Invasive Species Compendium

Detailed coverage of invasive species threatening livelihoods and the environment worldwide


Oryctes rhinoceros
(coconut rhinoceros beetle)



Oryctes rhinoceros (coconut rhinoceros beetle)


  • Last modified
  • 19 November 2018
  • Datasheet Type(s)
  • Invasive Species
  • Pest
  • Natural Enemy
  • Host Animal
  • Preferred Scientific Name
  • Oryctes rhinoceros
  • Preferred Common Name
  • coconut rhinoceros beetle
  • Taxonomic Tree
  • Domain: Eukaryota
  •   Kingdom: Metazoa
  •     Phylum: Arthropoda
  •       Subphylum: Uniramia
  •         Class: Insecta
  • Summary of Invasiveness
  • O. rhinoceros is included in the Global Invasive Species Database (ISSG, 2009).

  • There are no pictures available for this datasheet

    If you can supply pictures for this datasheet please contact:

    CAB International
    OX10 8DE
  • Distribution map More information

Don't need the entire report?

Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.

Generate report


Top of page


Top of page

Preferred Scientific Name

  • Oryctes rhinoceros (Linnaeus)

Preferred Common Name

  • coconut rhinoceros beetle

Other Scientific Names

  • Oryctes stentor Castelnau, 1840
  • Scarabaeus rhinoceros Linnaeus

International Common Names

  • English: Asiatic rhinoceros beetle; black beetle; coconut black beetle; coconut palm rhinoceros beetle; date palm beetle; dung beetle; rhinoceros beetle; scarab beetle
  • Spanish: escarabajo rinoceronte Asiático
  • French: oryctes du cocotier; rhinoceros du cocotier

Local Common Names

  • Germany: Indischer nashornkaefer
  • Indonesia: kumbang badak; kumbang tanduk
  • Netherlands: klappertor

EPPO code

  • ORYCRH (Oryctes rhinoceros)

Summary of Invasiveness

Top of page

O. rhinoceros is included in the Global Invasive Species Database (ISSG, 2009).

Taxonomic Tree

Top of page
  • Domain: Eukaryota
  •     Kingdom: Metazoa
  •         Phylum: Arthropoda
  •             Subphylum: Uniramia
  •                 Class: Insecta
  •                     Order: Coleoptera
  •                         Family: Scarabaeidae
  •                             Subfamily: Dynastinae
  •                                 Genus: Oryctes
  •                                     Species: Oryctes rhinoceros


Top of page


O. rhinoceros eggs are yellowish-white, measuring 3 mm in diameter and laid inside rotting vegetative matter. Initially oval in shape, they begin to swell about a week after laying and hatch within 11-13 days (Wood, 1968a).


The larval stages are usually yellowish-white in colour and may grow to about 60-100 mm long, or more (Wood, 1968a; Ooi, 1988). The maximum head capsule width is about 10.6-11.4 mm. The cranium is medium to dark brown, with numerous round pits, many of which bear minute setae. Thoracic spiracles are 1.85-2.23 mm long, 1.25-1.53 mm wide. Respiratory plate with a maximum of 40-80 or more small, round to oval holes along any diameter. Thoracic spiracles larger than abdominal spiracles; first abdominal spiracle somewhat smaller than succeeding spiracles (for detailed information, see Bedford (1974)). The larval stages may look similar to other species within the scarabeid family (e.g. Xylotrupes gideon, Scapanes australis, Trichogomphus fairmairei, Oryctes centaurus and Oryctoderus sp.). A key to differentiate the larval stages of these species has been provided by Bedford (1974). The presence of the organ of Herold on the ventral surface of the ninth abdominal segment indicates the male sex (Hurpin, 1953; Elliott, 1964). A description has been provided for third-instar larva of Chalcosoma atlas (Bedford, 1976a) which co-exists in Malaysia with O. rhinoceros and may be confused with it, while in the African region O. monoceros is widespread, for which a description of the larva is available (Bedford, 1979). Lucanid and cetoniine beetles, which often shared the same breeding sites, may also be confused with the early instars of O. rhinoceros (Wood, 1968a) and a key for separating some of these types of larvae has been provided for Papua New Guinea (Beaudoin-Ollivier et al., 1998, 2000).


The prepupa is somewhat similar in appearance to the larval stage, except that it is smaller than the final larval instar. Shrivelled in appearance, it shakes its body actively when disturbed.


The O. rhinoceros pupa is yellowish-brown in colour and measures up to 50 mm in length. It is segmented on the dorsal surface. The length of the horn-shaped protuberances on the anterior may indicate the sex of the adult.


Stout-looking adults, dark brown to black, shiny, 35-50 mm long and 20-23 mm wide, with a prominent horn on head (Wood, 1968a; Bedford, 1974). The males having a relatively longer horn than the female. The males can be differentiated more accurately by having a rounded, shiny terminal abdominal segment while the female has a relatively hairier 'tail' (Wood, 1968a). The strikingly similar but larger species of scarabeid, Oryctes gnu (=trituberculatus) may be confused with O. rhinoceros (Wood, 1968a). The difference is the three tubercles on the thoracic ridge for O. gnu, instead of two in O. rhinoceros. A key to Oryctes species is given by Endrödi (1985).


Top of page

O. rhinoceros is endemic to the coconut-growing regions of South and South-East Asia from Pakistan to the Philippines (CIE, 1967). It was accidentally introduced into parts of Papua New Guinea in the Bismarck Archipelago (New Britain, New Ireland, Manus Island); Western and American Samoas, Tonga, Fiji, Wallis Island, Micronesia, Mauritius and the Cocos Islands (Bedford, 1974, 1980). It has recently been found in Guam and Saipan (Moore, 2007) and Hawaii (Hawaii Department of Agriculture, 2014).

Distribution Table

Top of page

The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.

