Salvelinus namaycush (lake trout)
Index
- Pictures
- Identity
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Description
- Distribution
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Introductions
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat
- Habitat List
- Biology and Ecology
- Natural Food Sources
- Climate
- Latitude/Altitude Ranges
- Air Temperature
- Water Tolerances
- Natural enemies
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Causes
- Pathway Vectors
- Impact Summary
- Economic Impact
- Environmental Impact
- Social Impact
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Uses
- Uses List
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- References
- Links to Websites
- Principal Source
- Contributors
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate reportPictures
Top of pageIdentity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Salvelinus namaycush (Walbaum, 1792)
Preferred Common Name
- lake trout
Other Scientific Names
- Cristivomer namaycush (Walbaum, 1792)
- Cristivomer namaycush Walbaum, 1792
- Cristovomer namayacush (Walbaum, 1792)
- Cristovomer namayacush Walbaum, 1792
- Salmo amethystinus Mitchill, 1818
- Salmo amethystinus Mitchill, 1818
- Salmo amethystus Mitchill, 1818
- Salmo amethystus Mitchill, 1818
- Salmo confinis DeKay, 1842
- Salmo confinis DeKay, 1842
- Salmo ferox Perley, 1852
- Salmo ferox Perley, 1852
- Salmo namaycush Walbaum, 1792
- Salmo namaycush Walbaum, 1792
- Salmo pallidus Rafinesque, 1817
- Salmo pallidus Rafinesque, 1817
- Salvelinus namaycush Walbaum, 1792
International Common Names
- English: char; great lake trout; great Lakes char; great Lakes trout; grey trout; lake charr; lake trout; laker; landlocked salmon; mackinaw; mackinaw trout; masamacush; mountain trout; namaycush; salmon trout; siscowet; taque; togue; touladi
- Spanish: trucha lacustre; trucha lacustre
- French: cristivomer; omble d'Amérique; omble du Canada; Omble du Canada; touladi; truite de lac d'Amérique; truite grise
- Russian: severoamerikanskiy kristivomer
Local Common Names
- Argentina: trucha de lago
- Austria: Amerikanischer Seesaibling; lake trout
- Canada: Great Lakes char; Great Lakes trout; grey trout; idlorak; idlorak; ihok; ihok; iIuuraq; iIuuraq; ikhlorak; ikhlorak; ilortoq; ilortoq; islorak; islorak; isok; isok; isuuq; isuuq; isuuqiaq; isuuqiaq; isuuqiq; isuuqiq; isuuraaryuk; isuuraaryuk; isuuraq; isuuraq; ivitaruk; ivitaruk; keyteeleek; keyteeleek; lake charr; lake trout; laker; mackinaw trout; masamacush; mountain trout; naaqtuuq; naaqtuuq; näluarryuk; näluarryuk; Näluarryuk; namaycush; namekus; namekus; nauktoq; nauktoq; nemakos; nemakos; nemeks; nemeks; némèkus; némèkus; salmon trout; sigguayaq; sigguayaq; siscowet; siuktuuk; siyuktuuq; taque; togue; Touladi; truite grise
- Canada/British Columbia: hupin; k'wit'thet; k'wsech; shamet skelex; shmexwalsh; sk'wel'eng's schaanexw; slhop' schaanexw; spak'ws schaanexw
- Canada/Quebec: ikhiloktok; ishioraliktâq; milaqkkâyoq
- Czech Republic: siven obrovký; siven obrovký
- Denmark: amerikansk søørred; Amerikansk søørred; canadarødding; Canadarødding; canadarøding; Canadarøding; kanadarødding; Kanadarødding; kanadarøding; Kanadarøding
- Finland: harmaanieriä; harmaanieriä
- France: cristivomer; omble d'Amérique; Omble du Canada; truite de lac d'Amérique
- Germany: Amerikanische Seeforelle
- Greenland: iclook; iclook; iqluq; iqluq
- Iceland: murta; murta
- Italy: trota di lago americana; trota di lago americana
- New Zealand: mackinaw trout
- Norway: canadaröye; Canadaröye; Canadarøye
- Portugal: salvelino-lacustre; salvelino-lacustre; truta-do-lago; truta-do-lago
- Russian Federation: severoamerikanskiy kristivomer
- Serbia: pastrva
- Slovakia: sivon velký; sivon velký
- Spain: trucha lacustre
- Sweden: canadaröding; Canadaröding; kanadaröding; Kanadaröding
- Switzerland: amerikanische Seeforelle; Amerikanische Seeforelle
- UK: great lake trout; grey trout; lake trout; namaycush; togue; touladi
- USA: great lake trout; lake trout; siscowet
- USA/Alaska: akalukpik; akalukpik; col-lic-puk; col-lic-puk; ikalukpik; ikalukpik; lake trout
- Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro): pastrva
Summary of Invasiveness
Top of pageS. namaycush is a freshwater fish native to North America. It has been introduced to other areas within North America and to South America, Europe, New Zealand and Japan. It is a highly piscovourous top predator (Fuller, 2007) and competes with native fish for habitat and food. S. namaycush has been reported to be responsible for the decline numerous populations of cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarkii and has been reported to prey heavily on the Utah chub Gila atraria (Teuscher and Luecke, 1996). Predation by lake trout has been shown to be a major factor in the decline of kokanee O. nerka in Lake Chelan, Washington (Schoen et al., 2012).
