Invasive Species Compendium

Detailed coverage of invasive species threatening livelihoods and the environment worldwide

Datasheet

Haematoxylum campechianum
(logwood)

Toolbox

Datasheet

Haematoxylum campechianum (logwood)

Summary

  • Last modified
  • 27 September 2018
  • Datasheet Type(s)
  • Invasive Species
  • Host Plant
  • Preferred Scientific Name
  • Haematoxylum campechianum
  • Preferred Common Name
  • logwood
  • Taxonomic Tree
  • Domain: Eukaryota
  •   Kingdom: Plantae
  •     Phylum: Spermatophyta
  •       Subphylum: Angiospermae
  •         Class: Dicotyledonae
  • Summary of Invasiveness
  • H. campechianum is a shrub or small tree widely grown commercially for its wood, that has become naturalized and invasive in many tropical countries. This species is included in the Global Compendium of Weeds (...

  • There are no pictures available for this datasheet

    If you can supply pictures for this datasheet please contact:

    Compendia
    CAB International
    Wallingford
    Oxfordshire
    OX10 8DE
    UK
    compend@cabi.org
  • Distribution map More information

Don't need the entire report?

Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.

Generate report

Identity

Top of page

Preferred Scientific Name

  • Haematoxylum campechianum L.

Preferred Common Name

  • logwood

Other Scientific Names

  • Cymbosepalum baronii Baker
  • Haematoxylon campechiaum L.

International Common Names

  • English: blood-wood tree; campeachy wood; campeche wood
  • Spanish: campeche; palo de campeche; palo de tinta; palo negro; palo tinto
  • French: bois bleu; bois de Campèche; campêche; hématoxyle campêche
  • Chinese: cai mu

Local Common Names

  • Cuba: guamá-piñon
  • Germany: Blutholzbaum, Campeche-
  • Haiti: bois campeche; campechier
  • Italy: campeccio; campeggio; legno azurro
  • Lesser Antilles: champish; kampech

EPPO code

  • HATCA (Haematoxylum campechianum)

Summary of Invasiveness

Top of page

H. campechianum is a shrub or small tree widely grown commercially for its wood, that has become naturalized and invasive in many tropical countries. This species is included in the Global Compendium of Weeds (Randall, 2012) and it is classified as an invasive species causing serious problems to natural habitats in Australia, the Cayman Islands, Cuba, Jamaica, Mauritius Island, Rodrigues Island, Hawaii, New Caledonia and French Polynesia (Wagner et al., 1999; Kueffer and Mauremootoo, 2004; Acevedo-Rodríguez and Strong, 2012; ISSG, 2012; PIER, 2012). Although H. campechianum is not a fast-growing species, plants can form dense monocultures over extensive areas of land (known within its native range as “tintales”) displacing and completely replacing native vegetation.

Taxonomic Tree

Top of page
  • Domain: Eukaryota
  •     Kingdom: Plantae
  •         Phylum: Spermatophyta
  •             Subphylum: Angiospermae
  •                 Class: Dicotyledonae
  •                     Order: Fabales
  •                         Family: Fabaceae
  •                             Subfamily: Caesalpinioideae
  •                                 Genus: Haematoxylum
  •                                     Species: Haematoxylum campechianum

Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature

Top of page

Fabaceae is one the largest families of flowering plants. Species within the subfamiliy Caesalpinioideae are woody plants that may be recognized by their usually once-compound leaves and monosymmetric flowers with the odd petal adaxial and a well-developed hypanthium (Stevens, 2012). Haematoxylum is a small genus with about four species native to Central America and southern Africa. Only the species H. campechianum has spread over most of the tropics mostly due to the commercialization of its wood (logwood of commerce) to extract a colouring agent used commercially for dyeing wool, silk, cotton, fur, leather, bone and synthetic fibres such as nylon and rayon (Seegeler, 1992; Gurib-Fakim, 2005).