Continent/Country/RegionDistributionLast ReportedOriginFirst ReportedInvasiveReferenceNotes


BangladeshWidespreadAPPPC, 1987; EPPO, 2014
British Indian Ocean TerritoryPresent
Brunei DarussalamPresentWaterhouse, 1993; EPPO, 2014
CambodiaPresentWaterhouse, 1993; EPPO, 2014
ChinaRestricted distributionEPPO, 2014
-HainanPresentZhang, 1984; EPPO, 2014
-Hong KongPresentEPPO, 2014
Cocos IslandsPresentBedford and, 1980; EPPO, 2014
IndiaRestricted distributionEPPO, 2014
-Andaman and Nicobar IslandsPresentEPPO, 2014
-Andhra PradeshPresentEPPO, 2014
-AssamPresentEPPO, 2014
-BiharPresentEPPO, 2014
-GoaPresentRaju et al., 1983; EPPO, 2014
-GujaratPresentEPPO, 2014
-KarnatakaPresentDhileepan, 1992; EPPO, 2014
-KeralaPresentEPPO, 2014
-LakshadweepPresentEPPO, 2014
-MaharashtraPresentEPPO, 2014
-ManipurPresentGope and Prasad, 1983; EPPO, 2014
-NagalandPresentSharma and Gupta, 1988; EPPO, 2014
-OdishaPresentEPPO, 2014
-RajasthanPresentBhatnagar, 1971; EPPO, 2014
-Tamil NaduPresentRajamanickam et al., 1992; EPPO, 2014
-West BengalPresentEPPO, 2014
IndonesiaWidespreadEPPO, 2014
-Irian JayaPresentEPPO, 2014
-JavaPresentEPPO, 2014
-KalimantanPresentEPPO, 2014
-MoluccasPresentEPPO, 2014
-Nusa TenggaraPresentEPPO, 2014
-SulawesiPresentZelazny et al., 1992; EPPO, 2014
-SumatraPresentEPPO, 2014
IranPresentEPPO, 2014
JapanRestricted distributionEPPO, 2014
-Ryukyu ArchipelagoPresentHosoya, 2011; EPPO, 2014
LaosPresentWaterhouse, 1993; EPPO, 2014
MalaysiaWidespreadEPPO, 2014
-Peninsular MalaysiaPresentEPPO, 2014
-SabahPresentEPPO, 2014
-SarawakPresentEPPO, 2014
MaldivesPresentEPPO, 2014
MyanmarPresentWaterhouse, 1993; EPPO, 2014
OmanPresentANEPPN, 1986; EPPO, 2014
PakistanPresentEPPO, 2014
PhilippinesPresentWaterhouse, 1993; EPPO, 2014
SingaporePresentWaterhouse, 1993; AVA, 2001; EPPO, 2014
Sri LankaPresentWettasinghe and Mahindapala, 1986; EPPO, 2014
TaiwanPresentEPPO, 2014
ThailandPresentAPPPC, 1987; Waterhouse, 1993; EPPO, 2014
VietnamPresentWaterhouse, 1993; EPPO, 2014
YemenPresentAl-Habshi et al., 2006; EPPO, 2014


MauritiusPresentBedford and, 1980; EPPO, 2014
RéunionPresentEPPO, 2014

North America

USATransient: actionable, under eradicationEPPO, 2014
-HawaiiTransient: actionable, under eradicationEPPO, 2014; Hawaii Department of Agriculture, 2014; NAPPO, 2014


American SamoaPresentBedford and, 1980; EPPO, 2014
AustraliaAbsent, formerly presentEPPO, 2014
-QueenslandAbsent, formerly presentEPPO, 2014
FijiPresentBedford and, 1980; EPPO, 2014
GuamRestricted distributionMoore, 2007; Molet, 2013; EPPO, 2014
Micronesia, Federated states ofPresentBedford, 1974; Bedford and, 1980; EPPO, 2014
NiuePresentEPPO, 2014
Northern Mariana IslandsPresentMoore, 2007
PalauPresentEPPO, 2014
Papua New GuineaPresentBedford and, 1980; EPPO, 2014
SamoaPresentBedford and, 1980; EPPO, 2014
Solomon IslandsPresentEPPO, 2016
TokelauPresentUili, 1980; EPPO, 2014
TongaPresentBedford and, 1980; EPPO, 2014
Wallis and Futuna IslandsPresentBedford and, 1980; EPPO, 2014

Risk of Introduction

Top of page McKenna and Shroff (1911) reported that the pest first appeared in the extreme south of Myanmar, probably from Malaysia in 1895, and worked its way through to the north over the next 15 years. It was also introduced to Upolu island in Western Samoa in 1909 via potted rubber seedlings from Sri Lanka (Jepson, 1912).

Habitat List

Top of page

Hosts/Species Affected

Top of page

Primarily found attacking coconut and oil palm, O. rhinoceros has also occasionally been recorded on banana (Sharma and Gupta, 1988), sugarcane, papaya, sisal and pineapple (Khoo et al., 1991). In Mauritius, ornamentals such as the royal palm (Roystonea regia), the latanier palm (Livistona chinensis), the talipot palm (Corypha umbraculifera) and the raphia palm (Raphia ruffia) are attacked (Bedford, 1980).

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

Top of page

Growth Stages

Top of page Vegetative growing stage


Top of page

O. rhinoceros adults feed in the crown region of both coconut and oil palm. On oil palms they bore through petiole bases into the central unopened leaves. This causes tissue maceration and the presence of a fibrous frass inside and at the entrance to the feeding hole is an indication of its activity within (Catley, 1969). A single attack may be followed by others on the same palm (Barlow and Chew, 1970Young, 1975). These attacks subsequently produce fronds which have wedge-shaped gaps or the characteristic V-shaped cuts to fronds(Wood, 1968a; Sadakathulla and Ramachandran, 1990).

List of Symptoms/Signs

Top of page
SignLife StagesType
Growing point / dead heart
Growing point / dieback
Growing point / distortion
Growing point / internal feeding; boring
Leaves / abnormal forms
Leaves / internal feeding

Biology and Ecology

Top of page

O. rhinoceros eggs are laid in rotting palm materials including trunks, tree stumps, compost heaps, dung hills, sawdust or garbage dumps. The eggs hatch after 8-12 days and the entire larval stage is spent inside the breeding medium. Development of the larva takes 80-200 days: first instar takes 10-21 days, second instar takes 12-21 days and third instar takes 60-125 days. The beetle then enters the prepupal stage of about 8-13 days, subsequently pupating within a pupal chamber made from the food substrate. The pupal stage lasts 17-30 days. Adults may live up to 6 months or more (Bedford, 1980; Khoo et al., 1991).

