Invasive Species Compendium

Detailed coverage of invasive species threatening livelihoods and the environment worldwide

Datasheet

Alopecurus myosuroides
(black-grass)

Toolbox

Datasheet

Alopecurus myosuroides (black-grass)

Summary

  • Last modified
  • 06 November 2018
  • Datasheet Type(s)
  • Invasive Species
  • Pest
  • Host Plant
  • Preferred Scientific Name
  • Alopecurus myosuroides
  • Preferred Common Name
  • black-grass
  • Taxonomic Tree
  • Domain: Eukaryota
  •   Kingdom: Plantae
  •     Phylum: Spermatophyta
  •       Subphylum: Angiospermae
  •         Class: Monocotyledonae
  • Summary of Invasiveness
  • A. myosuroides is an annual grass which is native to Eurasia and grows in moist meadows, deciduous forests, and cultivated or disturbed ground. A significant weed species in temperate cereal crops, it has becom...

Don't need the entire report?

Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.

Generate report

Pictures

Top of page
PictureTitleCaptionCopyright
Inflorescence a spike-like, dense, cylindrical panicle, 4-12 cm long and 3-6 mm wide.
TitleInflorescence
CaptionInflorescence a spike-like, dense, cylindrical panicle, 4-12 cm long and 3-6 mm wide.
CopyrightDirk Aderhold
Inflorescence a spike-like, dense, cylindrical panicle, 4-12 cm long and 3-6 mm wide.
InflorescenceInflorescence a spike-like, dense, cylindrical panicle, 4-12 cm long and 3-6 mm wide.Dirk Aderhold
Leaf blade 5-15 (20) cm long, 2-8 mm wide, linear to lanceolate.
TitleLeaves and inflorescence
CaptionLeaf blade 5-15 (20) cm long, 2-8 mm wide, linear to lanceolate.
CopyrightDirk Aderhold
Leaf blade 5-15 (20) cm long, 2-8 mm wide, linear to lanceolate.
Leaves and inflorescenceLeaf blade 5-15 (20) cm long, 2-8 mm wide, linear to lanceolate.Dirk Aderhold
A. myosuroides inflorescence and leaves.
TitleInflorescence and leaves - colour illustration
CaptionA. myosuroides inflorescence and leaves.
CopyrightDirk Aderhold
A. myosuroides inflorescence and leaves.
Inflorescence and leaves - colour illustrationA. myosuroides inflorescence and leaves.Dirk Aderhold

Identity

Top of page

Preferred Scientific Name

  • Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. (1762)

Preferred Common Name

  • black-grass

Other Scientific Names

  • Alopecurus agrestis L. (1762)
  • Alopecurus coerulescens Stedu. & Hochst. ex Stedu. (1840)
  • Alopecurus myosuroides var. versicolor (Biasol.) Roshev. (1927)
  • Alopecurus purpurascens Link (1844)
  • Tozzettia agrestis (L.) Bubani (1901)

International Common Names

  • English: black twitch; black-grass; large foxtail; mousetail grass; slender foxtail
  • Spanish: alopecuro de los campos; cola de zorra
  • French: rabo-de-raposa; vulpin des champs
  • Portuguese: rabo-de-raposa

Local Common Names

  • China: kan-mai-nion
  • Czech Republic: psárka polní
  • Denmark: ager-rævehale
  • Estonia: põld-rebasesaba; roti-rebasesaba
  • Germany: Ackerfuchsschwanzgras
  • Greece: aleponoura
  • Italy: amaranto; coda di volpe comune; erba codina
  • Japan: nosuzumenoteppoh
  • Latvia: pelastišu lapsaste
  • Lithuania: pelinis pasiauselis
  • Netherlands: duist
  • Norway: akerreverumpe
  • Poland: wyczyniec polny
  • Portugal: rabo de raposa
  • Slovakia: psiarka rolná
  • Sweden: renkavle
  • Switzerland: Mäuseschwanzähnlicher fuchsschwanz
  • Taiwan: ta-suei-khan-mai-tsao
  • Turkey: tilki kuyrugu

EPPO code

  • ALOMY (Alopecurus myosuroides)

Summary of Invasiveness

Top of page

A. myosuroides is an annual grass which is native to Eurasia and grows in moist meadows, deciduous forests, and cultivated or disturbed ground. A significant weed species in temperate cereal crops, it has become one of the most damaging weeds of winter cereals in Western Europe with the changes in agricultural practice over the past 30 years from regular ploughing to reduced tillage systems, suppression of broadleaf weeds in continuous cereals, and the move away from burning of stubbles. These changes have allowed the weed to invade well-drained lighter soils in addition to the heavier clay soils on which it is dominant. It has been introduced repeatedly as a weed of cultivation into many temperate and warm temperate regions but has not spread to a large degree out of cultivation. A. myosuroides has been listed as a noxious weed in the state of Washington, one of the states where winter wheat is a major crop. Due to its propensity to evolve resistance to herbicides it is a threat to the productivity of continuous cereal growing in high-input systems of temperate areas.

Taxonomic Tree

Top of page
  • Domain: Eukaryota
  •     Kingdom: Plantae
  •         Phylum: Spermatophyta
  •             Subphylum: Angiospermae
  •                 Class: Monocotyledonae
  •                     Order: Cyperales
  •                         Family: Poaceae
  •                             Genus: Alopecurus
  •                                 Species: Alopecurus myosuroides

Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature

Top of page

The genus Alopecurus consists of 29 species and is distributed in almost all non-tropical regions and, to a certain extent, in the alpine tropics with its main distribution in southwest Asia. Dogan (1999) recognized two subspecies of A. myosuroides distinguished by the appearance of awns. The subsp. myosuroides has 8-12 mm long awns that are exerted from the glumes. This is the common form of the species that is native and widely distributed in Europe, found in Central/South Asia and has been introduced to North and South America, and Australasia. The subsp. tonsus is either awnless or has short awns that are not exerted from the glumes. Distribution of the subsp. tonsus is restricted to Greece, Cyprus and Turkey.

Description

Top of page

A. myosuroides is a tufted, slender, annual grass, 10 to 80 cm high (Naylor, 1972). The culms are often geniculate and the base of the leaf sheath is often coloured purple. The glabrous leaves are 3-17 cm long, 2-8 mm wide and linear to lanceolate in shape with a membraneous ligule up to 5 mm long. In the absence of competition, each plant may produce over 100 inflorescences, but in competitive cereal crops 3-4 per plant is more common (Moss, 1990).

The inflorescence is a spike-like, dense, cylindrical panicle, 4-12 cm long and 3-6 mm wide, often tinged brown or purple. The common name 'black-grass' derives from the dark colouration shown by ripening heads, which contrasts with the cereal crop which is still green in early July (Thurston, 1972). The spikelets are 4-7 mm long, single flowered, sub-sessile, with a disarticulation below the glumes. The glumes are united at the base, with three green nerves, narrowly winged and ciliate on keels. The lemmas equal the glumes in length, and are 4- to 5-nerved, with a 5-8 mm geniculate awn from near the base. Palea absent.

The flowers are protogynous and characteristically allogamous. Enforced self-fertilization results in a variable amount of seed set. The dispersal unit is a spikelet (commonly called 'seed') consisting of a caryopsis with the lemma and glumes attached (Naylor, 1972). Typically each inflorescence will contain about 100 spikelets (Moss, 1983).

Plant Type

Top of page Annual
Grass / sedge
Seed propagated

Distribution

Top of page

A. myosuroides is most often found in regions with oceanic to sub-oceanic climates (Holzner, 1981). A. myosuroides is a sub-cosmopolitan species that is suspected to have originated from the Mediterranean and subsequently spread throughout Europe and western Asia. It is less widespread in countries with a more continental climate (Himme and Bulcke, 1975).

