Aculops lycopersici
(tomato russet mite)

Pictures

Top of page

Identity

Top of page

Preferred Scientific Name

• Aculops lycopersici (Tryon, 1917)

Preferred Common Name

• tomato russet mite

Other Scientific Names

• Aceria lycopersici
• Aculops destructor
• Aculops lycopersicae
• Aculus destructor (Keifer, 1940)
• Aculus lycopersici (Tryon, 1917)
• Eriophyes lycopersici
• Phyllocoptes destructor Keifer, 1940
• Phyllocoptes lycopersici Tryon, 1917
• Vasates destructor (Keifer, 1940)
• Vasates lycopersici (Tryon, 1917)

International Common Names

• English: tomato mite
• Spanish: acaro de la roseta del tomate; acaro de la roseta del tomato (Mexico); acaro del tomate; acaro tostador de la tomate; canelilla de la roseta del tomato (Mexico); deca de los tomates
• French: acarien de la tomate; acariose bronzée de la tomate

Local Common Names

• Germany: Milbe, Tomaten-; Tomaten-Milbe

EPPO code

• VASALY (Aculops lycopersici)

Taxonomic Tree

Top of page

• Domain: Eukaryota
•     Kingdom: Metazoa
•         Phylum: Arthropoda
•             Subphylum: Chelicerata
•                 Class: Arachnida
•                     Subclass: Acari
•                         Superorder: Acariformes
•                             Suborder: Prostigmata
•                                 Family: Eriophyidae
•                                     Genus: Aculops
•                                         Species: Aculops lycopersici

Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature

Top of page Aculops lycopersici (Tryon, 1917) is the correct name for the tomato russet mite. Tryon published a brief description of the damage caused by the mite and proposed the name Phyllocoptes lycopersici. Massee (1937) considered Tryon's description to be inadequate and the name to be a nomen nudum. He redescribed the mite as a new species under the same name, Phyllocoptes lycopersici, and most subsequent authors have attributed the name to Massee. However, as pointed out by Amrine (1994), Tryon's description and name take precedence over Massee's under Article 12b(8) of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. There is now general agreement that the name Phyllocoptes destructor Keifer is a junior synonym of Phyllocoptes lycopersici Tryon.

Description

Top of page Adults of A. lycopersici were well described and illustrated by Keifer (1940) under the name Phyllocoptes destructor Keifer. Additional useful data and interpretations are found in Bailey and Keifer (1943), Lamb (1953a) and in Perring and Farrar (1986). Adult females are the most abundant and frequently encountered instar on symptomatic plants. They have the basic characters of Eriophyidae and Phyllocoptinae. The body is fusiform and from 150 to 200 µm long. The prodorsal shield is 40 to 50 µm long, has a broad, short anterior lobe that is abruptly deflected ventrally; is strongly sculptured with a diagnostic hourglass-shaped pattern of longitudinal striations, and bears a pair of moderately long, posteriorly-directed, divergent dorsal setae near the posterior edge. The body exhibits a series of annuli strongly differentiated into tergites and sternites. There are 25-30 tergites and more than 60 sternites, and the sternites bear pointed microtubercles at their posterior edges. The genital coverflap ranges from 14-16 µm in length and is sculptured with longitudinal striations. The two pairs of legs have distinctive claw-like structures terminally on the tarsi, termed feather-claws, with four pairs of rays.

Distribution

Top of page A. lycopersici probably now occurs in all countries where tomatoes and related solanaceous crops are grown.

Distribution Table

Top of page

The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.

Hosts/Species Affected

Top of page A. lycopersici is most often reported as a pest of tomatoes, but utilizes a wide range of Solanaceae, including several crop plants, as secondary hosts. The mites require perennial alternate hosts in order to survive during winter and, as a result of the catastrophic injury they cause to tomato plants, after death of their primary hosts.

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

Top of page

Growth Stages

Top of page Flowering stage, Fruiting stage, Vegetative growing stage

Symptoms

Top of page Members of A. lycopersici feed on the foliage, inflorescence and young fruit of tomato plants causing shrivelling and necrosis of leaves, dropping of flowers, russeting of fruit and, if uncontrolled, death of the plants (Keifer et al., 1982). Feeding by the mites damages epidermal tissue (Royalty and Perring, 1988) and guard cells thereby inhibiting gas exchange and photosynthesis (Royalty and Perring, 1989). The mites cause similar, but usually less severe, injury to related solanaceous crops.

List of Symptoms/Signs

Top of page

Biology and Ecology

Top of page In field situations, airborne adults of A. lycopersici begin to infest tomatoes perennial alternate hosts shortly after transplanting (Bailey, 1942; Michelbacher, 1943; Sloan, 1945; Keifer, 1952; Ramalho, 1978). Females begin to oviposit soon after becoming established on the host, giving rise to a succession of generations (up to seven per growing season) that can develop from egg to adult in as little as 6 or 7 days each under optimum conditions of 26.5°C and 30% RH (Bailey and Keifer, 1943; Anderson, 1954; Wilcox and Howland, 1954; Rice and Strong, 1962; Gerdzhikov, 1968; Jeppson et al., 1975; Osman, 1975; Flechtmann, 1977; Abou-Awad, 1979). Consequently, populations increase rapidly to very high densities with catastrophic impact on the vitality of the host, especially under dry weather conditions (Holdaway, 1941). When the primary host dies, some of the mites are dispersed by wind to nearby alternative hosts where they form overwintering aggregations. In greenhouses, the sources of infestation of young plants are surviving populations of mites on remnants of previous crops of infected plants or mites newly introduced on young plants. Perring (1996) summarized information on the biology of A. lycopersici.