Bedford (1976c, 1980) reviewed the life-cycle of O. rhinoceros and noted a wide range in the duration of the third-instar larvae (60-165 days) compared to the other stages. This may be caused by differences in climatic and nutritional conditions of different habitats. Dry climate or low nutritional conditions often delayed larval development of O. rhinoceros, which can be extended to as long as 14 months, giving rise to smaller-sized adults (Catley, 1969). Catley (1969) also demonstrated that with ample food supply, the duration of the third-instar larvae is within 3-4 months. With superior and improved larval diet combined with suitable temperatures, the duration of the larval stages can be shortened from 6 to 5 months (Schipper, 1976). Similarly, Wood (1968a) demonstrated that the larvae required about 5-7 months to mature in oil palm log tissue, while a shorter maturity period of 4-5 months was observed in a habitat mixture of cowdung and sawdust. Conditions suitable for larval development are temperature (27-29°C) and RH 85-95% (Bedford, 1980).

The adult beetles feed by boring into the growing point or meristem of coconut palms and this is the primary cause of crop damage leading to loss of yield and death in in coconut palms of all ages. Similar attacks stunt growth or may kill young oil palms. The larvae feed on dead wood; dead palm logs and stumps and the tops of dead standing coconut poles are a primary breeding site.

Natural enemies

Top of page
Natural enemyTypeLife stagesSpecificityReferencesBiological control inBiological control on
Alaus Predator Larvae
Alaus farinosus Predator Wallis and Futuna Cocos nucifera
Alaus montravelii Predator Wallis and Futuna Cocos nucifera
Alaus podargus Predator
Alaus speciosus Predator Larvae Western Samoa Cocos nucifera
Athogavia borneoica Parasite
Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki Pathogen
Bacillus thuringiensis thuringiensis Pathogen
Beauveria bassiana Pathogen Larvae
Boettcherisca peregrina Parasite
Brachinus stenoderus Predator Fiji Cocos nucifera
Campsomeris azurea Parasite Fiji Cocos nucifera
Catascopus facialis Predator Western Samoa Cocos nucifera
Elis romandi Parasite Western Samoa Cocos nucifera
Hololepta marginipunctata Predator Fiji Cocos nucifera
Hololepta quadridentata Predator Borneo; Cocos Islands; Fiji; Malaysia; Papua New Guinea; Sabah Cocos nucifera
Hypoaspis dubia Parasite India; Gujarat Cocos nucifera
Lanelater bifoveatus Predator Larvae
Lanelater fuscipes Predator Larvae Western Samoa Cocos nucifera
Mecodema spinifer Predator Fiji Cocos nucifera
Metarhizium anisopliae Pathogen Adults/Larvae/Pupae
Neochryopus savagei Predator Larvae American Samoa; Fiji; Papua New Guinea; Tonga; Western Samoa Cocos nucifera
Ochyropus gigas Predator Fiji Cocos nucifera
Oryctes rhinoceros nudivirus Pathogen Adults/Larvae/Pupae Andaman and Nicobar Islands
Oxylobus punctatosulcatus Predator Tonga Cocos nucifera
Pachylister Predator Larvae
Pachylister chinensis Predator Larvae American Samoa; Belau; Papua New Guinea Cocos nucifera
Paecilomyces tenuipes Pathogen
Paenibacillus popilliae Pathogen
Pheropsophus Predator Larvae
Pheropsophus consimilis Predator Mauritius Cocos nucifera
Pheropsophus hilaris sobrinus Predator Fiji; Mauritius; Wallis and Futuna Cocos nucifera
Pheropsophus lissoderus Predator Fiji; Mauritius Cocos nucifera
Pheropsophus occipitalis Predator Fiji; Mauritius Cocos nucifera
Pheropsophus sobrinus Predator Mauritius
Pheropsophus stenoderus Predator Fiji Cocos nucifera
Placodes ebenenus Predator Belau Cocos nucifera
Plaesius javanus Predator Larvae
Platymeris laevicollis Predator Adults American Samoa; Belau; Fiji; India; Laccadive, Minicoy and Amindivi Islands; Mauritius; New Britain; Papua New Guinea; Tonga; Wallis and Futuna; Western Samoa Cocos nucifera
Rhabditis sp. Parasite Adults/Larvae/Pupae
Santalus parallelus Predator
Scarites Predator Larvae
Scarites dubiosus Predator American Samoa; Tonga Cocos nucifera
Scarites madagascariensis Predator Fiji; Mauritius; Wallis and Futuna Cocos nucifera
Scolia cyanipennis Parasite Larvae
Scolia oryctophaga Parasite Larvae Fiji; Java; Mauritius; New Britain; Papua New Guinea; Western Samoa Cocos nucifera
Scolia patricialis Parasite Larvae Belau Cocos nucifera
Scolia procer Parasite Larvae Belau; Mauritius; Papua New Guinea Cocos nucifera
Scolia quadripustulata Parasite Larvae Fiji; Tonga Cocos nucifera
Scolia ruficornis Parasite Larvae Belau; Chagos Archipelogo; Fiji; Malaysia; Mauritius; New Britain; Papua New Guinea; Tokelau; Wallis and Futuna Cocos nucifera
Steinernema carpocapsae Parasite

Notes on Natural Enemies

Top of page

The entomopathogenic virus Oryctes rhinoceros nudivirus (OrNV), which was originally discovered in Malaysia (Huger, 1966), attacks both the larval and adult stages of O. rhinoceros. It has since been introduced into Fiji (Bedford, 1976d, 1985, 2013), the Maldives and other islands in the South Pacific to control O. rhinoceros in coconut (Marschall, 1970; Marschall and Ioane, 1982; Young and Longworth, 1981; Zelazny et al., 1992).

Oryctes larvae also succumb to attack by the green entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae (Sundara Babu et al., 1983). However, tests have shown that O. rhinoceros larvae are susceptible only to strains isolated from the same species (Fargues, 1976). Latch (1976) tested 34 isolates of Beauveria bassiana and B. tenella on O. rhinoceros larvae and found 17 isolates causing lesions similar to those by M. anisopliae.

