Invasive Species Compendium

Detailed coverage of invasive species threatening livelihoods and the environment worldwide

Datasheet

Cynodon dactylon
(Bermuda grass)

Toolbox

Datasheet

Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass)

Summary

  • Last modified
  • 27 September 2018
  • Datasheet Type(s)
  • Invasive Species
  • Pest
  • Host Plant
  • Preferred Scientific Name
  • Cynodon dactylon
  • Preferred Common Name
  • Bermuda grass
  • Taxonomic Tree
  • Domain: Eukaryota
  •   Kingdom: Plantae
  •     Phylum: Spermatophyta
  •       Subphylum: Angiospermae
  •         Class: Monocotyledonae
  • Summary of Invasiveness
  • C. dactylon is a stoloniferous grass widely naturalized in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. This species is a C4 grass included in the Global Compendium of Weeds (

Don't need the entire report?

Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.

Generate report

Pictures

Top of page
PictureTitleCaptionCopyright
Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass); leaves. Puu Moaulanui, Kahoolawe, February, 2008
Titleleaves
CaptionCynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass); leaves. Puu Moaulanui, Kahoolawe, February, 2008
Copyright©Forest Starr & Kim Starr - CC BY 4.0
Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass); leaves. Puu Moaulanui, Kahoolawe, February, 2008
leavesCynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass); leaves. Puu Moaulanui, Kahoolawe, February, 2008©Forest Starr & Kim Starr - CC BY 4.0
TitleShoot and inflorescence
Caption
Copyright©Chris Parker/Bristol, UK
Shoot and inflorescence©Chris Parker/Bristol, UK
Inflorescence supported on a culm up to 25 cm high, consisting of a single whorl of 3-7 narrow racemes, each 3-8 cm long. Spikelets 2-2.5 mm long, in two rows, closely appressed to the rachis.

Reproduced with permission from Hafliger E, Scholz H, 1981. Grass Weeds 2. Basle: CIBA-GEIGY.
TitleInflorescence and leaves - line drawing
CaptionInflorescence supported on a culm up to 25 cm high, consisting of a single whorl of 3-7 narrow racemes, each 3-8 cm long. Spikelets 2-2.5 mm long, in two rows, closely appressed to the rachis. Reproduced with permission from Hafliger E, Scholz H, 1981. Grass Weeds 2. Basle: CIBA-GEIGY.
CopyrightNOVARTIS
Inflorescence supported on a culm up to 25 cm high, consisting of a single whorl of 3-7 narrow racemes, each 3-8 cm long. Spikelets 2-2.5 mm long, in two rows, closely appressed to the rachis.

Reproduced with permission from Hafliger E, Scholz H, 1981. Grass Weeds 2. Basle: CIBA-GEIGY.
Inflorescence and leaves - line drawingInflorescence supported on a culm up to 25 cm high, consisting of a single whorl of 3-7 narrow racemes, each 3-8 cm long. Spikelets 2-2.5 mm long, in two rows, closely appressed to the rachis. Reproduced with permission from Hafliger E, Scholz H, 1981. Grass Weeds 2. Basle: CIBA-GEIGY.NOVARTIS
Glumes one-nerved, lower almost as long as the spikelet, the upper, half to three quarters as long. Lemma silky pubescent on the keel; palea glabrous.

Reproduced with permission from Hafliger E, Scholz H, 1981. Grass Weeds 2. Basle: Ciba-Geigy.
TitleSpikelet - line drawing
CaptionGlumes one-nerved, lower almost as long as the spikelet, the upper, half to three quarters as long. Lemma silky pubescent on the keel; palea glabrous. Reproduced with permission from Hafliger E, Scholz H, 1981. Grass Weeds 2. Basle: Ciba-Geigy.
Copyright©Chris Parker/Bristol, UK
Glumes one-nerved, lower almost as long as the spikelet, the upper, half to three quarters as long. Lemma silky pubescent on the keel; palea glabrous.

Reproduced with permission from Hafliger E, Scholz H, 1981. Grass Weeds 2. Basle: Ciba-Geigy.
Spikelet - line drawingGlumes one-nerved, lower almost as long as the spikelet, the upper, half to three quarters as long. Lemma silky pubescent on the keel; palea glabrous. Reproduced with permission from Hafliger E, Scholz H, 1981. Grass Weeds 2. Basle: Ciba-Geigy.©Chris Parker/Bristol, UK
Ligule very short, 0.2-0.3 mm, with a conspicuous fringe of white hairs.

Reproduced with permission from Hafliger E, Scholz H, 1981. Grass Weeds 2. Basle: Ciba-Geigy.
TitleBlade, ligule and sheath - line drawing
CaptionLigule very short, 0.2-0.3 mm, with a conspicuous fringe of white hairs. Reproduced with permission from Hafliger E, Scholz H, 1981. Grass Weeds 2. Basle: Ciba-Geigy.
CopyrightNOVARTIS
Ligule very short, 0.2-0.3 mm, with a conspicuous fringe of white hairs.

Reproduced with permission from Hafliger E, Scholz H, 1981. Grass Weeds 2. Basle: Ciba-Geigy.
Blade, ligule and sheath - line drawingLigule very short, 0.2-0.3 mm, with a conspicuous fringe of white hairs. Reproduced with permission from Hafliger E, Scholz H, 1981. Grass Weeds 2. Basle: Ciba-Geigy. NOVARTIS
a, Ligule, ventral view; b, part of spike; c, spikelet; d, flower; e, caryopsis.
TitleWhole plant - line drawing
Captiona, Ligule, ventral view; b, part of spike; c, spikelet; d, flower; e, caryopsis.
CopyrightSEAMEO-BIOTROP
a, Ligule, ventral view; b, part of spike; c, spikelet; d, flower; e, caryopsis.
Whole plant - line drawinga, Ligule, ventral view; b, part of spike; c, spikelet; d, flower; e, caryopsis.SEAMEO-BIOTROP
Shoot of C. dactylon showing three leaves per node.
TitleShoot
CaptionShoot of C. dactylon showing three leaves per node.
Copyright©Chris Parker/Bristol, UK
Shoot of C. dactylon showing three leaves per node.
ShootShoot of C. dactylon showing three leaves per node.©Chris Parker/Bristol, UK
C. dactylon showing rhizome system (Botswana).
TitleRhizome system
CaptionC. dactylon showing rhizome system (Botswana).
Copyright©Chris Parker/Bristol, UK
C. dactylon showing rhizome system (Botswana).
Rhizome systemC. dactylon showing rhizome system (Botswana).©Chris Parker/Bristol, UK
C. dactylon competing with cotton in Egypt.
TitleCompetition
CaptionC. dactylon competing with cotton in Egypt.
Copyright©Chris Parker/Bristol, UK
C. dactylon competing with cotton in Egypt.
CompetitionC. dactylon competing with cotton in Egypt.©Chris Parker/Bristol, UK

Identity

Top of page

Preferred Scientific Name

  • Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.

Preferred Common Name

  • Bermuda grass

Other Scientific Names

  • Agrostis linearis Retz
  • Agrostis stellata Willd.
  • Capriola dactylon (L.) Kuntze
  • Chloris maritime Trin.
  • Chloris paytensis Steud.
  • Cynodon affinis Caro & E.A.Sánchez
  • Cynodon aristiglumis Caro & E.A.Sánchez
  • Cynodon aristulatus Caro & E.A.Sánchez
  • Cynodon decipiens Caro & E.A.Sánchez
  • Cynodon distichloides Caro & E.A.Sánchez
  • Cynodon erectus J.S. Presl. ex C.B. Presl.
  • Cynodon glabratus Steud.
  • Cynodon hirsutissimus (Litard. & Maire) Caro & E.A.Sánchez
  • Cynodon iraquensis Caro
  • Cynodon laeviglumis Caro & E.A.Sánchez
  • Cynodon linearis Willd.
  • Cynodon maritimus H.B.K.
  • Cynodon mucronatus Caro & E.A.Sánchez
  • Cynodon nitidus Caro & E.A.Sánchez
  • Cynodon pascuus Nees
  • Cynodon pedicellatus Caro
  • Cynodon polevansii Stent
  • Cynodon scabrifolius Caro
  • Cynodon stellatus Willd.
  • Cynodon tenuis Trin.
  • Cynodon umbellatus (Lam.) Caro
  • Cynosurus dactylon (L.) Pers.
  • Cynosurus uniflorus Walter
  • Digitaria dactylon (L.) Scop.
  • Digitaria glumaepatula (Steud.) Miq.
  • Digitaria glumipatula (Steud.) Miq.
  • Digitaria linearis (L.) Pers.
  • Digitaria maritima (Kunth) Spreng.
  • Fibichia dactylon (L.) Beck
  • Milium dactylon (L.) Moench.
  • Panicum ambiguum (DC.) Le Turq.
  • Panicum dactylon L.
  • Panicum glumipatulum Steud.
  • Panicum lineare L.
  • Paspalum ambiguum DC.
  • Paspalum dactylon (L.) Lam.
  • Paspalum umbellatum Lam.
  • Phleum dactylon (L.) Georgi
  • Syntherisma linearis (L.) Nash
  • Vilfa linearis (Retz.) P. Beauv.
  • Vilfa stellata (Willd.) P. Beauv.

International Common Names

  • English: Bahama grass; couch grass; devil grass; dog's tooth grass; quick grass; star grass
  • Spanish: grama Bermuda; grama común; grama de Espana; gramilla; pasto bermuda; zacate de gallina
  • French: chiendent; chiendent dactyle; gros chiendent; herbes-des-Bermudes; pied de poule
  • Portuguese: capim-coastcross; capim-da-bermuda; capim-de-burro; grama; grama-bermuda; grama-seda; mate-me-embora

Local Common Names

  • Angola: usila
  • Argentina: chepica brava; grama bermuda; gramón; pasto de perro; pasto forestal; pata de perdiz; pie de gallina; tejedora; uña de gato
  • Brazil: capim de burro; capim-bermuda; capim-fino; grama rasteteira; grama sao paulo; grama seda
  • Cambodia: smao anchien
  • Chile: pasto de galina
  • Colombia: pasto Argentina; pasto ingles
  • Cuba: grama; hierba de la Bermuda; hierba fina
  • Dominican Republic: grama fina de Bermudas
  • Egypt: negil
  • El Salvador: barenillo; zacate de agujilla
  • Fiji: balama grass; kabuta
  • Germany: Echte-Hundsahn; Finger-Hundsahn
  • Greece: agriada
  • India: arugampul; doob; duba; hariali
  • Indonesia: gigirintingan; jukut kakawatan; jukut raket
  • Indonesia/Java: grintingan; hoe maneek; suket grinting
  • Iran: chair
  • Iraq: thayyel
  • Israel: yableet matsui
  • Italy: gramigna
  • Japan: gyogishiba
  • Lebanon: irk-en-najil; shirch-un unjil
  • Malaysia: rumput minak
  • Mexico: agrasia
  • Morocco: mor-chiendent
  • Myanmar: mye-sa-myet; mye-za-gyi
  • Netherlands: hondsgrass
  • New Zealand: Indian doab
  • Pakistan: khabbal; talla
  • Peru: grama dulce
  • Philippines: babalut; galud-galud; kawad-kawaran; kulatai
  • Puerto Rico: ala quete queda; pelo de brujas; pepe ortis; yerba Bermuda
  • Saudi Arabia: nageel
  • South Africa: gewone kweekgras
  • Sri Lanka: aruham-pul; buha
  • Sudan: nagila
  • Suriname: tigriston
  • Sweden: hundtandgraes
  • Taiwan: gou-ya-gen
  • Thailand: yah-phraek
  • Turkey: kopek disi ayrigi
  • USA/Hawaii: mahiki; manienie
  • Venezuela: pasto pata de gallina
  • Vietnam: cò chi'; co' ông
  • Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro): zubaca
  • Zambia: kapinga

