Centaurea melitensis (Maltese starthistle)
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Plant Type
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Habitat List
- Biology and Ecology
- Soil Tolerances
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Causes
- Pathway Vectors
- Impact Summary
- Environmental Impact
- Threatened Species
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Uses List
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- Links to Websites
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Centaurea melitensis Linnaeus, 1753
Preferred Common Name
- Maltese starthistle
Other Scientific Names
- Calcitrapa patibilcensis Kunth, 1818
International Common Names
- English: Malta starthistle; Maltese cockspur; Maltese star centaury; Maltese star-thistle; Maltese thistle; Napa starthistle; Napa thistle
Local Common Names
- Brazil: centáurea-estrela-de-Malta
- France: coix de Malte
- Germany: Malteser Flockenblume
- Spain: cardo escarolado; yerba de cristo
- USA: tocalote; tocolote
Summary of InvasivenessTop of page
C. melitensis is native to northern Africa and southern Europe in the western Mediterranean region, and has successfully invaded similar climates in the USA, New Zealand, Australia and South America. In favourable habitats it can form dense stands that replace native and desirable vegetation. It is commonly less aggressive than Centaurea solstitialis and in some areas grows as a minor forb in annual grasslands. C. melitensis usually invades open, disturbed sites and is often spread by humans and livestock and by transportation of contaminated soil, crop seed or hay (DiTomaso and Healy, 2007).
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Plantae
- Phylum: Spermatophyta
- Subphylum: Angiospermae
- Class: Dicotyledonae
- Order: Asterales
- Family: Asteraceae
- Genus: Centaurea
- Species: Centaurea melitensis
Notes on Taxonomy and NomenclatureTop of page
The synonym Calcitrapa patibilcensis Kunth (published in 1818) was used in a checklist prepared by Hind and Jeffrey (2001). It is not in common use. Centaurea melitensis is the commonly accepted name.
DescriptionTop of page
Erect plants 10-100 cm tall, herbage grey-green loosely tomentose and villous with jointed multicellular hairs, sometimes minutely scabrous. Leaves dotted with minute resinous glands. Stems single or several with few to many distal branches. Basal and proximal cauline leaves petiolate or tapering to the base, usually absent by anthesis, blades oblong to oblanceolate, 2-15 cm, margins entire to dentate or pinnately lobed. Cauline leaves long, decurrent, forming wings up to 3 mm wide down the stems, blades linear to oblong or oblanceolate, 1-5 cm long, margins entire or dentate. Young leaves sometimes densely covered with fine, cottony hairs, which become sparse with age and no longer hide the stiff hairs and resinous dots. Heads round to ovoid, solitary or in close corymbiform clusters of 2-3 at the tips of stems, sometimes clustered in distal axils, sessile or pedunculate; all disc flowers. Corollas yellow, typically 10-12 mm long. Involucres 8-15 mm, loosely cobwebby-tomentose or becoming glabrous. Central spine of principal phyllaries 5-12 mm long, slender, often purple to brown tinged, with lateral spines in 3 to 4 pairs, the upper pair near the middle of the central spine. Inner phyllary appendages entire, acute or spine-tipped. Three types of capitula are produced: cross-pollinating heads with fully expanded flowers, and two cleistogamous (self-pollinating) types, one with yellow flowers only partially protruding and one without exserted corollas. Three types of achenes are produced, with the variation linked to capitulum type: initial cleistogamous capitula produce thick achenes bearing a short pappus; in final cleistogamous capitula achenes are small with a short pappus; and chasmogamous (outcrossing) capitula produce small achenes with a longer pappus (Porras and Muñoz, 2000). Most achenes are 2-3 mm long, finely pubescent, greyish to tan, usually with slightly darker stripes. The base is deeply notched, narrow, hook-like. Pappus bristles are pale tan, 1-3 mm long.
Seedling identification: Cotyledons oblong to spatulate, base wedge-shaped, tip truncate to slightly rounded, glabrous. First few true leaves typically oblanceolate. Later rosette leaves entire to deeply lobed, nearly to the midvein, lobes usually rounded, including the terminal one. Upper and lower surfaces evenly covered with stiff, thick hairs and resinous glands. Fine, cottony hairs dense on young leaves becoming sparse on older leaves (DiTomaso and Healy, 2007).
