Sitophilus zeamais (greater grain weevil)
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Distribution Table
- Habitat List
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Growth Stages
- List of Symptoms/Signs
- Biology and Ecology
- Natural enemies
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Detection and Inspection
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky
Preferred Common Name
- greater grain weevil
Other Scientific Names
- Calandra chilensis (Philippi & Philippi)
- Calandra oryzae
- Calandra oryzae platensis
- Calandra platensis (Zacher)
- Calandra quadrimacula (Walker)
- Calandra zeamais Motschulsky
- Calandra zemais (Motschulsky)
- Calendra zeamais Motschulsky
- Sitophilus oryzae platensis
- Sitophilus oryzae zeamaiz Motschulsky
International Common Names
- English: billbug, northern corn; maize weevil; weevil, greater rice; weevil, maize
- Spanish: gorgojo del grano; gorgojo del maiz; gorgojo del maíz almacenado; picudo del maíz
- French: calandre du mais
- Portuguese: gorgulho do milho
Local Common Names
- Germany: Kaefer, La-Plata-Mais-; Kaefer, Mais-
- Iran: susske sorrat
- Japan: kokuzo
- Norway: maissnutebille
- Turkey: misir biti
- CALAZM (Sitophilus zeamais)
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Metazoa
- Phylum: Arthropoda
- Subphylum: Uniramia
- Class: Insecta
- Order: Coleoptera
- Family: Dryophthoridae
- Genus: Sitophilus
- Species: Sitophilus zeamais
Notes on Taxonomy and NomenclatureTop of page The taxonomy of the Sitophilus group has been confused until recently, so that the value of much of the earlier literature on these insects has been reduced, because of the difficulty of knowing the species to which it refers.
First described by Linnaeus in 1798 as Curculio oryza, the first named species of the group was later revised by De Clairville and Scheltenburg in 1798 as Calandra oryzae, which uses the commonest generic synonym for Sitophilus. Many workers subsequently recognized that two distinct forms of the species existed, which were described as the 'large' and 'small' forms. In 1855, Motschulsky recognized the large form as a distinct species, which he named Sitophilus zeamais. Unfortunately, few workers recognized this revision and the name Calandra oryzae continued to be applied to all insects in this complex. Takahashi in 1928 and 1931 complicated matters by raising the small form to specific status as Calandra sasakii. This confused situation continued until 1959, when Floyd and Newsom (1959) revised the complex; this was followed by a further revision by Kuschel (1961). In these revisions it was shown that Linnaeus originally described the smaller species and that Motschulsky's description of the larger species was valid. Both species were therefore placed in the genus Sitophilus with the specific names proposed by Linnaeus and Motschulsky.
Unfortunately, the size difference between S. oryzae and S. zeamais is not consistent, so it is not possible to be sure that references to the large and small forms of Calandra oryzae refer to S. zeamais and S. oryzae, respectively. Therefore the only true and unconfused synonym of S. oryzae is Calandra sasakii; in pre-1960s literature, Calandra oryzae 'small' and 'large' forms could refer to either S. zeamais or S. oryzae, and it is also possible that some references to 'S. oryzae' in the 1960s and early 1970s literature actually relate to S. zeamais misidentified by use of old keys. The genus Sitophilus and its species may be identified using the keys of Gorham (1987) or Haines (1991).
DescriptionTop of page Eggs, Larvae and Pupae
These developmental stages are all found within tunnels and chambers bored in the grain and are thus not normally seen. The larvae are apodous.
Usually blacker than S. oryzae, with fine microsculpture and is more shiny. Scutellum with lateral elevations further apart than their longitudinal length which is about half as long as the scutellum.
Males with median lobe of aedeagus with two longitudinal grooves dorsally, except in the apical quarter, and is thus sinuous in cross section.
Females with lateral lobes of the Y-shaped sclerite pointed and their separation is greater than for S. oryzae.
S. oryzae and S. zeamais are almost indistinguishable from each other externally; identification is by examination of the genitalia. Both have the characteristic rostrum and elbowed antennae of the family Curculionidae. The antennae have eight segments and are often carried in an extended position when the insect is walking. Both species usually have four pale reddish-brown or orange-brown oval markings on the elytra, but these are often indistinct. (See also S. oryzae.)
Both species can be separated from S. granarius by the presence of wings beneath the elytra (absent in S. granarius) and by having circular, rather than oval, punctures on the prothorax. Molecular characters also separate S. oryzae and S. zeamais and confirm reproductive isolation (Hidayat et al., 1996).
DistributionTop of page S. zeamais and S. oryzae are found in all warm and tropical parts of the world, but S. oryzae may also be found in temperate climates.
The detailed map plotted on the basis of actual country records gives a falsely restricted distribution. These pests are carried all over the world in grain shipments and can establish themselves wherever there is food and where grain moisture and temperature are favourable. In various locations, one species may be more common than the other. A global survey of resistance to pesticides (Champ and Dyte, 1976) contains detailed location lists for both species.
