Invasive Species Compendium

Detailed coverage of invasive species threatening livelihoods and the environment worldwide


Hylurgops palliatus
(lesser spruce shoot beetle)



Hylurgops palliatus (lesser spruce shoot beetle)


  • Last modified
  • 16 November 2018
  • Datasheet Type(s)
  • Invasive Species
  • Pest
  • Natural Enemy
  • Preferred Scientific Name
  • Hylurgops palliatus
  • Preferred Common Name
  • lesser spruce shoot beetle
  • Taxonomic Tree
  • Domain: Eukaryota
  •   Kingdom: Metazoa
  •     Phylum: Arthropoda
  •       Subphylum: Uniramia
  •         Class: Insecta

Don't need the entire report?

Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.

Generate report


Top of page
Hylurgops palliatus (lesser spruce shoot beetle); adult. Museum set specimen.
CaptionHylurgops palliatus (lesser spruce shoot beetle); adult. Museum set specimen.
Copyright©Udo Schmidt/via flickr - CC BY-SA 2.0
Hylurgops palliatus (lesser spruce shoot beetle); adult. Museum set specimen.
AdultHylurgops palliatus (lesser spruce shoot beetle); adult. Museum set specimen.©Udo Schmidt/via flickr - CC BY-SA 2.0


Top of page

Preferred Scientific Name

  • Hylurgops palliatus (Gyllenhal, 1813)

Preferred Common Name

  • lesser spruce shoot beetle

Other Scientific Names

  • Hylesinus abietiperda (Bechstein, 1818)
  • Hylesinus fuscus Duftschmid, 1825
  • Hylesinus helferi (Villa, 1835)
  • Hylesinus marginatus Duftschmid, 1825
  • Hylesinus palliatus Gyllenhal, 1813
  • Hylesinus piceus (Marsham, 1802)
  • Hylesinus rufescens (Stephens, 1830)
  • Hylesinus rufus (Marsham, 1802)
  • Hylurgops parvus Eggers, 1933
  • Hylurgus rufescens Stephens, 1830
  • Ips piceus Marsham, 1802
  • Ips rufus Marsham, 1802

International Common Names

  • English: shoot beetle
  • Russian: fioletovyi luboed; malyi elovyi luboed; malyi fioletovyi luboed

Local Common Names

  • Denmark: barkbille, bleg
  • Estonia: väike-kõduürask
  • Finland: vaippaniluri
  • Germany: brauner fichtenbastkäfer; gelbbrauner fichtenbastkäfer
  • Latvia: violetais skujkoku luksngrauzis
  • Lithuania: eglinis karnagrauzis; violetinis karnagrauzis
  • Norway: barkbille, blek
  • Sweden: bleka bastborren

EPPO code

  • HYLUPA (Hylurgops palliatus)

Taxonomic Tree

Top of page
  • Domain: Eukaryota
  •     Kingdom: Metazoa
  •         Phylum: Arthropoda
  •             Subphylum: Uniramia
  •                 Class: Insecta
  •                     Order: Coleoptera
  •                         Family: Scolytidae
  •                             Genus: Hylurgops
  •                                 Species: Hylurgops palliatus

Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature

Top of page Gyllenhal described H. palliatus as Hylesinus palliatus in 1813 . LeConte described the genus Hylurgops in 1876. Synonyms of H. palliatus are listed in Grüne (1979) and Pfeffer (1989, 1995).


Top of page The adults are 2.3-3.4 mm long (Freude et al., 1981), and black with reddish-brown elytra, pronotum, legs and antennae. The pronotum is strongly constricted.


Top of page H. palliatus is distributed in coniferous and mixed forests throughout the whole palaearctic region from England to Sakhalin and Japan. It is common in northern and central Europe, and Siberia.

Distribution Table

Top of page

The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.

Continent/Country/RegionDistributionLast ReportedOriginFirst ReportedInvasiveReferenceNotes


ChinaPresentNative Not invasive Wood and Bright, 1992
Georgia (Republic of)PresentNative Not invasive Kobakhidze et al., 1973
JapanPresentNative Not invasive Wood and Bright, 1992
Korea, DPRPresentNative Not invasive Wood and Bright, 1992
Korea, Republic ofPresentNative Not invasive Ho and Kun, 1989
TurkeyPresentNative Not invasive Wood and Bright, 1992


AlgeriaPresentNative Not invasive Wood and Bright, 1992

North America

USAPresentIntroduced Invasive Haack, 2002
-New YorkPresentHoebeke and Acciavatti, 2006
-OhioPresentHoebeke and Acciavatti, 2006
-PennsylvaniaPresentHoebeke and Acciavatti, 2006


