Aedes albopictus (Asian tiger mosquito)
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Habitat List
- Host Animals
- Species Vectored
- Biology and Ecology
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Causes
- Pathway Vectors
- Plant Trade
- Impact Summary
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- Principal Source
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Aedes albopictus (Skuse)
Preferred Common Name
- Asian tiger mosquito
Other Scientific Names
- Culex albopictus Skuse, 1895
International Common Names
- English: forest day mosquito; tiger mosquito
- Spanish: mosquito tigre
- French: moustique tigre
Local Common Names
- Germany: tigermücke
- Italy: zanzare tigre
Summary of InvasivenessTop of page
The Asian tiger mosquito is spread via the international tyre trade (due to the rainwater retained in the tyres when stored outside). In order to control its spread such trading routes must be highlighted for the introduction of sterilisation or quarantine measures. The tiger mosquito is associated with the transmission of many human diseases, including the viruses: Dengue, West Nile and Japanese Encephalitis.
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Metazoa
- Phylum: Arthropoda
- Subphylum: Uniramia
- Class: Insecta
- Order: Diptera
- Family: Culicidae
- Genus: Aedes
- Species: Aedes albopictus
DescriptionTop of page
Adults are known as tiger mosquitoes due to their conspicuous patterns of very black bodies with white stripes. Also, there is a distinctive single white band (stripe) down the length of the back. The body length is about 3/16-inch long. Like all mosquitoes, Asian tiger mosquitoes are small, fragile insects with slender bodies, one pair of narrow wings, and three pairs of long, slender legs. They have an elongate proboscis with which the female bites and feeds on blood.
DistributionTop of page
Native range: Ae. albopictus occurs thoughout the Oriental Region from the tropics of Southeast Asia, the Pacific and Indian Ocean Islands, north through China and Japan and west to Madagascar.
Known introduced range: Ae. albopictus has been one of the fastest spreading animal species over the past two decades (Benedict et al. 2007). The mosquito has been introduced in North and South America, with more recent introductions having occurred in Africa, Australia and Europe, where it is established in Albania and Italy and where it has been detected in France (Eritja et al. 2005). In the United States, it is established in most states east of the Mississippi River as far as Minnesota and Delaware (Source: Novak). It has spread to at least 28 countries outside its native range around the globe (Benedict et al. 2008).
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
|Continent/Country/Region||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||Reference||Notes|
|China||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-Fujian||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Guangdong||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Hainan||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Hong Kong||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Jiangxi||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Macau||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Shandong||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Shanghai||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Yunnan||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|India||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-Himachal Pradesh||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Indian Punjab||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Kerala||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Maharashtra||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Tamil Nadu||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-West Bengal||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|Indonesia||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-Java||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Bonin Island||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Honshu||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Ryukyu Archipelago||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|Korea, Republic of||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|Malaysia||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Sabah||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Sarawak||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|Myanmar||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|Oman||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|Pakistan||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|Philippines||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|Singapore||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|Sri Lanka||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|Equatorial Guinea||Present||Introduced||2001||ISSG, 2011|
|South Africa||Present||Introduced||1991||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Canada||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Delaware||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Georgia||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Hawaii||Present||Introduced||before 1902||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|-Kentucky||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Louisiana||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Maryland||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Mississippi||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-New Jersey||Present||Introduced||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|-North Carolina||Present||Introduced||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|-South Carolina||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Tennessee||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Texas||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
Central America and Caribbean