A. lycopersici has been implicated as a vector of the fungal pathogen Hirsutella thompsonii (Cabrera and McCoy, 1984).

Natural enemies

Top of page

Notes on Natural Enemies

Top of page Hessein and Perring (1988) reported predation of A. lycopersici by a tydeid mite Homeopronematus anconai. Osman and Zaki (1986) investigated the predation efficiency of the stigmaeid mite Agistemus exsertus against A. lycopersici. Sabelis (1996) summarized information on reported phytoseiid mite predators of A. lycopersici.

Impact

Top of page A. lycopersici may cause serious reductions in yield in tomato crops, especially when young plants are exposed to attack. Losses of up to 65% have been reported in situations where young plants have become heavily infested shortly after transplantation (Eschiapati et al., 1975; Oliveira et al., 1982).

Detection and Inspection

Top of page Field infestations of A. lycopersici are detected by inspecting the foliage of symptomatic plants.

Similarities to Other Species/Conditions

Top of page Eriophyoid mites can be identified with certainty only by examining properly cleared and slide-mounted specimens under high magnification. Members of A. lycopersici resemble members of other species of Aculops, but can be distinguished using the diagnostic character states listed by Keifer (1940), Bailey and Keifer (1943), Lamb (1953a) and Perring and Farrar (1986).

Prevention and Control

Top of page

Chemical Control

Approaches have changed from repeated application of broad spectrum insecticides to focused treatment of young plants to prevent establishment of A. lycopersici early in the growing season (Anon., 1934, 1942, 1951, 1972; Morgan, 1935; Cottier and Taylor, 1937; Sloan, 1938, 1941, 1945; Veitch, 1938; Keifer, 1940; Lockwood, 1940, 1942; Pescott, 1940; Planes, 1941; Bailey, 1942; Campbell, 1942a, b; Watson and Tissot, 1942; Bailey and Keifer, 1943; Wilcox and Elmore, 1943; Michelbacher, 1944; Michelbacher et al., 1948, 1950; Wilcox and Howland, 1950, 1954, 1956; Lamb and Jacks, 1952; Tuft and Anderson, 1953; Anderson, 1954; Blanck et al., 1954, 1956; Smith, 1955; Smith and Saunders, 1956, 1960; Rice and Strong, 1962; Tsalev, 1967; Gerdzhikov, 1968; Egashira, 1973; de Sales et al., 1973; Siqueira and Dunham, 1974; Jeppson et al., 1975; Osman, 1975; Hamilton, 1976; Kamau, 1977; Taylor, 1978; Ramalho and Leao-Veiga, 1980; Collingwood et al., 1981; Bourdouxhe and Collingwood, 1982; Vacante, 1982; Maeso and Nunez, 1983; Nunez and Maeso, 1983; Oliveira and Sponchiado, 1983; Perring and Trumble, 1984; Abou-Awad and El-Banhawy, 1985; Daiber, 1985; Perring and Farrar, 1986; Royalty and Perring, 1987; Kay and Shepherd, 1988; da Silva et al., 1988; Haji et al., 1988; Undurraga and Dybas, 1988; Costilla and Barberis, 1990; Baradaran-Anaraki and Daneshvar, 1992).

Of several acaricides tested against A. lycopersici in the field in Australia, dicofol, SLJ0312 (an experimental compound), cyhexatin, azocyclotin and sulprofos were found to be effective (Kay and Shepherd, 1988). Dicofol was recommended to control or prevent infestation of the mite. Royalty and Perring (1987) found avermectin B1 to be more toxic to A. lycopersici than dicofol, and selective doses of avermectin B1 gave good control of the pest without reducing numbers of the beneficial tydeid mite Homeopronematus anconai. Perring (1996) provides a short overview of the control of A. lycopersici.

Biological Control

Chemical methods have progressively been supplemented, especially in greenhouse situations, by increasingly well understood biological control strategies involving predatory phytoseid, stigmaeid and tydeid mites (Bailey and Keifer, 1943; Anderson, 1954; Bravenboer, 1975; Anon., 1977; Abou-Awad, 1979, 1980; de Morales and Lima, 1983; Hessein and Perring, 1986, 1988; Osman and Zaki, 1986; James, 1989; Manzaroli and Benuzzi, 1995; Brodeur et al., 1997). Integrated pest management of A. lycopersici in greenhouses has been reported in a number of recent studies (Berlinger et al., 1988; Arno et al., 1994; Atanasov et al., 1995).

