Staphylococcus aureus infections
Index
- Pictures
- Identity
- Pathogen/s
- Overview
- Host Animals
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Systems Affected
- Distribution
- Distribution Table
- Pathology
- Diagnosis
- List of Symptoms/Signs
- Disease Course
- Epidemiology
- Impact: Economic
- Zoonoses and Food Safety
- Disease Treatment
- Prevention and Control
- References
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate reportIdentity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Staphylococcus aureus infections
International Common Names
- English: agalatiae mastitis-metritis syndrome; avian staphylococcal infections; bacterial chondronecrosis with osteomyelitis in broiler chickens; bacterial endocarditis in ruminants; bovine actinobaccillosis; comb necrosis in layer breeder chickens; enzootic calf pneumonia; folliculitis of sheep; gangrenous dermatitis of chickens and turkeys; goat mastitis due to staphylococcus aureus; impetigo of sheep; mammary abscess in pigs; mastitis; mastitis in ewes due to miscellaneous bacteria; ovine and bovine infectious keratoconjunctivitis; ovine interdigital pouch lameness; purulent osteomyelitis; pyoderma of sheep; scalded skin disease; septicemia of lambs or kids, tick pyemia; staphylococcal dermatitis; staphylococcal dermatitis in birds; staphylococcal dermatitis in cattle, impetigo, folliculitis; staphylococcal dermatitis, folliculitis, furunculosis, impetigo, of sheep; staphylococcal dermatitis, folliculitis, impetigo, of sheep; staphylococcal mastitis; staphylococcal, staphylococcus aureus, mastitis in cows; staphylococcus aureus mastitis in ewes; Staphylococcus aureus-induced septicaemia; staphylococcus infections in birds
Local Common Names
- Norway: hva; mastitt
Overview
Top of pageHistory
The early classical historical, but un-referenced, description of Micrococcus (Staphylococcus) was recorded by Merchant and Parker (1967). These authors stated that micrococci were first discovered, in pus, by Ogston in 1881, who then divided the organism (Micrococcus) into two other groups namely Staphylococci and Streptococci respectively in 1883.
Merchant and Parker (1967) further stated that in 1884, these organisms (Staphylococci and streptococci) were first cultivated in artificial medium. During this process two species of Staphylococci, Staphylococcus pyogenes aureus and Staphylococcus pyogenes albus emerged.
Scientists have demonstrated the relationship of these cocci organisms to human infections following experimental self-inoculations.
Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Migula, in 1895, officially assigned three organisms (two staphylococci and one streptococci) to the genus Micrococcus and they were then named Micrococcus aureus, albus and citreus respectively in 1900. Further nomenclature of staphylococci into chromogenic strains such as S. pyogenes albus (a non-pigmented variety), a golden form, and an intermediate yellowish variety of S. pyogenes citreus, was observed to be merely a physiological characteristic that was readily lost during primary and sub-cultures. Transformation in historical nomenclature occurred then, when Buchanan, in 1911, used the genus name Micrococcus for the group and later Staphylococcus in 1917.
The first well defined systematic classification of these genera was by Bergey in (1948), who maintained the genus name Micrococcus; and in the 1957 edition classified them in the genus Staphylococcus and family Micrococcaceae consisting of four genera, Planococcus, Stomatococcus, Micrococcus and Staphylococcus. Bergey has since classified Staphylococcus in the family Staphylococcaceae. More than nineteen species of the genus Staphylococcus are recognized and four groups are clearly distinct, based on deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA:DNA) hybridization analysis. These four groups are S. epidermidis, S. saprophyticus, S. simulans and S. sciuri. Of the large number of staphylococcal species, only three (S. aureus, S. epidermidis and S. saprophyticus) are commonly associated with some human and animal diseases. However, S. aureus, amongst the staphylococcal species is one of the most important causative pathogens in a variety of human and animal diseases.
Association of S. aureus with animal diseases
One of the most economically important diseases caused by S. aureus in dairy animals is mastitis. This is commonly defined as an inflammation of the mammary gland accompanied by physical, chemical, pathological and bacteriological changes in the milk and glandular tissues (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Ameh et al., 1993; Oliver et al., 1999; Apolo et al., 1999; Fitz-Patrick, 2000). S. aureus mastitis in cattle, sheep and goats has serious financial and milk production implications for intensive herds and flocks in the diary industry (Elecko, 1998; Smith et al., 1998; Saratis et al., 1998; Barkema et al., 1999; Sears and Smith, 1999).
In an extensive system of production, multiparous ewes have been shown to have higher milk somatic cell counts compared with primiparous ewes (Lafi et al., 1994). In another study, S. aureus was reported to be the dominant pathogen in clinical cases of mastitis from 145 different breeds of Nigerian goats, as well as from 173 quarter milk samples collected from 297 dairy cows, maintained extensively in Egypt (Shoukry and Shabana, 1997).
The eradication of S. aureus from extensive dairy herds or flocks is more difficult than in intensive systems due to a non-adherence to mastitis control guidelines (Zurzul, 1994). Persistence of this organism in affected udders results in poor milk production, low condition scores, culling and preponderance of resistant strains in affected animals (Elecko, 1998; Zecconi and Piccinini, 1999; Tyagunenko et al., 1999; Costa et al., 2000). It can also lead to zoonotic transmissions from milk to man (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Oboegbulem and Fidelis, 1996).
S. aureus has also been incriminated, or shown to be associated with a variety of human and animal diseases. It has been reported as causing a generalized scalded skin disease in lambs, resembling ‘scalded skin syndrome’ of man. The characteristic lesions of this disease include exfoliation with deep ulcerations in the affected areas (Scott and Murphy, 1997; Yeruham et al., 1999).
Other infections caused by S. aureus and reported in pigs, include purulent osteomyelitis with lesions located at the costo-chrondral junction of affected pigs (Jensen et al., 1999). This disease has been experimentally reproduced when eight calves were intramedullarly infused with a haemolytic strain of S. aureus. This induced traumatic osteomyelitis shown by arteriographic and radiographic analysis. The analysis clearly indicated areas marked by an increased sprouting of osteomyelitic arterial networks around the meta-tarsal bones (Das et al., 1998). Similar microscopic osteo-myelitic lesions have also been observed in experimentally infected goats (Hoque, 1997; Singh et al., 1998).
Staphylococcal dermatitis in some domestic animal species is associated with three bacterial species, S. aureus, S. hyicus and S. epidermidis. S. aureus induced septicaemia has also been reported in chickens and lambs (Pyrah et al., 1994; Rasmaswamy et al., 1997; Fisher et al., 1998). Other important diseases associated with S. aureus in domestic animals which have serious implications in intensive and extensive husbandry systems includes agalactiae mastitis-metritis syndrome in cows and pigs. This is characterized by a purulent uterine discharge (Aerts et al., 1995; Esmat and Badr, 1996). Other equally important diseases implicated or associated with S. aureus in domestic animals are: ovine interdigital pouch lameness (Egwu et al., 1994), bovine actinobaccillosis (Mondodori et al., 1994), abcessation (Sharma et al., 1994), porcine gastroenteritis (Ayoade et al., 1990) and ovine/bovine infectious keratoconjunctivitis (Egwu et al., 1989; Egwu, 1992; Egwu et al., 1993; Chhabra et al., 1996; Takele et al., 2000).
The ability of S. aureus to produce these diseases in domestic animals, is due to elaboration of cytolytic, sphingomyelinase, leukocidic, demonecrotic and entero-toxins (A-E). These include enzymes such as hyaluronidase, nucleases, penicillinase, sphingomylinase, coagulases and the production of ‘slime’, which is known to aid attachment, inversion and multiplication of the organism (Baselga, 1994).
Drastic reduction and elimination of S. aureus-induced diseases, particularly mastitis, should involve good management. This includes good housing, sanitation, maintenance of milking equipment, routine monitoring and surveillance, composite and bulk milk testing, milker's hygiene, accurate timing and strategic treatment or chemotherapy of all diseases induced or associated with S. aureus. These measures are important to ensure the production of good quality milk and profitability. More importantly they are ensuring the consumption of high quality milk as one of our essential dietary components, with reduced chances of contracting diseases such as tuberculosis, streptococcal sore throat, staphylococcal entero-toxin and brucellosis. These are all of zoonotic importance, and are commonly associated with inadequate food safety or hygiene.
Host Animals
Top of pageAnimal name | Context | Life stage | System |
---|---|---|---|
Bos indicus (zebu) | Domesticated host; Experimental settings | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages | |
Bos taurus (cattle) | Domesticated host; Experimental settings | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages | |
Bubalus bubalis (Asian water buffalo) | Domesticated host; Experimental settings | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages | |
Camelus dromedarius (dromedary camel) | Domesticated host | ||
Capra hircus (goats) | |||
Gallus gallus domesticus (chickens) | Domesticated host | Poultry|All Stages | |
Lama glama (llamas) | Domesticated host | ||
Lama pacos (alpacas) | Domesticated host | ||
Meleagris gallopavo (turkey) | |||
Ovis aries (sheep) | Domesticated host; Experimental settings | Sheep and Goats|All Stages | |
Sus scrofa (pigs) | Domesticated host; Experimental settings; Wild host | Pigs|All Stages |
Hosts/Species Affected
Top of pageVectors and Intermediate Hosts
No vectors or intermediate hosts are needed for the development or transmission of S. aureus, and perhaps other staphylococcal organisms. Moreover, no literature exists to date reporting any significant role vectors or intermediate hosts may play in the transmission of staphylococcal diseases.
Hosts
There is a wide host range for infections caused by S. aureus and other important specific diseases caused by this species. Nevertheless, host susceptibility is dependent on a number of factors.
Survival of the causal organism in different climatic and geographical locations may depict differences in invasiveness, virulence, pathogenicity and therapeutic variations as observed with this species (Blood and Radostits, 1989; El-Sukhon, 1995; Bansel et al., 1995; Mackie et al., 1998; Zadoks et al., 2000; Larsen et al., 2000).
