- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Plant Type
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat List
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Biology and Ecology
- Soil Tolerances
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Causes
- Pathway Vectors
- Impact Summary
- Economic Impact
- Environmental Impact
- Social Impact
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Uses List
- Detection and Inspection
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Hydrocharis morsus-ranae Linnaeus, 1753
International Common Names
- English: common frogbit; common frog-bit; European frog-bit; European frog's-bit; frogbit; frog-bit; frogs-bit; frog's-bit; Water frog-bit; water-poppy
- French: grenouillete; hydrocharide grenouillette; hydrocharis des grenouilles; petit nénuphar
Local Common Names
- Germany: Froschbiss
- Italy: favagello di chiana; morso di rana
- Netherlands: kikkerbeet
- HYHMR (Hydrocharis morsus-ranae)
Summary of InvasivenessTop of page
H. morsus-ranae is a free-floating, stoloniferous aquatic plant that can grow to form dense floating mats of interlocking plants which cause many negative environmental and economic impacts. Some of these impacts include displacing native plant species, reducing biodiversity, decreasing water quality and flow, clogging irrigation pumps, impeding recreational activities, and diminishing aesthetic value. H. morsus-ranae is extremely difficult and costly to control, and its ability to form new plants vegetatively has allowed it to spread and proliferate quickly (Scribailo and Posluszny, 1984). The trade and potential escape of H. morsus-ranae through the water garden industry plays a large role in its spread to new locations, as does the transportation of this plant on recreational equipment or by wildlife moving between water bodies (USDA-NAS, 2002; Catling et al., 2003). H. morsus-ranae is declared a noxious weed in parts of the United States (USDA-GRIN, 2002), and is currently established in New York, Vermont, Michigan, and Washington.
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Plantae
- Phylum: Spermatophyta
- Subphylum: Angiospermae
- Class: Monocotyledonae
- Order: Hydrocharitales
- Family: Hydrocharitaceae
- Genus: Hydrocharis
- Species: Hydrocharis morsus-ranae
Notes on Taxonomy and NomenclatureTop of page
The genus Hydrocharis (family Hydrocharitaceae) contains approximately 15-16 species (Diversity of Life, 2005; ZipcodeZoo, 2008). The genus name comes from the Greek hydro meaning ‘water’ and charis meaning ‘some sort of plant’. The specific epithet is derived from the Latin morsus meaning ‘bite’ and rana meaning ‘frog’, referring to the observation of frogs biting at the leaves, searching for caterpillars that make their protective envelopes from the plant (Catling et al., 2003). The English common name ‘frog-bit’ comes from this relationship. Hydrocharis morsus-ranae was first named by Linnaeus in 1753, and this is still its current accepted scientific name.
DescriptionTop of page
Plant TypeTop of page Aquatic
DistributionTop of page
H. morsus-ranae is native through much of Europe and parts of temperate Asia (USDA-GRIN, 2002) as well as Africa (Catling et al., 2003). Cook and Lüönd (1982) define its native range as including western and central Europe, extending from Portugal, western France and the British Isles, north to southern Sweden and Finland, and south to northern Italy. There are scattered records in Eastern Europe to 40°E, while it is sparingly represented in Turkey, the Caucasus and south shore of the Caspian Sea. Isolated populations have also been reported from central Siberia and Kazakhstan (Cook and Lüönd, 1982). Reports of H. morsus-ranae from Australia and Japan (Holm et al., 1979) are unreliable and based upon material referable to H. dubia (Catling et al., 2003). H. morsus-ranae has declined or has been extirpated throughout parts of its European range, and is considered a conservation concern in several areas. In the United Kingdom, populations have decreased in their natural habitats, but populations have been reported in canals outside of its native range (Preston and Croft, 1997).