Plant TypeTop of page Annual
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
|Continent/Country/Region||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||Reference||Notes|
|Turkey||Absent, formerly present||Introduced||Not invasive||Wagenitz, 1975||Casual introduction to Rodhos|
|Algeria||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2009|
|Libya||Present||Native||Not invasive||Ali and Jafri, 1976||NW region of country|
|Morocco||Present||Native||Not invasive||Garcia-Jacas et al., 2006|
|South Africa||Present||Introduced||Russell et al., 1987|
|-Canary Islands||Present||Native||Not invasive||Izquierdo et al., 2004||On these islands: El Hierro, La Palma, Tenerife, Gran Canaria, Fuerte Ventura, Lanzarote|
|Tunisia||Present||Native||Not invasive||Pottier-Alapetite, 1979-1981|
|Canada||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-British Columbia||Present||Introduced||Not invasive||Roché and Roché, 1991; Brouillet et al., 2006||Georgeson & Samuel Islands, 1980|
|USA||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-Alabama||Absent, formerly present||Introduced||1901||Not invasive||Mohr, 1901; USDA-NRCS, 2009||Mobile Co. “fugitive on ballast”|
|-Arizona||Present||Introduced||2009||Invasive||USDA-NRCS, 2009||Apache, Cochise, Graham, Maricopa, Mohave, Pima, Pinal, and Yavapai counties; Tonto and Coconino National Forests. Not as aggressive as C. solstitialis, it readily infests disturbed roadsides and is especially problematic in and around the city of Tucson and along roadsides in the Sonoran desert.|
|-California||Widespread||Introduced||2009||Invasive||DiTomaso and Healy, 2007; USDA-NRCS, 2009||Throughout most of California, except Great Basin region, to 2200 m. Common in the central-western and south-western regions|
|-Georgia||Present||Introduced||Not invasive||Duncan and Kartesz, 1981||Probably not persisting|
|-Hawaii||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Wagner et al., 1999||Hawai’i, Moloka’i, Maui, Kaho‘olawe, Kaua’i, Lana‘i, Ni‘ihau Islands|
|-Idaho||Unconfirmed record||Introduced||Not invasive||Keil and Ochsmann, 2006||Not shown in other sources|
|-Indiana||Present||Introduced||Not invasive||USDA-NRCS, 2009||Undocumented report|
|-Massachusetts||Present||Introduced||Not invasive||Magee, 1940||Probably non-persisting, casual introduction|
|-Missouri||Present||Introduced||Not invasive||Yatskievych and Turner, 1990; Weber and Corcoran, 1993|
|-Nevada||Localised||Introduced||Invasive||USDA-NRCS, 2009||On state noxious weed list; found in Clark & Nye counties|
|-New Mexico||Present||Introduced||Invasive||USDA-NRCS, 2009||Class B noxious weed. Found in Hidalgo, Grant, Luna, Dona Ana, Otero, Chaves & Eddy counties|
|-Oregon||Localised||2005||Introduced||1876||Invasive||Roché and Talbott, 1986||Reported from Josephine (1886-2005), Douglas (1887-2003), Hood River (1884), Jackson (1896, 1927), Multnomah (1910), Marion (1911), Benton (1918), Curry (1919, 1925, 1947), Coos (1926), Linn (1931), Lane (1934) counties. Widely introduced along the coast and inland valley, but only persistent in the Mediterranean climate of the southwestern part of the state|
|-Pennsylvania||Present||Introduced||Not invasive||Wherry et al., 1979||Probably a casual introduction, non-persisting, see also Rhoads & MacKinley (1993)|
|-South Carolina||Present||Introduced||Not invasive||Nesom, 2004||Cleaned from fleeces at woolen mill in Berkeley Co. documented in 1957, 1958|
|-Texas||Present||Introduced||Invasive||USDA-NRCS, 2009||Numerous counties in west Texas, a few in central Texas|
|-Utah||Present||Introduced||Not invasive||USDA-NRCS, 2009||Disturbed sites in Salt Lake & Washington counties|
|-Washington||Present, few occurrences||1985||Introduced||1897||Not invasive||Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, 2006||Historic records in Clallam, Island and Whatcom counties, current site in Klickitat Co.|
|-Wisconsin||Present||Not invasive||USDA-NRCS, 2009||Probably a casual, not persisting introduction|
