Alyssum desertorum (desert madwort)
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Plant Type
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat List
- Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
- Biology and Ecology
- Latitude/Altitude Ranges
- Soil Tolerances
- Natural enemies
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Causes
- Pathway Vectors
- Impact Summary
- Economic Impact
- Environmental Impact
- Threatened Species
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Uses List
- Detection and Inspection
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- Gaps in Knowledge/Research Needs
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Alyssum desertorum Stapf
Preferred Common Name
- desert madwort
Other Scientific Names
- Alyssum sartorii Heldr. ex Maire & Petitm.
- Alyssum turkestanicum var. desertorum (Stapf) Botsch
- Psilonema minimum Schur.
International Common Names
- English: desert alyssum; dwarf alyssum
- French: alysson des déserts
- Russian: burachok pustynnyi
- Chinese: ting ji
Local Common Names
- Denmark: steppe-grådodder
- Estonia: liiv-kilbirohi
- Germany: Steppen-Steinkraut
- Latvia: tuksneša alise
- Lithuania: mažasis laibenis
- Norway: havnedodre
- Poland: smagliczka drobna
- Sweden: stäppdådra
Summary of InvasivenessTop of page
A. desertorum is an herbaceous plant native to central and eastern Europe, North Africa and Asia (from Turkey to Xinjiang in northwestern China). It has become naturalized in northern Europe as well as in western North America, where it is classed as an introduced species, a weed and a weak invader. A. desertorum is a weed predominately of disturbed areas such as overgrazed semiarid rangelands and areas affected by industrial activity. Its spread has been facilitated recently by the expansion of hydraulic fracturing ('fracking') of deep rock formations for methane or oil extraction. A. desertorum is an environmental threat mainly due to its displacement of native plant species, including a number of endangered species.
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Plantae
- Phylum: Spermatophyta
- Subphylum: Angiospermae
- Class: Dicotyledonae
- Order: Capparidales
- Family: Brassicaceae
- Genus: Alyssum
- Species: Alyssum desertorum
Notes on Taxonomy and NomenclatureTop of page
The genus Alyssum contains around 330 species. The species name A. desertorum was validly published by Otto Stapf (1886) for a specimen collected during an expedition to Persia (modern-day Iran) in 1882.
Dudley (1962) later divided A. desertorum into three varieties (var. desertorum, himalayensis and prostratum), distinguished on the basis of minor differences in fruit trichomes, but today no infraspecific taxa are recognised (The Plant List, 2013). Recently, however, Plazibat (2009) in his study of the tribe Alysseae in the Croatian flora identified a putative new variety, A. desertorum var. socolacicum var. nov. This variety is noted in Missouri Botanical Garden (2015) but not currently not recognised by The Plant List (2013).
DescriptionTop of page
A. desertorum is a self-compatible, autogamous, herbaceous annual with erect, ascending, or decumbent, stems 5-18 cm tall, sometimes reaching 28 cm. Leaves are cauline, arranged alternately on the stem; they are linear to oblanceolate-linear in shape, with a sharply pointed tip and are 0.3-3.0 x 0.5-4.0 mm in size. The entire plant except for the fruit is covered with 8-20 rayed uniformly stellate trichomes, giving the plant a canescent appearance. Inflorescences are up to 10 cm long with 30-40 flowers on stout, straight, ascending pedicels 1.0-4.5 mm long. The flowers form from the bottom up as the inflorescence grows. Flowers are small, less than 2.5 x 0.6 mm in size, with 4 pale yellow, oblanceolate, apically obtuse or retuse petals widest at the tip. There are 30-40 flowers per plant. The fruiting pods or silicles are 2.5-4.5 mm in diameter, circular in outline with a shallow notch at the tip where the short style persists, uniformly inflated at the middle and broadly flattened at the margins and often glaucous. There are often 2 ovules per locule and 2 locules per pod. The locules are separated by a thin membrane that persists and is obvious on the dried, senescent plant. Seeds are brown, ovate, slightly compressed, very narrowly winged at the margins and 1.2-1.5 x 0.9-1.1 mm in size (Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 2010; Jacobs, 2012; Flora of China, 2015).
Plant TypeTop of page Annual
DistributionTop of page
In Europe there is confusion about the status of A. desertorum in the Baltic States, with some sources claiming it to be native and others that it is an introduction. USDA-ARS (2015), for example, lists the species as being both native and naturalized in Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia.
The status of A. desertorum in Tibet is uncertain as it was not recorded in Flora Xizangica Vol. 2 (Wu, 1985) and it seems its presence is solely based on the holotype of A. desertorum var. himalayense collected in the 1830s in the Himalayas on the Tibet border.