This weed is mainly a problem in western Europe, where it is one of the most serious weeds of cereal-based rotations, especially in France, Germany, Belgium and England (Holm et al., 1997). In the UK it is most abundant where the mean July temperature exceeds 15°C (Thurston, 1972) and it is not usually recorded on land above 1,000 ft (Salisbury, 1961). The species is rare in Scandanavia, and is included in the Swedish Red List of endangered species (Ingelög et al., 1993). Farmers in the south of the country are concerned that this is a “new” winter annual that has become more troublesome in recent years. However, work by Milberg and Anderson (2006) has demonstrated that a northward spread is unlikely. The species is restricted by climate, producing smaller plants and few seeds in the north of the country. More generally abundance of A. myosuroides can be expected to be influenced by climate change. For example, models suggest a future of warmer, drier summers and wetter, warmer winters in eastern Scotland. This appears to indicate a climate increasingly similar to that current in eastern England where A. myosuroides is a particular problem. If this leads to an increasing trend to winter-based rotations grass weed problems such as A. myosuroides could become more significant. However the climate model, also suggests a reduction in importance in England and Scotland possibly related to the very dry summer predictions (Davies et al., 2007). Other studies have suggested that with climate change the occurrence of A. myosuroides will change at the margins of the distribution of wheat production in Europe. This could lead to a decline in southern Europe as conditions for wheat become less favourable (Knight and Wimshurst, 2005). 

Although it occurs in many other parts of the world, including North America, Asia and Australasia, it not usually considered a major weed in those areas, except locally. In the Pacific North West of the USA, the species is considered a problem in winter cereals in four counties of Oregon and Washington (Aldrich-Markham, 1992). Elsewhere it appears relatively rare in the other 20 states where it has been recorded. There are few details of the distribution of this species in Russia, eastern Europe and Central Asia beyond listings in relevant floras.

 

Distribution Table

Top of page

The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.

Continent/Country/RegionDistributionLast ReportedOriginFirst ReportedInvasiveReferenceNotes

Asia

AfghanistanPresentNative Not invasive Holm et al., 1997; GBIF, 2008
ChinaPresentHäfliger and Scholz, 1981
Georgia (Republic of)PresentNative Not invasive USDA-ARS, 2008
IndiaPresentHäfliger and Scholz, 1981
-Himachal PradeshPresentSaini and Singh, 2001
-Jammu and KashmirPresentNative Not invasive BOR, 1960
-NagalandPresentNative Not invasive BOR, 1960
IranPresentNativeMirkamali, 1993; GBIF, 2008
IraqPresentNativeHolm et al., 1997; GBIF, 2008
IsraelPresentNativeHolm et al., 1997; GBIF, 2008
JordanPresentHolm et al., 1997
KazakhstanPresentNative Not invasive Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2007
Korea, Republic ofPresentIntroduced1995Nier, 2008
KyrgyzstanPresentNative Not invasive Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2007
LebanonWidespreadIntroduced Not invasive Edgecombe, 1970
PakistanPresentCope, 1982; Rashid et al., 1988
Saudi ArabiaPresentNative Not invasive Dogan, 1999
TaiwanPresent, few occurrencesIntroduced Not invasive Huang, 2003Around Taipei
TajikistanPresentNative Not invasive Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2007
TurkeyPresentIntroducedHepworth and Tezel, 1975; GBIF, 2008
TurkmenistanPresentNative Not invasive Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2007
UzbekistanPresentNative Not invasive Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2007

Africa

AlgeriaPresentNative Not invasive USDA-ARS, 2008
Côte d'IvoirePresentGuillemin et al., 2005
EgyptPresentNative Not invasive Dogan, 1999
LibyaPresentNative Not invasive USDA-ARS, 2008
North AfricaPresentHäfliger and Scholz, 1981
TunisiaPresentNative Not invasive USDA-ARS, 2008

North America

CanadaPresentHäfliger and Scholz, 1981
-ManitobaPresentIntroduced Not invasive GBIF, 2008
MexicoPresentIntroduced Not invasive Häfliger and Scholz, 1981
USAPresentHäfliger and Scholz, 1981
-AlabamaPresentIntroduced Not invasive GBIF, 2008
-CaliforniaPresentIntroduced Invasive Calflora, 2008Reported from Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Mendocino and Los Angeles counties
-DelawarePresentIntroduced Not invasive GBIF, 2008
-IdahoPresent, few occurrencesIntroduced Invasive Lass and Prather, 2007
-KansasPresentIntroduced Not invasive GBIF, 2008
-KentuckyPresentIntroduced Not invasive GBIF, 2008
-LouisianaPresentIntroduced Not invasive GBIF, 2008
-MainePresentIntroducedGBIF, 2008
-MarylandPresentIntroduced Not invasive GBIF, 2008
-MassachusettsPresentIntroduced Not invasive GBIF, 2008
-MichiganPresentIntroduced Not invasive GBIF, 2008
-MississippiPresentIntroduced Not invasive GBIF, 2008
-New JerseyPresentIntroduced Not invasive GBIF, 2008
-New MexicoPresentIntroduced Not invasive GBIF, 2008
-North CarolinaPresentIntroduced Not invasive GBIF, 2008
-OhioPresentIntroduced Not invasive GBIF, 2008
-OregonLocalisedIntroducedAldrich-Markham, 1992In 1992 known in Yamhill County only
-PennsylvaniaPresentIntroduced Not invasive GBIF, 2008
-Rhode IslandPresentIntroducedGBIF, 2008
-South CarolinaPresentIntroduced Not invasive GBIF, 2008
-TexasPresentIntroducedGBIF, 2008
-VirginiaPresentIntroduced Not invasive DAVF, 2008Reported from Accomack, Henrico, James City, King George and Powhatan counties
-WashingtonLocalisedIntroduced Invasive Aldrich-Markham, 1992Lincoln, Spokane and Whitman counties

South America

ArgentinaPresentIntroducedHäfliger and Scholz, 1981; GBIF, 2008Rio Negro (1964), Buenos Aries, Distrito Federal
BoliviaPresentIntroduced Not invasive Häfliger and Scholz, 1981
ChilePresentIntroducedSoreng, 2003
PeruPresentHäfliger and Scholz, 1981
UruguayPresentHäfliger and Scholz, 1981; Soreng, 2003