Host specific influences, such as whether the animal is at the primiparous or multiparous state, can influence the colonisation, distribution and transmission of S. aureus in all clinical stages of mastitis (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Pyorala et al., 1994; Simpson et al., 1995; Poornima and Updhye, 1995; Boscos et al., 1996; Vural et al., 1999).
The age of the female animal is also an important consideration in the susceptibility to mastitis, as the number of pregnancies can affect intramammary infections (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Vural et al., 1999). Some inherited genetic characteristics, or resistance conferred by the host in retarding the entry and penetration of S. aureus into tissues of the udder, can be reflected in the anatomical conformation. This includes the size of the udder, shape, length of the teat and the openings of the teat sphincter (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Saratis et al., 1998; Aliyu et al., 1999).
Variations in the breed susceptibility of dairy animals to mastitis and other staphylococcal infections have been reported (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Egwu et al., 1995a; Boscos et al., 1996). Extensive dairy husbandry and semi-intensive systems, particularly in tropical countries during the time of scarce pasture grazing, result in various injuries of the teat. These injuries include abrasions, perforations of the udder and dog bites resulting in jagged and lacerated wounds, which enhance fast entry of the causal mastitis organisms (Smith and Roquisnsky 1977; Ameh et al., 1993, Lafi et al., 1998).
Host immunity may involve the ability of the animal to mount an effective systemic and local immune response. This is an important aspect of the host susceptibility to infection. Production of antibodies to specific immunogenic epitopes of S. aureus and cellular immune responses could determine the ability of the host to ward-off previous or recent infections by S. aureus and other staphylococcal diseases (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Park et al., 1999; Hayakawa et al., 2000; Rivas et al., 2000; Riolett et al., 2000).
Systems Affected
Top of pageblood and circulatory system diseases of pigs
blood and circulatory system diseases of poultry
blood and circulatory system diseases of small ruminants
bone, foot diseases and lameness in large ruminants
bone, foot diseases and lameness in pigs
bone, foot diseases and lameness in small ruminants
digestive diseases of large ruminants
digestive diseases of pigs
digestive diseases of poultry
digestive diseases of small ruminants
mammary gland diseases of large ruminants
mammary gland diseases of pigs
mammary gland diseases of small ruminants
multisystemic diseases of large ruminants
multisystemic diseases of pigs
multisystemic diseases of poultry
multisystemic diseases of small ruminants
muscular skeletal diseases of poultry
nervous system diseases of large ruminants
nervous system diseases of pigs
nervous system diseases of poultry
nervous system diseases of small ruminants
reproductive diseases of large ruminants
reproductive diseases of pigs
reproductive diseases of poultry
reproductive diseases of small ruminants
respiratory diseases of large ruminants
respiratory diseases of pigs
respiratory diseases of poultry
respiratory diseases of small ruminants
skin and ocular diseases of large ruminants
skin and ocular diseases of pigs
skin and ocular diseases of poultry
skin and ocular diseases of small ruminants
urinary tract and renal diseases of large ruminants
urinary tract and renal diseases of pigs
urinary tract and renal diseases of poultry
urinary tract and renal diseases of small ruminants
Distribution
Top of pageStaphylococcus aureus and the diseases this organism causes, or is associated with, occur worldwide in all continents and countries of the world. Surveys of various incriminated infections and diseases have shown remarkable similarity in epidemiology of S. aureus and its associated diseases (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Ameh et al., 1993; Oliver et al., 1999).
Although the distribution and occurrence of S. aureus and its diseases as shown on the map, the geographical spread is not exhaustive. The organism is widespread in countries where intensive and extensive livestock rearing are prominent (Smith et al., 1998; Blood and Radostits, 1989; Barkema et al., 1999).
Distribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
Last updated: 10 Jan 2020Continent/Country/Region | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | Reference | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Africa |
|||||||
Botswana | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Egypt | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Ethiopia | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Kenya | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Morocco | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Nigeria | Present, Widespread | ||||||
South Africa | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Sudan | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Tanzania | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Asia |
|||||||
Bangladesh | Present, Widespread | ||||||
China | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | |||||
-Shandong | Present, Widespread | ||||||
India | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Andhra Pradesh | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Bihar | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Himachal Pradesh | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Jammu and Kashmir | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Odisha | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Iran | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Israel | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Jordan | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Saudi Arabia | Present, Widespread | ||||||
South Korea | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Taiwan | Present | ||||||
Turkey | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Europe |
|||||||
Austria | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Belgium | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Bulgaria | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Croatia | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Czechia | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Czechoslovakia | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Denmark | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Estonia | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Finland | Present, Widespread | ||||||
France | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Germany | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Greece | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Hungary | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Italy | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Netherlands | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Norway | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Poland | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Russia | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | |||||
-Russia (Europe) | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Slovakia | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Slovenia | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Spain | Present, Widespread | ||||||
United Kingdom | Present, Widespread | ||||||
North America |
|||||||
Canada | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Ontario | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Quebec | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Costa Rica | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Mexico | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Trinidad and Tobago | Present, Widespread | ||||||
United States | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-California | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Connecticut | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Illinois | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Michigan | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-New Mexico | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-New York | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Oklahoma | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Pennsylvania | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Rhode Island | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Texas | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Washington | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Wisconsin | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Oceania |
|||||||
Australia | Present, Widespread | ||||||
New Zealand | Present, Widespread | ||||||
South America |
|||||||
Argentina | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Bolivia | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Brazil | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Paraiba | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Pernambuco | Present, Widespread | Original citation: Sa et al. (2000) | |||||
-Rio de Janeiro | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Rio Grande do Sul | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Uruguay | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Venezuela | Present, Widespread |
Pathology
Top of pageGross pathology
Gross and histopathological changes are common features that are associated with mastitis infected glands. Gross lesions are usually obvious following palpation of the infected udder and can be either a result of pronounced or massive swellings. The udder is usually enlarged to approximately twice its normal size, with other associated signs which are discussed in the disease course text (Blood and Radostits, 1984; Egwu et al., 1994; Ameh et al., 1996; Fabre et al., 1997). Necrotizing gangrenous lesions are a common feature associated with mastitis caused by S. aureus, Clostridium perfringens and Escherichia coli (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Ameh et al., 1994). The affected gland shows marked necrosis of the parenchymal epithelium coupled with foci of epithelial erosions, and ulcerations of the ductal system and surrounding skin (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Ameh et al., 1994; Cifrain et al., 1995, Jones, 1998).
Though necropsy procedures are usually not common in animals that have died of gangrenous and other clinical forms of mastitis, further examination of histopathological changes in affected animals are important in order to ascertain the extent of tissue damage.
Histopathology
Lesions observed through histopathology, include accumulation of large numbers of PMNs and other inflammatory cell cytokines (Sanchez et al., 1994; Shoshani et al., 1995; Leitner et al., 2000). Histologically, the inter-lobular duct’s epithelium, in the infected mammary gland, has been displaced by bits of necrotic debris and bacterial clumps. These ducts (interlobular) are necrotic with fibrinous thrombi, and sometimes the vascular walls of the inter-lobular stroma exhibit thrombosis (Shibahara and Nkamura, 1999; Leitner et al., 2000).
Marked accumulation of PMNs, which is sometimes not reflected in the grossly affected gland, is the basis of sub-acute diagnosis of mastitis using the California, Wisconsin and other somatic cell counts (Lam et al., 1996; Hulsen, 1997). This histopathological change, though not diagnostic for S. aureus-induced mastitis, could reveal the causative agent of the mastitis pathogen if backed by a laboratory culture of the collected samples.
Diagnosis
Top of pageHistory of Persistent Mastitis
This forms an integral part of the diagnostic tool of staphylococcal mastitis. A history of recurring and persistent mastitis in a flock or herd probably involves S. aureus as the sole or one of the multi-causative agents. This is because S. aureus can produce resistance to most anti-bacterials, as a result of production of beta-lactamase or penicillinase, allowing the organism to persist in the tissues of the udder (Allen et al., 1994; Simko and Bartko, 1996; Schlegelova and Sediva, 1999) following prolonged antibiotic treatment with unsuitable antibiotics.
Diagnosis based on history can be carried out either during on farm investigations/visits or by the use of questionnaires. Questions asked are usually based on the number of animals affected in the flock or herd, morbidity and mortality, breed, recurring cases, milk yield etc. Response to antibiotic treatments, cure rates and hygiene practices should form the bed-rock of using history as a diagnostic tool during epidemiological investigations.
Clinical Signs
The gross clinical signs manifested in affected animals with mastitis are very obvious, even when accompanied by systemic infections. Since many clinical forms of the disease have been described by many authors (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Deutz et al., 1995; Ameh et al., 1996; Fabre et al., 1997), most farmers can recognize affected animals with mastitis grossly or following assistance by veterinarians. Early recognition of these forms of mastitis allows urgent and prompt action for the affected animal, including initiation of treatment where necessary.
Laboratory Diagnosis
Laboratory diagnosis forms another very important component for confirmatory diagnosis of S. aureus mastitis and related diseases. The colony morphology on simple laboratory media may be fundamental in ascribing the agent S.aureus as a causal organism from cultured samples, particularly for sheep and ox-blood agar plates, due to the production of alpha or beta haemolysis. Laboratory cultures of milk from individual quarter, half, composite or bulk tanks, can be used to enable isolation of the organism (Hogenveen et al., 1997; Leitner et al., 2000). Cows, ewes, does and other animals with sub-clinical mastitis, may pose serious diagnostic problem(s) to the inexperienced farmer. Somatic cell and bacterial counts are then needed to make an accurate diagnosis (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Simpson et al., 1995; Hulsen, 1997; Lam et al., 1996) based on the degree of inflammatory PMNs and the number of leukocyte cells detectable on a graded scale.