References

Top of page

1977. Annual report of the Research Branch 1971-1972. Report, Department of Agriculture, Zambia, 287 pp.

1980. New pest introductions or discovery. Quarterly Report, FAO Caribbean Plant Protection Commission, 9(3):4

Abou-Awad BA, 1979. On the tomato russet mite, Aculops lycopersici (Massee) (Acari, Eriophyidae) in Egypt. Anzeiger für Schadlingskunde Pflanzenschutz Umweltschutz, 52(10):153-156

Abou-Awad BA, 1980. Two new species of genus Aculops in Egypt (Eriophyoidea: Eriophyidae). Acarologia, 21(2):234-238

Abou-Awad BA; El-Banhawy EM, 1985. Susceptibility of the tomato russet mite, Aculops lycopersici (Acari: Eriophyidae), in Egypt to methamidophos, pyridaphenthion, cypermethrin, dicofol and fenarimol. Experimental & Applied Acarology, 1(1):11-15

Akyazi R, 2012. First report of Aculops lycopersici (Tryon, 1917) (Acari: Eriophyidae) on Pepino in Turkey. Journal of Entomological and Acarological Research, 44(3):115-116. http://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/jear/article/view/jear.2012.e20/pdf

Amrine JW; Stasny TA, 1994. Catalog of the Eriophyoidea (Acarina: Prostigmata) of the world. West Bloomfield, USA; Indira Publishing House, viii + 798 pp.

Anderson LD, 1954. The tomato russet mite in the United States. Journal of Economic Entomology, 47:1001-1005.

Anon., 1934. Insect pests and their control. Agricultural Gazette, New South Wales, 45:210-215.

Anon., 1942. Meet the tomato mite. Pacific Rural Press, 44:131.

Anon., 1943. Incidence of insect pests by counties. Bulletin of the California Department of Agriculture, 32:253-256.

Anon., 1951. Tomato mite. Queensland Agricultural and Pastoral Handbook, 3(373):388-390.

Anon., 1953. Canadian Insect Pest Report, 31:63.

Anon., 1953. Summary of Insect Conditions - Delaware. Cooperative Economic Insect Report, 3:630.

Anon., 1960. Truck crop insects - tomato russet mite, Aculops lycopersici - New Mexico. Cooperative Economic Insect Report, 10:946.

Anon., 1961. Report of the Mauritius Department of Agriculture for 1959:50.

Anon., 1972. Tomato mite. Tasmanian Journal of Agriculture, 43:244-245.

Anon., 1973. Tomato mite (Aculus lycopersici). Bulletin, New South Wales Department of Agriculture, IP 56C.

Anon., 1979. The tomato russet mite, new tomato pest. Noticias Agricolas, 8:121-122.

APPPC, 1987. Insect pests of economic significance affecting major crops of the countries in Asia and the Pacific region. Technical Document No. 135. Bangkok, Thailand: Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific region (RAPA).

Arno J; Moliner J; Gabarra R, 1994. Integrated pest control of early greenhouse tomato in the Isle of Menorca. Boletin de Sanidad Vegetal, Plagas, 20(2):501-509

Atalla EAR; El-Atrouzy N, 1971. Survey of mites associated with vegetable crops in U.A.R. Agricultural Research Review, 49(1):116-117

Atanasov ND; Fernandez-Munoz R; Cuartero J; Gomez-Guillamon ML, 1995. Integrated control of mites on tomatoes. In: Fernandez-Munoz R, Cuartero J, eds. First International Symposium on Solanacea for Fresh Market, Malaga, Spain, 28-31 March, 1995. Acta Horticulturae, 412:546-550.

Attiah HH, 1971. New records of Eriophyid mites from Egypt (Acarina). Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique d'Egypte, 54:43-47.

Avidov Z; Harpaz I, 1969. Plant pests of Israel. Jerusalem, Israel: Israel Universities Press.

Bailey SF, 1942. Winter control of the tomato russet mite. California Cultivator, 89:600.

Bailey SF; Keifer HH, 1943. The tomato russet mite, Phyllocoptes destructor Keifer: Its present status. Journal of Economic Entomology, 36:706-712.

Baradaran-Anaraki P; Daneshvar H, 1992. Studies on the biology and chemical control of tomato russet mite, Aculops lycopersici (Acari: Eriophyidae), in Varamin. Applied Entomology and Phytopathology, 59(1-2):25-27

Berlinger MJ; Dahan R; Mordechi S, 1988. Integrated pest management of organically grown greenhouse tomatoes in Israel. Applied Agricultural Research, 3(5):233-238

Blanck A; Miguel L; Motemps J, 1954. Premier essais defficacité comparée des nouveaux acaricides dans la lutte contre lacariose bronzée de la tomate. Phytoma, 7:5-9.

Blanck A; Miguel L; Motemps J, 1956. Lutte contre lacariose de la tomate. Phytoma, 8:37-41.

Bourdouxhe L; Collingwood EF, 1982. Effectiveness of three photostable pyrethroids with regard to the principal orders of insects and mites injurious to market-garden crops in Senegal. Agronomie Tropicale, 37(4):379-388

Bourne AI, 1952. Tomoto russet mite (Vasates destructor) - Massechusetts. Cooperative Economic Insect Report, 2:179.

Bravenboer L, 1975. Developments in biological control in glasshouses. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 77(4):390-391

Brodeur J; Bouchard A; Turcotte G, 1997. Potential of four species of predatory mites as biological control agents of the tomato russet mite, Aculops lycopersici (Massee) (Eriophyidae). Canadian Entomologist, 129(1):1-6; 11 ref.

Cabrera RI, 1984. The mite Vasates destructor, a new host of the fungus Hirsutella thompsonii. Ciencia y Tecnica en la Agricultura, Proteccion de Plantas, 7(3):69-79

Campbell RE, 1942. Tomato insects. Pacific Rural Press, 144:72.

Campbell RE, 1942. Tomato mite. Western Grower and Shipper, 13:9-10.