Europe

AlbaniaPresentNative Not invasive Clarke, 1980; Flora Europaea, 2008
AustriaPresentNative Not invasive Holzner, 1981; Flora Europaea, 2008
BelgiumWidespreadNative Not invasive Hermann and Legrand, 1993; Flora Europaea, 2008
BulgariaPresentNative Not invasive Gospodinov, 1984; Flora Europaea, 2008
CroatiaPresentKostov and Pacanoski, 2006
Czech RepublicPresentFlora Europaea, 2008; Slavikova et al., 2009
Czechoslovakia (former)PresentMikulka, 1987
DenmarkPresent, few occurrencesNative Not invasive Melander, 1992; NOBANIS, 2008
EstoniaPresent, few occurrencesNative Not invasive NOBANIS, 2008Recorded since 1905
FranceWidespreadNative Not invasive Häfliger and Scholz, 1981; Flora Europaea, 2008
-CorsicaPresentNative Not invasive Clarke, 1980; Flora Europaea, 2008
GermanyPresentNative Not invasive Lechner et al., 1992; Flora Europaea, 2008
GreecePresentNative Not invasive Damanakes, 1982; Flora Europaea, 2008
-CretePresentClarke, 1980
HungaryPresentNative Not invasive Flora Europaea, 2008
ItalyPresentNative Not invasive Häfliger and Scholz, 1981; Flora Europaea, 2008Also Sicily
-SicilyPresentClarke, 1980
LatviaPresent, few occurrencesNative Not invasive NOBANIS, 2008Recorded since 1845
LithuaniaLocalisedNative Not invasive NOBANIS, 2008Recorded since 1982
MacedoniaPresentLozanovski et al., 1973
NetherlandsPresentNative Not invasive Sijtsma, 1983; Flora Europaea, 2008
NorwayPresentFykse, 1984
PolandPresentNative Not invasive Korniak and Szubstarski, 2001; Flora Europaea, 2008
PortugalPresentNative Not invasive Clarke, 1980; Flora Europaea, 2008
RomaniaPresentNative Not invasive Clarke, 1980; Flora Europaea, 2008
Russian FederationPresentNative Not invasive Häfliger and Scholz, 1981; Flora Europaea, 2008
-Central RussiaPresentNative Not invasive Flora Europaea, 2008
-Northern RussiaPresentNative Not invasive Flora Europaea, 2008
-Southern RussiaPresentNativeFlora Europaea, 2008
SerbiaPresentNative Not invasive Flora Europaea, 2008
SlovakiaPresentNative Not invasive Flora Europaea, 2008
SloveniaPresentJogan, 1990
SpainPresentNative Not invasive Martinez-Lopez and Sugranes-Alsina, 1993; Flora Europaea, 2008
SwedenPresent, few occurrencesNative Not invasive NOBANIS, 2008Recorded since 1790
SwitzerlandPresentNative Not invasive Ammon and Krebs, 1976; Flora Europaea, 2008
UKPresentNaylor, 1972; Flora Europaea, 2008
-England and WalesPresentMoss and Perryman, 2007
UkraineUSDA-ARS, 2008

Oceania

AustraliaPresentHäfliger and Scholz, 1981
-New South WalesPresentIntroduced Not invasive Weiller et al., 1995
-QueenslandPresentIntroduced Not invasive Weiller et al., 1995
-South AustraliaPresentIntroduced Not invasive Weiller et al., 1995
-TasmaniaPresentIntroduced Not invasive Weiller et al., 1995
-VictoriaPresentIntroduced Not invasive Weiller et al., 1995
-Western AustraliaPresentIntroduced Not invasive Weiller et al., 1995
New ZealandPresentIntroducedHäfliger and Scholz, 1981; GBIF, 2008Naturalised in Mid-Canterbury area

History of Introduction and Spread

Top of page

There appears to be no information in the literature on when A. myosuroides was introduced to areas beyond its native range. The species has been present in USA from at least the early part of the twentieth century. Specimens in US herbaria date from 1914 in both Oregon and New Jersey. Specimens from other states are from later collections e.g. Alabama in 1966 and North Carolina in 1968 (GBIF, 2008) but these are no more than indicative. There is no indication of the origin of such infestations.

Risk of Introduction

Top of page

There is little discussion in the literature of the risk of further spread of A. myosuroides in areas to which it has been introduced or of further introduction, with the exceptions of the states of Oregon and Washington, USA. Extension literature from the region (Aldrich-Markham, 1992) indicates that because the species has an extremely high seed production capacity there is potential for further spread in winter cereal producing areas of the Pacific North West. These authors note that A. myosuroides which is currently confined to three counties in Washington and one in Oregon, sheds seed ahead of the crop harvest and is well adapted to cereal production practices. However, Lass and Prather (2007) report A. myosuroides as recently spreading from Whitman county in Washington into hay meadows, winter crop land and along roadsides into Latah county, Idaho.

Habitat

Top of page

A. myosuroides is abundant in cereal fields in England, France, Germany and many other European countries (Holm et al., 1997). Although the species occurs in a wide range of crops, it is mainly associated with cereal dominated rotations and its presence as a weed of arable crops is closely related to the frequency of autumn-sown crops, particularly cereals, in a rotation (Himme and Bulcke, 1975). The weed is most often found on heavy soils with a high clay content and good water retention capacity (Dunker et al., 2000) although this is partly an association with the cropping systems commonly adopted on such soils rather than an adaptation to a specific soil type (Brenchley, 1913). In England it remains chiefly confined to heavy land, occurring only occasionally on sandy or gravely soil but in recent years has begun to appear on chalk soils (Bond et al., 2007). 

The species may also be found in hay meadows and spreading alongside roads as has recently been observed in Idaho (Lass and Prather, 2007). Here it is also associated with seasonally water-saturated soils of the Palouse Prairie. The prairie lands of the Palouse are less than 1% of the original size and the focus of many local conservationists.

Habitat List

Top of page
CategoryHabitatPresenceStatus
Terrestrial-managed
Cultivated / agricultural land Principal habitat
Rail / roadsides Secondary/tolerated habitat

Hosts/Species Affected

Top of page

Holm et al. (1997) report that A. myosuroides is a weed of 23 crops in 37 countries and is most important in European cereal-based rotations when they consider it to be as serious as Avena fatua (wild oat). Under these conditions the grass is a particular problem in winter wheat and barley, oil seed rape, field beans, potatoes, oats and rye.

Growth Stages

Top of page Flowering stage, Seedling stage, Vegetative growing stage

Biology and Ecology

Top of page

Genetics

Accessions of the grass that have been examined from different parts of the native range are diploid with 2n=14 chromosomes (e.g. Sieber and Murray, 1979). Morphological variability is seen even among plants present at the same site. Three plant types from a wheat field in Italy differed in panicle diameter and awn length, characters that showed high hereditability (Viggiani, 2005). Variability for other traits have been observed. Chauvel et al. (2002) demonstrated polymorphism for vernalization requirement both within and between populations. 

Recent molecular studies have concentrated on the population variability in resistance to herbicides. Work in France showed no geographical structure to black-grass populations implying that these populations, although geographically distant, are, or have until recently been, connected by gene flows (Délye et al., 2004). The authors indicated that target site-based resistance to acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase) inhibiting herbicides results from the independent selection of various resistance mechanisms in local black-grass populations undergoing contrasted herbicide and agronomical selection pressures as different ACCase resistant alleles are found at different sites. Cavan et al. (1998) using genetic fingerprinting techniques showed evidence for evolution of resistance ACCase inhibiting herbicides in a number of patches of A. myosuroides in adjacent fields, patches that had plants that were genetically disimilar. 

Reproductive Biology

A. myosuroides is an annual grass which grows up to 80 cm tall. It propagates solely by seed: 50 to 6000 seeds per plant have been recorded (Holzner, 1981). With high infestations, over 50,000 seeds/m² may be produced and these are mainly shed prior to harvest of winter wheat crops (Moss, 1983). Most seeds have only a short period of innate dormancy (Barralis, 1968). As a typical winter annual, A. myosuroides shows a germination peak in the autumn with a second, smaller peak in the following spring (Wallgren and Avholm, 1978; Melander, 1992). 

A. myosuroides is a temperate species: the optimum temperature for germination is 15-25°C, the minimum is 5°C and the maximum is 40°C (Sauerborn and Koch, 1988). Seedlings mainly emerge from seeds within the top 5 cm of soil (Naylor, 1970; Holzner, 1981) although this is affected by soil aggregate size (Cussans et al., 1996). Only a few seedlings emerge from 10 cm deep in the soil (Kazinczi and Hunyadi, 1992).

Germination is stimulated by light (Froud-Williams, 1985). Germination of A. myosuroides is not inhibited by abnormally low levels of oxygen in the soil, and may even be stimulated by them (Holzner and Namata, 1982). The seed bank in the soil shows an annual decline rate of 70-80% (Chadoeuf et al., 1984; Moss, 1985). Moss (1985) recorded seedbanks of over 50,000 seeds/m², so that even after several years without further seed return many viable seeds may remain.

