Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Ureaplasma infections
International Common Names
- English: abortion; blockage of uterine tubes, oviducts, salpingitis; bovine mycoplasma conjunctivitis; endemic pneumonia in calves; endometritis; endometritis, metritis, cervicitis, in gilts and sows; genital ureaplasma infections in ewes; granular vulvitis; granular vulvovaginitis of cattle, goats and sheep; impaired spermatozids and seminal vesiculitis in bulls; infertility; pustular vulvovaginitis, seminal vesiculitis, balanopostitis and fetal alveolitis in cattle; respiratory disease; salpingitis; Ureaplasma diversum associated reproductive disease
Pathogen/sTop of page Ureaplasma canigenitalium
OverviewTop of page
While few laboratories isolate and identify mycoplasmas regularly, even fewer are capable of detecting ureaplasmas because of their unusual and fastidious growth requirements. The existence of ureaplasmas, formerly known as T (for tiny) strains was first recognized in humans nearly 50 years ago (Shepard, 1954). Their possession of the urease enzyme made them unique amongst mollicutes and led to their reclassification within the new genus, Ureaplasma, which now contains 7 species that occur in mammals.
Three species of ureaplasmas play a major role in disease in animals and man: Ureaplasma diversum, a cause of pneumonia, vulvovaginitis, conjunctivitis, infertility and abortion in cattle and pneumonia in swine; and U. urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum, which can severely affect human neonates. Uncharacterized ureaplasma species are also frequently isolated from the reproductive and respiratory tracts of small ruminants where their role in disease is unclear. Ureaplasmas may also be found in pigs, chickens, cats and dogs.
Within the Mollicute Class, ureaplasmas are grouped within the Order I Mycoplasmatales and Family Mycoplasmataceae but comprise their own genus II, Ureaplasma. To date there are seven named species and some as yet unclassified ureaplasmas: U. urealyticum (man) which previously included the species now known as Ureaplasma parvum, U. diversum (cattle), U. gallorale (poultry), U. canigenitalium (dog), U. cati (cat), U. felinum (cat), and U. species (sheep, goats). Phylogenetically they are very close to mycoplasmas; U. urealyticum has been placed within the Pneumoniae group on the basis of its 16S rRNA gene sequence.
Host AnimalsTop of page
|Animal name||Context||Life stage||System|
|Bos indicus (zebu)||Domesticated host||Cattle & Buffaloes: All Stages|
|Bos taurus (cattle)||Domesticated host||Cattle & Buffaloes: All Stages|
|Bubalus bubalis (Asian water buffalo)||Domesticated host||Other: All Stages|
|Camelus dromedarius (dromedary camel)||Domesticated host|
|Canis familiaris (dogs)||Domesticated host|
|Capra hircus (goats)||Domesticated host||Sheep & Goats: Lamb|Sheep & Goats/Mature female|Sheep & Goats/Breeding male|
|Felis catus (cat)||Domesticated host|
|Neovison vison (American mink)|
|Ovis aries (sheep)||Domesticated host||Sheep & Goats: Lamb|Sheep & Goats/Mature female|Sheep & Goats/Breeding male|
|Sus scrofa (pigs)|
Hosts/Species AffectedTop of page
While cattle are the major species affected, sheep, goats, camels, pigs and poultry also possess ureaplasmas. A number of isolations have also been made from cats and dogs in Japan (Haraswa et al, 1990).
Systems AffectedTop of page multisystemic diseases of large ruminants
multisystemic diseases of poultry
multisystemic diseases of small ruminants
reproductive diseases of large ruminants
reproductive diseases of poultry
reproductive diseases of small ruminants
respiratory diseases of large ruminants
respiratory diseases of poultry
respiratory diseases of small ruminants
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.Last updated: 10 Jan 2020
PathologyTop of page
Genital disease in the female is characterized by a purulent vulvar discharge and inflamed hyperaemic vulvar mucosa with varying degrees of granularity (Ross, 1993). Gross lesions in the placenta consist of marked fibrotic thickening of large areas of the amnion and intercotyledonary zones in the chorioallantoic membrane infiltrated by mononuclear cells. There may be foci of fibrin exudation and haemorrhage. In aborted foetuses, microscopic lesions of alveolitis and placentitis may be seen and the antigen may be found in the zona pellucida of the embryo. Ureaplasma diversum was also linked with destructive polyarthropathy with fibrillation and erosion of articular cartilage deformation of articular surfaces, and proliferation of periarticular soft tissue in aborted bovine foetuses (Himsworth et al., 2009).