|Cayman Islands||Present||Introduced||1997||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Costa Rica||Present||Introduced||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Dominican Republic||Present||Introduced||1993||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|El Salvador||Present||Introduced||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Trinidad and Tobago||Present||Introduced||1983||ISSG, 2011|
|Brazil||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-Ceara||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Martins et al., 2006; Martins et al., 2010|
|-Mato Grosso do Sul||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Santos and Nascimento, 1998|
|-Minas Gerais||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Ayres et al., 2002|
|-Parana||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Lopes et al., 2004|
|-Pernambuco||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Ayres et al., 2002|
|-Rio de Janeiro||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Ayres et al., 2002; Honório et al., 2009|
|-Roraima||Present||Introduced||Jun-06||Invasive||Aguiar et al., 2008; ISSG, 2011|
|-Sao Paulo||Present||Camargo-Neves et al., 2005|
|Belgium||Present, few occurrences||Introduced||Schaffner et al., 2004; ISSG, 2011|
|Spain||Present||Introduced||Arrival detected in August 2004||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|UK||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|Australia||Present, few occurrences||Introduced||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|-Australian Northern Territory||Present||Introduced||1988||ISSG, 2011|
|-Queensland||Restricted distribution||Introduced||Invasive||Ritchie et al., 2006; ISSG, 2011|
|Caroline Islands||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|Guam||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|Marshall Islands||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|Micronesia, Federated states of||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|New Zealand||Absent, intercepted only||Laird et al., 1994; Derraik, 2004; Holder et al., 2010|
|Northern Mariana Islands||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|Solomon Islands||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
History of Introduction and SpreadTop of page
Climate change will likely allow tiger mosquitoes to further increase their range by increasing areas of suitable climate. These areas could include Australia (Dr. Moira McKinnon pers. comm. in Beilharz 2009), New Zealand (Derraik, 2004) and further north in the United States (Phillips, 2008).
HabitatTop of page
A. albopictus is a treehole mosquito, and so its breeding places in nature are small, restricted, shaded bodies of water surrounded by vegetation. It inhabits densely vegetated rural areas. However, its ecological flexibility allows it to colonize many types of man-made sites and urban regions. It may reproduce in cemetery flower pots, bird baths, soda cans and abandoned containers and water recipients. Tires are particularly useful for mosquito reproduction as they are often stored outdoors and effectively collect and retain rain water for a long time. The addition of decaying leaves from the neighboring trees produces chemical conditions similar to tree holes, which provides an excellent substrate for breeding. A. albopictus can also establish and survive throughout non-urbanized areas lacking any artificial containers, raising additional public health concerns for rural areas (Moore 1999, in Eritja et al. 2005).
Habitat ListTop of page
|Estuaries||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Lakes||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Rivers / streams||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Coastal areas||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Cultivated / agricultural land||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Disturbed areas||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Managed forests, plantations and orchards||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Urban / peri-urban areas||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Natural forests||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Natural grasslands||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Scrub / shrublands||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Wetlands||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
Host AnimalsTop of page
|Animal name||Context||Life stage||System|
|Bos taurus (cattle)|
|Canis familiaris (dogs)|
|Mus musculus (house mouse)|
|Odocoileus hemionus (black-tailed deer)|
|Procyon lotor (raccoon)|
|Sciurus niger (fox squirrel)|
Species VectoredTop of page African horse sickness virus
eastern equine encephalitis virus
Japanese encephalitis virus
Rift Valley fever virus
vesicular stomatitis virus
West Nile virus
western equine encephalitis virus
Biology and EcologyTop of page
A. albopcitus obtains energy by feeding on plant nectar. Females require blood to produce eggs. Although primarily a mammalian feeder, will accept blood from a wide variety of hosts.
Means of Movement and DispersalTop of page
Introduction pathways to new locations
Horticulture: During the summer of 2001, containerised shipments from China of the plant known as Lucky Bamboo (Dracaena spp.) were found to contain A. albopictus on inspection by quarantine officers on arrival at Los Angeles, USA (Linthicum 2001, in Eritja et al. 2005). This route of spread became an issue only after traders swapped from dry freight to low cost shipping routes (which required the plants to be shipped in standing water to preserve them for the longer voyage).
Nursery trade: The trade in "lucky bamboo" (Dracaena spp.) is increasing because it has cultural relevance within the Asiatic communities in the US and elsewhere, and it has also gained worldwide attention as a popular gift. Destination wholesale nurseries containing lucky bamboo in California were found to be infested by the tiger mosquito (Madon et al. 2002, in Eritja et al. 2005). Similarly large nurseries in the Guangdong province of China, where the climate is suitable for A. albopictus, should be kept under observation (Madon et al. 2002, in Eritja et al. 2005).