Physiology and Phenology

Cool damp weather during the maturation of black-grass seed is thought to increase the dormancy level of the seed. After a cool damp summer germination may be protracted or delayed with more seedlings than is usual emerging after cereal drilling (Bond et al., 2007). In the field in UK, there are two peaks of germination, autumn and spring, but weather conditions in the autumn may delay germination until spring (Salisbury, 1961; Thurston, 1972). If conditions are favourable most seeds germinate in late October and early November (Thurston, 1964). There is then a small flush of seedlings in spring, which is increased if autumn germination has been prevented (Thurston, 1976). 

In the UK, A. myosuroides flowers from May to August, sometimes into October (Morse and Palmer, 1925; Long, 1938). It is both self-fertile and cross-pollinated. The pollen is wind borne. The flower heads appear above the cereal crop in May and June. Flowering time is strongly influenced by vernalisation (Chauvel et al., 2002). While leaf and tiller appearance rate are increased at lower nitrogen levels and higher A. myosuroides densities, seed production is not strongly influenced by increasing nitrogen fertiliser application (Chauvel et al., 2005). Indeed Naylor (1972) demonstrated the ability of the weed to use nitrogen was reduced by competition with a crop and Chauvel et al. (2001) indicated little response in the field of A. myosuroides development, growth and seed production to nitrogen fertiliser doses.

Climate

Top of page
ClimateStatusDescriptionRemark
Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all year Tolerated Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all year
Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summer Preferred Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summers

Latitude/Altitude Ranges

Top of page
Latitude North (°N)Latitude South (°S)Altitude Lower (m)Altitude Upper (m)
57 28

Air Temperature

Top of page
Parameter Lower limit Upper limit
Mean annual temperature (ºC) 10.3 14.5
Mean maximum temperature of hottest month (ºC) 17.2 28.6
Mean minimum temperature of coldest month (ºC) 0 3.8

Rainfall

Top of page
ParameterLower limitUpper limitDescription
Dry season duration36number of consecutive months with <40 mm rainfall
Mean annual rainfall370590mm; lower/upper limits

Rainfall Regime

Top of page Winter

Soil Tolerances

Top of page

Soil drainage

  • impeded
  • seasonally waterlogged

Soil reaction

  • alkaline
  • neutral

Soil texture

  • heavy
  • light
  • medium

Natural enemies

Top of page
Natural enemyTypeLife stagesSpecificityReferencesBiological control inBiological control on
Claviceps purpurea Pathogen Inflorescence not specific
Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici Pathogen Roots not specific
Metopolophium dirhodum Herbivore Inflorescence not specific
Oculimacula yallundae Pathogen Leaves not specific
Puccinia coronata Pathogen Leaves not specific
Puccinia graminis Pathogen Leaves not specific
Sitobion avenae Herbivore Inflorescence not specific

Notes on Natural Enemies

Top of page

No information has been found in the literature on the importance of natural enemies for the regulation of A. myosuroides populations. The weed is considered the most important alternate host of ergot fungus (Claviceps purpurea) in wheat in Europe (Mantle and Shaw, 1977).

Means of Movement and Dispersal

Top of page

Vector Transmission (Biotic)
A. myosuroides seed has been found in cattle droppings (Salisbury, 1961). However, seed is rarely reported to survive passage through the digestive system of birds and other animals (Thurston, 1972).

Intentional Introduction

Early records suggest that A. myosuroides was once planted as a forage grass but was refused by most cattle (Naylor, 1972). However, it is not known if the grass was taken beyond its indigenous range for use in pasture. 

Accidental Introduction

There are few reports in the literature about pathways for introduction and spread of A. myosuroides. There is evidence of contamination of crop seed. This could result in both local and long distance spread. The species sheds seed relatively early so reducing the likelihood of contamination of most cereals except winter barley (Froud-Williams, 1987). However, in a survey of weed seed contamination in cereal seed in drills ready for sowing on farm in UK in spring 1970, A. myosuroides seed was found in 3% of samples (Tonkin and Phillipson, 1973). All of these were home-saved seed. In the period 1978-1981, it was found in 16-21% of wheat and 3-14% of barley seed samples tested (Tonkin, 1982). 

Separation of A. myosuroides seed from the seed of cultivated grasses can be difficult. MacKay (1964) found A. myosuroides seed occurred in 4 to 23% of grass seed samples examined in the UK particularly meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis). Seeds of the weed have also been found in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), Italian ryegrass (Loliummultiflorum), cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata), Timothy grass (Phleum pratense), red fescue (Festuca rubra) and tall fescue (Festuca arundunacea) samples (Gooch, 1963). A. myosuroides has also occurred as a contaminant of clover seed (Bond et al., 2007). 

Although seed of the weed is usually shed ahead of cereal harvest there is clearly a possibility of longer distance transport of seed in baled straw moved by road to livestock producing areas. Spread within or between fields may occur in combine harvesters or cultivation equipment. Movement of seeds in soil is also likely to be important, both during cultivation and in soil attached to equipment or tractor tyres. The use of contractors may increase the risk of spread between farms. However on individual fields patches of the weed remain relatively stable in their positions over a long time-scale. Wilson and Brain (1991) found over a 10-year period that the grass exhibited little ability to spread to new areas but persisted in the established areas of infestation.

 

Pathway Causes

Top of page
CauseNotesLong DistanceLocalReferences
Crop production Yes Bond et al., 2007
DisturbanceFrom Washington to Idaho, USA along road verges Yes Lass and Prather, 2007
Seed tradeContamination of grass seeds. No introduction information Yes Mackay, 1964

Pathway Vectors

Top of page
VectorNotesLong DistanceLocalReferences
Land vehiclesFarm equipment, grain transport. Seed along roadsides Yes Lass and Prather, 2007
Livestock Yes Salisbury, 1961
Mail Yes
Soil, sand and gravel Yes

Plant Trade

Top of page
Plant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transportPest stagesBorne internallyBorne externallyVisibility of pest or symptoms
True seeds (inc. grain) seeds Yes Yes Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye
Plant parts not known to carry the pest in trade/transport
Bark
Bulbs/Tubers/Corms/Rhizomes
Flowers/Inflorescences/Cones/Calyx
Fruits (inc. pods)
Growing medium accompanying plants
Leaves
Roots
Seedlings/Micropropagated plants
Stems (above ground)/Shoots/Trunks/Branches
Wood

Wood Packaging

Top of page
Wood Packaging not known to carry the pest in trade/transport
Loose wood packing material
Processed or treated wood
Solid wood packing material with bark
Solid wood packing material without bark

Impact Summary

Top of page
CategoryImpact
Economic/livelihood Negative
Environment (generally) Negative

Economic Impact

Top of page

Wilson and Wright (1990) studied the growth and competitiveness of 12 annual weed species in crops of winter wheat. Species were listed in competitive order based on percentage yield loss per weed per m²: Avena fatua>Matricaria perforata>Galium aparine>Myosotis arvensis>Poa trivialis>Alopecurus myosuroides>Stellaria media>Papaver rhoeas>Lamium purpureum>Veronica persica>Veronica hederifolia>Viola arvensis. This showed that A. myosuroides is a moderately competitive weed on a per plant basis. However, very high populations of up to 1000 or more plants per m² can occur if uncontrolled, resulting in very high potential yield losses.

By the mid-1980s, A. myosuroides was already widespread in the UK infesting over 65% of fields in some regions and over 650,000 ha in the entire country (Roberts and Chancellor, 1986). Hurle (1993) ranks six grass weeds according to their importance. He considers A. myosuroides as the most important grass weed in Germany. It is highly important in winter cereals and oilseed rape, of medium importance in spring cereals and sugarbeet and of low importance in maize. Roder and Eggert (1990) measured yield losses of up to 15.6% in winter barley on a plot infested with 240 A. myosuroides plants per m².

