Apiognomonia errabunda (anthracnose)
Index
- Pictures
- Identity
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Description
- Distribution
- Distribution Table
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat
- Habitat List
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
- Growth Stages
- Symptoms
- List of Symptoms/Signs
- Biology and Ecology
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Seedborne Aspects
- Pathway Vectors
- Plant Trade
- Wood Packaging
- Impact Summary
- Impact
- Economic Impact
- Environmental Impact
- Diagnosis
- Detection and Inspection
- Prevention and Control
- References
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate reportIdentity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Apiognomonia errabunda (Roberge ex Desm.) Höhn. 1918
Preferred Common Name
- anthracnose
Other Scientific Names
- Apiognomonia quercina (Kleb.) Höhn. 1920
- Apiognomonia tiliae (Rehm) Höhn. 1920
- Discula quercina (Westend.) Arx 1957
- Discula umbrinella (Berk. & Broome) M. Morelet 1973
- Gloeosporidium tiliae (Oudem.) Petr. 1922
- Gloeosporium fagi (Roberge ex Desm.) Westend.
- Gloeosporium quercinum Westend. 1854
- Gloeosporium tiliae Oudem. 1873
- Gloeosporium umbrinellum Berk. & Broome 1866
- Gnomonia errabunda (Roberge ex Desm.) Auersw. 1869
- Gnomonia quercina Kleb. 1918
- Gnomonia tiliae Rehm
International Common Names
- English: anthracnose: oak; beech leaf spot; beech shoot dieback; oak leaf spot; oak shoot dieback
- Spanish: antracnosis de la encina
Local Common Names
- Germany: Blattbraeune: Eiche; Blattfleckenkrankheit: Eiche
EPPO code
- GNOMEB (Gnomonia errabunda)
Summary of Invasiveness
Top of pageTaxonomic Tree
Top of page- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Fungi
- Phylum: Ascomycota
- Subphylum: Pezizomycotina
- Class: Sordariomycetes
- Subclass: Sordariomycetidae
- Order: Diaporthales
- Family: Gnomoniaceae
- Genus: Apiognomonia
- Species: Apiognomonia errabunda
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Top of pageApiognomonia errabunda sensu stricto is essentially linked to beech (Fagus sylvatica). Oak (Quercus spp.) on the other hand is infected by another species in the same complex, Apiognomonia quercina, with its anamorph Discula quercina (synonym Gloeosporium quercinum). The Linden tree (Tilia europaea) is infected by Apiognomonia tiliae, with the anamorph Gloeosporidium tiliae, and plane (especially London plane = Platanus x acerifolia) by Apiognomonia veneta, with the anamorph Discula platani. Apiognomonia veneta is considered to be a distinct species from A. errabunda by Monod (1983) and is treated in a separate datasheet in this Compendium.
The genus Apiognomonia was created by Höhnel in 1918, and many species found on Betula, Fagus, Fraxinus, Platanus, Quercus and Tilia have over time been referred to it. Apiognomonia was the teleomorph (or sexual form) and was associated with a variety of genera representing anamorph forms (von Arx, 1970).
On beech, the following species have, at some time, been related to the teleomorph A. errabunda, with the anamorph D. umbrinella: Labrella fagi, Gloeosporium fagi, Gloeosporidium fagi, Gloeosporium exsiccans, Discula fagi, Gloeosporium fagi, Myxosporina fagi, Gloeosporium fagicola and Gloeosporium fuckelii.
On oak, the species related to the teleomorph A. quercina, with the anamorph D. quercina (syn. G. quercinum) are: Gloeosporium quercigenum Westend., Myxosporina quercina, Gloeosporium canadense, Gloeosporium cecidophilum, Gloeosporium divergens, Gloeosporium intumescens, Gloeosporium marginans, Gloeosporium nervicola, Discula quercina, Gloeosporium quercuum, Gloeosporium umbrinellum and Gloeosporium umbrinellum.
On linden, the following species have been ascribed to the teleomorph A. tiliae, with the anamorph Gloeosporidium tiliae: Gloeosporium tiliae, Myxosporina tiliae, Gloeosporidium tiliae and Gloeosporium tiliaecola.
Thirty isolates of D. umbrinella found on beech, chestnut and oak have been studied using RAPD and RFLP markers. The isolates fell into four groups depending on the host tree on which they were found, which shows the high host specialization of the various members of the A. errabunda complex (Haemmerli et al., 1992).
Many anamorph forms are related to the Apiognomonia complex. Those of the genus Discula are listed here, only those occurring on forest trees or other tree species, without giving the synonyms by which they may have been designated in the past:
Discula acerina on Acer spp.
D. betulina on Betula spp.
D. betulina var. betulina on Betula spp.
D. betulina var. macrocarpa on Betula spp.
D. brunneotingens on Pinus sp.
D. campestris on Acer spp.
D. coloradensis on Populus grandidentata/P. angustifolia
D. cytospora on Populus sp.
D. cytosporea on Populus spp.
D. effusa on Pyrus sp. and Malus sp.
D. fagi on Fagus spp.
D. fraxinea on Fraxinus sp.
D. ochrostica on Eucalyptus spp.
D. orni on Fraxinus spp.
D. pinicola on Picea spp. and Pinus spp.
D. pinicola var. mamosa on Pinus spp.
D. pinicola var. pinicola on Pinus spp.
D. platani on Platanus spp.
D. quercicola on Quercus spp.
D. sassafras on Sassafras sp.
D. sanguisorbae on Sorbus sp.
D. terminaliae on Terminalia catappa
Saccardo (1884) also has: D. platyspora on Platanus sp., D. magnoliae on Magnoliae sp., D. citri on Citrus sp., D. macrosperma on Salix sp., D. rugosa on Acer sp., D. obscura on Acer sp. and D. packiana on Ostrya spp.
