Papilio demoleus (chequered swallowtail)
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Distribution Table
- Habitat List
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
- Growth Stages
- List of Symptoms/Signs
- Biology and Ecology
- Natural enemies
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Plant Trade
- Detection and Inspection
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- Links to Websites
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Papilio demoleus Linnaeus, 1758
Preferred Common Name
- chequered swallowtail
Other Scientific Names
- Orpheides erithonius (Moore)
- Papilio demoleus f. demoleinus Jordan
- Papilio epius Fabricius
- Papilio erithonius Cramer
- Papilio erithonius var. demoleinus Oberthür
- Princeps demoleus Linnaeus
International Common Names
- English: citrus dog; lemon butterfly; lemon caterpillar; lime butterfly; lime swallowtail; orange butterfly
- Chinese: Damo Fengde
Local Common Names
- Germany: Indischer Citrus-Schwalbenschwanz
- PAPIDE (Papilio demoleus)
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Metazoa
- Phylum: Arthropoda
- Subphylum: Uniramia
- Class: Insecta
- Order: Lepidoptera
- Family: Papilionidae
- Genus: Papilio
- Species: Papilio demoleus
Notes on Taxonomy and NomenclatureTop of page Papilio demoleus was first described by Linnaeus in 1758 under that genus. Some modern authors place this species in the genus Princeps, but this taxon should be used as a subgenus. A number of poorly differentiated subspecies are recognized, namely Papilio demoleus demoleus Linnaeus (Middle East and southern Asia; China), P. d. malayanus Wallace (South-East Asia), P. d. novoguineensis Rothschild (New Guinea), P. d. libanius Fruhstorfer (Taiwan) and P. d. sthenelus Macleay (Australia). The subspecies from Australia and New Guinea are sometimes accorded full specific status due to their divergent ecology and larval morphology.
This species is replaced in the Afrotropical region (including southern Oman, Yemen and southwestern Saudi Arabia) by the very similar P. demodocus Esper, 1798 (Larsen, l983; Pittaway, l985).
DescriptionTop of page Eggs
Eggs are pale yellow and spherical (1 mm), but become dark as the larva develops within.
Newly hatched larvae (2.5 mm) are black or dark brown with a dorsal white saddle-like mark, and are spiny. These spines disappear as the larva grows, apart from the anterior and posterior pair. Diffuse orange lateral patches and small blue spots develop as size increases, with the head and true legs becoming orange.
Mature larvae (33 mm) are very different. The dorsal surface is a smooth, rich velvet green while the ventral surface is greyish-white. These two areas are separated by a brilliant milky-white lower lateral band. Segment 3 bears dorsally a transverse white and brown bar with eye-like spots at either end, and the green area of segment 5 is bordered anteriorly by a narrow curved black line. Segments 7 and 8 bear laterally a fragmented diagonal yellow-brown and white bar (this may be absent in some individuals), and there is a patch of the same colour on segment 9. The osmeterium is flesh-coloured; the true legs and head are orange.
It should be noted that the Australasian subspecies differ in both markings and coloration (Common and Waterhouse, 1981).
Pupae are slightly concave dorsally (this differs from P. polytes), with a pair of lateral anterior projections and a short dorsal thoracic projection. They are formed under leaves or on twigs near the feeding site and may be either brown or green depending on the colour of the substrate.
The butterflies (65-110 mm) are unmistakeable. Dorsally, the wings are black with large yellow markings and a dusting of fine yellow scales. The main yellow markings form an irregular broken bar running from the apex of the forewing to the mid-dorsum on the hindwing, and there is a series of yellow submarginal spots on both wings. In the tornal angle of the hindwing there is a red and blue eye-like marking; in the female this eye spot contains a large black circular area. The ventral surface is mainly yellow with black markings, with a series of reddish post-discal bars on the hindwing. Both thorax and abdomen are yellow laterally, and black dorsally and ventrally. Unlike most swallowtails, the hindwings carry no tails.