AustriaPresentNative Not invasive Haidler and Wegensteiner, 2001
BelarusWidespreadNative Not invasive Solodovnikov, 1999
BelgiumPresentNative Not invasive Wood and Bright, 1992
BulgariaPresentNative Not invasive Wood and Bright, 1992
Czech RepublicPresentNative Not invasive Zumr, 1992
Czechoslovakia (former)PresentNative Not invasive Wood and Bright, 1992
DenmarkPresentNative Not invasive Wood and Bright, 1992
EstoniaWidespreadNative Not invasive Zolk, 1932; Voolma et al., 1997; Voolma et al., 2000
FinlandWidespreadNative Not invasive
FrancePresentNative Not invasive Wood and Bright, 1992
GermanyPresentNative Not invasive Wood and Bright, 1992
HungaryPresentNative Not invasive Bright and Skidmore, 2002
IrelandPresentNative Not invasive
ItalyPresentNative Not invasive
LatviaWidespreadNative Not invasive Ozols, 1975; Ozols, 1982
LithuaniaWidespreadNative Not invasive Pileckis and Monsevicius, 1997
NetherlandsPresentNative Not invasive Wood and Bright, 1992
NorwayWidespreadNative Not invasive Lekander et al., 1977
PolandPresentNative Not invasive Burakowski et al., 1992
RomaniaPresentNative Not invasive Simionescu, 1993; Simionescu, 1995
Russian Federation
-Central RussiaWidespreadNative Not invasive Petrov and Nikitskii, 2001
-Eastern SiberiaPresentNative Not invasive Mamaev, 1985; Yanovskij, 1999
-Northern RussiaWidespreadNative Not invasive Mandel'shtam and Popovichev, 2000
-Russian Far EastPresentNative Not invasive Mamaev, 1985; Yanovskij, 1999
-Southern RussiaPresentNative Not invasive
-Western SiberiaPresentNative Not invasive Mamaev, 1985; Yanovskij, 1999
SlovakiaPresentNative Not invasive Jakus, 1995; Jakus, 1998
SloveniaPresentJurc, 2006
SpainPresentNative Not invasive Wood and Bright, 1992
SwedenWidespreadNative Not invasive Lekander et al., 1977
SwitzerlandPresentNative Not invasive Wood and Bright, 1992
UKPresentNative Not invasive Wood and Bright, 1992
UkrainePresentNative Not invasive Rudnev and Vasechko, 1988
Yugoslavia (former)PresentNative Not invasive Tomic, 1957; Wood and Bright, 1992

History of Introduction and Spread

Top of page Since 1985, USDA APHIS has maintained an electronic database for all plant pests intercepted at USA ports of entry. H. palliatus was among the ten most commonly intercepted species (Haack, 2002).

Hosts/Species Affected

Top of page H. palliatus is typically a secondary species with broad host ranges (e.g. Escherich, 1923; Stark, 1952; Krivolutskaja, 1983; Eidmann, 1987; Pfeffer, 1995). The preferred host tree is Picea abies, but it also occurs on Pinus sylvestris, Pinus cembra, Pinus strobus, Pinus nigra, Larix europea and Abies pectinata [Abies alba] (Freude et al., 1981), and rarely on Cedrus (Koch, 1992).

Insect attack on logs from trees of 22 exotic conifer species in the genera Picea, Abies, Larix and Pseudotsuga was studied in Sweden. H. palliatus was among the most frequently found insect species (Eidmann, 1987). In southern Bohemia, Czech Republic observations were made in 11 species of Picea, Abies, Pinus, Larix, Pseudotsuga and Juniperus. H. palliatus was determined in trap logs from P. abies, Picea pungens, P. sylvestris and Pinus jeffreyi (Zumr, 1992).


Top of page The beetles of the genus Hylurgops are similar to Hylastes in their appearance and habits. They differ from Hylastes in having pronotal pits of varying size versus uniform size, the pronotum is generally more constricted anteriorly and the setae are longer on the elytral declivity.

List of Symptoms/Signs

Top of page
SignLife StagesType
Stems / internal feeding

Biology and Ecology

Top of page Physiology and Phenology

The phenology and life cycle of H. palliatus were studied in Finland and Denmark (Nuorteva, 1956; Subansence, 1971). Ozols (1975), Lekander et al. (1977) and Rudnev and Vasechko (1988) provide data on its development in different regions.

Trees are infested in early spring. Studies were carried out in two forest areas in Denmark (Zealand and South Jutland) to determine the emergence dates and flight periods of H. palliatus. It was shown that the overwintered adults began to fly in April, when the maximum temperature reached approximately 6°C, and the peak of activity occurred in late April when the maximum temperatures were approximately 15-25°C (Subansence, 1971). Flight activity declined in June. The adults of the new generation emerged between July and November/December, with a peak in August. These adults flew little and overwintered near the sites in which they had developed. There was only one generation a year.

In Latvia, the swarming starts in mid-April (Ozols, 1975). In Finland it takes place in early May and the first eggs were observed in the mid-May (Nuorteva, 1956). In general, all development stages have been observed during quite a long period in the summer.

Reproductive Biology

The biology and ecology of H. palliatus is briefly reviewed by Escherich (1923), Stark (1952), Postner (1974), Lekander et al. (1977), Rudnev and Vasechko (1988), and Ehnström and Axelsson (2002). Wood and Bright (1992) gave several references relating to the biology, habitats and taxonomy of H. palliatus.