Bacterial counts of more than 200 are used as a baseline for positive samples (Blood and Radostits, 1989). Somatic cell counts (PMNs) greater than 250,000/ml in milk are suggestive of an inflammatory process (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Beloti et al., 1997; Barkema et al., 1997; Allore et al., 1998; Bauldry et al., 1999). Examination of milk using the milk cup, in the laboratory or by the pen-side of the affected animal, is important for enabling the farmer, veterinarian or technologist to assess the milk quality, by examining the consistency and colour of the milk. Also important is the combined use of somatic cell count and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (Ngase) enzyme in discriminating the quarters with or without mastitis (Faingold et al., 1995; Pyorala and Pyorala, 1997). Experience and practice with any of these procedures highlighted will assist in the diagnosis and recognition of mastitic milk.
Serology
Mastitis caused by S. aureus is increasing in importance throughout the world. Since intensification of dairy farming, even in some tropical countries, the disease is gaining recognition, and therefore the control and eradication of mastitis should be of utmost priority to the dairy farmer. Early diagnosis of this disease using more reliable, specific and sensitive laboratory diagnostic tools, is gaining acceptance for rapid prevention and initiation of chemotherapeutic measures. Strains of S. aureus may vary in their geographical origin and antibiotic sensitivity patterns, as well as in their phage or ribotypes (Aarestrup et al., 1995; Adesiyun, 1995; Yoshida et al., 1997; Raimundo et al., 1999). Furthermore, diverse geographical isolates of S. aureus can be characterized by using genomic finger printing of isolates from milk. In one such study, 137 S. aureus isolates were categorized into 20 distinct DNA finger printing profiles, which were further amplified by PCR at 506, 770, 784 and 2479 bp regions (Kim et al., 1999). Also the use of genes expressed by S. aureus have been amplified using PCR on milk samples (Khan et al., 1988; Lammers et al., 2000; Tisala et al., 2000). Example genes used are the ‘nuc gene’ or those screened from the mutant library (Lac Z mutants), including those from the 165-235 ribosomal RNA spacer sequences. Other combined diagnostic techniques incorporating laboratory culture, somatic cell counts and enzyme linked immunosorbent assays have been described for the diagnosis of S. aureus mastitis in dairy cows (Hicks et al., 1994; Fox and Adams, 2000). Some other laboratory sensitive methods for the diagnosis of diseases caused by S. aureus, include the use of pulse field gel electrophoresis for identification of isolates (Mc Cullagh et al., 1998; Dalamitra et al., 1998) and other simple laboratory enzyme-based methods for milk samples (Faingold et al., 1995; Pyorala and Pyorala, 1997).
Immunology
Systemic and local immune responses are provoked during intra-mammary infection with S. aureus. The immunoglobulins involved in body fluids or milk during humoral immunity are IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgA and IgMs (Guidry et al., 1994; Leitner et al., 2000). As a result of possession of different antigenic components on the surface of S. aureus, antibodies are usually directed against these surface antigenic sites, and to the different toxins elaborated by these organisms (Baldi et al., 1994; Quinones and Demo, 1997; Jones, 1998).
Cellular immunity also plays a functional protective role in S. aureus mastitis and other staphylococcal diseases. Specific recruitment of mammary neutrophils and leukocyte or lymphocyte sub-populations following vaccination with type-5 capsular polysaccharide (Cp5) antigen and whole cells of S. aureus, have been reported in experimental studies (Herbelin et al., 1995; Almeida et al., 1997; Waller and Colditz, 1999). Nevertheless, altered immune reactions such as type I hypersensitivity reactions following inoculation of S. aureus have been reported in an experimental goat (Schofield et al., 1997). This shows that immunology to this disease can be protective, but can sometimes be accompanied by altered states of immunological reactions, which can be damaging to the affected host.
List of Symptoms/Signs
Top of pageSign | Life Stages | Type |
---|---|---|
Cardiovascular Signs / Absent p waves | Sign | |
Cardiovascular Signs / Arrhythmia, irregular heart rate, pulse | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Cardiovascular Signs / Atrial fibrillation | Sign | |
Cardiovascular Signs / Heart murmur | Sign | |
Cardiovascular Signs / Increased strength of pulse | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Cardiovascular Signs / Jugular pulse | Sign | |
Cardiovascular Signs / Palpable precordial thrill | Sign | |
Cardiovascular Signs / Peripheral venous distention, jugular distention | Sign | |
Cardiovascular Signs / Sinus tachycardia | Sign | |
Cardiovascular Signs / Tachycardia, rapid pulse, high heart rate | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Cardiovascular Signs / Ventricular premature beat, multifocal or unifocal | Sign | |
Digestive Signs / Anorexia, loss or decreased appetite, not nursing, off feed | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Pigs|Gilt; Pigs|Sow; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Sign |
Digestive Signs / Ascites, fluid abdomen | Sign | |
Digestive Signs / Congestion oral mucous membranes, erythema, redness oral mucosa | Sign | |
Digestive Signs / Decreased amount of stools, absent faeces, constipation | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Pigs|Gilt; Pigs|Sow; Sheep and Goats|Gimmer; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Sign |
Digestive Signs / Diarrhoea | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Digestive Signs / Excessive salivation, frothing at the mouth, ptyalism | Sign | |
Digestive Signs / Grinding teeth, bruxism, odontoprisis | Sign | |
Digestive Signs / Haematemesis, vomiting blood | Pigs|Growing-finishing pig; Pigs|Weaner | Sign |
Digestive Signs / Hepatosplenomegaly, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly | Sign | |
Digestive Signs / Rumen hypomotility or atony, decreased rate, motility, strength | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Sign |
Digestive Signs / Vomiting or regurgitation, emesis | Pigs|Growing-finishing pig; Pigs|Weaner | Sign |
General Signs / Corneal or ocular foreign body, eye | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
General Signs / Cyanosis, blue skin or membranes | Sign | |
General Signs / Cyanosis, blue skin or membranes | Sign | |
General Signs / Cyanosis, blue skin or membranes | Sign | |
General Signs / Cyanosis, blue skin or membranes | Sign | |
General Signs / Cyanosis, blue skin or membranes | Sign | |
General Signs / Dehydration | Sign | |
General Signs / Dehydration | Sign | |
General Signs / Discomfort, restlessness in birds | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Sign |
General Signs / Fever, pyrexia, hyperthermia | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Cattle and Buffaloes|Heifer; Pigs|Gilt; Pigs|Sow; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|Gimmer; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Sign |
General Signs / Forefoot swelling, mass front foot, feet | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Sign |
General Signs / Foreign body of the limbs, legs, foot, feet, in birds | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Sign |
General Signs / Forelimb lameness, stiffness, limping fore leg | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|Lamb | Diagnosis |
General Signs / Forelimb swelling, mass in fore leg joint and / or non-joint area | Sign | |
General Signs / Forelimb swelling, mass in fore leg joint and / or non-joint area | Sign | |
General Signs / Forelimb swelling, mass in fore leg joint and / or non-joint area | Sign | |
General Signs / Generalized lameness or stiffness, limping | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|Lamb | Diagnosis |
General Signs / Generalized weakness, paresis, paralysis | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Cattle and Buffaloes|Heifer; Pigs|Gilt; Pigs|Sow; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|Gimmer; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Sign |
General Signs / Haemorrhage of any body part or clotting failure, bleeding | Sign | |
General Signs / Haemorrhage of any body part or clotting failure, bleeding | Sign | |
General Signs / Head, face, ears, jaw, nose, nasal, swelling, mass | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Sign |
General Signs / Hindfoot swelling, mass rear foot, feet | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Sign |
General Signs / Hindlimb lameness, stiffness, limping hind leg | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|Lamb | Diagnosis |
General Signs / Hindlimb swelling, mass in hind leg joint and / or non-joint area | Sign | |
General Signs / Hindlimb swelling, mass in hind leg joint and / or non-joint area | Sign | |
General Signs / Hindlimb swelling, mass in hind leg joint and / or non-joint area | Sign | |
General Signs / Hindlimb swelling, mass in hind leg joint and / or non-joint area | Sign | |
General Signs / Hypothermia, low temperature | Sign | |
General Signs / Hypothermia, low temperature | Sign | |
General Signs / Inability to stand, downer, prostration | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Cattle and Buffaloes|Heifer; Sheep and Goats|Gimmer; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Sign |
General Signs / Increased mortality in flocks of birds | Sign | |
General Signs / Increased mortality in flocks of birds | Sign | |
General Signs / Increased mortality in flocks of birds | Sign | |
General Signs / Intraocular mass, swelling interior of eye | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
General Signs / Kyphosis, arched back | Sign | |
General Signs / Lack of growth or weight gain, retarded, stunted growth | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Poultry|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
General Signs / Lameness, stiffness, stilted gait in birds | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Diagnosis |
General Signs / Lymphadenopathy, swelling, mass or enlarged lymph nodes | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Cattle and Buffaloes|Heifer; Pigs|Gilt; Pigs|Sow; Sheep and Goats|Breeding male; Sheep and Goats|Gimmer; Sheep and Goats|Hogget; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Sign |
General Signs / Mammary gland swelling, mass, hypertrophy udder, gynecomastia | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Cattle and Buffaloes|Heifer; Pigs|Gilt; Pigs|Sow; Sheep and Goats|Gimmer; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Diagnosis |
General Signs / Orbital, periorbital, periocular, conjunctival swelling, eyeball mass | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
General Signs / Pale mucous membranes or skin, anemia | Sign | |
General Signs / Pale mucous membranes or skin, anemia | Sign | |
General Signs / Paraparesis, weakness, paralysis both hind limbs | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Sign |
General Signs / Petechiae or ecchymoses, bruises, ecchymosis | Sign | |
General Signs / Petechiae or ecchymoses, bruises, ecchymosis | Sign | |
General Signs / Petechiae or ecchymoses, bruises, ecchymosis | Sign | |
General Signs / Reluctant to move, refusal to move | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Cattle and Buffaloes|Heifer; Sheep and Goats|Gimmer; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Sign |
General Signs / Sudden death, found dead | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Cattle and Buffaloes|Heifer; Sheep and Goats|Gimmer; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Sign |
General Signs / Swelling of the limbs, legs, foot, feet, in birds | Sign | |
General Signs / Swelling of the limbs, legs, foot, feet, in birds | Sign | |
General Signs / Swelling of the limbs, legs, foot, feet, in birds | Sign | |
General Signs / Swelling skin or subcutaneous, mass, lump, nodule | Sign | |
General Signs / Swelling skin or subcutaneous, mass, lump, nodule | Sign | |
General Signs / Swelling skin or subcutaneous, mass, lump, nodule | Sign | |
General Signs / Swelling skin or subcutaneous, mass, lump, nodule | Sign | |
General Signs / Thoracic swelling, mass, thorax, chest, ribs, sternum | Pigs|Growing-finishing pig; Pigs|Weaner | Sign |
General Signs / Trembling, shivering, fasciculations, chilling | Sign | |
General Signs / Trembling, shivering, fasciculations, chilling | Sign | |
General Signs / Underweight, poor condition, thin, emaciated, unthriftiness, ill thrift | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Cattle and Buffaloes|Heifer; Pigs|Gilt; Pigs|Sow; Sheep and Goats|Gimmer; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Sign |
General Signs / Weakness, paresis, paralysis of the legs, limbs in birds | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Cattle and Buffaloes|Heifer; Pigs|Gilt; Pigs|Sow; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|Gimmer; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Sign |
General Signs / Weakness, paresis, paralysis, drooping, of the wings | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Sign |
General Signs / Weight loss | Sign | |
