Cacoecimorpha pronubana (carnation tortrix)
- Taxonomic Tree
- Distribution Table
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat List
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
- Growth Stages
- List of Symptoms/Signs
- Biology and Ecology
- Natural enemies
- Plant Trade
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- Links to Websites
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Cacoecimorpha pronubana Hübner
Preferred Common Name
- carnation tortrix
Other Scientific Names
- Cacoecia pronubana Hübner
- Cacoecimorpha ambustana Hübner
- Cacoecimorpha hermineana Duponchel
- Cacoecimorpha insolatana Lucas
- Tortrix pronubana Hübner
International Common Names
- English: carnation tortrix moth; European carnation tortrix; Mediteranean carnation tortrix; Mediterranean carnation leafroller
- Spanish: minador (gusano) del clavel; piral de los claveles; tortrix del clavel
- French: tordeuse méditerranéene de l'oeillet
Local Common Names
- Denmark: nellikevikler
- Germany: Mittelmeernelkenwickler; Wickler, Nelken-
- Italy: tortrice dei garofani
- Norway: nellikvikler
- Sweden: nejlikvecklare
- TORTPR (Cacoecimorpha pronubana)
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Metazoa
- Phylum: Arthropoda
- Subphylum: Uniramia
- Class: Insecta
- Order: Lepidoptera
- Family: Tortricidae
- Genus: Cacoecimorpha
- Species: Cacoecimorpha pronubana
DescriptionTop of page Eggs
Laid in mucilage-covered groups of 10-200, initially light-green, becoming yellow; oval to round, flattened and scale-like, 1 mm x 0.6 mm, with a reticulate chorion.
The larva is illustrated in detail by Carter (1984).
Initially yellow with a black head which becomes brown in the 2nd instar. In the last (7th) instar, which attains 20 mm in length, the head is brownish-yellow with variable dark spots. The prothorax is a greenish-yellow with four dark spots on the posterior margin. The abdomen is yellow, olive green or grey-brown, depending on diet.
For more information see Pandolfo and Zagami (1983) and van de Vrie (1991).
Initially brown, becoming almost black. The cremaster has four pairs of hooks. In addition to two rows of dorsal spines, the abdominal segments possess numerous yellow bristles.
Wingspan 15-17 mm in males, 18-24 mm in females, forewings rectangular, yellowish-brown to purplish-brown in colour with two (in males, one in females) narrow, darker, obliquely transverse bands. Hindwings orange with dark-brown edges. Colour tones vary widely between individuals, females being generally lighter than males.
DistributionTop of page
C. pronubana is indigenous to the Mediterranean region.
C. pronubana was previously considered a quarantine pest for Israel (D Opatowski, Plant Protection and Inspection Services (PPIS), Israel, personal communication, April, 2006). Records of presence (e.g. Bodenheimer, 1937 cited in Wysoki and Izhar, 1976; Wysoki, 1989; Swirski and Wysoki, 1995) were thought to be based on a misidentification. However, the pest found on avocados in Israel has now been identified as C. pronubana, confirming its presence in the country (D Opatowski, Plant Protection and Inspection Services (PPIS), Israel, personal communication, December, 2006).
A record of C. pronubana in Japan (Carter, 1984) published in previous versions of the Compendium is erroneous. Carter (1984) quotes CIE (1975) in his description of C. pronubana but there is no record of this species in Japan in CIE (1975) or CABI/EPPO (2014) and C. pronubana is not mentioned in A Guide to the Lepidoptera of Japan (Komai et al., 2011).
See also CABI/EPPO (1998, No. 37).
