Heger, T., Jeschke, J. M.|