Can M; Çobanoglu S, 2010. Studies on the determination of mite (Acari) species and their hosts of greenhouse vegetables in Kumluca, Antalya. (Kumluca (Antalya) ilçesinde sebze üretimi yapilan seralarda bulunan akar (Acari) türlerinin tanimi ve konukçulari üzerinde çalismalar.) Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, 23(2):87-92. http://www.akdeniz.edu.tr/ziraat/en/journal.htm

Capizzi J, 1956. Summary of insect conditions - 1955- Oregon. Cooperative Economic Insect Report, 6:120-126.

Carmona MM, 1964. Contribuicao para o conhecimento dos acaros das plantas cultivadas im Portugal. Agron. Lusitana, 22:221-230.

Carmona MM, 1968. Contribuicao para o estudo de alguns acaros fitofagos e depredadores de Angola. Agron. Lusitana, 29:267-288.

Carvalho MUP de; Cardoso HL, 1970. List of pests in Angola for the year 1968. Série Técnica, Instituto de Investigacio Agronomica de Angola, 19:22 pp.

Cavin GE, 1961. Summary of insect conditions in Libya. Cooperative Economic Insect Report, 11:303-304.

Celar F; Valic N, 2003. Tomato russet mite (Aculops lycopersici) (Tryon, 1917) (Eriophydae) in Slovenia. (Paradiznikova rjasta prsica (Aculops lycopersici) (Tryon, 1917) (Eriophydae) v Sloveniji.) In: Zbornik predavanj in referatov 6. Slovenskega Posvetovanje o Varstvu Rastlin, Zrece, Slovenije, 4-6 marec 2003. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Drustvo za varstvo rastlin Slovenije, 489-492.

Cermeli LM; Doreste S E; Balen Lvan, 1982. Aculops lycopersici (Massee, 1937) (Acari, Eriophyidae) a new pest of tomato crops in Venezuela. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad Central de Venezuela, 12(3/4):227-234

Cheremushkina NP; Aramov NKh; Makarenkova AA; Golyshin NM, 1991. The rust mite of tomato. Zashchita Rastenii, 11:44-45

Cohic F, 1958. Les parasites animaux de la tomate. Noumea Inst. Franc. Oceanie.

Collingwood EF; Bordouxhe L; Diouf M, 1981. Plant protection. Report on insecticide trials 1980-1981. Synthesis of results 1976-1981. Dakar, Senegal: Centre pour le Developpement de l'Horticulture, 59 pp.

Coppock Jr. S, 1958. Summary of insect conditions - 1957 - Oklahoma. Cooperative Economic Insect Report, 8:173-177.

Costa AS; Carvalho; AMB, 1962. Bronzeado e acronecrose do tomateiro causados por acaro eriofiideo. Bragantia, Campinas, SP, Brasil, 21:87-89.

Costilla MA, 1991. The mite Aculops lycopersici (Massee, 1937) (Acari: Eriophyidae) responsible for tomato russet in the North East of Argentina. Revista Industrial y Agri^acute~cola de Tucuma^acute~n, 68(1/2):83-90; 4 ref.

Costilla MA; Barberis EG, 1990. Importance and control of the mite Aculops lycopersici causing spotted wilt of tomato. Avance Agroindustrial, 11(41):8

Cottier W; Taylor GG, 1937. The tomato mite, Phyllocoptes sp. New Zealand Journal of Agricuture, 55:28-31.

Cuthbert; Reid, 1955. Truck crop insects - tomato russet mite, Vasates lycopersici - South Carolina. Cooperative Economic Insect Report, 5:133.

Daiber KC, 1985. Tomato pests in South Africa, their potential damage and their control. Technical Communication, Horticultural Science Series, Department of Agriculture, Republic of South Africa, No. 200:1-5

Daiber KC, 1996. Injurious insects, mites and nematodes on various vegetables in southern Africa. Zeitschrift fu^umlaut~r Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, 103(3):325-332; 21 ref.

Davis R, 1964. Some eriophyid mites occurring in Georgia with descriptions of three new species. Florida Entomologist, 47:17-27.

Decker GC, 1952. Summary of insect conditions - Illinois. Cooperative Economic Insect Report, 1:434.

Denmark HA, 1955. Summary of insect conditions - 1954 - Florida. Cooperative Economic Insect Report, 5:310.

Egashira Y, 1973. Resultado de um experimento de competicas inseticidas-acaracides e fungicida-acaracida para o control do acaro do bronzeamento na cultura do tomateiro. Petrolina, Estucao. Experimental de Bebedouro.

EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm

Eschiapati D; Oliveira CAL de; Velho D; Sponchiado OJ, 1975. Efieto da epoca de infestacao do microacaro, Aculops sp., na cultura do tomateiro. Ciencia e Cultura, 27:1336-1337.

Estebanes-Gonzalez ML; Rodriguez-Navarro S, 1991. Observations on some mites of the families Tetranychidae, Eriophyidae, Acaridae and Tarsonemidae (Acari), in horticultural crops from Mexico. Folia Entomologica Mexicana, No. 83:199-212.

Evans GO; Sheals JG; MacFarlane D, 1961. The Terrestrial Acari of the British Isles. Dorking, UK: Adlard and Son, Bartholemew Press.

Evans JW, 1942. Orchard and garden mites and their control. Tasmanian Journal of Agriculture, 13:140-142.

Farahbakhsh G, 1961. A Checklist of Economically Important Insects and other Enemies of Plants and Agricultural Products in Iran. Tehran, Iran: Department of Plant Protection, Ministry of Agriculture.