Road vehicles (long distance): The adult flight range is quite short. Therefore, most medium and long range colonization is the result of passive transportation by humans. This may occur, for example, in the movement of used tires in trucks (Eritja et al. 2005).
Ship: During the summer of 2001, containerised shipments from China of lucky bamboo (Dracaena spp.) were found to contain Aedes albopictus on inspection by quarantine officers on arrival at Los Angeles, USA (Linthicum 2001, in Eritja et al. 2005). This route of spread only became an issue after traders changed from dry freight to low cost shipping routes (which required the plants to be shipped in standing water to preserve them for the longer voyage).
Transportation of habitat material: Movement of moist vegetation, wet tires or water containers that hold eggs or larvae.
Transportation of habitat material: Movement of moist vegetation, wet tyres or water containers that can hold eggs or larvae.
Local dispersal methods
Garden escape/garden waste:
Natural dispersal (local): The adult flight range is quite short, as expected for a scrub-habitat mosquito. The spreading of A. albopictus is quite slow; it has not spread along the Mediterranean coast from Italy to France, in spite of relatively short distances (Eritja et al. 2005).
Road vehicles: May be spread in trucks transporting used tyres.
Transportation of habitat material (local): Movement of moist vegetation, wet tyres or water containers that can hold eggs or larvae (Eritja et al. 2005).
Pathway CausesTop of page
Pathway VectorsTop of page
Plant TradeTop of page
|Plant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transport||Pest stages||Borne internally||Borne externally||Visibility of pest or symptoms|
|Growing medium accompanying plants||Yes|
Impact SummaryTop of page
ImpactTop of page
Compiled by IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)
The tiger mosquito is an aggressive outdoor day biter that has a very broad host range and attacks humans, livestock, amphibians, reptiles and birds (Eritja et al. 2005). In one survey of biting rates a level of 30 to 48 bites per hour was recorded (Cancrini et al. 2003).
Mosquitoes are vectors of many relevant human diseases from Malaria to filariasis (caused by Dirofilaria immitis (Naya and Knight 1999, in Eritja et al. 2005)). Ae. albopictus may be a matter of particular concern as a bridge vector for the West Nile virus because it inhabits rural areas and has a wide host range including birds, so that it can readily pass enzootic cycles to humans.
There are a total of four Flaviviruses, ten Bunyaviruses and seven Alphaviruses that Ae. albopictus is known to be receptive to in laboratory conditions. These include Yellow Fever, Rift Valley Fever, Chikungunya and Sindbis (all of which are present in the Mediterranean). Of these Ae. albopictus is known to be receptive in field conditions to three Flaviviruses (Dengue, West Nile and Japanese Encephalitis), six Bunyaviruses (Jamestown Canyon, Keystone, LaCrosse, Potosi, Cache Valley and Tensaw) and one Alphavirus (EEE). Other circulating viruses in the Mediterranean that are pathogenic to humans (but which the receptivity of Ae. albopictus has not been observed or tested in the laboratory) include Israel Turkey virus, Tahyna and Batai.
However the extent to which Ae. albopictus can transmit diseases in the real world is unclear and depends on many factors including numbers, whether it bites humans, whether it takes blood meals from multiple people and how effectively the virus makes it from the mosquito’s gut to its salivary glands. Currently there is solid evidence for the tiger mosquito’s role in the transmission of only two diseases: Dengue and Chikungunya (Enserink, 2008). However, the recent outbreak Chikungunya virus in the Indian Ocean vectored by Ae. albopictus has been shown to be caused by a single nucleotide mutation in the virus that allowed it to more effectively use the tiger mosquito as a vector. Similar scenarios could happen with Dengue and other viruses that the mosquito was shown to transmit in the lab (Enserink, 2008).
