- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat List
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
- Growth Stages
- List of Symptoms/Signs
- Biology and Ecology
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Causes
- Pathway Vectors
- Plant Trade
- Impact Summary
- Economic Impact
- Impact: Biodiversity
- Social Impact
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Uses List
- Detection and Inspection
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Armillaria novae-zelandiae (G. Stevenson) Herink
Other Scientific Names
- Agaricus melleus sensu Cooke
- Armillaria mellea sensu Massee
- Armillaria novae-zelandiae (G. Stevenson) Boesewinkel
- Armillariella mellea sensu G. Stevenson
- Armillariella novae-zelandiae G. Stevenson
- Armillariella sparrei var. elaeodes Singer
Local Common Names
- New Zealand: harore
Summary of InvasivenessTop of page
Armillaria novae-zelandiae is a white rot wood decay fungus and root disease pathogen that occurs in a number of countries in the Southern Hemisphere and in parts of tropical and subtropical Asia. It is not known to have been introduced to these regions, where it is presumed to be indigenous. Its designation as “invasive” is based on its propensity to establish colonies and disease centres in disease-free areas by dispersal of basidiospores from “toadstool” fruit bodies that appear on wood during the winter months. As a wood decomposer fungus A. novae-zelandiae contributes beneficially to carbon and nutrient recycling. Like many other Armillaria species it is recognized by characteristic white mycelial fans or ribbons produced beneath host bark and by its bootlace-like rhizomorphs by which it spreads vegetatively from colonized buried woody material or stump root systems to infect living host plants.
Armillaria novae-zelandiae was the cause of substantial disease losses in plantations of Pinus radiata and orchards of kiwifruit vines (Actinidia deliciosa) in New Zealand from the 1970s to the 1990s. Its importance has since declined with changes in patterns of crop management, although it remains widely distributed. Much research into its control was undertaken during this period. In eastern states in Australia, A. novae-zelandiae is a minor cause of root disease in natural and planted forests, where it is of lesser importance than Armillaria luteobubalina. Its impact in other regions is unknown, but it has not been associated with reports of significant disease. Risk of unintended international spread appears to be low to negligible but should not be discounted. If intercepted, isolates of A. novae-zelandiae may be identified by laboratory culture testing or more rapidly and precisely by molecular sequencing procedures. Armillaria novae-zelandiae is listed in the EPPO Global Database and features in the United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service fungal databases. It is considered a risk organism in Hawaiʻi.
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Fungi
- Phylum: Basidiomycota
- Subphylum: Agaricomycotina
- Class: Agaricomycetes
- Subclass: Agaricomycetidae
- Order: Agaricales
- Family: Marasmiaceae
- Genus: Armillaria
- Species: Armillaria novae-zelandiae
Notes on Taxonomy and NomenclatureTop of page
Armillaria novae-zelandiae is a well-defined species that demonstrates monophyletic, within-species molecular variation. Isolates from different geographic regions tend to group separately within the same clade, based on phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences from the internal transcribed regions (ITS1, 5.8S and ITS4) and ribosomal large subunit (RSU) (Coetzee et al., 2003a, Pildain et al., 2009; 2010, Ota et al., 2011). This separation is not considered sufficient to divide A. novae-zelandiae into separate within-species taxa or to erect new species. The uniqueness of A. novae-zelandiae as a species is supported by phylogenetic analysis using the partial elongation factor 1-alpha gene region (Maphosa et al., 2006) and by interfertility studies using haploid isolates (Kile and Watling, 1988).
Pildain et al. (2010) synonymized A. sparrei var. elaeodes with A. novae-zelandiae. In New Zealand, Armillariella mellea sensu G. Stevenson, Agaricus melleus sensu Cooke and Armillaria mellea sensu Massee were used for both A. novae-zelandiae and Armillaria limonea (G. Stevenson) Boesewinkel before it was accepted that Armillaria mellea (Vahl) Kumm. is not naturally present in the Southern Hemisphere. The Maori word harore is a term used especially for the common New Zealand Armillaria species fruiting in winter, but also loosely for other edible agarics or fungi in general.
The holotype of A. novae-zelandiae, collected by G. Stevenson in New Zealand in 1949, is in the Fungarium at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (Kew Mycology Collection, 2020).
DescriptionTop of page
As described by Gadgil (2005): “Basidiomata pileate, centrally stipitate. Pileus 30–80 mm in diameter, olive buff to olive brown, sprinkled with very small dull brown scales at the centre, convex at first, becoming plane to shallow concave; flesh creamy white. Gills decurrent to almost sinuate, moderately crowded, creamy white becoming dull fawn. Stipe tapering towards the base, fawn above evanescent annulus, brown to dark purplish below, smooth or striate, solid, 40–70 mm long. Basidiospores ellipsoid to elongate-ellipsoid, 7–9 × 5–6 m, non-amyloid; spore print white”.
DistributionTop of page
Armillaria novae-zelandiae is found in Australasia (including Papua New Guinea), southern South America and southeastern Asia (Indonesia, Malaysia and the Amami Archipelago in southwestern Japan). It shows significant regional molecular variation between isolates from Australasia, Asia (Malaysia, Sumatra, Japan) and South America (Coetzee et al., 2003a; Pildain et al., 2009; 2010; Ota et al., 2011). Armillaria, as A. mellea (with “strong black rhizomorphs”; Parham 1953) and as Clitocybe tabescens (in plantations of Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis; Singh, 1978), occurs in Fiji, but its precise identity is unknown and the presence of A. novae-zelandiae remains to be confirmed.
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.Last updated: 14 Feb 2020
|Continent/Country/Region||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||Reference||Notes|
|-Sumatra||Present||Native||2003||Coetzee et al. (2003)||Lake Toba district|
|Japan||Present||CABI (2020)||Present, based on regional distribution|
|-Ryukyu Islands||Present||Native||2011||Ota et al. (2011)||Island of Amami-Oshima|
|Malaysia||Present||Native||2003||Coetzee et al. (2003)|
|Australia||Present||CABI (2020)||Present, based on regional distribution|
|-New South Wales||Present||Native||1988||Kile and Watling (1988)||One of five Armillaria species indigenous to Australia|
|-Queensland||Present||Native||1988||Kile and Watling (1988)||One of five Armillaria species indigenous to Australia. Occurs in southern Queensland as far north as the Bunya Mountains|
|-Tasmania||Present||Native||1983||Kile and Watling (1988)||One of five Armillaria species indigenous to Australia|
|-Victoria||Present||Native||1983||Kile and Watling (1988)||One of five Armillaria species indigenous to Australia|
|Fiji||Absent, Unconfirmed presence record(s)||Baumgartner et al. (2011)||Requires confirmation from an original literature source|
|New Zealand||Present, Widespread||Native||1964||Invasive||Stevenson (1964)||Present throughout New Zealand, including the Chatham Islands. One of four Armillaria species indigenous to New Zealand|
|Papua New Guinea||Present||Native||1992||Guillaumin et al. (1992)||Mount Giluwe and Mount Wilhelm upper altitude regions. Armillaria spp. (but not specifically A. novae-zelandiae) are reported earlier in PNG than 1992|
|Argentina||Present||Native||1969||Singer (1969)||Patagonian Andes (Neuquén) and Buenos Aires Province|
|Chile||Present||Native||1969||Singer (1969)||Llanquihue and Isla Grande de Chiloé|
History of Introduction and SpreadTop of page
There is no evidence that A. novae-zelandiae has spread internationally due to human activity. It is apparently indigenous in all places where it has been found, due to ancient basidiospore dispersal probably after the breakup of Gondwana (Coetzee et al., 2011; 2018; Klopfenstein et al., 2017; cf. distribution of certain other agaric species, Horak, 1983).
Risk of IntroductionTop of page
There are several documented accounts of the probable spread of Northern Hemisphere Armillaria species by human means. In Western Cape province in South Africa. Armillaria mellea was found in woody ornamental trees and shrubs in public gardens in Cape Town (Coetzee et al., 2001a) and subsequently A. mellea and A. gallica were both identified infecting Protea and Leucadendron plants in another public garden in the same Province (Coetzee et al., 2003b). Both introductions were considered to date back to early Dutch settlement by means of infested soil with potted plants. Later evidence has suggested that human movement of plant material from Japan, or from China via Japan, is responsible for the introduction of homothallic (self-fertile) populations of A. mellea to western and eastern Africa (Baumgartner et al., 2012; Guo et al., 2016). From the extent of their distribution, it appears that these introductions were also not recent. Both A. mellea and A. gallica are reported as introduced into Hawaiʻi, where they are threatening native vegetation, the former possibly on nursery fruit stock in the early 1900s and the latter more recently (Burgan and Nelson, 1972; Gardner, 2003; Kim et al., 2010; cf. Raabe et al., 2009).
Despite these reports, the risk of A. novae-zelandiae spreading internationally appears low to negligible, however it cannot be ignored. Armillaria novae-zelandiae is largely confined to roots and root collars of infected trees and shrubs. In young plants mycelial fans may extend above soil level only if host resistance declines prior to or after death, or because of physiological stress resulting from some additional external physical, chemical or biological cause. In older trees A. novae-zelandiae may form a butt rot or basal canker immediately above ground level. However, though possible, carriage on eucalypt logs from eastern Australia is considered of low risk (Kliejunas et al., 2003). The export of old growth native timber from New Zealand is restricted (Forestry New Zealand, 2020). In a proportion of mature P. radiata trees (up to ca. 25 years old) non-lethal by A. novae-zelandiae (see below) is present only at and below soil level, indicating a zero to negligible risk of its being present in harvested logs cut at stump height (butt rot does not develop prior to harvest in these trees). Armillaria novae-zelandiae requires a supporting wood- or organic-based substrate, so its presence in nurseries is rare. Any infected plants would normally show readily detectable disease symptoms. It is possible that soil admixtures such as peat or other organic material might support A. novae-zelandiae saprotrophically if the pathogen was somehow introduced, but the risk of movement in nursery stock would seem low.
