- Host Animals
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Systems Affected
- Distribution Table
- List of Symptoms/Signs
- Disease Course
- Impact: Economic
- Zoonoses and Food Safety
- Disease Treatment
- Prevention and Control
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- bovine papillomatosis
International Common Names
- English: bovine papillomatosis, warts in cattle; warts
Local Common Names
- UK: angleberries
Pathogen/sTop of page
OverviewTop of page
Bovine papillomaviruses (BPVs) produce generally benign tumours of the skin and of the mucous membranes of the alimentary and urogenital tracts. The tumours, which may be papillomas or fibropapillomas, are commonly called warts and have been known for a long time, probably for centuries.
There are several distinct types of BPV which differ in the sites they infect and the type of lesion they produce. The six that have been characterised to date are as follows:
- BPV-1 produces fibropapillomas in the skin (including the skin of teats) and in the genital mucosa (Lancaster and Olson, 1978; Jarrett et al., 1980).
- BPV-2 produces fibropapillomas in the skin (Lancaster and Olson, 1978), in the mucosa of the alimentary tract (Jarrett et al., 1984a) and also tumours of the bladder mucosa (Campo et al., 1992).
- BPV-3 produces papillomas in the skin (Pfister et al., 1979).
- BPV-4 produces papillomas in the alimentary tract (Campo et al., 1980).
- BPV-5 produces small ‘rice-grain’ fibropapillomas on the udder and teats (Campo et al., 1981).
- BPV-6 produces papillomas on the teats (Jarrett et al., 1984b).
BPV-4 and BPV-5 have also each been identified in cutaneous papillomas on the head, suggesting that site specificity of these viruses may not be absolute (Bloch et al., 1994; 1996). It is likely that there are also other types of BPV that have not yet been characterised (Spradbrow et al., 1983; Samuel et al., 1985).
The tumours can be a considerable nuisance to animals and their owners. They may grow to a large size and impair function or be infested with fly larvae. They usually regress spontaneously after months or years but in animals grazing bracken fern, tumours in the alimentary tract or bladder may become malignant and so lead to death (Jarrett et al., 1978a; Campo, 1997). Papillomaviruses or their DNA have also been found in papillomatous lesions that are precursors to squamous cell carcinomas of the eye and skin in cattle (Ford et al., 1982; Spradbrow et al., 1987). It is uncertain whether papillomaviruses play a role in the development of these cancers.
Host AnimalsTop of page
|Animal name||Context||Life stage||System|
|Bos indicus (zebu)||Domesticated host||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages|
|Bos taurus (cattle)||Domesticated host||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages|
|Equus caballus (horses)||Domesticated host||Other|All Stages|
|Oryctolagus cuniculus (rabbits)||Experimental settings|
Hosts/Species AffectedTop of page
Cutaneous fibropapillomas usually occur in cattle less than 2 years of age. Older animals have been exposed and acquired immunity to fibropapillomas; however, cutaneous papillomas may be seen in older animals (Barthold et al., 1974). The disease is more common in animals that are housed or penned (Olson and Skidmore, 1959). There is no sex predilection and most workers have found no breed predilection, although Prasad et al.(1980) observed more infection among imported (Bos taurus) and cross-bred cattle than in native Indian cattle (Bos indicus).
Husbandry practices may spread fibropapillomas within a herd. Cases of spread have been recorded after tattooing (Studdert et al., 1988), tuberculin testing (Johnstone et al., 1994), pregnancy testing by rectal palpation (Tweddle and White, 1977) and dehorning (Pulley et al., 1974). In the latter case, no lesions had been evident in the herd prior to dehorning. Papillomas and fibropapillomas of the teats are more common in females than males and their prevalence and number appears to increase with parity (Meischke, 1979a), probably as a result of spread during milking.
Animals grazing on bracken fern (Pteridium spp.) are prone to enzootic haematuria, which is associated with the presence of benign and malignant bladder tumours containing papillomavirus (Pamukcu, 1963; Olson et al., 1965). In Scotland there is an association between consumption of bracken fern and the number, size and persistence of alimentary papillomas caused by bovine papillomavirus (BPV) 4, as well as their conversion to malignancy (Jarrett et al., 1978a; Campo et al., 1980). Similar associations of alimentary tumours with bracken fern or other toxic plants have been reported from areas of Brazil, Colombia (Olson, 1990) and Kenya (Plowright et al., 1971; Thorsen et al., 1974). However, the problem does not seem as widespread as that of bladder cancer.
Unlike most papillomaviruses, BPV-1 and 2 infect a wide range of experimental hosts including rabbits, pikas (Ochotona rufescens) and hamsters, in which they induce fibrosarcomas which may metastasise (Breitbrud et al., 1981; Lancaster and Olson, 1982). There is also evidence for a role of BPV-1 and 2 in sarcoids, which are naturally occurring fibromatous tumours of horses and donkeys (Otten et al., 1993; Vanselow and Spradbrow, 1996; Nasir and Reid, 1999).
Systems AffectedTop of page
mammary gland diseases of large ruminants
reproductive diseases of large ruminants
skin and ocular diseases of large ruminants
urinary tract and renal diseases of large ruminants
DistributionTop of page
Because bovine papillomaviruses (BPVs) seldom cause serious losses, there is little information available on their distribution. Some surveys of tumours have specifically excluded cutaneous warts (Misdorp, 1967). Cutaneous fibropapillomas occur in cattle throughout the world (Beveridge, 1981; Olson, 1990), but whether all six known BPVs are widely distributed has not been established.
In the distribution table, countries or regions are listed if they have had reported papillomatosis or fibropapillomatosis of bovine skin, upper alimentary tract, genitalia or bladder, with or without demonstration of viruses. Reports of enzootic haematuria, without confirmation of the presence of bladder tumours, have not been included.
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.Last updated: 10 Jan 2020
|Continent/Country/Region||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||Reference||Notes|
|Federal Republic of Yugoslavia||Present|
|Portugal||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
PathologyTop of page
Except in the case of malignant conversion, disease due to bovine papillomaviruses (BPVs) is seldom fatal. Some animals may be killed because of persistent lesions or ill thrift, but in most cases BPV-induced lesions are incidental findings at post-mortem examination.