Taxonomic Tree
Top of page- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Metazoa
- Phylum: Chordata
- Subphylum: Vertebrata
- Class: Actinopterygii
- Order: Salmoniformes
- Family: Salmonidae
- Genus: Salvelinus
- Species: Salvelinus namaycush
Description
Top of pageS. namaycush has a deeply forked caudal fin and a slate grey to greenish body with lighter undersides. Cream to yellow spots are generally present on the head, body and dorsal and caudal fins. The lower fins tend to be orange-red with a narrow white edge. The species has nine to twelve gill rakers. Breeding males will develop a dark stripe on their sides temporarily (Lenart, 2001).
The average weight of S. namaycush is about 3 kg, but individuals can grow to up 27 kg under appropriate conditions (Hubert et al., 1994). Average length of S. namaycush varies from 45 to 68 cm (Scott and Crossman, 1973).
Distribution
Top of pageIn its native range, S. namaycush is widely distributed from northern Canada to New England and the Great Lakes basin (Page and Burr, 1991). Its established introduced range within North America includes the US states of California, Colorado, Idaho, Massachusetts, North Dakota, South Dakota, Washington and Wyoming. S. namaycush has been introduced into other countries such as Argentina, Austria, Bolivia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Morocco, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
Distribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
Last updated: 10 Feb 2022Continent/Country/Region | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | Reference | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Africa |
|||||||
Morocco | Present | Introduced | 1953 | ||||
Antarctica |
|||||||
French Southern Territories | Present | Introduced | 1961 | Original location reported: Kerguelen Islands | |||
Asia |
|||||||
Japan | Present | Introduced | 1904 | ||||
Europe |
|||||||
Austria | Present | Introduced | 1962 | ||||
Czechia | Present | Introduced | 1972 | ||||
Denmark | Present | Introduced | 1961 | ||||
Finland | Present | Introduced | 1955 | ||||
France | Present | Introduced | 1886 | ||||
Germany | Present | Introduced | 1883 | ||||
Italy | Present | Native | |||||
Norway | Present | Introduced | 1897 | ||||
Slovakia | Present | Introduced | |||||
Sweden | Present | Introduced | 1899 | ||||
Switzerland | Present | Introduced | 1888 | ||||
United Kingdom | Present | Introduced | 1870 | ||||
North America |
|||||||
Canada | Present | Native | |||||
-British Columbia | Present | Native | |||||
-Newfoundland and Labrador | Present | Native | |||||
-Quebec | Present | Native | |||||
United States | Present | ||||||
-Alaska | Present | Native | |||||
Oceania |
|||||||
New Zealand | Present | Introduced | First reported: 1901 - 1902 | ||||
South America |
|||||||
Argentina | Present | Introduced | 1904 | ||||
Bolivia | Present | Introduced | 1936 | ||||
Chile | Present | Introduced | 1949 | ||||
Peru | Present | Introduced | 1939 |
History of Introduction and Spread
Top of pageS. namaycush has been intentionally stocked as a sport fish in the majority of its introductions, though Kaeding et al. (1996) suggested that it was illegally introduced into Yellowstone Lake, Wyoming, USA.
