Invasive Species Compendium

Detailed coverage of invasive species threatening livelihoods and the environment worldwide


Banana bunchy top virus
(bunchy top of banana)



Banana bunchy top virus (bunchy top of banana)


  • Last modified
  • 11 May 2018
  • Datasheet Type(s)
  • Invasive Species
  • Pest
  • Preferred Scientific Name
  • Banana bunchy top virus
  • Preferred Common Name
  • bunchy top of banana
  • Taxonomic Tree
  • Domain: Virus
  •   Unknown: "ssDNA viruses"
  •     Unknown: "DNA viruses"
  •       Family: Nanoviridae
  •         Genus: Babuvirus

Don't need the entire report?

Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.

Generate report


Top of page
'Rosette' or 'bunchytop'. Appearance of BBTV-infected banana caused by the production of progressively shorter, narrower and more upright leaves.
TitleSymptoms on banana
Caption'Rosette' or 'bunchytop'. Appearance of BBTV-infected banana caused by the production of progressively shorter, narrower and more upright leaves.
CopyrightDavid Jones
'Rosette' or 'bunchytop'. Appearance of BBTV-infected banana caused by the production of progressively shorter, narrower and more upright leaves.
Symptoms on banana'Rosette' or 'bunchytop'. Appearance of BBTV-infected banana caused by the production of progressively shorter, narrower and more upright leaves.David Jones
Yellowing and curling of leaf margins on BBTV-infected banana.
TitleSymptoms on banana
CaptionYellowing and curling of leaf margins on BBTV-infected banana.
CopyrightDavid Jones
Yellowing and curling of leaf margins on BBTV-infected banana.
Symptoms on bananaYellowing and curling of leaf margins on BBTV-infected banana.David Jones
Yellowing and curling of leaf margins on BBTV-infected banana.
TitleSymptoms on banana - detail view
CaptionYellowing and curling of leaf margins on BBTV-infected banana.
CopyrightDavid Jones
Yellowing and curling of leaf margins on BBTV-infected banana.
Symptoms on banana - detail viewYellowing and curling of leaf margins on BBTV-infected banana.David Jones
Stunted plants arising from infected suckers.
TitleSymptoms on banana
CaptionStunted plants arising from infected suckers.
CopyrightDavid Jones
Stunted plants arising from infected suckers.
Symptoms on bananaStunted plants arising from infected suckers.David Jones
Dark green 'dot-dash' patterns in minor leaf veins forming 'hooks' where they enter the edge of the midrib.
TitleSymptoms on leaf (detail view)
CaptionDark green 'dot-dash' patterns in minor leaf veins forming 'hooks' where they enter the edge of the midrib.
CopyrightDavid Jones
Dark green 'dot-dash' patterns in minor leaf veins forming 'hooks' where they enter the edge of the midrib.
Symptoms on leaf (detail view)Dark green 'dot-dash' patterns in minor leaf veins forming 'hooks' where they enter the edge of the midrib.David Jones


Top of page

Preferred Scientific Name

  • Banana bunchy top virus

Preferred Common Name

  • bunchy top of banana

Other Scientific Names

  • banana bunchy top nanovirus

International Common Names

  • English: cabbage top of banana; curly top of banana
  • Spanish: cogollo racimoso del banano
  • French: maladie du bunchy top du bananier; sommet touffu du bananier

English acronym

  • BBTV

EPPO code

  • BBTV00 (Banana bunchy top virus)

Taxonomic Tree

Top of page
  • Domain: Virus
  •     Unknown: "ssDNA viruses"
  •         Unknown: "DNA viruses"
  •             Family: Nanoviridae
  •                 Genus: Babuvirus
  •                     Species: Banana bunchy top virus

Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature

Top of page

Banana bunchy top virus (BBTV) was originally included in the luteovirus group, but is now recognised as a species of the Babuvirus genus, one of two genera included in the Nanoviridae family (King et al., 2011).


Top of page

Evidence for a Viral Agent

A virus, BBTV, is the causal agent of bunchy top disease of banana. Although unequivocal evidence by reproduction of the disease through inoculation of purified virions or cloned genomic components is lacking, definitive association of BBTV with bunchy top disease was demonstrated by insect vector-mediated transmission of BBTV from an infected banana to a healthy banana plant. The virions are intimately associated with the disease (Harding et al., 1991; Thomas and Dietzgen, 1991) and have been detected in all symptomatic plants tested (Dietzgen and Thomas, 1991; Thomas, 1991; Thomas and Dietzgen, 1991; Karan et al., 1994; Kumar et al., 2011). Dale et al. (1986) and an published study (ML Iskra-Caruana, Montpellier, France) isolated dsRNA, suggestive of luteovirus infection, from Cavendish cultivars and from bunchy top affected plant samples. However, neither these, nor any subsequent studies, have identified or established a role for any virus other than BBTV in banana bunchy top disease aetiology.

Particle and Genome Properties

The virions of BBTV are icosahedra, ca 18-20 nm in diameter, have a coat protein of ca 20,000 Mr, a sedimentation coefficient of ca 46S and a buoyant density of 1.29-1.30 g/cm³ in caesium sulphate (Wu and Su, 1990c; Dietzgen and Thomas, 1991; Harding et al., 1991; Thomas and Dietzgen, 1991). Purified preparations have an A260/280 of 1.33 (Thomas and Dietzgen, 1991). The virus possesses a multi-component genome, consisting of at least six circular, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) components each ca. 1000-1100 nucleotides long, previously referred to as DNA-1 to -6 (Wu et al., 1994; Yeh et al., 1994; Burns et al., 1995; Xie and Hu, 1995). However, they were renamed as DNA-R, -U3, -S, -M, -C and -N. The DNA-R component encodes two open reading frames and other components each encode one protein (Burns et al., 1995; Dale et al., 1986; Beetham et al., 1997). Two areas of the non-coding regions are highly conserved between the six components (Burns et al., 1995). The first is a stem-loop common region of up to 69 nucleotides. It contains a nonanucleotide loop sequence conserved amongst ssDNA plant viruses and which may be involved in rolling circle replication and initiation of viral strand DNA synthesis. The second, 5' to the stem-loop common region, is a major common region varying in size between components from 65 to 92 nucleotides and which may have a promoter function. The initiation factor for endogenous DNA primers is also located within the major common region (Hafner et al., 1997a). DNA-R (component 1) encodes a putative replication initiation protein and contains a second functional open reading frame internal to this, referred as U5, the function of which is unknown; whilst DNA-S (component 3) codes for the coat protein (Harding et al., 1993; Dale et al., 1986; Hafner et al., 1997b, Wanitchakorn et al., 1997). DNA-U3 (component 2) codes a protein of unknown function, DNA-M (component 4) codes for movement protein, DNA-C (component 5) has been shown to produce a gene product containing an LXCXE motif and to have retinoblastoma protein (Rb)-binding activity, known to perform cell-cycle-link protein, and DNA-N (component 6) codes for a nuclear shuttle protein. The gene product may be produced very early in the infection cycle and be responsible for switching the first infected cells to S-phase in preparation for virus replication. Recent research indicates that component 1 is the minimal replicative unit of BBTV and encodes the 'master' viral Rep (Horser et al., 2001a). Additional Rep encoding circular ssDNA components were reported in a few BBTV isolates from East Asia and the South Pacific region (Horser et al., 2001b). They were named BBTV-S1 and BBTV-S2, of 1109 and 1095 nts, and encoded a protein similar to the DNA-R segment but the genomic organization differed from that of DNA-R. The –S1 and –S2 components lack internal ORF U5, and the stem loop sequence was not similar to the six genomic components. These sequences were not considered as an integral part of the BBTV genome but the precise function of these additional DNAs was not known.

Strains of BBTV

Most isolates of BBTV are associated with typical severe disease symptoms. However, mild and symptomless isolates have been reported from Taiwan (Su et al., 1993; Djailo et al., 2016). BBTV has been confirmed in specimens of mild and symptomless infections from Taiwan by both ELISA and PCR (HJ Su, JL Dale and JE Thomas, Brisbane, personal communication, 1996) and the isolates can be transmitted by Pentalonia nigronervosa (HJ Su, Taipei, personal communication, 1996). Genomic differences, which correlate with these biological variants, have not yet been determined.

Two broad groups of isolates have been identified on the basis of nucleotide sequence differences between some, possibly all, of the six recognized genome components (Karan et al., 1994; Hu et al., 2007; Kumar et al., 2015; Qazi, 2016). The 'South Pacific' group (also referred as Pacific Indian Ocean (PIO) group) comprises isolates from Australia, Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Fiji, Western Samoa, Tonga, Hawaii (USA) and all the isolates identified, as of 2017, in Africa (Angola, Benin, Burundi, Cameroon, CAR, Congo, DRC, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Malawi, Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa and Zambia), whilst the 'Asian' group (also referred as Southeast Asian (SEA) group) comprises isolates from China, Indonesia, Japan, the Philippines, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam. These differences are present throughout the genomes of components 1 and 6, but are most striking in the untranslated major common region. No biological differences have been associated with these sequence differences.