Fibropapillomas due to BPV-1 and 2 may be found anywhere on the outside of the body. They are generally most numerous on the head, including around the mouth, eyes and ears (Pearson et al., 1958), and on the neck, shoulders and brisket, but they also occur on the thorax, abdomen, back, legs and on the anal and genital mucosa (Olson, 1990). Early lesions are pink, fleshy and hairless, with filiform projections on the surface, whereas mature lesions have dark, hard, keratinized surfaces (Studdert et al., 1988). The lesions may be sessile or pedunculated, and range from less than 1 cm in diameter to large lesions, often described as resembling cauliflowers, up to 10 cm. The surfaces may crack and bleed, and the tumours may contain pockets of pus or insect maggots (duCasse, 1961). Tumours on the genital mucosa have similar forms but a less horny surface (Olson, 1990). On the skin of the teats, BPV-1 produces fibropapillomas with multiple filiform projections (Lindholm et al., 1984).
Cutaneous papillomas occur on haired skin all over the body. They differ from fibropapillomas in being always sessile-flat or domed and in having fine fronds on the surface, often with hair growing between the fronds (Barthold et al., 1974). They are circular and up to a few centimetres in size, but may coalesce to cover large areas. BPV-3 was identified from cutaneous papillomas from one animal in Australia (Pfister et al., 1979), but it is not known whether it is the cause of all such lesions. Interdigital papillomas occur in dairy cattle but no virus has been demonstrated in them (Rebhun et al., 1980) and it is possible they have a different aetiology (Britt et al., 1996).
In the upper alimentary tract, sessile papillomas are found on the mucosa of the palate, tongue, cheek, oesophagus and rumen (Jarrett et al., 1978b; 1984a). They are typically caused by BPV-4, although evidence for other BPV types has been found in an Australian survey (Samuel et al., 1985). They are up to 1 cm in diameter and up to 2 cm high, with a roughened or fronded surface (Thorsen et al., 1974; Hamada et al., 1989). In cattle grazing bracken fern they may become very numerous, coalesce into large clumps or transform into squamous cell carcinomas (Campo, 1997).
Fibropapillomas associated with BPV-2 are usually restricted to the oesophagus and rumen (Jarrett et al. 1984a), although one has been found on the caudodorsal aspect of the tongue (Bloch and Vanselow, University of New England, New South Wales, Australia, personal communication, 2000), and Head (1976) states that fibropapillomas occur anywhere from the lips to the fore-stomachs. They are smooth and pearly white, ranging in size from 1 mm to 20 cm, and may be multilobular and pedunculated (Jarrett et al., 1984a; Gordon, 1997). They do not undergo malignant transformation, but may interfere mechanically with the digestive process; tumours on the tongue have been known to cause death by asphyxiation. On the teats, in addition to the fronded fibropapillomas caused by BPV-1, lesions may be produced by BPV-5 or 6. The former are small white "rice-grain" fibropapillomas; the latter are papillomas with a fronded surface. All three types can occur on the one udder (Lindholm et al., 1984).
Histologically, lesions induced by BPVs are characterised by acanthosis: thickening of the stratum spinosum, often in a papilliform pattern. Cells in the upper part of this layer and in the stratum granulosum show vacuolation around the nucleus, known as koilocytosis, and often contain numerous keratohyaline granules. There is usually accompanying hyper- and/or para-keratosis, which may extend into long fronds. In true papillomas, fine strands of dermal stroma may support the folded epithelium but there is no dermal proliferation. In fibropapillomas dermal fibroblasts proliferate in whorls and bundles to provide a dense core to the tumour, with epidermal rete pegs growing down into it.
There is some variation in histological appearance depending on the BPV type and the site of the lesion. Lesions may ulcerate, leading to a predominantly neutrophilic inflammatory reaction. This is distinct from the inflammatory infiltration seen in regressing lesions, which is mainly mononuclear (Jarrett et al., 1991). Lesions induced in the bladder by BPV-2 include haemangiomas (Campo et al., 1992), fibromas and polypoid growths involving epithelial hyperplasia and metaplasia (Brobst and Olson, 1965).
DiagnosisTop of page
Infections of the skin and genital mucosa can generally be diagnosed on the basis of clinical examination and the characteristic appearance of the lesions. Diagnosis of internal tumours is usually made post mortem, or during exploratory surgery. Fibropapillomas in the oesophagus or fore-stomachs may be indicated by non-specific signs of digestive disturbance such as inappetance or bloat (Gordon, 1997), whereas bladder tumours present as haematuria or dysuria (Campo et al., 1992).
Papillomas may resemble other neoplasms, or lesions caused by poxviruses or Dermatophilus congolensis. Histological examination of biopsied material usually resolves this, although one case of mixed infection by papillomavirus and parapoxvirus has been recorded (Gerdes and Lugt, 1991).
Confirmation of papillomavirus aetiology is often possible by immunohistochemistry. Antiserum to disrupted bovine papillomavirus (BPV) 1 is commercially available and will detect antigen from BPVs 1, 2 and 5, as well as papillomaviruses from other species including humans (Jenson et al., 1982). Demonstration of BPV-3, 4 or 6 requires specific antisera (Jarrett et al., 1984b). On formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue, the peroxidase-antiperoxidase or avidin-biotin-complex methods provide the necessary sensitivity, but false-negative reactions are common as not all lesions produce the antigens (Lindholm et al., 1984; Olson et al., 1992). An ELISA test with broad specificity for use on homogenised tissue has also been described (Shazly et al., 1985).
Electron microscopy may be useful for lesions that produce mature virions (Gibbs et al., 1970) although it cannot distinguish between virus types. The techniques of DNA extraction, restriction-enzyme analysis, polymerase chain reaction and hybridization are used to demonstrate viral DNA and to determine the BPV type (Bloch et al., 1994; 1997).
Infected animals produce specific neutralising antibodies (Jarrett et al., 1990a) but these are not used in diagnosis.
