Cronartium flaccidum (Scots pine blister rust)
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Distribution Table
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat List
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Growth Stages
- List of Symptoms/Signs
- Biology and Ecology
- Natural enemies
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Vectors
- Plant Trade
- Wood Packaging
- Impact Summary
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Detection and Inspection
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- Gaps in Knowledge/Research Needs
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Cronartium flaccidum (Alb. & Schwein.) G. Winter 1880
Preferred Common Name
- Scots pine blister rust
Other Scientific Names
- Cronartium asclepiadeum (Willd.) Fr. 1815
- Cronartium nemesiae Vestergr. 1896
- Cronartium paeoniae Castagne 1845
- Cronartium pedicularis Lindr. 1900
- Erineum asclepiadeum Willd. 1806
- Peridermium cornui Rostr. ex Kleb. 1890
- Sphaeria flaccida Alb. & Schwein. 1805
International Common Names
- English: blister: pine rust; blister: Scotch pine rust; Cronartium rust; pine stem rust; resin canker; resin top disease: pine; resin: pine canker; resin-top; resin-top disease; scotch pine blister rust
- Spanish: roya americana del grosellero; roya vesiculosa del pino
- French: rouille americaine du groseillier; rouille de la pivoine; rouille vesiculeuse de l'ecorce du pin
Local Common Names
- Finland: tervasroso
- Germany: Keinzopt; Kiefernrindenblasenrost
- Norway: tyritopp
- Sweden: törskate
- CRONFL (Cronartium flaccidum)
- ENDCPI (Endocronartium pini)
Summary of InvasivenessTop of page
C. flaccidum is a heteroecious rust fungus, completing different stages of its life cycle on different plants. Mating of haploid strains occurs on species of Pinus, followed by the production of aeciospores, which infect various species of herbaceous dicotyledons. An asexual stage producing urediniospores occurs on the dicotyledonous plants, followed by the production of teliospores, the sexual stage, that germinate to form basidiospores that infect pines thus completing the cycle. A closely-related autoecious rust, Endocronartium (Peridermium) pini, only infects Pinus hosts. C. flaccidum is known from Europe and parts of northern and eastern Asia; it is a Regulated Pest for the USA (USDA/APHIS, 2008). As an invasive in other temperate areas, this rust could be damaging on native and introduced pines or the alternate host species. The infections on pines develop slowly, therefore the fungus might be overlooked, such that accidental introduction of the rust could occur through the importation of conifer [Pinopsida] seedlings or trees.
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Fungi
- Phylum: Basidiomycota
- Subphylum: Pucciniomycotina
- Class: Pucciniomycetes
- Order: Pucciniales
- Family: Cronartiaceae
- Genus: Cronartium
- Species: Cronartium flaccidum
Notes on Taxonomy and NomenclatureTop of page
The diverse interactions of this heteroecious fungus with its hosts have resulted in a complicated nomenclature. Several species of Cronartium were initially identified for the rust on the various dicotyledons that are primary hosts. An anamorph, Peridermium cornui, was described as the aecial form of one of these species (Cronartium asclepiadeum) that is now synonymized with C. flaccidum (Wilson and Henderson, 1966).
Another Peridermium species, Peridermium pini (Willd.:Pers.) Lev., was found to be autoecious, living only on pines [Pinus]. A separate Cronartium name was established for it, but this species came to be viewed, instead, as a race of C. flaccidum (Wilson and Henderson, 1966; Hiratsuka, 1968). Hiratsuka (1969) created the genus, Endocronartium, for such autoecious forms of Cronartium-related rusts. This genus forms units that are more closely related to distinct species of Cronartium than to each other (Vogler and Bruns, 1998). A number of studies have elucidated the close genetic relationship between the heteroecious C. flaccidum and the autoecious P. pini (Moricca et al., 1996; Moricca and Ragazzi, 1998; Vogler and Bruns, 1998; Kasanen et al., 2000; Hantula et al., 2002) as well as the difficulty of separating them on a morphological basis (Gibbs et al., 1988; Kasanen, 1997; Kaitera et al., 1999b).
DescriptionTop of page
C. flaccidum is a heteroecious rust, the spermogonial and aecial stages occurring on species of “hard” or two-needled pines, and the uredinial and telial stages on the leaves of herbaceous species in dicotyledonous families such as Asclepiadaceae, Paeoniaceae, and Scrophulariaceae.
Spermogonia: caulicolous, on cankers, under bark, flat, yellow, turning brown, exuding spermatia in orange droplets.
Aecia: caulicolous, blister-like, 2-7 mm diameter, single or confluent; peridium several cells thick, white, peridial cells rhomboid-ellipsoid, walls thick, verrucose. Aeciospores in chains, globose, ovoid to ellipsoid, or polygonal, verrucose except for a smooth area, 21-36 x 14-24 µm, orange-yellow; wall hyaline, thick, 2-4 µm; warts 1-2 µm high.
Uredinia: hypophyllous, scattered or in groups, blister-like, 100-300 µm diameter. Peridium hemispherical, opening by a central pore. Urediniospores single on pedicel, ellipsoid to ovoid, sparsely echinulate, 18-30 x 11-22 µm, yellow; wall hyaline, 1.5-2.5 µm thick.
Telia: hypophyllous, often developing in uredinia, erumpent; teliospores in chains, adhering in columns to 2 mm or more long, pale orange to cinnamon-brown. Teliospores ellipsoid to cylindrical, not separating, 20-64 x 6-16 µm, smooth, with yellowish wall 1-3 µm thick.
Basidiospores: globose-subglobose, smooth, 4-12 µm diameter, their production giving a whitish appearance to upper ends of telia.
Endocronartium pini is an autoecious rust, generally considered a closely related form of C. flaccidum, cycling from pine to pine through the infection of needles by spores produced in aecia. These spores are morphologically aeciospores, but function as teliospores (Hiratsuka, 1969). Wilson and Henderson (1966) do not identify any morphological differences between the aecial stages of the two species. Hiratsuka (1968) reported that aeciospores of European isolates of E. pini germinated to produce, for the most part, determinate, septate, usually binucleate, but frequently uninucleate, germ tubes, whereas the aeciospores of C. flaccidum produced indeterminate, aseptate germ tubes that are more frequently binucleate. Subsequently, Gibbs et al. (1988), Kasanen (1997), and Kaitera et al. (1999b) suggested that these germ tube characteristics were not consistently different between the heteroecious and autoecious rusts, so that the aeciospores cannot be used to distinguished these species morphologically.
