Robinia pseudoacacia (black locust)
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Plant Type
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat List
- Biology and Ecology
- Latitude/Altitude Ranges
- Air Temperature
- Rainfall Regime
- Soil Tolerances
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Impact Summary
- Environmental Impact
- Impact: Biodiversity
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Uses List
- Wood Products
- Prevention and Control
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Robinia pseudoacacia L.
Preferred Common Name
- black locust
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. amorphifolia
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. aurea
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. bullata
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. coluteoides
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. crispa
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. dissecta
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. inermis
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. linearis
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. lutea
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. microphylla
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. monophylla
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. pendula
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. piramidalis
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. rectissima
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. rozynskyana
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. semperflorens
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. stricta
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. tortuosa
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. ulriciana
- Robinia pseudoacacia var. umbraculifera
Other Scientific Names
- Robinia pringlei
International Common Names
- English: black locust tree; Chinese scholar tree; common robinia; false acacia; locust tree; robinia; ship-mast locust; yellow locust
- Spanish: acacia blanca; acacia falsa; falsa acacia; robinia
- French: acacia des jardiniers; faux-acacia; robinier; robinier faux-acacia
Local Common Names
- Brazil: acacia-salsa
- China: Chinese scolartree
- Germany: Falsche Akazie; Gemeine Robinie; Schoterndorn
- Hungary: akactermesztes
- India: kikar; robinia kikar
- Italy: acacia; cascia; falsa acacia; robinia
- Netherlands: robinia; schotdoorn
- Pakistan: kikar; robinia kikar
- Sweden: vanlig robinia
- ROBPS (Robinia pseudoacacia)
Summary of InvasivenessTop of page R. pseudoacacia is adaptable to environmental extremes such as drought, air pollutants and high light intensities (Hanover and Mebrahtu, 1991). It propagates easily by seed, coppice and root suckers and is an aggressive, thorny pioneer species. In its native range, R. pseudoacacia is a pioneer species, dominating in the early stages of a succession but then being taken over by other species as it is intolerant of shade. R. pseudoacacia has become established in the wild on a wide variety of disturbed sites such as old fields or other cleared areas and the greatest problems may be in continental Europe. It is a declared invader (category 2) in South Africa (Henderson, 2001) and is listed in the California exotic pest plant list (CE-PPC, 1999). However, respondents in a Canadian survey (White et al, 1993) felt that R. pseudoacacia was not a problem species in Canada, or regarded it as a localized, stable invasive with limited impact. It is regarded as potentially problematic in New Zealand where it has naturalized around Auckland along forest edges (Owen, 1996).
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Plantae
- Phylum: Spermatophyta
- Subphylum: Angiospermae
- Class: Dicotyledonae
- Order: Fabales
- Family: Fabaceae
- Subfamily: Faboideae
- Genus: Robinia
- Species: Robinia pseudoacacia
Notes on Taxonomy and NomenclatureTop of page The genus Robinia has recently been comprehensively investigated by Peabody (1984) and Isely and Peabody (1984), who recognized four different species of Robinia (R. pseudoacacia, R. neomexicana, R. hispida and R. viscosa), in great contrast to traditional treatments in which 20 or more species have been recognized.
Many cultivars are described: they vary in crown and stem form, growth rate, growth habit (upright vs. prostrate), leaf shape, thorniness, flowering characteristics and phenology.
The generic name Robinia is in honor of Jean Robin, herbalist of king Henry IV of France, who introduced this species in Europe sometime after 1601.
DescriptionTop of page R. pseudoacacia is a medium-sized tree, generally 12-18 m tall and 30-76 cm in stem diameter, with an open, irregular crown. On better sites it may reach 30 m tall and 122 cm or more in diameter. It is generally a crooked tree and often has a tendency to fork. The bole of open-grown trees is usually short and separates at 3 to 5 m above the ground into several stout branches, but in stands on good sites the bole is often clear and straight (Harlow et al., 1979; Harrar et al., 1962). R. pseudoacacia usually produces a shallow and wide-spreading root system that is excellent for soil binding but is also capable of producing deep roots (5-7 m deep). Radial root spread is about 1 to 1.5 times tree height (Cutler, 1978). The smooth bark becomes reddish-brown and deeply furrowed with age, becoming 4 cm thick. It has sharp spines or thorns at the nodes of young branches and twigs that cause difficulties when handling seedlings, harvesting saplings and mature trees, and when feeding animals. The leaves are alternate, deciduous, compound and imparipinnate, 20-45 cm long and consist of 7-19 small, oval, alternate leaflets, 3.8-5 cm long, 1.2-1.8 cm wide, broadest near the middle to uniformly wide, dull dark green in colour. The fragrant, whitish flowers, less than 20 mm long, are borne in lax to pendent inflorescences (racemes), with perfect flowers originating in the axils of current year leaves. The fruit is a small, flattened, oblong pod with a narrow wing along the ventral margin, containing 4-8 hard-coated seeds
Plant TypeTop of page Broadleaved