Magee (1948) noted that certain plants of 'Veimama', a cultivar originally from Fiji and growing then in New South Wales, showed a 'partial recovery' from bunchy top symptoms and produced bunches. After an initial flush of typical severe symptoms in three or four leaves, subsequent leaves showed few, if any, dark-green flecks. Suckers derived from these partially recovered plants also displayed a flush of typical symptoms followed by partial recovery. The origin of the infection, whether from Australia or Fiji, was uncertain. This partial recovery was noted for some infected plants of 'Veimama' only, and in Fiji was noted for one sucker only on a single infected stool from among hundreds of infected stools of 'Veimama' observed. Magee was not able to transmit the virus from partially recovered plants and was only able to super-infect them, with difficulty, with high inoculum pressure. This may be an example of a mild strain of BBTV, possibly a non-aphid transmitted one, propagated vegetatively, reaching only a low titre and conferring a degree of cross-protection. Alternatively, 'Veimama' may not be uniform and individual plants with a degree of resistance may exist. The complete explanation for this phenomenon is unclear. Evidence from recent studies suggests the occurrence of Musa cultivars with variable response to BBTV infection, ranging from extreme to moderate susceptibility and recovery associated with reduced virus titre (Ngatat et al., 2017; PL Kumar, IITA, Nigeria, personal communication, 2017). It is likely that previous observations of mild symptoms and lack of aphid-transmission may be related to virus-host interaction rather than to mild strains.

The inability to transmit bunchy top from abacá to banana (Ocfemia and Buhay, 1934) was originally considered evidence that two distinct strains of the virus existed. However, recent studies have identified a new virus, Abaca bunchy top virus (ABTV) which also belongs to the genus Babuvirus, as the cause of bunchy top-like symptoms in abacá (Sharman et al., 2008). The possibility of co-infection or single infection of BBTV and ABTV in abacá cannot be ruled out in endemic regions.


Top of page

BBTV has been confirmed in Africa, Asia, Australia and South Pacific islands. Confirmed findings of BBTV symptomatic plants and/or BBTV have been reported from the following countries.

Asia: Bangladesh, China, India, Iran, Japan, Indonesia, Myanmar, Pakistan, the Philippines, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam
Australia and South Pacific: Australia, Fiji, Western Samoa, Tuvalu, Tonga, and Wallis and Futuna; Hawaii (USA)
Africa: Angola, Benin, Burundi, Cameroon, CAR, Congo, DRC, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Malawi, Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa and Zambia.

Reports of BBTV in Cambodia (Stover, 1972), French Polynesia (CMI, 1977), Laos (Stover, 1972), Hong Kong (Buddenhagen, 1968; CMI, 1977), Papua New Guinea (Magee, 1954; CMI, 1977), Sabah (Magee, 1927; CMI, 1977) and the United Arab Republic (Buddenhagen, 1968) remain unconfirmed (Dale, 1987; Thomas and Iskra-Caruana, 1999). Sulyo and Muharam (1985) reported BBTV to be present in Irian Jaya, Indonesia, but symptoms have not been seen in recent surveys (Shivas et al. ,1996; R Davis, Mareeba, personal communication, 2000). Although there have been reports of bunchy top disease in Peninsular Malaysia (CMI, 1977), a survey conducted by MARDI and INIBAP in 1993 failed to locate any plants with typical or atypical symptoms (DR Jones, Montpellier, personal communication, 1993). A report of bunchy top in South Africa in the early 1990s (Su et al., 1993) was found to be erroneous (Pietersen et al., 1996), but there us now a confirmed report of BBTV in South Africa (Jooste et al., 2016). BBTV symptomatic plants were also recorded in Eritrea (Saverio 1964) but the  presence of the virus was not confirmed and the current status is unknown. A report of BBTV in northern Mozambique in 2007 (Gondwe et al., 2007) is unconfirmed; however, the presence of the virus was confirmed in southern Mozambique in 2016 in surveys conducted by the Direccao Nacional De Agriculture E Silvicultura Departamento De Sanidade Vegetal of Mozambique. In Australia, BBTV is restricted to northern New South Wales and southern Queensland. Quarantine measures are in force to prevent its introduction to northern Queensland and other states (Thomas and Iskra-Caruana, 1999). Similar to the situation in Australia, the presence of BBTV is restricted to certain regions of Nigeria, Benin, Cameroon, India, and a number of other countries where the virus has been reported (Kumar et al., 2015).

It is virtually impossible to state for many countries whether the virus is native or exotic. There is little doubt that BBTV is now native in many countries, but there is also some evidence that it was inadvertently disseminated to many of them in infected vegetative propagules with further spread within and between regions assisted by aphid vector and the movement of vegetative propagules by humans (Almeida et al., 2009; Kumar et al., 2011, 2015; Stainton et al., 2015).

Distribution Table

Top of page

The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.

Continent/Country/RegionDistributionLast ReportedOriginFirst ReportedInvasiveReferenceNotes


BangladeshPresentCABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
CambodiaAbsent, unreliable recordEPPO, 2014
ChinaRestricted distribution Invasive CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-FujianPresent Invasive Zhou and Xie, 1992; Zhou and Zheng, 2001; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-GuangdongPresent Invasive Zhou and Xie, 1992; He et al., 2001; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-GuangxiPresent Invasive Zhou and Xie, 1992; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-HainanPresentFeng et al., 2010; CABI/EPPO, 2013
-Hong KongAbsent, unreliable recordEPPO, 2014
-YunnanPresent Invasive Zhou and Xie, 1992; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
IndiaRestricted distribution Invasive CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-Andhra PradeshPresent Invasive CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-AssamPresent Invasive CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-KarnatakaPresent Invasive Sharma, 1988; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-KeralaPresent Invasive CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-MaharashtraPresent Invasive CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-MeghalayaPresentCABI/EPPO, 2013
-OdishaPresent Invasive CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-Tamil NaduPresent Invasive Govindaswamy et al., 1977; Thiribhuvanamala and Doraiswamy, 2001; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-Uttar PradeshPresent Invasive Khurana, 1971; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-West BengalPresentCABI/EPPO, 2013
IndonesiaPresent Invasive CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-Irian JayaAbsent, formerly presentEPPO, 2014
-JavaPresent Invasive Sulyo and Muharam, 1985; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-KalimantanPresent Invasive Sulyo and Muharam, 1985; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-Nusa TenggaraPresentCABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
IranRestricted distributionBananej et al., 2007; CABI/EPPO, 2013
JapanRestricted distribution Invasive CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-Bonin IslandPresent Invasive Gadd, 1926
-Ryukyu ArchipelagoRestricted distribution Invasive Kawano and Su, 1993; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
Korea, Republic ofAbsent, reported but not confirmedCABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
LaosAbsent, unreliable recordEPPO, 2014
MalaysiaRestricted distribution Invasive CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-Peninsular MalaysiaAbsent, formerly presentCABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-SabahAbsent, unreliable recordEPPO, 2014
-SarawakPresent Invasive CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
MyanmarPresentCABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
NepalAbsent, invalid recordIPPC, 2005; CABI/EPPO, 2013
PakistanRestricted distributionIntroduced Invasive Khalid et al., 1993; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
PhilippinesRestricted distribution Invasive Castillo and Martinez, 1961; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
Sri LankaPresent Invasive Bryce, 1921; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
TaiwanPresent Invasive Sun, 1961; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
ThailandPresentCABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
VietnamPresent Invasive Vakili, 1969; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014


AngolaRestricted distributionKumar et al., 2009; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
BeninRestricted distributionLokossou et al., 2012; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
BurundiPresent Invasive Thomas et al., 1994; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
CameroonRestricted distributionOben et al., 2009; IPPC, 2010; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
Central African RepublicPresent Invasive Thomas et al., 1994; Diekmann and Putter, 1996; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
CongoPresent Invasive Thomas et al., 1994; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
Congo Democratic RepublicWidespread Invasive CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
EgyptRestricted distribution Invasive Magee, 1927; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
Equatorial GuineaPresentCABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
EritreaPresentCABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
GabonRestricted distribution Invasive Fouré and Manser, 1982; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
MalawiWidespread Invasive Kenyon et al., 1997; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
MozambiqueRestricted distributionGondwe et al., 2007; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014; IPPC, 2017
NigeriaRestricted distributionAdegbola et al., 2013; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
RwandaPresent Invasive Thomas et al., 1994; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
South AfricaRestricted distribution2015CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014; Jooste et al., 2016
ZambiaRestricted distributionGondwe et al., 2007; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014

