| Picture | Title | Caption | Copyright |
|---|---|---|---|
| Symptoms | Xanthomonas fragariae (angular leaf spot); Water-soaked lesions with bacterial exudate on the lower surface of strawberry leaves. Novermber 2007. | ©Don Ferrin, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center/via Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 | |
| Symptoms | Xanthomonas fragariae (angular leaf spot); Translucency of lesions evident when viewed with transmitted light. November 2007. | ©Don Ferrin, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center/via Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 | |
| Symptoms | Xanthomonas fragariae (angular leaf spot); Lesions when viewed with transmitted light. January 2012. | ©Edward Sikora, Auburn University/via Bugwood.org - CC BY-NC 3.0 | |
| Symptoms | Xanthomonas fragariae (angular leaf spot); Lesions on the upper surface of a strawberry leaf. Florida, USA. August 2007. | ©Florida Division of Plant Industry, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services/via Bugwood.org - CC BY-NC 3.0 | |
| Symptoms | Xanthomonas fragariae (angular leaf spot); Lesions on the lower surface of a strawberry leaf. September 2010. | ©Gerald Holmes, Strawberry Center, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo/via Bugwood.org - CC BY-NC 3.0 | |
| Symptoms | Xanthomonas fragariae (angular leaf spot); Symptoms on strawberry sepal. September 2010. | ©Gerald Holmes, Strawberry Center, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo/via Bugwood.org - CC BY-NC 3.0 |
Datasheet
Xanthomonas fragariae (angular leaf spot)
Index
- Pictures
- Identity
- Taxonomic Tree
- Description
- Distribution
- Distribution Table
- Risk of Introduction
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
- Growth Stages
- Symptoms
- List of Symptoms/Signs
- Biology and Ecology
- Impact
- Detection and Inspection
- Prevention and Control
- References
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate reportPictures
Top of pageIdentity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Xanthomonas fragariae Kennedy & King, 1962
Preferred Common Name
- angular leaf spot
International Common Names
- English: leaf blight of strawberry; vascular collapse of strawberry
- Spanish: avejentamiento del fresa; mancha angular de las hojas del fresal; marchitamiento vascular del fresal
- French: bacteriose du fraisier; fletrissement vasculaire du fraisier; taches angulaires du fraisier
- Portuguese: manch angulare da folha do morangueiro
Local Common Names
- Germany: Eckige Blattfleckenkrankheit: Erdbeere
- Italy: maculatura angolare delle foglie della fragola
EPPO code
- XANTFR (Xanthomonas fragariae)
Taxonomic Tree
Top of page- Domain: Bacteria
- Phylum: Proteobacteria
- Class: Gammaproteobacteria
- Order: Xanthomonadales
- Family: Xanthomonadaceae
- Genus: Xanthomonas
- Species: Xanthomonas fragariae
Description
Top of page
X. fragariae is an aerobic, Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, non-capsulate rod; size averaging 0.4 x 1.3 µm. Most cells are non-motile, but some have a single polar flagellum. On beef-extract-peptone agar, or similar medium without added carbohydrate, colonies are circular, entire, convex, glistening, translucent to pale-yellow (Bradbury, 1977).
Distribution
Top of pageX. fragariae was first described in 1962 in North America. It probably spread from there, with planting material, to other continents but this is only a presumption.
A record of X. fragariae in Taiwan (CABI/EPPO, 2013; EPPO, 2014) published in previous versions of the Compendium was included in error. The original source of the record (Anon., 1978) refers to the presence of Phytophthora fragariae in Taiwan not X. fragariae.
See also CABI/EPPO (1998, No. 284).
Distribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
Last updated: 17 Feb 2021| Continent/Country/Region | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | Reference | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Africa |
|||||||
| Ethiopia | Present | 1991 | |||||
| Réunion | Absent, Eradicated | 1986 | |||||
Asia |
|||||||
| China | Present, Localized | ||||||
| -Tianjin | Present, Localized | ||||||
| Iran | Present, Few occurrences | ||||||
| Israel | Absent, Formerly present | ||||||
| South Korea | Present, Localized | ||||||
| Taiwan | Absent, Invalid presence record(s) | ||||||
| Turkey | Absent | ||||||
| Uzbekistan | Absent | ||||||
Europe |
|||||||
| Austria | Present, Localized | ||||||
| Belgium | Present, Few occurrences | 1998 | |||||
| Bulgaria | Present, Localized | ||||||
| Cyprus | Absent | ||||||
| Czechia | Absent | ||||||
| Estonia | Absent, Eradicated | ||||||
| Finland | Absent, Eradicated | ||||||
| France | Present, Localized | ||||||
| Germany | Present, Localized | 1995 | |||||
| Greece | Absent, Formerly present | ||||||
| Guernsey | Absent | ||||||
| Italy | Present, Localized | ||||||
| -Sicily | Present | ||||||
| Latvia | Absent | ||||||
| Malta | Absent | ||||||
| Netherlands | Present, Localized | 1996 | Present in several areas where host crops are grown. | ||||
| Norway | Absent, Confirmed absent by survey | ||||||
| Portugal | Present, Widespread | ||||||
| Romania | Absent, Formerly present | ||||||
| Slovakia | Absent | ||||||
| Slovenia | Absent, Formerly present | ||||||
| Spain | Present, Localized | ||||||
| Switzerland | Present, Widespread | 1993 | |||||
| Ukraine | Absent, Formerly present | ||||||
| United Kingdom | Absent, Eradicated | ||||||
| -England | Absent, Eradicated | ||||||
North America |
|||||||
| Canada | Present, Localized | ||||||
| -Alberta | Present | ||||||
| -Manitoba | Present | ||||||
| -New Brunswick | Present | ||||||
| -Newfoundland and Labrador | Present | ||||||
| -Nova Scotia | Present, Localized | ||||||
| -Ontario | Present | ||||||
| -Quebec | Present | ||||||
| -Saskatchewan | Present | ||||||
| Mexico | Present | ||||||
| United States | Present, Localized | 1962 | |||||
| -Alabama | Present | ||||||
| -California | Present | ||||||
| -Connecticut | Present | ||||||
| -Florida | Present | ||||||
| -Indiana | Present | ||||||
| -Kentucky | Present | ||||||
| -Louisiana | Present | ||||||
| -Maryland | Present | ||||||
| -Massachusetts | Present | ||||||
| -Michigan | Present | ||||||
| -Minnesota | Present | ||||||
| -Montana | Present | ||||||
| -New York | Present | ||||||
| -North Carolina | Present | ||||||
| -North Dakota | Present | ||||||
| -Ohio | Present | ||||||
| -Oklahoma | Present | ||||||
| -Oregon | Present | ||||||
| -Pennsylvania | Present | ||||||
| -Texas | Present | ||||||
| -Virginia | Present | ||||||
| -Wisconsin | Present | ||||||
Oceania |
|||||||
| Australia | Absent, Eradicated | ||||||
| -New South Wales | Absent, Eradicated | ||||||
| -Queensland | Absent, Eradicated | ||||||
| -South Australia | Absent, Eradicated | 1994 | |||||
| -Victoria | Absent, Eradicated | ||||||
| New Zealand | Absent, Eradicated | 1971 | |||||
South America |
|||||||
| Argentina | Present | ||||||
| Brazil | Present, Localized | ||||||
| -Distrito Federal | Present | ||||||
| -Minas Gerais | Present | ||||||
| -Rio Grande do Sul | Present | ||||||
| -Sao Paulo | Present | ||||||
| Chile | Absent, Eradicated | 1992 | |||||
| Ecuador | Absent, Formerly present | ||||||
| Paraguay | Present, Widespread | ||||||
| Uruguay | Present | ||||||
| Venezuela | Present | ||||||
Risk of Introduction
Top of page
EPPO considers X. fragariae as an A2 quarantine organism (OEPP/EPPO, 1986), while IAPSC also considers it as of quarantine significance. The disease is absent from most strawberry-growing countries in Europe but probably has the potential to establish there. Indeed, the general climatic conditions which are said to favour disease in North America tend to occur in Central and Northern Europe rather than in the Mediterranean countries where X. fragariae has been recorded until now. However, the specific influence of overhead sprinkler irrigation may be more characteristic of the Mediterranean countries. X. fragariae is certainly sufficiently damaging to deserve its quarantine status.