List of Symptoms/SignsTop of page
|Digestive Signs / Abdominal distention||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|Digestive Signs / Anorexia, loss or decreased appetite, not nursing, off feed||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|Digestive Signs / Bloat in ruminants, tympany||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|Digestive Signs / Increased rate or strength rumen motility, hypermotility||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|Digestive Signs / Oral mucosal ulcers, vesicles, plaques, pustules, erosions, tears||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Diagnosis|
|Digestive Signs / Pharyngeal ulcers, vesicles, erosion, papules, sores pharynx||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Diagnosis|
|Digestive Signs / Rumen hypomotility or atony, decreased rate, motility, strength||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|Digestive Signs / Vomiting or regurgitation, emesis||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|General Signs / Back swelling, mass back region||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Diagnosis|
|General Signs / Forelimb lameness, stiffness, limping fore leg||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|General Signs / Forelimb swelling, mass in fore leg joint and / or non-joint area||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Diagnosis|
|General Signs / Head, face, ears, jaw, nose, nasal, swelling, mass||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Diagnosis|
|General Signs / Hindlimb lameness, stiffness, limping hind leg||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|General Signs / Hindlimb swelling, mass in hind leg joint and / or non-joint area||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Diagnosis|
|General Signs / Lack of growth or weight gain, retarded, stunted growth||Cattle and Buffaloes|Calf||Sign|
|General Signs / Laryngeal, tracheal, pharyngeal swelling, mass larynx, trachea, pharynx||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Diagnosis|
|General Signs / Mammary gland swelling, mass, hypertrophy udder, gynecomastia||Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow||Diagnosis|
|General Signs / Neck swelling, mass cervical region||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Diagnosis|
|General Signs / Oral cavity, tongue swelling, mass in mouth||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Diagnosis|
|General Signs / Orbital, periorbital, periocular, conjunctival swelling, eyeball mass||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|General Signs / Pelvic or perineal swelling, mass||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|General Signs / Swelling mass anus rectum||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Diagnosis|
|General Signs / Swelling mass penis, prepuce, testes, scrotum||Cattle and Buffaloes|Bull||Diagnosis|
|General Signs / Swelling mass vagina||Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Cattle and Buffaloes|Heifer||Diagnosis|
|General Signs / Swelling mass, vulva, clitoris||Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Cattle and Buffaloes|Heifer||Diagnosis|
|General Signs / Swelling skin or subcutaneous, mass, lump, nodule||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Diagnosis|
|General Signs / Swelling, mass external abdomen||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Diagnosis|
|General Signs / Swelling, mass tail||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Diagnosis|
|General Signs / Thoracic swelling, mass, thorax, chest, ribs, sternum||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Diagnosis|
|General Signs / Underweight, poor condition, thin, emaciated, unthriftiness, ill thrift||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|General Signs / Weight loss||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|Reproductive Signs / Male infertility||Cattle and Buffaloes|Bull||Sign|
|Reproductive Signs / Mastitis, abnormal milk||Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow||Sign|
|Reproductive Signs / Papule, pustule, vesicle, ulcer penis or prepuce||Cattle and Buffaloes|Bull||Diagnosis|
|Reproductive Signs / Paraphimosis or priapism, inability to retract penis||Cattle and Buffaloes|Bull||Sign|
|Reproductive Signs / Phimosis||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|Reproductive Signs / Vaginal or cervical ulcers, vesicles, erosions, tears, papules, pustules||Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Cattle and Buffaloes|Heifer||Diagnosis|
|Respiratory Signs / Abnormal breathing sounds of the upper airway, airflow obstruction, stertor, snoring||Sign|
|Respiratory Signs / Dyspnea, difficult, open mouth breathing, grunt, gasping||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|Respiratory Signs / Increased respiratory rate, polypnea, tachypnea, hyperpnea||Sign|
|Skin / Integumentary Signs / Alopecia, thinning, shedding, easily epilated, loss of, hair||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|Skin / Integumentary Signs / Cracked skin, fissure||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|Skin / Integumentary Signs / Foul odor skin, smell||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|Skin / Integumentary Signs / Hyperkeratosis, thick skin||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Diagnosis|
|Skin / Integumentary Signs / Pruritus, itching skin||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Sign|
|Skin / Integumentary Signs / Skin papules||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Diagnosis|
|Skin / Integumentary Signs / Skin plaque||Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages||Diagnosis|
|Urinary Signs / Dysuria, difficult urination, stranguria||Cattle and Buffaloes|Bull; Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Cattle and Buffaloes|Heifer; Cattle and Buffaloes|Ox; Cattle and Buffaloes|Steer||Sign|
|Urinary Signs / Haematuria, blood in urine||Cattle and Buffaloes|Bull; Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Cattle and Buffaloes|Heifer; Cattle and Buffaloes|Ox; Cattle and Buffaloes|Steer||Diagnosis|
|Urinary Signs / Palpable calculi, swelling or mass, bladder||Cattle and Buffaloes|Bull; Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Cattle and Buffaloes|Heifer; Cattle and Buffaloes|Ox; Cattle and Buffaloes|Steer||Diagnosis|
Disease CourseTop of page
Proliferate lesions due to bovine papillomavirus (BPV) 1 or 2 may be detectable as early as 4 weeks after experimental inoculation of the skin (Lee and Olson, 1968; Jarrett et al., 1990a). They continue growing for some weeks, 10 to 17 weeks in one trial (Olson and Skidmore, 1959), and new lesions may appear especially at the sites of minor cutaneous injuries. There is considerable variation between individuals in the number and size of lesions that develop and in the time course of the disease (Olson et al., 1960; 1992). The incubation period may be longer in the case of natural infections, although warts have been seen on one-month-old calves (Olson et al., 1960). Recorded periods between procedures thought to spread the infection and appearance of lesions have ranged from less than two (Studdert et al., 1988) to more than 4 months (Tweddle and White, 1977). Experimental inoculations with BPV 4 or 6 have also resulted in detectable lesions within 4 weeks, whereas with BPV-5 papillomas were not seen until 26 weeks (Jarrett et al., 1990b).