Description

Top of page

Small, bushy thorny, gnarled shrub or tree up to 15 m tall; trunk irregularly fluted and contorted, attaining a length of 2-3 m and a diameter of 60 cm, bark grey to brown, rather smooth, peeling in flakes. Leaves are alternate, paripinnate; stipules partly spine-like; leaflets in 2-4 pairs, obovate, 10-35 mm x 5-25 mm, acute at base, closely veined and glabrous. Flowers are arranged in 5-20 cm long racemes in the axils leaves, 5-merous, sweet-scented; calyx 4-5 mm long, deeply lobed; petals 5-7 mm long, bright yellow; stamens 10, free; ovary superior, shortly stalked, glabrous; style filiform. The fruit is a lanceolate, extremely flattened pod, 3-5 cm long, pointed at both ends, dehiscent not along the sutures but along the median of the sides, usually 2-seeded (Seegeler, 1992; Wagner et al., 1999).

Distribution

Top of page

H. campechianum is native to Mexico (Gulf of Campeche and the Yucatan Peninsula) and Guatemala and Belize in Central America. It has been introduced and become naturalized in many tropical regions and countries including West Africa, Australia, the West Indies, South America, Southeastern Asia and several Pacific Islands (Acevedo-Rodríguez and Strong, 2012; ISSG, 2012; PIER, 2012; PROTA, 2012).

Distribution Table

Top of page

The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.

Continent/Country/RegionDistributionLast ReportedOriginFirst ReportedInvasiveReferenceNotes

Asia

ChinaPresentPresent based on regional distribution.
-GuangdongPresentIntroducedFlora of China Editorial Committee, 2012
-GuizhouPresentIntroducedFlora of China Editorial Committee, 2012
-YunnanPresentIntroducedFlora of China Editorial Committee, 2012
IndonesiaPresentPresent based on regional distribution.
-JavaPresentIntroducedSeegeler, 1992Cultivated
MalaysiaPresentIntroducedSeegeler, 1992Cultivated
PhilippinesPresentIntroducedSeegeler, 1992Cultivated
SingaporePresentIntroduced1876Seegeler, 1992
TaiwanPresentIntroducedFlora of China Editorial Committee, 2012

Africa

AngolaPresentIntroducedPROTA, 2012Cultivated
Congo Democratic RepublicPresentIntroducedPROTA, 2012Cultivated
Côte d'IvoirePresentIntroducedPROTA, 2012
KenyaPresentIntroducedPROTA, 2012Cultivated
MadagascarPresentIntroducedMadagascar Catalogue, 2012
MauritiusPresentIntroduced Invasive Kueffer and Mauremootoo, 2004
NigeriaPresentIntroducedPROTA, 2012Cultivated
RéunionPresentIntroducedPIER, 2012
Rodriguez IslandPresentIntroduced Invasive Kueffer and Mauremootoo, 2004
SenegalPresentIntroducedPROTA, 2012Cultivated
SeychellesPresentIntroducedPIER, 2012
Sierra LeonePresentIntroducedPROTA, 2012Cultivated
SudanPresentIntroducedPROTA, 2012Cultivated
TanzaniaPresentIntroducedPROTA, 2012Cultivated
UgandaPresentIntroducedPROTA, 2012Cultivated

North America

MexicoPresentNativeUSDA-ARS, 2012Campeche, Chiapas, Quintana Roo, Yucatán
USAPresentPresent based on regional distribution.
-HawaiiPresentIntroduced Invasive Wagner et al., 1999

Central America and Caribbean

Antigua and BarbudaPresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007
BahamasPresentIntroducedCorrell and Correll, 1982
BarbadosPresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007
BelizePresentNativeUSDA-ARS, 2012
British Virgin IslandsPresentIntroducedAcevedo-Rodríguez and Strong, 2012Guana, Tortola
Cayman IslandsPresentIntroducedProctor, 1984
CubaPresentIntroduced Invasive Leon and Alain, 1952Considered an invasive species by Cuba's Centro Nacional de Biodiversidad
DominicaPresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007
Dominican RepublicPresentIntroducedAcevedo-Rodríguez and Strong, 2012
GrenadaPresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007
GuadeloupePresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007
GuatemalaPresentNativeUSDA-ARS, 2012
HaitiPresentIntroducedAcevedo-Rodríguez and Strong, 2012
HondurasPresentMolina, 1975
JamaicaPresentIntroduced Invasive Adams, 1972Reported invasive in Cockpit Country
MartiniquePresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007
MontserratPresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007
Netherlands AntillesPresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007Saba, St. Eustatius
Puerto RicoPresentIntroducedLiogier, 1988Potentially invasive
Saint LuciaPresentIntroducedGraveson, 2012
Saint Vincent and the GrenadinesPresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007
Trinidad and TobagoPresentIntroducedAcevedo-Rodríguez and Strong, 2012
United States Virgin IslandsPresentIntroducedAcevedo-Rodríguez and Strong, 2012St. Thomas, St. Croix

