Haplaxius crudus
(American palm cixiid)

Pictures

Picture	Title	Caption	Copyright
Title Adult Caption Haplaxius crudus (American palm cixiid); adult, a major vector of Palm Lethal Yellowing Disease. Florida, USA. Copyright ©N.A. Harrison	Adult	Haplaxius crudus (American palm cixiid); adult, a major vector of Palm Lethal Yellowing Disease. Florida, USA.	©N.A. Harrison

Identity

Preferred Scientific Name

• Haplaxius crudus (Van Duzee 1907)

Preferred Common Name

• American palm cixiid

Other Scientific Names

• Haplaxius cocois (Fennah, 1945)
• Haplaxius pallidus Caldwell, 1946
• Myndus crudus Van Duzee, 1907
• Paramyndus cocois Fennah, 1945
• Paramyndus crudus Van Duzee, 1907

International Common Names

• English: pallid cane leafhopper
• Spanish: chicharita

EPPO code

• HAPXCR (Haplaxius crudus)
• MYNDCR (Myndus crudus)

Summary of Invasiveness

Haplaxius crudus, commonly known as American palm cixiid, is native to the American tropics and subtropics. The species was first described from Jamaica in 1907 and is currently known from northern South America, Central America, certain islands of the Caribbean, and Florida and southern Texas in the USA. The adults of H. crudus feed mainly on palms, particularly coconut palms, while the nymphs feed mainly on grasses. The main economic impact of H. crudus is as a vector of coconut (or palm) lethal yellowing (LY) caused by Candidatus Phytoplasma palmae, a highly destructive disease that affects at least 37 species of palms, including coconut palm (Cocos nucifera) and date palm (Phoenix dactylifera). Control of LY is best achieved by the planting of resistant cultivars integrated with cultural measures such as ground cover management because chemical control of H. crudus is not practical. International trade in palms from LY-infected areas is prohibited because of the threat of the disease and vector spreading not only to coconuts and date palms, but also to palms that are important as ornamental plants or as local sources of food or fibre.

Taxonomic Tree

• Domain: Eukaryota
•     Kingdom: Metazoa
•         Phylum: Arthropoda
•             Subphylum: Uniramia
•                 Class: Insecta
•                     Order: Hemiptera
•                         Suborder: Auchenorrhyncha
•                             Unknown: Fulgoroidea
•                                 Family: Cixiidae
•                                     Genus: Haplaxius
•                                         Species: Haplaxius crudus

Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature

Haplaxius crudus was originally described by Van Duzee as Myndus crudus from adults collected in Jamaica in 1906 (Van Duzee, 1907). The Western Hemisphere forms formerly included in Myndus Stål, 1862 were designated as members of the genus Halpaxius Fowler, 1904 by Caldwell (1946) (Tsai, 2005). Kramer (1979) subsequently synonymized Haplaxius and Paramyndus Fennah 1945 with Myndus, and Haplaxius pallidus Caldwell, 1946 and Paramyndus cocois Fennah, 1945 were synonymized with Myndus crudus. Emeljanov (1989) considered Haplaxius to be an independent genus for the New World species that were formerly placed in Myndus sensu lato by Kramer (1979). Some authors still use Myndus crudus in the literature rather than Haplaxius crudus, although this is considered to be erroneous (e.g. Ferreira et al., 2010).

For a full list of synonyms and other details refer to Bartlett et al. (2014).

Description

The egg and five nymphal instars of H. crudus are described and illustrated in Wilson and Tsai (1982) and a key to the nymphal instars is provided. Keys to the males of US species and Mexican and Neotropical species of Myndus (Haplaxius) are provided in Kramer (1979).

The female and male adults of H. crudus are 4.3-5.1 mm and 4.2-5.1 mm long, respectively, with females tending to be larger than males. The head and thorax of adults vary in colour from straw-coloured to light brown, and the abdomen has a greenish tinge in the pale forms. The wings are hyaline with pale veins (Kramer, 1979; Howard, 1987). The eyes of the adult are light sensitive, being maroon-coloured at night and becoming straw-coloured during the day (Howard, 1981).

Nymphs of H. crudus are tan to grey in colour, with a reddish blush on the front of the head and rostrum. The legs are also reddish, grading to bright red distally. The foretibia are flattened, which may be a modification for digging (Howard and Wilson, 2001). The nymphs produce wax threads, which coat their excrement, isolating the nymphs from toxic substances within the excrement (Wilson and Tsai, 1982; Howard, 1987; Howard and Wilson, 2001). The eyes of the nymphs are maroon and do not change colour with light intensity (Howard, 1981).

H. crudus is one of the few species in the subfamily Fulgoroidea and the only species of the family Cixiidae commonly found on palm foliage in southern Florida and the Caribbean region, aiding its identification in the field. Common features of the Fulgoroidea are the occurrence of a barrel-like basal segment (scape) bearing a seta-like flagellum on the antennae, clusters of tibial spines, and three parallel elevated ridges (carinae) along the prothorax (Howard, 2015). Among the Fulgoroidea, a large flatid, Ormenaria rufifascia (Walker) is found on native palms, such as Sabal palmetto, in Florida (USA), Georgia, and parts of the Caribbean. Several species of derbids also are common on palms in Florida and the Caribbean.

Distribution

H. crudus is native to the American tropics and subtropics, including Mexico, Florida (USA), Belize (Kramer, 1979), Cayman Islands (Fennah, 1971), Costa Rica (Kramer, 1979), Cuba (Osborn, 1926), Jamaica (Van Duzee, 1907), Panama (Kramer, 1979) and Trinidad and Tobago (Kramer, 1979).

It has spread as an introduced species to Texas (USA) (Carriere, 1982; Meyerdirk and Hart, 1982), Bahamas (Tsai, 2005), Haiti (Tsai 2005) and Puerto Rico (Segarra-Carmona et al., 2013).