North America

USARestricted distribution Invasive CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-HawaiiPresent Invasive Dietzgen and Thomas, 1991; Hu et al., 1993; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014

South America

BrazilAbsent, intercepted onlyIntroduced Not invasive Oliveira et al., 2002


American SamoaPresent Invasive CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
AustraliaRestricted distribution Invasive CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-New South WalesRestricted distribution Invasive Magee, 1927; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
-QueenslandRestricted distribution Invasive CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
FijiPresent Invasive Pearson and Grisoni, 2002; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
French PolynesiaAbsent, invalid recordEPPO, 2014
GuamPresent Invasive Pearson and Grisoni, 2002; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
KiribatiAbsent, invalid recordPearson and Grisoni, 2002; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
Micronesia, Federated states ofAbsent, unreliable recordEPPO, 2014
New CaledoniaRestricted distributionIntroduced Invasive Kagy et al., 2001; Pearson and Grisoni, 2002; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
Northern Mariana IslandsAbsent, unreliable recordCABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
PalauAbsent, invalid recordCABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
Papua New GuineaAbsent, unreliable recordEPPO, 2014
SamoaPresent Invasive Pearson and Grisoni, 2002; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
TongaPresent Invasive Pearson and Grisoni, 2002; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
TuvaluPresent Invasive Pearson and Grisoni, 2002; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014
Wallis and Futuna IslandsPresent Invasive Pearson and Grisoni, 2002; CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014

Risk of Introduction

Top of page

Great care should be taken to prevent the dissemination of BBTV to areas where it does not occur. The Americas are free of the disease, but the aphid vector, Pentalonia nigronervosa, is present and the disease would be expected to cause very serious problems if it appeared in smallholdings in the Caribbean and Central or South America. No movement should occur other than by tissue culture plantlets certified as free of BBTV because BBTV transmission has been demonstrated in micropropagated cultures (Drew et al., 1989).

Infected tissue culture plantlets were indistinguishable from uninfected control plantlets in culture (Drew et al., 1992). When plantlets were deflasked after 12 months in culture (as proliferating tissue) and allowed to grow, all plants developed severe symptoms within 1 month and all had died by 4 months. After 16 months in culture, 75% of plantlets showed symptoms, although it took up to 6 months for all plants to develop symptoms. The other 25% grew normally and appeared healthy (Drew et al., 1992). They were later tested for BBTV with negative results.

Helliot et al. (2001) achieved 97-100% eradication of BBTV using meristems from in vivo or in vitro cultured plants. Proliferating tissue cultures initiated from meristems from BBTV-infected plants were also shown to produce virus-free plants (Helliot et al., 2001; DR Jones, Montpellier, France, unpublished, 1995) but it would be advisable to test all germplasm from BBTV-affected areas before meristems are taken to initiate cultures. BBTV has been eliminated from Lakatan (AAA) by heat-treating shoot-tip cultures for extended periods (Ramos and Zamora, 1990). Subsequently, it was reported that the uneven distribution and low concentration of BBTV after exposure of proliferating tissue cultures to heat leads to BBTV-free primordial cells, which in turn develop into healthy plants (Wu and Su, 1991).


Hosts/Species Affected

Top of page

In the Musaceae, BBTV is known to infect a range of Musa species, cultivars in the Eumusa (derived mainly from M. acuminata and M. acuminata x M. balbisiana) and Australimusa (derived mainly from M. maclayi, M. lolodensis and M. peekelii) series of edible banana and Ensete ventricosum (enset). Susceptible Musa species include M. balbisiana (Magee, 1948; Espino et al., 1993), M. acuminata ssp. banksii, M. textilis (abacá) (Magee, 1927), M. velutina (Thomas and Dietzgen, 1991), M. uranoscopos, M. jackeyi, M. ornata and M. acuminata ssp. zebrina (ADW Geering and JE Thomas, Brisbane, personal communication, 1998).

To date, there are no confirmed reports of immunity to BBTV in any Musa species or cultivar. However, differences in susceptibility between cultivars subject to either experimental or field infection have frequently been noted (Magee, 1948; Muharam, 1984; Espino et al., 1993; Ngatat et al., 2017).

Espino et al. (1993) evaluated a total of 57 banana cultivars for their reaction to bunchy top, both by experimental inoculation and field observations. All cultivars in the AA and AAA genomic groups were highly susceptible. However, low levels of infection (as assessed by symptom expression) or total absence of symptoms following aphid inoculation was noted in some cultivars containing the B genome. These included 'Radja' (AAB, syn. 'Pisang Raja' - 12.5% of inoculated plants with symptoms), 'Bungaoisan' (AAB, Plantain subgroup - 0%), 'Pelipia' (ABB, syn. Pelipita' - 10%), 'Pundol' (ABB - 0%), 'Katali' (ABB, syn. 'Pisang Awak' - 0%), 'Abuhon' (ABB - 0%) and 'Turangkog' (ABB - 0%).

These cultivars were not back-indexed by aphid transmission to a susceptible banana cultivar or tested biochemically (for example, by ELISA), so the presence of symptomless infection cannot be ruled out. Also, greater numbers of aphids than the 15 used here may have resulted in infection. Cultivars 'Abuhon' and 'Bungaoisan' are susceptible to BBTV by experimental aphid inoculation (ADW Geering and JE Thomas, Brisbane, personal communication, 1998). Nevertheless, it appears that real differences exist in cultivar reaction to bunchy top and the time taken before symptoms are expressed.

Evaluation of 16 Musa genotypes in Cameroon comprising plantain landraces, Cavendish bananas and synthetic hybrids revealed a high level of tolerance to BBTV in Gros Michel (AAA, Cavendish sub-group) and Fougamou (ABB cooking banana) (Ngatat et al., 2017). In another study of 40 Musa genotypes in Burundi, 8 genotypes (Musa balbisiana type Tani (BB), Kayinja (ABB), FHIA-03 (AABB), Prata (AAB), Gisandugu (ABB), Pisang Awak (ABB), Saba (ABB) and Highgate (AAA, Gros Michel subgroup)) were found to be asymptomatic, although Pisang Awak, Saba and Highgate tested positive to virus indicating tolerance to BBTV in some genotpyes (Niyongere et al., 2011).

Cultivars within the Cavendish subgroup form the basis of the international banana export trade and are generally highly susceptible to bunchy top. However, it appears that not all cultivars with an AAA genome are similarly susceptible. 'Gros Michel' exhibits resistance to the disease under both experimental inoculation and field conditions and Magee (1948) considered that the introduction of this cultivar to Fiji in the early 1900s contributed to partial rehabilitation of the bunchy top-devastated industry. Compared to 'Williams' (AAA, Cavendish subgroup), the concentration of virions of BBTV in infected plants of 'Gros Michel' and the proportion of plants infected by aphid inoculation is lower. Symptoms are also slower to develop and are less severe (Ngatat et al., 2017; ADW Geering and JE Thomas, Brisbane, Australia, unpublished, 1997). These factors may contribute to a reduced rate of aphid transmission and field spread in plantations of 'Gros Michel' (Ngatat et al., 2017).

There is no evidence for hosts outside the Musaceae, though reports have been conflicting. Su et al. (1993) obtained positive ELISA reactions from BBTV-inoculated Canna indica and Hedychium coronarium, and recovery of the virus to banana, though not reported here, was demonstrated (HJ Su, Taipei, personal communication, 1996). Ram and Summanwar (1984) reported Colocasia esculenta as a host of BBTV. However, Hu et al. (1996) were unable to demonstrate C. esculenta or Alpinia purpurata as experimental (E) or natural (N) hosts of BBTV in Hawaii. Geering and Thomas (1996) also found no evidence for the following species as hosts of BBTV in Australia: Strelitzia sp. (N), C. indica (E, N), C. x generalis (N), C. x orchiodes (N), H. coronarium (E), Helocania psittacorum (E), Alpinia coerulea (E, N), A. arundinelliana (E), A. zerumbet (E), Alocasia brisbaensis (E, N) or C. esculenta (E, N). Magee (1927) was unable to infect Strelitzia sp., Ravenala sp., Canna sp. (including C. edulis), Solanum tuberosum and Zea mays. Since the advent of improved and reliable diagnostics for BBTV, searches for alternative hosts outside the Musaceae, including those earlier suspects, have turned out to be negative.

Primary hosts are banana cultivars derived from M. acuminata and M. acuminata x M. balbisiana, and Musa textilis (abacá).

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

Top of page
Plant nameFamilyContext
Musa (banana)MusaceaeMain
Musa acuminata (wild banana)MusaceaeMain
Musa textilis (manila hemp)MusaceaeMain
Musa x paradisiaca (plantain)MusaceaeMain

Growth Stages

Top of page Flowering stage, Fruiting stage, Vegetative growing stage


Top of page

The typical symptoms of bunchy top of banana are very distinctive and readily distinguished from those caused by other viruses of banana. Plants can become infected at any stage of growth and there are some initial differences between the symptoms produced in aphid-infected plants and those grown from infected planting material.