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.Last updated: 23 Apr 2020
|Continent/Country/Region||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||Reference||Notes|
|Algeria||Present, Localized||EPPO (2020); CABI and EPPO (2014)|
|Libya||Present||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Morocco||Present, Localized||EPPO (2020); CABI and EPPO (2014)|
|South Africa||Present, Few occurrences||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Tunisia||Present, Localized||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Azerbaijan||Present||Maharramova (2011); CABI and EPPO (2014)|
|Israel||Present||Wysoki (1989); CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Japan||Absent, Unconfirmed presence record(s)||Carter (1984)|
|Kazakhstan||Absent, Confirmed absent by survey||EPPO (2020)|
|Turkey||Present, Localized||Kaçar and Ulusoy (2008); CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Albania||Present||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Austria||Absent, Intercepted only||EPPO (2020)|
|Belgium||Present, Widespread||Karsholt and Razowski (1996); CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020); CABI (Undated)|
|Bulgaria||Absent, Confirmed absent by survey||EPPO (2020)|
|Croatia||Present, Localized||EPPO (2020); CABI and EPPO (2014)|
|Cyprus||Present||CABI and EPPO (2014)|
|Denmark||Present, Few occurrences||EPPO (2020); CABI and EPPO (2014)|
|Finland||Absent, Intercepted only||EPPO (2020)|
|France||Present, Widespread||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|-Corsica||Present, Widespread||Karsholt and Razowski (1996); CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Germany||Present, Localized||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Greece||Present||EPPO (2020); CABI and EPPO (2014)|
|-Crete||Present||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Guernsey||Present, Widespread||EPPO (2020)|
|Hungary||Present, Few occurrences||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Ireland||Present||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Italy||Present, Widespread||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|-Sardinia||Present||Karsholt and Razowski (1996); CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|-Sicily||Present||Karsholt and Razowski (1996); CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Lithuania||Present, Few occurrences||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Luxembourg||Present||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Malta||Present, Widespread||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Netherlands||Present, Localized||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Poland||Absent, Unconfirmed presence record(s)||EPPO (2020)|
|Portugal||Present||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|-Madeira||Present||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Romania||Present, Few occurrences||Karsholt and Razowski (1996); CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Russia||Present, Localized||EPPO (2020)|
|Serbia||Present, Localized||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Slovakia||Absent, Unconfirmed presence record(s)||EPPO (2020)|
|Slovenia||Present, Localized||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Spain||Present||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|-Balearic Islands||Present||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Sweden||Present, Few occurrences||CABI and EPPO (2014)|
|Switzerland||Present, Widespread||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|Ukraine||Absent, Unconfirmed presence record(s)||EPPO (2020)|
|United Kingdom||Present, Localized||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|-Channel Islands||Present||EPPO (2020); CABI and EPPO (2014)|
|-England||Present, Localized||EPPO (2020)|
|-Scotland||Present, Localized||CABI and EPPO (2014)|
|United States||Present, Localized||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|-California||Present, Few occurrences||EPPO (2020)|
|-Oregon||Present, Localized||CABI and EPPO (2014); EPPO (2020)|
|-Washington||Present, Localized||EPPO (2020); CABI and EPPO (2014)|
Risk of IntroductionTop of page C. pronubana is an A2 quarantine pest for EPPO (OEPP/EPPO, 1980) and the SADC region and is also of quarantine significance for JUNAC. Experiments in Germany indicate that the insect is unlikely, if introduced, to become established in the field in countries to the east and north of the January +2°C isotherm (Herfs, 1963). This means practically that the insect has reached the limits of its natural range. However, C. pronubana is a threat to glasshouse crops, especially carnations and other flowers and ornamental plants. For more information, see Balachowsky (1966).
Habitat ListTop of page
Hosts/Species AffectedTop of page Over 100 plant species have been noted as hosts, however Dianthus is the most seriously affected, although other species have suffered infestations regarded as serious.