Respiratory disease involving ureaplasmas is largely subclinical. However, following endobronchial, but not aerosol, infection of gnotobiotic calves, thick cuffs of lymphoid cells and macrophages surrounding the bronchi, bronchioles and blood vessels develop along with a lobular catarrhal pneumonia (Laak et al, 1993a). These results confirmed earlier studies by Gourlay et al. (1979). Macroscopic lesions seen in U. diversum-associated-respiratory-disease consisted of red consolidation in the cranioventral areas of the lung (Ross, 1993). In the lung there is a diffuse alveolitis and focal lymphocytic accumulations around the airways. The alveolitis is characterized by degeneration and necrosis of the alveolar epithelium and there is infiltration of macrophages and granulocytes (Ruhnke, 1994).
Marques et al. (2010) demonstrated in vitro that Ureaplasma diversum adhered to and invaded Hep-2 cells, but did not invade the cell nuclei.
DiagnosisTop of page
Clinical signs of granular vulvitis are considered suggestive of ureaplasma infections while other signs such as subclinical pneumonia or conjunctivitis are far less definitive. Consequently laboratory diagnosis is necessary to determine the causative agent. Isolation of ureaplasmas in the genital tract is most successful from cultures of vulval swabs. The transient colonization of the uterus makes sampling this region unreliable. Preputial swabs should be taken with a guarded unit to obtain the sample from as far into the cavity as possible. Semen should be collected following disinfection of the prepuce and should ideally be fresh or kept in liquid nitrogen until ready to culture. Preferred tissues from embryos include the lung, caruncle, cotyledon, stomach contents and amniotic fluid.
From respiratory cases, nasal swabs, lung lavage fluids and lung tissue can be taken. Laak et al (1992a) found considerably higher levels in lavage fluids than nasal swabs. The appropriate transport medium for samples is crucial and antibiotics such as streptomycin and gentamycin, commonly used in many media may prove harmful to ureaplasmas. Recommended media include sucrose phosphate broth (2SP) or standard liquid medium (SLM) (Furr, 1998).
Media recommended for the primary culture of U. diversum differ from those for other mycoplasmas by containing 1% urea instead of glucose or arginine and having an adjusted pH of approximately 7.0. However there are many variations in exact composition of ureaplasma media. Whitford et al. (1994) list the composition of several media which have given good results including U4 buffered broth medium. Laak et al. (1992a) used Friis Media HAU and NHU and A7B agar medium which enabled the production of manganese dioxide as a brown deposit when urea was hydrolyzed; however HAU and NHU were superior to A7B when all three were used in parallel. Commercial media is now available for ureaplasma isolation (Mycoplasma Experience, Reigate, UK).
Once isolated, ureaplasmas can be identified by the production of brown colonies on agar medium containing manganese sulphate due to the deposition of manganese on the surface of the colony. Isolates can be serotyped by immunofluorescence on colonies grown on agar medium (Howard and Gourlay, 1981).
A PCR, based on the 16S rRNA gene, was more sensitive and rapid than culture for detecting U. diversum in vaginal swabs of cattle (Cardoso et al., 2000). This test offers a lot of advantages over traditional culture techniques. More recently, quantitative TaqMan PCR assays, still based on the 16S rRNA gene, have been developed (Marques et al., 2013).
Serological tests are not widely available for ureaplasmas and may be complicated by the existence of different serogroups. However, an indirect haemagglutination test was described for U. diversum by Nagatomo et al. (1996).
