Neogobius fluviatilis (monkey goby)
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat List
- Biology and Ecology
- Air Temperature
- Water Tolerances
- Natural enemies
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Causes
- Pathway Vectors
- Impact Summary
- Environmental Impact
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Uses List
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Neogobius fluviatilis (Pallas, 1814)
Preferred Common Name
- monkey goby
Other Scientific Names
- Gobius fluviatilis Pallas, 1814
- Gobius fluviatilis pallasi Berg, 1916
- Gobius fluviatilis var. nigra Kessler, 1859
- Gobius lacteus Nordmann, 1840
- Gobius niger Eichwald, 1841
- Gobius sordidus Bennett, 1835
- Gobius steveni Nordmann, 1840
Local Common Names
- Germany: Flussgrundel
- Hungary: folyami géb
- Netherlands: pontische stroomgrondel
- Poland: babka szczupla
- Russian Federation: babka; bychok peschanik
- Slovakia: býcko riecny
Summary of InvasivenessTop of page
The monkey goby is considered to be one of the most successful fish invaders in European inland waters in recent decades (Copp et al., 2005). It has expanded to seven countries in Europe outside its natural range (Belarus, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, Serbia, Germany and the Netherlands) where it has been recorded from the upper Dnieper, Pripyat, Vistula, Western Bug, Danube and Rhine river basins.
The expansion of monkey goby range in the Danube may be the result of natural migration encouraged by water transport and by human-mediated alteration of the river's environment, e.g. construction of reservoirs (Ahnelt et al., 1998). The intensive shipping explains the jump-like dispersal observed in the Danube system.
Biró (1971) considered the possibility that monkey goby was passively introduced into Lake Balaton by ships. Passive dispersal of gobiids by ships, especially cargo vessels, seems to occur quite regularly (Ahnelt et al., 1998). It is connected with the gobiids concealment behaviour, in which they may occupy holes and depressions on ships hulls. Males can use ships hulls as places for nests, and be transported together with fertile eggs for long distances. This behaviour, and their presence in the dockside, also predisposes gobies to be taken into ballast tanks. The transport of ballast waters on the Danube by tankers occurs regularly (Ahnelt et al., 1998).
Together with natural spread, shipping seems to be an essential factor for dispersal of non-native gobiids in the Dnieper and Pripyat rivers, whereas in the Vistula and Bug rivers monkey goby dispersal was through natural migration as the shipping intensity is very low (Semenchenko et al., 2011). Moreover, the expansion of the monkey goby as well as other Ponto-Caspian gobies also seems to be facilitated by construction of reservoirs on large European rivers (Slynko et al., 2011), as they have established abundant populations in the reservoirs. Thus, reservoirs with stable conditions suitable for reproduction and increase in abundance, may serve as sources for further expansion in the river system. Construction of canals that connect different river basins also facilitates expansion of this species.
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Metazoa
- Phylum: Chordata
- Subphylum: Vertebrata
- Class: Actinopterygii
- Order: Perciformes
- Suborder: Gobioidei
- Family: Gobiidae
- Genus: Neogobius
- Species: Neogobius fluviatilis
Notes on Taxonomy and NomenclatureTop of page
Phylogenetic results indicate that the current genus Neogobius is paraphyletic and that the subgenus Apollonia should therefore be elevated to the level of genus, containing Apollonia (N.) melanostomus (the round goby) and A. (N.) fluviatilis (the monkey goby) (Stepien and Tumeo, 2006). Based on analysis of cranial osteology Vasil’eva (1989) grouped the round goby and monkey goby into the single sub-genus Apollonia Iljin, 1927. A close relationship between those species from phenetic and phyletic studies, which share synapomorphic states for 37 characters, was also proved by Simonovic (1999).
Based on results of all phylogenetic approaches the subfamily Benthophilinae was recognized as encompassing both the ‘‘neogobiins” and tadpole gobies, and genetically diverges from other Gobiidae subfamilies (Neilson and Stepien, 2009). Benthophilinae contains three tribes: Neogobiini (Neogobius, which is synonymized here with Apollonia; containing the type species N. fluviatilis, along with N. melanostomus and N. caspius), Ponticolini (containing the genera Mesogobius, Proterorhinus, Babka, and Ponticola - elevating the latter two from subgenera and removing them from the formerly paraphyletic Neogobius), and Benthophilini (tadpole gobies) (Neilson and Stepien, 2009).
