Invasive Species Compendium

Detailed coverage of invasive species threatening livelihoods and the environment worldwide

Datasheet

Solidago nemoralis
(grey goldenrod)

Toolbox

Datasheet

Solidago nemoralis (grey goldenrod)

Summary

  • Last modified
  • 16 November 2018
  • Datasheet Type(s)
  • Invasive Species
  • Preferred Scientific Name
  • Solidago nemoralis
  • Preferred Common Name
  • grey goldenrod
  • Taxonomic Tree
  • Domain: Eukaryota
  •   Kingdom: Plantae
  •     Phylum: Spermatophyta
  •       Subphylum: Angiospermae
  •         Class: Dicotyledonae
  • Summary of Invasiveness
  • S.nemoralis is absent in European vegetation, but considering its characteristics (high seed production, rapid seed spread and vegetative spread), which are very similar to the naturalized invasives Sol...

  • There are no pictures available for this datasheet

    If you can supply pictures for this datasheet please contact:

    Compendia
    CAB International
    Wallingford
    Oxfordshire
    OX10 8DE
    UK
    compend@cabi.org
  • Distribution map More information

Don't need the entire report?

Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.

Generate report

Identity

Top of page

Preferred Scientific Name

  • Solidago nemoralis Aiton, 1789

Preferred Common Name

  • grey goldenrod

International Common Names

  • English: gray goldenrod (USA)
  • French: verge d’or des bois

Local Common Names

  • : common gray-stemmed goldenrod; compass goldenrod; dwarf goldenrod; Dyer’s weed; field goldenrod; gray (-stemmed) goldenrod; showy goldenrod; wild quinine

EPPO code

  • SOONE (Solidago nemoralis)

Summary of Invasiveness

Top of page

S.nemoralis is absent in European vegetation, but considering its characteristics (high seed production, rapid seed spread and vegetative spread), which are very similar to the naturalized invasives Solidago canadensis and Solidago gigantea, this species can be considered as a potential invasive species (EPPO, 2009). The Plant Collections Network of Britain and Ireland developed a database on invasive and potentially invasive alien plants in European Botanic Gardens. The freely available data base comprises 32 European national lists with 622 species. According to this database S. nemoralis has not yet occurred in European botanical gardens.

In Switzerland the handling of alien plants and animals is regulated to stop the displacement of indigenous species. The Swiss list S. nemoralis as a potential invasive species (DETEC, 2009).

Taxonomic Tree

Top of page
  • Domain: Eukaryota
  •     Kingdom: Plantae
  •         Phylum: Spermatophyta
  •             Subphylum: Angiospermae
  •                 Class: Dicotyledonae
  •                     Order: Asterales
  •                         Family: Asteraceae
  •                             Genus: Solidago
  •                                 Species: Solidago nemoralis

Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature

Top of page

Solidago nemoralis was described and published in Hort. Kew. (3: 213) in 1789 by William Aiton. Two intraspecific variations were determined – Solidago nemoralis Aiton ssp. nemoralis and Solidago nemoralis ssp. decemflora (DC.) Brammall (Semple, 1985; Chmielewski and Semple, 2004).

Description

Top of page

S. nemoralis is a polycarpic hemi-cryptophyte (Walck et al., 1997a), that reproduces vegetatively from branched caudices (short, thick, vertical underground stems) (Gibson, 1961). Stems are erect from the short-branched caudex, 20-100 cm tall, are solitary to many (2-10), and densely covered by short, ascending, appressed hairs. Basal rosette and lower stem leaves are 2.0-9.5 cm long, 0.7-1.5 cm wide, spathulate-ovate to oblanceolate, acute, tapering to a long winged petiole. Leaf margins are entire or with rounded teeth. Both leaf surfaces are densely covered in minute, fine, short hairs. Upper stem leaves are reduced upwards, 1.6-4.5 cm long, 0.3-0.7 cm wide, becoming linear-oblanceolate, sessile, entire sometimes subtending axillary tufts of lateral branch leaves, with both surfaces densely covered in minute, fine, short hairs. The inflorescence is paniculiform, wand-shaped pyramidal, secund (on one side of the stem or branch, leaning to one side) to apically recurved, sometimes the lower inflorescence branches are elongated and repeating the pattern.