Ingle et al. (1997) showed that the winter wheat yield loss caused by A. myosuroides varied considerably between sites. In a comparison of 11 field experiments in the UK, the weed density causing a 5% yield loss varied from 4 to 82 plants per m² with a mean of 24 plants per m². The economic threshold level for A. myosuroides in winter wheat and winter barley is 20-30 plants per m² (Zwerger, 1996). Lower longer-term thresholds (7.5 plants per m²) have been advocated as a means of preventing weed build-up (Doyle et al., 1986).

Despite the widespread use of grass herbicides, A. myosuroides is a very important weed in Europe. This is partly due to the ability of populations to increase rapidly, by over 10-fold per annum, if not effectively controlled (Moss, 1990). Grass weeds such as A. myosuroides have increased in most arable crops. The main reasons are: more autumn sown crops, especially cereals; increased use of reduced tillage systems; banning of straw burning; earlier sowing date; high nitrogen fertilizer use; and the development of herbicide-resistant populations (Hurle, 1993).

Resistance is now widespread in major winter cereal-producing areas of Europe to two main modes of action in widely used herbicides, both inhibitors of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase) inhibiting herbicides (e.g, fenoxaprop) and acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitors (i.e. sulfonylureas including iodosulfuron-methyl sodium + mesosulfuron-methyl). Herbicide resistance complicates management of the weed and increases costs. In France target site- and non-target site-based resistance to ACCase inhibitors was detected in 99.2% of 243 A. myosuroides populations collected across the country. Mutant, resistant ACC allele(s) were detected in 56.8% of the populations (Delaye et al., 2007). Acetolactate synthase (ALS) target-site resistance conferred by a Pro,97 mutation has now being identified in England and is of concern because of increasing use of sulfonylurea herbicides such as mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron in Europe. There are also an increasing number of sites with A. myosuroides populations that have multiple resistance to a number of modes of action. These include resistance to ACCase, ALS, photosystem 2 inhibitors, ureas and amide and dinitro aniline based herbicides at the same site (see Weedscience.com, 2008).

Environmental Impact

Top of page

The impact of A. myosuroides on biodiversity is rarely mentioned in the literature. Concern has been raised however over invasion of the Palouse Prairie in Idaho (Lass and Prather, 2007). The prairie lands of the Palouse are less than 1% of the original size and the focus of many local conservationists.

Risk and Impact Factors

Top of page Invasiveness
  • Proved invasive outside its native range
  • Has a broad native range
  • Abundant in its native range
  • Highly adaptable to different environments
  • Pioneering in disturbed areas
  • Benefits from human association (i.e. it is a human commensal)
  • Fast growing
  • Has high reproductive potential
  • Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
  • Has high genetic variability
Impact outcomes
  • Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
  • Negatively impacts agriculture
  • Reduced native biodiversity
Impact mechanisms
  • Competition - monopolizing resources
  • Competition - shading
  • Pest and disease transmission
Likelihood of entry/control
  • Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
  • Difficult/costly to control

Uses List

Top of page

Environmental

  • Host of pest

Detection and Inspection

Top of page

Physical observation of commodity samples would be the usual approach for detection of this species.

Similarities to Other Species/Conditions

Top of page

In comparison with A. myosuroides, the perennial Alopecurus pratensis has a broader panicle, noticeably hairier margins to the spikelets and a shorter ligule. A. pratensis occurs mainly in pasture (commonly planted in wetter areas in the north-west USA (Aldrich-Markham, 1992) and hedgerows whereas A. myosuroides is primarily a weed of arable land. Alopecurus geniculatus is a shorter plant and occurs in wet or moist places and is rarely seen in arable situations. Alopecurus aequalis, a weed of rice and cereals in lowland areas of several temperate regions, particularly China, Japan, Nepal and Philippines (Holm et al., 1997) also has dense spike-like awned panicles. This species is also known from USA. The distinguishing features are the bright orange anthers, the short awn which is almost hidden, extending 1 mm or less from the glumes and the long hairs on the glumes.

A. myosuroides often occurs in mixed populations with Apera spica-venti in central Europe, but is easily distinguished by the open panicle of the latter species.

Prevention and Control

Top of page

Prevention 

SPS measures

A. myosuroides is scheduled as a Class B noxious weed in Washington State, USA. As such, land owners are obliged to undertake control operations in defined areas of the state. 

Early warning systems

None are known for this species. 

Eradication

There are no reports of eradication attempts

Control

Cultural control and sanitary measures

The growth cycle of A. myosuroides is well adapted to autumn sown crops. Seedling emergence occurs at the same time as the crop, so the weed is not at a competitive disadvantage, and most seeds are shed prior to harvest, so are not removed with the harvested crop. Because it is competitive and populations have the ability to increase rapidly, it has to be controlled regularly. Cultural control measures can have a big impact on populations but herbicides are the main means of control (Hurle, 1993). High levels of control are needed in order to prevent populations increasing (Moss, 1990). 

Physical/mechanical control

Many non-chemical methods are available for controlling A. myosuroides, but the levels of control achieved tend to be variable and unpredictable. Non-chemical control methods are unlikely to totally replace herbicides in intensive cropping systems, but can be considered complementary and have the potential to reduce herbicide use. However these are vital to organic growers and options have recently been reviewed by Bond et al. (2007).

Crop rotation, tillage and sowing time are three elements of a production system with potential as indirect measures for the control of annual weeds (Chauvel et al., 1998).

Growing crops that are unfavourable for a particular weed will lead to lower infestation and therefore to a quick decline of the seed bank in the soil.

The presence of seeds shed in the previous crop greatly influences A. myosuroides infestation in direct drilled crops where it was calculated that 80–90% of plants were derived from these recently shed seeds. In the crop established after ploughing, the infestation was unaffected by seed production in the previous crop (Moss, 1980). This study also demonstrated that straw burning destroyed many freshly shed seeds on the soil surface and resulted in less A. myosuroides in the crop. However, the practice of burning became socially and environmentally unacceptable and is no longer used in much of Europe. Ploughing buries seeds for one season; their chances of germinating and emerging are drastically reduced until they are returned to the topsoil in the next year (Hurle, 1993). The adoption of reduced tillage is viewed as a major reason for the present problems in controlling grass weeds such as A. myosuroides (Hurle, 1993). Methods of straw disposal that involve minimal cultivations will normally result in a build up of A. myosuroides particularly on heavy soils (Turley et al., 1996). Rotational ploughing, one year in three, will help to keep the grass in check but if an infestation is allowed to reach an excessive level, annual ploughing may be required for several years running.

The trend to early sowing of winter wheat, commonly now in late-September/mid-October in Europe, leads to severe infestations. This is both because the crop becomes established during peak emergence of A. myosuroides, and because the weed has time to become fully tillered before winter (MAFF, 1975). Sowing cereals before 25 October has been shown to increase A. myosuroides infestations, sowing after 5 November has led to a decrease (Bond et al., 2007). However, although emerged seedlings can be destroyed by seedbed preparation techniques linked to delayed sawing there may be may be a substantial loss in yield if winter wheat is drilled after mid-November.

In winter wheat the choice of cultivar and sowing rate can have a marked effect on A. myosuroides panicle numbers (Blake, 2006). Cultivars that tiller well and achieve an early ground cover reduce A. myosuroides head numbers the most and the effect is greater at high seed rates.