H. palliatus is a monogamous species. In central Scandinavia, H. palliatus flies from the end of April to the beginning of May (Lekander et al., 1977). The immature beetles seek the under-side of timber and branches cut in the winter and preferably those that are lying directly in contact with the ground. They make irregular galleries in the bark. Some weeks later the now mature beetles leave these galleries and look for suitable material in which to breed. The larvae mine in all directions without any evident pattern and they eventually consume the entire phloem in localized areas of heavy infestation. They pupate in late July and the new generation emerges in August. Generally, H. palliatus hibernates in the bark in association with the gallery systems but more occasionally in stump roots or litter. Generally, there is one generation annually. In the Ukraine, a sister generation may be produced or a second generation occurs, and hibernation as a larva is also possible (Rudnev and Vasechko, 1988).

The egg galleries are usually longitudinal and 2-5 cm long. According to Nuorteva (1956), the mean number of eggs in egg galleries was 37; the biggest number of eggs was observed in the relatively short egg galleries: 2.7 cm - 63 eggs, 2.2 cm - 62 eggs and 2.2 cm - 39 eggs.

Environmental Requirements

H. palliatus is a typically secondary species (Escherich, 1923). It generally reproduces in dead or dying trees. Chararas (1959) studied osmotic pressures in the bark, wood and needles of branches of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies. For both species, low pressures were associated with heavy attacks by Scolytidae. Measurements on a large number of samples showed that H. palliatus attacked branches only when bark pressures were in the range 3-5 atm, i.e. in dying trees.

H. palliatus infests the bases and roots of dying trees and stumps. It prefers logs cut during the autumn of the previous year to newly cut logs (Schroeder, 1991). This type of older breeding material may release relatively high amounts of ethanol produced in deteriorating tree tissue, whereas monoterpenes are probably released in lower amounts compared with the amounts released from newly felled or broken trees. Schroeder (1992) also studied the field response of H. palliatus to the attractant ethanol in combination with volatile wood constituents released from the non-host tree species Populus tremula and Betula pendula. The attraction of the species decreased when aspen or birch wood was added to the ethanol bait.

The sections close to the roots and parts of bark lying on the soil surface or partially covered with soil were attacked by H. palliatus. It occurs mainly on the under-side of timber, branches and other logging waste. Also the lower part (up to about 2 m) of standing, dying or dead trees, and occasionally stumps and roots, will be attacked. It seems to prefer high humidity in the bark and often occurs with Trypodendron lineatum (striped ambrosia beetle) (Ozols, 1975; Lekander et al., 1977; Koch, 1992; Jakus, 1998).

In Sweden, the attacks of bark beetles on broken conifer stems after severe snow-breakage in early 1988 were studied in autumn 1988 and 1989 (Schroeder and Eidmann, 1993). H. palliatus was frequently encountered on spruce and pine stumps in the second year following snow-breakage, whereas on spruce stumps it also occurred in the first year (Schroeder and Eidmann, 1993).

The attack density and breeding success of the bark beetles and the abundance of their predators were studied at forest-clearcut edges in southern Finland on Picea abies (Norway spruce) (Peltonen and Heliövaara, 1999). Attack densities of H. palliatus increased markedly towards the forest interior. The breeding success of H. palliatus was increased with increasing distance from the stand edge.

Attacks of bark and wood-boring beetles on mechanically created high stumps of P. abies were studied in central Sweden. H. palliatus was among the most frequently encountered species on the stumps. A negative relationship was found between stump diameter and H. palliatus occupancy (Schroeder et al., 1999).


Wingfield and Gibbs (1991) studied the blue-stain fungi associated with H. palliatus. Isolations for blue-stain fungi were made from Hylastes ater, Hylastes opacus, H. palliatus and Tomicus piniperda trapped in Pinus sylvestris billets. Five Leptographium spp. including one of unknown identity and two, apparently undescribed Graphium spp., were isolated. Leptographium procerum, Leptographium serpens [Ophiostoma serpens] and Leptographium wingfieldii were recorded for the first time in the UK. Leptographium lundbergii had previously been found in this country.

A dark stain penetrating only shallowly into the sap wood develops round the gallery and is most often caused by Ophiostoma penicillatum (Lekander et al., 1977).

In Germany, a new species of the hyphomycete genus Phialocephala, Phialocephala trigonospora, was isolated from conifericolous bark beetles (Dryocoetes autographus, H. palliatus, Ips typographus and Orthotomicus laricis) and their galleries in the bark of Pinus sylvestris and P. abies (Kirschner and Oberwinkler, 1998).

During a survey of fungi associated with bark beetles (Crypturgus cinereus, Crypturgus pusillus, D. autographus, H. palliatus, I. typographus, Pityogenes chalcographus and Trypodendron lineatum) in Germany, an undescribed species of Ophiostoma was isolated. This differs from the other species of the genus by having pigmented, aseptate, convergent ostiolar hyphae; cucullate, sheathed ascospores; and is a Hyalorhinocladiella anamorph. The species is described as Ophiostoma neglectum. It is rarely associated with primary bark beetles but often associated with secondary bark beetles mainly infesting P. abies (Kirschner and Oberwinkler, 1999b).