Cutaneous and anogenital fibropapillomas usually regress spontaneously after periods ranging from a month to well over a year (Brobst and Olson, 1965; Lee and Olson, 1968). Regressing lesions become dry and shrunken, and the animals may rub at them as if they are pruritic. Usually all lesions regress simultaneously, without leaving scars. Experimentally induced lesions of BPV-4, 5 and 6 may take more than a year to regress (Jarrett et al., 1990b). Papillomas due to BPV-3 have been little studied, but similar, so-called ‘atypical’, cutaneous papillomas in America have been observed to persist for long periods, up to 4 years in some animals (Barthold et al., 1974).
Regression is accompanied by infiltration of the lesions by T-lymphocytes, and is believed to be due to specific cell-mediated immunity (Campo, 1997). Animals bearing papillomas due to more than one BPV type may lose one type of lesion while retaining others; for example, in calves with fibropapillomas and ‘atypical’ cutaneous papillomas, the fibropapillomas regressed while the true papillomas persisted (Barthold et al., 1974). Recovered animals have immunity to the causative BPV, but not to BPVs of other types (Jarrett et al., 1990b). This immunity to re-infection in fact develops while lesions are still present; it is humorally mediated and is not linked to regression (Lee and Olson, 1968; 1969; Campo, 1997).
In a small number of individuals, fibropapillomas persist for long periods and are refractory to treatment. The reason for this is not known, but in one such animal there was evidence for suppression of cellular immunity (Duncan et al., 1975). Kuchroo et al. (1983) demonstrated specific blocking factors in the serum of three cattle with BPV-3 papillomas. Non-specific immunosuppression of calves infected with BPV-4 resulted in unusually numerous alimentary papillomas which failed to regress, as well as production of bladder tumours by latent BPV-2 (Campo et al., 1992; Campo, 1997).
EpidemiologyTop of page
Papillomaviruses infect cells in the basal stratum of the epidermis, inducing hyperplasia. Bovine papillomaviruses (BPVs) one, two and five also infect fibroblasts in the underlying dermis. Viral replication is tied to cell differentiation, with mature virions appearing only in the outer epidermal layers and being shed in exfoliated cells (Pfister, 1984; Campo, 1997). No virions are produced in the infected dermal cells of fibropapillomas, but there are large amounts of virus in their keratinized outer covering.
It is assumed that susceptible animals become infected when they rub against an infected herd-mate, with the virus gaining entry through small abrasions. The virus persists for some time on structures such as posts and fences that animals rub against (Campo et al., 1994). It can also be spread by items used for grooming and handling animals, including human hands (Studdert et al., 1988). There are no known vectors, although it has been suggested that biting flies may spread the virus mechanically (Du Casse, 1961). BPV-4, which induces lesions of the upper alimentary tract, may be spread in the saliva of animals.
There is evidence for latency of BPV-1 and 2. Calves born to mothers free of lesions, and raised from birth in isolation, developed fibropapillomas at sites of minor skin injury, or bladder tumours when they were immunosuppressed. DNA of BPV type 1 or 2 was found in the lesions and in peripheral blood lymphocytes (Campo et al., 1994).
Impact: EconomicTop of page
The diseases caused by the bovine papillomaviruses (BPVs) are generally of minor economic importance, although they can be a cause of loss in individual animals and herds (Olson and Skidmore, 1959; Prasad et al., 1980). Cutaneous lesions reduce the value of hides, and may prevent sale or exhibition of animals (Studdert et al., 1988). Severely affected animals have retarded growth rates and suffer secondary infections (Pearson et al., 1958; Du Casse, 1961). Lesions on the genitalia, especially in bulls, interfere with mating (Pearson et al., 1958). Lesions on the teats present problems for milking (Olson et al., 1982; Lindholm et al., 1984) and occasionally lead to mastitis via secondary bacterial infection (Moussa et al., 1983). In areas where cattle are exposed to bracken fern, losses due to bladder tumours can be significant (Pamukcu, 1963).
Zoonoses and Food SafetyTop of page
The genomes of bovine papillomavirus (BPV) 1 and 2 have some homology with that of human papillomavirus type 1 (Lancaster and Olson, 1982; Coggins et al., 1983). Despite this, and despite their ability to infect a number of species, they have failed to transform human cells in vitro. A high prevalence of warts among butchers and abattoir workers has led to the belief that these are caused by infections from cattle; however, investigations of these warts have failed to detect any of the known BPVs (Pfister, 1984). Meischke (1979b) demonstrated infective BPV in pasteurised milk, but there are no reports of human infections attributed to milk.
Most BPV-induced lesions occur on parts of the animal that are not used for human consumption. Papillomas on edible parts of the alimentary tract, such as the tongue, would normally be trimmed away for aesthetic reasons.
Disease TreatmentTop of page
In most cases the best course of action is to wait for lesions to regress spontaneously. Individual warts that are troublesome may require removal.
Pedunculated fibropapillomas can often be pulled off with little bleeding or evidence of pain. Alternatively, they can be removed surgically, or ligated. Surgical removal of sessile lesions from the teat or penis can result in undesirable scarring (Olson, 1990). There are claims that removal of one or two warts can result in regression of all the remaining lesions (Belschner and Edwards, 1984), but in some trials excision has appeared to stimulate further growth of lesions (Olson and Skidmore, 1959; Du Casse, 1961). Surgery should therefore be approached with caution, particularly early in the course of the disease. Cryosurgery and electrocautery have also been used but are probably attended by the same hazards.
A large number of substances have been recommended for treatment of papillomatosis, but because the lesions regress spontaneously and unpredictably it has been hard to assess their efficacy. Du Casse (1961) found systemic administration of bismuth, calcium sulphide or arsenic ineffective as well as difficult and dangerous. Du Casse (1961) and Prasad et al. (1980) found little effect of systemic lithium antimony thiomalate (anthiomaline), although Wadhwa et al. (1996) reported over 50% efficacy for it. The potential for toxicity and residues make its use inadvisable. Bovine interferon has been used but treated warts grew faster than controls (Lassauzet and Salamin, 1993).