DistributionTop of page
C. flaccidum occurs in Europe and parts of northern and eastern Asia in the Northern Hemisphere (Smith et al., 1988; CABI, 1989). The autoecious form, Endocronartium pini, only occurs in Europe, according to Hiratsuka (1969), but Tai (1979) and Chen (2002) report it from China. Given the difficulty of distinguishing the two forms on Pinus without molecular examination or inoculation of dicotyledonous hosts (Hantula et al., 2002), some of the Asian reports might be erroneous. Azbukina (2008) expected to find E. pini in Siberia, but did not.
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
|Continent/Country/Region||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||Reference||Notes|
|Armenia||Present||CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|Azerbaijan||Present||CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|China||Restricted distribution||Chen, 2002; EPPO, 2014|
|-Anhui||Present||Cheng et al., 1998|
|-Guizhou||Present||Jing and Wang, 1989; Chen, 2002|
|-Heilongjiang||Present||CMI, 1989; Cheng et al., 1995; EPPO, 2014|
|-Hubei||Present||Jing and Wang, 1989; Chen, 2002|
|-Jiangsu||Present||CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|-Jilin||Present||CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|-Liaoning||Present||CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|-Nei Menggu||Present||Chen, 2002|
|-Shaanxi||Present||Jing and Wang, 1989; Jing et al., 1995; Cao et al., 2000; Zhuang and Wei, 2005|
|-Shanxi||Present||Cheng et al., 1998|
|-Sichuan||Present||CMI, 1989; Jing and Wang, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|-Yunnan||Present||CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|-Zhejiang||Present||CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|Georgia (Republic of)||Present||CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|India||Absent, invalid record||EPPO, 2014|
|Japan||Present||CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|-Hokkaido||Present||Not invasive||Hiratsuka, 1932|
|Korea, DPR||Present||EPPO, 2014|
|Korea, Republic of||Present||Yi et al., 1985; CMI, 1989; Cho and Shin, 2004; EPPO, 2014|
|Taiwan||Present||Hiratsuka and Chen, 1991|
|Austria||Present||Native||Widder, 1941; CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|Belgium||Present||Native||CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|Bulgaria||Widespread||Native||1960||Widder, 1941; CMI, 1989; Denchev, 1995; EPPO, 2014|
|Czech Republic||Widespread||EPPO, 2014|
|Czechoslovakia (former)||Widespread||Native||Klebahn, 1938; CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|Denmark||Present||Native||Ferdinandsen and Jørgensen, 1938; Hylander et al., 1953; Buchwald NF et al., 1961; CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|Estonia||Present||Native||CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|Finland||Widespread||Native||Invasive||Liro, 1907; Liro, 1908; CMI, 1989; Hantula et al., 1998; Kaitera and Hantula, 1998; EPPO, 2014|
|Former USSR||Present||Rozhkov, 1975; Storozhenko, 1987; Leont'eva and Stenina, 1990|
|France||Present||Native||Cornu, 1886; CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|Germany||Present||Native||Klebahn, 1901; Klebahn, 1938; CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|Greece||Present||Native||Invasive||Diamandis & de Kam, 1986; CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|Hungary||Widespread||Native||CMI, 1989; Szabo, 1998; EPPO, 2014|
|Ireland||Absent, invalid record||EPPO, 2014|
|Italy||Present||Native||Invasive||Morionde, 1975; Raddi et al., 1979; Ragazzi and Moriondo, 1980; CMI, 1989; Moricca et al., 1996; EPPO, 2014|
|Latvia||Present||Native||Kuprevich and Transchel, 1957|
|Lithuania||Present||Kuprevich and Transchel, 1957; EPPO, 2014|
|Montenegro||Present||Karadzic and Vujanovic, 2009|
|Netherlands||Present||Native||Hiratsuka, 1968; CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|Norway||Widespread||Native||Invasive||Jørstad, 1925; Hiratsuka, 1968; Roll-Hansen, 1973; CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|Poland||Present||Native||CMI, 1989; Siwecki and Chojnacki, 1989; Mulenko et al., 2004; EPPO, 2014|
|Portugal||Present, few occurrences||EPPO, 2014|
|-Portugal (mainland)||Present||Native||Gonçalves, 1936; CMI, 1989|
|Romania||Present||Native||Klebahn, 1938; CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|Russian Federation||Restricted distribution||Kuprevich and Transchel, 1957; EPPO, 2014|
|-Central Russia||Present||Native||Kuprevich and Transchel, 1957|
|-Eastern Siberia||Present||Native||Kuprevich and Transchel, 1957; EPPO, 2014|
|-Northern Russia||Present||Native||Invasive||CMI, 1989; Krutov, 1989|
|-Russia (Europe)||Restricted distribution||EPPO, 2014|
|-Russian Far East||Present||Native||CMI, 1989; Azbukina, 1995; Kakishima et al., 1995|
|-Southern Russia||Present||Native||Kuprevich and Transchel, 1957|
|-Western Siberia||Present||Native||Kuzmina and Kuz'Min, 2008; EPPO, 2014|
|Spain||Present||Native||CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|Sweden||Widespread||Native||Invasive||Rennerfelt, 1943; Rennerfelt, 1947; Hiratsuka, 1968; Klingström, 1973; Martinsson and Nilsson, 1987; CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|Switzerland||Restricted distribution||Native||Widder, 1941; CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|UK||Restricted distribution||Native||Wilson and Henderson, 1966; CMI, 1989; EPPO, 2014|
|-England and Wales||Restricted distribution||EPPO, 2014|
|-Scotland||Present||Greig, 1987; Greig and Sharpe, 1991; Pei and Gibbs, 1991|
|Ukraine||Present||Native||CMI, 1989; Dudka et al., 2004; EPPO, 2014|
|Yugoslavia (former)||Present||Native||CMI, 1989|
|Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)||Present||Widder, 1941|
Risk of IntroductionTop of page
The risk of introduction of either form of this rust is greater for those temperate parts of the Southern Hemisphere, such as Australia, where introduced Pinus species are grown in plantations (Neumann and Marks, 1996). Single-aged monoculture populations could suffer epidemics, in particular, if trees are at a susceptible age and the autoecious Endocronartium pini form is introduced. In addition, dicotyledonous hosts for the heteroecious C. flaccidum are native to the temperate countries of the Southern Hemisphere (USDA-ARS, 2009). Other alternate hosts (Gentiana spp., Paeonia spp.) may be introduced as ornamentals and be grown near introduced ornamental pines.