Farahbakhsh G, 1961. A Checklist of Economically Important Insects and other Enemies of Plants and Agricultural Products in Iran. Tehran, Iran: Department of Plant Protection, Ministry of Agriculture.

Ferro DN, ed. , 1976. New Zealand insect pests. New Zealand insect pests. Lincoln University College of Agriculture. Canterbury New Zealand, 311 pp.

Fischer S; Mourrut-Salesse J, 2005. Tomato Russet Mite in Switzerland (Aculops lycopersici: Acari, Eriophyidae). (L'acariose bronzée de la tomate en Suisse (Aculops lycopersici: Acari, Eriophyidae).) Revue Suisse de Viticulture, Arboriculture et Horticulture, 37(4):227-232.

Flechtmann CHW, 1974. Phytophagous mites of economic importance in Brazil. Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of Acarology. Budapest, Hungary: Akademiai Kiado, 185-187.

Flechtmann CHW, 1977. Acaros de Importancia Agricola. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Livraria Nobel S.A.

Gardenhire RQ, 1959. Summary of insect conditions in Iran. Cooperative Economic Insect Report, 9:70-74.

Gentry JW, 1965. Crop Insects of northeast Africa-southwest Asia. Agriculture Handbook No. 273. USA: Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

Georghiou GP, 1960. Plant feeding mites of Cyprus. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin, 7:153-160.

Gerdzhikov I, 1968. Successful control of the tomato russet mite on tomatoes in the glasshouse combine at Dimitrovgrad. Rastit. Zasht., 16:12-13.

Haji FNP; Morps GJ de; Lacerda CA de; Neto RS, 1988. Chemical control of the tomato russet mite Aculops lycopersici (Massee, 1937). Anais da Sociedade Entomologica do Brasil, 17(2):437-442

Hamilton JT, 1976. Tomato mite. Entomological Bulletin of the New South Wales Department of Agriculture, 56:1-3.

Harpaz I, 1955. Notes on the eriophyid mites of Israel. Bulletin of the Israel Research Council, Section B, 5:61-69.

Hassan MF; Afifi AM; Nawar MS, 1987. Mites inhabiting plants and soil in Sinai and newly reclaimed lands. Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique d'Egypte, No. 66:211-225

Hatzinikolis E, 1969. Acariens Eriophyoidea signalées sur des plantes cultivées en Grece. Ann. Inst. Phytopath. Benaki, 2:54-56.

Hatzinikolis E, 1969. Preliminary notes of tetranychoid and eriophyoid mites infesting cultivated plants in Greece. Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress of Acarology, 161-167.

Hessein NA; Perring TM, 1986. Feeding habits of the Tydeidae with evidence of Homeopronematus anconai (Acari: Tydeidae) predation on Aculops lycopersici (Acari: Eriophyidae). International Journal of Acarology, 12(4):215-221

Hessein NA; Perring TM, 1988. The importance of alternate foods for the mite Homeopronematus anconai (Acari: Tydeidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 81(3):488-492

Hoerner JL, 1944. The tomato russet mite in Colorado. Journal of Economic Entomology, 37:562.

Holdaway FG, 1940. First record of tomato russet mite, Phyllocoptes destructor in Hawaii. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society, 12:6.

Holdaway FG, 1941. Insects of tomato and their control. University of Hawaii Agricultural Extension Service Circular, 116.

Hoyman WG; Post RL, 1948. Plant Disease Reports, 32:52.

Hutson R, 1952. Summary of insect conditions - Michigan. Cooperative Economic Insect Reports, 2:390.

Inserra R; Ciccarone A, 1973. Outbreaks and new records - Ethiopia - tomato russet mite. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin, 21:18-19.

IPPC-Secretariat, 2005. Identification of risks and management of invasive alien species using the IPPC framework. Proceedings of the workshop on invasive alien species and the International Plant Protection Convention, 22-26 September 2003. xii + 301 pp.

Izhevskii SS, 1992. New pests of greenhouse plants. Zashchita Rastenii (Moskva), No. 12:26-27

Jalloul A, 1971. List of Plant Pests and Diseases in Lebanon. Cairo, Egypt: FAO Near East Plant Protection Commission.

James DG, 1989. Influence of diet on development, survival and oviposition in an Australian phytoseiid, Amblyseius victoriensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Experimental & Applied Acarology, 6(1):1-10

Jeppson LR; Keifer HH; Baker EW, 1975. Mites Injurious to Economic Plants. Berkeley, USA: University of California Press.

Kamau AW, 1977. Effect of eriophyid mite Aculops lycopersici Massee (Acarina: Eriophyidae) on tomato. Kenya Entomologist's Newsletter, 5:4

Kamau AW; Mueke JM; Khaemba BM, 1992. Resistance of tomato varieties to the tomato russet mite, Aculops lycopersici (Massee) (Acarina: Eriophyidae). Insect Science and its Application, 13(3):351-356

Kay IR, 1986. Tomato russet mite: a serious pest of tomatoes. Queensland Agricultural Journal, 112(5):231-232

Keifer HH, 1940. Eriophyid studies X. Bulletin of the California Department of Agriculture, 29:21-46.

Keifer HH, 1952. The eriophyid mites of California. Bulletin of the California Insect Survey, 2. Berkeley and Los Angeles, USA: University of California Press.