In aphid-inoculated plants, symptoms usually appear in the second leaf to emerge after inoculation and consist of a few dark-green streaks or dots on the minor veins on the lower portion of the lamina. The streaks form 'hooks' as they enter the midrib and are best seen from the underside of the leaf in transmitted light. The 'dot-dash' symptoms can sometimes also be seen on the petiole. The following leaf may display whitish streaks along the secondary veins when it is still rolled. These streaks become dark green as the leaf unfurls. Successive leaves become smaller, both in length and in width of the lamina, and often have chlorotic, upturned margins. The leaves become dry and brittle and stand more erect than normal giving the plant a rosetted and 'bunchy top' appearance.

Suckers from an infected stool can show severe symptoms in the first leaf to emerge. The leaves are rosetted and small with very chlorotic margins that tend to turn necrotic. Dark-green streaks are usually evident in the leaves.

Infected plants rarely produce a fruit bunch after infection and do not fruit in subsequent years. Plants infected late in the growing cycle may fruit once, but the bunch stalk and the fruit will be small and distorted. On plants infected very late, the only symptoms present may be a few dark green streaks on the tips of the flower bracts (Thomas et al., 1994).

Mild strains of BBTV, which induce only limited vein clearing and dark-green flecks, and symptomless strains have been reported in Cavendish plants from Taiwan (Su et al., 1993). Mild disease symptoms are expressed in some banana cultivars and Musa species. The dark-green leaf and petiole streaks, so diagnostic and characteristic of infection of cultivars in the Cavendish subgroup, can be rare or absent (Magee, 1953). Some plants of 'Veimama' (AAA, Cavendish subgroup), after initial severe symptoms, have been observed to recover and to display few if any symptoms.

List of Symptoms/Signs

Top of page
SignLife StagesType
Fruit / abnormal shape
Inflorescence / lesions; flecking; streaks (not Poaceae)
Leaves / abnormal colours
Leaves / abnormal forms
Whole plant / distortion; rosetting
Whole plant / dwarfing

Biology and Ecology

Top of page

BBTV is transmitted by an aphid vector (Pentalonia nigronervosa) and is disseminated in vegetative planting material, but is not transmitted by mechanical inoculation (Magee, 1927).

Distribution and Movement within the Plant

Magee (1927) showed that banana bunchy top was systemic. Following aphid inoculation, symptoms generally do not appear until a further two or more leaves have been produced (Magee, 1927). This period can vary between 19 days in summer to 125 days in winter (Allen, 1978a). The virus can only be acquired by aphids from the first symptom leaf or those formed subsequently (Magee, 1940). Suckers produced on an infected stool generally develop severe symptoms before reaching maturity (Magee, 1927). The emergence of virus-free suckers from an infected stool due to incomplete virus systemicity in the corm has been reported (Djailo et al., 2016) but was found to be temporary with the virus later invaded apparently healthy parts of the corm and stool.

Magee (1939) also concluded that the virus was restricted to the phloem tissue. Microscopic examination revealed hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the phloem tissue and a reduction in the development of the fibrous sclerenchyma sheaths surrounding the vascular bundles. The cells surrounding the phloem contained abnormally large numbers of chloroplasts giving rise to the macroscopic dark-green streak symptom.

Subsequent investigation using RNA probes and PCR (Hafner et al., 1995) has demonstrated that BBTV replicates for a short period at the site of aphid inoculation, then moves down the pseudostem to the basal meristem, then finally to the corm, roots and newly formed leaves. Trace levels of virus were eventually detected by PCR in leaves formed prior to inoculation, but replication was not demonstrated. This latter observation is consistent with the inability to transmit the virus by aphids from such leaves (Magee, 1940) and with the sequential development of single, new leaves from the basal meristem.

BBTV has been detected by ELISA and/or PCR in most parts of the plant, including leaf lamina and midrib, pseudostem, corm, meristematic tissues, roots, fruit stalk and fruit rind (Thomas, 1991; Wu and Su, 1992; Hafner et al., 1995; Hooks et al., 2009b; Peng et al., 2012).

Vegetative Propagation

BBTV is efficiently disseminated in conventional planting material including corms, bits and suckers. All suckers from an infected stool will eventually become infected (Djailo et al., 2016). Magee (1927) demonstrated 100% transmission of bunchy top through new 'eyes' (meristematic growing points) even in a plant that had only been expressing symptoms for 2-3 weeks.

BBTV is also transmitted in micropropagated banana plants (Drew et al., 1989; Ramos and Zamora, 1990; Wu and Su, 1991) though not always at rates of 100%. From time to time, apparently virus-free meristems producing apparently virus-free plants can arise from an infected clone (Thomas et al., 1995; Djailo et al., 2016).

In Pakistan in the early 1990s, much of the available planting material of 'Basrai' (AAA, Cavendish subgroup) was infected with BBTV. Plantations established from infected suckers and corms were completely unproductive.

Epidemiology of Banana Bunchy Top

The epidemiology of banana bunchy top in Australia, as well as in sub-Saharan Africa, is simplified by the presence of a single susceptible host and a single vector species (P. nigronervosa). Dissemination over long distances is by infected planting material and it is by this means that new plantings in isolated areas usually become infected. Spread over short distances from these infection foci is by the banana aphid (Kumar et al., 2011).

In studies of outbreaks of bunchy top in commercial banana plantations, Allen (1978b, 1987) showed that the average distance of secondary spread of the disease by aphids was only 15.5-17.2 m. Nearly two-thirds of new infections were within 20 m of the nearest source of infection and 99% were within 86 m. Allen and Barnier (1977) showed that if a new plantation was located adjacent to a diseased plantation, the chance of spread of bunchy top into the new plantation within the first 12 months was 88%. This chance was reduced to 27% if the plantations were separated by 50-1000 m, and to less than 5% if they were 1000 m apart. On average, the interval between infection of a plant and movement of aphids from this plant to initiate new infections elsewhere (the disease latent period) was equivalent to the time taken for 3.7 new leaves to emerge. The rate of leaf emergence varied seasonally with a maximum in summer (Allen, 1987). On the basis of these studies, a computer program has been developed which simulates epidemics of bunchy top (RN Allen, Brisbane, 1994, personal communication). This program, which is commercially available, allows epidemiological factors to be varied and their effect on the progess of the epidemic and disease control to be monitored.

In the Philippines, Opina and Milloren (1996) also demonstrated that most new infections were adjacent to or in close proximity to primary sources of infection. In Malawi, the spread of BBTV within the country was attributed to human movement of planting material and cultural practices (Kumar et al., 2011). Inadvertent multiplication and distribution of infected planting material by government and non-governmental programmes and the movement of infected suckers by migrant workers and refugees are thought to be the major factor for the spread of BBTV in sub-Saharan Africa (Kumar et al., 2011; Mukwa et al., 2014).  

Means of Movement and Dispersal

Top of page

Aphid Transmission

In Australia, the banana aphid (Pentalonia nigronervosa) was considered to have a role in the etiology of banana bunchy top (Darnell-Smith, 1924) and in 1925 was conclusively demonstrated to be the vector (Magee, 1927). Banana aphids have a worldwide distribution with a host range that includes Musa textilis and other species in the Musaceae. Species in several closely related plant families including the Araceae (Alocasia sp., Caladium spp., Dieffenbachia spp., Xanthosoma sp.), Cannaceae (Canna spp.), Heliconiaceae (Heliconia spp.), Strelitzeaceae (Strelitzia spp.) and Zingiberaceae (Alpinia spp., Costus sp., Hedychium spp.) are also colonized (Wardlaw, 1961; RN Allen, Brisbane, Australia, personal communication, 1996). However, a degree of host preference is displayed and some difficulty can be experienced transferring them between host species. Recently, mitochondrial COI sequence based analysis identified lineages on most of the non-Musa hosts as Pentalonia caladii (Foottit et al., 2010), a recently proposed species, and P. nigronervosa was dominant on Musa. A recent population genetics study of Pentalonia aphids using mitochondrial COI or microsatellite markers found that P. nigronervosa and P. caladii include distinct genotypes, demonstrating the occurrence of intraspecific genetic variation in populations in Hawaii, India and also in Nigeria (Galambao, 2011; Savory and Ramakrishnan 2015; PL Kumar, IITA, Nigeria, unpublished data). Aphids were found more frequently near the base of plants, followed by the newest unfurled leaf at the top of the plant. Aphids were least likely to be located on leaves in between the top and bottom of the plant (Robson et al., 2006). Aphid numbers decrease during periods of drought (Wardlaw, 1961).