North America has a significant number of stem rusts of the genera Cronartium, Endocronartium and Peridermium on its native species of three-needled pines (Sinclair and Lyon, 2005), which are in a different section of the genus Pinus from the European two-needled hosts (USDA-ARS, 2009). The ecological situation into which C.flaccidum might invade is therefore complex. Some evidence exists of resistance in the native pines (Raddi and Fagnini, 1978; Kaitera and Nuorteva, 2008). Nevertheless, native or introduced primary (telial) hosts for C.flaccidum are present in North America (USDA-ARS, 2009). Among the USDA/APHIS Regulated Plant Pests, Rossman et al. (2006) place this species in the category of “Threat to major crop plants and forest trees”. Accidental introduction of the rust as a latent infection in pines or on pine wood, appears more likely than on ornamental dicotyledons, but the continent has no lack of pines for planting and regulatory agencies have established phytosanitary procedures (USDA/APHIS, 2008; Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 2009).
Introduction of E. pini to new temperate regions would require importation of infected seedlings without quarantine or the occurrence of viable aecia on bark-bearing pine wood materials or products. Apparently, due to regulatory vigilance or other circumstances, this has not happened yet.
HabitatTop of page
Moricca and Ragazzi (1996) found that C. flaccidum isolates had different cultural morphologies in different regions of Italy. Likewise, Gibbs et al. (1988) determined that Peridermium pini isolates from different parts of Great Britain have different culture morphologies. Kaitera et al. (1999a; 2005) identify C. flaccidum as occurring in southern Finland, whereas Endocronartium pini is found throughout the country. Nevertheless, the two forms can occur in the same or adjacent stands of P. sylvestris (Kaitera et al., 1999a).
Habitat ListTop of page
|Terrestrial – Managed||Managed forests, plantations and orchards||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural||Natural forests||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
Hosts/Species AffectedTop of page
The commercially valuable aecial hosts of C. flaccidum, specifically two-needled pines of Europe and Asia, vary in susceptibility (Raddi and Fagnini, 1978;Kaitera and Nuorteva 2008). Scots pine, Pinus sylvestris, is the common host in northern Europe, but appears to be less susceptible than the Mediterranean species when tested in southern Europe (Raddi and Fagnini, 1978). The North American three-needled pines tested were found to be relatively resistant. Less is known about the pine species reported as hosts in China (Tai, 1979; Teng, 1996; Cao et al., 2000; Chen, 2002; Zhuang and Wei, 2005), Japan (Kobayashi et al., 2007), Korea (Cho and Shin, 2004) and Taiwan (Hiratsuka and Chen, 1991). Raddi and Fagnini (1978) did not observe spotting on needles of young plants of the Asian species, Pinus densiflora, Pinusmassoniana and Pinus tabuliformis, which were exposed to natural basidiospore inoculation in Italy; these species appeared to be resistant.
The telial hosts of C. flaccidum are herbaceous dicotyledonous plants in at least 10 families, as demonstrated by inoculation tests (Wilson and Henderson, 1966; USDA/APHIS, 2008; Kaitera et al., 2012). Some of the species are not native to the geographic range of the rust, and infection was observed in gardens (Goncalves da Cunha, 1936; Gjaerum, 1974; BPI, 2009). Specialized forms referred to as formae speciales varying with respect to pathogenicity to various dicotyledonous hosts have been identified in Europe (Smith et al., 1988), but inoculation tests (Kaitera and Hantula, 1998; Kaitera, 1999; Kaitera et al., 1999a) have indicated that C. flaccidum has low host specificity. Although differences in host susceptibility within a plant genus were noted (Kaitera, 1999; Kaitera et al., 1999a), the broad host range of C. flaccidum suggests that additional host species are likely to be susceptible. Thus, the rust was recently reported from Paeonia daurica in Ukraine (Dudka et al., 2004) and Siphonostegia chinensis in China (Zhuang and Wei, 2005).
Growth StagesTop of page Vegetative growing stage
SymptomsTop of page
Infection of pine needles may or may not cause yellow-red spots on needles (Ragazzi et al., 1986; Smith et al., 1988); spots may appear only after some months (Ragazzi, 1989). Spermogonia appear within 1 or 2 years (Ragazzi, 1989) or later on older trees (Smith et al., 1988). The fungus grows into the shoots, which become swollen, and aecia are produced after one or two additional years (Grieg, 1987). Cankers on stems also bear blister-like pustules, containing orange-yellow spores, especially at bases of branch whorls (Butin, 1995), and the perennial growth of the fungus results in concentric zones of sporulation. Stems are flattened and deformed (Butin, 1995). Resin is produced from the cankers and in the wood underlying it. If cankers on the trunk grow large enough or separate cankers meet, girdling of the stem may result in death of the top or of the entire tree (Smith et al., 1988). The “resin top” name of the disease derives from the combined death of the tree top with copious visible resin generation. However, years may be required for infections to have this effect (Grieg, 1987). On Pinus sylvestris in Finland, Kaitera (2000) found that the average size of lesions bearing aecia on three- to twenty-year-old stems was about 4 cm in length.
On primary hosts, scattered, small chlorotic or necrotic spots appear on the upper side of leaves, with orange uredinia and, later, bristle-like yellowish to red-brown telia below (Wilson and Henderson, 1966; Ragazzi et al, 1987; Kaitera, 1999; Kaitera and Nuorteva, 2006). Spots are sometimes limited by veins (Ragazzi et al., 1987).
List of Symptoms/SignsTop of page
|Leaves / abnormal colours|
|Leaves / fungal growth|
|Leaves / yellowed or dead|
|Stems / canker on woody stem|
|Stems / dieback|
|Stems / gummosis or resinosis|
|Stems / mould growth on lesion|
Biology and EcologyTop of page
Teliospores in bristle-like telia on dicotyledonous primary host leaves germinate in spring to early summer and produce basidiospores that infect the young pine needles through stomates (Mordue and Gibson, 1978; Ragazzi et al., 1987). Mycelium grows through the needles into the cambium of stems and into the rays (Butin, 1995). Haploid spermogonia are the mating organs produced on shoots within 1 or 2 years; after fertilization, aecia are produced on the canker tissues during the summer of the next year or the year after that (Smith et al., 1988). Aeciospores are wind-blown to young leaves of herbaceous dicotyledons, where infection requires a film of free moisture; uredinia and telia develop on the lower sides of leaves (Ragazzi, 1983). Urediniospores are a repeating spore form, spreading the organism in multiple cycles to susceptible new leaves of the dicotyledonous hosts during the growing season. Telia develop in uredinia or directly from leaves (Ragazzi et al., 1987).
In the autoecious Endocronartium pini, the spores produced by aecia are capable of infecting pine directly, without an intervening telial stage. When free water is present, aeciospores germinate on needles and infect through stomates (Van der Kamp, 1970). Wounding of the stem can enhance infection (Wilson and Henderson, 1966; Gibbs et al., 1988), and infections through stem wounds are more damaging (Van der Kamp, 1970).