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
|Continent/Country/Region||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||Reference||Notes|
|Afghanistan||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Bahrain||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|China||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|India||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Maharashtra||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Uttar Pradesh||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Indonesia||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Iran||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Iraq||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Israel||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Japan||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Korea, Republic of||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Kuwait||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Malaysia||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Myanmar||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Nepal||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Pakistan||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Philippines||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Saudi Arabia||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Singapore||Widespread||Champ and Dyte, 1976; AVA, 2001|
|Sri Lanka||Present||Ganesalingam, 1977|
|Syria||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Taiwan||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Thailand||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Turkey||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Vietnam||Present||Stusak et al., 1986|
|Yemen||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Algeria||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Angola||Present||Pacavira et al., 2006|
|Benin||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Botswana||Present||Mpuchane et al., 2000|
|Cameroon||Present||Ayuk-Takem et al., 1982|
|Central African Republic||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Côte d'Ivoire||Present||Clement et al., 1988|
|Egypt||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Ethiopia||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Gambia||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Kenya||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Lesotho||Present||Thind and Muggleton, 1981|
|Libya||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Malawi||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Morocco||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Mozambique||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Nigeria||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Rwanda||Present||Weaver et al., 1991|
|Senegal||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Somalia||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|South Africa||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Swaziland||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Tanzania||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Togo||Present||Deuse and Pointel, 1975; Pantenius, 1988|
|Zambia||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Zimbabwe||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Mexico||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Arkansas||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-California||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Georgia||Present||Brown and Lee, 2002|
|-Kansas||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Louisiana||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Texas||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Virginia||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Wisconsin||Present||Nansen et al., 2004|
Central America and Caribbean
|Antigua and Barbuda||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Belize||Present||Fortier et al., 1982|
|Cuba||Present||Aviles and Guibert, 1986|
|El Salvador||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Guatemala||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Jamaica||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Nicaragua||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Trinidad and Tobago||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Argentina||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Amazonas||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Goias||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Minas Gerais||Present||Oliveira et al., 2007|
|-Piaui||Present||Fontes et al., 2003|
|-Rio de Janeiro||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Rio Grande do Sul||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Roraima||Present||Marsaro et al., 2007|
|-Santa Catarina||Present||Santos and Wamser, 2006|
|-Sao Paulo||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Easter Island||Present||Olalquiaga, 1980|
|Colombia||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|French Guiana||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Guyana||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Peru||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Uruguay||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Austria||Present||Berger and Hetfleis, 1985|
|Belgium||Present||Letellier et al., 1994|
|Bulgaria||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Cyprus||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Germany||Present||Bahr and Prinz, 1977|
|Greece||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Italy||Present||Gelosi and Arcozzi, 1983|
|Poland||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Portugal||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Romania||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Russian Federation||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Spain||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|UK||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|Yugoslavia (former)||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-New South Wales||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Queensland||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-South Australia||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Tasmania||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Victoria||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|-Western Australia||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
|New Caledonia||Present||Brun and Attia, 1983|
|Papua New Guinea||Present||Champ and Dyte, 1976|
Habitat ListTop of page
Hosts/Species AffectedTop of page Both S. oryzae and S. zeamais are able to develop on a wide range of cereals and also on processed cereal products such as pasta. However, food preferences of the two species are variable; it is clear that S. zeamais is predominantly found associated with maize grain, whereas S. oryzae is associated with wheat.
In the case of rice, detailed surveys in Indonesia have shown that S. zeamais is dominant on milled rice, whereas S. oryzae is more common on paddy (rough rice). Laboratory studies have shown that this is a result of their different rates of increase on these two forms of rice (Hussain et al., 1985). It is not yet known whether these relationships with the form of rice hold true throughout the tropics, but imports of milled rice into the UK from many countries are much more frequently infested by S. zeamais than by S. oryzae.
Both species are able to breed on dried cassava and have been reported as frequent pests of this commodity. A few strains of S. oryzae have been found which can develop on grain legumes (Coombs et al., 1977): peas, lentils and green or black gram are the pulses most often attacked by these strains.
Growth StagesTop of page Post-harvest
SymptomsTop of page The eggs, larvae and pupae are not normally seen because they develop inside intact grains. Adult emergence holes with irregular edges are apparent some weeks after the initial attack. Adults can be found wandering over the surface of grain.
List of Symptoms/SignsTop of page
|Seeds / internal feeding|
Biology and EcologyTop of page The earlier confusion over the identity of S. zeamais and S. oryzae, and the fact that most of the major basic studies were made before the confusion was resolved, means we cannot be sure to which of the species many of the observations refer. The development of the two species is clearly very similar, but there are probably a number of differences in the effects of environmental factors. Thus, the information given below may be taken as generally applicable to both species, but it should be remembered that there may be specific differences in details.
The biology of S. zeamais and S. oryzae has been reviewed in detail by Longstaff (1981). The adults are long-lived (several months to one year). Eggs are laid throughout most of the adult life, although 50% may be laid in the first 4-5 weeks; each female may lay up to 150 eggs. The eggs are laid individually in small cavities chewed into cereal grains by the female; each cavity is sealed, thus protecting the egg, by a waxy secretion (usually referred to as an 'egg-plug') produced by the female. The incubation period of the egg is about 6 days at 25°C (Howe, 1952). Eggs are laid at temperatures between 15 and 35°C (with an optimum around 25°C) and at grain moisture contents over 10%; however, rates of oviposition are very low below 20°C or above 32°C, and below about 12% moisture content (Birch, 1944).
Upon hatching, the larva begins to feed inside the grain, excavating a tunnel as it develops. There are four larval instars: in English wheat at 25°C and 70% RH, pupation occurs after about 25 days, although development periods are extremely protracted at low temperatures (e.g. 98 days at 18°C and 70% RH). Pupation takes place within the grain; the newly developed adult chews its way out, leaving a large, characteristic emergence hole. Total development periods range from about 35 days under optimal conditions to over 110 days in unfavourable conditions (Birch, 1944; Howe, 1952). The actual length of the life cycle also depends upon the type and quality of grain being infested: for example, in different varieties of maize, mean development periods of S. zeamais at 27°C and 70% RH have been shown to vary from 31 to 37 days. The development of S. zeamais on different wheats (Triticum spelta, T. dicoccum and T. monococcum spikelets and kernels) has also been studied (Suss et al., 1999). A demographic population simulation model of S. zeamais in grain stores in West Africa has been devised (Meikle et al., 1999).
Although both species are capable of flight, S. zeamais has a greater ability and tendency to fly (Giles, 1969). Where grain is stored on small farms, S. zeamais is thus more likely than S. oryzae to fly to the ripening crop in the field and establish an infestation in the grain before harvest.
Natural enemiesTop of page
|Natural enemy||Type||Life stages||Specificity||References||Biological control in||Biological control on|
Notes on Natural EnemiesTop of page Both S. zeamais and S. oryzae are commonly parasitized by pteromalids (and occasionally other Hymenoptera). Common pteromalid parasites found in the Tropics include Anisopteromalus calandrae, Lariophagus distinguendus and Theocolax elegans.
ImpactTop of page S. oryzae and S. zeamais are very important pests of cereals. In maize or sorghum, attack may start in the mature crop when the moisture content of the grain has fallen to 18-20%. Subsequent infestations in store result from the transfer of infested grain into store or from the pest flying into storage facilities, probably attracted by the odour of the stored grain.