Diplocladium gregarium was described almost 100 years ago. It was recent rediscovered from bark beetle (C. pusillus, D. autographus, H. palliatus, I. typographus and Orthotomicus laricis) galleries in the bark of P. abies and Pinus sylvestris in Germany. The fungus was redescribed and a new genus (Cylindrocarpostylus) was proposed to accommodate it (Kirschner and Oberwinkler, 1999a).

A previously unknown heterobasidiomycetous fungus was isolated from the galleries of H. palliatus, collected from P. abies in Germany. It is described as Atractocolax pulvinatus gen. et sp. nov. (Kirschner et al., 1999).

Several species of bark beetles may carry dauer larvae of nematodes. H. palliatus proved to be a vector of dauer larvae of Bursaphelenchus poligraphi, Bursaphelenchus eggersi and Bursaphelenchus sexdentati in Germany (Braasch et al., 1999).

Kakulia et al. (1973) studied the nematode fauna of H. palliatus in the Former Republic of Georgia. Parasitorhabditis palliati, Cryptaphelenchus cryptus, B. eggersi, Mikoletzkya palliati, Panagrolaimus fuchsi and Cephalobus persegnis were found in H. palliatus and its frass on Picea orientalis in the Borzhomy and Khashuri districts of Georgia.

Crypturgus cinereus was found in the galleries of H. palliatus (Michalski and Mazur, 1999).

In Finland, H. palliatus was among the most abundant bark beetle species in a dead Norway spruce stand flooded by beavers (Castor canadensis) (Saarenmaa, 1978).

Natural enemies

Top of page
Natural enemyTypeLife stagesSpecificityReferencesBiological control inBiological control on
Corticeus fraxini Predator Larvae/Pupae
Corticeus pini Predator Larvae/Pupae
Dendrosoter middendorffii Parasite Larvae
Dinotiscus eupterus Parasite Larvae
Epuraea marseuli Predator
Epuraea unicolour Predator
Eurytoma arctica Parasite Larvae
Glischrochilus quadripunctatus Predator
Nudobius lentus Predator Eggs/Larvae/Pupae
Paromalus parallelepipedus Predator Eggs/Larvae
Plegaderus vulneratus Predator Eggs/Larvae/Pupae
Rhizophagus depressus Predator
Rhizophagus parvulus Predator
Rhopalicus tutela Parasite Larvae
Scoloposcelis pulchella Predator
Scutacarus scolyti

Notes on Natural Enemies

Top of page The natural enemies of H. palliatus were investigated by several authors (e.g. Nuorteva, 1956; Kolomiets and Bogdanova, 1980; Nikitski, 1980; Õunap, 1992, 2001; Grodzki, 1997). In Finland, 25 species of Coleoptera and some larvae of Medetera flies, and three species of chalcidids were found in the galleries of H. palliatus (Nuorteva, 1956). Õunap (1992, 2001) studied the natural enemies of bark beetles, and listed 46 species of predators and parasitoids associated with H. palliatus in Estonia. Twenty-nine species of predators and parasitoids of H. palliatus were found in Siberia, Russia (Kolomiets and Bogdanova, 1980). Grodzki (1997) studied the parasitoids, predators and commensals of the cambiophagous insects on Norway spruce in the Sudety Mountains of Poland. Michalski and Mazur (1999) provide a wide list of natural enemies for Poland; organisms other than insects (e.g. acari) are also listed.

Nuorteva (1959) discusses systematics, biology, and bark beetle associations (for example) of five Medetera species found in Finland. From the mean numbers of Medetera larvae found per breeding gallery of H. palliatus (1.75), beetle larvae destroyed by fly larvae in feeding tests (7) and eggs of H. palliatus per breeding gallery (38), it is estimated that Medetera larvae destroyed approximately one-third of the H. palliatus larvae.

In a spruce forest near Aarau, Switzerland. web-building spiders were observed as predators of H. palliatus (Moor and Nyffeler, 1983). A small erigonid spider, Troxochrus nasutus was observed feeding on H. palliatus and Pityogenes chalcographus bark beetles (Moor and Nyffeler, 1984).

Protozoa as pathogens of some species of bark beetles were studied in Germany (Purrini, 1978, 1980). A list of the 16 species of Protozoa that are known as pathogenic to scolytids is given, together with their hosts, spore size and the names of their collectors. H. palliatus was found to be infected by Nosema cf. typographi in Upper Bavaria (Purrini, 1978). Trophozoites and cysts of Malamoeba scolyti n.sp. (Amoebidae, Rhizopoda, Protozoa) were found in the Malpighian tubules of 14% of H. palliatus collected from spruce stands in Lower Saxony, Germany (Purrini, 1980). Only the pupae and adult beetles were infected.

Means of Movement and Dispersal

Top of page All stages of H. palliatus would be transported with infested conifer logs.