Moricca et al. (1996) identified three regions of DNA with high similarity in C. flaccidum and E. pini isolates from Europe. The 5.8s ribosomal gene sequence was highly conserved, but some heterogeneity appeared in the ITS1 and ITS2 regions. Nevertheless, the same sequence variants occurred in isolates of both fungi. Moricca and Ragazzi (1998) observed virtually identical restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) profiles, again, suggesting a high degree of affinity between the two fungi. A diagnostic difference between them, observed in single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis of a highly variable region, was of a type found in genetic analyses of differences within a species.
Hantula et al. (1998) also observed a high degree of similarity in two genetic regions in European C. flaccidum and E. pini. Results of additional tests using the two markers led Hantula et al. (2002) to consider the two forms to be the same species. For one highly variable marker, differentiation was lower between the two rusts than within populations of each form.
The two rusts are separated on the basis of their reproduction, because E. pini is autoecious, lacking the stage of sexual recombination on any primary host (Wilson and Henderson, 1966; Hantula et al., 2002). On the other hand, Gibbs et al. (1988) reported infection of a dicotyledonous host invitro, with production of telia, by isolates considered to be the autoecious form. This suggests that E. pini may be “facultatively heteroecious”, although Hantula et al. (2002) consider this unlikely. Kasanen et al. (2000) found support for E. pini as homothallic, if not clonal, whereas allele distribution among aecia of C. flaccidum provided evidence of both heterothallic and homothallic matings.
The spermogonia of E. pini appear to be self-fertilizing or non-functional (Hantula et al., 2002). Spermogonial fluid was observed on only a few infected plants in tests in Finland (Kaitera and Nuorteva, 2008).
Physiology and Phenology
Three specialized types of C. flaccidum in Europe have been proposed depending on the telial host genera and varying in geographic distribution (Smith et al., 1988). Scientific attention has focused on f. sp. typica in western Europe. Kaitera (1999) identified new primary hosts in the genus Melampyrum (Scrophulariaceae, now Orobanchaceae) infected by C. flaccidum in Finland; their susceptibility to the other two formae speciales was not examined.
The pine blister rust organisms also exhibit variations in morphology in culture. Pei and Gibbs (1991) found two morphological types of colonies derived from aeciospores that corresponded to two regions of E. pini in Great Britain. Likewise, Moricca and Ragazzi (1996) observed two groupings of C. flaccidum isolates with different cultural characters that were correlated to their geographic origins in Italy.
Mittempergher and Raddi (1977) observed differences in regional sources of C. flaccidum in Italy. A montane isolate was more virulent on Pinus nigra from the same region than were isolates from other habitats. E.pini spore collections from different areas of Finland also differ in virulence on the pine host, but no significant differences were observed among three C. flaccidum collections (Kaitera and Nuorteva, 2008).
Insect may play a role in mating in C. flaccidum based on the similarity of its life cycle to that of Cronartium ribicola (Mordue and Gibson, 1978; Smith et al., 1988). In that species, insects are attracted to sweet liquid produced from spermogonia and appear to promote fertilization by carrying spermatia between them (Hunt, 1997).
Pappinen and von Weissenberg (1994) investigated an interaction between Pissodes piniphilus, the pine top weevil, and E. pini. The weevils fed more often on infected branches than on healthy branches, and the fungus may infect through feeding wounds, but results were inconclusive concerning the role for the insect as vector of the fungus. E. pini is parasitized by the conidial fungus Tuberculina maxima (Wilson and Henderson, 1966; Gibbs et al., 1987), but that does not substantially affect losses due to rust (Moricca et al., 2001). Growth on the aecia apparently reduces sporulation rather than lesion expansion (Van der Kamp, 1970).
E. pini is parasitized by the conidial fungus Tuberculina maxima (Wilson and Henderson, 1966; Gibbs et al., 1987), but that does not substantially affect losses due to rust (Moricca et al., 2001). Growth on the aecia apparently reduces sporulation rather than lesion expansion (Van der Kamp, 1970).
ClimateTop of page
|Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summer||Preferred||Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summers|
|Cw - Warm temperate climate with dry winter||Preferred||Warm temperate climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry winters)|
|Ds - Continental climate with dry summer||Preferred||Continental climate with dry summer (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, dry summers)|
|Dw - Continental climate with dry winter||Preferred||Continental climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, dry winters)|
Natural enemiesTop of page
Notes on Natural EnemiesTop of page
Tuberculina maxima (van der Kamp, 1970) and Cladosporium tenuissimum (Moricca et al., 1999; 2001) are naturally occurring hyperparasites of C. flaccidum.
T. maxima invades C. flaccidum aecia, which reduces the formation and sporulation of aeciospores (van der Kamp, 1970; Gibbs et al., 1987). The fungus also infects the spermogonia of Cronartium spp. and has been found on Cronartium spp. uredinia and telia (Wicker, 1981). In the UK, T. maxima reduced the aecia production of E. pini by 30% (van der Kamp, 1970).
C. tenuissimum inhibits C. flaccidum aeciospore germination in vitro, parasitizes aeciospores and destroys their cell wall, probably using enzymes (Moricca et al., 2001).
No control measures are available in practice to use T. maxima or C. tenuissimum for reducing Cronartium spp. incidence on Pinus spp. (Wicker, 1981; Moricca et al., 2001).
Means of Movement and DispersalTop of page
Rust aeciospores, urediniospores and sporidia (basidiospores) are distributed by wind (Alexopoulos et al., 1996; Hunt, 1997). Aeciospores and urediniospores may be disseminated greater distances than the basidiospores, which may be limited to less than 500 metres (Hunt, 1997).
An association of Endocronartium pini with pine top weevils may involve transmission, but results were inconclusive (Pappinen and von Weissenberg, 1994).
Introduction of either form of the rust would be possible if seedlings or young trees were transported while the systemic infections were latent (USDA/APHIS, 2008).
