Invasive Species Compendium

Detailed coverage of invasive species threatening livelihoods and the environment worldwide


Cygnus olor
(mute swan)



Cygnus olor (mute swan)


  • Last modified
  • 15 November 2018
  • Datasheet Type(s)
  • Invasive Species
  • Host Animal
  • Preferred Scientific Name
  • Cygnus olor
  • Preferred Common Name
  • mute swan
  • Taxonomic Tree
  • Domain: Eukaryota
  •   Kingdom: Metazoa
  •     Phylum: Chordata
  •       Subphylum: Vertebrata
  •         Class: Aves
  • Summary of Invasiveness
  • Cygnus olor (mute swan) is a large swan species that can utilise a variety of aquatic habitats. They consume submerged aquatic vegetation to the point of overg...

  • There are no pictures available for this datasheet

    If you can supply pictures for this datasheet please contact:

    CAB International
    OX10 8DE
  • Distribution map More information

Don't need the entire report?

Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.

Generate report


Top of page


Top of page

Preferred Scientific Name

  • Cygnus olor (Gmelin, 1789)

Preferred Common Name

  • mute swan

Other Scientific Names

  • Anas olor Gmelin

International Common Names

  • English: swan, mute
  • French: cygne tuburculé
  • Russian: lebed-shipun

Local Common Names

  • Turkey: fysyldayan gu gushu

Summary of Invasiveness

Top of page

Cygnus olor (mute swan) is a large swan species that can utilise a variety of aquatic habitats. They consume submerged aquatic vegetation to the point of overgrazing, which in turn reduces the carrying capacity of natural habitats for native waterfowl. They will occasionally overgraze to such an extent that certain vegetation is eliminated from the ecosystem. Cygnus olor is also very territorial and will drive off native waterfowl species and has been known to attack and kill native species while defending territory. Mute swans have also been known to attack and injure humans and can be especially dangerous to small children.

Taxonomic Tree

Top of page
  • Domain: Eukaryota
  •     Kingdom: Metazoa
  •         Phylum: Chordata
  •             Subphylum: Vertebrata
  •                 Class: Aves
  •                     Order: Anseriformes
  •                         Family: Anatidae
  •                             Genus: Cygnus
  •                                 Species: Cygnus olor


Top of page

Native range: Asia and Europe (Ivory, 2002; and Watola et al. 2003).
Known introduced range: North America (Bergman et al. 2004).

Distribution Table

Top of page

The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.

Continent/Country/RegionDistributionLast ReportedOriginFirst ReportedInvasiveReferenceNotes


IndiaPresentNativeISSG, 2011
IsraelPresentNativeISSG, 2011
KazakhstanPresentNativeISSG, 2011
Korea, DPRPresentNativeISSG, 2011
Korea, Republic ofPresentNativeISSG, 2011
TurkeyPresentNativeISSG, 2011

North America

CanadaPresentNativeISSG, 2011
-OntarioPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
USAPresentPresent based on regional distribution.
-CaliforniaPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-GeorgiaPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-HawaiiPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-IllinoisPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-IndianaPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-KentuckyPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-MainePresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-MarylandPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-MichiganPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-New HampshirePresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-New JerseyPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-New YorkPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-North CarolinaPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-OhioPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-PennsylvaniaPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-Rhode IslandPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-TennesseePresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-VirginiaPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-WashingtonPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011
-WisconsinPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2011


AustriaPresentNativeISSG, 2011
BelarusPresentNativeISSG, 2011
BelgiumPresentNativeISSG, 2011
BulgariaPresentNativeISSG, 2011
CroatiaPresentNativeISSG, 2011
Czech RepublicPresentNativeISSG, 2011
DenmarkPresentNativeISSG, 2011
EstoniaPresentNativeISSG, 2011
FinlandPresentNativeISSG, 2011
FrancePresentNativeISSG, 2011
GermanyPresentNativeISSG, 2011
GreecePresentNativeISSG, 2011
HungaryPresentNativeISSG, 2011
IrelandPresentNativeISSG, 2011
ItalyPresentNativeISSG, 2011
LatviaPresentNativeISSG, 2011
LithuaniaPresentNativeISSG, 2011
LuxembourgPresentNativeISSG, 2011
MoldovaPresentNativeISSG, 2011
NetherlandsPresentNativeISSG, 2011
NorwayPresentNativeISSG, 2011
PolandPresentNativeISSG, 2011
PortugalPresentNativeISSG, 2011
RomaniaPresentNativeISSG, 2011
Russian FederationPresentNativeISSG, 2011
SlovakiaPresentNativeISSG, 2011
SloveniaPresentNativeISSG, 2011
SpainPresentNativeISSG, 2011
SwedenPresentNativeISSG, 2011
SwitzerlandPresentNativeISSG, 2011
UKPresentNativeISSG, 2011
-England and WalesPresentNative Invasive ISSG, 2011
-Northern IrelandPresentNativeISSG, 2011
UkrainePresentNativeISSG, 2011
Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)PresentNativeISSG, 2011


