Lepomis macrochirus (bluegill)
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat List
- Biology and Ecology
- Natural Food Sources
- Water Tolerances
- Natural enemies
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Economic Impact
- Environmental Impact
- Threatened Species
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- Links to Websites
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque, 1819
Preferred Common Name
Other Scientific Names
- Lepomis macrochira Rafinesque, 1819
International Common Names
- English: bluegill sunfish; sunfish
- Spanish: pez sol
Local Common Names
- Finland: isoaurinkoahven
- Germany: Blauer Sonnenbarsch
- Japan: burûgiru
Summary of InvasivenessTop of page
Lepomis macrochirus, commonly known as bluegill, is a freshwater teleost belonging to the sunfish family (Centrarchidae). It has been introduced outside of its native ranges of Mexico, USA and Canada and is known to be invasive in Japan, South Africa and some states of the USA. In these areas it can overcrowd and stunt the growth of other fish, including native sunfish species, by competing for food and habitat. It may even cause displacement and extinction of native fish. The invasion success of L. macrochirus in Lake Biwa in Japan is attributed to its drastic population growth shortly after its introduction, together with artificial transplantations (Kawamura et al., 2010). Bluegill are opportunistic feeders and can alter their diet according to food availability. They are also able to tolerate a wide range of environmental parameters such as temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen, giving them an advantage over many native fish (Welcomme, 1988; FAO, 1997).
L. macrochirusis not listed with a special status on either the IUCN red list or on the US Federal list and CITES (ADW, 2012).
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Metazoa
- Phylum: Chordata
- Subphylum: Vertebrata
- Class: Actinopterygii
- Order: Perciformes
- Suborder: Percoidei
- Family: Centrarchidae
- Genus: Lepomis
- Species: Lepomis macrochirus
Notes on Taxonomy and NomenclatureTop of page
Three subspecies of Lepomis macrochirus have been identified: Lepomis macrochirus macrochirus (north-central United States), Lepomis macrochirusspeciosus (Texas and northern Mexico), and Lepomis macrochiruspurpurascens (Atlantic and Gulf States) (Rintamaki, 1986).
DescriptionTop of page
Greek meaning of Lepomis is “scaled gill cover” and macrochirus, is “large hand”, perhaps in reference to the body shape (Pflieger, 1975). L. macrochirus has a laterally compressed deep body, (Ross, 2001) with a terminal oblique mouth (Sublette et al., 1990). Body depth is usually two to two and a half times in standard length (Hubbs et al., 1991). The sides of the head and chin are bluish in colouration and the back is olive-green to brown. The sides ventrally are blue-green to brown-orange in colour or may be pinkish in colour. The breast is yellow and it has a yellowish-white abdomen with olive green fins and often a black opercula flap (Sublette et al., 1990). L. macrochirus has a darkened spot on the posterior edge of the gills and the base of the dorsal fin and opercle is not margined with scarlet (Hubbs et al., 1991). The breast of the breeding male is copper-orange in colour and they have greenish or bluish metallic overtones on the head and body (Sublette et al., 1990).
L. macrochirus has long and pointed pectoral fins; lower fin rays are shorter than upper pectoral fin rays. It has an anteriorly arched upward lateral line, flexible opercle and gill rakers reaching at least to the base of the second below when depressed. The supramaxilla, when present, is shorter than the breath of the maxilla (Ross, 2001). As common for teleosts, L. macrochirus has ctenoid scales. It has less than 55 lateral line scales, three anal fin spines, 10-12 anal fin rays, 6-13 dorsal fin spines, 11-12 dorsal fin and rays and 12-13 pectoral rays (Hubbs et al., 1991). Females have a more distinguished and conspicuous genital papilla than the males (McComish, 1968). The intestine of L. macrochirus is well differentiated with pyloric caeca and a silvery peritoneum (Goldstein and Simon, 1999). This species does not usually have palatine teeth (Hubbs et al., 1991; Ross, 2001).
DistributionTop of page
L. macrochirus occurs naturally in the United States east of the Rocky Mountains (Hubbs et al., 1991) ranging from coastal Virginia to Florida, west to Texas and northern Mexico, and north from western Minnesota to western New York. Its native range includes Lake Champlain and the southern Ontario region through to the St. Lawrence-Great Lakes and Mississippi River basins from Quebec and New York to Minnesota and south to the Gulf, the Carolinas, Atlantic and Gulf Slope drainages from the Cape Fear River, Virginia, to the Rio Grande, Texas, New Mexico (Rintamaki, 1986; Page and Burr 1991; Fuller and Cannister, 2012), northern Mexico (Page and Burr 1991) and southeastern Canada (TPWD, 2012). In Texas this species is distributed statewide (Hubbs et al., 1991).
