Morinda citrifolia (Indian mulberry)
Index
- Pictures
- Identity
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Description
- Plant Type
- Distribution
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat
- Biology and Ecology
- Climate
- Latitude/Altitude Ranges
- Air Temperature
- Rainfall
- Rainfall Regime
- Soil Tolerances
- Natural enemies
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Causes
- Pathway Vectors
- Environmental Impact
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Uses
- Uses List
- Prevention and Control
- References
- Contributors
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate reportIdentity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Morinda citrifolia L.
Preferred Common Name
- Indian mulberry
Other Scientific Names
- Belicea hoffimannioides Lundell
- Morinda aspera Wight & Arn.
- Morinda asperula Standl.
- Morinda bracteata Roxb.
- Morinda chachuca Buch.-Ham.
- Morinda elliptica (Hook.f.) Ridl.
- Morinda ligulata Blanco
- Morinda litoralis Blanco
- Morinda macrophylla Desf.
- Morinda mudia Buch.-Ham.
- Morinda multiflora Roxb.
- Morinda nodosa Buch.-Ham.
- Morinda quadrangularis G.Don
- Morinda stenophylla Spreng.
- Morinda teysmanniana Miq.
- Morinda tomentosa B.Heyne ex Roth
- Morinda zollingeriana Miq.
- Platanocephalus orientalis Crantz
- Samama citrifolia (L.) Kuntze
- Sarcocephalus leichhardtii F.Muell.
International Common Names
- English: canary-wood; cheesefruit; great morinda
- Spanish: mora de la India; morinda; noni; ruibarbo Caribe (Mexico)
- French: bois douleur ; morinde
- Chinese: hai bin mu ba ji
Local Common Names
- Australia: canary wood ; rotten cheesefruit
- Brazil: pau-azeitona
- Cambodia: nhoër srôk; nhoër thôm'
- Cuba: árbol de queso; mora de la India; noni
- Dominican Republic: bagá; buñuela; fruta del diablo ; manzana de puerto rico; manzanilla; nigua; piña de puerco; piñecla; piñuela
- Haiti: bois bouleur; fromagier
- Indonesia: bengkudu; cangkudu; mengkudu
- Jamaica: hog apple
- Laos: nhoo baanz
- Lesser Antilles: bilimbi; feuille froide; jumbie breadfruit; pain killer; pomme de singe; pomme-macaque; rhubarbe caraïbe
- Malaysia: mengkudu besar; mengkudu jantan
- Philippines: apatot ; bankoro; tumbong-aso
- Puerto Rico: gardenia hedionda; noni
- Thailand: yo ban
EPPO code
- MOJCI (Morinda citrifolia)
Summary of Invasiveness
Top of pageM. citrifolia is a shrub or small tree that in recent years has attained significant economic importance worldwide due to the great variety of health and cosmetic products made from its leaves and fruits. Consequently, it has been extensively introduced in cultivation and can be found cultivated and naturalized across tropical and subtropical regions of the world (Groenendijk, 1991; Nelson, 2006; Orwa et al., 2009; USDA-ARS, 2017). Currently, M. citrifolia is listed as invasive in Cuba, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic and Haiti (Kairo et al., 2003; Chacon and Saborio, 2012, Oviedo Prieto et al., 2012).
M. citrifolia is a species that can tolerate and thrive in very harsh conditions. It is well adapted to a wide range of environmental conditions and soil types. It can grow in infertile, acidic, and alkaline soils, and in areas with climates ranging from very dry to very wet. It is also tolerant to fire, waterlogging, wind, shaded conditions (>80% shade) and salt spray (Francis, 2004; Nelson, 2006; PROTA, 2017). For instance, M. citrifolia is one of the first plants to colonize harsh waste areas or lava flows on islands across the Pacific region and is also one of the few species that can thrive beneath the canopy of the allelopathic tree Casuarina equisetifolia (Nelson, 2006). Additionally, M. citrifolia has a deep taproot and an extensive and aggressive root system and once established it is very persistent and difficult to eradicate. Seeds have a distinct air chamber and can retain viability even after floating in water for months, facilitating the wide distribution and occurrence of this species on many seashores worldwide (Nelson, 2006).