DistributionTop of page R. pseudoacacia is native to eastern North America (Westbrooks, 1998). However, the exact extent of the native range is not accurately known (Huntley, 1990), but has an eastern range centred on the Appalachian Mountains ranging from central Pennsylvania and southern Ohio, south to northeastern Alabama, northern Georgia, and northwest South Carolina. The western section of the native range includes parts of Missouri, Arkansas and Oklahoma and populations also exist in Indiana and Kentucky (Huntley, 1990)
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
|Continent/Country/Region||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||Planted||Reference||Notes|
|Bhutan||Present||Introduced||World Agroforestry Centre, 2002|
|-Jammu and Kashmir||Present||Introduced||Planted|
|Israel||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Cronk and Fuller , 1995|
|Korea, DPR||Present||Introduced||Planted||World Agroforestry Centre, 2002|
|Korea, Republic of||Present||Introduced||Planted||World Agroforestry Centre, 2002|
|Nepal||Present||Introduced||World Agroforestry Centre, 2002|
|Pakistan||Present||Introduced||Planted||Hussain , 2002|
|Turkey||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Cronk and Fuller , 1995|
|Botswana||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Buss , 2002|
|Namibia||Present||Introduced||Invasive||World Agroforestry Centre, 2002|
|South Africa||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Planted||Henderson , 2001|
|Canada||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Planted||Cronk and Fuller , 1995|
|-British Columbia||Present||Introduced||Invasive||White and et al. , 1993|
|-Nova Scotia||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Planted||White and et al. , 1993|
|-Ontario||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Planted||White and et al. , 1993|
|USA||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-Kentucky||Present||Native||Natural||Bryant et al., 1980|
|-New Hampshire||Present||Native||Planted, Natural|
|-West Virginia||Present||Native||Planted, Natural||Cronk and Fuller , 1995|
|Argentina||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Planted||Zalba , 1995|
|Belarus||Present||Introduced||World Agroforestry Centre, 2002|
|Bosnia-Hercegovina||Present||Introduced||World Agroforestry Centre, 2002|
|Croatia||Present||Introduced||Planted||World Agroforestry Centre, 2002|
|Cyprus||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Cronk and Fuller , 1995|
|Czech Republic||Present||Introduced||Planted||ILDIS, 2002|
|Czechoslovakia (former)||Present||Introduced||Planted||World Agroforestry Centre, 2002|
|France||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Cronk and Fuller , 1995|
|Germany||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Planted||Cronk and Fuller , 1995|
|Greece||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Cronk and Fuller , 1995|
|Hungary||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Cronk and Fuller , 1995; Redei, 1997|
|Latvia||Present||Introduced||World Agroforestry Centre, 2002|
|Lithuania||Present||Introduced||World Agroforestry Centre, 2002|
|Netherlands||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Cronk and Fuller , 1995|
|Poland||Present||Introduced||World Agroforestry Centre, 2002|
|Switzerland||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Cronk and Fuller , 1995|
|Ukraine||Present||Introduced||World Agroforestry Centre, 2002|
|Yugoslavia (former)||Present||Introduced||Planted||ILDIS, 2002|
|Australia||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Planted||Cronk and Fuller , 1995|
|New Zealand||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Cronk and Fuller , 1995; Owen , 1996|
History of Introduction and SpreadTop of page R. pseudoacacia has been widely introduced to other parts of North America, possibly in pre-history, thus blurring the actual limits to its native range. It is known to have been introduced to tidewater Virginia by native Americans for bow production, and then introduced widely by colonists in New England and Canada as a ship building timber and later as an ornamental species (Cronk and Fuller, 1995). It was introduced in Europe in the early 1600s and has since become widely naturalized in many countries. A very old tree in a park in central Paris, France, is considered to be the original tree introduced by Jean Robin, planted in 1604, and is still bearing fruit 400 years later (Pasiecznik N, CAB International, personal communication, 2004). Although many forest managers today consider this tree a weed species and a strong competitor against more desirable species, it has been widely planted in some central European countries where it is an important timber species. It is one of the most important stand-forming tree species in Hungary, covering approximately 20% of the forested land and providing 25% of the country's annual timber cut (Redei, 1997). R. pseudoacacia has also been introduced extensively to countries in Africa, Australasia and Asia for control of soil erosion, revegetating denuded hills, land reclamation, rehabilitation of eroded tracts in temperate and subtropical regions, windbreaks, nurse crops, honey production and as an ornamental plant.
Risk of IntroductionTop of page The popularity of R. pseudoacacia as an ornamental, forestry, shelter and land reclamation species have ensured that it has been widely introduced. At the same time, it has become naturalized or invasive across many regions, so there is a risk that it will become naturalized or invasive where conditions are suitable. Some countries where it is naturalized view it as a potential problem and are monitoring for signs of invasiveness.
HabitatTop of page The native range of range of R. pseudoacacia includes cool temperate moist forest, warm temperate montane moist forest, warm temperate montane wet forest, and warm temperate moist forest life zones (Sawyer and Lindsey, 1964). R. pseudoacacia invades disturbed woodlands and urban and rural landscapes throughout North America (Westbrooks, 1998), riparian areas and canyons in California (CE-PPC, 1999), also disturbed or cleared sites, and frequently becomes established on burned-over land (Converse, 1984). It also agressively invades dry prairies, sand prairies and savannas (Converse, 1984). In South Africa, R. pseudoacacia invades riverbanks and roadsides (Henderson, 2001). In Europe, it is commonly seen as a roadside tree, and forming thorny, stands from root suckers along roads, rivers and field margins.
