Commelina diffusa (spreading dayflower)
Index
- Pictures
- Identity
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Description
- Distribution
- Distribution Table
- Habitat
- Habitat List
- Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
- Growth Stages
- Biology and Ecology
- Natural enemies
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Impact
- Uses List
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- References
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate reportIdentity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Commelina diffusa Burm. f. (1768)
Preferred Common Name
- spreading dayflower
Other Scientific Names
- Commelina agraria Kunth (1843)
- Commelina aquatica J.K.Morton (1956)
- Commelina communis Benth., non L. (1849)
- Commelina longicaulis Jacq.
- Commelina nudiflora auct. non L.
International Common Names
- English: dayflower; french weed; pond grass; water grass
- Spanish: Babosilla; Canutillo; Tripa de pollo
- French: curage; herbe de l'eau
Local Common Names
- Bangladesh: manaina
- Cuba: canutillo
- Indonesia: brangbangan
- Japan: Shimatsuyukusa
- Philippines: alibangon
- Thailand: phak-prap
EPPO code
- COMDI (Commelina diffusa)
Taxonomic Tree
Top of page- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Plantae
- Phylum: Spermatophyta
- Subphylum: Angiospermae
- Class: Monocotyledonae
- Order: Commelinales
- Family: Commelinaceae
- Genus: Commelina
- Species: Commelina diffusa
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Top of pageDescription
Top of pageDistinguishing features include the long, open spathe with an acute apex, the lanceolate to broadly lanceolate leaves and seeds which are finely reticulated and ridged on one side (Holm et al., 1977); it is not geocarpic. The stem can be up to 100 cm long. The leaves are lanceolate to broadly lanceolate, 4-6 cm long, and gradually acute to acuminate. It has bracts subtending the flower (spathe), which are broad, rounded or shallow heart-shaped at the base and gradually tapering above to a rather acute apex 2-3 cm long, 1.5-2 cm wide when unfolded. There are hairs on the margins of the leaves. Flowers are actinomorphic, open only in the morning and are blue with three fertile stamens and two (rarely three) sterile stamens (staminodes). There are three free petals. The fruit is a three-celled capsule with five seeds and is 4-5 mm long. Seeds are dark brown reticulate-ribbed, ridged on one side and finely reticulated and 2-3 mm long.
Distribution
Top of pageDistribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
Last updated: 10 Feb 2022Continent/Country/Region | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | Reference | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Africa |
|||||||
Cameroon | Present | ||||||
Côte d'Ivoire | Present | ||||||
Ethiopia | Present | ||||||
Gambia | Present | Original citation: Terry, 1983 | |||||
Ghana | Present | Original citation: Terry, 1983 | |||||
Guinea-Bissau | Present | ||||||
Kenya | Present | Original citation: Terry and Micheika, 1987 | |||||
Liberia | Present | ||||||
Malawi | Present | Original citation: Banda & Morris, 1985 | |||||
Mali | Present | ||||||
Nigeria | Present | Original citation: Terry, 1983 | |||||
Senegal | Present | ||||||
Sierra Leone | Present | ||||||
Tanzania | Present | ||||||
Zambia | Present | Original citation: Vernon, 1983 | |||||
Zimbabwe | Present | ||||||
Asia |
|||||||
Bangladesh | Present | ||||||
Bhutan | Present | ||||||
China | Present | ||||||
India | Present | ||||||
Indonesia | Present | ||||||
-Java | Present | ||||||
Japan | Present | ||||||
Laos | Present | ||||||
Malaysia | Present | ||||||
Myanmar | Present | ||||||
North Korea | Present | ||||||
Philippines | Present | ||||||
Singapore | Present | ||||||
South Korea | Present | ||||||
Taiwan | Present | ||||||
Thailand | Present | ||||||
Vietnam | Present | ||||||
Europe |
|||||||
Belgium | Present | Introduced | 1997 | ||||
Portugal | |||||||
-Madeira | Present | Introduced | 1894 | ||||
Spain | |||||||
-Canary Islands | Present | Introduced | First reported: 1940's | ||||
North America |
|||||||
Costa Rica | Present | ||||||
Cuba | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Guatemala | Present | Original citation: Castillo et al. (1971b) | |||||
Jamaica | Present | ||||||
Mexico | Present | ||||||
Nicaragua | Present | ||||||
Panama | Present | ||||||
Puerto Rico | Present | ||||||
Trinidad and Tobago | Present | ||||||
United States | Present | ||||||
-Hawaii | Present | Introduced | 1835 | ||||
-Louisiana | Present | ||||||
-Mississippi | Present | Original citation: Houge, 1976 | |||||
-Texas | Present | ||||||
Oceania |
|||||||
Australia | Present | ||||||
Fiji | Present | ||||||
Papua New Guinea | Present | ||||||
South America |
|||||||
Argentina | Present | ||||||
Bolivia | Present | ||||||
Brazil | Present | ||||||
-Alagoas | Present | ||||||
-Bahia | Present | ||||||
-Ceara | Present | ||||||
-Espirito Santo | Present | ||||||
-Goias | Present | ||||||
-Maranhao | Present | ||||||
-Mato Grosso do Sul | Present | ||||||
-Minas Gerais | Present | ||||||