In the Great Lakes of North America, part of its native range, S. namaycush has been stocked to restore populations that had been severely reduced by the sea lamprey.
Introductions
Top of pageIntroduced to | Introduced from | Year | Reason | Introduced by | Established in wild through | References | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural reproduction | Continuous restocking | |||||||
Argentina | USA | 1904 | Yes | |||||
Bolivia | USA | 1936 | No | |||||
Czech Republic | Norway | 1972 | No | |||||
Denmark | Sweden | 1961 | No | |||||
Denmark | USA | 1961 | No | |||||
Finland | USA | 1955 | ||||||
France | USA | 1963-1978 | ||||||
France | North America | 1886 | No | |||||
Germany | Switzerland | 1888 | Yes | |||||
Germany | USA | 1888 | Yes | |||||
Japan | USA | 1904 | Yes | |||||
Morocco | Canada | |||||||
New Zealand | USA | 1901-1902 | ||||||
Newfoundland and Labrador | Ontario | 1886-1893 | No | |||||
Norway | 1971 | Yes | ||||||
Peru | USA | 1940 | ||||||
Sweden | North America | 1959 | Yes | |||||
Switzerland | USA | 1888 | Yes | |||||
UK | USA | 1928 | No |
Risk of Introduction
Top of pageS. namaycush has been intentionally stocked as a sport fish in the majority of its introductions, and since it is still stocked intentionally this remains the most likely pathway for new introductions.
Habitat
Top of pageS. namaycush is a cold-water species, preferring temperatures below 13°C and requiring relatively high concentrations of dissolved oxygen for survival (Ryan, 1994). S. namaycush is the only major native North American sport fish adapted to the deep, cold water of oligotrophic (low-nutrient) lakes, such as those often found in northern Canada and the northern Great Lakes region (Shuter, 1998). At the southern range of the species, S. namaycush requires deep-water refuges, where its preferred temperature ranges and oxygen levels exist. Residing exclusively in freshwater and most often found in lakes, S. namaycush might also inhabit large river systems that have the necessary habitat characteristics.
Habitat List
Top of pageCategory | Sub-Category | Habitat | Presence | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Freshwater | ||||
Freshwater | Lakes | Principal habitat | Natural | |
Freshwater | Reservoirs | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | |
Freshwater | Reservoirs | Present, no further details | Natural | |
Freshwater | Rivers / streams | Secondary/tolerated habitat | Natural | |
Brackish | ||||
Marine |
Biology and Ecology
Top of pageReproductive biology
Spawning occurs mostly at night, with peak activity between dusk and 9 or 10 pm (Royce, 1951; Martin, 1957). One or two males approach a female, press against her sides and quiver, causing the female to release eggs, which are then fertilized. A large female may contain up to 17,000 eggs.
The eggs, which are quite large, become lodged in crevices in the rubble bottom, where they remain for months before hatching. Unlike most other salmonid species, S. namaycush do create nests (redds) during spawning. Age at maturity varies widely from around 5 years in southern areas of its native range to more than 20 years in northern areas.
Longevity
S. namaycush tends to reach a maximum age of 25 years; however, the oldest fish on record, in the Northwest Territories (Canada), was aged at 65 years.
Activity patterns
In large water bodies such as the Great Lakes, S. namaycush may migrate up to 300 km (186 mi) to their spawning grounds.
Associations
Muzzall and Whelan (2011) reviewed the available literature for parasites of fish within the Great Lakes. Below is a list of all identified on S. namaycush:
Adult Cestoda: Eubothrium crassum (Cooper, 1919; Pearse, 1924); Eubothrium salvelini, (Amin, 1977; Muzzall, 1989; Wardle, 1933; Dechtiar and Christie, 1988; Bangham, 1955; Muzzall and Bowen, 2000).
Larval/Immature Cestoda: Proteocephalus sp. (Muzzall, 1989).
Adult Nematoda: Cystidicola farionis (Ward and Magath, 1916); Cystidicola farionis (Lankester and Smith, 1980; Dextrase, 1987); Cystidicola stigmatura (Wright, 1879; Leidy, 1886; Black, 1983; Dechtiar and Lawrie, 1988;); Cystidicoloides ephemeridarum (Dechtiar and Lawrie, 1988); Cystidicola stigmatura (Ward and Magath, 1916).