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
|Continent/Country/Region||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||Reference||Notes|
|Iran||Localised||Introduced||Coad, 1995||Established in Namak Lake basin|
|Japan||Widespread||Introduced||Invasive||Masuda et al., 1984||Occurs in central and southern Japan. Also recorded from Lake Biwa|
|Korea, Republic of||Localised||Introduced||Kim et al., 2005||Recorded from the Nakdong, Kum and Youngsan rivers|
|Philippines||Widespread||Introduced||Aquarium Science Association of the Philippines, ASAP||Established in swamps and highland rivers|
|Congo Democratic Republic||Present||Introduced||Welcomme, 1988|
|Kenya||Present, few occurrences||Not invasive||Seegers et al., 2003||Introduced into some dams, but also reported from Tana River system after introduction. The species apparently failed to establish viable populations in natural waters|
|Malawi||Present||Introduced||Not invasive||FAO-DIAS, 1997||Current status unknown, populations tend to stunt and die out, being then re-introduced from other dams. Earlier populations confined to estate dams in shire highlands|
|Mauritius||Localised||Introduced||Not invasive||Welcomme, 1988||The species is present in small numbers in ponds and reservoirs|
|Morocco||Localised||Introduced||Welcomme, 1988||Stocks established in Lake Roumi|
|South Africa||Widespread||Introduced||Invasive||Welcomme, 1988||Established in slow-flowing waters where it forms stunted dense populations|
|Zambia||Absent, formerly present||Introduced||Not invasive||Thys van den Audenaerde DFE, 1994||Introduced to Mkushi, Lake Chila (Mbala), Chipata and Kasama in Zambia. No survivors seen in 1992|
|Zimbabwe||Present||Introduced||Bell-Cross and Minshull, 1988|
|Canada||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-Ontario||Localised||Native||Coker et al., 2001|
|-Quebec||Localised||Native||Coker et al., 2001|
|Mexico||Present||Native||Contreras-Balderas and Escalante-C, 1984|
|USA||Widespread||Native||Robins et al., 1980|
|-Hawaii||Widespread||Introduced||Yamamoto, 1992||Introduced to Hawaii in 1946 in Chapman Pond, Kane'ohe, O'ahu and has since then been transplanted widely; can be found in reservoirs and ponds on Kaua'I, O'ahu, Maui and Hawaii|
Central America and Caribbean
|Cuba||Present||Introduced||Burgess and Franz, 1989|
|El Salvador||Present||Introduced||Welcomme, 1988|
|Puerto Rico||Widespread||Introduced||Martin and Patus, 1984||Established in reservoirs, farm ponds and a few rivers such as the La Plata at Aibonito to Comerío|
|United States Virgin Islands||Localised||Introduced||Not invasive||Ogden et al., 1975||Introduced to freshwater ponds|
|Brazil||Present||Not invasive||Welcomme, 1988|
|Venezuela||Present||Introduced||Welcomme, 1988||Known to be breeding in Laguna Potrerito|
History of Introduction and SpreadTop of page
The species has been widely introduced outside its native range due to intentional as well as unintentional introductions (Stuber and Gebhart, 1982), mainly through intentional stocking for sport fishing. The following narrative describes the areas of intentional stocking (Fuller and Cannister, 2012):
“Lepomis macrochirus have been stocked in Arkansas (Robison and Buchanan, 1988), Arizona (Minckley, 1973; Tyus et al., 1982; USFWS, 2005), California (Lampman, 1946; Moyle, 1976; Shapovalov et al., 1981; Smith, 1986; Taylor et al., 1982; Matern et al., 2002; USFWS, 2005), Colorado (Tyus et al., 1982; Propst and Carlson, 1986; Tilmant, 1999), Connecticut (Schmidt, 1986; Whitworth, 1996), Delaware (Lee et al., 1980; Lee et al, 1981), District of Columbia (Tilmant, 1999), Hawaii (Devick, 1991), Idaho (Simpson and Wallace, 1978; Idaho Anonymous, 2004) Illinois (Burr, personal communication), Kansas (Cross, 1967), Maine (Halliwell, 2003), Maryland (Lee et al., 1976; Lee et al., 1980; Lee et al., 1981; Tilmant 1999; Starnes et al., 2011), Massachusetts (Schmidt, 1986; Hartel, 1992; Cardoza et al., 1993; USFWS, 2005), Michigan (Hubbs and Lagler, 1949), Minnesota (Lee et al., 1980; Tilmant, 1999), Montana (Brown, 1971; Holton, 1990), Nebraska (Morris et al., 1974), Nevada (Moffett, 1943; La Rivers, 1962; Deacon and Williams, 1984; Tilmant, 1999), New Hampshire (Scarola, 1973; Schmidt, 1986; Tilmant, 1999), New Jersey (Fowler 1920; 1952; Stiles, 1978; Tilmant, 1999), New Mexico (Tyus et al., 1982; Sublette et al,. 1990; Platania, 1991), New York (Smith, 1985; Schmidt, 1986; Tilmant, 1999; USFWS, 2005), North Carolina (Hocutt et al., 1986; Menhinick, 1991), North Dakota (Owen et al., 1981), Ohio (Trautman, 1981); Oklahoma (Miller and Robison, 1973), Oregon (Lampman, 1946; Ridler, 2004), Pennsylvania (Cooper, 1983), Puerto Rico (Erdsman, 1984), Rhode Island (Lapin, personal communication), South Carolina (Rohde, personal communication), South Dakota (Underhill, 1959; Bailey and Allum, 1962), Texas (Howells, 1987; Waldrip, 1993), Utah (Tyus et al., 1982; Tilmant, 1999), Virginia (Hocutt et al., 1986; Jenkins and Burkhead, 1994; Starnes et al., 2011), Washington (Smith, 1896; Chapman, 1942; Wydoski and Whitney, 1979; USFWS, 2005; Chapman, 1933), West Virginia (Stauffer et al., 1995), Wisconsin (Becker, 1983) and Wyoming (Baxter and Simon, 1970)”.
Among its introductions to parts of the US, bluegill has been introduced to a number of countries including Iran, Japan, Korea, Philippines, South Africa, Kenya, Morocco, Mauritius, Brazil, Congo, Cuba and Puerto Rico. Most introductions have originated from the US but some populations have been introduced from Japan and South Africa.
Bluegill are spreading rapidly over the Japanese main islands and are now present in most ponds and lakes in the country. Their spread was most likely linked to the rise of game fishing in the 1970s. They feed on the young of some native fishes in Japan, threatening the survival of several species such as the tanago (Acheilognathus melanogaster) and honmoroko (Gnathopogon caerulescens). Lake Biwa catch for native species has dropped from more than 8000 tons in 1972 to 2174 tons in 2000 while experts estimate catch of exotic species (black bass and bluegill) exceeds 3000 tons (Chiba et al., 1989).