Ae. albopictus has been demonstrated to have a competitive advantage over a number of other mosquito species including Ae. Aegypti (O’Meara et al. 1995; Juliano, 1998; Lounibos, 2002; Braks et al. 2004 in Vezzani and Carbajo, 2008). Ae. aegypti is an even more important vector of diseases than Ae. albopictus. This is largely because Ae. albopictus has such as wide host range compared to Ae. aegypti which feeds almost exclusively on humans (Enserink, 2008). Because diseases like Dengue affect only primates, if Ae. albopictus feeds on a lizard or bird after a human, the disease is not transmitted. Thus the actual consequence of the potential displacement of Ae. aegypti by Ae. albopictus in terms of diseases transmission remains unknown in many regions. Professor Gubler predicts that the spread of Ae. albopictus will actually result in a net gain for public health because in many places, it is displacing Ae. aegypti populations (Enserink, 2008). Indeed there are many studies that report Ae. albopictus outcompeting mosquito larvae of other species such as Ochlerotatus triseriatus, a vector for La Crosse Virus (Bevins, 2008) and Ae. japonicas (Armistead et al. 2008). However Didier Fontenille of the Institute of Research for Development in Montpellier, France disagrees with Gubler citing outbreaks of Chikungunya in the Indian Ocean Islands, La Reunion island and Italy as evidence of the tiger mosquito’s potential devastating impacts (Enserink, 2008).
Risk and Impact FactorsTop of page Invasiveness
- Invasive in its native range
- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Host damage
- Negatively impacts human health
- Negatively impacts animal health
- Negatively impacts tourism
- Causes allergic responses
- Pest and disease transmission
Similarities to Other Species/ConditionsTop of page
Aedes aegypti cannot survive during cold winters. It is very similar in size and color with the same markings. It does not have the extended probosci that the Aedes albopictus has.
Prevention and ControlTop of page
Compiled by: IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)
Preventative measures: Starting in 1992, several countries in South America (Venezuela, Chile, Bermuda, Costa Rica, Argentina and Brazil) have dictated embargoes on used tire importations, in an attempt to prevent mosquito and dengue introduction into areas where a potential vector, A. aegypti, is already present (Eritja et al. 2005).
Source reduction strategies (such as larval or adult control within tire dumps) have proven to be difficult and relatively inefficient due to the shape and abundance of the water surfaces (Eritja et al. 2005).
Quarantine and inspection measures in Australia have allowed detection of larval introductions of the tiger mosquito (Eritja et al. 2005). As immediate control measures have been applied, Ae. albopictus has not as of yet become established on the continent (R. Russell, pers. comm., in Eritja et al. 2005).
In the Netherlands horticultural companies have taken steps to reduce the risk, for instance, by treating shipments before they leave China (Enserink, 2008).
Predicting the potential spread of the tiger mosquito may be important in alerting the appropriate authorities to take preventative action. Areas at risk in Europe would have mean winter temperatures higher than 0°, at least 500mm rainfall per year and a warm month mean temperature of 20°. It is believed that less than 300mm rainfall per year would make establishment extremely unlikely. (Eritja et al. 2005).
Physical Control: Ae. albopictus is not readily captured by most traps, even those that catch other mosquito species. However, recently there are new traps being developed: BG-SentinelTM and the Collapsible Mosquito Trap (CMT-20TM). These traps use ammonia, fatty acids and lactic acids to produce a smell similar to that of a human body in an upward air current. The addition of carbon dioxide greatly improves the number of mosquitoes captured. When carbon dioxide is added these traps collect about 33 times more than standard light traps (Meeraus et al. 2008).
Biological Control: Bioengineering is a major focus of research in agricultural and public health entomology. Oxford Insect Technologies (http://www.oxitec.com/) have created a strain of Ae. aegypti with a dominant tetracycline-repressible gene. The aim is to release transgenic males in the field; the progeny of matings with wild females will die. Ultimately we will select a sex-linked strain that will kill only female progeny, providing a “driver” for the lethal gene in the field. Current research is studying the ‘fitness’ of such transgenic strains and will also attempt to engineer strains of Ae. albopictus (Insects and Infectious Diseases, 2006).