Discussion on the risk of introducing Armillaria species to North America on eucalypt logs and chips from Australia is included in Kliejunas et al. (2003) and from South America in Kliejunas et al. (2001). Similar information and discussion regarding the movement of Pinus radiata and Douglas fir logs from New Zealand to North America can be found in White et al. (1992). Armillaria novae-zelandiae is listed in the EPPO Global Database (EPPO, 2019) and features in the United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service fungal databases (USDA-ARS, 2019). Armillaria novae-zelandiae is considered to be a risk organism in Hawaiʻi (DeNitto et al., 2015).
HabitatTop of page
Armillaria novae-zelandiae occurs naturally in woody vegetation of various kinds. Available information on the occurrence of A. novae-zelandiae in South America, Asia or Oceania is limited. In South America it was found on living and dead trunks of dicotyledenous trees such as Nothofagus and Salix species (Singer, 1969). In subtropical southern Japan it was reported in evergreen forest dominated by Castanopsis sieboldii, Quercus miyagi and Distylium racemosum (along with planted Pinus luchuensis) (Ota et al., 2011). In Australia it occurs in all four States (including Tasmania) along the eastern side of the continent on standing dead trees, stumps or fallen trees or shrubs of species such as Eucalyptus spp., Lophozonia (Nothofagus) cunninghamii, Atherosperma moschatum, Acacia melanoxylon, Pomaderris sp., Olearia sp. and Phebalium sp. (Kile and Watling, 1983; 1988). It is apparently more common in montane native forests in this region (Kile and Watling, 1988).
In New Zealand, A. novae-zelandiae occurs naturally (along with A. limonea) as a very common saprotrophic fungus causing decay in coarse woody debris and as a butt rot species in living trees in native forests, both podocarp-hardwood and southern beech (Nothofagus) (Colenso, 1890; Birch, 1937a; Gilmour 1954; 1966; Hood and Sandberg, 1987; Hood et al., 2004c; 2019). Rhizomorphs are prolific in the soil beneath podocarp-hardwood forests, growing epiphytically across healthy roots without infecting them (roots of older trees can be found with Armillaria-caused decay, but it is not clear whether the fungus is the cause of death or if the roots were killed or weakened from some other cause). Armillaria novae-zelandiae is not generally seen as a pathogen of native trees (Rawlings, 1953) but Armillaria-caused mortality has occurred e.g., in densely stocked Nothofagusmenziesii saplings regenerating in gaps after storm damage (Birch, 1937b) and in the same host planted as an ornamental specimen tree in urban settings (Hood, 1989). Nevertheless, Armillaria species provide an indispensable service as important members of the indigenous wood decay community. Along with other decomposer fungi, A. novae-zelandiae contributes significantly to carbon and nutrient recycling in the native forest ecosystem (Hood et al., 2019).
Habitat ListTop of page
|Terrestrial – Managed||Managed forests, plantations and orchards||Secondary/tolerated habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Urban / peri-urban areas||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural||Natural forests||Principal habitat||Natural|
|Scrub / shrublands||Present, no further details||Natural|
Hosts/Species AffectedTop of page
Armillaria novae-zelandiae occurs as a parasite on a wide range of host species, both angiosperms and gymnosperms. An online global list of hosts is provided by the Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-ARS, 2019). Host lists for New Zealand are given by Gilmour (1966); Dingley (1969); Laundon (1973); Shaw et al. (1976); Pennycook (1989); McKenzie et al. (1999; 2000; 2002); Gadgil (2005) and van der Pas et al. (2008) (A. novae-zelandiae and A. limonea are not always distinguished in these lists).
In New Zealand Armillaria species (including A. novae-zelandiae) are or have been important in fruit orchards (Atkinson, 1971), kiwifruit orchards (Actinidiadeliciosa), riparian willows (Salix species) and in forest plantations, particularly of Pinus radiata. Pathogenicity by A. novae-zelandiae to this host has been demonstrated by inoculation experiments with seedlings (Shaw et al., 1981; Benjamin, 1983; Benjamin and Newhook, 1984b; Hood and Sandberg, 1993b). Some of the minor scattered damage in pine and eucalypt plantations along the eastern States of Australia is due to A. novae-zelandiae (e.g., in a first rotation P. radiata plantation in southern Queensland; Kile and Watling, 1988). In Papua New Guinea there are records of Armillaria “mellea” in crops of Camellia sinensis, Coffea spp., Musa spp., and Theobroma cacao L., but it is not clear how much of this, if any, is due to A. novae-zelandiae or to other Armillaria species (Shaw, 1984). Similarly, minor damage due to Armillaria is reported in pines (including P. radiata) and other crops in southern South America, but the degree to which A. novae-zelandiae is implicated is unknown. Brief reviews of Armillaria in planted hosts in South America, Australasia and Papua New Guinea can be found in Hood et al. (1991), generally without indication of the contribution made by A. novae-zelandiae.
Host Plants and Other Plants AffectedTop of page
|Acacia mangium (brown salwood)||Fabaceae||Unknown|
|Acacia melanoxylon (Australian blackwood)||Fabaceae||Unknown|
|Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)||Actinidiaceae||Main|
|Agathis australis (kauri)||Araucariaceae||Unknown|
|Buddleja davidii (butterfly bush)||Loganiaceae||Unknown|
|Casuarina cunninghamiana (Australian beefwood)||Casuarinaceae||Unknown|
|Cedrus atlantica (Atlas cedar)||Pinaceae||Unknown|
|Chamaecyparis lawsoniana (Port Orford cedar)||Cupressaceae||Unknown|
|Citrus sinensis (navel orange)||Rutaceae||Unknown|
|Cryptomeria japonica (Japanese cedar)||Taxodiaceae||Unknown|
|Cupressus macrocarpa (Monterey cypress)||Cupressaceae||Unknown|
|Dacrycarpus dacrydioides (white pine)||Podocarpaceae||Unknown|
|Eucalyptus delegatensis (alpine ash)||Myrtaceae||Unknown|
|Eucalyptus grandis (saligna gum)||Myrtaceae||Unknown|
|Eucalyptus regnans (mountain ash)||Myrtaceae||Unknown|
|Euonymus japonicus (Japanese spindle tree)||Celastraceae||Unknown|
|Grevillea robusta (silky oak)||Proteaceae||Unknown|
|Jacaranda mimosifolia (jacaranda)||Bignoniaceae||Unknown|
|Larix decidua (common larch)||Pinaceae||Unknown|
|Larix kaempferi (Japanese larch)||Pinaceae||Unknown|
|Liriodendron tulipifera (tuliptree)||Magnoliaceae||Unknown|
|Lycium ferocissimum (African boxthorn)||Solanaceae||Unknown|
|Malus domestica (apple)||Rosaceae||Unknown|
|Metasequoia glyptostroboides (water fir)||Taxodiaceae||Unknown|
|Nothofagus alpina (rauli beech)||Nothofagaceae||Unknown|
|Nothofagus dombeyi (coigue)||Nothofagaceae||Unknown|
|Nothofagus fusca (red beech)||Nothofagaceae||Unknown|
|Nothofagus obliqua (roble)||Nothofagaceae||Unknown|
|Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides||Nothofagaceae||Unknown|
|Paraserianthes lophantha (brush wattle)||Fabaceae||Unknown|
|Persea americana (avocado)||Lauraceae||Unknown|
|Pinus caribaea (Caribbean pine)||Pinaceae||Unknown|
|Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine)||Pinaceae||Unknown|
|Pinus elliottii (slash pine)||Pinaceae||Unknown|
|Pinus muricata (bishop pine)||Pinaceae||Unknown|
|Pinus nigra ssp. laricio||Pinaceae||Unknown|
|Pinus patula (Mexican weeping pine)||Pinaceae||Unknown|
|Pinus pinaster (maritime pine)||Pinaceae||Unknown|
|Pinus ponderosa (ponderosa pine)||Pinaceae||Unknown|
|Pinus radiata (radiata pine)||Pinaceae||Main|
|Pinus strobus (eastern white pine)||Pinaceae||Unknown|
|Pinus taeda (loblolly pine)||Pinaceae||Unknown|
|Podocarpus totara (totara)||Podocarpaceae||Unknown|
|Populus sp. (poplar)||Salicaceae||Unknown|
|Prunus armeniaca (apricot)||Rosaceae||Unknown|
|Prunus persica (peach)||Rosaceae||Unknown|
|Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir)||Pinaceae||Unknown|
|Pyrus communis (European pear)||Rosaceae||Unknown|
|Ribes nigrum (blackcurrant)||Grossulariaceae||Unknown|
|Ribes uva-crispa (gooseberry)||Grossulariaceae||Unknown|
|Rubus idaeus (raspberry)||Rosaceae||Unknown|
|Salix alba var. vitellina||Unknown|
|Salix fragilis (crack willow)||Salicaceae||Unknown|
|Salix matsudana (Peking willow)||Salicaceae||Unknown|
|Tecoma capensis (Cape honeysuckle)||Bignoniaceae||Unknown|
|Thuja plicata (western redcedar)||Cupressaceae||Unknown|
|Tsuga heterophylla (western hemlock)||Pinaceae||Unknown|
|Vitis vinifera (grapevine)||Vitaceae||Unknown|
|Weinmannia racemosa (maori)||Cunoniaceae||Unknown|
Growth StagesTop of page Seedling stage, Vegetative growing stage
SymptomsTop of page
As with other Armillaria species, plants infected by A. novae-zelandiae suffer injury and death of tissues in the roots and root collar region, accompanied by resinosis or gummosis (depending on the host). Characteristic signs are black, shoelace-like rhizomorphs and white mycelial sheeting or ribbons beneath the bark. Younger plants wilt or show crown discoloration and retain dead foliage for a time if they are killed rapidly. Older trees may decline more slowly or, in the case of Pinus radiata, retain green foliage, to all intents and purposes appearing healthy, although infected at the root collar. Old, mature trees may develop butt rot.