Transmission of BBTV is of the persistent, circulative, non-propagative type (Anhalt and Almeida, 2008). The transmission parameters reported from Hawaii (Hu et al., 1996) and Australia (Magee, 1927), respectively, are: minimum acquisition access period 4 h/17 h; minimum inoculation access period 15 min/30 min-2 h; retention of infectivity after removal from virus source 13 days/20 days; a latent period of 20-28 h for virus transmission was detected. Similar parameters have also been reported by Thiribhuvanamala et al. (2001) from India and Ngatat et al. (2017) from Cameroon. No evidence was found for transmission of BBTV to the parthenogenetic offspring (Magee, 1940; Hu et al., 1996) or for multiplication of BBTV in the aphid vector (Hafner et al., 1995; Watanabe et al., 2013).

Transmission efficiency for individual aphids has been reported as ranging from 46 to 67% (Magee, 1927; Wu and Su., 1990a; Hu et al., 1996) and the virus is more efficiently acquired by nymphs than by adults (Magee, 1940).

Colonies of P. nigrHooks et al., onervosa from Australia (where bunchy top occurs) and from Reunion Island (where bunchy top does not occur) both transmitted each of six isolates of BBTV with similar efficiency (ML Iskra-Caruana, Montpellier, personal communication, 1994).

Banana plants treated with systemic herbicide can serve as source for virus acquisition for up to 6 weeks after treatment (Hooks et al., 2009a).

Plant Trade

Top of page
Plant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transportPest stagesBorne internallyBorne externallyVisibility of pest or symptoms
Bulbs/Tubers/Corms/Rhizomes Yes Pest or symptoms usually invisible
Flowers/Inflorescences/Cones/Calyx Yes Pest or symptoms usually invisible
Fruits (inc. pods) Yes Pest or symptoms usually invisible
Leaves Yes Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye
Roots Yes Pest or symptoms usually invisible
Seedlings/Micropropagated plants Yes Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye
Stems (above ground)/Shoots/Trunks/Branches Yes Pest or symptoms usually invisible
Plant parts not known to carry the pest in trade/transport
Growing medium accompanying plants
True seeds (inc. grain)

Wood Packaging

Top of page
Wood Packaging not known to carry the pest in trade/transport
Loose wood packing material
Processed or treated wood
Solid wood packing material with bark
Solid wood packing material without bark

Vectors and Intermediate Hosts

Top of page
Pentalonia nigronervosaInsect

Impact Summary

Top of page
Animal/plant collections None
Animal/plant products None
Biodiversity (generally) Negative
Crop production Negative
Environment (generally) None
Fisheries / aquaculture None
Forestry production None
Human health None
Livestock production None
Native fauna None
Native flora None
Rare/protected species None
Tourism None
Trade/international relations Negative
Transport/travel None

Economic Impact

Top of page

BBTV is the most serious virus disease of bananas and plantains. Devastating epidemics occurred in Fiji at the turn of the century and in Australia in the 1920s. The economic effect in northern New South Wales was dramatic. Between 1922 and 1926, about 90% of the area under bananas had gone out of production, despite a rapid expansion of the industry to compensate for abandoned farms. In the Currumbin district in southern Queensland, the number of plantations fell from 100 to 4 between 1922 and 1925, and production plummeted by over 95% (Dale, 1987). In recent years, bunchy top disease has been decimating the banana industry in Pakistan. In the early 1990s, statistics revealed that the area under banana cultivation in Sindh province fell by 55% in 1 year (Jones, 1994). BBTV is a major constraint to production in many areas where it occurs. In sub-Saharan Africa, BBTV was the main contributor to a reduction in banana bunch production by up to 70-90% in disease affected areas (Kumar et al., 2015). Precise estimates of losses due to BBTV are not known. However, Cook et al. (2012) estimated that implementation of BBTV exclusion measures prevented Aus$15.9-27.0 million in annual losses for the banana industry in Australia. This study suggests significant economic benefit in controlling BBTV.


Top of page

Prior to 1990, the only assays available for banana bunchy top were visual assessment of symptoms and aphid transmission to a sensitive banana cultivar. Subsequently, both serological and nucleic acid-based assays have become available.

Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies are now routinely used in ELISA to detect BBTV in field and tissue culture plants and can detect the virus in single viruliferous aphids (Wu and Su, 1990b; Dietzgen and Thomas, 1991; Thomas and Dietzgen, 1991; Thomas et al., 1995). Triple antibody sandwich-ELISA was found to be the optimum assay format for routine virus indexing (Geering and Thomas, 1996). Double antibody sandwich (DAS)-ELISA has also been used to successfully detect BBTV (Prakash et al., 2010). All isolates tested from Africa, Australia, Asia and the Pacific region are serologically related (Thomas, 1991).

A variety of nucleic acid-based assays have been applied to the detection of BBTV in plant tissue and viruliferous aphids, including DNA and RNA probes, labelled either non-radioactively or with 32P (Hafner et al., 1995; Xie and Hu, 1995). PCR has proved to be about one thousand times more sensitive than ELISA or dot blots with DNA probes (Xie and Hu, 1995; Zhou and Zheng, 2001; Manickam et al., 2002). Substances in banana sap inhibitory to PCR can be circumvented by simple extraction procedures (Thomson and Dietzgen, 1995) or by immunocapture PCR (Anceau, 1996; M Sharman, JE Thomas and RG Dietzgen, Brisbane, Australia, personal communication, 1997).

More recently, isothermal assays such as Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) (Peng et al., 2012) and Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) (Kapoor et al., 2017) assays have been developed for BBTV detection.

Detection and Inspection

Top of page The presence of 'dot-dash' symptoms on leaves almost certainly indicates that a plant is infected with BBTV. The rosetted appearance of leaves which are progressively shorter, narrower and more upright is noticeable at a distance. Yellowing of the leaf margins is also indicative, though this can be caused by other problems.

Prevention and Control

Top of page

Regulatory Control

BBTV has not been eradicated from any country where it occurs, but it is believed to have been eliminated from certain banana-growing districts in Australia. Here, the disease is kept in check by strict State Government legislation which controls the source and movement of planting material, controls the issue of planting permits and requires the destruction of feral plants and all plants with symptoms. Banana inspectors are also employed to police these regulations and locate diseased and feral plants. An ambitious programme of eradication is on-going which is based on replacing plantations where the disease regularly occurs, with BBTV-tested, tissue-cultured, planting material (Thomas et al., 1994). Another initiative to control the spread of BBTV in Africa, named ALLIANCE for BBTV control in Africa, aims to contain the spread of BBTV from disease-affected areas to new regions through quarantine regulations and the recovery of banana production by eradication of infected stools and replanting with health planting material (Kumar et al., 2016;

Host-Plant Resistance

When little work had been undertaken on testing germplasm for resistance, it was thought that all cultivars were susceptible, although some may take longer to develop symptoms and others may escape infection because of aphid preferences or host morphological factors. However, work in Australia suggested that Musa coccinea, a wild species, and the cultivar Kluai Teparot (ABBB/ABB) may have physiological resistance (J Thomas, QDPI, Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia, personal communication, 1995). Several studies have since been undertaken to evaluate Musa genotypes for BBTV resistance and found genotypes with tolerance (no symptoms and near normal performance of virus infected plants (e.g. Gros Michel), delayed expression of symptoms (e.g. Dwarf Apple, also known as Santa Catarina) and difficult to infect (e.g. Fugamou) (Espino et al., 1993; Hooks et al., 2009b; Niyongere et al. 2011; Ngatat et al., 2017).

Cultural Control

Banana bunchy top disease can be effectively controlled by the eradication of diseased plants and the use of virus-tested planting material. Before destruction, diseased plants should first be sprayed with power kerosene or insecticide to kill all viruliferous aphids. The whole stool, including corm and all associated suckers, must then be destroyed by uprooting and chopping into small pieces or by herbicide treatment, as the virus will ultimately spread to all parts of the mat. Control must be practised across the whole production area to avoid the rapid re-infection of virus-tested planting material (Thomas et al., 1994; Kumar et al., 2016).

Chemical Control

Aphicides have been used in some countries to control populations of Pentalonia nigronervosa, the aphid vector of bunchy top, and a decrease in disease incidence has been reported. In Tonga, Aphidius colemani, a parasitic wasp, has been released in an attempt at biological control of the aphid vector, but its effects on disease incidence have been disappointing.


Top of page

Adegbola RO, Ayodeji O, Awosusi OO, Atiri GI, Kumar PL, 2013. First report of Banana bunchy top virus in banana and plantain (Musa spp.) in Nigeria. Plant Disease, 97(2):290.

Allen RN, 1978. Epidemiological factors influencing the success of roguing for the control of bunchy top disease of bananas in New South Wales. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 29(3):535-544

Allen RN, 1978. Spread of bunchy top disease in established banana plantations. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 29(6):1223-1233

Allen RN, 1987. Further studies on epidemiological factors influencing control of banana bunchy top disease and evaluation of control measures by computer simulation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 38(2):373-382

Allen RN, Barnier NC, 1977. The spread of bunchy top disease between banana plantations in the Tweed River District during 1975-76. NSW Department of Agriculture, Biology Branch Plant Disease Survey (1975-76), 27-28.