Habitat ListTop of page
|Terrestrial – Managed||Managed forests, plantations and orchards||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Managed grasslands (grazing systems)||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Disturbed areas||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Rail / roadsides||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural||Natural forests||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Natural grasslands||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Riverbanks||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
Biology and EcologyTop of page Genetics
In R. pseudoacacia, natural variation in numerous traits has been observed (Surles et al., 1989) and many cultivars are described, varying in crown and stem form, growth rate, growth habit (upright vs. prostrate), leaf shape, thorniness, flowering characteristics and phenology. Most of the diversity resides within seed sources with low geographic variation. Efforts in crossbreeding to improve the tree for growth rate, resistance to boring insects, stem form, thornlessness, or other traits are reported by Hanover (1990), for the USA by Bongarten (1992), for Hungary by Keresztesi (1983) and for Korea by Hyun and Kim (1963) and Kim and Hwang (1982). Clonal selection, early pruning, and close spacing are effective means of producing straight-stemmed R. pseudoacacia in plantations, especially in eastern Europe. In Hungary, a large array of tall clones are in commercial use (Keresztesi, 1983) based on seeds from trees of 'shipmast locust' originating from Long Island, New York, USA. Despite its widespread planting, efforts to genetically improve planting stock have been limited, and the magnitude and patterning of natural variation in R. pseudoacacia has only been slightly investigated. Rehder (1940) lists more than two dozen horticultural varieties selected for flower, leaf and form characteristics, the majority of which originated in Europe. Since then, many new varieties have been registered, for example in Hungary alone, the National Agricultural Council for Variety Testing has registered 21 new cultivars (Gras, 1991).
Physiology and Phenology
R. pseudoacacia flowers at a relatively early age, often around 3 years of age. The fruit ripens during September and October, opens on the tree, and seeds are dispersed from September to April (Olson, 1974) and can persist in the soil for many years. Seed crops occur every 1-2 years, with full seed production beginning from about age 6 and continuing to age 60, is highest when trees are 15-40 years old, but fruiting has also been observed in a single tree 400 years old (Pasiecznik N, CAB International, personal communication, 2004). R. pseudoacacia flowers at a relatively early age (3 years). appear after leaf emergence in May or June and are pollinated by insects, primarily bees.R. pseudoacacia usually produces a shallow and wide-spreading root system that is excellent for soil binding but is also capable of producing deep roots (5-7 m deep) and radial root spread is about 1 to 1.5 times tree height (Cutler, 1978).
R. pseudoacacia yields 7-15 kg of seeds per 45 kg of fruit, with high number of seeds, 35,000-77,000 seeds/kg (Olson, 1974; Roach, 1965). Dry seeds can be stored and retain their viability for as long as 10 years if placed in closed containers at 0-5°C. Trees sprouts readily from both stump and roots, especially after being cut or damaged, and also graft easily. Although seedlings are produced, root suckers are most prevalent in natural reproduction. They can be propagated with difficulty from hardwood cuttings (15-30 cm long and 1-2 cm diameter) collected in winter or early spring. Propagation from root cuttings is suitable for reproduction of superior individuals or cultivars. Treatment with the rooting hormone IAA (indole acetic acid) improves rooting. In nursery culture, R. pseudoacacia is either direct seeded or root sections (5-8 cm long) are planted. Clonal propagation of mature R. pseudoacacia trees using tissue culture has been reported by Davis and Keathley (1987), and has been mass propagated by this method.
The native range of R. pseudoacacia is classified as humid, with two local areas of superhumid climate, though it has been successfully introduced into many parts of the world where the climatic conditions are quite different, and is grown in temperate and subtropical regions in Europe, New Zealand, Argentina, India, China and Korea. It has even been grown at higher, cooler altitudes in the tropics (for example, in Java). Trees tolerate temperatures from 40°C to -12°C, and it has been reported to withstand temperatures as low as -35°C without damage. Although black locust is moderately frost hardy in the southern and central plains of the USA, cold weather damage has occurred in the colder parts of its range (Roach, 1965). In Hungary (Varga, 1971) and in Italy (Grasso, 1971) frost damage is the only environmental damage reported. However, it shows resistance to extremely cold winter temperatures, and this has been linked to a seasonal increase in the fatty acid content of the bark (Smith, 1992). The preferred mean annual rainfall range is 700-2000 mm. R. pseudoacacia does not withstand drought, and is noted to only tolerate dry seasons not exceeding 4 months, and suffered 100% mortality in a field trial in semi-arid southern Spain (Hyde et al., 1990).
It is found on a variety of soils with pH ranging from 4.6 to 8.2, but grows best on moist, rich, loamy soils, those of limestone origin and soils without pronounced subsoil development (Roach, 1965). It is very sensitive to poorly drained or compact plastic soils. Excessively dry sites are also poor for the species. Trees do not tolerate water-logging. The most common orders of soil within its native range are Inceptisols, Ultisols and Alfisols, and the most common soil great groups are Hapludults, Paleudults, Dystrochrepts and Eutrochrepts (US-Geological-Survey, 1970). R. pseudoacacia has become established on a wide variety of disturbed sites such as old fields or other cleared areas. Although R. pseudoacacia has done well in mine spoil banks in central USA, it has failed consistently when planted on badly eroded, compacted, clayey soils of the southern Appalachian Region (Hepting, 1971). R. pseudoacacia can also tolerate saline and infertile soils, and is found at altitudes up to 2500 m. Simulated acid rain (pH2) caused serious damage to leaves and arrested growth of Robinia seedlings (Neufeld et al., 1985). Hanover (1989) noted that black locust was not very much affected by pollution.
