Leptocybe invasa (blue gum chalcid)
Index
- Pictures
- Identity
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Description
- Distribution
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat
- Habitat List
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
- Growth Stages
- Symptoms
- List of Symptoms/Signs
- Biology and Ecology
- Climate
- Latitude/Altitude Ranges
- Natural enemies
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Causes
- Pathway Vectors
- Plant Trade
- Impact Summary
- Economic Impact
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- References
- Links to Websites
- Principal Source
- Contributors
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate reportIdentity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle, 2004
Preferred Common Name
- blue gum chalcid
International Common Names
- English: Eucalyptus gall wasp
Local Common Names
- Argentina: avispa de la agalla del eucalipto
- Portugal: vespa da galha
Summary of Invasiveness
Top of pageLeptocybe invasa is believed to be native to Australia or to the native range of its host plants Eucalyptus - Australia, New Guinea, Indonesia and Philippines -, although it has only been detected in Australia in Queensland and New South Wales. During the last two decades, L. invasa has spread worldwide, invading all the continents where Eucalyptus has been imported to (Asia, Africa, Europe, South and North America). The invasive potential of L. invasa is very high. Its broad host range, polyvoltinism, overlapping generations, concealed life style (galls) and reproductive modalities allow the pest to quickly spread and exponentially grow from few individuals. L. invasa is considered thelytokous because sex ratio of the most widespread lineage is female biased, but a biparental lineage also exists.
Taxonomic Tree
Top of page- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Metazoa
- Phylum: Arthropoda
- Subphylum: Uniramia
- Class: Insecta
- Order: Hymenoptera
- Family: Eulophidae
- Genus: Leptocybe
- Species: Leptocybe invasa
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Top of pageL. invasa was unknown until the early 2000s, when it was recorded in Italy in 2001 as Aprostocetus sp. (Viggiani et al., 2002) and in Turkey (Aytar, 2003). Simultaneously, severe damages to eucalypt plantations in Israel and consequent economic losses encouraged studies about this unknown eulophid wasp causing galling on eucalypts, which resulted in the first description of L. invasa (Mendel et al., 2004). The original description included only female specimens, because the male was never found, thus the species was considered thelytokous. The first male was reported in Turkey in 2004 (Doganlar, 2005). To date, the genus Leptocybe includes only the species L. invasa, although recent studies based on molecular and biological evidence have underlined the presence of two lineages behind the morphospecies L. invasa, the first from the Mediterranean region and South America and the other from China (Nugnes et al., 2015).
Description
Top of pageAdult:
- Female: body brownish with metallic shine (blue or dark green), 1.1-1.4 mm in length; head brown with mouth margin slightly lighter or yellow; antennae with scape yellow becoming darker in the apex, while funicle and club are brown or light brown; middle and hind coxae brown (as the body), while the fore coxa is yellow. The remaining parts of the legs are yellow, except the last tarsal segments that turn brown apically. Wings hyaline with light brown veins. The original and detailed description is available in Mendel et al. (2004). The female holotype is deposited at the Australian National Insect Collection, CSIRO, Canberra, Australia.
- Male: body length 0.8-1.2 mm; mesosoma brown with metallic shine (blue or dark green); metasoma brown with a very little metallic hint on the dorsal portion. Antennae with scape yellow becoming darker dorsally in the apex and ventral plaque; pedicellus yellow, with the dorsal basal portion darker, funicle and club yellow. Wings hyaline with yellow veins. Original and detailed description is available in Doganlar (2005).
Egg: shiny-white; mature oocyte with a peduncle (Sangtongpraow et al., 2011; Nugnes et al., 2015).
Larvae: preliminary studies supposed that L. invasa preimaginal development consisted of a single larval instar, whitish, spherical and with a body diameter ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 mm, without visible segmentation and spiracles (De Marzo, 2014). However, successive studies confirmed the presence of a globular young larva, totally immersed in the liquid material contained in the gall (Viggiani, 2015), but recorded and described as a mature larva also. The whitish mature larva looks hymenopteriform (Dittrich-Schröder et al., 2014), without visible spiracles; 0.8-1.0 mm in length; the body appears indistinctly segmented with a well-developed head. Presence of sclerotized, triangular mandibles. Inside the gall, mature larvae assume a curved posture due to the small space (Viggiani, 2015). Oviposition and secretions of the larva induce hyperplasy and metaplasy of the leaves and stems tissues, causing the formation of galls (Mendel et al., 2004). Each larva lives in a cavity inside the gall, feeding on growing tissues (Zhu et al., 2012; Kumar et al., 2015).
Distribution
Top of pageL. invasa is believed to be native either only to Australia or to the whole native range of its host plants Eucalyptus, i.e. Australia, New Guinea, Indonesia and Philippines (Hill and Johnson, 2000; Nugnes et al., 2015). The species is closely related to its host plants and, in principle, could be found everywhere Eucalyptus is grown. At the moment, it seems to have spread from its native region into Africa, Asia, Europe, South and North America (Nugnes et al., 2015).
Distribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
Last updated: 29 Jun 2022Continent/Country/Region | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | Reference | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Africa |
|||||||
Algeria | Present | Introduced | 2002 | Invasive | |||
Egypt | Present | Introduced | 2001 | Invasive | |||
Ethiopia | Present | Introduced | 2002 | Invasive | |||
Ghana | Present | ||||||
Kenya | Present | ||||||
Madagascar | Present | ||||||
Malawi | Present | Introduced | 2008 | Invasive | |||
Mauritius | Present | ||||||
Morocco | Present | Introduced | 2001 | Invasive | |||
Mozambique | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Réunion | Present | ||||||
Rwanda | Present | ||||||
Sierra Leone | Present | ||||||
South Africa | Present | Introduced | 2007 | Invasive | |||
Tanzania | Present | Introduced | 2005 | Invasive | |||
Tunisia | Present | Introduced | 2004 | Invasive | |||
Uganda | Present | Introduced | 2002 | Invasive | |||
Zimbabwe | Present | Introduced | 2007 | Invasive | |||
Asia |
|||||||
Cambodia | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
China | |||||||
-Fujian | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Guangdong | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Guangxi | Present | Introduced | 2007 | Invasive | |||
-Hainan | Present | Introduced | 2008 | Invasive | |||
-Jiangxi | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Sichuan | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
India | Present | ||||||
-Andhra Pradesh | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Delhi | Present | Original citation: Ramanagouda et al.(2011) | |||||
-Goa | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Gujarat | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Haryana | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Jammu and Kashmir | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Karnataka | Present | Introduced | Invasive | Noticed in 2001 | |||
-Kerala | Present | Introduced | 2004 | Invasive | |||
-Madhya Pradesh | Present | ||||||
-Maharashtra | Present | ||||||
-Odisha | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Punjab | Present | Introduced | 2009 | Invasive | |||
-Tamil Nadu | Present | Introduced | Invasive | Noticed in 2002 | |||
-Uttar Pradesh | Present | Introduced | 2007 | Invasive | |||
-Uttarakhand | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Iran | Present | Introduced | 2005 | Invasive | |||
Iraq | Present | Introduced | 2010 | Invasive | |||
Israel | Present | Introduced | 2001 | Invasive | |||
Jordan | Present | Introduced | 2001 | Invasive | |||
Laos | Present | Introduced | 2008 | Invasive | |||
Malaysia | Present | Present based on regional distribution | |||||
-Sabah | Present | Introduced | 2012 | Invasive | |||
Sri Lanka | Present | Introduced | 2010 | Invasive | |||
Syria | Present | Introduced | 2001 | Invasive | |||
Taiwan | Present | Introduced | 2010 | Invasive | Original citation: Tung and La Salle (2010) | ||