Another form of biological control that is currently being investigated is use of an entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisoplia. Results from laboratory studies showed that longevity of M. anisopliae-infected Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus is significantly lower than that of uninfected mosquitoes. The challenge is to find and apply an effective methodology that will result in reduced vectorial capacity of mosquitoes in the field (Scholte et al. 2008).
Integrated Management: In Switzerland, monitoring systems consisted of over 300 strategically positioned oviposition traps along main traffic axes, including parking lots within industrial complexes, border crossings and shopping centres.. Bi-weekly control visits to all traps were conducted between April and November 2007. As soon as eggs were detected, the surrounding vegetation within a perimeter of about 100 metres was sprayed with permethrin against adult mosquitoes. Stagnant water was treated with Bacillus thuringiensis and in some cases with diflubenzuron to control the larval stages (Wymann et al. 2008).
BibliographyTop of page
Aranda, C., Eritja, R. & Roiz, D., 2006. First record and establishment of the mosquito Aedes albopictus in Spain. Med. Vet. Ent. 20: 150-152
Beilharz, M. 2009. Climate change raises the disease threat. ECOS 146: 12-13.
Benedict, M.Q., Levine, R.S., Hawley, W.A. & Lounios, L.P. 2007. Spread of the tiger: global risk of invasion by the mosquito Aedes albopictus. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 7(1): 76-85.
Berry, R.L. and Lyon, W.F. 1991.Ohio State University Extension Fact Sheet. Entomology. Asian Tiger Mosquito. HYG-2148-98
Bevins, S. 2008. Invasive mosquitoes, larval competition, and indirect effects on the vector competence of native mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae). Biological Invasions 10: 1109-1117. Halstead, S.B. 2007. Dengue. Lancet 370: 1644-52.
Cancrini, G., di Regalbono, A., Frangipane, Ricci, I., Tessarin, C., Gabrielli, S. and M., Pietrobelli. 2003. Aedes albopictus is a natural vector of Dirofilaria immitis in Italy, Veterinary Parasitology 118(3-4): abstract.
Center for Disease Control. 2004. Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases. Arboviral Encephalitides. Atlanta, Georgia.
Chang, L., Hsu, E., Teng, H. & Ho, C. 2007. Differential Survival of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) Larvae Exposed to Low Temperatures in Taiwan. Journal of Medical Entomology 44(2): 205-210.
Cignini, B., Di Domenicantonio, R., Chionne, M. & Scirocchi, A. 2008. Decennial experience of the Municipality of Rome in the fight against Asian Tiger Mosquito. Parassitologia 50, 105-107.
Coffinet, T., Mourou, J.R., Pradines, B., Toto, J.C., Jarjaval, F., Amalvict, R., Kombila, M., Carnevale, P. & Pages, F. 2008. First record of Aedes albopictus in Gabon. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 23(4),: 471-472.
Contini, C. 2007 Aedes albopictus in Sardinia: reappearance or widespread colonization? Parassitologia 49: 33-35.
Enserink, M. 2008. A mosquito goes global. Science 320: 864-866.
Eritja, R., Escosa, R., Lucientes, J., Marque, E., Molina, R., Roiz, D. and Ruiz, S. 2005. Worldwide Invasion of Vector Mosquitoes: Present European Distribution and Challenges for Spain, Biological Invasions 7: 87–97.
Facchinelli, L., Koenraadt, C.J.M., Fanello, C., Kijchalao, U., Valerio, L., Jones, J.W., Scott, T.W. & Della Torre, A. 2008 Evaluation of a sticky trap for collectingAedes (Stegomyia) adults in a dengue-endemic area in Thailand. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 78(6): 904-909.