Pathway VectorsTop of page
Plant TradeTop of page
|Plant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transport||Pest stages||Borne internally||Borne externally||Visibility of pest or symptoms|
|Bark||hyphae; spores||Yes||Yes||Pest or symptoms not visible to the naked eye but usually visible under light microscope|
|Leaves||hyphae; spores||Yes||Yes||Pest or symptoms not visible to the naked eye but usually visible under light microscope|
|Stems (above ground)/Shoots/Trunks/Branches||hyphae; spores||Yes||Yes||Pest or symptoms not visible to the naked eye but usually visible under light microscope|
|Wood||hyphae||Yes||Pest or symptoms not visible to the naked eye but usually visible under light microscope|
|Plant parts not known to carry the pest in trade/transport|
|Fruits (inc. pods)|
|Growing medium accompanying plants|
|True seeds (inc. grain)|
Wood PackagingTop of page
|Wood Packaging not known to carry the pest in trade/transport|
|Loose wood packing material|
|Processed or treated wood|
|Solid wood packing material with bark|
|Solid wood packing material without bark|
Impact SummaryTop of page
ImpactTop of page Severe epidemics on Pinus sylvestris caused by C. flaccidum have been reported in Sweden (Rennerfelt, 1943; 1947; Martinsson and Nilsson, 1987), Norway (Jørstad, 1925; Roll-Hansen, 1973), Finland (Kaitera et al., 1994; Kaitera, 2000; Kankaanhuhta et al., 2000), Germany (Klebahn, 1938), Greece (Diamandis and de Kam, 1986), UK (Wilson and Henderson, 1966; Murray et al., 1969; Gibbs et al., 1987; Greig, 1987), Russia (Krutov, 1989; Azbukina, 1995) and China (Jing and Wang, 1989). In Italy, C. flaccidum epidemics on Pinus nigra, Pinus pinea and Pinus pinaster were frequently reported from 1953 to 1972 (Moriondo, 1975).
In Finland, severe C. flaccidum epidemics have been reported in young P. sylvestris stands, with about 70% of trees infected (Kaitera, 2000). In some locations in Germany, 21-28% of P. sylvestris over 40 years of age were infected by C. flaccidum (Mülder, 1953). In northern Norway, Endocronartium pini affected 60% of P. sylvestris in some stands (Jørstad, 1925). In Thetford forest in England, UK, the number of P. sylvestris trees infected by E. pini increased from 1 to 10% from 1964 to 1979 (Greig, 1987). A C. flaccidum epidemic in Greece killed 5000 m³ of Pinus spp. trees over a 1000 ha area (Diamandis and de Kam, 1986).
In Sweden, E. pini and C. flaccidum caused 40-70% losses in radial increment in mature P. sylvestris stands (Martinsson and Nilsson, 1987). In northern Finland, E. pini reduced the volume of saw timber trees in mature P. sylvestris stands by 2% in trees bearing stem lesions and by 10% in trees with dead tops (Kaitera et al., 1994). The corresponding reductions in marketing value of saw timber trees were 18 and 15%, respectively (Kaitera et al., 1994). In Scotland, UK, E. pini occurred most frequently in old trees; over 50% of the stands infected by E. pini were more than 30 years old (Murray et al., 1969) and the annual loss in timber wood was 4500 m³. In Italy, C. flaccidum reduced the annual height increment more in severely affected P. nigra trees than in slightly affected trees in years of severe rust incidence (Mittempergher and Raddi, 1975).
Risk and Impact FactorsTop of page Invasiveness
- Has a broad native range
- Abundant in its native range
- Highly adaptable to different environments
- Highly mobile locally
- Long lived
- Has high reproductive potential
- Reproduces asexually
- Host damage
- Negatively impacts forestry
- Negatively impacts livelihoods
- Reduced amenity values
- Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant
- Difficult to identify/detect in the field
- Difficult/costly to control
DiagnosisTop of page
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified fragments of two regions of rDNA can be used in restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis to distinguish alternating from non-alternating isolates of pine blister rust (Moricca and Ragazzi, 1998). Sequences for several regions of rDNA, particularly those for the 5.8s rRNA examined by Moricca et al. (1996), are currently available in GenBank for comparison (NCBI, 2009).
Detection and InspectionTop of page
The delay of sporulation for months or years after infection of pines (Wilson and Henderson, 1966) reduces the reliability of single inspections of seedlings and young trees to detect this fungus. Spots may or may not result from infection of needles (Raddi et al., 1979; Ragazzi et al., 1986). Infection through wounded stems is also possible (Wilson and Henderson, 1966). Established infections produce cankers with blister-like aecia on stems or bark-bearing wood. In the field, nearby herbaceous alternate hosts can be examined for the presence of uredinia and/or bristle-like telial columns on the undersides of leaves (Kaitera et al., 2005).
Similarities to Other Species/ConditionsTop of page
Hantula et al. (2002) showed that C. flaccidum and the autoecious rust Endocronartium pini are genetically almost indistinguishable despite differences in life cyle. The two cannot be distinguished by aeciospore morphology (Kasanen, 1997; Kaitera et al., 1999b). Inoculation tests on the dicotyledonous alternate hosts should establish the difference (Kaitera, 1999; Kaitera et al., 1999a; Kaitera and Nuorteva, 2008, but see Gibbs et al., 1988). Moricca and Ragazzi (1998) identified a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) technique that distinguished the two forms on the basis of one electrophoretic band resulting from Hinf1 restriction endonuclease digestion of the IGS1 region of rDNA.
In North America, there are at least 11 species of Cronartium including Cronartium ribicola and six species of Peridermium that infect trees in the genus Pinus (Sinclair and Lyon, 2005). To a certain extent, these can be distinguished by aeciospore and urediniospore morphology, as well as by symptomatology. Some cause stem cankers, and other rusts produce galls or witchs’ brooms in infected stems or branches. Others cause no stem symptoms at all (Sinclair and Lyon, 2005). Although some of the common Eurasian hosts have been naturalized e.g. Pinus sylvestris (USDA-NCRS, 2009), tests indicate that the three-needled pines native to North America are not susceptible to C. flaccidum (Raddi and Fagnini, 1978; Kaitera and Nuorteva, 2008). Cronartium comandrae, a widespread North American pine stem rust that also infects introduced two-needled species, also hosts for C. flaccidum, produces unique tear-drop-shaped aeciospores on pine (Sinclair and Lyon, 2005).
Other European rusts that can attack pines have a heteroecious life cycle similar to that of C. flaccidum, but usually infect different alternate hosts. Coleosporium tussilaginis, the pine needle rust, shares a few telial hosts with the blister rust, but produces its spermogonia and aecia on pine needles, not on stems (Smith et al., 1988). Also, teliospores of this rust on species of Melampyrum are single and cylindrical, produced not in long columns, but in waxy crusts (Wilson and Henderson, 1966). Melampsora populnea infects the shoots of two-needled pines, causing shoot bending and/or tip death (Smith et al., 1988). Its linear aecia lack a peridium and the aeciospores are significantly smaller than those of C. flaccidum (Wilson and Henderson, 1966).
Although their aeciospores cannot be distinguished even at the level of scanning electron microscopy (Kasanen, 1997), the invasive species C. ribicola does not infect the primary hosts of C. flaccidum in Europe (Kaitera and Nuorteva, 2006) or the same species of pines, because it is restricted to five-needled (soft) pines (Sinclair and Lyon, 2005). Butin (1995) notes that C. flaccidum tends to infect at the top of a tree rather than at the base of stems or of lower branches, where C. ribicola infection is usually found.