Taxonomic Tree
Top of page- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Plantae
- Phylum: Spermatophyta
- Subphylum: Angiospermae
- Class: Dicotyledonae
- Order: Gentianales
- Family: Rubiaceae
- Species: Morinda citrifolia
- Species: Morinda citrifolia
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Top of pageRubiaceae is a family of flowering plants comprising 611 genera and 13,150 species of herbs, shrubs, trees and lianas distributed worldwide but largely tropical, especially diverse in Madagascar and the Andes (Stevens, 2012). The genus Morinda includes about 100 species of climbing shrubs, erect shrubs, or small trees (The Plant List, 2013).
There are forms of M. citrifolia previously recognized as botanical varieties (M. citrifolia var. citrifolia, M. citrifolia var. bracteata and M. citrifolia var. elliptica) and one cultivar (M. citrifolia cultivar Potteri) (Nelson, 2006; The Plant List, 2013), but now regarded as synonyms. The former var. bracteata is a small fruited variety with conspicuous bracts subtending the fruit. It is found in Indonesia and other parts of the region between the Indian and Pacific oceans. It is cultivated in some locations. The former var. potteri is an ornamental, small-fruited, narrow-leafed type with green-and-white leaf variegation, which is distributed throughout the Pacific (Janick and Paull, 2008).
A proposal was been made to conserve the name Morinda citrifolia with a conserved type (Razafimandimbison et al., 2011). If this proposal had been rejected the name would have been applied to the species known as M. coreia and the species presently known as M. citrifolia would have to be renamed M. nodosa, which would cause confusion in this widely cultivated species.
Description
Top of pageMorinda citrifolia is a small tree or large evergreen shrub approximately 3–10 m in height at maturity and 15 cm or more in stem diameter. The plant sometimes finds support on other plants as a liana. The sapwood is soft and yellow-brown and the bark relatively smooth to slightly rough and grey or light brown. The light green, four-angled twigs have opposite, pinnately veined, glossy leaves attached by stout petioles, 1.5–2 cm long. Stipules are connate or distinct, 10–12 mm long, the apex entire or two- to three-lobed. The membranous, glabrous leaf blades range from elliptic to elliptic-ovate and range in size from 20 to 45 cm long and 7–25 cm wide. The tubular flowers are perfect, with about 75–90 in ovoid to globose heads. Peduncles are 10–30 mm long; the calyx a truncated rim. The corolla is white, five lobed, with the tube greenish white, 7–9 mm long and lobes oblong-deltate, approximately 7 mm long. There are five stamens, scarcely exserted and the style is about 15 mm long. Fruit (a syncarp) are yellowish white and fleshy, 5–14 cm long, about 3–7.5 cm in diameter, soft and fetid when ripe. Seeds are brown, about 4–9 mm long and have a distinct air chamber. The plant has a rooting habit similar to citrus and coffee, with an extensive lateral root system and a deep taproot (Janick and Paull, 2008).
Distribution
Top of pageM. citrifolia is native to tropical and subtropical Asia and Australia and now has a pantropical distribution (Govaerts, 2017; USDA-ARS, 2017), occurring roughly between latitudes 19°N and S. The Indo-Pacific distribution includes Eastern Polynesia (e.g. Hawaii, the Line Islands, Marquesas, Society Islands, Australs, Tuamotus, Pitcairn and the Cook islands), Melanesia (e.g. Fiji, Vanuatu, New Guinea, New Caledonia and the Solomon Islands), Western Polynesia (e.g. Samoa, Tonga, Niue, ‘Uvea/Futuna, Rotuma and Tuvalu) and Micronesia (e.g. Pohnpei, Guam, Chuuk, Palau, the Marshall Islands and the Northern Marianas), Indonesia, Australia and South-east Asia. The species has also become naturalized on the open shores of Central and South America (from Mexico to Panama, Venezuela and Surinam) and on many islands of the West Indies, the Bahamas, Bermuda, the Florida Keys and parts of Africa (Janick and Paull, 2008).
A study of nucleotide sequence data by Razafimandimbison et al. (2010) suggests a Micronesian origin for M. citrifolia. Large fruited var. citrifolia may have been present in the Pacific before the arrival of Micronesian and Polynesian ancestors from South East Asia.
Distribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
Last updated: 29 Apr 2022Continent/Country/Region | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | Reference | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Africa |
|||||||
Cameroon | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
Comoros | Present | ||||||
Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
Madagascar | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
Sierra Leone | Present | Introduced | |||||
Asia |
|||||||
Bangladesh | Present | Native | |||||
British Indian Ocean Territory | |||||||
-Chagos Archipelago | Present | Native | |||||
Cambodia | Present | Native | |||||
China | Present | Probably native | |||||
-Guangdong | Present | Probably native | |||||
-Hainan | Present | Probably native | |||||
Cocos Islands | Present | Native | |||||
India | Present | Native | |||||
-Andaman and Nicobar Islands | Present | Native | |||||
-Assam | Present | Native | |||||
-Karnataka | Present | Native | Wild and cultivated | ||||
-Kerala | Present | Native | Wild and cultivated | ||||
-Maharashtra | Present | Native | Wild and cultivated | ||||
-Tamil Nadu | Present | Native | Wild and cultivated | ||||
Indonesia | Present | Native | |||||
-Java | Present | Native | |||||
-Lesser Sunda Islands | Present | Native | |||||
-Maluku Islands | Present | Native | |||||
-Sulawesi | Present | Native | |||||
-Sumatra | Present | Native | |||||
Japan | Present | Native | |||||
Malaysia | Present | Native | |||||
-Peninsular Malaysia | Present | Native | |||||
-Sabah | Present | Native | |||||
-Sarawak | Present | Native | |||||
Myanmar | Present | Native | |||||
Philippines | Present | Native | |||||
Sri Lanka | Present | Native | |||||
Taiwan | Present | Native | |||||
Thailand | Present | Native | |||||
Vietnam | Present | Native | |||||
North America |
|||||||
Bahamas | Present | Introduced | |||||
Barbados | Present | Introduced | |||||
Belize | Present | Introduced | |||||
Bermuda | Present | Introduced | |||||
British Virgin Islands | Present | Introduced | Tortola, Virgin Gorda | ||||
Cayman Islands | Present | Introduced | |||||
Costa Rica | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Cuba | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Dominican Republic | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
El Salvador | Present | Introduced | |||||
Guadeloupe | Present | Introduced | |||||
Guatemala | Present | Introduced | |||||
Haiti | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Honduras | Present | Introduced | |||||
Jamaica | Present | Introduced | |||||
Mexico | Present | Introduced | |||||
Montserrat | Present | Introduced | |||||
Nicaragua | Present | Introduced | |||||
Panama | Present | Introduced | |||||
Puerto Rico | Present | Introduced | |||||
Saint Kitts and Nevis | Present | Introduced | |||||
Saint Lucia | Present | Introduced | |||||
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Present | Introduced | |||||
U.S. Virgin Islands | Present | Introduced | |||||
United States | Present, Localized | Introduced | Only in 2 states | ||||
-Florida | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Hawaii | Present | Introduced | |||||
Oceania |
|||||||
Australia | Present | Native | |||||
-Northern Territory | Present | Native | |||||
-Queensland | Present | Native | |||||
Christmas Island | Present | Native | |||||
Cook Islands | Present | Introduced | |||||
Federated States of Micronesia | Present | Introduced | |||||
Fiji | Present | Introduced | |||||
French Polynesia | Present | Introduced | |||||
Guam | Present | Introduced | |||||
Marshall Islands | Present | Introduced | |||||
Nauru | Present | Introduced | |||||
New Caledonia | Present | Introduced | |||||
Niue | Present | Introduced | |||||
Northern Mariana Islands | Present | Introduced | |||||
Palau | Present | Introduced | |||||
Papua New Guinea | Present | Native | |||||
Pitcairn | Present | Introduced | |||||
Samoa | Present | Introduced | |||||
Solomon Islands | Present | Native | |||||
Tokelau | Present | Introduced | |||||
Tonga | Present | Introduced | |||||
Tuvalu | Present | Introduced | |||||
Vanuatu | Present | Introduced | |||||
Wallis and Futuna | Present | Introduced | |||||
South America |
|||||||
Brazil | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
-Amazonas | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
-Bahia | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
-Ceara | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
-Espirito Santo | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
-Goias | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
-Maranhao | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
-Mato Grosso | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
-Minas Gerais | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
-Para | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
-Parana | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
-Pernambuco | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
-Piaui | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
-Rio de Janeiro | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
-Rio Grande do Norte | Present | ||||||
-Sao Paulo | Present | Introduced | Cultivated | ||||
Colombia | Present | Introduced | |||||
Guyana | Present | Introduced | |||||
Suriname | Present | Introduced | |||||
Venezuela | Present | Introduced |
History of Introduction and Spread
Top of pageM. citrifolia may have been distributed by man and carried westwards into the Indian Ocean by sea currents, reaching the Seychelles, and similarly into the Pacific between 30°N and 30°S latitude, reaching the Marquesas and Easter Island. It is present throughout South-East Asia both wild and cultivated (Groenendijk, 1991). In Hawaii, it was introduced in 1941 from Fiji and now it can be found planted and naturalized (Little and Skolmen, 2003).