General Signs / Weight loss | Sign | |
General Signs / Weight loss | Sign | |
General Signs / Weight loss | Sign | |
General Signs / Weight loss | Sign | |
General Signs / Weight loss | Sign | |
Musculoskeletal Signs / Abnormal curvature, angulation, deviation of legs, limbs, feet of birds | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Diagnosis |
Musculoskeletal Signs / Contracture hind limb, leg | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Diagnosis |
Musculoskeletal Signs / Contracture of limbs, legs, foot, feet in birds | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Diagnosis |
Musculoskeletal Signs / Contracture of the toes of birds, curly toe | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Diagnosis |
Musculoskeletal Signs / Contracture, curvature, wings | Sign | |
Musculoskeletal Signs / Malformation of sternum, chest, thorax | Pigs|Boar; Pigs|Gilt; Pigs|Growing-finishing pig; Pigs|Piglet; Pigs|Sow; Pigs|Weaner | Diagnosis |
Nervous Signs / Circling | Sign | |
Nervous Signs / Dullness, depression, lethargy, depressed, lethargic, listless | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Pigs|Gilt; Pigs|Sow; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Sign |
Nervous Signs / Head tilt | Sign | |
Nervous Signs / Tremor | Sign | |
Ophthalmology Signs / Abnormal pupillary response to light | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Ophthalmology Signs / Blindness | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Ophthalmology Signs / Cataract, lens opacity | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Ophthalmology Signs / Chemosis, conjunctival, scleral edema, swelling | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Ophthalmology Signs / Conjunctival, scleral, injection, abnormal vasculature | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Ophthalmology Signs / Conjunctival, scleral, laceration, cut, tear, injury | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Ophthalmology Signs / Conjunctival, scleral, papules | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Ophthalmology Signs / Conjunctival, scleral, redness | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Ophthalmology Signs / Corneal edema, opacity | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Ophthalmology Signs / Corneal injury, cut, tear | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Ophthalmology Signs / Corneal neovascularization, pannus | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Ophthalmology Signs / Corneal swelling, mass, nodule | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Ophthalmology Signs / Decreased or absent menace response but not blind | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Ophthalmology Signs / Decreased tearing, lacrimation | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Ophthalmology Signs / Hyphema, blood anterior chamber of eye, "black eye" | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Ophthalmology Signs / Hypopyon, lipid, or fibrin, flare, of anterior chamber | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Ophthalmology Signs / Lacrimation, tearing, serous ocular discharge, watery eyes | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Ophthalmology Signs / Photophobia | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Forefoot pain, front foot | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Sign |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Forelimb pain, front leg | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Sign |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Hindlimb pain, hind leg | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Sign |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Ocular pain, eye | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain mammary gland, udder | Sign | |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain mammary gland, udder | Sign | |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain mammary gland, udder | Sign | |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain mammary gland, udder | Sign | |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain mammary gland, udder | Sign | |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain mammary gland, udder | Sign | |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain mammary gland, udder | Sign | |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain of the limbs, legs, foot, feet in birds | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Sign |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain on external abdominal pressure | Sign | |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain, chest, thorax, ribs, sternum | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain, head, face, jaw, ears | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Sign |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain, kidney, ureters, on palpation | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Diagnosis |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain, umbilicus | Cattle and Buffaloes|Calf; Pigs|Piglet; Sheep and Goats|Lamb | Diagnosis |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain, vulva, vagina | Pigs|Sow | Sign |
Pain / Discomfort Signs / Skin pain | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Reproductive Signs / Agalactia, decreased, absent milk production | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Pigs|Gilt; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Sign |
Reproductive Signs / Bloody milk, red, pink, brown milk | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Pigs|Gilt; Pigs|Sow; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Diagnosis |
Reproductive Signs / Cold mammary gland, cool udder | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Pigs|Sow; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Diagnosis |
Reproductive Signs / Decreased hatchability of eggs | Poultry|Embryo | Diagnosis |
Reproductive Signs / Edema of mammary gland, udder | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Cattle and Buffaloes|Heifer; Pigs|Gilt; Pigs|Sow; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Diagnosis |
Reproductive Signs / Enlarged uterus | Pigs|Sow | Diagnosis |
Reproductive Signs / Firm mammary gland, hard udder | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Pigs|Sow; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Diagnosis |
Reproductive Signs / Mastitis, abnormal milk | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Pigs|Gilt; Pigs|Sow; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Diagnosis |
Reproductive Signs / Mucous discharge, vulvar, vaginal | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Pigs|Gilt; Pigs|Growing-finishing pig; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Sign |
Reproductive Signs / Obstruction of milk outflow | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Pigs|Sow; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Diagnosis |
Reproductive Signs / Papule, pustule, vesicle, ulcer penis or prepuce | Cattle and Buffaloes|Bull; Cattle and Buffaloes|Ox; Cattle and Buffaloes|Steer; Pigs|Boar; Pigs|Weaner; Sheep and Goats|Breeding male; Sheep and Goats|Hogget | Sign |
Reproductive Signs / Purulent discharge, penis or prepuce | Cattle and Buffaloes|Bull; Cattle and Buffaloes|Ox; Cattle and Buffaloes|Steer; Pigs|Boar; Pigs|Weaner; Sheep and Goats|Breeding male; Sheep and Goats|Hogget | Sign |
Reproductive Signs / Slough of mammary gland, udder | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Pigs|Growing-finishing pig; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Diagnosis |
Reproductive Signs / Teat injury, cut, tear | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Pigs|Gilt; Pigs|Sow; Sheep and Goats|Mature female | Sign |
Reproductive Signs / Vulval ulcers, vesicles, erosions, tears, cuts, pustules, papules | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Reproductive Signs / Warm mammary gland, hot, heat, udder | Sign | |
Reproductive Signs / Warm mammary gland, hot, heat, udder | Sign | |
Reproductive Signs / Warm mammary gland, hot, heat, udder | Sign | |
Reproductive Signs / Warm mammary gland, hot, heat, udder | Sign | |
Reproductive Signs / Warm mammary gland, hot, heat, udder | Sign | |
Respiratory Signs / Abnormal lung or pleural sounds, rales, crackles, wheezes, friction rubs | Sign | |
Respiratory Signs / Abnormal lung or pleural sounds, rales, crackles, wheezes, friction rubs | Sign | |
Respiratory Signs / Coughing, coughs | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Respiratory Signs / Dyspnea, difficult, open mouth breathing, grunt, gasping | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Respiratory Signs / Epistaxis, nosebleed, nasal haemorrhage, bleeding | Sign | |
Respiratory Signs / Epistaxis, nosebleed, nasal haemorrhage, bleeding | Sign | |
Respiratory Signs / Increased respiratory rate, polypnea, tachypnea, hyperpnea | Sign | |
Respiratory Signs / Increased respiratory rate, polypnea, tachypnea, hyperpnea | Sign | |
Respiratory Signs / Increased respiratory rate, polypnea, tachypnea, hyperpnea | Sign | |
Respiratory Signs / Mucoid nasal discharge, serous, watery | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Respiratory Signs / Nasal mucosal ulcers, vesicles, erosions, cuts, tears, papules, pustules | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Respiratory Signs / Purulent nasal discharge | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Respiratory Signs / Sneezing, sneeze | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Alopecia, thinning, shedding, easily epilated, loss of, hair | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Cold skin, cool ears, extremities | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Cold skin, cool ears, extremities | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Cold skin, cool ears, extremities | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Cold skin, cool ears, extremities | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Cold skin, cool ears, extremities | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Cold skin, cool ears, extremities | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Cracked skin, fissure | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Enlarged feather follicles in birds | Poultry|Cockerel; Poultry|Day-old chick; Poultry|Mature female; Poultry|Mature male; Poultry|Young poultry | Sign |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Foul odor skin, smell | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Diagnosis |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Loss of feathers, loose feathers | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Moist skin, hair or feathers | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Moist skin, hair or feathers | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Moist skin, hair or feathers | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Pruritus, itching skin | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Diagnosis |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Purulent discharge skin | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Diagnosis |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Rough hair coat, dull, standing on end | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Ruffled, ruffling of the feathers | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Ruffled, ruffling of the feathers | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Scarred skin | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Skin crusts, scabs | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Skin crusts, scabs | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Skin crusts, scabs | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Skin crusts, scabs | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Skin edema | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Skin erythema, inflammation, redness | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Diagnosis |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Skin necrosis, sloughing, gangrene | Cattle and Buffaloes|Cow; Pigs|Gilt; Sheep and Goats|Gimmer | Sign |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Skin papules | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Diagnosis |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Skin pustules | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Skin scales, flakes, peeling | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Skin scales, flakes, peeling | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Skin ulcer, erosion, excoriation | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Skin vesicles, bullae, blisters | Cattle and Buffaloes|All Stages; Pigs|All Stages; Sheep and Goats|All Stages | Sign |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Subcutaneous crepitation, skin emphysema | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Warm skin, hot, heat | Sign | |
Skin / Integumentary Signs / Warm skin, hot, heat | Sign | |
Urinary Signs / Haematuria, blood in urine | Sign | |
Urinary Signs / Proteinuria, protein in urine | Sign |
Disease Course
Top of pagePathogenesis
S. aureus induces disease by either toxin production (Cifrian et al., 1996; Quinones and Demo, 1997; Jones 1998), or by direct invasion and destruction of tissues (Kang et al., 1996; Quinones and Demo, 1997).