List of Symptoms/SignsTop of page
|Leaves / abnormal colours|
|Leaves / wilting|
|Leaves / yellowed or dead|
|Roots / 'dirty' roots|
|Roots / fungal growth on surface|
|Roots / reduced root system|
|Roots / rot of wood|
|Stems / gummosis or resinosis|
|Stems / internal discoloration|
|Stems / mycelium present|
|Stems / rot|
|Whole plant / discoloration|
|Whole plant / dwarfing|
|Whole plant / plant dead; dieback|
|Whole plant / uprooted or toppled|
|Whole plant / wilt|
Biology and EcologyTop of page
Like many other Armillaria species, A. novae-zelandiae is assumed to have a diploid vegetative mycelium, undergoing meiosis to form haploid basidiospores (the basidium lacks a basal clamp connection; Kile and Watling, 1983).
Inherently, A. novae-zelandiae appears to show an intermediate level of virulence when compared with other saprotrophic and pathogenic species of Armillaria. In Australia it has less impact than A. luteobubalina. In New Zealand, A. novae-zelandiae has not shown secondary spread between adjacent root systems of young infected Pinus radiata trees as occurs, for instance, with the more virulent Armillariaostoyae in Pinus pinaster stands in the Landes de Gascogne forest region in southwest France (Roth et al., 1979; van der Pas, 1981b; Lung-Escarmant and Guyon, 2004). Pathogenicity is influenced environmentally as well as genetically: Armillaria, probably including A. novae-zelandiae, is observed to acquire greater inoculum potential on hardwood stumps of indigenous or exotic host species than on pine stumps, causing greater mortality in young, newly established P. radiata plantations. Inoculation studies have demonstrated that different A. novae-zelandiae isolates vary innately in their level of virulence to Pinus radiata (Shaw et al., 1981; Benjamin, 1983; Hood and Sandberg, 1993b; Hood et al., 2009).
Fruiting occurs over several weeks in the Southern Hemisphere’s autumn and winter, between March and May (South America, Australia; Singer, 1969; Kile and Watling, 1983) or April to July (New Zealand; Hood et al., 2004b; Hood and Gardner, 2005). In New Zealand small and often very large clusters of fruitbodies appear along with those of Armillaria limonea in natural forests and on woody debris in indigenous forests, producing copious quantities of basidiospores. Fruiting is observed less commonly on infected introduced host trees and shrubs. There is no asexual stage.
Physiology and Phenology
Plantation P. radiata trees older than ca. 10 years (near mid-rotation) infected by A. novae-zelandiae are not killed but interact dynamically with the pathogen while remaining green and apparently healthy. Over time, infection at the root collar decreases in some trees while increasing in others (MacKenzie, 1987; Hood et al., 2002c). A. novae-zelandiae induces abnormal production of bark in the root collar region in which it survives and from which it penetrates and causes small lesions in the cambium during the cooler seasons when trees are less active (Gilmour, 1954; van der Kamp and Hood, 2002). These lesions heal during the warmer, more active growth periods but there is possibly an energy cost to the host associated with keeping the pathogen at bay.
Armillaria limonea, and presumably also A. novae-zelandiae, demonstrate bioluminescence and in New Zealand wood decayed by Armillaria may be seen faintly glowing in native forests on dark nights. Cultures are also bioluminescent, especially when young and actively growing.
Population Size and Structure
Populations of A. novae-zelandiae in New Zealand are composed of comparatively high colony densities per unit ground area. In a study in natural podocarp hardwood forest in New Zealand, cultural pairing of isolates demonstrated a density of colonies (vegetative compatibility groups) of A. novae-zelandiae estimated at between 19 and 93/ha (Hood and Sandberg, 1987; Hood, 1989). Similar studies in young P. radiata plantations that had replaced native forest yielded equivalent values of 32 colonies/ha (Benjamin, 1983; Benjamin and Newhook, 1984a) and between 46 and 108 colonies/ha (Hood and Sandberg, 1993b).
Rhizomorphs are produced prolifically (Farr et al., 1919). In New Zealand Hood and Sandberg (1987) recorded an average aggregate rhizomorph length (comprising both A. novae-zelandiae and A. limonea) ranging from 2 to 9 m/m2 of soil surface down to a depth of 22 cm beneath a podocarp-hardwood forest logged of the podocarp element three decades earlier.
In New Zealand, an Armillaria species that is probably A. novae-zelandiae (incorrectly described in the paper as A. mellea, which is not found in the Southern Hemisphere), forms a mycorrhizal relationship with the native orchid, Gastrodia cunninghamii in beech forests (Campbell, 1962; cf. Cone, 1959). Armillaria novae-zelandiae appears to behave similarly in Pinus radiata plantations with G. cunninghamii, Gastrodia aff. sesamoides, or both, in effect apparently facilitating indirect parasitism of the pines by the orchid species (Hood et al., 2004a; Hood, 2005). In New Zealand’s North Island podocarp-hardwood forest, A. novae-zelandiae has been found colonizing dead plants of the root parasite Dactylanthus taylori (Balanophoraceae), but it is not known if it was responsible for their deaths.
In tropical regions (e.g., Papua New Guinea) A. novae-zelandiae appears to occur in cooler, high elevation habitats.
ClimateTop of page
|Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all year||Preferred||Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all year|
Means of Movement and DispersalTop of page
Like many other Armillaria species, A. novae-zelandiae spreads vegetatively from colonized woody matter by means of rhizomorphs. Infection of live hosts by this means leads to the formation of small disease centres.
There are strong indications that in New Zealand A. novae-zelandiae basidiospores (to a much greater extent than those of A. limonea) play a significant role in initiating new colonies, perhaps due to a better survival ability and plentiful rainfall throughout much of the year (Termorshuizen, 2000). Non-lethally infected trees were widely distributed in second rotation stands of P. radiata in a plantation forest originally established on a treeless plain (MacKenzie and Self, 1988). In the preceding first rotation stands the pathogen was present only saprotrophically (Gilmour, 1954), implying invasion by spores of dead trees and woody matter, giving rise to inoculum that infected trees in the following crop. These observations were supported by the mapping of high densities of colonies (an average minimum of 44 per hectare of only A. novae-zelandiae) infecting the second rotation trees in the same forest(Hood and Sandberg, 1993a; Hood et al., 2002c). Similar results were found in some kiwifruit orchards where individual colonies of A. novae-zelandiae were confined to single or several contiguously grouped, herbicide-treated willow stumps from which the pathogen had spread vegetatively along root systems to infect the immediately adjacent kiwifruit vines (Horner, 1992). Using molecular techniques, Dodd et al. (2010) identified A. novae-zelandiae as the predominant species among isolates from both kiwifruit orchards and second and third rotation P. radiata stands. High densities of coloniesof both A. novae-zelandiae and A. limonea, were mapped in indigenous forests and in first rotation P. radiata stands that replaced them after clearing and burning the original cover (Benjamin and Newhook, 1984a; Hood and Sandberg, 1987; 1989; 1993b). However, any new colonies detected after burning were only of A. novae-zelandiae.
Other studies have demonstrated the ability of artificially applied or naturally trapped basidiospores of A. novae-zelandiae to colonise partly buried billets and, to a lesser extent, stumps of P. radiata (Hood et al., 2002a; 2008; Hood and Gardner, 2005). Basidiospores of A. novae-zelandiae, identified using PCR, were readily detected using an air-sampling suction trap up to 150 m from the edge of a podocarp-hardwood forest during periods of fruiting (Power et al., 2008).
Low to no risk of accidental introduction - see “Risk of Introduction” section.
Pathway CausesTop of page
Pathway VectorsTop of page
Plant TradeTop of page
|Plant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transport||Pest stages||Borne internally||Borne externally||Visibility of pest or symptoms|
|Growing medium accompanying plants||Yes||Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye|
|Roots||Yes||Yes||Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye|
|Seedlings/Micropropagated plants||Yes||Yes||Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye|
|Stems (above ground)/Shoots/Trunks/Branches||Yes||Yes||Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye|
Impact SummaryTop of page
Economic ImpactTop of page
General remarks on the significance of A. novae-zelandiae in different crops and regions can be found in the section “Notes on Crops/Other Plants Affected”. This section focuses primarily on the effect of A. novae-zelandiae in New Zealand, as this is where the majority of the research on the impact of A. novae-zelandiae has been located. Growth loss and economic analyses in New Zealand P. radiata plantations have been undertaken by Shaw and Calderon (1977), MacKenzie (1987), Self and MacKenzie (1995) and Kimberley at al. (2002).
In New Zealand, Armillaria novae-zelandiae at one time caused serious damage in Pinus radiata plantations and in kiwifruit orchards. General accounts of the disease in forests have been published by Gilmour (1966), Shaw et al. (1976), Ridley and Dick (2001) and van der Pas et al. (2008), and reviews were produced by Hood (1989). Hill (1988; 2000), Hill and Travis (1994), Hill et al. (1999), Horner (1985; 1987; 1988a, b; 1990a, b; 1992; 2005a, b; 2006a, b) and Horner and Kay (2001) have discussed the disease in kiwifruit orchards.
First rotation pine plantations on cleared indigenous forest sites
Little indigenous forest is now converted to exotic pine plantation in New Zealand, but this practice was widespread during the 1970s and 1980s leading to severe mortality due to Armillaria (A. novae-zelandiae and A. limonea) in the young pine crops (Beveridge et al., 1973). Tracts of remnant podocarp-hardwood and southern beech forest previously logged of commercially valuable trees were clear felled, desiccated and burnt prior to planting. Heat from the fire temporarily reduced the level of Armillaria inoculum (Hood and Sandberg, 1989), but recolonization of dead wood was rapid, with signs of mycelial fans, rhizomorphs and (in season) prolific fruiting by A. novae-zelandiae (and A. limonea) on charred stumps and logs within 1-2 years. Mortality of pine seedlings commenced 3 to 6 months after planting and continued at an increasing rate for 3-5 years before declining (MacKenzie and Shaw, 1977; Roth et al., 1979; van der Pas, 1981a). Resultant mortality gaps were associated with indigenous hardwood stump root systems, which acted as a substrate providing an enhanced inoculum potential (Shaw and Calderon, 1977; Roth et al., 1979; van der Pas, 1981b; Benjamin 1983; Benjamin and Newhook, 1984b; van der Pas and Hood, 1984; Hood and Sandberg, 1993b). Mortality then declined up to about age 10 years, but infection continued through the remainder of the 25- to 30-year rotation in approximately 15% of the residual crop trees in a cryptic, non-lethal form (trees infected at the root collar retained green crowns and appeared healthy). There was no evidence of secondary spread between pine trees (Shaw and Toes, 1977; Roth et al., 1979; MacKenzie, 1987).