M. citrifolia was widely spread across the Pacific by native peoples beginning 2000 years ago (Smith, 2002), and later in the late 1700s by Europeans exploring the islands of the South Pacific. European explorers noticed that this species was widely used by the native people across Pacific islands and for example, Captain Cook in his journals mentioned the use of “noni” for food and medicinally by island natives (Francis, 2004; Nelson, 2006).
Risk of Introduction
Top of pageThe likelihood of new introductions of M. citrifolia is very high. Worldwide, this species has attained significant economic importance due to the great variety of health and cosmetic products made from its leaves and fruits (Nelson, 2006; USDA-ARS, 2017). Consequently, it has been extensively introduced and in recent years many countries in Asia, Africa and America have approved its cultivation.
Habitat
Top of pageM. citrifolia can be found growing in a wide range of habitats (e.g., from very dry to wet sites) including coastal and littoral forests, disturbed forests, dry to mesic forests, deciduous forests, xerophytic habitats, grasslands, open areas near shoreline, abandoned pastures, and coconut plantations. It is also common in home gardens, backyards, disturbed sites around villages, and along streams near cultivation (Nelson, 2006).
Biology and Ecology
Top of pageGenetics
The chromosome number reported for M. citrifolia is n = 22 (Philip and Mathew, 1988). Within this species, there is great morphological variation for fruits and leaves with no clear subpopulations bearing unique traits (Nelson, 2006).
Reproductive Biology
Flowers in M. citrifolia are hermaphroditic. Anthesis is diurnal and flowers are visited and probably pollinated by bees, but plants can self-pollinate (Orwa et al., 2009; PROTA, 2017).
Physiology and Phenology
M. citrifolia has a moderate growth rate (0.75–1.5 m/year), slowing as the tree reaches maturity. However, juvenile plants may grow 1.2–1.5 m in just 6 months. Plants begin flowering and producing fruit in the first year after transplanting. Flowers and fruit are produced throughout the year. Unripe fruit are light green, turning whitish yellow when ripe. Fruit when harvested at the ‘hard white’ stage turn soft and translucent yellow within a few days. In Hawaii flowers on individual M. citrifolia trees are produced over a span of several weeks (or more) as fruit expand in size (Janick and Paull, 2008). Ripe fruit are distributed by several animals including fruit bats.
The seeds have an air chambers and float, facilitating their dispersal via oceanic currents (Macpherson et al., 2007). Dispersal of seeds in native habitats is probably by birds, rats, bats and other mammals. Seeds may remain viable for at least 6 months. Germination time is 3-9 weeks after sowing. Seed germination can be rapid and uniform (~20 days) in full sun to partial shade and mean temperature of approximately 38°C (Groenendijk, 1991; Nelson, 2006; Orwa et al., 2009; PROTA, 2017).
Qualitative and compositional changes were determined in harvested fruits and ripening went through three stages: no significant softening, significant softening and dramatic softening (Cárdenas-Coronel et al., 2016). Ripening was accompanied by accumulation of acidity and soluble solids, and the activity of pectinases and hemicellulases promoted the differential disassembly of cell wall polymers resulting in fruit softening.
Longevity
M. citrifolia is a perennial species and plants may live for 25 to 50 years, probably longer (Nelson, 2006).
Associations
A symbiotic association in the native range with the ant species Oecophylla smaragdina has been described. The plant provides the ants with food and leaves for nesting in exchange for protection from insect predators (Tan, 2001; Francis, 2004). M. citrifolia is the principal larval host of the hawk moth, Macroglossum hirundo vitiensis in Fiji (Nelson, 2006).
Environmental Requirements
M. citrifolia grows in a very wide range of environments and soils and has an unusual ability to survive in harsh conditions such as coral atolls or basaltic lava flows. The species grows from sea level to about 1500 m, depending on latitude and environment. It prefers 20–35°C, although it can tolerate a minimum temperature of about 5°C.