Flacio E, Lüthy P, Patocchi N, Guidotti F, Tonolla M, Peduzzi R. Primo ritrovamento di Aedes albopictus in Svizzera. Bollettino della Società ticinese di Scienze Naturali 2004;92:141-142
Haddad, N., Harbach, R.E., Chamat, S. & Bouharoun-Tayoun, H. 2007. Presence of Aedes albopictus in Lebanon and Syria. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 23(2): 226-228.
Insects and Infectious Diseases. 2006. Accessed 12 December 2008 from: http://www.pasteur.fr/recherche/RAR/RAR2006/Imi-en.html
Lounibos, L.P. 2002. Invasions by Insect Vectors of Human Disease, Annual Review of Entomology 47.
Lutz, N. 2002. Ecoaccess. North Carolina Central University.
MAF (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry)/Biosecurity New Zealand. 2007. No further evidence of Asian Tiger Mosquito found. Accessed 11 December 2008 from: http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/media/24-05-07/asian-tiger-mosquito
Meeraus, W.H., Armistead, J.S. & Arias, J.R. 2008. Field comparison of novel and gold standard traps for collecting Aedes albopictus in Northern Virginia. Journal of American Mosquito Control Association 24(2): 244–248.
Phillips, M.L. 2008. Dengue Reborn: Widespread resurgence of a resilient vector. Environmental Health Perspectives 116(9): 382-388.
Ratsitorahina, M., Harisoa, J., Ratovonjato, J., Biacabe,S., Reynes, J., Zeller, H., Raoelina, Y., Talarmin, A., Richard, V. & Soares, J.L. 2008. Outbreak of Dengue and Chikungunya fevers, Toamasina, Madagascar, 2006. Emerging Infectious Diseases 14(7): 1135-1137.
Reiskind, M.H., Pesko, K., Westbrook, C.J., Mores, C.N. 2008. Susceptibility of Florida mosquitoes to infection with Chikungunya virus. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 78(3): 422-425.
Reiter, P., Fontenille, D. & Paupy, C. 2006. Aedes albopictus as an epidemic vector of chikungunya virus: another emerging problem? The Lancet, 6: 463-464
Richards, S.L., Ghosh, S.K., Zeichner, B.C. & Apperson, C.S. 2008. Impact of Source Reduction on the Spatial Distribution of Larvae and Pupae of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Suburban Neighborhoods of a Piedmont Community in North Carolina. Journal of Medical Entomology 45(4): 617-628.
Roiz, D., Eritja, R., Molina, R., Melero-Alicibar, R. & Lucientes, J. 2008. Initial Distribution Assessment of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Barcelona, Spain, Area. Journal of Medical Entomology 45(3): 347-352.
Romi, R., Toma, L., Severini, F., Di Luca, M. 2003. Susceptibility of Italian populations of Aedes albopictus to temephos and to other insecticides, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 19(4): abstract.
Samanidou-Voyadjoglou, A., Patsoula, E., Spanakos, G. & Vakalis, N.C., 2005. Confirmation of Aedes albopictus (Skuse) (Diptera: Culicidae) in Greece. European Mosquito Bulletin, 19, 10–12.
Scholte, E., Takken, W. & Knols, B.G.J. 2007. Infection of adult Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus mosquitoes with the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. Acta Tropica 102: 151-158.
Scholte, E.J., Dijkstra, E., Blok, H., Devries, A., Takken, W., Hofhuis, A., Koopmans, M., Deboer, A. & Reusken, C.B.E.M. 2008. Accidental importation of the mosquito Aedes albopictus into the Netherlands: a survey of mosquito distribution and the presence of dengue virus. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 22: 352-358.
Schweigmann, N., Vezzani, D., Orellano, P., Kuruc, J., and Boffi, R. 2004. Aedes albopictus in an area of Misiones, Argentina, Revista de Saude Publica 38(1): abstract. D20
Severini, F., Di Luca, M., Toma, L., & Romi, R. (2008). Aedes albopictus in Rome: results and perspectives after 10 years of monitoring. Parassitologia 50: 121-123.
Varnham, K. 2006. Non-native species in UK Overseas Territories: a review. JNCC Report 372. Peterborough: United Kingdom.