Estimates of seedling deaths during the first 5 years ranged 10-50% over an area of between 50,000 and 60,000 ha of land formerly covered in remnant podocarp-hardwood forest, with lower values on former southern beech forest sites (Shaw and Calderon, 1977; van der Pas, 1981a; Hood, 1989). The uneven distribution of mortality resulted in potentially lower stem wood quality in surviving trees because of excessive branch growth and hence knot size in stand gaps. Estimates of wood volume loss per unit land area in a rotation varied between 6% and 32% as a result of a combination of underutilized ground space due to mortality gaps and reduced growth increment from non-lethal infection in surviving trees (Shaw and Calderon, 1977; MacKenzie, 1987; Kimberley at al., 2002).
Second rotation pine plantations
There is now little planting of pine directly onto indigenous forest cutover sites in New Zealand, and early mortality in second and third rotation pine stands on such sites is generally lower (up to 5% of trees killed in small, scattered disease centres) and of little concern, with some exceptions (van der Pas, 1981a; MacKenzie and Self, 1988). Non-lethal infection is widespread, but variable in pine stands throughout New Zealand, ranging from less than 1% to 38% of trees affected, depending on the pre-plantation vegetation cover (Hood and Sandberg, 1993a; Self et al., 1998; Hood et al., 2002c). Non-lethal infection makes up a significant but smaller component of the overall growth loss (Kimberley et al., 2002).
Similar low early mortality and significant subsequent non-lethal infection occurs in plantations on originally non-forested land that have replaced first rotation stands in which the pathogen was not present, except as a saprotroph colonizing thinning stumps and dead trees, probably introduced by means of spore inoculum (Gilmour, 1954; MacKenzie and Self, 1988; Hood and Sandberg, 1993a; Hood et al., 2002c). Growth loss in one such stand was estimated as a little over 2% at 13 years (mid rotation; Kimberley et al., 2002).
Occasional, more severe mortality has occurred in pine stands subjected to atypical management procedures. For example, the long-abandoned practice of poison thinning, as the dead trees provide plentiful pathogen substrate for increased inoculum potential (van der Pas, 1981a). Establishing the stand after, for instance, a Eucalyptus crop produces a planting site containing hardwood instead of softwood pine stumps, which is more favorable to the fungus. Spraying with treated sewage effluent in stands on sites set aside for the disposal of such material makes the trees stressed and more vulnerable to infection, due either to excessive water loading or to undesirable chemicals. Trees infected by Armillaria sp. Show a greater reduction in growth increment if also infected by the needle pathogen Dothistroma septosporum (Shaw and Toes, 1977) or if pruned too heavily.
Armillaria novae-zelandiae had a serious impact in orchards of kiwifruit in parts of New Zealand during the 1980s and 1990s (Cutler and Hill, 1994). Spores colonizing stumps created during the removal of certain rows of the shelter belt species, Salix matsudana, to reduce shade as trees grew, enabled infection to spread into kiwifruit vines through extensive root interaction, resulting in sizeable mortality centres (Horner, 1992). Due to remedial measures the disease is no longer considered to be of economic significance in orchards of this host (Kiwifruit Vine Health, 2019a).
Impact: BiodiversityTop of page
Armillaria novae-zelandiae is not known to threaten species or affect biodiversity.
Social ImpactTop of page
In parks and urban gardens in New Zealand, A. novae-zelandiae is most common in introduced hosts, and is responsible for a significant number of deaths of amenity trees and shrubs. For instance, it has been responsible for the loss of some trees in the Christchurch Botanic Gardens in the South Island of New Zealand (Bradbury and Steinegg, 1999). Similar issues in botanical gardens in Hobart and Melbourne were caused by A. luteobuballina.
Risk and Impact FactorsTop of page Invasiveness
- Invasive in its native range
- Has a broad native range
- Abundant in its native range
- Pioneering in disturbed areas
- Tolerant of shade
- Capable of securing and ingesting a wide range of food
- Has high genetic variability
- Host damage
- Negatively impacts agriculture
- Negatively impacts forestry
- Negatively impacts livelihoods
- Negatively impacts animal/plant collections
- Pest and disease transmission
- Parasitism (incl. parasitoid)
- Difficult/costly to control
UsesTop of page
Armillaria novae-zelandiae has no economic benefit. In New Zealand there was at one time some interest in the association of A. novae-zelandiae with Gastrodia orchid rhizomes with the possibility of potential herbal medicinal use in China, but no industry has developed.
Young fruitbodies of A. novae-zelandiae are edible. Known as “harore” they are harvested by some Maori.
Uses ListTop of page
Human food and beverage
DiagnosisTop of page
To identify the species first requires laboratory isolation of fungal cultures from infected tissue, mycelial sheeting, rhizomorphs or, if present, fruitbody tissue. This is done by antiseptically transferring small pieces onto plates of an Armillaria-selective medium such as malt extract agar with suitable antibiotic &/or biocidal additives (e.g., o-phenylphenol or benomyl) to discourage contaminating bacteria and other unwanted fungi (Morrison et al., 1991; Worrall, 1991). One recipe prescribes the addition of from 2 to 10 ppm benomyl and (after autoclaving and cooling before pouring plates) 100 ppm streptomycin sulphate to a 2% malt extract agar base. A substitute may need to be found if the fungicide Benlateä (active ingredient 50% benomyl) becomes unavailable. Cultures may be maintained in the laboratory by sub-culturing on potato dextrose or 2% malt extract agar. Armillaria isolates are readily recognized in culture from their reddish-purple crustose appearance and production of characteristic rhizomorphs (distinct in appearance, however, from those formed in the field), but additional techniques are necessary for distinguishing species.
An older procedure to identify an unknown diploid field isolate, first developed with Northern Hemisphere Armillaria species (Korhonen, 1978), was to pair it with a range of selected, white, fluffy, single spore, haploid, tester isolates of known species. The paired tester isolate that changed from white fluffy to a dark purple, crustose, diploid form identified the unknown as being of the same species (Kile and Watling, 1988; Hood and Sandberg, 1987). The method is mostly reliable but takes time and the result is not always clear cut. Isolates of A. novae-zelandiae can also be distinguished from those of A. limonea by the production of rhizomorphs only in the latter after growing for approximately three weeks under a 24-hour photoperiod using specified lighting conditions (Shaw et al., 1981; Benjamin, 1983; Hood and Sandberg, 1987).
More recently, cultures of A. novae-zelandiae have been distinguished from other Armillaria species using molecular techniques (Coetzee et al., 2001b; 2003a; Maphosa et al., 2006; Pildain et al., 2009; 2010; Ota et al., 2011). Molecular procedures have been developed for identifying A. novae-zelandiae using the internal transcribed spacer ITS1 and ITS4 regions and the 5.8S ribosomal gene in Australia (Dunne et al., 2002; Smith-White et al., 2002) and New Zealand (Dodd et al., 2006; 2010).
In New Zealand rhizomorphs of the two common species are difficult to distinguish in the field (Hood and Sandberg, 1987) but according to Benjamin (1983) those of A. novae-zelandiae are slightly thicker on average and produced in greater abundance than those of A. limonea.
Detection and InspectionTop of page
As with other Armillaria species, first evidence of disease in a crop will be symptoms of wilting or crown discoloration. Removal of soil to expose the root collar using a small trowel or grubber may reveal evidence of oozing resin or gum in conifers or hardwood species, respectively. This presence of resinosis or gummosis indicates damage to the living host, implying that the pathogen is acting parasitically and not simply feeding saprotrophically on already dead tissue. Black, branching, bootlace-like rhizomorphs consisting of a thin, outer, black rind and a soft, inner, pinkish, hyphal core, may be present. Also defining will be characteristic, thick, white mycelial sheets, fans or ribbons which are revealed by using a knife to cut and prize away the bark. If the host is already dead and no longer resisting the pathogen, these sheets may be present more extensively running up into the stem. Rarely, fruitbodies may be present (see “Description”, above). Unlikely in crop plants, but in older, mature trees, a butt heartwood rot may be present with a distinctive moist, cheesy, yellowish, fibrous decay interspersed with thin, black zone lines (the edges of sclerotial sheeting forming large, 2-3 cm “pockets” within the wood) which give rise to a scalloped appearance on drying.
Similarities to Other Species/ConditionsTop of page
Armillaria novae-zelandiae is one of many Armillaria species broadly similar in appearance and behavior (Watling et al., 1991; Pegler, 2000). All have white basidiospores, an anulus or ring (partial veil) around the fruitbody stipe (toadstool stalk), and many produce rhizomorphs (species without a ring belong in the recently erected genus, Desarmillaria in Koch et al., 2017). Species vary in their level of intrinsic pathogenicity against different hosts, but many are responsible for economic diseases in crops, plantations and managed natural forests around the world (Kile et al., 1991; Hood et al., 1991). All species also feed saprotrophically, colonizing and producing a white rot in wood, on which they fruit. Molecular analysis has shown that A. novae-zelandiae belongs in a broad group of Southern Hemisphere Armillaria species that cluster separately from those in the Northern Hemisphere (Maphosa et al., 2006; Coetzee et al., 2011; Klopfenstein et al., 2017).
Unusually for Armillaria species, A. novae-zelandiae was first recognized as a distinct taxon on morphological grounds (Stevenson, 1964). However, to distinguish it confidently from other species internationally requires cultural or molecular procedures (see “Diagnosis”, below).
Prevention and ControlTop of page
Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Research was undertaken in New Zealand from the late 1990s to develop an economic integrated control procedure for A. novae-zelandiae in second and third rotation Pinus radiata plantations as an alternative to the costly removal of previous crop stumps prior to planting, which though effective was generally not implemented operationally (see below). This included investigating host genetic resistance or tolerance, the effect of stock quality and vigour, potential biological control and a possible silvicultural management approach. Research in intensively managed kiwifruit orchards in the 1980s led to successful control of the disease. In both forest plantations and kiwifruit orchards in New Zealand, A. novae-zelandiae is no longer considered to cause a serious economic disease, although sporadic, locally important outbreaks may occasionally still occur in forests.
