Mycosphaerella fijiensis (black Sigatoka)
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Risk of Introduction
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
- Growth Stages
- List of Symptoms/Signs
- Biology and Ecology
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Plant Trade
- Impact Summary
- Environmental Impact
- Impact: Biodiversity
- Detection and Inspection
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Mycosphaerella fijiensis M. Morelet
Preferred Common Name
- black Sigatoka
Other Scientific Names
- Cercospora fijiensis M. Morelet
- Cercospora fijiensis var. difformis J.L. Mulder & R.H. Stover
- Mycosphaerella fijiensis var. difformis J.L. Mulder & R.H. Stover
- Mycosphaerella fijiensis var. fijiensis
- Paracercospora fijiensis (M. Morelet) Deighton
- Pseudocercospora fijiensis (M. Morelet) Deighton
International Common Names
- English: black leaf streak
- Spanish: raya negra de la hoja; sigatoka negra
- French: cercosporiose noire; maladie des raies noires de la feuille
Local Common Names
- Germany: Schwarze Sigatoka: Banane
- MYCOFI (Mycosphaerella fijiensis)
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Fungi
- Phylum: Ascomycota
- Subphylum: Pezizomycotina
- Class: Dothideomycetes
- Subclass: Dothideomycetidae
- Order: Capnodiales
- Family: Mycosphaerellaceae
- Genus: Mycosphaerella
- Species: Mycosphaerella fijiensis
Notes on Taxonomy and NomenclatureTop of page Leach (1964) found that black leaf streak of bananas was caused by a species of Mycosphaerella which had a Cercospora-like imperfect state. The fungus was examined by Deighton who considered it was a new species. The name M. fijiensis was suggested and was later validated by Morelet (1969).
Meredith and Lawrence (1969) made a detailed study of black leaf streak disease in Hawaii, comparing conidial states of M. fijiensis and M. musicola.
Stover (1974) assigned the name M. fijiensis var. difformis to the fungus causing black Sigatoka disease in Honduras. This name was validated by Mulder and Stover (1976) on the basis of specimens collected at La Lima, Honduras. The taxonomic criterion used to separate M. fijiensis var. difformis from M. fijiensis var. fijiensis was the presence of a sporadic stroma as the origin for dense or loose fascicles of conidiophores in the former in contrast to the absence of a stroma in the latter. However, the presence of the stroma in M. fijiensis var. difformis is an inconsistent feature. Pons (1987) examined specimens of M. fijiensis var. difformis and var. fijiensis and found that conidiophores could develop on a stroma in both. The two names are now considered synonyms (Pons, 1999).
The anamorph of M. fijiensis was first described as Cercospora fijiensis by Morelet (1969) and then transferred to Pseudocercospora by Deighton (1976) because of pigmented conidia. Deighton (1979) later placed the anamorph in Paracercospora due to minutely thickened spore scars.
Pseudocercospora fijiensis is again recommended as the anamorph because molecular data has proven that thickened spore scars, though useful in distinguishing the pathogen, are not phylogenetically important in the cercosporoids (Crous and Mourichon, 2002).
DescriptionTop of page (After Meredith and Lawrence, 1969; Mulder and Holliday, 1974.)
Conidiophores first develop in the initial flecks or streaks on the lower surface of the leaf and continue to be produced until spots mature. They emerge singly or in diverging fascicles of 2-8 from stroma on the lower surface of the leaf within the boundary of the lesion; few arise on the upper surface. Conidiophores are pale to medium olivaceous-brown, becoming slightly paler towards the tip. They are straight or bent, often with geniculations and sometimes with a basal swelling up to 8 µm in diameter, 0- to 5-septate, 16.5-62.5 x 4-7 µm, usually slightly narrower, but occasionally wider, at the tip. One or more scars are present near the tip of the conidiophore, either flat against the apex or on the side, or on a slightly sloping shoulder.
Conidia are formed singly at the apex of the conidiophore, later becoming lateral as the conidiophore develops. Up to four mature conidia may be attached to a single conidiophore. Conidia are not quite colourless, being pale-green or olivaceous. They are obclavate to cylindro-obclavate, 1- to 10-septate (commonly 5- to 7-septate), straight or curved, obtuse at the apex, truncate or rounded at the base with a visible and slightly thickened hilum, 30-132 x 2.5-5 µm, the broadest point being near the base.
Spermogonia develop at the stage when streaks develop into spots and are more abundant on the lower surface of the leaf, being consistently associated with conidiophores. Spermogonia are hour-glass shaped, oval or almost globose and measure 55-88 x 35-50 µm. The ostiole is slightly prominent and protrudes through the stoma pore. Many hyaline, rod-shaped spermatia, 2.5-5.0 x 1.0-2.5 µm, are found in mature spermogonia.
Ascomata and Asci
Ascomata are perithecial, globose, 47-85 µm in diameter. They are immersed in the leaf tissue with protruding ostioles and are found on both leaf surfaces, although more abundant on the upper. Asci are numerous, obclavate, fisstunicate and 8-spored; paraphyses are lacking. Ascospores are unequally 1-septate and slightly constricted at the septum, the longer cell being uppermost in the ascus. They are hyaline, biseriate, fusiform, 11.5-16.5 x 2.5-5.0 µm.
Colonies on potato dextrose agar are slow growing, compact but with a velvety surface, prominently raised, grey to pale-buff or olive-green, black in reverse (Mulder and Holliday, 1974). On Mycophyl agar, colonies are dark-grey or grey-brown with a crenate edge or pale-grey to pink (Stover, 1976). Conidia can be produced in culture for use in inoculation experiments. Mourichon et al. (1987) used colonies growing on modified V8 juice agar at 25°C under continuous light as a source of conidia.
DistributionTop of page Black leaf streak was first recognized in Fiji in 1963, but was present over a wide area of the Asia/Pacific region before its discovery. Stover (1978) believed the centre of origin of M. fijiensis may have been the Papua New Guinea/Solomon Islands area. Certainly, isolates of the pathogen have been found to be more genetically diverse in Papua New Guinea and also the Philippines than elsewhere(Carlier et al., 2000a), which supports Stover's argument. In the 'Distribution list' above, Irian Jaya/Papua New Guinea/Solomon Islands have been designated the locations where black leaf streak may have originated.
In Australia, black leaf streak is confined to the Torres Strait region of Queensland. Quarantine restrictions are in force to prevent its spread south in Cape York Peninsula and to other areas of Australia (Jones, 1990).
Black leaf streak was reported as present in Java (Indonesia) by Reddy (1969). However, a survey in 1988 showed the dominant leaf spot in Java to be Sigatoka (DR Jones, Brisbane, 1988, personal communication). In 1996, black leaf streak was again identified as present in Java, but Sigatoka was still the dominant leaf spot disease (X Mourichon, Montpellier, 1996, personal communication). Black leaf streak almost certainly exists in Irian Jaya (Indonesia), but has not been officially recorded.
Black leaf streak was first reported in peninsular Malaysia in 1965, but, if the record is correct, failed to become the dominant leaf spot as in many other tropical countries. More recently, the causal agent has been identified in Johore and Langkawi Island (X Mourichon, CIRAD, Montpellier, France, personal communication, 1996), but elsewhere eumusae leaf spot caused by the fungus Mycosphaerella eumusae is prevalent.
Although black leaf streak has been recorded in Thailand (Reddy, 1969), all leaf spot samples collected during a 1994 banana disease survey of the country were identified as eumusae leaf spot (DR Jones, INIBAP, personal communication, 1995).
Black leaf streak was reported in Bhutan in 1989, but the disease has not yet been recorded in India or Bangladesh. One would have expected black leaf streak to have spread from Bhutan to the Indian subcontinent before now if it was invasive in this region. Therefore, a similar situation may exist as in Thailand and peninsular Malaysia. Certainly, eumusae leaf spot has been identified has the predominant leaf spot in southern India and Sri lanka.
The first record of black leaf streak in Africa, which was in Zambia in 1973, is in doubt. Specimens sent to IMI for identification could not be confirmed as M. fijiensis (Tushemereirwe and Waller, 1993). A report of black leaf streak in Guinea (Jones and Mourichon, 1993) was erroneous and has been omitted. Recent reports from Guinea Bissau and Niger (EPPO, 2003) need confirmation.
Reports of black leaf streak in the Netherlands Antilles (EPPO, 2003) in the Caribbean can not be verified. Another report from Guyana has proved false and has been omitted (EPPO, 2009).
The disease may be present in the Northern Mariana Islands although the reports are unsubstantiated (EPPO, 2003).