IntroductionsTop of page
|Introduced to||Introduced from||Year||Reason||Introduced by||Established in wild through||References||Notes|
|Natural reproduction||Continuous restocking|
|Brazil||USA||Aquaculture (pathway cause)||Welcomme (1988)|
|China||Japan||1987||Aquaculture (pathway cause)||Ma et al. (2003)|
|Congo||USA||Aquaculture (pathway cause)||Welcomme (1988)|
|Cuba||Burgess and Franz (1989)|
|El Salvador||USA||1957||Aquaculture (pathway cause)||Welcomme (1988)||Stunted and became a pest so population eliminated|
|Hawaii||USA||1946||Fisheries (pathway cause)||Welcomme (1988)||Widespread and successful in reservoirs in all the islands. The species has formed spontaneous intervener hybrids with Micropterus salmoides in at least two reservoirs on Kauai Island|
|Iran||Coad (1995)||Recorded from Namak Lake basin|
|Japan||USA||1960||Aquaculture (pathway cause)
Hunting, angling, sport or racing (pathway cause)
|Chiba et al. (1989)||Spread throughout the country: may have been connected to the rise of game fishing in the 1970s|
|Kenya||South Africa||1940||Hunting, angling, sport or racing (pathway cause)||FAO-DIAS (1997)|
|Kenya||USA||1940||Hunting, angling, sport or racing (pathway cause)||FAO-DIAS (1997)|
|Korea, Republic of||Japan||1969||Jang et al. (2002); Welcomme (1988)||Recorded from the Nakdong, Kum and Youngsan rivers|
|Madagascar||USA||1954||Forage (pathway cause)||Welcomme (1988)|
|Malawi||Forage (pathway cause)
Hunting, angling, sport or racing (pathway cause)
|FAO-DIAS (1997)||Current status unknown (Angling Society of Malawi), latest information (1976) is that populations tend to stunt and die out, then re-introduced from other dams. Earlier populations confined to estate dams in shire highlands|
|Mauritius||USA||1944||Aquaculture (pathway cause)||FAO-DIAS (1997)||Reintroduced in 1950. The species is present in small numbers in ponds and reservoirs; Presence of stunted populations. It does not form a fishery|
|Mauritius||East Africa||1944||Aquaculture (pathway cause)||FAO-DIAS (1997)||Reintroduced in 1950. The species is present in small numbers in ponds and reservoirs; Presence of stunted populations. It does not form a fishery|
|Mexico||USA||Forage (pathway cause)||FAO-DIAS (1997)||Caused displacement of the native species.|
|Morocco||USA||Welcomme (1988)||Stocks established in Lake Roumi|
|Panama||USA||1955||Hunting, angling, sport or racing (pathway cause)||Welcomme (1988)||Overcrowds and stunts; possibly eliminated native Astanax kompi|
|Philippines||USA||1950||Aquaculture (pathway cause)||Juliano et al. (1989)||Established in swamps and highland rivers|
|Puerto Rico||USA||1915||Forage (pathway cause)
Hunting, angling, sport or racing (pathway cause)
|Welcomme (1988)||Widespread in reservoirs, farm ponds and a few rivers such as the La Plata at Aibonito to Comerío where currents are not swift|
|South Africa||USA||1938||Forage (pathway cause)
Hunting, angling, sport or racing (pathway cause)
|Moor and Bruton (1988); Welcomme (1988)||Widespread in slow-flowing waters where it forms stunted dense populations - regarded as a pest|
|Swaziland||South Africa||1939||Forage (pathway cause)||Welcomme (1988)||Introduced as forage for bass|
|United States Virgin Islands||Ogden et al. (1975)||Introduced to freshwater ponds and grows to at least 0.5m in length|
|Venezuela||USA||1955-59||Welcomme (1988)||Known to be breeding in Laguna Potrerito. Stunts and eats young fish|
|Zambia||USA||1946||Aquaculture (pathway cause)||Thys Audenaerde DFEvan den (1994); Thys van den Audenaerde DFE (1994)||Introduced to Mkushi, Lake Chila (Mbala), Chipata and Kasama in Zambia. No survivors seen in 1992|
|Zimbabwe||South Africa||1940||Forage (pathway cause)||Welcomme (1988)|
Risk of IntroductionTop of page
Today, as a result of many intentional as well as unintentional introductions, bluegill are found throughout the US and northern Mexico (TPWD, 2012). This trend may continue due to its food and ecotourism value and its use as an important game fish. As they are raised in aquaculture facilities and used to stock rivers and lakes, accidental releases pose a threat of further spread of this species locally, as well as internationally.
HabitatTop of page
L. macrochirus are frequently found in lakes, ponds, reservoirs, slow flowing streams (Page and Burr, 1991; Etnier and Starnes, 1993), creeks (Lee, 1980) and pools and backwaters (Rose and Echelle, 1981). It inhabits shallow, warm, slow-flowing waters, often with abundant aquatic vegetation (Lee, 1980). However, deeper areas are also required during winter and as a retreat from the summer heat (Rintamaki, 1986). They can often be found around weed beds, where they search for food or spawn (Lee, 1980). In riverine habitats, L. macrochirus are mostly restricted to areas of low velocity. Optimal stream gradient <0.5 m/km) is based on the preference for low-gradient, lentic type waters (Rintamaki, 1986). Optimal lacustrine habitat is characterized by fertile lakes, ponds, and reservoirs with extensive (>20 percent of lacustrine surface area) littoral areas (Rintamaki, 1986).
This species is rarely found in river channels but can be found in the Brazos River, Texas. It is most abundant in oxbow lakes (Zeug et al., 2005) and occurs primarily in reservoirs in Hawaii (Page and Burr, 1991). In Texas, it is one of the most abundant species collected from the main stem of Sister Grove Creek (Trinity River basin) (Matthews et al., 1996). Younger fish utilize areas with cover while older fish seek more open water, generally resulting in lack of competition for food between size classes (Mittelback, 1984). L. macrochirus tend to be absent in northern Minnesota lakes, as the water gets too cold.
Habitat ListTop of page
Biology and EcologyTop of page
Arkhipchuk (1999) reported 24 and 48-48 haploid and diploid chromosome numbers for L. macrochirus in the United States. Kawamura et al. (2010) reported that “phylogenetic analysis reconfirmed a single origin of Japanese populations”. Populations established in the 1960s, when the bluegill sunfish was introduced to Japan, were found to have high genetic diversity comparable to the ancestral population in Guttenberg, Iowa. Later-established populations, however, were found to have diverged from the ancestral population and subsequently had lower genetic diversity.
L. macrochirus hybridizes with green sunfish, redear sunfish, redbreast sunfish, and warmouth (USGS, 2012).
L. macrochirus are guarders and nest spawners (Simon, 1999). They commonly nest at depths from 0.2-1.2 m (Gosch et al., 2006) but spawning depths to 3.3 m have been documented (Carlander, 1977). It will spawn over a wide variety of substrates including gravel, sand, clay, and detrital nests (Simon, 1999). Nests are usually constructed in a vegetation free area and over sand or gravel. L. microchirus nests are placed close together (Clugston, 1966) in colonies of 9-15 (Carlander, 1977). Every colony observed by Gosch et al. (2006) in Lake Cochrane, South Dakota, was located on hard-bottomed gravel with a relatively low-density of Chara vegetation; suggesting that this was the preferred habitat for bluegill in this area. However, it is not clear as to whether spawning simply results in less vegetation or if it is a preference of this species. This finding was however supported by Weimer (2004) who reported that transmittered L. macrochirus preferred sparse density vegetation during the spawning season in Enemy Swim Lake, South Dakota (Gosch et al., 2006).