-Paraiba | Present | ||||||
-Piaui | Present | ||||||
-Rio Grande do Norte | Present | ||||||
-Rio Grande do Sul | Present | ||||||
-Santa Catarina | Present | ||||||
-Sao Paulo | Present | ||||||
-Sergipe | Present | ||||||
Colombia | Present | ||||||
Guyana | Present | ||||||
Venezuela | Present |
Habitat
Top of pageHost Plants and Other Plants Affected
Top of pagePlant name | Family | Context | References |
---|---|---|---|
Ananas comosus (pineapple) | Bromeliaceae | Main | |
Avena sativa (oats) | Poaceae | Main | |
Carica papaya (pawpaw) | Caricaceae | Main | |
Citrus limon (lemon) | Rutaceae | Main | |
Citrus sinensis (sweet orange) | Rutaceae | Main | |
Coffea (coffee) | Rubiaceae | Main | |
Colocasia esculenta (taro) | Araceae | Main | |
Glycine max (soyabean) | Fabaceae | Main | |
Gossypium (cotton) | Malvaceae | Main | |
Hordeum vulgare (barley) | Poaceae | Main | |
Musa (banana) | Musaceae | Main | |
Oryza sativa (rice) | Poaceae | Main | |
Phaseolus (beans) | Fabaceae | Main | |
Prunus armeniaca (apricot) | Rosaceae | Main | |
Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane) | Poaceae | Main | |
Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) | Solanaceae | Unknown | |
Solanum tuberosum (potato) | Solanaceae | Main | |
Sorghum bicolor (sorghum) | Poaceae | Main | |
Theobroma cacao (cocoa) | Malvaceae | Other | |
Triticum (wheat) | Poaceae | Main | |
Vitis vinifera (grapevine) | Vitaceae | Main | |
Zea mays (maize) | Poaceae | Main |
Biology and Ecology
Top of pageSeeds of C. diffusa which have been buried in the soil and removed at different periods showed cyclic changes in dormancy in Japan (Watanabe and Horokwa, 1975) while Nakayama (1977) showed that seedlings began to emerge at temperatures below 10°C and reached peak emergence at 10-15°C. The rate of growth and sprawling leads to rapid establishment of the weed when it infests crops. Generally the species is very persistent.
Natural enemies
Top of pageNatural enemy | Type | Life stages | Specificity | References | Biological control in | Biological control on |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kordyana celebensis | Pathogen | |||||
Kordyana cubensis | Pathogen | |||||
Puccinia | Pathogen |
Notes on Natural Enemies
Top of pageImpact
Top of pageC. diffusa is rated as one of the most important weeds in rice in Texas and competes vigorously for nutrients and light with that crop (Daniel, 1974). It was found to be infesting 55% of the rice area in Texas (Palmer, 1972) and increasing at a rate of 10% annually.
It is an alternative host of Cuscuta filiformis and C. sandwichiana (Raabe, 1965) and of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita (Valdez, 1968). Dhingra and Silva (1978) found a correlation between C. diffusa development and four species of fungi in Brazil.
Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
Top of pageThe commonest other species, C. benghalensis, has the spathe sealed along two edges to form a triangular pocket; it also has broader leaves (length 2-3 times width), stolons with underground flowers, and leaf sheaths with reddish-brown-tipped hairs.
C. forskalaei also has stolons, rough seeds, spathe sealed and leaves wavy-edged (Ivens, 1967; Holm et al., 1977; Drummond, 1984).
Two other species occurring commonly in South Asia, C. sikkimensis and C. caroliniana (=C. hasskarlii) are closely similar to C. diffusa, differing mainly in the seeds: those of C. sikkimensis being deeply pitted and those of C. caroliniana quite smooth (Noltie, 1994).
C. communis, widespread in North America and some other areas, and C. latifolia, common in Ethiopia, each have the lower petal white or very pale, not blue.
Prevention and Control
Top of pageDue to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Cultural ControlC. diffusa is very difficult to control manually as the stolons are cut into small pieces which easily regenerate. The weed should be removed from the field and then desiccated for more than 2 weeks. Most of the smallholder farmers in Asia and Africa use handhoeing, handpulling and use of animal-drawn cultivators.
Chemical Control
Control using herbicides is variable depending on the herbicide, accuracy of leaf coverage and environmental conditions. As reviewed by Wilson (1981), many standard herbicides have relatively low activity on species of Commelina: these include 2,4-D, propanil, butachlor, trifluralin and pendimethalin. Herbicides with good activity on C. diffusa in rice include bentazone, molinate, oxyfluorfen and bifenox. Propanil alone gives poor control but combinations with the first three and others such as 2,4-D, thiobencarb, oxadiazon and pendimethalin have given good results. In soyabeans, bentazone and metribuzin can both be effective. In plantation crops, paraquat is not always effective, but mixture with diuron is often advocated. Glyphosate is effective, but additives or mixtures may be needed for good results at moderate doses. Best results are always likely to be achieved when the weed is small. Prodiamine has been effective in ornamental fern beds (Stamp, 1993).