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
|Continent/Country/Region||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||Reference||Notes|
|Georgia (Republic of)||Present||Native||USDA-GRIN, 2002|
|Kazakhstan||Present, few occurrences||Native||Cook and Luond, 1982|
|Turkey||Present, few occurrences||Native||Catling et al., 2003|
|Canada||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-Ontario||Present||Introduced||1932||CWS, 2003||Escape from hortcultural cultivation|
|USA||Restricted distribution||USGS-NAS, 2002; EPPO, 2014|
|-New York||Present||Introduced||1974||USGS-NAS, 2002|
|Czech Republic||Present||Native||ISSG, 2005|
|Czechoslovakia (former)||Present||Native||USDA-GRIN, 2002|
|Norway||Localised||Native||Halvorsen, 1989||Population discovered in 1989 along a watercourse|
|Russian Federation||Present||Native||USDA-GRIN, 2002|
|-Eastern Siberia||Present||Native||USDA-GRIN, 2002|
|-Western Siberia||Present||Native||USDA-GRIN, 2002|
|Switzerland||Present, few occurrences||Native||Sager and Clerc, 2006||Endangered; specimens sent from the Zurich Botanical Gardens in 1932 to Canada.|
|Yugoslavia (former)||Present||Native||USDA-GRIN, 2002|
History of Introduction and SpreadTop of page
The first recorded introduction of H. morsus-ranae into Canada was in 1932 when an intentional introduction for horticultural purposes was made at an aquatic pond in the arboretum of the Central Experimental Farm in Ottawa (CWS, 2003). Earlier introduction of the plant is also possible (Catling and Porebski, 1995). The original plants, or possibility seeds, came from the Zürich Botanical Garden in Switzerland (Dore, 1968; CWS, 2003). The population grew at the original site without incident until 1939, when Minshall (1940) noticed that it had spread to nearby sections of the Rideau Canal and Brown’s Inlet, a nearby artificial pond with underwater connections to the Canal. By 1952, a population was collected from the Ottawa River at Montreal Island, either as a result of floating plant material travelling and establishing downstream, or perhaps the result of a separate introduction from specimens which escaped confinement from the Montreal Botanic Garden or McGill University (Minshall and Scarth, 1952; Dore, 1968; Catling and Dore, 1982). In 1953 it had spread towards the exit of the Rideau Canal and along the shores of the Ottawa River, being found in the main channel of the Rideau River by 1957. During 1960 H. morsus-ranae was found at various locations along the Ottawa River around Montreal, as well as much further downstream at Lake St. Peter (CWS, 2003). By 1967 the plant had also spread upstream in the Rideau River to at least Merrickville (Dore, 1968), and continued to spread along the Rideau and Ottawa Rivers, as well as into connected tributaries and isolated wetlands (Reddoch, 1976). By 1970, the total extent of North American occurrence was a stretch of 340 km of major waterways (Catling and Dore, 1982). H. morsus-ranae was reported along the Lake Erie shoreline in 1976 (USGS-NAS, 2002). By 1980 it had extended southwest to Lake Ontario and northeast to Quebec City (Catling et al., 2003). H. morsus-ranae has recently continued to spread throughout much of southern Ontario.
IntroductionsTop of page
|Introduced to||Introduced from||Year||Reason||Introduced by||Established in wild through||References||Notes|
|Natural reproduction||Continuous restocking|
|Canada||Switzerland||1932||Escape from confinement or garden escape (pathway cause)
Horticulture (pathway cause)
|Yes||USGS-NAS (2002)||Plants or perhaps seeds came from the Zurich Botanical Garden, Switzerland.|
|USA||Canada||1974||Interbasin transfers (pathway cause)
Interconnected waterways (pathway cause)
Risk of IntroductionTop of page
H. morsus-ranae is continuing to expand its range and become more abundant. H. morsus-ranae is a popular water garden and aquarium plant, and the ability to order this plant over the Internet and through mail order gives it the ability to travel to all parts of the world (Catling et al., 2003). It has escaped confinement and has been intentionally or accidentally introduced on several occasions outside of its native range. In the locales to which it has been introduced, it has often become the dominant plant species, out-competing and displacing native species that depend on the ecosystem (Catling et al., 2003). The ability of H. morsus-ranae to reproduce vegetatively facilitates its spread and colonization; it is a highly competitive plant which is capable of a maximum rate of spread of 15.6 km/year, and has already spread over an area of 644 km from point of origin (Catling et al., 2003). Although its initial spread had been confined to interconnected waterways, it has since found ways to spread into isolated and unconnected wetlands and waterways, facilitated by dispersal on boats, trailers, and wildlife (Catling et al., 2003). Within the next ten to 20 years, it is anticipated that H. morsus-ranae will continue to move westward through the Great Lakes basin towards the Midwest, and become established in the northern Midwest and prairie regions of the United States (Catling and Porebski, 1995; Catling et al., 2003)
HabitatTop of page
H. morsus-ranae prefers shallow, slow moving waters, inhabiting quiet edges of rivers, lakes, ponds, sheltered bays, open marshes, and wetlands (UFL-IFAS, 2002; USDA-NAS, 2002). It is also found growing in canals, beaver dams, swamps, and irrigation ditches. It tolerates a wide range of climatic conditions, and the genotypes established in North America also appear to have a broad tolerance. It is currently established in two major eco-zones of Canada and five eco-regions (Catling et al., 2003). Organic substrate is necessary for development, and it does not tolerate waters with a mineral substrate, such as clay pits of fishponds. H. morsus-ranae favours calcium-poor waters, often occurring on peaty soils, and often occurs in mesotrophic waters, though usually not found in oligotrophic conditions (Cook and Lüönd, 1982).