DistributionTop of page
The distribution map includes records based on specimens of P. demoleus from the collection in the Natural History Museum (London, UK): dates of collection are noted in the list of countries (NHM, various dates).
P. demoleus was not recorded from Kalimantan (southern Borneo), Timor or Sulawesi by Common and Waterhouse (198l), even though citrus is widely cultivated there. They also stated that this butterfly was absent from the Philippines and Sumatra (Indonesia); however, Corbet and Pendlebury (1992) recorded it from these last two areas. Jumalon (1969) had also recorded it from the Philippines much earlier. It has recently colonized Sarawak (Wan, 1970), Java (Matsumoto and Woro Noerdjito, 1996), Borneo (including Indonesian Kalimantan) and Bali, Indonesia (Matsumoto, 2002). Records from Sabah (Anon., 1962) require further investigation because this species appears to be extending its range. Vagrants have occurred sporadically on various islands of the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan (Matsuka, 2003).
In March 2004 P. demoleus was discovered in the Dominican Republic on the Caribbean island of Hispaniola in an area commonly known as 'Hoyo Azul' (18°33.528'N, 68°26.807'W) located in the municipality of El Veron, Higuey Province. This was the first New World documentation of this Old World citrus pest (Guerrero et al., 2004). The specimens were not the strongly yellow Australian subspecies P. demoleus sthenelus, but resembled populations of P. demoleus malayanus from South-East Asia. P. demoleus has now been reported from Puerto Rico (Homziak and Homziak, 2006) and, more recently, a December 2006 OPIS (Offshore Pest Information System) report helped to confirm new country detection of lime swallowtail in Jamaica (NAPPO, 2006; see http://www.pestalert.org/oprDetail.cfm?oprID=244).
All records of this species from the Afrotropical (Ethiopian) biogeographical region refer to the closely related but specifically distinct P. demodocus.
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
|Continent/Country/Region||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||Reference||Notes|
|Afghanistan||Restricted distribution||Heydemann, 1954|
|Bangladesh||Widespread||Bingham, 1907; APPPC, 1987|
|Cambodia||Widespread||HANSON, 1963; Waterhouse, 1993|
|China||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-Fujian||Restricted distribution||Tong, 1993|
|-Hong Kong||Widespread||Marsh, 1960|
|-Zhejiang||Restricted distribution||Tong, 1993|
|India||Widespread||Talbot, 1939; APPPC, 1987|
|-Andhra Pradesh||Present||Narayanamma and Savithri, 2003|
|-Gujarat||Present||Patel et al., 2004|
|-Himachal Pradesh||Present||CIE, 1979|
|-Indian Punjab||Present||CIE, 1979|
|-Jammu and Kashmir||Present||CIE, 1979|
|-Karnataka||Present||Channa Basavanna, 1954|
|-Tamil Nadu||Present||Singh, 1991|
|-Uttar Pradesh||Present||CIE, 1979|
|-West Bengal||Present||Subhankar and Amitava, 2007|
|Indonesia||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-Java||Present, few occurrences||Matsumoto & Woro Noerdjito, 1996|
|-Kalimantan||Present||Matsumoto, 2002; Matsumoto, 2002|
|-Kalimantan||Present||Invasive||Matsumoto, 2002; Matsumoto, 2002|
|-Nusa Tenggara||Present||Invasive||Matsumoto, 2002|
|-Sumatra||Present||Kalshoven and van der Laan, 1981|
|Iran||Present||Eckweiler and Hofmann, 1980; Farid, 1987|
|Iraq||Restricted distribution||Larsen, 1977; EPPO, 2014|
