Ambrosia psilostachya (perennial ragweed)
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Plant Type
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat List
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
- Growth Stages
- Biology and Ecology
- Air Temperature
- Rainfall Regime
- Soil Tolerances
- Natural enemies
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Vectors
- Plant Trade
- Impact Summary
- Social Impact
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Ambrosia psilostachya DC.
Preferred Common Name
- perennial ragweed
Other Scientific Names
- Ambrosia californica Rydb.
- Ambrosia coronopifolia Torr. & A. Gray
- Ambrosia cumanensis auct. non Kunth
- Ambrosia glandulosa Scheele
- Ambrosia hispida Torr.
- Ambrosia lindheimeriana Scheele
- Ambrosia maritima L.
- Ambrosia psilostachya var. coronopifolia Torr. & A. Gray
- Ambrosia rugelii Rydb.
International Common Names
- English: western ragweed
- Spanish: artemisa perenne
- French: l'herbe á poux vivace
- Russian: ambrosia mnogoletnyaya
Local Common Names
- Germany: Ausdauernde Ambrosie; Stauden- Ambrosie
- Poland: ambrozji zachodnie
- USA: cuman ragweed
- AMBCU (Ambrosia cumanensis)
- AMBMA (Ambrosia maritima)
- AMBPC (Ambrosia psilostachya var. coronopifolia)
- AMBPS (Ambrosia psilostachya)
Summary of InvasivenessTop of page The further movement of A. psilostachya to new regions is possible as a seed contaminant in cereal grain. Through its spreading rootstocks, an area can be quickly colonized by one or a few original plants, despite low seed production, and control is not easy. A. psilostachya is highly competitive and will invade crops and pastures. Negative impacts include: crop losses, decrease in fodder availability, reduction in the local flora and increased human allergic reactions.
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Plantae
- Phylum: Spermatophyta
- Subphylum: Angiospermae
- Class: Dicotyledonae
- Order: Asterales
- Family: Asteraceae
- Genus: Ambrosia
- Species: Ambrosia psilostachya
Notes on Taxonomy and NomenclatureTop of page The name Ambrosia means food of the gods (Spencer, 1957). Payne (1970) has listed 11 scientific names including species, subspecies and varieties which he refers to synonymously under Ambrosia psilostachya DC. Of these, only A. coronopifolia T. & G. and A. psilostachya DC. var. coronopifolia (T. & G.) Farwell are frequently used (Bassett and Crompton, 1975). Wagner and Beals (1958) have tentatively treated A. coronopifolia T. & G. and A. psilostachya DC. as two distinct species. They found that these taxa differ from each other in habit, pubescence, distribution, and shape of fruit, pollen size, and other characters. Typical A. psilostachya apparently grows only in the southern portion of the USA while the sole perennial species in the central states is A. coronopifolia. The pollen of A. psilostachya was observed to be larger than that of A. coronopifolia. All the Canadian material examined is A. coronopifolia (A. psilostachya var. coronopifolia (T. & G.) Farw.). The morphological variability of A. psilostachya is probably related, at least in part, to the presence in this species of a polyploid series (Bassett and Crompton, 1975), and A. coronocopia is treated here as a synonym of A. psilostachya. The accepted common name is perennial ragweed.
DescriptionTop of page A psilostachya is an erect perennial broadleaved weed, spreading by seeds and rhizomes. The stems are unbranched or branched, harshly pubescent with stiff, short, minutely glandular hairs. It grows from 30 to 105 cm tall. Leaves are 5-10 cm long, opposite at the base, alternate above, hairy, pinnately to bi-pinnately lobed, thickish, light green to greyish green, subsessile or occasionally on short-winged petioles. Flower heads contain either male or female flowers and are on different parts of the same plant. Flowers are produced from summer to early autumn (July to October). Staminate (male) flowers numbering 10 to 40 per plant are yellowish-white and stalked to subsessile, arranged in spikes terminating the stems and branchlets. The involucre is hirsutulous with usually tuberculate-based hairs; corolla five-lobed (Bassett and Crompton, 1975). Male flowers produce excessive wind-dispersed pollen. Pistillate (female) heads 1-flowered, sessile, single or clustered in the upper axils. The fruits are obovate achenes, greenish-brown, grey or dark grey, 2.5-3(-6) mm long and 2-3.5 mm broad with a short blunt spine. Seeds are obovate, approximately 2-3 mm long and1.8-2.5 mm broad, smooth and shiny.