Males sweep away silt and sand with their tails when preparing for the nest so as to expose coarser substrata (gravels) underneath (Avila, 1976). It is thought that coarser particles provide interstitial spaces for the yolk-sac larvae and may function as a protective shelter (Bain and Helfrich, 1983; Ross, 2001). Potentially, these gravel areas may maximize survival of L. macrochirus during their early life stages as suggested by Bain and Helfrich (1983). Their study showed that the mortality of larvae decreased as the proportion of nest substrate (>0.8 cm) increased. Furthermore, another study found that small gravel and sand sites yielded the most fry in an Ohio farm pond (Stevenson et al. 1969).
Spawning males are more aggressive than non-spawning males, often leaving the nest, which can result in other males entering the nest and engaging with the female (Hassan-Williams and Bonner, 2007). Simultaneous polygamous spawning in L. macrochirus is natural but rarely occurs (Avila, 1976). Courtship involves the male rapidly swimming up to the female and then back to the nest, whilst producing a series of distinctive grunts during the display. Specific odours may attract males to spawning areas (Gerald, 1971).
The spawning season of L. macrochirus may vary according to geographic location and water temperature but generally occurs from March-October (Estes, 1949). In Texas, peak gonadal development was reached around mid-April but spawning continued until September (Schloemer, 1947). Clugston (1966) reported that spawning takes place at water temperatures of 21-320C in Florida.
Generally bluegill first spawn at one year of age but can spawn as early as four months of age under favorable conditions (Swingle and Smith, 1943). Females can spawn an average of five times a year, with a 12.0 cm female spawning about 80,000 eggs a year (Estes, 1949). Ulrey et al. (1938) reported that females of two years of age produced more than 3800 eggs and those at four years of age produced more than 19,000. Fertilized eggs are usually 0.11-0.14 cm in diameter (Merriner, 1971) and typically hatch in the littoral zone, before migrating to the limnetic zone after yolk-sac absorption, and then returning to the littoral zone after attaining a larger body size (Werner, 1969; Dimond et al., 1985). This species reportedly produced nearly 18,000 fry per nest in Deep Lake, Michigan (Carbine, 1939).
Physiology and Phenology
In Japan, drastic population growth of L. macrochirus shortly after their introduction maintained genetic diversity and allowed for local adaptation and high phenotypic plasticity (Kawamura et al., 2010).
L. macrochirus are active mainly during dusk and dawn (Fishbase, 2012). During the day they stay hidden under cover, moving into shallower waters for the night (Williams, 1996). They prefer water with aquatic plants, and hide within fallen logs or water weeds. Bluegill will normally swim in schools of 10-20 fish, and these schools will often include other sunfish, such as crappie (Pomoxis), pumpkinseeds (Lepomis gibbosus), and smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) (Poulas et al., 2012). Vegetation or logs and brush are utilized by the species, especially juveniles and small adults. An excessive abundance of vegetation can interfere with feeding or cause stunting through reducing predation success by L. macrochirus (Stuber and Gebhart, 1982). However, populations may also benefit from excessive amounts of aquatic vegetation as it may inhibit the utilization of L. macrochirus as prey.
Population Size and Density
Bluegill usually mature between one and two years of age, are able to grow to a maximum total length of 39.0-40.5 cm and can weigh up to 2.1 kg (Lee, 1980; Rintamaki, 1986). The growth of this fish is very rapid in the first three years, but slows considerably once the fish reaches maturity (Swingle and Smith, 1943). At the end of its first year it typically measures 5.1 cm in length but can grow up to 20.1 cm by its sixth year (NJDEP, 2012). At year two, three, four and five it can reach 9.2 cm, 12.4 cm, 14.8 cm and 17.4 cm, respectively.
L. macrochirus are opportunistic feeders and so can alter their diet according to food availability. Fry feed primarily on zooplankton and small insects whilst juveniles and adults feed on zooplankton, both aquatic and terrestrial insects and aquatic vegetation, including algae (Carlander, 1977; Rintamaki, 1986; Sublette et al. 1990). Larvae and juveniles of L. macrochirus from 0.5-1.0 cm in length will frequently feed on cladocerans (Chydorinae) and copepod nauplii (Werner 1969; Beard 1982). Individuals reaching 2.0 cm have varied feeding habits, primarily consuming cladocerans, adult copepods and insects (mainly chironomids) (Beard, 1982). The primary diet of adults in various water bodies is comprised of aquatic insects, crayfish, and small fish, although zooplankton serves as the main food item in other bodies of water (Mittelbach, 1984; Carlander, 1977). Adults will also feed upon snails, worms and small minnows (Page and Burr, 1991)
Mittelbach (1984) demonstrated that individuals undergo pronounced shifts with habitat and food items as they grow due to changes in vulnerability to predation. Competition between size classes is generally avoided as younger fish utilize areas with cover while older fish seek more open water (Mittelbach, 1984). They actively feed during daylight hours, with a minor feeding peak in the morning and a major peak in the evening (Carlander, 1977; Sarker, 1977).
L. macrochirus prefers low velocity streams of less than 10 cm/sec but it can tolerate velocities up to 45 cm/sec. It is able to tolerate a wide range of pH values from 4.0-10.3 (Stuber and Gebhart, 1982) and can withstand salinities up to 3.6 ppt but not over 5.6 ppt according to Rintamaki (1986). Peterson and Ross (1991) did note however, the occurrence of this species in waters with salinities of up to 10 ppt. L. macrochirus requires deeper water for over wintering, low to moderate turbidities preferably less than 50 ppm and prefer 20 % - 60% cover within the littoral area with no more than 30% in the form of aquatic vegetation (Rintamaki, 1986). However, too much aquatic vegetation can interfere with feeding or cause stunting by reducing predation (Stuber and Gebhart, 1982).
Rintamaki (1986) reported the following temperature ranges for growth of different life stages of L. macrochirus: optimal growth of adult occurs near 27°C, no growth occurs below 10°C or above 30°C. The reported ultimate upper incipient lethal temperature for this species is 35°C. Optimal temperatures for successful embryo development are 22°- 27°C, and development will occur from 22°-34°C. Optimal water current velocities for embryo development are less than 7.5 cm/sec, and embryos are not found at water current velocities greater than 30 cm/sec. Optimal temperatures for fry are 25°-32°C. Fry will not survive temperatures below 11°C or above 34°C. Optimal current velocities for fry are less than 5 cm/sec and fry are not found in areas with velocities greater than 7.5 cm/sec. The highest specific growth rate of juvenile L. macrochirus occurs in waters of 30°C and the suitable temperature range is 22-34°C. Preferred current velocities for juveniles are less than 5 cm/sec and juveniles are not found in areas with velocities greater than 15 cm/sec. Selection of foraging area is also affected by water temperatures, with fish preferring a temperature of 30° C (Hassan-Williams and Bonner, 2007).