|Argentina||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Nobile and Luján, 1989||Agricultural weed|
|Chile||Present||Introduced||Marticorena and Quezada, 1985; Negrete et al., 1989; Finot et al., 1996||Common, weed of southcentral Chile|
|Ecuador||Present||Introduced||Jorgensen and Ulloa, 1994; Jørgensen and León-Yànez, 1999||Pichincha Province|
|Peru||Present||Introduced||Dillon, 1982||Andean I-II, Coastal: disturbed areas. Ancash, Cuzco, Junín, La Libertad dpts|
|France||Present||Native||Not invasive||Guinochet and Vilmorin, 1987||Mainly in the south|
|-Corsica||Present||Native||Not invasive||Guinochet and Vilmorin, 1987|
|Greece||Present||Native||Not invasive||Dostal, 1976|
|Italy||Present||Native||Not invasive||Pignatti, 1982||Lig. Occid. In Riviera, Lazio al Circeo, Puglie, Cal,, Sic., Sard., Cors., Guanutri ed Is. Maltesi|
|Portugal||Present||Native||Not invasive||Dostal, 1976|
|-Azores||Present||Native||Not invasive||Silva et al., 2005||On these islands: Faial, Pico, Graciosa, Sao Jorge, Santa Maria|
|Spain||Widespread||Native||Not invasive||Dostal, 1976; Flora de Aragón, 2009|
|UK||Present||Introduced||Dunn, 1905||Frequently introduced with grain to fields|
|Yugoslavia (former)||Present||Native||Not invasive||Dostal, 1976|
|Australia||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-New South Wales||Absent, formerly present||Introduced||Invasive||Orchard, 1994||"A weed of waste places. A.N. Rodd & J. Pickard, Cunninghamia 1: 278 (1983) suggested that it was only established briefly on Lord Howe Is. and has since died out". Voucher cited: J.D McComish 206 (NSW)|
|-Western Australia||Present||Introduced||<1897||Invasive||Lindley-Cowan, 1897; Spooner, 1997||Weed of roadsides, cultivated areas & other disturbed areas. Distribution: ER: CAR, COO, HAM, MUR, NUL, YAL; SW: AW, ESP, GS, JF, MAL, SWA, WAR|
|New Caledonia||Present||Introduced||Invasive||MacKee, 1994; Tassin, 2005||Isle Grande Terre, Vouchers cited: Deplanche 226 s.loc., Cribs 949, Schlechter 15024|
|New Zealand||Present||Introduced||1891||Healey, 1944||2009 adventive, invasive status not yet classified. In 1944 thoroughly established on the bluffs of Hurunui River; well dispersed in modified tussock grassland, Mt. Benger Station, Mt. Alexander Station, and Hitchen Hills, North Canterbury|
|Norfolk Island||Present||Introduced||1902||Invasive||Orchard, 1994||"A weed of waste places". Vouchers cited: W.R. Sykes NI 975 (CHR); 1902, J.H. Maiden & J.L. Boorman (NSW)|
History of Introduction and SpreadTop of page
C. melitensis was widely distributed throughout the 1700s and 1800s, during the period of worldwide colonization by Spain and Portugal; its seeds were carried in the soil used as ship ballast, lodged in the wool of sheep, and as a contaminant of cereal grains, either in seed or straw (Roché and Talbott, 1986). It was probably introduced in California, USA, in the late 1700s during the Spanish missionary period (Spira and Wagner, 1983; DiTomaso and Healy, 2007). It reached South America, Hawaii, Australia and New Zealand during the same era. It failed to establish in northern and eastern US states, despite numerous introductions. In California, C. melitensis has been more invasive in the west-central and south-western regions, as well as across southern Arizona, New Mexico and western Texas. It forms the dominant vegetation in some California inland valley and foothill annual grasslands (Borchert and Jain, 1978).
HabitatTop of page
In West Yorkshire, UK, Shimwell (2006) reported that some weeds introduced with wool waste became ‘casuals’, not persisting for more than a few years. Many casuals of the Cardueae Tribe of the Asteraceae (including C. melitensis) appear to have suffered due to the progressive reduction in marginal habitats on natural soils and in their inability to withstand competition from gregarious weed species. An increase in a highly competitive nitrophilous weed flora thus appears to have further restricted the frequency of opportunity for annual and biennial wool aliens typical of relatively xeric soil conditions.