Plant TypeTop of page Broadleaved
DistributionTop of page A. psilostachya is a native of North America and originated in western USA (Rydberg, 1965; Bassett and Crompton, 1975; Lorenzi and Jeffery, 1987). In Canada, the area of greatest concentration of the perennial ragweed lies in southeastern Saskatchewan and southern Manitoba and is rare in British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario and the rest of eastern Canada (Bassett and Crompton, 1975). Outside North America the perennial ragweed has been introduced to many countries in Europe (Lawalrée, 1947), Asia (Kazakhstan) (Buyankin, 1975), Africa (Mauritius) (McIntyre, 1985) and Australia (Eardley, 1944; Auld and Medd, 1987).
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
|Continent/Country/Region||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||Reference||Notes|
|India||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-Karnataka||Present||Prasad et al., 2013|
|Kazakhstan||Restricted distribution||Introduced||Invasive||Buyankin, 1975|
|Canada||Restricted distribution||Introduced||1885||Invasive||Bassett and Terasmae, 1962; Bassett and Crompton, 1975|
|-Alberta||Restricted distribution||Introduced||Invasive||Bassett and Terasmae, 1962; Bassett and Crompton, 1975|
|-British Columbia||Restricted distribution||Introduced||1885||Invasive||Bassett and Terasmae, 1962; Bassett and Crompton, 1975|
|-Manitoba||Widespread||Introduced||Invasive||Bassett and Terasmae, 1962; Bassett and Crompton, 1975|
|-Ontario||Restricted distribution||Introduced||Invasive||Bassett and Terasmae, 1962; Bassett and Crompton, 1975|
|-Quebec||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Bassett and Terasmae, 1962; Bassett and Crompton, 1975|
|-Saskatchewan||Widespread||Introduced||Invasive||Bassett and Terasmae, 1962; Bassett and Crompton, 1975|
|USA||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936; Rydberg, 1965|
|-Arizona||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-California||Widespread||Native||Britton & Brown, 1965; Britton & Brown, Rydberg; Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Colorado||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Connecticut||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Idaho||Widespread||Native||Invasive||Britton and Brown, 1936; USDA-NRCS, 2002|
|-Illinois||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Indiana||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Iowa||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Kansas||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Maine||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Massachusetts||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Michigan||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Minnesota||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Missouri||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Montana||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Nebraska||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Nevada||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-New Hampshire||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-New Mexico||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-New York||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-North Dakota||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Oklahoma||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-South Carolina||Present||Native||USDA-NRCS, 2002|
|-South Dakota||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Texas||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Utah||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Wisconsin||Widespread||Native||Britton and Brown, 1936|
|-Wyoming||Widespread||Native||Invasive||Britton and Brown, 1936; USDA-NRCS, 2002|
|Belgium||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Lawalrée, 1947; Tutin et al., 1976|
|Hungary||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Lawalrée, 1947; Tutin et al., 1976|
|Italy||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Lawalrée, 1947; Tutin et al., 1976|
|Netherlands||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Tutin et al., 1976|
|Poland||Restricted distribution||Introduced||Invasive||Tutin et al., 1976; Karnkowski, 2001|
|Russian Federation||Restricted distribution||Introduced||Invasive||Moskalenko, 2001; EPPO, 2014|
|-Central Russia||Restricted distribution||EPPO, 2014|
|-Southern Russia||Restricted distribution||Introduced||Invasive||Moskalenko, 2001; EPPO, 2014|
|Spain||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Lawalrée, 1947; Tutin et al., 1976|
|Sweden||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Lawalrée, 1947; Tutin et al., 1976|
|Australia||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Eardley, 1944; Auld and Medd, 1987|
|-New South Wales||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Auld and Medd, 1987; Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney, 2003|
|-Queensland||Present||Introduced||Auld and Medd, 1987|
|-Victoria||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Auld and Medd, 1987; Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney, 2003|
|-Western Australia||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney, 2003|
History of Introduction and SpreadTop of page A. psilostachya was introduced into British Columbia, Canada probably as early as 1885. It then migrated from the south-west into eastern Canada (Bassett and Terasmae, 1962). The first record of A. psilostachya in Russia was from Krasnodar region, Southern Russia in 1945 (Anon., 1970) and by 1960 was found in 6 regions of Russia: Krasnodar, Stavropol, Samara, Volgograd, Bashkortostan and Kalmikiya. In 1969, A. psilostachya infested 1761 ha in Russia and was found for the first time in Orenburg region. Quarantine measures limited weed distribution, and now the area occupied by A. psilostachya is about 1160 ha (Moskalenko, 2001). In Kazakhstan, A. psilostachya was found for the first time in 1970 and by 1975 was classed as invasive (Buyankin, 1975).
