Orobanche cernua (nodding broomrape)
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat List
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Growth Stages
- List of Symptoms/Signs
- Biology and Ecology
- Latitude/Altitude Ranges
- Natural enemies
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Plant Trade
- Impact Summary
- Economic Impact
- Social Impact
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Detection and Inspection
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Orobanche cernua Loefl.
Preferred Common Name
- nodding broomrape
Other Scientific Names
- Orobanche bicolor CA Meyer
- Orobanche cernua var. cumana (Wallr.) G. Beck
- Orobanche curviflora Viv.
- Orobanche gallica Grenier
- Orobanche glaucantha Trautvetter
- Orobanche hispanica Boissier
- Orobanche nicotiana Wight
- Orobanche pogonanthera Reuter in DC.
International Common Names
- English: drooping broomrape
Local Common Names
- Ethiopia: delantuba; yebeg eras; yemeder kitenge
- Germany: Nickende Sommerwurz
- India: bodu; pokayilai-kalan
- ORACE (Orobanche cernua)
Summary of InvasivenessTop of page
O. cernua is an obligatory, non-photosynthetic root parasite which is native over a wide range across northeast Africa, southern Europe and western and southern Asia. In many of these areas it is a serious pest of Solanaceaeous crops such as Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) and S. melongena (aubergine) and occasionally S. tuberosum (potato). Species of Orobanche depend totally on their hosts for all nutrition and become an active sink for the host plant. This therefore results in a decrease in crop yield and as a result can have a major impact on the economy and livelihoods. Once established, the seed bank may last 10-20 years and there are no simple, economic control measures. Seeds of O. cernua are very small and inconspicuous and can be accidentally introduced into new areas as a contaminant of soil, seeds and machinery. There is potential for this species to invade many other areas of the world.
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Plantae
- Phylum: Spermatophyta
- Subphylum: Angiospermae
- Class: Dicotyledonae
- Order: Scrophulariales
- Family: Orobanchaceae
- Genus: Orobanche
- Species: Orobanche cernua
Notes on Taxonomy and NomenclatureTop of page
The family Orobanchaceae comprises of more than 100 parasitic plants, native to temperature zones of the old world (Miladinovic et al., 2012).
O. cernua is often treated as a single species sensu lato, in accordance with many botanical authorities, including Beck-Mennagetta (1930), Chater and Webb (1972) and The Plant List (2013). There is now, however, well supported evidence for a clear distinction between the typical O. cernua and the form now known as O. cumana Wallr.. This difference is based not only on quite distinct host range but also on seed morphology, flower morphology, genetic differences and seed oil profiles (Joel et al., 1996; Paran et al., 1997; Pujadas-Salvá and Thalouarn, 1998; Pujadas-Salva and Velasco, 2000). Furthermore, the primer (GATA)4 detected polymorphism between five specimens each of O. cernua and O. cumana collected from different countries, permitting these two closely related species to be clearly differentiated molecularly (Benharrat et al., 2002). Hybridisation between the two species can occur, as in Hungary (Solymosi and Horvath, 2001; Solymosi et al., 2004). There is also suspicion that this has occurred in Israel where Joel (2015) reports that infestations of O. cumana on Helianthus annuus (sunflower) have developed to infest and cause serious damage to Solanum lycopersicum (tomato), perhaps by introgression with local O. cernua.
Several other varieties of O. cernua were distinguished by Beck-Mennagetta (1930); vars. typica, latebracteata, desertorum (also known as var. nepalensis), hansii and australiana. The form of O. cernua attacking Solanaceae is usually ascribed to var. desertorum. The significance of the other varieties as crop pests is uncertain. The geographical distribution provided in this data sheet makes distinction between varieties where that information is available.
Although generally referred to as O. cernua Loefl., there is a suggestion that the botanical authority for this taxon could be Linnaeus, hence O. cernua L. (Pujadas-Salva and Velasco, 2000).
DescriptionTop of page
O. cernua is a non-photosynthetic parasite producing erect, fleshy, leafless flowering stems 15-40 cm high bearing alternate scales less than 1 cm long. Although usually unbranched above ground, multiple stems sometimes arise from a single tubercle below ground. The plant is pale, completely lacking any chlorophyll. The base of the stem, below ground, is normally swollen and tuberous. The inflorescence, occupying up to half the length of the stems carries many acropetally developing flowers, arranged in spikes or racemes, each subtended by a bract 7-12 mm long (without the additional bracteoles present in O. ramosa). The calyx has four free segments, more-or-less bidentate, 7-12 mm long. The white corolla tube, 12-30 mm long, is inflated near the base, conspicuously down-curved, with narrow reflexed lips, up to 10 mm across. The tube is mainly white or pale while the lips are contrastingly blue or purple, without distinct venation. Filaments are inserted in the corolla tube, 4-6 mm above the base. A capsule develops up to 8-10 mm long and may contain several hundred seeds, each about 0.2 x 0.4 mm. A single plant carries 10-100 flowers and hence may produce over 100,000 seeds (Chater and Webb, 1972).