Habitat ListTop of page
|Terrestrial – Managed||Cultivated / agricultural land||Present, no further details|
|Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural||Natural grasslands||Principal habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Scrub / shrublands||Secondary/tolerated habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
Biology and EcologyTop of page
2n = 24 (Bartolo et al., 1978; Natarajan, 1981; Hellwig, 1994; Hellwig et al., 1994; Garcia-Jacas et al., 1998)
(x=12, Portugal) (Powell et al., 1974).
C. melitensis reproduces solely by seed. Plants characteristically have both outcrossing and cleistogamous capitula, an adaptation that ensures seed production in risky conditions (Porras and Muñoz, 2000). Flowering culms develop in early spring. Seed production is highly variable, ranging from one to 60 seeds per head and one to more than 100 heads per plant, depending on the availability of resources (DiTomaso and Healy, 2007). The litter of Avena fatua appears to have allelopathic properties which reduce the germination of C. melitensis seeds (Tinnin and Muller, 1972).
Physiology and Phenology
Most seeds germinate after the first autumn rains. Plants remain as rosettes while growing deep tap roots throughout the winter and early spring. The taproots of C. melitensis do not usually penetrate as deeply in the soil as those of C. solstitialis, so plants flower much earlier in the growing season (DiTomaso and Healy, 2007). Depending on altitude and latitude, flowering occurs from April through July (Keil and Ochsmann, 2006).
In a study of the relationship of soil fungi and native bunchgrass to C. melitensis competitiveness, Callaway et al. (2001) found that the biomass of clipped C. melitensis grown with both Nassella pulchra and non-treated soil fungi was equal to that of unclipped plants. When stressed by defoliation, C. melitensis benefited from mycorrhizae or N. pulchra altered the fungal community to enhance the positive direct effects of soil fungi on C. melitensis.
Milberg et al. (1999) grew C. melitensis in a study comparing survival and growth of exotic and native species along a nutrient gradient in Western Australia and found that the exotic species responded more positively to higher nutrient additions than the native species, indicating that the exotics might have a competitive advantage in a nutrient-enhanced situation (e.g., after fire). During monitoring of response of C. melitensis populations after a wildfire in California, its population expanded beyond pre-fire levels from 2004-2005, but declined in frequency during 2006, probably because of reduced rainfall during the third year (Hubbert, 2007).
ClimateTop of page
|BS - Steppe climate||Tolerated||> 430mm and < 860mm annual precipitation|
|Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all year||Preferred||Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all year|
Soil TolerancesTop of page
Special soil tolerances
Means of Movement and DispersalTop of page
Natural Dispersal (Non-Biotic)
Most seeds fall near the parent plant or is dispersed over short distances by wind or sometimes water (DiTomaso and Healy, 2007).
Vector Transmission (Biotic)
Longer distance dispersal is usually mediated by human or other animal activities such as being carried on vehicles, transported in mud or soil, on hooves or equipment, clinging to fur or hair, or passing through a digestive tract of an animal. In Chile, researchers found 32% germination of C. melitensis seeds distributed in rabbit faeces (Fernandez and Saiz, 2007), indicating that European rabbits were vectors. The presence of C. melitensis seeds in fleeces cleaned at woollen mills indicates that sheep transport the seeds (Nesom, 2004).
All of the introductions appear to have been accidental, or at least caused by carelessness. Soil carried as ballast on ships appears to have been the most significant long distance dispersal mechanism between continents (Roché and Talbott, 1986). Movement with cereal grains probably also contributed (Dunn, 1905).
Pathway CausesTop of page
Pathway VectorsTop of page
Impact SummaryTop of page
Environmental ImpactTop of page
Impact on Habitats
The Forest Service included C. melitensis in the list of the invasive, non-native species posing the greatest threat to successful restoration of native vegetation in chaparral types following the 2003 Grand Prix/Old Fire in the San Bernardino Mountains of southern California (Hubbert, 2007).
After the fires, surveys for infestations of the target weed species found that C. melitensis covered large acreages. Fire disturbance aided the spread of weed infestations that were already present before the fire, either in the seed bank or in close proximity to the burn, including infestations of C. melitensis which expanded beyond the pre-fire levels, especially on fire roads. It was probably already established along roadsides before the fire, but was able to spread into new areas because of a lack of competition after the fire. Dozer lines, safety zones and hand lines were the second most infested areas and, in most cases, C. melitensis grew faster than the native species (Hubbert, 2007).