Risk of IntroductionTop of page A. psilostachya was listed in the noxious weed act of Manitoba, Ontario and Saskatchewan (Bassett and Crompton, 1975), listed as a noxious weed by three states of the USA (USDA-NRCS, 2002), and is declared a class C noxious weed in the Northern Territory, Australia (Crothers, 1993). Ambrosia spp. seem to possess the highest potential phytosanitary risk in Poland (Karnkowski, 2001) and in Russia, A. psilostachya is listed as a quarantine weed. Quarantine phytosanitary measures limited weed distribution (Moskalenko, 2001), but there remains a high risk that this species will be further introduced as a seed contaminant of cereal grain.
HabitatTop of page A. psilostachya forms large populations along roadsides, railways embankments, in abandoned fields, wastelands, open prairies, orchards and in cultivated agronomic and horticultural crops. A. psilostachya will invade grassy fields (Bassett and Terasmae, 1962; Bassett and Crompton, 1975; Moskalenko, 2001) and thrives in disturbed sites (Wagner and Beales, 1958).
Habitat ListTop of page
|Terrestrial – Managed||Cultivated / agricultural land||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Managed forests, plantations and orchards||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Managed grasslands (grazing systems)||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Disturbed areas||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Rail / roadsides||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Urban / peri-urban areas||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural||Natural forests||Present, no further details|
|Natural grasslands||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Riverbanks||Present, no further details|
Hosts/Species AffectedTop of page A. psilostachya is an aggressive and competitive weed of agriculture and pastures. The plants of perennial ragweed inhibit germination and early seedling growth of different crops, notably rye, wheat, oat, tomato and alfalfa (Dalrymple and Rogers, 1983). A. psilostachya can compete with perennial grasses on artificial pastures and native ranges (Vermeire and Gillen, 2000).
Host Plants and Other Plants AffectedTop of page
Growth StagesTop of page Post-harvest, Pre-emergence, Seedling stage, Vegetative growing stage
Biology and EcologyTop of page Genetics
The chromosome number of 2n=72 for A. psilostachya was reported from Ontario, Canada and Michigan, USA (Mulligan, 1957; Wagner and Beals, 1958). However, Payne et al. (1964) reported chromosome counts for A. psilostachya of 2n=36, 54 and 72, whereas Miller et al (1968) found different populations of A. psilostachya were all diploid (n=18, 2n=36). Payne (1970) reported no correlation between ploidy levels and morphological expressions of A. psilostachya. The hybrid Ambrosia artemisiifolia x A. psilostachya (A. intergradiens Wagner) has been found in USA (Wagner and Beals, 1958). This hybrid often formed clonal populations that persisted for many years but it is not known whether viable seeds are produced in these patches. Somatic chromosome counts from three localities of this hybrid were 2n=54.