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
|Continent/Country/Region||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||Reference||Notes|
|Bhutan||Present||Introduced||1985||Not invasive||Peregrine and, 1989; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Brunei Darussalam||Present||CABI/EPPO, 2011|
|China||Restricted distribution||CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Guangdong||Present||Introduced||1990||Invasive||Mourichon and Fullerton, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Hainan||Present||Introduced||1980||Invasive||Stover and Simmonds, 1987; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Yunnan||Present||Introduced||1993||Invasive||Jones and Mourichon, 1993; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Indonesia||Restricted distribution||CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Irian Jaya||Present||Native||Invasive||Davis et al., 2000; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Java||Present||Introduced||1969||Not invasive||Reddy and, 1969; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Kalimantan||Present||Introduced||1996||Invasive||Carlier et al., 2000a; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Moluccas||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Stover, 1978; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Sumatra||Present||Introduced||1993||Invasive||Jones and Mourichon, 1993; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Malaysia||Restricted distribution||CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Peninsular Malaysia||Present||Introduced||1965||Not invasive||Graham, 1969; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Sarawak||Present||Introduced||1996||Invasive||Carlier et al., 2003a; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Philippines||Present||Introduced||1964||Invasive||Hapitan and Reyes, 1970; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Singapore||Present||Introduced||1964-1967||Invasive||Graham, 1969; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Taiwan||Present||Introduced||1927||Invasive||Stover, 1978; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Thailand||Present||Introduced||1969||Not invasive||Reddy and, 1969; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Vietnam||Present||Introduced||1993||Invasive||Jones and Mourichon, 1993; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Benin||Present||Introduced||1993||Invasive||Jones and Mourichon, 1993; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Burundi||Present||Introduced||1987||Invasive||Mourichon and Fullerton, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Cameroon||Present||Introduced||1980||Invasive||Tezenas, 1982; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Central African Republic||Present||Carlier et al., 2003a; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Comoros||Widespread||Introduced||Invasive||Jones and Mourichon, 1993; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Congo||Present||Introduced||1985||Invasive||Mourichon, 1986; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Congo Democratic Republic||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Mobambo & Nakau, 1993; Sebasigari and Stover, 1988; Mourichon and Fullerton, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Côte d'Ivoire||Present||Introduced||1985||Invasive||Mourichon and Fullerton, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Gabon||Present||Introduced||1978||Invasive||Frossard, 1980; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Ghana||Present||Introduced||1986||Invasive||Wilson, 1987; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Kenya||Present||Introduced||1988||Invasive||Kung'u et al., 1992; IPPC-Secretariat, 2005; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Madagascar||Present||Introduced||2000||Invasive||Jones, 2003; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Malawi||Present||Introduced||1990||Invasive||Ploetz et al., 1992; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Mauritius||Present||CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Mayotte||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Carlier et al., 2003a; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Nigeria||Present||CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Rwanda||Present||Introduced||1986||Invasive||Mourichon and Fullerton, 1990; Sebasigari, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Sao Tome and Principe||Present||Introduced||1983||Invasive||Frossard, 1980; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Tanzania||Present||Introduced||1987||Invasive||Sebasigari and Stover, 1988; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Zanzibar||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Sebasigari and Stover, 1988|
|Togo||Present||Introduced||1988||Invasive||Mourichon and Fullerton, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Uganda||Present||Introduced||1990||Invasive||Tushemereirwe and Waller, 1993; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Zambia||Absent, reported but not confirmed||Raemakers, 1975; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Mexico||Restricted distribution||Introduced||1980||Invasive||Stover and Simmonds, 1987; Mourichon and Fullerton, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|USA||Restricted distribution||CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Florida||Present||Introduced||1998||Invasive||Ploetz and Mourichon, 1999; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Hawaii||Present||Introduced||1958||Invasive||Meredith and Lawrence, 1969; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
Central America and Caribbean
|Bahamas||Restricted distribution||CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Belize||Widespread||Introduced||1975||Invasive||Stover, 1980a; Stover, 1980b; Mourichon and Fullerton, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Costa Rica||Restricted distribution||Introduced||1979||Invasive||Stover, 1980a; Stover, 1980b; Mourichon and Fullerton, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Cuba||Present||Introduced||1991||Invasive||Vidal, 1992; Jones and Mourichon, 1993; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Dominican Republic||Present||Introduced||1996||Invasive||CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|El Salvador||Present||Introduced||1979||Invasive||Mourichon and Fullerton, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|French West Indies||Present||Bellaire et al., 2009|
|Grenada||Restricted distribution||IPPC, 2007; IPPC, 2007; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Guadeloupe||Absent, invalid record||CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Guatemala||Restricted distribution||Introduced||1977||Invasive||Stover, 1980a; Stover, 1980b; Mourichon and Fullerton, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Haiti||Present||Introduced||1999||Invasive||Jones, 2003; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Honduras||Present||Introduced||1972||Invasive||Stover & Dickson, 1976; Mourichon and Fullerton, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Jamaica||Present||Introduced||1995||Invasive||Wilson, 1996; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Martinique||Present||CABI/EPPO, 2011; Ioos et al., 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Nicaragua||Restricted distribution||Introduced||1979||Invasive||Stover, 1980a; Stover, 1980b; Mourichon and Fullerton, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Panama||Present||Introduced||1981||Invasive||Stover, 1987; Mourichon and Fullerton, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Puerto Rico||Present||Irish et al., 2006; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Saint Lucia||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Compton, 2010; Lebourne, 2010; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines||Widespread||IPPC, 2009; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Trinidad and Tobago||Widespread||IPPC, 2012a; IPPC, 2012b; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Bolivia||Present||Introduced||1996||Invasive||Tejerina, 1997; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Brazil||Present||Introduced||1998||Invasive||Cordeiro et al., 1998; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Acre||Present||Cavalcante et al., 2004; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Amazonas||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Cordeiro et al., 1998; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Bahia||Absent, unreliable record||Senhor et al., 2009; EPPO, 2014|
|-Espirito Santo||Absent, unreliable record||EPPO, 2014|
|-Mato Grosso||Present||Souza and Feguri, 2004; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Mato Grosso do Sul||Present||EPPO, 2014|
|-Minas Gerais||Absent, unreliable record||Castro et al., 2005; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Para||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Trinidade et al., 2002; Benchimol et al., 2010; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Rio Grande do Sul||Present||Favreto et al., 2007; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Santa Catarina||Present||EPPO, 2014|
|-Sao Paulo||Restricted distribution||Introduced||Invasive||Nogueira et al., 2000; Ferrari et al., 2005; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Colombia||Present||Introduced||1991||Invasive||Merchan, 1990; Mourichon and Fullerton, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Ecuador||Present||Introduced||1986||Invasive||Mourichon and Fullerton, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Guyana||Present||CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Peru||Present||Introduced||1996||Invasive||Jones, 2003; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Suriname||Absent, unreliable record||CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Venezuela||Present||Introduced||1993||Invasive||Jones and Mourichon, 1993; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|American Samoa||Present||Introduced||1975||Invasive||Firman, 1975; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Australia||Eradicated||Introduced||1981/2001||CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|-Queensland||Eradicated||Introduced||Invasive||Jones and Alcorn, 1982; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Cook Islands||Present||Introduced||1976||Invasive||Firman, 1975; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Fiji||Present||Introduced||1963||Invasive||Rhodes, 1964; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|French Polynesia||Present||Introduced||1964-1967||Invasive||Graham, 1969; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Marshall Islands||Present||CABI/EPPO, 2011|
|Micronesia, Federated states of||Present||Introduced||1964-1967||Invasive||Graham, 1969; Jones and Mourichon, 1993; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|New Caledonia||Restricted distribution||Introduced||1964-1967||Invasive||Graham, 1968; Mourichon and Fullerton, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Niue||Present||Introduced||1976||Invasive||Stover, 1976; Dingley et al., 1981; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Norfolk Island||Present||Introduced||1980||Invasive||Jones, 1990; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Northern Mariana Islands||Present||CABI/EPPO, 2011|
|Papua New Guinea||Present||Native||Invasive||Stover, 1976; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Samoa||Present||Introduced||1965||Invasive||CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Solomon Islands||Present||Native||Stover, 1976; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Tonga||Present||Introduced||1965||Johnston, 1965; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Vanuatu||Present||Introduced||1964-1967||Invasive||Graham, 1969; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
|Wallis and Futuna Islands||Present||Introduced||1996||Invasive||Carlier et al., 2003a; CABI/EPPO, 2011; EPPO, 2014|
History of Introduction and SpreadTop of page First records
The first report of M. fijiensis causing damage was in the same Sigatoka valley on the island of Vitu Levu in Fiji where M. musicola was first recognised as a major pathogen of banana fifty years earlier. In February 1963, the disease caused by M. fijiensis was said to be spreading rapidly in the Sigatoka Valley (Rhodes 1964) and it was predicted that it would be island-wide by the end of 1964 (Leach 1964a). The causal agent was also described for the first time from material collected in Fiji (Leach 1964b). The disease caused by M. fijiensis was called 'black leaf streak' by Rhodes (1964). Leach (1964b) described the risk of spread of this new disease of banana as 'a grave threat' and that the abundance of airborne ascospores produced by the pathogen may lead to it being disseminated around the world faster than Sigatoka leaf spot (Jones, 2003).
The problem caused by M. fijiensis in Fiji became apparent when the mist-sprays of light mineral oil being used successfully to control M. musicola could no longer keep leaf spot in check. The recognition of yet another important banana pathogen in Fiji before anywhere else can probably be attributed to the fact that at this location there were sizeable plantations of susceptible dessert banana cultivars and an efficient plant protection service experienced in banana problems (Jones, 2003).
Surveys undertaken after black leaf streak was discovered in Fiji led to the conclusion that the pathogen had most likely been present in the Pacific and parts of the Pacific rim for many years previously (Meredith 1970, Stover 1976, Stover 1978, Long 1979). It was suggested that M. fijiensis may have been in the Hawaiian Islands in 1958 (Meredith and Lawrence 1969). An analysis of herbarium specimens by Stover (1976), showed that M. fijiensis was present in Papua New Guinea by at least 1957 and in Taiwan as early as 1927. The similarity of symptoms with those of Sigatoka most likely masked the arrival of this new disease in many countries. Because of this, the year that black leaf streak was first discovered in many countries in this region does not reflect the order of spread of the pathogen (Jones, 2003).