EPPO code

  • CYNAR (Cynodon arcuatus)
  • CYNDA (Cynodon dactylon)
  • CYNMA (Cynodon maritimus)

Summary of Invasiveness

Top of page

C. dactylon is a stoloniferous grass widely naturalized in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. This species is a C4 grass included in the Global Compendium of Weeds (Randall, 2012) and it is listed as one of the most “serious” agricultural and environmental weeds in the world (Holm et al., 1977). It is a fast-growing grass that spreads by seeds and stolons and rapidly colonizes new areas and grows forming dense mats. As with many other African grasses, this species has the potential to alter ecosystem functions by altering fire regimes, hydrological cycles, biophysical dynamics, nutrients cycles, and community composition (D’Antonio and Vitousek, 1992). C. dactylon is very drought tolerant by virtue of rhizome survival through drought-induced dormancy over periods of up to 7 months. After dormancy, it has the ability to easily re-sprout from stolons and rooted runners. Plants also recover quickly after fire and can tolerate at least several weeks of deep flooding (Cook et al., 2005). Currently, C. dactylon is listed as invasive in many countries including Australia, Indonesia, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, USA, Mexico, Costa Rica, Puerto Rico, Chile, Colombia, Uruguay, Argentina, Brazil and many islands in the Pacific Ocean such as Hawaii, Fiji, and French Polynesia among others (see distribution table for details). 

Taxonomic Tree

Top of page
  • Domain: Eukaryota
  •     Kingdom: Plantae
  •         Phylum: Spermatophyta
  •             Subphylum: Angiospermae
  •                 Class: Monocotyledonae
  •                     Order: Cyperales
  •                         Family: Poaceae
  •                             Genus: Cynodon
  •                                 Species: Cynodon dactylon

Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature

Top of page

The name Cynodon dactylon is universally accepted for this common, widespread weed. It is highly variable and various subspecies have been distinguished (Harlan et al., 1970). It is normally tetraploid (2n=36) but diploid, triploid and pentaploid forms also occur (Rochecouste, 1962a; Thomas and Murray, 1978; Kissmann , 1991). A few other related species can also occur as weeds in some regions (see Similarities with Other Species).

Although it is not native to Bermuda, C. dactylon is an abundant invasive species there. It is presumed to have arrived in North America from Bermuda, resulting in its common name of Bermuda grass.
 

Description

Top of page

C. dactylon is a perennial grass, with underground rhizomes and on the ground runners (Cabrera, 1968; Covas and Salvai, 1970). The runners spread horizontally and bear nodes with internodes of about 10 cm length. They may be flattened or cylindrical, mostly unhaired. Each node roots in the soil and produces short culms (tillers), up to 25 cm high, but develop into prostrate runners under less dense conditions. The almost unique character of the Cynodon genus of at least two and often three leaves at each node can be seen on the extended runners. This immediately distinguishes it from other perennial weeds with comparable growth pattern such as Panicum repens and Paspalum distichum (Perez and Labrada, 1985).

The rhizomes are mainly in the top 10 cm of the soil but may penetrate to a depth of 35 cm (Perez and Labrada, 1985; Phillips and Moaisi, 1993) .They may be twice as wide as the runners and this is one of the variable characters in populations (0.2-0.9 cm). Each node is covered by a white cataphyl. Runner or rhizome nodes may bear up to three viable buds.

Leaves have an alternate-distal pattern of distribution along the runners. Leaf blades are open up to the base, unhaired, similar or shorter than the length of the internode. The ligule is very short but with a conspicuous fringe of white hairs. Leaf blades are green to dull-green, from 1 to 15 cm depending on node, lanceolate, and forming almost a 90° angle with the leaf blade, finely parallel-ribbed on both surfaces, without a conspicuous midrib (Rosengurt et al., 1960). The width and pilosity of the weed blade may be used to distinguish populations of the weed (Oakley, 1999).

The inflorescence is supported on a culm up to 25 cm high and consists of a single whorl of 3-7 narrow racemes, each 3-8 cm long. Spikelets are 2-2.5 mm long in two rows, closely appressed to the rachis. Glumes are one-nerved, the lower almost as long as the spikelet, the upper half to three-quarters as long. The lemma is silky pubescent on the keel, palea glabrous. Caryopses are sub-eliptical, compressed and brownish, brilliant coloured (Kissmann, 1991).

The seedling has a hairy ligule, bearing 0.5 mm hairs. Pilosity increases as the seedling grows.

Plant Type

Top of page Annual
Grass / sedge
Herbaceous
Perennial
Seed propagated
Vegetatively propagated

Distribution

Top of page

C. dactylon is thought to have originated in Africa but now occurs worldwide in both tropical and subtropical regions including Asia, North, Central and South America, the Caribbean, and islands in the Pacific Ocean (see distribution table for details). It also spreads into temperate areas of Europe and North America but is limited by sensitivity to prolonged frost.

C. dactylon invades almost all kinds of crops and modified ecosystems, including urban areas and circulation paths (road and railroad tracks) in many regions. 

Distribution Table

Top of page

The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.

Continent/Country/RegionDistributionLast ReportedOriginFirst ReportedInvasiveReferenceNotes

Asia

AfghanistanPresentIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
ArmeniaPresentIntroducedTselev and Fedorov, 1983
AzerbaijanPresentIntroducedTselev and Fedorov, 1983
BahrainWidespreadIntroducedChaudhary et al., 1981
BangladeshWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
BhutanWidespreadIntroducedParker, 1992
Brunei DarussalamPresentIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
CambodiaPresentIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979; Waterhouse, 1993
Chagos ArchipelagoPresentIntroduced Invasive PIER, 2014
ChinaWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
-BeijingPresentIntroducedKairo et al., 2003Naturalized
-FujianWidespreadIntroducedFlora of China Editorial Committee, 2014Cultivated
-GansuWidespreadIntroducedFlora of China Editorial Committee, 2014Cultivated
-GuangdongWidespreadIntroducedFlora of China Editorial Committee, 2014Cultivated
-HainanWidespreadIntroducedFlora of China Editorial Committee, 2014Cultivated
-Hong KongPresentIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
-HubeiWidespreadIntroducedFlora of China Editorial Committee, 2014Cultivated
-JiangsuWidespreadIntroducedFlora of China Editorial Committee, 2014Cultivated
-ShaanxiWidespreadIntroducedFlora of China Editorial Committee, 2014Cultivated
-ShanxiWidespreadIntroducedFlora of China Editorial Committee, 2014Cultivated
-SichuanWidespreadIntroducedFlora of China Editorial Committee, 2014Cultivated
-YunnanWidespreadIntroducedFlora of China Editorial Committee, 2014Cultivated
-ZhejiangWidespreadIntroducedFlora of China Editorial Committee, 2014Cultivated
Christmas Island (Indian Ocean)PresentIntroduced Invasive PIER, 2014
Cocos IslandsPresentIntroduced Invasive PIER, 2014
Georgia (Republic of)PresentIntroducedTselev and Fedorov, 1983
IndiaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979
-Andaman and Nicobar IslandsWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979
-AssamWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979
IndonesiaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979; Waterhouse, 1993
-JavaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Soerjani et al., 1987
-MoluccasWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Soerjani et al., 1987
-Nusa TenggaraWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Soerjani et al., 1987
-SumatraWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Soerjani et al., 1987
IranWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
IraqWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
IsraelWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979
JapanWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
-HonshuPresentIntroducedNumata et al., 1975
-KyushuPresentIntroducedNumata et al., 1975
-Ryukyu ArchipelagoPresentIntroducedNumata et al., 1975
-ShikokuPresentIntroducedNumata et al., 1975
JordanWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
KazakhstanPresentIntroducedTselev and Fedorov, 1983
Korea, DPRPresentIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
Korea, Republic ofPresentIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
KyrgyzstanPresentIntroducedTselev and Fedorov, 1983
LaosPresentIntroducedWaterhouse, 1993
LebanonWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
MalaysiaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979; Waterhouse, 1993
-Peninsular MalaysiaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979
-SabahPresentIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
-SarawakPresentIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
MyanmarPresentIntroducedHolm et al., 1979; Waterhouse, 1993
NepalPresentIntroducedDangol, 2001; Moody, 1989
OmanWidespreadIntroducedChaudhary et al., 1981
PakistanWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
PhilippinesWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979; Waterhouse, 1993
Russian Federation
-Russia (Asia)PresentIntroducedTutin et al., 1980
Saudi ArabiaPresentIntroducedClayton et al., 2014
SingaporeWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Waterhouse, 1993
Sri LankaWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
TaiwanWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
TajikistanPresentIntroducedTselev and Fedorov, 1983
ThailandWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979; Waterhouse, 1993
TurkeyWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Tutin et al., 1980; Tepe et al., 2002
TurkmenistanPresentIntroducedTselev and Fedorov, 1983
United Arab EmiratesWidespreadIntroducedChaudhary et al., 1981
UzbekistanPresentIntroducedTselev and Fedorov, 1983
VietnamPresentIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979; Waterhouse, 1993
YemenWidespreadIntroducedChaudhary et al., 1981

Africa

AldabraPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
AlgeriaPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
AngolaWidespreadNativeHolm et al., 1979
BeninPresentNativeHolm et al., 1979
BotswanaWidespreadNativeGibbs Russell et al., 1990
Burkina FasoPresentNativeHolm et al., 1979
BurundiPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
CameroonPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
Cape VerdePresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
Central African RepublicPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
ChadPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
CongoPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
Congo Democratic RepublicPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
Côte d'IvoirePresentNativeHolm et al., 1979
DjiboutiPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
EgyptWidespreadNativeHolm et al., 1979
Equatorial GuineaPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
EritreaPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
EthiopiaWidespreadNativeHolm et al., 1979
GabonPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
GambiaPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
GhanaPresentNativeHolm et al., 1979
GuineaWidespreadNativeHolm et al., 1979
KenyaWidespreadNativeHolm et al., 1979
LesothoPresentNativeGibbs Russell et al., 1990
LiberiaPresentNativeHolm et al., 1979
LibyaPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
MadagascarPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
MalawiPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
MaliPresentNativeHolm et al., 1979
MauritiusWidespreadNativeHolm et al., 1979
MoroccoWidespreadNativeHolm et al., 1979
MozambiqueWidespreadNativeHolm et al., 1979
NamibiaPresentNativeGibbs Russell et al., 1990
NigerPresentNativeHolm et al., 1979
NigeriaPresentNativeHolm et al., 1979
RéunionPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
Rodriguez IslandPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
RwandaPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
Saint HelenaPresentIntroducedClayton et al., 2014
SenegalPresentNativeHolm et al., 1979
SeychellesPresentIntroducedClayton et al., 2014
Sierra LeonePresentHopper, 1972
South AfricaWidespreadNativeHolm et al., 1979
SudanWidespreadNativeHolm et al., 1979
SwazilandWidespreadNativeGibbs Russell et al., 1990
TanzaniaWidespreadNativeHolm et al., 1979
TogoPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
TunisiaWidespreadNativeHolm et al., 1979
UgandaWidespreadNativeHolm et al., 1979
Western SaharaPresentNativeClayton et al., 2014
ZambiaWidespreadNativeHolm et al., 1979
ZimbabweWidespreadNativeHolm et al., 1979