List of Symptoms/SignsTop of page
|Digestive Signs / Anorexia, loss or decreased appetite, not nursing, off feed||Poultry:Day-old chick,Poultry:Young poultry,Poultry:Mature female,Poultry:Cockerel,Poultry:Mature male,Other:Juvenile,Other:Adult Female,Other:Adult Male||Sign|
|General Signs / Fever, pyrexia, hyperthermia||Cattle & Buffaloes:Calf||Sign|
|General Signs / Lack of growth or weight gain, retarded, stunted growth||Cattle & Buffaloes:Calf||Sign|
|General Signs / Reluctant to move, refusal to move||Cattle & Buffaloes:Calf||Sign|
|General Signs / Swelling mass ovary||Sign|
|General Signs / Swelling mass oviducts||Poultry:Day-old chick,Poultry:Young poultry,Poultry:Mature female,Poultry:Cockerel,Poultry:Mature male,Other:Juvenile,Other:Adult Female,Other:Adult Male||Sign|
|General Signs / Weight loss||Cattle & Buffaloes:Calf||Sign|
|Nervous Signs / Dullness, depression, lethargy, depressed, lethargic, listless||Sign|
|Ophthalmology Signs / Blepharospasm||Sign|
|Ophthalmology Signs / Blindness||Cattle & Buffaloes:All Stages||Sign|
|Ophthalmology Signs / Chemosis, conjunctival, scleral edema, swelling||Sign|
|Ophthalmology Signs / Conjunctival, scleral, redness||Sign|
|Ophthalmology Signs / Lacrimation, tearing, serous ocular discharge, watery eyes||Sign|
|Ophthalmology Signs / Photophobia||Other:Juvenile||Sign|
|Ophthalmology Signs / Purulent discharge from eye||Pigs:Weaner,Pigs:Growing-finishing pig||Sign|
|Pain / Discomfort Signs / Ocular pain, eye||Sign|
|Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain, penis||Cattle & Buffaloes:Bull||Sign|
|Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain, prepuce||Cattle & Buffaloes:Bull||Sign|
|Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain, seminal vesicles||Cattle & Buffaloes:Bull||Sign|
|Pain / Discomfort Signs / Pain, vulva, vagina||Poultry:Mature female,Other:Adult Female||Sign|
|Reproductive Signs / Abnormal length estrus cycle, long, short, irregular interestrus period||Pigs:Piglet,Pigs:Weaner||Sign|
|Reproductive Signs / Abortion or weak newborns, stillbirth||Cattle & Buffaloes:Cow||Sign|
|Reproductive Signs / Agalactia, decreased, absent milk production||Pigs:Piglet,Pigs:Weaner||Sign|
|Reproductive Signs / Anestrus, absence of reproductive cycle, no visible estrus||Sign|
|Reproductive Signs / Female infertility, repeat breeder||Cattle & Buffaloes:Cow,Sheep & Goats:Mature female||Sign|
|Reproductive Signs / Foul smelling discharge, vulvar, vaginal||Sign|
|Reproductive Signs / Necrosis, vagina, vulva||Sign|
|Reproductive Signs / Purulent discharge, vulvar, vaginal||Other:Adult Female,Other:Adult Male||Sign|
|Reproductive Signs / Purulent or mucoid discharge, cervix or uterus||Poultry:Day-old chick,Poultry:Young poultry,Poultry:Mature female,Poultry:Cockerel,Poultry:Mature male,Other:Juvenile,Other:Adult Female,Other:Adult Male||Sign|
|Reproductive Signs / Vaginal or cervical ulcers, vesicles, erosions, tears, papules, pustules||Sign|
|Reproductive Signs / Vaginal or cervical ulcers, vesicles, erosions, tears, papules, pustules||Sign|
|Reproductive Signs / Vulval ulcers, vesicles, erosions, tears, cuts, pustules, papules||Diagnosis|
|Respiratory Signs / Coughing, coughs||Cattle & Buffaloes:Calf||Sign|
|Respiratory Signs / Dyspnea, difficult, open mouth breathing, grunt, gasping||Cattle & Buffaloes:Calf||Sign|
|Respiratory Signs / Increased respiratory rate, polypnea, tachypnea, hyperpnea||Cattle & Buffaloes:Calf||Sign|
|Respiratory Signs / Mucoid nasal discharge, serous, watery||Cattle & Buffaloes:Calf||Sign|
|Urinary Signs / Palpable calculi, swelling or mass, bladder||Sheep & Goats:All Stages||Sign|
Disease CourseTop of page
Acute granular vulvitis is characterized by an inflamed hyperaemic vulvar mucosa with small raised granules usually clustered around the clitoris. A purulent discharge may begin 3 days after infection and may last up to 2 weeks. The disease then becomes chronic with a reduction in clinical signs; however the ureaplasma can be isolated from the vulva for up to 7 months (Ruhnke, 1994). There may also be a transient colonisation of the uterus. During acute disease, the endometrium and/or fallopian tubes may become permanently damaged leading to infertility (Kreplin and Maitland, 1989). In some cases embryo death or abortion usually in the first and the last trimester, still birth or extremely weak calves that die shortly after birth with respiratory failure, may result as a consequence of ureaplasma infection (Ruhnke, 1994).