South America

French GuianaPresentIntroducedFunk et al., 2007
GuyanaPresentIntroducedFunk et al., 2007Cultivated
SurinamePresentIntroducedFunk et al., 2007Cultivated
VenezuelaPresentIntroducedHokche et al., 2008Delta Amacuro

Oceania

AustraliaPresentPresent based on regional distribution.
-QueenslandPresentIntroduced Invasive Flora of Australia, 2012
FijiPresentIntroducedSmith, 1985Cultivated
French PolynesiaPresentIntroduced Invasive Florence et al., 2011
New CaledoniaPresentIntroduced Invasive MacKee, 1994
TongaPresentIntroduced Invasive PIER, 2012

History of Introduction and Spread

Top of page

H. campechianum was discovered by the Spaniards when they arrived on the shores of Campeche Bay in the Gulf of Mexico and its wood was introduced into Europe as a dyeing substance as early as 1525 (Gurib-Fakim, 2005). However, from 1581 to 1662 in England the use of this species was prohibited by legislation to protect dyes already in use there. After that period, British traders started the export of wood from the Yucatan Peninsula, where they founded a colony that is now Belize, and French traders established their own plantations of H. campechianum in Haiti (Seegeler, 1992; Gurib-Fakim, 2005).

During the eigtheenth century, H. campechianum was introduced into the Caribbean in the Bahamas, Cayman Islands, Cuba, Jamaica, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico and the Lesser Antilles. By 1911, this species was described by Ignatius Urban as “naturalized” in the Bahamas, Cuba, Jamaica, Cayman Islands, Hispaniola, Puerto Rico, St. Thomas, St. Croix, St. John, Antigua, Guadeloupe, Dominica, Martinique, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, Grenada, and Trinidad and Tobago.

H. campechianum was introduced into Nigeria in the 1890s and since this year it has been cultivated and naturalized in other parts of Africa and Indian Ocean including Madagascar, the Seychelles Islands, Mauritius and Rodrigues Islands where it has become invasive (Kueffer and Mauremootoo, 2004; Gurib-Fakim, 2005; PROTA, 2012).

In Singapore, H. campechianum was introduced in 1876, and probably from here it was introduced into Malaysia, Indonesia (Java), and the Philippines where it is currently cultivated on a limited scale (Seegeler, 1992).

By the beginning of the nineteenth century, H. campechianum was found in the dry lowland forests of several islands in the Pacific including Hawaii (Logan, 1918), New Caledonia (MacKee, 1994), and French Polynesia (Florence et al., 2011).

Risk of Introduction

Top of page

The risk of introduction of H. campechianum is moderate to high. This species is widely cultivated mainly in tropical countries to commercialize its wood to extract dyes. H. campechianum spreads by seeds and by cuttings (Seegeler, 1992). Seeds can be easily dispersed by wind, water, and human activities. Seeds can remain viable in the soil for up to 8 months and have germination rates greater than 45% under natural conditions (Niembro, 2002).

Habitat

Top of page

Within its native distribution range, H. campechianum grows primarily in flat terrain with clayey soils, deficient drainage, and periodic flooding (Niembro, 2002). Outside its native range, this species is able to grow in disturbed secondary forest, along roadsides, riverbanks, lowland dry forests, urban forests, and seasonal waterlogged areas (Seegeler, 1992; Wagner et al., 1999; Kueffer and Mauremootoo, 2004; Gurib-Fakim, 2005). In the West Indies, this species commonly grows on exposed limestone hillsides in dry secondary thickets (Adams, 1972; Liogier, 1988).

Habitat List

Top of page
CategorySub-CategoryHabitatPresenceStatus
Terrestrial
Terrestrial – ManagedManaged forests, plantations and orchards Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Managed forests, plantations and orchards Present, no further details Natural
Managed forests, plantations and orchards Present, no further details Productive/non-natural
Disturbed areas Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Disturbed areas Present, no further details Natural
Rail / roadsides Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Rail / roadsides Present, no further details Natural
Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalRiverbanks Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Riverbanks Present, no further details Natural

Biology and Ecology

Top of page

Genetics

Chromosome number in H. campechianum is 2n = 24 (Kumari and Bir, 1990).