Morphological differences between typical O. cernua and O. cumana include; height 15-30 cm in O. cernua, 40-60 in O. cumana; flowers 10-20 mm in O. cernua, 20-30 mm in O. cumana; inflorescence dense in O. cernua, lax in O. cumana; filaments and anthers virtually glabrous in O. cernua, hairy in O. cumana. The flowers are conspicuously longer and more down-curved in O. cumana.
DistributionTop of page
O. cernua occurs widely from southern and eastern Europe and North Africa eastwards through southern Asia into China and Australia. There are sporadic occurrences of O. cernua in both West and East Africa. The presence of O. cernua in the UK as described by Stace (1991) is believed to have been in error (Euro+Med, 2016).
The Distribution Table below includes almost all records for O. cernua in the widest sense. Even where the main weed problem is O. cumana other forms of O. cernua will occur. Where these are not thought to include the weedy form, it is noted accordingly.
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
History of Introduction and SpreadTop of page
Due to the uncertainty over the natural distribution of O. cernua there are few examples of its introduction, that into Niger being perhaps the most probable, though there is no information on its history. USDA-ARS (2016) indicates ‘naturalization’ in Slovakia but it is however listed as occurring naturally in closely adjacent countries of southern Europe.
Risk of IntroductionTop of page
Species of Orobanche are listed as prohibited and/or subject to quarantine, in virtually all countries with developed plant quarantine systems. However the due to the small size of the seeds they can be readily overlooked as contaminants in crop seed or in the packaging of crop produce, etc. and hence the risks of this species being accidentally introduced is quite high.
HabitatTop of page
Most of the weedy Orobanche species are native to the Middle East and are adapted to soils of generally high pH. They occur to some extent in wild vegetation but the weedy species are mostly associated with the crops which they attack. O. cernua requires relatively high temperatures for optimum germination and growth and the weedy form occurs mainly in irrigated or rain fed crops grown under summer conditions in sub-tropical climates. The forms parasitising wild hosts can occur in a wide range of soil types, sometimes in very dry conditions.
Habitat ListTop of page
|Terrestrial – Managed||Cultivated / agricultural land||Principal habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
Hosts/Species AffectedTop of page
The weedy form of O. cernua (var. desertorum), with which this data sheet is primarily concerned normally parasitises Solanaceae, especially Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco), S. melongena (aubergine) and occasionally S. tuberosum (potato). In very dense infestations, there can be occasional attachment of O. cernua to species of Xanthium but it is possible that this occurred after stimulation of germination by an adjacent crop. Other varieties of O. cernua are usually recorded on Asteraceae, especially species of Artemisia but are also recorded on species of Galinsoga and Senecio. Helianthus annuus (sunflower) is usually attacked by the closely related species O. cumana rather but O. cernua has been recorded on sunflower in China (Daniel M. Joel, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, Israel, personal communication, 2016). Other crops which are attacked by O. cernua locally include Olea europaea (olive) in Jordan (Qasem, 2011), species of Capsicum (pepper) in Kenya, (Mwangi, 1999), Prunus armeniaca and P. persica in Jordan (Qasem, 2009), Cuminum cyminum (cumin) and Plantago ovata in Rajasthan, India (Maharshi, 2001).
A study on the mitochondrial activity in O. cernua from different hosts recorded this species on Petunia hybrida, Solanum nigrum and Datura metel (Singh, 2007).
Growth StagesTop of page Flowering stage, Fruiting stage, Vegetative growing stage
SymptomsTop of page
O. cernua does not cause very distinctive symptoms but may cause some wilting, yellowing and necrosis of the foliage and a general weakening of the plant, with reduced fruit production. Hibberd et al. (1998) have shown that the damaging effect on Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) is proportional to the weight of the parasite, while surprisingly, the carbon fixation by the host was increased by 20%. Under drought conditions there may be more serious reduction of crop growth.
List of Symptoms/SignsTop of page
|Fruit / reduced size|
|Leaves / wilting|
|Leaves / yellowed or dead|
|Whole plant / dwarfing|
|Whole plant / early senescence|
Biology and EcologyTop of page
The chromosome number of O. cernua is 2n = 38 (Missouri Botanic Garden, 2016) but Musselman (1986) indicates that 2n = 24 may also occur. Hybridisation with O. cumana is possible.
O. cernua is self-pollinated, having a very pronounced form of autogamy in which anthers shed pollen onto the stigma several nodes above the open flowers (Musselman et al., 1982). Seeds are produced in very large numbers and remain viable in soil for many years. There is evidence for other Orobanche species, of seeds surviving at least 10-13 years and possibly longer. It would seem likely that the same would apply to O. cernua. However, in India, it is claimed that populations affecting Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) can be reduced by three years of clean weeding, suggesting shorter longevity under those local conditions.