Thailand | Present | Introduced | 2004 | Invasive | |||
Turkey | Present | Introduced | 2000 | Invasive | |||
Vietnam | Present | Introduced | 2002 | Invasive | |||
Europe |
|||||||
Cyprus | Present | ||||||
France | |||||||
-Corsica | Present | Introduced | 2004 | Invasive | |||
Gibraltar | Present | ||||||
Greece | Present | Introduced | 2004 | Invasive | |||
Italy | Present | Introduced | 2000 | Invasive | As Aprostocetus sp. | ||
-Sardinia | Present | Introduced | 2001 | ||||
-Sicily | Present | Introduced | 2002 | ||||
Malta | Present | Introduced | 2006 | Invasive | |||
Montenegro | Present, Localized | ||||||
Portugal | Present | Introduced | 2003 | ||||
Spain | Present | Introduced | 2003 | Invasive | |||
-Balearic Islands | Present | Introduced | 2003 | Invasive | |||
United Kingdom | Present | Introduced | 2006 | Invasive | |||
North America |
|||||||
Mexico | Present | Introduced | 2014 | Invasive | |||
United States | Present, Localized | ||||||
-Florida | Present | Introduced | 2008 | Invasive | |||
Oceania |
|||||||
Australia | Absent, Unconfirmed presence record(s) | ||||||
-New South Wales | Present | Native | |||||
-Queensland | Present | Native | |||||
New Zealand | Absent, Invalid presence record(s) | ||||||
South America |
|||||||
Argentina | Present | Introduced | 2009 | Invasive | |||
Brazil | Present | ||||||
-Bahia | Present | Introduced | 2007 | Invasive | |||
-Espirito Santo | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Goias | Present | Introduced | 2011 | Invasive | |||
-Maranhao | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Mato Grosso do Sul | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Minas Gerais | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Parana | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Pernambuco | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Rio Grande do Sul | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Sao Paulo | Present | Introduced | 2007 | Invasive | |||
-Sergipe | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Tocantins | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Chile | Present | Introduced | 2010 | Invasive | |||
Paraguay | Present | Introduced | 2012 | Invasive | |||
Uruguay | Present | Introduced | 2013 | Invasive | First galls observed in 2011 |
History of Introduction and Spread
Top of pageIt is impossible to define the first country in which L. invasa was found, as the description of this new genus and species has followed first records in Italy, Turkey and the Middle East. However, after the first records, the blue gum chalcid has been found in all continents suitable for eucalypts. The only probable history of spread has been suggested in the African continent, where L. invasa was first detected in Ethiopia in 2002, moving southwards to Kenya, Tanzania and Zimbabwe, reaching South Africa in 2007 (Dittrich-Schröder et al., 2009). Its South American route of invasion has also been reconstructed to Brazil-Argentina-Chile-Paraguay-Uruguay.
Risk of Introduction
Top of pageGlobalisation and increasing trade promote the spread of the blue gum chalcid via its main pathways of introduction, including trade of nursery plants with leaves and shoots. Difficult detection of both adults and early stages of the galling process does not facilitate early interception of the pest, which can hence be introduced very easily. Furthermore, the species small dimensions can facilitate its local dispersal both by unintentional carriage and via wind currents. Strict quarantine measures can delay species spread, but almost certainly cannot stop invasion in all countries where eucalypts are grown.
Habitat
Top of pageIn the invaded range, L. invasa is distributed in agricultural, forest and urban areas, and in rangelands where eucalypts are grown. Hence, it can be found in nurseries and in eucalyptus plantations growing as planted forest stands, as ornamental trees, as windbreaks around orchards or in groves growing under irrigation (Mendel et al., 2004; Nyeko, 2005; Protasov et al., 2008; Thu et al., 2009; Karunaratne et al., 2010; Pereira et al., 2014).
Habitat List
Top of pageCategory | Sub-Category | Habitat | Presence | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Terrestrial-managed/Cultivated / agricultural land | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | ||
Terrestrial-managed/Protected agriculture (e.g. glasshouse production) | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | ||
Terrestrial-managed/Managed forests, plantations and orchards | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | ||
Terrestrial-managed/Managed grasslands (grazing systems) | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | ||
Terrestrial-managed/Disturbed areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | ||
Terrestrial-managed/Rail / roadsides | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | ||
Terrestrial-managed/Urban / peri-urban areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | ||
Terrestrial-natural/semi-natural/Natural forests | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | ||
Terrestrial-natural/semi-natural/Natural grasslands | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | ||
Terrestrial-natural/semi-natural/Riverbanks | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | ||
Terrestrial-natural/semi-natural/Wetlands | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | ||
Terrestrial-natural/semi-natural/Deserts | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | ||
Terrestrial-natural/semi-natural/Arid regions | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | ||
Littoral/Coastal areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) | ||
Littoral/Coastal dunes | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Hosts/Species Affected
Top of pageThe majority of Eucalyptus species have been confirmed to be susceptible to L. invasa (Jorge et al., 2016). Among these, E. camaldulensis (var. camaldulensis and obtusa), E. grandis, E. robusta and E. tereticornis showed remarkably high susceptibility to the blue gum chalcid (Mendel et al., 2004; Thu et al., 2009; Nyeko et al., 2010). Studies carried out on several clonal hybrids or clones of these species showed that the incidence of L. invasa infestation could affect them differently (Nyeko et al., 2010; ICFR, 2011). E. gomphocephala and E. occidentalis did not show susceptibility to L. invasa, while E. erythrocorys exhibited “cork tissue” symptoms some days after deposition, but no further gall formation was observed (Mendel et al., 2004).
To date, the only susceptible species not belonging to the Eucalyptus genus is Corymbia polycarpa (Thu et al., 2009), with other species of this genus (C. citriodora, C. maculata, C. torelliana) apparently being tolerant (Mendel et al., 2004).
Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
Top of pageSymptoms
Top of pageL. invasa females usually prefer newly developed leaves, where they lay their eggs in the midribs, petioles and parenchyma tissue of twigs. Usually eggs are laid in a lined group at a distance of 0.3-0.5 mm of each other (Mendel et al., 2004; Shylesha, 2008). After hatching, the larva remains in a tissue cavity and its growth and gall development take place simultaneously. Gall development consists of five stages, described in Mendel et al. (2004):
- First stage: at the deposition site, a little spot of dead cells (epidermic and sub-epidermic), similar to a cork tissue, becomes evident, without any initial gall-shaped formation (Jacob and Ramesh, 2009; Kumar et al., 2015). A change in colour from green to pink or reddish usually occurs to the cells of midribs containing the eggs, and the spherical shape of the gall starts to be visible at the end of the stage, usually 1-2 weeks after deposition (Mendel et al., 2004; Jacob and Ramesh, 2009).
- Second stage: in the following days galls reach their maximum size and attain the typical green bump-shape (Jacob and Ramesh, 2009; Kavitha Kumari et al., 2010; Eyidozehi et al., 2014).
- Third stage: galls start to lose their green colour, turning into a glossy reddish colour (ICFR, 2011).
- Fourth stage: galls lose their glossiness, turning into dull pink/dark red (Kavitha Kumari et al., 2010).
- Fifth stage: corresponds to adult emergence, with exit holes visible on the galls surface. Gall colours turn to light brown on the leaf or red-brown on the stems.
Gall formation on leaf petioles, midribs and young twigs usually results in leaf shape deformation. Heavy infestations can firstly cause leaf deformation, due to curling of the midribs, premature aging and leaf fall (Nugnes et al., 2015), and eventually stunted growth of the tree (Mendel et al., 2004; Eyidozehi et al., 2014). Heavy infestation can seriously damage young plantations and nursery seedlings, although tree mortality has not been observed to date (EPPO, 2006).