Plant Trade

Top of page
Plant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transportPest stagesBorne internallyBorne externallyVisibility of pest or symptoms
Bark adults; eggs; larvae; pupae Yes Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye
Stems (above ground)/Shoots/Trunks/Branches adults; eggs; larvae; pupae Yes Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye
Plant parts not known to carry the pest in trade/transport
Fruits (inc. pods)
Growing medium accompanying plants
Seedlings/Micropropagated plants
True seeds (inc. grain)

Wood Packaging

Top of page
Wood Packaging liable to carry the pest in trade/transportTimber typeUsed as packing
Solid wood packing material with bark Conifers No
Wood Packaging not known to carry the pest in trade/transport
Loose wood packing material
Processed or treated wood
Solid wood packing material without bark

Impact Summary

Top of page
Animal/plant collections None
Animal/plant products None
Biodiversity (generally) Positive
Crop production None
Environment (generally) None
Fisheries / aquaculture None
Forestry production None
Human health None
Livestock production None
Native fauna None
Native flora None
Rare/protected species None
Tourism None
Trade/international relations None
Transport/travel None


Top of page H. palliatus is a secondary bark beetle that attacks stumps, freshly cut logs and logging slash for example and it might not appear to be a threat to growing trees.

Impact: Biodiversity

Top of page Several oligophagous natural enemies living in the galleries of H. palliatus, may act as predators and parasitoids of other bark beetle species that may be real forest pests. In this context, H. palliatus can be treated as a beneficial species in the forest. In Finland, Nuorteva (1956) discussed the possibility of favouring this harmless, secondary parasite of spruce as an alternative host or prey for polyphagous enemies of bark beetles, in order to maintain a high population of such useful insects.

Investigations carried out in Germany have shown that Picea abies stems harvested by modern harvesters are unsuitable for successful colonization by the most important bark beetles (Ips typographus or Pityogenes chalcographus). This is because they have already been attacked by the early-swarming H. palliatus which presents no danger, and because their bark rapidly loses its physiological suitability for the dangerous species (Watzek and Niemeyer, 1996).

Detection and Inspection

Top of page Traps baited with host volatiles and ethanol would be used for detection of H. palliatus. Chemical communication systems in secondary bark beetles, including H. palliatus, and their attraction to host volatiles, have been investigated by several researchers (e.g. Perttunen, 1957; Kohnle, 1985; Schroeder, 1988, 1991; Schroeder and Lindelöw, 1989; Lindelöw et al., 1992; Byers, 1992).

Perttunen (1957) investigated the reactions of H. palliatus to different concentrations of alpha-pinene in the laboratory. H. palliatus was strongly repelled by the higher and slightly by the lower concentration.

Scolytids normally living in spruce, or in spruce as well as in pine, were mostly attracted to stored spruce wood. Even though fresh wood attracted many H. palliatus, stored wood was generally the more attractive host material for this species (Lindelöw et al., 1992). Chemical analyses of the wood samples revealed differences in the composition of volatile constituents between stored and fresh spruce wood. Samples from stored tree stems showed a considerable increase in the relative amounts of two volatile constituents during storage. These constituents have been identified as ethanol and acetaldehyde using gas chromatography (Sjödin et al., 1989). Ethanol was found in different relative amounts in injured trees but not in healthy trees. Ethanol and acetaldehyde are also produced in stressed trees (Kimmerer and Kozlowski, 1982).

H. palliatus was attracted to traps containing ethanol as a bait and spruce resin acted synergistically (Kohnle, 1985). Schroeder (1988) also found that H. palliatus was attracted by ethanol. Combinations of alpha-pinene and ethanol attracted high numbers of H. palliatus and the catches increased with increasing release rates of ethanol.

According to Volz (1988), who studied host selection in the bark beetles under field conditions, H. palliatus preferred flight barrier traps baited with ethanol and oleoresin from their favoured host, Picea abies, compared to traps baited with ethanol and various monoterpenes. However, the replacement of host-specific oleoresin with beta-pinene and the pine characteristic terpinolene enhanced trap catches of the species. The response of H. palliatus increased with myrtenol, but decreased with transverbenol.

Byers (1992) confirmed that a monoterpene mix containing (±)-a-pinene, (+)-3-carene and terpinolene plus ethanol was significantly more attractive to H. palliatus than ethanol alone. The baiting of pipe traps with a series of short-chain alcohols (methanol to hexanol) showed that ethanol was greatly preferred by H. palliatus but sometimes it was attracted to propanol. No insects were caught on butanol, pentanol, hexanol, ethylene glycol or unbaited pipe traps (Byers, 1992).

Schroeder and Lindelöw (1989) studied the attraction of scolytids and associated beetles by using different absolute amounts and proportions of alpha-pinene and ethanol in field experiments with flight barrier traps. Traps baited with both alpha-pinene alone and ethanol alone caught significantly higher numbers than unbaited traps of H. palliatus. However, H. palliatus was not attracted as strongly to alpha-pinene alone as Tomicus piniperda was but it was synergistically attracted to combinations of alpha-pinene and ethanol (Schroeder, 1991). Combinations of alpha-pinene and ethanol resulted in a synergistically increased attraction of this species. The effect of synergism was strongest when the release rate of ethanol was ten times higher than that of alpha-pinene.