North America

CanadaPresentPresent based on regional distribution.
-British ColumbiaPresentIntroducedUSDA-NRCS, 2014
MexicoWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979
Saint Pierre and MiquelonPresentIntroducedUSDA-NRCS, 2014
USAWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979
-AlabamaPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-ArizonaPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-ArkansasPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987; USDA-NRCS, 2014
-CaliforniaPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987; USDA-NRCS, 2014
-ColoradoPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-ConnecticutPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-DelawarePresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-District of ColumbiaPresentIntroducedUSDA-NRCS, 2014
-FloridaPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-GeorgiaPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-HawaiiWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979Noxious weed
-IdahoRestricted distributionIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-IllinoisPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-IndianaPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-IowaRestricted distributionIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-KansasPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-KentuckyPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-LouisianaPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-MarylandPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-MassachusettsPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-MichiganRestricted distributionIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-MississippiPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-MissouriPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-MontanaPresentIntroducedUSDA-NRCS, 2014
-NebraskaRestricted distributionIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-NevadaPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-New HampshireRestricted distributionIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-New JerseyPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-New MexicoPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-New YorkPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-North CarolinaPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-OhioPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-OklahomaPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-OregonPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-PennsylvaniaPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-Rhode IslandPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-South CarolinaPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-TennesseePresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-TexasPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-UtahPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987; USDA-NRCS, 2014
-VermontRestricted distributionIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-VirginiaPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-WashingtonPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987
-West VirginiaPresentIntroducedLorenzi and Jeffery, 1987

Central America and Caribbean

Antigua and BarbudaPresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007
ArubaPresentIntroducedAcevedo-Rodriguez and Strong, 2012
BahamasPresentIntroducedAcevedo-Rodriguez and Strong, 2012
BarbadosPresentIntroducedMay & Baker, 1964
BelizePresentIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
British Virgin IslandsPresentIntroducedAcevedo-Rodriguez and Strong, 2012
Cayman IslandsPresentIntroducedAcevedo-Rodriguez and Strong, 2012
Costa RicaPresentIntroducedHolm et al., 1979; Chacon and Saborio, 2012
CubaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979; Oviedo Prieto et al., 2012
CuraçaoPresentIntroducedAcevedo-Rodriguez and Strong, 2012
DominicaPresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007
Dominican RepublicPresentIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
El SalvadorPresentIntroducedClayton et al., 2014
GrenadaPresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007
GuadeloupePresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007
GuatemalaWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
HaitiPresentIntroducedAcevedo-Rodriguez and Strong, 2012
JamaicaWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
MontserratPresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007
Netherlands AntillesPresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007
NicaraguaPresentIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
PanamaPresentIntroducedClayton et al., 2014
Puerto RicoWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979
Saint Kitts and NevisPresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007
Saint LuciaPresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007
Saint Vincent and the GrenadinesPresentIntroducedBroome et al., 2007
Trinidad and TobagoWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
United States Virgin IslandsPresentIntroducedAcevedo-Rodriguez and Strong, 2012

South America

ArgentinaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979
BoliviaWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
BrazilPresentIntroducedLorenzi, 1982
-AlagoasPresentIntroducedLorenzi, 1982
-AmazonasPresentIntroducedLorenzi, 1982
-BahiaPresentIntroducedLorenzi, 1982
-CearaPresentIntroducedLorenzi, 1982
-Espirito SantoWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Lorenzi, 1982; I3N-Brasil, 2014
-GoiasPresentIntroducedLorenzi, 1982
-MaranhaoPresentIntroducedLorenzi, 1982
-Mato GrossoPresentIntroducedLorenzi, 1982
-Mato Grosso do SulPresentIntroducedLorenzi, 1982
-Minas GeraisPresentIntroducedLorenzi, 1982
-ParaPresentIntroducedLorenzi, 1982
-ParaibaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Lorenzi, 1982; I3N-Brasil, 2014
-ParanaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Lorenzi, 1982; I3N-Brasil, 2014
-PernambucoPresentIntroducedLorenzi, 1982
-PiauiPresentIntroducedLorenzi, 1982
-Rio de JaneiroPresentIntroduced Invasive Lorenzi, 1982; I3N-Brasil, 2014
-Rio Grande do NortePresentIntroducedLorenzi, 1982
-Rio Grande do SulWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Lorenzi, 1982; I3N-Brasil, 2014
-RondoniaPresentIntroducedLorenzi, 1982
-Santa CatarinaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Lorenzi, 1982; I3N-Brasil, 2014
-Sao PauloPresentIntroducedLorenzi, 1982
-SergipePresentIntroducedLorenzi, 1982
ChileWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979; IABIN, 2014Also invasive on J. Fernandez Islands
-Easter IslandWidespreadIntroduced Invasive IABIN, 2014
ColombiaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979; IABIN, 2014
EcuadorPresentIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
-Galapagos IslandsIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979
French GuianaPresentIntroducedClayton et al., 2014
GuyanaPresentIntroducedClayton et al., 2014
ParaguayWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979; IABIN, 2014
PeruWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
SurinameWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
UruguayPresentIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979
VenezuelaWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979

Europe

AlbaniaPresentIntroducedTutin et al., 1980
AustriaPresentIntroducedTutin et al., 1980
BelarusPresentIntroducedDAISIE, 2014Casual alien
BelgiumPresentIntroducedDAISIE, 2014Naturalized
BulgariaWidespreadIntroducedTutin et al., 1980
CyprusWidespreadIntroducedAmericanos, 1972
Czech RepublicPresentIntroduced Invasive DAISIE, 2014
Czechoslovakia (former)PresentIntroducedTutin et al., 1980
FranceWidespreadIntroducedTutin et al., 1980
-CorsicaPresentIntroducedTutin et al., 1980
GermanyRestricted distributionIntroducedTutin et al., 1980
GreeceWidespreadIntroducedTutin et al., 1980
HungaryPresentIntroducedTutin et al., 1980
ItalyWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Tutin et al., 1980
LatviaPresentIntroducedDAISIE, 2014Casual alien
LiechtensteinPresentIntroducedDAISIE, 2014Casual alien
LuxembourgPresentIntroducedDAISIE, 2014
NetherlandsPresentIntroducedTutin et al., 1980
PortugalWidespreadIntroducedTutin et al., 1980
-AzoresPresentIntroducedTutin et al., 1980; DAISIE, 2014
RomaniaPresentIntroducedTutin et al., 1980
Russian FederationWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
-Russia (Europe)PresentIntroducedTutin et al., 1980
-Russian Far EastPresentIntroducedTselev and Fedorov, 1983
-SiberiaPresentIntroducedTselev and Fedorov, 1983
SerbiaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Nestorovic and Konstantinovic, 2011
SpainWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Tutin et al., 1980
-Balearic IslandsPresentIntroducedTutin et al., 1980
SwitzerlandWidespreadIntroducedTutin et al., 1980
UKPresentIntroducedTutin et al., 1980
UkrainePresentIntroducedDAISIE, 2014
Yugoslavia (former)WidespreadIntroducedTutin et al., 1980

Oceania

American SamoaPresentIntroducedWhistler, 1983; PIER, 2014
AustraliaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Holm et al., 1979
-Australian Northern TerritoryPresentIntroducedQueensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, 2011
-New South WalesWidespreadQueensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, 2011Probably native
-QueenslandWidespreadQueensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, 2011Probably native
-South AustraliaPresentIntroducedQueensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, 2011
-TasmaniaPresentIntroducedQueensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, 2011
-VictoriaPresentIntroducedQueensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, 2011
-Western AustraliaPresentQueensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, 2011
Cook IslandsPresentIntroducedPIER, 2014
FijiPresentIntroducedHolm et al., 1979; PIER, 2014
French PolynesiaPresentIntroduced Invasive PIER, 2014
GuamPresentIntroducedPIER, 2014
KiribatiPresentIntroduced Invasive PIER, 2014
Marshall IslandsPresentIntroduced Invasive PIER, 2014
Micronesia, Federated states ofPresentIntroducedPIER, 2014
NauruPresentIntroduced Invasive PIER, 2014
New CaledoniaPresentIntroduced Invasive PIER, 2014
New ZealandWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
NiuePresentIntroduced Invasive PIER, 2014; PIER, 2014
Norfolk IslandPresentPIER, 2014
Northern Mariana IslandsPresentIntroduced Invasive PIER, 2014
PalauPresentIntroduced Invasive PIER, 2014
Papua New GuineaWidespreadIntroducedHolm et al., 1979
SamoaPresentIntroducedWhistler, 1983
Solomon IslandsPresentPIER, 2014
TongaPresentIntroduced Invasive Whistler, 1983
US Minor Outlying IslandsPresentIntroduced Invasive PIER, 2014
VanuatuPresentIntroducedPIER, 2014
Wake IslandPresentIntroduced Invasive PIER, 2014
Wallis and Futuna IslandsPresentIntroduced Invasive PIER, 2014

History of Introduction and Spread

Top of page

The date of the initial introduction of C. dactylon into new habitats is unclear mainly because it has been repeatedly introduced in most countries where it is now present. In the USA, this species was introduced in 1807 and in Puerto Rico in 1876. Since 1943, many cultivars have been created and introduced in the USA, including among others the variety “Coastal” introduced in Georgia in 1943, “Alicia” introduced in Texas in 1967, “Grazer” introduced in Louisiana in 1985; and “Florakik” introduced in Florida in 1994 (Cook et al., 2005).

Risk of Introduction

Top of page

C. dactylon has high potential for further spread in those areas where it is still absent. Ecophysiological and genetic traits coupled with both forms of propagation give this species a high score for success in almost any ecosystem.

Habitat

Top of page

C. dactylon requires moderate warmth. It is tolerant of extremely high temperatures but is susceptible to hard or prolonged frost. It is especially predominant in subtropical conditions as a weed in both annual and perennial crops and in pastures, fallows and waste areas. It occurs under semi-arid and irrigated conditions on a wide range of soil types of varying pH and salinity.

Habitat List

Top of page
CategoryHabitatPresenceStatus
Littoral
Coastal areas Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Terrestrial-managed
Cultivated / agricultural land Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Disturbed areas Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Managed forests, plantations and orchards Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Managed grasslands (grazing systems) Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Protected agriculture (e.g. glasshouse production) Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Rail / roadsides Present, no further details
Urban / peri-urban areas Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Terrestrial-natural/semi-natural
Deserts Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Natural forests Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Natural grasslands Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)
Riverbanks Present, no further details
Wetlands Present, no further details Harmful (pest or invasive)

Hosts/Species Affected

Top of page

C. dactylon is treated by Holm et al. (1977) as the second most important weed in the world (after Cyperus rotundus), a status justified by its occurrence in virtually every tropical and subtropical country and in virtually every crop in those countries. In Holm et al. (1979) it is listed as a 'serious' or 'principal' weed in no less than 57 countries. A list of crops in which C. dactylon is, or could be, a problem weed would include virtually every crop of the tropics and subtropics and most temperate crops. The crops in which it is most commonly a major problem are those of the subtropics that are planted in wide rows, for example, cotton, sugarcane, tobacco, citrus, olive, deciduous fruit, forestry and ornamental species and many vegetables, but also some closer-planted but less competitive crops such as rice, lucerne, mixed lucerne and grass pastures, onion and jute (Labrada, 1994).