It occurs on upland sites in hardwood forests with black oak, red oak, chestnut oak, pignut hickory, yellow poplar, maple, and with ash along streams. In the northern part of its range at 800 m altitude, it occurs with Picea rubra and Acer saccharum (Keresztezi, 1988b). R. pseudoacacia has root nodules associated with Rhizobium bacteria. R. pseudoacacia is fairly specific in its Rhizobium requirements. Although it will form nodules with a variety of exotic strains, for effective nitrogen-fixation, strains from native trees work best. Newly introduced trees require inoculation; inoculum may be obtained from the soil of R. pseudoacacia stands. The fine roots are also colonized by both endo- and ectomycorrhizae. These associations can be beneficial in scavenging scarce soil phosphorus, assisting in nodulation and nitrogen fixation, as well as increasing in the effective area of the mycorrhizal root system for water uptake, increasing plant drought resistance (Dawson et al., 1992).
Latitude/Altitude RangesTop of page
|Latitude North (°N)||Latitude South (°S)||Altitude Lower (m)||Altitude Upper (m)|
Air TemperatureTop of page
|Parameter||Lower limit||Upper limit|
|Absolute minimum temperature (ºC)||-12|
|Mean annual temperature (ºC)||10||18|
|Mean maximum temperature of hottest month (ºC)||25||35|
|Mean minimum temperature of coldest month (ºC)||-7||-4|
RainfallTop of page
|Parameter||Lower limit||Upper limit||Description|
|Dry season duration||2||4||number of consecutive months with <40 mm rainfall|
|Mean annual rainfall||700||2000||mm; lower/upper limits|
Rainfall RegimeTop of page Bimodal
Soil TolerancesTop of page
Special soil tolerances
Notes on Natural EnemiesTop of page The most serious pest to R. pseudoacacia is the locust borer, Megacyllene robiniae. Locust borer larvae construct feeding tunnels throughout the wood, and the holes serve as entry points for diseases that cause extensive wood decay. Attacks can begin at a young age and, in some situations, damage can be so extensive that trees are not suitable for timber purposes. Slow-growing trees on poor sites are most susceptible to borer attack. Outbreaks of the locust leafminer Odontota dorsalis occur almost yearly in the USA, and R. pseudoacacia trees throughout an entire region are often defoliated and many are killed during years of low rainfall. Another insect is the locust twig borer, Ecdytolopha insiticiana, with attacks occurring over a wide area and seedling mortality may be high in heavily infested areas. Phyllonorycter robiniellus (P. robiniella) and Parectopa robiniella were observed infesting R. pseudoacacia in Trentino, Italy (Angeli et al., 1996). The rate of larval parasitism, infection by entomogenous fungi and the efficacy of two insecticides were reported. Cydia trasias is an important insect pest in China (Chen and Qi, 1996).
Common diseases are heart rot (Phellinus rimosus or Polyporus robiniophilus) and witches' broom disease, caused by a virus, Chlorogenus robiniae. In the southern Appalachians, USA, most large trees are infected with heart rot and decay of trunk wood is extensive. In the Texas root-rot belt, R. pseudoacacia is extremely susceptible to Phymatotrichum omnivorum (Hepting, 1971). In Germany, Kehr and Butin (1996) reported local leaf diseases of R. pseudoacacia. Fusarium oxysporum and F. solani were identified as the causal agents of serious canker of R. pseudoacacia in coastal areas of Shandong, China (Hong and Ji, 1996). Aphids and Nectria canker also affect the tree (Hoffard and Anderson, 1982), with Nectria cinnabarina reported to cause high mortality and dieback of branches in New Brunswick, Canada (Sickle, 1974).
Means of Movement and DispersalTop of page Information on natural dissemination of seed is limited, but large amounts of wind-dispersed seed are produced annually and this is assumed to be the principal means of dispersal. International spread has been due to intentional introduction for perceived positive benefits.
Impact SummaryTop of page
|Fisheries / aquaculture||None|
Environmental ImpactTop of page Due to nitrogen-fixating ability, changes in nutrient cycling may occur. Sabo (2000) details increased nitrogen concentration in stream waters draining out of areas with R. pseudoacacia stands.
Impact: BiodiversityTop of page R. pseudoacacia invasion inhibits the growth of native species and plant species composition can be heavily impacted (Sabo, 2000).
Risk and Impact FactorsTop of page Invasiveness
- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Highly adaptable to different environments
- Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
- Highly mobile locally
- Has high reproductive potential
- Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
- Damaged ecosystem services
- Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
- Negatively impacts agriculture
- Negatively impacts animal health
- Reduced native biodiversity
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Produces spines, thorns or burrs
- Highly likely to be transported internationally deliberately
- Difficult/costly to control
UsesTop of page R. pseudoacacia is used by foresters of Europe, North America and Asia for the production of wood products, as a shade or nurse tree (Keresztezi, 1980) and large animal forage (Cheeke, 1992), but it is also widely planted for erosion control, amelioration of sites and reclamation of disturbed sites (Bridgen, 1992; Gupta, 1993). It is cultivated in urban areas as an ornamental tree, because of its shape and pea-like blossoms. It is also adaptable to environmental extremes such as drought, air pollution and high light intensities (Hanover, 1990). It can be incorporated into multi-layered, mixed species plantings, and is a suitable candidate for agroforestry plantations, e.g. Muthoo and Kango (1965), Chandra and Sharma (1976) and Sagwal (1995) in India. It may even prove useful for alley cropping in temperate climates. A dense growth habit makes black locust suitable for windbreaks, most commonly in China and Russia (Gras, 1991). The same considerations make this tree a valuable nurse crop for other tree species. R. pseudoacacia is capable of nitrogen fixation and is, therefore, widely planted for soil improvement.