Peduncles are 2.0-3.5 mm long. The flowering heads are 2.6-5.8 mm high. The phyllaries (head bracts) are arranged in several unequal series, number 22-30, are ovate to linear-lanceolate, the innermost acute, the outermost obtuse. Rays number 5-11, are 2.8-5.5 mm long, 0.3-0.7 mm wide, and yellow. The ray pappus measures 1.5-3.6 mm long. Disc florets number 3-10, are 2.5-4.6 mm long, the lobes 0.4-0.6 mm long. The disc pappus measures 2.0-4.0 mm. The achenes are covered in straight, stiff, appressed hairs, those of the disc florets 0.5-2.0 mm long.
 
S. nemoralis is morphologically variable throughout its range and includes eastern S. nemoralis ssp. nemoralis and western North American S. nemoralis ssp. decemflora (DC.) Brammall races (Semple, 1985; Semple et al., 1990). The eastern race is commonly diploid, though tetraploids do occur in scattered locations. The western race is strictly tetraploid.
 
In S. nemoralis ssp. nemoralis the pappus bristles generally do not, or barely exceed the ray floret corolla tube and the base of the disc floret lobes; disc corolla lobes are 0.5-0.9(1.0) mm long; the flowering heads are mostly less than 4.2 mm high, but tetraploids do have larger flowering heads; mature achenes are usually only sparsely covered with stiff, sharp, appressed hairs; and the basal leaves are usually with rounded teeth about the margins.

In S. nemoralis spp. decemflora the pappus bristles generally do exceed the ray floret corolla tube and the base of the disc corolla lobes; disc corolla lobes are (0.6)0.8-1.5 mm long; the flowering heads are mostly greater than 4.6 mm high; mature achenes are moderately covered with stiff, sharp, appressed hairs; basal leaves are usually not with rounded teeth about the margins (Semple et al., 1990; Chmielewski and Semple, 2004). A third race, southern in distribution (var. haleana), is described as having an inflorescence branching that is more open and elm-like than considered typical. Because insect damage may alter the appearance of an inflorescence, and not all shoots of an individual plant may have the same inflorescence trait, margins Semple et al. (1990) chose to treat the third race as a form rather than a subspecies (Chmielewski and Semple, 2004).

Distribution

Top of page

S. nemoralis is native to North America (Walck et al., 1997a). It occurs from Nova Scotia in the northeast, westward to British Columbia and southward to Florida and Texas (Scoggan, 1979). S. nemoralis ssp. nemoralis occurs throughout the eastern deciduous forest region of North America (i.e. Appalachian and Atlantic-Gulf Coastal Plain Floristic Provinces (Cronquist, 1982). S. nemoralis ssp. decemflora typically occurs on the prairies (North American Prairies Floristic Province (Cronquist, 1982)) and sometimes at elevations of the Rocky Mountains from New Mexico to British Columbia (Semple et al., 1990). S. nemoralis ssp. decemflora is rare in Ontario and British Columbia and threatened in Colorado (Brunton and Semple, 1987; Chmielewski and Semple, 2004).

According to Clement and Foster (1994)S. nemoralis was recorded form Bromley (West Kent) in Great Britain (Burton, 1983).

 

Distribution Table

Top of page

The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.

Continent/Country/RegionDistributionLast ReportedOriginFirst ReportedInvasiveReferenceNotes

North America

CanadaPresentEPPO, 2014
-AlbertaPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-British ColumbiaPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-ManitobaPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-New BrunswickPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-Nova ScotiaPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-OntarioPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-Prince Edward IslandPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-QuebecPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-SaskatchewanPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
USARestricted distributionEPPO, 2014
-AlabamaPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-AlaskaPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-ArizonaPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-ArkansasPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-CaliforniaPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-ColoradoPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-ConnecticutPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-DelawarePresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-FloridaPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-GeorgiaPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-HawaiiPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-IdahoPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-IllinoisPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-IndianaPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-IowaPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-KansasPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-KentuckyPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-LouisianaPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-MainePresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-MarylandPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-MassachusettsPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-MichiganPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-MinnesotaPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-MississippiPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-MissouriPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-MontanaPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-NebraskaPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-NevadaPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-New HampshirePresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-New JerseyPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-New MexicoPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-New YorkPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-North CarolinaPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-North DakotaPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-OhioPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-OklahomaPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-OregonPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-PennsylvaniaPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-Rhode IslandPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-South CarolinaPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-South DakotaPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-TennesseePresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-TexasPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-UtahPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-VermontPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-VirginiaPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-WashingtonPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-West VirginiaPresentUSDA-NRCS, 2009; EPPO, 2014
-WisconsinPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009
-WyomingPresentNativeUSDA-NRCS, 2009