In stored maize, heavy infestations of these pests may cause weight losses of as much as 30-40%, although losses are commonly 4-5%. S. zeamais has been found to be amongst the most important pests of maize in a number of studies; in South Carolina, USA, (Arbogast and Throne, 1997), in Kentucky (Sedlacek et al., 1998) and in steel silos in Taiwan (Peng, 1998), and in central Italy (Trematerra et al., 1999). Insect pests infesting stored pearl millet and their damage potential, were assessed in northeastern Nigeria by Lale and Yusuf (2000). S. zeamais caused ca. 0.6% damage. Damage was greater in grains stored in the underground pit storage system than in grains stored in a rumbu, clay pot or polypropylene sack.
S. zeamais has been detected in seeds during quarantine processing of germplasm imported into India (Babu, 1997), in pigeonpeas imported from Indonesia and sorghum from the USA.
Infestations in rice are damaging, but loss estimates from real, as opposed to laboratory situations, are lacking.
Detection and InspectionTop of page Flight traps will collect S. zeamais, but seldom S. oryzae (which rarely flies). In milled rice stores, bag traps baited with brown rice have captured both species (Hodges et al., 1986). Disturbance of the grain causes adult Sitophilus spp. to migrate upwards and become visible on the surface.
A male-produced aggregation pheromone which attracts both sexes occurs in Sitophilus spp. Sitophilure, 5-hydroxy-4-methyl-3-heptanone, was reported to be the aggregation pheromone common for S. oryzae and S. zeamais, and Levinson et al. (1990) confirmed the activity of 4S,5R sitophinone and 2S,3R-sitophilate for Sitophilus spp. Some interspecific cross attraction between three Sitophilus species has been demonstrated to occur; more so between S. oryzae and S. zeamais than between S. granarius and either of the other species.
The responses of S. zeamais to pheromone and synthetic maize volatiles as lures in crevice or flight traps have been studied in Kenya (Hodges et al., 1998). Three trap types (probe, cone and sticky) were used to monitor S. zeamais populations infesting shelled maize housed in galvanized steel storage bins. The results of this study were similar to those reported by Weston and Barney (1998); a combination of sticky traps in the grain bin headspace and probe traps positioned just below the grain surface was most efficient for monitoring the presence of pest and beneficial insect species in grain storage. Likhayo and Hodges (2000) reported the field monitoring of S. zeamais and S. oryzae using refuge and flight traps baited with synthetic pheromone and cracked wheat. The combination of pheromone and cracked wheat had an additive effect on trap catch.
Similarities to Other Species/ConditionsTop of page S. oryzae and S. zeamais can be separated from S. granarius by the presence of wings beneath the elytra (absent in S. granarius) and by having circular, rather than oval, punctures on the prothorax.
Prevention and ControlTop of page
Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Cultural Control and Sanitary Methods
Good store hygiene plays an important role in limiting infestation by S. oryzae and S. zeamais. The removal of infested residues from last season's harvest is essential. The use of resistant maize varieties has also shown some potential in slowing the build-up of insect densities in stores. Phenolic compounds have been associated with grain resistance to S. zeamais.
A combination of controlled ambient aeration in the autumn and chilled aeration during summer storage has significant potential as a non-chemical preventative pest management technique (Maier et al., 1996). Aeration dramatically reduces the numbers of weevils compared with population levels in non-aerated maize (Arthur, 1998). Thorpe (1997) modelled ecosystems in ventilated conical-bottomed farm grain silos.
Zea mays genotypes resistant to S. zeamais have been evaluated by Boica et al. (1997) and in the field in Benin (Meikle et al., 1998). Genetic variability for resistance to S. zeamais in domestic US maize germplasm has been identified by Li et al. (1998). In Brazil, tests were carried out with maize cultivars to evaluate the attractiveness and oviposition preference of S. zeamais (Toscano et al., 1999).
The mechanism of resistance in maize to S. zeamais was investigated in relation to secondary chemistry and other biochemical and physical characteristics of maize genotypes. Phenolic acid content was correlated strongly with hardness of the grain (Arnason et al., 1997). Huang et al. (1998) assessed alpha-Pinene for antifeedant and growth inhibitory effects against S. zeamais adults.
Grain may be protected by the admixture of insecticide. Sitophilus spp. have a low susceptibility to synthetic pyrethroids but are readily killed by organophosphorous compounds such as fenitrothion and pirimiphos-methyl. Grain stocks may be fumigated with phosphine to eliminate existing infestation, but these treatments provide no protection against re-infestation. Sitophilus spp., particularly in the pupal stage, have a lower natural susceptibility to the fumigant phosphine and to carbon dioxide used in controlled-atmosphere storage than do other species tested and thus inadequate treatments are particularly likely to result in some survival.
Guedes and Heyde (1996) estimated the toxicity of deltamethrin to a number of resistant and susceptible populations of S. zeamais in traditional maize stores in Togo. In another study, a treatment with pirimiphos-methyl and deltamethrin was most effective in traditional granaries after pirimiphos-methyl, deltamethrin and permethrin were applied in various combinations (Richter et al., 1997, 1998). Srinivasacharayulu and Yadav (1997) evaluated the toxicity of deltamethrin, fluvalinate, chlorpyrifos-methyl, etrimfos and malathion against S. zeamais, and topical application bioassays of malathion, pirimiphos-methyl, deltamethrin and permethrin were undertaken with 11 field strains of S. zeamais, collected from nine states in Mexico (Perez-Mendoza, 1999).
A number of studies have investigated the efficacy of phosphine fumigation: Goto et al. (1996) reported its effects at concentrations of 0.5, 1 or 2 g/m³ on pupae at 15°C. The effects of phosphine on the development of S. zeamais was investigated by Zhang (1997). Field strains of S. zeamais from the Philippines were evaluated for resistance to phosphine by Gibe et al. (1997). Peng et al. (1999) and Peng (2000) studied vertical penetration and distribution of phosphine in corn and sorghum stored in steel silos and compared the distribution of phosphine in bins when aluminium phosphide was placed on the stack surface and on the floor.