M. citrifolia is a salt and salt-spray tolerant plant and is most competitive where many other plants cannot grow, such as on coral beach sands, volcanic lava flows, in brackish tide pools or on the slopes of very steep gulches. It grows very well on rocky soils, but may not compete well with grasses or other weeds in deep, silty soils. It can tolerate a wide range of precipitation patterns up to 3000 mm/year, including summer, winter, bimodal and uniform. Mature, cultivated M. citrifolia can easily withstand drought of 6 months or more. Wild M. citrifolia plants growing in arid conditions can spend their entire lives in conditions of perpetual drought. It also tolerates waterlogging, salty soils and salt spray.
M. citrifolia can grow well under a wide range of light intensities, from full sun to over 80% shade. It can regenerate after fire by sprouting new foliage from roots or stems. The plant tolerates shallow, sodic and infertile soils (Janick and Paull, 2008). It is tolerant of windy locations, but yields and growth are retarded. The brittle woody branches are easily broken by high winds, but are easily regenerated following storms (Macpherson et al., 2007).
Climate
Top of pageClimate | Status | Description | Remark |
---|---|---|---|
Af - Tropical rainforest climate | Preferred | > 60mm precipitation per month | |
Am - Tropical monsoon climate | Preferred | Tropical monsoon climate ( < 60mm precipitation driest month but > (100 - [total annual precipitation(mm}/25])) | |
As - Tropical savanna climate with dry summer | Preferred | < 60mm precipitation driest month (in summer) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25]) | |
Aw - Tropical wet and dry savanna climate | Preferred | < 60mm precipitation driest month (in winter) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25]) |
Latitude/Altitude Ranges
Top of pageLatitude North (°N) | Latitude South (°S) | Altitude Lower (m) | Altitude Upper (m) |
---|---|---|---|
30 | 30 |
Air Temperature
Top of pageParameter | Lower limit | Upper limit |
---|---|---|
Mean annual temperature (ºC) | 20 | 25 |
Mean maximum temperature of hottest month (ºC) | 32 | 38 |
Mean minimum temperature of coldest month (ºC) | 5 | 18 |
Rainfall
Top of pageParameter | Lower limit | Upper limit | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Dry season duration | 0 | 4 | number of consecutive months with <40 mm rainfall |
Mean annual rainfall | 250 mm | 4000 mm | mm; lower/upper limits |
Soil Tolerances
Top of pageSoil drainage
- free
- seasonally waterlogged
Soil reaction
- acid
- alkaline
- neutral
Soil texture
- heavy
- light
- medium
Special soil tolerances
- infertile
- saline
- shallow
- sodic
Natural enemies
Top of pageNatural enemy | Type | Life stages | Specificity | References | Biological control in | Biological control on |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Achaea janata | Herbivore | Plants|Whole plant | not specific | |||
Aphis gossypii | Plants|Whole plant | not specific | ||||
Athelia rolfsii | Pathogen | Plants|Whole plant | not specific | |||
Cassytha filiformis | Parasite | Plants|Whole plant | not specific | |||
Coccus viridis | Plants|Whole plant | not specific | ||||
Dialeurodes kirkaldyi | Plants|Whole plant | not specific | ||||
Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis | Plants|Whole plant | not specific |
Notes on Natural Enemies
Top of pageNelson (2006) reports that M. citrifolia is susceptible to attack and damage by a range of insects, diseases, and pests, including:
- Aphis gosypii (aphids)
- Coccus viridis (green scale)
- Dialeurodes kirkaldyi (whitefly)
- Achaea janata
- Heliothrips haemorroidalis (thrips)
- Colletotrichum spp. (leaf spot disease)
- Phytophthora spp. (fungi)
- Athelia rolfsii
- Meloidogyne spp. (nematodes)
M. citrifolia is also susceptible to infection by coastline parasitic plants such as Cuscuta spp. and Cassytha filiformis (Nelson, 2006).
Means of Movement and Dispersal
Top of pageM. citrifolia spreads by seeds (Francis, 2004; Orwa et al., 2009). In cultivation, it can also be propagated vegetatively by cuttings made from stems and roots (Nelson, 2006).
Natural Dispersal (Non-Biotic)
Seeds can be dispersed floating in water. Seeds have a distinct air chamber and can retain viability even after months floating in water (e.g., ocean currents and/or streams and rivers), until their deposition on suitable substrates (Nelson, 2006).
Vector Transmission (Biotic)
Seeds are dispersed by bats, birds, and other mammals (Francis, 2004; Orwa et al., 2009).
Intentional Introduction
M. citrifolia has been widely introduced across tropical and subtropical regions of the world mainly for its fruits and medicinal uses (Nelson, 2006; Govaerts, 2017; USDA-ARS, 2017).