List of Symptoms/Signs
Top of pageSign | Life Stages | Type |
---|---|---|
Leaves / abnormal colours | ||
Leaves / abnormal forms | ||
Leaves / abnormal leaf fall | ||
Leaves / leaves rolled or folded | ||
Leaves / wilting | ||
Leaves / yellowed or dead | ||
Stems / distortion | ||
Stems / galls | ||
Stems / stunting or rosetting |
Biology and Ecology
Top of pageDetailed information on the biology of L. invasa in different environments and hosts is available in many different publications (Mendel et al., 2004; Kavitha Kumari et al., 2010; Sangtongpraow et al., 2011; Eyidozehi et al., 2014; Udagedara and Karunaratne, 2014; Zhu et al., 2015).
Genetics
Few studies have been carried out on the genetic characterisation of L. invasa. Nugnes et al. (2015) found that L. invasa is represented by at least two genetically and biologically distinct lineages: a Chinese lineage present in East Asia and characterized by biparental populations, and a Western lineage (in Italy, Tunisia, Turkey and Argentina) that reproduces by thelytokous parthenogenesis. Each lineage was found to be infested by a respective endosymbiotic Rickettsia which, at least for the Western lineage, is considered responsible for the thelytoky (Nugnes et al., 2015).
Reproductive Biology
Studies on potential fecundity of L. invasa highlight that an increase in size can increase potential fecundity. Indeed, ovaries of small females contained an average of 90 eggs (range of 39-140), in contrast with large females that reached an average of 210 eggs (range of 141-298). As such, potential fecundity of the blue gum chalcid is, in average, 160 eggs/female (Sangtongpraow et al., 2011). Number of eggs is correlated with environmental temperature, with an increase in number of eggs per female being directly proportional to an increase in temperature from 20 to 29°C. Number of eggs/female was the highest at 29°C, with a sharp decrease at 32°C (Zhu et al., 2015).
Generally, realized fecundity is determined taking into account the number of eggs laid on/in a host over the life time of a female. L. invasa females lay eggs in lined groups, at a distance of about 0.3-0.5 mm of each other, in the midribs or petioles of young leaves of eucalyptus (about 0.5-5 cm in length). Due to this oviposition behaviour, it is difficult to detect the real number of eggs laid. Hence, to determine L. invasa’s realized fecundity, the number of emerging progenies over the life time of a female was taken into account (Sangtongpraow et al., 2011).
Dissections of newly emerging females of the blue gum chalcid showed the presence of mature eggs in ovaries, indicating L. invasa to be a pro-ovigenic species (Sangtongpraow et al., 2011; Nugnes et al., 2015). Soon after their emergence females start to lay eggs in host tissues, with a trend for these numbers to decrease with time. Indeed, during the first day, a female could lay about 30 eggs, whereas this number gradually declines, reaching 0.2 eggs/female on the sixth day (Sangtongpraow et al., 2011).
Physiology and Phenology
L. invasa develops two or three overlapping generations per year in most countries where it occurs, depending on the ecological conditions (Mendel et al., 2004), although in Guangxi, China, the species can complete five or six overlapping generations per year (Wu et al., 2009).
Mean development time from eggs to adults has been recorded to last about 138 days in the field (Hesami et al., 2005). In greenhouse, average development time varies greatly according to different studies: 132 days (Mendel et al., 2004), 126 days (Hesami et al., 2005), 60 days (Kavitha Kumari et al., 2010) or 46 days (Sangtongpraow et al., 2011). Duration of each life stage has been estimated as about 11 days for the egg stage, 19 and 30 days for the young and mature larval stages, respectively, and 38 days for the pupal stage. However, temperature affects development time of L. invasa, with development time decreasing linearly as temperature increases (Zhu et al., 2015). The temperature that allowed the shortest development time from egg to adult was 29°C, likely the species optimum developmental temperature. Temperature is also positively correlated to survival rate of the immature stage, with the highest percentage survival at 29°C, and a sudden decrease in survival at 32°C (Zhu et al., 2015). Tests carried out in 2011 in Guangdong, China, reported very low thresholds (0°C) for the development of several stages of the blue gum chalcid (egg, larval, pupal and adult stages). Furthermore, different requirements were estimated for cumulative temperatures (degree-days) of each life stage: 146.6 (eggs), 1228 (larvae), 161.7 (pupae) and 205.2 (adults) (Qiu et al., 2011). The developmental zero temperature (DZT) for the complete life cycle (egg-adult) of L. invasa in Dongfang (Hainan Island, China) was estimated to be about 19°C, while DZTs of egg, larval and pupal stages were 13, 19.7 and 17 °C, respectively. The same study calculated the cumulative temperatures needed for each life stage as 128°C for eggs, 284°C for larvae and 201°C for pupae, totalising a cumulative temperature of 563°C needed for the development period from egg to adult (Zhu et al., 2015).
Longevity
Adult longevity tests have been performed in climatic chamber (at 25°C and 80% relative humidity) under different feed treatments (Mendel et al., 2004; Sangtongpraow et al., 2011). Adult females of L. invasa fed with honey solution (honey:water, 1:1) showed the longest mean life span (6-8 days). Adults lived for 2-5 days if fed with fresh flowers of the host plant (E. camaldulensis), from 1.5 to 3.7 days if fed only with distilled water and 3.5 days if only young fresh foliage of the host plant was available. A diet made up of a combination of fresh foliage and honey solution did not extend life span over the 6 days observed for the “honey solution diet”. Adults with no food and no water lived for about 1.33 days. Male longevity was shorter than for females, with males exposed to the same food sources surviving for 5-6 days (honey solution), 1.22 days (flowers), 1.11 days (water), 1.56 days (water+flowers), 5.22 days (honey solution+flowers) and 1 day (no food and no water) (Sangtongpraow et al., 2011).
Temperature also influences adult longevity, with female longevity being the highest between 23 and 29°C (about 8-9 days), and just 5.8 days at 32°C. Male longevity reached the highest values of 12-13 days at 20 and 23°C and a proportional decline was observed with an increase in temperature, reaching 6 days at 32°C (Zhu et al., 2015).
Activity Patterns
In the field, L. invasa adults are active throughout the day, although their activity increases in sunny hours.
Population Size and Structure
Gall density can vary with tree age: in nursery seedlings and coppice, density was 36.99 galls/10 cm shoot, while on grown-up trees the average number of galls for a shoot of 10 cm only reached about 16 galls (Kavitha Kumari et al., 2010; Kulkarni, 2010). Furthermore, density of galls in different tissues is correlated to the Eucalyptus species host. Studies revealed that E. urophylla x E. camaldulensis hybrids showed a higher density of galls on midribs and twigs, while E. exserta had more galls on petioles (Zhu et al., 2012).
L. invasa populations exhibit different sex ratios in different areas. Males have never been recorded in Europe, Africa, Laos, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Vietnam, Florida (USA), Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Paraguay and Australia (Nugnes et al., 2015), which might indicate that, in these countries, the species reproduces by thelytoky. The role of symbionts as being responsible for thelytoky has been supported by several facts: complete female-biased sex ratio, high-density localisation within the ovaries, and vertical transmission of a Rickettsia endosymbiont to the offspring (Nugnes et al., 2015). The presence of males has been recorded in India (Karnataka), Turkey, Thailand, Brazil and China (Doganlar, 2005; Chen et al., 2009; Gupta and Poorani, 2009; Kavitha Kumari et al., 2010; Liang et al., 2010; Tung and La Salle, 2010; Zheng et al., 2014; Sangtongpraow et al., 2011; De Souza, 2016). Particularly in China, male proportion ranged from 18 to 48% in some populations (Liang et al., 2010) although, in others, males only occurred occasionally (Zhu et al., 2015). Genetic characterisation of both the insect and the endosymbiotic Rickettsia corresponds to the different geographic sex ratios recorded in populations from China and Mediterranean and South American regions (Nugnes et al., 2015). Furthermore, the presence of males does not always correspond to sexual reproduction, with unmated females from Chinese and Thai populations having offspring of both sexes (Sangtongpraow et al., 2011).