Physiology and Phenology
O. cernua is an obligate parasite, needing to establish a connection to a host root within a few days of germination. The seed is minute (approximately 0.2 x 0.4 mm), from which only the radicle emerges and this can grow only a few mm long. A chemical stimulus is needed to trigger Orobanche germination. This stimulus normally comes from host roots. Therefore, Orobanche normally only germinates when a host root is nearby. However, a moist environment is required (for several days) together with suitable temperatures, before the mature seed is responsive to germination stimulants. This preparatory period is known as conditioning or preconditioning. Conditioned seeds remain responsive to germination stimulants for a limited period beyond which secondary dormancy may be induced, especially at lower than optimal temperatures (Weldeghiorghis and Murdoch, 1997; Kebreab and Murdoch, 1999a). The ability to respond to germination stimuli also fades gradually when the seeds dry and they then remain dormant until reconditioned (Timko et al., 1989; Joel et al., 1995). Detailed studies of the effects of different temperature and moisture regimes on the germination and viability of O. cernua have been reported by Kebreab and Murdoch (1999a; 199b). Optimum temperatures for conditioning and germination of O. cernua are in the region of 15-25°C (Foy et al., 1991). The stimulus exuded by host roots may be one or more strigolactones, including orobanchol and solanacoil.
On contact with the host root, a swelling, the haustorium, is formed and intrusive cells penetrate through the cortex to the vascular bundle to establish connection with the host xylem. This process is assisted by the exudation of pectolytic enzymes (Losner-Goshen et al., 1998). The parasite develops into a tubercle on the surface of the root, developing to a diameter of 5-20 mm. Secondary roots may develop on the tubercle and make separate contacts with the host root system. After several weeks, the tubercle develops a flowering shoot which emerges above the soil.
Species of Orobanche depend totally on their hosts for all nutrition, drawing sugars and nitrogen compounds from the phloem and also drawing most of their water from the host xylem. The parasite becomes an active sink, comparable to an actively growing part of the host plant itself, such that effects on the host are generally proportional to the biomass of the parasite. Thus the mass of the parasite is reflected in a very similar loss in mass of the host crop (Hibberd et al., 1998; Hibberd et al., 1999). Photosynthesis in the host may even be stimulated initially. Hibberd et al. (1999) showed that net fixation of carbon was 20% higher in infected N. tabacum compared with uninfected controls. However, O. cernua caused an 84% increase in net carbon flux moving downward from the shoot and 73% of this carbon was intercepted by O. cernua, almost entirely through the phloem.
O. cernua requires temperatures of at least 15-20°C for germination and is associated with host crops requiring at least these temperatures. Hence it is a weed of at least warm temperate to sub-tropical conditions. Soils must be moist for conditioning and germination but are otherwise not critical. It is most common in relatively alkaline soils but can occur in others. Germination of O. cernua is quite sensitive to ammonium levels (Westwood and Foy, 1999).
ClimateTop of page
|BS - Steppe climate||Tolerated||> 430mm and < 860mm annual precipitation|
|C - Temperate/Mesothermal climate||Preferred||Average temp. of coldest month > 0°C and < 18°C, mean warmest month > 10°C|
|Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summer||Preferred||Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summers|
|Cw - Warm temperate climate with dry winter||Preferred||Warm temperate climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry winters)|
Latitude/Altitude RangesTop of page
|Latitude North (°N)||Latitude South (°S)||Altitude Lower (m)||Altitude Upper (m)|
Natural enemiesTop of page
|Natural enemy||Type||Life stages||Specificity||References||Biological control in||Biological control on|
|Athelia rolfsii||Pathogen||Galdames and Diaz, 2010|
|Fusarium arthrosporioides||Pathogen||Bedi, 1994|
|Fusarium oxysporum||Pathogen||Seedlings||Thomas et al., 1999|
|Phytomyza orobanchia||Predator||Fruits/pods/Stems||Elzein et al., 1999|
Notes on Natural EnemiesTop of page
O. cernua is widely affected by the mining fly Phytomyza orobanchia. In Ethiopia it was estimated that over 70% of capsules of O. cernua were damaged at one location (Elzein et al., 1999).
Pathogens of O. cernua have been widely studied and Fusarium oxysporum and F. arthrosporioides have shown some potential as biocontrol agents (Bedi, 1994; Thomas et al., 1999; Amsellem et al., 2001). A study in Jordon showed highest pathogenicity from a species of Cylindrocladium, Fusarium, F. oxysporum and F. solani. These organisms caused total necrosis of inoculated stem tissues. A species of Epicoccum was found to cause moderate damage (60% severity) (Goussous et al., 2009). A previous report of Sclerotium rolfsii [Athelia rolfsii] parasitising O. cernua has also been made. The high susceptibility of Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) and Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) plants to this isolate precludes the use of this pathogen as a biological control agent against O. cernua (Galdames and Diaz, 2010).