H. crudus is a vector of lethal yellowing (LY) disease, howeverthe current geographical distribution of H. crudus seems to be more limited than that of LY; this may be because the insect has not yet been recorded in areas where the disease is present or because another vector exists. Most of the transmission experiments have been conducted in Florida, USA, and no evidence has been found for additional species of insect vectors of LY there or elsewhere. However, as there are more species of auchenorrhynchous insects on palms in tropical America than in Florida, and little is known about the biology of most of these species, it is possible that other vectors of LY may occur (Howard, 2015).

Distribution Table

The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.

History of Introduction and Spread

The species was first described from Jamaica in 1907 (Van Duzee, 1907) and subsequently from Cuba in 1926 (Osborn, 1926). By 1979 the species had been recorded from Belize, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Trinidad and Venezuela (Kramer, 1979) and Grand Cayman in the Cayman Islands (Fennah, 1971). The only US state where it was known was Florida (Caldwell, 1946; Kramer, 1979). H. crudus was collected in Texas, USA, for the first time in 1980, in the Lower Rio Grande Valley from Canary Island date palm (Phoenix canariensis) (Carriere, 1982; Meyerdirk and Hart, 1982). Howard and Wilson (2001) suggested that it is possible that the low populations found in southern Texas were seasonal migrants from more southerly areas. H. crudus was reported from several localities in central Mexico (Veracruz, Cuernavaca) and Baja California (Todos Santos) by Kramer (1979), and was first found in the Cancún area in September 1983 where coconut lethal yellowing (LY) had been reported (Howard et al., 1984a). It has since been found along the Yucatán coast (Pérez-Hernández et al., 2004). H. crudus has now been reported from the Bahamas and Haiti (Tsai, 2005), the Dominican Republic (Tsai, 2005; Ferreira et al., 2010; Bartlett et al., 2014) and Puerto Rico (Segarra-Carmona et al., 2013). An undescribed species of Haplaxius near H. crudus was reported from the Dominican Republic by Howard et al. (1981).

Risk of Introduction

The most likely way H. crudus could be spread is by the international trade of plant material (Smith, 1997).

Habitat

H. crudus can be found whever there are suitable palms and grasses for the nymphs (S Halbert, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, USA, personal communication, 2016). See Hosts/Species Affected.

Habitat List

Hosts/Species Affected

The adults of H. crudus feed predominantly on the phloem in the foliage of various species of palm trees (Arecaceae). The major host of H. crudus adults is coconut palm (Cocos nucifera). H. crudus is also very common on Sabal palm (Sabal palmetto)which might be the original host (S Halbert, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Service, USA, personal communication, 2016). Minor hosts include Pritchardia spp. including Fiji fan palm (Pritchardia pacifica), Thurston palm (Pritchardia thurstonii), date palm (Phoenix dactylifera), Canary Island date palm (Phoenix canariensis), windmill palm (Trachycarpusfortunei), Manila palm (Veitchia merrillii) and Washingtonia spp. including Mexican fan palm (Washingtonia robusta) (Meyerdirk and Hart, 1982; Howard et al., 1983, 1984b; Howard and Wilson, 2001; Howard, 2015). In southern Florida, USA, where palm trees are grown as ornamental plants, the insect is found on both native and exotic species (Howard and Mead, 1980) although it is rare on some palm species, including Cuban royal palm (Roystonea regia) and yellow-cane palm (Dypsis lutescens) (Howard and Wilson, 2001; Howard, 2015). Adults also feed on grasses, for example St Augustine grass (Stenotaphrum secundatum), bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) and Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) (Reinert, 1977, 1980; Howard and Wilson, 2001) and weeping lovegrass (Eragrostis curvula) (Wilson and Wheeler, 2010), and have been observed occasionally on sugarcane (Howard and Wilson, 2001). Many continuous generations have been reared in the laboratory on St Augustine grass (Tsai et al., 1976). Adults have been observed to visit other monocotyledonous plants besides palms and grasses, e.g. common screw-pine (Pandanus utilis) (Pandanaceae) and macawflower (Heliconia bihai) (Heliconiaceae) (Howard and Wilson, 2001). Very occasionally adults have been observed on dicotyledonous shrubs but such cases are rare and they may be vagrants from nearby palm trees (Howard, 1999; Howard and Wilson, 2001).

The nymphs are subterranean and develop on the roots of certain species of grasses (Poaceae) and a few species of sedges (Cyperaceae) growing in the vicinity of palms. Their hosts include grasses cultivated as turf or forage, particularly St Augustine grass (Stenotaphrum secundatum), but also other species such as West Indian foxtail grass (Andropogon bicornis), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), bufflegrass (Cenchrus ciliaris), swollen fingergrass (Chloris barbata), Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), African Bermudagrass (Cynodon nlemfuensis), Cyperus spp. including yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus), digitgrass (Digitaria eriantha), salt grass (Distichlis spicata), centipedegrass (Eremochloa ophiuroides), pinewoods fingergrass (Eustachys petraea), hurricane grass (Fimbristylis cymosa), Guinea grass (Panicum maximum), fall panic grass (Panicum bartowense), bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), paragrass (Panicum purpurascens), foxtail (Setaria spp.) and Zoisia [Zoysia] sp. (Tsai and Kirsch, 1978; Howard and Wilson, 2001; Molet, 2013). Other grass species are less favourable for development or are non-hosts (Howard, 2015). Nymphs have also been observed feeding on the roots of sandpaper vervain (Verbena scabra) (family Verbenaceae) (Tsai and Kirsch, 1978).

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

Growth Stages

List of Symptoms/Signs

Species Vectored

Biology and Ecology

Reproductive Biology

H. crudus is heterovoltine, the number of generations being affected by temperature (Halbert et al., 2014). Reproduction occurs throughout the year (Smith, 1997). Parthenogenic reproduction has not been observed (Tsai and Kirsch, 1978). The female:male ratio has been reported as 1:1 by Tsai and Kirsch (1978) and 1.7:1 by Reinert (1980), although the ratio may be skewed because females tend to live longer than males (Howard, 1987).