When the black leaf streak pathogen was first found in Honduras in 1972, it was thought from its morphology to be a variant of M. fijiensis and was named M. fijiensis var. difformis (Mulder and Stover 1976). The disease the fungus caused was called black Sigatoka. However, it was later shown that M. fijiensis and M. fijiensis var. difformis were synonymous (Pons 1987).
A measure of the rate of spread of M. fijiensis between countries can be gained from an examination of the records from the Latin American/Caribbean region . Here, year of first report roughly corresponds with the year of introduction. Within three years of its detection in Honduras in 1972, M. fijiensis was reported in Belize to the north and by 1977 had arrived in Guatemala to the west. Local spread was quicker in the direction of prevailing winds from the east and northeast (Stover 1980). In 1979, it appeared in El Salvador, Nicaragua and Costa Rica and by 1981 had spread north to Mexico and south to Panama and northern Colombia (Carlier et al. 2000a). Spread was believed to have been accelerated in Central America by the movement of diseased banana leaves and leaf trash across international boundaries with road-transported banana and plantain fruit (Stover 1980). By 1986, commercial plantations in northern Ecuador were affected and plantains in western Venezuela succumbed in 1991. Spread to northern Peru occurred in 1994 and to Bolivia in 1996. The first report from western Brazil came in 1996 and since then M. fijiensis has been advancing in a southwesterly direction towards the Brazilian coast. In 2001, movements of banana fruit and associated banana leaves from inland areas where M. fijiensis was found to coastal cities were being controlled in an effort to delay spread (R. S. Moreira, Brazil, 2001, personal communication) (Jones, 2003).
In the Caribbean, black leaf streak was first found in Cuba in 1990. Jamaica followed in 1995 and then the Dominican Republic in 1996. The first authenticated report from Haiti, which has a dry climate, was made in 1999. Natural spread to other Caribbean countries is inevitable, but may be slowed considerably by the prevailing winds, which blow from the east. Recent investigations involving the analysis of isolates have revealed that the source of inoculum for the outbreak in Jamaica may have come from Central America and not windblown from Cuba as initially suspected (G. Rivas, Costa Rica, 2001, personal communication). The outbreak in the Dominican Republic has also been linked to Central America, though the evidence is more circumstantial. In both cases, the disease appeared shortly after banana fruit was shipped to the islands (Jones, 2003).
The first record of black leaf streak in Africa was from Zambia in 1973 (Raemaekers 1975). Although the paper published on this outbreak is convincing, the identity of the pathogen could not be confirmed from specimens sent to the UK for identification and therefore doubt remains as to the authenticity of the report (Dabek and Waller 1990). The next record was from Gabon in 1978. Frossard (1980) believed it may have been introduced on planting material from Asia. The disease then spread steadily through Central and West Africa reaching Côte d'Ivoire, Nigeria and Ghana in 1985-1986, and Uganda and Malawi in 1990 (Table 2). A second, separate introduction of M. fijiensis into Africa is thought to have occurred in 1987 on the island of Pemba. This outbreak is believed to have led to the pathogen spreading to the island of Zanzibar and coastal areas of Tanzania and Kenya (Carlier et al. 2000a). In 2000, M.fijiensis was recorded in Madagascar for the first time (Jones, 2003).
The Australian experience- a case study in local disease spread
Stover (1978) believed that M. fijiensis may have originated in the Papua New Guinea-Solomon Islands area and disseminated around the South Pacific with banana leaves or planting material. This possibility has received credence by the discovery that isolates of M. fijiensis are more diverse in the Papua New Guinea /Philippines region than elsewhere, an indication that this area may be the centre of origin of the pathogen (Carlier et al. 2000a). Therefore, it is likely that M. fijiensis may have been present on banana plants on islands in the Torres Strait and on the tip of Cape York Peninsula in Australia long before its discovery on the first plant pathological survey of the area in 1981 (Jones and Alcorn 1982). Airborne inoculum of the pathogen may not have spread the disease any further south in Australia because of the barrier presented by the Cape York Peninsula, which is a large, remote area of native bush with comparatively few communities and banana plants (Jones, 2003).
The discovery of the disease led to an attempt to eradicate the pathogen from the Bamaga area at the tip of Cape York and some Torres Strait islands by the destruction of all banana plants at these locations. This attempt failed for unknown reasons, the disease reappearing on reintroduced banana plants after a significant host-free period (Jones 1984). In hindsight, it seems likely that the close proximity of this area to Papua New Guinea, where the pathogen was endemic, meant that reintroduction by airborne inoculum was inevitable.
In the 1980s, better land and air communications in the far north of Queensland encouraged more tourists and people seeking an alternative lifestyle to visit the remote area of Australia where black leaf streak was present. This led to a higher risk of spread through movement of affected propagating material and possibly leaves with viable lesions. A programme of replacing susceptible cultivars with those that were known to have some resistance to M. fijiensis, such as 'Mysore' and 'Pisang Awak', was begun on some islands in the Torres Strait and on Cape York Peninsula in order to reduce disease incidence and local inoculum levels.
During the 1990s, isolated outbreaks of M. fijiensis were detected and eradicated from small banana plantings within Cape York Peninsula. These were at Pascoe River (1991), Bloomfield (1993), Weipa (1996) and Daintree (1997). In all cases, the origin of the inoculum could not be positively determined. The latter outbreak was the farthest south and the greatest cause of concern because of its close proximity to Cairns and the main commercial banana growing areas.
During banana disease surveys in 1998-1999, the presence of the pathogen was reported at Bamaga and Pascoe river (Wattle Hills) on Cape York Peninsula and on islands in the Torres Strait (Davis et al., 2000). In 2000, an outbreak occurred on a commercial banana planting for the first time. This was at Daintree, where an earlier outbreak on a much smaller planting in 1997 had been eradicated. The grower concerned was compensated for the destruction of his crop by the Australian banana industry. The pathogen was again eradicated (Jones, 2003).
Towards the end of the wet season in April 2001, M. fijiensis was detected on unmanaged (feral) and adjacent cultivated banana plants in the Tully Valley, which is in the heart of the commercial banana-growing area in North Queensland centred south of Cairns. Subsequently, the pathogen was reported from other locations in the same area. An eradication campaign was immediately mounted. This campaign gathered momentum when the governments of banana-growing states and the Commonwealth Government pledged funds. Measures employed included: - (1) the establishment of a special banana quarantine area, (2) a ban on the movement of fruit from this area to other banana-growing areas in Australia, (3) the close monitoring of crops and the diagnosis of any leaf spots detected, (4) the destruction of fields where affected plants were found (5) the drastic pruning of all banana plants in the growing area, (5) the regular application of systemic fungicides and (6) zero tolerance for leaf spot. This campaign was conducted during the 2001 dry winter season, which also significantly reduced chances of spore release and infection, with the co-operation of most growers. A total of 25 plants were found infected with M. fijiensis in the Tully area in 2001. The last seven plants found were either growing in private gardens or were unmanaged (Jones, 2003).
At the time of writing (January 2004), M. fijiensis has not been detected on banana in the Tully Valley for over two years. It seems likely that M. fijiensis has been successful eradicated from a growing area, which is the first time that this has been accomplished anywhere in the world. This was only achieved because (1) the pathogen was recognised very soon after introduction because of routine leaf spot monitoring operations, (2) the banana growers' association immediately lobbied the government for action to be taken to eradicate the pathogen, (3) the government provided funds necessary to eradicate the pathogen and (4) the local growers worked in unison for the benefit of the entire industry and undertook the control measures necessary for the eradication campaign to be successful.
The future for the banana industry in North Queensland as regards black leaf streak is uncertain especially as the sources of inoculum for the numerous outbreaks remains undetermined. It seems unlikely that airborne inoculum originating in Papua New Guinea/Torres Strait could be responsible for outbreaks as far south as Daintree and the Tully Valley, which is a distance of over 700 km. It is also unlikely that inoculum originates from undiscovered small pockets of disease further south on Cape York Peninsula, though this theory cannot be entirely discarded. It seems probable that inoculum is being introduced by another pathway, perhaps on illegally introduced propagating material or by deliberate mischievousness.
Risk of IntroductionTop of page Black leaf streak disease has not yet been reported in the islands in the eastern Caribbean where smallholders produce fruit for export. It has also not been recorded in India, Sri Lanka, South Africa and commercial production areas in Australia where bananas are mostly grown for local consumption. Quarantine measures are in place in Australia to prevent the spread of black leaf streak from the Torres Strait region to other areas (Jones, 1990). The disease can be disseminated long distances by the movement of conventional planting material, such as infected sword suckers or as diseased leaf tissue. Banana plantlets in tissue culture pose no risk of contamination by fungal diseases if maintained in a sterile environment.
Hosts/Species AffectedTop of page Advanced symptoms of black leaf streak caused by M. fijiensis have only been recorded on cultivated banana and plantain and the wild banana species Musa acuminata (subsp. banksii and subsp. zebrina). Banana cultivars differ in their reaction to the pathogen. Many are susceptible, but some show varying degrees of resistance from slow lesion development to a hypersensitive-like response to infection (see Biology and Ecology). Most wild species that have been tested are infected, but invasion is usually halted at a very early stage in a hypersensitive-like response (Carlier et al., 2000a).