|Kuwait||Restricted distribution||Al-Houty, 1983|
|Laos||Widespread||Dean, 1978; Waterhouse, 1993|
|Malaysia||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-Peninsular Malaysia||Widespread||Corbet and Pendlebury, 1992|
|-Sabah||Present, few occurrences||Anon, 1962|
|-Sarawak||Present, few occurrences||Wan, 1970|
|Myanmar||Widespread||Bingham, 1907; HANSON, 1963; Waterhouse, 1993|
|Oman||Widespread||Larsen & Larsen, 1980|
|Philippines||Widespread||Jumalon, 1969; Corbet and Pendlebury, 1992|
|Qatar||Restricted distribution||Pittaway, 1980|
|Saudi Arabia||Widespread||Pittaway, 1979|
|Singapore||Widespread||Murphy, 1973; APPPC, 1987; Waterhouse, 1993|
|Sri Lanka||Widespread||Talbot, 1939|
|Syria||Present||Benyamini et al., 2007|
|Taiwan||Widespread||Io and, 1990; Tong, 1993|
|Thailand||Widespread||Pinratana, 1977; Waterhouse, 1993|
|Turkey||Present||Benyamini et al., 2007|
|United Arab Emirates||Restricted distribution||Walker and Pittaway, 1987|
|Vietnam||Widespread||NHM, 1918; NHM, 1927; HANSON, 1963; Waterhouse, 1993|
Central America and Caribbean
|Cuba||Present||Benyamini et al., 2007|
|Dominican Republic||Present||Introduced||2004||Not invasive||Guerrero et al., 2004|
|Jamaica||Widespread||Introduced||2006||Invasive||IPPC, 2006; Garraway et al., 2009||Established in most parishes and a minor pest in citrus nurseries|
|Puerto Rico||Present||Homziak Homziak, 2006; Segarra-Carmona et al., 2010|
|Portugal||Present||Introduced||Morgun and Wiemers, 2012; EPPO, 2014|
|Australia||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-Australian Northern Territory||Widespread||Common and Waterhouse, 1981|
|-New South Wales||Restricted distribution||Common and Waterhouse, 1981|
|-Queensland||Widespread||Common and Waterhouse, 1981|
|-South Australia||Restricted distribution||Common and Waterhouse, 1981|
|-Victoria||Restricted distribution||Common and Waterhouse, 1981|
|-Western Australia||Widespread||Common and Waterhouse, 1981|
|Papua New Guinea||Restricted distribution||Common and Waterhouse, 1981|
HabitatTop of page P. demoleus is a very direct and rapid-flying species of gardens, farms and sunny open areas, stopping only to nervously sip nectar from many species of flowers, such as Ixora spp., Lantana spp., Vernonia spp. and Clerodendrum spp. Males sometimes congregate at puddles and riverbanks in search of salts. This species avoids dense, damp forest, and excessively wet areas.
Habitat ListTop of page
Hosts/Species AffectedTop of page This species can be found almost everywhere Citrus spp. are cultivated under rural or urban conditions; however, wet, wooded areas are avoided. Although Murraya koenigii is an excellent host, larvae cannot complete their development on M. panniculata, a common garden shrub.
Yunus and Munir (1972) showed that P. demoleus larvae will accept leaves of at least 19 citrus species or varieties, but demonstrated some differences in larval consumption rates, development times, and mortality between the hosts.
Utilization of the leguminous genus Psoralea is mainly confined to the Australasian subspecies (Common and Waterhouse, 1981); however, Psoralea corylifolia [Cullen corylifolium] has been recorded as a suitable host from Rajasthan (Pandey and Bogawat, 1969) and other areas of northern India. Michelia champaca and Annona squamosa are also newly recorded hosts from India (Patil and Rajashekhargouda, 1985).