In studies of experimentally infected heifers using broth cultures of U. diversum or vaginal swabs from previously infected heifers, all animals developed granular vulvovaginitis; U. diversum was isolated from the vagina, urinary bladder and urethra. The pathogenicity of U. diversum increased with consecutive passages, making the incubation period shorter and clinical symptoms more pronounced (Pilaszek and Truszczynsk, 1991).
Experimental infections of sheep with Ureaplasma parvum, a Ureaplasma species associated with pre-term delivery in women, did not cause sustained effects on air space or vascular development in premature lambs (Polglase et al., 2010).
EpidemiologyTop of page
Numerous studies have shown that U. diversum plays an important role in bovine reproductive failure (Ruhnke, 1994). Clinical signs include granular vulvitis, endometritis, salpingitis, abortion, infertility in the female and seminovesiculitis; all conditions have been reproduced experimentally (Ball et al., 1981, 1987). Ureaplasmas are common contaminants of the prepuce and the distal urethra, having been isolated from 29-100% of samples cultured where there may be, but not always, inflammation of the prepuce or penis (Pilaszek 1988). Semen is often contaminated by ureaplasmas and may impair sperm function and possibly fertility (Hobson et al., 2013); it also provides an important transmission vector to cows. Embryo transfer fluids have also been found to contain ureaplasmas, which adhere to the zona pellucida often resisting removal by washing (Britton et al., 1988). The spread of genital forms of the disease is facilitated by persistent infections in either the female or male genital tracts.
In a study in the Netherlands, Laak et al. (1992a, b) detected U. diversum in the respiratory tract of 80% of pneumonic calves compared to only 9% of healthy calves, indicating a significant role in the aetiology of respiratory disease. This confirms experimental infections of gnotobiotic calves with ureaplasmas in which pneumonic lesions, though not clinical disease, were seen (Gourlay et al., 1979). The principal reservoir of these infections is the respiratory tract of cattle.
Despite successful experimental reproduction of conjunctivitis in cattle, ureaplasma involvement in natural infections is unclear as known pathogens such as M. bovoculi and Moraxella bovis are often present as well.
The role of ureaplasmas in sheep and goats is less clear; they are readily isolated from the urogenital and, occasionally, respiratory tract of both healthy and diseased animals. Curiously, there have only been reports of isolation from the respiratory tract of small ruminants during rutting (Ross, 1993). A link however has been established between ureaplasmas and urinary calculi in goats on a low calcium diet (Ruhnke, 1994). It appears that ureaplasma infection may influence the total amount and composition of calculi. dos Santos et al. (2013) detected Ureaplasma spp. in sheep semen samples.
Ureaplasma diversum has also been detected in the pneumonic lungs of swine (Burgher et al., 2014).
Impact: EconomicTop of page
Very little data exists for the effects of ureaplasma infections on livestock but it is clear that infections are under reported because of the difficulties in isolating the organism. However, Ross (1993) states that up to 27% reduction in fertility may occur in some herds which could incur significant economic losses.
Zoonoses and Food SafetyTop of page
There are no zoonotic or food safety implications of Ureaplasma infection.
Disease TreatmentTop of page
Little information is available on chemotherapeutic strategies for control of ureaplasma infections. An in vitro study of antibiotic sensitivity to 17 strains of U. diversum in the Netherlands showed the most effective <1m g/ml) to be: chlorotetracycline, tiamulin and tylosin. Antibiotics showing intermediate effectiveness (2-4m g/ml) included oxytetracycline and enrofloxacin. Antibiotics to which ureaplasmas were resistant (>8m g/ml) included: chloramphenicol, spectinomycin and lincomycin (Laak et al., 1993b).