Biological Control
There have not been any attempts to use biological control against Commelina spp. and the possibilities have not been explored. However, Waterhouse (1994) notes that although Commelina spp. are believed to be of Old World origin, it is curious that there are no records of agromyzid leaf miners, except from the Americas, and therefore tropical and subtropical areas of the Americas may be promising sources of candidate biological control agents.
References
Top of pageAlvarado MJ, 1971. Evaluation of several herbicide mixuters at different times in paddy rice in the Culiacan Valley, Sinaloa, Mexico. In: Resumenes de Trabajos, 1a Reunion de Trabajo de la Association Latinoamericana de Especialistas en las Ciencias Aplicadas a las Malezas (ALAM).
Alwmman RF; Neito HJ, 1971. Weed control in maize in the Torluca Valley, Mexico. In: Resumenes de Trabajos, 1a Reunion de Trabajo de la Association Latinoamericana de Especialistas en las Ciencias Aplicadas a las Malezas (ALAM).
Baker JB, 1977. Rice weed control studies (a preliminary report). 68th Annual Progress Report Rice Experiment Station, Crowley, Louisiana, 1976., 82-96
Brenan JPM, 1968. Commelinaceae. In: Flora of West Tropical Africa. Volume 3, Part 1 (Ed. by Hutchinson, J. & Dalziel, J.M.), Second Edition (Ed. by F.N. Hepper), pp. 22-50. London, UK: Crown Agents.
Castillo JM; Garcia JG; Rodriquez CF, 1971b. Evaluation of herbicides in potato (Solanum tuberosum) in Guatemala. In: Resumes de Trabajos, 1a Reunion de Trabajo de la Asociacion de la Associacion Latinoamericana de Especialistas en las Ciencias Aplicadas a las Malezes (ALARM).
Castillo M; Garcia JG; Rodriquez F, 1971a. Herbicide evaluation in wheat in Guatemala. In: Resumenes de Trabajos, 1a Reunion de Trabajo de la Asociacion Latinoamericana de Especialistas en las Ciencias Aplicadas a las Malezas (ALARM).
Ciba Geigy, 1982. Monocot Weeds 3. Basel, Switzerland: Ciba Geigy Ltd.
Drummond RB, 1984. Arable weeds of Zimbabwe. A guide to the recognition of more important arable weeds of crops. Harare, Zimbabwe: Agricultural Research Trust.
Ivens GW, 1967. East African Weeds and their Control. Nairobi, Kenya: Oxford University Press.
Lawrence RM Jr; Habetz R, 1976. Soybean herbicide experiments (a preliminary report). 67th Annual Progress Report Rice Experiment Station, Crowley, Louisiana, 1975., 208-213
Noltie HJ, 1994. Flora of Bhutan. Volume 3 Part 1. Edinburgh, Scotland: Royal Botanic Gardens.
Oviedo Prieto R; Herrera Oliver P; Caluff MG, et al. , 2012. National list of invasive and potentially invasive plants in the Republic of Cuba - 2011. (Lista nacional de especies de plantas invasoras y potencialmente invasoras en la República de Cuba - 2011). Bissea: Boletín sobre Conservación de Plantas del Jardín Botánico Nacional de Cuba, 6(Special Issue 1):22-96.
Pritchard GH, 1971. Weed control in Arabica coffee in the central highlands of New Guinea. In: Proceedings 3rd Conference of the Asian-Paccific Weed Science Society, Kuala Lumpur No. 14.
Raabe R, 1965. Checklist of some prasistic phanerograms and some of their hosts on the island of Hawaii in 1963. Plant Disease Reporter, 49(7):583-585.
Sancho EC; Chavarria PL; Garcia JG, 1971. Herbicide trials in rice in Costa Rica. Resumenes de tabajos, 1a Reunion de Trabajo de la Associacion Latinoamericana de Especialistas en las Ciencias Aplicads a las Malezes (ALARM).
Smith RJ Jr, 1974. Herbicide combinations for weed control. Rice Journal, 77(7):31-32
Watanabe Y; Hirokawa F, 1975. Ecological studies on the germination and emergence of annual weeds. 4. Seasonal changes in dormancy status of viable seeds in cultivated and uncultivated soil. Weed Research, Japan, 19:20-24.
Distribution References
Brennan JPM, 1968. Commelinaceae. In: Flora of West Tropical Africa, 3 (1) [ed. by Hutchinson J, Dalziel JM, Hepper FN]. London, UK: Crown Agents. 22-50.
CABI, Undated. Compendium record. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated a. CABI Compendium: Status as determined by CABI editor. Wallingford, UK: CABI
Ciba Geigy, 1982. Moroco Weed 3., Basel, Switzerland: Ciba Geigy Ltd.
Drummond RB, 1984. Arable weeds of Zimbabwe. A guide to the recognition of more important arable weeds of crops., Harare, Zimbabwe: Agricultural Research Trust.
Noltie HJ, 1994. Flora of Bhutan., 3 (1) Edinburgh, Scotland: Royal Botanic Gardens.
Distribution Maps
Top of pageSelect a dataset
Map Legends
-
CABI Summary Records
Map Filters
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/