A recently identified species that deserves a special mention is Discula destructiva, the most serious disease agent on Cornus florida, C. nuttallii and C. kousa in Canada and the USA. The teleomorph of D. destructiva is currently unknown (Mielke and Daughtrey, 1989); all attempts to reproduce it in the laboratory have so far been unsuccessful. Some authors have suggested that the teleomorph is also part of the Apiognomonia errabunda complex, but such a relation has never really become accepted (Mielke and Langdon, 1986; Schneeberger and Jackson, 1989). At present D. destructiva cannot be considered conspecific with the anamorph forms of the genus Discula related to A. errabunda: its cultural characteristics and range of hosts are too different (Neely and Himelick, 1967; Monod, 1983).
Description
Top of pageOn senescent or dead leaves, A. errabunda produces spherical perithecia, almost black in colour and shiny, with a diameter of 130-450 µm and containing two-celled hyaline ascospores measuring 2-4 x 12-16 µm.
Acervula of D. umbrinella are subepidermal and erupt in the form of dark, waxy discs or pads, with a diameter of ca 240-260 µm. Conidia are one-celled, hyaline, ovoid or oblong, rarely curved, 2-6 x 8-16 µm. On PDA the colony has white, woolly mycelium with concentric haloes that tend to grow darker.
A. quercina (anamorph Discula quercina)
A. quercina produces dark, almost brown perithecia, 330-450 x 580-850 µm, on senescent and dead leaves. The asci are evanescent and measure 8-15 x 40-55 µm. The ascospores are two-celled, hyaline, tending to pale yellow, and measure 3-7 x 13-22 µm. On leaves, the acervula of D. quercina are round or elliptical, with their diameter frequently exceeding 250 µm. The conidia are one-celled, hyaline, ellipsoid, 3-6 x 8-15 µm. Colonies are a very light brown; the mycelium is sunken with hyaline, septate hyphae.
Discula destructiva
The acervula of D. destructiva are dark, globose, subcuticular, with a diameter of 30-135 µm on the leaves and 90-340 µm on the twigs. The conidia are hyaline, one-celled, elliptical or spindle-shaped, and measure 2.5-3.5 x 7-12 µm on the leaves and 2.5-4 x 6-10 µm on the twigs. Colonies on PDA or malt agar are granular, white at first, turning darker with age.
Distribution
Top of pageDistribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
Last updated: 10 Feb 2022Continent/Country/Region | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | Reference | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Africa |
|||||||
Algeria | Present | ||||||
Asia |
|||||||
Azerbaijan | Present | ||||||
Japan | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | |||||
-Honshu | Present | ||||||
South Korea | Present | ||||||
Europe |
|||||||
Austria | Present | ||||||
Belgium | Present | ||||||
Bulgaria | Present | ||||||
Czechia | Present | ||||||
Denmark | Present | ||||||
France | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Germany | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Hungary | Present | ||||||
Ireland | Present | ||||||
Italy | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Lithuania | Present | ||||||
Netherlands | Present | ||||||
Norway | Present | ||||||
Poland | Present | ||||||
Romania | Present | ||||||
Russia | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | |||||
-Central Russia | Present | ||||||
-Northern Russia | Present | ||||||
-Siberia | Present | ||||||
-Western Siberia | Present | ||||||
Slovakia | Present | ||||||
Slovenia | Present | ||||||
Switzerland | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Ukraine | Present | ||||||
United Kingdom | Present | ||||||
North America |
|||||||
Canada | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | |||||
-New Brunswick | Present | ||||||
-Ontario | Present | ||||||
-Quebec | Present | ||||||
Mexico | Present | ||||||
United States | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | |||||
-California | Present | ||||||
-Connecticut | Present | ||||||
-Iowa | Present | Original citation: Iowa State University Plant Disease Clinic, 2004 | |||||
-Maryland | Present | ||||||
-Mississippi | Present | ||||||
-Ohio | Present | ||||||
-Oregon | Present | ||||||
-Washington | Present | Original citation: Washington State University Cooperative Extension, | |||||
-Wisconsin | Present | Original citation: Ambuel et al., 1977 | |||||
Oceania |
|||||||
Australia | Present | Introduced | 1909 | ||||
-New South Wales | Present | ||||||
New Zealand | Present |
Risk of Introduction
Top of pageHabitat
Top of pageFor the southern Mediterranean it is difficult to give a general picture of oak groves in a few words because of their diversity. In Italy, a reference oak stand can be taken to be one in which Q. pubescens and Q. cerris are mixed with hop hornbeam (Ostrya carpinifolia), which here replaces Carpinus betulus, though hornbeam remains the main competitor of the oaks. In more arid areas, the hop hornbeam becomes less successful and the only formations that remain are skimpy stands of Q. petraea and flowering ash (Fraxinus ornus), with an undergrowth of herbaceous species of dry brome grass (Ubaldi et al., 1984).
In more acidic soils the most successful stands are those containing Q. cerris, but also Q. petraea and chestnut (Oberdorfer and Hofmann, 1967). The latter species are replaced further south in Italy by Q. cerris with various species of heather (Erica) and Coronilla emerus, which are more thermophilous (Giordano and Schirone, 1989).
In hilly terrain in Italy it is not uncommon to see stands of Q. pubescens and Q. cerris with smaller admixtures of hop hornbeam. In the Po Valley there are plain-growing oak groves with Q. robur and Carpinus betulus, or with Q. robur, Q. cerris and Carpinus betulus (Agostini, 1965; Paiero, 1965). In coastal areas of central and southern Italy, the remaining plain-growing stands consist of Q. robur, Q. cerris, Q. frainetto (only in the south) as well as cork oak and Q. ilex (Corti, 1955; Padula, 1985).