Habitat ListTop of page
|Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural||Riverbanks||Principal habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Wetlands||Principal habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Irrigation channels||Secondary/tolerated habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Lakes||Principal habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Reservoirs||Principal habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Rivers / streams||Principal habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Ponds||Principal habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
Hosts/Species AffectedTop of page
Biology and EcologyTop of page
North American populations of H. morsus-ranae have a chromosome number of 2n=28 as reported by material collected by Dore and analyzed by G.A. Mulligan from the Rideau Canal in Ottawa, Ontario (Catling et al., 2003). Several other authors report 2n=28 for Eurasian material (Löve, 1980; Dvorak, 1989). H. morsus-ranae posses one pair of long sub-metacentric chromosomes, the rest being medium length, metacentric, acrocentric, or short metacentric (Cook and Lüönd, 1982). Meiosis is reported to be regular. Dvorak (1989) provides additional information on chromosome morphology.
H. morsus-ranae reproduces primarily vegetatively by means of strong stolons and the productions of turion winter buds. It is estimated that a single plant can form approximately 100 to 150 turions (Dore, 1968; Scribailo and Posluszny, 1984).
H. morsus-ranae also has the ability to reproduce sexually, though reproduction by seeds is rarely reported (Catling et al., 2003), and probably is of limited importance in the spread of the species (Scribailo and Posluszny, 1984). The fruit is a globose berry containing up to 74 seeds, with an average of 26-42 seeds (Scribailo and Posluszny, 1985).
Physiology and Phenology
In late summer and early autumn, turions are formed along the stolon and then separate from the plant in late autumn, sinking towards the bottom where they remain dormant over winter for seven months (Dore, 1968). Their release from dormancy requires several weeks of chilling, with a temperature of approximately 5°C being optimal (ISSG, 2005). In the spring the turions rise towards the surface, germinate from late April to early May, and grow into small floating rosettes (Catling et al., 2003). Rosettes are well developed or fully grown by mid-May. By early June most plants have developed into three rosettes joined by stolons, and by mid to late June will often have six rosettes. Flowering is regulated by photoperiod, though it is very erratic and small fluctuations in temperature can readily influence timing. Generally, the peak flowering period in North America ranges from mid-July to mid-August.
H. morsus-ranae is often associated with emergent and semi-emergent plants that offer protection from currents, wind, and waves, including: Typha spp., Phragmites australis, Sparganium spp., Lemna spp., Nymphaea spp., Hottonia inflate, Pontedaria cordata, Nuphar variegata, Butomus umbellatus, Sagittaria spp., Equisetum fluviatile, and Myriophyllum spp. (Catling et al., 2003).
In Canada, H. morsus-ranae also often occurs with Potamogeton pusillus, Potamogeton vaseyi, Spirodela polyrhiza, Utricularia vulgaris, and the exotic Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) (CWS, 2003).
H. morsus-ranae is found in waters with pH between 6.5-7.8 (Catling and Dore, 1982). It has been suggested that the mostly acid and nutrient poor waters of the Canadian Shield and northern Appalachian regions have restricted its spread (Catling and Porebski, 1995). Turions can tolerate only a brief period of freezing conditions, ranging from less than ten days to up to several weeks (Catling et al., 2003).
ClimateTop of page
|BW - Desert climate||Tolerated||< 430mm annual precipitation|
|Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all year||Preferred||Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all year|
|Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summer||Preferred||Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summers|
|Ds - Continental climate with dry summer||Tolerated||Continental climate with dry summer (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, dry summers)|
Soil TolerancesTop of page
Notes on Natural EnemiesTop of page
H. morsus-ranae is eaten by grass or amur carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella Val.), ducks, water birds, and rodents. It is a food plant for a number of insects and water snails (Catling and Dore, 1982), as well as host to a number of rusts, smuts and molds (Catling et al., 2003). In Europe it is reported as being consumed by beavers (Castor fiber) (Catling et al., 2003).