Physiology and Phenology
A. psilostachya survives and spreads primarily by spreading rootstocks. The growth of the shoots begins in May (Bassett and Crompton, 1975; Moskalenko, 2001). Vermeire and Gillen (2000) found that survival of A. psilostachya shoots from June to September was greater in mixed prairie (81%) than in tallgrass prairie (63%) and was greater in ungrazed (76%) than grazed plots (68%). A. psilostachya shoots weighed less per unit height in tallgrass prairie, and shoots in ungrazed plots were taller than shoots in grazed plots but weighed less per unit height. These differences in shoot morphology are consistent with increased competition for light in tallgrass prairie and in ungrazed sites. The frequency of A. psilostachya increased on grazed areas (Berg et al., 1997). A. psilostachya can grow from rhizomes 5 cm long. Under glasshouse conditions shoot regeneration from 2-5 cm soil depth was better than from 10-15 cm deep but plants which emerged from the deeper soil layer had the highest shoot and root fresh weights (Miziniak and Praczyk, 2002). Warming increased A. psilostachya stems by 88% when not clipped and 46% when clipped. Clipping increased ragweed stems by 75 and 36% in the control and warmed plots, respectively. Dry mass per A. psilostachya stem in the warmed plots was 38% greater than that in the control plots. Although warming caused no difference in pollen production per stem, total pollen production increased by 84% because there were more A. psilostachya stems (Wan et al., 2002). Flowering occurs in July, and mature seeds form at the end of August or early September (Bassett and Crompton, 1975; Moskalenko, 2001). Seeds contained an average of 13% crude protein and 21% fat (Peoples et al., 1994).
Through its spreading rootstocks, an area can be readily colonized by one or a few original plants despite the small seed set. The reproductive strategy appears similar in all habitats. In the first year, the individual plant does not appear to produce additional shoots from its root system. In the second year, new shoots emerge from the creeping rootstocks thus establishing a clone which can cover about 2 m² (Wagner and Beals, 1958). A. psilostachya is primarily anemophilous (wind-pollinated). It does shed large quantities of air-borne pollen that causes hay fever symptoms (Wodehouse, 1971; Bassett and Crompton, 1975). The plant produces one seed per flowering head. Wagner and Beals (1958) counted a total of 118 flowering heads on one plant from which only 66 fruits developed to maturity. Since reproduction takes place largely by vegetative means, seed production in this plant is of secondary importance to its survival and spread. Seeds have no germination at maturity and usually require winter stratification before germination. The optimal temperatures for seed germination are 18-22°C (Moskalenko, 2001). Seeds are able to germinate both in darkness and light, but light seems to promote germination. Seeds on the soil surface lose their viability after four years, but those in deeper soil layers keep their viability for longer (Beres, 2003).
Allard (1943) states that all Ambrosia spp. are most common between latitudes 45° and 30° in both the northern and southern hemispheres. A. psilostachya prefers well-drained sandy or gravely soils. In Michigan, USA the species forms large clones by proliferation from underground parts in disturbed habitats such as along roadsides and railways and especially around populated areas (Wagner and Beals, 1958). In southern Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada, A. psilostachya is often found growing in sandy alkaline regions in open habitats (Bassett and Crompton, 1975). A. psilostachya preferentially colonizes non-saline soil over saline soil and clones with the strongest preference for non-saline soil are those least able to grow when restricted to saline conditions. In clonal plant species, non-random associations of genotypes with specific environments may thus reflect habitat selection by plants as well as selective mortality imposed by different habitat patches (Murray and Mishkin, 1985). Salzman and Parker (1985) in laboratory conditions found that paired stems of A. psilostachya clones from natural saline basins survived and grew in salt water, yet dry weight gain of these plants was only 34% of that of plants grown with tap water.
This plant is a major forb species in mixed and tallgrass prairies (Vermeire and Gillen, 2000). Tallgrass prairie includes as representative species; Andropogon gerardii, Schizachyrium scoparium, Panicum virgatum, Sorghastrum nutans, Sporobolus asper, Dichanthelium [Panicum] oligosanthes, Ambrosia psilostachya and Psoralea tenuiflora (Gillen and McNew, 1987). In Texas, A. psilostachya is found in association with Croton spp., Setaria spp., Paspalum spp. and Panicum spp. (Baker and Guthery, 1990). Major species on sandhill rangeland in Oklahoma included Andropogon hallii, Schizachyrium scoparium, Sporobolus cryptandrus, Panicum virgatum, Calamovilfa gigantea, Bouteloua gracilis, Ambrosia psilostachya, Eriogonum annuum and Artemisia filifolia (Baker and Powell, 1979).
The seeds of A. psilostachya are an important food item for bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) in prairie (Vermeire and Gillen, 2000). This plant is forb of particularly high quality for deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) nutrition (Soltero-Gardea, 1991; Soltero-Gardea et al., 1994).