Prevention and ControlTop of page
Given the possibility of latent infections in Pinus, phytosanitary post-entry quarantine of any imported plants is necessary (USDA/APHIS, 2008). Accidental introduction would also likely be prevented by controlling bark-bearing wood in shipping materials from areas where the rust occurs (see Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 2009: MAF, 2009).
Butin (1995) recommends removal of infected branches or trees in stands where the disease is already present. Pruning of infected branches may or may not prevent development of additional cankers on the trunk, although the general purpose of removing inoculum is achieved (Moricca and Ragazzi, 2008).
Cultural control and sanitary measures
Basidiospores are disseminated only over a short distance (Hunt, 1997), therefore removal of the primary hosts from the vicinity of limited plantings of pine is a measure that can reduce infection by the heteroecious C. flaccidum (Mordue and Gibson, 1978; Butin, 1995). In Italy, the alternate host is too common for this effort to be effective or worthwhile; however, development of a “hazard map” of the known distribution of the alternate host allows for planting of susceptible pines away from sources of inoculum (Moricca and Ragazzi, 2008).
The use of fungicides may be practical for rust control on plantation, nursery and garden trees, but is impractical in forests (Moricca and Raghazzi, 2008).
The hyperparasite Cladosporium tenuissimum is proposed by Moricca et al. (2001) as a possible means of control for stem rust. The aeciospores are directly penetrated and parasitized by the conidial fungus. Tests on two-year-old pine seedlings in the greenhouse showed that treatment with the parasite prevented new rust infections by an average of 42%.
Selection of more resistant species or provenances of pines for growing in areas of stem blister rust is a feasible and promising means of control; although Moricca et al. (2001) state that breeding efforts were not successful. The testing methodology may be a major factor in the usefulness of results obtained. Because the fungus develops slowly even in susceptible plants, progress in rating the plants for resistance must be slow.
Raddi and Fagnini (1978) used three methods to inoculate seedlings and young plants of different pine species with basidiospores of C. flaccidum. Species from southern Europe were susceptible whereas North American and Asian species appeared resistant. In later tests, differing levels of susceptibility were found in three of the European species (Raddi et al., 1979) and results indicated that selection for resistance might be possible in Pinus pinaster.
Although P. sylvestris appeared resistant in the limited tests in Italy (Raddi and Fagnani, 1978),it is a major host species in northern Europe, and differences in susceptibility have been observed (Mordue and Gibson, 1978). Over a number of years, Kaitera and Nuorteva (2008) tested seedlings 1-7 years old with aeciospores of E. pini and basidiospores of C. flaccidum. Little disease was obtained and no significant differences among provenances of Finnish trees were observed. The apparent resistance of the introduced American species Pinus contorta in the same tests led the researchers to recommend use of that species as an alternative to Pinus sylvestris in Finland.
Although levels of rust disease caused by both forms were low (10% or less), Kuzmina and Kuz’min (2008) did find variation in the resistance of “climatypes” of P. sylvestris from different parts of Russia in trials in Western Siberia. Soil type and humidity affected the severity of disease as well as the strength of the provenance tests.
Among the several alternate hosts of C. flaccidum, differences in susceptibility would be expected as well. Roll-Hansen (1973) found strong resistance in some Paeonia (ornamental peony) cultivars and suggested that use of those in gardens could assist in control of C. flaccidum. Kaitera et al. (1999a) also observed variation in susceptibility among telial hosts in several genera, including Paeonia, but found the rust to have a low host specificity in general, because infections by Finnish isolates occurred on both native and non-native species.
Gaps in Knowledge/Research NeedsTop of page
Additional information is needed on variation within C. flaccidum as well as on its relationship with Endocronartium pini. The existence of specialized forms with respect to pathogenicity on telial hosts and/or on the pine species should be investigated beyond western Europe, particularly in Asia, where available host species differ.
ReferencesTop of page
Azbukina ZM, 1995. Cronartium species on Pinus species in the Russian far east. In: Kaneko S, Katsuya K, Kakishima M, Ono Y, eds. Proceedings of the 4th IUFRO Rusts of pines Working Party Conference, Tsukuba, Japan, 65-69.
Bagyanarayana G, 1989. Rusts of pine from India. In: Hiratsuka Y, Samoil JK, Blenis PV, Crane PE, Laishley BL, eds. Rusts of Pine. Proceedings of the IUFRO Rusts of Pine Working Party Conference, Canada. Forestry Canada, 333-337.
BPI (US National Fungus Collections), 2009. Fungal Databases - Specimens. Beltsville, USA: Systematic Mycology and Microbiology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA. www.nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/specimens/specimens.cfm
Buchwald NF et al., 1961. Lists of parasitical fungi and of hosts of such fungi: Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden. I. Pinus, Populus, Quercus. Medd. Norsk. Skogfors°ksvesen, 17.
Chen MM, 2002. Forest fungi phytogeography: Forest fungi phytogeography of China, North America, and Siberia and international quarantine of tree pathogens. Sacramento, USA: Pacific Mushroom Research and Education Center, 469 pp.
Cheng DS; Xue Y; Shao LP, 1995. Differentiation among Cronartium species from northeast China by isozyme analysis. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Rusts of Pines Working Party Conference, Tsukuba. Tsukuba, Japan: Institute of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Tsukuba, 71-75.
Cornu M, 1886. Nouvel exemple de gTnTrations alternantes chez les champignons urTdinTes (Cronartium asclepiadeum et Peridermium pini corticolum). Paris, France: C.R. Hebd. Acad. Sc., 102:930-932.
EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm
Ferdinandsen C; Jørgensen CA, 1938. Skovtraeernes sygdomme. København, Denmark: Nordisk Forlag.
Gibbs JN; Greig BJW; Hickman IT, 1987. An analysis of Peridermium stem rust of Scots pine in Thetford Forest in 1984 and 1985. Forestry, 60:204-218.
Greig BJW, 1987. History of Peridermium stem rust of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Thetford Forest, East Anglia. Forestry, 60:193-202.
Grzywacz A; Wazny J, 1973. The impact of industrial air pollutants on the occurrence of several important pathogenic fungi of forest trees in Poland. European Journal of Forest Pathology, 3(3):129-141
Gäumann E, 1959. Die Rostpilze Mitteleuropas. Bern, Switzerland: Buchler & Co.
Haack G, 1914. Der Kienzopf (Peridermium pini (Willd.) Kleb.). Seine _bertragung von Kiefer zu Kiefer ohne Zwischenwirt. Zeitschrift fnr Forst- und Jagdwesen, 46:3-46.