Neogobius fluviatilis used to be divided into two subspecies: N. f. fluviatilis (Pallas, 1814) in the Black and Azov Seas and associated drainages and N. f. pallasi (Berg, 1916) in the Caspian Sea basin. The two subspecies were distinguished by the presence of a darker lower band on the first dorsal fin, reduced average numbers of lateral scales and longitudinal scale rows and a shorter snout in N. f. pallasi (Berg, 1949), as well as some reported variations in osteology (Pinchuk et al., 2003). Recent phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial and nuclear sequences discerned a pronounced genetic break between monkey gobies in the Black and Caspian Seas, indicating a long-term species-level separation dating to around 3 million years (Neilson and Stepien, 2011). This pronounced separation was confirmed by morphological and population genetic divergence. Thus, instead of the formerly identified subspecies of N. fluviatilis, according to the authors there are two separate species of monkey gobies: N. fluviatilis in the Black Sea basin, Don and Volga Rivers, and the Kumo-Manych Depression, and Neogobius pallasi in the Caspian Sea and Volga River delta (Neilson and Stepien, 2011).
DescriptionTop of page
The monkey goby is a small/medium fish of total length up to 195-160 mm (males) and 128-115 mm (females) for Black Sea and Caspian Sea populations. The shape of the body is typically streamlined. Snout pointed. Interorbital space is about half to three-quarters eye diameter. Head width about equal (or slightly more) to depth. Mouth moderately obliquely upwards. Lower jaw prominent anteriorly. Angle of jaws below anterior age of orbit. As in all fish from the Perciformes family it has two dorsal fins with contiguous or slightly separated bases. First dorsal fin relatively high with more or less acute anterior profile. The second dorsal fin as well as anal fin profile descending evenly towards the rear tip. Pectoral fins reach beyond the second dorsal fin origin. Its pelvic fins form a very characteristic suction disc on the ventral surface. Caudal fin rounded. Caudal peduncle relatively shallow (Pinchuk et al., 2003). The body is scaled with ctenoid scales, but cycloid on rear breast, pectoral fin lobes and abdomen. The meristic features of monkey goby are: D1 VI (V-VII), D2 I/15-17 (14-18), A I/13-15 (12-17), scales in lateral line l.l. 57-65 (52-67) (Evlanov et al., 1998; Pinchuk et al., 2003).
Its coloration is rather pale, sandy to brownish grey, with small brownish irregular spots above the lateral line, along which there is a row of 8-9 or more rectangular black spots of larger size. The fish appears semi-transparent especially in the abdominal part where miomers are clearly visible under the skin. A dark streak runs from the eye to the angle of upper lip. First and second dorsal fins have 3-4 dark pigmented streaks, other fins more or less pale.
The dimorphism between sexes, apart from in the breeding season, is not clearly visible. Breeding males are much darker than females, sometimes almost black with distinct yellow or orange edges of dorsal and caudal fins. Tips of dorsal fins are elongated in spawning males.
DistributionTop of page
The monkey goby is an example of a relict Ponto-Caspian fish fauna and naturally occurs in freshwater, estuarine and coastal habitats of the Caspian Sea, Black Sea, Azov Sea and Sea of Marmara basins as well as the rivers flowing into them, e.g. Danube, Dniester, Dnieper, Don, Kuban, Southern Bug, Volga and Ural (Pinchuk et al., 2003).
Generally, in the first part of the nineteenth century its range was limited to lower sections of these rivers: for example, in the Danube it naturally inhabited from the delta as far upstream as the Iron Gate, a gorge that forms part of the boundary between Romania and Serbia (Oliva, 1960; Banarescu, 1964). In recent decades, expansion upstream has been observed in most of the above mentioned rivers. Along the Danube it has reached Hungary, Slovakia and Germany, and has also been recently found in the Waal River (the Rhine River system, the North Sea basin) in the Netherlands (Stránai and Andreji, 2001; Harka and Biró, 2007; Van Kessel et al., 2009).
Due to upstream migration in the Dnieper River the monkey goby spread to Belarus, and through the Dnieper-Bug canal it has entered rivers of the Baltic Sea basin, i.e. the Bug River (Eastern Bug) and the Vistula River in Poland (Grabowska et al., 2008; Semenchenko et al., 2011). It has also expanded its range upstream in the Volga River in Russia (Slynko et al., 2011).