Prevention and Control

Top of page

Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.

H. palliatus is typically a secondary species and does not need any control measures.


Top of page

Braasch H; Metge K; Burgermeister W, 1999. Bursaphelenchus species (Nematoda, Parasitaphelenchidae) found in coniferous trees in Germany and their ITS-RFLP patterns. Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes, 51(12):312-320; 34 ref.

Bright DE; Skidmore RE, 2002. A catalogue of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera), Supplement 2 (1995-1999). Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press, 523 pp.

Burakowski B; Mroczkowski M; Stefanska J, 1992. Volume 18, Part XXIII. Beetles - Coleoptera. Curculionoidea apart from Curculionidae. Katalog Fauny Polski, 23(18):324 pp.; many ref.

Byers JA, 1992. Attraction of bark beetles, Tomicus piniperda, Hylurgops palliatus, and Trypodendron domesticum and other insects to short-chain alcohols and monoterpenes. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 18(12):2385-2402

Chararas C, 1959. Variations of osmotic pressure in conifers, as a factor determining penetration by Scolytidae. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Siances de I'Acadgmie des Sciences, Paris, 249(9):(1407-1410).

Ehnström B; Axelsson R, 2002. Insekts gnag i bark och ved. Uppsala, Sweden: ArtDatabanken, SLU.

Eidmann HH, 1987. Infestation of logs of exotic conifers in Sweden by scolytids and cerambycids. Journal of Applied Entomology, 103(3):278-283

Escherich K, 1923. Die Forstinsekten Mitteleuropas II. Berlin, Germany: Paul Parey, 1-663.

Freude H; Harde KW; Lohse GA, 1981. Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. Vol. 10. Krefeld, Germany: Goecke & Evers.

Grodzki W, 1997. Parasitoids, predators and commensals of the cambiophagous insects on Norway spruce in the conditions of reduced biodiversity of forest ecosystems in the Sudety Mountains. Prace Instytutu Badawczego Lesnictwa, No. 836/842:193-213; [^italic~Prace^roman~ No. 841]; 40 ref.

Grüne S, 1979. Handbuch zur bestimmung der Europäischen Borkenkäfer (Brief illustrated key to European bark beetles). Hannover, Germany: Verlag M & H Schapfer.

Haack RA, 2002. Intercepted bark beetles (Scolytidae) at US ports of entry: 1985-2000. In: Proceedings US Department of Agriculture interagency research forum on Gypsy moth and other invasive species. USDA Northeastern Research Station, General Technical Report NE-300, 33.

Haidler B; Wegensteiner R, 2001. Occurrence of bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) in Norway spruce (Picea abies) trap logs from an Alpine site in Austria. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für allgemeine und angewandte Entomologie, 13(1-6):419-422; 15 ref.

Ho YC; Kun SW, 1989. Supplementary notes on the bark and ambrosia beetles of Korea. Korean Journal of Applied Entomology, 28(1):4-9

Hoebeke ER; Acciavatti RE, 2006. Hylurgops palliatus (Gyllenhal) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), an Eurasian bark beetle new to North America. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 108(2):267-273.

Jakus R, 1995. Bark beetle (Col., Scolytidae) communities and host and site factors on tree level in Norway spruce primeval natural forest. Journal of Applied Entomology, 119(10):643-651; 26 ref.

Jakus R, 1998. Patch level variation on bark beetle attack (Col., Scolytidae) on snapped and uprooted trees in Norway spruce primeval natural forest in endemic conditions: species distribution. Journal of Applied Entomology, 122(2/3):65-70; 29 ref.

Jurc M, 2006. Norway spruce - Picea abies (L.) Karsten. Insects on trunks, branches and in the wood - Part III. (Navadna smreka - Picea abies (L.) Karsten. Zuzelke na deblih, vejah in v lesu - 3. Del.) Gozdarski Vestnik, 64(4):197-212.

Kakulia GA; Maglakelidze LK; Kakuliya GA, 1973. Nematode fauna of Hylurgops palliatus in the Georgian SSR. Parazitologicheskii Sbornik. Tbilisi, 3:76-78.

Kimmerer TW; Kozlowski TT, 1982. Ethylene, ethane, acetaldehyde, and ethanol production by plants under stress. Plant Physiology, 69(4):840-847

Kirschner R; Bauer R; Oberwinkler F, 1999. Atractocolax, a new heterobasidiomycetous genus based on a species vectored by conifericolous bark beetles. Mycologia, 91(3):538-543; 39 ref.

Kirschner R; Oberwinkler F, 1998. Phialocephala trigonospora, a new hyphomycete species associated with conifericolous bark beetles. Sydowia, 50(2):205-212; 15 ref.

Kirschner R; Oberwinkler F, 1999. A new Ophiostoma species associated with bark beetles infesting Norway spruce. Canadian Journal of Botany, 77(2):247-252; 24 ref.