Air TemperatureTop of page
|Parameter||Lower limit||Upper limit|
|Absolute minimum temperature (ºC)||-42|
|Mean annual temperature (ºC)||4||12|
|Mean maximum temperature of hottest month (ºC)||15||31|
|Mean minimum temperature of coldest month (ºC)||-15||-4|
RainfallTop of page
|Parameter||Lower limit||Upper limit||Description|
|Mean annual rainfall||335||750||mm; lower/upper limits|
Rainfall RegimeTop of page Bimodal
Soil TolerancesTop of page
Special soil tolerances
Natural enemiesTop of page
Notes on Natural EnemiesTop of page Goeden and Ricker (1976) reported numerous phytophagous insects, representing 7 orders, 36 families and 113 or more species on A. psilostachya in southern California, USA. Most insects found attacking this native species were euryphagous, ectophagous, sap- and foliage-feeding species and about half reproduced on this plant. Seventeen of the 95 associates identified to species were stenophagous, and their hosts were apparently confined to the tribe Heliantheae. Thirty of these were minor or major pests of cultivars. Under laboratory conditions, nymphs of Melanoplus confusus Scud., M. bivittatus (Say), M. keeleri luridus (Dodge) developed normally on A. psilostachya (Bajoi and Knutson, 1977). The larvae of Ophraella notulata (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) were found to feed gregariously at first on A. psilostachya (Goeden and Ricker, 1985), causing 'shot-hole' damage before dispersing and skeletonizing the leaves. Under conditions which eliminate overwintering, O. notulata completed a generation each month throughout the year for 27 generations, but in the field about 3 generations a year were more likely. The last generation, developing in October-November, was the most numerous.
Means of Movement and DispersalTop of page Natural Dispersal (Non-Biotic)
A. psilostachya spreads primarily by rootstocks and secondary by seeds. Seeds of A. psilostachya are spread by wind and water from mother plants. In spring they transfer by water in ditches, canals and rivers (Moskalenko, 2001).
Vector Transmission (Biotic)
Seeds of A. psilostachya are eaten by bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) and whole plants and eaten by deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) (Soltero-Gardea, 1991; Soltero-Gardea et al., 1994; Vermeire and Gillen, 2000). It is assumed that these seeds retain viability though this is not proven.
Tillage may be the cause of movement because A. psilostachya can grow from rhizomes (Miziniak and Praczyk, 2002).
The fruits of A psilostachya were found by Russian quarantine observations on imported wheat grain from Canada (Moskalenko, 2001), and this is possibly the greatest threat for further long-distance introduction.
It is unlikely to have been intentionally introduced.
Pathway VectorsTop of page
Plant TradeTop of page
|Plant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transport||Pest stages||Borne internally||Borne externally||Visibility of pest or symptoms|
|Fruits (inc. pods)||seeds|
|Growing medium accompanying plants||roots|
|True seeds (inc. grain)||seeds|
|Plant parts not known to carry the pest in trade/transport|
|Stems (above ground)/Shoots/Trunks/Branches|
Impact SummaryTop of page
|Fisheries / aquaculture||None|
ImpactTop of page Ambrosia spp. (incl. A. psilostachya) are weeds harmful to various crops in North America (Piper, 1978), Poland (Karnkowski, 2001), Russia and in other countries (Moskalenko, 2001). They cause severe drying of plants, impoverishment of the soil and yield reduction (Karnkowski, 2001), even though A. psilostachya does not appear to reduce the growth of standing prairie grasses in its native range (Vermeire and Gillen, 2000). Potential sesquiterpenoid allelochemicals were found in A. psilostachya, which have been shown to be active as phytoalexins or allelopathic agents (Elakovich et al., 1987). Leaf and rhizome extracts of A. psilostachya inhibited germination and early seedling growth in a range of Poaceae including wheat, oats and rye, reducing germination by an average of 19.5% and shoot and root growth by an average of 56.8%. Combined effects of reduced germination and growth resulted in test plants giving only 34.8% of the production of control plants grown in distilled water (Dalrymple and Rogers, 1983).