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
|Continent/Country/Region||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||Reference||Notes|
|Armenia||Localised||Native||Pinchuk et al., 2003|
|Azerbaijan||Localised||Native||Pinchuk et al., 2003||Coast of Caspian Sea, and estuaries and lower reaches of rivers entering the Caspian Sea|
|Georgia (Republic of)||Localised||Introduced||Pinchuk et al., 2003||Coast of Caspian Sea, and estuaries and lower reaches of rivers entering the Caspian Sea|
|Kazakhstan||Localised||Native||Pinchuk et al., 2003||Coast of Caspian Sea, and estuaries and lower reaches of rivers entering the Caspian Sea|
|Turkey||Localised||Native||Pinchuk et al., 2003||Coast of Black Sea, and estuaries and lower reaches of rivers entering the Black Sea; also the Marmara Sea catchment, Lake Manyas and Sapandzha, the Kozoly River|
|Belarus||Localised||Introduced||1936||Invasive||Datamining 2011 - Invasive Species Databases; Vorontzov, 1937||In the Dnieper and its tributary the Pripyat R.|
|Bulgaria||Localised||Native||Pinchuk et al., 2003||In the Danube R., up to the Iron Gate and its system, i.e. rivers such as Ogosta, Iskur, Vit to Pleven, Osam, Yantra|
|Germany||Localised||2008||Introduced||2008||Stemmer, 2008; Borcherding et al., 2011||German section of the Rhine|
|Hungary||Localised||Introduced||1970||Invasive||Biró, 1972; Pintér, 1989; Harka, 1993; Ahnelt et al., 1998||In Lake Balaton|
|Moldova||Localised||Native||Pinchuk et al., 2003||In the Dniestr and Prut river basins|
|Netherlands||Localised||Introduced||2009||Invasive||Kessel et al., 2009||The Waal River (Dutch part of the Rhine system), vicinity of the city of Nijmegen|
|Poland||Localised||Introduced||1997||Invasive||Danilkiewicz, 1998; Kostrzewa and Grabowski, 2002; Kostrzewa et al., 2004; Grabowska et al., 2008||In the middle course of the Bug R.|
|Romania||Present||Native||Pinchuk et al., 2003||In the Sasik R. (the Siret R. tributary – Danube system) and in the Danube up to Iron Gate. Lake Razelm.|
|-Southern Russia||Localised||Invasive||Pinchuk et al., 2003; Slynko et al., 2011||Lower section of the Volga River and Caspian Sea coast and estuaries of its rivers|
|Serbia||Localised||Introduced||Invasive||Banarescu, 1970; Jankovic, 1996; Simonovic et al., 2001||In the Serbian part of the Danube R. and its tributaries: Czerna and Sava rivers|
|Slovakia||Localised||Introduced||2001||Invasive||Stránai and Andreji, 2001||In the Danube and its tributaries including Hron R.|
|Ukraine||Widespread||Native||Smirnov, 1986; Pinchuk et al., 2003; Vasil'eva, 2003||It is native in the lower section of the Dnieper River and in the Black Sea estuaries|
History of Introduction and SpreadTop of page
In the Danube the monkey goby was detected for the first time outside its natural distribution area in 1965, prior to construction of dams ( Banarescu, 1970). Later (after 2000) it was recorded in a few localities in the Serbian section of the Danube and its tributaries there, e.g. the Sava and Czerna rivers (Simonovic et al., 2001). Thus, although the monkey goby is native to Serbia, its expansion to many new localities has been observed. A similar expansion also occurred in Ukraine in the Dnieper and its tributaries, and in Russia in the Volga (Smirnov, 1986; Slynko et al., 2001; Vasil’eva, 2003).
In Hungary the monkey goby was recorded for the first time in Lake Balaton in 1970 (Biró, 1971, 1972), and since 1984 in the Hungarian stretch of the Danube. The next records of its upstream migration come from Slovakia, where in 2001 it was collected in the Hungarian–Slovak section of the Danube (Stránai and Andreji, 2001). It also entered some of its tributaries like the Hron (Stránai and Andreji, 2001), Bodrog and Tisza rivers (Harka, 1997; Ahnelt et al., 1998), and in 2003 the Rába River at the border of Austria (Harka and Biró, 2007). In 2008 the species was collected in the German section of the Rhine in Duisburg harbour, and subsequently in 2009 it was observed in the Netherlands (the Waal River of the Rhine River system), possibly as a result of monkey goby dispersal through the Rhine–Main–Danube Canal (Van Kessel et al., 2009).
The upstream migration of the monkey goby in the Dnieper River began quite early as it was recorded in the middle section of the river in 1856 and again in 1932, at locations currently within the Ukraine (Berg, 1949). It was reported in the Belarusian part of the river in 1936 (Vorontzov, 1937). It penetrated to its tributary, the Pripyat River, in the early 1950s (Voronin, 1957). Due to the Dnieper–Bug canal that connects the basins of the Black Sea and the Baltic Sea (through the Pripyat River and the Muchavets River, a small tributary of the Bug River) it migrated to the Bug River (a tributary of the Vistula) in Poland, where it was found in 1997 only a few kilometers downstream of its convergence with the Dnieper-Bug canal (Danilkiewicz, 1998; Semenchenko et al., 2011).
In subsequent years, the species expanded downstream in the Vistula River and reached the river mouth in 2003 (Grabowska et al., 2008). The rate of spread in the Vistula River was estimated as 122 km per year (Semenchenko et al., 2011). Genetic analysis of introduced populations in the upper Danube/Hron River and Vistula River basins indicates a north-west Black Sea origin. Two distinct pathways of their expansion are identified: the Danube River and the Dnieper-Pripyat-Bug River system (Neilson and Stepien, 2011).