Biology and Ecology

Top of page

Genetics

The chromosome number reported for C. dactylon varies from 2n = 18 to 2n = 36 with diploid and polyploid populations (Cook et al., 2005).

Ramakrishan and Singh (1966) and Sarandon (1991) have found differences in total biomass and biomass partition according to the origin of the population. Sarandon (1991) points out that characters are highly heritable, which means that high genetic variability for biomass production and variable architecture allows an ample base for selection, which in most cases is induced by herbicides, mechanical control or forage production.

Reproductive Biology

C. dactylon is wind-pollinated and generally self-incompatible, suffering from inbreeding depression when genotypes are self-pollinated. Quantitative traits such as seed yield and forage yield can be dramatically negatively affected by inbreeding depression (Cook et al., 2005). In diploid populations, caryopses are formed after zygote formation. In polyploids, which are sterile, caryopses may be apomictic.

Physiology

This C4 plant (Kissmann, 1991) has high rates of accumulation under adequate irradiance, water and nutrient supply and may consume 75 kg of N, 20 kg of P and more than 1,500,000 litres of water for 5000 kg/ha of biomass dry matter (Fernandez , 1991). In the south of Santa Fe province, Argentina, a maximum biomass of 8000 kg/ha may be generated under a summer crop of maize or sunflower with >75 % located in the first 10 cm of the soil profile (Lombardo, 1973), whereas in Balcarce (Argentina) about 5000 kg/ha is commonly found in maize or sunflower stubble.

Phenology

A photoperiod of 13 hours induces flowering. Low night temperatures coupled with high diurnal temperatures induces blooming (Nir and Koller, 1976). A reduction in irradiance drastically decreases inflorescence production (Moreira, 1975). In North America, annual plants reproduce during spring and perennial plants reproduce all year long (USDA-NRCS, 2014).

Longevity

C. dactylon grows as both an annual and perennial grass. The annual growth-form becomes dormant and turns brown when nighttime temperatures fall below freezing or average daytime temperatures are below 10° C (Cook et al., 2005).

Activity Patterns

Seeds may be the route of invasion in weed-free fields through the faeces of cows (Rodriguez, personal communication). Rhizome biomass exhibits an annual cyclic pattern and, as with any perennial weed, low temperatures reduce biomass and viability is lost as a consequence of the consumption of materials due to respiration and maintenance. The digestibility of stocked material is severely decreased, implying a loss in forage quality (Vaz Martins, 1989). This is a character that has largely improved in cultivated varieties. Each node has a physiological self-governing structure in relation to the apex, but is highly dependent on substances from other plant parts. The mother plant determines the runner growth pattern on the soil surface according to the sugar-gibberellin balance (Montaldi 1970). Node disconnection may be caused by natural decay and cultivation and produces damage in the breakdown zone and changes in hormone and nutrient relationships. It is widely demonstrated that rhizome or runner fragmentation induces the activation of buds. The proportion of activated buds increases as the number of buds per segment decreases (Moreira, 1980; Kigel and Koller, 1985; Fernandez and Bedmar, 1992). The cultivation method is mainly responsible for vegetative propagation fragmentation. The higher the cultivation intensity, the smaller the segments produced (Kigel and Koller, 1985).

Population Size and Structure

This weed produces an enormous number of small seeds (0.25-0.30 mg), the viability and dormancy of which are highly variable according to genotype and the conditions when formed. The seed is important because it confers high genetic variability on the population.

Perez et al. (1995) recorded a very low germination rate. Uygur et al. (1985) obtained up to 15% germination at constant temperatures of 35-40°C, and 50% at temperatures alternating between 20 and 30°C. Moreira (1975) obtained up to 80% germination with the help of nitrate, chilling and alternating temperatures, and Elias (1986) recorded up to 96% germination from heavier samples of seed. Seeds remain viable in the soil for at least 2 years (Caixinhas et al., 1988). As a rule, cultivars have relatively high viability. Osmo-conditioning of Bermuda grass seeds with PEG followed by immediate sowing improved seed germination and seedling growth under saline conditions (Al-Humaid 2002).

The probability of emergence and successful establishment of C. dactylon decreases with the depth of the fragment, but increases with the weight of the node and internode (Perez et al., 1998). Growth from plants originated from a runner may exhibit a different biomass partition than that from plants originated from a rhizome (Fernandez, 1986). From sprouting onwards, weed growth is controlled mainly by temperature (optimum 25-30°C) and radiation, but also by humidity and soil fertility. The efficiency of carbohydrate reserve usage during sprout growth is highly dependent on temperature and the type of vegetative structure; it is maximum at 20°C and is higher for rhizomes than for stolons (Satorre et al., 1996). Runners and rhizome growth begins 30 days after growth but only if soil temperature is >15°C. Rates of 15 g/g/day have been recorded in Argentina (Lescano de Ríos, 1982).

Environmental Requirements

The annual cycle of the weed starts with bud reactivation by the end of winter. There is no innate dormancy and buds can activate if adequate temperature and humidity is available at any time of the year. Base temperature for bud sprouting ranging from 7.7°C, to 10°C (Bedmar 1991; Satorre 1996). New rhizomes are generated when temperatures exceed 15-20°C (Horowitz 1972). Aerial fractions have maximum dry matter content during the autumn and old rhizomes may have higher dry matter content than new rhizomes. C. dactylon tolerates a wide range of temperatures, especially very high temperatures in near-desert conditions. There is variation in tolerance to low temperatures and interactions between the time of exposure and relative humidity. Freezing point ranges from -2 to -3°C (Thomas 1969). Extreme temperatures were lethal to bud survival, but from 0 to 30°C, the rate of sprouting increased with increasing temperature.

Growth is favoured by medium-to-heavy, moist, well-drained soils but C. dactylon will also grow on acid and quite highly alkaline soils and the undisturbed rhizome system can survive flood conditions and drought (Holm et al., 1977). Runners allow C. dactylon to expand the exploration for new resources; avoid interference from other species; and propagate the most adapted genotype.

Air Temperature

Top of page
Parameter Lower limit Upper limit
Mean annual temperature (ºC) 15 25
Mean minimum temperature of coldest month (ºC) 7 10

Rainfall Regime

Top of page Summer

Soil Tolerances

Top of page

Soil drainage

  • free
  • impeded

Soil reaction

  • acid
  • alkaline
  • neutral

Soil texture

  • heavy
  • light
  • medium

Special soil tolerances

  • saline
  • shallow

Natural enemies

Top of page
Natural enemyTypeLife stagesSpecificityReferencesBiological control inBiological control on
Acromyrmex landolti balzani
Atherigona reversura
Blissus leucopterus
Cochliobolus cynodontis
Cochliobolus heterostrophus
Gesonula punctifrons Herbivore
Hieroglyphus banian Herbivore
Indian peanut clump virus Pathogen
Magnaporthe oryzae Pathogen
Mocis latipes
mycoplasma-like organisms Pathogen
Mythimna separata
Nisaga simplex
Peregrinus maidis Herbivore
Prosapia bicincta
Pseudaspidoproctus fulleri
Pseudonapomyza asiatica Herbivore
Sipha maydis Predator Inflorescence/Leaves
Spiroplasma citri
Spodoptera frugiperda
Thanatephorus cucumeris
Ustilago cynodontis

Notes on Natural Enemies

Top of page

A wide range of natural enemies of C. dactylon have been recorded, including many that cause undesirable damage or disfigurement of C. dactylon lawns. They include a mycoplasma-like organism, which causes pale foliage and commonly occurs in weedy populations. Damage from natural enemies is rarely sufficient to provide useful control. Many of the species listed as natural enemies are better known as polyphagous pests of poaceous and other crops, while others such as Sipha maydis require evaluation before being considered as potential biological control agents attacking inflorescences and leaves in India (Labrada, 1994).

Means of Movement and Dispersal

Top of page

C. dactylon is extremely efficient at propagation. Natural dispersal (non-biotic factors) such as water (flooding, irrigation) and agricutural practices (contaminated seed) and cattle husbandry propagate the seeds with released dormancy. Also cultivators, chisels and drilling equipment allow runners and rhizomes to be distributed away from a given source.

Pathway Vectors

Top of page
VectorNotesLong DistanceLocalReferences
Clothing, footwear and possessions Yes

Plant Trade

Top of page
Plant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transportPest stagesBorne internallyBorne externallyVisibility of pest or symptoms
Bulbs/Tubers/Corms/Rhizomes Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye
Growing medium accompanying plants Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye
True seeds (inc. grain) Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye
Plant parts not known to carry the pest in trade/transport
Bark
Flowers/Inflorescences/Cones/Calyx
Fruits (inc. pods)
Leaves
Roots
Seedlings/Micropropagated plants
Stems (above ground)/Shoots/Trunks/Branches
Wood

Impact Summary

Top of page
CategoryImpact
Animal/plant collections Negative
Animal/plant products Negative
Biodiversity (generally) None
Crop production Negative
Environment (generally) None
Fisheries / aquaculture None
Forestry production None
Human health Negative
Livestock production None
Native fauna None
Native flora Negative
Rare/protected species None
Tourism None
Trade/international relations None
Transport/travel None

Economic Impact

Top of page

C. dactylon is treated by Holm et al. (1977) as the second most important weed in the world (after Cyperus rotundus), a status justified by its occurrence in virtually every tropical and sub-tropical country and in virtually every crop in those countries. In their later book (Holm et al., 1979), it is listed as a 'serious' or 'principal' weed in no less than 57 countries. It is especially vigorous and pre-dominant in crops with wide spacing (annual, such as cotton, and perennial, such as citrus) where it suffers a minimum of shading.

Holm et al. (1977) note that it is among the most serious weed species in sugarcane in 13 named countries, in cotton in eight, in maize in eight and in plantation crops and vineyards in 21. Other crops in which it is a serious problem include rice, groundnuts, tobacco, sugar-beet, banana, pawpaw, pineapple, sorghum and many vegetables. Its exact competitive potential has rarely been measured but it is generally regarded as a highly competitive weed. It has been listed among the top seven weed species in a world-wide review of weeds in sugarcane (Cepero and Rodriguez, 1983). There is some evidence for allelopathic effects on peach (Bengoa and Kogan, 1985) and on citrus (Horowitz, 1973) but it appears that such effects may depend on the crop species and local conditions.

In cotton, newly planted C. dactylon had little effect on cotton yield in the first season, but established stands with 75% or more ground cover reduced yields by 25-80% (Brown et al., 1985). In an earlier study, monetary loss from C. dactylon was estimated at $165/acre (ca $350/ha) (Kempen, 1984). The competitive effects of C. dactylon were generally less than those from the much taller grass weeds Sorghum halepense and Echinochloa crus-galli, but comparable with those from Solanum nigrum and species of Amaranthus. Another detailed study in the USA showed that cotton yields could be reduced by 40% by C. dactylon (Giraudo, 1992). A combination of C. dactylon and C. rotundus as dominant weeds left uncontrolled for 2 months reduced cotton yield by 90% in Brazil (Beltrao et al., 1978).