Pathway Causes
Top of pageCause | Notes | Long Distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crop production | Cultivated for its fruits and leaves | Yes | Yes | Orwa et al. (2009) |
Disturbance | Naturalized in disturbed areas near villages | Yes | Yes | Nelson (2006) |
Food | Fruits/ Leaves consumed as vegetable | Yes | Yes | Nelson (2006) |
Forage | Fruits used to feed pigs | Yes | Yes | Francis (2004) |
Habitat restoration and improvement | Planted for control coastal erosion | Yes | Francis (2004) | |
Hedges and windbreaks | Windbreak and shade tree | Yes | Yes | Francis (2004) |
Horticulture | Yes | Yes | Francis (2004) | |
Internet sales | Seeds and fruits sold online | Yes | Yes | |
Medicinal use | Widely used for medicinal purposes | Yes | Yes | Orwa et al. (2009) |
Ornamental purposes | Yes | Yes | Nelson (2006) | |
People foraging | Fruits/ Leaves consumed as vegetable | Yes | Yes | Nelson (2006) |
Pathway Vectors
Top of pageVector | Notes | Long Distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Floating vegetation and debris | Seeds can float in water for months | Yes | Yes | Nelson (2006) |
Water | Seeds floating in water | Yes | Yes | Nelson (2006) |
Host and vector organisms | Seeds are dispersed by birds, bats, and other mammals | Yes | Yes | Nelson (2006) |
Environmental Impact
Top of pageM. citrifolia is an invasive species with the capability to survive harsh environmental conditions and extended periods of drought. It is also recognized for its ability of persist and to disperse and colonize new areas without a specific biological dispersal agent, such as humans, rodents, and birds. Once naturalized, this species grows forming dense canopies that inhibit the establishment of native vegetation. It also has a very aggressive and extensive root system that outcompetes native plants for resources such as water and nutrients. On some islands across the Pacific region (i.e., Micronesia) M. citrifolia is considered a weed in some agroforestry or diversified farming settings (Nelson, 2006).
Risk and Impact Factors
Top of page- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Has a broad native range
- Abundant in its native range
- Highly adaptable to different environments
- Is a habitat generalist
- Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
- Pioneering in disturbed areas
- Tolerant of shade
- Highly mobile locally
- Benefits from human association (i.e. it is a human commensal)
- Long lived
- Fast growing
- Gregarious
- Reproduces asexually
- Altered trophic level
- Damaged ecosystem services
- Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
- Modification of nutrient regime
- Modification of successional patterns
- Monoculture formation
- Reduced amenity values
- Reduced native biodiversity
- Threat to/ loss of native species
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Competition - shading
- Rapid growth
- Rooting
- Highly likely to be transported internationally deliberately
- Difficult/costly to control
Uses
Top of pageM. citrifolia is harvested from both plantations and from the wild. This species is one of the most important botanical remedies and food supplements traded on the international market. Its fruits, leaves, fruit juice, and extracts are sold worldwide. The fruit and leaves are edible raw or cooked. Unripe fruit are cooked in curries and ripe fruit are consumed with salt in Myanmar. The ripe fruit has the smell of putrid cheese. Cooked fruit is mixed with coconut in Nauru. Very young leaves are cooked as vegetables (containing 4–6% protein) and eaten with rice in Java and Thailand (Janick and Paull, 2008).
M. citrifolia is often planted as a windbreak, to provide support for pepper vines, and as a shade tree in coffee plantations (Tan, 2001). It is sometime planted as an ornamental, but this practice is not very common due to the strong and sometimes offensive odour of ripened fruits and because the fallen fruits attract many flies and other insects.
All parts of the plant have traditional uses. The roots and bark are used for dyes and medicines; the trunks are used for firewood and tools; the leaves are used as leafy vegetables and for wrapping foods, in medicines and poultices; and the fruit are used as famine food, in juices and for topical and internal medicines. The root bark produces a red dye (morindin) and the plant was widely grown in Java in the late 19th century for this purpose before synthetic dyes became available. The dye is still used in high quality batik (Janick and Paull, 2008). The fruit pulp is used to clean hair, iron and steel, while the wood is occasionally used for poles and plant supports (Nguyen and Nguyen, 2003).