IntroductionsTop of page
|Introduced to||Introduced from||Year||Reason||Introduced by||Established in wild through||References||Notes|
|Natural reproduction||Continuous restocking|
|Belarus||1936||Interconnected waterways (pathway cause)||Yes||Vorontzov (1937)||Upstream migration from the lower section of the Dnieper River|
|Belarus||1950||Interconnected waterways (pathway cause)||Yes||Voronin (1957)||Upstream migration from the Dnieper River to the Pripyat River|
|Germany||2008||Interconnected waterways (pathway cause)||Yes||Kessel et al. (2009)||In Rhine, introduced by upstream migration in the Rhine River|
|Hungary||1970||Interconnected waterways (pathway cause)||Yes||Biró (1971)||Lake Bulaton. Passive transport by ships suggested, possibly from lower Danube|
|Hungary||1984||Interconnected waterways (pathway cause)||Yes||Biró (1972)||Danube River, possibly from the lower river|
|Netherlands||2009||Interconnected waterways (pathway cause)||Yes||Kessel et al. (2009)||First record from the North Sea Basin. Found in Waal River, possibly as a result of dispersal through Rhine–Main–Danube Canal|
|Poland||1997||Interconnected waterways (pathway cause)||Yes||Danilkiewicz (1998)||Middle course of Bug River. First record from the Baltic Sea basin. Upstream migration from the Dnieper River through the Prypiat-Bug canal|
|Poland||2002||Interconnected waterways (pathway cause)||Yes||Kostrzewa and Grabowski (2002)||Introduced to lower Vistula River by downstream migration from the Bug River|
|Serbia||1965||Interconnected waterways (pathway cause)||Yes||Banarescu (1970)||First record of expansion in the Danube R. outside its previous range of distribution. Upstream migration from the lower section of the Danube River|
|Slovakia||2001||Interconnected waterways (pathway cause)||Yes||Stránai and Andreji (2001)||Upstream migration in the Danube River|
|Ukraine||1932||Interconnected waterways (pathway cause)||Yes||Berg (1949)||Introduced by upstream migration from the lower section of the Dnieper River|
Risk of IntroductionTop of page
The further expansion of the monkey goby may be expected through three main invasion corridors for Ponto-Caspian hydrofauna identified by Bij de Vaate et al. (2002). The so-called southern and central corridors are especially important for the invasion to Western Europe i.e. from the Danube River through the system of canals that connects it with the Main River (the right tributary of the Rhine River, the North Sea basin) and from the Dnieper through the Vistula River system to the Oder and Laba rivers. Considering it is a euryhaline we can also expect that the monkey goby may enter the Baltic Sea. Thus, another route to the West and North of Europe is possible along the Baltic and North Sea coasts. The monkey goby spread may be due to natural migration combined with passive dispersal by ships and barges.
HabitatTop of page
The monkey goby is a benthic euryhaline species, inhabiting from the entirely freshwaters of rivers and man-made lakes to brackish and polyhaline salinities of the Black, Azov and Caspian seas. In the seas it is found in coastal shallows on sandy or sandy-shelly bottom. In spring it is found typically at depths of 0.5 –5.0 m, but in late autumn and winter it moves to much deeper waters of 5-10 m (see Pinchuk et al., 2003 for review).
Among fresh waters it prefers relatively large (in European scale) rivers (e.g. Danube, Dniest, Dnieper, Rhine, Vistula) with moderate current and sandy bottoms. In the Danube River system the monkey goby occurs mainly on sandy bottoms (Adámek et al., 2007), but also on gravel and gravel-rocky substrate although much less abundant here than bighead goby and round goby (Jurajda et al., 2005). Abundant populations are also found in reservoirs located on these rivers. Entering the down sections of their tributaries it avoids small rivers and streams with fast running water as well as flood plains e.g. in the Belarusian part of the Dnieper (Zhukov, 1965; Pinchuk et al., 2003). It is also common in large bays in the Danube delta (Pinchuk et al., 2003) and Rhine delta (Borcherding et al., 2011).
Habitat ListTop of page
|Reservoirs||Principal habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Rivers / streams||Principal habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Rivers / streams||Principal habitat||Natural|
|Inshore marine||Secondary/tolerated habitat||Natural|
Biology and EcologyTop of page
The monkey goby has a maximum life span of 5-6 years, but in most studied populations in its natural range does not exceed 3-4 years (Pinchuk et al., 2003). The age of maturation observed in its natural range is from 2 years at a total length from 40 to 120 mm (Smirnov, 1986; see Pinchuk et al., 2003 for review). Fecundity, depending on female size, ranges from 300 to 2000 or even 3000 mature oocytes (see Pinchuk et al., 2003). The egg diameter in gonads at the beginning of the spawning season is 1.5 to 2.0 mm. The spawned eggs are yellow-orange of pyriform shape, length 3.95 (3.7-4.2) mm by width 1.8 (1.7-2.0) mm (Bilko, 1968). It is a multiple spawner (at least two batches). The spawning starts in April when water temperature exceeds 11-14oC, reaches its peak in May at 18-19oC and lasts until June or July. Spawning occurs in shallow waters (usually 0.3-1.0 m and down to 2.3 m; Bilko, 1968). In the Lower Rhine spawning starts later in the year, although the above temperature thresholds are exceeded, and the first larvae are found in June (J Borcherding, University of Cologne, Germany, personal communication, 2012).