In the USA, the Jepson Flora Project (2014) noted the presence of A. desertorum in disturbed areas and rocky sagebrush flats at an altitude of 1000–1500 m in California's Inner South Coast Ranges and Modoc Plateau, with the range extending to Washington and Nebraska. According to Johnson (1999) A. desertorum has been identified as an alien invasive in a number of national parks, including Yellowstone National Park (which is primarily located in Wyoming but also extends partially into Idaho and Montana), Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area (in the northern Rockies of Wyoming and Montana), Devil's Tower National Monument (northeastern Wyoming), Little Bighorn National Battlefield Monument (Montana) and Wind Cave National Park (South Dakota). It is in Yellowstone National Park that much research into A. desertorum control has been undertaken.
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
|Continent/Country/Region||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||Reference||Notes|
|China||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-Xinjiang||Present||Native||Tang et al., 2011; Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2015; USDA-ARS, 2015|
|Georgia (Republic of)||Present||Native||USDA-ARS, 2015|
|-Jammu and Kashmir||Present||Native||Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2015|
|Mongolia||Present||Native||FloraGREIF, 2010; Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2015|
|Pakistan||Present||Native||Khan and Shah, 2013; USDA-ARS, 2015||Collected in Mardan District, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province in 2013|
|Tajikistan||Present||Native||Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2015|
|Turkey||Present||Native||Med-Checklist, 2015; USDA-ARS, 2015|
|Canada||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-Alberta||Localised||Introduced||Mulligan, 2002; Plants of Canada Database, 2013; USDA-ARS, 2015||Present in southern Alberta|
|-British Columbia||Localised||Introduced||Mulligan, 2002; Plants of Canada Database, 2013; USDA-ARS, 2015||Present in south-east and south-central British Columbia|
|-Manitoba||Present||Introduced||Plants of Canada Database, 2013|
|-Saskatchewan||Localised||Introduced||1944||CBIF, 2012; Plants of Canada Database, 2013; USDA-ARS, 2015||Present in southeastern Saskatchewan|
|USA||Localised||Introduced||1941||Invasive||Mosley, 2014||Invasive of disturbed sites in some western locations|
|-California||Present||Introduced||Jepson Flora Poject, 2014; USDA-ARS, 2015|
|-Colorado||Localised||Introduced||EDDMapS, 2015; USDA-ARS, 2015||Present in Siskiyou, Modoc and Lassen Counties in northern California|
|-Idaho||Localised||Introduced||Dudley, 1962; USDA-ARS, 2015|
|-Montana||Localised||Introduced||Invasive||Dudley, 1968; Evangelista et al., 2011; USDA-ARS, 2015||Invades sites disturbed by gas drilling|
|-Nebraska||Localised||Introduced||EDDMapS, 2015||Present in Sioux County, western Nebraska|
|-North Dakota||Present||Introduced||USDA-ARS, 2015|
|-Oregon||Localised||Introduced||EDDMapS, 2015; USDA-ARS, 2015||Present in Lake County, southern Oregon|
|-South Dakota||Present||Introduced||USDA-ARS, 2015|
|-Utah||Localised||Introduced||Invasive||Dudley, 1968; EDDMapS, 2015; USDA-ARS, 2015|
|-Washington||Present||Introduced||Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 2015|
|-Wyoming||Localised||Introduced||Invasive||Dudley, 1968; Rew et al., 2007; Evangelista et al., 2011; USDA-ARS, 2015||Invades sites disturbed by gas drilling; invasive in Yellowstone National Park|
|Denmark||Present, few occurrences||Native||1925||NOBANIS, 2015|
|Estonia||Present, few occurrences||Introduced||1925||DAISIE, 2015; NOBANIS, 2015; USDA-ARS, 2015||Disagreement between sources as to whether native or introduced|
|Greece||Present||Native||Med-Checklist, 2015; USDA-ARS, 2015||Present on mainland and east Aegean islands|
|Latvia||Present||DAISIE, 2015; USDA-ARS, 2015||Disagreement between sources as to whether native or introduced|
|Liechtenstein||Present||Native||Euro+Med PlantBase, 2011|
|Lithuania||Present||DAISIE, 2015; USDA-ARS, 2015||Disagreement between sources as to whether native or introduced|
|Norway||Present||Introduced||1957||Not invasive||NOBANIS, 2015|
|Poland||Localised||Native||Zajac and Zajac, 2001; USDA-ARS, 2015||Rare and confined mainly to the Mazowieckie and Podlaskie provinces in the east|
|Russian Federation||Present||Native||USDA-ARS, 2015|
|-Central Russia||Zolotareva et al., 2014||Reported in the Central Urals, with a new record for Sverdlovsk Province in 2014|