Cultural Control and Sanitary Measures
Planting at a greater density has been recommended on infested sites in Pinus radiata plantations, to compensate for mortality losses. However, this may only be effective if mortality gaps are not large and surviving trees are reasonably evenly distributed (MacKenzie and Self, 1988). In a trial in a second rotation P. radiata stand set up to determine how thinning influences the level of disease on infested sites, mean non-lethal infection was present in 50% of trees after a first thinning at age 7 years to 250 stems per hectare at age 13 years (approximately mid-rotation). This compared with 35% for the same treatment but with stumps simultaneously extracted, and 29-32% for unthinned controls (Hood et al., 2002c). It appears that the additional substrate provided by the thinning stumps had increased the inoculum potential (approximately half of the stumps were colonized by Armillaria). However, by age 19 years no difference was detected, apparently because of the increased vigour and associated physiological resistance of the host trees in response to thinning (Hood and Kimberley, 2009). Although there was a small loss in individual tree growth due to infection during the first half of the rotation, overall reduction for the full rotation was negligible. It was concluded that although thinning was not detrimental to the final crop volume, it gave no benefit in terms of disease control.
Field experiments have demonstrated the importance of the quality of the planting stock on sites known to be infested with A. novae-zelandiae (and A. limonea). In a first rotation P. radiata stand on a site cleared of podocarp-hardwood forest in New Zealand mortality from the disease among newly planted seedlings was lower than among rooted cuttings (Klomp and Hong, 1985). However, with improved quality of P. radiata cuttings, the trend was reversed when a second rotation trial stand was established on the same site (Hood et al., 2006). In each case, better planting stock was at an advantage when exposed to Armillaria inoculum.
Removal of stumps and woody debris before planting is the most effective method of controlling armillaria root disease. However, this procedure has been applied only occasionally in forest plantations because benefits are not seen by forest managers to outweigh the initial expense, despite economic analyses to the contrary (Shaw and Calderon, 1977; MacKenzie, 1987; Self and MacKenzie, 1995). Unlike some other management options, stump extraction also benefits subsequent rotations by removing inoculum from the site, although its effects on soil quality (removal of topsoil, compaction) must also be considered. Soil cultivation without stump removal has a number of advantages e.g., improved planting efficiency and better establishment, but it is not clear if this procedure reduces disease levels.
In one study, removal of indigenous forest stumps reduced mortality among planted pine seedlings to 12-21% after 5 years, compared with 52% on the untreated site (Shaw and Calderon, 1977; van der Pas, 1981a). In another, similar trial, which included clearing debris into windrows after removing indigenous forest stumps, mortality after 4 years was 1% in treated and 23% in untreated plots (van der Pas and Hood, 1984). In a third trial, in a second rotation radiata pine plantation following Pinus ponderosa that had been planted on a cleared indigenous forest site and subsequently poison thinned, mortality was reduced after 5 years from 22% (untreated) to 5% (stumps removed) at one site and from 10% to less than 1% at another (Self and MacKenzie, 1995). After 8 years, non-lethal infection in the same trial was reduced from 67% to 31% of trees affected and from 85% to 10% of trees, in the respective sites.
With smaller pine root systems, whole tree harvesting is another possibility prior to establishing second and third rotation stands that has not been investigated.
Various techniques were tried in infested kiwifruit orchards during the 1980s in New Zealand, including inserting root barriers consisting of trenches lined with polyvinyl chloride sheeting to prevent spread (Horner, 1987; Hill, 1988). However, the most effective procedure was using machinery to excavate and mechanically sieve the soil free from roots and other woody matter before replanting. This was undertaken operationally and achieved eradication of the pathogen in more than 90% of treated sites. At that time the high value of the crop justified the intensity and expense, but it was important to ensure that the ground area sifted encompassed the full extent of the infected root systems for full effectiveness. In a later study to investigate treatment of infected vines without having to remove and replace them, exposing root collars by water sluicing in order to surgically detach diseased tissue achieved significant disease control, and proved better than fungicide injection or application of biological control agents (Horner, 2006a, b). Final recommendations for kiwifruit vines were to clear stumps and woody matter from soil before establishing new orchards, to deploy shelterbelts of tree species with non-spreading root systems and to plant them at final stocking in order to eliminate the need for felling and creating stumps (Hill, 1988; Horner, 2005b). If shelterbelts had to be removed, stumps should be extracted and not sprayed with herbicides, which aided spore colonization by A. novae-zelandiae.
Research was conducted in the 1980s to evaluate the effectiveness of strains of Trichoderma species in controlling armillaria root disease in kiwifruit orchards and Pinus radiata plantations. In one trial pine seedling root systems were immersed in a selected Trichoderma slurry treatment before planting on an Armillaria-infested site. Mortality after 2 years was 6% of treated plants compared with 22% in the untreated controls (Cutler and Hill, 1994). Surviving treated plants were healthier. Similar results have been obtained in forest nurseries (Robert Hill, personal communication; Dyck, 2006).
Laboratory studies conducted with different Trichoderma species (e.g., T. atroviride, T. harzianum, T. viride) identified a number of potentially superior isolates in terms of their aggressiveness towards A. novae-zelandiae (Taylor, 1991; Cutler and Hill, 1994; Dodd-Wilson, 1996). Formulations were prepared, using substrates such as sawdust and peat, for testing in field trials (Hill and Travis, 1994), and some products were registered commercially for operational use in kiwifruit orchards (Cutler and Hill, 1994). Further tests with various formulations, e.g., as pastes and by injecting vines, have given variable results (Hill and Travis, 1994; McLaughlin, 1996; Hunt, 1998; Hunt and Clarkin, 1998; Horner 2006a, b). Trichoderma products are currently used in kiwifruit orchards against other pathogens (particularly Pseudomonas syringae pv actinidiae) and for general vine health (Woodcock, 2016; Kiwifruit Vine Health, 2019b).
In interactive laboratory studies with wood decay fungi as potential biological control agents for treating stumps, there was evidence of reduced colonization by A. novae-zelandiae of woody substrate also inoculated with either Rigidoporus concrescens or a species of Ganoderma (Li and Hood, 1992). However, in a field trial there was no evidence that these and other basidiomycete wood decay species reduced the level of A. novae-zelandiae when inoculated into P. radiata thinning stumps (Hood et al., 2015).
Studies have been undertaken to test the effectiveness of chemical treatments in reducing the incidence of disease caused by A. novae-zelandiae (and A. limonea), although none have been used operationally in forest plantations. Mortality 4 years after planting P. radiata on an indigenous forest cutover site was 9% in plots with stumps treated with a commercial hydrocarbon mixture containing methyl isothiocyanate compared with 23% in untreated plots, despite there being no difference in the frequencies and quantities of soil rhizomorphs between sites (van der Pas and Hood, 1984). A similar result was obtained after applying agricultural lime to the soil surface. Sodium pentachlorphenate and pentachlorphenol introduced to the soil gave no protection to container grown P. radiata against artificial inoculum of A. novae-zelandiae (Shaw et al., 1980).
Soil fumigation was tried experimentally for controlling the disease in kiwifruit orchards using several chemicals, such as methyl bromide, chloropicrin, and dazomet (Ian Horner, pers. comm.). Methyl bromide was the most effective, but infected kiwifruit vine tap roots were found to grow to depths of 5 m, beyond the reach of the fumigants. In another study, treatment with a phosphorous acid product proved to be ineffective (Ian Horner, personal communication).
Host Resistance (Incl. Vaccination)
There is evidence that host species vary in resistance or tolerance to A. novae-zelandiae. In inoculation studies, Benjamin and Newhook (1984b) found more seedlings of P. radiata became infected and died than did those of Eucalyptus species, among which variation also occurred. Field observations of the effects of armillaria root disease (A. novae-zelandiae and A. limonea) on tree species planted on sites cleared of indigenous forest have been published (Weston, 1957; Gilmour, 1966). Most susceptible were P. radiata, species of Larix and Chamaecyparislawsonianaarl., while least affected were Cryptomeria japonica and Thuja plicata (Hocking and Mayfield, 1939; Jolliffe, 1940; Lysaght, 1942). Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) was as susceptible as P. radiata but showed lower rates of mortality. Losses were low among eucalypts (Newhook, 1964). Although apparently less vulnerable, C. japonica was found to develop butt heart rot caused by Armillaria. A list of species recorded as susceptible to the disease in New Zealand (without distinguishing between A. novae-zelandiae and A. limonea) was published by van der Pas et al. (2008).
In inoculation experiments, no differences were found in infection and mortality among 25 P. radiata clones (Hood et al., 2009). More testing may eventually identify stock that is less susceptible, but with little more than a century’s exposure to a new pathogen (P. radiata is exotic in New Zealand) there may have been insufficient time or opportunity for resistant material of this host to become naturally selected. Fruiting is not common in P. radiata plantation forests in which the establishment of new disease centres may be from external spore sources, exposing trees to only part of the population gene pool.
Monitoring and Surveillance (Incl. Remote Sensing)
Monitoring of mortality is normally undertaken on the ground by means of transects or other appropriate field design (Hood et al., 2002b). In P. radiata plantations, non-lethal infection is estimated in the same way, except that in the absence of crown symptoms it is also necessary to expose the root collar to reveal the presence and extent of girdling infection (Shaw and Toes, 1977). Firth and Brownlie (2002) found that by using high resolution colour, stereo aerial photography it was possible to detect most trees greater than 2 m tall that had been killed by Armillaria, reducing the time and investment necessary for ground monitoring. Mapping of infested sites in second rotation stands indicated that the distribution of non-lethally infected trees showed a broad approximation to that of trees visibly killed by the disease (e.g., areas with an average pre-thinning mortality greater than 3% of trees killed were reasonable indicators of stand areas with non-lethal infection exceeding 25%). This implied that it might be possible to use the distribution of visible mortality (e.g., from aerial photography) to produce contour maps that predict and delineate areas requiring treatment, either during or at the end of the rotation (Hood et al., 2002b; Hood et al., 2006).