Social ImpactTop of page A. psilostachya sheds large quantities of air-borne pollen that causes hay fever symptoms (Wodehouse, 1971; Culver et al., 1988; Karnkowski, 2001), with the allergen 'amb pV' (A1 variant) isolated from A. psilostachya pollen (Ghosh et al., 1994). However, the more localized occurrence of plants and their smaller size lessens the importance of A. psilostachya as a cause of hay fever. Global warming could aggravate allergic hazards and thereby jeopardize public health in years to come because warming resulted in a 105% increase in A. psilostachya aboveground biomass (Wan et al., 2002).
Risk and Impact FactorsTop of page Invasiveness
- Invasive in its native range
- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Highly adaptable to different environments
- Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
- Highly mobile locally
- Has high reproductive potential
- Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
- Negatively impacts agriculture
- Negatively impacts human health
- Negatively impacts tourism
- Reduced amenity values
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
- Difficult/costly to control
UsesTop of page There are no known uses for A. psilostachya. Autoclaved water extracts and methanol extracts of A. psilostachya depressed growth of bacteria (Mallik and Tesfai, 1987).
Similarities to Other Species/ConditionsTop of page A. psilostachya is very similar in appearance to Ambrosia artemisiifolia except that the former is a perennial with horizontal creeping roots whereas the latter is an annual with a tap root (Bassett and Crompton, 1975). Moreover, leaves of A. psilostachya are more greyish green and not as finely divided as A. artemisiifolia. The fruits of A. psilostachya are smaller and have only one blunt spine (Moskalenko, 2001).
Prevention and ControlTop of page
Mechanical damage of rhizome buds slightly influenced the regrowth of ragweed (Miziniak and Praczyk, 2002).
For chemical control of A. psilostachya, aerially applied 2,4-D was as effective and more consistent than fenoprop and dichlorprop, with late April and early May the optimum time for spraying (Elwell and McMurphy, 1973). Picloram, dicamba and 2,4-D provided effective control of A. psilostachya in pastures when applied for 2 successive years (Hoffman, 1972; McCarty and Scifres, 1972). Dahl et al. (1989) found that triclopyr and dicamba + 2,4-D were ineffective, but picloram + 2,4-D and dicamba gave adequate control of A. psilostachya. Picloram is recommended for control of A. psilostachya in Mauritius (McIntyre, 1985). Atrazine applied in April also reduced the density of A. psilostachya (Baker, 1979; Rice and Stritzke, 1985; 1986; 1989; Gillen et al., 1987).
Zygogramma suturalis (F.) (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) was introduced from North America for the biological control of Ambrosia spp. and released in several countries, including Russia in 1978 (Reznik et al., 1994), Yugoslavia in 1984 (Igrc, 1987), Croatia in 1985 (Igrc et al., 1995) and China in 1997 and 1998 (Wan and Wang, 1989; 1990). The larvae and adults of the Z. suturalis were able to feed and develop on A. artemisiifolia and A. psilostachya in the natural environment (Kovalev et al., 1983; Kovalev and Vecherin, 1986; Reznik and Kovalev, 1989). However, 10 years after it was introduced into Russia, Z. suturalis was only moderately successful as a biological control agent due to low population establishment (Reznik et al., 1994) and poor movement (Reznik et al., 1990). The second natural enemy of Ambrosia spp., Zigogramma disrupta (Rogers) was introduced into the former USSR from Texas, USA in 1981 for the biological control of A. artemisiifolia and A. psilostachya (Kovalev et al., 1983), with the adults and larvae feeding on the uppermost foliage of the plant (Piper, 1978). The western biotype of Tarachidia candefacta (Hb.) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) was introduced from California, USA into the former USSR in 1967 for the biological control of Ambrosia spp. (Nayanov, 1973; Gilstrap and Goeden, 1974; Kovalev, 1989) and was found to have acclimatized in Krasnodar region, Southern Russia (Shurov, 1998).
ReferencesTop of page
Allard HA, 1943. The North American ragweeds and their occurrence in other parts of the world. Science, 98:292-294.
Anon., 1970. Handbook on Quarantine and other Noxious Pests. Moscow, Russia: Kolos.
Auld B; Medd R, 1992. Weeds. An illustrated botanical guide to the weeds of Australia. Melbourne, Australia: Inkata Press.