Guedes et al. (1996) reported that 20% carbon dioxide controlled S. zeamais in 5 days. Treatment with 15% carbon dioxide and 5% oxygen controlled the insects in 10 days. Santos et al. (1997) describes use of carbon dioxide-controlled atmosphere in Brazil for the control of S. zeamais on maize and wheat. Carbon dioxide at concentrations of 50% and 60% killed all life stages of the weevil after 10 days of exposure. In another study with fumigation periods of 15 and 20 days, the concentrations of 40%, 50% and 60% eliminated all stages of the insects (Santos et al., 1998). According to Casella et al. (1998), effective control of Sitophilus was achieved with a synthetic atmosphere and 0.5 or 0.75 g/m³ of phosphine, for an exposure period of 120 hours.
Natural carbon dioxide production in stored maize is affected by moisture content, the amount of broken corn and foreign materials and infestation by S. zeamais (Sone, 1999). Respiration by fungi including Aspergillus spp. appears to have a greater influence on carbon dioxide production in stores than the presence of insects. Under sealed storage conditions in maize, insects and fungi both deplete the oxygen supply, creating an unfavourable atmosphere for their own survival (Damcevski et al., 1998; Moreno-Martinez et al., 2000).
Contessi (1999) assessed the effectiveness of controlled atmospheres using generators of inert gases, such as carbonic anhydride and nitrogen, for the disinfestation of wheat stored in vertical silos and horizontal stores.
Irradiation of S. zeamais by microwave and gamma radiation has been studied. Insect mortality studies were carried out with a high-power microwave source operating at a frequency of 10.6 GHz at power levels of 9-20 kW to irradiate samples of Triticum aestivum infested with S. zeamais (Halverson et al., 1996). Applying high-power microwaves demonstrated that selective heating of insects and their resulting mortality is a non-linear function of frequency and increases at frequencies above 2.45 GHz in the vicinity of increasing relaxation processes associated with free water (Plarre et al., 1997). Tests were conducted at 12, 15, 17.9 and 55 GHz. The results indicated that 15 GHz produced greater mortality among adults than 12 and 17.9 GHz. However, 55 GHz produced the greatest mortality for the three developmental stages studied.
A sterilizing dose of gamma radiation from Cobalt-60 was determined for adults of S. zeamais on rice, maize and wheat grains (Franco et al., 1997) at 24-26°C and 65-75% RH with a dose rate of 3.00 kGy/h. The dose was found to be 60 Gy for S. zeamais.
Low-temperature storage of rice is extensively practised to control insect pests in Japan. Nakakita et al. (1997) reported that both hatching and metamorphosis of S. zeamais were completely inhibited at 10°C; a small number of adult S. zeamais emerged at 15°C.
Dry heat treatment has been found to be an effective control against all developmental stages of S. zeamais (Mohammed-Dawd and Morallo-Rejesus, 2000). All eggs and adult weevils were killed following exposure to 60°C for 2 hours, or 70-80°C for 1 hour. All larvae were killed when seeds were exposed to 70-80°C for 1 hour.
The bionomics of the pteromalid parasitoid Lariophagus distinguendus and its controlling effect on S. zeamais were studied by Li et al. (1998). L. distinguendus was found to have five generations each year in the laboratory, with final-instar larvae of the parasitoid over-wintering in larvae of S. zeamais. The parasitoid Theocolax elegans has also been recorded to attack S. zeamais (Helbig, 1998).
The effect of different isolates and formulations of Beauveria bassiana on S. zeamais in stored maize are reported by Adane et al. (1996); Moino and Alves (1997); Hidalgo et al. (1998); and Junior and Alves (1998). B. bassiana can be an effective microbial control agent if used as a preventative treatment (Moino et al., 1998).
The fungal pathogens of maize storage pests in Kenya were surveyed by Oduor et al. (2000). Between 0.08 and 0.94% of the insects collected (mostly S. zeamais) were found to be infected.
The toxicity of a large number of essential oils and plant parts of various spices and herbs have been assessed against S. zeamais.
A number of citrus oils have vapour toxicity to adults of S. zeamais; lime, mandarin and grapefruit peel oils reduce oviposition and larval emergence (Don-Pedro, 1996). Garlic oil is toxic to adults (Ho et al., 1997), and oils of coconut, sunflower, sesame and mustard, alone and in combination with eucalyptol, eugenol or camphor have been found to be toxic to S. zeamais in wheat and maize-treated grains (Obeng-Ofori and Reichmuth, 1999).
Plants or extacts from a considerable number of other plants have exhibited toxicity to S. zeamais. These include: Ocimum suave (Bekele et al., 1996); Ocimum kenyense (Bekele et al., 1997); Ocimum kilimandscharicum (Obeng-Ofori et al., 1998); Dennettia tripetala, Piper guineense, Monodora myristica and Xylopia aethiopica (Okonkwo and Okoye, 1996); Ricinus communis, Gaura coccinea, Larrea tridentata, Ribes ciliatum, Castilleja tenuiflora, Alchemilla procumbens and Guazuma tomentosa (Araya-Gonzalez et al., 1996); Juniperus sabina (Gao and Zhang, 1997); Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium (Saggar et al., 1997); Tagetes minuta (Weaver et al., 1997); cinnamon, garlic, coriander, Capsicum annuum and Murraya paniculata (Ho et al., 1997); Eucalyptus (Obeng-Ofori et al., 1997); Cinnamomum aromaticum (Huang and Ho, 1998); Pachyrhizus erosus (Alavez-Solano et al., 1998); Allium sativum (Chiam et al., 1999); Evodia rutaecarpa (Liu and Ho, 1999); Canaga odorata (Huang et al., 1999); Baccharis genistelloides (Prates, 1999); Aloe marlothii (Achiano et al., 1999); Securidaca longipedunculata (Belmain et al., 1999); Cleome hirta; cardamom (Huang et al., 2000); Basella alba, Operculina turpethum and Calotropis gigantea (Haque et al., 2000).