Associations
L. invasa populations have been associated with the endosymbiotic bacteria Rickettsia (Nugnes et al., 2015). In samples from the Mediterranean region and South America, Rickettsia causes parthenogenetic reproduction, resulting in a female biased sex ratio. The association Leptocybe-Rickettsia improves the biotic potential of the infected populations because the whole progeny is feminine, hence potentially doubling the intrinsic rate of population increase.
Environmental Requirements
L. invasa has substantial environmental plasticity, being able to live where the host trees are present, under different climatic conditions. However, some studies have demonstrated a negative correlation between altitude and L. invasa attack to Eucalyptus spp. (Nyeko et al., 2009), with no attack having been observed on trees in plantations at altitudes higher than 1938 m above sea level.
L. invasa shows tolerance to low temperatures, with pupae having higher tolerance than larvae and adults. Indeed, the supercooling points of larvae, pupae and adults were about -25.5, -25 and -21°C respectively, while the freezing points of the same stages were about -24, -23 and -17.5°C, respectively. Male adults showed more resistance than females to lower temperatures (Han et al., 2012).
Climate
Top of pageClimate | Status | Description | Remark |
---|---|---|---|
Af - Tropical rainforest climate | Preferred | > 60mm precipitation per month | |
Am - Tropical monsoon climate | Preferred | Tropical monsoon climate ( < 60mm precipitation driest month but > (100 - [total annual precipitation(mm}/25])) | |
As - Tropical savanna climate with dry summer | Preferred | < 60mm precipitation driest month (in summer) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25]) | |
Aw - Tropical wet and dry savanna climate | Preferred | < 60mm precipitation driest month (in winter) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25]) | |
BS - Steppe climate | Preferred | > 430mm and < 860mm annual precipitation | |
BW - Desert climate | Preferred | < 430mm annual precipitation | |
Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summer | Preferred | Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summers | |
Cw - Warm temperate climate with dry winter | Preferred | Warm temperate climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry winters) | |
Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all year | Preferred | Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all year |
Latitude/Altitude Ranges
Top of pageLatitude North (°N) | Latitude South (°S) | Altitude Lower (m) | Altitude Upper (m) |
---|---|---|---|
63 | 46 |
Natural enemies
Top of pageNatural enemy | Type | Life stages | Specificity | References | Biological control in | Biological control on |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aprostocetus | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Aprostocetus gala | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Megastigmus | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Megastigmus brasiliensis | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Megastigmus dharwadicus | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Megastigmus leptocybus | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Megastigmus thitipornae | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Megastigmus viggianii | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Megastigmus zebrinus | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Megastigmus zvimendeli | Parasite | not specific | ||||
Quadrastichus mendeli | Parasite | to species | Israel, Kenya, South Africa, India | |||
Selitrichodes krycery | Parasite | not specific | Israel, South Africa, India | |||
Selitrichodes neseri | Parasite | not specific | Kelly et al. (2012) | South Africa, Brazil | ||
Telenomus | Parasite | not specific |
Notes on Natural Enemies
Top of pageIn the native range, natural enemies play a very important role in limiting populations of L. invasa, such that the species does not threaten either wild Eucalyptus or plantations. Surveys carried out in the native area have highlighted the potential of the species Quadrastichus mendeli, Selitrichodes kryceri and S. neseri (Eulophidae, Tetrastichinae) (Kim et al., 2008; Kelly et al., 2012).
In areas invaded by L. invasa, many studies have been carried out looking for natural enemies of the species. Native Megastigmus spp. (Torymidae) have been reared in South America (Argentina and Brazil), the Mediterranean area (Israel, Italy and Turkey), Africa (South Africa) and Asia (India, Sri Lanka and Thailand) (Viggiani et al., 2002; Protasov et al., 2008; Vastrad et al., 2009; Doganlar and Hassan, 2010; Zaché et al., 2012; Doganlar et al., 2013; Sangtongpraow and Charernsom, 2013; Udagedara and Karunaratne, 2014; Doganlar, 2015; Nugnes et al., 2016; Zheng et al., 2016). Furthermore, Aprostocetus sp. and Aprostocetus causalis (Eulophidae, Tetrastichinae), Parallelaptera sp. [Erythmelus sp.] (Mymaridae) and Telenomus sp. (Platygasteridae) have also been identified in India (Vastrad et al., 2009).
Means of Movement and Dispersal
Top of pageNatural Dispersal
L. invasa can spread by adult flight in small areas, but its movements can be strongly supported by wind currents.
Intentional Introduction
Human influence, via national and international trade and transport, is the most important factor responsible for L. invasa spread all over the world. In particular, spread to new countries occurs by introduction of infested seedlings or plants of Eucalyptus spp., which are widely planted commercially all around the world due to forestry or habitat restoration and improvement (to control soil erosion and as windbreaks). Furthermore, their role as source for fuelwood, pulpwood and medicinal eucalyptus oil is still increasing (Eldridge et al., 1994; Doughty, 2000).
Pathway Causes
Top of pageCause | Notes | Long Distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Acclimatization societies | Yes | Yes | ||
Botanical gardens and zoos | Yes | Yes | ||
Breeding and propagation | Yes | Yes | ||
Cut flower trade | Yes | Yes | ||
Forestry | Yes | Yes | ||
Habitat restoration and improvement | Through the use of eucalyptus (especially in coastal dunes) | Yes | Yes | |
Hedges and windbreaks | Through the use of eucalyptus as windbreaks | Yes | Yes | |
Hitchhiker | Small L. invasa adults or movement of leaves with galls (e.g. leaves stuck outside the windscreen of a vehicle) | Yes | ||
Landscape improvement | Yes | Yes | ||
Nursery trade | The most relevant pathway | Yes | Yes | |
Ornamental purposes | Yes | Yes |
Pathway Vectors
Top of pageVector | Notes | Long Distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bulk freight or cargo | Potential transport in refrigerated containers that, due to the low temperature, could extend the life period of blue gum chalcid | Yes | Yes | |
Clothing, footwear and possessions | Yes | |||
Containers and packaging - non-wood | The small dimension of the pest could help its spread as a hitchhiker, especially in refrigerated containers | Yes | Yes | |
Plants or parts of plants | Yes | Yes | ||
Land vehicles | Yes | |||
Wind | Yes |
Plant Trade
Top of pagePlant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transport | Pest stages | Borne internally | Borne externally | Visibility of pest or symptoms |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leaves | arthropods/eggs; arthropods/larvae; arthropods/pupae | Yes | Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye | |
Seedlings/Micropropagated plants | arthropods/eggs; arthropods/larvae; arthropods/pupae | Yes | Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye | |
Stems (above ground)/Shoots/Trunks/Branches | arthropods/eggs; arthropods/larvae; arthropods/pupae | Yes | Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye |
Plant parts not known to carry the pest in trade/transport |
---|
Bulbs/Tubers/Corms/Rhizomes |
Flowers/Inflorescences/Cones/Calyx |
Fruits (inc. pods) |
Growing medium accompanying plants |
Roots |
True seeds (inc. grain) |
Wood |
Impact Summary
Top of pageCategory | Impact |
---|---|
Economic/livelihood | Negative |
Environment (generally) | Negative |
Economic Impact
Top of pageL. invasa has been considered a pest in eucalypt plantations outside its native range, due to the absence of natural enemies. The impact of L. invasa is exacerbated by both its biological characteristics (overlapping generations, parthenogenetic reproduction) and its wide range of hosts. In the introduced areas, gall formation caused by L. invasa can have a major impact on eucalypt seedlings in nurseries, causing severe injury to young foliage and inducing gall formation mainly on rapid growing shoots (Sambaraju et al., 2015). Severe outbreaks of L. invasa have also occurred on mature plants of eucalypt plantations (Mendel et al., 2004; Jacob et al., 2007; 2009).