R. pseudoacacia produces a durable, tough and high quality wood which can be used for many purposes, including posts, poles, piling, mine props, wall panelling, flooring, fence posts, vine props, furniture, fruit boxes, pulp and paper, and biomass energy. The wood is usually straight-grained and fairly coarse textured, and has a tendency to warp. Wood is naturally yellowish-green in colour. It has excellent properties for steam bending, and high pressure steaming can change the colour to golden yellow, yellowish brown, light or dark brown (Savill, 1991). Conventional use of R. pseudoacacia wood has been dictated by its ability to resist decay. The decay resistance results from its heartwood extractives, mainly flavonoids (such as robinetin) (Smith, 1992). With the exception of roundwood products, black locust has had little commercial use in the USA because large R. pseudoacacia trees are diseased and the production of high quality large diameter logs is a rarity throughout much of its native range (Stringer, 1992). However, larger logs can be used for veneers (Savill, 1991). Its high specific gravity is advantageous for its use as a fuel. The wood makes a good charcoal. and is also used in many countries in short rotation, intensive culture for wood biomass production for energy purposes. In Hungary, R. pseudoacacia is often grown for wood on small private farms (Keresztesi, 1988a, b).
R. pseudoacacia produces forage for animals such as poultry, ruminants (Cheeke, 1992), pigs and rabbits (Keresztezi, 1980), especially in those areas where alfalfa (Medicago sativa) is in short supply (Horton and Christensen, 1981). In all cases, relatively poor animal performance occurred. Leaf protein digestibility is reported to be low, leaves have a crude protein content of 24% and its proteins have low nutritive value (Verma and Mishra, 1989) because of the presence of condensed tannins (Horigome et al., 1984). The nutritive value of R. pseudoacacia leaves in growing Soviet Chinchilla rabbits was reported by Singh et al. (1997). The effect of feeding R. pseudoacacia leaves on the immune-response in broiler rabbits was studied by Tiwari et al. (1996), and showed that leaves could be used as the sole dietary ingredient in rabbit diets without adverse effects on the immune system when supplemented with concentrate mixture. The bark of black locust has been found to contain lectins, proteins that aggluminate red blood cells (Smith, 1992). Tannins and lectin proteins found in leaves and inner bark can interfere with digestion in ruminants and nonruminants (Harris et al., 1984). Tannin levels are high in young leaves but decrease as the leaves mature.
Nectar and pollen provided by R. pseudoacacia is valued as bee forage (Keresztezi, 1978) and in Europe it is widely planted for honey production. In Hungary, honey is the most important secondary product associated with R. pseudoacacia (Keresztezi, 1977) and Bencat (1986) reported high honey production derived from R. pseudoacacia flowers. The flowers have a very pleasent aroma and they are used in the perfume industry to produce eau de toilette and by herbalists as a remedy against stomach acidity. A good herbal tea with calming and antispasmodic properties can be produced using 12 g of dried or fresh flowers per cup of boiling water (Tocci, 1986).
Uses ListTop of page
Animal feed, fodder, forage
- Fodder/animal feed
- Erosion control or dune stabilization
- Shade and shelter
- Soil improvement
Human food and beverage
- Honey/honey flora
- Carved material
- Miscellaneous materials
- Poisonous to mammals
- Source of medicine/pharmaceutical
Wood ProductsTop of page
- Short-fibre pulp
- Building poles
- Pit props
Sawn or hewn building timbers
- Carpentry/joinery (exterior/interior)
- Exterior fittings
- For light construction
- Wall panelling
Wood gas (and other hydrocarbons
- Industrial and domestic woodware
- Sports equipment
- Tool handles
Prevention and ControlTop of page
No present techniques provide effective control of R. pseudoacacia, mostly due to its resprouting ability, however, Converse (1984) noted that R. pseudoacacia seedling growth and nitrogen fixation was reduced allelopathically by several herbaceous species including Solidago altissima and Andropogon virginicus. Cutting or burning usually increases sucker and sprout activity (Converse, 1984) although repeated cutting can eventually kill the tree (Weber, 2003). Seedlings and saplings may also be pulled or dug out, but the roots should be removed (Weber, 2003).
Most management has focused on the use of chemical control with variable success, since apparently killed plants can resprout several years after treatment (Converse, 1984). Glyphosate was effective in Christmas tree plantations in Maryland (Huntley, 1990). Converse (1984) describes various attempts to control R. pseudoacacia chemically using glyphosate, picloram, AMS, 2,4-D, 2,4-DP, triclopyr, and freshly cut stumps may also be treated effectively with glyphosate (Weber, 2003).