Means of Movement and DispersalTop of page
Natural dispersal of O. cernua can occur locally by wind or by water.
Seeds of species of Orobanche can survive passage through livestock, as well as adhering to feet and fur and are those of O. cernua are thus very likely to be moved by cattle or sheep (Jacobsohn et al., 1987; Ginman et al., 2015).
The accidental introduction of O. cernua can occur locally via the movement of soil on vehicles or over long distances via contaminated crop seed, or plant parts in e.g. hay.
Plant TradeTop of page
|Plant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transport||Pest stages||Borne internally||Borne externally||Visibility of pest or symptoms|
|Bulbs/Tubers/Corms/Rhizomes||seeds||Yes||Pest or symptoms not visible to the naked eye but usually visible under light microscope|
|Flowers/Inflorescences/Cones/Calyx||seeds||Yes||Pest or symptoms not visible to the naked eye but usually visible under light microscope|
|Fruits (inc. pods)||seeds||Yes||Pest or symptoms not visible to the naked eye but usually visible under light microscope|
|Growing medium accompanying plants||seeds||Yes||Pest or symptoms not visible to the naked eye but usually visible under light microscope|
|Roots||seeds||Yes||Pest or symptoms not visible to the naked eye but usually visible under light microscope|
Impact SummaryTop of page
Economic ImpactTop of page
The economic impact of O. cernua is unknown. However, species of Orobanche depend totally on their hosts for all nutrition, drawing sugars and nitrogen compounds from the phloem and also drawing most of their water from the host xylem. The parasite becomes an active sink, comparable to an actively growing part of the host plant itself, such that effects on the host are generally proportional to the biomass of the parasite. Thus the mass of the parasite is reflected in a very similar loss in mass of the host crop (Hibberd et al., 1998; Hibberd et al., 1999). Holm et al. (1979) recorded O. cernua as a 'principal' or 'serious' weed in Arabia, Egypt, India, Italy, Iran, Nepal and Pakistan. Most of these records probably relate to the form attacking Solanaceae, with Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) being the most widely affected followed by Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) and S. melongena (aubergine). Parker and Wilson (1986) record it as a problem on Solanceae in Algeria, Jordan, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. In Ethiopia, the viability of tomato juice factories has been threatened by reduced yields, resulting from both O. ramosa and O. cernua (Parker, 1988). In Kenya, O. cernua has now been identified attacking tomato and species of Capsicum (pepper) (Mwangi, 1999). In India, yield losses of 24-52% are recorded in tobacco, with additional loss due to reduction in leaf quality (Krishnamurthy et al., 1977; Ramachandra et al., 2015). O. cernua is also a major problem for tobacco in Pakistan (Shah and Khan, 2006).
Social ImpactTop of page
The social impact of O. cernua is related to the economic hardship created by reduced yields to farmers.
Risk and Impact FactorsTop of page Invasiveness
- Invasive in its native range
- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Has a broad native range
- Tolerant of shade
- Fast growing
- Has high reproductive potential
- Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
- Has high genetic variability
- Host damage
- Negatively impacts agriculture
- Negatively impacts livelihoods
- Parasitism (incl. parasitoid)
- Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
- Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant
- Difficult/costly to control
Detection and InspectionTop of page
It is possible to determine the level of O. cernua seeds in the soil by sieving the lighter, organic matter and the portion between 0.1 and 0.5 mm studied under a dissecting microscope for the presence of the characteristically sculpted seeds. Jacobsohn and Marcus (1988) have developed a method to check for the contamination of crop seed stocks which involves washing and sieving material a number of times. The presence of Orobanche seeds can be determined on the surface of the lower sieve, with the help of a dissection microscope.
Molecular techniques have also been developed for the detection of O. cumana seeds and the results of this assay can be expressed in terms of the number of O. cumana seeds per kilogram of crop seeds and can help decisions regarding crop seed lot utilisation and commercialisation (Dongo et al., 2012).
Similarities to Other Species/ConditionsTop of page
O. cernua (and O. cumana) are distinguished from the related species O. ramosa and O. aegyptiaca by the absence of bracteoles and the lack of branching above ground, while they are much less robust than O. crenata. The closest of other common weedy species in size and morphology is O. minor, but the latter has distinct veins in the corolla and wider-spreading lips. Useful keys for identification are provided by Chater and Webb (1972) and Parker (2013).
Morphological differences between typical O. cernua and O. cumana include height 15-30 cm, flowers 10-20 mm, inflorescence dense and filaments and anthers virtually glabrous in O. cernua, whereas for O. cumana the height is 40-60 cm, flowers 20-30 mm, inflorescence lax, the filaments and anthers are hairy and the flowers are conspicuously longer and more down-curved. These differences are illustrated by Pujadas-Salva and Thalouarn (1998). The two species may also be distinguished on the basis of DNA markers, even from individual seeds (Joel et al., 1998) and on the basis of seed-borne oils, O. cumana containing much higher levels of linoleic acid than typical O. cernua (Pujadas-Salva and Velasco, 2000).