Keifer HH; Baker EW; Kono T; Delfinado M; Styer WE, 1982. An illustrated guide to plant abnormalities caused by eriophyid mites in North America. Agriculture Handbook, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 573:178 pp.

Kerenyine Nemestothy K; Budai C, 1985. Leaf mites (Acari, Eriophyidae) as new greenhouse pests. Novenyvedelem, 21(5):220

Kim DG; Park DG; Kim SH; Park IS; Choi SK, 2002. Morphology, biology and chemical control of tomato russet mite, Aculops lycopersici Massee (Acari: Eriophyidae) in Korea. Korean Journal of Applied Entomology, 41(4):255-261.

Klara KN; Csaba B, 1985. Leaf mites (Acari: Eriophyidae) as new greenhouse pests. Novenyvedelen, 21:220.

Kuang HY, 1983. Two new species and one new record of eriophyid mites from China (Acariformes: Eriophyoidea). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica, 8(4):389-391

Ky IR; Shepherd RK, 1988. Chemical control of the tomato russet mite on tomatoes in the dry tropics of Queensland. Queensland Journal of Agricultural and Animal Sciences, 45(1):1-8

Lamb KP, 1953. A revision of the gall-mites (Acarina, Eriophiyidae) occurring on tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) with a key to the Eriophyidae recorded from solanaceous plants. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 44:343-350.

Lamb KP, 1953. Tomato gall mites from Morocco. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 44:401-404.

Lamb KP; Jacks H, 1952. Screening trials of acaricides for control of tomato russet mite (Phyllocoptes lycopersici Massee) in the glasshouse. New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology, 34:327-334.

Leite GLD; Picanço M; Marquini da Silva F; Casali VWD; Galvan T; Cavalcante TRM, 2000. Distribution of Aculops lycopersici on Lycopersicon esculentum and Lycopersicon hirsutum canopy and leaves. (Distribuição de Aculops lycopersici no dossel e nas folhas de Lycopersicon esculentum e Lycopersicon hirsutum.) Agro-Ciencia, 17(2):259-263.

Lindquist EE; Sabelis MW; Brun J, 1996. Eriophyoid Mites - Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.

Liro JI; Roivainen H, 1951. -kSmSpunkit (Eriophyidae). Suomen ElSimet, Animalia Fennica, 6: 281 pp.

Lockwood S, 1940. Field entomology. Bulletin of the California Department of Agriculture, 29:235-241.

Lockwood S, 1942. Field entomology. Bulletin of the California Department of Agriculture, 31:170-175.

Máca J, 2012. New records of galls (zoocecidia) in Southern Bohemia (Czech Republic). (Nové nálezy hálek (zoocecidií) v jizních Cechách.) Sborník Jihoceského Muzea v Ceských Budejovicích, Prírodní Vedy, 52:197-208. http://www.muzeumcb.cz

Macnay CG, 1953. Outbreaks and new records. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin, 2:43-44.

Maeso DC; Nunez S, 1983. Evaluation of fungicides for control of early blight in tomato and their secondary action over the tomato rust mite. American Phytopathological Society, Fungicide and Nematicide Tests, 38:112.

Manson DCM, 1984. Eriophyoidea except Eriophyinp (Arachnida: Acari). Fauna of New Zealand, No. 4. DSIR, Wellington, New Zealand: Science Information Publishing Centre.

Manzaroli G; Benuzzi M, 1995. Protected tomato: biological and integrated control. Colture Protette, 24(1):41-47.

Martin HE, 1971. List of Plant Pests and Diseases in Saudi Arabia. Cairo, Egypt: FAO Near East Plant Protection Commission.

Massee AM, 1937. An eriophyid mite injurious to tomato. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 28:403.

Messiaen CM, 1971. Mites attacking solanaceous crops in Guadeloupe. Nouvelles Maraicheres et Vivrieres de l'INRA aux Antilles, 2:1-5.

Michelbacher AE, 1943. Petunia, an important winter host of the tomato russet mite. Pan Pacific Entomologist, 19:73.

Michelbacher AE, 1944. Tomato mite is serious California pest - control in plantings urged. Western Canner and Packer, 36:23.

Michelbacher AE; Middlekauf WW; Akesson NB, 1948. Controlling the common pests of tomato in northern California. Bulletin of the California Agricultural Experiment Station, 384:3-17.

Michelbacher AE; Middlekauff WW; Hanson C, 1950. A report of results of investigations in northern California during 1949 for tomato insect control. Agric. Chem., 5:30-31, 95, 97-98.

Milek TM; Simala M, 2008. Tomato russet mite (Aculops lycopersici (Masse) as a most important Eriophyidae-type mite attacking tomatoes in greenhouses. (RÐasta grinja rajcice [Aculops lycopersici (Masse)] kao najznacajnija eriofidna grinja rajcice u zasticenim prostorima.) Glasilo Biljne Zastite, 8(1):6-10.

Millet ER, 1959. Summary of insect conditions in Tunisia. Cooperative Economic Insect Reports, 9:77-78.

Milne DL; Meyer MKP; Calitz PC, 1962. Mites on tobacco. South African Journal of Agricutural Sciences, 5:333-334.

Mitchell TB, 1955. Summary of insect conditions - 1954 - North Carolina. Cooperative Economic Insect Reports, 5:7-12.

Mohamed II; El-Heidari H, 1968. Contribution to the knowledge of the mite fauna of Iraq (Acarina). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique d'Egypte, 50:127-128.