Eggs are deposited in a nest on the underside of different structures such as rocks, stones, logs, roots, algal clumps, and empty shells of molluscs, as well as on human artifacts such as litter and ropes. The males guard their eggs until they hatch, fan the clutch with their pectoral fins, and defend the nest aggressively. The number of eggs found in one nest ranges from 150 to 6000, and more than one female may deposit eggs in the same nest (Bilko, 1968; Ulman, 1970).
Monkey gobies reach their defined phenotype very early in their ontogeny and thus represent a strongly precocial species with direct development ( Capová et al., 2008). They have been reported to feed on a variety of food items: invertebrates rather than fish. The diet is composed mainly of chironomid larvae, small Crustaceans i.e. amphipods; less frequently it includes Oligochaeta, Trichoptera, Simullidae and Mollusca but only large specimens (Biró, 1995; Kakareko et al., 2005; Adámek et al., 2007; Grabowska et al., 2009; see also Pinchuk et al., 2003 for review). In the Lower Rhine, however, large individuals have been observed to feed preferably on fish (J Borcherding, University of Cologne, Germany, personal communication, 2012).
ClimateTop of page
|Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summer||Preferred||Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summers|
|Ds - Continental climate with dry summer||Tolerated||Continental climate with dry summer (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, dry summers)|
Air TemperatureTop of page
|Parameter||Lower limit||Upper limit|
|Mean maximum temperature of hottest month (ºC)||2.7||40.7|
Water TolerancesTop of page
|Parameter||Minimum Value||Maximum Value||Typical Value||Status||Life Stage||Notes|
|Dissolved oxygen (mg/l)||Optimum||Saturation not less than 50-60%|
|Salinity (part per thousand)||Optimum||In the Caspian region (also polihaline waters of the northern Black Sea; Kartanitsky Bay), 0-17% tolerated|
|Water temperature (ºC temperature)||Optimum||from 4-20° tolerated|
Natural enemiesTop of page
|Natural enemy||Type||Life stages||Specificity||References||Biological control in||Biological control on|
|Acanthocephaloides propinquus||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Kvach, 2002; Kvach, 2005|
|Acanthocephalus lucii||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Kvach, 2002; Kvach, 2005|
|Anodonta anatina||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Ondracková et al., 2005|
|Apatemon cobitidis||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Molnár, 2006|
|Contracaecum||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Ondracková et al., 2005|
|Cryptocotyle concavum||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Kvach, 2002; Kvach, 2004; Kvach, 2005|
|Cryptocotyle lingua||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Kvach, 2002; Kvach, 2005|
|Dichelyne minutus||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Kvach, 2002|
|Diplostomum||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Ondracková et al., 2005|
|Eimeria daviesae||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Molnár, 2006|
|Eustrongylides excisus||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Kvach, 2004; Kvach, 2005|
|Goussia kessleri||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Molnár, 2006|
|Goussia szekelyi||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Molnár, 2006|
|Ichthyophthirius multifiliis||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Molnár, 2006|
|Ligula pavlovskii||Parasite||All Stages||to species||Kvach, 2001; Kvach, 2004; Kvach, 2005|
|Metagonimus yokogawai||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Molnár, 2006|
|Nicolla skrjabini||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Kvach, 2004; Ondracková et al., 2005|
|Pomphorhynchus laevis||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Molnár, 2006; Ondracková et al., 2005|
|Proteocephalus gobiorum||Parasite||All Stages||to genus||Kvach, 2002|
|Pseudanodonta complanata||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Ondracková et al., 2005|
|Pygidiopsis genata||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Kvach, 2002|
|Raphidascaris||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Kvach, 2004; Kvach, 2005|
|Raphidascaris acus||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Molnár, 2006; Ondracková et al., 2005|
|Telosentis exiguus||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Kvach, 2002|
|Timoniella imbutiforme||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Kvach, 2002|
|Unio tumidus||Parasite||All Stages||not specific||Ondracková et al., 2005|
Notes on Natural EnemiesTop of page
The monkey goby is a prey of common freshwater predators like northern pike Esox lucius, perchpike Sander lucioperca, burbot Lota lota, European wels Silurus glanis and large individuals of perch Perca fluviatilis (Plachocki et al., in press; see also Pinchuk et al., 2003 for review). It is characterized by high parasite burdens over its entire range, with a wide variety of parasite species. Kvach (2001) reported high infection of monkey goby in one of the Dnieper River estuaries with the metazoan parasite Ligula pavlovskii which influences the biological condition of fish (Kvach, 2001).