Mating occurs on the palms and the females return to grasses to lay eggs. It is not known if mating also occurs on grasses (Howard and Wilson, 2001).

Eggs are laid singly or in rows of up to five eggs on the lower fronds of grasses, near to the root collar (Howard and Wilson, 2001). Eggs are white and a mean of 0.54 mm long and 0.17 mm wide, with the anterior end asymmetrical and pointed and the posterior end rounded (Wilson and Tsai, 1982).

Physiology and Phenology

Two population peaks of H. crudus were observed in southeastern Florida: one in March-May and the other in June-August (Tsai and Kirsch, 1978). In studies using rotary flight traps to sample flying insects around the groves of coconut palms in southern Florida, H. crudus was trapped throughout the year, with peak flight activity in March, May, September and November (Woodiel and Tsai, 1978). Halbert et al. (2014) saw increased activity of H. crudus in the winter in Florida, USA - H. crudus can overwinter consistently as far north as Gainesville.

There are five nymphal instars, with a mean length of 0.64, 1.01, 1.29, 2.20 and 2.68 mm for the 1st to 5th instar, respectively (Wilson and Tsai, 1982).

The nymphs secrete a cottony wax material from abdominal glands, which helps to protect them from moisture, disease and predators. They form the cottony wax material to make a ‘nest’, in which they live, usually in groups of 2-10 individuals (Tsai and Kirsch, 1978). When disturbed, nymphs become active and can jump about 5-10 cm (Howard and Wilson, 2001).

Longevity

In laboratory studies the mean life span on St Augustine grass (Stenotaphrum secundatum) at 24°C was 7.3 days for males and 7.8 days for females. The mean generation time was 52.6 days at 30°C and 80.8 days at 24°C. Adult longevity was longer on Veitchia merrillii (maximum of 50 days) than on coconut palm (Cocos nucifera) (maximum of 37 days) (Tsai and Kirsch, 1978).

Activity Patterns

The adults are active during the day and night, although more adults are captured during the day (Howard, 1981).

Feeding Behaviour

Mature adults fly to palm foliage and feed by penetrating the tissue of the frond with their stylet and sucking the phloem (Tsai and Fisher, 1993; Howard and Wilson, 2001). They feed on the undersides of leaves or in partly concealed portions of the plant (Kramer, 1979).

Environmental Requirements

H. crudus is not cold hardy, and nymphs reared at 15°C failed to moult to adults (Tsai and Kirsch, 1978), indicating that its distribution will be limited by low temperatures. Tsai and Kirsch (1978) reported that the insect does not occur north of 30° N latitude, although H. crudus has been recorded overwintering as far north as Gainesville in northern Florida, USA (29.63380° N, 82.37200° W), even in cold winters (Halbert et al., 2014).

After hatching the nymphs move down to the soil surface and develop in the root zone of grasses, often beneath small clumps of leaf litter and other organic matter. Larvae have been reported at soil depths up to 20 cm (Howard and Wilson, 2001). Moist sites and longer grasses are favoured over drier sites and short-cut grasses (Howard, 2015).

Natural Dispersal

Natural dispersal of the insect is by flight between host plants and wind dispersal.

Pathogen Transmission

The main economic impact of H. crudus is as a vector of coconut (or palm) lethal yellowing (LY). LY is caused by the phytoplasma Candidatus Phytoplasma palmae, which is transmitted to palms in a circulative-propagative manner by H. crudus (Harrison and Oropeza, 2008; Harrison and Elliott, 2015). H. crudus is considered to be an inefficient vector of LY but is sufficiently abundant to spread the disease (Purcell, 1985 in Smith, 1997). It was thought that absence of the vector in northern areas of Florida set the northern limit on the occurrence of LY (Smith, 1997), but recent observations by Halbert et al. (2014) indicate that probably it is the lack of cold hardiness of the LY phytoplasmas that set a northern limit for lethal yellowing.

H. crudus may also be a vector of Texas Phoenix palm decline (TPPD) but the vector could be a derbid. TPPD is more cold tolerant and is spreading in Gainesville, Florida, USA (S Halbert, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, USA, personal communication, 2016).

Climate

Latitude/Altitude Ranges

Air Temperature

Natural enemies

Notes on Natural Enemies

Few natural enemies have been recorded for H. crudus. Spiders have been observed preying on adults in the palm canopy in Florida (Tsai and Kirsch, 1978). In field observations in south-eastern Florida 250 individuals of web-building spiders were collected from 40 coconut palms. The most abundant species was Theridion melanostictum (Theridiidae) (84.4%) followed by T. adamsoni (8.4%), both of which are thought to have been introduced only recently into Florida. H. crudus was the most commonly identified arthropod in the web contents of both species (Howard and Edwards, 1984). Ants (Solenopsis invicta), lizards and tree frogs also prey on H. crudus (Howard, 1987).

Unidentified parasitic wasps have been reported attacking H. crudus in Mexico and Central America, and parasitic mites in the genera Leptus and Erythraeus have been observed infrequently in Mexico and Florida. The fungus Hirsutella citriformis has been recorded infecting adults of H. crudus in Florida, and a related or possibly the same species attacks the insect in Trinidad and Mexico (Howard, 1987; Howard and Wilson, 2001).

Means of Movement and Dispersal

Natural Dispersal

Natural dispersal of the insect is by flight between host plants and wind dispersal.

Accidental Dispersal

H. crudus is an effective hitchhiker pest which has probably spread via the international trade of plant material (Smith, 1997; Molet, 2013). H. crudus has been intercepted twice at US ports of entry, both times on cut flowers (Molet, 2013).

It is possible that it was carried in fodder or on pasture grasses with Zebu cattle from India to Jamaica and other countries in the Caribbean in the 19th century, spreading lethal yellowing disease (Ogle and Harries, 2005).