Risk of Introduction

Top of page

As it is similar to other invasive Solidago species in Europe and other parts of the world, S. nemoralis can be considered as a potential invasive species in natural and semi-natural environments. It is advertised for landscaping purposes in Europe, and hence was added to the EPPO Watch List in 2004 to 2012, after which it was transferred to the Observation List.

Habitat

Top of page

S. nemoralis typically occurs on dry, sandy, or gravelly, sterile soil (Messina, 1983; Rhoads and Klein, 1993). It has been found in one through to 60-year-old fields on the New Jersey, Piedmont (Bard, 1952; Chmielewski and Semple, 2004).

Habitat List

Top of page
CategorySub-CategoryHabitatPresenceStatus
Terrestrial
 
Terrestrial – ManagedCultivated / agricultural land Principal habitat Natural
Managed forests, plantations and orchards Secondary/tolerated habitat Natural
Managed grasslands (grazing systems) Principal habitat Natural
Disturbed areas Principal habitat Natural
Rail / roadsides Principal habitat Natural
Urban / peri-urban areas Principal habitat Natural
Buildings Principal habitat Natural
Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalNatural forests Principal habitat Harmful (pest or invasive)
Natural grasslands Principal habitat Harmful (pest or invasive)
Riverbanks Principal habitat Natural
Wetlands Principal habitat Natural
Freshwater
Lakes Present, no further details Natural
Rivers / streams Present, no further details Natural

Biology and Ecology

Top of page
Genetics
 
Chromosome numbers for S. nemoralis sensu lato include meiotic determinations of n=9 II or 18 II, mitotic determinations of 2n=18 or 36 (Beaudry and Chabot, 1959; Beaudry 1963, 1969, 1970; Jones, 1968; Mulligan and Cody, 1971; Kapoor, 1977; Morton, 1981; Semple et al., 1981, 1984, 1990; Semple, 1985; Brammal and Semple, 1990) and single hexaploids (2n=36) (Brammal and Semple, 1990; Chmielewski and Semple, 2004). Despite Fernald (1950) citing that S. nemoralis hybridizes with S. bicolor, S. juncea, and S. puberula, hybridization between S. nemoralis and any species has not been formally documented, though is likely possible with other members of the subsection Nemorales (J Semple personal communication in Chmielewski and Semple, 2004).
 
Reproductive Biology
 
S. nemoralis is essentially an obligate outbreeder, because it is largely incapable of self-pollination (Gross and Werner, 1983; Havercamp and Whitney, 1983). Achene production per plant in S. nemoralis is quite variable both between and among sites or habitats (e.g. 200 (Werner and Platt, 1976), 5153 (Havercamp and Whitney, 1983)). There was no correlation between ramet height and seed set, though inflorescence size (i.e., the volume of seeds produced) was weakly correlated with set (Gross and Werner, 1983; Chmielewski and Semple, 2004).
 
In actuality, S. nemoralis flowered in the study plot during the second year and occurred in quadrate vegetation in year 4 though it did not appear in the seed bank until year 5, and then persisted to the end of the study in year 10 (Leck and Leck, 1998). Dormancy is broken by cold stratification in late autumn/winter and by early spring the seeds are non-dormant. Those seeds that not do germinate during the first spring following dispersal may re-enter conditional dormancy in the late spring/winter period (Walck et al., 1997b). At least three consecutive days of soil moisture are necessary for S. nemoralis to germinate with any regularity (Walck et al., 1997b). S. nemoralis may reproduce vegetatively from a short-branched caudex (Havercamp and Whitney, 1983, Semple et al., 1999). Reproduction is almost entirely by seeds (Werner, 1976).
 