In the field, Ball and McCaughey (1984) successfully eliminated ureaplasmas from the urogenital tract of most, but not all, infected sheep with tiamulin or oxytetracycline. In a study by Rae et al., (1993), pre-breeding treatment with chlortetracycline appeared to improve pregnancy rates in beef heifers with endemic U. diversum infections, though there was only a slight decrease in colonization rates of the vagina by ureaplasmas in treated groups.
There was marked and rapid clinical improvement in 2-year old heifers and bulls with granular vulvitis and ulcerative posthitis following a 5 day intramuscular course of tylosin (Gummow et al., 1992). Ureaplasma could not be cultured from the external genitalia of either heifers or bulls following clinical recovery, which began 3 days after treatment.
Prevention and ControlTop of page
Treatment of semen with antibiotic combinations of gentamycin, lincospectin and tylosin appears to prevent spread of ureaplasmas and mycoplasmas according to one source (Ruhnke, 1994); however culling of persistently infected bulls may sometimes be necessary (Reid et al., 1989).
The application of three photosensitive agents followed by irradiation for disinfection of bovine semen had no effect on U. diversum at concentrations harmless to sperm (Eaglesome et al., 1994).
Mulira and Saunders (1994) measured antibody levels in serum and cervicovaginal mucus of heifers vaccinated with killed U. diversum strain 2312 in adjuvant; control heifers were given a placebo before both groups were challenged intravaginally. Vaccination stimulated specific IgG1 and IgG2 responses in serum and CVM but only a slight IgM and no IgA response. It was concluded that vaccination stimulated a specific, albeit non-protective, IgG response in serum and CVM. No commercial vaccines are presently available for infections caused by ureaplasmas.
Control of calf pneumonia (including those caused by ureaplasmas) should include measures to reduce environmental stress and to ensure adequate housing with good circulation of air. Wherever possible consideration should be given to ‘all in, all out practices’ to prevent older animals infecting younger ones. If this is not possible separation of calves from the adults is advisable at the earliest possible opportunity where endemic disease exists.
Although survival time of U. diversum in the environment (floors, slurry) does not exceed 24 h, Pilaszek and Truszczynski (1991) showed that it was sufficient to infect preputial mucosa in bulls but not heifers. These workers also showed that asymptomatic carriers can shed U. diversum with urine for prolonged periods. It was concluded that disinfection of cowsheds and treatment of carriers with antibiotics could play an important role in prevention of ureaplasma infection.
No recent studies have investigated veterinary Ureaplasma species antibiotic sensitivities, or their survival in the environment; however studies on Ureaplasma urealyticum have demonstrated that it can form biofilms (Pandelidis et al., 2013), which may have an impact on antibiotic susceptibility, their ability to evade host immune responses and their survival in the environment.
ReferencesTop of page
Ball HJ, McCaughey WJ et al. , 1981. Experimental genital infection of heifers with ureaplasmas. Research in Veterinary Science, 30:312-317.
Burgher Y; Miranda L; Rodriguez-Roche R; Almeida Campos ACde; Lobo E; Neves T; Martinez O; Timenetsky J, 2014. Ureaplasma diversum in pneumonic lungs of swine. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 21:486-488.
Cardoso MV, Blanchard A et al. , 2000. Detection of Ureaplasma diversum in cattle using a newly developed PCR-based detection assay. Veterinary Microbiology, 72(3-4):241-250.
Eaglesome MD; Bielanski A; Hare WCD; Ruhnke HL, 1994. Studies on inactivation of pathogenic microrganisms in culture media and in bovine semen by photosensitive agents. Veterinary Microbiology, 38(3):277-284; 16 ref.
Filiousis G, Papanikolaou E et al. , 1999. Isolation and characterisation of M. bovis from a calf pneumonia outbreak in Greece. In: Stipkovits L, Rosengarten R, Frey J, eds. Mycoplasmas of ruminants:pathogenicity, diagnostics, epidemiology and molecular genetics Vol 3. Brussels: European Commission, 101-103.
Furr P, 1998. Cultivation of ureaplasmas. In: Miles RJ, Nicholas RAJ eds. Mycoplasma Protocols. Totowa, USA: Humana Press, 53-59.
Gariépy M, 1988. Characterization of the pathogenic role of Ureaplasma diversum strains [from cattle]. Médecin Vétérinaire du Québec, 18(4):203.