Bacterial pathogens which have the potential to control larval stages of Oryctes were identified as Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (Kannan et al., 1980), Pseudomonas alcaligenes (Gopal and Gupta, 2002), Bacillus thuringiensis and B. popilliae (Sundara Babu et al., 1971; Norman et al., 2005) and Protista flagellates Monocercomonoides oryctesae and M. qadrii (Krishnamurthy and Sultana, 1977).

A list of predators and parasitoids for O. rhinoceros tested in the Pacific area has been compiled by Swan (1974), and includes Coleoptera (Elateridae, Histeridae and Carabidae), Hemiptera (Reduviidae), centipedes and vertebrates (rats, mice, shrews, squirrels, lemurs, monkeys and pigs). Wood (1968a) also reported the barn owl (Tyto alba javanica) as a predator of the beetles. Other natural enemies affecting O. rhinoceros include hymenopteran (Scoliidae) and dipteran (Tachinidae) parasitoids.

Means of Movement and Dispersal

Top of page

O. rhinoceros is thought to have spread throughout the Pacific by increased sea traffic during World War II. The pest has also been found in air cargo and may be transported to new areas in decaying organic materials such as compost and sawdust, and in nursery pot plants. The larvae may also be transported to new areas in floating logs.



Top of page

On oil palms, O. rhinoceros bores into the base of the cluster of unopened leaves (spears), causing V- or wedge-shaped cuts in the unfolded fronds. Spears may collapse or emerged fronds may break off along the petiole or midrib (Wood, 1968). In young palms where the spears are narrower and penetration may occur lower down, the effects of damage can be much more severe than in older palms (Wood, 1968a). The young palms affected by the beetle damage are believed to have a delayed immaturity period (Liau and Ahmad, 1991). Thus, early oil palm yields could be considerably reduced after a prolonged and serious rhinoceros beetle attack. Although Wood et al. (1973) suggested that the damage to the immature palms results in relatively small crop losses, field experiments conducted by Liau and Ahmad (1991) revealed an average of 25% yield loss over the first 2 years of production. This was possibly caused by the reduction in the canopy size of more than 15% for moderately serious to higher damage levels (Samsudin et al., 1993). In India, the infestation in oil palm was more prevalent in mature plantations (10-15 year old) compared to immature or younger plantings (Dhileepan, 1988).

Similarly, on coconut the reduction in leaf area of the palms influences nut production (Zelazny, 1979a) but the attack was more towards the tall, mature trees, from about 5 years of age onwards (Bedford, 1976c). Serious attacks on coconut may be observed in areas adjacent to a breeding site with a high beetle population, especially in the coastal region of Peninsular Malaysia. Zelazny (1979a) reported an average of 10% of fronds damaged by cuts resulted in a 3% reduction of the leaf area and a 4-5% loss of nut production; similarly 30% of fronds damaged resulted in a 7% reduction of the leaf area and 13% nut yield reduction, i.e. loss.

Detection and Inspection

Top of page

On both oil palms and coconuts, O. rhinoceros bores through the petiole bases into the central unopened leaves. This causes tissue maceration and the presence of a fibrous frass inside the feeding hole is an indication of its activity within (Catley, 1969). The adults may be forced out by 'winkling' with a hooked barbed wire into the feeding hole. Larval, pupal as well as adult population may be detected and inspected by digging into or breaking open its possible breeding sites its possible breeding grounds.

Similarities to Other Species/Conditions

Top of page

The strikingly similar but larger species of scarabeid, Oryctes gnu (=trituberculatus) may be confused with the adult O. rhinoceros (Wood, 1968a). The difference is the three tubercles on the thoracic ridge for O. gnu, instead of two in O. rhinoceros. The larvae of Xylotrupes gideon are more hairy than those of O. rhinoceros. The head capsule at each larval stage is also smaller (Wood, 1968a). Aegus chelifer larvae are relatively hairless, relatively more translucent, with an orange head and a longitudinal anal slit (Wood, 1968a). Coelodera diardi larvae appear to be very similar to the second-instar O. rhinoceros larvae but are less curved. When placed on a slippery surface they swiftly move away on their backs. See Description for keys to larvae and adults, also Bedford (1976a) for a description of the Chalcosoma atlas larva from Malaysia, and Bedford (1979) for the larva of O. monoceros from the Seychelles.

Prevention and Control

Top of page

Physical Control

A method for trapping adults has been developed and tested by Hoyt (1963) and Bedford (1973). Hoyt (1963) designed a simple, cheap trap, consisting of a piece of coconut trunk, the cap with a beetle-size hole drilled through the centre, and resting on a tin can a tin can placed right below it leaving no space between them. The whole trap is set at a height of 1.8 m from the ground. There was no chemical attractant used in this trap: the decaying trunk served as the attractant. When a small quantity of the synthetic chemical attractant ethyl dihydrochrysanthemumate (chrislure) was applied to the coconut cap of the Hoyt trap, catch was increased (Bedford, 1973) compared to dispensing the lure from a more expensive metal vane-type trap (Barber et al., 1971). Chrislure was subsequently superseded by ethyl chrysanthemumate (rhinolure) (Maddison et al., 1973). Hoyt's trap was used by Bedford (1975) to monitor population trends at a density of 23 traps per 8 hectares. To control beetle infestation, the density of the traps should be increased at the borders of a known source of infestation rather than inside the field (Young, 1972). The use of light traps for controlling populations has been found to be ineffective: Wood (1968a) indicated that beetles do not often enter traps although they are attracted to the light source. However, light traps may be useful for monitoring purposes.

Pheromonal Control

A male-produced aggregation pheromone, ethyl 4-methyloctanoate (E4-MO) was discovered (Hallett et al., 1995; Morin et al., 1996). It has been synthesised and is available commercially (for details of synthesis and types of traps available, see Bedford (2013a)). It is reported to be 10 times more attractive than ethyl chrysanthemumate. The pheromone is stored in a small, heat-sealed, polymer membrane bag and placed between interlocking metal vanes mounted on a plastic bucket. The beetles attracted by the pheromone are trapped inside the bucket. It is very useful as a monitoring tool, and as an economical control method particularly in young oil palm replant areas when placed at one trap per 2 ha (Norman and Basri, 2004; Oeschlager, 2007; Bedford, 2014). 