Other staphylococcal species can invoke disease by proliferation of the causative agent in conjunction with some virulent toxins and/or associated enzymes produced by these organisms (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Baselga, 1994; Bezek and Hull, 1995; Ichikawa 1996). Amongst the numerous diseases caused by S. aureus, mastitis is of a high priority in dairy animals. This disease (mastitis) can be classified as per-acute, sub-acute, acute and chronic (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Simpson et al., 1995; Topolko and Benice, 1997) forms or clinical stages.
The disease process is dependent on the ability of the organism (S. aureus) to survive in the vicinity of the dairy animal, and its ability to confer resistance on a variety of disinfectants and antibiotics used in the farm (Boddie and Nickelson, 1997).
The strain variation of S. aureus accounts for the degree of pathogenicity (Bansal et al., 1995; Hermans et al., 2000). However, the size of the inoculum, stage of lactation, injuries on the teat and elaboration of toxins and enzymes will determine the type of mastitis and pathology induced in the hosts (Sultra and Poutrel, 1994; Bansal et al., 1995; Ameh et al., 1993; Quinones and Demo, 1997; Fitzgerald et al., 2000). In spite of these aforementioned factors, the adherence of S. aureus to the epithelial cells of the mammary gland, is the first process required for the initiation of pathogenesis (Katic et al., 1996).
Clinical Forms of Mastitis
Per-acute
This occurs most frequently during infections of early lactation (Blood and Radostits, 1989). It is sometimes accompanied by gangrene of the udder, due to the necrotizing action of the alpha toxins (Cifrain et al. 1995; Jones 1998). Per-acute mastitis usually occurs during the first few days of lactation and is accompanied by a severe temperature elevation to 41 - 42°C, tachycardia, pronounced depression, absence of rumen motility and muscular weakness (Blood and Radostits, 1989). The affected quarter or half of the animal is swollen and hard. There is subcutaneous emphysema, blister formation and gangrene in some affected cases. These inflammatory processes can subside within a few days, and the infected gland is then replaced by proliferation of connective tissue, marked by blockage and atrophy of the ductal area.
Sub-acute
The sub-acute form of S. aureus mastitis is transient and mimics the clinical signs of either the acute or chronic forms, or both. The milk may show some degree of infection as evidenced by blood clots (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Petrovic et al., 1997) with an elevation of the leukocyte counts (Lam et al., 1996). The California mastitis test (CMT) is routinely used on individual, composite and bulk milk samples (Simpson et al., 1995; Leitner et al., 2000) to detect levels of polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs). The temperature of the affected animal may or may not become elevated (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Egwu et al., 1994; Rapoport et al., 1994).
Acute
The acute form of mastitis is characterised by a visible enlargement of the udder. There are marked changes in the milk observed, such as evidence of blot clots, fibrin, watery consistency, lobules and coloration. The temperature of the animal is elevated and the enlarged udder is painful on palpation. The affected animal is weak, comatose and sometimes becomes recumbent in unfavourable situations (Ameh et al., 1996; Fabre et al., 1997). Other associated signs include dullness, anorexia, inappetence and general malaise. Milk quality and production are reduced drastically (Wilson et al., 1997). This form is clinically recognizable by the farmer and provides an opportunity for reporting such cases urgently to the veterinarian or other appropriate authorities.
Chronic
If an animal is suffering from the chronic form of mastitis, the functional capacity of the udder is compromized. There is atrophy or shrinkage of the udder and milk production is also drastically reduced. The glandular tissue becomes fibrosed, and sometimes the ducts are blocked with difficulty in milk letdown through the teat sphincter (Shoshani et al., 1995). Most causal agents persist in the udder during this stage and with appropriate treatment, recovery from this clinical form of mastitis is high (Deutz et al., 1995). Farmers usually try to maintain patency of the teat canal by making use of teat cannulas. Total milking out by farmers or veterinarians can assist in the successful application of chemotherapy at this stage.
Epidemiology
Top of pageThe staphylococcal species, with particular reference to S. aureus and associated diseases, are ubiquitous worldwide and affect a whole range of domestic and wild animals (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Oliver et al., 1999; Smith 1999).
S. aureus is always a dominant causal agent of mastitis (Smith et al., 1998; Elecko, 1998; Oliver et al., 1999) and is also highly predisposed to many organs of animal and human hosts, thereby causing different diseases (Egwu et al., 1989; Mondodori et al., 1994; Esmat and Badr, 1996; Ramaswamy et al., 1997; Takele and Zerihun, 2000).
Direct replication (cell division) of S. aureus is by binary fission and intermediate hosts or vectors are not necessary in the development of this organism. However, it is interesting to note that tick-pyaemia of lambs, characterized by elaboration of neuro-toxins, as a result of tick bites on the definitive host (lambs) is enhanced by S. aureus (Clarkson and Faull, 1985; Blood and Radostits, 1989). The obvious lesions resulting from these septicaemic staphylococcal infections are lameness, abcessation of vital organs, unthriftiness and general weakness of affected lambs. Experimentally, ixodes ricinus ticks acting as intermediate hosts infected with S. aureus have also reproduced typical lesions of tick pyaemia (Webster and Mitchell, 1986). The disease (tick pyaemia) has been reported as occurring naturally and concurrently with other diseases of domestic animals such as, enterotoxaemia, tick-borne fever, louping ill and lamb dysentry (Clarkson and Faull, 1985; Blood and Radostits, 1989).
Incubation Period and Transmission
The primary barrier protecting against the entry of S. aureus into the mammary gland is the teat sphincter. When the pathogen (S. aureus) overcomes this barrier, if not washed out by the physical act of milking, the bacteria multiplies, invades and proliferates in the udder tissue (Das and Khanna, 1994; Sultra and Poutrel, 1994).
Considerable variation occurs amongst susceptible animals, between infection and appearance of clinical signs. The incubation period may be for 3 - 4 days following infection of the teat (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Fox et al., 1995), with inflammatory processes coming into action 3 - 5 days later. These processes however, depend on the virulence, host immune mechanisms and weight of infecting pathogen. These factors also determine the degree of pathology and type of mastitis produced (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Das and Khanna, 1994; Sutra and Poutrel, 1994; Bansel et al., 1995).
Direct and indirect transmission of S. aureus, are usually the main avenues of disseminating an infection. Usually, mammary gland infection occurs via the teat canal and/or environment (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Bansal et al., 1995; Bouchard et al., 1996; Kosev et al., 1996). It can also occur through other unhygienic measures such as, housing, defects in milking machines and management factors (Demchonko, 1994; Vasil, 1994; Refsdal, 1996; Fox et al., 1995; Benda 1998; Barkema et al., 1999). Other inter-alia factors include: the use of clean milking towels for pre and post cleaning of mammary teats, clean calving pens, unhygienic housing condition, improper adjustments of milking machine, dirty teat cups or the use of unclean hands during hand milking. The importance of all factors mentioned cannot be overemphasized in their respective roles in the transmission of mastitis pathogens.
S. aureus is known to co-exist with many other bacterial pathogens occurring in the environment and other animal sites (Poorima and Updhye, 1995; Poorima and Upadhye, 1995; Huan and Huan, 1996; Yanni, 1999). However, the ability of S. aureus to persist in the tissue of the udder makes it somewhat more ameliorable to treatment, compared to other organism such as Escherichia coli, Streptococcus dysagalactiae, S. uberis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa that are all found in the environment (Sultra and Poutrel, 1994).
Since S. aureus is ubiquitous in distribution and is also involved in many other animal diseases, contact transmission, aerosol transmission, wounds and abrasions on the body surface play an important role in the transmission of S. aureus (El-Sukhon 1995; Poorima and Upadhye 1995; Yanni, 1999; Moller et al., 2000). They also play a role in other induced diseases such as mastitis-metritis syndrome, abcessation, gastroenteritis, septicaemia, osteomyelitis and urinary infections, including respiratory and environmentally acquired infections. Dissemination of the organism from one organ to the other is also possible, depending on the invasiveness or multiplication of the organism in the host tissues.
Impact: Economic
Top of pageEconomic impact of Mastitis
Mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus, is a major disease for the dairy industry to contend with, if productivity and health of the animals are to be ensured.
Generally in most affected animals, losses occurring from fatalities amongst dairy herds are very minimal compared to those resulting from milk production (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Deutz et al., 1995). Affected cows with sub-clinical mastitis have been shown to produce low birth weight calves (Dominigues et al., 1996). This may pose very serious economic costs and returns in rearing the dairy calves.
Contaminated milk has transmitted some zoonotic bacteria to man, when the milk has not been properly pasteurized before human consumption. Such diseases caused by this transmission include tuberculosis, streptococcal sore throat, brucellosis and staphylococcal food poisoning (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Mousing et al., 1997; Hernandez and Baca, 1998). Most of these diseases are becoming devastating in most developing countries and some are emerging as diseases in parts of the developed world.
Economic effects resulting from quarter or udder half infections of the mammary gland are drastically reduced milk yield, monetary returns and profit to the dairy farmer. This is dependant on the stage of lactation and time of infection (Shoshani et al., 1995; Deutz et al., 1995; Ameh et al., 1996; Fabre et al., 1997). Infection of cows during the dry period could reduce milk yield by up to 11%, whereas those occurring at late lactation could reduce percentage yield by up to 48% (Blood and Radostit, 1989; Deutz et al., 1995). This constitutes tremendous economic waste and financial returns to the dairy farmer.