ReferencesTop of page
Achiano KA; Giliomee JH; Pringle KL, 1999. The use of ash from Aloe marlothii Berger for the control of maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in stored maize. African Entomology, 7(1):169-172; 13 ref.
Adane K; Moore D; Archer SA, 1996. Preliminary studies on the use of Beauveria bassiana to control Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the laboratory. Journal of Stored Products Research, 32(2):105-113.
Alavez-Solano D; Reyes-Chilpa JR; Jimenez-Estrada MA; Villavicencio MA; Perez-Escandon BE; Gomez-Garibay F, Sorensen-M (ed. ); Estrella-E-JE (ed.); Hamann-OJ (ed.); Rios-Ruiz-SA, 1998. Estudio quimico y actividad insecticida de semillas de Pachyrhizus erosus (L.) Urban. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Tuberous Legumes, Celaya, Guanajuato, Mexico: 535-548.
APPPC, 1987. Insect pests of economic significance affecting major crops of the countries in Asia and the Pacific region. Technical Document No. 135. Bangkok, Thailand: Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific region (RAPA).
Araya-Gonzalez JA; Sanchez-Arroyo H; Lagunes-Tejeda A; Mota-Sanchez D, 1996. Control de plagas de maiz y frijol almacenado mediante polvos minerales y vegetales. Agrociencia, 30(2):223-231.
Arnason JT; Beyssac BCde; PhilogFne BJR; Bergvinson DJ; Serratos JA; Mihm JA, 1997. Mechanisms of resistance in maize grain to the maize weevil and the larger grain borer. Insect resistant maize: recent advances and utilization. Proceedings of an International Symposium held at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, 27 November-3 December 1994., 91-95; [11 ref].
Arnason JT; Gale J; Conilh de Beyssac B; Sen A; Miller SS; Philogene JR; Lambert DH; Fulcher RG; Serratos A; Mihm J, 1992. Role of phenolics in resistance of maize grain to the stored grain insects Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) and Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch). Journal of Stored Products Research, 28(2):119-126
Arthur FH; Throne JE; Maier DE; Montross MD, 1998. Feasibility of aeration for management of maize weevil populations in corn stored in the southern United States: model simulations based on recorded weather data. American Entomologist, 44(2):118-123; 17 ref.
AVA, 2001. Diagnostic records of the Plant Health Diagnostic Services, Plant Health Centre, Agri-food & Veterinary Authority, Singapore.
Babu BS, 1997. Detection of insect pests of quarantine significance in screening of seeds of germplasms under an exchange programme during 1989-1995 in India. Journal of Entomological Research, 21(3):295-297.
Bekele AJ; Obeng-Ofori D; Hassanali A, 1996. Evaluation of Ocimum suave (Willd) as a source of repellents, toxicants and protectants in storage against three stored product insect pests. International Journal of Pest Management, 42(2):139-142; 20 ref.
Bekele AJ; Obeng-Ofori D; Hassanali A, 1997. Evaluation of Ocimum kenyense (Ayobangira) as source of repellents, toxicants and protectants in storage against three major stored product insect pests. Journal of Applied Entomology, 121(3):169-173; 20 ref.
Birch LC, 1944. Two strains of Calandra oryzae L. (Coleoptera). Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Science, 22:271-275.
Boica AL Jr; Lara FM; Guidi FP, 1997. Resistencia de genotipos de milho ao ataque de Sitophilus zeamais Mots. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Anais da Sociedade Entomologica do Brasil, 26(3):481-485.
Brown SL; Lee RD, 2002. Effect of planting date, variety and degree of ear maturation on the colonization of field corn by maize weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Entomological Science, 37(2):137-142.
Brun LO; Attia FI, 1983. Resistance to lindane, malathion and fenitrothion in coleopterous pests of stored products in New Caledonia. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society, 24(2/3):211-215
Casella TL-de C; Faroni LRD; Berbert PA; Cecon PR, 1998. Dioxido de carbono associado a fosfina no controle do gorgulho-do-milho (Sitophilus zeamais). Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, 2(2):179-185.
Champ BR; Dyte CE, 1976. Report of the FAO global survey of pesticide susceptibility of stored grain pests. FAO Plant Production and Protection Series No. 5. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.
Chiam WanYee; Huang Yan; Chen ShaoXing; Ho ShuitHung, 1999. Toxic and antifeedant effects of allyl disulfide on Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 92(1):239-245; 31 ref.
Contessi A, 1999. Conservazione dei cereali mediante l'impiego di atmosfere modificate prodotte in loco. Tecnica Molitoria, 50(9):990-999.
Coombs CW; Billings CJ; Porter JE, 1977. The effect of yellow split-peas (Pisum sativum L.) and other pulses on the productivity of certain strains of Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Col. Curculionidae) and the ability of other strains to breed thereon. Journal of Stored Products Research, 13(2):53-58
Damcevski KA; Annis PC; Waterford CJ, 1998. Effect of grain on apparent respiration of adult stored-product Coleoptera in an air-tight system: implications for fumigant testing. Journal of Stored Products Research, 34(4):331-339; 21 ref.
Deuse JPL; Pointel JG, 1975. Assessment of research at farm level storage in francophone Africa. Brady, E. U.; Brower, J. H.; Hunter, P. E.; Jay, E. G.; Lum, P. T. M.; Lund, H. O.; Mullen, M. A.; Davis, R. (Organisers): Proceedings of the First International Working Conference on Stored-Product Entomology, Savannah, Georgia, USA, October 7-11, 1974. Stored-Product Insects Research and Development Laboratory, ARS, USDA & Department of Entomology, Georgia University. Savannah & Athens, Georgia USA, 85-91
Dobie P, 1974. The laboratory assessment of the inherent susceptibility of maize varieties to post-harvest infestation by Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Journal of Stored Products Research, 10(3/4):183-197
Floyd EH; Newsom LD, 1959. Biological study of the rice weevil complex. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 52:687-695.