|-Eastern Siberia||Present||Native||USDA-ARS, 2015|
|-Southern Russia||Present||Native||USDA-ARS, 2015|
|-Western Siberia||Present||Native||USDA-ARS, 2015|
|Slovakia||Present||Native||Murín et al., 1999; USDA-ARS, 2015|
|Sweden||Present, few occurrences||Introduced||Not invasive||NOBANIS, 2015|
|Ukraine||Present||Native||USDA-ARS, 2015||Including Crimea|
|Yugoslavia (former)||Present||Native||Med-Checklist, 2015|
History of Introduction and SpreadTop of page
According to Mosley (2014), A. desertorum was introduced into the USA by migrants from Europe and/or Asia to be grown for its traditional medicinal properties (including as a cure for hiccoughs, rabies and mental illness) but was not reported until 1941. T. R. Dudley, writing in 1968, observed that A. desertorum had a narrower distribution in the USA than Alyssum alyssoides, another introduction from Europe/Asia (Dudley, 1968). At the time only sporadic populations of A. desertorum were known from: Bannock County, Idaho; Missoula County, Montana; Sheridan County, Wyoming; and San Juan County, Utah. However, Rollins (1981; 1993) reported that the species is abundant on sheep rangelands in the Rocky Mountains and Great Basin region. In the Lower Muddy Creek Watershed in Wyoming, transects in 2009 that did not include A. desertorum 10 years previously, then reported it as the dominant species (BLM Wyoming, 2014). This area had recently experienced intensive coalbed methane drilling activity and hence, site disturbance. A. desertorum with its relative A. alyssoides together occur as exotic aliens in 37 USA states and seven Canadian provinces (Mosley, 2014).
In Canada A. desertorum was first collected in 1944, at Indian Head in southeastern Saskatchewan by B. J. Sallans and R. C. Russell (CBIF, 2012). It was subsequently found in other areas of south Saskatchewan, south Alberta and southeast and south-central British Columbia. It is, however, not listed under the Plant Protection Act nor the Federal Weed Seeds Order (Plants of Canada Database, 2013).
IntroductionsTop of page
|Introduced to||Introduced from||Year||Reason||Introduced by||Established in wild through||References||Notes|
|Natural reproduction||Continuous restocking|
|Canada||Europe||1944||Medicinal use (pathway cause)||Yes||No||Mulligan (2002)||First identified in Saskatchewan|
|USA||Europe||1941||Medicinal use (pathway cause)||Yes||No||Mosley (2014)||First collected 1941 but probably introduced much earlier|
Risk of IntroductionTop of page
According to Mosley (2014), writing about the situation in Montana, there is a perceived expansion in the range of A. desertorum with the species becoming more prevalent and problematic in the west, centre and south-east, although it is not listed as a noxious weed in the state. The reasons for the expansion in distribution are not clear, but climate change could be a cause, not only in Montana but throughout the western USA. Although there has been no research into the consequences of climate change per se on the spread of A. desertorum, recent serious droughts, for example, may have weakened established plant communities allowing invasion by Alyssum species which are more adapted to drought conditions. Mild winters favour A. desertorum seedling establishment and the adoption of reduced tillage of croplands by farmers may have encouraged the formation of environments more suitable for invasive species. Increased industrial activity, especially fracking, also favours the spread of A. desertorum by providing it with a suitable disturbed habitat to colonize. Seed of A. desertorum can adhere to both animals and vehicles and may be accidentally transported and introduced into new locations.
HabitatTop of page
In its native range, A. desertorum is found from near sea level up to an altitude of around 2600 m. It prefers arid and semiarid lands, deserts and rocky areas (Flora of China, 2015). Grubov (2001) indicates that in Mongolia A. desertorum is found on steppes, stony and debris-covered slopes and alkaline waterside gravels. In Poland, A. desertorum was identified as a species characteristic of xeric sand grasslands (Matuszkiewicz, 2001).
In North America, it is found at altitudes of 800-2000 m, in deserts, rocky areas, prairies, around grain elevators, railway beds, disturbed sites, roadsides, fields, meadows and sagebrush flats (Mulligan, 2002; Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 2015). Dry, gravelly areas on rangelands and croplands are also favoured.