The prevalence of specific mastitis pathogens such as S. aureus varies from herd to herd. In a high prevalence herd, conservative economic milk losses resulting from S. aureus mastitis on a ‘cow basis’, could be in excess of US $90-250, particularly in large dairy herds (Blood and Radostits, 1989).
Quarters or halves of udders from animals infected with S. aureus, alone or in combination with other mastitis pathogens, can result in low or poor quality milk and market sales (Shoshani et al., 1995; Lam et al., 1996; Fabre et al., 1997). Losses emanating from premature culling as a result of unthriftiness or poor condition of acutely or chronically affected animals, could seriously undermine the productivity of the dairy farm as well as monetary returns (Deutz et al., 1995; Dominigues et al., 1996; Moclerson et al., 2000).
The greatest economic losses for dairy farms with mastitis are usually associated with the costs of veterinary medicine and care, particularly in those herds with acute or chronic forms of the disease. The use of pre-dipping disinfectants, intra-mammary antibiotics and other systemic antibiotics can impact large economic losses in monetary terms to the dairy farmers. This is especially the case, if these are carried out routinely in the process of trying to eliminate persistent and recalcitrant strains of S. aureus on a dairy farm.
Apart from those practices aimed at reducing intra-mammary infections, there are other diagnostic costs incurred by the farmer. These include routine somatic milk counts on individual, composite and bulk milk samples and the increased labour costs for this. There are obvious advantages in monitoring levels of milk infection, but it does create an extra cost.
Other Economic Impact of S. aureus Associated or Induced Diseases
Other losses occurring from S. aureus induced or associated diseases, include blindness in small and large ruminants. This could be temporary or permanent blindness as observed in sheep, goats and cattle suffering from ovine, caprine and bovine kerato-conjunctivitis (Egwu et al., 1989; Al-Gaabary et al., 1998; Takele and Zerihun, 2000). Affected animals with this acute or chronic ocular disease are unthrifty, off-feed, emaciated and generally lose sight of their environment. It is not clearly known what role S. aureus plays in initiating the disease or exacerbating the disease condition, but its frequent association with the disease process is likely to indicate a possible role of toxins and enzymes, and other ocular inflammatory mediators in the disease process. Corneal ulceration (see picture) which is usually purulent, or scarification on the cornea following healing, has been reported to be associated with S. aureus following natural and experimental infections (Egwu et al., 1989; Egwu and Faull, 1991, Egwu and Faull, 1993).
Tick pyaemia causes the early death of lambs, particularly those with good traits that make them potential replacements for breeding ewes. Losses from this disease could be as a result of septicaemia, lameness, arthritis and disseminated abscessation of vital organs (Clarkson and Faull, 1985; Webster and Mitchell, 1986).
Zoonoses and Food Safety
Top of pageThere is an important public health aspect of S. aureus infections. Staphylococcal food poisoning is becoming important in the milk and meat industry (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Mousing et al., 1997; Hernandez and Baca, 1998). Nosocomial (hospital acquired) infections are common sources of acquiring S. aureus. The need for pasteurization of milk before consumption, and the sterilization of prosthetic surgical equipment before open surgery must also be ensured. Many other pathogens of zoonotic importance apart from S. aureus are involved in ‘mastitides’ (Blood and Radostits, 1989). These include Mycobacterium spp. (El-Haenaeey et al., 1994; Klinger and Rosenthal, 1997), and commonly incriminated species of this genera (mycobacterium) include: M. bovis, M. fortuitum, M. smegmatis, all of which are commonly acquired from contaminated milk and its products. Infections can also be obtained from infections of the hosts or from contaminated unhygienic preparations of milk and meat products (El-Haenaeey et al., 1994; Klinger and Rosenthal, 1997). Clostridium perfringens type A, Bacillus spp., Campylobacter jejuni, and Brucella abortus and milletensis are also commonly acquired pathogens from improperly pasteurized milk and its products (Egwu et al., 1994; Huan and Huan 1996; Waage et al., 1999).
The isolation of S. aureus from local milk products (nono) or local yoghurts, even at low pH has been reported by Egwu et al. (1995b). Consumers should therefore ensure that milk and meat products are wholesome before taking them to market, to ensure freedom from some of these zoonotic diseases. This is particularly important in developing countries where consumption of local milk products is popular.
Disease Treatment
Top of pageConsideration for the treatment of S. aureus induced diseases should involve the target sites involved in the disease process. These sites include the udder, respiratory tract, eyes, bones and skin where the diseases are manifested. Priority is however ascribed to S. aureus mastitis, as it stands out prominently because of the economics involved in controlling the disease. Treatment should aim at combating or controlling the severity of mastitis through chemotherapy, with the use of the right antibiotics following adequate sensitivity tests or anti-biogrammes (Sandgren and Ekman, 1996).
Antibiotics
A number of first generation antibiotics including penicillins, streptomycin, cloxacillin, penicillin/streptomycin combination and nitrofurazone, have been used at various doses and regimens for the treatment of S. aureus mastitis (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Owens et al., 1997; Egwu et al., 1994; Dhabele et al., 1997; Schlegelova and Sediva, 1999).
The intramammary and/or systemic routes are usually employed during the chemotherapy of mastitis (Egwu et al., 1994; Pyorala and Pyorala, 1994; Dhabele et al., 1997; Owens et al., 1997).
Most drugs used in the treatment of S. aureus mastitis tend to be more sensitive in vitro than in vivo (Egwu et al., 1994; Owens et al., 1994; Dhabele et al., 1997), following experience from laboratory and field investigations.
The increasing incidence of S. aureus resistance following mastitis treatment has resulted in inefficacy treatment in the use of antibiotics (Allen et al., 1994; Simko and Bartes, 1996; Schlegelova and Sediva, 1999).
There is a need for antibiotic sensitivity testing prior to treatment of mastitis to determine the best drug of choice (Cruz et al., 1997; Kumajock et al., 1999). This should involve serum blood concentrations of the drug of choice, minimum inhibitory concentration studies and disk sensitivity antibiotic testing (Owens et al., 1994; Egwu et al., 1994; Allen et al., 1994; Simko and Bartes, 1996), so as to allow the veterinarian to select the best antibiotics.
Ethnoveterinary Practice
Ethnoveterinary practice has not assumed any significance in recent times for the treatment of mastitis and other related diseases. However, the efficacy of this method of treatment has not been properly assessed in line with current antibiotic usage. This practice in nomadic pastoralism could offer some benefits to the nomadic farmer, who may find costs of modern antibiotic treatment very exorbitant. Some of these practices may be handed from generation to generation in the family line.
Chemotherapy of Other S. aureus Diseases
Infections like osteomyelitis, keratoconjunctivitis, and staphylococcal dermatitis can be treated with oxytetracycline, erythromycin, demofloxacin and other suitable antibiotics (Egwu, 1992; Egwu and Faull, 1993; Al-Gaabary et al., 1998).
The commonly used drugs, dose, adverse reactions and possible emergence of resistant strains in the disease treatment table.
Prevention and Control
Top of pageFarm Level Control
The pathogenic importance of S. aureus in mastitis and other related infections necessitates the need for its control, eradication and prevention in affected dairy herds (Tichaecek, 1999). Though complete eradication of S. aureus may, to some extent, appear inconceivable or unachievable, the need for continuous monitoring and surveillance in affected dairy herds or flocks cannot be overemphasized.
A holistic approach is therefore needed to achieve a meaningful eradication programme of mastitis that will maximize profitability in the dairy industry.
Awareness of farmers
To raise farmer awareness, there should be an on-farm discussion by veterinarians, animal scientists and dairy epidemiologists, with dairy farmers on the need to be constantly aware of and control this important disease (mastitis). The importance of the ability to recognize the clinical signs of mastitis and the performance of simple routine tests on milk by the farmers, cannot be underestimated. Some of these facets of awareness in the control of mastitis have been previously documented (Majic et al., 1994; Brown et al., 1998). There is a need for farmers to partake in all aspects of the on-farm control measures if the weight of the infecting organisms and elimination of the causal agents are to be achieved in the dairy farm.
Husbandry Practices
Management is important in the control of S. aureus mastitis. The components of this aspect of management include housing, movement of livestock, in-house sanitation of cow cubicles, pens and milking parlours, as well as milking procedures and general hygiene of the milker and premises (Vasil, 1994; Benda, 1998; Barkema et al., 1999).
It is a recognized fact, that the dairy industry is well developed in more temperate than tropical countries. In the latter countries, nomadism and transhumance practices that are tied to the extensive and semi-intensive husbandry have compromized some of the enumerated measures (Smith et al., 1998; Ameh et al., 1993; Aliyu et al., 1999). These practices, rather than enhancing control have worsened it, because animals are usually herded together, eat and drink together and generally disseminate and contract infections.
Housing
It is a known fact, that the construction of dairy houses in temperate region is of a higher quality standard than those in the tropics, where milking animals are always on the move and sedentary herds or flocks are rarely found. Even where dairy farm houses exist, in-house milking equipment and other infrastructures may vary from farm to farm. The hygienic conditions of this equipment and the degree of disinfection in the dairy houses, may account for the prevalence of S. aureus on these farms (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Poorima and Updhye, 1995; Barkema et al., 1999).
The site or location of the house, as well as the nature (wooden or concrete) can significantly affect the prevalence of mastitis pathogens (Poorima and Updhye, 1995; Barkema et al., 1999).
The bedding material used, such as wet sawdust has been shown to easily predispose to mastitis compared to dry shavings and straw (Blood and Radostits, 1989).
Milking parlour/milking cow
The milking parlour should be routinely disinfected and overcrowding during milking minimized. The mammary gland of the milking cow should be washed with a mild disinfectant containing mild and suitable antiseptics. This should include the use of creams and solutions on teat sores, which constitute a common source for entry of bacterial pathogens (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Saratis et al., 1998; Aliyu et al., 1999). Practising pre- and post-dipping of the teat can reduce the incidence of mastitis in the herd, for example the use of 0.25% or 0.5% solutions of providone iodine (hydrochloride) and iodine.