Host Plants and Other Plants AffectedTop of page
Growth StagesTop of page Flowering stage, Fruiting stage, Seedling stage, Vegetative growing stage
SymptomsTop of page
Symptoms are first visible as faint, minute, reddish-brown specks on the lower surface of the leaf. Specks elongate, becoming slightly wider, to form a characteristic narrow, reddish-brown streak with dimensions of 20 x 2 mm with the long axis parallel to leaf veins. Streaks frequently overlap to form compound streaks. The colour of streaks, which are now clearly visible on the upper leaf surface, changes to dark brown, almost black. The entire leaf can blacken at this stage if streaks are numerous. If less densely congregated, streaks broaden and become fusiform or elliptical spots. Water-soaked borders appear around spots and surrounding leaf tissue yellows slightly. The centres of spots become slightly depressed and dry out, becoming light grey or buff. Each spot has a well-defined, narrow dark brown or black border and surrounding tissue is often yellow. Whole sections of leaves can become necrotic as spots coalesce. After the leaf has withered, spots remain visible because of their light-coloured centres. Different stages of disease development have been identified (Meredith and Lawrence 1969; Fouré, 1987). Often, all stages of disease development can be seen on one leaf.
If inoculum pressure is high, leaves are rapidly destroyed. Often, fewer than six living leaves may be seen on a susceptible plant that is growing vegetatively. On resistant cultivars, symptoms are only usually seen on the older, lower leaves. The disease is more severe on plants with bunches because new leaves are no longer being produced to replace those lost due to disease. If disease pressure is great, it is not uncommon for a susceptible cultivar to have no viable leaves at harvest.
List of Symptoms/SignsTop of page
|Leaves / abnormal colours|
|Leaves / abnormal leaf fall|
|Leaves / necrotic areas|
Biology and EcologyTop of page Disease development.
The period between infection and the formation of mature lesions depends on the resistance or susceptibility of the cultivar, intensity of infection and environmental conditions. Infection is believed to occur as a new leaf emerges from the pseudostem and unfurls. If the cultivar is susceptible, initial specks may appear on the second and third open leaves of a growing plant, streaks on the third and fourth leaves and both spots and streaks on older leaves. If a cultivar has resistance, streaks and spots may only be seen on the very oldest leaves. In some highly resistant cultivars, specks develop quite rapidly in response to infection, but there is no further disease development. Some authors believe that in these cases, the speck may represent a hypersensitive-like reaction (Carlier et al., 2000a).
Conidia are formed first in lesions and spread the infection to other leaves on the same plant or to adjacent plants. They are dislodged from conidiophores by wind and water (Stover, 1980b). Germination occurs in water and the leaf is penetrated through stomata. Ascospores are thought to contribute to most of the inoculum and can spread the disease further distances than conidia. They are forcibly discharged when the leaf surface is wet and can be carried many kilometres in air currents (Stover, 1980b). However, recent studies suggest that ascospores are susceptible to UV radiation which may prevent spread over very long distances (Parnell et al., 1998). Ascospores also germinate in moisture and infect leaves through stomata. Both conidia and ascospores can germinate within 2-3 hours, but stomata are not usually penetrated until after 48-72 hours of humidity at or near saturation, and at temperatures above 20°C. After infection, hyphae emerge from the stomata and either develop into conidiophores or grow across the surface and infect adjacent stomata. Streaks usually appear first near the leaf apex and along the leaf margin, which is indicative of infection by ascospores (Meredith, 1970). Spotting can develop on the third or fourth fully opened leaf of a susceptible, vegetatively growing plant and sometimes on the second (Stover, 1980b).
Populations of M. fijiensis maintain a high level of genetic diversity and it is speculated that pathogenic variability is, therefore, also likely to exist (Carlier et al., 2000a). Isolates of the pathogen from different locations in Papua New Guinea and elsewhere have in fact been found to vary in their pathogenicity in glasshouse screening tests using differential Musa genotypes (Fullerton and Olsen, 1995). Isolates have also been shown to vary in aggressiveness (Jacome and Schuh, 1993; Romero and Sutton, 1997).
Maximum germination of conidia and ascopsores occurs in water and decreases as the relative humidity (RH) lowers. No conidia have been observed germinating below 95% RH and no ascospores below 98% RH (Jacome et al., 1991). The minimum, optimum and maximum temperatures for the development of ascospore germ tubes of M. fijiensis is 12°C, 27°C and 36°C respectively, with no development taking place at 11°C and 38°C (Stover, 1983; Jacome et al., 1991; Porras and Pérez, 1997). However, ascospore germ-tube growth at 20°C is half the rate it is at 27°C. A film of water on the leaf surface is required for ascospore infection under controlled conditions. Water is not required for conidial infection provided the relative humidity is high. Epiphytic growth of hyphae from one stoma to another is most likely encouraged by leaf surface moisture as disease severity increases the longer the period of leaf wetness (Jacome and Schuh, 1992). Maximum disease development probably takes place at around 25-27°C under wet conditions.
Conidiophores develop under conditions of high humidity. They were seen in streak symptoms in Cameroon in the rainy season, but not in the dry (Fouré and Moreau, 1992). Condia are dislodged by wind and water (Stover, 1980). Mature perithecial ascocarps need to be impregnated with water before ascospores can be discharged (Stover, 1976). As UV radiation has been shown to affect the viability of ascospores (Parnell et al., 1998), maximum survival could be expected during periods of heavy cloud cover as is experienced during thunderstorms or cyclonic disturbances. Strong winds that occur during these natural phenomena would be expected to carry viable ascospores the maximum distances.
Records showing that black leaf streak is gradually becoming dominant at higher and higher altitudes suggest that M. fijiensis may be slowly adapting to cooler temperatures (Carlier et al., 2000a).
M. fijienis is well suited for the environmental conditions prevailing in the tropical coastal areas and has now virtually replaced M. musicola, which is the pathogen causing Sigatoka, in most of these locations. This process took 2-3 years in coastal Honduras and less than 5 years in coastal Costa Rica. Lesion expansion and ascospore production is greater for M. fijiensis in wet tropical environments and this has probably given it a competitive advantage over M. musicola. However, the situation is different at altitude as M. musicola seems more suited to cooler environments.The optimum growth of ascospore germ tubes of M. musicola is at 25°C, which is 2°C lower than that the optimum for M. fijiensis (Porras and Pérez, 1997). This physiological difference may explain the dominance of M. musicola in upland areas.
In South-East Asia, M. fijensis was recorded as present in Indonesia, peninsular Malaysia and Thailand in the 1960s, but it has not become the dominant leaf spot pathogen. Eumusae leaf spot caused by M. eumusae appears to be common and widespread in peninsular Malaysia and Thailand and in these countries this pathogen may be outcompeting M. fijiensis. In Java, its lack of dominance over M. musicola is harder to explain, but may be related to environmental factors and the great genetic diversity of banana cultivars which are mainly grown in mixed plantings.
Means of Movement and DispersalTop of page Natural dispersal
Rain splash and wind are believed to carry conidia from leaf to leaf and plant to plant thus initiating new infections. Ascopsores, which are forcibly ejected from perithecial ascocarps and are the most common form of inoculum, have the potential to be carried for longer distances. During overcast and windy conditions, such as occurs during tropical disturbances, ascospores may remain viable for extended periods and spread the pathogen for considerable distances. However, dispersal over a distance of a few hundred kilometres is considered unlikely (Parnell et al., 1998).
Sword suckers, which are an important form of planting material, especially in developing countries, usually have some attached leaf material. This material could be infected by the pathogen. Therefore, if affected sword suckers are moved long distances prior to planting, the pathogen could be disseminated to new areas. The intercontinental spread of M. fijiensis is believed to have occurred in this way.
The chances of spread of M. fijiensis may be much less if corm pieces, with no leaf material, are used as planting material. However, there is a possibility that viable spores could be carried passively on the surface of such material and later be in a position, perhaps by rain splash, to infect leaves.
The risk of spread is eliminated if planting material is moved in tissue culture. This is recommended for the international movement of banana germplasm (Jones and Diekmann, 2000; Jones 2002)
Movement in trade
In some societies, banana leaves are used as ornaments on special occasions and for wrapping foods. In most banana producing countries, banana leaves are used to cushion and protect banana fruit from the sun during transportation from places of production to market. The long distance movement of leaves that could be infected by pathogens is viewed as a quarantine risk. The spread of black leaf streak in Central America may have been accelerated when plantains and green reject export bananas cushioned by infected leaves were trucked across international borders (Stover, 1980). Imported banana leaves and leaf trash should be destroyed. Leaf trash may be found in boxes of commercially packed banana fruit (Jones, 2002).
A recent paper from Venezuela suggests that small sporulating lesions of M. fijiensis can form on fruit of 'Harton' (AAB, Plantain subgroup) (Cedeno et al., 2000). If this report is accurate, then it is possible for the pathogen to be disseminated with plantain fruit. However, Sigatoka lesions have never been reported on fruit of Cavendish cultivars, which is the main commodity of the banana trades (Jones, 2002).
The risk from spores of banana pathogens carried passively on or with fruit is also a quarantine consideration. Research in Brazil has found that large numbers of conidia of M. fijiensis are present on the surfaces of fruit of 'Prata Anã' (AAB, Pome subgroup) from areas where black leaf streak is present. These spores retain their viability for 18 days. On cardboard and polyethylene surfaces, such as is used in packaging banana fruit, viability of spores has been found to extend to 30 days (L. Gasparotto, EMBRAPA, 2002, personal communication). However, it is difficult to show that spores in these situations would initiate infections. One would suppose that there is a chance that conidia on fruit and packaging discarded in banana plots could be splashed onto leaves during rainstorms (Jones, 2002).