ReferencesTop of page
Baumgartner, K., Baker, B. R., Korhonen, K., Zhao Jun, Hughes, K. W., Bruhn, J., Bowman, T. S., Bergemann, S. E., 2012. Evidence of natural hybridization among homothallic members of the basidiomycete Armillaria mellea sensu stricto. Fungal Biology, 116(6), 677-691. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878614612000669 doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2012.03.006
Baumgartner, K., Coetzee, M. P. A., Hoffmeister, D., 2011. Secrets of the subterranean pathosystem of armillaria. Molecular Plant Pathology, 12(6), 515-534. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00693.x/full doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00693.x
Benjamin M, 1983. Studies on the biology of Armillaria in New Zealand. PhD Thesis. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland. https://catalogue.library.auckland.ac.nz/permalink/f/ta4ieu/uoa_alma21166218130002091
Benjamin M, Newhook FJ, 1984. Armillaria clones in pine plantations in central North Island, New Zealand. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots of Forest Trees, Melbourne, Victoria-Gympie, Queensland (Australia), August 25-31, 1983. IUFRO Working Party S2.06.01 [ed. by Kile GA]. Melbourne, Australia: IUFRO.404.
Benjamin M, Newhook FJ, 1984. The relative susceptibilities of various Eucalyptus spp. and Pinus radiata to Armillaria grown on different food bases. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots of Forest Trees, Melbourne, Victoria-Gympie, Queensland (Australia), August 25-31, 1983. IUFRO Working Party S2.06.01 [ed. by Kile GA]. Melbourne, Australia: IUFRO.140-147.
Beveridge, A. E., Klomp, B. K., Knowles, R. L., 1973. Grazing in young plantations of Radiata Pine established after clearing logged and reverted indigenous forest. New Zealand Journal of Forestry, 18(1), 152-156.
Bradbury P, Steinegg D, 1999. Armillaria root rot – not just a forest disease. In: Forest Health News , 88(2) . Rotorua, New Zealand: New Zealand Forest Research Institute (Scion).
Burgan, R. E., Nelson, R. E., 1972. Decline of Ohia Lehua forests in Hawaii. In: USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station , (No. PSW-3) . 4 pp.
Campbell EO, 1962. The mycorrhiza of Gastrodia cunninghamii Hook.f. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand. Botany, 1(24), 289-296. https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/TRSBOT19620810.2.2
Coetzee MPA, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ, 2018. Armillaria root-rot pathogens: species boundaries and global distribution. Pathogens, 7(83), doi: 10.3390/pathogens7040083
Coetzee, M. P. A., Bloomer, P., Wingfield, M. J., Wingfield, B. D., 2011. Paleogene radiation of a plant pathogenic mushroom. PLoS ONE, (No.December), e28545. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028545 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028545
Coetzee, M. P. A., Wingfield, B. D., Bloomer, P., Ridley, G. S., Kile, G. A., Wingfield, M. J., 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of Australian and New Zealand Armillaria species. Mycologia, 93(5), 887-896. doi: 10.2307/3761754
Coetzee, M. P. A., Wingfield, B. D., Bloomer, P., Ridley, G. S., Wingfield, M. J., 2003. Molecular identification and phylogeny of Armillaria isolates from South America and Indo-Malaysia. Mycologia, 95(2), 285-293. doi: 10.2307/3762039
Coetzee, M. P. A., Wingfield, B. D., Harrington, T. C., Steimel, J., Coutinho, T. A., Wingfield, M. J., 2001. The root rot fungus Armillaria mellea introduced into South Africa by early Dutch settlers. Molecular Ecology, 10(2), 387-396. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01187.x
Coetzee, M. P. A., Wingfield, B. D., Roux, J., Crous, P. W., Denman, S., Wingfield, M. J., 2003. Discovery of two northern hemisphere Armillaria species on Proteaceae in South Africa. Plant Pathology, 52(5), 604-612. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2003.00879.x
Colenso W, 1890. An enumeration of fungi recently discovered in New Zealand. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 23, 391-398.
Cone GB, 1959. Gastrodia and mycorrhiza. Wellington Botanical Society, 31, 3-5, 10. http://bts.nzpcn.org.nz/bts_pdf/Well_1959_31__3-5.pdf
Cooke MC, 1879. New Zealand fungi. Grevillea, 8(46), 54-68. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/188079#page/76/mode/1up
Cooper J, 2016. Mycological Notes - 34. New Zealand Physalacriaceae. 24 pp. https://www.funnz.org.nz/sites/default/files/2016-MycNotes34-Physlacriaceae_1.pdf
Cutler HG, Hill RA, 1994. Natural fungicides and their delivery systems as alternatives to synthetics. In: Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases. Theory and Practice, [ed. by Wilson CL, Wisniewski ME]. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press. 135-152.
DeNitto, G. A., Cannon, P., Eglitis, A., Glaeser, J. A., Maffei, H., Smith, S., 2015. General Technical Report - Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Berkeley, USA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service (No.PSW-GTR-250), 171 pp. http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/documents/psw_gtr250/psw_gtr250.pdf
Dodd SL, Ramsfield T, Marshall JW, 2006. PCR primers to distinguish the four species of Armillaria found in New Zealand. Poster. [Proceedings of the Fourth Australasian Soilborne Diseases Symposium. 3-6 September, 2006], Queenstown, New Zealand
Dodd, S. L., Ramsfield, T. D., Marshall, J. W., 2010. PCR primers to distinguish Armillaria species found in New Zealand. Australasian Plant Pathology, 39(6), 536-543. http://www.publish.csiro.au/nid/39.htm doi: 10.1071/AP10026
Dodd-Wilson SL, 1996. Biochemical and molecular characterisation of Trichoderma species. PhD thesis. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland. https://catalogue.library.auckland.ac.nz/permalink/f/ta4ieu/uoa_alma21161774820002091
Dunne, C. P., Glen, M., Tommerup, I. C., Shearer, B. L., Hardy, G. E. S. J., 2002. Sequence variation in the rDNA ITS of Australian Armillaria species and intra-specific variation in A. luteobubalina. Australasian Plant Pathology, 31(3), 241-251. doi: 10.1071/AP02015
Dyck B, 2006. Bio-control offers promise for combating tree diseases including armillaria. New Zealand Tree Grower, 27(2), 30-31.
Farr CC, Hogg EG, Page S, Wild LJ, Hilgendorf FW, 1919. Report on the natural features of the Arthur’s Pass tunnel. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 51, 422-426. http://rsnz.natlib.govt.nz/volume/rsnz_51/rsnz_51_00_005210.pdf
Forestry New Zealand, 2020. Exporting indigenous timber & timber products. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry for Primary Industries.https://www.mpi.govt.nz/growing-and-harvesting/forestry/indigenous-forestry/exporting-indigenous-timber-and-timber-products/
Gadgil PD, 2005. Landcare Research New Zealand Fungal Diversity Research Series 16. Fungi of New Zealand Volume 4: Fungi on trees and shrubs in New Zealand, Hong Kong, Fungal Diversity Press.
Gilmour JW, 1954. Forest Research Notes 1(9). Armillaria mellea (Vahl) Saccardo in New Zealand forests. Part I. In stands of Pinus radiata D. Don in Kaingaroa State Forest. Rotorua, New Zealand: Forest Research Institute, New Zealand Forest Service.
Guo Ting, Wang HanChen, Xue WanQiu, Zhao Jun, Yang, Z. L., 2016. Phylogenetic analyses of Armillaria reveal at least 15 phylogenetic lineages in China, seven of which are associated with cultivated Gastrodia elata. PLoS ONE, 11(5), e0154794. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0154794
Herink J, 1973. Taxonomy of honey fungus – Armillaria mellea (Vahl ex Fr.) Kumm. (Taxonomie václavky obecné – Armillaria mellea (Vahl ex Fr.) Kumm). [Symposium on Honey Fungus - Armillaria mellea (Vahl ex Fr.) Kumm], Brno, Czech Republic: Mendel University. 21-48.
Hill RA, 1988. Armillaria in kiwifruit, control measures. Aglink. Horticultural Produce and Practice HPP 93. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries.3 pp.
Hill RA, 2000. Kiwifruit Armillaria Manual. Zespri Innovation Company Limited, in association with the Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand (HortResearch).50 pp.
Hill RA, Eden MA, Cutler HG, Elmer PAG, Reglinski T, Parker SR, 1999. Practical natural solutions for plant disease control. In: Biologically Active Natural Products. Agrochemicals, [ed. by Cutler HG, Cutler SJ]. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press. 210.
Hill RA, Travis K, 1994. Biological control of armillaria disease in kiwifruit. New Zealand Kiwifruit (October/November), 19-20.
Hood IA, 1989. Armillaria in New Zealand Forests. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 19, 180-197. https://www.scionresearch.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/59992/NZJFS192-and-31989HOOD180_197.pdf
Hood IA, 2005. Armillaria and Gastrodia in pine forests. New Zealand native orchids, 94(1)
Hood IA, Gardner JF, 2004. Armillaria and Gastrodia. In: Forest Health News , (146) . Rotorua, New Zealand: New Zealand Forest Research Institute (Scion).https://cdm20044.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/p20044coll2/id/8
Hood IA, Gardner JF, 2005. Colonisation of Pinus radiata thinning stumps by Armillaria and other basidiomycetes following treatment with Armillaria basidiospores. In: Root and Butt Rots of Forest Trees [Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots, Poznań and Białowieża (Poland), August 16-22, 2004. IUFRO Working Party 7.02.01], [ed. by Mańka M, Łakomy P]. Poznań, Poland: The August Cieszkowski Agricultural University. 196-208.
Hood IA, Gardner JF, Ramsfield TD, 2004. Armillaria spore dispersal. In: Forest Health News , (142) . Rotorua, New Zealand: New Zealand Forest Research Institute (Scion).