Milking machines
There is no doubt that milking machines constitute an essential component of the infrastructures required in the dairy industry. However, the misuse of these machines has resulted in increased subclinical and clinical mastitis (Vasil, 1994; Refsdall, 1996; Barkema et al., 1999).
Therefore, for good herd health surveillance in dairy farms, examination of the milking machines to detect faults related to vacuum pressure, milk cup pressures, vacuum capacity, pulsation rate, air bleeds and the milking vacuum at the teat-cup to ascertain no blockage of air vents should be carried out. These measures must be ensured in order to meet standards of specification prior to milking (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Fox, 1997; Barkema et al., 1999).
It is however, important to state that some modern technological advancements in the design of milking machines have incorporated automatic milk cup deflectors, which divert refluxed milk from the pipeline, and also automatic milk cup removers to prevent milk accumulation in the cups and reflux into the tanks.
Restriction of Animal Movement
There is a need to restrict movement of dairy herds to neighbouring paddocks. It is important to minimize or prevent contact of affected animals with clean herds. Nevertheless, the practicability of this practice in pastoral nomadism is far from reality (Mech, 1975; Williamson and Payne, 1978; Gefu, 1982). Strict government laws on livestock movement, quarantine and free market livestock trades should be enforced in all their ramifications to prevent S. aureus mastitis epidemics. National and international policy programmes on livestock movement should ensure that animals with clean bills of health should be allowed to cross international boundaries. There should also be a need for dairy monitoring boards, required to censor infected herds/flocks by examination of milk through testing by somatic cell counts of individual, composite, herd, or bulk milk (Blood and Radostits, 1989; Lam, 1996; Hogeveen et al., 1997; Leitner et al., 2000). This process of testing, backed up with culture, can also detect some other serious mastitis causing pathogens, which may be exotic in the importing country.
Culling
Routine monitoring and surveillance of dairy herds and infected milk allows easy identification of animals suffering from mastitis. This ensures that the affected animals are culled from the herd, enabling the dairy farmer to institute good mastitis control measures. Identified animals that are sick with mastitis should be treated and the farmer should ensure that such animals are routinely removed and treated before allowing them back into the herd. This culling process ensures that certain mastitis pathogens not ameliorable to treatment are kept under check.
Vaccines
The use of vaccines for the control of staphylococcal mastitis has not been well documented and its efficacy is not well ascertained. Vaccines prepared using whole cells of S. aureus, sub-units, anti-toxins or targeted against specific anti-inflammatory cells may be promising, if such vaccines are able to invoke protective anti-body levels. Nevertheless, varying degrees of success have been reported in the field following experimental trials on various species of animals (Nordhaug et al., 1994a, b; Fitzpatrick, 2000; Virtala and Nevalainen, 2000).
Although many S. aureus component vaccines are still undergoing experimental field trials, the likely past and future problems, and efficacy on the use of such vaccines has been previously highlighted (Faria et al., 2000; Fitzpatrick 2000).
The vaccines listed in the table are not exhaustive, the potential acceptability of each vaccine and ability to confer immunity in vaccinated animals remains properly assessed (Han-HongRyul et al., 2000; Virtala and Nevalainen, 2000). It is however, important to note that there is yet to be any effective marketable S. aureus vaccine. The potential for producing S. aureus sub-unit vaccines in the present age of deoxyribonucleic acid recombinant research is great, provided such genetically engineered vaccines targeted against immunogenic epitopes can also cross-protect against similarly related pathogenic bacterial organisms causing mastitis.
It is also important that apart from mastitis induced by S. aureus, no available vaccines exist for immuno-prophylaxis of other diseases caused by or associated with S. aureus. Research into these types of vaccine, for other staphylococcal-induced disease, is still in its infancy, but it is hoped that following experimental trials and field success this type of vaccine will become available.
References
Top of pageAl-Gaabary MH, Ammar KM, 1998. Infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis, IBK., in Egyptian buffaloes. Eighth Scientific Congress, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, 15-17 November, 1998., 654-667; 19 ref
Ameh JA, Addo PB, Abekeye JO, Gyang EO, 1996. Prevalence of clinical mastitis and of intramammary infections in Nigerian sheep. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa, 44(2):117-119; 14 ref
Ameh JA, Addo PB, Adekeye JO, Gyang EO, Teddek LB, Abubakar Y, 1994. Gangrenous caprine coliform mastitis. Small Ruminant Research, 13(3):307-309; 14 ref
Arvind Kumar, Katoch RC, 1997. Microbial flora of infertile dairy animals in Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 67(4):288-289; 14 ref
Baird-Parker AC, 1963. A classification of Micrococci based on physiological and biochemical tests. Journal of General Microbiology, 30:409-427
Baldi L, Guarino A, Fenizia D, Franciscis Gde, Gentile A, 1994. Identification of antibodies against the Stafilococcus aureus [Staphylococcus aureus] in water buffalo by fluorescence activated cell sorting. Proceedings, 4th World Buffalo Congress, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 27-30 June 1994. Volume 3., 449; 3 ref
Bergey DH, 1948. Staphylococci. In: Krieg NR, Holt J, eds. Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacterilogy, Vol. 2. Baltimore, USA: Williams and Wilkins
Bergey DH, 1957. In: Krieg NR, John HOH, eds. Manual of Determinative bacteriology, edition 7. Baltimore, USA: Williams and Wilkins Co
Bergey, DH, 1983. Manual of determinative bacteriology, edition 8. Baltimore, USA: Williams and Wilkins Co
Bersot LS, Oliveira LATde, Franco RM, Carvalho JCAP, 1998. Bacteriological evaluation of pork (loin cuts) on sale in Niterói and Sao GonÇalo, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Revista brasileira de Ciência Veterinária, 5(1):3-7; 15 ref
Bezek DM, Hull BL, 1995. Peracute gangrenous mastitis and cheilitis associated with enterotoxin-secreting Staphylococcus aureus in a goat. Canadian Veterinary Journal, 36(2):106-107; 10 ref
Blood DC, Radostits OM, 1989. Veterinary Medicine, ELBVS edition, London, UK: Bailliere Tindal, 501-550
Chao MR, Wu FM, Chen MC, Vinther K, 1994. The periparturient excretion pattern of haemolytic bacteria from sows in Taiwan. Proceedings: The 13th International Pig Veterinary Society Congress, Bangkok, Thailand, 26-30 June 1994., 214
Chen-Sujen, Wang-ChingHo, Chen SJ, Wang CH, 2000. The contamination status of bacteria and fungi in the chicken hatcheries of Taiwan. Journal of the Chinese Society of Veterinary Science, 26:103-109
Cifrain E, Guidry AJ, O'Brien CN, Marquardt WW, 1995. Effects of alpha toxin and capular exopolysaccharide on adherence of S. aureus to cultured teat, ductal and secretory mammary epithelial cell. Research in Veterinary Science, 58:20-25
Cowan ST, 1962. An Introduction to chaos, or the classification of micrococci and staphylcocci. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 25:324-340
Dalamitra S, Fenlon DR, Thomson-Carter F, Allan EJ, 1998. A study of the epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in the cow using pulsed field gel electrophoresis. British Mastitis Conference 1998., 84-86
Das SC, Khanna PN, 1994. Factors influencing shedding of Staphylococcus aureus in milch cows. Cheiron, 23(5):210-214; 5 ref
Dhabale RB, Sharma NC, Kumar AA, 1996. Microbial and therapeutic studies in repeat breeder cattle. Indian Journal of Veterinary Research, 5(2):55-59; 9 ref
Egwu GO, Onyeyili PA, Ameh JA, Sulaimon S, 1995. Prevalence of - lactamase producing staphylococci recovered from fermented milk products. West African Journal of Biological Sciences, 2(182):90-98
El-Sayed AA, Abdalla AE, Fadelmula A, 1996. Isolation of bacteria and fungi from bovine abortions in Sudan. Sudan Journal of Veterinary Research, 14:29-33
Faingold D, Ham Mvan, Winkler M, Glickman A, Leitner G, Saran A, 1995. The impact of Staphylococcus aureus udder infection on the milk somatic cell count and NAGase [N-acetyl-
Fisher ME, Trampel DW, Griffith-RW, 1998. Post-mortem detection of acute septiceamia in broilers. Avian Diseases, 42(3):352-461
Fitzgerald JR, Smyth CJ, Hartigan PJ, Meaney WJ, Kapur V, 1996. Analysis of diversity of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from bovine mastitis using DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms of rRNA genes. Mastitis Newsletter, No. 21:29; [Newsletters of the International Dairy Federation No. 144]
Fox LK, Adams DS, 2000. The ability of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect antibodies against Staphylococcus aureus in milk following experimental intramammary infection. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series B, 47(7):517-526
Fox LK, Saran A, Soback S, 1995. Colonisation of S. aureus on chapped teat skin. In: Proceedings of the Third IDF International Mastitis Seminar Tel-Aviv, 28th May 1995, 6:51-55
Gefu JO, 1982. Socio-economic characteristics of goat producers and their husbandry practices in Northern Nigeria. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Goat Production and Disease, Tucson, USA, 422-427
Guidry A, Fattom A, Petel A, O'Brien C, 1997. The prevalence of capsular serotypes amongst Staphyloceccus aureus isolates from cows with mastitis in the United States. Veterinary Microbiology, 59(1):53-58