Adult Acanthocephala: Acanthocephalus dirus (Amin, 1977; 1985; Muzzall, 1989); Echinorhynchus leidyi (Pearse, 1924b); Echinorhynchus salmonis (Pearse, 1924; Hnath, 1969; Amin and Burrows, 1977; Amin, 1985; Dechtiar and Christie, 1988; Muzzall, 1989;); Echinorhynchus lateralis (Dechtiar and Lawrie, 1988); Echinorhynchus salmonis (Dechtiar and Lawrie, 1988).
Adult Digenea: Crepidostomum farionis (Dechtiar and Lawrie, 1988) Monogenea: Discocotyle sagittata (Dechtiar and Lawrie, 1988).
Larval/Immature Digenea: Diplostomum spathaceum (Collins and Dechtiar, 1974; Dechtiar et al., 1988); Diplostomum sp. (Bangham, 1955; Muzzall and Bowen, 2000); Ichthyocotylurus intermedia (Collins and Dechtiar, 1974).
Hirudinea: Unidentified leeches (Pearse, 1924).
Copepoda: Salmincola extensus (Pearse, 1924); Salmincola siscowet (Dechtiar and Lawrie, 1988).
Natural Food Sources
Top of pageFood Source | Food Source Datasheet | Life Stage | Contribution to Total Food Intake (%) | Details |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alosa pseudoharengus | Aquatic|Adult | |||
Catostomus catostomus | Aquatic|Adult | |||
Cottus cognatus | Aquatic|Adult | |||
Cottus cognatus | Aquatic|Adult; Aquatic|Fry | |||
Myoxocephalus quadricornis | Aquatic|Adult; Aquatic|Fry | |||
Mysis relicta | Aquatic|Fry | |||
Notropis atherinoides | Aquatic|Adult | |||
Percopsis omiscomaycus | Aquatic|Adult | |||
Pontoporeia | Aquatic|Larval | |||
Pungitius pungitius | Aquatic|Fry | |||
Salvelinus namaycush | Aquatic|Adult |
Climate
Top of pageClimate | Status | Description | Remark |
---|---|---|---|
Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all year | Tolerated | Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all year | |
Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summer | Tolerated | Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summers | |
Cw - Warm temperate climate with dry winter | Tolerated | Warm temperate climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry winters) | |
Df - Continental climate, wet all year | Preferred | Continental climate, wet all year (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, wet all year) | |
Ds - Continental climate with dry summer | Preferred | Continental climate with dry summer (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, dry summers) | |
Dw - Continental climate with dry winter | Preferred | Continental climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, dry winters) |
Latitude/Altitude Ranges
Top of pageLatitude North (°N) | Latitude South (°S) | Altitude Lower (m) | Altitude Upper (m) |
---|---|---|---|
73 | 43 |
Water Tolerances
Top of pageParameter | Minimum Value | Maximum Value | Typical Value | Status | Life Stage | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Water temperature (ºC temperature) | 11.2 | Optimum |
Natural enemies
Top of pageNatural enemy | Type | Life stages | Specificity | References | Biological control in | Biological control on |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ameiurus nebulosus | Predator | Aquatic|Adult; Aquatic|Fry | not specific | |||
Ichthyomyzon unicuspis | Predator | Aquatic|Adult; Aquatic|Fry | not specific | |||
Lota lota | Predator | Aquatic|Adult | not specific | N | ||
Petromyzon marinus | Predator | Aquatic|Adult | not specific | N | ||
Prosopium cylindraceum | Predator | Aquatic|Adult; Aquatic|Fry | not specific |
Notes on Natural Enemies
Top of pageThere are several natural enemies of S. namaycush reported in its native range, including lamprey species (Ichthyomyzon unicuspis and Petromyzon marinus) and fish (Ameiurus nebulosus, Lota lota and Prosopium cylindraceum). Smaller S. namaycush are potentially predated upon by ducks and other birds.
Means of Movement and Dispersal
Top of pageNatural dispersal
In large water bodies such as the Great Lakes, S. namaycush may migrate up to 300 km (186 mi) to their spawning grounds.