Habitat ListTop of page
|Terrestrial – Managed||Cultivated / agricultural land||Principal habitat||Natural|
|Cultivated / agricultural land||Principal habitat||Productive/non-natural|
|Managed grasslands (grazing systems)||Principal habitat||Natural|
|Managed grasslands (grazing systems)||Principal habitat||Productive/non-natural|
|Industrial / intensive livestock production systems||Secondary/tolerated habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Disturbed areas||Secondary/tolerated habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Rail / roadsides||Secondary/tolerated habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Urban / peri-urban areas||Secondary/tolerated habitat||Natural|
|Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural||Natural grasslands||Principal habitat||Natural|
|Natural grasslands||Principal habitat||Productive/non-natural|
|Rocky areas / lava flows||Principal habitat||Natural|
|Scrub / shrublands||Principal habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Scrub / shrublands||Principal habitat||Natural|
|Arid regions||Principal habitat||Natural|
Host Plants and Other Plants AffectedTop of page
Biology and EcologyTop of page
A. desertorum is an annual forb that propagates by seed. With its coloured flowers, pollination is assumed to be entomophilous (FloraGREIF, 2010). Khan (2003) reports on the pollen morphology of seven Alyssum species, including A. desertorum, from Pakistan. Pollen grains are tricolpate with a reticulate tectum. Little variation between species was observed in shape, size, colpi length and exine pattern, but a palynological key to the species is provided. According to data collected in the Gurbantunggut Desert in northwest Xinjiang by Liu et al. (2014), seeds weigh 0.37 mg, are dispersed by rain drops (ombrohydrochory).
Physiology and Phenology
Plants flower in spring, with flowering, fruiting and seed dispersal occurring between March and July, depending on location. In North America plants flower and fruit from April to July, and from April to June in China. Plants die in summer after seed is shed. Seeds must after-ripen on the soil surface for several weeks before they can germinate. Most seeds will germinate in the current year. Germination rates of 93% have been recorded (Liu et al., 2014). Flowering and seed production are delayed following mild winters, allowing germination to occur in autumn when soil moisture is usually optimal for seedling survival. Although harsh winters promote early flowering and seed dispersal, seedling death is frequent under the subsequent hot, dry conditions of summer. The trichomes covering the plant that give it a greyish appearance help retain moisture, a feature typical of plants of arid and semiarid habitats.
In Poland, A. desertorum was identified as a species characteristic of xeric sand grasslands of the Koelerion glaucae [Koeleria glauca] complex and the association Cerastio-Androsacetum septentrionalis (Matuszkiewicz, 2001).
In western North America, it is invading big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) complexes (Bates et al., 2004).
A. desertorum is found growing at altitudes from sea level to 2600 m in its native range and 800-2000 m in North America, its introduced range. A. desertorum is a temperate species which prefers free draining soil.
ClimateTop of page
|B - Dry (arid and semi-arid)||Preferred||< 860mm precipitation annually|
|BS - Steppe climate||Preferred||> 430mm and < 860mm annual precipitation|
|BW - Desert climate||Preferred||< 430mm annual precipitation|
|C - Temperate/Mesothermal climate||Preferred||Average temp. of coldest month > 0°C and < 18°C, mean warmest month > 10°C|
|Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summer||Preferred||Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summers|
|D - Continental/Microthermal climate||Preferred||Continental/Microthermal climate (Average temp. of coldest month < 0°C, mean warmest month > 10°C)|
|Ds - Continental climate with dry summer||Preferred||Continental climate with dry summer (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, dry summers)|
Latitude/Altitude RangesTop of page
|Latitude North (°N)||Latitude South (°S)||Altitude Lower (m)||Altitude Upper (m)|
Soil TolerancesTop of page
Special soil tolerances
Natural enemiesTop of page
Notes on Natural EnemiesTop of page
Erysiphe cruciferarum was observed in 2005 infecting leaves of A. desertorum and A. hirsutum growing on a farm near Ankara in central Turkey (Karakaya, 2006). The same disease had previously been reported on A. desertorum in 1926 in Romania (HerbIMI, 2015). In 1977 Peronospora parasitica [Hyaloperonospora parasitica] was also reported on A. desertorum in Romania (HerbIMI, 2015).
Means of Movement and DispersalTop of page
A. desertorum exhibits ombrohydrochorous (rain assisted) seed dispersal (Liu et al., 2014).
Seeds of A. desertorum are carried on the bodies of animals, or are eaten in forage or in hay and subsequently excreted some distance away (Olliff et al., 2001). Western harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex occidentalis) predate on the seeds and are effective dispersal vectors (Mull, 2003).
Roadsides and areas where ground disturbing activities take place are among the main habitats in which A. desertorum is found, indicating that seeds are transported on vehicles including construction and industrial equipment. Gravel and sand used in construction and roadways are often contaminated with weed seeds (Olliff et al., 2001).
A. desertorum was originally introduced into North America as a medicinal garden plant, from where it spread into the wild (Mosley, 2014).