In summary, for A. myosuroides, Hurle (1993) states that “crop rotations with a high proportion of spring crops and ploughing as the tillage system are not likely to run into serious problems with this grass weed”. However, spring crops are often less profitable than autumn-sown crops and many farmers throughout Europe are seeking to replace ploughing with reduce tillage systems in order to reduce costs. Thus the threat from A. myosuroides is tending to increase rather than decrease. 

Mowing frequency can be adjusted to suppress the weed in non-crop areas. Mowing is being used successfully on road verges in Idaho (Lass and Prather, 2007). 

Movement control

No measures to control movement of the species are reported. 

Biological control

No biological control agents have been developed for use against this species. 

Chemical control

Many products have been introduced over the past 40 years that when first used provided effective control of A. myosuroides The most often-used herbicides are the substituted ureas, aryloxyphenoxypropionates, cyclohexanediones, dinitroanilines and sulfonyl-ureas (Schmidt, 1997).

Chlorotoluron and isoproturon are substituted ureas which show activity against other grass and broad-leaved weeds and are mainly soil acting herbicides. Their broad spectrum of activity has led to an intensive use of these herbicides, mainly as autumn treatments of winter cereals (Hance and Holly, 1990). Resistance to this class of chemistry has evolved at a number of sites (e.g. Hall et al., 1995). Isoproturon will not be registered for use after 2008 in Europe due to environmental concerns. However, Laux et al. (2006) consider that chlorotoluron will still have an important role to play in A. myosuroides management in Germany. Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl and clodinafop-propargyl are two aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides widely used in wheat crops, and fluazifop-P-butyl and propaquizafop are members of the same herbicide class used in broad-leaved crops such as oil-seed rape. Resistance to this class of herbicides in A. myosuroides in Europe is now common (Delye et al., 2007).

The cyclohexanedione herbicide tralkoxydim is used in cereals and cycloxydim and sethoxydim in broadleaved break crops. The dinitroaniline herbicides trifluralin and pendimethalin have often been used in mixtures with other herbicides for control of A. myosuroides. However trifluralin is due to be withdrawn from the market in Europe in 2009, due to health and environmental concerns. Flupyrsulfuron is a recently introduced sulfonyl-urea herbicide for use in wheat.

Other herbicides, such as tri-allate, imazamethabenz-methyl and terbutryn are used in cereals and propyzamide and metazachlor in broad-leaved break crops.

Repeated use of herbicides led to the development of herbicide resistance in England and Germany in the early 1980s. Resistant populations now occur in nine European countries. One UK case study estimated that the cost of herbicide resistant A. myosuroides in winter wheat is $300/ha while the cost of preventing resistance is $146/ha (Orson, 1999).

Use of the cell division inhibitor flufenacet has increased in popularity as an autumn applied pre-emergence treatment for A. myosuroides. No resistance had been reported by June 2008. Due to relayed emergence of the weed it is common to follow flufenccet with post-emergence mesosulfuron methyl + iodosulfuron methyl applied in the spring. However there are increasing concerns of resistance developing to the ALS inhibitor (Weedscience.com, 2008). 

Resistance is best prevented by integrating cultural and chemical methods in order to reduce the reliance on herbicides (Moss and Clarke, 1994; Chauvel et al., 2001).

Monitoring and Surveillance

 A system of digital image analysis has been developed that can identify seeds of A. myosuroides in cereal samples (Sokefeld et al., 1999). This can be used to analyse the purity of crop seed or grain samples.

References

Top of page

Aldrich-Markham S, 1992. Pacific Northwest Extension Publication 377. Corvallis, Oregon: Oregon State University.

Ammon HU; Krebs H, 1976. Choice of date and necessity for grass control. Mitteilungen fnr die Schweizerische Landwirtschaft, 24(1):34-37

Barralis G, 1968. Ecology of black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds). Proceedings of the 9th British Weed Control Conference, 6-8.

Blake A, 2006. Weeds are a consideration. Farmers Weekly, 145(14)(6 October), 57.

Bond W; Davies G; Turner R, 2007. The biology and non-chemical control of black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds). HDRA Fact sheet. http://www.gardenorganic.org.uk/organicweeds

BOR NL, 1960. Grasses of Burma, Ceylon, India and Pakistan. Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford & London, xviii + 767 pp.

Brenchley WE, 1913. The weeds of arable land in relation to the soils on which they grow. III (Norfolk). Annals Botany, 27:141-166.

Calflora, 2008. Calflora: Information on California plants for education, research and conservation. The Calflora Database. http://www.calflora.org/

Cavan G; Biss P; Moss SR, 1998. Localized origins of herbicide resistance in Alopecurus myosuroides. Weed Research (Oxford), 38(3):239-245.

Chadoeuf R; Barralis G; Lonchamp JP, 1984. Evolution of the seed potential of annual weeds in cultivated soil. Comptes rendus du 7eme colloque international sur l'ecologie, la biologie et la systematique des mauvaises herbes Paris, France: COLUMA/EWRS, 63-70

Chauvel B; Guillemin JP; Colbach N; Gasquez J, 2001. Evaluation of cropping systems for management of herbicide-resistant populations of blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.). Crop Protection, 20(2):127-137.

Chauvel B; Guillemin JP; Letouze A, 2005. Effect of intra-specific competition on development and growth of Alopecurus myosuroides Hudson. European Journal of Agronomy, 22(3):301-308.

Chauvel B; Munier-Jolain N; Colbach N; Maillet J, 1998. Modelisation des effets des systemes de culture sur l'evolution demographique des populations de mauvaises herbes. Comptes-rendus 6eme symposium Mediterraneen EWRS, Montpellier, France, 251-258.

Chauvel B; Munier-Jolain NM; Grandgirard D; Gueritaine G, 2002. Effect of vernalization on development and growth within black-grass population (Alopecurus myosuroides Hudson). Weed Research, 42(2):166-175.

Clarke GCS, 1980. Alopecurus L. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA, eds. Flora Europaea, Vol 5. Alismataceae to Orchidaceae (Monocotyledones). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 241-243.

Cocker KM; Moss SR; Coleman JOD, 1999. Multiple mechanisms of resistance to fenoxaprop-P-ethyl in United Kingdom and other European populations of herbicide-resistant Alopecurus myosuroides (Black-Grass). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 65(3):169-180; 24 ref.

Cope T, 1982. Poaceae. Flora Of Pakistan., 461-462.

Cussans GW; Raudonius S; Brain P; Cumberworth S, 1996. Effects of depth of seed burial and soil aggregate size on seedling emergence of Alopecurus myosuroides, Galium aparine, Stellaria media and wheat. Weed Research (Oxford), 36(2):133-141; 9 ref.

Damanakes ME, 1982. Survey of grass weeds in wheat fields in central Greece. Zizaniologia, 1(1):23-27

DAVF, 2008. Digital Atlas of the Virginia Flora. USA: Department of Biology, Virginia Tech. http://www.biol.vt.edu/digital_atlas

Davies K; Evans Oxlwy AS, 2007. Technical Note TN 605. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Agricultural Colleges.

Délye C; Menchari Y; Guillemin JP; Matéjicek A; Michel S; Camilleri C; Chauvel B, 2007. Status of black grass (Alopecurus myosuroides) resistance to acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors in France. Weed Research (Oxford), 47(2):95-105. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2007.00544.x

Délye C; Straub C; Matéjicek A; Michel S, 2004. Multiple origins for black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds) target-site-based resistance to herbicides inhibiting acetyl-CoA carboxylase. Pest Management Science, 60(1):35-41.

Dogan M, 1999. A concise taxonomic revision of the genus Alopecurus L. (Gramineae). Turkish Journal of Botany, 23(4):245-262.