Habitat List
Top of pageCategory | Sub-Category | Habitat | Presence | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Terrestrial | Managed | Cultivated / agricultural land | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Protected agriculture (e.g. glasshouse production) | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Managed forests, plantations and orchards | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Managed grasslands (grazing systems) | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Disturbed areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Rail / roadsides | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Urban / peri-urban areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Natural forests | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Natural grasslands | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Riverbanks | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Wetlands | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Littoral | Coastal areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Hosts/Species Affected
Top of pageInformation on the host range can be found in Farr et al. (1989), Kowalski and Kehr (1992), Phillips and Burdekin (1992), Toti et al. (1993), Wilson and Carroll (1994), Sahashi et al. (2000) and Anselmi et al. (2002).
An undefined species of Discula has been found in the leaves of Fagus crenata in Japan (Sahashi et al., 2000).
Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
Top of pageSymptoms
Top of pageA. quercina (anamorph Discula quercina) essentially causes leaf spot and shoot dieback although symptoms vary depending on the oak species infected, the vegetative stage of the tree at the time of infection, the tree organ affected, and the climate.
In Mediterranean countries the first symptom that appears on the leaves shortly after the annual resumption of growth is small, brown spots. These spots increase in size and become reddish-brown, irregular in outline, and bounded by the leaf veins (angular spots); when more nearly round these spots measure 12-22 mm in diameter. The spots may become confluent and cover the entire leaf surface between the veins. However, a part of the leaf blade remains green. When the spots cover 70-80% of the leaf blade, the leaf withers, becomes papery and hazel-brown, and the leaf blade becomes twisted. The entire expanding foliage in the crown is often destroyed.
Older leaves are also affected, but symptoms remain limited to brown spots, which spread but do not occupy the entire leaf area.
The infection often passes through the leaf stalk to the shoot, although the shoot can also be infected directly. If the infection completely surrounds the shoot, it dies. The infection also proceeds to the twigs, on which a canker forms, 8-10 cm long and slightly sunk into the wood. Twigs so infected will die (shoot dieback). The cones are also often infected, becoming covered with small, black specks.
Repeated infections over the years, always entailing the death of leaves, shoots and twigs, gradually cause very extensive crown thinning and ultimately the death of the tree. The perithecia of the teleomorph A. quercina form on the leaves, whereas the acervula of the anamorph D. quercina differentiate on the cankers.
The symptoms as they appear in European countries are described, albeit in a general way, by Grove (1937), who states that in more than usually rainy years, especially in the spring and summer, the incidence of the disease increases as it did in England, UK, in the summer of 1980.
In North America, symptoms vary on the many susceptible oak species. On Quercus alba, which is probably the most sensitive to this infection, symptoms manifest themselves in a number of ways: rapidly spreading blight of leaves and shoots, with browning of young leaves during the growth period; a large and irregularly shaped portion of the leaf blade dies off, and the leaf blade becomes twisted, but part of the leaf area remains green; and small necrotic spots form on the adult leaves.
On Quercus phellos and Q. laurifolia the spots are often very numerous, small, brown or black, and surrounded by a halo of green tissue. On Q. nigra and Q. falcata the spots are larger and often surrounded by a yellow ring. When infection is severe the apical shoot dies and folds in upon itself. On Q. palustris and Q. shumardi the spots on the upper leaf blade are round, reddish-brown, varying in size and surrounded by a pale-green halo, whereas on the lower leaf blade they are often concave. On Q. virginiana, which is not a very sensitive species, leaf spots also form, but at a very low density, 6-10 per square inch compared with 100-150 spots per square inch on more sensitive species. On Q. durandii the density of spots is even lower than that on Q. virginiana.
Further details can be found in Grove (1937), Parris and Byrd (1962), Morelet (1989) and Ragazzi et al. (1999c).
List of Symptoms/Signs
Top of pageSign | Life Stages | Type |
---|---|---|
Fruit / abnormal shape | ||
Fruit / lesions: black or brown | ||
Fruit / reduced size | ||
Growing point / mycelium present | ||
Leaves / abnormal colours | ||
Leaves / abnormal forms | ||
Leaves / abnormal leaf fall | ||
Leaves / leaves rolled or folded | ||
Leaves / necrotic areas | ||
Stems / canker on woody stem | ||
Stems / dieback | ||
Stems / discoloration of bark | ||
Stems / distortion | ||
Stems / gummosis or resinosis | ||
Stems / necrosis | ||
Stems / stunting or rosetting | ||
Whole plant / discoloration | ||
Whole plant / early senescence | ||
Whole plant / plant dead; dieback | ||
Whole plant / seedling blight |
Biology and Ecology
Top of pageA. errabunda and A. quercina are most easily found on Fagus sylvatica and Quercus spp., respectively; however, they have a vast host range to cover their geographic range. In North America they are found from the western provinces of Canada down along the coast to the Gulf of Mexico. In Europe they occur from central and southern Russia across north-eastern Europe, all the way to the countries of the Mediterranean. Such an extensive geographic range, with so many different climates, shows the adaptability of these fungi, though it is possible that ecotypes have differentiated within the species (A. errabunda and A. quercina) that are adapted to the particular climates of the two continents.
This is also seen in Italy, where A. quercina occurs in many different parts of the country, from areas with a semi-arid climate (e.g. Sicily, 37-38° N, 13-15° E) to those with a continental climate (e.g. Tuscany, 43-44° N, 10-12° E) (Anselmi et al., 2002).