Intentional introduction
S. namaycush is primarily bred, introduced and stocked for recreational fisheries worldwide (Fuller, 2007).
Pathway Causes
Top of pageCause | Notes | Long Distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Acclimatization societies | Stocked as a sport fish worldwide | Yes | Yes | |
Hunting, angling, sport or racing | Yes | Yes | ||
Intentional release | Released as a sport fish | Yes |
Pathway Vectors
Top of pageVector | Notes | Long Distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Water | All life stages by natural dispersal | Yes | Yes |
Impact Summary
Top of pageCategory | Impact |
---|---|
Economic/livelihood | Positive and negative |
Environment (generally) | Positive and negative |
Economic Impact
Top of pageS. namaycush was once an important commercial fish in the Great Lakes but numbers dropped sharply during the 1950s due to overfishing and predation by the sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus (Houston and Kelso, 1990). S. namaycush is still highly valued as a sport fish by anglers worldwide (Lenart, 2001). Recreational fishing and tourism may create a demand not only for food, accommodation and transportation, but also for related recreational activities such as camping, boating and canoeing, all of which may provide economic opportunities locally.
Environmental Impact
Top of pageThe various introductions of S. namaycush within the USA has had detrimental effects on native biodiversity. Several species of fish have been affected not only by competition from S. namaycush but by predation as well, as this species is a top predator (Fuller, 2007). For instance, numerous populations of cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) have either been eliminated (e.g. in Lake Tahoe, western USA) or severely reduced (e.g. in Yellowstone Lake, Wyoming, USA). S. namaycush introduced into Flaming Gorge Reservoir were found to prey heavily on the Utah chub Gila atraria (Teuscher and Luecke, 1996). Predation by lake trout was shown to be a major factor in the decline of kokanee Oncorhynchus nerka in Lake Chelan, Washington (Schoen et al., 2012).
Social Impact
Top of pageS. namaycush is a highly sought after recreational fishing species throughout North America.
Risk and Impact Factors
Top of page- Invasive in its native range
- Has a broad native range
- Abundant in its native range
- Tolerant of shade
- Capable of securing and ingesting a wide range of food
- Long lived
- Has high reproductive potential
- Altered trophic level
- Conflict
- Damaged ecosystem services
- Negatively impacts aquaculture/fisheries
- Reduced native biodiversity
- Threat to/ loss of endangered species
- Threat to/ loss of native species
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Competition (unspecified)
- Pest and disease transmission
- Hybridization
- Predation
- Highly likely to be transported internationally deliberately
- Highly likely to be transported internationally illegally
- Difficult/costly to control
Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
Top of pageS. namaycush looks similar to the brook trout, S. fontinalis; however, S. fontinalis can be distinguished by a black stripe on the anterior edge of their pelvic and anal fins (Lenart, 2001).
Prevention and Control
Top of pageDue to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Eradication
Numerous techniques have been used in an attempt to eradicate S. namaycush. In Yellowstone national park, USA, gillnetting and trapping were deemed the most suitable management techniques for its control (Kaeding et al., 1996). Electrofishing was effective in managing populations of S. namaycush, and is undertaken yearly in Yellowstone Lake (Greater Yellowstone Science Learning Center, 2012). Cox et al. (2012) examined the efficacy of high intensity sound from a seismic air gun in reducing survival of S. namaycush embryos, finding increased mortality in embryos at close range and younger age.
Control
As established populations are difficult and costly to control, further introductions or stocking should be avoided.
Chemical control
The only effective method of fish eradication is the application of rotenone, a piscicide that is also toxic to non target species.
Monitoring and surveillance (incl. remote sensing)
Both radio and acoustic telemetry can be used.
References
Top of pageAFMAFEWM, 2011. Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management.
Amin OM, 1985. The relationship between the size of some salmonid fishes and the intensity of their acanthocephalan infections. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 63:924-927.
Arkhipchuk V, 1999. Chromosome database. Database of Dr. Victor Arkhipchuk.
Bangham RV, 1955. Studies on parasites of Lake Huron and Manitoulin Island. The American Midland Naturalist Journal, 53:184- 194.
Cooper AR, 1919. North American pseudophyllidean cestodes from fishes. Illinois Biological Monographs, 4. 288-541.
Cox BS; Dux AM; Quist MC; Guy CS, 2012. Use of a seismic air gun to reduce survival of nonnative lake trout embryos: a tool for conservation? North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 32(2):292-298.