Doyle CJ; Cousens R; Moss SR, 1986. A model of the economics of controlling Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. in winter wheat. Crop Protection, 5(2):143-150

Dunker M; Nordmeyer H; Haas HU; Hurle K, 2000. Ursachen einer kleinraumigen Verteilung von Unkrautarten auf Ackerflachen - Feld- und Gewachshausuntersuchungen zum Einfluss von Bodeneigenschaften. Zeitschrift-fnr-Pflanzenkrankheiten-und-Pflanzenschutz. Sonderh., 17:55-62.

Edgecombe WS, 1970. Weeds of Lebanon, 3rd Edition. Beirut, Lebanon: American University of Beirut, 42.

Elliott JG; Church BM; Harvey JJ; Holroyd J; Hulls RH; Waterson HA, 1979. Survey of the presence and methods of control of wild oat, black grass and couch grass in cereal crops in the United Kingdom during 1977. Journal of Agricultural Science, UK, 92(3):616-634

Flora Europaea, 2008. Alopecurus myosuroides (Huds). Scotland: Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. http://www.rbg-web2.rbge.uk/FE/fe

Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2007. Flora of China Web. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Herbaria. http://flora.huh.harvard.edu/china/

Froud-Williams RJ, 1985. Dormancy and germination of arable grass-weeds. Aspects of Applied Biology, 9:9-18.

Froud-Williams RJ, 1987. Survival and fate of weed seed population - interaction with cultural practice. In: Proceedings British Crop Protection Conference - Weeds, Brighton, UK, 707-718.

Fykse H, 1984. General characteristics of grass weeds. Annual and biennial species. Nordisk Jordbrugsforskning, 66(2):168

GBIF, 2008. Global Biodiversity Information System website. http://www.gbif.org

Gooch SMS, 1963. The occurrence of weed seeds in samples tested by the Official Seed Testing Station [Cambridge], 1960-1. 1. Grass seed of United Kingdom origin. 2. Grass seed of Scandinavian origin. 3. Clover seed. 4. Cereal seed. 5. Fodder, root and vegetable seeds. Journal. National Institute of Agricultural Botany, 9(3):353-71.

Gospodinov G, 1984. Biological characteristics of Alopecurus myosuroides Hudson in conditions of intensive grain production. Rasteniev''dni Nauki, 21(1):74-81

Guillemin JP; Chauvel B; Delattre M; Dessaint F; Délye C; Matéjicek A; Bissot R; Klein JN; Lagaudrière D; Radix A; Waeckel L, 2005. Blackgrass in wheat: a map of herbicide resistance. (Resistance du vulpin aux herbicides.) Phytoma, No.589:20-23.

Hall LM; Moss SR; Powles SB, 1995. Mechanism of resistance to chlorotoluron in two biotypes of the grass weed Alopecurus myosuroides. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 53(3):180-192.

Hallgren E, 1991. New herbicides for control of annual grass weeds (and dicot weeds) in cereals. Swedish Crop Protection Conference. Weeds and weed control Uppsala, Sweden; Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences), No. 32:173-189

Hance RJ; Holly K, 1990. Weed Control Handbook: Principles. 8th edition. Issued by BCPC. Oxford, London, Edinburgh, Boston, Melbourne: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

Heap IM, 1999. International survey of herbicide-resistant weeds: lessons and limitations. 1999 Brighton crop protection conference: weeds. Proceedings of an international conference, Brighton, UK, 15-18 November 1999., Volume 3:769-776; 7 ref.

Hepworth HM; Tezel C, 1975. Weed control on the high plateau of Turkey. Proceedings of the Third Regional Wheat Workshop, Tunis, Tunisia, 1975, 186-197.

Hermann O; Legrand G, 1993. Grasses: identification and control. Betteravier (Bruxelles), 27(284):11-13.

Himme M van; Bulcke R, 1975. The distribution, spread and importance of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. in Europe. Symposium on Status, Biology and Control of Grassweeds in Europe, organised by E.W.R.S. and COLUMA, Paris, 1975., Vol. 2:23-54

Holm L; Doll J; Holm E; Pancho J; Herberger J, 1997. World Weeds. Natural Histories and Distribution. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Holzner W, 1981. AckerunkrSuter: Bestimmung, Verbreitung, Biologie und +kologie. Graz, Stuttgart: Leopold Stocker Verlag, 175.

Holzner W; Namuta M, 1982. Biology and Ecology of Weeds. The Hague, Netherlands: Dr W Junk Publishers.

HSfliger E; Scholz H, 1981. Grass Weeds 2. Weeds of the subfamilies Chloridoideae, Pooideae, Oryzoideae. Basel, Switzerland: Documenta CIBA GEIGY.

Huang T, 2003. Flora of Taiwan [ed. by Huang T]. Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan University, 345.

Hurle K, 1993. Integrated management of grass weeds in arable crops. Brighton Crop Protection Conference, Weeds. Proceedings of an international conference, Brighton, UK, 22-25 November, 1993. Farnham, UK: British Crop Protection Council (BCPC), Vol. 1:81-88

Ingelög T; Andersson R; Tjernberg M, 1993. Red Data Book of the Baltic Region, part 1. Sweden: ArtDatabanken, 95 pp.

Ingle S; Blair AM; Cussans JW, 1997. The use of weed density to predict winter wheat yield. Association of Applied Biologists Aspects of Applied Biology, 50: Optimising cereal inputs: Its scientific basis, 393-400.

Jogan N, 1990. A contribution to the knowledge of the distribution of grasses in Slovenia. Bioloski Vestnik, 38(2):27-38

Kazinczi G; Hunyadi K, 1992. Water relations of some annual weeds. 16th German conference on weed biology and control, held at Stuttgart-Hohenheim, Germany, on 10-12 March 1992. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, Sonderheft, 13:111-117.

Knight BEA; Wimshurst AA, 2005. Impact of climate change on the geographical spread of agricultural pests, diseases and weeds. In: Plant protection and plant health in Europe: introduction and spread of invasive species, held at Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany, 9-11 June 2005 Alton, UK: British Crop Protection Council, 241-242.

Korniak T; Szubstarski P, 2001. Alopecurus myosuroides (Poaceae) in cultivated fields of north-eastern Poland. In: Studies on grasses in Poland [ed. by Frey, L.]. Kraków, Poland: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, 229-233.

Kostov T; Pacanoski Z, 2006. Postemergence weed control in seedling alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) with imazamox. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 12(4):299-306. http://wssp.org.pk/

Lass L; Prather T, 2007. A scientific evaluation for noxious and invasive weeds of the Highway 95 construction project between the Uniontown cutoff and Moscow. Montana, USA: Missula. http://www.aquilavision.com

Laux P; Glaser B; Konradt; M, 2006. Chlorotoluron - re-introduction of a compound with great importance to manage herbicide resistance in blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds). Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 20:1053-1059.

Lechner M; Hurle K; Zwerger P, 1992. Effect of rotational fallow on weed infestation. BCPC Monograph, 50:97-102.

Long HC, 1938. Weeds of arable land. MAFF Bulletin 108. London, UK: HMSO.

Lozanovski R; Antoski SP; Natseva L; Svetievski P, 1973. Representation of grassy weeds in some weed communities in Macedonia and results of chemical control trials. Simpozium za Klasesti Pleveli, Makedonska Akademija na Naukite i Umetnostite, Skopje, 1973., 61-70

Mackay DB, 1964. The incidence and significance of injurious weed seeds in crop seed. Proceedings 7th Brit. Weed Control Conf., 1964., 583-91.

MAFF, 1975. MAFF Advisory Leaflet. Edinburgh, UK: HMSO.

Mantle P; Shaw S, 1977. Role of weed grasses in the ecology of ergot in wheat. Annals of Applied Biology, 86:339-351.