Suggested topical applications have included castor or olive oils, copper sulphate, caustic potash, salicylic or glacial acetic acids (Belschner and Edwards, 1984) and dimethyl sulphoxide (Donovan, 1983). However, there has been little evidence offered of their efficacy. No response has been found to tincture of iodine (Amin et al., 1997) and Du Casse (1961) reported a slight response to formalin and good results with podophyllin ointment. Various plants that have caustic or irritant sap have also been used. With all such substances it is necessary to protect the surrounding skin with petroleum jelly; application is therefore time-consuming but may be worthwhile for single troublesome papillomas.
The most consistently recommended treatment has been vaccination with homogenates of lesion tissue. Several workers observed regression of lesions after this treatment (Pearson et al., 1958; Du Casse, 1961; Prasad et al., 1980) although others did not (Olson and Skidmore, 1959). Recent experiments have shown that vaccination with sub-units of bovine papillomavirus (BPV) does induce regression of lesions caused by that BPV type (Jarrett et al., 1991; Campo et al., 1993). Earlier variable results may have been due to vaccines being prepared from lesions of a different BPV type, from lesions that were not producing virus, or from the fibromatous core of the lesion. In the future, effective sub-unit vaccines may be available.
Prevention and ControlTop of page
Where practical, animals with lesions should be kept from contact with others, either directly or indirectly through yards, stalls, halters and other fomites. Cows with lesions on the teats should be milked last. During procedures such as tattooing or vaccinating, disinfection of hands and equipment, and changing of needles, between animals will help prevent the spread of bovine papilloma virus (BPV) and of other infectious agents (Studdert et al., 1988).
Vaccines made of formalinized lesion homogenates have been shown to produce immunity to infection (Olson et al., 1959; 1960; 1962; Jarrett et al., 1990a). They may be useful in situations where new infections are likely to be troublesome, for example in bulls introduced to a breeding farm (Barthold et al., 1976). As with their therapeutic effect, the protection is specific to the BPV type (Jarrett et al., 1990b). Vaccines are available commercially in some countries, but cannot be assumed to be effective for either treatment or prophylaxis unless they are known to contain the same BPV type as the lesions to be treated. Autogenous vaccines should be prepared from mature lesions, including the keratinized outer layers. Various methods are used, but usually tissues are homogenised to make a 5 or 10% suspension in saline, inactivated with 0.5% formalin, filtered through gauze, and injected in 5 or 10 ml doses at intervals of 2 weeks. Teat lesions are often too small, and produce too little virus, for effective vaccines to be made. There has been considerable work on development of sub-unit vaccines against BPV-2 and 4, with the aim of preventing tumours that may progress to malignancy (Campo, 1997). At present, minimising exposure to bracken remains the best means of protecting animals from the alimentary and urinary carcinomas associated with these viruses.
ReferencesTop of page
Abdouslam OE; Levkut M; Levkutová M; Revajová V; Ondrejka R; Benísek Z, 1997. Immunohistochemistry of the progressive and regressive stages of bovine papillomatosis. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 66(4):245-248; 16 ref.
Amin DM; Salem SAH; Ahmed MH; Karim IA, 1997. Pathological and virological studies on bovine papillomatosis in cattle. Egyptian Journal of Comparative Pathology and Clinical Pathology, 10(1):1-11; 35 ref.
Barthold SW; Koller LD; Olson C et al, 1974. Atypical warts in cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 165(3):276-280.
Barthold SW; Olson C; Larson LL, 1976. Precipitin response of cattle to commercial wart vaccine. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 37(4):449-451.
Bastianello SS, 1982. A survey on neoplasia in domestic species over a 40-year period from 1935 to 1974 in the Republic of South Africa. I. Tumours occurring in cattle. Onderstpoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 49:195-204.
Belschner HG; Edwards MJ, 1984. Diseases of the udder; Diseases of the skin. In: Belschner HG, Edwards MJ, Cattle Diseases. Sydney, Australia: Angus & Robertson Publishers, 258-272; 294-305.
Beveridge WIB, 1981. Fibropapillomatosis. In: Beveridge WIB, Viral Diseases of Farm Livestock. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service, 56-59.
Bezerra MJG; Soares PC; Bezerra R, 1994. Evaluation of immunization against bovine papillomatosis using attenuated or inactivated vaccines. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária, 16(3):98-101; 16 ref.
Bloch N; Sutton RH; Breen M; Spradbrow PB, 1997. Identification of papillomaviruses in scrapings from bovine warts by use of the polymerase chain reaction. Veterinary Research Communications, 21(1):63-68; 19 ref.
Brandly PJ; Migaki G, 1963. Types of tumours found by federal meat inspectors in an eight-year survey. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 108:872-879.
Breitbrud F; Favre M; Zoorob R et al, 1981. Detection and characterization of viral genomes and search for tumoral antigens in two hamster cell lines derived from tumours induced by bovine papillomavirus type 1. International Journal of Cancer, 27:693-702.
Britt JS; Gaska J; Garrett EF; Konkle D; Mealy M, 1996. Comparison of topical application of three products for treatment of papillomatous digital dermatitis in dairy cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 209(6):1134-1136; 6 ref.
Brobst DF; Olson C, 1965. Histopathology of urinary bladder tumours induced by bovine cutaneous papilloma agent. Cancer Research, 25:12-19.
Campo MS, 1997. Bovine papillomavirus and cancer. Veterinary Journal, 154(3):175-188; many ref.
Campo MS; Grindlay GJ; O'Neil BW; Chandrachud LM; McGarvie GM; Jarrett WFH, 1993. Prophylactic and therapeutic vaccination against a mucosal papillomavirus. Journal of General Virology, 74(6):945-953; 32 ref.
Campo MS; Jarrett WFH; Barron R; O'Neil BW; Smith KT, 1992. Association of bovine papillomavirus type 2 and bracken fern with bladder cancer in cattle. Cancer Research (Baltimore), 52(24):6898-6904; 33 ref.
Campo MS; Moar MH; Jarrett WFH; Laird HM, 1980. A new papillomavirus associated with alimentary cancer in cattle. Nature, 286:180-182.