In winter A. quercina survives mainly through its anamorph form (acervula) that differentiates on cankers along the branches and twigs. The teleomorph form (perithecia on dead leaves on the ground) ensures survival in more temperate areas.
The primary infection, in all areas, appears after the winter season when the temperature rises in the spring (18-20°C is sufficient for perithecia and acervula to mature). The ascospores and conidia then begin to infect the leaves, buds, shoots and twigs. The teleomorph Apiognomonia usually colonizes the leaves, buds and shoots, whereas the anamorph Discula colonizes not only the leaves and buds but also the twigs (bark and wood) (Ragazzi et al., 1999a). The ascospores and conidia are dispersed by wind, water and seeds, and possibly by insects as well (Petrini, 1991). Under test conditions, ascospores and conidia caused high levels of infection with the following regime parameters: day/night 16/8 h, 22/18°C, 40/65% RH and 20,000/0 lux (Ragazzi et al., 1999b).
The literature reveals that, on the whole, species of the Apiognomonia complex are adapted to temperatures ranging from 3 to 30°C (Neely and Himelick, 1967; Shishkina, 1969; Sinclair et al., 1987; Smith et al., 1988; Wilson and Carroll, 1994). The percent infected leaf area increases as the inoculum concentration increases from 100 to 100,000 conidia/ml, but then decreases at 1,000,000 conidia/ml. An inoculum concentration of 100,000 is therefore optimal for producing extensive leaf necrosis (Ragazzi et al., 1999a). Under experimental conditions of day/night 12/12 h, 25/15°C, 50/75% RH and 25,000/0 lux, conidia production gradually increased until it peaked at 23,000 conidia/m³ air, 14 days after sporulation. Conidia production is greatest between 21.00 h and 06.00 h (Ragazzi et al., 1999a).
The frequency of occurrence and extent of colonization are greater at lower altitudes and diminish as the altitude increases (Toti et al., 1993). Secondary infections are caused mainly by conidia that have differentiated in the canker lesions, produced by the primary inoculum, on the branches and twigs. Infected trees produce infected cones. The inoculum (conidia + ascospores) released from a mixed stand of Quercus cerris and Q. pubescens, averaging 15 m tall and growing at an altitude of 400 m a.s.l., decreases with distance from the inoculum source, so that 10 days after the start of sporulation, the number of propagules trapped in a spore trap increased from 49,300 propagules/m³ air at 10 m from the source to 14,200 propagules/m³ at 1000 m. After 40 days, the corresponding figures were 16,200 propagules/m³ at 10 m and 2400 propagules/m³ at 1000 m (Ragazzi, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy, unpublished data).
Individual species of the Apiognomonia complex are invasive in stands of Quercus spp. mixed with Fraxinus spp., Alnus spp., Castanea sativa, Fagus sylvatica, Corylus spp. and Acer spp, depending on location. In the USA, it is the pure oak stands that are most seriously affected. In both Europe and the USA, infection level is related to rainfall, increasing when rainfall is higher in the early part of the growing season (March-April in Europe and March-April-May in the USA). The incidence of A. errabunda on F. sylvatica increased on permanent observation plots in Alpine sites in Switzerland after the application of nitrogen fertilizer (Fluckiger et al., 1999).
A. errabunda sensu stricto is frequently found in association with Aureobasidium pullulans, Diplodina cf. microsperma, Epicoccum purpurescens, Microsphaeropsis sp., Phialophora sp., Phoma sp., Phomopsis sp. and Sporormiella intermedia.
A. quercina is associated with Alternaria alternata, Biscogniauxia mediterranea, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Cytospora sp., Diplodia mutila, Epicoccum spp., Monochaetia sp., Phoma cava, Phomopsis quercina, Trichoderma spp., Tubakia dryina and Ulocladium sp.
Notes on Natural Enemies
Top of pageMeans of Movement and Dispersal
Top of pageSeedborne Aspects
Top of pagePathway Vectors
Top of pageVector | Notes | Long Distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clothing, footwear and possessions | Yes | |||
Land vehicles | Yes | |||
Yes | ||||
Containers and packaging - wood | Yes | |||
Plants or parts of plants | Yes |
Plant Trade
Top of pagePlant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transport | Pest stages | Borne internally | Borne externally | Visibility of pest or symptoms |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fruits (inc. pods) | fungi/hyphae | Yes | Pest or symptoms not visible to the naked eye but usually visible under light microscope | |
Leaves | fungi/fruiting bodies; fungi/spores | Yes | Pest or symptoms not visible to the naked eye but usually visible under light microscope | |
Seedlings/Micropropagated plants | fungi/hyphae | Yes | Pest or symptoms not visible to the naked eye but usually visible under light microscope | |
Stems (above ground)/Shoots/Trunks/Branches | fungi/fruiting bodies; fungi/spores | Yes | Yes | Pest or symptoms not visible to the naked eye but usually visible under light microscope |
Wood |
Plant parts not known to carry the pest in trade/transport |
---|
Bark |
Bulbs/Tubers/Corms/Rhizomes |
Flowers/Inflorescences/Cones/Calyx |
Growing medium accompanying plants |
True seeds (inc. grain) |
Wood Packaging
Top of pageWood Packaging liable to carry the pest in trade/transport | Timber type | Used as packing |
---|---|---|
Solid wood packing material with bark | No | |
Solid wood packing material without bark | No |
Wood Packaging not known to carry the pest in trade/transport |
---|
Non-wood |
Processed or treated wood |
Impact Summary
Top of pageCategory | Impact |
---|---|
Biodiversity (generally) | Negative |
Biodiversity (generally) | Negative |
Crop production | Negative |
Crop production | Negative |
Environment (generally) | Negative |
Environment (generally) | Negative |
Forestry production | Negative |
Forestry production | Negative |
Native flora | Negative |
Native flora | Negative |
Impact
Top of pageIn urban and periurban parks the removal of leaves fallen in consequence of infection by species of Apiognomonia is without doubt a burden on the city administration.