Pathway CausesTop of page
|Digestion and excretion||Seeds eaten by browsing wild and domestic animals||Yes||Olliff et al., 2001|
|Disturbance||Yes||Evangelista et al., 2011|
|Escape from confinement or garden escape||Originally introduced as a medicinal herb for garden cultivation||Yes||Yes||Mosley, 2014|
|Forage||In hay||Yes||Olliff et al., 2001|
|Medicinal use||Imported into North America as medicinal herb||Yes||Mosley, 2014|
Pathway VectorsTop of page
|Land vehicles||Yes||Yes||Olliff et al., 2001|
|Livestock||By seed ingestion and defecation in domestic and wild animals; on animals' bodies||Yes||Olliff et al., 2001|
|Machinery and equipment||Yes||Yes||Olliff et al., 2001|
|Mulch, straw, baskets and sod||In hay||Yes||Olliff et al., 2001|
|Soil, sand and gravel||Yes||Yes||Olliff et al., 2001|
|Water||Seeds dispersed by rain action||Yes||Liu et al., 2014|
Impact SummaryTop of page
Economic ImpactTop of page
One of the main economic impacts quantified with regard to A. desertorum is the actual cost of controlling the weed and restoring native plant communities to a pre-invasion status. In a pilot vegetation restoration project in the Gardiner Basin of Yellowstone National Park from 2008 to 2015, the actual plus projected costs amounted to US$1,013,459 for the eight years. This included the costs of native plant seed production, salaries, fencing contracts, equipment, herbicides, cover crop sowing and soil sampling which amounted to US$20,269 per acre (Renkin et al., 2014).
Environmental ImpactTop of page
A. desertorum is a shallow rooted plant that can accelerate soil erosion. It also extracts surface soil moisture, thus impeding the establishment of seedlings of other more desirable species. Nersesyan and Shur-Bagdasaryan (1990) showed that heavy grazing in Armenia of steppe grasslands dominated by Festuca sulcata [Festuca rupicola] on sloping sites destroyed plant cover and increased water erosion of soil. Reduction in soil fertility was indicated by the development of drought resistant annual weeds, including A. desertorum, which had a negative effect on soil conservation.
Since the early 2000s, A. desertorum has greatly expanded its coverage in Gardiner Basin, an area of abandoned agricultural land and arid grassland ecosystem important as a wildlife corridor and winter range for large ungulates, including bison (Bison bison). Here it forms near-monocultures in some areas and is colonising surrounding landslides and mudflows, out-competing native vegetation and negatively altering soil biodiversity. Hamilton and Hellquist (2012) found that microbial community diversity was much lower in soils dominated by A. desertorum than in soils supporting native plant communities and even soils colonised by exotic perennial grasses. This resulted in negative effects on soil quality through decreases in soil organic matter, moisture-holding capacity, respiration rates and net ecosystem productivity. However, the invasion by A. desertorum had not affected the soils in which native Poa secunda was growing, indicating the persistence of native soil bacterial communities within invaded soils (Hamilton III et al., 2009).
In Wyoming, A. desertorum is invading areas such as the Lower Muddy Creek Watershed which are crucial winter ranges for antelope, deer and elk (Cervus canadensis) and are important for the greater sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) as areas for over-wintering, brood-rearing and courtship (leks). A. desertorum is also displacing many native perennial plants through competition (BLM Wyoming, 2014).
In their experimental studies, Evangelista et al. (2011) found that the richness and overall coverage of disturbed land by A. desertorum, cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), Japanese brome (Bromus japonicus) and other invasive weeds was generally increased by disturbance. As a result, the richness and coverage of native species was decreased. The native species in the region being typical of sagebrush steppe and mixed-grass prairie.
The Goose Creek milkvetch (Astragalus anserinus), a low-growing, matted, perennial forb, listed in the USA as a candidate species under the Endangered Species Act, grows only in a 26 km2 area of the Goose Watershed of the Upper Snake River Basin in Idaho, Nevada and Utah. A survey of the species in 2011 in Utah by Shohet and Wolf (2011) found several non-native species growing at or immediately adjacent to milkvetch population sites. Many sites had both B. tectorum and A. desertorum in high concentrations, threatening the survival of these populations.