Cultural Control

Sanitation within and surrounding the plantations, especially destruction of the potential or existing breeding sites of this pest, provides an important basis for its control (Wood, 1968a; Turner, 1973). Manure heaps and pits may have to be covered or alternatively turned regularly for the removal of the grubs (Catley, 1969). The establishment of a good, fast-growing ground cover crop provides a vegetative barrier that hampers the movement of the adult beetle looking for suitable breeding sites or young oil palms in replant areas (Wood, 1968b). This restricts the damage in oil palm to low levels (Wood et al., 1973). Removal of the adults from the point of attack in young palms by using a hooked piece of wire (winkling) can be considered a common mechanical control technique to reduce the number of adults in an infested area. This practice is often costly, labour intensive and needs to be conducted regularly, provided that sufficient labour is available. However, some additional damage may be inflicted to the young palms during the search for the adults, making the practice not entirely satisfactory.

Biological Control

Early attempts at biological control of O. rhinoceros concentrated on the introduction of predators and scoliid parasitoids of other Oryctes species mainly from Africa. None of those that became established was able to provide satisfactory control. However, biological control effort concentrated on Oryctes rhinoceros nudivirus (OrNV) after its discovery in Malaysia in 1965 (Huger, 1966) and its successful introduction into Western Samoa in 1967 (Swan, 1974; Waterhouse and Norris, 1987). Endemic natural enemies of O. rhinoceros offer a cheap and long-term control of the pest, leading to a reduction in the use of chemical insecticides. OrNV and the pathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae have been utilized further for field control of this pest in several countries (George and Kurian, 1971; Latch and Falloon, 1976; Zelazny, 1979b; Bedford, 1986; Darwis, 1990). For OrNV, the adult beetles are dipped in a suspension of ground, infected grubs. They are then allowed to crawl about for 24 hours through sterilized sawdust mixed with the above suspension. They are then released back into the plantation to infect other adults and larvae in the breeding sites (Bedford, 1976d). OrNV suspension may also be applied directly to the mouthparts of adults to infect them for release (Ramle et al., 2005). A supply of beetles for infecting and release may be obtained from a mass-rearing facility. The fungus Metarhizium anisopliae var. major may be produced commercially or in bulk by various methods, for release by suitable means into breeding sites, particularly into chipped decaying oil palm trunk material in oil palm replant areas (Sivapragasam and Tey, 1995; Tey and Ho, 1995; Ramle et al., 1999, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2011; Ramle and Kamarudin, 2013).

Chemical Control

Most of the chemicals applied are targeted to control the adult stages attacking the spear of the palm. The point of application is therefore at the base of the leaf sheath (Sadakathulla and Ramachandran, 1990). Granular formulations of the insecticide gamma-BHC were effective as this facilitates applying them in the frond axils and thereby lowering costs compared to spraying liquid formulations (Ho and Toh, 1982). Eleven types of insecticides were evaluated for the control of the adults in the nursery and immature stages of the oil palm (Chung et al., 1991). On immature oil palm, the most effective treatment in reducing the number of broken spears and spear dieback, was lambda cyhalothrin. Cypermethrin was effective in reducing the number of holes on spears and fronds. Systemic insecticides have been used in trunk injections in tall coconut palms in Malaysia, but their effectiveness is uncertain. Insect-repellent naphthalene applied (as moth balls) fortnightly to the frond axils provided 95% control of the pest (Singh, 1987). Juvenile hormone mimics have been tested on pupae of O. rhinoceros and indicated that methoprene was effective in causing death of the developing adult at the pupal stage (Dhondt et al., 1976). The use of long residual insecticides for drenching the breeding sites (i.e. coconut stumps) has been found effective to suppress the larval stages up to 7 months (Ho and Toh, 1982). Insecticidal treatment at the bottom soil of manure pits may also be useful to suppress the larval stages (Visalakshi et al., 1988).

Field Monitoring/Economic Threshold Levels

On oil palm, the economic threshold for O. rhinoceros still needs to be investigated and developed. Wood (1968a) developed four categories of damage to young oil palms which may be used to determine the severity of infestation in a particular area.

Category 1: Slight damage - limited signs of damage to fronds with little or no damage to spears.
Category 2: Medium damage - numerous damaged fronds but with new healthy spears.
Category 3: Severe damage - many fronds damaged and only short, distorted spears emerging. Spear rot does not affect all spears.
Category 4: Dead palms - fronds severely damaged, all spears rotting and can be lifted out easily with no live spears to emerge.Some palms of this category may recover.

These categories may change between the observation periods, thus indicating the beetles' activity. If a census of 1 row in every 10 is conducted and more than 10% incidence of damage (those found in the categories mentioned) is found, this indicates high beetle activity and control measures should be conducted immediately (Wood, 1968a). The number of beetles found affecting young palms per hectare can also be considered as threshold levels for initiating control measures. IRHO (1991) recommended the detection of 3-5 adult beetles per hectare of oil palms for the first 2 years of the crop, to initiate control measures. However, the level can be increased to 15-20 adults per hectare once the palms have grown for more than 2 years (IRHO, 1991). Winkling frequency also depended on the numbers found per hectare. Monthly winkling is suggested for 3-5 adults, fortnightly for 5-10 adults and weekly for more than 10 adults per hectare (IRHO, 1991).


Top of page

Al-Habshi KA, Ba-Angood SA, Al-Baiti SO, 2006. The occurrence of the date palm borer Oryctes rhinoceros (Linnaeus) in light traps in Wadi Hadramout in 2002. University of Aden Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 10(3):419-426.

ANEPPN, 1986. Crop Protection news from Arab/Near East countries. Arab and Near East Plant Protection Newsletter No. 3(19-20):2-4.

APPPC, 1987. Insect pests of economic significance affecting major crops of the countries in Asia and the Pacific region. Technical Document No. 135. Bangkok, Thailand: Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific region (RAPA).

AVA, 2001. Diagnostic records of the Plant Health Diagnostic Services, Plant Health Centre, Agri-food & Veterinary Authority, Singapore.