Pathway Causes

Plant Trade

Impact Summary

Economic Impact

H. crudus does not appear to cause visible damage to its host plants in the adult or nymphal stage and is not considered to be a major pest of palms (Tsai and Kirsch, 1978; Smith, 1997). The main economic impact of H. crudus is as a vector of lethal yellowing (LY) [Candidatus Phytoplasma palmae]. LY is a highly destructive disease that affects at least 37 species of palms, including coconut palm and date palm (Phoenix dactylifera), as well as many palms that are important as ornamental plants or as local sources of food or fibre in tropical countries (Howard et al., 1983; Howard, 1987; Harrison and Elliott, 2015; Howard, 2015). Since the 1980s LY has practically eliminated coconut palms from the Caribbean coast of most of southern Mexico and much of Central America (Howard, 2015). The disease has also destroyed ornamental palms in Florida, USA (Smith, 1997).

Another disease of palms that may be transmitted by H. crudus is Texas Phoenix palm decline (TPPD) [Candidatus Phytoplasma palmae] (Harrison and Elliott, 2013; Powell et al., 2015), known to cause decline in Phoenix sylvestris, Phoenix dactylifera, Phoenix canariensis, Phoenix roebelenii, Sabal palmetto and Syagrus romanzoffiana (Halbert, 2014; Halbert et al., 2014, Jeyaprakash et al., 2011). Other possible candidates are Omolicna rufirascia and O. joi (Powell et al., 2015). P. roebelenii is not susceptible to LY, which has resulted in widespread trade of it in southern Florida, however it is susceptible to TPPD which is moving south (Jeyaprakash et al., 2011; S Halbert, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, USA, personal communication, 2016).

H. crudus has also been implicated as a possible vector of coconut foliar decay virus (CFDV) (Wilson, 2005).

Threatened Species

Risk and Impact Factors

• Invasive in its native range
• Proved invasive outside its native range
• Highly mobile locally
• Gregarious

• Negatively impacts agriculture
• Threat to/ loss of endangered species
• Threat to/ loss of native species
• Negatively impacts trade/international relations

• Pest and disease transmission
• Herbivory/grazing/browsing
• Pathogenic

• Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
• Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant
• Difficult to identify/detect in the field
• Difficult/costly to control

Detection and Inspection

No pheromones have been discovered for H. crudus (Molet, 2013). The species has been monitored using visual inspections (e.g. Tsai and Kirsch, 1978), use of adhesive (Tanglefoot^®) applied to the surface of the palm foliage (Howard and Hutchinson, 1977), sweep net sampling (Reinert, 1980; Molet, 2013), rotary flight traps (Woodiel and Tsai, 1978; Tsai and Mead, 1982) and sticky traps (Cherry and Howard, 1984).

A rotary flight trap was successful in sampling flying insects associated with coconut palms in southern Florida. The trap consisted of a triangular unit supporting a boom and net assembly, which was powered by an electric motor. Nearly 90% of the total leafhoppers and planthoppers trapped in the nets at each sampling site were H. crudus, and they were trapped all year round (Woodiel and Tsai, 1978).

In field studies in coconut palms in Florida, the effectiveness of coloured sticky traps in capturing H. crudus was evaluated. The traps were plastic discs (15.7 cm in diameter) covered with adhesive (Tree Tanglefoot^®) and hung by wire under fronds on coconut palms. Blue and white sticky traps captured more adults of H. crudus than any other colour of sticky trap tested (yellow, red, orange, green, brown and black). Significantly more adults were captured in blue sticky traps during the day than during the night. The blue traps also caught significantly more males than expected when compared with field populations on adjacent palms. The use of blue traps was more effective for sampling adults of H. crudus than the application of adhesive to palm trees (Cherry and Howard, 1984). It was later discovered that the blue and white paints used on the sticky traps had higher concentrations of titanium dioxide than the other paints tested, making them more reflective of ultraviolet light and thus more attractive to H. crudus (Howard and Wilson, 2001).

H. crudus is one of the few species in the subfamily Fulgoroidea and the only species of the family Cixiidae commonly found on palm foliage in southern Florida and the Caribbean region, aiding its identification in the field. Other fulgoroids include Ormenaria rufifascia and several derbids.

Similarities to Other Species/Conditions

New World species of Haplaxius can be distinguished primarily on the basis of structural modifications of the male genitalia, especially the aedeagus. Keys to males of the genus are provided in Kramer (1979).

H. crudus may be confused in the field with several species of Derbidae: Cedusa spp., Omolicna spp., and Patara albida. In contrast to H. crudus the derbids have a short apical segment on the rostrum (Redford et al., 2010; Molet, 2013). Ormenaria rufifascia is much larger than H. crudus and thus is unlikely to be confused with it. A cixiid species in the Melanoliarus genus has also been reported on palms in Texas (S Halbert, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, USA, personal communication, 2016).

Prevention and Control

Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.

Prevention

Containment/zoning

The most likely way the vector or pathogen could be spread is by the international trade of plant material (Smith, 1997). Because the disease is difficult to diagnose and has a long incubation period, the importation of palms from countries where LY is present is prohibited. Vigilance is essential to prevent the disease from being introduced to tropical and subtropical countries and islands where coconut palm populations could be decimated.

Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) is the most important economic crop at risk from LY disease in the EPPO region. Although H. crudus is an inefficient vector of LY and is unlikely to survive in southern Europe, it is possible that existing species of Auchenorrhyncha on palms in the EPPO region may become vectors of LY if the disease was accidentally introduced to that region. Moreover, Europe is an important producer of plant material that is exported around the world, increasing the risk of the disease being spread to more susceptible areas (Smith, 1997).

It is also important that ornamental palms are not moved from infested areas because of the risk of spreading the disease not only to coconuts and date palms but also to valuable protected and outside plantings of ornamental palms (Smith, 1997).