Natural Food SourcesTop of page
|Food Source||Food Source Datasheet||Life Stage||Contribution to Total Food Intake (%)||Details|
Water TolerancesTop of page
|Parameter||Minimum Value||Maximum Value||Typical Value||Status||Life Stage||Notes|
|Dissolved oxygen (mg/l)||5||Optimum||Tolerates a minimum oxygen value of 1.5 mg/l|
|Salinity (part per thousand)||3.6||Optimum|
|Turbidity (JTU turbidity)||50||Optimum|
|Velocity (cm/h)||36000||Optimum||Tolerates up to 162,000 cm/hr|
|Water pH (pH)||6.5||8.5||Optimum||Tolerates pH range of pH 4-10.3|
|Water temperature (ºC temperature)||16||27||Optimum||Tolerates temperatures from 10-30°C|
Natural enemiesTop of page
|Natural enemy||Type||Life stages||Specificity||References||Biological control in||Biological control on|
|Ardea herodias||Predator||Adults/Juveniles||not specific|
|Ceryle alcyon||Predator||Adult/Fry||not specific|
|Cichla ocellaris||Predator||Juveniles||not specific|
|Esox lucius||Predator||Adults/Juveniles||not specific|
|Esox masquinongy||Predator||Adults/Juveniles||not specific|
|Micropterus salmoides||Predator||Juveniles||not specific|
|Morone saxatilis||Predator||Adults/Juveniles||not specific|
|Salmo trutta||Predator||Adults/Juveniles||not specific|
Notes on Natural EnemiesTop of page
L. macrochirus are prey to many larger predatory fish species, including largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), muskellunge (Esox masquinongy), northern pike (Esox lucius), yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and walleye (Sander vitreus). Turtles, otters and predatory birds, such as herons (Ardea cinerea) have also been witnessed preying on bluegill in shallow water, although, the shape of the fish makes them hard to swallow (Paulson and Hatch, 2011).
Economic ImpactTop of page
After introduction of L. macrochirus in Lake Biwa, Japan, the catch of native species has dropped from more than 8000 tons in 1972 to 2174 tons in 2000 whilst the estimated catch of exotic species, such as black bass (Micropterus salmoides) and bluegill exceeds 3000 tons (Takayama, 2002).
Environmental ImpactTop of page
Impact on Biodiversity
This species is commonly considered a pest in its introduced range and several countries report it causing negative ecological effects (ADW, 2012; Fishbase, 2012). L. macrochirus overcrowd and stunt the growth of other fish and may even be responsible for causing extinctions, such as the extinction of a native fish in Panama. It predates on crustaceans and insects, and as a population may consume six times its own weight during a single summer (Gerking, 1962). It competes for food and habitat with native sunfish (Maine's red-breast (Lepomis auritus) and pumpkin seed (Lepomis gibbosus)) and preys on native minnow (blacknose dace (Rhinichthys atratulus)) (USGS, 2012). It has caused displacement of the native species in Mexico (FAO, 1997) and eliminated native Astyanax kompi (Welcomme, 1988). In Japan it feeds on the young of some native fishes, threatening the survival of several species such as the honmoroko (Gnathopogon caerulescens) and the IUCN red listed tanago (Acheilognathus melanogaster) (Chiba et al., 1989). In California, aggressive bluegill outcompete native Sacramento perch (Archoplites interruptus) (Moyle et al., 1974; Moyle, 1976). They may also chase Sacramento perch away from spawning areas and out of favoured places, such as shallow weedy areas, and into open water (Moyle, 1976). Once in open water, the perch are more vulnerable to predation and have less available food (USGS, 2012).
Threatened SpeciesTop of page
Risk and Impact FactorsTop of page Invasiveness
- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Highly adaptable to different environments
- Highly mobile locally
- Fast growing
- Has high genetic variability
- Reduced native biodiversity
- Threat to/ loss of native species
- Pest and disease transmission
- Highly likely to be transported internationally deliberately
- Difficult to identify/detect in the field
UsesTop of page
It is an important game fish in the United States and has a food and ecotourism value (ADW, 2012). It is raised in aquaculture facilities and is also used to stock rivers and lakes with food for largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), another important game fish (Williams, 1996; Conservation Commission of Missouri, 2002; ADW, 2012).
Bluegill has commonly been used for research in aquatic biology and ecotoxicology (Touart 1988). In Texas, the parasite fauna of this species are well known and may be utilized to monitor historical and current health of watershed ecosystems (Bhuthimethee et al., 2005).
Similarities to Other Species/ConditionsTop of page
L. macrochirus is most similar to Lepomis humilis (orangespotted sunfish) and Lepomis microlophus (redear sunfish). It can be distinguished from these two other species by its distinct dark spot at the base of the soft dorsal fin. It also differs from L. microlophus in having long and slender gill rakers and from L. humilis in lacking the elongate sensory pores on the pre-opercle margin (Ross, 2001). L. macrochirus hybridizes with Lepomis auritus, Lepomis cyanellus, Lepomis gibosus, Lepomis gulosus, Lepomis humilis, Lepomis megalotis, Lepomis microlophus, Lepomis punctatus and artificially hybridizes with Pomoxis annularis and Pomoxis nigromaculatus (Carlander, 1977).
Prevention and ControlTop of page
Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Reducing the abundance of bluegill in some areas may include using trap nets, sein nets or electrofishing (The Maine Invasion, 2012).
The largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) could be introduced to control bluegill through predation. However, if this species were to become established, its effects on the rest of the ecosystem could be more detrimental (The Maine Invasion, 2012).
Control by Utilization
Authorizing unrestricted catch limits and promotion of L. macrochirus as a good fish for consumption may be more successful measures to control populations (The Maine Invasion, 2012).
ReferencesTop of page
ADW, 2012. Lepomis macrochirus: Bluegill. Animal Diversity Web. Michigan, USA: University of Michigan. http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/
Applegate RL; Mullan JW; Morais DI, 1967. Proceedings of the Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commissioners, 20. 469-482.
Aquarium Science Association of the Philippines (ASAP), 1996. Aquarium species in the Philippines. ASAP Aquarist Database Report. Quezon City, Philippines: Aquarium Science Association of the Philippines, 9.
Avila VL, 1976. A field study of nesting behavior of male bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque). American Midland Naturalist, 96(1):195-206.