Hantula J; Kasanen R; Kaitera J; Moricca S, 2002. Analyses of genetic variation suggest that pine rusts Cronartium flaccidum and Peridermium pini belong to the same species. Mycological Research, 106(2):203-209; 28 ref.
Hantula J; Niemi EM; Kaitera J; Jalkanen R; Kurkela T, 1998. Genetic variation of the resin top fungus in Finland as determined by random amplified microsatellites (RAMS). European Journal of Forest Pathology, 28(6):361-372; 13 ref.
Hertz M, 1930. Tutkimus mSnnyn tervasroson kehityksestS ja vaikutuksista. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae, 15:1-40.
Hiratsuka N, 1932. Inoculation experiments with some heteroecious species of the Melampsoraceae in Japan. Japanese Journal of Botany, 6:1-33.
Hiratsuka Y, 1968. Morphology and cytology of aeciospores and aeciospore germ tubes of host-alternating and pine-to-pine races of Cronartium flaccidum in northern Europe. Canadian Journal of Botany, 46:1119-1122.
Hiratsuka Y, 1969. Endocronartium, a new genus for autoecious pine stem rusts. Canadian Journal of Botany, 47:1493-1495.
Hiratsuka Y, 1995. Pine stem rusts of the world-frame work for a monograph. In: Kaneko S, Katsuya K, Kakishima M, Ono Y, eds. Proceedings of the 4th IUFRO Rusts of pines Working Party Conference, Tsukuba, Japan, 1-8.
Hylander N; Jrstad I; Nannfeldt JA, 1953. Enumeration uredionea rum scandinavicarum. Opera Botanica, 1:1-102.
Jing Y; Li WH; Zhao SG, 1995. Study on pine rusts in Northwest China. In: Kaneko S, Katsuya K, Kakishima M, Ono Y, eds. Proceedings of the Fourth IUFRO Rusts of Pines Working Party Conference, Tsukuba. Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan: Laboratory of Plant Pathology & Mycology, University of Tsukuba, 37-41.
Jing Y; Wang P, 1989. A study of the blister rust of Pinus massoniana of China. In: Hiratsuka Y, Samoil JK, Blenis PV, Crane PE, Laishley BL, eds. Rusts of Pine. Proceedings of the IUFRO Rusts of Pine Working Party Conference, Canada. Forestry Canada, 302-312.
Jurc D, 2007. Diseases of shoots, branches and trunk. Gremeniella abietina, Cronartium flaccidum, Melampsora pinitorqua. (Bolezni poganjkov, vej in debla. Gremeniella abietina, Cronartium flaccidum, Melampsora pinitorqua.) Gozdarski Vestnik, 65(2):89-104. http://www.dendro.bf.uni-lj.si/gozdv.html
Jørstad I, 1925. Norske skogsykdommer I. Nsletresykdommer bevirket av rustsopper, ascomyceter og fungi imperfecti. Meddelanden fra det Norske skogforsøksvesen, 62:19-186.
Kaitera J, 1999. The effect of storage temperature, time and spore source on the germination of Cronartium flaccidum and Peridermium pini aeciospores in vitro. Karstenia, 39:69-75.
Kaitera J; Aalto T; Jalkanen R, 1994. Effect of resin-top disease caused by Peridermium pini on the volume and value of Pinus sylvestris saw timber and pulpwood. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 9(4):376-381
Kaitera J; Fedorkov A; Jalkanen R; Krutov V; Tsvetkov V, 1995. Occurrence of Gremmeniella abietina damage on Scots pine along a pollution gradient from Monchegorsk nickel smelter to western Lapland. European Journal of Forest Pathology, 25(1):13-23
Kaitera J; Hiltunen R; Samils B, 2012. Alternate host ranges of Cronartium flaccidum and Cronartium ribicola in northern Europe. Botany, 90(8):694-703. http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/full/10.1139/b2012-039
Kaitera J; Nuorteva H, 2003. Cronartium flaccidum produces uredinia and telia on Melampyrum nemorosum and on Finnish Vincetoxicum hirundinaria. Forest Pathology, 32:1-9.
Kaitera J; Nuorteva H, 2008. Inoculations of eight Pinus species with Cronartium and Peridermium stem rusts. Forest Ecology and Management, 255(3/4):973-981. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03781127
Kaitera J; Nuorteva H; Hantula J, 2005. Distribution and frequency of Cronartium flaccidum on Melampyrum spp. in Finland. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35(2):229-234. http://pubs.nrc-crnc.gc.ca/.
Kaitera J; SeitamSki L; Hantula J; Jalkanen R; Kurkela T, 1999. Inoculation of known and potential alternate hosts with Peridermium pini and Cronartium flaccidum aeciospores. Mycological Research, 103(2):235-241; 27 ref.
Kakishima M; Imazu M; Katsuya K; Azbukina ZM; Ono Y; Kaneko S; Hiratsuka Y; Sato S, 1995. Preliminary survey of pine blister rusts in the Russian Far East. In: Kaneko S, Katsuya K, Kakishima M, Ono Y, eds. Proceedings of the Fourth IUFRO Rusts of Pines Working Party Conference, Tsukuba. Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan: Laboratory of Plant Pathology & Mycology, University of Tsukuba, 49-63.
Kankaanhuhta V; MSkisara K; Tomppo E; Piri T; Kaitera J, 2000. Monitoring of diseases caused by Heterobasidion annosum and Peridermium pini in Norway spruce and Scots pine stands by airborne imaging spectrometry (AISA). MetsSntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja, 782:113-131.
Karadzic D; Vujanovic V, 2009. Aleppo pine defence against Sphaeropsis sapinea, Cronartium flaccidum and other fungal pathogens in the Mediterranean part of Montenegro. Glasnik ?umarskog Fakulteta, Univerzitet u Beogradu, No.99:59-74. http://user.sezampro.yu/~sf.bg
Klebahn H, 1901. Kulturversuche mit Rostpilzen X. Zeitschrift fnr Pflanzenkrankheiten, 11:132-151.
Klebahn H, 1905. Kulturversuche mit Rostpilzen XII. Zeitschrift fnr Pflanzenkrankheiten, 15:65-108.
Klebahn H, 1907. Kulturversuche mit Rostpilzen XIII. Zeitschrift fnr Pflanzenkrankheiten, 17:129-157.
Klebahn H, 1914. Kulturversuche mit Rostpilzen XV. Zeitschrift fnr Pflanzenkrankheiten, 24:1-32.
Klebahn H, 1916. Kulturversuche mit Rostpilzen XVI. Zeitschrift fnr Pflanzenkrankheiten, 26:257-277.