Hood IA, Redfern DB, Kile GA, 1991. Chapter 9. Armillaria in planted hosts. In: Armillaria Root Disease. Agriculture Handbook No. 691, [ed. by Shaw III CG, Kile GA]. Washington DC, USA: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 122-149.
Hood IA, Sandberg CJ, 1989. Changes in soil populations of Armillaria species following felling and burning of indigenous forests in the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand. [Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots, Vernon and Victoria, British Columbia (Canada), August 9-16, 1988. IUFRO Working Party S2.06.01], [ed. by Morrison DJ]. Victoria, BC, Canada: Forestry Canada. 288-296.
Hood, I. A., Beets, P. N., Kimberley, M. O., Gardner, J. F., Oliver, G. R., Pearce, S., 2004. Colonisation of podocarp coarse woody debris by decomposer basidiomycete fungi in an indigenous forest in the central North Island of New Zealand. Forest Ecology and Management, 196(2/3), 311-325. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.024
Hood, I. A., Horner, I. J., Gardner, J. F., Sandberg, C. J., 2002. Armillaria root disease of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. 1: Basidiospore dispersal. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 32(1), 94-102.
Hood, I. A., Kimberley, M. O., 2009. Impact of armillaria root disease and the effect of thinning in a late-rotation Pinus radiata plantation. Forest Pathology, 39(6), 415-427. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/efp doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2009.00602.x
Hood, I. A., Kimberley, M. O., Gardner, J. F., 2006. Stock-type susceptibility and delineation of treatment areas for a cryptic Pinus radiata root disease. Phytopathology, 96(6), 630-636. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-96-0630
Hood, I. A., Kimberley, M. O., Gardner, J. F., 2009. Susceptibility to Armillaria novae-zelandiae among clones of Pinus radiata. Forest Pathology, 39(6), 405-414. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2009.00611.x
Hood, I. A., Kimberley, M. O., Gardner, J. F., Sandberg, C. J., 2002. Armillaria root disease of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. 3: Influence of thinning and pruning. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 32(1), 116-132.
Hood, I. A., McDougal, R. L., Somchit, C., Kimberley, M. O., Lewis, A. S. R., Hood, J. O. L., 2019. Fungi decaying the wood of fallen beech (Nothofagus) trees in the South Island of New Zealand. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 49(1), 1-17. https://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/cjfr-2018-0179#.XO3n2_5DsbA doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2018-0179
Hood, I. A., Oliva, J., Kimberley, M. O., Arhipova, N., Bakys, R., 2015. Armillaria novae-zelandiae and other basidiomycete wood decay fungi in New Zealand Pinus radiata thinning stumps. Forest Pathology, 45(4), 298-310. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1439-0329 doi: 10.1111/efp.12171
Hood, I. A., Petrini, L. E., Gardner, J. F., 2008. Colonisation of woody material in Pinus radiata plantations by Armillaria novae-zelandiae basidiospores. Australasian Plant Pathology, 37(4), 347-352. http://www.publish.csiro.au/nid/39.htm doi: 10.1071/AP08030
Hood, I. A., Sandberg, C. J., 1987. Occurrence of Armillaria rhizomorph populations in the soil beneath indigenous forests in the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 17(1), 83-99.
Horak E, 1980. (Fungi, Basidiomycetes. Agaricales y Gasteromycetes secotioides). Flora Criptogámica de Tierra del Fuego, 11(6)
Horak E, 1983. Mycogeography in the South Pacific Region: Agaricales, Boletales. Australian Journal of Botany Supplementary Series, 13(10), 1-41.
Horner IJ, 1985. How serious is the Armillaria problem?. New Zealand Kiwifruit (December), (20)
Horner IJ, 1987. Armillaria – spreading but controllable. New Zealand Kiwifruit (February), (23), 25.
Horner IJ, 1988. Armillaria root-rot of kiwifruit. In: Abstracts of Papers [5th International Congress of Plant Pathology], Kyoto, Japan: 204.
Horner IJ, 1988. Early Armillaria treatment pays. New Zealand Kiwifruit (November), 50(5)
Horner IJ, 1990. How to diagnose Armillaria. New Zealand Kiwifruit (May), (67), 14-15.
Horner IJ, 1990. No miracle cures for Armillaria. New Zealand Kiwifruit (April), 66(8), 14-15.
Horner IJ, 1992. Epidemiology of Armillaria root-rot of kiwifruit. Acta Horticulturae (Kiwifruit II), 297, 573-578.
Horner IJ, 2005. Identifying Armillaria. In: Kiwitech Bulletin No.40 (August 2005),Zespri International Ltd.
Horner IJ, 2005. Managing Armillaria. In: Kiwitech Bulletin No.41 (October 2005),Zespri International Ltd.
Horner IJ, 2006. Armillaria control trials in New Zealand kiwifruit orchards. [Proceedings of the Fourth Australasian Soilborne Diseases Symposium, 3-6 September, 2006], Queenstown, New Zealand
Horner IJ, 2006. Control treatments for Armillaria in kiwifruit orchards: Results of a four-year trial. New Zealand Kiwifruit Journal (February), 5-7.
Horner IJ, Kay S, 2001. Diagnosis of Armillaria in Kiwifruit Orchards. New Zealand Kiwifruit Journal (March), 25-28.
Hunt JS, 1998. Armillaria in kiwifruit – a long term management problem. New Zealand Kiwifruit Journal (March/April), 32-34.
Hunt JS, Clarkin GA, 1998. Survey of vine protection from Armillaria. New Zealand Kiwifruit Journal (November/December), 30-32.
Kamp BJ van der, Hood IA, 2002. Armillaria root disease of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. 2: Invasion and host reaction. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 32, 103-115. https://www.scionresearch.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/59283/Reprint-2803-02a.pdf
Kew Mycology Collection, 2020. London, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew.https://herbtrack.science.kew.org/search
Kile GA, McDonald GI , Byler JW, 1991. Chapter 8. Ecology and disease in natural forests. In: Armillaria Root Disease. Agriculture Handbook No. 691, [ed. by Shaw III CG, Kile GA]. Washington DC, USA: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 102-121.
Kile, G. A., Watling, R., 1988. Identification and occurrence of Australian Armillaria species, including A. pallidula sp.nov. and comparative studies between them and non-Australian tropical and Indian Armillaria. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 91(2), 305-315.
Kim, M. S., Hanna, J. W., Klopfenstein, N. B., 2010. First report of an Armillaria root disease pathogen, Armillaria gallica, associated with several new hosts in Hawaii. Plant Disease, 94(12), 1503. http://apsjournals.apsnet.org/loi/pdis doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-10-0534
Kiwifruit Vine Health, 2019. Kiwifruit risk organisms – March 2019. Tauranga, New Zealand: Kiwifruit Vine Health.http://www.kvh.org.nz/vdb/document/91544
Kiwifruit Vine Health, 2019. Psa-V best practice guide. Tauranga, New Zealand: Kiwifruit Vine Health.41 pp. https://www.kvh.org.nz/best_practice
Kliejunas, J. T., Burdsall, H. H., Jr., DeNitto, G. A., Eglitis, A., Haugen, D. A., Haverty, M. I., Micales, J. A., Tkacz, B. M., Powell, M. R., 2003. General Technical Report - Forest Products Laboratory, USDA Forest Service, Madison, USA: USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory (No.FPL-GTR-137), viii + 206 pp.
Kliejunas, J. T., Tkacz, B. M., Burdsall, H. H., Jr., DeNitto, G. A., Eglitis, A., Haugen, D. A., Wallner, W. E., 2001. General Technical Report - Forest Products Laboratory, USDA Forest Service, Madison, USA: USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory (No. FPL-GTR-124), viii + 134 pp.
Klopfenstein, N. B., Stewart, J. E., Ota, Y., Hanna, J. W., Richardson, B. A., Ross-Davis, A. L., Elías-Román, R. D., Korhonen, K., Keča, N., Iturritxa, E., Alvarado-Rosales, D., Solheim, H., Brazee, N. J., Łakomy, P., Cleary, M. R., Hasegawa, E., Kikuchi, T., Garza-Ocañas, F., Tsopelas, P., Rigling, D., Prospero, S., Tsykun, T., Bérubé, J. A., Stefani, F. O. P., Jafarpour, S., Antonín, V. (et al), 2017. Insights into the phylogeny of Northern Hemisphere Armillaria: Neighbor-net and Bayesian analyses of translation elongation factor 1-α gene sequences. Mycologia, 109(1), 75-91. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00275514.2017.1286572 doi: 10.1080/00275514.2017.1286572
Koch, R. A., Wilson, A. W., Séné, O., Henkel, T. W., Aime, M. C., 2017. Resolved phylogeny and biogeography of the root pathogen Armillaria and its gasteroid relative, Guyanagaster. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 17(33), (25 January 2017). http://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-017-0877-3 doi: 10.1186/s12862-017-0877-3
Korhonen K, 1978. Interfertility and clonal size in the Armillariella mellea complex. Karstenia, 18, 31-42. http://www.funga.fi/Karstenia/Karstenia%2018-2%201978-1.pdf
Lung-Escarmant, B., Guyon, D., 2004. Temporal and spatial dynamics of primary and secondary infection by Armillaria ostoyae in a Pinus pinaster plantation. Phytopathology, 94(2), 125-131. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.2.125
MacKenzie M, Self NM, 1988. Armillaria in some New Zealand second rotation pine stands. [Proceedings of the 36th Annual Western International Forest Disease Work Conference], [ed. by van der Kamp BJ]. Park City, Utah, USA: 82-87.
MacKenzie, M., Shaw, C. G., III, 1977. Spatial relationships between Armillaria root-rot of Pinus radiata seedlings and the stumps of indigenous trees. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 7(3), 374-383.
Maphosa, L., Wingfield, B. D., Coetzee, M. P. A., Mwenje, E., Wingfield, M. J., 2006. Phylogenetic relationships among Armillaria species inferred from partial elongation factor 1-alpha DNA sequence data. Australasian Plant Pathology, 35(5), 513-520. http://publish.csiro.au/nid/39/paper/AP06056.htm doi: 10.1071/AP06056
Massee G, 1898. The fungus flora of New Zealand. Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, 31, 282-349. http://rsnz.natlib.govt.nz/volume/rsnz_31/rsnz_31_00_005930.html
McLaughlin S, 1996. Fighting fungi with fungi. New Zealand Kiwifruit Journal (May), 11.