Heavy infestations of L. invasa can firstly cause leaf deformation, premature aging and leaf fall, and eventually stunted growth of Eucalyptus trees (Mendel et al., 2004; Eyidozehi et al., 2014; Nugnes et al., 2015). In fact, L. invasa has a highly negative impact on Eucalyptus plant growth, with a marked reduction in height (Petro et al., 2015) or diameter (Zhao et al., 2008). This directly affects the production of biomass, and hence the use of wood, in the construction and industrial sectors. Although damage can vary based on eucalypt species or hybrid (Zhao et al., 2008; Nyeko et al., 2009), the greatest impact occurs when plantations are reliant on a single species or few clones, for which effects could be devastating, causing death of whole nurseries or young plantations (Thu et al., 2009).
L. invasa’s economic impact has not been quantified, but it must take into account the economic value of Eucalyptus plantations, which represent one of the most important economic resources in the world (for pulp and fuelwood) (Paine et al., 2011). Indeed, planted areas of eucalypts outside their native range reach nearly 20 million hectares, with Brazil (almost 5.6 million ha), India (almost 4 million ha) and China (2.5 million ha) being the main growers in the world (Brockerhoff et al., 2013; IBÁ, 2015). In addition to biomass loss, a possible economic impact needs to take into account the positive contribution of eucalypts to restoration and habitat improvement (control of soil erosion or as windbreak), its beneficial contribution to human health (reducing malaria incidence by draining soils and via extraction of essential oils) and its contribution to beekeepers production.
Risk and Impact Factors
Top of page- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Highly adaptable to different environments
- Is a habitat generalist
- Capable of securing and ingesting a wide range of food
- Has high reproductive potential
- Gregarious
- Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
- Reproduces asexually
- Damaged ecosystem services
- Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
- Host damage
- Loss of medicinal resources
- Negatively impacts forestry
- Negatively impacts livelihoods
- Damages animal/plant products
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
- Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant
- Difficult/costly to control
Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
Top of pageThe genus Leptocybe (where L. invasa is the unique species) did not exist until 2004, which caused some authors to misidenty L. invasa as Aprostocetus sp. based on the Tetrastichinae key (Viggiani et al., 2002). L. invasa is distinguished from the other Tetrastichinae by the presence of a weakened area on the vertex behind the ocelli. It can be distinguished from Aprostocetus by several characters that are in common with Baryscapus. Characters useful in distinguishing L. invasa from Baryscapus and Oncastichus (as reported in Mendel et al., 2004) are the following:
- L. invasa vs Baryscapus: propodeum with a raised lobe of the callus that partially overhangs the outer rim of the spiracle; spiracular depression open to anterior margin of propodeum; mesoscutum with a single row of 2-3 adnotaular short, weak setae.
- L. invasa vs Oncastichus: postmarginal vein less than 0.25 the length of the stigmal vein; scape not reaching upper margin of vertex.
First and second stages of L. invasa galls could be confused with early stages of Ophelimus maskelli galls, but while L. invasa makes bump-shaped galls on petioles, leaf midribs and young branches (Zheng et al., 2014), O. maskelli induces blister-like galls on the leaf’s surface (Burks et al., 2015). Similar blister-like galls are also induced by Epichrysocharis burwelli, but this species current distribution range includes the USA, Brazil and Portugal and its main host is Corymbia citriodora (Schauff and Garrison, 2000; Franco et al., 2016; Schnell e Schühli et al., 2016). Selitrichodes globulus also causes multilocular galls that hang from branches and twigs of the host (La Salle et al., 2009).
Prevention and Control
Top of pageDue to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Prevention
Because the blue gum chalcid has already spread to all continents, it is too late to implement preventive measures that can effectively avoid its introduction to new large areas. Nevertheless, introduction to new countries can perhaps be prevented by using detection protocols that provide accurate examination of leaves, petioles and twigs when searching for galls and by adopting quarantine measures that allow development of visible stages of symptoms and consequent detection of the pest. In addition, avoiding movement of infested plants or seedlings could prevent further spread from a plantation to another, especially in areas where L. invasa is not totally widespread.
Control
Physical/mechanical control
Physical control has been suggested during the early stage attack of the blue gum chalcid only. Indeed, removing and destroying infested material could decrease L. invasa populations. However, this method is not efficient for late and/or high infestations, because it is arduous, or even impossible, to remove all infested material. Furthermore, due to the overlapping generations of L. invasa in the field, removal of the attached material would be practically incessant (ICFR, 2011).
Biological control
Biological control seems to be the most promising solution for L. invasa’s control. Different species of parasitoids have been found and studied since the first finding of the blue gum chalcid.
Quadrastichus mendeli - The best performing parasitoid against L. invasa which, from 2007, has been released in Israel, Kenya and India as part of classical biological control programs (Kim et al., 2008; Shylesha, 2008; K.E. Mutitu, pers. comm.). In Israel, percentage of parasitism of L. invasa by Q. mendeli reached 73%, and its spread and establishment were confirmed by its retrieval in all sampled sites (Kim et al., 2008). In contrast, Q. mendeli did not express any control action against L. invasa in Kenya (Dittrich-Schröder et al., 2012) while, from preliminary studies, a reduction in gall infestation in nurseries has recently emerged in India (Jacob et al., 2015). In Italy, Q. mendeli was never officially released but, from 2013, specimens were collected from galls of L. invasa on Eucalyptus camaldulensis and subsequent surveys showed its spread in Central and Southern Italy (including in Sicily). In Italy, the highest mean percentage of parasitisation reached 50.5 ± 6.16%, while the lowest percentage was 30.2 ± 8.10%. However, its effective control action against the blue gum chalcid was shown both by the 100% parasitisation percentage reached in the Southeast coast and the complete disappearance of L. invasa galls from Portici (Southwest Italy) soon after the first record of the parasitoid (Nugnes et al., 2016).
Selitrichodes neseri - This eulophid wasp was originally collected in Queensland (Australia) in 2010 (Kelly et al., 2012). It has been reared in quarantine in South Africa, where its nominal parasitism rate ranged from 9.7 to 71.8% and where it was shown to be specific for L. invasa, when tested on 17 possible non-target hosts from South Africa (Dittrich-Schröder et al., 2014). In 2012, it was released in fields in South Africa and some adults emerged in subsequent sampling sessions (Hurley, 2012). Preliminary laboratory and field studies about the efficiency of S. neseri were carried out in Brazil, showing a higher index of population growth in the fields than in laboratory (De Souza, 2016).
Selitrichodes kryceri - This biparental parasitoid was introduced to Israel as part of a biological control program and its percentage of parasitism of L. invasa reached 52% (Kim et al., 2008). It has been released in India (Shylesha, 2008) and South Africa too (ICFR, 2011). Detailed descriptive and biological features of the species are available in Kim et al. (2008).
Aprostocetus causalis - Firstly identified as A. gala in India (Kavitha Kumari, 2009; Vastrad et al., 2009), but a subsequent identification clarified its species status (Yang et al., 2014). Its control activity was tested in 2010 in greenhouses, confirming its effectiveness (Vastrad and Ramanagouda, 2014).
Megastigmus dharwadicus - Although it was found in a survey in India in 2008 as the most dominant parasitoid on L. invasa galls (90.7%) (Vastrad et al., 2009), it was described for the first time in 2010 (Narendran et al., 2010).
Megastigmus thitipornae - Although its life cycle is shorter than that of the blue gum chalcid, a preliminary study carried out in Thailand demonstrated its scarce parasitism capacity due to its low potential and realized fecundities, and its male-biased sex ratio (Sangtongpraow and Charernsom, 2013).
Megastigmus leptocybus - Reared from galls of L. invasa on E. camaldulensis from Israel, Turkey and Italy (Doganlar and Hassan, 2010; Doganlar, 2015).
Megastigmus zebrinus - Reared from 2010 from galls of L. invasa in South Africa (Kelly et al., 2012).