Babu PCS, Lakshmanan P, Subramaniam TR, 1971. Preliminary study on the efficacy of certain bacterial insecticides on the rhinoceros beetle. Madras Agricultural Journal, 58(6):511-513

Barber IA, McGovern TP, Beroza M, Hoyt CP, Walker A, 1971. Attractant for the coconut rhinoceros beetle. Journal of Economic Entomology, 64:1041-1044.

Barlow HS, Chew PS, 1970. The rhinoceros beetle Oryctes rhinoceros in young oil palms replanted after rubber on some estates in Western Malaysia. In: Wastie RL, Wood BJ, eds. Proceedings of the Malaysian Crop Protection Conference 1970. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Incorporated Society of Planters, 133-144.

Beaudoin-Ollivier L, Prior RNB, Laup S, 1998. A field key to identify some rhinoceros and other beetle larvae breeding in coconut palm habitats in Papua New Guinea. Papua New Guinea Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries, 41:1-15.

Beaudoin-Ollivier L, Prior RNB, Laup S, 2000. Simplified field key to identify larvae of some rhinoceros beetles and associated scarabs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) in Papua New Guinea coconut developments. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 93(1):90-95.

Bedford GO, 1973. Comparison of two attractant trap types for coconut rhinoceros beetles in New Guinea. Journal of Economic Entomology, 66(3):1216-1217.

Bedford GO, 1974. Descriptions of the larvae of some rhinoceros beetles (Col., Scarabaeidae, Dynastinae) associated with coconut palms in New Guinea. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 63(3):445-472

Bedford GO, 1975. Trap catches of the coconut rhinoceros beetle Oryctes rhinoceros (L.) (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Dynastinae) in New Britain. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 65(3):443-451

Bedford GO, 1976. Description of the larva of Chalcosoma atlas (L.) (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Dynastinae) from Malaysia. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 66(2):189-193.

Bedford GO, 1976. Mass rearing of the coconut palm rhinoceros beetle for release of virus. PANS, 22(1):5-10.

Bedford GO, 1976. Observations on the biology and ecology of Oryctes rhinoceros and Scapanes australis (Coleoptera: Scarabpidae: Dynastinp): pests of coconut palms in Melanesia. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society, 15(3):241-251

Bedford GO, 1976. Rhinoceros beetles in Papua New Guinea. South Pacific Bulletin, 26(3):38-41

Bedford GO, 1976. Use of a virus against the coconut palm rhinoceros beetle in Fiji. PANS, 22(1):11-25

Bedford GO, 1979. Description of the larva of Oryctes monoceros (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Scarabpidae: Dynastinp) from the Seychelles. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 69(4):599-604

Bedford GO, 1980. Biology, ecology and control of palm rhinoceros beetles. In: Mittler TE, Radovsky FJ, Resh VH, ed. Annual Review of Entomology, 25:309-339

Bedford GO, 1986. Biological control of the rhinoceros beetle (Oryctes rhinoceros) in the South Pacific by baculovirus. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 15(2/3):141-147

Bedford GO, 2013. Biology and management of palm dynastid beetles: recent advances. Annual Review of Entomology, 58:353-372.

Bedford GO, 2013. Long-term reduction in damage by rhinoceros beetle Oryctes rhinoceros (L.) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) to coconut palms at Oryctes Nudivirus release sites on Viti Levu, Fiji. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(49):6422-6425.

Bedford GO, 2014. Advances in the control of rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros in oil palm. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 26(3):183-194.

Bhatnagar SP, 1971. New records of the Dynastides pests from Rajasthan. Labdev Journal of Science and Technology, 9-B(3/4):232-233

Burand JP, 1998. Nudiviruses. In: The Insect Viruses [ed. by Miller, L. K. \Ball, L. A.]. New York, USA: Plenum, 69-90.

Catley A, 1969. The coconut rhinoceros beetle Oryctes rhinoceros(L.). PANS, 15:18-30.

Chung GF, Sim SC, Tan MW, 1991. Chemical control of rhinoceros beetles in the nursery and immature oil palms. Proceedings of the PORIM International Palm Oil Development Conference Module II - Agriculture. PORIM (Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

CIE, 1967. Distribution Maps of Plant Pests, No. 54. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.

Darwis M, 1990. Minimum effective concentration of Metarhizium anisopliae to control Oryctes rhinoceros larvae. Pemberitaan Penelitian Tanaman Industri, 15(4):133-136

David WAL, 1975. The status of viruses pathogenic for insects and mites. In: Smith RF, Mittler TE, Smith CN, ed. Annual review of entomology. Volume 20. Annual Reviews Inc. Palo Alto, California USA, 97-117

Dechambre RP, 1983. Contribution to the phylogenetic study of the Oryctes of the Madagascan region; use of the propygidial stridulatory stria (Col. Dynastidae). Bulletin de Societe Entomologique de France, 88(5/6):436-448

Dhileepan K, 1988. Incidence and intensity of rhinoceros beetle infestation in oil palm plantations in India. Journal of Plantation Crops, 16(2):126-129

Dhileepan K, 1992. Insect pests of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) in India. Planter, 68(793):183-191

Dhondt AA, McGovern TP, Beroza M, 1976. Effect of juvenile hormone mimics on the coconut rhinoceros beetle. Journal of Economic Entomology, 69(4):427-428

Elliott R, 1964. Recognition of the sexes in some scarabaeid larvae. New Zealand Journal of Science, 7:181-187.

Endrödi S, 1985. The Dynastinae of the World. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Dr. W. Junk, 800 pp.

EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization.

EPPO, 2016. EPPO Global database (available online). Paris, France: EPPO.

Fargues J, 1976. Specificity of fungi imperfecti (Hyphomycetes) pathogenic for the larvae of Coleoptera (Scarabpidae and Chrysomelidae). Entomophaga, 21(3):313-323

George E, Kurian C, 1971. Studies on the green muscardine fungus: influence of meteorological factors and inoculum potential on the infection of Metarrhizium anisopliae on Oryctes rhinoceros L. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(4):423-430

Gopal M, Gupta A, 2002. An opportunistic bacterial pathogen, Pseudomonas alcaligenes, may limit the perpetuation of Oryctes virus, a biocontrol agent of Oryctes rhinoceros L. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 12(4):507-512.