Phytosanitary measures
EPPO recommends, in its specific quarantine requirements (OEPP/EPPO, 1990), that strawberry planting material from infested countries should be derived from mother plants kept free from X. fragariae as part of a certification
scheme (in preparation by EPPO), and in addition that the place of production should have been found free from the disease during the last five growing seasons. In addition, visual inspections during the dormant period can be useful. Inspectors should look for typical angular spots on old leaves or on their remains still attached to the runners. Samples from lots kept in cold storage must be inspected immediately after the runners are taken out and thawed. The spots can no longer be seen after only 1 day at room temperature.
Phytosanitary measures
EPPO recommends, in its specific quarantine requirements (OEPP/EPPO, 1990), that strawberry planting material from infested countries should be derived from mother plants kept free from X. fragariae as part of a certification
scheme (in preparation by EPPO), and in addition that the place of production should have been found free from the disease during the last five growing seasons. In addition, visual inspections during the dormant period can be useful. Inspectors should look for typical angular spots on old leaves or on their remains still attached to the runners. Samples from lots kept in cold storage must be inspected immediately after the runners are taken out and thawed. The spots can no longer be seen after only 1 day at room temperature.
Hosts/Species Affected
Top of page
Cultivated strawberries (Fragaria ananassa) are the only host of concern. The numerous cultivars vary a great deal in susceptibility. F. virginiana, F. vesca, Potentilla fruticosa and P. glandulosa have been infected following experimental inoculation. Among Fragaria spp. only F. moschata is immune (Kennedy and King, 1962a; Kennedy, 1965; Maas, 1984).
Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
Top of page| Plant name | Family | Context | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fragaria (strawberry) | Rosaceae | Main | |
| Fragaria ananassa (strawberry) | Rosaceae | Main |
Symptoms
Top of page
On leaves, 1-4 mm, angular, shiny, water-soaked spots appear surrounded by the smallest veins. In the early stage the spots are only visible on the lower surface and appear translucent against the light. They enlarge, coalesce and after about 2 weeks are also visible on the upper surface as water-soaked, angular spots, which become reddish-brown in colour. They have a shiny appearance and are usually covered by bacterial exudate which when dry turns brown and appears as gum-like scales. Spots coalesce more frequently along the primary and secondary veins. The dead tissues tear and break off, and the diseased leaf may assume a ragged appearance.
In the most severe cases crown infection pockets may be seen inside after dissection. They appear as localized, water-soaked zones, frequently confined to one side of the crown.
For more information, see Kennedy and King (1962b), Hildebrand et al. (1967), Mazzucchi et al. (1973), Panagopoulos et al. (1978) and Maas (1984).
In the most severe cases crown infection pockets may be seen inside after dissection. They appear as localized, water-soaked zones, frequently confined to one side of the crown.
For more information, see Kennedy and King (1962b), Hildebrand et al. (1967), Mazzucchi et al. (1973), Panagopoulos et al. (1978) and Maas (1984).
List of Symptoms/Signs
Top of page| Sign | Life Stages | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Growing point / rot | ||
| Leaves / abnormal colours | ||
| Leaves / necrotic areas |
Biology and Ecology
Top of page
Residues of infected leaves and crown infections on runners used for planting are sources of inoculum for primary infections. In the residues of infected leaves, in or on soil, the bacterium survives from one crop to the
next. In dried infected leaves, kept in the laboratory, the bacterium may survive for at least 2.5 years. Bacterial cells are transferred from residues to young leaves at the beginning of the growing season. From crown infection pockets, the bacterium causes lesions along the veins at the base of the youngest leaves, which develop in the apical crown region.
X. fragariae is exuded from primary lesions, and bacterial cells are spread by aerosols, caused by rain and sprinkler irrigation, and transported by wind to healthy leaves. Penetration occurs through the stomata. Infections of the
crowns occur through local wounds or downwards from the affected leaves. During the growing season several cycles of secondary infections may occur. The bacterium may attack flowers, but not fruits.
During epidemics, when environmental conditions favour exudation and spread, X. fragariae may cause systemic infections associated with crown pockets. Systemic infections may arise under damp nursery conditions. The
conditions favouring infection are moderate to cool daytime temperatures (about 20°C), low night-time temperatures and high humidities (Maas, 1984). For more information, see Kennedy and King (1962b), Hildebrand et al. (1967), Maas (1984).