Morrison DJ, 1989. Pathogenicity of Armillaria species is related to rhizomorph growth habit. [Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots, Vernon and Victoria, British Columbia (Canada), August 9-16, 1988. IUFRO Working Party S2.06.01], [ed. by Morrison DJ]. Victoria, BC, Canada: Forestry Canada. 584-589.
Morrison DJ, Williams RE, Whitney RD, 1991. Chapter 5. Infection, disease development, diagnosis, and detection. In: Armillaria Root Disease. Agriculture Handbook No. 691, [ed. by Shaw III CG, Kile GA]. Washington DC, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, . 62-75.
Newhook FJ, 1964. Forest disease situation, Australasia. [11th FAO / IUFRO Symposium on Internationally Dangerous Forest Diseases and Insects, Oxford, England, July 1964], Oxford, UK
Niveiro N, Albertό E, 2013. Checklist of the Argentine Agaricales 4. Tricholomataceae and Polyporaceae. Mycotaxon, 97 pp. https://www.mycotaxon.com/resources/checklists/Niveiro-v121-checklist.pdf
Ota, Y., Kim MeeSook, Neda, H., Klopfenstein, N. B., Hasegawa, E., 2011. The phylogenetic position of an Armillaria species from Amami-Oshima, a subtropical island of Japan, based on elongation factor and ITS sequences. Mycoscience, 52(1), 53-58. http://www.springerlink.com/content/h53033706q042333/ doi: 10.1007/s10267-010-0066-3
Parham BEV, 1953. Some Fiji fungi. Transactions and Proceedings of the Fiji Society of Science and Industry, 2, 169-182.
Pas JB van der, 1981. Impact and control of Armillaria root rot in New Zealand pine plantations. [Root and Butt Rots in Scotch Pine Stands. IUFRO Working Party S2.06.01, European Regional Meeting], Poznań, Poland: 69-77.
Pas JB van der, Hood IA, 1984. The effect of site preparation on the incidence of Armillaria root rot in Pinus radiata four years after conversion from indigenous forest in Omataroa Forest, New Zealand. [Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots of Forest Trees, Melbourne, Victoria-Gympie, Queensland (Australia), August 25-31, 1983. IUFRO Working Party S2.06.01], [ed. by Kile GA]. Melbourne, Australia
Pas JB van der, Hood IA, MacKenzie M, 2008. Forest Pathology in New Zealand No. 4. Armillaria root disease (second edition). Rotorua, New Zealand: Scion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute).https://cdm20044.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/p20044coll10/id/12
Pegler DN, 2000. Chapter 4. Taxonomy, nomenclature and description of Armillaria. In: Armillaria Root Rot: Biology and Control of Honey Fungus, [ed. by Fox RTV]. Andover, UK: Intercept Limited. 81-93.
Pildain, M. B., Coetzee, M. P. A., Rajchenberg, M., Petersen, R. H., Wingfield, M. J., Wingfield, B. D., 2009. Molecular phylogeny of Armillaria from the Patagonian Andes. Mycological Progress, 8(3), 181-194. http://www.springerlink.com/content/5m44t0776755g4j5/?p=3cbb8352446f4a8282bf1c1412c3babd&pi=2 doi: 10.1007/s11557-009-0590-8
Pildain, M. B., Coetzee, M. P. A., Wingfield, B. D., Wingfield, M. J., Rajchenberg, M., 2010. Taxonomy of Armillaria in the Patagonian forests of Argentina. Mycologia, 102(2), 392-403. doi: 10.3852/09-105
Power, M. W. P., Ramsfield, T. D., Hood, I. A., 2008. Detection of Armillaria basidiospore dispersal. In: New Zealand Plant Protection [The New Zealand Plant Protection Society 61st Annual Conference, Copthorne Hotel, Paihia, Bay of Islands, New Zealand, 12-14 August 2008], 61. Hastings, New Zealand: New Zealand Plant Protection Society. 35-40. http://www.nzpps.org/journal.php
Raabe RD, Connors IL, Martinez AP, Nelson SC, 2009. Checklist of plant diseases in Hawaii including records of microorganisms, principally fungi, found in the State. In: Information Text Series 022 . Honolulu, Hawaiʻi: University of Hawaiʻi, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources.313. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/12387/3/InfoTxtSer-022.pdf
Raithelhuber J, 1974. Hongos argentinos I, Buenos Aires, Argentina: Compañía Impressora Argentina.32.
Raithelhuber J, 1987. Flora mycologica Argentina. Hongos I, Stuttgart, Germany: Mycosur.140.
Raithelhuber J, 1991. Flora mycologica Argentina. Hongos III, Stuttgart, Germany: Mycosur.67.
Raithelhuber J, 1992. Agaric flora of South America 3. Metrodiana, 20(1), 41.
Raithelhuber J, 2004. Nueva flora micolόgica Argentina, Stuttgart, Germany: Mycosur.43.
Ridley GS, 1999. The Armillaria species of New Zealand. Poster. [Australasian Mycological Society Meeting], 18(2) : Australian Mycologist. https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/86d4e0_09eba89e973b46eb8c562748d470eb1a.pdf
Roth, L. F., Shaw, C. G., III, MacKenzie, M., Crockett, F., 1979. Early patterns of Armillaria root rot in New Zealand pine plantations converted from indigenous forest - an alternative interpretation. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 9(3), 316-323.
Self, N. M., Hood, I. A., Kimberley, M., Shu, Q. L., Gardner, J. F., 1998. Distribution and incidence of Armillaria root disease in Pinus radiata plantations throughout New Zealand. In: Root and butt rots of forest trees: 9th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots, Carcans-Maubuisson, (France), 1-7 September, 1997 [Root and butt rots of forest trees: 9th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots, Carcans-Maubuisson, (France), 1-7 September, 1997], [ed. by Delatour, C., Guillaumin, J. J., Lung-Escarmant, B., Marçais, B.]. Paris, France: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA). 137-147.
Shaw, C. G., III, Calderon, S., 1977. Impact of Armillaria root rot in plantations of Pinus radiata established on sites converted from indigenous forest. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 7(3), 359-373.
Shaw, C. G., III, MacKenzie, M., Toes, E. H. A., Hood, I. A., 1981. Cultural characteristics and pathogenicity to Pinus radiata of Armillaria novae-zelandiae and A. limonea. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 11(1), 65-70.
Singh S, 1978. Plantation diseases in Fiji Islands. Dehradun, India: Forest Research Institute and Colleges.99 pp.
Smith-White, J. L., Summerell, B. A., Gunn, L. V., Rinzin, C., Porter, C., Burgess, L. W., 2002. Molecular detection and differentiation of Australian Armillaria species. Australasian Plant Pathology, 31(1), 75-79. doi: 10.1071/AP01061
Stevenson G, 1964. The Agaricales of New Zealand: V Tricholomataceae. 19(1) : Kew Bulletin. 1-59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4108283
Taylor H, 1991. Laboratory studies on the interactions between Armillaria novaezelandiae and Trichoderma species. Master of Science thesis. Auckland, Australia: Botany Department, University of Auckland. https://catalogue.library.auckland.ac.nz/permalink/f/ta4ieu/uoa_alma21191812130002091
Termorshuizen AJ, 2000. Chapter 2. Ecology and epidemiology of Armillaria. In: Armillaria Root Rot: Biology and Control of Honey Fungus, [ed. by Fox RTV]. Andover, UK: Intercept Limited. 45-63.
USDA-ARS, 2019. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. In: Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory.https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysimple.aspx
Watling R , Kile GA, Burdsall HH, Jr., 1991. Armillaria Root Disease. Agriculture Handbook No. 691, [ed. by Shaw III CG, Kile GA]. Washington DC, USA: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.1-9.
Weston, G. C., 1957. Exotic forest trees in New Zealand. In: Seventh British Commonwealth Forestry Conference, Australia and New Zealand, 1957 [Seventh British Commonwealth Forestry Conference, Australia and New Zealand, 1957], xxvii + 104 pp.
White, W. B., Nitto, G. A. de, Hanson, J. B., Bellinger, M. D., Russell, T. H., Jr., 1992. Pest risk assessment [including termites and other insect pests, root disease and decay fungi] of the importation of Pinus radiata and Douglas fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii] logs from New Zealand. In: Miscellaneous Publication - USDA Forest Service , (No. 1508) . Washington, USA: USDA Forest Service.v + 235 pp.
Woodcock SD, 2016. A review of research and development undertaken on Psa. Tauranga, New Zealand: Kiwifruit Vine Health.48 pp. http://www.kvh.org.nz/vdb/document/103504
CABI, 2020. CABI Distribution Database: Status inferred from regional distribution. Wallingford, UK: CABI
Coetzee M P A, Wingfield B D, Bloomer P, Ridley G S, Wingfield M J, 2003. Molecular identification and phylogeny of Armillaria isolates from South America and Indo-Malaysia. Mycologia. 95 (2), 285-293. DOI:10.2307/3762039
Kile G A, Watling R, 1988. Identification and occurrence of Australian Armillaria species, including A. pallidula sp.nov. and comparative studies between them and non-Australian tropical and Indian Armillaria. Transactions of the British Mycological Society. 91 (2), 305-315.
Ota Y, Kim MeeSook, Neda H, Klopfenstein N B, Hasegawa E, 2011. The phylogenetic position of an Armillaria species from Amami-Oshima, a subtropical island of Japan, based on elongation factor and ITS sequences. Mycoscience. 52 (1), 53-58. DOI:10.1007/s10267-010-0066-3
Stevenson G, 1964. The Agaricales of New Zealand: V. Tricholomataceae. Kew Bulletin. 19 (1), 1-59.
ContributorsTop of page
16/10/19 Original text by:
Ian Hood, New Zealand Forest Research Institute (Scion), Rotorua, New Zealand.
Charles Shaw, Consultant, USA
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/