Megastigmus zvimendeli - Found in 2010 in Queensland (Australia) and then introduced to Israel and Turkey (Doganlar, 2015).
Megastigmus viggianii - Reported for the first time in India on leaf galls of the blue gum chalcid (Gupta and Poorani, 2008), with a percentage of parasitisation almost reaching 25% in China (Zheng et al., 2016).
Megastigmus brasiliensis - Its behaviour is considered parasitic against the blue gum chalcid because of the findings of adults in stems and leaves of eucalypts infested by L. invasa (Doganlar et al., 2013).
Parallelaptera sp. [Erythmelus sp.] (Mymaridae) and Telenomus sp. (Platygastridae) - Found once in India, but their role in the control of the blue gum chalcid is not clarified yet (Vastrad et al., 2009). Based on species from the same families, these two parasitoids should be oophagous, and gall wasps are usually not included among the hosts of Telenomus spp. (Viggiani, 1997), while Erythmelus spp. are usually parasitoids of Hemiptera eggs (Triapitsyn et al., 2007).
Chemical control
Chemical control is probably not feasible both in large plantations and natural environments, but may be possible in nurseries and seedlings (EPPO, 2006). However, because L. invasa completes its life cycle inside a gall, chemical control could be ineffective (Maged, 2016) or effective only with systemic insecticides. The use of systemic insecticides has been tested in different studies and results are very variable depending on eucalypt species and environments (Basavana Goud et al., 2010; Javaregowda et al., 2010; Jhala et al., 2010; Kulkarni, 2010; Nyeko et al., 2010; Vastrad et al., 2011; Cegatta and Villegas, 2013; Chakrabarti, 2015). Furthermore, their use would be too expensive and dangerous towards its natural enemies (both of the blue gum chalcid and of other eucalypt pests), so it is not considered a practicable option for large plantations of Eucalyptus spp.
Host resistance
There seem to be differences in the efficiency of insecticides and of natural enemies, probably associated to environmental factors or to the existence of two L. invasa lineages. Numerous studies have highlighted the susceptibility, resistance or tolerance of eucalypt species (including hybrids and clones) to L. invasa attack (Nyeko, 2005; Thu et al., 2009; Basavana Goud et al., 2010; Javaregowda et al., 2010; Dittrich-Schröder et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2015; Jacob et al., 2015). Differences in chemical, structural and nutritional characteristics could clarify the mechanisms ruling the resistance or susceptibility of the hosts (Nyeko et al., 2010; Oates et al., 2015).
References
Top of pageAquino DA, Botto E, Loiacono MS, Pathauer P, 2011. [English title not available]. ("Avispa de la agalla del eucalipto", Leptocybe invasa Fischer & La Salle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae: Tetrastichinae), en Argentina). Revista de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, 37(2), 159-164.
Aytar F, 2003. Natural biology, distribution and control method of Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle (Hym., Eulophidae), Eucalyptus gall wasp in Turkey. Journal of DOA, 9, 47-66.
Bain J, 2011. Leptocybe invasa, a gall forming wasp on eucalyptus, not in New Zealand. In: Forest Health News 217 . https://www.scionresearch.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/35396/FHNews-217_July2011.pdf
Benítez Díaz EA, Costa VA, de Moraes GJ, Godziewsky D, 2014. First record of Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) and Rhombacus eucalypti Ghosh & Chakrabarti (Acari: Eriophyidae) from Paraguay. Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Paraguay, 18, 129-132.
Cegatta IR, Villegas C, 2013. Efficiency of two systemic insecticides to control blue gum chalcid wasp in seedlings of Eucalyptus camaldulensis. (Eficiência de dois inseticidas sistêmicos no controle de Leptocybe invasa em mudas de Eucalyptus camaldulensis). Revista do Instituto Florestal, 25, 215-221.
Chen HY, Yao JM, Xu ZF, 2009. First description of the male of Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). China Journal of Environmental Entomology, 31, 285-287.
Chen YS, Liao ZM, Tu XY, 2015. Study on resistance of different Eucalyptus varieties to Leptocybe invasa in southern Jiangxi. Northern Horticulture, 11, 106-109.
Costa VA, Berti Filho E, Wilcken CF, Stape JL, 2008. Eucalyptus gall wasp, Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in Brazil: new forest pest reaches the New World. Revista de Agricultura (Piracicaba), 83, 136-139.
CPF, 2014. Leptocybe invasa (Hym.: Eulophidae). Sección Vigilancia Fitosanitaria Forestal Subdepartamento Sanidad Vegetal. División Protección Agrícola y Forestal. http://www.cpf.cl/pdf/charla.pdf
De Marzo L, 2014. Larval respiratory system analyzed for three eulophids occurring on eucalypts in Southern Italy (Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea). Entomologica, 45, 3-9.
De Souza AR, 2016. [English title not available]. (Aspectos biológicos de Leptocybe invasa (Hymenoptera:Eulophidae) e de seu parasitoide Selitrichodes neseri (Hymenoptera:Eulophidae) e levantamento de vespas galhadoras em florestas de eucalipto na Austrália. DPhil Thesis). São Paulo, Brazil: São Paulo State University.
Dhahri S, Ben Jamaa ML, Lo Verde G, 2010. First record of Leptocybe invasa and Ophelimus maskelli eucalyptus gall wasps in Tunisia. Tunisian Journal of Plant Protection, 5, 229-234.
Dittrich-Schröder G, Wingfield MJ, Hurley B, Neser S, Mendel Z, Slippers B, 2009. The invasive gall-forming wasp Leptocybe invasa (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in South Africa. [Proceedings of the 16th Congress of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa, Stellenbosch], Stellenbosch, South Africa: Entomological Society of South Africa. 27.
Doganlar M, 2015. Diagnosis of Megastigmus spp. (Hymenoptera:Torymidae) reared from galls of Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle, 2004 (Hymenoptera:Eulophidae) on Eucalyptus spp. (Myrtaceae), with description of a new species from South Africa. Entomofauna Zeitschrift für Entomologie, 36, 561-580.
EPPO, 2006. Addition of Leptocybe invasa to the EPPO Alert List. In: EPPO Reporting Service 2006/190 . Paris, France: European Plant Protection Organization.
EPPO, 2012. EPPO Reporting Service. EPPO Reporting Service. Paris, France: EPPO. http://archives.eppo.org/EPPOReporting/Reporting_Archives.htm
EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm
FAO, 2012. Forest pest species profiles - Leptocybe invasa, blue gum chalcid. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization. http://www.fao.org/forestry/13569-05912e0e2fe9054c3ed4904ae597e3310.pdf
FRIM, 2010. Biodiversity in Malawi. Malawi: Forestry Research Institute of Malawi. http://www.sdnp.org.mw/frim/index.html
Gupta A, Poorani J, 2008. New distribution and host records of Chalcidoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera) from various parts of India. Check List, 4(4), 410-414.
Hurley B, 2012. First discovery of Selitrichodes neseri in the field. Johannesburg, South Africa: Forestry South Africa. http://www.forestry.co.za/first-discovery-of-selitrichodes-neseri-in-the-field/
IBÁ, 2015. Brazilian Tree Industry. (Indústria Brasileira de Árvores). Report 2015. http://iba.org/images/shared/iba_2015.pdf
ICFR, 2011. Leptocybe invasa, the blue gum chalcid wasp (Information Sheet 01/ 2011). South Africa: Institute for Commercial Forestry Research and Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute. http://www.forestry.co.za/uploads/File/home/notices/2011/ICFR%20IS01-2011gallwasp.pdf
IPPC, 2012. Occurrence of eucalyptus gall wasp Leptocybe invasa in Mozambique. Rome, Italy: International Plant Protection Convention, Food and Agriculture Organization. https://www.ippc.int/en/countries/mozambique/pestreports/2012/02/occurence-of-eucalyptus-gall-wasp-leptocybe-invasa-in-mozambique/
Jacob JP, Devaraj R, Natarajan R, 2007. Outbreak of the invasive gall inducing wasp Leptocybe invasa on eucalypts in India. Newsletter of the Asia-Pacific Forest Invasive Species Network, 8, 4-5.