Means of Movement and DispersalTop of page
The species was not intentionally introduced anywhere. Its dispersal is considered to be both natural and passive. Shipping and man-made alterations of the river system seem to facilitate monkey goby expansion in large rivers of eastern and central Europe. Cargo vessels and ships with ballast water provide shelter and concealment for the species and a means of long distance transport, especially during reproductive seasons when males guard fertile eggs deposited in nests, settled possibly in any available holes of ship hulls. Harbours, reservoirs and artificial banks with rip-rap habitats are often preferred by gobiids and facilitate their establishment, and are sources for further expansion.
Pathway CausesTop of page
Pathway VectorsTop of page
Impact SummaryTop of page
Environmental ImpactTop of page
The influence of monkey goby on invaded ecosystems needs detailed studies as its interactions with native fish species are unknown. Evaluating the potential impact of this species on ecosystems, several taxonomic groups of native macroinvetebrate hydrofauna could potentially be affected by the presence of this new omnivorous feeder. Moreover it can reduce food resources of many native species, as many European freshwater fish species utilize the same prey categories e.g. chironomid larvae, amphipods or oligochaetes.
Risk and Impact FactorsTop of page Invasiveness
- Invasive in its native range
- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Has a broad native range
- Highly adaptable to different environments
- Is a habitat generalist
- Capable of securing and ingesting a wide range of food
- Highly mobile locally
- Fast growing
- Has high reproductive potential
- Altered trophic level
- Modification of natural benthic communities
- Modification of nutrient regime
- Negatively impacts aquaculture/fisheries
- Reduced native biodiversity
- Threat to/ loss of endangered species
- Threat to/ loss of native species
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Interaction with other invasive species
UsesTop of page
The monkey goby used to be a commercially important species in the Ponto-Caspian region. It has been the most numerous and widely distributed of commercially exploited gobies, constituting 54% (varying in importance from region to region) of the entire goby catch in the northern Caspian and 42% in the Dnieper-Bug estuaries. In the Azov Sea it was the third most common species in catches (see also Pinchuk et al., 2003 for review). Traditionally, as with other gobies, monkey gobies were consumed dried or as a soup. The species is of some significance as a food for more commercially valuable predatory species. Nowadays, monkey gobies are less abundant, and the absence of large concentrations of the species prevents its widespread commercial exploitation (see Pinchuk et al., 2003 for review). In newly invaded areas there is no commercial value for the monkey goby.
Uses ListTop of page
Human food and beverage
ReferencesTop of page
Adámek Z; Andreji J; Gallardo JM, 2007. Food habitats of four bottom-dwelling gobiid species at the confluence of the Danube and Hron Rivers (South Slovakia). International Review of Hydrobiology, 92:554-563.
Ahnelt H; Banarescu PM; Spolwind R; Harka Á; Waidbacher H, 1998. Occurrence and distribution of three gobiid species (Pisces, Gobiidae) in the middle and upper Danube region - examples of different dispersal patterns? Biologia, 53(5):665-678.
Banarescu PM, 1970. [English title not available]. (Die Fische des ponto-kaspischen potamophilen Artenkomplex und die karpato-kaukasische Disjunction.) Hydrobiologia, 11:135-141.
Berg LS, 1949. Freshwater fishes of the U.S.S.R. and adjacent countries. Moscow, Russia: USSR Academy of Sciences.
Bij Vaate Ade; Jazdzewski K; Ketelaars H; Gollasch S; Velde Gder, 2002. Geographical patterns in range expansion of macroinvertebrate Ponto-Caspian species in Europe. Canadian Journal of Fisheries Aquatic Sciences, 59:1159-1174.
Bilko VP, 1968. Reproduction of Black Sea gobies in the Dnieper-Bug estuary. Voprosy Ikhtiolgy, 8(4):670.
Biró P, 1971. A new goby (Neogobius fluviatilis Pallas) from Lake Balaton. Halászat, 64(1):22-23.
Biró P, 1972. Neogobius fluviatilis in Lake Balaton - a Ponto-Caspian goby new to the fauna of Central Europe. Journal of Fish Biology, 4:249-255.
Biró P, 1995. [Dynamics and food of monkey goby (Neogobius fluviatilis Pallas) in Lake Balaton]. (A folyami geb (Neogobius fluviatilis Pallas) novekedese es tapleka a Balaton parti oveben.) Halaszát, 88:175-184.