Martínez López F; Sugranes Alsina JM, 1993. Agil, a new post-emergence grasskiller for application in narrow-leaved crops and in garlic and onions. Proceedings of the 1993 Congress of the Spanish Weed Science Society, Lugo, Spain, 1-3 December 1993., 322-327; 2 ref.

Melander B, 1992. Germination biology and competitive ability of loose silky bent (Apera spica-venti L.) and black grass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.). Tidsskrift for Planteavls Specialserie, No. S 2178:7-22

Menendez J; De-Prado-R, 1996. Diclofop-methyl cross-resistance in a chlorotoluron-resistant biotype of Alopecurus myosuroides. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 56(2):123-133.

Mikulka J, 1987. Development of resistant weed biotypes following long-term application of herbicides. Internationale Zeitschrift der Landwirtschaft, 1:59-62.

Milberg P; Andersson L, 2006. Evaluating the potential northward spread of two grass weeds in Sweden. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica. Section B, Plant Soil Science, 56(2):91-95. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a747866892~db=all~order=page

Mirkamali H, 1993. Chemical control of grasses in wheat. Brighton crop protection conference, weeds. Proceedings of an international conference, Brighton, UK, 22-25 November 1993. Farnham, UK: British Crop Protection Council (BCPC), Vol. 2:579-584

Morse R; Palmer R, 1925. British weeds: their identification and control. London, UK: Ernest Benn Ltd.

Moss SR, 1980. The agro-ecology and control of black-grass, Alopecurus myosuroides Huds., in modern cereal growing systems. ADAS Quarterly Review, No. 38:170-191

Moss SR, 1983. The production and shedding of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. seeds in winter cereals crops. Weed Research, 23(1):45-51

Moss SR, 1985. The survival of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. seeds in soil. Weed Research, UK, 25(3):201-211

Moss SR, 1990. The seed cycle of Alopecurus myosuroides in winter cereals: a quantitative analysis. Symposium on integrated weed management in cereals. Proceedings of an EWRS symposium, Helsinki, Finland, 4-6 June 1990 Wageningen, Netherlands; European Weed Research Society, 27-35

Moss SR; Clarke JH, 1994. Guidelines for the prevention and control of herbicide-resistant black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.). Crop Protection, 13(3):230-234

Moss SR; Perryman SAM, 2007. The incidence of herbicide-resistant Alopecurus myosuroides (black-grass) in England and its development in relation to past herbicide use. Aspects of Applied Biology [Crop protection in Southern Britain, 27-28 February 2007, Peterborough, UK.], No.83:109-113.

Moss SR; Perryman SAM; Tatnell LV, 2007. Weed Technology., 300-309.

Naylor REL, 1970. The prediction of black-grass infestations. Weed Research, 10:296-299.

Naylor REL, 1972. Biological flora of the British Isles. No. 129 Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. (A. agrestis L.). Journal of Ecology, 60:611-622

Nier, 2008. Alien Plants in Korea. Korea: National Institute of Environmental Research. http://www.alienplant.nier

NOBANIS, 2008. North European and Baltic Network on Invasive Alien Species. http://www.nobanis.org

Orson JH, 1999. The cost to the farmer of herbicide resistance. Weed Technology, 13(3):607-611; 7 ref.

Rashid A; Khan S; Hussain F, 1988. Distribution of some weeds in turmeric fields of District Bannu. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(4):556-560; 9 ref.

Roberts HA; Chancellor RJ, 1986. Seed banks of some arable soils in the English midlands. Weed Research, UK, 26(4):251-257

Roder W; Eggert H, 1990. The injurious effect of slender foxtail, Alopecurus myosuroides Huds., in winter barley on alluvial soils and on the establishment of control thresholds. Archiv fur Phytopathologie und Pflanzenschutz, 26(6):573-578

Saini JP; Singh KP, 2001. Efficacy of new herbicides against grass weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum) under mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 46(2):233-238.

Salisbury EJ, 1961. Weeds and aliens. London: Collins, 384 pp.

Sauerborn J; Koch W, 1988. An investigation of the germination of six tropical arable weeds. Weed Research, UK, 28(1):47-52

Schmidt RR, 1997. HRAC classification of herbicides according to mode of action. 1997 Brighton crop protection conference: weeds. Proceedings of an international conference, Brighton, UK, 17-20 November 1997., Volume 3:1133-1140; 9 ref.

Sieber VK; Murray BG, 1979. The cytology of the genus Alopecurus (Gramineae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 79(4):343-355.

Sijtsma R, 1983. Control of volunteer cereals in some grass species. Bedrijfsontwikkeling, 14(9):726-729

Slavikova L; Mikulka J; Kundu JK, 2009. Resistance of blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides) to sulfonylurea herbicides in the Czech Republic. In: XIIIème Colloque International sur la Biologie des Mauvaises Herbes, Dijon, France, 8-10 Septembre 2009. Alfortville, France: Association Française de Protection des Plantes (AFPP), 405-413.

Soreng RJ, 2003. Alopecurus. Catalogue of New World Grasses (Poaceae): IV. Subfamily Pooideae. Contributions from US National Herbarium, 48:97-106.

Sökefeld M; Gerhards R; Kühbauch W; Nabout A, 1999. Automatic calibration and classification of seeds using digital image analysis. (Automatische Vermessung und Klassifikation von Saatgut mit digitaler Bildverarbeitung.) Agribiological Research, 52(2):183-191.

Thurston JM, 1964. Germination of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. (blackgrass). In: Proceedings 7th Brit. Weed Control Conf., 1964, 349-51.

Thurston JM, 1972. Black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.) and its control. Proceedings of the 11th British Weed Control Conference, 977-987.

Thurston JM, 1976. Weeds in cereals in relation to agricultural practices. Annals of Applied Biology, 83(2):338-341.

Tonkin JHB, 1982. The presence of seed impurities in samples of cereal seed tested at the Official Seed Testing Station, Cambridge in the period 1978-1981. Aspects of Applied Biology, 1:163-171.

Tonkin JHB; Phillipson A, 1973. The presence of weed seeds in cereal seed drills in England and Wales during spring 1970. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany, 13(1):1-8.

Tóth Á; Molnár J; Török T; Fekete A, 1989. Preliminary report on the third nationwide assessment of hard to control weeds. Növényvédelem, 25(9):420-422

Turley DB; Bacon ET; Shepherd CE; Peters NCB; Potyka I; Glen DM; Dampney PMR; Johnson PN, 1996. Straw incorporation - rotational ploughing for grass weed control. Aspects of Applied Biology, No. 47:257-264; 7 ref.

USDA-ARS, 2008. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx

Viggiani P, 2005. Morphological and structural variability of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. (Variabilità morfologica e strutturale di Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.) Informatore Fitopatologico, 55(1):37-43.

Wallgren B; Avholm K, 1978. Dormancy and germination of Apera spica-venti L. and Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. seeds. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(1):11-15

Weedsciencecom, 2008. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org

Weiller CM; Henwood MJ; Lenz J; Watson L, 1995. Pooideae (Poaceae) in Australia - Descriptions and Illustrations. http://muse.bio.cornell.edu/delta/

Wilson BJ; Brain P, 1991. Long-term stability of distribution of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. within cereal fields. Weed Research (Oxford), 31(6):367-373.

Wilson BJ; Wright KJ, 1990. Predicting the growth and competitive effects of annual weeds in wheat. Weed Research, 30:201-211.

Zwerger P, 1996. Integrated weed management in developed nations. Proceedings of the second international weed control congress, Copenhagen, Denmark, 25-28 June 1996: Volumes 1-4., 933-942; 35 ref.

Contributors

Top of page

20/06/2008 Updated by:

Charlie Riches, Consultant, UK

Distribution Maps

Top of page
You can pan and zoom the map
Save map