Prevention and ControlTop of page
Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Most countries prohibit the entry of major parasitic weed species, including species of Orobanche. Phytosanitary measures are aimed at preventing the spread of viable seeds by minimizing the movement of infested soil by farm machinery and vehicles, preventing livestock grazing on infested plant material, treating manure (e.g. composting) and avoiding the use of hay made of Orobanche infested plants (Jacobsohn, 1984). The use of Orobanche infested crop seeds should also be avoided.
Hand-weeding of emerged stems of O. cernua is often too late to prevent crop damage but may be worthwhile where infestations are still light, to prevent or reduce future infestations. The stems should immediately be removed from the field to preclude seed shed after pulling.
Trap crops may be used to promote germination of Orobanche seeds in soil, without themselves supporting parasitism, in order to deplete the seed reserve. Examples of trap crops for O. cernua include species of Sorghum, Vigna unguiculata (cowpea), Capsicum annuum (chilli), Cannabis sativa (hemp), Linum usitatissimum (linseed), Medicago sativa (lucerne), Glycine max (soybean), Cicer arietinum (chickpea) (Parker and Riches, 1993), Crotalaria juncea (sunn hemp) and Vigna radiata (mung bean) (Dhanapal and Struik, 1996). While trap crops rarely provide high levels of control, they should be considered in any integrated control approach.
Soil solarisation, based on mulching moist soil with polyethylene sheets for several weeks under solar irradiation, can provide excellent levels of control of Orobanche seeds in the upper soil layers where temperatures are high enough (Jacobsohn et al., 1980) and this has been confirmed in a number of studies involving O. cernua (Parker and Riches, 1993; Meti and Hosmani, 1994).
There has been little progress on enhancing resistance in crops attacked by O. cernua however, resistant varieties of Helianthus annuus (sunflower) has been developed for the closely related species O. cumana. Some variation in the susceptibility towards O. cernua has been reported in both Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) and Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) (Alonso, 1998; Cubero, 1991; Parker and Riches, 1993; Cubero, 1994), but there has been little evidence that resistance in these crops is proving of practical usefulness. Nagarajan and Reddy (2001) screened over 100 varieties of tobacco and failed to find any that were resistant.
A mutant of tomato, SI-ORT1, produced by fast-neutron mutagenesis from the standard processing variety M82 shows resistance to O.cernua and related species characterised by its inability to secrete strigolactones. This character is controlled by a single recessive gene and is of potential value for further breeding work (Dor et al., 2010). Subsequently, the same group used ethyl methane sulfonate to cause more refined point mutations in M82 tomato and have 8 lines highly resistant to Orobanche species, again lacking strigolactone secretion. Although these yield equally with M82, there are problems of fruit quality (Dor et al., 2013).
A recent development has been the demonstration of induced resistance in Helianthus annuus (sunflower) resulting from seed treatment with the benzothiadiazole compound known as 'BTH'. This treatment greatly reduces subsequent attack by O. cernua, apparently due to the enhanced production of the phytoalexin scopoletin and/or hydrogen peroxide in the crop roots (Sauerborn et al., 2002).
In Iran, sulfosulforon directed to the soil 20 days after transplanting proved partially selective for control of O. cernua and of other weeds in tomato (Bazgir et al., 2013). In India, Prabhakaran et al. (2009) achieved good control with post emergence application of imazethapyr 55 days after transplanting. For N. tabacum, the use of glyphosate applying at 40 and 60 days after planting has been reported to reduce the levels of O. cernua (Jinga et al., 2006).
More recently it has also been shown that post-emergence application of maleic hydrazide can provide selective control of O. aegyptiaca in S. lycopersicum (Herschenhorn et al., 2015). Dor et al. (2015) report on the use of chemical mutagenesis to create a tomato line HRT-1 that is resistant to several groups of ALS inhibiting herbicides, including imidazolinones. Thus imazapic and imazapyr can be safely used to cause complete suppression of Orobanche seeds Field tests at very high doses of herbicide have caused no yield reduction.
The fly Phytomyza orobanchia has been used for biological control of species of Orobanche in the past (Kroschel and Klein, 1999) but there is no evidence that there are currently any deliberate efforts to exploit this organism for control of O. cernua. Promising results have been reported by several groups studying the potential of a species of Fusarium for biocontrol of O. cumana (Bedi, 1994; Amsellem et al., 2001; Iliev et al., 1998) but no practical recommendations have yet emerged.
Seed treatment with Penicillium oxalicum followed by soil drenches after 25 and 50 days gave 80% reduction in O. cernua (misidentified as O. crenata) (Pathak and Kannan, 2015).