Host Plants and Other Plants AffectedTop of page
|Aegle marmelos (golden apple)||Rutaceae||Wild host|
|Annona squamosa (sugar apple)||Annonaceae||Other|
|Cullen corylifolium (black-dot)||Fabaceae||Other|
|Cullen corylifolium (black-dot)||Fabaceae||Wild host|
|Desmodium gangeticum||Fabaceae||Wild host|
|Glycosmis pentaphylla||Rutaceae||Wild host|
|Limonia acidissima (elephant apple)||Rutaceae||Wild host|
|Michelia champaca (golden champa)||Magnoliaceae||Wild host|
|Murraya koenigii (curry leaf tree)||Rutaceae||Main|
|Ruta graveolens (common rue)||Rutaceae||Wild host|
|Zanthoxylum (prickly-ash)||Rutaceae||Wild host|
|Ziziphus mauritiana (jujube)||Rhamnaceae||Other|
Growth StagesTop of page Vegetative growing stage
SymptomsTop of page The phytophagous larvae generally eat younger leaves and can denude growing shoots. During major infestations, the entire plant may be defoliated (Zacher, 1914).
List of Symptoms/SignsTop of page
|Growing point / external feeding|
|Leaves / external feeding|
Biology and EcologyTop of page
The spherical, pale yellow eggs are laid singly on the upper surface of young leaves. These darken as the larva develops within, and hatch after 5-9 days. Radke and Kandalkar (1988) state that 15-22 eggs are laid per female, but Farid (1987) quotes a maximum of 511 eggs per female. Krishnamoorthy and Singh (1986) found that natural rates of egg parasitism by Trichogramma chilonis could reach 75.9% in Karnataka, India. This stage generally lasts 4-7 days, depending on temperature.
Up until the fourth instar the brown-black and white larvae feed and rest openly on the upper sides of leaves, relying on a resemblance to fresh bird droppings for protection.
Mature larvae behave differently. These generally rest some distance from the feeding area on twigs among foliage and rely on their now cryptic coloration for protection; however, Corbet and Pendlebury (1992) state that it is at this stage that larvae suffer their heaviest mortality. Larvae of this species can often be found in the company of larvae of Papilio polytes and P. memnon, which are very similar in appearance. The larval stage generally lasts 15-26 days, depending on temperature.
Pupae, which are formed under leaves or on twigs near the feeding site, may be either brown or green depending on the colour of the substrate. Rafi et al. (1989) found that overall mortality was highest during this stage, with the main mortality factor being the parasitoid Pteromalus puparum. Farid (1987) states that 30-86% of pupae are killed by this wasp. This stage lasts from 8-19 days to a number of months, depending on whether the pupa diapauses. Details of pupal diapause are given by Singh (1993b) and Ishii (1987).
The unmistakable yellow and black chequered adults (65-100 mm) generally emerge during the morning and are usually on the wing a few hours later, visiting low-growing flowers in sunny locations. Courtship takes place in such areas, with mating lasting 1.5-2 h. The natural lifespan of wild adults rarely exceeds 6 days (Singh and Gangwar, 1989).
More details of the biology of this species in India and Pakistan are given by Ghosh (1914), Mishra and Pandey (1965), Radke and Kandalkar (1988), Rafi et al., (1989), Singh and Gangwar (1989), and Goyle (1990).
In Puerto Rico, where it has recently been introduced, it has a life cycle of approximately 30 days. From oviposition, eggs hatch in three days. Larval instar durations are 3, 2, 3, 3, and 5 d for larval stages 1 to 5, respectively. Pupal stage lasts approximately 12 days. Twelve or more generations are possible under local citrus-growing conditions (Segarra-Carmona et al., 2010).