Bailey RM; Allum MO, 1962. Fishes of South Dakota. Michigan, USA: Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 119.
Bain MB; Helfrich LA, 1983. Role of male parental care in survival of larval bluegills. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 112:47-52.
Baxter GT; Simon JR, 1970. Wyoming Fishes, 4:129.
Beard TD, 1982. Population dynamics of young-of-year bluegill, 127:32.
Bell-Cross G; Minshull JL, 1988. The fishes of Zimbabwe. Harare, Zimbabwe: National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe, 294.
Brooks WR; Jordan RC, 2010. Enhanced interspecific territoriality and the invasion success of the spotted tilapia (Tilapia mariae) in South Florida. Biological Invasions, 12(4):865-874. http://www.springerlink.com/content/12r52705056h1t13/?p=dab8851dbcca4ba49460f7bf0aa4d83f&pi=15
Brown CJD, 1971. Fishes of Montana. Bozeman, Montana, USA: Montana State University, 207.
Carbine WF, 1939. Observations on the spawning habits of centrarchid fishes in Deep Lake, Oakland County, Michigan. In: Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 4. 275-287.
Cardoza JE; Jones GS; French TW; Halliwell DB, 1993. Exotic and Translocated Vertebrates of Massachusetts. Fauna of Massachusetts, 6(17223-110-200-11/93-C.R):95 pp.
Carlander KD, 1977. Handbook of freshwater fishery biology, 2. Ames, Iowa, USA: Iowa State University Press, 431.
Chapman WM, 1942. Alien fishes in the waters of the Pacific Northwest. California Fish and Game, 28(1):9-15.
Chapman WM; DeLacy AC, 1933. Notes on the fishes of the State of Washington. Copeia, 2:102-103.
Chiba K; Taki Y; Sakai K; Oozeki Y, 1989. Present status of aquatic organisms introduced into Japan. In: Exotic aquatic organisms in Asia. Proceedings of the Workshop on Introduction of Exotic Aquatic Organisms in Asia. Special Publication of the Asian Fisheries Society 3 [ed. by Silva SSDe].
Clugston JP, 1966. Centrarchid spawning in the Florida Everglades. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences, 29(2):137-144.
Conservation Commission of Missouri, 2002. Bluegill fishing in Missouri. Missouri, USA: Conservation Commission of Missouri. http://www.conservation.state.mo.us/fish/fishid/bluegill/
Contreras-Balderas S; Escalante-C MA, 1984. Distribution and known impacts of exotic fishes in Mexico. In: Distribution, biology and management of exotic fishes [ed. by Courtenay Jr., W. R. \Stauffer Jr, J. R.]. Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press, 102-130.
Cooper EL, 1983. Fishes of Pennsylvania and the Northeastern United States. Pennsylvania, USA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 243.
Devick WS, 1991. New Directions in Research, Management and Conservation of Hawaiian Freshwater Stream Ecosystems: Proceedings of the 1990 Symposium on Freshwater Stream Biology and Fisheries Management [ed. by Devick, W. S.]. Honolulu, USA: Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Aquatic Resources, 189-213.
Dimond WF; Storck TW; Kruse KC, 1985. A turbidityrelated delay in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) reproduction and some size dependent differences in the spatial distribution of bluegill fry. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science, 78:49-56.
Erdman DS, 1984. Exotic fishes in Puerto Rico. In: Distribution, biology and management of exotic fishes [ed. by Courtney Jr WR, Stauffer Jr JR] Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press, 162-176.
Estes CM, 1949. The fecundity of the bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) in certain small east Texas reservoirs. Texas, USA: North Texas State College, 39.
FAO-DIAS, 1997. Database on introductions of aquatic species. FAO Fisheries Global Information System. Rome, Italy: Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. http://www.fao.org/fi/figis
Fishbase, 2012. Fishbase: Lepomis macrochirusm - Bluegill. Fishbase: Lepomis macrochirus - Bluegill [ed. by Froese, R. \Pauly, D.]. http://www.fishbase.org
Fowler HW, 1952. A list of the fishes of New Jersey, with off-shore species. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 104:89-151.
Froese R; Pauly D, 2012. FishBase. FishBase. http://www.fishbase.org
Fuller P; Cannister M, 2012. Non Indigenous Aquatic Species Database: Lepomis macrochirus. Gainesville, Florida, USA: Non Indigenous Aquatic Species Database. http://nas.usgs.gov/
Gerald JW, 1971. Sound production during courtship in six species of sunfish (Centrarchidae). Evolution, 25(1):75-87.
Gerking SD, 1962. Production and food utilization in a population of bluegill sunfish. Ecological Monographs, 32(1):31-78.
Goldstein RM; Simon TP, 1999. Toward a united definition of guild structure for feeding ecology of North American freshwater fishes. In: Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities [ed. by Simon, TP] Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 123-202.
Gosch NJC; Phelps QE; Willis DW, 2006. Habitat characteristics at bluegill spawning colonies in a South Dakota glacial lake. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 15:464-469.
Halliwell DB, 2003. Introduced Fish in Maine. MABP series: Focus on Freshwater Biodiversity. Augusta, Maine, USA: Maine Department.
Hartel K, 1992. Non-native fishes known from Massachusetts freshwaters. Occasional Reports of the MCZ Fish Department, 1992(2). 1-9.
Hassan-Williams C; Bonner TH, 2007. Texas freshwater fishes. Texas, USA: Texas State University-San Marcos: Biology Department/ Aquatic Station. http://www.bio.txstate.edu/
Hocutte CH; Jenkins RE; Stauffer Jr JR, 1986. Zoogeography of the Fishes of the Central Appalachians and Central Atlantic Coastal Plain. In: The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes [ed. by Hocutt, C. H. \Wiley, E. O.]. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 161-212.
Holton GD, 1990. A Field Guide to Montana Fishes. Helena, Montana, USA: Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, 104.
Howells RG, 1987. Genetic introgression of introduced Florida largemouth bass and coppernose bluegill on native largemouth and bluegill in a new south Texas Reservoir. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Inland Fisheries Data Series, 2:20pp.
Hubbs CL; Lagler KF, 1949. Fishes of Isle Royale, Lake Superior, Michigan. Michigan, USA: Reprinted from Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters, Vol. XXXIII 1947. Contrib. from the Scripps Inst. of Ocean. New Series,, 420.