Host Plants and Other Plants AffectedTop of page
|Allium porrum (leek)||Liliaceae||Other|
|Chrysanthemum morifolium (chrysanthemum (florists'))||Asteraceae||Main|
|Cupressocyparis (Leyland cypress)||Cupressaceae||Other|
|Daucus carota (carrot)||Apiaceae||Main|
|Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)||Caryophyllaceae||Main|
|Fragaria ananassa (strawberry)||Rosaceae||Other|
|Gerbera (Barbeton daisy)||Asteraceae||Other|
|Persea americana (avocado)||Lauraceae||Other|
|Pinus halepensis (Aleppo pine)||Pinaceae||Unknown|
|Pisum sativum (pea)||Fabaceae||Main|
|Prunus (stone fruit)||Rosaceae||Main|
|Rubus (blackberry, raspberry)||Rosaceae||Main|
|Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)||Solanaceae||Main|
|Solanum tuberosum (potato)||Solanaceae||Main|
|Syringa vulgaris (lilac)||Oleaceae||Main|
|Vicia faba (faba bean)||Fabaceae||Main|
|Vicia faba var. major (broad bean)||Fabaceae||Main|
Growth StagesTop of page Flowering stage, Post-harvest, Vegetative growing stage
SymptomsTop of page On carnation cuttings
Terminal and axial leaves and buds are enclosed in silk and eaten, becoming typically crooked; this is usually more serious in spring.
On carnation flowers
The buds are penetrated by the larvae; petals may be joined by larval silk, thus hampering opening and giving flowers a characteristic swollen appearance. In some cases, it may not be apparent that flowers are infested.
Foliage attack is similar to that described for carnations, with typical crooked growth (Delucchi and Merle, 1962). Young stems may be mined. On fruit, there are two types of damage. In April to July, the larvae penetrate the young developing fruit, feeding superficially on the skin at the peduncle base. The larvae then move up the fruit and continue to consume the skin while protected by leaves which they have spun together with silk. The pulp is never attacked and the damaged mesocarp quickly suberizes. This results in light-brown to blackish patches on the fruit surface, reducing marketability. The second type of damage is that on ripe fruit, attacked in October to November; the calyx end is not usually affected, and damaged areas do not suberize, so favouring the development of rots.
For more information, see Targe and Deportes (1961) and Balachowsky (1966).
List of Symptoms/SignsTop of page
|Inflorescence / twisting and distortion|
|Inflorescence / webbing|
|Leaves / leaves rolled or folded|
Biology and EcologyTop of page In northern areas of its distribution (the UK), C. pronubana overwinters as first or mainly second generation larvae, on plants in the glasshouse or open air. Mortality among these larvae may be as high as 70-90% in winter, since they cannot survive low temperatures and are injured by rain. These larvae mature from the end of March to May, the pupal stage lasting 10-45 days, and adults emerge in April; they fly and deposit eggs until June. First generation larvae emerge and feed from April to August. Pupation takes 15-17 days and second generation imagoes appear from mid-August and fly until the end of September or beginning of October, some individuals hatching up until November if conditions (food and temperature) are favourable. Following a very warm season, a third generation may develop in the autumn on evergreen plants.
In southern areas (Spain, Italy), four generations are the rule; third and fourth generation larvae overwinter, those in glasshouses (with minimum temperature 8°C, for example, for carnations) emerging around April, about 15 days earlier than those on crops in the open air. In North Africa, on citrus, there are at least five, and probably six, generations annually.
In glasshouses (with minimum temperature 15°C, for example, for roses), more than five generations may develop each year, and all stages of the insect may be found between spring and autumn, although in the south of France the periods of egg laying and appearance of first generation adults never overlap. Adults are chiefly day-flying, especially in morning sunshine.
Imagoes usually hatch at night and copulation, lasting 1-2 h, takes place immediately. The large-bodied females cannot fly easily and only males are normally active. Egg laying occurs in batches, beginning 3-4 h after copulation, and is spaced out over several days. Eggs are laid on smooth surfaces, especially glass, the first batch, usually of 150-250 eggs, being the most important. Each female can lay up to 700 eggs (average 430).
Eggs hatch after 6-22 days (van de Vrie, 1991). The larvae emerge within a few seconds and, being positively phototactic, quickly move or are carried in wind to the young growing points or flowers. Here, they spin silk around two to three terminal leaves or petals, and feed on the upper surface, so making numerous holes; the parenchyma may be mined. By the end of the third larval instar, the whole leaf is attacked and surrounded by a dense silken mass.