Monkman KD, 1992. Tomato russet mite - Acari: Eriophyoidea. Monthly Bulletin - Department of Agriculture, Fisheries & Parks, Bermuda, 63(3):19-21

Morgan WL, 1935. The tomato mite, Phyllocoptes lycopersici Tryon. Agricultural Gazette, 46:683-684.

Morps GJ de; Lima HC, 1983. Biology of Euseius concordis (Chant) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) a predator of the tomato russet mite. Acarologia, 24(3):251-255

Morris AP, 1956. Summary of insect conditions - 1955 - Virginia. Cooperative Economic Insect Reports, 6:158-165.

Nunez S; Maeso DC, 1983. Secondary action of fungicides on Aculops lycopersici (Massee) on tomatoes. Investigaciones Agronomicas, 4:3-5.

Oliveira CAL de; Eschiapapti D; Velho D; Sponchiado OJ, 1982. Quantitative losses caused by the tomato russet mite, Aculops lycopersici (Massee) in field tomato crop. Ecossistema, 7:14-18.

Oliveira CAL de; Sponchiado OJ, 1983. Effect of the application of acaricide, insecticide and fungicide on the mite Aculops lycopersici (Massee, 1937) on crops of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Anais da Sociedade Entomologica do Brasil, 12(2):213-219

Osburn, 1953. Summary of insect conditions - Georgia. Cooperative Economic Insect Reports, 3:767.

Osman AA, 1975. Efficiency of some fungicides in the control of the eriophyid mite, Vasates lycopersici (Massee) in Egypt (Acarina: Eriophyidae). Bulletin of the Entomological Society of Egypt, Economic Series, 9:115-118

Osman AA; Zaki AM, 1986. Studies on the predation efficiency of Agistemus exsertus Gonzalez (Acarina, Stigmpidae) on the eriophyid mite Aculops lycopersici (Massee). Anzeiger fur Schadlingskunde, Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz, 59(7):135-136

Parks TH, 1952. Tomato russet mite (Vasates destructor) in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan. Cooperative Economic Insect Reports, 2:319.

Perring TM, 1996. Vegetables. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J, eds. Eriophyoid Mites - Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests, 6: 593-610.

Perring TM; Farrar CA, 1986. Historical perspective and current world status of the tomato russet mite (Acari: Eriophyidae). Miscellaneous Publications of the Entomological Society of America, 63:19 pp.

Perring TM; Trumble JT, 1984. Impact of insecticides on secondary outbreak of tomato russet mites 1983. Insecticide and Acaricide Tests, 9:197.

Pescott RTM, 1940. Insect pests of tomatoes, control measures. Journal of the Department of Agriculture of Victoria, 38:140-152.

Pettersson ML, 1995. Horticultural pests and diseases in Sweden, 1994. Vaxtskyddsnotiser, 59:86-91.

Planes S, 1941. Grave enfermedad del tomate producida por un acaro del genero Phyllocoptes. Boletin de Patologia Vegetal, 10:148-156.

Ramalho FS, 1978. Levels of infestation of Aculops lycopersici (Massee, 1937) in different growth of tomato plant. Anais Soc. Entomol. Brazil, 7:26-29.

Ramalho FS; Veiga AF de SL, 1980. Acaricides for the control of the rust mite - Aculops lycopersici (Massee, 1937) on the tomato crop. Revista de Agricultura, Piracicaba, 55(4):281-286

Raun E, 1953. Summary of insect conditions - Iowa. Cooperative Economic Insect Reports, 3:630.

Rice RE; Strong FE, 1962. Bionomics of the tomato russet mite, Vasates lycopersici (Massee). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 55:431-435.

Rodrigues M da C, 1968. Acari of Mozambique. A catalog of the species related to agriculture. Agronomia Mocambicana, 2:215-255.

Rolfs PH, 1893. The tomato and some of its diseases. Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin, 21:19-26.

Rossetto CJ, 1972. Acaros eriofiidos pragas de fruteiras e outras plantas no Brasil. Ciencia e Cultura, S. P., Brasil, 24:817-829.

Rossi NH, 1963. Vasates lycopersici (Massee), parasito de la tomatera nuevo pata la Argentina (Acari, Eriophyidae). IDIA Centro Nacion. Investigac. Agropec., 182:34-37.

Royalty RN; Perring TM, 1987. Comparative toxicity of acaricides to Aculops lycopersici and Homeopronematus anconai (Acari: Eriophyidae, Tydeidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 80(2):348-351

Royalty RN; Perring TM, 1988. Morphological analysis of damage to tomato leaflets by tomato russet mite (Acari: Eriophyidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 81(3):816-820

Royalty RN; Perring TM, 1989. Reduction in photosynthesis of tomato leaflets caused by tomato russet mite (Acari: Eriophyidae) Environmental Entomology, 18(2):256-260.

Ryke PAJ; Meyer MKP, 1960. South African gall mites, rust mites and bud mites (Acarina: Eriophyidae) of economic importance. South African Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3:231-242.

Sabelis MW, 1996. Phytoseiidae. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J, eds. Eriophyoid Mites - Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests, 6:427-466.

Sales FJM de; Lima PJBF; Pinto GL, 1973. Controle quimico do acaro do bronzeamento Aculops lycopersici (Massee 1937) em tomateiro. Cien. Agron., 3:107-112.

Saliba LJ, 1963. Insect pests of crop plants in the Maltese islands. Malta: Malta Department of Information, 13.