Idaho Fish 'n' hunt, 2004. Idaho warm water fish. Idaho, USA: Idaho Fish 'n' Hunt, Spring Creek Communications. http://www.idfishnhunt.com/warmwatermenu2.html
Jang M-H; Kim J-G; Park S-B; Jeong K-S; Cho G-I; Joo G-J, 2002. The current status of the distribution of introduced fish in large river systems of South Korea. International Review of Hydrobiology, 87(2-3):319-328.
Juliano R; Guerrero IIIR; Ronquillo I, 1989. The introduction of exotic aquatic species in the Philippines. In: Exotic Aquatic Organisms in Asia. Proceedings of the Workshop on Introduction of Exotic Aquatic Organisms in Asia. Asian Fish. Soc. Spec. Publ [ed. by Silva SDe] Manila, Philippines: Asian Fisheries Society, 154.
Kawamura K; Yonekura R; Ozaki Y; Katano O; Taniguchi Y; Saitoh K, 2010. The role of propagule pressure in the invasion success of bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus, in Japan. Molecular Ecology, 19(24):5371-5388. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/mec
Kim IS; Choi Y; Lee CL; Lee YJ; Kim BJ; Kim JH, 2005. Illustrated book of Korean fishes (Illustrated book of Korean fishes)., Korea: Kyo-Hak Pub Co. Seoul, 615.
Lampman BH, 1946. The Coming of the Pond Fishes. Portland, USA: Binfords and Mort Portland, 177.
Lee DA; Platania SP; Gilbert CR; Franz R; Norden A, 1981. Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings, 3(3). 1-10.
Lee DS, 1980. Lepomis macrochirus (Rafinesque 1819), Bluegill. In: Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes [ed. by Lee, D. S. \]. Raleigh, USA: N. C. State Mus. Nat. Hist, 597.
Ma X; Bangxi X; Yindong W; Mingxue W, 2003. Intentionally introduced and transferred fishes in China's inland waters. Asian Fisheries Science, 16(3, 4):279-290.
Martin FD; Patus JW, 1984. An annotated key to the Teleost fishes of Puerto Rico. (An annotated key to the Teleost fishes of Puerto Rico.) Compendio Enciclopedico de los Recursos Nat, 5:1-191.
Matern SA; Moyle PB; Pierce LC, 2002. Native and alien fishes in a California estuarine marsh: twenty-one years of changing assemblages. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 131:797-816.
Matthews WJ; Schorrs MS; Meador MR, 1996. Effects of experimentally enhanced flows on fishes of a small Texas (USA) stream: assessing the impact of interbasin transfer. Freshwater Biology, 35:349-362.
McComish TS, 1968. Sexual differentiation of bluegills by the urogenital opening. Progressive Fish-Culturist, 63:28.
Menhinick EF, 1991. The Freshwater Fishes of North Carolina. North Carolina, USA: North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, 227.
Merriner JV, 1971. Egg size as a factor in intergenetic hybrid success of centrarchids. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 100(1):29-32.
Miller RJ; Robison HW, 1973. The Fishes of Oklahoma. Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA: Oklahoma State University Press, 246.
Mittelbach GG, 1984. Predation and resource partitioning in two sunfishes (Centrarchidae). Ecology, 65(2):499-513.
Moffett JW, 1943. A preliminary report on the fishery of Lake Meade. In: Transactions of the 8th North American Wildlife Conference, 1943. 179-186.
Morris J; Morris L; Witt L, 1974. The Fishes of Nebraska. Lincoln, Nebraska, USA: Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, 98.
Moyle PB; Mathews SB; Bonderson N, 1974. Feeding habits of the Sacramento perch, Archoplites interruptus. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 103:399-402.
NJDEP, 2012. Bluegill: Lepomis macrochirus. New Jersey, USA: Division of Fish and Wildlife. http://www.state.nj.us/dep/fgw/pdf/fishfact/bluegill.pdf
Owen JB; Elsen DS; Russell GW, 1981. Distribution of fishes in North and South Dakota basins affected by the Garrison Diversion Unit. North Dakota, USA: University of North Dakota Press.
Paulson N; Hatch JT, 2011. Fishes of Minnesota-Bluegill. Minnesota, USA: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, University of Minnesota. http://hatch.cehd.edu/research/fish/fishes/bluegill
Peterson MS; Ross ST, 1991. Dynamics of littoral fishes and decapods along a coastal river gradient. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 33:467-483.
Pflieger WL, 1975. The Fishes of Missouri. Jefferson City, USA: Missouri Department of Conservation, 343.
Platania SP, 1991. Fishes of the Rio Chama and upper Rio Grande, New Mexico, with preliminary comments on their longitudinal distribution. Southwestern Naturalist, 36(2):186-193.
Poulos HM; Chernoff B; Fuller PL; Butman D, 2012. Mapping the potential distribution of the invasive red shiner, Cyprinella lutrensis (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) across waterways of the conterminous United States. Aquatic Invasions, 7(3):377-385. http://www.aquaticinvasions.net/2012/AI_2012_3_Poulos_etal.pdf
Propst DL; Carlson CA, 1986. The distribution and status of warmwater fishes in the Platte River drainage, Colorado. The Southwestern Naturalist, 31(2):149-167.
Ridler K, 2004. Foreign fish invading reservoir. Florida, USA: Gannett. http://www.statesmanjournal.com/
Rintamaki R, 1986. Technical Notes: Bluegill, 301. Wyoming, USA: US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 2. http://efotg.egov.usda.gov/references/public/WY/Bio_No_301
Rivers ILa, 1962. Fishes and fisheries of Nevada. Carson City, Nevada, USA: Nevada State Print Office.
Robins CR; Bailey RM; Bond CE; Brooker JR; Lachner EA; Lea RN; Scott WB, 1980. A list of common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. A list of common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada., Ed. 4:174pp.
Robinson HW; Buchanan TM, 1988. Fishes of Arkansas. Arkansas, USA: University of Arkansas Press, 536.
Rose; D; Echelle AA, 1981. Factor analysis of fishes in Little River, central Texas, with an interdrainage comparison. American Midland Naturalist, 106(2):379-391.
Sarker AL, 1977. Feeding ecology of the bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus, in two heated reservoirs of Texas. III. Time of day and patterns of feeding. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 106(6):596-601.
Scarola JF, 1973. Freshwater Fishes of New Hampshire. New Hampshire, USA: New Hampshire Fish and Game Department, Division of Inland and Marine Fisheries, 131.
Schloemer CL, 1947. Reproductive cycles of five species of Texas Centrarchids. Science, 106(2743):85-86.