Borcherding J; Staas S; Krüger S; Ondracková M; Slapanský L; Jurajda P, 2011. Non-native Gobiid species in the lower River Rhine (Germany): recent range extensions and densities. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 27(1):153-155. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1439-0426
Cápová M; Zlatnická I; Kovác V; Katina S, 2008. Ontogenetic variability in the external morphology of monkey goby, Neogobius fluviatilis (Pallas, 1814) and its relevance to invasion potential. Hydrobiologia, 607:17-26. http://springerlink.metapress.com/content/1573-5117/
Copp GH; Bianco PG; Bogutskaya N; Ero?s T; Falka I; Ferreira MT; Fox MG; Freyhof J; Gozlan RE; Grabowska J; Kovàc
Danilkiewicz Z, 1998. [Monkey goby, Neogobius fluviatilis (Pallas, 1811), Perciformes, Gobiidae - a new pontic element in fish fauna of Baltic Sea basin]. (Babka szczupla, Neogobius fluviatilis (Pallas, 1811), Perciformes, Gobiidae - nowy, pontyjski element w ichtiofaunie zlewiska Morza Baltyckiego.) Fragmenta faunistica, 41(21):269-277.
Evlanov IA; Kozlovski SV; Antonov PI, 1998. Cadastre of fish of the Samara region. (Kadastr ryb Samarskoi oblasti.) Toliatti. 222.
Grabowska J; Grabowski M; Kostecka A, 2009. Diet and feeding habits of monkey goby (Neogobius fluviatilis) in a newly invaded area. Biological Invasions [Aquatic Invaders: From Success Factors to Ecological Risk Assessment. Selected Papers from the 15th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 23-27 September 2007.], 11(9):2161-2170. http://www.springerlink.com/content/p6642129v00t1759/fulltext.html
Grabowska J; Pietraszewski D; Ondracková M, 2008. Tubenose goby Proterorhinus marmoratus (Pallas, 1814) has joined three other Ponto-Caspian gobies in the Vistula River (Poland). Aquatic Invasions, 3(2):261-265. http://www.aquaticinvasions.ru/2008/AI_2008_3_2_Grabowska_etal.pdf
Harka Á, 1993. Invasion of the Neogobius fluviatilis. Halászat, 86(4):180-181.
Harka Á, 1997. Fishes of Hungary. Budapest, Hungary: Természet - és Környezetvédo Tanárok Egyesülete, 175 pp (in Hungarian), 175 pp.
Harka Á; Biró P, 2007. New patterns in Danubian distribution of Ponto-Caspian gobies - a result of global climatic change and/or canalization? Electronic Journal of Ichthyology, 3(1):1-14.
Jankovic DV, 1996. Ichthyofauna of the Danube in the Djerdap Area after the construction of the Iron Gate I Hydroelectric Power System. Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Biologica, 40:123-131.
Jurajda P; Cerny J; Polacik M; Valová Z; Janác M; Blažek R; Ondracková M, 2005. The recent distribution and abundance of non-native Neogobius fishes in the Slovak section of the river Danube. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 21(4):319-323.
Kakareko T; Zbikowski J; Zytkowicz J, 2005. Diel partitioning in summer of two syntopic neogobiids from two different habitats of the lower Vistula River, Poland. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 21:292- 295.
Kessel Nvan; Dorenbosch M; Spikmans F, 2009. First record of Pontian monkey goby, Neogobius fluviatilis (Pallas, 1814), in the Dutch Rhine. Aquatic Invasions, 4(2):421-424. http://www.aquaticinvasions.ru/2009/AI_2009_4_2_vanKessel_etal.pdf
Kostrzewa J; Grabowski M; Zieba G, 2004. [New invasive fish species In Polish waterbodies]. (Nowe inwazyjne gatunki ryb w wodach Polski.) Archives of Polish Fisheries, 12(Supplement 2):21-34.
Kvach YV, 2001. Infection of monkey goby (Neogobius fluviatilis) in some estuaries of North Western Black Sea region. Vestniki zoologii, 35(1):85-88.
Kvach YV, 2002. Helminthes of goby fish of the Hryhoryivsky Estuary (Black Sea, Ukraine). Vestniki zoologii, 36(3):71-76.
Kvach YV, 2004. The metazoan parasites of gobiids in the Dniester Estuary (Black Sea) depending on water salinity. Oceanological and Hydrobiological studies, 33(3):47-56.
Kvach YV, 2005. A comperative analysis of helminth faunas and infection [parameters of ten species of gobiid fishes (Actinopterygii: Gobiidae) from the north-western Black Sea. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, 35(2):103-110.
Molnár K, 2006. Some remarks on parasitic infections of the invasive Neogobius spp. (Pisces) in the Hungarian reaches of the Danube River, with a description of Goussia szekelyi sp. n. (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22(5):395-400. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent?func=showIssues&code=jai
Neilson ME; Stepien CA, 2009. Escape from the Ponto-Caspian: Evolution and biogeography of an endemic goby species flock (Benthophilinae: Gobiidae: Teleostei). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 52:84-102.