Fontes LS; Filho AJde A; Arthur V, 2003. Losses caused by Sitophilus oryzae (Linné, 1763) and Sitophilus zeamais Motschulky, 1855 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.). (Danos causados por Sitophilus oryzae (Linné, 1763) e Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky, 1855 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) em cultivares de arroz (Oryza sativa L.).) Arquivos do Instituto Biológico (São Paulo), 70(3):303-307. http://www.biologico.sp.gov.br/ARQUIVOS/V70_3/fontes.PDF
Fortier G; Arnason JT; Lambert JDH; McNeill J; Nozzolillo C; Philogene BJR, 1982. Local and improved corns (Zea mays) in small farm agriculture in Belize, C.A.; their taxonomy, productivity, and resistance to Sitophilus zeamais. Phytoprotection, 63(2):68-78
Franco SSH; Franco JG; Arthur V, 1997. Determinacao da dose esterilizante de radiacao gama do Cobalto-60 para Sitophilus oryzae, S. zeamais, S. granarius, em arroz, milho e trigo. Ecossistema, 22:120-121.
Gao CongFen; Zhang Xing, 1997. The fumigating insecticidal action of the essential oil from seeds of the savin juniper (Sabina vulgaris Ant.). Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 20(3):50-53; 5 ref.
Gibe AJG; Sayaboc PD; Acda MA; Caliboso FM, Sidik M (ed. ); Rejesus-BM (ed.); Garcia-RP (ed.); Champ-BR (ed.); Bengston-M (ed.); Dharmaputa-OS (ed.); Halid-H, 1997. Resistance of four major coleopterous stored grain insects to phosphine in selected areas in the Philippines. Proceedings of the symposium on pest management for stored food and feed, held at Bogor, Indonesia. BIOTROP Special Publication, No. 59: 231-236.
Giles PH, 1969. Observations in Kenya on the flight activity of stored products insects, particularly Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. Journal of Stored Products Research, 4:317-329.
Gorham JR, 1987. Insect and mite pests in food: An Illustrated Key, Vols I and II. US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook Number 655.
Goto M; Kishino H; Imamura M; Hirose Y; Soma Y, 1996. Responses of the pupae of Sitophilus granarius L., Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky and Sitophilus oryzae L. to phosphine and mixtures of phosphine and carbon dioxide. Research Bulletin of the Plant Protection Service, Japan, No. 32:63-67; 10 ref.
Guedes JVC; Bortoluzzi G; Brackmann A; Costa EC, 1996. Controle de Sitophilus zeamais Mots. atraves de diferentes concentracoes de CO2 e O2. Ciencia Rural, 26(2):177-180.
Guedes RNC; Heyde CJ, 1996. Influencia da temperatura e umidade relativa na toxicidade de deltametrina a populacoes resistente e susceptivel de Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Anais da Sociedade Entomologica do Brasil, 25(3):521-528.
Haines CP, 1991. Insects and Arachnids of Tropical Stored Products: Their Biology and Identification (A Training Manual), 2nd edition. Chatham, UK: Natural Resources Institute.
Halverson SL; Burkholder WE; Bigelow TS; Nordheim EV; Misenheimer ME, 1996. High-power microwave radiation as an alternative insect control method for stored products. Journal of Economic Entomology, 89(6):1638-1648; 21 ref.
Haque MA; Nakakita H; Ikenaga H; Sota N, 2000. Development-inhibiting activity of some tropical plants against Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Stored Products Research, 36(3):281-287; 21 ref.
Helbig J, 1998. Ability of naturally occurring parasitoids to suppress the introduced pest Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera, Bostrichidae) in traditional maize stores in Togo. Journal of Stored Products Research, 34(4):287-295; 26 ref.
Hidayat P; Phillips TW; Ffrench-Constant RH, 1996. Molecular and morphological characters discriminate Sitophilus oryzae and S. zeamais (Coleoptera: curculionidae) and confirm reproductive isolation. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 89(5):645-652; 22 ref.
Ho SH; Koh L; Ma Y; Huang Y; Sim KY, 1997. The oil of garlic, Allium sativum L. (Amaryllidaceae), as a potential grain protectant against Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 9(1):41-48; 19 ref.
Ho SH; Ma Y; Tan HTW, Sidik M (ed. ); Rejesus-BM (ed.); Garcia-RP (ed.); Champ-BR (ed.); Bengston-M (ed.); Dharmaputa-OS (ed.); Halid-H, 1997. Repellency of some plant extracts to the stored products beetles, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. Proceedings of the symposium on pest management for stored food and feed, held at Bogor, Indonesia. BIOTROP Special Publication, 1997, No. 59:209-215.
Hodges RJ; Hall DR; Mbugua JN; Likhayo PW, 1998. The responses of Prostephanus truncatus (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to pheromone and synthetic maize volatiles as lures in crevice or flight traps. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 88(2):131-139; 29 ref.
Howe RW, 1952. The biology of the rice weevil, Calandra oryzae (L.). Annals of Applied Biology, 39(1):68-180.
Huang Y; Hee SK; Ho SH, 1998. Antifeedant and growth inhibitory effects of
Huang Y; Ho SH, 1998. Toxicity and antifeedant activities of cinnamaldehyde against the grain storage insects, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. Journal of Stored Products Research, 34(1):11-17; 21 ref.
Huang Y; Lam SL; Ho SH, 2000. Bioactivities of essential oil from Elletaria cardamomum (L.) Maton. to Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst). Journal of Stored Products Research, 36(2):107-117; 18 ref.
Huang Yan; Ho ShuitHung; Kini RM, 1999. Bioactivities of safrole and isosafrole on Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 92(3):676-683; 43 ref.
Hussain I; Bin; Haines CP; Pranata RI, 1985. Susceptibility of paddy and milled rice to attack by Sitophilus oryzae (Linnaeus) and Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual Workshop on Grain Post-Harvest Technology (Maintaining Good Grain Quality), Puncak Pass, Bogor, Indonesia, 3-6 May 1983, 147-156.
Junior MA; Alves BS, 1998. Efeito de Beauveria bassiana sobre o desenvolvimento de Sitophilus zeamais. Manejo Integrado de Plagas, No. 50:51-54.
Kuschel G, 1961. On problems of synonymy in the Sitophilus oryzae complex (30th contribution, Col., Curculionidea). Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 13(4):241-244.