Jacob PJ, Ramesh KA, 2009. Incidence of galls induced by Leptocybe invasa (Hymenoptera:Eulophidae) on seedlings of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and E. tereticornis (Myrtaceae) from different seed sources in Southern India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 35, 187-198.
Kavitha Kumari N, 2009. Bioecology and management of Eucalyptus gall wasp, Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). MPhil Thesis. Dharwad, India: University of Agricultural Sciences.
Kim IK, Mendel Z, Protasov A, Blumberg D, La Salle J, 2008. Taxonomy, biology, and efficacy of two Australian parasitoids of the Eucalyptus gall wasp, Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae: Tetrastichinae). Zootaxa, 1910, 1-20.
Kulkarni H, 2010. Distribution, seasonal incidence and management of Eucalyptus gall wasp, Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) with special reference to native parasitoids. MPhil Thesis. Dharwad, India: University of Agricultural Sciences.
La Salle J, Arakelian G, Garrison RW, Gates MW, 2009. A new species of invasive gall wasp (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae: Tetrastichinae) on blue gum (Eucalyptus globulus) in California. Zootaxa, 2121, 35-43.
Lawson S, Griffiths M, Nahrung H, Noack A, Wingfield M, Wilcken C, et al., 2012. Biological control of eucalypt pests overseas and in Australia. Final report for project FST/2011/028. Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR). 40 pp.
Liang Y, Jiyue LI, Xiujun W, Zuozhen LI, 2010. Observation on the male ratio of Leptocybe invasa adult. Forest Pest and Disease, 2010-05, 21-22.
Maged MES, 2016. The interaction between the gall wasp Leptocybe invasa and Eucalyptus camaldulensis leaves: a study of phyto-volatile metabolites. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy, 8(4), 90-98.
Mifsud D, 2012. Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle, 2004 and Ophelimus maskelli Haliday, 1844 two new records of gall forming Eulophidae from Malta (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea). Bulletin of Entomological Society of Malta, 5, 189-193.
Mutitu KE, 2003. A pest threat to Eucalyptus species in Kenya. KEFRI Technical Report. p. 12.
Nyeko P, 2005. The cause, incidence and severity of a new gall damage on Eucalyptus species at Oruchinga refugee settlement in Mbarara district, Uganda. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11, 47-50.
Qiu HX, Xu JX, Lin MS, 2011. Study on the biology and effective accumulated temperature by Leptocybe invasa at Eucalyptus. Guangdong Forestry Science and Technology, 27, 1-5.
Rolim GS, Almeida TS, Poderoso JCM, Chagas TX, Ribeiro GT, 2014. First record of Leptocybe invasa in Eucalyptus spp. (Myrtaceae) in the state of Sergipe. (Primeiro registro de Leptocybe invasa em Eucalyptus spp. (Myrtaceae) no estado de Sergipe). In: XXV Congresso Brasileiro de Entomologia, Goiânia, Brasil, 14-18 September 2014 . https://issuu.com/ericdamascenokaji/docs/xxv_cbe_miolo_final
Roux J, 2005. Pest alert - Blue gum chalcid. Tree Protection News, 10, 13. https://www.fabinet.up.ac.za/tpcp/newsletters/TPCP_Newsletter_Nov_2005.pdf
Sambaraju K, DesRochers P, Rioux D, Boulanger Y, Kulkarni N, Verma RK, Pautasso M, et al., 2015. Forest ecosystem health and biotic disturbances: perspectives on indicators and management approaches. In: Ecological forest management handbook, [ed. by Larocque GR]. London, UK: CRC Press.
Sánchez I, 2003. Two new eucalypt pests found in Spain. (Descubiertas dos nuevas plagas del eucalipto en España). Quercus, 214, 32-33.
Sangha KS, Dhillon GPS, Kumar V, 2011. Leptocybe invasa (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), an invasive gall inducer of Eucalyptus in Punjab. In: Extended Abstracts of the 3rd Congress on Insect Science [Pest management for food security and environment health], [ed. by Dhawan, SDR, Kumar R]. Ludhiana, India: Punjab Agricultural University. p. 32.
Shylesha AN, 2008. Classical biological control of Eucalyptus gall wasp Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle. Final Project report on the management of emerging pests Eucalyptus. Bangalore, India: National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Insects. http://www.dcpulppaper.org/gifs/report63.pdf
Thu PQ, 2004. The first record of gall forming wasp associated with eucalypt plantations in Vietnam. Science and Technological Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 11, 1598-1599.
Thu PQ, Dell B, Burgess TI, 2009. Susceptibility of 18 eucalypt species to the gall wasp Leptocybe invasa in the nursery and young plantations in Vietnam. Science Asia, 35, 113-117.
Triapitsyn SV, Berezovskiy VV, Hoddle MS, Morse JG, 2007. A review of the Nearctic species of Erythmelus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), with a key and new additions to the New World fauna. Zootaxa, 1641, 1-64.
Tung GS, La Salle J, 2010. Pest alert - a newly discovered invasion of gall-forming wasps, Leptocybe invasa (Fisher & La Salle), on eucalyptus trees in Taiwan. Formosan Entomologist, 30, 241-244.
Vastrad AS, Kavitha Kumari N, Ramanagouda SH, Basavana Goud K, 2011. Management of eucalyptus gall wasp, Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle in greenhouse. Pestology, 35, 44-53.
Vastrad AS, Ramanagouda SH, 2014. Invasive gall wasp (Leptocybe invasa) in eucalypt and its management. In: Eucalypts in India, Edition I, Dehradun, India: Envis Center on Forestry, Forest Research Institute. 346-380.
Viggiani G, 1997. [English title not available]. (Lotta biologica e integrata nella difesa fitosanitaria. Vol. 2: Lotta integrata ai fitofagi), Italy: Liguori Ed.460 pp.
Viggiani G, 2015. Description of the final-instar larvae of the gall inducer wasps Aprostocetus monacoi Viggiani and Leptocybe invasa Fisher et La Salle (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea: Eulophidae). Entomological Review, 95(4), 447-449.
Wiley J, Skelley PA, 2008. A eucalyptus pest, Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), genus and species new to Florida and North America. Pest Alert. Florida, USA: Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry.http://www.freshfromflorida.com/content/download/68487/1614796/Pest_Alert_- _Leptocybe_invasa,_Blue_Gum_Chalcid.pdf
Wu YJ, Jiang XJ, Li DW, Luo JT, Zhou GF, Chang MS, Yang ZQ, 2009. Leptocybe invasa, a new invasive forest pest making galls on twigs and leaves of eucalyptus trees in China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 45, 161-163.
Zaché B, Zaché RRC, Souza NM, Candelaria MC, Barbosa LR, Moio SG, et al., 2012. [English title not available]. (Ocorrência de Megastigmus sp. (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) parasitoide da vespa da galha Leptocybe invasa (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) no Brasil). In: XXIV Congresso Brasileiro de Entomologia, Curitiba, Brasil, 16-20 September 2012
Zhang HF, Kang WT, Chen SL, Tang XH, Lin XQ, 2012. Study on the relationship between eucalyptus clones and the damage degrees caused by Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, 32, 345-349.
Zhao DY, Xu JX, Lin MS, Qiu HX, Zhong TK, Chen MR, Huang MY, Chen RP, 2008. Evaluation for the growth loss of eucalyptus caused by Leptocybe invasa. Guangdong Forestry Science and Technology, 24, 58-60.