Almeida, R. P. P., Bennett, G. M., Anhalt, M. D., Tsai, C. W., O'Grady, P., 2009. Spread of an introduced vector-borne banana virus in Hawaii., Molecular Ecology, 18(1):136-146

Amrita Banerjee, Somnath Roy, Behere GT, Roy SS, Dutta SK, Ngachan SV, 2014. Identification and characterization of a distinct banana bunchy top virus isolate of Pacific-Indian Oceans group from North-East India. Virus Research, 183:41-49.

Anceau C, 1996. Identification and characterisation of viruses associated to the syndrome of banana bunchy top disease (BBTD). Final Scientific Report, March 1993 to February 1996. Gembloux, Belgium: FacultT Universitaire des Sciences Agronomiques de Gembloux.

Anhalt, M. D., Almeida, R. P. P., 2008. Effect of temperature, vector life stage, and plant access period on transmission of Banana bunchy top virus to banana., Phytopathology, 98(6):743-748

APPPC, 1987. Insect pests of economic significance affecting major crops of the countries in Asia and the Pacific region. Technical Document No. 135. Bangkok, Thailand: Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific region (RAPA).

Bananej K, Ghotbi T, Vahdat A, 2007. First report of Banana bunchy top virus infecting banana in Iran. Plant Pathology, 56(4):719.

Beetham PR, Hafner GJ, Harding RM, Dale JL, 1997. Two mRNAs are transcribed from banana bunchy top virus DNA-1. Journal of General Virology, 78(1):229-236; 33 ref.

Blomme, G., Ploetz, R., Jones, D., Langhe, E. de, Price, N., Gold, C., Geering, A., Viljoen, A., Karamura, D., Pillay, M., Tinzaara, W., Teycheney, P. Y., Lepoint, P., Karamura, E., Buddenhagen, I., 2013. A historical overview of the appearance and spread of Musa pests and pathogens on the African continent: highlighting the importance of clean Musa planting materials and quarantine measures., Annals of Applied Biology, 162(1):4-26

Bryce G, 1921. The bunchy top plantain disease. Leaflet 18. Ceylon: Department of Agriculture, 2 pp.

Buddenhagen IW, 1968. Banana diseases in the Pacific area. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin, 16: 17-31.

Burns TM, Harding RM, Dale JL, 1995. The genome organization of banana bunchy top virus: analysis of six ssDNA components. Journal of General Virology, 76(6):1471-1482

CABI/EPPO, 2001. Banana bunchy top virus. Distribution Maps of Plant Diseases, No. 19, edition 5. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.

CABI/EPPO, 2013. Banana bunchy top virus. [Distribution map]. Distribution Maps of Plant Diseases, No.October. Wallingford, UK: CABI, Map 19 (Edition 6).

Castillo BS, Martinez AL, 1961. Occurrence of bunchy top disease of banana in the Philippines. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin, 9: 74-75.

CMI, 1977. Banana bunchy top virus. Distribution Maps of Plant Diseases, Map No. 19, Edition 4. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.

Cook, D. C., Liu Shuang, Edwards, J., Villalta, O. N., Aurambout, J. P., Kriticos, D. J., Drenth, A., Barro, P. J. de, 2012. Predicting the benefits of banana bunchy top virus exclusion from commercial plantations in Australia., PLoS ONE, 7(8):e42391

Dale JL, 1987. Banana bunchy top: an economically important tropical plant virus disease. Advances in Virus Research, 33:301-325.

Dale JL, Phillips DA, Parry JN, 1986. Double-stranded RNA in banana plants with bunchy top disease. Journal of General Virology, 67: 371-375.

Darnell-Smith GP, 1924. "Bunchy top" disease in banana. Queensland Agricultural Journal, 2: 169-179.

Diekmann M, Putter CAJ, 1996. FAO/IPGRI technical guidelines for the safe movement of germplasm No. 15: Musa spp. FAO/IPGRI technical guidelines for the safe movement of germplasm No. 15: ^italic~Musa^roman~ spp., 26 pp.; many ref.

Dietzgen RG, Thomas JE, 1991. Properties of virus-like particles associated with banana bunchy top disease in Hawaii, Indonesia and Tonga. Australasian Plant Pathology, 20(4):161-165

Djailo, B. D., Lokana, J., Ngama, F., Nkosi, B. I., Blomme, G., 2016. Systemicity of banana bunchy top viral infection in the Kisangani region of the Democratic Republic of Congo., African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(7):527-532

Drew RA, Moisander JA, Smith MK, 1989. The transmission of banana bunchy top virus in micropropagated plants. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 16:187-193.

Drew RA, Smith MK, Anderson DW, 1992. Field evaluation of micropropagated bananas derived from plants containing banana bunchy-top virus. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 28(2):203-205

EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization.

Espino, R. C., Magnaye, L. V., Johns, A. P., Juanillo, C., 1993. Evaluation of Philippine banana cultivars for resistance to bunchy-top and fusarium wilt. In: Valmayor, R.V., Hwang, S.C., Ploetz, R., Lee, S.C., Roa, N.V., eds. Proceedings: International Symposium on Recent Developments in Banana Cultivation Technology, 14-18 December 1992, Chiuju, Pingtung, Taiwan. Taiwan Banana Research Institute, INIBAP/ASPNET, Los Banos, Philippines, pp. 89-102.

Feng TuanCheng, Wang JianHua, Liu ZhiXin, 2010. Cloning and sequencing of genome of Banana bunchy top virus Haikou isolate. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 40(1):40-50.

Foottit, R. G., Maw, H. E. L., Pike, K. S., Miller, R. H., 2010. The identity of Pentalonia nigronervosa Coquerel and P. caladii van der Goot (Hemiptera: Aphididae) based on molecular and morphometric analysis., Zootaxa, 2358:25-38

Fouré E, Manser PD, 1982. Note sur l'apparition au Gabon d'une grave maladie virale des bananiers et plantains: le bunchy top. Fruits (Paris), 37:409-414.

Gadd CH, 1926. Bunchy top disease of plantains (a review). Tropical Agriculturist, 66: 3-20.

Galambao, M. B., 2011. The population genetics of Pentalonia nigronervosa and P. caladii (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Hawaii Master of Science, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, pp. 59.

Geering ADW, Thomas JE, 1996. A comparison of four serological tests for the detection of banana bunchy top virus in banana. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 47(3):403-412; 23 ref.

Gondwe WT, Mwenebanda BML, Natha E, Mutale P, 2007. Banana bunchy top disease in Mozambique and Zambia. Infomusa, 16(1/2):38-39.

Govindaswamy CV, Padmanaban P, Alagianagalingam MN, 1977. Studies on bunchy top disease of banana. Madras Agricultural Journal, 64(3):205-206

Hafner GJ, Harding RM, Dale JL, 1995. Movement and transmission of banana bunchy top virus DNA component one in bananas. Journal of General Virology, 76(9):2279-2285; 33 ref.

Hafner GJ, Harding RM, Dale JL, 1997. A DNA primer associated with banana bunchy top virus. Journal of General Virology, 78(2):479-486; 36 ref.

Hafner GJ, Stafford MR, Wolter LC, Harding RM, Dale JL, 1997. Nicking and joining activity of banana bunchy top virus replication protein in vitro. Journal of General Virology, 78(7):1795-1799; 24 ref.

Harding RM, Burns TM, Dale JL, 1991. Virus-like particles associated with banana bunchy top disease contain small single-stranded DNA. Journal of General Virology, 72(2):225-230

Harding RM, Burns TM, Hafner G, Dietzgen RG, Dale JL, 1993. Nucleotide sequence of one component of the banana bunchy top virus genome contains a putative replicase gene. Journal of General Virology, 74(3):323-328

He ZF, Li HP, Xiao HG, Fan HZ, 2001. Biological characteristics of banana bunchy top virus strains. Acta Phytopathologia Sinica, 31(1):50-55.

Helliot, B., Panis, B., Locicero, A., Reyniers, K., Muylle, H., Vandewalle, M., Michel, C., Swennens, R., Lepoivre, P., 2001. Development of in vitro techniques for elimination of virus diseases from Musa., Acta Horticulturae:535-538

Hooks, C. R. R., Fukuda, S., Perez, E. A., Roshan Manandhar, Wang KoonHui, Wright, M. G., Almeida, R. P. P., 2009. Aphid transmission of banana bunchy top virus to bananas after treatment with a bananacide., Journal of Economic Entomology, 102(2):493-499

Hooks, C. R. R., Manandhar, R., Perez, E. P., Wang, K. H., Almeida, R. P. P., 2009. Comparative susceptibility of two banana cultivars to banana bunchy top virus under laboratory and field environments., Journal of Economic Entomology, 102(3):897-904

Horser CL, Harding RM, Dale JL, 2001a. Banana bunchy top nanovirus DNA-1 encodes the 'master' replication initiation protein. Journal of General Virology, 82(2):459-464; 24 ref.