Campo MS; Moar MH; Laird HM; Jarrett WFH, 1981. Molecular heterogeneity and lesion site specificity of cutaneous bovine papillomaviruses. Virology, 113:323-335.
Chen EY; Howley PM; Levinson AD; Seeburg PH, 1982. The primary structure and genetic organization of the bovine papillomavirus type 1 genome. Nature, 299:529-534.
Coggins LW; Hettich I; Smith KT et al, 1983. The genomes of bovine papillomaviruses types 3 and 4 are colinear. Journal of General Virology, 64:2771-2776.
Donovan CA, 1983. DMSO and bovine warts: a practitioner's experience. Veterinary Medicine and Small Animal Clinician, 78(8):1278.
Du Casse FBW, 1961. Bovine papillomatosis, with special reference to treatment with tissue vaccines. Journal of the South African Veterinary Medical Association, 32:59-63.
Duncan JR; Corbeil LB; Davies DH et al, 1975. Persistent papillomatosis associated with immunodeficiency. Cornell Veterinarian, 65:205-211.
Elzein ETE; Sundberg JP; Housawi FM; Gameel AA; Ramadan RO; Hassanein MM, 1991. Genital bovine papillomavirus infection in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 3(1):36-38; 9 ref.
Ford JN; Jennings PA; Spradbrow PB; Francis J, 1982. Evidence for papillomaviruses in ocular lesions in cattle. Research in Veterinary Science, 32:257-259.
Gibbs EPJ; Johnson RH; Osborne AD, 1970. The differential diagnosis of viral skin infections of the bovine teat. Veterinary Record, 87:602-609.
Hanichen T; Sandersleben J von, 1971. Papillomatose des Schlundes bei einer Kuh. Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift, 84(13):255.
Head KW, 1976. Tumours of the upper alimentary tract. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 53(2-3):145-166.
Inayat A; Muhammed G; Asi MN; Saqib M; Athar M, 1999. Use of autogenous vaccine for the treatment of generalized papillomatosis in cattle. Pakistan Veterinary Journal, 19(2):102-103; 13 ref.
Jackson C, 1936. The incidence and pathology of tumours of domesticated animals in South Africa. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Industry, 6(1):3-443.
Jarrett WFH; Campo MS; Blaxter ML; O'Neil BW; Laird HM; Moar MH; Sartirana ML, 1984. Alimentary fibropapilloma in cattle: a spontaneous tumor, nonpermissive for papillomavirus replication. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 73(2):499-504; 17 ref.
Jarrett WFH; Campo MS; O'Neil BW; Laird HM; Coggins LW, 1984. A novel bovine papillomavirus (BPV-6) causing true epithelial papillomas of the mammary gland skin: a member of a proposed new BPV subgroup. Virology, 136(2):255-264; 23 ref.
Jarrett WFH; McNeil PE; Laird HM et al, 1980. Papilloma viruses in benign and malignant tumours of cattle. In: Essex M, Todaro G, zur Hausen H, Cold Spring Harbor Conferences on Cell Proliferation. New York; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 7:215-222.
Jarrett WFH; Murphy J; O'Neil BW; Laird HM, 1978. Virus-induced papillomas of the alimentary tract of cattle. International Journal of Cancer, 22:323-328.
Jarrett WFH; NcNeil PE; Grimshaw WTR et al, 1978. High incidence area of cattle cancer with a possible interaction between an environmental carcinogen and a papillomavirus. Nature, 274:215-217.
Jarrett WFH; O'Neil BW; Gaukroger JM; Smith KT; Laird HM; Campo MS, 1990. Studies on vaccination against papillomavirus: the immunity after infection and vaccination with bovine papillomaviruses of different types. Veterinary Record, 126(19):473-475; 11 ref.
Jarrett WFH; O'Neill BW; Gaukroger JM; Laird HM; Smith KT; Campo MS, 1990. Studies on vaccination against papillomaviruses: a comparison of purified virus, tumour extract and transformed cells in prophylactic vaccination. Veterinary Record, 126(18):449-452; 9 ref.
Jarrett WFH; Smith KT; O'Neil BW; Gaukroger JM; Chandrachud LM; Grindlay GJ; McGarvie GM; Campo MS, 1991. Studies on vaccination against papillomaviruses: prophylactic and therapeutic vaccination with recombinant structural proteins. Virology (New York), 184(1):33-42; 31 ref.
Jenson AB; Lancaster WD; Hartmann DP; Schaffer EL, 1982. Frequency and distribution of papillomavirus structural antigens in verrucae, multiple papillomas, and condylomata of the oral cavity. American Journal of Pathology, 107:212-218.
Kuchroo VK; Halliday WJ et al, 1983. Serum blocking factors in bovine ocular squamous cell carcinoma demonstrated by inhibition of erythrocyte rosette augmentation. Cancer Research, 43:1325-1329.
Lancaster WD; Olson C, 1978. Demonstration of two distinct classes of bovine papilloma virus. Virology, 89:372-379.
Lancaster WD; Olson C, 1982. Animal papillomaviruses. Microbiological Reviews, 46(2):191-207.
Lassauzet ML; Salamin PA, 1993. Lack of effect of recombinant bovine interferon alpha1 in the treatment of experimentally-induced bovine warts. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, 57(3):166-169; 27 ref.
Lee KP; Olson C, 1968. Response of calves to intravenous and repeated intradermal inoculation of bovine papilloma virus. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 29(11):2103-2112.
Lee KP; Olson C, 1969. Precipitin response of cattle to bovine papilloma virus. Cancer Research, 29: 1393-1397.
Li XM; Chen HT, 1996. [Ecological survey and analysis of bovine tumours.] Chinese Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology, 26(2):18-19.
McKenzie RA, 1978. An abattoir survey of bovine urinary bladder pathology. Australian Veterinary Journal, 54:41.
Meischke HRC, 1979. A survey of bovine teat papillomatosis. Veterinary Record, 104:28-32.
Meischke HRC, 1979. In vitro transformation by bovine papilloma virus. Journal of General Virology, 43:473-487.