Hatching to pupation (seven larval instars) takes 19-70 days, and pupation itself 4-30 days (van de Vrie, 1991). Longevity of imagoes is about 11-12 days for females and 14-18 for males. Temperature thresholds for copulation, egg laying and hatching are 10.5, 12-13 and 14°C, respectively. Pupae cannot survive 2 h at -4°C, and are therefore of no importance in overwintering. At average temperatures of 15 and 30°C, the complete life cycle takes 123-147 and 28-44 days, respectively. Humidity is an important factor with respect to mortality; larvae can develop at 10-15% RH; 70-90% RH (van de Vrie, 1991) is optimum but, above 90% RH, larval and pupal mortality is increased. For more information, see Fisher (1924), Bestango (1955), Balachowsky (1966).
Means of movement/dispersal
The adults can disperse themselves locally. In international trade, C. pronubana may be carried on plants for planting or cut flowers of carnations, chrysanthemums, pelargoniums, roses and other host plants.
Natural enemiesTop of page
|Natural enemy||Type||Life stages||Specificity||References||Biological control in||Biological control on|
|Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki||Pathogen|
|Bacillus thuringiensis thuringiensis||Pathogen|
Plant TradeTop of page
|Plant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transport||Pest stages||Borne internally||Borne externally||Visibility of pest or symptoms|
|Flowers/Inflorescences/Cones/Calyx||larvae||Yes||Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye|
|Leaves||eggs; larvae; pupae||Yes||Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye|
|Plant parts not known to carry the pest in trade/transport|
|Fruits (inc. pods)|
|Growing medium accompanying plants|
|Stems (above ground)/Shoots/Trunks/Branches|
|True seeds (inc. grain)|
ImpactTop of page In spite of the polyphagous nature of this insect, serious damage is confined mainly to carnation crops in the Mediterranean area, where losses have been reported since the 1920s. In France, around Nice, 25-35% of carnations were affected in 1972-1973, and losses in consignments for export were valued at about 100,000 F. In Morocco, C. pronubana was first found in 1933, on citrus, but it was not until 20 years later that it developed into a widespread pest on this crop, the larvae destroying foliage and damaging fruit. In Algeria, it is found mainly on lemons, but is not considered a serious pest. In Italy (Sicily) surveys reported C. pronubana mainly on olives, weeds and roses but not on lemons (Inserra et al., 1987; Siscaro et al., 1988). In northern countries (for example, Poland), C. pronubana is important in glasshouses.
Similarities to Other Species/ConditionsTop of page It may be difficult to differentiate C. pronubana eggs and larvae from those of Epichoristodes acerbella (EPPO/CABI, 1996), but adults of the latter have distinctive greyish-white hindwings.
Prevention and ControlTop of page
Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.Control of C. pronubana can be achieved by using pyrethroids such as deltamethrin and fenvalerate (Pandolfo and Zagami, 1983; Inserra et al., 1987). Control of C. pronubana by biological means has not been fully investigated. Monitoring of C. pronubana populations is carried out by sex pheromone traps, but their use as a direct control agent by means of mating disruption is still being questioned (Guda and Capizzi, 1988).
Burgess and Jarret (1978) studied the effect of Bacillus thuringiensis on C. pronubana in glasshouses but found that a higher than normal dose was necessary for effectiveness. Wysoki (1989) tested its effect in Israel where the moth is a pest of avocados. Pheremones have been used extensively for monitoring populations, details are given in Quaglia (1993).
EPPO recommends (OEPP/EPPO, 1990) that, in countries where C. pronubana occurs, nursery inspections should be carried out during the growing season prior to dispatch.
Baraldi (1996) stated that experimental research on the use of direct ionizing radiation (radiodisinfestation) to control insect pests on cut flowers has given promising results.
ReferencesTop of page
Baraldi D, 1996. Irraggiamento di prodotti floricoli da esportazione. Informatore Fitopatologico, 46 (5):20-24.
Bestango G, 1955. [Biological observations and experience of control of Cacoecia pronubana in 1954]. Rivista della Ortoflorofrutticoltura Italiana, 39:439-454.
Bodenheimer FS, 1937. Prodromus Faunae Palaestinae. Mém. Inst. d'Egypte, 33:98.