AustraliaPresentNativeISSG, 2011


Top of page

C. olor is found in a variety of aquatic habitats, including ponds and lagoons, fresh to salt water marshes, well-sheltered bays and lakes. In the warmer months, mute swans spend most of their time in shallow water. As shallow water freezes, the birds move to deeper water, but will utilise deeper water throughout the year (Chesapeake Bay Program, 2002; and Ivory, 2002).

Habitat List

Top of page
Terrestrial – ManagedCultivated / agricultural land Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Urban / peri-urban areas Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalRiverbanks Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Wetlands Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Lakes Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Rivers / streams Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Estuaries Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)

Biology and Ecology

Top of page

Submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) is the preferred diet of Cygnus olor (mute swan), though they also eat grain crops. They consume daily at least 3-4kg (wet weight) of submerged aquatic plants, including leaves, stems, roots, stolons and rhizomes, uproot additional vegetation that is not eaten, and use emergent vegetation for nest building. They have been observed pulling plants up by the roots or rhizomes or paddling vigorously to dislodge whole plants to consume or to make available for cygnets (Chesapeake Bay Program, 2002; and Petrie and Francis, 2003).

Adult Cygnus olor (mute swans) do not necessarily pair for life, but established pairs are more successful breeders than non-established pairs. Mute swans rarely nest in colonies. Nest sites are selected and breeding begins in March or early April. Nests will be built or a previously constructed mound, such as a muskrat house will be used. Nests are large, composed of aquatic vegetation and lined with feathers and down. It is built above the water level in a swampy place near a pond or lake. Clutch sizes of 5 to 12 can occur, but 5 to 7 is most common. Eggs are pale grey to pale blue-green. Incubation lasts 36 to 38 days. Incubation is shared between the male and female, but the female spends the majority of time sitting and the male typically stands guard (Ivory, 2002).
Lifecycle stages
Cygnus olor (mute swan) chicks are brownish grey (gradually turning white within the next 12 months) and only remain in the nest for one day. They are able to fly in about 60 days. Chicks can ride on the backs of their parents or under their wings. By the following breeding season the parents drive the young away. Adolescents then join flocks of other non-breeding swans and during this time molt their feathers, becoming flightless for a short period of time. In the next two years, they begin to bond with a mate and begin to look for suitable breeding territory. Swans do not begin to breed until around year three (Ivory, 2002).

Means of Movement and Dispersal

Top of page

Introduction pathways to new locations
Acclimatisation societies:C. olor were introduced to North American city parks, zoos, avicultural collections, and estates in the late 1800s and early 1900s (Bellrose 1980). The intentional release and accidental escape of these birds resulted in the establishment of populations along the northeastern Atlantic Coast of the United States, portions of the Pacific Coast, and more recently, the lower Great Lakes (Petrie and Francis, 2003).

Impact Summary

Top of page
Biodiversity (generally) Negative


Top of page

General Impacts

Compiled by IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)
Cygnus olor (mute swans) impact native waterfowl habitat. They consume great quantities of submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) and aquatic invertebrates and cause competition for space and food, attacking and driving off native waterfowl and potentially reducing the carrying capacity of breeding, staging and wintering habitats for native species of migratory waterfowl. Mute swans occupy and defend large territories (up to 6ha) of wetland habitat during nesting, brood rearing and foraging. Studies have shown that in Europe mute swans have successfully eliminated individual plant species from some wetlands and it is feared that in North America, similar impacts on food resources will occur and effect migrant and wintering waterfowl populations. They have been reported to kill adult and juvenile ducks and geese as well as other wetland-dependent birds (Allin and Husband, 2003; Petrie and Francis, 2003).
At high densities, mute swans can overgraze an area with the potential to eliminate some plant species from an ecosystem. During winter, mute swans may also consume nutrient storage and over wintering structures such as tubers, which could reduce the future availability of perennial species such as wild celery (Vallisneria americana) and American bulrush (Scirpus americanus), both important food sources for native waterfowl (Petrie and Francis, 2003).