Economic Impact
Top of pageIn urban and periurban parks the removal of leaves fallen in consequence of infection by species of Apiognomonia is without doubt a burden on the city administration.
Environmental Impact
Top of pageIn all of these stands, both A. errabunda and, where there are oaks, A. quercina occur endemically. The incidence of these fungi is higher when the season is favourable and this can cause heavy defoliation and death of the apical twigs.
The environmental impact is nevertheless thought to be only modest: the tree, beech or oak, may die after repeated attacks in successive years, but during this long period natural renewal may allow the stand to retain its original forest cover and tree density. It is difficult to isolate the effect of A. quercina alone from the whole context of oak decline, though it is certainly one of a number of pathogenic agents that cause the death of oak trees. As such, the environmental impact of these two pathogens in particular cannot be assessed.
Diagnosis
Top of pageD. umbrinella can be isolated from leaves of Quercus alba and Q. rubra by the following method:
The fungus was isolated from leaf discs using the method of Wilson and Carroll (1994) with modifications in the solution concentrations and in the times and number of rinses during the sterilization procedure. A 6-mm-hole punch sterilized in 95% ethanol was used to remove six leaf discs located equidistantly along the midvein of each leaf. Each disc was placed on the sterile filter paper of a large vacuum filtration apparatus. The apparatus consisted of a plastic container (27.5 x 40 x 14.6 cm), an aluminium frame with an open aluminium lattice (33.1 x 46.2 x 2.8 cm), a sheet of porous Teflon filter (39.7 x 26.9 cm) (Reed Plastics, Rockville, Maryland, USA), and a sheet of sterile filter paper (39 x 26 cm) (Whatman, 3MM). The apparatus was attached in tandem to a vacuum flask and vacuum line. The entire apparatus was assembled within a laminar flow hood to maintain sterility throughout the isolation procedure. The sterile Whatman paper was placed on the Teflon surface of the vacuum filtration unit, premoistened with sterile distilled water, which was allowed to drag by gravity. The leaf discs were sterilized on the apparatus with 95% ethanol for 50 s, 70% ethanol for 50 s, 0.5% sodium hypochlorite with Tween 80 (0.2 ml/100 ml) for 2 min, and were then rinsed three times with sterile distilled water. Sterilization fluids were applied with squeeze bottles or pasteur pipettes. Excess liquid was vacuumed away from the leaf discs, which were then transferred to 24-well tissue-culture dishes containing 1 ml per well of oak leaf agar (OLA) consisting of 1.0 g dried and ground white oak leaves, 20 g Difco agar, 1000 ml distilled water. Prior to preparation of the OLA medium, leaves were collected, dried at 100°C for 15 min, shredded in a Waring blender for 1 min, then ground in a coffee grinder for 30 s. Dishes were incubated at 24°C under 12 h fluorescent lighting per day to induce conidiomata production.
Apiognomonia quercina (anamorph Discula quercina)
The isolation of D. quercina followed Ragazzi et al. (1999c). Two bark fragments of 3 cm² each were excised from Quercus cerris twigs, one from near the tip and one from near the base of the twigs, and two wood fragments were similarly removed, one from the base and one from the tip of the same twigs. Two fragments of embryo tissue and two of bud scale were also removed from each of two basal buds and two apical buds per twig. All fragments were sterilized by immersion in 3% sodium hypochlorite for 4 min followed by immersion in 60% ethanol for 2 min. The fragments were placed in Petri dishes, 9 cm in diameter, containing 20 ml PDA, plus 30 p.p.m. streptomycin to suppress bacterial growth. Incubation was in a controlled environment chamber at 22±2°C, 70% RH, with constant lighting at 15,000 lux.
Colony differentiation started after 4-5 days of incubation. Colonies were a very light brown, almost yellow, the mycelium was immersed, with hyaline, septate and branched hyphae. Growth, on oak leaf agar (OLA) at 25°C, was slow, reaching a diameter of ca 6.5 cm after 8 days. Acervula, 150 µm in diameter, epidermic, separate or confluent, light brown, smooth-walled and with an irregular dehiscence were produced after about 5 days on impoverished PDA (6 g/l potato dextrose broth (PDB) + 20 g/l agar). Conidiophores were 13-3-5 x 21 µm, hyaline, septate, single or branched (but only at the base), straight or slightly curved, elongated towards the tip. Conidia were 3.5-5 x 9-15 µm, hyaline, oblong, ellipsoid, not septate, with a smooth, thin wall, a blunt tip and the base more or less truncated.
PDA was certainly an excellent medium for the isolation of A. quercina, but for colony growth the best medium was OLA, pH 6.6, prepared by boiling 30 g oak leaves in 350 ml water for 30 min and adding 8 g agar (Difco). The best growth conditions in a controlled environment were: 30 W fluorescent lighting, a 12-h day with day/night temperatures 24/18°C; 50/75% RH, light intensity 15,000/0 lux. Under such conditions the colony differentiated in 3 days and reached a diameter of 9 cm in 6 days (Ragazzi et al., 2002). Other authors have carried out similar experiments, the most important of which have been Neely and Himelick (1967) and Wilson and Carroll (1994).
Neely and Himelick stated that isolates of Gnomonia quercina from white oak were studied on 10 agar media (Difco) with added bean pod, cabbage infusion, corn meal, lima bean, malt extract, potato dextrose, prune and Sabourand-dextrose. Growth rates were determined at temperatures ranging from 3 to 30°C.