Gourlay RN; Howard CJ; Thomas LH; Wyld SG, 1979. Pathogenicity of some mycoplasmas and acholeplasma species in the lungs of gnotobiotic calves. Research in Veterinary Science, 27:233-237.
Grand Dle; Poumarat F; Martel JL, 1995. Infectious genital disease caused by Ureaplasma diversum: investigations in cattle in France. Veterinary Research, 26(1):11-20; 40 ref.
Haraswa R; Imada Y; Ito M; Koshimizu K; Cassell GH; Barile MF, 1990. Ureaplasma felinum sp. nov. and Ureaplasma cati sp. isolated from the oral cavities of cats. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 40(1):45-51; 36 ref.
Herrmann R, 1992. Genome structure and organization. In: Maniloff J ed. Mycoplasmas: molecular biology and pathogenesis. Washington DC, USA: American Society of Microbiology, 157-168.
Himsworth CG; Hill JE; Huang Y; Waters EH; Wobeser GA, 2009. Destructive polyarthropathy in aborted bovine fetuses: a possible association with Ureaplasma diversum infection? Veterinary Pathology, 46(2):269-272. http://vet.sagepub.com/content/46/2/269.full
Hobson N; Chousalkar KK; Chenoweth PJ, 2013. Ureaplasma diversum in bull semen in Australia: its detection and potential effects. Australian Veterinary Journal, 91(11):469-473. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1751-0813
Howard CJ; Gourlay RN, 1981. Identification of of ureaplasmas from cattle using antisera prepared in gnotobiotic calves. Journal of General Microbiology, 126:365-369.
Kapoor PK; Garg DN, 1989. Occurrence of Ureaplasma in apparently healthy and diseased (reproductive disorders) bovines. Indian Journal of Comparative Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, 10(3):127-132; 21 ref.
Laak EAter; Dijk JEvan; Noordergraaf JH, 1993. Comparison of pathological signs of disease in specific-pathogen-free calves after inoculation of the respiratory tract with Ureaplasma diversum or Mycoplasma canis.. Journal of Comparative Pathology, 108(2):121-132; 20 ref.
Laak EAter; Noordergraaf JH; Verschure MH, 1993. Susceptibilities of Mycoplasma bovis, Mycoplasma dispar and Ureaplasma diversum strains to antimicrobial agents in vitro. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 37(2):317-321.
León BA; Campos E; Bolanos H; Caballero M; Padilla M, 1994. Isolation of the bacteria Ureaplasma sp. in the reproductive tract of dairy cows in Costa Rica. Revista de Biología Tropical, 42(1/2):9-13; 17 ref.
Machado M; Monteiro MM; Atalaia V, 1987. Infection by Mycoplasma bovis in calves. Its isolation from a case of meningitis. Repositório de Trabalhos do Laboratório Nacional de InvestigaÇao Veterinaria, 19:67-74; [2 pl.]; 19 ref.
Marques LM; Amorim AT; Martins HB; Rezende IS; Barbosa MS; Lobão TN; Campos GB; Timenetsky J, 2013. A quantitative TaqMan PCR assay for the detection of Ureaplasma diversum. Veterinary Microbiology, 167(3/4):670-674. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03781135
Marques LM; Ueno PM; Buzinhani M; Cortez BA; Neto; RL; Yamaguti M; Oliveira RC; Guimarães AM; Monezi TA; Braga Jr AC; Machardo-Santelli GM; Timenetsky J, 2010. Invasion of Ureaplasma diversum in Hep-2 cells. BMC Microbiology, 10:83.
Miles RJ, 1992. Cell nutrition and growth. In: Maniloff J, ed. Mycoplasmas: molecular biology and pathogenesis. Washington DC, USA: American Society of Microbiology, 23-40.
Mulira GL; Saunders JR, 1994. Humoral and secretory antibodies to Ureaplasma diversum in heifers following subcutaneous vaccination and vaginal infection. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, 58(2):104-108.
Mulira GL; Saunders JR; Barth AD, 1992. Isolation of Ureaplasma diversum and mycoplasmas from genital tracts of beef and dairy cattle in Saskatchewan. Canadian Veterinary Journal, 33(1):46-49; 29 ref.
Mulira GL; Saunders JR; Kariuki DP, 1989. Isolation of Ureaplasma diversum from bovine granular vulvitis in Kenya. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa, 37(4):347-350; 26 ref.