Impact on Biodiversity
The Forest Service is monitoring the expansion of a population of C. melitensis following the Cedar Fire in southern California chaparral and its potential impact on the habitat of the listed species Acanthomintia ilicifolia on Viejas Mountain (Hubbert, 2007).
Threatened SpeciesTop of page
|Threatened Species||Conservation Status||Where Threatened||Mechanism||References||Notes|
|Acanthomintha ilicifolia||NatureServe NatureServe; USA ESA listing as threatened species USA ESA listing as threatened species||California||Competition - monopolizing resources||US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2009a|
|Cirsium wrightii (Wright's marsh thistle)||NatureServe NatureServe; USA ESA candidate species USA ESA candidate species||Arizona; New Mexico||Competition (unspecified); Ecosystem change / habitat alteration||US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2015|
|Enceliopsis nudicaulis var. corrugata (Ash Meadows sunray)||USA ESA listing as threatened species USA ESA listing as threatened species||California; Nevada||Competition - monopolizing resources; Ecosystem change / habitat alteration||US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2011|
|Grindelia fraxinipratensis (ash meadows gumplant)||NatureServe NatureServe; USA ESA listing as threatened species USA ESA listing as threatened species||California; Nevada||Competition - monopolizing resources||US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2007|
|Zeltnera namophila||No Details||California; Nevada||Competition - monopolizing resources||US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2009b|
Risk and Impact FactorsTop of page Invasiveness
- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Abundant in its native range
- Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
- Pioneering in disturbed areas
- Highly mobile locally
- Benefits from human association (i.e. it is a human commensal)
- Fast growing
- Has high reproductive potential
- Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
- Reproduces asexually
- Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
- Modification of successional patterns
- Negatively impacts agriculture
- Negatively impacts animal health
- Negatively impacts livelihoods
- Reduced native biodiversity
- Threat to/ loss of native species
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Produces spines, thorns or burrs
- Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
- Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant
- Difficult to identify/detect in the field
UsesTop of page
C. melitensis is used in Spain for its stomachic, diuretic and hypoglycaemic properties (Negrete et al., 1989).
Uses ListTop of page
Human food and beverage
- Honey/honey flora
- Source of medicine/pharmaceutical
Similarities to Other Species/ConditionsTop of page
C. melitensis and C. solstitialis might be confused by someone unfamiliar with both species. Both are winter annuals that invade similar habitats and have spiny phyllaries and yellow flowers. The central spines of C. melitensis are shorter (5-12 mm) than those of C. solstitialis (10-25 mm) and are branched closer to the tip. They are purplish to brown-tinged compared with the yellowish to straw-coloured spines of C. solstitialis. The senescent flower heads of C. melitensis retain the spined phyllaries and shed the fuzzy centre (leaving an empty ‘bowl’), whereas those of C. solstitialis shed the spined bracts and retain the fuzzy centre (leaving a cottony tip) (DiTomaso and Healy, 2007).
Prevention and ControlTop of page
A small beetle (Lasioderma haemorrhoidale) that feeds in the capitula of C. melitensis was unintentionally introduced in California from the Mediterranean region, but has had little impact on controlling C. melitensis populations (DiTomaso and Healy, 2007). It is a generalist seed feeder that also attacks C. solstitialis, C. sulphurea and Carduus pycnocephalus. Two other agents introduced for C. solstitialis, Chaetorellia succinea and Eustenopus villosus, also utilize C. melitensis, but to a lesser extent (DiTomaso and Healey, 2007). In host specificity tests, there was significant larval development by the Eurasian weevil Ceratapion basicorne on C. melitensis (Smith, 2007).
C. melitensis is susceptible to the same chemicals as other Centaurea species, including phenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D), benzoic acid (dicamba), pyridines (triclopyr, aminopyralid, clopyralid, picloram), imidazolinones (imazapic), semicarbazone (diflufenzopyr) and glyphosate. Recommended rates and application times for the Pacific Northwest states are given in Peachey (2009).
Control by utilization
Cattle may graze C. melitensis if adequate palatable forage is lacking, but the amount of use under normal conditions is probably minimal. Sheep and goats would probably be more effective, but have not been studied. They could also contribute to spread of the weed.