Distribution References
Aquino DA, Botto E, Loiacono MS, Pathauer P, 2011. [English title not available]. ("Avispa de la agalla del eucalipto", Leptocybe invasa Fischer & La Salle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae: Tetrastichinae), en Argentina). In: Revista de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, 37 (2) 159-164.
Aytar F, 2003. Natural biology, distribution and control method of Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle (Hym., Eulophidae), Eucalyptus gall wasp in Turkey. In: Journal of DOA, 9 47-66.
Bain J, 2011. Leptocybe invasa, a gall forming wasp on eucalyptus, not in New Zealand. In: Forest Health News 217, https://www.scionresearch.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/35396/FHNews-217_July2011.pdf
Benítez Díaz EA, Costa VA, de Moraes GJ, Godziewsky D, 2014. First record of Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) and Rhombacus eucalypti Ghosh & Chakrabarti (Acari: Eriophyidae) from Paraguay. In: Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Paraguay, 18 129-132.
CABI, Undated. Compendium record. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated a. CABI Compendium: Status inferred from regional distribution. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated b. CABI Compendium: Status as determined by CABI editor. Wallingford, UK: CABI
Chen YS, Liao ZM, Tu XY, 2015. Study on resistance of different Eucalyptus varieties to Leptocybe invasa in southern Jiangxi. In: Northern Horticulture, 11 106-109.
Costa VA, Berti Filho E, Wilcken CF, Stape JL, 2008. Eucalyptus gall wasp, Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in Brazil: new forest pest reaches the New World. In: Revista de Agricultura (Piracicaba), 83 136-139.
CPF, 2014. Leptocybe invasa (Hym.: Eulophidae)., Sección Vigilancia Fitosanitaria Forestal Subdepartamento Sanidad Vegetal. División Protección Agrícola y Forestal. http://www.cpf.cl/pdf/charla.pdf
De Souza AR, 2016. [English title not available]. (Aspectos biológicos de Leptocybe invasa (Hymenoptera:Eulophidae) e de seu parasitoide Selitrichodes neseri (Hymenoptera:Eulophidae) e levantamento de vespas galhadoras em florestas de eucalipto na Austrália. DPhil Thesis)., São Paulo, Brazil: São Paulo State University.
Dhahri S, Ben Jamaa ML, Lo Verde G, 2010. First record of Leptocybe invasa and Ophelimus maskelli eucalyptus gall wasps in Tunisia. In: Tunisian Journal of Plant Protection, 5 229-234.
Dittrich-Schröder G, Wingfield MJ, Hurley B, Neser S, Mendel Z, Slippers B, 2009. The invasive gall-forming wasp Leptocybe invasa (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in South Africa. [Proceedings of the 16th Congress of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa, Stellenbosch], Stellenbosch, South Africa: Entomological Society of South Africa. 27.
FAO, 2012. Forest pest species profiles - Leptocybe invasa, blue gum chalcid., Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization. http://www.fao.org/forestry/13569-05912e0e2fe9054c3ed4904ae597e3310.pdf
FRIM, 2010. Biodiversity in Malawi., Malawi: Forestry Research Institute of Malawi. http://www.sdnp.org.mw/frim/index.html
ICFR, 2011. Leptocybe invasa, the blue gum chalcid wasp (Information Sheet 01/ 2011)., South Africa: Institute for Commercial Forestry Research and Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute. http://www.forestry.co.za/uploads/File/home/notices/2011/ICFR%20IS01-2011gallwasp.pdf
IPPC, 2012. Occurrence of eucalyptus gall wasp Leptocybe invasa in Mozambique., Rome, Italy: International Plant Protection Convention, Food and Agriculture Organization. https://www.ippc.int/en/countries/mozambique/pestreports/2012/02/occurence-of-eucalyptus-gall-wasp-leptocybe-invasa-in-mozambique/
Jacob JP, Devaraj R, Natarajan R, 2007. Outbreak of the invasive gall inducing wasp Leptocybe invasa on eucalypts in India. In: Newsletter of the Asia-Pacific Forest Invasive Species Network, 8 4-5.
Jacob PJ, Ramesh KA, 2009. Incidence of galls induced by Leptocybe invasa (Hymenoptera:Eulophidae) on seedlings of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and E. tereticornis (Myrtaceae) from different seed sources in Southern India. In: International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 35 187-198.
Lawson S, Griffiths M, Nahrung H, Noack A, Wingfield M, Wilcken C, et al, 2012. Biological control of eucalypt pests overseas and in Australia. Final report for project FST/2011/028., Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR). 40 pp.
Mifsud D, 2012. Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle, 2004 and Ophelimus maskelli Haliday, 1844 two new records of gall forming Eulophidae from Malta (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea). In: Bulletin of Entomological Society of Malta, 5 189-193.
Mutitu KE, 2003. A pest threat to Eucalyptus species in Kenya. KEFRI Technical Report., 12.
Rolim GS, Almeida TS, Poderoso JCM, Chagas TX, Ribeiro GT, 2014. First record of Leptocybe invasa in Eucalyptus spp. (Myrtaceae) in the state of Sergipe. (Primeiro registro de Leptocybe invasa em Eucalyptus spp. (Myrtaceae) no estado de Sergipe). [XXV Congresso Brasileiro de Entomologia, Goiânia, Brasil, 14-18 September 2014], https://issuu.com/ericdamascenokaji/docs/xxv_cbe_miolo_final
Roux J, 2005. Pest alert - Blue gum chalcid. In: Tree Protection News, 10 13. https://www.fabinet.up.ac.za/tpcp/newsletters/TPCP_Newsletter_Nov_2005.pdf
Sánchez I, 2003. Two new eucalypt pests found in Spain. (Descubiertas dos nuevas plagas del eucalipto en España). In: Quercus, 214 32-33.
Sangha KS, Dhillon GPS, Kumar V, 2011. Leptocybe invasa (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), an invasive gall inducer of Eucalyptus in Punjab. [Extended Abstracts of the 3rd Congress on Insect Science [Pest management for food security and environment health]], [ed. by Dhawan SDR, Kumar R]. Ludhiana, India: Punjab Agricultural University. 32.
Thu PQ, 2004. The first record of gall forming wasp associated with eucalypt plantations in Vietnam. In: Science and Technological Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 11 1598-1599.
Thu PQ, Dell B, Burgess TI, 2009. Susceptibility of 18 eucalypt species to the gall wasp Leptocybe invasa in the nursery and young plantations in Vietnam. In: Science Asia, 35 113-117.
Wiley J, Skelley PA, 2008. A eucalyptus pest, Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), genus and species new to Florida and North America. Pest Alert., Florida, USA: Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry. http://www.freshfromflorida.com/content/download/68487/1614796/Pest_Alert_- _Leptocybe_invasa,_Blue_Gum_Chalcid.pdf
Wu YJ, Jiang XJ, Li DW, Luo JT, Zhou GF, Chang MS, Yang ZQ, 2009. Leptocybe invasa, a new invasive forest pest making galls on twigs and leaves of eucalyptus trees in China. In: Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 45 161-163.
Zhang HF, Kang WT, Chen SL, Tang XH, Lin XQ, 2012. Study on the relationship between eucalyptus clones and the damage degrees caused by Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle. In: Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, 32 345-349.
Links to Websites
Top of pageWebsite | URL | Comment |
---|---|---|
Consorcio Protecciòn Fitosanitaria Forestal | http://www.cpf.cl/ | |
Forestry Research Institute of Malawi | http://www.sdnp.org.mw/frim/ | |
GISD/IASPMR: Invasive Alien Species Pathway Management Resource and DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway | https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m93f6 | Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list. |
Global register of Introduced and Invasive species (GRIIS) | http://griis.org/ | Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list. |
Indústria Brasileira de Árvores | http//iba.org/pt/ |
Contributors
Top of page18/01/17 Original text by:
Francesco Nugnes, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, Italy
Distribution Maps
Top of pageSelect a dataset
Map Legends
-
CABI Summary Records
Map Filters
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/