Control

Cultural control

Control is best achieved by integrating the planting of resistant species or cultivars of palms with cultural measures such as ground cover management. Coconut cultivars ‘Panama Tall’ and ‘Malayan Dwarf’ selections and their hybrid ‘MayPan’ (‘Malayan Dwarf’ × ‘Panama Tall’) have shown resistance (Howard and Wilson, 2001; Harrison and Elliott, 2008). However, the long-term resistance of these cultivars is now in doubt because of recent reports of heavy losses due to LY in ‘Malayan Dwarf’ and ‘MayPan’ in some areas of south-eastern Florida (Broschat et al., 2002) and Jamaica (Lebrun et al., 2008).

LY has not been reported on most palm species that are native to Florida (USA) and the Caribbean Basin, including Paurotis (or Everglades) palm (Acoelorrhaphe wrightii), royal palm (Roystonea regia), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto) and species of thatch palms (Thrinax spp.), and these may provide alternatives to susceptible species in ornamental plantings (Harrison and Elliott, 2008). However, there is uncertainty surrounding LY resistance of native species in these areas now that TPPD is present: Sabal palmetto is highly susceptible; Roystonea is susceptible to a D strain phytoplasma in Puerto Rico; Washingtonia also might get TPPD (S Halbert, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, USA, personal communication, 2016).

In addition, some exotic species used as ornamental trees in Florida, for example Archontophoenix alexandrae, Carpentaria acuminata, Dypsis lutescens, Ptychosperma elegans, Ptychosperma macarthurii, Washingtoniarobusta and Wodyetia bifurcate, are not susceptible to LY and are suitable for use in landscaping in areas where the disease is a threat (Howard and Wilson, 2001).

Research in cultural control measures against H. crudus aims to identify grass or dicotyledonous ground covers in coconut plantations that inhibit the development of the immature stages of the insect or that are non-hosts (Howard, 1999). In laboratory and field studies in Florida, the grasses Brachiaria brizantha, B. dictyoneura, B. humidicola, Chloris gayana, Hemarthria altissima, Hyparrhenia rufa, Pennisetum purpureum and a variety of sugarcane were found to be poor hosts and may have potential as ground cover in coconut plantations to reduce the spread of LY (Howard et al., 1990a,b; Howard and Wilson, 2001). Dicotyledonous plants, such as the legumes Arachis pintoi and Pueraria phaseoloides, which are non-hosts of larvae of H. crudus, may also be used as ground cover in coconut plantations to reduce the population of H. crudus (Howard, 1999; Howard and Wilson, 2001). Research in Jamaica, however, has shown the presence of the lethal yellowing group (16SrIV) of phytoplasmas in some species of dictotyledonous weeds, suggesting that weed control in and around coconuts may assist in the management of LY (Brown et al., 2008a,b; Brown and McLaughlin, 2011).

Certain types of organic mulches have been shown to enhance nymphal development of H. crudus, possibly by providing shelter. Field studies in Florida showed that more adults emerged from coconut plots with St Augustine grass as ground cover when mulched with coconut frond mulch or with eucalyptus or pine bark mulch than from control plots with no mulches. Fewer adults emerged from plots mulched with coarse materials such as pine bark nuggets (Howard and Oropeza, 1998).

Chemical control

Insecticide treatments of palms and grasses have been used as quarantine treatments in an attempt to prevent H. crudus from being transported to new localities (Howard, 2015).

Although chemical control of the vector H. crudus has been shown to be effective and is likely to limit the spread of LY, it is not a practical means of managing the insect because repeated applications of insecticides would be required, which would be costly and environmental damaging (Reinert, 1977; Ennis, 1982; Howard, 1987, 2015). Treatment of LY-infected plants by injection into the trunk of the antibiotic oxytetracycline hydrochloride (OTC) every 4 months has been shown to suppress the symptoms of the disease (McCoy, 1975, 1982; Harrison and Elliott, 2015).

Biological control

The prospects for controlling LY via biological control of the vector are not promising. Although several natural enemies have been identified, they do not appear to reduce the populations of this insect sufficiently where they occur naturally to reduce the spread of LY (Howard, 2015).

References

Arellano J, Oropeza C, 1995. Lethal Yellowing. In: Lethal Yellowing: Research and Practical Aspects [ed. by Oropeza C, Howard FW, Ashburner GR]. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 1-15.

Aviña-Padilla K, Rodríguez-Páez LA, Nava-Castrejón ÁI, Ochoa-Sánchez JC, Rivera-Bustamante R, Martínez-Soriano JP, 2011. Epidemic of lethal yellowing disease affecting Phoenix dactilyfera [sic] and Sabal mexicana in central Mexico. Bulletin of Insectology [Second International Phytoplasmologist Working Group Meeting. Neustadt an der Weinstrasse, Germany, September 12-15, 2011], 64(Supplement):S221-S222. http://www.bulletinofinsectology.org/

Bartlett CR, O'Brien LB, Wilson SW, 2014. A review of the planthoppers (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea) of the United States. Memoirs of the American Entomological Society, 50:1-287.

Bourgoin T, 2012. FLOW (Fulgoromorpha Lists on The Web): a world knowledge base dedicated to planthoppers. Version 8. http://www.hemiptera-databases.org/flow/

Broschat TK, Harrison NA, Donselman H, 2002. Losses to lethal yellowing cast doubt on coconut cultivar resistance. Palms, 46(4):185-189.

Brown SE, Been BO, McLaughlin WA, 2006. Detection and variability of the lethal yellowing group (16Sr IV) phytoplasmas in the Cedusa sp. (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Derbidae) in Jamaica. Annals of Applied Biology, 149(1):53-62. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2006.00072.x

Brown SE, Been BO, McLaughlin WA, 2007. The lethal yellowing (16SIV) group of phytoplasmas. Pest Technology, 1(1):61-69.