Means of Movement and DispersalTop of page Natural Dispersal (Non-Biotic)
Hydrochory, the dispersal of disseminules by water currents, seems to be the main dispersal mode of vegetative fragments within a watershed.Vector Transmission (Biotic)
H. morsus-ranae can be spread accidentally to new locations by the movement of boats, trailers, nets, sea planes, and other recreational equipment between water bodies (USDA-NAS, 2002). Taking plants from an existing wetland in order to restore another wetland may also possibly introduce exotic species to a new location (Catling et al., 2003). H. morsus-ranae can also be a ‘hitchhiker’ plant with other species ordered through water garden catalogues. Plants can alsobe accidentally introduced to new locations by ornamental ponds flooding into surrounding natural waterways. In addition, it is possible that H. morsus-ranae has been introduced through hobbyists emptying unwanted aquarium species directly into surrounding waterways.
The trade of this plant as an aquarium plant through the Internet and mail order has greatly increased its availability and ease of spread into new environments. In addition, some new colonies of H. morsus-ranae may have been started intentionally by duck hunting clubs, which introduced the plant to provide food and cover for waterfowl (Catling and Dore, 1982).
Pathway CausesTop of page
|Botanical gardens and zoos||Yes||Yes||CWS, 2003|
|Escape from confinement or garden escape||Yes||USGS-NAS, 2002|
|Intentional release||Yes||Yes||CWS, 2003|
|Interbasin transfers||Yes||Yes||USGS-NAS, 2002|
|Interconnected waterways||Yes||USGS-NAS, 2002|
|Internet sales||Yes||Yes||Catling et al., 2003|
|Ornamental purposes||Yes||Yes||CWS, 2003|
|Pet trade||Yes||Yes||Catling et al., 2003|
Pathway VectorsTop of page
|Floating vegetation and debris||Yes||USGS-NAS, 2002|
|Land vehicles||Vehicles with trailers||Yes||Yes||USGS-NAS, 2002|
|Pets and aquarium species||Yes||Yes||Catling et al., 2003|
|Ship structures above the water line||Yes||Yes||USGS-NAS, 2002|
|Wind||Yes||Catling et al., 2003|
Impact SummaryTop of page
|Cultural/amenity||Positive and negative|
|Environment (generally)||Positive and negative|
Economic ImpactTop of page
H. morsus-ranae has limited water flow in irrigations systems and canals (Catling et al., 2003). In addition, the loss of recreational and aesthetic value associated with H. morsus-ranae can also cause a decline in waterfront property values, as well as possible declines in tourism related revenue for the community.
Environmental ImpactTop of page Impact on Habitats
The dense floating mats of vegetation that are characteristic of this species when introduced outside of its native range can block light penetration in the water column, reducing the available light for native aquatic vegetation (Catling et al., 2003). H. morsus-ranae can also deplete oxygen levels by limiting water circulation and through increased decomposition of dead plants. Dense mats of H. morsus-ranae also have the ability to change water hydrology and quality, negatively affecting the ecosystem in which it occurs.
H. morsus-ranae reduces biodiversity by competing with and displacing native vegetation, and is capable of changing the fauna and flora of an ecosystem.H. morsus-ranae can form dense monocultures which exclude light to native plants and do not provide habitat or food for wildlife. Very dramatic declines in the cover value of native submerged aquatic vegetation were noted under mats of H. morsus-ranae (Catling et al., 1988). H. morsus-ranae restricts available nutrients and dissolved gases for other plants, inhibiting plant growth beneath the mats. Large decomposing mats of H. morsus-ranae also have the ability to deplete dissolved oxygen levels, which can potentially cause fish and other aquatic organism kills (Catling et al., 2003).
Social ImpactTop of page
H. morsus-ranae can form dense mats that impede recreational activities such as boating, fishing, swimming, water skiing, canoeing, and kayaking. In addition, unsightly mats of vegetation decrease aesthetic values. These declines in recreational and aesthetic values can decrease tourism, which can be a major source of livelihood within the community.
Risk and Impact FactorsTop of page Invasiveness
- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Has a broad native range
- Highly adaptable to different environments
- Highly mobile locally
- Fast growing
- Has high reproductive potential
- Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
- Reproduces asexually
- Has high genetic variability
- Damaged ecosystem services
- Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
- Modification of hydrology
- Modification of natural benthic communities
- Modification of nutrient regime
- Monoculture formation
- Negatively impacts cultural/traditional practices
- Negatively impacts livelihoods
- Negatively impacts aquaculture/fisheries
- Negatively impacts tourism
- Reduced amenity values
- Reduced native biodiversity
- Threat to/ loss of endangered species
- Threat to/ loss of native species
- Transportation disruption
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Competition - shading
- Rapid growth
- Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
- Highly likely to be transported internationally deliberately
- Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant
- Difficult to identify/detect in the field
UsesTop of page Economic Value
Ornamental plants of H. morsus-ranae are sold for water ponds, though the specific economic value of this particular species in the ornamental plant trade is undocumented.