Threatened SpeciesTop of page
|Threatened Species||Conservation Status||Where Threatened||Mechanism||References||Notes|
|Astragalus anserinus (Goose Creek milkvetch)||NatureServe NatureServe; USA ESA candidate species USA ESA candidate species||Idaho; Nevada; Utah||Competition - monopolizing resources; Competition (unspecified); Ecosystem change / habitat alteration||Shohet and Wolf, 2011; US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2014|
Risk and Impact FactorsTop of page Invasiveness
- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Has a broad native range
- Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
- Pioneering in disturbed areas
- Fast growing
- Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
- Damaged ecosystem services
- Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
- Modification of nutrient regime
- Monoculture formation
- Negatively impacts agriculture
- Reduced native biodiversity
- Threat to/ loss of endangered species
- Threat to/ loss of native species
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
- Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant
- Difficult/costly to control
UsesTop of page
Hovsepyan and Willcox (2008) analysed charred plant remains and impressions of chaff in pisé (mud brick) from the Neolithic sites of Aratashen and Aknashen (sixth millennium BC.) in the Ararat valley in Armenia. They discovered that along with barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum species), two lesser known crucifers, Camelina microcarpa and A. desertorum, were frequently present in the form of crop processing residues. This indicates that in prehistory they were important, grown or collected, perhaps as sources of seed oil.
Today, A. desertorum is grown as a minor oilseed crop in parts of western Asia. In on-farm trials in Shahrekord in Iran, Yadegari and Shakerian (2014) tested the effects of irrigation periods and iron and zinc foliar feeds on the agronomic characteristics of Borago officinalis, Calendula officinalis, Thymus vulgaris and A. desertorum. Results found that applying iron and zinc at 400 ppm, with irrigation every three days, gave the highest seed yields.
A. desertorum is part of the southern steppe plant community in Ukraine and as such has been used as fodder.
The seeds of A. desertorum are an important food source for several animals, including the desert hamster (Phodopus roborovskii) in its native range across northeastern China and Mongolia (Ross, 1994). The steppe tortoise, Testudo horsfieldii (an IUCN red list vulnerable species) is native to Central Asia and feeds during its mating season on leaves, flowers and fruits of A. desertorum (Lagarde et al., 2003).
In its introduced range, seed predation by western harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex occidentalis) has been observed in Wyoming (Mull, 2003) and in Yellowstone National Park A. desertorum is browsed by pronghorn antelopes (Antilocapra americana) in winter (Boccadori et al., 2008).
Uses ListTop of page
Animal feed, fodder, forage
- Fodder/animal feed
Human food and beverage
DiagnosisTop of page
Presence of A. desertorum can be determined by visual inspection of plants and seeds.
Detection and InspectionTop of page
Rew et al. (2007) in their survey of non-indigenous plant species, including A. desertorum, in the Northern Range of Yellowstone National Park in 2001-2004, surveyed along transects to allow data to be collected continuously and a large sample size to be generated. Surveying along transects allowed changes in underlying environmental variables to be recorded, which was important for estimating the geographic distribution of the species from the sample data. Transects established perpendicular to roads and trails were accepted as the most effective sampling methodology. At a length of 2000 m, transects were sufficiently long to cross a number of habitat types. Paired transects were used to maximize surveying time while in the field. Transects were walked and survey observations were made within a 10 m wide swath. Surveys over an area of 529,000 m x 10 m in the Park's Northern Range found A. desertorum to be one of nine species that were observed to occur over more than 1% of the surveyed area (Rew et al., 2007).
Similarities to Other Species/ConditionsTop of page
Commenting on introduced Alyssum species in the USA, Dudley (1968) noted that A. desertorum was often confused with but could be easily distinguished from the very similar A. alyssoides. A. desertorum is identifiable by its larger and glabrous silicles and early deciduous sepals; in A. alyssoides the silicles always possess an indumentum of stellate trichomes and the sepals are persistent. Both species grow on dry, gravelly areas on rangelands and croplands, but A. desertorum occupies harsher, rockier sites at lower elevations (Mosley, 2014).
Weeds mistaken for A. desertorum in Montana include hoary alyssum (Berteroa incana), a Priority 2A noxious weed in the state and whitetop (Lepidium draba) a Priority 2B noxious weed. B. incana is taller than A. desertorum with white flowers which bloom from May to September. L. draba is also taller than A. desertorum with white-flowers, but is also perennial and with leaves covered in straight rather than stellate trichomes (Mosley, 2014).
In the Tianshan Mountains of central Asia, A. desertorum is similar to Arabidopsis thaliana in terms of ecological requirements and habitats (Jacobs, 2012).
Prevention and ControlTop of page
As A. desertorum can be transported in hay, only certified weed-free hay is allowed in or through Yellowstone National Park (Olliff et al., 2001).
Cultural Control and Sanitary Measures
To eliminate A. desertorum seed from being transported in gravel, any gravel destined for use in Yellowstone National Park has to be from a source operating a weed management plan or has to be heated to 150°C (Olliff et al., 2001).
A native grass restoration project in the northern boundary area of Yellowstone National Park north of Gardiner, Montana, found that applying prescribed burns in October significantly reduced A. desertorum numbers the year following the burns (Jacobs, 2012). However, Bates et al. (2004) found that burning of Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata subsp. wyomingensis) by wildfires substantially increased A. desertorum cover.