ReferencesTop of page
Allegri E, 1941. La robinia. Bologna, Italy: Edagricole.
Ayers AC; Barrett RP; Cheeke PR, 1996. Feeding value of tree leaves (hybrid poplar and black locust) evaluated with sheep, goats and rabbits. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 57(1/2):51-62; 25 ref.
Barrett RP, 1992. Forage plantation management for Black locust. In: Hanover JW, Miller K, Plesko S, eds. Proceedings, International Conference on black locust: biology, culture, & utilization. Michigan, USA: Department of Forestry, Michigan State University: 259-272.
Barrett RP; Mebrahtu T; Hanover JW, 1990. Black locust: a multi-purpose tree species for temperate climates. In: Janick J, Simon JE, eds. Advances in new crops. Proceedings of the first national symposium 'New crops: research, development, economics', Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 23-26 October 1988; 278-283; 9 ref.
Bencat T, 1992. Black locust biomass production in Slovakia. In: Hanover JW, Miller K, Plesko S, eds. Proceedings, International Conference on black locust: biology, culture, & utilization. Michigan, USA: Department of Forestry, Michigan State University: 32-38.
Bennett MD; Leitch IJ, 2003. Plant DNA C-values database, version 2.0. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens. http://www.rbgkew.org.uk/cval/homepage.html.
Bongarten BC, 1992. Genetic variation in black locust within its native range. In: Hanover JW, Miller K, Plesko S, eds. Proceedings, International Conference on black locust: biology, culture, & utilization. Michigan, USA: Department of Forestry, Michigan State University: 78-97.
Bridgen MR, 1992. Plantation silviculture of black locust. In: Hanover JW, Miller K, Plesko S, eds. Proceedings, International Conference on black locust: biology, culture, & utilization. Michigan, USA: Department of Forestry, Michigan State University: 21-32.
Bujtas Z, 1992. Seed and root propagation of black locust. In: Hanover JW, Miller K, Plesko S, eds. Proceedings, International Conference on black locust: biology, culture, & utilization. Michigan, USA: Department of Forestry, Michigan State University: 197-207.
Buresti E; Frattegiani M, 1994. First results of a mixed plantation [in Italy] with high quality timber broadleaves [Fraxinus angustifolia, Juglans nigra, Prunus avium and Quercus robur] and N-fixing trees [Robinia pseudoacacia and Elaeagnus angustifolia]. In: Pinto da Costa ME, Preuhsler T, eds. Mixed stands: research plots, measurements and results, models. Proceedings from the Symposium of the IUFRO Working Groups S4.01, April 25-29, 1994 in Lousa-Coimbra, Portugal, 219-228; 5 ref.
Buss CM, 2002. The potential threat of invasive tree species in Botswana. Department of Crop Production and Forestry, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of Botswana, 40 pp.
CE-PPC, 1999. Exotic pest plant list. USA: California Exotic Pest Plant Council. http://www.caleppc.org/info/plantlist.html.
Chandra JP; Sharma KC, 1976. Multipurpose tree species for hills- Robinia pseudoacacia. Soil Conservation Digest, 4(1):22-25.
Cheeke PR, 1992. Black locust forage as an animal foodstuff. In: Hanover JW, Miller K, Plesko S, eds. Proceedings, International Conference on black locust: biology, culture, & utilization. Michigan, USA: Department of Forestry, Michigan State University: 252-258.
Chen ErXue; Guo Heng; Liang YuTang, 1997. Study on economic evaluation of coppice forest of black locust growing on mountainous region in Central-south area, Shandong Province. Forest Research, 10(1):6-12; 10 ref.
Cronk QCB; Fuller JL, 1995. Plant invaders: the threat to natural ecosystems. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
CSIR, 1972. Robinia pseudoacacia. The wealth of India. Volume IX: Raw materials. Delhi, India: CSIR.
Dawson JO; Vogel CS; Johnsen KH, 1992. Nitrogen relations in black locust. In: Hanover JW, Miller K, Plesko S, eds. Proceedings, International Conference on black locust: biology, culture, & utilization. Michigan, USA: Department of Forestry, Michigan State University: 197-207.
Forest Research Institute; Hungary, 1996. Black locust growing in Hungary. Budapest, Hungary: Forest Research Institute.
Gras MA, 1991. Robinia pseudoacacia: Annotazioni da una rassegna bibliografica. Rome, Italy: SAF.
Gui-Fen Zhang; Xian-Zuo Meng; Yan Han; Cheng-Fa Sheng, 2000. Chinese tortrix, Cydia trasias (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae): Suppression on Street-Planting Trees by Mass Trapping with Sex Pheromone Traps. Environmental Entomology 31(4): 602-607.
Guran A, 1977. Hemagglutination and hemagglutination-inhibition studies of the Robinia pseudoacacia seeds. Planta medica, 32(2):171-176.
Hanover JW, 1990. Physiological genetics of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.): a model multipurpose tree species. In: Werner D, Muller P, eds. Proceedings of conference on fast growing trees and nitrogen fixing trees, held Marburg, Germany, 8-12 October 1989. Stuttgart, Germany; Gustav Fischer Verlag: 175-183; 12 ref.
Hanover JW; Mebrahtu T, 1991. Robinia pseudoacacia: temperate legume tree with worldwide potential. NFT Highlights, No. 91-03, 2 pp.; 10 ref. Available from: http://www.winrock.org/forestry/factpub/FACTSH/R_pseudoacacia.html.