Nagatomo H; Shimizu T; Higashiyama Y; Yano Y; Kuroki H; Hamana K, 1996. Antibody response to Mycoplasma bovis of calves introduced in a farm contaminated with the organism. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 58(9):919-920; 11 ref.
Pan IJ; Harasawa R; Ito M; Koshimizu K; Ohta K; Lu ZS; Chou SY, 1990. Isolation of Ureaplasma gallorale from a chicken in Taiwan. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Supplement 20:878-879; [Proceedings of the 7th Congress of the International Organization for Mycoplasmology, Baden near Vienna, 1988.]; 5 ref.
Pandelidis K; McCarthy A; Chesko KL; Viscardi RM, 2013. Role of biofilm formation in ureaplasma antibiotic susceptibility and development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm neonates. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 32(4):394-398. http://journals.lww.com/pidj/Abstract/2013/04000/Role_of_Biofilm_Formation_in_Ureaplasma_Antibiotic.21.aspx
Polglase GR; Dalton RG; Nitsos I; Knox CL; Pillow JJ; Jobe AH; Moss TJ; Newnham JP; Kallapur SG, 2010. Pulmonary vascular and alveolar development in preterm lambs chronically colonized with Ureaplasma parvum. American Journal of Physiology - Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, 299(2):L232-L241.
Rae DO; Chenoweth PJ; Brown MB; Genho PC; Moore SA; Jacobsen KE, 1993. Reproductive performance of beef heifers: effects of vulvo-vaginitis, Ureaplasma diversum and prebreeding antibiotic administration. Theriogenology, 40(3):497-508; 36 ref.
Ross RF, 1993. Mycoplasmas - Animal pathogens. In: Kahane I, Adoni A, eds. Rapid Diagnosis of Mycoplasmas. New York, USA: Plenum Press, 69-110.
Ruhnke HL, 1994. Mycoplasma associated with bovine genital tract infections. In: Whitford HW, Rosenbusch RF, Lauerman LH, eds. Mycoplasmosis in animals: laboratory diagnosis. Ames, Iowa, USA: Iowa State University Press, 56-62.
Santos SBdos; Souza Neto OLde; Albuquerque PPFde; Mota Ada R; Kim Pde CP; Moraes ÉPBXde; Nascimento ERdo; Mota RA, 2013. Detection of Ureaplasma spp. in semen samples from sheep in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 44(3):911-914. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822013000300040&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en#end
Sassani F; Vand Yousefi G, 1997. Pathological and microbiological study of pulmonary lesions in calves and the first report of the isolation of ureaplasma in Iran. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, 52(1):23-28; 10 ref.
Shepard MC, 1954. The recovery of pleuropneumonia-like organisms from negro men with and without nongonococcal urethritis. American Journal of Syphillus, 38:113-124.
Shimizu T; Nagatomo H; Yano Y; Kurogi H; Goto Y, 1988. Microorganisms detected from nasal discharges of calves before and at the onset of pneumonia. Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture, Miyazaki University, 35(1):39-47; 11 ref.
Stemke GW; Robertson JA, 1996. Ureaplasma gallorale, an isolate from chickens, is most closely related to the human isolate, U. urealyticum. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 46(4):1183-1184; 8 ref.
Thornton R; Wake H, 1997. Ureaplasma in New Zealand dairy cattle. Surveillance (Wellington), 24(3):15-16; 9 ref.
Unternährer B, 1990. Bacterial contamination of freshly-collected bull semen, particularly with mycoplasmas. Investigations conducted at Swiss AI Centres. Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde, 132(1):36; [Summary of Dissertation, Veterinary Faculty of Bern University.].
Viana FC, 1990. Embryo transfer. 1. Epidemiological aspects of interactions between infectious agents and bovine embryos. 2. International import/export trade regulations for bovine. Revista Brasileira de ReproduÇao Animal, 14(4):263-277; 30 ref.
Whitford HW; Rosenbusch RF; Lauerman LH, 1994. Mycoplasmosis in animals: laboratory diagnosis. Mycoplasmosis in animals: laboratory diagnosis., xi + 173 pp.; [compiled by the Mycoplasmosis Committee of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians.]; many ref.