Habrun B, Bilic V, Humski A, 1997. Bacterial diseases of pigs in large agglomerations in Croatia in 1996. Veterinarski dani 1997, Cavtat, Croatia, 15-18 October 1997. Zbornik radova., 183-189; 6 ref
Han-HongRyul, Park-Hee Myung, Han HR, Park HM, 2000. Efficacy of bovine staphylococcal mastitis vaccine composed of alpha toxin, capsular polysaccharide and fibronectin buiding protein in lactating cows and heifers. Korean Journal of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, 17(1):152-158
Heidimli HH, Uaar M, 1999. Efficacy of amoxicillin + clavulanic acid for treatment of clinical and sub-clinical mastitis. Hayvancilik-Arastirma-Dergisi, 9(1-2):65-70
Herbelin C, Gilbert F, Poutrel B, 1995. Specific recruitment of mammary neutrophils and bactericidal activity of milk from cows immunized with Staphylococcus aureus type 5 capsular polysaccharide (CP 5) and
Hoque M, 1997. Post-traumatic osteomyelitis: its incidence in fracture cases and experimental studies in goats. Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery, 18(1):46
Ismail TM, Hatem ME, 1998. Prevalence of subclinical mastitis in a dairy cattle herd in the Eastern region of Saudi Arabia. Eighth Scientific Congress, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, 15-17 November, 1998., 646-653; 19 ref
Jones TO, 1998. Toxin production by Staphylococcus aureus from cases of bovine mastitis. British Mastitis Conference 1998., 94
Khan-Nazer AH, Niyakan S, 1995. A comprehensive study on bacterial flora isolated from yolk sac infection in chicks and their antibacterial sensitivity testing in poultry farms around Shiraz city. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, 49:23-34
Kim D, Kwon T, Ahn S, Kim D, Kwon ST, Ahn SJ, 1999. Genomic fingerprinting of S. aureus isolated from bovine mastitic milk by PCR. Korean Journal of Veterinary clinical medicine, 16(1):19-25
Kleczkowski M, Jakubczak A, Biskupski J, Klucinski W, Sitarska E, Sikora J, Lechowski R, 1999. The evaluation of bacterial agents of pig diseases and their sensibility to chemotherapeutics in the North-Eastern Poland. Praxis Veterinaria (Zagreb), 47(1/2):37-38; 6 ref
Kumajock VL, Bagadi HO, Shears P, Mukhtar MM, 1999. Prevalence of multiple antibiotic resistances among bovine mastitis pathogens in Khartoum state, Sudan. Sudan Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, 38(1-2):64-70
Longan KE et al, 1998. Immunological responses of Holstein Friesian cattle to S. aureus. In: British mastitis conference No. 93, 991-993
Mecha I, 1975. Traditional goat husbandry in Southern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 2:67-70
Merchant IA, Parker RA, 1967. The genus staphylococci. In: The Text book of Veterinary Bacteriology and Virology, edition 7, Iowa, USA: Iowa State University Press, 237-245
Mercier P, 1999. Mastitis: antibiotic treatment at drying off is effective. Chèvre, No. 234:26,28,30
Mishra PR, Sidhartha-Hazari, Pal-A, Hazaris, 1996. Sub-clinical mastitis in goats with special reference to fungus. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 49(3):209-210
Moclerson SC, Owens WE, de Rouen SM, 2000. Mastitis prevalence in calf beef heifers and effect on calf weaning weight. Large Animal Practice, 21(3):20-23
Moller K, Agerholm JS, Ahrens P et al. , 2000. Abscess disease, caseous lymphadenitis, and pulmonary adenomatosis in imported sheep. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series B, 47(1):55-62
Mondadori AJ, Riet-Correa F, Carter GR, Mendez MC, 1994. Actinobacillosis in cattle in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Ciência Rural, 24(3):571-577; 19 ref
Mulei M, 1991. Teat lesions and their relationship to intrammary infections on small scale dairy farms in Kiambu district in Kenya. Journal of South African Veterinary Medical Association, 70(4):156-157
Murray PR, Drew LW, Mosayashi G, Thompson JH, 1990. Staphylococcus. In: Medical Microbiology. Baltimore, USA: CV Mosby Company
Nickerson SC, Owens WE, De-Rouen SM, 2000. Mastitis prevalence in first beef heifers and effect on calf weaning weight. Large Animal Medicine, 21(3):20-23
Nissen JR, 1999. Homeopathic treatment of production animals. Two cases from practice. Dansk Veterinærtidsskrift, 82(17):759, 762
Ramtamaki LK, Muller H, 1995. The purification of goat immunoglobulin IgG1 and IgG2 antibodies by use of Streptococcus dysagalactiae cells with FC receptors. Veterinary Immunology and Immuno-Pathology, 45(1-2):115-126
Refsdal AO, 1996. What is mastitis?. Buskap og AvdrÅtt, 48(2):6-7
Riolett C Rainard P, Poultrel B, 2000. Differential induction of complement fragment C5a and inflammatory cytokines during inflammatory infections with Escherichia coli and S. aureus. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Imminology, 7(2):161-167
Roberson JR, 1995. Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus intramammary infections in prepartum dairy heifers [in the USA]. Proceedings of the Third IDF International Mastitis Seminar Tel-Aviv, Israel, 28 May - 1 June 1995. Book 2., s-6,13-17; 10 ref
Rojano Flores U, Hernández Andrade L, Pérez Domínguez M, 1994. One year survey of pathogens isolated from the milk of cows with high somatic cell counts and their sensitivity to antibiotics. Técnica Pecuaria en México, 32(1):47-54; 28 ref
Sabreen MS, Abdel-Haleen AA, 2000. Microbiological evaluation of sheep and goats milk in Assuit Governorate. Assuit Veterinary Medical Journal, 42(84):36-46
Sandgren CH, Ekman T, 1996. Policy on antibiotics in the treatment of mastitis in cows. 4. Measures against subclinical mastitis. Svensk Veterinärtidning, 48(2):53-58; 14 ref
Schofield LN, DiNinno VL, Bhatti AR, 1997. A Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin-B induced type 1 immediate hypersensitivity reaction in a goat. Microbios, 89(358):29-30; 4 ref
Sharma LK, 1994. Abscess disease in goats. Indian Veterinary Journal, 71(5):520; 3 ref
Shoshani E, Leitner G, Saran A, Spiegel NY, Trainin Z, Berman A, 1995. Changes in mammary function induced by Staph. aureus from inoculation to chronic infection state. Proceedings of the Third IDF International Mastitis Seminar Tel-Aviv, Israel, 28 May - 1 June 1995. Book 1., s-1,65-66
Shwimmer A, Shpigel NY, Yeruham I, Saran A, 1995. Epidemiological and bacteriological aspects of mastitis associated with yellow jacket wasp teat lesions in Israeli dairy cows. Proceedings of the Third IDF International Mastitis Seminar Tel-Aviv, Israel, 28 May - 1 June 1995. Book 2., s-6,100-102; 5 ref
Smith M, Roquinsky MC, 1977. Mastitis and other diseases of goats udder. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association, 17:1241-1248
Takele G, Zerihun A, 2000. Epidemiology of infectious keratoconjunctivities in cattle in South east Ethiopia. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A, 47(3):169-173
Teper G, Ziv G, Skutelsky E, 1995. Cytochemical ultrastructural visualization of capsular constituents of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis. Proceedings of the Third IDF International Mastitis Seminar Tel-Aviv, Israel, 28 May - 1 June 1995. Book 1., as-2,11-15; 10 ref
Tisala TA, Forsman P, Alatossava T, 2000. Bovine mastitis diagnosis from milk by a polymerase chain reaction based method. Milchewissensch aft, 55(9):488-492
Tollersrud T, Kenny K, Reitz AJ, Lee JC, 2000. Genetic and serologic evaluation of capsule production by bovine mammary isolate of S. aureus and other staphylococci species from Europe and United States. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 38:2998-3003
Trolldenier H, 1996. Development of resistance to bacterial pathogens among farm animals in Germany (1990-1994) - an overview. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift, 103(7):256-260; 9 ref
Vural R, Esendal O, Izgur H, Aslan S, Kilicoglu C, 1999. Sub-clinical mastitis in premiparous Holsterin cows part II: Intra mammary infections during first lactation veteriner-Fakultesi-Dergisi, Ankara Universitesi, 46(2/3):287-298
Webster KA, Mitchel GBB, 1986. Experimental tick Pyemia in lambs. Veterinary Record, 119:186
Williamson G, Pyne WJA, 1978. An Introduction to Animal Husbandry in the Tropics, edition 3, ELBS London
Yoshida M, Kashiwagi Y, Okuda M, Tsumagari S. Takeishi M, 1997. Drug sensitivity of S. aureus isolates from cases of bovine mastitis. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 50:826-828
Zurzul D, 1994. Results of the long-term control of mastitis in intensively kept cows. Veterinarski Glasnik, 48(3/4):267-270; 8 ref
Distribution References
CABI, Undated. Compendium record. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated a. CABI Compendium: Status inferred from regional distribution. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated b. CABI Compendium: Status as determined by CABI editor. Wallingford, UK: CABI
Heidimli HH, Uaar M, 1999. Efficacy of amoxicillin + clavulanic acid for treatment of clinical and sub-clinical mastitis. In: Hayvancilik-Arastirma-Dergisi, 9 (1-2) 65-70.
Kumajock VL, Bagadi HO, Shears P, Mukhtar MM, 1999. Prevalence of multiple antibiotic resistances among bovine mastitis pathogens in Khartoum state, Sudan. In: Sudan Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, 38 (1-2) 64-70.
Mulei M, 1991. Teat lesions and their relationship to intrammary infections on small scale dairy farms in Kiambu district in Kenya. In: Journal of South African Veterinary Medical Association, 70 (4) 156-157.
Refsdal A O, 1996. What is mastitis? (Hva er mastitt?). Buskap og Avdrǻtt. 48 (2), 6-7.
Sabreen MS, Abdel-Haleen AA, 2000. Microbiological evaluation of sheep and goats milk in Assuit Governorate. In: Assuit Veterinary Medical Journal, 42 (84) 36-46.
Vural R, Esendal O, Izgur H, Aslan S, Kilicoglu C, 1999. Sub-clinical mastitis in premiparous Holsterin cows part II: Intra mammary infections during first lactation veteriner-Fakultesi-Dergisi. In: Ankara Universitesi, 46 (2/3) 287-298.
Distribution Maps
Top of pageSelect a dataset
Map Legends
-
CABI Summary Records
Map Filters
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/