Kirschner R; Oberwinkler F, 1999. Cylindrocarpostylus, a new genus based on a hyphomycete rediscovered from bark beetle galleries. Mycological Research, 103(9):1152-1156; 16 ref.

Kobakhidze DN; Murusidze BV; Zharkov DG; Nizharadze TG; Imnadze TS; Kobakhidze TD; Dzhavelidze IG; Mirianashvili VV, 1973. Sbornik nauchnyh rabot po izucheniyu bolshogo elovogo luboeda v Gruzii. [Materials on the investigation of bioecology of the great spruce beetle (Dendroctonus micans Kugel.) in Georgia]. Tbilisi, 1:7-27.

Koch K, 1992. Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. Ökologie, vol. 3. Krefeld, Germany: Goecke & Evers.

Kohnle U, 1985. Studies on the pheromone systems of secondary bark-beetles (Col., Scolytidae). Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Entomologie, 100(2):197-218

Kolomiets NG; Bogdanova DA, 1980. Parazity i chishchniki ksilofagov Sibiri. Novosibirsk, USSR: Izdatelstvo "Nauka", Sibirskoe Otdelenie.

Krivolutskaya GP, 1983. Ecological-geographical characteristics of the fauna of bark-beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) of northern Asia. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 62(2):287-301

Lekander B; Bejer-Petersen B; Kangas E; Bakke A, 1977. The distribution of bark beetles in the Nordic countries. Acta Entomologica Fennica, No. 32:37 pp.

Lindelow A; Risberg B; Sjodin K, 1992. Attraction during flight of scolytids and other bark- and wood-dwelling beetles to volatiles from fresh and stored spruce wood. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 22(2):224-228

Mamaev BM, 1985. Stem pests in the forests of Siberia and Far East. Moscow: Agropromizdat.

Mandel'shtam MYu; Popovichev BG, 2000. Annotated list of bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) of Leningrad province. E^dot over~ntomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 79(3):599-618; 49 ref.

Michalski J; Mazur A, 1999. Korniki. Praktyczny przewodnik dla lesnikow. Wydawnictwo Swiat, Warszawa, 188 pp.

Moor H; Nyffeler M, 1983. A note on spiders killing bark-beetles. Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft, 56(1/2):195-199

Moor H; Nyffeler M, 1984. Eine borkenkäferfressende Spinne, Troxochrus nasutus Schenkel (Araneae, Erigonidae). [A bark beetle-eating spider, Troxochrus nasutus Schenkel (Araneae, Erigonidae)]. Faunistisch-ökologische Mitteilungen. Neumünster, 5(9-10):193-197.

Nikitskii NB, 1980. Insect predators of bark-beetles and their ecology. Nasekomye - khishchniki koroedov i ikh ekologiya. "Nauka" Moscow USSR, 237 pp.

Nuorteva M, 1956. Über den Fichtenstamm-Bastkäfer, Hylurgops palliatus Gyll., und seine Insektenfeinde. Acta Entomologica Fennica, 13:1-118.

Nuorteva M, 1959. Untersuchungen über einige in den Frassbildern der Borkenkäfer lebende Medetera-Arten (Dipt., Dolichopodidae). [Some Medetera species living in the galleries of bark-beetles]. Annales Entomologici Fennici, 25(4):193-210.

Ounap H, 1992. Laboratory studies of the food selection of some predators of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Toimetised, Bioloogia, 41(3):131-140

Õunap H, 2001. Insect predators and parasitoids of bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) in Estonia. Dissertationes Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Agriculturae Estoniae, 8:1-44, ISBN 9985-882-96-2.

Ozols G, 1982. Investigation of the fauna of dendrophagous beetles of pine and spruce in the Latvian SSR. Latvijas Entomologs, 25:20-36.

Ozols GE, 1975. Bark beetles (Col., Scolytidae) of spruce in the Latvian SSR. In: Liepa I et al., eds. Spruce and spuce stands of Latvia, Riga, Latvia: Zinatne, 140-145.

Peltonen M; Heliövaara K, 1999. Attack density and breeding success of bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) at different distances from forest-clearcut edge. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 1(4):237-242; 47 ref.

Perttunen V, 1957. Reactions of two bark beetle species, Hylurgops palliatus Gyll. and Hylastes ater Payk. (Col., Scolytidae) to the terpene alpha-pinene. Annales Entomologici Fennici, 23(2):101-110.

Petrov AV; Nikitskii NB, 2001. Scolytid fauna (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) of Moscow Province. E^dot over~ntomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 80(2):353-367; 18 ref.

Pileckis S, 1976. Lietuvos vabalai. Vilnius, Lithuania: Mokslas.

Pileckis S; Monsevicius V, 1997. Lietuvos fauna. Vabalai 2. Mokslo ir enciklopediju leidybos institutas, Vilnius, 216 pp.

Postner M, 1974. Scolytidae (= Ipidae), Borkenkäfer. In: Schwenke W, ed. Die Forstschadlinge Europas. Vol. 2. Hamburg, Berlin, Germany: Parey, 334-482.