Klebahn H, 1918. Peridermium pini (Willd.) Kleb. und seine _bertragung von Kiefer zu Kiefer. Flora, 11:194-207.
Klebahn H, 1924. Kulturversuche mit Rostpilzen XVII. Zeitschrift fnr Pflanzenkrankheiten, 34:289-303.
Klingström A, 1973. Studies on free amino acid contents in the aeciospores of Endocronartium pini and Cronartium flaccidum. European Journal of Forest Pathology, 3:209-214.
Krutov VI, 1989. Gribnye bolezni hvoinyh porod v iskusstvennyh tsenozah taejnoi zony Evropeiskogo Severa SSSR: Petrozavodsk.
Lagerberg T, 1912. Studier ÷fver den norrlSndska tallens sjukdomar, sSrskildt med hSnsyn till dess f÷ryngring. Meddelanden frsn Statens Skogsf÷rs÷ksanstalt, 9:135-170.
Laundon GF, 1976. Peridermium (Fungi). Taxon, 25:186-187.
Liro JI, 1907. Kulturversuche mit Finnischen Rostpilzen. II. Acta Societatis Pro Fauna et Flora Fennica, 29:1-58.
Liro JI, 1908. Uredinae Fennicae. Bidrag till kSnnedom af Finlands natur och folk, 65:1-567.
MAF, 2009. Search results - Endocronartium pini., New Zealand: Biosecurity New Zealand, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry., unpaginated. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/search/node/Endocronartium+pini
Mnlder D, 1953. Die Disposition der Kiefer fnr den Kienzopfbefall als Kernproblem waldbautechnischer Abwehr. Schriftenreihe der Forstlichen FakultSt der UniversitSt G÷ttingen und Mitteilungen der NiedersSchsischen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt, 10:1-35.
Moricca S; Kasuga T; Mitchelson K; Ragazzi A; Diamandis S, 1996. Heterogeneity in intergenic regions of the ribosomal repeat of the pine-blister rusts Cronartium flaccidum and Peridermium pini. Current Genetics, 29(4):388-394; 41 ref.
Moricca S; Ragazzi A, 2008. Biological and integrated means to control rust diseases. In: Integrated Management of Plant Pests and Diseases, 3 [ed. by Ciancio, A.\Mukerji, K. G.]. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 303-329.
Moricca S; Ragazzi A; Mitchelson KR, 1999. Molecular and conventional detection and identification of Cladosporium tenuissimum on two-needle pine rust aeciospores. Canadian Journal of Botany, 77(3):339-347; 32 ref.
Moricca S; Ragazzi A; Mitchelson KR; Assante G, 2001. Antagonism of the two-needle pine stem rust fungi Cronartium flaccidum and Peridermium pini by Cladosporium tenuissimum in vitro and in planta. Phytopathology, 91(5):457-468; 59 ref.
Murray JS; Millar CS; van der Kamp BJ, 1969. Incidence and importance of Peridermium pini (Pers.) LTv. in North-east Scotland. Forestry, 42:165-184.
Olembo TW, 1971. A study on the mode of infection of Pinus sylvestris L. by Peridermium pini (Pers.) LTv. Forestry, 44:67-79.
Ragazzi A, 1983. Development of Cronartium flaccidum (Alb. et Schw.) Wint. on Vincetoxicum officinale Moench in connection with some environmental factors. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift, 108(2):160-171
Ragazzi A; Mesturino L, 1986. The possibility of Vincetoxicum officinale infection by pciospores of Cronartium flaccidum (Alb. et Schw.) Wint. at high temperatures. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 25(1-3):73-75
Ragazzi A; Moricca S; Dellavalle I, 1995. Growth of axenic cultures of Cronartium flaccidum on callus tissue from Pinus nigra var. laricio and Pinus sylvestris. European Journal of Forest Pathology, 25(1):31-37
Ragazzi A; Moricca S; Dellavalle I, 1998. Disease gradient of Cronartium flaccidum on its intermediate host Vincetoxicum hirundinaria. Zeitschrift fu^umlaut~r Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, 105(1):58-63; 16 ref.
Ragazzi A; Moriondo F, 1980. Results of Cronartium flaccidum (Alb. & Schw.) Wint. inoculations on eight-year-old plants of Pinus pinea L. In: Powers HR, Grasso V, Raddi P, ed. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 19:51-56
Rennerfelt E, 1947. Om f÷rekomsten av blssroststadiet i Peridermium-angripna tallbestsnd. Meddelanden frsn Statens Skogsforskningsinstitut, 6:191-215.
Roll-Hansen F, 1973. Resistance of Paeonia cultivars to Cronartium flaccidum in Norway. European Journal of Forest Pathology, 3:142-145.
Rossman AY; Britton K; Luster D; Palm M; Royer MH; Sherald J, 2006. Evaluating the threat posed by fungi on the APHIS List of Regulated Plant Pests. Plant Health Progress, May:1-3. http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/php/
Siwecki R; Chojnacki B, 1989. Epidemiology of Scots pine rusts in Poland. In: Hiratsuka Y, Samoil JK, Blenis PV, Crane PE, Laishley BL, eds. Rusts of pine. Proceedings of the IUFRO Rusts of Pine Working Party Conference, Canada. Forestry Canada, 158-163.
Szabo I, 1998. Occurrence and importance of rust fungi in Hungarian forests. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Paper, 712:9-13.
Tai FL, 1979. Sylloge Fungorum Sinicorum. Beijing, China: Science Press Academica Sinica, 1527 pp.
USDA/APHIS, 2008. Circular 34: Diseases of Picea spp. Post-entry Quarantine Manual for State Inspectors. Washington DC, USA: USDA, 10-152. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/domestic/downloads/postentry.pdf
USDA-ARS, 2009. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx
van der Kamp BJ, 1968. Peridermium pini (Pers.) LTv. and the resin-top disease of Scots pine. I. A review of the literature. Forestry, 41:189-198.
van der Kamp BJ, 1970. Peridermium pini (Pers.) LTv. and the resin-top disease of Scots pine. III. Infection and lesion development. Forestry, 43:73-88.
Widder F, 1941. Untersuchungen nber forstschSdliche Cronartium-arten. +sterreichlicher Botanischer Zeitschrift, 90:107-117.
Wilson M; Henderson DM, 1966. British rust fungi. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Yi CK; Kim HJ; La YJ, 1985. Cronartium flaccidum found on Pinus densiflora in Korea. In: Ko JH, La YJ, eds. Proceedings of the Joint Conference IUFRO Working Party on Forest Gall Midges and Rusts of Pines. Suweon, Korea: Korean Forestry Society, 149-161.
ContributorsTop of page
19/08/09 Updated by:
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/