Lale NES; Yusuf BA, 2000. Insect pests infesting stored pearl millet Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. in northeastern Nigeria and their damage potential. Cereal Research Communications, 28(1/2):181-186; 18 ref.
Levinson HZ; Levinson A; Ren Z; Mori K, 1990. Comparative olfactory perception of the aggregation pheromones of Sitophilus oryzae (L.), S. zeamais (Motsch.) and S. granarius (L.), as well as the stereoisomers of these pheromones. Journal of Applied Entomology, 110(2):203-213
Li RuMing; Kang MS; Moreno OJ; Pollak LM, 1998. Genetic variability in exotic x adapted maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm for resistance to maize weevil. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter, No. 114:22-25; 15 ref.
Li ZhaoHui; Zheng FangQiang; Ye BaoHua; Liu GuiLin, 1998. Bionomics of Lariophagus distinguendus Foerster (Hym.: Pteromalidae) and its control effect on maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Col.: Curculionidae). Journal of Shandong Agricultural University, 29(4):427-430; 5 ref.
Likhayo PW; Hodges RJ, 2000. Field monitoring Sitophilus zeamais and Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) using refuge and flight traps baited with synthetic pheromone and cracked wheat. Journal of Stored Products Research, 36(4):341-353; 17 ref.
Liu ZL; Ho SH, 1999. Bioactivity of the essential oil extracted from Evodia rutaecarpa Hook f. et Thomas against the grain storage insects, Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst). Journal of Stored Products Research, 35(4):317-328; 29 ref.
Maier DE; Adams WH; Throne JE; Mason LJ, 1996. Temperature management of the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in three locations in the United States. Journal of Stored Products Research, 32(3):255-273; 27 ref.
Manueke J; Tulung M; Pelealu J; Pinontoan OR, 2015. DNA profile of Sitophilus oryzae and S. zeamais in rice and corn kernels. International Journal of ChemTech Research, 7(5):2194-2202. http://sphinxsai.com/2015/ch_vol7_no5/2/(2194-2202)V7N5.pdf
Marsaro Júnior AL; Mourão Júnior M; Paiva WRSCde; Barreto HCdos Sdos, 2007. Effectiveness of diatomaceous earth to control Sitophilus zeamais in corn stored. (Eficiência da terra de diatomácea no controle de Sitophilus zeamais em milho armazenado.) Revista Acadêmica Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais, 5(1):27-32. http://www2.pucpr.br/reol/index.php/ACADEMICA?dd1=1499&dd99=view
Meikle WG; Markham RH; Holst N; Djomamou B; Schneider H; Vowotor KA, 1998. Distribution and sampling of Prostephanus truncatus (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in maize stores in Benin. Journal of Economic Entomology, 91(6):1366-1374; 41 ref.
Moino A Jr; Alves SB, 1997. Determinacaoes de concentracoes de Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. para o controle de insetos-pragas de graos armazenados. Anais da Sociedade Entomologica do Brasil, 26(1):15-20.
Moreno-Martinez E; Jiménez S; Vázquez ME, 2000. Effect of Sitophilus zeamais and Aspergillus chevalieri on the oxygen level in maize stored hermetically. Journal of Stored Products Research, 36(1):25-36; 33 ref.
Mould HA, 1973. Grain storage in Ghana. Ghana Cocoa Marketing Board, Accra. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture: A seminar on grain storage in the humid tropics, held in Ibadan, Nigeria, 26-30 July 1971. Tropical Stored Products Information, 25:44.
Nakakita H; Ikenaga H, Shaaya E (ed. ); Bell-C, 1997. Action of low temperature on physiology of Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky and Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in rice storage. Ecologically safe alternatives for the control of stored-product insects. Papers from the XIII International Plant Protection Congress, July 1995, The Hague, The Netherlands. Journal of Stored Products Research, 33(1):31-38.
Obeng-Ofori D; Reichmuth C, 1999. Plant oils as potentiation agents of monoterpenes for protection of stored grains against damage by stored product beetle pests. International Journal of Pest Management, 45(2):155-159; 28 ref.
Obeng-Ofori D; Reichmuth CH; Bekele AJ; Hassanali A, 1998. Toxicity and protectant potential of camphor, a major component of essential oil of Ocimum kilimandscharicum, against four stored product beetles. International Journal of Pest Management, 44(4):203-209; 20 ref.
Obeng-Ofori D; Reichmuth CH; Bekele J; Hassanali A, 1997. Biological activity of 1,8-cineole, a major component of essential oil of Ocimum kenyense (Ayobangira) against stored product beetles. Journal of Applied Entomology, 121(4):237-243; 21 ref.
Oduor GI; Smith SM; Chandi EA; Karanja LW; Agano JO; Moore D, 2000. Occurrence of Beauveria bassiana on insect pests of stored maize in Kenya. Journal of Stored Products Research, 36(2):177-185; 25 ref.
Okonkwo EU; Okoye WI, 1996. The efficacy of four seed powders and the essential oils as protectants of cowpea and maize grains against infestation by Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) and Sitophilus zeamais (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Nigeria. International Journal of Pest Management, 42(3):143-146; 13 ref.
Oliveira EE; Guedes RNC; Tótola MR; Marco Júnior Pde, 2007. Competition between insecticide-susceptible and -resistant populations of the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais. Chemosphere, 69(1):17-24. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V74-4NYJRWH-1&_user=10&_coverDate=08%2F31%2F2007&_rdoc=4&_fmt=summary&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info(%23toc%235832%232007%23999309998%23665092%23FLA%23display%23Volume)&_cdi=5832&_sort=d&_docanchor=&_ct=24&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=13b6470a7ee489fc35340c08d01cb34e
Pacavira R; Mata O; Manuel A; Pereira AP; Mexia A, 2006. Detection of stored products pests by pheromone traps in seven warehouses in Luanda/Angola. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Working Conference on Stored-Product Protection, ABRAPOS, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil, 15-18 October 2006 [ed. by Lorini, I.\Bacaltchuk, B.\Beckel, H.\Deckers, D.\Sundfeld, E.\Santos, J. P. dos\Biagi, J. D.\Celaro, J. C.\Faroni, L. R. D.\Bortolini, L. de O. F.\Sartori, M. R.\Elias, M. C.\Guedes, R. N. C.\Fonseca, R. G. da\Scussel, V. M.]. Passo Fundo, Brazil: Brazilian Post-Harvest Association (ABRAPOS), 1157-1165. http://bru.gmprc.ksu.edu/proj/iwcspp/pdf/9/6335.pdf
Peng WK; Lee TK; Liao JF, 2000. Distribution of phosphine in bins storing bagged sorghum after application of aluminium phosphate. Chinese Journal of Entomology, 20(1):45-55.