ReferencesTop of page
Alonso LC, 1998. Resistance to Orobanche and resistance breeding: a review. In: Wegmann K, Musselman LJ, Joel DM, eds. Current Problems of Orobanche Research. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Orobanche, Albena, 233-257.
Amri M; Abbes Z; Youssef SB; Bouhadida M; Salah HB; Kharrat M, 2012. Detection of the parasitic plant, Orobanche cumana on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in Tunisia. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11(18):4163-4167.
Amsellem Z; Kleifeld Y; Kerenyi Z; Hornok L; Goldwasser Y; Gressel J, 2001. Isolation, identification, and activity of mycoherbicidal pathogens from juvenile broomrape plants. Biological Control, 21(3):274-284.
Bazgir E; Zeidaliand E; Ahmadi A, 2013. Using from sulfonylurea for control of broomrape (Orobanche cernua) in tomato fields in Khorramabad. Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3(19):2437-2444.
Beck-Mennagetta G, 1930. Orobanchaceae. In: Engler HGA, ed. Das Pflanzenreich, 96(IV-261):1-275.
Bedi JS, 1994. Further studies on control of sunflower broomrape with Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. orthoceras - a potential mycoherbicide. Biology and management of Orobanche. Proceedings of the third international workshop on Orobanche and related Striga research, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 8-12 November 1993., 539-544.
Borg SJ ter, 1994. General aspects of taxonomy, distribution and ecology: state of the art after the third international workshop on Orobanche. Biology and management of Orobanche. Proceedings of the third international workshop on Orobanche and related Striga research, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 8-12 November 1993 [edited by Pieterse, A.H.; Verkleij, J.A.C.; Borg, S.J. ter] Amsterdam, Netherlands; Royal Tropical Institute, 710-718
Carlón L; Casares GG; Laínz M; Moral GM; Pedraja OS; Schneeweiss GM, 2015. Index of Orobanchaceae. Online dataset. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282442804_Orobanche_cernua_in_Index_of_Orobanchaceae
Chater AO; Webb DA, 1972. 2. Orobanche. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burgess NA, Morre DM, Valentine, DH, Walters SM, Webb DM, eds. Flora Europaea 3. Diapensiaceae to Myoporaceae. Cambridge, UK: University Press, 286-293.
Cubero JI, 1991. Breeding for resistance to Orobanche species: a review. Progress in Orobanche research. In: Weymann K, Musselman LJ, eds. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Orobanche Research, Obermarchtal, Germany, 19-22 August 1989. Tubingen, Germany: Eberhard Karls Universitat, 257-277
Cubero JI, 1994. Breeding work in Spain for Orobanche resistance in faba bean and sunflower. Biology and management of Orobanche. In: Pieterse AH, Verkleij JAC, Borg SJ ter, eds. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Orobanche and related Striga research, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 8-12 November 1993 Amsterdam, Netherlands: Royal Tropical Institute, 465-473
Dongo A; Leflon M; Simier P; Delavault P, 2012. Development of a high-throughput real-time quantitative PCR method to detect and quantify contaminating seeds of Phelipanche ramosa and Orobanche cumana in crop seed lots. Weed Research (Oxford), 52(1):34-41. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2011.00891.x/full
Dor E; Alperin B; Wininger S; Ben-Dor B; Somvanshi VS; Koltai H; Kapulnik Y; Hershenhorn J, 2010. Characterization of a novel tomato mutant resistant to the weedy parasites Orobanche and Phelipanche spp. Euphytica, 171(3):371-380. http://springerlink.metapress.com/link.asp?id=102881
Dor E; Smirnov E; Achdary G; Herschenhorn J, 2015. Programme and Abstracts, 13th World Congress on Parasitic Plants, Kunming, China, 5-10 July 2015. 93.
Dor E; Smirnov E; Herschenhorn J, 2013. Programme and Abstracts, 12th World Congress on Parasitic Plants, Sheffield, UK, 15-20 July, 2013. 25.
Edgecombe WS, 1970. Weeds of Lebanon. Beirut, Lebanon: American University of Beirut.
Elzein AEM; Kroschel J; Assefa Admasu; Masresha Fetene, 1999. Preliminary evaluation of Phytomyza orobanchia (Diptera: Agromyzidae) as a controller of Orobanche spp. in Ethiopia. Sinet, an Ethiopian Journal of Science, 22(2):271-282.
Euro+Med, 2016. Euro+Med PlantBase - the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. http://www.emplantbase.org/home.html
Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2016. Flora of China. St. Louis, Missouri and Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden and Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2
Foy CL; Jacobsohn R; Bohlinger B; Jacobsohn M, 1991. Seasonal behaviour of broomrape species as determined by host range and environmental factors. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium of parasitic weeds, Nairobi, Kenya, 24-30 June 1991 [ed. by Ransom, J.K.\Musselman, L.J.\Worsham, A.D.\Parker, C.]. Nairobi, Kenya: CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center), 454-457.