Brown SE, Been BO, McLaughlin WA, 2008. First report of lethal yellowing group (16Sr IV) of phytoplasmas in Vernonia cinerea in Jamaica. Plant Disease, 92(7):1132. http://www.apsnet.org

Brown SE, Been BO, McLaughlin WA, 2008. First report of the presence of the lethal yellowing group (16Sr IV) of phytoplasmas in the weeds Emilia fosbergii and Synedrella nodiflora in Jamaica. Plant Pathology, 57(4):770. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/ppa

Brown SE, McLaughlin WA, 2011. Identification of of lethal yellowing group (16SrIV) of phytoplasmas in the weeds Stachytarpheta jamaicensis, Macroptilium lathyroides and Cleome rutidosperma in Jamaica. Phytopathogenic Mollicutes, 1(1):27-34.

CABI, 2015. Datasheet report for Candidatus Phytoplasma palmae (lethal yellowing of coconut). Wallingford, UK: CABI. http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/38647

CABI/EPPO, 1998. Distribution maps of quarantine pests for Europe (edited by Smith IM, Charles LMF). Wallingford, UK: CAB International, xviii + 768 pp.

Caldwell JS, 1946. Notes on Haplaxius Fowler with descriptions of new species (Homoptera, Cixiidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 48(8). 203-206.

Carriere B, 1982. Date palm disease vector found. Agricultural Research, USA, 31(3):16.

Cherry RH, Howard FW, 1984. Sampling for adults of the planthopper Myndus crudus, a vector of lethal yellowing of palms. Tropical Pest Management, 30(1):22-25.

Duzee EP Van, 1907. Notes on Jamaican Hemiptera: a report on a collection of Hemiptera made on the island of Jamaica in the spring of 1906. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences, 8:3-79.

Emel'janov AF, 1989. On the problem of division of the family Cixiidae (Homoptera, Cicadina). Entomological Review, 68(4):54-67.

Ennis WB Jr, 1982. Status of research on lethal yellowing and similar diseases. (État de recherches sur le jaunissement mortel et les maladies similaires.) Oléagineux, 37(1):17-24.

EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm

EPPO, 2015. EPPO Standards. EPPO A1 list of pests recommended for regulation as quarantine pests (version 2015-09). European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation. http://www.eppo.int/QUARANTINE/listA1.htm

EPPO, 2016. EPPO Global database (available online). Paris, France: EPPO. https://gd.eppo.int/

Fennah RG, 1945. The Fulgoroidea or lanternflies of Trinidad, and adjacent parts of South America. Proceedings of the US Natural History Museum, 95(3184). 411-520.

Fennah RG, 1971. Fulgoroidea from the Cayman Islands and adjacent areas. Journal of Natural History, 5(3):299-342.

Ferreira M, McKamey SH, Martinez RT, 2010. New records of Haplaxius (Hemiptera: Cixiidae) in the Dominican Republic, with description of a new species. Zootaxa, 2614:65-68. http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2010/f/z02614p068f.pdf

Halbert S, 2014. Texas Phoenix palm decline. Pest Alert, DACS-P-01582. Florida, USA: Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, 4 pp. http://www.freshfromflorida.com/content/download/39924/868718/TPPD_Update_Texas_Phoenix_Palm_Decline.pdf

Halbert SE, Wilson SW, Bextine B, Youngblood SB, 2014. Potential planthopper vectors of palm phytoplasmas in Florida with a description of a new species of the genus Omolicna (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea). Florida Entomologist, 97(1):90-97. http://www.fcla.edu/FlaEnt/

Harrison NA, Elliott ML, 2008. Lethal Yellowing of Palms. The Plant Health Instructor. http://www.apsnet.org/edcenter/intropp/lessons/prokaryotes/Pages/LethalYellowing.aspx

Harrison NA, Elliott ML, 2013. Texas Phoenix palm decline. Originally published 2007, revised 2013. USA: Plant Pathology Department, University of Florida (UF)/ Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) Extension, PP-243. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu

Harrison NA, Elliott ML, 2015. Lethal yellowing (LY) of palm. Originally published 2007, revised 2015. USA: Plant Pathology Department, University of Florida (UF)/ Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) Extension, PP-222. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu

Harrison NA, Oropeza C, 2008. Coconut lethal yellowing. In: Characterization, diagnosis & management of phytoplasmas [ed. by Harrison NA, Rao GP, Marcone C]. Houston, Texas, USA: Studium Press LLC, 219–248.

Harrison NA, Womack M, Carpio ML, 2002. Detection and characterization of a lethal yellowing (16SrIV) group phytoplasma in Canary Island date palms affected by lethal decline in Texas. Plant Disease, 86(6):676-681.

Howard FW, 1980. Attractiveness of date and coconut palms to Myndus crudus and other homopterans. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 93. 199-201.

Howard FW, 1981. Pigment migration in the eye of Myndus crudus (Homoptera: Cixiidae) and its relation to day and night activity. Insect Science and its Application, 2(3):129-133.

Howard FW, 1983. World distribution and possible geographic origin of palm lethal yellowing disease and its vectors. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin, 31(3):101-113

Howard FW, 1987. Myndus crudus (Homoptera: Cixiidae), a vector of lethal yellowing of palms. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Leafhoppers and Planthoppers of Economic Importance. Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA, 28th July- 1st August 1986 [ed. by Wilson MR, Nault LR]. London, UK: CAB International Institute of Entomology, 117-129.

Howard FW, 1990. Evaluation of Brachiaria and St. Augustine grasses as breeding hosts of Myndus crudus Van Duzee (Homoptera: Cixiidae), a vector of the lethal yellowing disease of palms. Beiträge zur Tropischen Landwirtschaft und Veterinärmedizin, 28(4):425-430.

Howard FW, 1990. Evaluation of grasses for cultural control of Myndus crudus, a vector of lethal yellowing of palms. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 56(2):131-137

Howard FW, 1999. Evaluation of dicotyledonous herbaceous plants as hosts of Myndus crudus (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cixiidae). Plantations, Recherche, Développement, 6(2):95-99.

Howard FW, 2015. American palm cixiid - Myndus crudus Van Duzee. Featured Creatures. USA: University of Florida. http://entnemdept.ufl.edu/creatures/orn/palms/palm_cixiid.htm

Howard FW, Edwards GB, 1985. Web-building spiders on coconut palms and their prey (Arachnida; Araneae). Folia Entomológica Mexicana, No. 62:81-87.