In an experiment in the Sequoia National Park, California, USA, annual grasslands dominated by exotic annuals were burned once in the spring or autumn or in two or three successive years in the spring or autumn to convert them to native perennial bunchgrasses. Both burning regimes increased the number of alien and native forb species without establishing any native grass. C. melitensis, which was not encountered in any plots before burning, accounted for most of the alien forb response (Parsons and Stohlgren, 1989). DiTomaso et al. (2001) burned for 2 consecutive years in the late spring or early summer for control of barb goatgrass (Aegilops triancialis) and noted a decrease in the frequency of C. melitensis on annual grassland in California.
ReferencesTop of page
Brouillet L, Coursol F, Favreau M, 2006. VASCAN. The database of Canadian vascular plants. VASCAN. The database of Canadian vascular plants. Herbier Marie-Victorin, Institut de recherche en biologie végétale, Université de Montréal, unpaginated
Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, 2006. Herbarium collection record. Herbarium collection record. Seattle, USA: Washington State University, unpaginated. http://biology.burke.washington.edu/herbarium/collections/vascular/results.php?SourcePage=SearchForm&x=38&y=12&Fam=Asteraceae&Gen=Centaurea&Sp=melitensis&Sub=&IncSyn=Y&Com=&Coll=&Num=&Y=&Country=&State=&County=&Loc=&Ori=&Acc=&Sort1=ScientificName1&SortOrder1=ASC&Sort2=Year&SortOrder2=DESC&Limit=100
Fernàndez A, Sàiz F, 2007. The European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.) as seed disperser of the invasive opium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.) in Robinson Crusoe island, Chile. Mastozool. Neotrop, 14:19-27
Font M, Garcia-Jacas N, Vilatersana R, Roquet C, Susanna A, 2009. Evolution and biogeography of Centaurea section Acrocentron inferred from nuclear and plastid DNA sequence analyses. Annals of Botany, 103(6):985-997
Garcia-Jacas N, Susanna A, Mozaffarian V, Ilarslan R, 2000. The natural delimitation of Centaurea (Asteraceae: Cardueae): ITS sequence analysis of the Centaurea jacea group. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 223(3/4):185-199
Garcia-Jacas N, Susanna A, Vilatersana R, Guara M, 1998. New chromosome counts in the subtribe Centaureinae (Asteraceae, Cardueae) from west Asia, II. Botany Journal of the Linnaean Society, 128:403-412
Garcia-Jacas N, Uysal T, Romashchenko K, Suárez-Santiago VN, Ertugrul K, Susanna A, 2006. Centaurea revisited: a molecular survey of the Jacea group. Annals of Botany, 98(4):741-753. http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/
Gibbs Russell GE, Welman WG, Reitief E, Immelman KL, Germishuizen G, Pienaar BJ, Wyk Mvan, Nicholas A, 1987. List of species of southern African plants. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa, 2(1 & 2):1-152 & 1-270
Hubbert KR, 2007. Treatment effectiveness monitoring for southern California wildfires: the 2nd year and 3rd years, 2004 to 2005 and 2005 to 2006. The Cedar, Grand Prix/Old, Piru, and Padua Fires. Treatment effectiveness monitoring for southern California wildfires: the 2nd year and 3rd years, 2004 to 2005 and 2005 to 2006. The Cedar, Grand Prix/Old, Piru, and Padua Fires. unpaginated. [USDA Forest Service Pacific SW Res. Sta. Publ. 4403.] http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/4403/TreatmentEffectivenessMonitoringForSoCA_W.pdf
Izquierdo Zamora I, Martín Esquivel JM, Zurita Perez N, Arechavaleta Hernàndez M, 2004. List of wild species of the Canaries: fungi, plants and land animals. (Lista de especies silvestres de Canarias: hongos, plantas y animales terrestres.) Gobierno de Canarias, Spain: Direccion General de Medio Natural, 500 pp
Kamanzi K, Raynaud J, Voirin B, 1983. C-glycosyl flavonoids of the flowers of Centaurea melitensis L. (Compositae). (Les C-glycosyls flavonoïdes des fleurs de Centaurea melitensis L. (Composées).) Plantes Médicinales et Phytothérapie, 17(1):47-51
MacKee HS, 1994. Catalogue of introduced and cultivated plants in New Caledonia. (Catalogue des plantes introduites et cultivées en Nouvelle-Calédonie.) Paris, France: Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, unpaginated
Masso JL, Bertran MN, Adzet T, 1979. Contribution to the chemical and pharmacological study of some species of Centaurea. (Contribution a l'etude chimique et pharmacologique de quelques especes de Centaurea (composees).) Plantes Medicinales et Phytotherapie, 13(1):41-45