Economic Value
The worldwide market for products of M. citrifolia was an estimated US$400 million in 2002 and projected to reach up to US$ 1.3 billion in 2015 (Potterat and Hamburger, 2007; Assi et al., 2017). M. citrifolia contains phytochemicals that own antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, antitumor, anthelminthic, analgesic, hypotensive, anti-inflammatory and immune enhancing effects that have attracted industries to employ it as a part of various products and for wide applications such as a natural source of medicines and chemical reagents as well as a green insecticide (Assi et al., 2017).
Social Benefit
M. citrifolia has been used for centuries for its curative properties to treat varieties of illnesses. The purported modern application of M. citrifolia as a complementary alternative medicine spans a vast array of maladies including high blood pressure, diabetes, beri-beri, asthma, coughs, fevers, centipede bites, sores, headaches, pneumonia, diarrhoea, pain, arthritis, depression, cancer, AIDS, skin parasites, skin and stomach ulcers, arteriosclerosis and senility. Some of these uses can be accounted for by the presence of a number of physiologically active chemicals including anthraquinones, alkaloids, scopoletin, glycosides, polysaccharides, asperuloide and organic acids such as caprioc, caprylic and ursolic acids.
While the plant enjoys an outstanding anecdotal reputation regarding these maladies and shows promise as an anti-cancer agent in mice experiments, many purported benefits of using M. citrifolia topically or internally have yet to be supported by published data from peer-reviewed clinical trials involving humans. Nevertheless, M. citrifolia has attained significant economic importance worldwide through a variety of health and cosmetic products made from its leaves and fruit. These products, including fruit juice and powders derived from fruit or foliage, are some of the most important botanical remedies and food supplements currently traded on the international market (Nguyen and Nguyen, 2003; Janick and Paull, 2008).
The ethnomedicinal and pharmaceutical properties are reviewed by Macpherson et al., 2007, Assi et al. (2017), Ali et al. (2016) and Torres et al. (2017). Gu et al. (2018) demonstrated that leaf extracts enhanced osteogenic differentiation in human cell lines. Pandy and Vijeepallam (2017) showed that methanolic fruit extracts, specifically the scopoletin and rutin components, alleviated symptoms of schizophrenia in mice.
Environmental Services
M. citrifolia has been planted in coastal areas for erosion control (Francis, 2004). On islands across the Pacific region, M. citrifolia is also used in traditional subsistence farming, intercropped with breadfruit, kava, papaya, mango, coconut, and bananas (Nelson, 2006).
Uses List
Top of pageEnvironmental
- Agroforestry
- Amenity
- Erosion control or dune stabilization
- Windbreak
Fuels
- Fuelwood
Human food and beverage
- Beverage base
- Emergency (famine) food
- Fruits
- Honey/honey flora
- Vegetable
Materials
- Chemicals
- Cosmetics
- Dye/tanning
- Wood/timber
Medicinal, pharmaceutical
- Source of medicine/pharmaceutical
- Traditional/folklore
Ornamental
- Christmas tree
- Cut flower
- garden plant
- Potted plant
- Propagation material
- Seed trade
Prevention and Control
Top of pageDue to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
M. citrifolia has deep taproot and an extensive and aggressive root system and once established it is very persistent and difficult to eradicate (Nelson, 2006). There is no information available for the chemical control of M. citrifolia.