Schmidt RE, 1986. Zoogeography of the Northern Appalachians. In: The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes [ed. by Hocutt, C. H. \Wiley, E. O.]. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 137-160.
Seegers L; Vos LDe; Okeyo DO, 2003. Annotated checklist of the freshwater fishes of Kenya (excluding the lacustrine haplochromines from Lake Victoria). Afr. Nat. Hist. Journal of East African Natural History, 92:11-47.
Simon TP, 1999. Assessment of Balon's reproductive guilds with application to Midwestern North American Freshwater Fishes. In: Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities [ed. by Simon, T. L.]. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press, 97-121.
Smith HM, 1896. A review of the history and results of the attempts to acclimatize fish and other water animals in the Pacific states. Bulletin of the US Fish Commission, 15:379-472.
Starnes WC; Odenkirk J; Ashton MJ, 2011. Update and analysis of fish occurrences in the lower Potomac River drainage in the vicinity of Plummers Island, Maryland-Contribution XXXI to the natural history of Plummers Island, Maryland. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 124(4):280-309.
Stevenson F; Momot WT; Svoboda FJIII, 1969. Nesting success of the bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque, in a small Ohio farm pond. The Ohio Journal of Science, 69:347-355.
Stiles EW, 1978. Vertebrates of New Jersey. Edmund W Stiles, 158.
Stiles EW, 1978. Vertebrates of New Jersey. Somerset, New Jersey, USA: Edmund W. Stiles.
Stuber RJ; Gebhart G; Maughan OE, 1982. Habitat suitability indexmodels: Bluegill, FWS/OBS-82/10.8. Washington DC, USA: US Fish and Wildlife Service, 26.
Swingle HS; Smith EV, 1943. Factors affecting the reproduction of bluegill bream and large black bass in ponds. Ala. Poly-Tech. Inst. Agr. Exp. Stn. Circ, 87:8.
Takayama H, 2002. Aliens in the palace. Newsweek.
Taylor TL; Moyle PB; Price DG, 1982. Fishes of the Clear Lake Basin. In: Distribution and Ecology of Stream Fishes of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Drainage System, California, 115 [ed. by Moyle, P. B. \Smith, J. J. \Daniels, R. A. \Price, T. L. \Baltz, D. M.]. California, USA: University of California Press Berkeley, 171-224.
The Maine Invasion, 2012. Bluegill sunfish: Lepomis macrochirus. Maine, USA: The Maine Invasion. https://sites.google.com/a/rsu5.org/invasive/maine-invasive-species/bluegill-sunfish-lepomis-macrochirus
Thys Audenaerde DFEvan den, 1994. Introduction of aquatic species into Zambian waters, and their importance for aquaculture and fisheries, Aquaculture for Local Community Development Programme. Introduction of aquatic species into Zambian waters, and their importance for aquaculture and fisheries, Aquaculture for Local Community Development Programme. [ALCOM Field Document No 29.]
Touart LW, 1988. Aquatic mesocosm tests to support pesticide registrations, 540/09-28-0. Washington D.C, USA: Environmental Protection Agency.
TPWD, 2012. Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Texas, USA: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. www.tpwd.state.us/
Tyus; HM; Burdick BD; Valdez RA; Haynes CM; Lytle TA; Berry CR, 1982. Fishes of the upper Colorado River basin: distribution, abundance, and status. In: Fishes of the upper Colorado River system: present and future, Western Division [ed. by Miller, W. H. \Tyus, H. M. \Carlson, C. A.]. Bethesda, Maryland, USA: American Fisheries Society, 12-70.
Ulrey L; Risk C; Scott W, 1938. The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes. Invest. Ind. Lakes, Streams, 1(6):73-78.
Underhill JC, 1959. Fishes of the Vermillion River, South Dakota. Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science, 38:96-102.
USFWS, 2005. National Wildlife Refuge System Invasive Species. US Fish and Wildlife Service. http://www.fws.gov/invasives/nwrs.html
USGS, 2012. Non Indigenous Aquatic Species Database: Lepomis macrochirus. Reston, Virginia, USA: US Geological Survey. http://nas.er.usgs.gov/
Waldrip L, 1993. 1992 Fish stocking report. Texas, USA: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, 9-12.
Warren Jr LW; Burr BM; Walsh SJ; Bart Jr HL; Cashner RC; Etnier DA; Freeman BJ; Kuhajda BR; Mayden RL; Robison HW; Ross ST; Starnes WC, 2000. Diversity, distribution and conservation status of the native freshwater fishes of the southern United States. Fisheries, 25(10):7-29.
Weimer EJ, 2004. Bluegill seasonal habitat selection, movement, and relationship to angler locations in a South Dakota glacial lake. Brookings, South Dakota, USA: South Dakota State University.
Welcomme RL, 1988. International introductions of inland aquatic species. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 294. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organisation, 318.
Werner RG, 1969. Ecology of limnetic bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) fry in Crane Lake, Indiana. The American Midland Naturalist, 81:164-181.
Whitworth WR, 1996. Freshwater Fishes of Connecticut, 114. Connecticut, USA: Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Connecticut Geological and Natural History Survey, 243.
Wildhaber ML; Neill WH, 1992. Activity and distribution of northern and Florida largemouth bass in a Texas impoundment. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 7(3):293-302.
Williams T, 1996. Fish capsule report: Lepomis macrochirus [ed. by University of Michigan]. Michigan, USA: University of Michigan. http://www.umich.edu/
Wydoski RS; Whitney RR, 1979. Inland Fishes of Washington. Seattle, Washington, USA: University of Washington Press, 220.
Yamamoto MN, 1992. Occurrence, distribution and abundance of accidentally introduced freshwater aquatic organisms in Hawaii. State of Hawaii, Freshwater Fisheries Research and Surveys, Proj. No. F-14-R-16.
Zeug S; Winemiller KO; Tarim S, 2005. Response of Brazos River oxbow fish assemblages to patterns of hydrologic connectivity and environmental variabilty. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 134:1389-1399.
OrganizationsTop of page
Italy: FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, http://www.fao.org/
Switzerland: IUCN (The World Conservation Union), Rue Mauverney 28, Gland 1196, Gland, Switzerland, http://www.iucn.org/
USA: TPWD Texas Parks and Wildlife, 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas, http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/
USA: USGS US Geological Survey, USGS National Center, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA 20192, http://www.usgs.gov/ask/index.php
ContributorsTop of page
25/09/2012 Original text by:
Sunil Niranjan Siriwardena, Stirling, Scotland, UK
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/