C. dactylon can act as host to a very wide range of organisms and is often implicated as an important alternate host of crop pests and diseases including, for example, bacterial leaf blight of rice (Li et al., 1985); covered smut of sorghum (Marley, 1995); stubborn disease of citrus (Carles, 1986); and others such as stripe disease of rice, barley yellow dwarf, lucerne dwarf, Rhizoctonia solaniPhyllachora sp. and Pratylenchus pratensis (see Holm et al., 1977 for further details). However, the extent to which C. dactylon has contributed to crop loss via these organisms has not been quantified.

C. dactylon may also cause cause poisoning in cows which pasture on the weed (Odriozola et al., 1998).

Losses to all weeds in a number of the crops in which C. dactylon is a major weed (for example, maize and cotton) are of the order of 10-15% and amount to many billions of US dollars. As a major component of the weed flora in these crops over a substantial proportion of their total area, it is likely that C. dactylon contributes at least 1 or 2% of this total monetary loss, i.e. many million dollars, to which could be added the time, effort and costs involved in manual weeding which is especially laborious in the case of this rhizomatous weed.

Environmental Impact

Top of page

Hood and Naiman (2000) have compared the invasibility of riparian plant communities high on river banks with those on floodplain floors for four South African rivers. Analyses of abundant and significant riparian species showed that the floors have 3.1 times more exotic plants than the banks. The percentage of exotics ranges from 5 to 11% of total species richness for the banks, and from 20 to 30% for the floors. Species richness and percent exotics are negatively correlated for the banks, but not correlated for the floors. Authors claim that the most prominent exotic species are Lantana camara and C. dactylon, which are present on both banks and floors. Despite great differences in climate, species richness, and land use history, the percentages of exotic plants in three rivers in the Pacific Northwest of the USA and one river in southwestern France are similar to those in South Africa (24-30% versus 20-30%, respectively). Furthermore, the high proportions of exotic species in these riparian plant communities are comparable to those reported for vascular plant communities on islands. They so conclude that the macro-channel floor regions of the riparian zones of South African rivers are highly vulnerable to invasion by exotic vascular plants.

Threatened Species

Top of page
Threatened SpeciesConservation StatusWhere ThreatenedMechanismReferencesNotes
Lyonia truncata var. proctorii (Proctor's staggerbush)USA ESA listing as endangered species USA ESA listing as endangered speciesPuerto RicoCompetition - stranglingUS Fish and Wildlife Service, 1994
Panicum fauriei (Carter's panicgrass)NatureServe NatureServe; USA ESA listing as endangered species USA ESA listing as endangered speciesHawaiiCompetition (unspecified)US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2011
Scaevola coriacea (dwarf naupaka)NatureServe NatureServe; USA ESA listing as endangered species USA ESA listing as endangered speciesHawaiiCompetition (unspecified)US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2010a
Sesbania tomentosaNational list(s) National list(s); USA ESA listing as endangered species USA ESA listing as endangered speciesHawaiiCompetition - monopolizing resources; Ecosystem change / habitat alterationUS Fish and Wildlife Service, 2010b
Spiranthes delitescensEN (IUCN red list: Endangered) EN (IUCN red list: Endangered); USA ESA listing as endangered species USA ESA listing as endangered speciesArizonaCompetition - stranglingUS Fish and Wildlife Service, 1997

Social Impact

Top of page

The pollen of C. dactylon has been shown to produce allergy symptoms in asthmatics in Malaysia (Sam-ChoonKook et al., 1998) and Brazil (Kissmann, 1991). Purification and characterization of the isoallergen has been achieved by Chow (2003) .The role of C. dactylon in different religious ceremonies common to Bundelkhand region of Madhya Pradesh (India) has been studied by Dubey et al, (2000).

Auddy et al., (2003) have made extensive screenings of antioxidant activity of three Indian medicinal plants, including C. dactylon, traditionally used for the management of neurodegenerative diseases.

 

Risk and Impact Factors

Top of page Invasiveness
  • Invasive in its native range
  • Proved invasive outside its native range
  • Highly adaptable to different environments
  • Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
  • Highly mobile locally
  • Has high reproductive potential
  • Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
Impact outcomes
  • Negatively impacts agriculture
  • Negatively impacts human health
  • Negatively impacts animal health
  • Reduced native biodiversity
Impact mechanisms
  • Competition - monopolizing resources
  • Competition - strangling
  • Competition
  • Pest and disease transmission
Likelihood of entry/control
  • Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
  • Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant
  • Difficult/costly to control

Uses

Top of page

C. dactylon is used in many countries  as a valuable pasture grass, a lawn grass, or an anti-erosion cover on bunds and embankments. In the USA, new cultivars with enhanced performance are periodically released (Eichhorn, 1996; Hanna et al., 1997). Mechanical and chemical methods of controlling weeds in C. dactylon tuffs have also been developed (Alvim et al., 1996; Johnson, 1997; Walker et al., 1998).

In areas where the soil is not suitable for growing crops such as maize or soyabean, C. dactylon has proved to be a forage resource for milk cattle. Its serious limitations for forage quality and production during winter may be much improved if suitable management (heavy instantaneous charge) allows the germination and establishment of naturalized species already existing in the soil bank such as Trifolium repens and Lolium multiflorum amongst others.

Somaclonal variation from C. dactylon germplasm can provide a source of resistance to Spodoptera frugiperda (Croughan et al., 1997).

Uses List

Top of page

Animal feed, fodder, forage

  • Fodder/animal feed
  • Forage

Environmental

  • Erosion control or dune stabilization

General

  • Ornamental

Materials

  • Poisonous to mammals

Medicinal, pharmaceutical

  • Traditional/folklore

Similarities to Other Species/Conditions

Top of page

Outside Africa, there is rarely confusion between C. dactylon and related species. However, in eastern Africa there is frequent confusion with C. nlemfuensis. This species is similar to C. dactylon in almost all respects but lacks below-ground rhizomes. Two larger, more vigorous species, which are also without rhizomes and can occur as weeds, are C. plectostachyus and C. aethiopicus. C. plectostachyus, which is often cultivated as giant star grass, is distinguished by the upper glume being very short, less than one-quarter the length of the spikelet; and C. aethiopicus differs mainly in being very robust and woody with multiple whorls of coloured racemes. For further details, descriptions and keys, see Clayton and Harlan (1970) and Clayton et al. (1974).

Prevention and Control

Top of page

Cultural Control

Legumes or other cover crops are sometimes used for smothering C. dactylon since the weed does not tolerate deep shade. Vigorous crops and higher crop density may be important in reducing weed competition.

Mechanical Control

Traditional techniques of controlling C. dactylon rely very little on manual methods, as it easily survives shallow hoeing and positively thrives on mowing. However, the benefits of deep cultivation have been confirmed in Botswana and Zimbabwe where double ploughing, either after crop harvest or before the onset of the next season's rains, provided a high degree of control and was beneficial to crop yields (Phillips, 1993; Phillips and Moaisi, 1993; Mabasa et al., 1995). In these studies, conditions were dry and the rhizome systems not too deep, and standard ploughing depths of 10-15 cm were adequate to cause desiccation of the rhizomes. In contrast, Egamberdiev and Suleimanov (1985) found that double ploughing to 60 cm was needed, perhaps because wetter or cooler conditions meant that control had to be achieved by burial rather than desiccation. The main non-chemical approaches to control are deep tillage and shading/smothering crops.

Solarization

Solarization, using plastic sheets to raise soil temperatures, has proved highly effective in the control of C. dactylon in Egypt (Satour et al., 1991) and India (Nasr Esfahani, 1993; Anju-Kamra and Gaur, 1998). This technique has been also been recently tested in tomato orchards by Kumar et al (2003).

Chemical Control

EPTC may be used as a pre-plant incorporated treatment in soyabean and Phaseolus beans and, in combination with an herbicide such as dichlormid, in maize and sugarcane (Labrada, 1994). In each case a follow-up treatment with a post-emergent herbicide may be needed. In sugarcane, banana and plantain, glyphosate can be used successfully as a directed spray but care is needed to avoid contact with crop foliage. In sugarcane, dalapon may be a less hazardous choice for directed spraying, while an alternative for citrus and pineapple is the older soil-acting herbicide bromacil (Labrada, 1994).

Sulfometuron applied pre-emerge reduced C. dactylon ground cover from 73 to 93% in a succession-planted sugarcane crop in Louisiana, USA (Miller et al., 1998). Richard (1998) reported similar results with sulfometuron and also with thiazopyr. Richard et al. (2000) recently found that at-planting applications of clomazone mixed with either atrazine or sulfentrazone or imazapyr with atrazine were the only treatments evaluated that increased cane (7%) and sugar (9%) yields over the control of a weed community where C. dactylon was included.

Glufosinate-ammonium at maximum rate mixed with paraquat effectively controlled the weed under zero tillage in mustard and controlled C. dactylon under a non-crop situation (Das and Yaduraju, 2002.

Fluchloralin sprayed pre-sowing along with hand weeding gave effective control of C. dactylon in Cicer arietinum (Sesharee et al., 1996).

In other annual broad-leaved crops such as soyabeans, sunflower and potatoes, graminicides are selective and generally effective, with haloxyfop-methyl and quizalofop-ethyl having perhaps the highest activity, followed by fluazifop-butyl, and sethoxydim somewhat less effective (Kempen, 1983; Johnson and Talbert, 1985; Bedmar, 1997). Repeated applications may be needed for season-long control. The effects of different herbicidal combinations on weed management in soyabeans have been investigated by Jadhav et al. (2003).

The effects of addition of urea on herbicides have been tested by El-Quesni et al. (2000) in Egypt. Results suggest that glyphosate or fluazifop applied with urea gave an effective level of control of C. dactylon in July and August. Glyphosate formulations may have different behaviour, and have been studied by Martini et al. (2002): best results were obtained with 2.50 kg a.i./ha of potash glyphosate.

Imazapyr has proved selective in Pinus taeda and in Eucalyptus viminalis (Rivoir et al., 1987).

In tree and orchard crops, control of the actively growing weed before or after annual crops may be achieved using glyphosate (or the related sulphosate), which is effective at standard rates. The activity of glyphosate on C. dactylon is improved by a lower spray volume rate (Chivinge and Mare, 1991) and by various additives. However, a single application is unlikely to give permanent control and best results may be obtained by integration with tillage (Mabasa et al., 1995), smothering crops or ground covers: paraquat and glufosinate cause only temporary damage to the foliage.

The effects of most herbicides tend to vary according to the clone (biotype) or the population of C. dactylon being treated. Several studies have attempted to relate this to polyploidy level but little or no correlation has been detected for the activity of dalapon (Rochecouste, 1962b; Thomas and Murray, 1978) or sethoxydim (De Silva and Froud-Williams, 1992).

Biological Control

Drechslera cynodontis, Ustilago cynodontis, Puccinia cynodontis, and Fusarium poae as fungal pathogens and a specimen of Thripidae family were identified on C. dactylon and studied for potential use in biological control (Uygur, 2000).

Integrated Control

A single ploughing followed by glyphosate after a regrowth of C. dactylon may provide an effective and affordable control method to small-scale farmers (Abdullahi 2002).