Reproductive Biology

Flowers in H. campechianum are bright yellow and arranged in long racemes in the axils of leaves. Flowers are hermaphroditic and visited and pollinated mainly by bees (Tucker and Kantz, 1997; Niembro, 2002).

Physiology and Phenology

H. campechianum grows slowly. Under favourable environmental conditions, trees can attain harvestable size in about 8 -10 years (Gurib-Fakim, 2005). However, the World Agroforestry Centre reports that trees planted in the botanical garden at Bogor (Indonesia) in 1886 were only 2 m tall in 1918.

H. campechianum produces flowers from September through April in its native range, and the fruits (legumes) ripen from March through May (Niembro, 2002). The seeds remain viable naturally for 8 months.

Environmental Requirements

In its native range, the regions where the tree grows have an average annual temperature of 26 °C with a maximum temperature of 36.7°C and a minimum temperature of 14.9°C. The maximum temperatures occur in April and May; the minimum temperatures in December and January. Average precipitation is approximately 1288 mm, ranging between 900 and 1800 mm (Niembro, 2002). H. campechianum is able to grow on riverbanks and in seasonally inundated areas and it prefers light soils with some humus, but also can be found growing on clay and sandy soils and on exposed limestone hillsides (Adams, 1972; Liogier, 1988; Gurib-Fakim, 2005).

Climate

Top of page
ClimateStatusDescriptionRemark
Af - Tropical rainforest climate Preferred > 60mm precipitation per month
Am - Tropical monsoon climate Preferred Tropical monsoon climate ( < 60mm precipitation driest month but > (100 - [total annual precipitation(mm}/25]))
As - Tropical savanna climate with dry summer Preferred < 60mm precipitation driest month (in summer) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25])
Aw - Tropical wet and dry savanna climate Preferred < 60mm precipitation driest month (in winter) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25])
Cw - Warm temperate climate with dry winter Preferred Warm temperate climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry winters)

Air Temperature

Top of page
Parameter Lower limit Upper limit
Absolute minimum temperature (ºC) 4
Mean maximum temperature of hottest month (ºC) 36.7
Mean minimum temperature of coldest month (ºC) 14.9

Rainfall

Top of page
ParameterLower limitUpper limitDescription
Mean annual rainfall9001800mm; lower/upper limits

Means of Movement and Dispersal

Top of page

H. campechianum can be propagated by seed and vegetatively by cuttings. Each fruit (legume) produces 2-3 seeds that can be dispersed by wind, water, and by human activities (Gurib-Fakim, 2005). Under natural conditions, this species does not propagate vegetatively and then cuttings have to be planted (Seegeler, 1992; Gurib-Fakim, 2005).

Impact Summary

Top of page
CategoryImpact
Economic/livelihood Positive and negative
Environment (generally) Negative

Environmental Impact

Top of page

H. campechianum is classified as an invasive woody plant. This species has the potential to grow forming dense monoculture thickets over extensive areas of land mainly in lowland dry and semi-arid tropical forests where it displaces and replaces native vegetation (ISSG, 2012; PIER, 2012; PROTA, 2012). The fact that H. campechianum is invading tropical dry forests is concerning considering that these forests are the most vulnerable and threatened of all major tropical forest types (Janzen, 1988).

Risk and Impact Factors

Top of page Invasiveness
  • Invasive in its native range
  • Proved invasive outside its native range
  • Abundant in its native range
  • Benefits from human association (i.e. it is a human commensal)
  • Long lived
  • Has high reproductive potential
  • Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
Impact outcomes
  • Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
  • Monoculture formation
  • Reduced native biodiversity
  • Threat to/ loss of endangered species
Impact mechanisms
  • Competition - monopolizing resources
  • Competition - shading
  • Produces spines, thorns or burrs
Likelihood of entry/control
  • Highly likely to be transported internationally deliberately

Uses

Top of page

H. campechianum is a widely cultivated tree and its wood is used to extract a series of dyes in darker tints of grey, brown, violet, blue and black called “haematoxylin”. The dyes give a permanent colour to several fabrics such as silk, wool, cotton, nylon and rayon. This extract is also used to dye leather, fur, feathers and paper and to produce inks. The haematoxylin is also a histological stain used for staining cell nuclei (Seegeler, 1992; Gurib-Fakim, 2005).