Neilson ME; Stepien CA, 2011. Historic speciation and recent colonization of Eurasian monkey gobies (Neogobius fluviatilis and N. pallasi) revealed by DNA sequences, microsatellites, and morphology. Diversity and Distributions, 17(4):688-702. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1472-4642
Oliva O, 1960. Remarks on the distribution of Neogobius kessleri and Neogobius fluviatilis (Pallas) (Osteichthyes, Gobiidae). Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Biologica, 1:45-54.
Ondracková M; Dávidová M; Pecínková M; Blazek R; Gelnar M; Valová Z; Cerný J; Jurajda P, 2005. Metazoan parasites of Neogobius fishes in the Slovak section of the River Danube. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 21(4):345-349. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent?func=showIssues&code=jai
Pinchuk VI; Vasil'eva ED; Vasil'ev VP; Miller P, 2003. Neogobius fluviatilis (Kessler, 1857). In: The Freshwater Fishes of Europe. Vol. 8/I Mugilidae, Atherinidae, Atherionopsidae, Blennidae, Odontobutidae, Gobiidae 1 [ed. by Miller, P.]. Wiesbaden: AULA-Verlag, 223-264.
Pintér K, 1989. Fishes of Hungary. Budapest, Hungary: Akademia Kiadó, 202 pp.
Plachocki D; Kobak J; Kakareko T, unda. First report on the importance of alien gobiids in the diet of native piscivorous fishes in the lower Vistula River (Poland). Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies.
Semenchenko V; Grabowska J; Grabowski M; Rizevsky V; Pluta M, 2011. Non-native fish in Belarusian and Polish areas of the European central invasion corridor. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies, 40(1):57- 67.
Simonovic P; Paunovic M; Popovic S, 2001. Morphology, feeding and reproduction of the Round Goby, Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas), in the Danube River basin, Yugoslavia. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 27:281-289.
Simonovic PD, 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of Ponto-Caspian gobies and their relationship to the atlantic-Mediterranean Gobiinae. Journal of Fish Biology, 54:533-555.
Skazkina EP, 1972. On active metabolism in Azov goby. Trudy VNIMRKO, 85:138-144.
Slynko YuV; Dgebuadze YuYu; Novitskiy RA; Kchristov OA, 2011. Invasions of alien fishes in the basins of the largest rivers of the Ponto-Caspian Basin: composition, vectors, invasion routes, and rates. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions, 2(1):49-59. http://www.springerlink.com/content/f4514123l3232781/
Stemmer B, 2008. [English title not available]. (Flussgrundel im Rhein-Gewässersystem - Vierte neue Grundelart im nordrhein-westfälischen Rhein nachgewiesen.) Natur in NRW, No. 4/2008:57-60.
Stepien CA; Tumeo MA, 2006. Invasion genetics of Ponto-Caspian gobies in the Great Lakes: a 'cryptic' species, absence of founder effects, and comparative risk analysis. Biological Invasions, 8(1):61-78.
Stránai I; Andreji J, 2001. Monkey goby - still the latest invasive species of family Gobidae. Pol'ovnictvo a rybárstvo, 53:44-45.
Ulman EG, 1970. Gobiids of Kakhovka Reservoir. PhD Thesis (Bychki Kakhovskogo vodokhranilischa). Kiev, Ukraine 30 pp.
Vasil'eva E, 1989. [Morphology of the cranial skeleton of the round goby Gobius melanostomus i syrman goby G. syrman in relation to their place within the genus Gobius sensu lato (Gobiidae, Pisces)]. (Morfologiya cherepa bichka-kruglaka Gobius melanostomus i syrmana G. syrman v svyazi ikh polozheniem v rode Gobius sensu lato (Gobiidae, Pisces).) Voprosy Ikhtiologii, 29:186-197.
Vasil'eva E, 2003. Main alteration in ichthyofauna of the larger rivers of the northern coast of the Black Sea in the last 50 years: A review. Folia Zoologica, 52(4):337-358.
Voronin FN, 1957. Fish of Belarus. Minsk, Russia: Universitetskoepp, 83 pp.
Vorontzov EM, 1937. Composition ichthyofauna of waterbodies of West region and BSSR, and characterization of ichthyofauna of the upper part of Dnieper River basin. Smolensk, Fauna and Ecologia, 3:59-86.
Zhukov PI, 1965. The fishes of Belarus. Minsk, Russia: Nauka i Tekhinka, 415 pp.
ContributorsTop of page
31/12/11 Original text by:
Joanna Grabowska, University of Lodz, Dept Invertebrate Zoology & Hydrobiology, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland
Reviewers' names are available on request.
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/