Peng WK; Yang CC; Lee TK; Cheng HY, 1999. Vertical penetration and distribution of phosphine in corn and sorghum stored in steel silos. Chinese Journal of Entomology, 19(3):279-291.
Perez-Mendoza J, 1999. Survey of insecticide resistance in Mexican populations of maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Stored Products Research, 35(1):107-115.
Plarre R; Halverson SL; Burkholder WE; Bigelow TS; Misenheimer ME; Booske JH; Nordheim EV, 1997. Effects of high-power microwave radiation on Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) at different frequencies. International conference on pests in agriculture, 6-8 January 1997, at le Corum, Montpellier, France. Volume 3., 819-828; 23 ref.
Prates HT; Santos JP; Waquil JM; Raslan DS; Oliveira AB; Souza-Filho JD; Cruz ES, Caffini N (ed. ); Bernath-J (ed.); Craker-L (ed.); Jatisatienr-A (ed.); Giberti-G, 1999. Evaluation of ethanolic extract of Baccharis genistelloides against stored grain pests. Proceedings of the Second World Congress on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, WOCMAP-2. Biological resources, sustainable use, conservation and ethnobotany, Mendoza, Argentina, 10-15 November, 1997. Acta-Horticulturae, No. 500:97-100.
Revetti LM, 1972. Irradiation of grains. I. Irradiation of maize (Zea mays l.). Agronomia Tropical, 22(5):497-507.
Richter J; Biliwa A; Henning-Helbig S, 1997. Losses and pest infestation in different maize storage systems with particular emphasis on Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Col., Bostrichidae) in Togo. Anzeiger fu^umlaut~r Scha^umlaut~dlingskunde, Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz, 70(6):112-116; 21 ref.
Saggar P; Wamicha WN; Chhabra SC; Ndalut P, 1997. Isolation, identification and bioassay of repellent factors in the essential oil of pyrethrum for grain protection against Sitophilus zeamais (Molts.). Pyrethrum Post, 19(4):126-130; 10 ref.
Santos DS; Santos JP; Vilela-ER, 1998. Altos teores de CO2 no controle de Sitophilus zeamais em milho. Revista Brasileira de Armazenamento, 23(1):3-10.
Santos JP; Santos DSda; Gon¦alves RA; TomT PHF, 1997. CO-controlled atmosphere on the control of stored grain pests. Atmosfera controlada por CO no combate a pragas de gra^tilde~os armazenados., 6 pp.; 10 ref.
Santos JPdos; Wamser AF, 2006. Fruit bagging effect on the damage caused by biotics and abiotics factors in an organic apple orchard. (Efeito do ensacamento de frutos sobre danos causados por fatores bióticos e abióticos em pomar orgânico de macieira.) Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 28(2):168-171.
Sedlacek JD; Barney RJ; Price BD; Siddiqui M, 1991. Effect of several management tactics on adult mortality and progeny production of Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on stored corn in the laboratory. Journal of Economic Entomology, 84(3):1041-1046
Snss L; Locatelli DP; Guarino L, 1999. Development of Sitophilus granarius (L.), S. oryzae (L.) and S. zeamais Mots. on kernels of Triticum monococcum, T. dicoccum and T. spelta. Bollettino di Zoologia Agraria e di Bachicoltura, 31(2):187-196; 16 ref.
Sone Jin, 1999. Carbon dioxide production in stored maize as affected by moisture content, level of broken corn and foreign materials and infestation by Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 2(2):133-141; 23 ref.
Squire FA, 1972. Storage and household pests. In: Squire FA, ed. Entomological Problems in Bolivia. PANS, 18:261.
Srinivasacharayulu BS; Yadav TD, 1997. Toxicity of insecticides against Sitophilus zeamais and S. oryzae. Indian Journal of Entomology, 59(2):190-192.
Thind BB; Muggleton J, 1981. Inheritance of the ability of strains of Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to breed on split-pea (Pisum sativum). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 71(3):419-424
Throne JE, 1994. Life history of immature maize weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on corn stored at constant temperatures and relative humidities in the laboratory. Environmental Entomology, 23(6):1459-1471
Toscano LC; Boica AL Jr; Lara FM; Waquil JM, 1999. Resistencia e mecanismos envolvidos em genotipos de milho em relacao ao ataque do gorgulho, Sitophilus zeamais Mots. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Anais da Sociedade Entomologica do Brasil, 28(1):141-146.
Trematerra P; Sciarretta A; Mancini M, 1999. Insect pests in traditional cereal warehouses. [Infestazioni da insetti in depositi tradizionali di cereali.] Tecnica Molitoria, 50(9):980-989.
Trivelli H dell'Orto; Dell'Orto Trivelli H, 1975. Species of insects attacking different types of stored wheat and their control. Proceedings of the First International Working Conference on Stored-Product Entomology, Savannah, Georgia, USA, October 7-11, 1974. Savannah & Athens, Georgia, USA: Stored Product Insects Research and Development Laboratory, ARS, USDA & Department of Entomology, Georgia University, 219-233.
Weaver DK; Dunkel FV; Ntezurubanza L; Jackson LL; Stock DT, 1991. The efficacy of linalool, a major component of freshly-milled Ocimum canum Sims (Lamiaceae), for protection against postharvest damage by certain stored product Coleoptera. Journal of Stored Products Research, 27(4):213-220
Weaver DK; Zettler JL; Wells CD; Baker JE; Bertsch W; Throne JE, 1997. Toxicity of fractionated and degraded Mexican marigold floral extract to adult Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 90(6):1678-1683; 13 ref.
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/