In Southeastern Asia and Africa, H. campechianum is also used as timber in the fabrication of furniture, veneer, and wood articles. The wood of this species is strong and durable for use outdoors and in contact with the ground. Wood is also used as firewood and for posts.

This species is also planted around houses as an ornamental for its delicate foliage and fragrant flowers. Flowers are honey bearing and consequently the species is frequently planted by apiculturists near beehives. The leaves and young branches are used as forage (Niembro 1986, Rico-Gray et al., 1991).

H. campechianum is used in traditional medicine as an astringent and tonic. It is also useful against diarrhoea, dysentery, dyspepsia, and leucorrhoea. The extract “haematoxylin” has been shown to possess anti-inflammatory properties (Seegeler, 1992; Gurib-Fakim, 2005; Graveson, 2012). Finally, this species is used as a boundary, barrier or support plant, and in India and Southeastern Asia, it is occasionally cultivated as a hedge plant.

Similarities to Other Species/Conditions

Top of page

There are two other species in this genus also exploited commercially. Haematoxylum brasiletto from tropical America, which is also used as source of a red dye (brazilin), and H. dinteri a shrub up to 2 metres tall, endemic in Namibia in rocky crevices and sandy river beds (Gurib-Fakim, 2005).

Prevention and Control

Top of page

Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.

Mechanical control must be practiced over a several year period as dormant seeds will continue to germinate. Seedlings and young plants should be hand-pulled and removed from treated areas, while large plants should be cut with specialized equipment due to the presence of thorns. 

There is no information or data available on the biological or chemical control of this species. Further investigation is needed.

References

Top of page

Acevedo-Rodríguez P; Strong MT, 2012. Catalogue of the Seed Plants of the West Indies. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, 98:1192 pp. Washington DC, USA: Smithsonian Institution. http://botany.si.edu/Antilles/WestIndies/catalog.htm

Adams CD, 1972. Flowering Plants of Jamaica. University of the West Indies, 267.

Broome R; Sabir K; Carrington S, 2007. Plants of the Eastern Caribbean. Online database. Barbados: University of the West Indies. http://ecflora.cavehill.uwi.edu/index.html

Correll DS; Correll HB, 1982. Flora of the Bahama Archipelago. Vaduz, Germany: J. Cramer, 1692 pp.

Flora of Australia, 2012. Flora of Australia Online. Canberra, Australia: Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/flora/main/

Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2012. Flora of China Web. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Herbaria. http://flora.huh.harvard.edu/china/

Florence J; Chevillotte H; Ollier C; Meyer JY, 2011. [English title not available]. (Base de données botaniques Nadeaud de l'Herbier de la Polynésie Française (PAP).) . http://www.herbier-tahiti.pf

Funk V; Hollowell T; Berry P; Kelloff C; Alexander SN, 2007. Checklist of the plants of the Guiana Shield (Venezuela: Amazonas, Bolivar, Delta Amacuro; Guyana, Surinam, French Guiana). Contributions from the United States National Herbarium, 584 pp.

Graveson R, 2012. Plants of Saint Lucia. http://www.saintlucianplants.com

Gurib-Fakim A, 2005. Haematoxylum campechianum L. Record from Protabase. PROTA (Plant Resources of Tropical Africa / Ressources végétales de l'Afrique tropicale) [ed. by Jansen, P. C. M. \Cardon, D.]. Wageningen, Netherlands: PROTA. http://www.prota4u.org/search.asp

Hokche O; Berry PE; Huber O, 2008. Nuevo Catálogo de la Flora Vascular de Venezuela (New catalogue of the vascular flora of Venezuela). Caracas, Venezuela: Fundación Instituto Botánico de Venezuela, 860 pp.

ISSG, 2012. Global Invasive Species Database (GISD). Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland. http://www.issg.org/database

Janzen D, 1988. Tropical Dry Forests: The most endangered major tropical ecosystem. In: Biodiversity [ed. by Wilson, E. O.]. Washington DC, USA: National Academy of Sciences/Smithsonian Institution, 130-137.

Kueffer C; Mauremootoo J, 2004. Case studies on the status of invasive woody plant species in the Western Indian Ocean. 3 Mauritius (Islands of Mauritius and Rodrigues). Forest Health and Biosecurity Working Paper, No.4-3E:vi + 35 pp. http://www.fao.org/documents/dep_result.asp?css=//www.fao.org/forestry/foris/css/docrep.css&series=388&RecordsPerPage=50&SortOrder=3&cover=no&new=no&keyworkds=y&lang=&Language=&nopsumm=y

Kumari S; Bir SS, 1990. Karyomorphological evolution in Papilionaceae. Journal of Cytology and Genetics, 25:173-219.