Howard FW, Hutchinson GA, 1977. Tanglefoot for collecting Homoptera associated with palms, and plastic tubes for specimen storage. Florida Entomologist, 60(4):280.

Howard FW, Kramer JP, Feliz Peralta M, 1981. Homoptera Auchenorrhyncha associated with palm trees in an area of the Dominican Republic affected by lethal yellowing of coconuts. (Homopteros Auchenorrhyncha asociados a palmeras en un area de la Republica Dominicana afectada por el amarillamiento letal del cocotero). Folia Entomologica Mexicana, No. 47:39-49.

Howard FW, Kramer JP, Teliz-Ortiz M, 1984. Myndus crudus (Homoptera: Cixiidae) in Cancun, Mexico. Florida Entomologist, 67(4):577-579.

Howard FW, Mead FW, 1980. A survey of Auchenorrhyncha (Insecta: Homoptera) associated with palms in southern Florida. Tropical Agriculture, 57(2):145-153.

Howard FW, Norris RC, Thomas DL, 1983. Evidence of transmission of palm lethal yellowing agent by a planthopper, Myndus crudus(Homoptera, Cixiidae). Tropical Agriculture, 60(3):168-171.

Howard FW, Oropeza C, 1998. Organic mulch as a factor in the nymphal habitat of Myndus crudus (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cixiidae). Florida Entomologist, 81(1):92-97.

Howard FW, Williams DS, Norris RC, 1984. Insect transmission of lethal yellowing to young palms. International Journal of Entomology, 26(4):331-338

Howard FW, Wilson MR, 2001. Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha. In: Insects on Palms [ed. by Howard FW, Moore D, Giblin-Davis RM, Abad RG]. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, 128-160.

Jeyaprakash, Sutton ABD, Halbert SE, Schubert TS, 2011. High-fidelity PCR facilitates detection and identification of a Texas Phoenix palm phytoplasma strain from pigmy date palm, Phoenix roebelenii in Florida. Plant Disease, 95:1475.

Kramer JP, 1979. Taxonomic study of the planthopper genus Myndus in the Americas (Homoptera: Fulgoroidea: Cixiidae). Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 105(3):301-389.

Lebrun P, Baudouin L, Myrie W, Berger A, Dollet M, 2008. Recent lethal yellowing outbreak: why is the Malayan Yellow Dwarf coconut no longer resistant in Jamaica? Tree Genetics and Genomes, 4(1):125-131. http://www.springerlink.com/content/p2lpjm770k351473/?p=923e400ede6e4fb8a67dd340e8d89bb3&pi=10

McCoy RE, 1975. Effect of oxytetracycline dose and stage of disease development on remission of lethal yellowing in coconut palm. Plant Disease Reporter, 59(9):717-720.

McCoy RE, 1982. Use of tetracycline antibiotics to control yellows diseases. Plant Disease, 66(7):539-542.

McCoy RE, Miller ME, Thomas DL, Amador J, 1980. Lethal decline of Phoenix palms in Texas associated with mycoplasmalike organisms. Plant Disease, 64(11):1038-1040.

Mena Tascon E, Martinez-Lopez G, 1977. Identification of the insect vector of sudden wilt of African oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). (Identificacion del insecto vector de la marchitez sorpresiva de la palma africana (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.)). Fitopatologia Colombiana, 6(1):2-14.

Meyerdirk DE, Hart WG, 1982. Survey of Auchenorrhyncha (Insecta: Homoptera) associated with the Canary Island date palm in southern Texas. Florida Entomologist, 65(3):327-334.

Molet T, 2013. CPHST pest datasheet for Haplaxius crudus. USDA-APHIS-PPQ-CPHST. https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwj-w6qA0rbNAhVLIcAKHT4ACnkQFggeMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdownload.ceris.purdue.edu%2Ffile%2F2086&usg=AFQjCNFWQnJHEKRjv1M5cdXKZVFwuAN0UA&cad=rja

Ogle L, Harries H, 2005. Introducing the vector: how coconut lethal yellowing disease may have reached the Caribbean. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 3(2):139-142. http://www.ethnobotanyjournal.org/vol3/I1547-3465-03-139.pdf

Ortiz G, 2000. First report of coconut lethal yellowing disease in Guatemala. New Disease Reports, 9(23). http://www.ndrs.org.uk/article.php?

Osborn H, 1926. Faunistic and ecologic notes on Cuban Homoptera. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 19(3):335-366.

Pérez-Hernández O, Góngora-Canul CC, Medina-Lara MF, Oropeza-Salín C, Escamilla-Bencomo JA, Mora-Aguilera G, 2004. Temporal-space pattern of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) lethal yellowing in Yucatan, Mexico. (Patrón espacio-temporal del amarillamiento letal en cocotero (Cocos nucifera L.) en Yucatán, México.) Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología, 22(2):231-238.

Powell CM, Hail D, Potocnjak J, Hanson JD, Halbert SH, Bextine BR, 2015. Bacterial community composition of three candidate insect vectors of palm phytoplasma (Texas Phoenix Palm Decline and Lethal Yellowing). Current Microbiology, 70(2):240-245. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00284-014-0709-2

Purcell AH, 1985. The ecology of bacterial and mycoplasma plant diseases spread by leafhoppers and planthoppers. In: The leafhoppers and planthoppers [ed. by Nault LR, Rodriguez JG]. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 351-380.

Redford AJ, Walters TW, Hodges AC, Howard FW, Trice MD, 2010. A Resource for Pests and Diseases of Cultivated Palms. Screening Aid to Pests. Fort Collins, Colorado, USA: USDA-APHIS-PPQ-CPHST. http://itp.lucidcentral.org/id/palms/sap/American_Palm_Cixiid.htm

Reinert JA, 1977. Field biology and control of Haplaxius crudus on St. Augustine grass and Christmas palm. Journal of Economic Entomology, 70(1):54-56.