Risk and Impact Factors

Top of page Invasiveness
  • Proved invasive outside its native range
  • Gregarious
Impact outcomes
  • Conflict
  • Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
  • Reduced native biodiversity
  • Threat to/ loss of native species
Impact mechanisms
  • Competition - monopolizing resources
  • Herbivory/grazing/browsing

Uses List

Top of page


  • Botanical garden/zoo
  • Ornamental

Human food and beverage

  • Fresh meat


  • Feathers

Prevention and Control

Top of page

Management Information

Compiled by IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)
Physical: Clutch reduction by destroying or oiling a proportion of eggs in each clutch to prevent hatching has so far been a preferred method of control, but its effectiveness in actually controlling mute swan populations is in doubt, however clutch reduction has the advantage of being unobtrusive and it is likely to be less disruptive than culling or translocation of birds. Clutch reduction is labour intensive, requires persistence to be effective and its effects may vary between populations depending on immigration rates. Studies by Watola et al. (2003) have demonstrated that control of breeding output will not necessarily control mute swan populations enough to prevent overgrazing. Deterrent measures and habitat management at the site of conflict may be more effective. In simulated clutch reduction, if clutches were reduced to two eggs per clutch then non-breeding numbers decreased by 30% over a 10-year period. Total destruction of all eggs in each clutch stabilised the non-breeding sub-population but did not eradicate it. The effects of clutch reduction were offset by high survival rates and immigration (Watola et al. 2003).

Increasing the mortality of adult mute swans through culling would be three or four times more efficient than egg destruction, but culling is, and will remain, unacceptable in many areas (Watola et al. 2003).

Petrie and Francis (2003) recommend that the first step to management be to remove mute swans from the list of protected species in all regions in the United States and Canada. Second, they recommend initiation of a control programme. Non-lethal control programmes have been implemented in a number of the eastern United States, but their effectiveness has been limited. Capture and removal programmes or shooting would be most beneficial in removing adult swans from the current populations, but swan capture and removal would be costly and it is doubtful that sufficiently large numbers could be captured in a cost-effective manner. Encouraging hunters and managers to shoot adults would be a far more effective strategy. Such a programme would be unlikely to eradicate the species, but would probably be sufficient to maintain the regional population at no more than a few hundred individuals. In areas where lethal control may not be appropriate, such as city parks, egg oiling could also be implemented to prevent population expansion (Petrie and Francis, 2003).


Top of page

Allin, C. C., and T. P. Husband. 2003. C. olor (Cygnus olor) impact on submerged aquatic vegetation and macro invertebrates in a Rhode Island coastal pond. Northeastern Naturalist 10(3): 305-318.

Bergman, D. L., M. D. Chandler, and A. Locklear. 2004. Economic Impact of Invasive Species to Wildlife Services' Cooperators. USDA. APHIS. Wildlife Services. Proceedings of the Third National Wildlife Research Center Special Symposium: Human Conflicts with Wildlife: Economic Considerations.

Chesapeake Bay Program. 2002. Mute swan Cygnus olor. Invasive Species in the Chesapeake Watershed.

Ivory, A. 2002. Cygnus olor. (On-line), Animal Diversity Web.

Perry M. C., P. C. Osenton, and E. J. R. Lohnes. 2002. The Exotic Mute Swan (Cygnus olor) in Chesapeake Bay, USA. . USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center.

Petrie, S. A., and C. M. Francis. 2003. Rapid increase in the lower Great Lakes population of feral C. olor's: a review and a recommendation. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2003, 31(2):407-416.

Watola, G. V., D. A. Stone, G. C. Smith, G. J. Forrester, A. E. Coleman, J. T. Coleman, M. J. Goulding, K. A. Robinson, and T. P. Milsom. 2003. Analyses of two C. olor populations and the effects of clutch reduction: implications for population management . Journal of Applied Ecology 2003 40:565-579.


Top of page

Reviewed by: Expert review underway: Michel Gauthier-Clerc, Station Biologique de la Tour Du Valat France

Principal sources:Chesapeake Bay Program, 2002. Mute Swan Cygnus olor
Petrie and Francis, 2003. Rapid increase in the lower Great Lakes population of feral mute swanss: a review and a recommendation

    Compiled by: National Biological Information Infrastructure (NBII) & IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)
Last Modified: Thursday, September 27, 2007

Distribution Maps

Top of page
You can pan and zoom the map
Save map