A number of herbicides, including metsulfuron and glyphosate, are known to temporarily reduce populations of A. desertorum (Jacobs, 2012). In the Lower Muddy Creek Watershed in Wyoming, small plot treatments were started in 2009 with a variety of different chemicals and rates to test for the most efficient and cost-effective treatment. Preliminary results show a 75-90% reduction in A. desertorum cover, a 15-75% increase in grass cover and a 100% increase in bare ground after treatments (BLM Wyoming, 2014). Removal of A. desertorum in this area would improve or maintain the habitat for wildlife and livestock using the area.
IPM and Ecosystem Restoration
A pilot native plant community restoration project was undertaken in the Gardiner Basin of the Yellowstone National Park, USA in 2008-14. This project had an integrated approach to controlling A. desertorum. Treatments involved herbicide applications, hand pulling, burning, harrowing, construction of exclosures and planting a barley/wheat cover crop to stabilize the soil and stimulate soil biota. Preliminary results indicate that the management actions undertaken have increased the likelihood of long-term successful native vegetation restoration (Renkin et al., 2014). A vigorous native plant community can help prevent invasion of an area by weedy species (Olliff et al., 2001).
Gaps in Knowledge/Research NeedsTop of page
Research into the effects of climate change on A. desertorum is needed, as well as more assessments on the impact of fracking on native plant communities and alien plant invasions.
ReferencesTop of page
Bates J, Davies K, Miller R, 2004. Ecology of the Wyoming big sagebrush alliance in the northern Great Basin: 2004 progress report. Burns, Oregon, USA: Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, 65 pp.
BLM Wyoming, 2014. Inventory and control of desert alyssum in Lower Muddy Creek Watershed. USGS ScienceBase Catalog. Wyoming, USA: USGS. https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/4f4e4ac1e4b07f02db677300
CBIF, 2012. Canadian biodiversity information facility. http://www.cbif.gc.ca/eng/home/?id=1370403266262
DAISIE, 2015. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe. European Invasive Alien Species Gateway. www.europe-aliens.org/default.do
Dudley TR, 1962. Some new Alyssa from the Near East. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, 24:157-165.
Dudley TR, 1968. Alyssum (Cruciferae) introduced in North America. Rhodora, 70:298-300.
EDDMapS, 2015. Early detection and distribution mapping system https://www.eddmaps.org/. Tifton, Georgia, USA: The University of Georgia - Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health
Euro+Med PlantBase, 2011. Euro+Med PlantBase: The information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. Palermo, Italy. http://www.emplantbase.org/home.html
Europeana, 2015. Alyssum desertorum Stapf. http://www.europeana.eu/portal/record/11602/HERBARWU_WU_AUSTRIA_119430.html
Evangelista PH, Crall AW, Bergquist E, 2011. Invasive plants and their response to energy development. In: Energy development and wildlife conservation in western North America [ed. by Naugle, D. E.]. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 115-130.
Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2015. Flora of China. St. Louis, Missouri and Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden and Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2
Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 2010. Alyssum desertorum Stapf. Flora of North America. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 248-249.
Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 2015. Flora of North America North of Mexico. St. Louis, Missouri and Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden and Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=1
FloraGREIF, 2010. FloraGREIF - virtual guide to the flora of Mongolia. Greifswald, Germany: Greifswald University. http://greif.uni-greifswald.de/floragreif/
Hamilton IIIEW, Hellquist CE, 2012. Yellowstone's most invaded landscape: vegetation restoration in Gardiner Basin. Yellowstone Science, 20(1):25-32.
Hamilton IIIEW, Hellquist CE, Fay B, Friend W, Gregory B, Wahl K, 2009. 94th ESA Annual Meeting. http://eco.confex.com/eco/2009/webprogram/Paper16739.html
HerbIMI, 2015. HerbIMI database. London, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens. http://www.herbimi.info
Hovsepyan R, Willcox G, 2008. The earliest finds of cultivated plants in Armenia: evidence from charred remains and crop processing residues in pisé from the Neolithic settlements of Aratashen and Aknashen. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany [Proceedings of the 14th Symposium of the International Work Group for Palaeoethnobotany, Kraków, Poland, 17-23 June 2007.], 17(Suppl. 1):63-71. http://springerlink.com/content/v15l225p712rp12q/fulltext.html
Jacobs J, 2012. Plant fact sheet for desert madwort (Alyssum desertorum). Bozeman, Montana, USA: USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Bozeman State Office.
Jepson Flora Poject, 2014. Jepson eFlora. Berkeley California, USA: Univeristy of California. http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/jepson_flora_project.html
Johnson T, 1999. Alyssum desertorum. In: CRC ethnobotany desk reference. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 35.