Dechtiar AO; Christie WJ, 1988. Survey of the parasite fauna of Lake Ontario fishes, 1961-1971. Great Lakes Fishery Commission, Technical Report, 51. 66-106.
Dechtiar AO; Lawrie AH, 1988. Survey of the parasite fauna of Lake Superior fishes, 1967-1975. Great Lakes Fishery Commission, Technical Report, 51. 1-18.
Dechtiar AO; Nepszy SJ, 1988. Survey of the parasite fauna of selected fish species from Lake Erie, 1970-1975. Great Lakes Fishery Commission, Technical Report, 51. 49-65.
Dextrase AJ, 1987. MSc thesis. Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada: Lakehead University.
FAO, 1997. FAO Database on Introduced Aquatic Species. Rome, Italy: FAO.
Froese R; Pauly D, 2004. FishBase DVD. Penang, Malaysia: Worldfish Center. Online at www.fishbase.org.
Greater Yellowstone Science Learning Center, 2012. Lake Trout Control. http://www.greateryellowstonescience.org/topics/biological/fish/yct/projects/laketrout. Acessed 8 Oct 2014
Houston KA; Kelso JRM, 1990. Lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) mortality - a review. Great Lakes Fishery Commission Research Completion Report. Ontario, Canada: Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Department of Fisheries and Oceans.
Hubert WA; Gipson RD; Whaley RA, 1994. Interpreting relative weights of lake trout stocks. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 14:212-215.
Kaeding LR; Boltz GD; Carty DG, 1996. Lake trout discovered in Yellowstone Lake threaten native cutthroat trout. Fisheries, 21(3):16-20.
Koli L, 1990. Werner Söderström Osakeyhtiö. Helsinki, Finland, 357 pp.
Leidy J, 1886. Notices of nematoid worms. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 38:308-313.
Martin NV, 1957. Reproduction of lake trout in Algonquin Park, Ontario. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 86:231-244.
Morrow JE, 1980. The freshwater fishes of Alaska. Animal Resources Ecology Library. British Columbia, Canada: University of British Columbia, 248.
Muzzall PM; Whelan G, 2011. Parasites of fish from the Great Lakes: a synopsis and review of the literature, 1871-2010. Great Lakes Fish. Comm. Misc. Publ.
Myers P; Espinosa R; Parr CS; Jones T; Hammond GS; Dewey TA, 2014. The Animal Diversity Web. Michigan, USA: University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. http://animaldiversity.org
Pearse AS, 1924. The parasites of lake fishes. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters, 21:161-194.
Royce WF, 1951. Breeding habits of lake trout in New York. Fishery bulletin, 52(59):59-76.
Ryan P; Marshall T, 1994. Niche Definition for Lake Trout and Its Use to Identify Populations at Risk. Canadian Journal of Fishery and Aquatic Science, 51:2513-2519.
Shuter B; Jones M; Korver R; Lester N, 1998. A general, life history based model for regional management of fish stocks. Canadian Journal of Fishery and Aquatic Science, 55:2161-2177.
USGS, 2013. USGS Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database. Gainesville, Florida, USA: United States Geological Survey. http://nas.er.usgs.gov
Wright RR, 1879. Contributions to American helminthology. Proceedings of the Canadian Institute, 1:54-75.
Distribution References
AFMAFEWM, 2011. Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management., Federal Ministry of Agriculture Forestry, Environment and Water Management.
CABI, Undated. CABI Compendium: Status as determined by CABI editor. Wallingford, UK: CABI
FAO, 1997. FAO database on introduced aquatic species., Rome, Italy: FAO.
Froese R, Pauly D, 2004. FishBase. http://www.fishbase.org
Koli L, 1990. Suomen kalat. Helsinki, Finland: Werner Söderström Osakeyhtiö. 357 pp.
Morrow JE, 1980. The freshwater fishes of Alaska. In: Animal Resources Ecology Library, British Columbia, Canada: University of British Columbia. 248.
Scott W B, Crossman E J, 1973. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Bulletin, 966 pp.
Links to Websites
Top of pageWebsite | URL | Comment |
---|---|---|
Greater Yellowstone Science | http://www.greateryellowstonescience.org/topics/biological/fish/yct/projects/laketrout |
Distribution Maps
Top of pageSelect a dataset
Map Legends
-
CABI Summary Records
Map Filters
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/