Vazeille, M., Moutailler, S., Pages, F., Jarjaval, F. & Failloux, A. 2008. Introduction of Aedes albopictus in Gabon: what consequences for dengue and chikungunya transmission? Tropical Medicine and International Health 13(9): 1176-1179.
Vezzani, D. & Carbajo, A.E. 2008. Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and dengue in Argentina: current knowledge and future directions. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 103(1): 66-74.
Walker, K. 2006. Asian Tiger Mosquito (Aedes albopictus) Pest and Diseases Image Library. Updated on 29/08/2006 2:40:04 PM.
Wymann, M.N., Flacio, E., Radczuweit, S., Patocchi, N. & Luthy, P. (2008). Asian tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus) a threat for Switzerland? Eurosurveillance 13: 1-3.
Zhang, L.Y. & Lei, C.L. 2008. Evaluation of sticky ovitraps for the surveillance of Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse) and the screening of oviposition attractants from organic infusions. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 102(5): 399-407.
ReferencesTop of page
Aguiar DB, Fontão A, Rufino P, Macedo VA, Ríos-Velásquez CM, Castro MG, Honório NA, 2008. First record of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the state of Roraima, Brazil. (Primeiro registro de Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) em Roraima, Brasil.) Acta Amazonica, 38(2):357-359. http://acta.inpa.gov.br
Camargo-Neves VLFde, Poletto DW, Rodas LAC, Pachioli ML, Cardoso RP, Scandar SAS, Sampaio SMP, Koyanagui PH, Botti MV, Mucci LF, Gomes Ade C, 2005. Entomological investigation of a sylvatic yellow fever area in São Paulo State, Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 21(4):1278-1286.
Holder, P., George, S., Disbury, M., Singe, M., Kean, J. M., McFadden, A., 2010. A biosecurity response to Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Auckland, New Zealand, Journal of Medical Entomology, 47(4):600-609
Honório NA, Castro MG, Barros FSMde, Magalhães Mde AFM, Sabroza PC, 2009. The spatial distribution of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in a transition zone, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 25(6):1203-1214. http://www.ensp.fiocruz.br/csp
Laird, M., Calder, L., Thornton, R. C., Syme, R., Holder, P. W., Mogi, M., 1994. Japanese Aedes albopictus among four mosquito species reaching New Zealand in used tires, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 10(1):14-23
Lopes J, Martins EAC, Oliveira Ode, Oliveira Vde, Oliveira Neto BPde, Oliveira JEde, 2004. Dispersion of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse, 1894) in the rural zone of North Paraná State. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 47(5):739-746.
Martins VEP, Alencar CHMde, Facó PEG, Dutra RF, Alves CR, Pontes RJS, Guedes MIF, 2010. Spatial distribution and breeding site characteristics of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti in Fortaleza, State of Ceará. (Distribuição espacial e características dos criadouros de Aedes albopictus e Aedes aegypti em Fortaleza, Estado do Ceará.) Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 43(1):73-77. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0037-8682&lng=en&nrm=iso
Martins VEP, Martins MG, Araújo JMPde, Silva LOR, Monteiro HAde O, Castro FC, Vasconcelos PFda C, Guedes MIF, 2006. First report of Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus in the state of Ceará, Brazil. (Primeiro registro de Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus no Estado do Ceará, Brasil.) Revista de Saúde Pública, 40(4):737-739. http://www.fsp.usp.br/rsp
Ritchie SA, Moore P, Carruthers M, Williams C, Montgomery B, Foley P, Ahboo S, Hurk AFvan den, Lindsay MD, Cooper B, Beebe N, Russell RC, 2006. Discovery of a widespread infestation of Aedes albopictus in the Torres Strait, Australia. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 22(3):358-365.
Santos SOdos, Nascimento JCdo, 1998. First record of the presence of Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse) in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. (Primeiro registro da presença do Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse) em Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.) Revista de Saúde Pública, 32(5):486.
ContributorsTop of page
Reviewed by: Dr. Roger Eritja Spain
- Last Modified: Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/