Gope B, Prasad B, 1983. Preliminary observation on the nutritional value of some edible insects of Manipur. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 4(1):55-61

Gurmit Singh, 1987. Naphthalene balls for the protection of coconuts and oil palms against Oryctes rhinoceros (L.). Planter, 63(736):286-292

Hallett RH, Perez AL, Gries G, Gries R, Pierce HD Jr, Yue JunMing, Oehlschlager AC, Gonzalez LM, Borden JH, 1995. Aggregation pheromone on coconut rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros (L.) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 21(10):1549-1570.

Hawaii Department of Agriculture, 2014. Destructive beetles found on oahu coconut trees. Destructive beetles found on oahu coconut trees. Hawaii, USA: Hawaii Department of Agriculture.

Ho CT, Toh PY, 1982. Some investigations into the control of Oryctes rhinoceros L. in coconut plantings. The Planter, 58:492-506.

Hosoya T, 2011. Records of the exotic and pest beetle Oryctes rhinoceros (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Dynastinae) from Takara Island in the Tokara Islands. Elytra, 1(2):209-210.

Hoyt CP, 1963. Investigations of rhinoceros beetles in West Africa. Pacific Science, 17:444-451.

HUGER AM, 1966. A virus disease of the Indian rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros (Linnaeus), caused by a new type of insect virus, Rhabdionvirus oryctes gen. n., sp.n. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 8(1):38-51 pp.

Hurpin B, 1953. Reconnaissance des sexes chez les larves de Coléoptères Scarabaeidae. Bulletin de Societe Entomologique de France, 58:104-107.

IRHO (Instiut de Recherches pour les Huiles et Oleagineux), 1991. Oil palm insect pests and their enemies in Southeast Asia. Oleagineux Numerospecial Publication Mensuelle, 46(11):405-407.

ISSG, 2009. Global Invasive Species Database (GISD). Invasive Species Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission.

Kannan N, Shanmugasundaram S, Lakshmanan M, 1980. Isolation of a bacterial pathogen from the coconut pest Oryctes rhinoceros L. Entomon, 5(4):285-289

Khoo KC, Ooi PAC, Ho CT, 1991. Crop pests and their management in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Tropical Press Sdn. Bhd, ix + 242 pp.

Krishnamurthy R, Sultana T, 1977. Studies on two flagellates of the genus Monocercomonoides Travis 1932 from the gut of dung beetle larve (Oryctes rhinoceros) in India. Archiv fur Protistenkunde, 119(1/2):121-126

Latch GCM, 1976. Studies on the susceptibility of Oryctes rhinoceros to some entomogenous fungi. Entomophaga, 21(1):31-38

Latch GCM, Falloon RE, 1976. Studies on the use of Metarhizium anisopliae to control Oryctes rhinoceros. Entomophaga, 21(1):39-48

Liau SS, Ahmad A, 1991. The control of Oryctes rhinoceros by clean clearing and its effect on early yield in palm to palm replants. Proceedings of the 1991 PORIM International Palm Oil Development Conference Module II - Agriculture. PORIM (Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Maddison PA, Beroza M, McGovern TP, 1973. Ethyl chrysanthemumate as an attractant for the coconut rhinoceros beetle. Journal of Economic Entomology, 66(3):591-592.

Marschall KJ, 1970. Introduction of a new virus disease of the coconut rhinoceros beetle in Western Samoa. Nature, 225:288-289.

Marschall KJ, Ioane I, 1982. The effect of re-release of Oryctes rhinoceros baculovirus in the biological control of rhinoceros beetles in Western Samoa. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 39(3):267-276

Molet T, 2013. CPHST Pest Datasheet for Oryctes rhinoceros. CPHST Pest Datasheet for Oryctes rhinoceros., USA: USDA-APHIS-PPQ-CPHST.

Moore A, 2007. Rhinoceros beetle pest found in Guam and Saipan. Pest Alert. Suva, Fiji Islands: Plant Protection Service Secretariat of the Pacific Community.

Morin JP, Rochat D, Malosse C, Lettere M, Chenon RDde, Wibwo H, Descoins C, 1996. Ethyl 4-methyloctanoate, major component of Oryctes rhinoceros (L.) (Coleoptera, Dynastidae) male pheromone. (Le 4-méthyloctanoate d'éthyle, composant principal de la phéromone mâle de Oryctes rhinoceros (L.) (Coleoptera, Dynastidae).) Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences. Série III, Sciences de la Vie, 319(7):595-602.

NAPPO, 2014. Phytosanitary Alert System: Coconut Rhinoceros Beetle (Oryctes rhinoceros, Scarabaeidae) detected in Hawaii. Phytosanitary Alert System: Coconut Rhinoceros Beetle (Oryctes rhinoceros, Scarabaeidae) detected in Hawaii. NAPPO.

Norman K, Basri MW, Ramle M, 2005. Environmental factors affecting the population density of Oryctes rhinoceros in a zero-burn oil palm replant. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 17:53-63.

Norman K, Mohd Basri W, 2004. Immigration and activity of Oryctes rhinoceros within a small oil palm replanting area. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 16(2):64-77.

Oehlschlager C, 2007. Optimizing trapping of palm weevils and beetles. Acta Horticulturae [Proceedings of the Third International Date Palm Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 19-21 February 2006.], No.736:347-368.

Ooi PAC, 1988. Insects in Malaysian agriculture. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Tropical Press Sdn. Bhd., viii + 106 pp.

Purrini K, 1985. On disease agents of insect pests of wild palms and forests in Tanzania. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Entomologie, 99(3):237-240

Rajamanickam K, Kennedy FJS, Lourduraj AC, Raveendran TS, 1992. Attractants - an aid in rhinoceros beetle (Oryctes rhinoceros L.) management. Indian Coconut Journal (Cochin), 23(1):6-7

Raju DS, 1983. A note on major pest problems of cashew, coconut and arecanut and their control in Goa. In: Venkata Ram CS, ed. Proceedings of the Second Annual Symposium on Plantation Crops. Plant protection (entomology, microbiology, nematology, plant pathology and rodentology). PLACROSYM II 1979 PLACROSYM Standing Committee Kasaragod, Kerala India, 523-529

Ramle M, Basri MW, Norman K, Mukesh S, Siti Ramlah AA, 1999. Impact of Metarhizium anisopliae (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes) applied by wet and dry inoculum on oil palm rhinoceros beetles, Oryctes rhinoceros (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Journal of Oil Palm Research, 11:25-40.