Hanover JW; Mebrahtu T; Bloese P, 1989. Genetic improvement of black locust: a prime agroforestry species. Proceedings, first conference on agroforestry in North America, August 1989, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Forestry Chronicle, 67: 227-231.
Hanover JW; Miller K; Plesko S, 1992. Proceedings of the International Conference on Black Locust: Biology, Culture and Utilization. Michigan, USA: Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, 277 pp.
Harrar ES; Harrar JG, 1962. Guide to southern trees. New York, USA: Dover Publications.
Henderson L, 2001. Alien Weeds and Invasive Plants. Plant Protection Research Institute Handbook No. 12. Cape Town, South Africa: Paarl Printers.
Hirschfeld JR; Finn JT; Patterson WA III, 1984. Effects of Robinia pseudoacacia on leaf litter decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in a northern hardwood stand. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 14(2):201-205; 31 ref.
Hoffard WH, 1992. Insect pests of black locust. In: Hanover JW, Miller K, Plesko S, eds. Proceedings, International Conference on black locust: biology, culture, & utilization. Michigan, USA: Department of Forestry, Michigan State University: 44-49.
Hoffard WH; Anderson RL, 1982. A guide to common insects, diseases, and other problems of black locust. USDA Forestry Report, SA-FR-19.
Horton GMJ; Christensen DA, 1981. Nutritional value of black locust tree leaf meal (Robinia pseudoacacia) and alfalfa meal. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 61(2):503-506.
Huntley JC, 1990. Robinia pseudoacacia L. black locust. In: Burns, RM, Honkala BH, eds. Silvics of North America. Volume 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook, No. 654. Washington DC, USA; USDA Forest Service: 755-761.
Hussain A, 2002. Present status of invasive alien species in Pakistan. In: The Prevention and Management of Invasive Alien Species: Forging Cooperation throughout South and Southeast Asia. Proceedings of a conference in Bangkok, Thailand. GISP Global Invasive Species Programme, OEPP Ministry of Science Technology and Environment, Thailand Biodiversity Center, US Government.
Hyun SK; Kim CS, 1963. Some characteristics of autotetraploids of trees species induced by colchicine treatment. [Pap.] FAO World Consult. For. Genet., Stockholm No. FAO/FORGEN 63/-1/3, 1963. pp. iii + 16. 23 refs.
ILDIS, 2002. International Legume Database and Information Service. University of Southampton, UK. http://www.ildis.org/database/.
Keeler K, 1989. Can genetically engineered crops become weeds? Bio-Technology, 7:1134-1139.
Keresztesi B ed, 1988. The black locust. Budapest, Hungary: Akademiai Kiado.
Keresztezi B, 1977. Robinia pseudoacacia: the basis of commercial honey production in Hungary. Bee World, 58(4):144-150.
Kim BK; Moon YH; Lee SC; Lee SS; Kang HS, 1995. Evaluation of nutrient degradabilities of Robinia pseudoacacia, Pueraria thunbergiana and Lespedeza bicolor in the rumen and lower tract of dairy cows. Korean Journal of Dairy Science, 17(2):77-89; 14 ref.
Kim CS; Hwang JS, 1982. Studies on artificial polyploid forest trees XV. Seed fertilities and inner structure of seed in polyploid genus Robinia by soft X-ray photography. Journal of Gyeong Sang National University, Biology and Agriculture, 21: 111-115; 1 pl. En tab. & fig.; 9 ref.
Niklas KJ, 1997. Mechanical properties of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) wood: correlations among elastic and rupture moduli, proportional limit, and tissue density and specific gravity. Annals of Botany, 79(5):479-485; 23 ref.
Olson DF, 1974. Robinia L., locust. In: Schopmeyer CS, ed. Seeds of woody plants in the United States. USDA Agriculture Handbook, No. 450. Washington DC, USA: 728-731.
Olszewska MJ; Osiecka R, 1984. The relationship between 2 C DNA content, systematic position, and the level of nuclear DNA endoreplication during differentiation of root parenchyma in some dicotyledonous shrubs and trees. Comparison with herbaceous species. Biochemie und Physiologie der Pflanzen, 179(8):641-657; 1 pl.; 10 ref.
Owen SJ, 1996. Ecological weeds on conservation land in New Zealand: A database. Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand: DOC Science Publications. http://www.hear.org/weedlists/other_areas/nz/nzecoweeds.htm.
Papanastasia VP; Tsiouvaras CN; Dini-Papanastasi O; Vaitsis T; Stringi L; Cereti CF; Dupraz C; Armand D; Meuret M; Olea L, 1999. Selection and utilization of cultivated fodder trees and shrubs in the Mediterranean region: results and researches carried out within the CAMAR EC/DG.VI Programme, contract 8001-CT90-0030 titled "Selection and Utilization of Cultivated Fodder Trees and Shrubs in Mediterranean Extensive Livestock Production Systems". Options Mediterraneennes, Serie B, Etudes et Recherches, No. 23. Paris, France; Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Mediterraneennes (CIHEAM): ii + 93 pp.
Papanastasis VP; Platis PD; Dini-Papanastasi O, 1997. Productivity of deciduous woody and fodder species in relation to air temperature and precipitation in a Mediterranean environment. Agroforestry Systems, 37(2):187-198; 23 ref.