Physiology and Phenology
 
S. nemoralis is a short-day plant that requires vernalization for flowering to occur (Walck et al., 1999). Flowering occurs from late June to December in North America (Fernald, 1950; Semple et al., 1990, 1999; Chmielewski and Semple, 2004). Similarly, blooming occurred approximately between days 230 and 270 (essentially mid-August until the end of September) in a Wisconsin prairie site (Anderson and Schelfhout, 1980). Ramet variation in flowering phenology (duration and initiation of) was described in detail by Gross and Werner (1983). According to their studies flowering phenology was nearly synchronous with that of S. canadensis, but peak bloom occurred approximately 7-10 days later than for Euthamia graminifolia.
 
Germination typically occurs in early spring. In New Jersey, seeds germinated in April, May or September, but none germinated in mid-summer (Beimborn, 1970, 1973). Seeds that do not germinate during the first spring following dispersal (during the previous autumn) may re-enter conditional dormancy in late spring/summer, and then during the second late autumn/winter period become non-dormant (Walck et al., 1997b). Seeds of the geographically–widespread Solidago altissima and S. nemoralis and the narrow-spread endemic S. shortii were buried in pots of soil and placed in a glasshouse without temperature control. After 0.3-4.3 years of burial, some seeds (21-60%) of all three species were viable and they germinated to 75-100% during incubation in light (Walck et al., 1998).
 
Associations
 
S. nemoralis occurs in prairie-like open fields, oak savannahs, along roadsides, woods, and disturbed ground in southwestern Ontario (Semple et al., 1999). The species is also known to occupy chalk outcrops, rock outcrops, pastures, and riparian habitats (Walck et al., 1997a; Leidolf et al., 2002). Less frequently colonized habitats by S. nemoralis include shale barrens, ravines, uplands, and disturbed sites (Chmielewski and Semple, 2004).
 
Environmental Requirements
 
Little is known of the specific climatic requirements of S. nemoralis although the North American distribution of the species would suggest that is adapted to a wide range of environmental and physiographic conditions. Light tolerances range between full to light shade (Chmielewski and Semple, 2004).

In central Ontario the species was reported from dry, sparsely vegetated and barren areas that were acidic (pH 5.5) and low in calcium (500 ppm) and from prairie openings which had 0.1-0.25 m of dark-brown humus rich sand (pH of 6.6-7.4 and calcium levels from 1600-3300 ppm).

Climate

Top of page
ClimateStatusDescriptionRemark
Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all year Preferred Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all year
Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summer Preferred Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summers
Cw - Warm temperate climate with dry winter Preferred Warm temperate climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry winters)

Means of Movement and Dispersal

Top of page

Seeds are easily dispersed by wind, but during dry weather conditions only.

Impact Summary

Top of page
CategoryImpact
Cultural/amenity Negative
Economic/livelihood Negative
Environment (generally) Negative

Economic Impact

Top of page

S. nemoralis is weedy in Canada and the United States (Darbyshire et al., 2000; Chmielewski and Semple, 2004). A nuisance value (derived from sites occupied and abundance) of 125 was reported for the species from populations sampled in Ontario, Québec, and Maine (Dale et al., 1965). Various species of goldenrod, including S. nemoralis, possess similar medicinal properties when used in conjunction with appropriate antibiotics. S. nemoralis is a source of nectar for adult butterflies and honeybees (Chmielewski and Semple, 2004).

Environmental Impact

Top of page

Large-scale infested areas of S. nemoralis are a result of the inappropriate management of grasslands and old fields. S. nemoralis competes with native flora and vertebrate fauna, reducing grass and other low-growing plants. Monodominated communities cause a decrease in field diversity.