Horser, C. L., Karan, M., Harding, R. M., Dale, J. L., 2001. Additional Rep-encoding DNAs associated with banana bunchy top virus., Archives of Virology, 146(1):71-86

Hu JerMing, Fu HuiChuan, Lin ChiaHua, Su HongJi, Yeh HsinHung, 2007. Reassortment and concerted evolution in Banana bunchy top virus genomes., Journal of Virology, 81(4):1746-1761

Hu JS, Wang M, Sether D, Xie W, Leonhardt KW, 1996. Use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to study transmission of banana bunchy top virus by the banana aphid (Pentalonia nigronervosa). Annals of Applied Biology, 128(1):55-64; 20 ref.

Hu JS, Xu MQ, Wu ZC, Wang M, 1993. Detection of banana bunchy top virus in Hawaii. Plant Disease, 77(9):952

IPPC, 2005. Disease of Crops. IPPC Official Pest Report. Rome, Italy: FAO.

IPPC, 2010. Occurrence of Banana Bunchy Top Disease on banana and plantain in Cameroon. IPPC Official Pest Report, No. CMR-01/1, No. CMR-01/1. Rome, Italy: FAO.

IPPC, 2017. Occurrence of Fall Arm Worm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in Mozambique. IPPC Official Pest Report, No. MOZ-06/1. Rome, Italy: FAO.

Javaria Qazi, 2016. Banana bunchy top virus and the bunchy top disease., Journal of General Plant Pathology, 82(1):2-11

Jones DR, 1994. Risks involved in the transfer of banana and plantain germplasm. In: Jones DR, ed. The Improvement and Testing of Musa: a Global Partnership. Proceedings of the First Global Conference of the International Musa Testing Program, FHIA, Honduras, 27-30 April 1994. Montpellier, France: INIBAP, 85-98.

Jooste AEC, Wessels N, Merwe Mvan der, 2016. First report of Banana bunchy top virus in banana (Musa spp.) from South Africa. Plant Disease, 100(6):1251-1252.

Kagy V, Thomas JE, Sharman M, Mademba-Sy F, 2001. First record of banana bunchy top disease in New Caledonia. Australasian Plant Pathology, 30(1):71; 3 ref.

Karan M, Harding RM, Dale JL, 1994. Evidence for two groups of banana bunchy top virus isolates. Journal of General Virology, 75(12):3541-3546

Kawano S, Su HJ, 1993. Occurrence of banana bunchy top virus in Okinawa. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan 59, 53.

Kenyon L, Brown M, Khonje P, 1997. First report of banana bunchy top virus in Malawi. Plant Disease, 81: 1096.

Khalid S, Soomro MH, Stover RH, 1993. First report of banana bunchy top virus in Pakistan. Plant Disease, 77(1):101

Khurana SMP, 1971. Occurrence of the banana aphid and its relation with banana bunchy top disease in Gorakphur (U.P.). Indian Journal of Horticulture, 28:167-168.

King, A., Lefkowitz, E., Adams, M. J., Carstens, E. B., 2011. Virus Taxonomy: Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. USA: Academic Press.

Kumar PL, Ayodele M, Oben TT, Mahungu NM, Beed F, Coyne D, Londa L, Mutunda MP, Kiala D, Maruthi MN, 2009. First report of Banana bunchy top virus in banana and plantain (Musa spp.) in Angola. Plant Pathology, 58(2):402.

Kumar, P. L., Hanna, R., Alabi, O. J., Soko, M. M., Oben, T. T., Vangu, G. H. P., Naidu, R. A., 2011. Banana bunchy top virus in sub-Saharan Africa: investigations on virus distribution and diversity., Virus Research, 159(2):171-182

Kumar, P. L., Selvarajan, R., Iskra-Caruana, M. L., Chabannes, M., Hanna, R., 2015. Biology, etiology, and control of virus diseases of banana and plantain., Advances in Virus Research, 91:229-269

Kumar, P. L., Staver, C., Hanna, R., Omondi, A., Iskra-Caruana, M. L., Onyeani, C., Ogunfunmilayo, O. O., Nyongere, C., Mobambo, P., Dheda, B., Soko, M. M., Tachin, M. M., Akinyemi, S., Adeime, M., Mvila, A., 2016. Recovering banana production in BBTD affected areas in sub-Saharan Africa: Strategies to reduce infection pressure prior to and after replanting In: Xth International Symposium of ProMusa: Agroecological Approaches to Promote Innovative Banana Production Systems. 10-14 October 2016, Agropolis International, Montpellier, France.

Lokossou B, Gnanvossou D, Ayodeji O, Akplogan F, Safiore A, Migan DZ, Pefoura AM, Hanna R, Kumar PL, 2012. Occurrence of Banana bunchy top virus in banana and plantain (Musa sp.) in Benin. New Disease Reports, 25:13.

Magee CJ, 1927. Investigation on the bunchy top disease of bananas. Bulletin of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research in Australia, 30:64.

Magee CJ, 1967. The control of banana bunchy top. Report to the Government of Western Samoa. South Pacific Commission Technical Paper, No. 150.

Magee CJP, 1939. Pathological changes in the phloem and neighbouring tissues of the banana (Musa Cavendishii Lamb.) caused by the bunchy-top virus. Science Bulletin of the Department of Agriculture, New South Wales, 67: 4-32.

Magee CJP, 1940. Transmission studies on the banana bunchy-top virus. The Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, 6: 109-110.

Magee CJP, 1948. Transmission of banana bunchy top to banana varieties. The Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, 14: 18-24.

Magee CJP, 1953. Some aspects of the bunchy top disease of banana and other Musa spp. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, 87: 3-18.

Magee CJP, 1954. Report on a plant virus disease survey in the Territory of Papua New Guinea. Part 1, Manila hemp. Agricultural Gazette of Papua New Guinea, 8 (4): 12-27.

Manickam K, Doraiswamy S, Ganapathy T, Rabindran R, 2002. Early detection of banana bunchy top virus in India using polymerase chain reaction. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica, 37(1-3):9-16.

Manser PD, 1982. Bunchy top disease of plantain. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin, 30(2):78-79

Muharam A, 1984. Test for resistance of some banana cultivars to banana bunchy-top disease. Bulletin of Penel. Hort., 11:16-19.

Mukwa, L. F. T., Muengula, M., Zinga, I., Kalonji, A., Iskra-Caruana, M. L., Bragard, C., 2014. Occurrence and distribution of Banana bunchy top virus related agro-ecosystem in South Western, Democratic Republic of Congo., American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5(5):647-658

Ngatat, S., Hanna, R., Kumar, P. L., Gray, S. M., Cilia, M., Ghogomu, R. T., Fontem, D. A., 2017. Relative susceptibility of Musa genotypes to banana bunchy top disease in Cameroon and implication for disease management., Crop Protection, 101:116-122

Niyongere, C., Ateka, E., Losenge, T., Blomme, G., Lepoint, P., 2011. Screening Musa genotypes for banana bunchy top disease resistance in Burundi., Acta Horticulturae:439-447

Oben, T. T., Hanna, R., Ngeve, J., Alabi, O. J., Naidu, R. A., Kumar, P. L., 2009. Occurrence of banana bunchy top disease caused by the Banana bunchy top virus on banana and plantain (Musa sp.) in Cameroon., Plant Disease, 93(10):1076

Ocfemia GO, Buhay GG, 1934. Bunchy top of abaca, or Manila hemp. II. Further studies on the transmission of the disease and a trial planting of abaca seedlings in a bunchy-top devastated field. Philippine Agriculturist, 22:267-280.

Oliveira MRVde, AMarinho VLde, Tenente RCV, Mendes MAS, Marques ASdos A, Batista Mde F, Gonzaga V, Urben AF, Fonseca JNL, 2002. Quarantine information and transit of plant propagation material. Documentos - Embrapa Soja, No.180:154-1.

Opina OS, Milloren HJL, 1996. Dynamics of banana bunchy top within commercial populations of banana (Musa sp.) cv Lakatan. Philippine Phytopathology, 32: 75-82.

Pearson MN, Grisoni M, 2002. Records of plant viruses for the Pacific Islands. Australasian Plant Pathology 31:15-26.

Peng Jun, Zhang JunFang, Xia ZiHao, Li YongQiang, Huang JunSheng, Fan ZaiFeng, 2012. Rapid and sensitive detection of Banana bunchy top virus by loop-mediated isothermal amplification., Journal of Virological Methods, 185(2):254-258

Pietersen G, Staples MS, Swart G, Korsten L, 1996. Non-confirmation of banana bunchy top virus in South Africa. African Plant Protection, 2(1):1-8; 19 ref.