Misdorp W, 1967. Tumours in large domestic animals in the Netherlands. Journal of Comparative Pathology, 77:211-216.
Monlux AW; Anderson WA; Davis CL, 1956. A survey of tumors occurring in cattle, sheep and swine. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 17:646-677.
Moulton JE, 1978. Tumors of the genital system. In: Moulton JE, ed. Tumors in Domestic Animals. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press, 309-345.
Moussa A; Morand M; Maillet M; Millet A; Vermot-Gaud D; Belli P, 1983. Clinical aspects and virological diagnosis with the electron microscope of bovine thelitis due to papilloma virus. Recueil de Médecine Vétérinaire, 159(7):639-644; 11 ref.
Mugera GM, 1968. A study of bovine neoplasms in Kenya. Bulletin of Epizootic Disease in Africa, 16:513-515.
Nasir L; Reid SWJ, 1999. Bovine papillomaviral gene expression in equine sarcoid tumours. Virus Research, 61(2):171-175.
Ndarathi CM; Mbuthia PG, 1994. Individual bovine-specific and species-specific autogenous vaccine in treatment of bovine cutaneous papillomatosis. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 64(3):218-221; 9 ref.
Nobel TA; Neumann F, 1960. Survey of animal neoplasms in Israel:1954-1959. Refuah Veterinarith, 17:39-45.
Olson C, 1990. Papillomaviruses. Virus infections of ruminants. In: Dinter Z, Morein B, eds. Papillomaviruses. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers, 189-200; 37 ref.
Olson C; Luedke AJ; Brobst DF, 1962. Induced immunity of skin, vagina, and urinary bladder to bovine papillomatosis. Cancer Research, 22:463-468.
Olson C; Pamukcu AM; Brobst DF, 1965. Papilloma-like virus from bovine urinary bladder tumours. Cancer Research, 25:840-849.
Olson C; Segre D; Skidmore LV, 1959. Immunity to bovine cutaneous papillomatosis produced by vaccine homologous to the challenge agent. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 135(10):499-502.
Olson C; Segre D; Skidmore LV, 1960. Further observations on immunity to bovine cutaneous papillomatosis. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 21(81):233-242.
Olson C; Skidmore LV, 1959. Therapy of experimentally produced bovine cutaneous papillomatosis with vaccines and excision. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 135:339-343.
Olson RO; Olson C; Easterday BC, 1982. Papillomatosis of the bovine teat (mammary papilla). American Journal of Veterinary Research, 43(12):2250-2252.
Otten N; von Tscharner C; Lazary S et al, 1993. DNA of bovine papillomavirus type 1 and 2 in equine sarcoids: PCR detection and direct sequencing. Archives of Virology, 132(1-2):121-131.
Pamukcu AM, 1963. Epidemiologic studies on urinary bladder tumors in Turkish cattle. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 108:938-947.
Pattanayak GM; Nayak BC, 1972. A short note on the occurrence of oesophageal papilloma in a bullock. Indian Veterinary Journal, 49(9):949-950.
Pearson JKL; Kerr WR; McCartney WDJ; Steele THJ, 1958. Tissue vaccines in the treatment of bovine papillomas. Veterinary Record, 70(48):971-973.
Pfister H, 1984. Biology and biochemistry of papillomaviruses. Review of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, 99:112-181.
Pfister H; Linz U; Gissmann L et al, 1979. Partial characterization of a new type of bovine papilloma viruses. Virology, 96(1): 1-8.
Pinto C; Medeiros F; Freitas F; Cabral A; Oliveira V; Rebimbas F, 1996. Neoplasms in cattle in Sao Miguel, Azores. I. Retrospective study and current situation. Veterinária Técnica, 6(1):30-37; 21 ref.
Plowright W; Linsell CA; Peer FG, 1971. A focus of ruminal cancer in Kenyan cattle. British Journal of Cancer, 25:72-80.
Prasad CB; Singh MP; Deokiouliyar UK, 1980. A note on successful treatment of generalised cutaneous papillomatosis with autogenous vaccine in cross-bred cattle. Indian Veterinary Journal, 57:950-952.
Pulley LT; Shively JN; Pawlicki JJ, 1974. An outbreak of bovine cutaneous fibropapillomas following dehorning. Cornell Veterinarian, 64:427-434.
Rebhun WC; Payne RM; King JM et al, 1980. Interdigital papillomatosis in dairy cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 177(5):437-440.
Smit JD, 1962. Skin lesions in South African domestic animals with special reference to the incidence and prognosis of various skin tumours. Journal of the South African Veterinary Medical Association, 33(3):363-376.
Ssenyonga GSZ; Onapito JS; Nakasala-Situma J; Omara-Opyene AL, 1990. Therapeutic value of partial excision of lesions combined with administration of an autogenous vaccine during an episode of cutaneous papillomatosis in cattle of Uganda. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 197(6):739-740; 7 ref.
Stannard AA; Pulley LT, 1978. Tumors of the skin and soft tissues. In: Moulton JE, ed. Tumors in Domestic Animals. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press, 16-74.
Svrcek S; Lesník F; Maracek I; Janda J; Ondrejka R; Konrád V; Levkut M; Süliová J; Benísek Z; Bíres J; Bajová V; Bartko P; Paulík S; Palkovic J; Kochan P; Némethová K; Závadová J; Durove A; Mojzisová J, 1995. Unusual outbreak of bovine papillomatosis in the Spis region of Slovakia. Slovensky Veterinársky Casopis, 20(4):163-168; 29 ref.
Thorsen J; Cooper JE; Warwick GP, 1974. Oesophageal papillomata in cattle in Kenya. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 6:95-98.
Tweddle NE; White WE, 1977. An outbreak of anal fibropapillomatosis in cows following rectal examination. Australian Veterinary Journal, 53:492-495.
Vanselow BA; Spradbrow PB, 1996. Equine and bovine papillomavirus infections. Virus infections of equines,, 83-94; [Virus infections of vertebrates, volume 6]; 63 ref.