Ramle M, Basri MW, Norman K, Siti Ramlah AA, Hisham H, 2006. Research into the commercialization of Metarhizium anisopliae (Hyphomycetes) for biocontrol of oil palm rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros (Scarabaeidae), in oil palm. Journal of Oil Palm Research, Special Issue:37-49.

Ramle M, Norman K, Ang BN, Ramlah Ali AS, Basri MW, 2007. Application of powder formulation of Metarhizium anisopliae to control Oryctes rhinoceros in rotting oil palm residues under leguminous cover crops. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 19:319-331.

Ramle M, Norman K, Basri MW, 2009. Pathogenicity of granule formulations of Metarhizium anisopliae against the larvae of the oil palm rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros (L. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 21:602-612.

Ramle M, Norman K, Idris AG, Mohd BW, Jackson TA, Tey CC, Mohd AA, 2011. Molecular approaches in the assessment of Oryctes rhinoceros virus for the control of rhinoceros beetle in oil palm plantations. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 23:1096-1109.

Ramle M, Norman K, Mohd BW, 2011. Trap for the auto dissemination of Metarhizium anisopliae in management of rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 23:1011-1017.

Ramle Moslim, Kamarudin N, 2014. The use of palm kernel cake in the production of conidia and blastospores of Metarhizium anisopliae var. major for control of Oryctes rhinoceros. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 26(1):133-139.

Sadakathulla S, Ramachandran TKA, 1990. A novel method to control rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros L. in coconut. Indian Coconut Journal Cochin, 21:7-8, 10-12

Samsudin A, Chew PS, Mohamad MM, 1993. Oryctes rhinoceros: Breeding and damage on oil palms in an oil palm to oil palm replanting situation. The Planter, 69(813):583-591.

Schipper CM, 1976. Mass rearing the coconut rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros L. (Scarab., Dynastinae). Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Entomologie, 81(1):21-25

Sharma S, Gupta SG, 1988. Rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros (Coleoptera: Dynastidae) on banana from Nagaland. Bulletin of Entomology (New Delhi), 29(2):228-230

Sivapragasam A, Tey CC, 1994. Susceptibility of Oryctes rhinoceros larvae (L.) to three isolates of Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch) Sorokin. MAPPS Newsletter, 18(2):13-14

Sundara Babu PC, Balasubramanian M, Jayaraj S, 1983. Studies on the pathogenicity of Metarhizium anisoplip (Metschnikoff) Sorokin var. major Tulloch in Oryctes rhinoceros (L.). Research Publication, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, No. 1:32pp.

Swan DI, 1974. A review of the work on predators, parasites and pathogens for the control of Oryctes rhinoceros (L.) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) [on coconut] in the Pacific area. Miscellaneous Publication, Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, No. 7:[3 +] 64 pp.

Tey CC, Ho CT, 1995. Infection of Oryctes rhinoceros L. by application of Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorokin to breeding sites. Planter, Kuala Lumpur, 71(837):563-567.

Turner PD, 1973. An effective trap for Oryctes beetle in oil palm? Planter, 49(573):488-490.

Uili S, 1980. Agricultural development in Tokelau. Alafua Agricultural Bulletin, 5(4):23-25

Visalakshi A, Santhakumari K, Mohandas N, 1988. Control of breeding of Oryctes rhinoceros L. in manure by treating the bottom soil of the manure pits with insecticides. Entomon, 13(3-4):223-225

Waterhouse DF, 1993. The Major Arthropod Pests and Weeds of Agriculture in Southeast Asia. ACIAR Monograph No. 21. Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, 141 pp.

Waterhouse DF, Norris KR, 1987. Biological control: Pacific prospects. viii + 454pp

Wettasinghe DT, Mahindapala R(Editors), 1986. Report of the Crop Protection Division. Report of the Coconut Research Institute, Sri Lanka, for 1986 Lunuwila, Sri Lanka; Coconut Research Institute, 97-121

Wood BJ, 1968a. Pest of Oil Palms in Malaysia and their Control. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Incorporated Society of Planters.

Wood BJ, 1968b. Studies on the effect of ground vegetation on infestations of Oryctes rhinoceros (L.) (Col., Dynastidae) in young oil palm replantings in Malaysia. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 59:85-96.

Wood BJ, Corley RHV, Goh KH, 1973. Studies on the effect of pest damage on oil palm yield. In: Wastie RL, Earp DA, eds. Advances in Oil Palm Cultivation. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Incorporated Society of Planters, 360-379.

Young EC, 1972. The coconut palm rhinoceros beetle (distribution, recognition of palm damage and methods of possible eradication of a new infestation). South Pacific Bulletin, 22:27-32.

Young EC, 1975. A study of rhinoceros beetle damage in coconut palms. Technical Paper, South Pacific Commission, No. 170:vi + 63 pp.

Young EC, Longworth JF, 1981. The epizootiology of the baculovirus of the coconut palm rhinoceros beetle (Oryctes rhinoceros) in Tonga. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 38(3):362-369

Zelazny B, 1979. Loss in coconut yield due to Oryctes rhinoceros damage. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin, 27(3):65-70.

Zelazny B, 1979. Virulence of the baculovirus of Oryctes rhinoceros from ten locations in the Philippines and in Western Samoa. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 33(1):106-107

Zelazny B, Lolong A, Pattang B, 1992. Oryctes rhinoceros (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) populations suppressed by a baculovirus. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 59(1):61-68

Zhang J, 1984. The coconut rhinoceros beetle on Hainan Island, China. Plant Protection Bulletin, FAO, 32(1):17-24

Links to Websites

Top of page
GISD/IASPMR: Invasive Alien Species Pathway Management Resource and DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway source for updated system data added to species habitat list.


Top of page

19/05/15 Review by:

Geoff Bedford, Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia

Distribution Maps

Top of page
You can pan and zoom the map
Save map