Plant TradeTop of page
|Plant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transport||Pest stages||Borne internally||Borne externally||Visibility of pest or symptoms|
|Leaves||hyphae; spores||Yes||Yes||Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye|
|Plant parts not known to carry the pest in trade/transport|
|Fruits (inc. pods)|
|Growing medium accompanying plants|
|Stems (above ground)/Shoots/Trunks/Branches|
|True seeds (inc. grain)|
Impact SummaryTop of page
|Fisheries / aquaculture||Negative|
ImpactTop of page Black leaf streak disease of banana has spread to all major banana-growing regions of the world since it was first recognised in Fiji in 1963. In the Pacific, it has been recorded in American Samoa, Australia (Torres Strait and Cape York Peninsula), the Cook Islands, Fiji, French Polynesia, Hawaii (USA), Micronesia, New Caledonia, Niue, Norfolk Island, Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, Tonga, Vanuatu, Wallis and Fortuna Islands and Samoa. The disease has been found in many countries in Latin America namely Belize, Bolivia, Brazil (Amazonia), Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama and Venezuela. In the Caribbean region, black leaf streak has been identified in Florida (USA), Cuba, Jamaica, the Dominican Republic and now poses a threat to the export industry based in the Windward Islands. West African countries with the disease are Benin, Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, Ghana, Nigeria, S¦o Tomé and Togo. In the East African region, black leaf streak has been found in Burundi, Comoros, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mayotte, Rwanda, Tanzania (including Zanzibar), Uganda and possibly Zambia. Bhutan, China (Hainan, Guangdong and Yunnan), Indonesia (Halmahera, Java, Kalimantan and Sumatra), Malaysia (Johore, Langkawi Island and Sarawak), the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam have been found with the disease in Asia. However, the situation is more confused in this region because M. fijiensis is not common at all locations. Competition from other leaf spots and the diversity of banana germplasm with varying degrees of disease resistance may account for its erratic distribution (Carlier et al., 2000; Jones, 2003).
Black leaf streak is a major constraint to banana production in most countries where it occurs (Stover, 1983, 1986; Fouré, 1985; Fullerton, 1987; Stover and Simmonds, 1987). After the first occurrence of black leaf streak in an area, the disease usually builds up and often reaches an epidemic level in a few years (Fullerton and Stover, 1990; Belalcazar, 1991). Chemical control costs and crop losses are well documented for industrially produced bananas (Stover, 1986, 1990). Losses to smallholders' crops that are consumed locally are harder to estimate.
Black leaf streak does not kill plants immediately, but crop losses increase gradually with the age of plantings. The decrease in functional leaf area caused by the disease results in a reduction in the quality and quantity of fruit (Stover, 1983; Stover and Simmonds, 1987; Pasberg-Gauhl, 1989; Mobambo et al., 1993, 1996b). Fruit from infected plants ripens prematurely and does not properly fill. Bananas for export are sometimes harvested at a lower grade (younger age) in order to reduce the risks of premature ripening in transit to overseas markets (Stover and Simmonds, 1987).
Until the 1970s, the common leaf diseases of plantain were not considered economically important. This changed when black leaf streak spread to areas where the crop was extensively grown. All over the tropics, plantain is cultivated and fruit consumed by smallholders. In many areas, black leaf streak has caused a considerable decrease in the availability of fruit for local consumption and this has resulted in a substantial increase in their market price. Smallholders growing plantain in the Americas either go out of business, because they cannot cover the high costs of chemical control, or form cooperatives so that their limited resources can be pooled to fight the disease.
Black leaf streak is endangering the food security of resource-poor people. Africa alone contributes about 50% of the world plantain production and the demand for plantain is steadily increasing (Wilson, 1987). All known plantain cultivars (Fouré, 1985; Mobambo et al., 1996a) are susceptible to black leaf streak and are severely defoliated by the disease. Plants in the ratoon crop are weaker than in the first cycle and thus more affected by wind damage. On poor sandy soils in West Africa, Mobambo et al. (1996b) estimated that yield losses due to black leaf streak are 33% and 76% during the first and second cropping cycle respectively. However, in intensively cropped backyard or home garden systems, cultivation is not so seriously affected (Mobambo et al., 1994). Under marginal conditions, plantain production is often abandoned due to low yields.
Plantain is not the only smallholder banana to be affected in Africa. The disease also causes serious damage to East African highland cultivars in the Lujugira-Mutika subgroup (AAA). In Uganda, Tushemereirwe (1996) reported yield losses of 37% due to the effects of a leaf spot complex consisting mainly of black leaf streak and Cladosporium leaf speckle.
Black leaf streak has had a devastating effect on the production of export bananas in the South Pacific. Firman (1972) noted that only 49% of unsprayed Cavendish cultivars produced fruit that reached the export quality standard. Fiji ceased exporting bananas in 1974 and Samoa in 1984. Exports also dropped in Tonga and the Cook Islands, because producers had problems maintaining fruit quality standards for their markets in New Zealand. Black leaf streak control has become the single largest production cost (Fullerton, 1987).
In 1974, the production of dessert bananas and plantains in Central America was seriously affected by hurricane Fifi, which was also thought to be responsible for the wind borne spread of black leaf streak to new areas. In many countries, production subsequently dropped substantially. Before 1974, Honduras exported 500,000 boxes of plantain each year, but afterwards exports dropped to below 1,000 boxes (Stover, 1983). In 1978, the export of plantain from Honduras to the USA was curtailed because of the shortage of fruit with the required quality (Bustamente, 1983). Plantain exports only resumed in 1985, when black leaf streak was controlled by the aerial application of fungicides (Stover, 1987).
After the identification of black leaf streak in Costa Rica in 1979, the government initiated a quarantine programme (Woods, 1980). This programme consisted of the destruction of host plants in the affected area and the establishment of roadside quarantine stations strategically located to stop movements of banana and plantain leaves which were used for padding and shading fruit. About 3,000 hectares of plantain were destroyed in 1979 and early 1980. The Costa Rican government paid about US$ 3 million for the eradication program, but the spread of the disease could not be stopped (Woods, 1980). By 1982, the Ministry of Agriculture in Costa Rica estimated that black leaf streak alone reduced plantain production by 40% (Romero, 1986). In general, yields of plantains in well maintained fields on rich fertile soils in Central America may have fallen by 20-50% (Stover, 1983a; Pasberg-Gauhl, 1989).
Black leaf streak was first detected in Panama in 1980. Bureau (1990) estimated that plantain production in Panama decreased by 69% between 1979 (100,910 t) and 1984 (31,134 t). During this period, the price of plantains rose by up to 50% in local markets. Jaramillo (1987) reported that between 1982 and 1985, the area planted with plantain decreased by 22% from 7432 ha to 5800 ha. About 34% of growers were believed to have abandoned their holdings leading to a decrease in production of 47%.
Colombia is one of the largest plantain producers in Latin America with 400,000 ha under cultivation and an estimated yearly production of 2.5 million t. About 96% of plantains are consumed locally, the remainder being exported (Belalcazar, 1991). Smallholders grow about 88% of the plantain in association with coffee. Only 12% of the crop is grown in monoculture in larger plantations. After the introduction of black leaf streak, this staple food became scarce and much higher prices were demanded in the market (Belalcazar, 1991). Due to the high cost of plantain, consumers changed to other, cheaper food crops. This in turn had a negative effect on plantain production. Black leaf streak has thus had a significant impact on Colombian agriculture and the eating habits of a nation.
Black leaf streak can be chemically controlled on plantations, but the cost is substantial. Up to 36 spray cycles per year may be required for plantations growing dessert bananas for export and up to 19 cycles for commercial plantings of plantain (Fouré, 1983, 1988a, b; Stover, 1980b, 1990; Belalcazar, 1991; Gauhl, 1994; Romero and Sutton, 1997b). Stover and Simmonds (1987) reported that 27% of production costs in dessert banana plantations was spent controlling black leaf streak. From 1972 until 1985, the estimated cost of black leaf streak control in Central America, Colombia and Mexico was more than US$ 350 million (Stover and Simmonds, 1987). The cost of chemical control measures has been calculated to be US$ 400-1,400 per ha per year (Anon., 1993). During the 1980s, the cost of black leaf streak control in export banana crops in Costa Rica was estimated at approximately US$ 17.5 million per year (Stover and Simmonds, 1987). Between 1985 and 1994, the area under banana cultivation increased from approximately 21,000 ha to 52,737 ha (Serrano and Marín, 1998). As a consequence, the cost of black leaf streak control in 1995 was estimated to have increased to US$ 49 million per year (Romero and Sutton, 1997b). Recent information from Venezuela indicates that the cost of black leaf streak control in plantain farms south of Lake Maracaibo amounts to almost 50% of production costs. However, even with control measures being taken, yields were still 25% below those before the appearance of the disease in that country (Zabala and Bermudez, 1999).
Environmental ImpactTop of page The extensive use of chemicals is believed to be having a detrimental effect on the environment of countries where inoculum pressures are high and aerial spraying is practised on a large scale, such as Costa Rica. The health of plantation workers as a result of exposure to chemicals has also been raised. Numerous websites are devoted to this topic.
Impact: BiodiversityTop of page In some countries, the affect of black leaf streak on the yield of some cultivars has been so great that they are being replaced with cultivars that are more resistant to the disease (Watson, 1993). If this trend continues, it could mean that the diversity of cultivated banana germplasm will be eroded.
DiagnosisTop of page
Overnight incubation of lesions at the streak stage under 100% RH and at 25°C should produce abundant conidia and conidiophores for identification. However, these closely resemble those caused by M. musicola, the cause of Sigatoka disease, and M. eumusae, the cause of eumusae leaf spot. A thickened basal hilum on the (on average) longer conidia and scars on the conidiophores where conidia have detached, distinguish M. fijiensis from M. musicola and M. eumusae.