Conidia production was greatest on bean pod, malt extract and PDA. No isolate produced many conidia on cabbage infusion, corn meal or Sabourand-dextrose. All isolates tended to form zonation rings on many of the media. The aerial mycelium of all isolates was white tending to pale grey on all media. Zonation rings varied in colour from grey to black. On PDA all isolates produced a dark-yellow pigment that spread throughout the medium after incubation for 4-6 weeks at 21°C. Colonies reached their greatest diameter size (7-9 cm) on prune, Sabourand-dextrose, corn meal and PDA. The optimal temperature for growth was 18°C.
Wilson and Carroll (1994) isolated D. quercina from various tissues of Quercus garryana. Surface sterilization of tree tissues was carried out as described in Wilson and Carroll (1994):
- Acorn shells (60 s in 95% ethanol, 60 s in 70% ethanol, 5 min in 33% NaOCl, 5 washes in sterile, distilled water)
- Naked seeds (shelled acorns) (30 s in 70% ethanol, 10 min in 10% NaOCl with 1% SDS, 5 washes in sterile, distilled water)
- Twigs, bark, wood (60 s in 95% ethanol, 2 min in 70% ethanol, 8 min in 33% NaOCl, 5 washes in sterile, distilled water)
- Leaves (50 s in 95% ethanol, 60 s in 70% ethanol, 5 min in 33% NaOCl, 4 washes in sterile, distilled water)
- Prebud burst and young postbud burst leaves (25 s in 95% ethanol, 30 s in 70% ethanol, 2 min in 33% NaOCl, 4 washes in sterile, distilled water).
Note:
NaOCl: dilutions (by volume) from a 5% sodium hypochlorite household bleach stock solution.
SDS: sodium dodecyl sulfate is a detergent used as a wetting agent.
Isolation was attempted from three organs:
Shelled acorns: the shell was removed, leaving only the cotyledons, which were attached at the embryo region. A single piece of each acorn seed (about a quarter of the total acorn) was surface sterilized. The pieces were placed in 22-mm-diam. sterile test tubes with 2 ml sterile water, and incubated under ambient laboratory conditions for 6 weeks, then scored for D. quercina.
Twigs: one 12-cm length of 1-2- and 3-year-old twigs was cut from trees. These were put on ice, taken back to the laboratory and immediately surface sterilized. The terminal 1 cm of twig length was cut off, then the remaining 10-cm length was cut into four equal sized parts. All 40 1-year-old segments, and 10 out of the 40 segments of the 2- and 3-year age classes of twigs were placed onto PDA and left to incubate under ambient laboratory conditions, then scored for the presence of the endophyte. All the remaining 2- and 3-year-old twig pieces had the bark removed from the wood. Bark of 2- and 3-year-old twigs can be prized off the wood with a sterile razor blade. The bark and wood were both separately placed onto PDA, incubated for 3 weeks under ambient laboratory conditions, then scored for the presence of the endophyte.
Increment cores of the tree trunk: two core samples per tree were taken at breast height from five trees. As oak trees are difficult to core with increment corers, the cores only went 10 cm into the tree trunk. To prevent contamination of the core sample with bark fungi, a small section of bark was removed from the tree around the point where the increment corer was inserted. The increment corer was sterilized in the field by flaming with ethanol. The cores were immediately placed in sterile glass tubes on ice, taken to the laboratory, surface-sterilized, broken in half, placed on PDA, incubated, and scored for D. quercina.
Studies to establish the cultural characteristics of A. quercina can be found in Stoneman (1898), Edgerton (1908), Westerdijk and van Luijk (1920) and Schuldt (1955).
Detection and Inspection
Top of pageToti et al. (1993) isolated D. umbrinella from the buds, twigs and leaves of Fagus sylvatica as follows: twigs from 10 randomly selected F. sylvatica trees were collected in March 1991 in Switzerland. One branch, 1-1.5 cm in diameter and carrying at least 30-40 buds, was excised from each tree. Five buds, along with the branch segment bearing the buds, were taken from each branch and surface sterilized by sequential immersion in 75% ethanol (1 min), NaOCl with 3-5% available chlorine (5 min), and 75% ethanol (30 sec). Each bud was cut longitudinally and the outer scales removed. The young, rolled-up leaf was cut into two parts, and the first 3-cm length of each piece of contiguous twig was sectioned longitudinally into two pieces. The twig pieces directly underneath the buds were contiguous pieces, as distinct from the distal pieces, which were separated from the buds by the contiguous twig pieces. Bud scales, rolled up leaf pieces, and twig pieces were placed in that order on 2% MEA (2% agar, 1% malt extract, Difco) supplemented with 50 p.p.m. terramycin to suppress bacterial growth. All plates were incubated at 20±2°C for up to 3 weeks, depending on the growth rate of the fungi. Isolation was by transfer of mycelium to MEA slants. Near-UV light (Philips TL 40W/05) was used to induce sporulation. Other detection methods are described in 'Diagnostic Methods'.
In addition to traditional detection methods, a number of biomolecular techniques are now widely available in plant pathology. Haemmerli et al. (1992) identified and compared isolates of D. umbrinella in F. sylvatica, Castanea sativa, Quercus petraea and Q. rubra using the following protocol:
Fungal isolates
All strains of D. umbrinella were isolated from symptomless leaf tissues of F. sylvatica, C. sativa, Q. petraea and Q. rubra as described by Sieber and Hugentobler (1987); all isolates were mycelial isolates. Cultures were maintained on 2% MEA slants (2% malt extract, 2% agar, both Difco) at 4°C.