Reinert JA, 1980. Phenology and density of Haplaxius crudus (Homoptera: Cixiidae) on three southern turfgrasses. Environmental Entomology, 9(1):13-15.

Segarra-Carmona A, Franqui RA, Otero-Arocho M, 2013. Survey of palm-associated Fulgoroidea in Puerto Rico. Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico, 97(3/4):107-117.

Smith IM, McNamara DG, Scott PR, Holderness M, 1997. Palm lethal yellowing phytoplasma. Quarantine Pests for Europe, second edition. Wallingford, UK: CABI, 6 pp. http://www.eppo.int/QUARANTINE/data_sheets/bacteria/PHYP56_ds.pdf

Thomas DL, Donselman HM, 1979. Mycoplasmalike bodies and phloem degeneration associated with declining Pandanus in Florida. Plant Disease Reporter, 63(11):911-916

Tsai JH, 2005. Myndus crudus Van Duzee (Hemiptera: Cixiidae). Encyclopedia of Entomology, 3:1503-1504. http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F0-306-48380-7_2793

Tsai JH, Fisher JB, 1993. Feeding sites of some leaf- and planthopper insects (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha) associated with coconut palms. Principes, 37(1):35-41.

Tsai JH, Kirsch OH, 1978. Bionomics of Haplaxius crudus (Homoptera: Cixiidae). Environmental Entomology, 7(2):305-308.

Tsai JH, Mead FW, 1982. Rotary net survey of homopterans in palm plantings in south Florida. Journal of Economic Entomology, 75(5):809-812.

Tsai JH, Woodiel NL, Kirsch OH, 1976. Rearing techniques for Haplaxius crudus (Homoptera:Cixiidae). Florida Entomologist, 59(1):41-43.

US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2008. Pritchardia kaalae (Lo'ulu) 5-Year Review Summary and Evaluation. USA: US Fish and Wildlife ServiceUS Fish and Wildlife Service, 11 pp.

US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2008. In: Pritchardia kaalae (Lo'ulu). 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 11 pp.

Wilson SW, 2005. Keys to the families of Fulgoromorpha with emphasis on planthoppers of potential economic importance in the Southeastern United States (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Florida Entomologist, 88(4):464-481.

Wilson SW, Tsai JH, 1982. Descriptions of the immature stages of Myndus crudus (Homoptera: Fulgoroidea: Cixiidae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society, 90(3):166-175.

Wilson SW, Wheeler AG Jr, 2010. Planthopper (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea) diversity of weeping lovegrass (Eragrostis curvula), an introduced host of little-known, rarely collected native species. Entomologica Americana, 116(3/4):98-106.

Woodiel NL, Tsai JH, 1978. A rotary flight trap used for sampling Haplaxius crudus (Homoptera: Cixiidae) in coconut groves. Journal of the New York Entomological Society, 86(1):37-44.

Distribution References

CABI, Undated. Compendium record. Wallingford, UK: CABI

CABI, Undated a. CABI Compendium: Status inferred from regional distribution. Wallingford, UK: CABI

CABI, Undated b. CABI Compendium: Status as determined by CABI editor. Wallingford, UK: CABI

Caldwell JS, 1946. Notes on Haplaxius Fowler with descriptions of new species (Homoptera, Cixiidae). [Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington], 48 (8) 203-206.

Carriere B, 1982. Date palm disease vector found. Agricultural Research, USA. 31 (3), 16.

Duzee EP Van, 1907. Notes on Jamaican Hemiptera: a report on a collection of Hemiptera made on the island of Jamaica in the spring of 1906. In: Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences, 8 3-79.

EPPO, 2020. EPPO Global database. In: EPPO Global database, Paris, France: EPPO.

Fennah RG, 1971. Fulgoroidea from the Cayman Islands and adjacent areas. In: Journal of Natural History, 5 (3) 299-342.

Halbert S E, Wilson S W, Bextine B, Youngblood S B, 2014. Potential planthopper vectors of palm phytoplasmas in Florida with a description of a new species of the genus Omolicna (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea). Florida Entomologist. 97 (1), 90-97. http://www.fcla.edu/FlaEnt/ DOI:10.1653/024.097.0112

Howard F W, Kramer J P, Teliz-Ortiz M, 1984. Myndus crudus (Homoptera: Cixiidae) in Cancun, Mexico. Florida Entomologist. 67 (4), 577-579. DOI:10.2307/3494471

Kramer J P, 1979. Taxonomic study of the planthopper genus Myndus in the Americas (Homoptera: Fulgoroidea: Cixiidae). Transactions of the American Entomological Society. 105 (3), 301-389.

Meyerdirk D E, Hart W G, 1982. Survey of Auchenorrhyncha (Insecta: Homoptera) associated with the Canary Island date palm in southern Texas. Florida Entomologist. 65 (3), 327-334. DOI:10.2307/3494305

Osborn H, 1926. Faunistic and ecologic notes on Cuban Homoptera. In: Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 19 (3) 335-366.

Pérez-Hernández O, Góngora-Canul C C, Medina-Lara M F, Oropeza-Salín C, Escamilla-Bencomo J A, Mora-Aguilera G, 2004. Temporal-space pattern of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) lethal yellowing in Yucatan, Mexico. (Patrón espacio-temporal del amarillamiento letal en cocotero (Cocos nucifera L.) en Yucatán, México.). Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología. 22 (2), 231-238.

Segarra-Carmona A, Franqui R A, Otero-Arocho M, 2013. Survey of palm-associated Fulgoroidea in Puerto Rico. Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico. 97 (3/4), 107-117.

Tsai JH, 2005. Myndus crudus Van Duzee (Hemiptera: Cixiidae). In: Encyclopedia of Entomology, 3 1503-1504. http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F0-306-48380-7_2793

Contributors

03/02/2016 Original text by:

Angela Whittaker, Consultant, UK

Distribution Maps