H. morsus-ranae has also been proved beneficial as an experimental plant for physiological and developmental studies because of its large, clear unicellular root hairs, ease of cultivation, and regular organogenesis (Catling et al., 2003).
H. morsus-ranae is a food plant for several species of water birds, rodents, fish, and insects (Catling et al., 2003). In association with other aquatic vegetation, it can provide some cover for insects and fish (Nichols and Shaw, 1986). H. morsus-ranae may also be beneficial in removing nitrogen and phosphorus from wastewater (Reddy, 1984).
Uses ListTop of page
Animal feed, fodder, forage
- Fodder/animal feed
- Invertebrate food
- Wildlife habitat
- Botanical garden/zoo
- Laboratory use
- Pet/aquarium trade
- Research model
- Sport (hunting, shooting, fishing, racing)
DiagnosisTop of page
Detection and InspectionTop of page
Similarities to Other Species/ConditionsTop of page
H. morsus-ranae looks similar to Limnobim spongia, commonly referred to as American frog-bit (UFL-IFAS, 2002). H. morsus-ranae can be distinguished from L. spongia by having relatively less developed aerenchyma on the undersurface of the leaf, relatively longer leaf lobes, leaf veins on either side of the mid-vein less ascending, free stipules in pairs, roots usually un-branched, and stolon buds developing one instead of multiple roots initially (Catling and Dore, 1982).
Prevention and ControlTop of page
As with all weed management, prevention is better and more cost-effective than control.
Early detection and eradication are essential in the prevention of future invasions and spread of H. morsus-ranae. Smaller, localized populations have better success at being controlled than those which have the opportunity to spread and become well established (Catling et al., 2003).Public awareness
Several publications have been produced in areas with H. morsus-ranae populations regarding the impacts of invasive species such as H. morsus-ranae, and the steps that lake recreationists need to take in order to prevent introducing and spreading aquatic invasives.
Cultural control and sanitary measures
In several regions where aquatic invasives have established, governmental organizations have started requiring that recreationists drain all water and clean off all gear (boats, trailers, fishing equipment, etc.) used on water bodies in order to minimize the chance of spreading aquatic invasive species, such as H. morsus-ranae, to other areas.Physical/mechanical control
Past control of H. morsus-ranae has been primarily by means of mechanical removal. Small scale raking by hand in the spring can provide a temporary solution, and should be done after over-wintering turions have initiated growth on the water surface, but before dense mats have developed (Catling et al., 2003).
In small ponds, H. morsus-ranae may be controlled by a water drawdown either over winter or in late May to early June, when turions have already germinated, but before extensive summer growth has begun (Catling et al., 2003).Movement control
Several countries have banned the importation or sale of exotic plants, such as H. morsus-ranae in attempts to minimize the chance of introduction to non-native regions.Biological control
Grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella , will readily feed on H. morsus-ranae, though theintroduction of grass carp can negatively impact the coexisting native submerged vegetation, and introduction is even prohibited in some countries.Chemical control
H. morsus-ranae is susceptible to the herbicides diquat, Paraquat™, chlorthiamid, and cyanatryn (Newbold, 1977). The first three listed chemicals are most efficient in non-flowing waters, and work to change the plant community structure and reduce species diversity rather than eradicating all plant life. Cyanatryn can be used in flowing water in the form of a slow-release granule. Breakdown of the herbicides in water generally occurs after 2-11 days, depending on bacterial presence and sometimes light (Newbold, 1975; Catling et al., 2003).
ReferencesTop of page
Catling PM; Spicer KW; Lefkovitch LP, 1988. Effects of the introduced floating vascular aquatic Hydrocharis morsus-ranae (Hydrocharitaceae), on some north American aquatic macrophytes. Naturaliste Canadien, 115(2):131-137.
EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm
ContributorsTop of page
01/07/08 Original text by:
Alison Mikulyuk, Wisconsin Dept of Natural Resources, Science Operations Center, 2801 Progress Rd, Madison, WI 53716, USA
Michelle Nault, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 2801 Progress Rd, Madison, WI 53716-3339, USA
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/