Risk and Impact Factors

Top of page Invasiveness
  • Has a broad native range
  • Abundant in its native range
  • Highly adaptable to different environments
  • Pioneering in disturbed areas
  • Highly mobile locally
  • Fast growing
  • Has high reproductive potential
  • Reproduces asexually
  • Has high genetic variability
Impact outcomes
  • Changed gene pool/ selective loss of genotypes
  • Damaged ecosystem services
  • Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
  • Host damage
  • Infrastructure damage
  • Modification of nutrient regime
  • Modification of successional patterns
  • Monoculture formation
  • Negatively impacts agriculture
  • Negatively impacts cultural/traditional practices
  • Negatively impacts forestry
  • Negatively impacts tourism
  • Reduced amenity values
  • Reduced native biodiversity
  • Soil accretion
  • Threat to/ loss of endangered species
  • Threat to/ loss of native species
  • Negatively impacts animal/plant collections
  • Damages animal/plant products
Impact mechanisms
  • Competition - monopolizing resources
  • Competition - shading
  • Competition - smothering
  • Competition - strangling
  • Competition
  • Pest and disease transmission
  • Herbivory/grazing/browsing
  • Interaction with other invasive species
  • Rapid growth
  • Rooting
Likelihood of entry/control
  • Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
  • Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant

Similarities to Other Species/Conditions

Top of page

S. nemoralis ssp. decemflora may be similar to the subspecies S. velutina ssp. californica and S. velutina ssp. sparsiflora. S. nemoralis differs form S. velutina in that S. nemoralis has short rhizomes, whereas S. velutina possesses creeping rhizomes (Chmielewski and Semple, 2004). S. nemoralis is shorter than S. canadensis, S. gigantea and S. altissima, which are generally up to 5 ft tall while S. nemoralis is usually less than 3 ft tall. S. gigantea has smooth (hairless) stems below the inflorescence. S. canadensis has hairy stems below the inflorescence but the hairs diminish and disappear further down the stem.

S. speciosa and S. nemaralis have leaves that are largest at the bottom and are progressively smaller moving up the stem. Beneath the inflorescence, S. speciosa is smooth stemmed while S. nemoralis has pubescent stems.

Prevention and Control

Top of page

Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.

Repeated mowing for at least 2 years effectively controlled S. nemoralis on Missouri pasture land. Further, the timing of mowing had little effect on the degree of control. Although annual mowing, early in the season, for two consecutive years also significantly reduced stands of S. nemoralis, this control method was not as consistently effective as was repeated mowing (Peters and Lowance, 1978). Based on field studies conducted in open (pioneered by annual species and short-lived perennials) and closed (90-100% cover of perennial pasture plants) communities in Québec, S. nemoralis demonstrated susceptibility to foliar applications of the water-soluble auxin herbicides 2,4-D, picloram, a combination of 2,4-D and picloram, and diuron (Tomkins and Grant, 1974). S. nemoralis was easily controlled in non-till plots in southern Illinois subjected to various applications of glyphosate (Kapusta and Krausz, 1993).

References

Top of page

Anderson RC; Schelfhout S, 1980. Phenological patterns among tallgrass prairie plants and their implications for pollinator competition. American Midland Naturalist, 104(2):253-263.

Bard GE, 1952. Secondary succession on the Piedmont of New Jersey. Ecological Monographs, 22(3):195-215.

Beaudry JR, 1963. Studies on Solidago L. Additional chromosome numbers of taxa of the genus Solidago. Can. J. Genet. Cytol, 5:150-174.

Beaudry JR, 1969. [English title not available]. (Études sur les Solidago L. Une triosième liste de nombres chromosomiques des taxons du genre Solidago et de certains genres voisins.) Nat. Can, 96:103-122.

Beaudry JR, 1970. [English title not available]. (Ètudes sur les Solidago L. Caryotypes additionnels de taxons du genre Solidago L.) Nat. Can, 97:431-445.

Beaudry JR; Chabot DL, 1959. Studies on Solidago IV. The chromosome numbers of certain taxa of the genus Solidago. Can. J. Bot, 37:209-288.

Beimborn WA, 1970. Establishment ecology of gray goldenrod (Solidago nemoralis Ait.). New Brunswick, NJ, USA: Rutgers University, 129 pp.

Beimborn WA, 1973. Physical factors affecting establishment of Solidago nemoralis on the New Jersey Piedmont. New Brunswick, NJ, USA: Rutgers University, 113 pp.

Brammal RA; Semple JC, 1990. The cytotaxonomy of Solidago nemoralis (Compositae: Asteraceae). Can. J. Bot, 68:2065-2069.

Brunton D; Semple JC, 1987. Solidago nemoralis ssp. decemflora. National Museums of Ontario. In: Rare vascular plants of Ontario [ed. by Argus, G. W. \White, J.]. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: National Museums of Ontario. [National Museums of Canada publication.]