Zendulkova D, Jurmanova K et al. , 2001. Epidemiological study of mycoplasmas in herds of cattle in the Czech Republic. In: Poveda JB, Fernandez A, Frey J, Johnansson K-E, eds. Mycoplasmas of ruminants:pathogenicity, diagnostics, epidemiology and molecular genetics Vol 5. Brussels: European Commission, 113-115.
CABI, Undated. Compendium record. Wallingford, UK: CABI
Farstad W, Krogenæs A, Friis N F, 1996. Outbreak of infectious granulomatous vaginitis in cattle caused by Ureaplasma diversum. (Utbrudd av smittsom granulomatøs vaginitt hos storfe forǻrsaket av Ureaplasma diversum.). Norsk Veterinærtidsskrift. 108 (3), 159-164.
Gariépy M, 1988. Characterization of the pathogenic role of Ureaplasma diversum strains [from cattle]. In: Médecin Vétérinaire du Québec, 18 (4) 203.
Grand D le, Poumarat F, Martel J L, 1995. Infectious genital disease caused by Ureaplasma diversum: investigations in cattle in France. (Infection génitale à Ureaplasma diversum: enquête chez les bovins en France.). Veterinary Research. 26 (1), 11-20.
Gustafsson H, Bäckström G, Bölske G, Emanuelson U, 1995. Vaginitis in dairy cows in south-east Sweden - results of a pilot study. (Vaginit hos mjölkkor i sydöstra Sverige - resultat av en pilotstudie.). Svensk Veterinärtidning. 47 (11), 469-473.
Kapoor P K, Garg D N, 1989. Occurrence of Ureaplasma in apparently healthy and diseased (reproductive disorders) bovines. Indian Journal of Comparative Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases. 10 (3), 127-132.
León B A, Campos E, Bolaños H, Caballero M, Padilla M, 1994. Isolation of the bacteria Ureaplasma sp. in the reproductive tract of dairy cows in Costa Rica. (Aislamiento de la bacteria Ureaplasma sp. en el tracto reproductivo de vacas lecheras de Costa Rica.). Revista de Biología Tropical. 42 (1/2), 9-13.
Machado M, Monteiro M M, Atalaia V, 1987. Infection by Mycoplasma bovis in calves. Its isolation from a case of meningitis. (Infecções por Mycoplasma bovis em vitelos. Seu isolamento a partir dum caso de meningite.). Repositório de Trabalhos do Laboratório Nacional de Investigação Veterinaria. 67-74.
Pilaszek J, 1988. Occurrence of Mycoplasmatales in the reproductive tract of cattle. I. Isolation from bulls. (Wystepowanie drobnoustrojow Mycoplasmatales w narzadzie rozrodczym u bydla. I. Izolacja szczepow od buhajow.). Medycyna Weterynaryjna. 44 (6), 369-372.
Ross RF, 1993. Mycoplasmas - Animal pathogens. In: Rapid Diagnosis of Mycoplasmas, [ed. by Kahane I, Adoni A]. New York, USA: Plenum Press. 69-110.
Sassani F, Vand Yousefi G, 1997. Pathological and microbiological study of pulmonary lesions in calves and the first report of the isolation of ureaplasma in Iran. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran. 52 (1), 23-28.
Shimizu T, Nagatomo H, Yano Y, Kurogi H, Goto Y, 1988. Microorganisms detected from nasal discharges of calves before and at the onset of pneumonia. Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture, Miyazaki University. 35 (1), 39-47.
Türkarslan J, 1988. Identification of sheep and goat mycoplasmas by their biochemical characteristics. (Koyun ve keçi mikoplazmalarinin biyoșimik karakterlerine göre identifikasyonu.). Pendik Hayvan Hastalıkları Merkez Avastırma Enstitüsü Dergisi. 19 (1-2), 44-52.
Unternährer B, 1990. Bacterial contamination of freshly-collected bull semen, particularly with mycoplasmas. Investigations conducted at Swiss AI Centres. Summary of Dissertation, Veterinary Faculty of Bern University. In: Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde, 132 (1) 36.
Viana FC, 1990. Embryo transfer. 1. Epidemiological aspects of interactions between infectious agents and bovine embryos. 2. International import/export trade regulations for bovine. In: Revista Brasileira de ReproduÇao Animal, 14 (4) 263-277.
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/