DNA isolation
Isolates were grown for 10 days at 20°C in shake culture containing 50 ml of V8 juice. The mycelium was removed by centrifugation (10 min at 3000 x g), lyophilized and ground to a fine powder. Mycelial DNA (30-40 mg) was extracted and purified by a total DNA CTAB mini-prep extraction method (Zolan and Pukkila, 1986).
PCR amplification conditions
Amplification reactions were carried out in volumes of 25 µl containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3; 50 mM KCl; 2 mM MgCl2 (for primers P1, P2, P14, OPE2, OPE4, OPE7, OPE12, OPE15); 2.5 mM MgCl2 (primers P11, OPE3, OPE5, OPE6, OPE11, OPE16, OPE20); 3 mM MgCl2 (P4, OPE1); 100 µM each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP and TTP (Boehringer Mannheim); 0.2 M primer; 25 ng of DNA; and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim). Amplification was performed in a Perkin Elmer Cetus Gene Amp PCR system 9600 programmed for two cycles of 30 sec at 94°C, 30 s at 36°C, 120 sec at 72°C, 36 cycles of 20 s at 94°C, 15 s at 36°C, 15 s at 45°C, 90 s at 72°C, followed by 10 min at 72°C. Reaction products were resolved by electrophoresis (4 V/cm) in a 1.5% agarose gel, run in 1 x TPE for 4 h and stained with ethidium bromide.
A total of 17 random primers, each with a length of 10 nucleotides and a minimum GC content of 50% were used. The primers were supplied by Operon Technologies Inc., Alameda, California, USA, and some were synthesized by MicroSynth AG, Windisch, Switzerland.
Hybridization and autoradiography
Three RAPD marker products: no. 211, a 2100-bp product of isolate 11 by primer P2; no. 214, a 1170-bp product of isolate 2 by primer P14; and no. 1814, a 1000-bp product of isolate 18 by primer P14, were transferred from the agarose gel to reaction tubes using autoclaved toothpicks and amplified under the conditions described above. Twenty-five nanograms of reamplified DNA was labelled with 50 µCi (a-32P)dCTP (3000 Ci/mmole; Amersham International; random primed DNA labelling kit, Boehringer Mannheim) and used as hybridization probes on Southern blots. EcoRI-digested total genomic DNA was separated by horizontal agarose electrophoresis for 15 h and blotted to Hybond N+ membranes (Amersham) (Southern, 1975). Prehybridization and hybridization reactions were carried out in plastic bags at 65°C with 5 x SSPE, 5 x Denhardt's solution, 1% SDS, 0.5 mg of herring sperm DNA. Hybridizations were incubated at 65°C for 14 h.
Data analysis
The occurrence of each amplification product in the gel was scored as 1, non-occurrence as 0. The resulting matrix was used to compute indices of between-isolate distance using the PCT option offered by the software package SYSTAT 5.1 (Wilkinson, 1989). This matrix computes the percentage of value comparisons resulting in disagreements in two column or row profiles, and is particularly useful for categorical or nominal scales as it does not apply any weighting to the matrix. The dendrogram was constructed by UPGMA-clustering (Sneath and Sokal, 1973).
Prevention and Control
Top of pageDue to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Any methods of control must be applied to trees in the nursery or to young trees in the field. On adult trees, the general decline caused by A. errabunda on beech and A. quercina on oak, involves other organisms and is therefore difficult to control.
In the nursery and arboretum it is good practice to gather up the leaves, twigs and branches that fall to the ground, to keep the trees in good condition by proper watering and fertilizing, and to ensure good ventilation.
Although it remains doubtful whether A. quercina is transmitted by seed, it is nevertheless strongly advisable to use healthy seed (checked to be free of the mycete) or seed from healthy trees. Any beech or oak trees that become infected in adult stands must be eliminated.
Chemical treatments are rare. Only in cases where anthracnose has defoliated oak trees for 3-5 years in succession is thiophanate-methyl applied to start vegetative growth, with repeated treatment after 7-10 days. Additional spraying may be carried out when the growing season is cool and humid (see http://www.entomology-umn.edu/cues/dx/CB/oanthab.htm, the site of the Center for Urban Ecology and Sustainability, The University of Minnesota, USA).
One promising means of control is to promote fungi that are biological antagonists against A. quercina and occur on the same organs on the oak tree that yield the disease agent.
References
Top of pageAmbuel B, Kuntz JE, Sarkis EH, Worf GL, 1978. The effects of temperature and moisture on white oak anthracnose. In: Proceedings of the American Phytopathological Society, 4:85.
Anselmi N, Capretti P, Cellerino GP, Franceschini A, Granata G, Luisi N, Marras F, Mazzaglia A, Mutto Accordi S, Ragazzi A, Vannini A, 2002. Studi sull’endofitismo di patogeni fungini di debolezza implicati nel deperimento delle querce in Italia. In: Franceschini A, Marras F, eds., Atti del Convegno Nazionale “L’endofitismo di funghi e batteri patogeni in piante arboree e arbustive”, Sassari – Tempio Pausania, Italy, 43-59.
Arx JA von, 1970. A revision of the fungi classified as Gloeosporium. Bibliotheca Mycologica, 24:1.
Barr ME, 1978. The Diaporthales of North America, with emphasis on Gnomonia and its segregates. Mycologia Memoir, 7: 232 pp.
Canadian Forest Service, 2004. www.cfl.scf.rncan.gc.ca/. Laurentian Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada.
Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, 2004. Anthracnose Disease of Trees. www.caes.state.ct.us/FactSheetFiles/PlantPathology/fspp066f.htm. New Haven, CT, USA.
Edgerton CW, 1908. The physiology and development of some anthracnose. Botanical Gazette, 45:367-408.