Ginman E; Prider J; Matthews J; Virtue J; Watling J, 2015. Sheep as vectors for branched broomrape (Orobanche ramosa subsp. mutelii [F.W. Schultz] Cout.) seed dispersal. Weed Biology and Management, 15(2):61-69. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/wbm.12065/full
Goussous SJ; Hameed KM; Saadoun I, 2009. Isolation and evaluation of indigenous fungal and bacterial isolates as potential bioagents against broomrape (Orobanche cernua) in Jordan. Plant Pathology Journal (Faisalabad), 8(3):98-105. http://scialert.net/qredirect.php?doi=ppj.2009.98.105&linkid=pdf
Government of South Australia, 2008. Orobanche cernua var. australiana, Australian broomrape., Australia: Adelaide and Mount Lofty ranges of South Australia. Biodiversity Conservation Unit, Dept. for Environment and Heritage, Government of South Australia, 2 pp. http://www.naturalresources.sa.gov.au/files/sharedassets/public/plants_and_animals/threatened_plants/pa-fact-pafactorobanchecernuavaraustraliana.pdf
Graham RA, 1957. Orobanchaceae. In: Turrill WB, Milne-Redhead E, eds. Flora of Tropical East Africa. London, UK: Crown Agents, 1-7.
Hershenhorn J; Venezian A; Smirnov E; Achdary G; Plakhine D, 2015. Programme and Abstracts, 13th World Congress on Parasitic Plants, Kunming, China, 5-10 July 2015. 85.
Hibberd JM; Quick WP; Press MC; Scholes JD, 1998. Can source-sink relations explain responses of tobacco to infection by the root holoparasitic angiosperm Orobanche cernua?. Plant, Cell and Environment, 21(3):333-340.
Hibberd JM; Quick WP; Press MC; Scholes JD; Jeschke WD, 1999. Solute fluxes from tobacco to the parasitic angiosperm Orobanche cernua and the influence of infection on host carbon and nitrogen relations. Plant, Cell and Environment, 22(8):937-947.
Iliev I; Kiriyakov I; Shindrova P; Entcheva V, 1998. A possibility for industrial production of a bioherbicide for control of O. cumana. In: Wegmann K, Musselman LJ, Joel DM, eds, Current Problems of Orobanche research, Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Orobanche, Albena, 1998, 419.
Jacobsohn R, 1984. Broomrape avoidance and control: agronomic problems and available methods. In: Borg SJ ter, ed. Proceedings of a Workshop on Biology and Control of Orobanche. Wageningen, Netherlands: LH/VPO, 18-24.
Jacobsohn R; Greenberger A; Katan J; Levi M; Alon H, 1980. Control of Egyptian broomrape (Orobanche pgyptiaca) and other weeds by means of solar heating of the soil by polyethylene mulching. Weed Science, 28(3):312-316
Jinga V; Iliescu H; Stanescu V; Gradila M; , 2006. Control of broomrape on tobacco crops in Romania. COST Action 849: Parasitic plant management in sustainable agriculture. Final meeting of COST 849. ITQB Oeiras-Lisbon, Portugal, 23-24 November 2006. 38.
Joel D, 2015. Programme and Abstracts, 13th World Congress on Parasitic Plants, Kunming, China, 5-10 July 2015. 20.
Joel DM; Portnoy V; Katzir N, 1998. Use of DNA fingerprinting for soil-borne seed identification. Aspects of Applied Biology, 51:23-27.
Joel DM; Portnoy V; Tzuri G; Greenberg R; Katzir N, 1996. Molecular markers for the identification of Orobanche species. In: Moreno MT, Cubero JI, Berner D, Joel DM, Musselman LJ, Parker C, eds. Advances in Parasitic Plant Research. Cordoba, Spain: Junta de Andalucia, 151-160.
Joel DM; Steffens JC; Matthews DE, 1995. Germination of Weedy Root Parasites. In: Kigel J, Galili G, eds. Seed Development and Germination. New York, USA: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 567-598.
Kebreab E; Murdoch AJ, 1999. A quantitative model for loss of primary dormancy and induction of secondary dormancy in imbibed seeds of Orobanche spp. Journal of Experimental Botany, 50(331):211-219; 23 ref.
Krishnamurthy GVG; Chari MS, 1991. Further studies on post-emergence control of broomrape on tobacco with plant oils. In: Ransom JK, Musselman LJ, Worsham AD, Parker C, eds.Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium of Parasitic Weeds, Nairobi, Kenya, 24-30 June 1991. Nairobi, Kenya; CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center), 108-110
Krishnamurthy GVG; Nagarajan K; Ramji Lal; Some studies on Orobanche cernua Loefl, a parasitic weed on tobacco in India. Program and Abstracts of Papers, Weed Science Conference and Workshop in India, 1977, Paper No. 178:113-114
Kroschel J; Klein O, 1999. Biological control of Orobanche spp. with Phytomyza orobanchia Kalt., a review. In: Kroschel J, Abderabihi M, Betz H. eds. Advances in Parasitic Weed Control at On-farm Level, Volume II. Wekersheim, Germany: Margraf Verlag, 135-159.