Burton RM, 1983. Flora of the London area. London, UK: London Natural History Society.

Chmielewski JG; Semple JC, 2004. The biology of Canadian weeds. 130. Solidago nemoralis Ait. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 84(4):1221-1233.

Clement EJ; Foster MC, 1994. Alien plants of the British Isles. London, UK: Botanical Society of the British Isles, 603 pp.

Cronquist A, 1982. Map of the floristic provinces of North America. Brittonia, 34:144-145.

DALE HM; HARRISON PJ; THOMSON GW, 1965. Weeds as indicators of physical site characteristics in abandoned pastures. Canadian Journal of Botany, 43(11):1319-27.

Darbyshire SJ; Favreau M; Murray M, 2000. Common and scientific names of weeds in Canada. Common and scientific names of weeds in Canada. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Agriculture and AgriFood Canada, 132 pp. [Publication 1397/B.]

DETEC, 2009. New regulations for the release of organisms. New regulations for the release of organisms. Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications. http://www.uvek.admin.ch/dokumentation/00474/00492/index.html?lang=en&msg-id=21266

EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm

Fernald ML, 1950. Gray's Manual of Botany. New York, NY, USA: American Book Company, 1632 pp.

Frenald ML, 1936. Contribution from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University. CXIII VI. Studies in Solidago. Rhodora, 38:209-228.

Gibson D, 1961. Life-forms of Kentucky flowering plants. Am. Midl. Nat, 66:1-60.

Ginns JH, 1986. Compendium of plant disease and decay fungi in Canada, 1960-1980. Ottawa, Canada; Canadian Government Publishing Centre1813:416..

Gross RS; Werner PA, 1983. Relationships among flowering phenology, insect visitors, and seed-set of individuals: experimental studies on four co-occurring species of goldenrod (Solidago: Compositae). Ecological Monographs, 53(1):95-117

Havercamp J; Whitney GG, 1983. The life history characteristics of three ecologically distinct groups of forbs associated with the tallgrass prairie. Am. Midl. Nat, 109:105-119.

Jones S, 1968. Chromosome numbers in southeastern United States Compositae. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club, 95:488-489.

Kapoor BM, 1977. Further observations on the morphology of some Solidago species. Cytologia, 42:241-253.

Kapusta G; Krausz RF, 1993. Weed control and yields are equal in conventional, reduced-, and no-tillage soybean (Glycine max) after 11 years. Weed Technology, 7(2):443-451.

Leck MA; Leck CF, 1998. A ten-year seed bank study of old field succession in central New Jersey. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 125(1):11-32.

Leidolf A; McDaniel S; Nuttle T, 2002. The flora of Oktibbeha County, Mississippi. Sida, 20:691-765.

Messina FJ, 1983. Response of a goldenrod beetle to four seldom-encountered goldenrod (Solidago) species. Journal of the New York Entomological Society, 91(3):269-272.

Moran H, 1986. Benefits of host plant specificity in Uroleucon (Homoptera: Aphididae). Ecology, 67:108-115.

Moran N, 1984. Reproductive performance of a specialist herbivore, Uroleucon nigrotibium (Homoptera), on its host and on a non-host. Oikos, 42:171-175.

Moran N, 1984. The genus Uroleucon (Homoptera: Aphidiae) in Michigan: key, host records, biological notes, and descriptions of three new species. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc, 57:596-616.

Morton JK, 1981. Chromosome numbers in Compositae from Canada and the U.S.A. Bot. J. Linn. Soc, 82:357-368.

Mulligan G; Cody W, 1971. IOPB chromosome number reports XXXIII. Taxon, 20:613-614.

Peters EJ; Lowance SA, 1978. Effects of multiple mowing on western ironweed (Vernonia baldwinii) and gray goldenrod (Solidago nemoralis). Weed Science, 26(2):190-192.

Pielou EC, 1972. Niche width and niche overlap: a method for measuring them. Ecology, 53:687-692.

PlantNetwork, 2009. The Plant Collections Network of Britain & Ireland. http://www.plantnetwork.org/aliens/aliens.xls

Rhoads AF; McKinley Klein W Jr, 1993. The vascular flora of Pennsylvania: annotated checklist and atlas. Philadelphia, USA; American Philosophical Society, 636 pp.