Leon H; Alain H, 1952. Dicotyledons: Casuarinaceas to Meliaceas. (Dicotoledoneas: Casuarinaceas a Meliaceas.) Flora de Cuba, 2:1-456.

Liogier AH, 1988. Flora of Puerto Rico and Adjacent Islands: A Systematic Synopsis. Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico: Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico.

Logan D, 1918. Hawaiian Forest and Agriculturist. Vol. 15:330 pp.

MacKee HS, 1994. Catalogue of introduced and cultivated plants in New Caledonia. (Catalogue des plantes introduites et cultivées en Nouvelle-Calédonie.) Paris, France: Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, unpaginated.

Madagascar Catalogue, 2012. Catalogue of the Vascular Plants of Madagascar. Antananarivo, Madagascar: Missouri Botanical Garden, Madagascar Research and Conservation Program. http://www.efloras.org/madagascar

Molina RA, 1975. Enumeration of the plants of Honduras. (Enumeración de las plantas de Honduras) Ceiba, 19(1):1-118.

Niembro A, 2002. Haematoxylum campechianum L. Fabaceae (Bean Family). In: Tropical tree seed manual [ed. by Vozzo, J. A.]. Washington DC, USA: USDA Forest Service. [Forest Service. Agriculture Handbook 721.]

Niembro RA, 1986. Arboles y arbustos otiles de Mexico. Mexico, D.F., Mexico: Editorial LIMUSA, 306 pp.

PIER, 2012. Pacific Islands Ecosystems at Risk. Honolulu, USA: HEAR, University of Hawaii. http://www.hear.org/pier/index.html

Proctor GR, 1984. Flora of the Cayman Islands. London, UK: Royal Botanical Gardens, 834 pp.

PROTA, 2012. PROTA4U web database. Grubben GJH, Denton OA, eds. Wageningen, Netherlands: Plant Resources of Tropical Africa. http://www.prota4u.org/search.asp

Randall RP, 2012. A Global Compendium of Weeds. Perth, Australia: Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, 1124 pp. http://www.cabi.org/isc/FullTextPDF/2013/20133109119.pdf

Rico Gray V; Chemas A; Mandujano S, 1991. Uses of tropical deciduous forest species by the Yucatecan Maya. Agroforestry Systems, 14(2):149-161; 21 ref.

Seegeler CJP, 1992. Haematoxylum campechianum L. In: Plant Resources of South-East Asia. No. 3: Dye and tannin-producing plants [ed. by Lemmens, R. H. M. J. \Wulijarni-Soetjipto, N.]. Bogor, Indonesia: PROSEA Foundation, 78-79.

Smith AC, 1985. Flora Vitiensis nova: a new flora of Fiji. Lawai, Kauai, Hawaii, USA: National Tropical Botanic Gardens, 758 pp.

Stevens PF, 2012. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/

Tucker SC; Kantz KE, 1997. Comparative floral development and evolution in tribe Caesalpinieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). Haematoxylum. American Journal of Botany, 84(8):1047-1063.

Urban I, 1905. Symbolae Antillanae. Volumen IV. Berlin, Germany: Fratres Borntraeger, 771 pp.

USDA-ARS, 2012. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx

Wagner WL; Herbst DR; Sohmer SH, 1999. Manual of the flowering plants of Hawaii. Revised edition. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: University of Hawaii Press/Bishop Museum Press, 1919 pp.

Links to Websites

Top of page
WebsiteURLComment
Plants of the Eastern Caribbeanhttp://ecflora.cavehill.uwi.edu/index.html
PROTA: Plant Resources of Tropical Africahttp://www.prota4u.org/
World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF WAC)http://www.worldagroforestry.org/

Contributors

Top of page

19/03/13 Original text by:

Julissa Rojas-Sandoval, Department of Botany-Smithsonian NMNH, Washington DC, USA

Pedro Acevedo-Rodríguez, Department of Botany-Smithsonian NMNH, Washington DC, USA

Distribution Maps

Top of page
You can pan and zoom the map
Save map