Cultures can be initiated from ascospores. Necrotic leaf tissue with abundant advanced spots should be incubated in a humid chamber for 48 hours. The tissue should then be cut into small squares no bigger than 5 x 5 cm and soaked in 2% sodium hypochlorite solution for 5 minutes. After rinsing in tap water, the squares of tissue are stapled to a piece of paper towel and immersed in water for 3 minutes. The paper towel is then pressed against the lid of a Petri dish with the leaf surface facing the agar. With the paper stuck to the inside, the lid is placed on a Petri dish containing water agar. The surface of the agar is regularly checked for ascospores which discharge from ascomata. Individual, germinating ascospores can be transferred to nutrient agar for further growth and development. Conidia produced on colonies can be used for diagnostic purposes and in inoculation studies.
Zapater et al. (2008) detail a protocol for diagnosing M. fijiensis based on observation of anamorphs.
Mycosphaerella fijiensis and M. musicola can also be distinguished in culture and leaf tissue by a polymerase chain reaction technique (Johanson and Jeger, 1993; Carlier et al., 2000). Molina and Kahl (2004) developed locus-specific simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for M. fijiensis and M. musicola, for use in PCR methods. Real-time PCR assays were successfully used to diagnose M. fijiensis, and differentiate it from related species, in an Australian banana plantation (Henderson et al., 1996, 2006; Ioos et al., 2011). TaqMan real-time quantitative PCR assays have also been developed (Arzanlou et al., 2007).
Phylogenetical analysis based on sequences of the ITS of ribosomal DNA from M. fijiensis, M. eumusae, M. musicola and P. musae has confirmed that all are different species (Carlier et al., 2000).
Vázquez-Euán et al. (2012) report on the use of direct colony-polymerase chain reaction (DC-PCR) approach to rapidly distinguish M. fijiensis and M. musicola strains in multiplex PCR reactions.
Detection and InspectionTop of page
Mycosphaerella fijiensis can be detected by direct observation of conidiophores and conidia on banana leaves (Zapater et al., 2008). The disease may be difficult to identify during the early stages of disease development because streak symptoms are caused by many fungal diseases of banana (Carlier et al., 2000). Advanced symptoms of black leaf streak disease may also be confused with those of Sigatoka and Sigatoka-like leaf spots. Diagnosis needs to be undertaken using a light microscope or by the polymerase chain reaction method (Souza and Feguri, 2004). See Similarities to Other Pests and Diagnostic Methods.
Similarities to Other Species/ConditionsTop of page Black leaf streak is difficult to diagnose as symptoms resemble those of Sigatoka, eumusae leaf spot and Phaeoseptoria leaf spot. The causal agent of Phaeoseptoria leaf spot can be distinguished from those causing eumusae leaf spot, Sigatoka and black leaf streak because Phaeoseptoria musae forms conidia in pycnidial conidiomata whereas M. eumusae, M. musicola and M. fijiensis form conidia borne on conidiophores on sporodochia. However, M. eumusae can give the impression that conidia form in pycnidia (Carlier et al., 2000a, b; Crous and Mourichon, 2002) so care must be taken in the identification. The presence of scars on conidia and conidiophores is a feature that can be used to separate M. fijiensis from M. eumusae and M. musicola.
Prevention and ControlTop of page Cultural Control
Removal and destruction of diseased leaves will reduce inoculum levels. If diseased leaves cannot be removed from the plot and burnt, they should be cut from plants and stacked on top of one another. This will prevent ascospores discharging effectively from the lower leaves in the pile. Overhead irrigation encourages disease and under-canopy micro-irrigation is preferable. Plants are also more prone to black leaf streak in sheltered areas where humidity levels are high. Good drainage systems that take surface water rapidly out of plantations can reduce humidity levels.
Genetic resistance to black leaf streak is clearly the best long-term goal for disease control, especially for smallholders who cannot afford to purchase chemicals. Cultivars with high levels of resistance include 'Yangambi Km 5' (AAA), 'Mysore' (AAB), 'Pelipita' (ABB), 'Saba' (ABB) and 'Pisang Awak' (ABB). However, these do not suit all local tastes and some are susceptible to Fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubense). Conventional banana breeding programmes utilize resistance to black leaf streak found in wild species of Musa, notably M. acuminata subsp. burmanicca, subsp. malaccensis and subsp. siamea, and in diploid cultivars such as 'Paka' (AA) and 'Pisang Lilin' (AA). Although a black leaf streak-resistant Cavendish-type dessert banana useful for the export trades has still to be developed, progress has been made towards breeding banana hybrids for local consumption. Plantain hybrids with good resistance have been bred by the International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Nigeria, and by the Fundación Hondureña de Investigación Agricola (FHIA), Honduras. FHIA has also bred resistant dessert bananas hybrids which have fruit of a subacid or apple flavour and resistant robust cooking banana hybrids. Other breeding programmes include the Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement (CIRAD) in Guadeloupe and the Centre de recherches sur bananiers et plantains (CARBAP) in Cameroon Biotechnological techniques, such as exploiting somaclonal variation, gamma irradiation and genetic engineering, are also being utilised in attempts to produce banana cultivars resistant to black leaf streak (Jones et al., 2000).
The disease can be controlled by the application of systemic fungicides such as benzimidazoles (benomyl, carbendazim), morpholines (tridemorph), triazoles (difenoconazole, propiconazole, triadimenol, flusilazole, fenbuconazole, bitertanol, tebuconazole, hexaconazole and cyproconazole) and strobulins (azoxystrobin, trifloxystrobin). Protectant fungicides, such as dithiocarbamates (mancozeb in oil or oil-water emulsions) and chlorothalonil in water, can also control the disease during periods of low inoculum pressure. (Carlier et al., 2000; Marin et al., 2003). In countries where disease pressure is high, fungicide sprays need to be applied at very regular intervals for control to be effective. The cultivation of banana for export in Central America has become a chemical intensive industry and the cost of black leaf streak control is high (see Economic Impact).
Resistance to benomyl (Stover 1980a; Fullerton and Tracy, 1984), propiconazole (Romero and Sutton, 1997) and oxystrobin has been reported. Strategies to combat this problem, such as alternating triazoles and morpholines, which have different modes of action, and the application of systemics in mixtures with protectants, have been developed (Carlier et al., 2000a; Marin et al., 2003).
There are concerns that the high use of fungicides in export industries is polluting the environment. Although the number of sprays can be significantly reduced in some countries when used in conjunction with disease prediction systems, this method has not been successful in Central America (Carlier et al., 2000a; Marin et al., 2003).
No biological control methodshave been adopted in commercial plantations. Some bacteria have shown promise, but the challenge of controlling this polycyclic fungus by biological methods is immense (Marin et al., 2003).
ReferencesTop of page
Anon., 1993. Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC) Banana Working Group. Conclusions and Recommendations of the Third Meeting, Orlando, Florida, USA, February 1993. Switzerland: Ciba-Geigy.
Belalcazar SL, 1991. El cultivo del plátano en el trópico. Manual de Asistencia Técnica No. 50. Cali, Colombia: Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario (ICA).
Bellaire Lde Lde; Ngando JE; Abadie C; Chabrier C; Blanco R; Lescot T; Carlier J; Côte F, 2009. Is chemical control of mycosphaerella foliar diseases of banana sustainable? Acta Horticulturae [Proceedings of the International Symposium on Recent Advances in Banana Crop Protection for Sustainable Production and Improved Livelihoods, White River, South Africa, 10-14 September 2007.], No.828:161-170. http://www.actahort.org/books/828/828_16.htm
Benchimol RL; Verzignassi JR; Matos APde; Santos Mde F; Poltronieri LS; Silva CMda, 2010. First report of black Sigatoka disease in the northern part of the Brazilian State of Pará. (Primeiro relato de Sigatoka-negra no Nordeste paraense.) Revista de Ciências Agrárias / Amazonian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 53(1):108-111. http://www.ajaes.ufra.edu.br/index.php/ajaes/article/viewFile/81/46
Bustamente M, 1983. Impact du Cercospora noir sur la production du plantain au Honduras. Fruits, 38:330-332.
Campos Nogueire EM de, 2000. A threat for bananas in the State of Sao Paulo. Summa Phytopathologica 26(1): 156-158.
Carlier J; Zapater MF; Lapeyre F; Jones DR; Mourichon X, 2000. Septoria leaf spot of banana: a newly discovered disease caused by Mycosphaerella eumusae (anamorph Septoria eumusae). Phytopathology, 90(8):884-890.
Castro MEA; Pereira JCR; Gasparotto L, 2005. First report of black-sigatoka in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. (Primeiro relato de ocorrência da sigatoka-negra em Minas Gerais.) Fitopatologia Brasileira, 30(6):668. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/fb/v30n6/a18v30n6.pdf
Cavalcante Mde JB; Sá CPde; Gomes FCda R; Gondim TMde S; Cordeiro ZJM; Hessel JL, 2004. Distribution and impact of black sigatoka in the banana plantations in the State of Acre. (Distribuição e impacto da sigatoka-negra na bananicultura do Estado do Acre.) Fitopatologia Brasileira, 29(5):544-547. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/fb/v29n5/21866.pdf
Cedeno L; Carrero C; Quintero K, 2000. Identification of Mycosphaerella fijiensis as cause of specks on fruits of plantain cv. Harton in Venezuela. Fitopatologi^acute~a Venezolana, 13(1):6-10; 17 ref.
Compton E, 2010. Status of Sigatoka control in the sub-region. Black Sigatoka Sub-Regional Workshop, Gros Islet, Saint Lucia, 26 March 2010.