Mohr C, 1901. Plant Life of Alabama. Contributions from the US National Herbarium, Vol. VI. Washington DC, USA: US Department of Agriculture
Negrete RE, Backhouse N, Prieto P, Mejias H, Camargo RC, Cassels BK, Breitmaier E, Hartmann R, 1989. Steroids, a lignan and a flavonoid from Centaurea melitensis L. Plantes Médicinales et Phytothérapie, 23(4):293-204
New Zealand Plant Conservation Network, 2009. New Zealand Plant Conservation Network. New Zealand Plant Conservation Network. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Plant Conservation Network, unpaginated. http://www.nzpcn.org.nz/exotic_plant_life_and_weeds/detail.asp?WeedID=1263
Roché BF Jr, Roché CT, 1991. Identification, introduction, distribution, ecology and economics of Centaurea species. Chapter 28. In: Noxious Range Weeds [ed. by James, L. F.\Evans, J. O.\Ralphs, M. H.\Child, R. D.]. Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press, 274-291
Silva L, Pinto N, Press B, Rumsey F, Carine M, Henderson S, Sjögren E, 2005. [English title not available]. (Listagem da fauna e flora terrestres dos Açores. Lista des plantas vasculares (Pteridophyta e Spermatophyta).) Listagem da fauna e flora terrestres dos Açores. Lista des plantas vasculares (Pteridophyta e Spermatophyta). unpaginated. http://www.azoresbioportal.angra.uac.pt/listagens.php?lang=en&sstr=4&id=F00759&dis=azores
Spooner A, 1997. FloraBase, the western Australian flora. FloraBase, the western Australian flora. unpaginated. http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://florabase.dec.wa.gov.au/science/tmap/345/7916im1.gif&imgrefurl=http://florabase.dec.wa.gov.au/browse/profile/7916&usg=__cg5o-TBm7myp_FEJbBEyuaaUtSs=&h=400&w=330&sz=9&hl=en&start=5&tbnid=x__8Cn9PCr9PBM:&tbnh=124&tbnw=102&prev=/images%3Fq%3D%2522Centaurea%2Bmelitensis%2522%26hl%3Den
Tassin J, 2005. Jacques Tassin (IAC-CIRAD), Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk (PIER) website p.c. reference. Jacques Tassin (IAC-CIRAD), Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk (PIER) website p.c. reference. unpaginated. http://www.hear.org/Pier/references/pierref000358.htm
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2007. Ash Meadows Gumplant (Grindelia fraxino-pratensis). Five-year Review: Summary and Evaluation. In: Ash Meadows Gumplant (Grindelia fraxino-pratensis). Five-year Review: Summary and Evaluation : US Fish and Wildlife Service.22 pp. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc1865.pdf
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2009. Acanthomintha ilicifolia (San Diego thornmint). 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. In: Acanthomintha ilicifolia (San Diego thornmint). 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation : US Fish and Wildlife Service.39 pp. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc2571.pdf
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2009. Centaurium nomaphilum (Spring-loving centaury). 5-year Review: Summary and Evaluation. In: Centaurium nomaphilum (Spring-loving centaury). 5-year Review: Summary and Evaluation : US Fish and Wildlife Service.32 pp. http://www.fws.gov/ecos/ajax/docs/five_year_review/doc2569.pdf
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2011. Enceliopsis nudicaulis var. corrugata (Ash Meadows sunray). 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. In: Enceliopsis nudicaulis var. corrugata (Ash Meadows sunray). 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation : US Fish and Wildlife Service.42 pp. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc3887.pdf
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2015. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service species assessment and listing priority assignment form: Cirsium wrightii. In: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service species assessment and listing priority assignment form: Cirsium wrightii : US Fish and Wildlife Service.37 pp. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/candidate/assessments/2015/r2/Q3N3_P01.pdf
USDA-ARS, 2009. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx
ContributorsTop of page
13/11/09 Original text by:
Dominique Roche, McGill University - STRI, Department of Biology, Canada
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/