Integrated weed management practices in spring planted sugarcane of coastal Orissa have been studied by Mishra et al. (2003). The effects of combined management techniques were studied in Italy by Caruso et al. (1997) who measured the effects of herbicides, and transplanting date of onions in the weed community structure. They found that crop growth rate increased during the first phases of the crop cycle, that the Shannon-Wiener diversity index showed a decreasing trend from the first to the third planting time for the herbicide treatment, and that the greatest mean influence on the diversity index was given by Amaranthus retroflexus, C. dactylon, Cyperus esculentus and Portulaca oleracea.

When designing a weed management program the following should be taken into account:

-The depletion of carbohydrates accumulated in the vegetative structures of the weed (sprouting promotion) coupled with the exposition of rhizomes and stolons to the soil surface in winter when low temperatures may kill buds to a greater extent.
-The design of a crop sequence, in which the initial crop must be highly competitive (such as sunflower or soyabean), to be sown early in the spring. The main target should be to avoid irradiance reaching this C4 creeping weed.
-The use of herbicides such as glyphosate. These chemicals should be applied when the aerial/subterranean biomass ratio is at its highest value (at the end of favourable season), after the crop harvest in early autumn.

References

Top of page

Abdullahi AE, 2002. Cynodon dactylon control with tillage and glyphosate. Crop Protection, 21(10):1093-1100; 13 ref.

Acevedo-Rodríguez P, Strong MT, 2012. Catalogue of the Seed Plants of the West Indies. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, 98:1192 pp. Washington DC, USA: Smithsonian Institution. http://botany.si.edu/Antilles/WestIndies/catalog.htm

Acharya S, Sengupta PK, 1998. Collateral hosts of rice sheath blight fungus Rhizoctonia solani. Oryza, 35(1):89-90; 7 ref.

Al Humaid AI, 2002. Effects of osmotic priming on seed germination and seedling growth of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L.) under saline conditions. Faculty of Agriculture Bulletin, Cairo University, 53(2):265-274.

Alvim MJ, Botrel M de A, Rezende H, Xavier DF, 2003. Evaluation under grazing of forage potential of Cynodon grass under two nitrogen and potassium levels. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 32(1):47-54.

Alvim MJ, Resende H, Botrel M de A, 1996. Efeito da frequencia de cortes e do nivel de nitrogenio sobre a producao e qualidade da materia seca do `Coast-cross'. Proceedings of the workshop on the forage potential of the genus Cynodon, Brazil, 7-9 November 1995, 45-55.

Americanos PG, 1972. The weed complexes of citrus groves in Cyprus. Technical Bulletin 9. Nicosia, Cyprus: Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources.

Anju Kamra, Gaur HS, 1998. Control of nematodes, fungi and weeds in nursery beds by soil solarization. International Journal of Nematology, 8(1):46-52; 11 ref.

Auddy B, Ferreira M, Blasina F, Lafon L, Arredondo F, Dajas F, Tripathi PC, Seal T, Mukherjee B, 2003. Screening of antioxidant activity of three Indian medicinal plants, traditionally used for the management of neurodegenerative diseases. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 84(2/3):131-138; 22 ref.

Azania AAPM, Azania CAM, Alves PLCA, Palaniraj R, Kadian HS, Sati SC, Rawat LS, Dahiya DS, Narwal SS, 2003. Allelopathic plants. 7. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Allelopathy Journal, 11(1):1-20; 55 ref.

Baka ZA, Gjµrum HB, 1996. Egyptian Uredinales. I. Rusts on wild plants from the Nile Delta. Mycotaxon, 60:291-303; 24 ref.

Bedmar F, 1997. Control de gramon (Cynodon dactylon), en girasol, soja y papa con herbicidas graminicidas postemergentes. Balcarce, Argentina: EEA. Boletin Tecnico 141.

Beltrao NE de M, Canuto VTB, Aguiar M de JN, 1978. Competitive influence of purple nutsedge and bermuda grass on cotton cultivar AFC 38-12. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 13(4):35-43

Bengoa GR, Kogan AM, 1985. The allelopathic effect of five perennial weeds on the growth of young peach trees. Samiente, 55(1/2):33.

Bhargava AK, Sobti AK, 2000. Detection of Indian peanut clump virus in the weeds present in the infested fields of Arachis hypogaea. Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology, 30(1):114-115; 7 ref.

Blanche KR, Tran Nguyen L, Gibb KS, 2003. Tests of transmission of cynodon white leaf phytoplasma to sugarcane and maize in northern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 54(4):423-427.

Blanche KR, Tran-Nguyen L, Gibb KS, 2003. Tests of transmission of cynodon white leaf phytoplasma to sugarcane and maize in northern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 54(4):423-427; 19 ref.

Broome R, Sabir K, Carrington S, 2007. Plants of the Eastern Caribbean. Online database. Barbados: University of the West Indies. http://ecflora.cavehill.uwi.edu/index.html

Brown SM, Whitwell T, Street JE, 1985. Common Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) competition in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Science, 33(4):503-506

Burton, GW, 2001. Tifton 85 bermudagrass early history of its creation, selection, and evaluation. Crop Science, 41(1):5-6.

Cabrera AL, 1968. Flora de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. II. Buenos Aires, Argentina: INTA, 309-404.

Caixinhas ML, Lourenco MR, Moreira I, 1988. Viability of caryopses of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. VIIIe Colloque International sur la Biologie, l'Ecologie et la Systematique des Mauvaises Herbes Paris, France; A.N.P.P., Vol.1:17-23

Carles L, 1986. Stubborn disease of citrus. Arboriculture Fruitiere, 33(382):43-46

Caruso G, 2000. Relationships among planting time, chemical weed control and weed cover in cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata). Acta Horticulturae, No. 533:229-241; 16 ref.

Cepero G S, Rodriguez G S, 1983. Weeds in sugarcane (Saccharum sp. hibridum). Centro Agricola, 10(2):47-55

Cerda A, Garrigos N, Garcia Fayos P, Rubio JL (ed), Morgan RPC (ed), Asins S (ed), Andreu V, 2000. Seed erosion susceptibility of species selected for road embankment stabilisation. Man and soil at the Third Millennium. Proceedings International Congress of the European Society for Soil Conservation, Valencia, Spain,-28-March-1-April,-2000. Volume 2:1301-1309.

Chacón E, Saborío G, 2012. Red Interamericana de Información de Especies Invasoras, Costa Rica ([English title not available]). San José, Costa Rica: Asociación para la Conservación y el Estudio de la Biodiversidad. http://invasoras.acebio.org

Chaturvedi VB, Singh P, Jain VK, 2001. Beta-carotene, nitrate and composition of dub grass (Cynodon dactylon) at monthly intervals. Animal Sciences Indian Journal, 71(3):283-284.

Chaudhary SA, Parker C, Kasasian L, 1981. Weeds of Central, Southern and Eastern Arabian Peninsula. Tropical Pest Management, 27(2):181-190.

Chivinge OA, Mare C, 1991. The effect of glyphosate applied using two volumes of water on purple nutsedge and three perennial grasses. Transactions of the Zimbabwe Scientific Association, 65:34-38

Clayton WD, Govaerts R, Harman KT, Williamson H, Vorontsova M, 2014. World Checklist of Poaceae. Richmond, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/

Clayton WD, Harlan JR, 1970. The genus Cynodon L.C.Rich in tropical Africa. Kew Bulletin, 24:185-189.

Clayton WD, Phillips SM, Renvoize SA, 1974. Flora of Tropical East Africa. Gramineae (Part 2). London, UK: Crown Agents.

Cook B, Pengelly B, Brown S, Donnelly J, Eagle D, Franco A, Hanson J, Mullen B, Partridge I, Peters M, Schultze-Kraft R, 2005. Tropical Forages: an interactive selection tool. Brisbane, Australia: CSIRO, DPI&F (Qld), CIAT and ILRI. http://www.tropicalforages.info/

Covas G, Salvai AF, 1972. Las especies de Cynodon (Graminae) de la Rep·blica Argentina. Kurtziana, 5:191-252. Córdoba.

Croughan SS, Quisenberry SS, Cuomo GJ, 1997. Bermudagrass somaclone resistance to fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Agricultural Entomology, 14(1):73-79; 18 ref.

DAISIE, 2014. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe. European Invasive Alien Species Gateway. www.europe-aliens.org/default.do

D'Antonio CM, Vitousek PM, 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global chance. Annual Review in Ecology and Systematics, 23:63-87.

Das TK, Yaduraju NT, 2002. Bio-efficacy of glufosinate-ammonium under zero tillage in mustard and on Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers and Cyperus rotundus L. under non-crop situation. Pesticide Research Journal, 14(1):16-21; 3 ref.

Deregibus VA, Casal JJ, Simone F, 1986. Efectos de pastoreos con altas cargas en pasturas invadidas por la gramilla (Cynodon dactylon. L. Pers). Revista Argentina de Producción Animal, 6(11-12):689-694.

Devashish Kar, Barbhuiya MH, 2001. Ecology of aquatic macrophytes of Chatla Haor, a floodplain wetland in Cachar district of Assam. Environment and Ecology, 19(1):231-233.

Dissanayake N, Hoy JW, Griffin JL, 1997. Weed hosts of the sugarcane root rot pathogen, Pythium arrhenomanes. Plant Disease, 81(6):587-591; 14 ref.

Dubey G, Shahu P, Sahu R, Sushil Kumar (ed), Hasan SA(ed), Samresh Dwivedi (ed), Kukreja AK(ed), Ashok Sharma (ed), Singh AK (ed), Srikant Sharma (ed), Rakesh Tewari, 2000. Role of plants in different religious ceremonies common to Bundelkhand region of Madhya Pradesh. Proceedings of the National Seminar on the Frontiers of Research and Development in Medicinal Plants, Lucknow, India, 16-18 September 2000. Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Sciences Journal, (22):542-545.

Egamberdiev AM, Suleimanov SM, 1985. On weed control in cotton. Uzbekskii Biologicheskii Zhurnal, No.2:20-21

Eichhorn MMJr, 1996. Russell bermudagrass released by experiment stations. Louisiana Agriculture, 39(1):27.

Elias P, 1986. Weight and germination capacity of seeds of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. Biologia, Czechoslovakia, A (Botanika), 41(1):69-73

Fayed MTB, El Geddawy IH, El Zeny MM, 2000. Effect of sugar beet interference on some growth traits of the common associated weeds. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 78(1): 215-225.

Fernández Greco R, Obregón E, Doumecq M, Oiavarrfa C, Lucesoli R, 1988. Efecto de periodos de pastoreo y descanso en un pastizal natural de la depresión del salado dominado por Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. Revista Argentina de Producción Animal, 8(1):107-108.

Fernandez O, Bedmar F, 1991. Fundamentos para el manejo integrado del gramón. Balcarce. Buenos Aires, Argentina: INTA EEA. Boletin Tecnico 105.

Fernandez ON, 1991. Sprouting and early growth of Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). II. Effects of the type and size of fragments and depth of burial. Proceedings of the 12th Argentine meeting on weeds and their control, Mar del Plata, Argentina, 9-11 October 1991 Buenos Aires, Argentina; Asociacion Argentina para el Control de Malezas, Vol. 1:61-69

Fernandez ON, 2003. Establishment of Cynodon dactylon from stolon and rhizome fragments. Weed Research (Oxford), 43(2):130-138; 35 ref.

Fernßndez ON, Vignolio OR, Requesens EC, 2002. Competition between corn (Zea mays) and bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) in relation to the crop plant arrangement. Agronomie, 22(3):293-305; 51 ref.