Dingley JR; Fullerton RA; McKenzie EHC, 1981. Survey of Agricultural Pests and Diseases, Technical Report Vol. 2, Records of Fungi, Bacteria, Algae and Angiosperms Pathogenic on Plants in Cook Islands, Fiji, Kiribati, Nive, Tonga, Tuvalu and Western Samoa. Rome, Italy: South Pacific Bureau of Economic Co-operation, United Nations Development Programme, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.
EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm
Favreto R; Model NS; Tonietto A, 2007. Black Sigatoka, environmental factors and agroforestry systems in banana plantations of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. (Sigatoka Negra, fatores de ambiente e sistemas agroflorestais em bananais do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.) Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha, 13(1/2):95-104.
Ferrari JT; Nogueira EMde C; Gasparotto L; Hanada RE; Louzeiro IM, 2005. Occurrence of Black Sigatoka of banana plantain in São Paulo State, Brazil. (Ocorrência da Sigatoka Negra em bananeiras no Estado de São Paulo.) Arquivos do Instituto Biológico (São Paulo), 72(1):133-134. http://www.biologico.sp.gov.br/ARQUIVOS/V72_1/ferrari.PDF
Firman ID, 1972. Susceptibility of banana cultivars to fungus leaf diseases in Fiji. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad), 49:189-196.
Firman ID, 1975. Plant Diseases in the Area of the South Pacific Commission. 1. Banana Diseases. Noumea. New Caledonia: SPC, 9 pp.
FourT E, 1983. Les Cercosporioses du bananier et leurs traitements. STlection de molTcules fongicides nouvelles. ActivitTs comparTes de diffTrentes molTcules fongicides sur Mycosphaerella fijiensis MORELET, agent de la "maladie des raies noires" des bananiers et plantains du Gabon. Fruits, 38:21-34.
FourT E, 1985. Les Cercosporioses du bananier et leurs traitements. Comportement des variTtTs. Etude de la sensibilitT variTtale des bananiers et plantains T Mycosphaerella fijiensis MORELET au Gabon (maladie des raies noires). (Suite III). Fruits, 40:393-399.
FourT E, 1987. Varietal reactions of bananas and plantains to black leaf streak disease. In: Persley GJ, De Langhe EA, eds. Banana and Plantain Breeding Strategies, Proceedings of an International Workshop hrld in Cairns, Australia, 13-17 October 1986. ACIAR Proceedings No. 21, Canberra, Australia: ACIAR, 110-113.
FourT E, 1988. Les Cercosporioses du bananier et leurs traitements. EfficacitT comparTe de diffTrentes molTcules fongicides sur Mycosphaerella fijiensis MORELET, agent de la maladie des raies noires des bananiers et plantains au Cameroun (I). Fruits, 43:15-19.
FourT E, 1988b. Les Cercosporioses du bananier et leurs traitements. EfficacitTs comparTes du Pyrazophos et du Triadimenol sur Mycosphaerella fijiensis MORELET (agent de la Cercosporiose noire des bananiers et des plantains au Cameroun) lors de traitements sur grandes surfaces. Fruits, 43:143-147.
Fullerton RA, 1987. Banana production in selected Pacific islands. In: Persley GJ, De Langhe EA, eds. Banana and Plantain Breeding Strategies, Proceedings of an International Workshop held at Cairns, Australia, 13-17 October 1986. ACIAR Proceedings 21. Canberra, Australia: ACIAR, 57-62.
Fullerton RA; Stover RH, 1990. Sigatoka Leaf Spot Diseases of Bananas, Proceedings of an International Workshop held at San Jose, Costa Rica, March 28-April 1, 1989. Montferrier-sur-Lez, France: INIBAP.
Gauhl F, 1994. Epidemiology and ecology of black Sigatoka (Mycosphaerella fijiensis MORELET) on plantain and banana (Musa spp.) in Costa Rica, Central America. Montpellier, France: INIBAP.
Graham KM, 1969. A simple way to distinguish black leaf streak from Sigatoka disease on bananas. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Agriculture, Fiji.
Hapitan JC; Reyes TT, 1970. Black leaf streak disease of bananas in the Philippines. Philippine Agriculturist, 54: 47-54.
Henderson J; Pattemore JA; Porchun SC; Hayden HL; Brunschot Svan; Grice KRE; Peterson RA; Thomas-Hall SR; Aitken EAB, 2006. Black Sigatoka disease: new technologies to strengthen eradication strategies in Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology, 35(2):181-193. http://www.publish.csiro.au/nid/39/paper/AP06017.htm
Ioos R; Hubert J; Abadie C; Duféal D; Opdebeeck G; Iotti J, 2011. First report of black sigatoka disease in banana caused by Mycosphaerella fijiensis on Martinique island. Plant Disease, 95(3):359. http://apsjournals.apsnet.org/loi/pdis
IPPC, 2007. IPP Report No. GD-1/3. Rome, Italy: FAO.
IPPC, 2009. "Presence of Black Sigatoka" in St. Vincent and the Grenadines. IPPC Official Pest Report, VCT-02/1. Rome, Italy: FAO. https://www.ippc.int/index.php?id=1110520&no_cache=1&type=pestreport&L=0
IPPC, 2012. First Report of Black Sigatoka Disease (Mycosphaerella fijiensis) from Trinidad. IPPC Official Pest Report, No. TTO-06/1, No. TTO-06/1. Rome, Italy: FAO. https://www.ippc.int/
IPPC, 2012. Report of Black Sigatoka disease in bananas in Tobago. IPPC Official Pest Report, No. TTO-05/1, No. TTO-05/1. Rome, Italy: FAO. https://www.ippc.int/
IPPC-Secretariat, 2005. Identification of risks and management of invasive alien species using the IPPC framework. Proceedings of the workshop on invasive alien species and the International Plant Protection Convention, 22-26 September 2003. xii + 301 pp.
Jacome LH; Schuh W, 1992. Effects of leaf wetness duration and temperature on development of black Sigatoka disease on banana infected by Mycosphaerella fijiensis var. difformis. Phytopathology, 82(5):515-520
Jacome LH; Schuh W; Stevenson RE, 1991. Effect of temperature and relative humidity on germination and germ tube development of Mycosphaerella fijiensis var. difformis. Phytopathology, 81(12):1480-1485
Jaramillo R, 1987. Banana and plantain production in Latin America and the Carribean. In: Persley GJ, de Langhe EA, eds. Banana and Plantain Breeding Strategies. Proceedings of an International Workshop held at Cairns, Australia, 13-17 October 1986. ACIAR Proceedings 21, Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, 29-35.
Johnston A, 1965. Spread of banana black leaf streak. FAO Plant Protection Committee for the South East Asia and Pacific Region. Information Letter No. 41, Bangkok, Thailand, 2 pp.
Jones DR, 1990. Black Sigatoka - a threat to Australia. In: Fullerton RA, Stover RH, eds. Sigatoka Leaf Spot Diseases of Bananas, Proceedings of an International Workshop held at San José, Costa Rica, March 28-April 1, 1989. Montferrier-sur-Lez, France: INIBAP, 38-46.
Jones DR, 1994. The improvement and testing of Musa: a global partnership. Proceedings of the First Global Conference of the International Musa Testing Program, FHIA, Honduras, 27-30 April 1994. The improvement and testing of ^italic~Musa^roman~: a global partnership. Proceedings of the First Global Conference of the International ^italic~Musa^roman~ Testing Program, FHIA, Honduras, 27-30 April 1994., 303 pp.; [ref. at ends of papers].
Jones DR, 2000. Diseases of Banana, Abacá and Enset. Wallingford, UK: CAB Publishing, 545 pp.
Jones DR, 2002. Risk of spread of banana diseases in international trade and germplasm exchange. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Meeting of ACORBAT, Cartegena de Indias, Colombia, 27 October-2 November 2002. Medellin, Colombia: AUGURA, 105-113.
Jones DR, 2003. The Distribution and Importance of the Mycosphaerella Leaf Spot Diseases of Banana. In: Jacome L, Lepoivre P, Marin D, Ortiz R, Romero R and Escalant J-V, eds. Mycosphaerella Leaf Spot Diseases of Bananas: Present Status and Outlook. Proceedings of the Workshop on Mycosphaerella Leaf Spot Diseases held in San JosT, Costa Rica on 20-23 May 2002. Montpellier, France: INIBAP (in press).
Jones DR; Alcorn JL, 1982. Freckle and black Sigatoka diseases of banana in far north Queensland. Australasian Plant Pathology, 11:7-9.
Jones DR; Diekmann M, 2000. Quarantine and the safe movement of of Musa germplasm. In: Jones DR, ed. Diseases of Banana, Abacá and Enset. Wallingford, UK: CAB Publishing, 409-423.
Jones DR; Rowe; PR; Rosales FE; Hwang SC; Tang CY, 2000. Banana breeding for disease resistance. In: Jones DR, ed. Diseases of Banana, Abacá and Enset. Wallingford, UK: CAB Publishing, 425-464.
Krishnamoorthy V; Kumar N; Angappan K; Soorianathasundaram K, 2004. InfoMusa, 13(1):25-27.
Leach R, 1964. A new form of banana leaf spot in Fiji, black leaf streak. World Crops, 16:60-64.
Leach R, 1964. Report on investigations into the cause and control of the new banana disease in Fiji, black leaf streak. Council Papers, Fiji, 38, Suva.