Abdouslam O E, Levkut M, Levkutová M, Revajová V, Ondrejka R, Beníšek Z, 1997. Immunohistochemistry of the progressive and regressive stages of bovine papillomatosis. Acta Veterinaria Brno. 66 (4), 245-248. DOI:10.2754/avb199766040245
Amin D M, Salem S A H, Ahmed M H, Karim I A, 1997. Pathological and virological studies on bovine papillomatosis in cattle. Egyptian Journal of Comparative Pathology and Clinical Pathology. 10 (1), 1-11.
Baba A I, Riond J L, Gaboreanu M, Cătoi C, 1999. Histopathological findings in the urinary system of cows with enzootic haematuria. (Cercetări histopatologice asupra aparatului urinar la vacile cu hematurie enzootică.). Revista Română de Medicină Veterinara. 9 (2), 163-171.
Bastianello SS, 1982. A survey on neoplasia in domestic species over a 40-year period from 1935 to 1974 in the Republic of South Africa. I. Tumours occurring in cattle. In: Onderstpoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 49 195-204.
Bezerra M J G, Soares P C, Bezerra R, 1994. Evaluation of immunization against bovine papillomatosis using attenuated or inactivated vaccines. (Avaliação da imunização contra papilomatose bovina com as vacinas atenuada e inativada.). Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária. 16 (3), 98-101.
Bloch N, Sutton R H, Breen M, Spradbrow P B, 1997. Identification of papillomaviruses in scrapings from bovine warts by use of the polymerase chain reaction. Veterinary Research Communications. 21 (1), 63-68. DOI:10.1023/B:VERC.0000009702.65202.3b
CABI, Undated. Compendium record. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated a. CABI Compendium: Status inferred from regional distribution. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated b. CABI Compendium: Status as determined by CABI editor. Wallingford, UK: CABI
Elzein E T E, Sundberg J P, Housawi F M, Gameel A A, Ramadan R O, Hassanein M M, 1991. Genital bovine papillomavirus infection in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 3 (1), 36-38.
Jackson C, 1936. The Incidence and Pathology of Tumours of Domesticated Animals in South Africa : A Study of the Onderstepoort Collection of Neoplasms with Special Reference to their Histopathology. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Science. 6 (1), 460 pp.
Jarrett W F H, Campo M S, Blaxter M L, O'Neil B W, Laird H M, Moar M H, Sartirana M L, 1984. Alimentary fibropapilloma in cattle: a spontaneous tumor, nonpermissive for papillomavirus replication. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 73 (2), 499-504.
Makay B, 1989. Results from use of a herd-specific inactivated vaccine against bovine papillomatosis. (Szarvasmarha-papillomatosis elleni istállóspecifikus inaktivált vakcina alkalmazása és eredménye.). Magyar Állatorvosok Lapja. 44 (4), 231-232.
Moussa A, Morand M, Maillet M, Millet A, Vermot-Gaud D, Belli P, 1983. Clinical aspects and virological diagnosis with the electron microscope of bovine thelitis due to papilloma virus. (Aspect clinique et diagnostic virologique par microscopie électronique de la thélite bovine due au virus du papillome.). Recueil de Médecine Vétérinaire. 159 (7), 639-644.
Ndarathi C M, Mbuthia P G, 1994. Individual bovine-specific and species-specific autogenous vaccine in treatment of bovine cutaneous papillomatosis. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 64 (3), 218-221.
Otten N, Tscharner C von, Lazary S, Antczak D F, Gerber H, 1993. DNA of bovine papillomavirus type 1 and 2 in equine sarcoids: PCR detection and direct sequencing. Archives of Virology. 132 (1/2), 121-131. DOI:10.1007/BF01309847
Pinto C, Medeiros F, Freitas F, Cabral A, Oliveira V, Rebimbas F, 1996. Neoplasms in cattle in Sao Miguel, Azores. I. Retrospective study and current situation. (Neoplasias em bovinos de S. Miguel, Açores. I. Estudo retrospectivo e situação actual.). Veterinária Técnica. 6 (1), 30-37.
Pobrić H, Huskić E, Filipović-Paninčić M, Podžo M, 1990. Frequency of udder abnormalities in cows on private farms. (Učestalost anomalija vimena kod krava u individualnom uzgoju.). Veterinaria (Sarajevo). 39 (1-2), 67-71.
Prasad C B, Singh M P, Deokiouliyar U K, 1980. A note on successful treatment of generalised cutaneous papillomatosis with autogenous vaccine in cross-bred cattle. Indian Veterinary Journal. 57 (11), 950-952.
Smit J D, 1962. Skin lesions in South African domestic animals with special reference to the incidence and prognosis of various skin tumours. Journal of the South African Veterinary Medical Association. 363-376.
Spradbrow P B, Ford J N, Samuel J L, 1983. Papillomaviruses with unusual restriction endonuclease profiles from bovine skin warts. Australian Veterinary Journal. 60 (8), 259-260. DOI:10.1111/j.1751-0813.1983.tb05987.x
Ssenyonga G S Z, Onapito J S, Nakasala-Situma J, Omara-Opyene A L, 1990. Therapeutic value of partial excision of lesions combined with administration of an autogenous vaccine during an episode of cutaneous papillomatosis in cattle of Uganda. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 197 (6), 739-740.
Stannard AA, Pulley LT, 1978. Tumors of the skin and soft tissues. In: Tumors in Domestic Animals, [ed. by Moulton JE]. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California, University of California Press. 16-74.
Švrček Š, Lešník F, Maraček I, Janda J, Ondrejka R, Konrád V, Levkut M, Süliová J, Beníšek Z, Bíreš J, Bajová V, Bartko P, Paulík Š, Palkovič J, Kochan P, Némethová K, Závadová J, Ďurove A, Mojžišová J, 1995. Unusual outbreak of bovine papillomatosis in the Spiš region of Slovakia. (Neobvyklá forma výskytu bovinnej papilomatózy na Spiši.). Slovenský Veterinársky Časopis. 20 (4), 163-168.
Distribution MapsTop of page
Select a dataset
CABI Summary Records
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/