Paris P; Cannata F, 1992. A comparison between two treatments for stimulating germination of Robinia pseudoacacia. [Analisi comparata di due trattamenti di stimolazione della germinabilita di Robinia pseudoacacia L.] Monti e Boschi, 43(5):45-50; 23 ref.
Parker RN, 1956. A forest flora for the Punjab with Hazara and Delhi. Lahore, Pakistan: Government Printing Press.
Redei K, 1992. Management of black locust stands in Hungary. In: Hanover JW, Miller K, Plesko S, eds. Proceedings, International Conference on black locust: biology, culture, & utilization. Michigan, USA: Department of Forestry, Michigan State University: 38-43.
Roach BA, 1965. Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.). In: Fowells HA, comp. Silvics of forest trees of the United States. Washington DC, USA: USDA Agriculture Handbook, No. 271: 642-648.
Sabo AE, 2000. Robinia pseudoacacia invasions and control in North America and Europe. Restoration and Reclammation Review. http://www.hort.agri.umn.edu/h5015/00papers/sabo.htm.
Sagwal SS, 1995. Constraints of raising robinia (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) plantations. Advances in Horticulture and Forestry, 4: 213-217; 10 ref.
Sawyer JO; Lindsey AA, 1964. The Holdridge bioclimatic formations of eastern and central United States. Proceedings Indiana Academy of Science, 72:105-112.
Schutt P, 1994. Robinia pseudoacacia Linné, 1753. In: Schutt P, Schuck HJ, Aas G, Lang UM, eds. Enzyklopadie der Holzgewachse: Handbuch und Atlas der Dendrologie [Encyclopaedia of woody plants: manual and atlas of dendrology.]. Landsberg am Lech, Germany: Ecomed; 16 pp.
Schutt P; Schuck HJ; Aas G; Lang UM; eds, 1994. Encyclopaedia of woody plants: manual and atlas of dendrology. [Enzyklopädie der Holzgewächse: Handbuch und Atlas der Dendrologie]. Landsberg am Lech, Germany: Ecomed Verlagsgesellschaft.
Smith AL, 1992. Chemistry of the extractives of the black locust tree. In: Hanover JW, Miller K, Plesko S, eds. Proceedings, International Conference on black locust: biology, culture, & utilization. Michigan, USA: Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, 208-217.
Stringer JW, 1992. Wood properties of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.): physical, mechanical, and quantitative chemical variability. In: Hanover JW, Miller K, Plesko S, eds. Proceedings, International Conference on black locust: biology, culture, & utilization. Michigan, USA: Department of Forestry, Michigan State University: 197-207.
Tocci AV, 1986. I prodotti secondari del bosco in cucina. Ministero Agricoltura e Foresta, Collana Verde, 73.
Trimble GR Jr, 1975. Summaries of some silvical characteristics of several Appalachian hardwood trees. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, No. NE-16, i + 5 pp.; 22 ref.
Troup RS; Joshi HB, 1983. The Silviculture of Indian Trees. Vol IV. Leguminosae. Delhi, India; Controller of Publications.
US Department of Interior; Geological Survey, 1970. The National atlas of the United States of America. p. 97. Washington, DC.
Verani S, 1993. Prove di stagionatura e determinazioni di alcune caratteristiche meccaniche del legno di Prunus avium L., Juglans regia L., e Robinia pseudoacacia L. [Some mechanical characteristics and wood seasoning in Prunus avium, Juglans regia and Robinia pseudoacacia.]. Quaderni di Ricerca - Centro di Sperimentazione Agricola e Forestale, Istituto di Sperimentazione per la Pioppicoltura, No. 35: 5 pp. Rome, Italy; Societa Agricola e Forestale (Gruppo ENCC).
Verma KS; Mishra VK, 1989. Nutrient dynamics studies in agroforestry species of Western Himalaya: I. Macronutrient[s] in Robinia pseudoacacia and Grewia optiva.. Indian Journal of Forestry, 12(2):96-100; 7 ref.
Watt G, 1972. Dictionary of the economic products of India. Vol. I. Dehra Dun, India: Periodical Experts.
Webb DB; Wood PJ; Smith JP; Henman GS, 1984. A guide to species selection for tropical and sub-tropical plantations. Tropical Forestry Papers, No. 15. Oxford, UK: Commonwealth Forestry Institute, University of Oxford.
Westbrooks RG, 1998. Invasive plants, changing the landscape of America: Fact book. Washington DC, USA: Federal Interagency Committee for the Management of Noxious and Exotic Weeds (FICMNEW), 109 pp.
White DJ; Haber E; Keddy C, 1993. Invasive Plants of Natural Habitats in Canada: An Integrated Review of Wetland and Upland Species and Legislation Governing their Control. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada.
World Agroforestry Centre, 2002. Agroforestree Database. Nairobi, Kenya: ICRAF. http://www.worldagroforestrycentre.org/Sites/TreeDBS/AFT/AFT.htm.
Zalba SM, 1995. Alien woody plants in Ernesto Tornquist Provincial Park (Buenos Aires): impact assessment and a proposal for their control. MSc Thesis. Cordoba, Argentina: Centro de zoologia aplicada, Universidad Nacional de Cordoba.
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/