Baker DL; Guthery FS, 1990. Effects of continuous grazing on habitat and density of ground-foraging birds in south Texas. Journal of Range Management, 43(1):2-5.
Baker RL; Powell J, 1979. Western Oklahoma sandhill prairie yield and crude protein response to atrazine, nitrogen, and 2,4-D during drought. Arid lands plant resources: proceedings of the international arid lands conference on plant resources, Texas Tech University (J. R. Goodin and D. K. Northington, editors). Texas Tech University, International Center for Arid and Semi-Arid Land Studies (ICASALS). Lubbock, Texas USA, 564-573
Bassett IJ; Terasmae J, 1962. Ragweeds, Ambrosia species, in Canada and their history in postglacial time. Canadian Journal of Botany, 40:141-150.
Beres I, 2003. Distribution, importance and biology of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.). Novenyvedelem, 39(7):293-302.
Berg WA; Bradford JA; Sims PL, 1997. Long-term soil nitrogen and vegetation change on sandhill rangeland. Journal of Range Management, 50(5):482-486.
Britton NL; Brown A, 1970. An illustrated flora of the northern United States and Canada, Vol. III, edition. New York, USA: Dover Publications, Inc.
Culver CA; Malina JJ; Talbert RL, 1988. Probable anaphylactoid reaction to a pyrethrin pediculocide shampoo. Clinical-Pharmacology, 7 (11): 846-849.
Eardley CM, 1944. Control of perennial ragweed (Ambrosia psilostachya). Journal of Department Agricultural South Australia, 47:430-434.
Elakovich SD; Fuller G; Nes WD, 1987. Sesquiterpenes as phytoalexins and allelopathic agents. Ecology and Metabolism of Plant Lipids. ACS Symposium Series No. 325, 93-108.
EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm
Ghosh B; Rafnar T; Perry MP; Bassolino-Klimas D; Metzler WJ; Klapper DG; Marsh DG, 1994. Immunologic and molecular characterization of Amb p V allergens from Ambrosia psilostachya (Western Ragweed) pollen. Journal of Immunology (Baltimore), 152(6):2882-2889; 38 ref.
Gillen RL; McNew RW, 1987. Seasonal growth rates of tallgrass prairie after clipping. Journal of Range Management, 40(4):342-345.
Goeden RD; Ricker DW, 1985. The life history of Ophraella notulata (F.) on western ragweed, Ambrosia psilostachya De Candolle, in southern California (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 61(1):32-37
Hoffman GO, 1972. Control of perennial weeds on rangelands with fall application of herbicides. Proceedings 25th Annual Meeting Southern Weed Science Society, 318-319.
Igrc J; DeLoach CG; Zlof V, 1995. Release and establishment of Zygogramma suturalis F. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Croatia for control of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.). Biological Control, 5:203-208.
Karnkowski W, 2001. Can the weeds be recognized as quarantine pests? - Polish experiences with Ambrosia spp. Zbornik predavanj in referatov 5. Slovensko Posvetovanje o Varstvu Rastlin, C^hacek~atez^hacek~ ob Savi, Slovenija, 6. marec-8. marec 2001, 396-402; 21 ref.
Kovalev OV; Reznik SYa; Cherkashin VN, 1983. Characteristics of methods of using leaf-beetles of the genus Zygogramma Chevr. (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) in the biological control of ragweeds (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L., A. psilostachya D.C.). Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 62(2):402-408
Kovalev OV; Vecherin VV, 1986. Description of a new wave process in populations, with reference to the introduction and spread of the ambrosia leaf beetle Zygogramma suturalis F. (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 65(1):21-38
Lawalrée A, 1947. Les Ambrosia adventices en Europe occidentale. Bull. Jard. Bot. Etat Bruxelles, 18:305-315.
Lorenzi HJ; Jeffery LS, 1987. Weeds of the United States and their Control. New York, USA:Van Norstrand Reinhold Co.
McCarty MK; Scifres CJ, 1972. Herbicidal control of western ragweed in Nebraska pastures. Journal of Range Management, 25(4):290-292.
Miller HE; Mabry TJ; Turner BL and Payne WW, 1968. Infraspecific variation of sequiterpene lactones in Ambrosia psilostachya (Compositae). American Journal of Botany, 55:316-324.