Prakash DP, Ramakrishnappa K, Viswanath M, Sujatha NT, Nataraj SK, Swamy SG, 2010. Virus diagnosis in suckers and tissue cultures of banana. Acta Horticulturae [IV International Symposium on Acclimatization and Establishment of Micropropagated Plants, Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 8-12 December 2008.], No.865:241-246.

Ram RD, Summanwar AS, 1984. Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott. a reservoir of bunchy top disease of banana. Current Science, 53(3):145-146

Ramos CS, Zamora AB, 1990. Elimination of banana bunchy top infection from banana (Musa sp. cv. Lacatan) by heat pretreatment and meristem culture. Philippine Journal of Crop Science, 15(2):119-123

Reetika Kapoor, Nishant Srivastava, Shailender Kumar, Saritha, R. K., Sharma, S. K., Jain, R. K., Baranwal, V. K., 2017. Development of a recombinase polymerase amplification assay for the diagnosis of banana bunchy top virus in different banana cultivars., Archives of Virology, 162(9):2791-2796

Regenmortel MHVvan, Fauquet CM, Bishop DHL, Carstens EB, Estes MK, Lemon SM, Maniloff J, Mayo MA, McGeoch DJ, Pringle CR, Wickner RB, 2000. Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses. Seventh report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. xii + 1162 pp.; many ref.

Robson, J. D., Wright, M. G., Almeida, R. P. P., 2006. Within-plant distribution and binomial sampling of Pentalonia nigronervosa (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on banana., Journal of Economic Entomology, 99(6):2185-2190

Saverio, B., 1964. Banana cultivation in Eritrea and its problems. Milan, Italy: Edagricole. 56 pp.

Savory, F. R., Ramakrishnan, U., 2015. Cryptic diversity and habitat partitioning in an economically important aphid species complex., Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 30:230-237

Sebasigari K, Stover RH, 1988. Banana Diseases and Pests in East Africa. Report of a Survey in November 1987. Montpellier, France: INIBAP.

Selvarajan R, Sheeba MM, Balasubramanian V, Rajmohan R, Dhevi NL, Sasireka T, 2010. Molecular characterization of geographically different Banana bunchy top virus isolates in India. Indian Journal of Virology, 21(2):110-116.

Shanmuganathan N, 1980. Virus and virus-like diseases of plants in the Gilbert Islands. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin, 28(1):29-38

Sharma SR, 1988. Banana bunchy top virus. International Journal of Tropical Plant Diseases, 6(1):19-41

Sharman, M., Thomas, J. E., Skabo, S., Holton, T. A., 2008. Abacá bunchy top virus, a new member of the genus Babuvirus (family Nanoviridae)., Archives of Virology, 153(1):135-147

Simmonds NW, 1933. Report on visit to Samoa. Fiji: Department of Agriculture.

Stainton, D., Martin, D. P., Muhire, B. M., Lolohea, S., Halafihi, M., Lepoint, P., Blomme, G., Crew, K. S., Sharman, M., Kraberger, S., Dayaram, A., Walters, M., Collings, D. A., Mabvakure, B., Lemey, P., Harkins, G. W., Thomas, J. E., Varsani, A., 2015. The global distribution of Banana bunchy top virus reveals little evidence for frequent recent, human-mediated long distance dispersal events., Virus Evolution, 1(1):vev009

Stover RH, 1972. Banana, Plantain and Abaca Diseases. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 316 pp.

Su HJ, Wu RY, Tsao LY, 1993. Ecology of banana bunchy top virus disease. In: Valmayor RV, Hurang SC, Ploetz R, Lee SW, Roa NV, eds. Proceedings: International Symposium on Recent Developments in Banana Cultivation Technology, Chiuju, Pingtung, Taiwan, 14-18 December 1992. Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines: INIBAP-ASPNET, 308-312.

Sulyo Y, Muharam A, 1985. Present status of banana bunchy-top disease in Indonesia. Proceedings of the regional conference on plant quarantine support for agricultural development. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 10-12 December 1985 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia; ASEAN Plant Quarantine Centre and Training Institute, 297-299

Sun, S.K. , 1961. Studies on the bunchy top disease of bananas Spec. Publ. Coll. Agric. Taiwan Univ. 10:82-109.

Thiribhuvanamala G, Doraiswamy S, 2001. Survey for important virus diseases of banana. Madras Agricultural Journal, 88(1-3):148-149.

Thiribhuvanamala G, Doraiswamy S, Ganapathy T, Manickam K, 2001. Transmission studies of banana bunchy top virus. Madras Agricultural Journal, 88(10-12):738-739.

Thomas JE, 1991. Virus indexing procedures for banana in Australia. In: Banana Diseases in Asia and the Pacific, Proceedings of a Regional Technical Meeting on Diseases Affecting Banana and Plantain in Asia and the Pacific, 15-18 April 1991, Brisbane, Australia. Montpellier, France: INIBAP, 144-155.

Thomas JE, 1995. Musa Forum, News from Readers. INFOMUSA, 4(2):23.

Thomas JE, Iskra-Caruana ML, Jones DR, 1994. Banana bunchy top disease, Musa Disease Fact Sheet No. 4. Montpellier, France: INIBAP.

Thomas, J. E., Dietzgen, R. G., 1991. Purification, characterization and serological detection of virus-like particles associated with banana bunchy top disease in Australia., Journal of General Virology, 72(2):217-224

Thomas, J. E., Iskra-Caruana, M.-L., 1999. Bunchy top. In: Diseases of banana, abaca and enset. Jones, D. R. ed. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 241-253.

Thomas, J. E., Smith, M. K., Kessling, A. F., Hamill, S. D., 1995. Inconsistent transmission of banana bunchy top virus in micropropagated bananas and its implication for germplasm screening., Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 46(3):663-671

Thomson D, Dietzgen RG, 1995. Detection of DNA and RNA plant viruses by PCR and RT-PCR using a rapid virus release protocol without tissue homogenization. Journal of Virological Methods, 54(2/3):85-95

Vakili NG, 1969. Bunchy top disease of bananas in the Central Highlands of South Vietnam. Plant Disease Reporter, 53:634-638.

Wanitchakorn R, Hafner GJ, Harding RM, Dale JL, 2000. Functional analysis of proteins encoded by banana bunchy top virus DNA-4 to -6. Journal of General Virology, 81(1):299-306; 41 ref.

Wanitchakorn, R., Harding, R. M., Dale, J. L., 1997. Banana bunchy top virus DNA-3 encodes the viral coat protein., Archives of Virology, 142(8):1673-1680

Wardlaw CW, 1961. Banana Diseases including Plantains and Abaca. London, UK: Longmans, Green and Co. Ltd.

Watanabe, S., Greenwell, A. M., Bressan, A., 2013. Localization, concentration, and transmission efficiency of Banana bunchy top virus in four asexual lineages of Pentalonia aphids, Viruses, 5:758-775 doi:10.3390/v5020758

Wu RY, Su HJ, 1990. Production of monoclonal antibodies against banana bunchy top virus and their use in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Journal of Phytopathology, 128(3):203-208; 13 ref.

Wu RY, Su HJ, 1990. Purification and characterization of banana bunchy top virus. Journal of Phytopathology, 128(2):153-160

Wu RY, Su HJ, 1990. Transmission of banana bunchy top virus by aphids to banana plantlets from tissue culture. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 31(1):7-10

Wu RY, Su HJ, 1991. Regeneration of healthy banana plantlets from banana bunchy top virus-infected tissues cultured at high temperature. Plant Pathology, 40(1):4-7

Wu RY, Su HJ, 1992. Detection of banana bunchy top virus in diseased and symptomless banana plants with monoclonal antibody. Tropical Agriculture, 69(4):397-399

Wu RY, You LR, Soong TS, 1994. Nucleotide sequence of two circular single-stranded DNAs associated with banana bunchy top virus. Phytopathology, 84(9):952-958

Xie WS, Hu JS, 1995. Molecular cloning, sequence analysis, and detection of banana bunchy top virus in Hawaii. Phytopathology, 85(3):339-347

Yeh HH, Su HJ, Chao YC, 1994. Genome characterization and identification of viral-associated dsDNA component of banana bunchy top virus. Virology (New York), 198(2):645-652

Zhou LJ, Zheng WW, 2001. Detection of banana bunchy top virus (NNTV) by PCR. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 16(4):45-48.

Zhou Z, Xie L, 1992. Status of banana diseases in China. Fruits (Paris), 47(6):715-721; 27 ref.


Top of page

15/10/17 Review by:

Lava Kumar, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria.


Distribution Maps

Top of page
You can pan and zoom the map
Save map