Purrini K, 1978. Protozoa as pathogens of some species of bark-beetles (Col., Scolytidae) in the Konigssee district, Upper Bavaria. Anzeiger fur Schadlingskunde Pflanzenschutz Umweltschutz, 51(11):171-175

Purrini K, 1980. Malamoeba scolyti sp. n. (Amoebidae, Rhizopoda, Protozoa) parasitizing the bark beetles, Dryocoetes autographus Ratz., and Hylurgops palliatus Gyll. (Scolytidae, Coleoptera). Archiv fur Protistenkunde, 123(3):358-366

Rudnev DF; Vasechko GI, 1988. Bark beetles - Ipidae. In: Vasilyev VP, ed. Pests of Agricultural Crops and Forest Plantations Vol. 2. Kiev, Ukraine: Urozhai, 146-182.

Saarenmaa H, 1978. The occurrence of bark beetles (Scolytidae) in a dead Norway spruce stand flooded by beavers (Castor canadensis Kuhl). Silva Fennica, 12(3):201-216.

Schroeder LM, 1988. Attraction of the bark beetle Tomicus piniperda and some other bark- and wood-living beetles to the host volatiles -pinene and ethanol. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 46(3):203-210

Schroeder LM, 1991. Attraction of some scolytids and associated beetles to the host volatiles (-pinene and ethanol. In: Baranchikov YN, Mattson WJ, Hain FP, Payne TL, eds. Forest insect guilds: patterns of interaction with host trees, USDA Forestry Service General Technical Report, NE-153, 393-394.

Schroeder LM; Eidmann HH, 1993. Attacks of bark- and wood-boring Coleoptera on snow-broken conifers over a two-year period. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 8(2):257-265; 19 ref.

Schroeder LM; Lindelöw A, 1989. Attraction of scolytids and associated beetles by different absolute amounts and proportions of -pinene and ethanol. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 15(3):807-817

Schroeder LM; Weslien J; Lindelöw A; Lindhe A, 1999. Attacks by bark- and wood-boring Coleoptera on mechanically created high stumps of Norway spruce in the two years following cutting. Forest Ecology and Management, 123(1):21-30; 29 ref.

Simionescu A, 1993. The health of the forests of Bucovina during the years 1955-1991. Bucovina Forestiera, 1(1-2):18-32.

Simionescu A, 1995. Protection of softwoods in the northern part of the East Carpathians damaged by wind and snow. Revista Pa^breve~durilor, 110(2):16-25.

Sjödin K; Schroeder LM, Eidmann HH et al. , 1989. Attack rates of scolytids and composition of volatile wood constituents in healthy and mechanically weakened pine trees. Scandinavian Journal of Forestry Research, 4:379-391.

Solodovnikov IA, 1999. Catalogue of Coleoptera (Insecta) of Belarussian Poozerye. Vitebsk.

Subansenee W, 1971. Flight period and emergence in Denmark of the adult bark beetle Hylurgops palliatus Gyll. (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). Arsskrift, Kongelige Veterinaer- og Landbohojskole, 114-113

Tomic D, 1957. Potkornjaci sumskog rezervata planine Golije u 1953 godini. [Bark beetles in the forest reserve on Mt. Golija in 1953]. Sumarstvo, 10(3/4):207-210.

Volz HA, 1988. Monoterpenes governing host selection in the bark beetles Hylurgops palliatus and Tomicus piniperda. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 47(1):31-35

Voolma K; Ounap H; Süda I, 1997. Bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) of Estonia: results of the examination of insect collections. Baltic Forestry, 3(1):19-23; 43 ref.

Voolma K; sunap H; Süda I, 2000. Scolytidae. Distribution maps of Estonian insects, 2. Tartu.

Watzek G; Niemeyer H, 1996. Reduction of bark beetle damage by using harvesters and by work organization. Forst und Holz, 51(8):247-250; 3 ref.

Wingfield MJ; Gibbs JN, 1991. Leptographium and Graphium species associated with pine-infesting bark beetles in England. Mycological Research, 95(11):1257-1260

Wood SL; Bright DE, 1992. A catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera), Part 2: Taxonomic index. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs, 13: 1-1553.

Yanovskij VM, 1999. Annotated list of scolytids (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) of North Asia. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 78(2):327-362.

Zolk K, 1932. Kodumaa ürasklased (Ipidae) ühes lühikese ülevaatega nende bionoomiast ja levimisest Eestis. [Die Borkenkäfer (Ipidae) Estlands mit kurzer Berücksichtigung ihrer Bionomie und Verbreitung]. Eesti Metsanduse Aastaraamat, 6. Tartu, 127-176.

Zumr V, 1992. Attractiveness of introduced conifers to xylophagous beetles and their acceptance. Journal of Applied Entomology, 113(3):233-238

Links to Websites

Top of page
GISD/IASPMR: Invasive Alien Species Pathway Management Resource and DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway source for updated system data added to species habitat list.

Distribution Maps

Top of page
You can pan and zoom the map
Save map