Miladinovic D; Cantamutto M; Vasin J; Dedic B; Alvarez D; Poverene M, 2012. Exploring environmental determinants of the geographic distribution of broomrape (Orobanche cumana Wallr.). Helia, 35(56):79-87. http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1018-1806/2012/1018-18061256079M.pdf
Missouri Botanical Garden, 2016. Tropicos database. St. Louis, Missouri, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden. http://www.tropicos.org/
Musselman LJ; Parker C; Dixon N, 1982. Notes on autogamy and flower structure in agronomically important species of Striga (Scrophulariaceae) and Orobanche (Orobanchaceae). Beitrage sur Biologie der Pflanzen, 56:329-343.
Mwangi H, 1999. Orobanche in Kenya. Haustorium, 35:5-6.
Parker C, 1988. Parasitic plants in Ethiopia. Walia, 11: 21-27.
Parker C, 2013. The parasitic weeds of the Orobancaceae. In: Parasitic Mechanisms and Control Strategies [ed. by Joel, D. M. \Gressel, J. \Musselman, L. J.]. Heidelburg, Germany: Springer.
Pathak A; Kannan C, 2015. Biological management of Orobanche crenata on tomato using native fungi and their metabolites. In: 25th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Hyderabad, India, 13-16 October 2015. Proceedings, Volume II (oral papers) [ed. by Shetty, S. V. R.\Prasad, T. V. R.\Reddy, M. D.\Rao, A. N.\Mishra, J. S.\Kulshreshta, G.\Abraham, C. T.]. Jabalpur, India: Indian Society of Weed Science, 136.
Prabhakaran N; Chinnusamy C; Rathika S, 2009. bstracts 33 in Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Parasitic Plants, June 8 - 12, 2009, Kusadasi, Turkey.
Pujadas-Salva A; Thalouarn P, 1998. Orobanche cernua Loefl. & O. cumana Wallr. in the Iberian Peninsula. Comptes-rendus 6e^grave~me symposium Me^acute~diterrane^acute~en EWRS, Montpellier, France, 13-15 Mai, 1998., 159-160.
Ramachandra Prasad TV; Mishra JS; Girija T, 2015. 25th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Hyderabad, India. 20-24.
Singh P, 2007. Mitochondrial activity in Orobanche cernua from different regions of the scape and as influenced by host. Journal of Phytopathology, 155(1):45-49. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent?func=showIssues&code=jph
Solymosi P; Horváth Z, 2001. Investigation of broomrape-hybrid (Orobanche cernua Loefl. × O. cumana Wallr.) populations in county Bács-Kiskun in Hungary. (Hibridszádor (Orobanche cernua Loefl. × O. cumana Wallr.) populációk megjelenése és morfológiai jellemzése Bács-Kiskun megyében.) Magyar Gyomkutatás és Technológia, 2(1):29-34.
Solymosi P; Horváth Z; Piszker Z; Vecseri C, 2004. Taxonomical studies on Orobanche cernua Loefl. and O. cumana Wallr. in Hungary. (Magyarországi napraforgószádor-populációk taxonómiai besorolásának vizsgálata.) Növényvédelem, 40(7):361-364.
The Plant List, 2013. The Plant List: a working list of all plant species. Version 1.1. London, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://www.theplantlist.org
Thomas H; Heller A; Sauerborn J; Müller-Stöver D, 1999. Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. orthoceras, a potential mycoherbicide, parasitizes seeds of Orobanche cumana (sunflower broomrape): a cytological study. Annals of Botany, 83(4):453-458.
Timko MP; Flore CS; Riopel JL, 1989. Control of the germination and early development in parasitic angiosperms. In: Teylorson RB, ed. Recent Advances in the Development and Germination of Seeds. New York, USA: Plenum Press, 225-240.
USDA-ARS, 2016. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). National Plant Germplasm System. Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx
Weldeghiorghis EK; Murdoch AJ, 1997. Towards prediction of the effect of wet dormancy on Orobanche infestations. 1997 Brighton crop protection conference: weeds. Proceedings of an international conference, Brighton, UK, 17-20 November 1997, 2:677-678.
Westwood JH; Foy CL, 1999. Influence of nitrogen on germination and early development of broomrape (Orobanche spp.). Weed Science, 47:2-7.
ContributorsTop of page
24/02/2016 Updated by:
Christ Parker, Consultant, UK
20/03/2002 Original text by:
Chris Parker, Consultant, UK
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/