References
Top of pageChromosome Counts Database, 2018. In: Chromosome Counts Database, http://ccdb.tau.ac.il/home/
Acevedo-Rodríguez P, Strong MT, 2012. Catalogue of the Seed Plants of the West Indies. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, 98:1192 pp. Washington DC, USA: Smithsonian Institution. http://botany.si.edu/Antilles/WestIndies/catalog.htm
Assi, R. A., Darwis, Y., Abdulbaqu, I. M., Khan, A. A., Lim, V. H., Laghari, M. H., 2017. Morinda citrifolia (Noni): A comprehensive review on its industrial uses, pharmacological activities, and clinical trials. 10(5), 691-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.06.018
Aurait Supreme Pty Ltd, 2008. Morinda citrifolia cv. Allright. 21(4), 373-375. https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/sites/g/files/net856/f/journals/pvj_vol_21_4.pdf
Chacón E, Saborío G, 2012. Red Interamericana de Información de Especies Invasoras, Costa Rica. San José, Costa Rica: Asociación para la Conservación y el Estudio de la Biodiversidad. http://invasoras.acebio.org
Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2017. Flora of China. St. Louis, Missouri and Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden and Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2
Govaerts R, 2017. World Checklist of Rubiaceae. Richmond, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/
Groenendijk JJ, 1991. Morinda citrifolia L. Record from Proseabase. In: Lemmens RHMJ, Wulijarni-Soetjipto N, Eds. PROSEA (Plant Resources of South-East Asia) Foundation, Bogor, Indonesia. http://www.proseanet.org
India Biodiversity Portal, 2017. Online Portal of India Biodiversity. http://indiabiodiversity.org/species/list
Little EL, Skolmen RG, 2003. Common forest trees of Hawaii, native and introduced. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service and College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii at Manoa
Macpherson, H., Daniells, J., Wedding, B., Davis, C., 2007. (RIRDC Publication No 07/132) . Barton, Australia, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.46 pp. https://agrifutures.infoservices.com.au/downloads/07-132.pdf
Maio FR di, Oliveira JA, 2015. Morinda in Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/jabot/floradobrasil/FB129013
Nelson, S. C., 2003. Noni cultivation and production in Hawai'i. Manoa, Hawaii, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii. 33-50. http://www.wailuarivernursery.com/html/noni/NoniCultivationInHawaii.pdf
Nelson, S. C., 2006. Morinda citrifolia (noni), Rubiaceae (coffee family). http://agroforestry.org/images/pdfs/Morinda-noni.pdf
Nguyen Tap, Nguyen Kim Bich, 2003. Morinda citrifolia L. In: Plant Resources of South-East Asia 12(3). Medicinal and Poisonous Plants 3, Leiden, Netherlands, Backhuys Publishers. 304-305.
Orwa C, Mutua A, Kindt R, Jamnadass R, Anthony S, 2009. Agroforestree Database: a tree reference and selection guide version 4.0. http://www.worldagroforestry.org/sites/treedbs/treedatabases.asp
Oviedo Prieto R, Herrera Oliver P, Caluff MG, et al., et al. National list of invasive and potentially invasive plants in the Republic of Cuba - 2011. (Lista nacional de especies de plantas invasoras y potencialmente invasoras en la República de Cuba - 2011). Bissea: Boletín sobre Conservación de Plantas del Jardín Botánico Nacional de Cuba, 6(Special Issue 1):22-96
Philip KO, Mathew PM, 1988. Cytology of the south Indian Rubiaceae and its bearing on the evolution and systematics of the family. Glimpses in Plant Research, 8, 177-244.
PROSEA, 2017. Plant Resources of South East Asia. http://proseanet.org/prosea/profile.php
PROTA, 2017. PROTA4U web database. Wageningen, Netherlands: Plant Resources of Tropical Africa. http://www.prota4u.org/search.asp
Singh, A. K., 2010. Descriptors for noni (Morinda citrifolia L.). 1, vi + 43 pp. http://www.worldnoni.net/publication/technicalbulletinbooks/Technical%20Bulletin%201.pdf
Smith RS, 2002. History and tradition of Morinda citrifolia. http://rsscomp.freeyellow.com/morindacitrifoliastory.htm
Stevens PF, 2012. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/
Tan R, 2001. Mangrove and wetland wildlife at Sungei Buloh Nature Park: Great morinda. http://www.naturia.per.sg/buloh/plants/morinda.htm
The Plant List, 2013. The Plant List: a working list of all plant species. Version 1.1. London, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://www.theplantlist.org
USDA-ARS, 2017. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, USA. http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/tax_search.pl
USDA-NRCS, 2017. The PLANTS Database. Baton Rouge, USA: National Plant Data Center. http://plants.usda.gov/
Waki, J., Okpul, T., Komolong, M. K., 2008. A descriptor list for morphological characterisation of Noni (Morinda citrifolia L). 25(1), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.1071/SP07010
Yüce, B., Gülberg, V., Diebold, J., Gerbes, A. L., 2006. Hepatitis induced by noni juice from Morinda citrifolia: a rare cause of hepatotoxicity or the tip of the iceberg?. 73(2-3), 167-170. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00164.x
Distribution References
CABI, Undated. Compendium record. Wallingford, UK: CABI
Govaerts R, 2017. World Checklist of Rubiaceae., Richmond, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/
Maio FR di, Oliveira JA, 2015. (Morinda in Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil)., Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/jabot/floradobrasil/FB129013
Contributors
Top of page08/05/17 Updated by:
Julissa Rojas-Sandoval, Department of Botany-Smithsonian NMNH, Washington DC, USA
Distribution Maps
Top of pageSelect a dataset
Map Legends
-
CABI Summary Records
Map Filters
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/