Moskalenko GP, 2001. Quarantine Weeds for Russia. Moscow, Russia: Plant Quarantine Inspectorate.
Mulligan GA, 1957. Chromosome numbers of Canadian weeds. Canadian Journal of Botany, 35:779-789.
Murray EA; Mishkin M, 1985. Habitat selection in a clonal plant. Science (USA), 228(4699):603-604.
Payne WW, 1970. Preliminary reports on the flora of Wisconsin. LXII. Compositae-composite family. 6. The genus Ambrosia-the ragweeds. Transact. Wisconsin Acad. Sci, 58:353-371.
Payne WW; Raven PH and Kyhos DW, 1964. Chromosome numbers in Compositae. American Journal of Botany, 51:419-424.
Peoples AD; Lochmiller RL, Leslie DM Jr. , Engle DM, 1994. Production and nutritional quality of western ragweed seed in response to fertilization. Journal of Range Management, 47(6):467-469.
Reznik SY; Belokobyl' skii SA; Lobanov AL, 1994. Weed and herbivourous insect popoulation densities at the broad spatial scale: Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and Zygogramma suturalis F. (Col., Chrysomelidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 118:1-9.
Reznik SYa; Belokobyl'skii SA; Lobanov AL, 1990. Effect of agroecosystem stability on the population density of the ambrosia leaf beetle Zygogramma suturalis (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 69(10):54-59
Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney, 2003. Australia's Virtual Herbarium. Sydney, Australia: Royal Botanic Gardens. http://plantnet.rbgsyd.gov.au/cgi-bin/avh/avh.cgi.
Rydberg PA, 1965. Flora of the prairies and plains of Central North America. New York and London: Hafner publisching Company.
Salzman AG; Parker MA, 1985. Neighbors ameliorate local salinity stress for a rhizomatous plant in a heterogeneous environment. Oecologia, 65(2):273-277.
Shurov VI, 1998. Acclimation of the American ragweed cutworm. Zashchita I Karantin Rastenii, 12:31-32.
Soltero-Gardea S, 1991. Phytomass dynamics and deer and cattle nutrition under different grazing practices in the Texas Coastal Bend. Dissertation Abstracts International. B, Sciences and Engineering, 52(5): 2379B. Abstract of Thesis. USA: Texas Tech University.
Soltero-Gardea S; Ortega IM; Bryant FC, 1994. Nutrient content of important deer forage plants in the Texas coastal bend. Texas Journal of Science, 46(2):133-142.
Spencer ER, 1957. Just Weeds. New York, USA: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Tutin TG; Heywood VH; Burges NA; Moore DM; Valentine DH; Walters SM, Webb DA (et al. editors), 1976. Flora Europaea. Volume 4. Plantaginaceae to Compositae (and Rubiaceae). Cambridge, UK: University Press, xxix + 505 + 5pp + 5 maps.
USDA-ARS, 2003. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx
USDA-NRCS, 2002. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, USA. http://plants.usda.gov.
Vermeire LT; Gillen RL, 2000. Western ragweed effects on herbaceous standing crop in Great Plains grasslands. Journal of Range Management, 53(3):335-341.
Wagner WH; Beals TF, 1958. Perennial ragweed (Ambrosia) in Michigan, with the description of a new, intermediate taxon. Rhodora, 60:177-204.
Wan FH; Wang R, 1989. Biology of Zygogramma suturalis (F.) (Col.: Chrysomelidae), an introduced biological control agent of common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 5(2):71-75
Wan FH; Wang R, 1990. A cage study on the control effects of Ambrosia artemisiifolia by the introduced biological control agent, Zygogramma suturalis (Col.: Chrysomelidae). Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 6(1):8-12
Wan SQ; Yuan T; Bowdish S; Wallace L; Russell SD; Luo YQ, 2002. Response of an allergenic species, Ambrosia psilostachya (Asteraceae), to experimental warming and clipping: implications for public health. American Journal of Botany, 89(11):1843-1846; 37 ref.
Wodenhouse RP, 1971. Hayfever Plants. Edition 2. New York, USA: Hafner Publ. Co.
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/