Means of movement/dispersal
X. fragariae is spread locally by splash dispersal. Commercial strawberry runners used for planting may spread the bacterium. They may still bear old, whole or torn, infected leaves or have crown infection pockets. Moreover, almost invisible fragments of infected leaves may be hidden in the apical crown region or between the roots (Kennedy and King, 1962a).
next. In dried infected leaves, kept in the laboratory, the bacterium may survive for at least 2.5 years. Bacterial cells are transferred from residues to young leaves at the beginning of the growing season. From crown infection pockets, the bacterium causes lesions along the veins at the base of the youngest leaves, which develop in the apical crown region.
X. fragariae is exuded from primary lesions, and bacterial cells are spread by aerosols, caused by rain and sprinkler irrigation, and transported by wind to healthy leaves. Penetration occurs through the stomata. Infections of the
crowns occur through local wounds or downwards from the affected leaves. During the growing season several cycles of secondary infections may occur. The bacterium may attack flowers, but not fruits.
During epidemics, when environmental conditions favour exudation and spread, X. fragariae may cause systemic infections associated with crown pockets. Systemic infections may arise under damp nursery conditions. The
conditions favouring infection are moderate to cool daytime temperatures (about 20°C), low night-time temperatures and high humidities (Maas, 1984). For more information, see Kennedy and King (1962b), Hildebrand et al. (1967), Maas (1984).
Means of movement/dispersal
X. fragariae is spread locally by splash dispersal. Commercial strawberry runners used for planting may spread the bacterium. They may still bear old, whole or torn, infected leaves or have crown infection pockets. Moreover, almost invisible fragments of infected leaves may be hidden in the apical crown region or between the roots (Kennedy and King, 1962a).
Impact
Top of page
Like other strawberry leaf blights, X. fragariae causes a certain reduction in yield, but generally the disease is not destructive. However, heavy losses may occur with frequent overhead sprinkler irrigation.
Detection and Inspection
Top of page
The presence of the bacterium in affected plants may be confirmed by direct isolation or indirect immunofluorescence antibody staining (IFAS) of suspensions obtained by macerating in a mortar some water-soaked spots in a small volume of distilled water (Mazzucchi et al., 1973).
Direct isolation is difficult because the growth of the bacterium is very slow and its colonies are easily overgrown by those of secondary organisms. Isolation may be successful if the suspension is streaked on yeast dextrose chalk agar plates and incubated at 27°C at high humidities. Colonies develop more frequently where a mass of cells is transferred in close association. The first colonies are visible after 4-5 days. The colonies are circular, 0.5-1.0 mm in diameter, yellow-pigmented, dome-shaped, with entire edges. The pure culture is distinguishable from other phytopathogenic xanthomonads by at least seven characteristics (no growth at 33°C; no hydrolysis of aesculin; no acid from arabinose, galactose, trehalose, cellobiose; 0.5-1.0% maximum NaCl tolerance) (Kennedy and King, 1962b; Bradbury, 1984).
IFAS can be used successfully on the concentrated suspension or on its ten-fold dilution. In positive cases millions of small, rounded fluorescent bacteria can be seen. When using differential dilutions of antiserum, no interference has yet been reported due to the existence of cross-reactions with other bacteria. Detection is quite difficult on symptomless runners (Mazzucchi and Calzolari, 1987). Any crown infection pockets can only be detected by histological examination of single runners, which is difficult to apply to large lots. Moreover the runners may be so well cleaned that any small residues of old infected leaves are almost invisible. Recently a sampling detection method for symptomless runners was studied. Cleaned crowns of the sample are cut in quarters and homogenized. The bacteria are concentrated from the thick suspension by centrifuging. IFAS is applied to the final pellet. Although the method is not very sensitive, preliminary applications were quite encouraging. ELISA has also been tried out as a detection method (Lopez et al., 1987).
See also Opgenorth et al. (1996), Zhang and Goodwin (1997) and Mahuku and Goodwin (1997).
Direct isolation is difficult because the growth of the bacterium is very slow and its colonies are easily overgrown by those of secondary organisms. Isolation may be successful if the suspension is streaked on yeast dextrose chalk agar plates and incubated at 27°C at high humidities. Colonies develop more frequently where a mass of cells is transferred in close association. The first colonies are visible after 4-5 days. The colonies are circular, 0.5-1.0 mm in diameter, yellow-pigmented, dome-shaped, with entire edges. The pure culture is distinguishable from other phytopathogenic xanthomonads by at least seven characteristics (no growth at 33°C; no hydrolysis of aesculin; no acid from arabinose, galactose, trehalose, cellobiose; 0.5-1.0% maximum NaCl tolerance) (Kennedy and King, 1962b; Bradbury, 1984).