Fike JH, Staples CR, Sollenberger LE, Macoon B, Moore JE, 2003. Pasture forages, supplementation rate, and stocking rate effects on dairy cow performance. Dairy Science Journal, 86(4):1268-1281.

Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2014. Flora of China. St. Louis, Missouri and Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden and Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2

Geng ShiLei, Zhao Sheng, Wu Hong, Geng SL, Zhao S, Wu H, 2002. Anatomical characters of stems and leaves of three lawn grasses. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 10(2):145-151.

Gibbs Russell GE, Watson L, Koekemoer M, Smook L, Barker NP, Anderson HM, Dellwitz MJ, 1990. Grasses of Southern Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No 58. Pretoria, South Africa: National Botanic Grdens/ Botanical Research Institute.

Giraudo LJ, 1992. Coastal bermudagrass-cotton competition in a conservation-tillage system. Dissertation Abstracts International. B, Sciences and Engineering, 52(8):3955B

Gokbulak F, 1999. Vegetation diversity on a heavily grazed rangeland. Istanbul Universitesi Orman Fakultesi Dergisi publ, 49(1):111-119.

Gorski P, Frey L, 1999. Cynodon dactylon (Poaceae) in Poland. Taxonomy, karyology and distribution of grasses in Poland. Proceedings of the Third All-Polish Scientific Meeting, Krakow, Poland, 17-18 November 1998. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica, Suppl.7, 65-71.

Guglielmini AC, Satorre EH, 2002. Shading effects on spatial growth and biomass partitioning of Cynodon dactylon. Weed Research (Oxford), 42(2):123-134; 37 ref.

Hanna WW, Carrow RN, Powell AJ, 1997. Registration of 'Tift 94' bermudagrass. Nicosia, Cyprus: Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 37(3).

Harlan JR, de Wet JM, Huffiner WW, Deakin JR, 1970. A guide to the species of Cynodon (Gramineae). Oklahoma State University Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin B-673.

Hepper FN, 1972. Flora of West tropical Africa. Volume 3, Part 2. London, Crown Agents for Oversea Governments., UK 298pp.

Holm LG, Pancho JV, Herberger JP, Plucknett DL, 1979. A geographical atlas of world weeds. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 391 pp.

Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP, 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: University Press of Hawaii.

Hood WG, Naiman RJ, 2000. Vulnerability of riparian zones to invasion by exotic vascular plants. Plant Ecology, 148(1):105-114; 63 ref.

Horowitz M, 1972. Development of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. Weed Research, 12(3):207-220

Horowitz M, 1973. Competitive effects of three perennial weeds, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., Cyperus rotundus L. and Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers., on young citrus. Journal of Horticultural Science, 48(2):135-147

I3N-Brasil, 2014. Base de dados nacional de espécies exóticas invasora (National database of exotic invasive species). Florianópolis - SC, Brazil: I3N Brasil, Instituto Hórus de Desenvolvimento e Conservação Ambiental. http://i3n.institutohorus.org.br

IABIN, 2014. Inter-American Biodiversity Information Network (IABIN). Red de Informacion sobre especies invasoras ([English title not available]). http://www.oas.org/en/sedi/dsd/iabin/

ISSG, 2004. Invasive Species Specialists Group. World Wide Web at http:///issg.appfa.auckland.ac.nz/database/species/Species List.

Itavo LCV, de Valadares SC Jr, da Silva FF, Valadares RFD, Cecon PR, Itavo CCBF, de Moraes EHBK, Paulino PVR, 2002. Nutritional value of Cynodon grass hay. Estimation of intake, degradability and apparent digestibility by means of internal markers. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 31(2)Supplement:1024-1032.

Jadhav KT, Arthamwar DN, Rathod NB, Giram MM, Shaikh AK, 2003. Effect of different herbicidal combinations on weed management in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Soils and Crops Journal, 13(1):182-184.

Johnson BJ, 1997. Reduced herbicide rates for large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) and goosegrass (Eleusine indica) control in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). Weed Science, 45(2):283-287; 18 ref.

Johnson DH, Talbert RE, 1985. Perennial grass control in grapes. Proceedings, Southern Weed Science Society, 39th annual meeting, 181

Kairo M, Ali B, Cheesman O, Haysom K, Murphy S, 2003. Invasive species threats in the Caribbean region. Report to the Nature Conservancy. Curepe, Trinidad and Tobago: CAB International, 132 pp. http://www.issg.org/database/species/reference_files/Kairo%20et%20al,%202003.pdf

Kalita D, Choudhury H, Dey SC, 1999. Allelopathic effectiveness of some common rice weed species on germination, radicle and plumule growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seed. Crop Research (Hisar), 17(2):183-187; 8 ref.

Kalita D, Choudhury H, Dey SC, 1999. Assessment of allelopathic potential of some common upland rice weed species on morpho,physiological properties of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plant. Crop Research Hisar, 17(1):41-45.

Kalita D, Choudhury H, Dey SC, 1999. Assessment of allelopathic potential of some common upland rice weed species on morpho-physiological properties of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plant. Crop Research (Hisar), 17(1):41-45; 11 ref.

Karaca M, Lang DJ, Yerk Davis GL, Sukumar S, Ainsworth AJ, Saha S, 2000. Determination of DNA content and genome in Cynodon species by flow cytometry. Crop Research Hisar, 20(1):1-12.

Keeley PE, Thullen RJ, 1991. Growth and interaction of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Science, 39(4):570-574

Kempen HM, 1983. Selective grass herbicides on cotton in California. Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science, 36:136-142.

Kempen HM, 1984. Cotton production losses from weed competition in Kern County: a three year evaluation. Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science Spokane, Washington, USA; Western Society of Weed Science, 47-51

Kigel J, Koller D, 1985. Asexual reproduction of weeds. In Duke SO, ed. Weed Physiology. Vol. 1. Reproduction and Ecophysiology. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 65-100.

Kissmann K, 1991. Plantas infestantes e nocivas. Basf Brasileira, 317-321.

Krausz JP, White RH, Tisserat NA, Dernoeden PH, 2001. Bermudagrass dead spot: a new disease of bermudagrass caused by Ophiosphaerella agrostis. Plant Disease, 85(12):1286; 2 ref.

Kumar VKK, Nanjappa HV, Ramachandrappa BK, 2003. Effect of soil solarization for a period of one month during March, April and May on weed control and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Crop Research (Hisar), 25(2):259-265; 16 ref.

Labrada R, 1994. Cynodon dactylon In: Labrada R, Caseley JC, Parker C, eds. Weed Management for Developing Countries. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 120. Rome, Italy FAO, 44-49.

Lescano de Rfos MC, 1982. Bioecologfa del gramón (Cynodon dactylon.L.Pers) I. Estudios de crecimiento. IX Reunión de ASAM (Asociación Argentina para el control de Malezas), I:35-51.

Li ZZ, Zhao H, Ying XD, 1985. The weed carriers of bacterial leaf blight of rice. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 15(4):246-248

Liao ChungTa, Shiao ShiuhFeng, 2001. Pseudonapomyza asiatica Spencer (Diptera: Agromyzidae), a recently resurgent pest species which damages rice in Taiwan. Plant Protection Bulletin (Taipei), 43(4):235-242; 13 ref.

Lima A, Duclos J, 2001. Host, mating type and fertility of Magnaporthe grisea in Santiago Island, Cape Verde archipelago. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 40(2):119-124; 16 ref.

Liu JianXiu, Guo AiGui, Guo HaiLin, Liu JX, Guo AG, Guo HL, 2002. Creeping characteristics of Cynodon dactylon. Grassland of China, 24(2):36-42.

Lorenzi H, 1982. Weeds of Brazil, terrestrial and aquatic, parasitic, poisonous and medicinal. (Plantas daninhas de Brasil, terrestres, aquaticas, parasitas, toxicas e medicinais.) Nova Odessa, Brazil: H. Lorenzi, 425 pp.

Lorenzi HJ, Jeffery LS(Editors), 1987. Weeds of the United States and their control. New York, USA; Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. Ltd., 355 pp.

Mabasa S, Twomlow SJ, Riches CR, 1995. Integrated control of Cynodon dactylon in commercial areas of Zimbabwe. Brighton crop protection conference: weeds. Proceedings of an international conference, Brighton, UK, 20-23 November 1995., Vol. 1:201-206; 6 ref.

Marcone C, Ragozzino A, Seemnller E, 1997. Detection of Bermuda grass white leaf disease in Italy and characterization of the associated phytoplasma by RFLP analysis. Plant Disease, 81(8):862-866; 24 ref.

Marley PS, 1995. Cynodon dactylon: an alternative host for Sporisorium sorghi, the causal organism of sorghum covered smut. Crop Protection, 14(6):491-493

Martini G, Pedrinho AFF Jr, Felici GV, Piva FM, Durigan JC, 2002. Efficacy of a new formulation of glyphosate for control of Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) in citrus orchards. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 24(3):683-686.

May & Baker, 1964. Weeds of the West Indies and Mauritius. Dagenham, Essex, UK: May & Baker Ltd.

Miller DK, Richard EPJr, Griffin JL, 1998. Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control programs in succession-planted sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids). Journal - American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 18:18-30; 16 ref.

Mishra PJ, Mishra PK, Biswal S, Panda SK, Mishra MK, 2003. Studies on integrated weed management practices in spring planted sugarcane of coastal Orissa. Indian Sugar, 52(11):925-929; 5 ref.

Mohamed MA, Quisenberry SS, Croughan SS, 1997. Growth stimulant and antifeedant activity in Bermuda grass affecting the fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 90(5):1414-1225; 33 ref.

Montaldi ER, 1970. Cynodon dactylon: posible causa de su diageotropismo. Revista de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. INTA Serie 2(7):67-87.

Moody K, 1989. Weeds reported in Rice in South and Southeast Asia. Manila, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.

Moreira I, 1975. Propagation by seed of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. Anais do Instituto Superior de Agronomia, 35:95-112

Moreira I, 1980. Dominancia apical nos rizomas de Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. e de Panicum repens (L.). Efeito de gravidade, temperatura e nutricao azotasa. An Inst. Sup. Agron. Univ. Téc. Lisboa, 39:107.

Munshaw GC, Williams DW, Cornelius PL, 2001. Management strategies during the establishment year enhance production and fitness of seeded bermudagrass stolons. Crop Science, 41(5):1558-1564.

Nasr-Esfahani M, 1993. Soil-solarization for the control of weeds in Pantanagar. Integrated weed management for sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of an Indian Society of Weed Science International Symposium, Hisar, India, 18-20 November 1993 Hisar, Haryana, India; Indian Society of Weed Science, Vol. III:233-237

Nestorovic MLJ, Konstantinovic B, 2011. Overview of the Weed Flora in the Serbia. Contemporary Agriculture,The Serbian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 60:215-230.

Nir I, Koller D, 1976. Environmental control of flowering of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. Phytoparasitica, 4(2):142-3

Numata M, Yoshizawa N, 1975. Weed flora of Japan. Japan Association for the Advancement of Phyto-Regulators. Tokyo, Japan: Zenkoku Noson Kyoiku Kyokai.

Oakley L, 1999. Botánica y sistemática de Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. Revista Facultad de Agronomfa, Universidad de Buenos Aires, 19(1):3-10.