Lebourne S, 2010. Press release: Government on the offensive against the Black Sigatoka disease. Press release: Government on the offensive against the Black Sigatoka disease. Government of St Lucia. http://stlucia.gov.lc/pr2010/february/government_on_the_offensive_against_the_black_sigatoka_disease.htm
Merchan VM, 1990. Update of research on Mycosphaerella spp. in Colombia. In: Fullerton RA, Stover RH (eds) Sigatoka Leaf Spot Diseases of Bananas, Proceedings of an International Workshop held at San José, Costa Rica, 28 March-1 April 1989. Montpellier, France: INIBAP, 50-55.
Meredith DS, 1970. Banana Leaf Spot Disease (Sigatoka) caused by Mycosphaerella musicola Leach. Phytopathological Papers, No. 11. Kew, UK: Commonwealth Mycological Institute.
Meredith DS; Lawrence JS, 1969. Black leaf streak disease of bananas (Mycosphaerella fijiensis): symptoms of disease in Hawaii, and notes on the conidial state of the causal fungus. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 52:459-476.
Mobambo KN; Gauhl F; Swennen R; Pasberg-Gauhl C, 1996. Assessment of the cropping cycle effects on black leaf streak severity and yield decline of plantain and plantain hybrids. International Journal of Pest Management, 42(1):1-7; 32 ref.
Mobambo KN; Gauhl F; Vuylsteke D; Ortiz R; Pasberg-Gauhl C; Swennen R, 1993. Yield loss in plantain from black sigatoka leaf spot and field performance of resistant hybrids. Field Crops Research, 35(1):35-42
Mobambo KN; Zuofa K; Gauhl F; Adeniji MO; Pasberg-Gauhl C, 1994. Effect of soil fertility on host response to black leaf streak of plantain (Musa spp., AAB group) under traditional farming systems in southeastern Nigeria. International Journal of Pest Management, 40(1):75-80
Molina CM; Kahl G, 2004. Genomics of two banana pathogens: genetic diversity, diagnostics, and phylogeny of Mycosphaerella fijiensis and M. musicola. In: Banana improvement: cellular, molecular biology, and induced mutations. Proceedings of a meeting held in Leuven, Belgium, 24-28 September 2001 [ed. by Jain, S. M.\Swennen, R.]. Enfield, USA: Science Publishers, Inc., 127-145.
Morelet M, 1969. Micromycetes du Var et d'ailleurs (2me Note). Annales de la Société des Sciences Naturelles et d'Archeologic de Toulon et du Var, 21:104-106.
Mourichon X, 1986. Mise en évidence de Mycosphaerella fijiensis Morelet, agent de la maladie des raies noires (black leaf streak) des bananiers plantains au Congo. Fruits, 41:371-374.
Mourichon X; Fullerton RA, 1990. Geographical distribution of the two species Mycosphaerella musicola Leach (Cercospora musae) and M. fijiensis Morelet (C. fijiensis), respectively agents of Sigatoka disease and black leaf streak disease in bananas and plantains. Fruits (Paris), 45(3):213-218; 27 ref.
Parnell M; Burt PJA; Wilson K, 1998. The influence of exposure to ultraviolet radiation in simulated sunlight on ascospores causing Black Sigatoka disease of banana and plantain. International Journal of Biometeorology, 42(1):22-27; 30 ref.
Pasberg-Gauhl C, 1989. Untersuchungen zur Symptomentwicklung und BekSmpfung der Schwarzen Sigatoka-Krankheit (Mycosphaerella fijiensis MORELET) an Bananen (Musa sp.) in vitro und im Freiland. Göttinger BeitrSge zur Land- und Forstwirtschaft in den Tropen und Subtropen, Heft 40.
Pons N, 1990. Taxonomy of Cercospora and related genera. In: Fullerton RA, Stover RH, eds. Sigatoka Leaf Spot Diseases of Bananas: Proceedings of an International Workshop held at San Jose, Costa Rica, March 28-April 1, 1989. Montferrier-sur-Lez, France: INIBAP, 360-370.
Reddy DB; ed, 1969. Quarterly Newsletter of the Plant Protection Committee for South East Asia and Pacific Region (12), 1-3. Bangkok, Thailand: FAO.
Rhodes PL, 1964. A new banana disease in Fiji. Commonwealth Phytopathological News, 10:38-41.
Romero CR, 1986. Impacto de Sigatoka Negra y Roya del Cafeto en actividad platanera nacional. Revista de la Asociación Bananera Nacional (ASBANA), San José, Costa Rica, A±o 9, No. 26, 10-11.
Sebasigari K, 1990. Effects of black Sigatoka (Mycosphaerella fijiensis Morelet) on bananas and plantains in the Imbo Plain in Rwanda and Burundi. In: Fullerton, RA, Stover, RH (eds) Sigatoka Leaf Spot Diseases of Bananas. Proceedings of an International Workshop held at San José, Costa Rica, 28 March-1 April 1989. Montpellier, France: INIBAP, 61-65.
Sebasigari K; Stover RH, 1988. Banana Diseases and Pests in East Africa. Report of a Survey in November 1987. Montpellier, France: INIBAP.
Senhor RF; Carvalho JNde; Souza PAde; Silva MC; Silva FLda, 2009. Integrated management Black Sigatoka. (Manejo integrado de Sigatoka Negra.) Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 4(3):7-12. http://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/286/304
Serrano E; Marfn DH, 1998. Disminución de la productividad bananera en Costa Rica. CORBANA, 23:85-96.
Souza NSde; Feguri E, 2004. Occurrence of Black Sigatoka caused by Mycosphaerella fijiensis in banana in the State of Mato Grosso, Brazil. (Ocorrência da Sigatoka Negra em bananeira causada por Mycosphaerella fijiensis no Estado de Mato Grosso.) Fitopatologia Brasileira, 29(2):225. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/fb/v29n2/19572.pdf
Stover RH, 1974. Pathogenic and morphologic variation in Mycosphaerella fijiensis (M. musicola). Proceedings of the American Phytopathology Society, 1:123.
Stover RH, 1978. Distribution and possible origin of Mycosphaerella fijiensis in Southeast Asia. Tropical Agriculture, 55: 65-68.
Stover RH, 1980. Sigatoka leaf spots of banana and plantain. In: Krigsvold DT, Woods TL, eds. Proceedings of the Sigatoka Workshop, 18-19 February 1980, La Lima, Honduras. La Lima, Honduras: United Fruit Company, 1-18.
Stover RH, 1983. Effet du Cercospora noir sur les plantains en Amérique centrale. Fruits, 38:326-329.
Stover RH, 1983. The effect of temperature on ascospore germinative tube growth of Mycosphaerella musicola and Mycosphaerella fijiensis var. difformis. Fruits, 38:625-628.
Stover RH, 1986. Disease management strategies and the survival of the banana industry. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 24:83-91.
Stover RH, 1987. Produccion de platano en presencia de la Sigatoka Negra. Union de Paises Exportadores de Banano (UPEB), Informe Mensual, 82:50-56.
Stover RH, 1990. Sigatoka leaf spots: Thirty years of changing control strategies: 1959-1989. In: Fullerton RA, Stover RH, eds. Sigatoka Leaf Spot Diseases of Bananas. Proceedings of an International Workshop held at San JosT, Costa Rica, 28.3.1989-1.4.1989. Montpellier, France: INIBAP, 66-74.
Tezenas du Montcel H, 1982. Propositions d'etudes pour la lutte contre la cercosporiose noire sur les plantains d'Hevecam au Cameroun. Rapport d'activites 1980-82. Centre de recherches d'Ekona, Ekona, Cameroon: IRA.
Trinidade DR; Poltronieiri LS; Menezes AJAE, 2002. Black Sigatoka in the State of Para. Fitopatologica Brasilleira 27(3): 323-326.
Tushemereirwe WK, 1996. Factors influencing the expression of leaf spot diseases of highland bananas in Uganda. PhD Thesis. Reading, UK: University of Reading.
Vázquez-Euán R; Grijalva-Arango R; Chi-Manzanero B; Tzec-Simá M; Islas-Flores I; Rodríguez-García C; Peraza-Echeverría L; James AC; Manzo-Sánchez G; Canto-Canché B, 2012. Direct colony polymerase chain reaction (PCR): an efficient technique to rapidly identify and distinguish Mycosphaerella fijiensis and Mycosphaerella musicola. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11(33):8172-8180. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB/PDF/pdf2012/24Apr/Vazquez-Euan%20et%20al.pdf
Wilson C, 1996. Black Sigatoka in Jamaica. CARAPHIN News, 13:5.
Wilson GF, 1987. Status of bananas and plantains in West Africa. In: Persley G, De Langhe EA, eds. Banana and Plantain Breeding Strategies, Proceedings of an International Workshop held at Cairns, Australia, 13-17 October 1986. Canberra, Australia: ACIAR, 29-35.
Woods TL, 1980. The black Sigatoka situation in Costa Rica. In: Krigsvold DT, Woods TL, eds. Proceedings of the Sigatoka Workshop, 18-19 February 1980, La Lima, Honduras: United Fruit Company, La Lima, Honduras, 19-20.
Zabala M; Berm·dez A, 1999. Black sigatoka (Mycosphaerella fijiensis, Morelet) control costs effect on farmer profit of plantain (Musa AAB cv. Hart=n) in the south region of Maracaibo lake. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomi^acute~a, Universidad del Zulia, 16(1):107-119; 8 ref.
Zapater MF; Abadie C; Pignolet L; Carlier J; Mourichon X, 2008. Diagnosis of Mycosphaerella spp., responsible for Mycosphaerella leaf spot diseases of bananas and plantains, through morphotaxonomic observations. Fruits (Paris), 63(6):389-393. http://www.fruits-journal.org/
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/