IFAS can be used successfully on the concentrated suspension or on its ten-fold dilution. In positive cases millions of small, rounded fluorescent bacteria can be seen. When using differential dilutions of antiserum, no interference has yet been reported due to the existence of cross-reactions with other bacteria. Detection is quite difficult on symptomless runners (Mazzucchi and Calzolari, 1987). Any crown infection pockets can only be detected by histological examination of single runners, which is difficult to apply to large lots. Moreover the runners may be so well cleaned that any small residues of old infected leaves are almost invisible. Recently a sampling detection method for symptomless runners was studied. Cleaned crowns of the sample are cut in quarters and homogenized. The bacteria are concentrated from the thick suspension by centrifuging. IFAS is applied to the final pellet. Although the method is not very sensitive, preliminary applications were quite encouraging. ELISA has also been tried out as a detection method (Lopez et al., 1987).
See also Opgenorth et al. (1996), Zhang and Goodwin (1997) and Mahuku and Goodwin (1997).
Prevention and Control
Top of pageDue to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
The use of healthy planting material and avoidance of conditions favouring disease are the main control methods. Treatments with copper-containing products have some effectiveness, but have to be applied very intensively,with a risk of phytotoxicity. Resistance to X. fragariae exists in breeding material, but not yet in commercial cultivars (Maas, 1984, 2000).
References
Top of pageBradbury JF, 1984 Xanthomonas. In: Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, vol. 1. Krieg NR, Holt JG, eds. Baltimore, USA: Williams & Wilkins
Bradbury JF, 1986. Guide to Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. Wallingford, UK: CAB International
EPPO, 1986. EPPO data sheets on quarantine organisms. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 16(1):13-78
EPPO, 1990. Specific quarantine requirements. EPPO Technical Documents, No. 1008. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization
EPPO, 2011. EPPO Reporting Service. EPPO Reporting Service. Paris, France: EPPO. http://archives.eppo.org/EPPOReporting/Reporting_Archives.htm
EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm
EPPO, 2018. EPPO Global Database (available online). https://gd.eppo.int
Hildebrand DC, Schroth MN, Wilhelm S, 1967. Systemic invasion of strawberry by Xanthomonas fragariae causing vascular collapse. Phytopathology, 57:1260-1261
Kennedy BW, 1965. Infection of Potentilla by Xanthomonas fragariae. Plant Disease Reporter, 49:491-492
Kennedy BW, King TH, 1962. Angular leaf spot of strawberry caused by Xanthomonas fragariae sp. nov. Phytopathology, 52:873-875
Kennedy BW, King TH, 1962. Studies on epidemiology of bacterial angular leaf spot on strawberry. Plant Disease Reporter, 46:360-363
Lopez MM, Aramburu JM, Cambra M, Borras V, 1985. [Detection and identification of Xanthomonas fragariae in Spain.] Anales del Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias. Serie Agricola, 28:245-259
Maas JL, 1984. Compendium of Strawberry Diseases. St. Paul, Minnesota, USA: American Phytopathology Society
Mazzucchi U, Calzolari A, 1987. Detection of Xanthomonas fragariae in symptomless strawberry plants. Acta Horticulturae, 265:601-604
Pruvost O, FabrFgue C, Luisetti J, 1988. Mise en évidence de la maladie des taches angulaires du fraisier à l'île de la Réunion. Fruits (France), 43:369-373
Rat B, 1974. Présence en France de la maladie des taches angulaires du fraisier. Annales de Phytopathologie, 6:223
Distribution References
CABI, Undated. CABI Compendium: Status as determined by CABI editor. Wallingford, UK: CABI
NPPO of the Netherlands, 2013. Pest status of harmful organisms in the Netherlands., Wageningen, Netherlands:
Distribution Maps
Top of page
You can pan and zoom the map
Save map
Select a dataset
Map Legends
-
CABI Summary Records
Map Filters
Extent
Invasive
Origin
Third party data sources:
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Please click OK to ACCEPT or Cancel to REJECT