Natural enemiesTop of page
|Natural enemy||Type||Life stages||Specificity||References||Biological control in||Biological control on|
|Bacillus thuringiensis thuringiensis||Pathogen||Larvae|
|Cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus (CPV)||Pathogen||Larvae|
|cytoplasmic polyhedrosis viruses||Pathogen||Larvae||Karnataka||Citrus|
|Distatrix papilionis||Parasite||Larvae||India; Karnataka||Citrus|
|Trichogramma chilonis||Parasite||Eggs||India; Karnataka||Citrus|
Notes on Natural EnemiesTop of page Krishnamoorthy and Singh (1988) surveyed the parasitoids of P. demoleus and P. polytes in Karnataka, India, in 1984-85. The egg parasitoids Trichogramma chilonis and a Telenomus sp., and the larval parasitoid Distatrix papilionis, were common. Two uncommon hyperparasitoids of the egg parasitoid Ooencyrtus papilionis were also recorded. Percentage parasitism by T. chilonis, a Telenomus sp. and O. papilionis was 0-65, 10-78 and 1-73, respectively. The same authors first recorded T. chilonis parasitizing eggs of these papilionids in India in 1986, with natural rates of parasitism up to 75.9%. In laboratory studies, T. chilonis readily parasitized 1 to 2-day-old Papilio eggs, with development taking 8.3 days at 28°C. Adult wasps survived for 6.9 days when fed with 40% honey solution. Each parasitized Papilio egg yielded 8-27 adults of both sexes. The male-to-female ratio was 1:7.06. The authors suggested that T. chilonis could be mass-reared in eggs of the pyralid Corcyra cephalonica and released to suppress populations of P. demoleus and P. polytes.
Singh (1991) carried out a similar survey in Tamil Nadu, India, of P. demoleus, P. polytes, P. polymnestor and P. helenus, all pests of citrus. The following parasitoids were recorded: Distatrix papilionis, Holcojoppa coelopyga, Melalophacharops sp., Brachymeria jambolana and Pteromalus puparum. The latter was found by Farid (1987) to be the most active parasitoid of pupae in southern Iran, with pupae of the fourth generation being the most susceptible (86% parasitism) and those of the seventh generation the least susceptible (30%).
Singh (1993) reported that an entomophilic nematode (Steinernema sp.) isolated from Agrotis segetum and A. biconica in India, was shown to be highly effective against larvae of P. demoleus in the laboratory, causing 90-100% mortality within 10 days.
Preparations of Bacillus thuringiensis have been used throughout the region to control this species and may sometimes be found infecting larvae under natural conditions.
Means of Movement and DispersalTop of page P. demoleus has been introduced accidentally with citrus stock.
Plant TradeTop of page
|Plant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transport||Pest stages||Borne internally||Borne externally||Visibility of pest or symptoms|
|Leaves||eggs; larvae||Yes||Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye|
|Stems (above ground)/Shoots/Trunks/Branches||pupae||Yes||Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye|
|Plant parts not known to carry the pest in trade/transport|
|Fruits (inc. pods)|
|Growing medium accompanying plants|
|True seeds (inc. grain)|
ImpactTop of page Although generally not important pests of larger trees, larvae of P. demoleus can become so numerous as to repeatedly defoliate young trees or small bushes of Citrus spp. or Murraya koenigii, causing the death of those plants. This is particularly so in citrus orchards.
Detection and InspectionTop of page The presence of adults at flowers or flying around citrus plants will indicate the occurrence of this species in an area. Field infestations of P. demoleus are detected by visually surveying orchards for signs of damage to leaves on young shoots, or for the presence of eggs or young larvae on leaves.
Similarities to Other Species/ConditionsTop of page Although the adult is very distinct, with no similar species in the Oriental region, the eggs, larvae and pupae are very similar to a number of other citrus-feeding species, notably Papilio polytes, P. memnon, P. rumanzovius, P. polymnestor and P. helenus. These may be found together on the same plant.
The adult P. demoleus is, however, very similar to the African species P. demodocus, from which it can be distinguished by the characteristic form of the blue and red eyespots on the hindwing as well as the rounded outlines of cream spots on the forewing.
Prevention and ControlTop of page
Low-level infestations can be controlled by hand-picking larvae (Cherian, 1942). Severe infestations are generally controlled by applying chemical pesticides or plant extracts to the foliage, e.g. carbaryl, phosalone, acephate, pirimiphos-methyl, fenitrothion, permethrin, etc. Details are given by Radke and Kandalkar (1986), Singh and Kumar (1986), Batra (1990), Nandihalli et al. (1991), and Solunke and Deshpande (1991).