Richards WR, 1972. Review of the Solidago-inhabiting aphids in Canada with descriptions of three new species (Homoptera: Aphididae). Can. Entomol, 104:1-34.

Ritchie ME; Tilman D, 2003. Predictions of species interactions from consumer-resource theory: experimental tests with grasshoppers and plants. Oecologia, 94:516-527.

Scoggan H, 1979. Flora of Canada. Natrl. Mus. Nat. Sci. (Ottawa) Publ. Bot, 7(4).

Semple JC, 1985. New names and combinations in Compositae, tribe Asteraceae. Phytologia, 58:429-431.

Semple JC; Brammall RA; Chmielewski J, 1981. Chromosome numbers of goldenrods, Euthamia and Solidago (Compositae-Astereae). Canadian Journal of Botany, 59(7):1167-1173.

Semple JC; Chmielewski JG; Brammall RA, 1990. A multivariate morphometric study of Solidago nemoralis (Compositae: Asteraceae) and comparison with S. californica and S. sparsiflora. Can J. Bot, 68:2070-2082.

Semple JC; Ringius GS; Leeder C; Morton G, 1984. Chromosome numbers of goldenrods, Euthamia and Solidago (Compositae:Asteraceae). Additional counts with comments on cytogeography. Brittonia, 36:280-292.

Semple JC; Ringius GS; Zhang JJ, 1999. The Gondenrods of Ontario: Solidago L. and Euthamia Nutt. University of Waterloo Biology Series, 39:1-90.

Tomkins DJ; Grant WF, 1974. Differential response of 14 weed species to seven herbicides in two plant communities. Canadian Journal of Botany, 52(3):525-533.

USDA-NRCS, 2009. The PLANTS Database. Baton Rouge, USA: National Plant Data Center. http://plants.usda.gov/

Walck JL; Baskin JM; Baskin CC, 1997. A comparative study of the seed germination biology of a narrow endemic and two geographically-widespread species of Solidago (Asteraceae). 1. Germination phenology and effect of cold stratification on germination. Seed Science Research, 7(1):47-58; 61 ref.

Walck JL; Baskin JM; Baskin CC, 1997. A comparative study of the seed germination biology of a narrow endemic and two geographically-widespread species of Solidago (Asteraceae). 1. Germination responses of burried seeds in relation to seasonal temperature cycles. Seed Sci. Res, 7:20-220.

Walck JL; Baskin JM; Baskin CC, 1998. A comparative study of the seed germination biology of a narrow endemic and two geographically-widespread species of Solidago (Asteraceae). 6. Seed bank. Seed Science Research, 8(1):65-74.

Walck JL; Baskin JM; Baskin CC, 1999. Ecology of the endangered species Solidago shortii. VII. Survivorship and flowering, and comparison with common geographically-widespread Solidago species. Torrey Bot. Soc.

Werner PA, 1976. Ecology of plant populations in successional environments. Syst. Bot, 1:246-268.

Werner PA; Platt WJ, 1976. Ecological relationships of co-occurring goldenrods (Solidago: Compositae). Am. Nat, 110:959-971.

Links to Websites

Top of page
WebsiteURLComment
Atlas of Florida Vascular Plantshttp://florida.plantatlas.usf.edu
GISD/IASPMR: Invasive Alien Species Pathway Management Resource and DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gatewayhttps://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m93f6Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list.
Invasive and Exotic Specieshttp://www.invasive.org

Organizations

Top of page

France: EPPO European and Mediterranean Organization, OEPP/EPPO, 1 rue Le Nôtre, 75016 Paris, France, http://www.eppo.org

UK: PlantNetwork The Plant Collections Network of Britain & Ireland, University Computing Service, New Museums Site, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QH, http://www.plantnetwork.org

USA: USDA United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Public Affairs Division, P.O. Box 2890, Washington, DC 20013, http://www.nrcs.usda.gov

Contributors

Top of page

21/07/09 Original text by:

István Dancza, Central Service for Plant Protection and Soil Conservation, Budaösi ut 141-145118 Budapest, Hungary

Distribution Maps

Top of page
You can pan and zoom the map
Save map