Odriozola E, Bretschneider G, Pagalday M, Odriozola H, Quiroz J, Ferreria J, 1998. Intoxicacion natural con Cynodon dactylon (pata de perdiz) en un rodeo de cria. Veterinaria, Argentina, 15(148):579-583.

Oerke EC, Dehne HW, Schönbeck F, Weber A, 1994. Crop production and crop protection: estimated losses in major food and cash crops. Crop production and crop protection: estimated losses in major food and cash crops., xxii + 808 pp.; [ref. at ends of chapters, available from publishers at PO Box 1991, Amsterdam, Netherlands or PO Box 945, Madison Square Station, NY 10160-0757, USA].

Overman AR, Brock KH, 2003. Confirmation of the expanded growth model for a warm-season perennial grass. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 34(7): 1105-1117.

Overman AR, Scholtz RV III, Taliaferro CM, 2001. Model analysis of response of bermudagrass to applied nitrogen. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 34(9-10):1303-1310.

Overman AR, Scholtz RV, Chambliss CG, 2003. Response of Coastal bermudagrass and Pensacola bahiagrass to applied nitrogen and seasonal rainfall. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 34 (7):1097-1103.

Oviedo Prieto R, Herrera Oliver P, Caluff MG, et al. , 2012. National list of invasive and potentially invasive plants in the Republic of Cuba - 2011. (Lista nacional de especies de plantas invasoras y potencialmente invasoras en la República de Cuba - 2011). Bissea: Boletín sobre Conservación de Plantas del Jardín Botánico Nacional de Cuba, 6(Special Issue 1):22-96.

Parker C, 1992. Weeds of Bhutan. Weeds of Bhutan., vi + 236 pp.

Perez E, Labrada R, 1985. Biological aspects of Cynodon dactylon. II. Phenology and plant productivity. Agrotecnia de Cuba, 17(2):37-45

Perez MB, Perez LA, Leguizamon ES, 1995. Capacidad regenerativa de poblaciones de gramón (Cynodon spp.) seg·n la profundidad y longitud de los rizomas. Gral Villegas. Buenos Aires, Argentina: INTA. Publicación Técnica 19.

Perez Montesbravo E, Labrada R, Duarte M, 1985. Biological aspects of Cynodon dactylon. I. Germination and budding of seeds and vegetative parts. Agrotecnia de Cuba, 17(1):69-77

Petetin CA, Zanelli M, 1973. The effect of temperature on the viability of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. rhizomes. Revista de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, 10(1):41-47

Phillips MC, 1993. Use of tillage to control Cynodon dactylon under small-scale farming conditions. Crop Protection, 12(4):267-272

Phillips MC, Moaisi K, 1993. Distribution of the rhizomes and roots of Cynodon dactylon in the soil profile and effect of depth of burial on regrowth of rhizome fragments. Brighton crop protection conference, weeds. Proceedings of an international conference, Brighton, UK, 22-25 November 1993 Farnham, UK; British Crop Protection Council (BCPC), Vol. 3:1167-1170

PIER, 2004. Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk. Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry. http://www.hear.org/pier/.

PIER, 2014. Pacific Islands Ecosystems at Risk. Honolulu, USA: HEAR, University of Hawaii. http://www.hear.org/pier/index.html

Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, 2011. Special edition of Environmental Weeds of Australia for Biosecurity Queensland., Australia: The University of Queensland and Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries. http://keyserver.lucidcentral.org/weeds/data/03030800-0b07-490a-8d04-0605030c0f01/media/Html/Index.htm

Rahman A, Sanders P, Nichols M (ed. ), Swain D, 1996. Succession of weed flora in some New Zealand asparagus crops. Proceedings of the VIII International asparagus symposium, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 21-26 Nov. 1993. Acta Horticulturae, 415: 279-284.

Ramarkrishnan PS, Singh VK, 1966. Differential response of the edaphic ecotypes in Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. to soil calcium. New Phytologist, 65:100-108.

Remes Lenicov AMM, Mariani R, 2001. Discovery of the vector of maize mosaic virus Peregrinus maidis (Homoptera: Delphacidae) in the province of Buenos Aires. Neotropica, 47:48.

Richard EP Jr, White B, Hoy J, King R, 2000. At-planting herbicides for bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) control in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids).29th Annual Joint Meeting, American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, Fort Walton Beach, Florida, USA. American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists Journal.

Richard EP Jr., 1996. Bermudagrass interference during a three-year sugarcane cycle. Part I. Sugar Journal, 58(10):32-33.

Richard EPJr, 1998. Control of perennated bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids). Weed Technology, 12(1):128-133; 19 ref.

Rivoir OR, Vigiani AR, Reyes Gorena H de los, 1987. Imazapyr. Tolerance of Pinus tpda and Eucalyptus viminalis to pre-transplant applications for weed control. Malezas, 15(1):35-45

Rochecouste E, 1962a. Studies on the biotypes of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. I. Botanical investigations. Weed Research, 2:1-23.

Rochecouste E, 1962b. Studies on the biotypes of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. II. Growth response to trichloroacteic acid and 2,2-dichloropropionic acid. Weed Research, 2:136-145.

Rosengurt B, Arrillaga BR, Sierra de Soriano B, 1960. Caracteres vegetativos y forrajeros de 175 gramineas del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Revista Facultad de Agronomfa, 47:1-168.

Sam ChoonKook, Kesavan-Padmaja, Liam ChongKin, Soon SiewChoo, Lim AhLan, Ong EngKok, 1998. A study of pollen prevalence in relation to pollen allergy in Malaysian asthmatics. Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology, 16(1):1-4; 9 ref.

Sarandón R, 1989. Biologfa poblacional del gramón. I. Variabilidad morfológica y ambiente. La Plata, Argentina: Revista Facultad de Agronomfa, 64:47-69.

Satorre EH, Rizzo FA, Arias SP, 1996. The effect of temperature on sprouting and early establishment of Cynodon dactylon. Weed Research (Oxford), 36(5):431-440; 19 ref.

Satour MM, El-Sherif EM, El-Ghareeb L, El-Hadad SA, El-Wakil HR, 1991. Achievements of soil solarization in Egypt. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper, No. 109:200-212

Sayed SA, Ahmed AN, Sadiq M, 1979. Effect of weed-crop competition on cotton production. Pakistan Cottons, 23(3/4):245-248

Sertkaya G, cinar A, 2002. Detection of some weed species as host of Spiroplasma citri Saglio et al. and its insect vector Circulifer haematoceps (M.-R.) (Hom.: Cicadellidae) in the Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Tu^umlaut~rkiye Herboloji Dergisi, 5(1):35-41; 19 ref.

Sesharee A, Prasad PVN, Rao KL, Rao KHP, 1996. Integrated weed management in gram (Cicer arietinum). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 41(3):496-497; 1 ref.

Silva PHAU de, Froud-Williams RJ, 1992. Variation in susceptibility to graminicides within populations of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. from various climatic zones and ecological habitats in Sri Lanka. IXe Colloque international sur la biologie des mauvaises herbes, 16-18 September 1992, Dijon, France Paris; France; ANPP, 447-456

Soerjani M, Kostermans AJGH, Tjitrosoepomo G, 1987. Weeds of Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia: Balai Pustaka, 716 pp.

Soerjani M, Pancho JV, Tjitrosoepomo G, eds, 1987. Weeds of rice in Indonesia. Balai Pustaka, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Sponheimer M, Robinson T, Roeder B, Hammer J, Ayliffe L, Passey B, Cerling T, Dearing D, Ehleringer J, 2003. Digestion and passage rates of grass hays by llamas, alpacas, goats, rabbits, and horses. Small Ruminant Research, 48(2):149-154.

Su SongNan, Peng HoJen, Yang SueYee, Tsai LaiChen, Chow LuPing, Huang SW, 2003. Purification and characterization of a novel isoallergen of a major Bermuda grass pollen allergen, Cyn d 1. Journal of Biomedical Science, 10(1):111-119; 34 ref.

Tepe I, Erman M, ipek K, Yazlik A, Levent R, 2002. Weeds and their densities in lentil in Van, Turkey. Tu^umlaut~rkiye Herboloji Dergisi, 5(1):42-51; 13 ref.

Thomas PEL, 1969. Effects of desiccation and temperature on survival of Cyperus esculentus tubers and Cynodon dactylon rhizomes. Weed Research, 9:1-8.

Thomas SM, Murray BG, 1978. Herbicide tolerance and polyploidy in Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. (Graminep). Annals of Botany, 42(177):137-143

Tselev NN, Fedorov AA, 1983. Grasses of the Soviet Union. Part 2. New Delhi, India: Oxonian Press Ltd.

Turner JE, Coblentz WK, Scarbrough DA, Coffey KP, Kellogg DW, McBeth LJ, Rhein RT, 2002. Changes in nutritive value of bermudagrass hay during storage. Agronomy Journal, 94(1):109-117.

Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA, 1980. Flora Europaea. Volume 5. Alismataceae to Orchidaceae (Monocotyledones). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 452pp.

US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1994. In: Aristida chaseae, Lyonia truncata var. proctorii, and Vernonia proctorii Recovery Plan. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 21 pp.

US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1997. In: Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered Status for Three Wetland Species Found in Southern Arizona and Northern Sonora, Mexico. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 25 pp.

US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2010. In: Scaevola coriacea (dwarf naupaka). 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 19 pp.

US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2010. In: Sesbania tomentosa (ohai). 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 24 pp.

US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2011. In: Panicum fauriei var. carteri (no common name). 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 17 pp.

USDA-NRCS, 2014. The PLANTS Database. Baton Rouge, USA: National Plant Data Center. http://plants.usda.gov/

Uygur FN, Koch W, Walter H, 1985. Investigation of the vegetative and generative development of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. and Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Mededelingen van de Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen, Rijksuniversiteit Gent, 47(1):247-256

Uygur S, 2000. Investigations on biological control of two common weeds, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. (bermudagrass) and Cichorium intybus L. (common chicory) in cukurova Region. Tu^umlaut~rkiye Herboloji Dergisi, 3(2):47-55; 12 ref.

Vaz Martins D, 1989. Producción de carne en Pasto Bermuda ( Cynodon dactylon .L.Pers) . Diálogo XIX. Procisur, 283-292.

Walker RH, Wehtje G, Richburg JSIII, 1998. Interference and control of large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) and southern sandbur (Cenchrus echinatus) in forage bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). Weed Technology, 12(4):707-711; 13 ref.

Waterhouse DF, 1993. The Major Arthropod Pests and Weeds of Agriculture in Southeast Asia. ACIAR Monograph No. 21. Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, 141 pp.

Webster TM, Coble HD, 1997. Changes in the weed species composition of the southern United States: 1974 to 1995. Weed Technology, 11(2):308-317; 22 ref.

Webster, TM, Bednarz CW, Hanna WW, 2003. Sensivity of Triploid Hybrid bermudagrass cultivars and common bermudagrass to postemergence herbicides. Weed Technology, 17:509-515.

Whistler WA, 1983. Weed handbook of Western Polynesia. Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Gesellschaft fnr Technische Zusammenarbeit, 157 pp.

Contributors

Top of page

20/05/14 Updated by:

Julissa Rojas-Sandoval, Department of Botany-Smithsonian NMNH, Washington DC, USA

Pedro Acevedo-Rodríguez, Department of Botany-Smithsonian NMNH, Washington DC, USA

Distribution Maps

Top of page
You can pan and zoom the map
Save map