The efficacy of different concentrations of the biopesticides Bacillus thuringiensis and Beauveria bassiana, as well as of neem seed kernel extract, neem oil and azadirachtin were tested by Narayanamma and Savithri (2003) against P. demoleus in Andhra Pradesh, India. Spraying of B. thuringiensis resulted in a 100% control of the pest population after 5 days of application, regardless of the concentration used (0.0025, 0.005 or 0.0075%). The mean reduction in the population of the pest was highest using B. thuringiensis and lowest with azadirachtin sprays.
ReferencesTop of page
Al-Houty W, 1983. Butterflies and hawkmoths of Kuwait. Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation, 95(9-10):202-204.
Anon, 1962. Host list of insects recorded in the South East Asia and Pacific Region, Citrus spp. - Citrus. Technical Document, Food and Agriculture Organization, Plant Protection Committee for the Southeast Asia and Pacific Region, No 22, 1-9.
APPPC, 1987. Insect pests of economic significance affecting major crops of the countries in Asia and the Pacific region. Technical Document No. 135. Bangkok, Thailand: Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific region (RAPA).
Batra RC, 1990. Citriculture in North-Western India. Proceedings of a Citrus Show-cum-Seminar on Prospects and Problems of Kinnow Cultivation, Ludhiana, India, 6-7 January, 1989 [edited by Gill, K.S.; Kanwar, J.S.; Raghbir Singh] Ludhiana, India; Punjab Agricultural University, 189-195
Benyamini D; Bruschini C; Serra G; John E, 2007. First confirmed record of Papilio demoleus (Linnaeus 1758) in Syria, with comments on the species' appearance in Turkey and the Dominican Republic. News of the Israeli Lepidopterists Society, 24(2):4-11.
Bingham CT, 1907. Butterflies Vol 2. In: Bingham CT, ed. The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
Channa Basavanna GP, 1954. Important insect pests of fruit crops - nature of damage and control. Mysore Agricultural Calendar, 1954:96-103.
Cherian MC, 1942. Our present position with regard to the control of fruit pests. Madras Agricultural Journal, 30(1):14-17.
Common IFB; Waterhouse DF, 1981. Butterflies of Australia. rev. edn. Melbourne, Australia: Angus & Robertson Publishers.
Corbet AS; Pendlebury HM, 1992 (revised by JN Eliot). The Butterflies of the Malay Peninsula. 4th edn. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: United Selangor Press.
Eckweiler W; Hofmann P, 1980. Checklist of Iranian butterflies. Nachrichten der Entomologischen Verein Apollo, Suppl. 1:1-28.
EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm
Farid A, 1987. Some bio-ecological features of citrus butterflies in south-east Iran. Entomologie et Phytopathologie Appliquees, 54(1-2):49-50, 129-137.
Garraway E; Murphy CP; Allen GA, 2009. Papilio demoleus (the lime swallowtail) (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae), a potential pest of citrus, expanding its range in the Caribbean. Tropical Lepidoptera Research, 19(1):58-59. http://troplep.org
Ghosh CC, 1914. Life-histories of Indian insects - V. Lepidoptera (Butterflies). Memoirs, Department of Agriculture India Entomology Series V (I):1-71.
Guerrero KA; Veoz D; Boyce SL; Farrell BD, 2004. First New World documentation of an Old World Citrus pest. The lime swallowtail Papilio demoleus (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae), in the Dominican Republic (Hispaniola). American Entomologist, 50(4):224-226.
Heydemann F, 1954. Beitrag zur Lepidopteren-Fauna Afghanistans. Zeitschrift der Wiener Entomologischen Gesellschaft, 39:385-396, 412-428.
Io C; ed, 1990. Monographia Rhopalocerorum Sinensium Vol. 1. Henan, China: Henan Scientific and Technical Publishing House.