Schmidt CT, 1943. Occurrence of tomato russet mite in Hawaii. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society, 11:275-276.

Sekeroglu E; Ozgur AF, 1984. A new tomato pest in Cukurova, Aculops lycopersici (Massee), (Acarina: Eriophyidae). Turkiye Bitki Koruma Dergisi, 8(4):211-210

Sepúlveda-Chavera GF; Salinas Vásquez F; Arismendi Macuer M; Huanca Mamani W, 2015. Aculops lycopersici Tryon, 1917, Tomato russet mite in northern Chile. IDESIA, 33(2):143-146. http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-34292015000200016&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=en

Silva AL da; Veloso VRS; Silva RMC de; Rocha MR da, 1988. Assay for the control of the tomato mite Aculops lycopersici (Massee, 1937) (Acari: Eriophyidae) with a new acaricide. Anais das Escolas de Agronomia e Veterinaria (Goiania), 18(1):29-34

Siqueira PR; Dunham O, 1974. Competicao de acaricida ao microacaro Aculops lycopersici (Massee, 1937) no tamateiro (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Revista Oleric., 14:150-154.

Sloan WJS, 1938. Mite injury of tomatoes. Queensland Agricultural Journal, 50:370-371.

Sloan WJS, 1941. The control of tomato pests. Queensland Agricultural Journal, 56:277-294.

Sloan WJS, 1945. The control of tomato pests. Queensland Agricultural Journal, 61:17-41.

Smith WA, 1955. The tomato mite. Queensland Agricultural Journal, 81:90-91.

Smith WA; Saunders GW, 1956. Tomato mite control. Queensland Journal of Agricultural Science, 13:63-65.

Smith WA; Saunders GW, 1960. Tobacco pests controlled in seedbed and field. Queensland Agricultural Journal, 86:423-424.

Talhouk, 1950. A list of insects observed on economically important plants and plant products in Lebanon. Bulletin Soc. Fouad Entomol., 34:133-141.

Talhouk, 1954. A list of insects found on plants of economic importance in Syria. Bulletin Soc. Fouad Entomol., 38:305-309.

Taylor DE, 1978. Entomological notes. Tomato russet mite. Rhodesia Agricultural Journal, 75:69.

Trottin-Caudal Y; Grasselly D; Trapateau M; Villevieille M, 1989. The principal mites found on Solanaceae and Cucurbitaceae grown under glass in France. Infos (Paris), 57:9-13.

Tryon H, 1917. Report of the entomologist and vegetable pathologist. Queensland Annual Report of the Department of Agriculture and Stock, Brisbane, 49-63.

Tsalev M, 1967. The tomato russet mite and its control. Rastit. Zasht., 15:17-18.

Tuft TO; Anderson LD, 1953. Acaricides for control of tomato russet mite in California. Journal of Economic Entomology, 46:502-504.

Tukalevskii IM; Rogachev VL, 1959. A new pest of tomato and potato in the south of the Ukraine. Zashch. Past. Vredit. Bolezn., 5:54.

Undurraga JM; Dybas RA, 1988. Abamectin, novel naturally-derived insecticide/acaricide for integral key pest controls on pears and tomatoes. Brighton Crop Protection Conference, Pests and Diseases. Thornton Heath, UK: British Crop Protection Council, 1:205-210

Vacante V, 1982. La difesa del pomodoro in serra dal l'Eriofide rugginoso (Aculops lycopersici) (Acarina: Eriophyidae). Culture Protettie Rivista Professionale del l'Ortofloro Fruitticoltura Intensiva, 11:29-34.

Vacante V, 1985. Acari present in horticulture and floriculture in greenhouses of the Ragusa area and considerations on the possibility of chemical, biological and integrated control. Tecnica Agricola, 37(3-4):299-321

Van Rossem G, 1974. Pest insects in the Netherlands in 1973. Entomol. Ber., 34:133-135.

Veitch R, 1938. Insect pests and their control. Tomato mite. Queensland Agricultural and Pastoral Handbook, 3:97.

Wahab AEA; Yousef AA; Hemeda HM, 1974. Mites associated with vegetable and ornamental plants in Lower Egypt (Acarina : Parasitiformes, Acariformes). Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique d'Egypte, 58:359-366

WATSON JR; TISSOT AN, 1942. Insects and other Pests of Florida Vegetables. Bull. Fla. agric. Exp. Stn, 370. Gainesville, Fla., 118 pp.

Whelan JA, 1962. Report of the Federal Ministry of Agriculture of Rhodesia and Nyassaland for 1960. 61:68.

Wilcox J; Elmore JC, 1943. The control of the tomato fruitworm, the tomato pinworm, the tomato russet mite, and hornworms. U.S. Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, E-589.

Wilcox J; Howland AF, 1950. Tests of new insecticides for control of tomato insects in southern California. Journal of Economic Entomology, 43:883-887.

Wilcox J; Howland AF, 1954. The tomato russet mite. U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research Branch, E-876.

Wilcox J; Howland AF, 1956. Experiments on control of the tomato russet mite in southern California. Journal of Economic Entomology, 49:768-771.

Zalom FG; Kitzmiller J; Wilson LT; Gutierrez P, 1986. Observation of tomato russet mite (Acari: Eriophyidae) damage symptoms in relation to tomato plant development. Journal of Economic Entomology, 79(4):940-942

Distribution Maps

Top of page