Lagarde F, Bonnet X, Corbin J, Henen B, Nagy K, Mardonov B, Naulleau G, 2003. Foraging behaviour and diet of an ectothermic herbivore: Testudo horsfieldi. Ecography, 26(2):236-242.
Liu HL, Zhang DY, Yang XJ, Huang ZY, Duan SM, Wang XY, 2014. Seed dispersal and germination traits of 70 plant species inhabiting the Gurbantunggut Desert in northwest China. Scientific World Journal, 2014(Article ID:346405).
Matuszkiewicz W, 2001. Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk roslinnych Polski. [Identification guide for the plant communities of Poland]. Warsaw, Poland: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Med-Checklist, 2015. A critical inventory of vascular plants of the circum-mediterranean countries. Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem. http://ww2.bgbm.org/mcl/home.asp
Missouri Botanical Garden, 2015. Tropicos database. St. Louis, Missouri, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden. http://www.tropicos.org/
Mosley J, 2014. Featured weed: yellow and desert alyssum. Big Sky Small Acres, Spring/Summer:4-5.
NOBANIS, 2015. North European and Baltic Network on Invasive Alien Species. http://www.nobanis.org/
Olliff T, Renkin R, McClure C, Miller P, Price D, Reinhart D, Whipple J, 2001. Managing a complex exotic vegetation program in Yellowstone National Park. Western North American Naturalist, 61(3):347-358.
Plants of Canada Database, 2013. Plants of Canada Database., Canada: Government of Canada. http://www.plantsofcanada.info.gc.ca/taxa.php?lang=e
Renkin R, Klaptosky J, Winslow S, Jacobs J, Scianna J, Hamilton IIIEW, 2014. Progress report: implementation of pilot native vegetation restoration efforts in the Gardiner Basin, Yellowstone National Park, 2008-2014., USA: Yellowstone Center for Resources, 23 pp.
Rew LJ, Maxwell BD, Dougher FL, Aspinall R, Weaver T, Despain D, 2007. A survey of non-indigenous plant species in the Northern Range of Yellowstone National Park, 2001-2004. An inventory case study. In: Invasive plant management: CIPM online textbook. Bozeman, Montana, USA: Center for Invasive Plant Management.
Rollins RC, 1981. Weeds of the Cruciferae (Brassicaceae) in North America. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum, 62:517-540.
Rollins RC, 1993. The Cruciferae of continental North America: Systematics of the mustard family from the Arctic to Panama. Stanford, California, USA: Stanford University Press, 996 pp.
Ross PD, 1994. Phodopus roborovskii. Mammalian Species, 459:1-4.
Shohet C, Wolf L, 2011. Botanical studies of the Goose Creek milkvetch in Utah: 2011 population survey results from known and new sites. Botanical Survey Report No. L10PS02416. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA: Bureau of Land Management, Utah State Office, 23 pp.
Stapf O, 1886. Alyssum desertorum Stapf. Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften,Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Classe, 51:302.
Tang J, Li X, Zhao Z, Yin YB, 2011. Response of plant diversity in desert and dominant population spatial pattern to the environment - a case study of Gurbantunggut Desert [in Chinese]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 47(10):2084-2090.
The Plant List, 2013. The Plant List: a working list of all plant species. Version 1.1. London, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://www.theplantlist.org
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2014. In: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service species assessment and listing priority assignment form: Astragalus anserinus. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 30 pp.. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/candidate/assessments/2014/r6/Q3B5_P01.pdf
USDA-ARS, 2015. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx
Wu CY, 1985. Flora Xizangica, Volume 2 [ed. by Wu, C. Y.]. Beijing, China: Kexue Chubanshe, 969 pp.
Yadegari M, Shakerian A, 2014. Irrigation periods and Fe, Zn foliar application on agronomic characters of Borago officinalis, Calendula officinalis, Thymus vulgaris and Alyssum desertorum. Advances in Environmental Biology, 8(4):1054-1062.
Zajac A, Zajac M, 2001. Atlas rozmieszczenia roslin naczyniowych w Polsce (Distribution atlas of vascular plants in Poland) [ed. by Zajac,. A.\Zajac, M.]. Kraków, Poland: Jagiellonian University, xii + 714 pp.
Zolotareva NV, Podgaevskaya EN, Knyasev MS, 2014. The forest-steppe and steppe species on the northern limit of their distribution (floristic records of vascular plants in the Middle Urals). Botanicheskii Zhurnal, 99(3):352-358.
ContributorsTop of page
15/02/2015 Original text by:
Andrew Praciak, Carne, Wexford, Ireland.
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/