Ellenberg H, 1988. Vegetation ecology of Central Europe. 1988, Ed.4, 731 pp.
Fluckiger W, Braun S, Sheppard LJ, 1999. Nitrogen and its effect on growth, nutrient status and parasite attacks in beech and norway spruce. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 116:99-110.
Grove WB, 1937. British stem and leaf fungi (Coelomycetes), Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press.
Guseinov ES, 1974. Some diseases of Oak in Azerbaijan. Lesnoi Zhurnal, 17(1):147-148.
Höhnel F von, 1921. Mycologische fragmente. Annales Mycologici, 16:35-174.
Iowa State University, Plant Disease Clinic, 2004. www.exnet.iastate.edu/Pages/plantpath/pdcintro.html.
Kowalski T, Kehr RD, 1992. Endophytic fungal colonization of branch bases in several forest tree species. Sydowia, 44:137-168.
Mayer H, 1984. The forests of Europe. [Walder Europas.] 1984, 691 pp.; many pl.
Mielke ME, Daughtrey ML, 1989. How to identify and control dogwood anthracnose. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, Broomal, Pennsylvania, NA-GR-18.
Mielke ME, Langdon K, 1986. Dogwood anthracnose threatens Catoctin Mountain Park. US Department of Interior, National Park Service. Park Science, Winter: 6-8.
Minter DW, 2004. Biodiversity website. www.biodiversity.ac.psiweb.com/.
Monod M, 1983. Monographie taxonomique des Gnomoniaceae (Ascomycètes de l’ordre des Diaporthales) I. Sydowia, Beih. 9:1-315.
Oberdorfer E, Hofmann A, 1967. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Vegetation des Nordapennin. Beiträge zur naturkundlichen Forschung in Südwestdeutschland, 26:83-139.
Padula M, 1985. Aspetti della vegetazione del Parco Nazionale del Circeo. Webbia, 39:29-110.
Petrini O, 1991. Fungal endophytes of tree leaves. In: Andrews JA, Hirano S, eds. Microbial Ecology of the Leaves. New York, USA: Springer Verlag, 179-197.
Raabe RD, 1990. Diseases of native oaks in California. Fremontia, 18(3):64-67
Saccardo PA, 1884. Sylloge Fungorum, 3:507.
Schneeberger NF, Jackson W, 1989. Impact of dogwood anthracnose on flowering dogwood at Catoctin Mountain Park. Plant Diagnostician’s Quart., 10:30-43.
Shirnina LV, 1997. Gloeosporium disease of lime in Gornaya Shoria. Lesovedenie, No. 5:90-94; 11 ref.
Shishkina AK, 1969. Aetiology of twig and leaf shrinking of Quercus iberica in early spring. Mycology and Phytopathology, 3:365-367.
Smith I, Dunez J, Phillips DH, Lelliot RA, Archer SA, 1988. European Handbook of Plant Diseases. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Southern EM, 1975. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. Journal of Molecular Biology, 98:503-517.
Stoneman B, 1898. A comparative study of the development of some anthracnose. Botanical Gazette, 26:69-120.
Tiberi R, Ragazzi A, Marianelli L, Peverieri Sabatini G, Roversi PF, 2002. Insects and fungi involved in oak decline in Italy. In: Villemant C, Sousa E, eds. Proceedings of the Meeting Integrated Protection in Oak Forests, Oeiras-Lisbonn, Portugal. IOBC/wprs Bulletin, 25:67-74.
Ubaldi D, Puppi G, Speranza M, Zanotti AL, 1984. Primi risultati sulla tipologia fitosociologica dei boschi di Quercus pubescens della provincia di Pesaro e Urbino. Archivio Botanico e Biogeografico Italiano, 60:222-237.
Washington State University Cooperative Extension, 2004. Plant Diseases. http://cru.cahe.wsu.edu/CEPublications/eb1263/eb1263.html.
Westerdijk J, van Luijk A, 1920. Die Gloeosporien der Eiche und der Platane. Meded. Phytopath. Lab. "W.C.S.", 4:3-21.
Wilkinson L, 1989. SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. Evanston, Illinois, USA: SYSTAT Inc.
Zolan ME, Pukkila PJ, 1986. Inheritance of DNA methylation in Coprinus cinereus. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 6:195-200.
Distribution References
CABI, Undated. Compendium record. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated a. CABI Compendium: Status inferred from regional distribution. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated b. CABI Compendium: Status as determined by CABI editor. Wallingford, UK: CABI
Canadian Forest Service, 2004. Canadian Forest Service., Canada: Laurentian Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada. http://www.cfl.scf.rncan.gc.ca
Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, 2004. Anthracnose Disease of Trees., New Haven, CT, USA: http://www.caes.state.ct.us/FactSheetFiles/PlantPathology/fspp066f.htm
Guseinov E S, 1974. Some diseases of Oak in Azerbaijan. Lesnoi Zhurnal. 17 (1), 147-148.
Kowalski T, Kehr RD, 1992. Endophytic fungal colonization of branch bases in several forest tree species. In: Sydowia, 44 137-168.
Minter DW, 2004. Biodiversity website., http://www.biodiversity.ac.psiweb.com/
Parris G K, Byrd J, 1962. Oak anthracnose in Mississippi. Plant Disease Reporter. 46 (9), 677-81.
Raabe R D, 1990. Diseases of native oaks in California. Fremontia. 18 (3), 64-67.
Shirnina L V, 1997. Gloeosporium disease of lime in Gornaya Shoria. Lesovedenie. 90-94.
Distribution Maps
Top of pageSelect a dataset
Map Legends
-
CABI Summary Records
Map Filters
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/