Burges HD, Jarrett P, 1978. Caterpillar control with Bacillus thuringiensis. Grower, 90 (13):589-590, 593-595.
Delucchi VL, Merle L, 1962. La tordeuse de l'oeillet Cacoecia pronubana Hübner Lepidoptera, Tortricidae ravageur peu connu des agrumes au Maroc. Al Awamia, 3:79-86.
EPPO, 1990. Specific quarantine requirements. EPPO Technical Documents, No. 1008. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization.
EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm
Fisher RC, 1924. The life-history and habits of Tortrix pronubana Hb. with special reference to the larval and pupal stages. Annals of Applied Biology, 11:395-447.
Herfs W, 1963. [Open-air experiments on climate resistance of Tortrix pronubana in relation to its possible survival in Germany. II. Trials on climate resistance and assessment of establishment potential]. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 52:1-38.
Inserra S, Calabretta C, Garzia GT, 1987. Attack by Cacoecimorpha pronubana (Hbn.) on protected crops of gerbera and rose and possibilities of chemical and biological control. Difesa delle Piante, 10(1):97-100; [In Convegno 'La difesa delle colture ornamentali e da fiore']; 2 ref.
Kaçar G, Ulusoy MR, 2008. A new pest of olive trees: Carnation tortrix, Cacoecimorpha pronubana (Hübner), 1796-1799 (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in the Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey. (Dogu Akdeniz Bölgesi'nde yeni bir zeytin zararlisi Karanfil yaprakbükeni, Cacoecimorpha pronubana (Hübner), 1796-1799 (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae).) Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, 32(3):211-223. http://agr.ege.edu.tr/~turkento/index.html
Karsholt O, Razowski J, 1996. The Lepidoptera of Europe: a distributional checklist. Stenstrup, Denmark: Apollo Books, 380 pp.
Komai, F., Yoshiyasu, Y., Nasu, Y., Saito, T., 2011. A Guide to the Lepidoptera of Japan, Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society, 65(3):203-204
Quaglia F, 1993. Populations dynamics of tortricids (Cacoecimorpha pronubana (Hb.) and Epichoristodes acerbella (Walk.)) on ornamentals, with special reference to the potential use of sex-pheromones for monitoring, mass-trapping and mating disruption. Frustula Entomologica, 16:1-7; 7 ref.
Smith IM, McNamara DG, Scott PR, Holderness M, 1997. Quarantine pests for Europe. Second Edition. Data sheets on quarantine pests for the European Union and for the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. Quarantine pests for Europe. Second Edition. Data sheets on quarantine pests for the European Union and for the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization., Ed. 2:vii + 1425 pp.; many ref.
Swirski E, Wysoki M, 1995. Avocado pests in Israel. In: Proceedings of the World Avocado Congress III, 419-428.
Van de Vrie M, 1991. Tortricids in ornamental crops in greenhouses. In: van der Geest, Evenhuis, eds. Tortricoid Pests, their biology, natural enemies and control. World Crop Pests: Volume 5:525-530.
Wysoki M, Izhar Y, 1976. The carnation leaf-roller Cacoecimorpha (Cacoecia) pronubana Huebner (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) on avocado trees in Israel. California Avocado Society 1976 Yearbook, 60:92-95.
CABI, Undated. Compendium record. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated a. CABI Compendium: Status as determined by CABI editor. Wallingford, UK: CABI
Kaçar G, Ulusoy M R, 2008. A new pest of olive trees: Carnation tortrix, Cacoecimorpha pronubana (Hübner), 1796-1799 (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in the Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey. (Doğu Akdeniz Bölgesi'nde yeni bir zeytin zararlısı Karanfil yaprakbükeni, Cacoecimorpha pronubana (Hübner), 1796-1799 (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae).). Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi. 32 (3), 211-223. http://agr.ege.edu.tr/˜turkento/index.html
Karsholt O, Razowski J, 1996. The Lepidoptera of Europe: a distributional checklist., Stenstrup, Denmark: Apollo Books. 380 pp.
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/