Jumalon JN, 1969. Notes on the new range of some Asiatic papilionids in the Philippines [including Papilio demoleus L.]. Philippine Entomologist, 1(3):251-257.
Larsen TB, 1977. Extension récente en Iraq de l'aire de Papilio demoleus Linné. Entomops, 42:37-38.
Larsen TB; Larsen K, 1980. Butterflies of Oman. Edinburgh, UK: Bartholomew Books.
Marsh JCS, 1960. Hong Kong Butterflies. Hong Kong, China: Shell Company of Hong Kong Ltd.
Matsuka H, 2003. A list of butterflies from Japan: immigrant species. http://www02.so-net.ne.jp/~jamides/jplist/jplist-e.html.
Matsumoto K; Woro Noerdjito A, 1996. Establishment of Papilio demoleus L. (Papilionidae) in Java. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society, 50(2):129-140.
Mishra SC; Pandey ND, 1965. Some observations on the biology of Papilio demoleus Linn (Papilionidae: Lepidoptera). Labdev Journal of Science and Technology, 3(2):142-143.
Morgun DV; Wiemers M, 2012. First record of the Lime Swallowtail Papilio demoleus Linnaeus, 1758 (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) in Europe. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera, 45:85-89. http://www.doylegroup.harvard.edu/~carlo/JRL/jrl.html
Murphy DH, 1973. A preliminary list of insects attacking economic plants in Singapore. Technical Document, Food and Agriculture Organization, Plant Protection Committee for the Southeast Asia and Pacific Region, No. 87:17 pp.
Narayanamma VL; Savithri P, 2003. Evaluation of biopesticides against citrus butterfly, Papilio demoleus L. on sweet orange. Indian Journal of Plant Protection, 31(2):105-106.
Narayanan K; Gopalakrishnan C, 1987. Occurrence of cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus in citrus leaf caterpillar, Papilio demoleus L. (Papilionidae: Lepidoptera). Journal of Biological Control, 1(1):73-74
Pandey SN; Bogawat JK, 1969. Growth and development of Papilio demoleus (L.) in relation to a wild host plant. Indian Journal of Entomology, 31(1):92.
Patil RH; Rajashekhargouda R, 1985. New addition to the list of host plants of the citrus butterfly, Papilio demoleus (Papilionidae: Lepidoptera). Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 82(3):681
Pinratana BA, 1977. Butterflies in Thailand Vol. 1. Papilionidae and Danaidae. Bangkok, Thailand: Viratham Press.
Rafi MA; Matin MA; Saghir SA, 1989. Studies on some bio-ecological aspects of the citrus butterfly Papilio demoleus L. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in the Barani ecology of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 32(1):36-38
Segarra-Carmona AE; Cabrera-Asencio I; Flores-López LE; Morales-Collado L, 2010. Life cycle and control of the Asian lime swallowtail, Papilio demoleus (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae): a new invasive pest in Puerto Rico. (Ciclo de vida y control de la mariposa asiática de los cítricos, Papilio demoleus (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae), una nueva plaga invasiva en Puerto Rico.) Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico, 94(1/2):165-174.
Smith C, 1990. Beautiful butterflies: a colourful introduction to Nepal's most beautiful insects. Bangkok, Thailand: Craftsman Press.
Talbot G, 1939. Butterflies Vol. 1. In: Sewell RBS, ed. The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
Tong X, 1993. Butterfly fauna of Zhejiang. Hangzhou, China: Zhejiang Science and Technology Publishers.
Wan MTK, 1970. A list of insects and other animals of economic importance of Sarawak, East Malaysia 1961-1970. Kuching, Malaysia: Department of Agriculture, Entomology Division.
Waterhouse DF, 1993. The Major Arthropod Pests and Weeds of Agriculture in Southeast Asia. ACIAR Monograph No. 21. Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, 141 pp.
Wiltshire EP, 1964. The Lepidoptera of Bahrain. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 61:119-141.
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/