- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat List
- Biology and Ecology
- Water Tolerances
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Impact Summary
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Prevention and Control
- Gaps in Knowledge/Research Needs
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Polysiphonia brodiei (Dillwyn) Sprengel, 1827
Other Scientific Names
- Ceramium brodiei (Dillwyn) C.Agardh, 1811
- Conferva brodiei Dillwyn, 1809
- Hutchinsia brodiei (Dillwyn) Lyngbye, 1819
- Hutchinsia penicillata C.Agardh, 1828
- Polysiphonia brodiei f. densa Holmes & Batters, 1890
- Polysiphonia penicillata (C.Agardh) Sprengel, 1827
Local Common Names
- Denmark: knippeledtang
- Norway: penseldokke
Summary of InvasivenessTop of page
P. brodiei is a filamentous red alga which has been introduced to the Pacific and Atlantic coasts of North America, as well as to Japan, Australia, and New Zealand.
In analyses of the potential impacts of introduced marine species in Australian waters, P. brodiei has been assessed as one of the 10 most damaging species (Hayes et al., 2005) based on a combination of human health, economic and environmental criteria. P. brodiei is listed as one of 66 marine species on the Global Invasive Species Database managed by the Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG).
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Plantae
- Phylum: Rhodophyta
- Class: Rhodophyceae
- Order: Ceramiales
- Family: Rhodomelaceae
- Genus: Polysiphonia
- Species: Polysiphonia brodiei
Notes on Taxonomy and NomenclatureTop of page
Polysiphonia brodiei (Dillwyn) Spreng. is a red alga belonging to the family Rhodomelaceae within the order Ceramiales (Rhodophyta). The specific name, recognizing the Scottish botanist James Brodie, was initially and incorrectly spelt “brodiaei”. Silva et al. (1996) noted that in forming the epithet the genitive inflection should be added to the unmodified name in accordance with Rec. 60C.3 of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature.
The type locality is Bantry Bay, Cork, Ireland (Womersley, 1979: 497). The type specimen is Lectotype BM-K; Probable Syntype: LD – 24.vi.1807, Hutchins. (Maggs and Hommersand, 1993). The basionym is Conferva brodiaei Dillwyn 1809: 81, pl.107, and recorded synonyms include: Ceramium brodiaei (Dillwyn) C.Agardh; Hutchinsia brodiaei (Dillwyn) Lyngbye; Hutchinsia penicillata C.Agardh; and Polysiphonia penicillata (C.Agardh) Spreng.
DescriptionTop of page
Species of Polysiphonia are generally distinguished by the number of pericentral cells present (ranging from 4 to 12 or more), the degree of cortication of the axes, the growth habit and robustness of plants, as well as on the basis of particular features of vegetative and reproductive cells e.g. presence/absence of trichoblasts, shape of the cystocarp, size and shape of spermatangial branches (e.g. Womersley, 1979).
P. brodiei is a red alga, generally 5-25 cm in height although they may be as tall as 40 cm, dark reddish brown to crimson purple in colour, and profusely and irregularly branched. The plants are attached to the substrate by numerous rhizoids and a mat of interwoven, branched prostrate axes that develop from the base of young axes. The axes are extremely soft and flaccid when young, becoming firmer and flexible when older. There are several main percurrent axes that are generally 0.6-0.9 mm in diameter, and which bear numerous, spirally arranged laterals. The lower axes are heavily corticated by several layers of small cells. Only the new growth of the upper axes are ecorticate, with well-defined segments visible. There are (6)7-8 pericentral cells. Trichoblasts or scar cells are on every segment, and the trichoblasts are slender and 2-4 times furcate. Branches are formed in the axils of the trichoblasts. Plants are dioecious.
Cystocarps have short stalks, and are urceolate with the ostiolar cells slightly inflated. The spermatangial branches develop as a branch of a trichoblast, and are cylindrical with a rounded to pointed apex. Tetrasporangia are formed in long spiral series, with a divergence of 1/6 to 1/7. When mature, the tetrasporangia occupy about half the segment width resulting in a slight distortion of the segments. Maggs and Hommersand (1993) noted that the morphology of this species varies greatly with environmental conditions. Plants found on lower intertidal shores or floating structures are elongate and flaccid with a cylindrical outline to the laterals, whereas in upper shore pools the plants are densely tufted and have a pyramidal outline.
DistributionTop of page
Within its native range, P. brodiei has been reported from northern Europe (the UK and Scandinavia) through to western Africa and nearby islands, and in the Mediterranean from Morocco to Turkey.
It has been reported as introduced to the Pacific coast of North America (Alaska to California), Japan and Australasia (southern Australia and Tasmania, New Zealand). It is also present in Atlantic Canada in Newfoundland (South and Hooper, 1980) and Nova Scotia (Lauret, 1971), and is reported as introduced in these localities (NIMPIS, 2002). P. brodiei is also recorded from India (both western and eastern coasts), Iran, Kuwait, Qatar and Saudi Arabia (Silva et al., 1996), however, it is not clear whether the species is native or introduced to these areas.
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
History of Introduction and SpreadTop of page
P. brodiei was first reported in Australia in 1979 as a species that had probably been introduced via shipping (Womersley, 1979), based on specimens collected from 1940 onwards. In New Zealand P. brodiei was reported for the first time by Adams (1983) based on a specimen collected in 1940 from Wellington Harbour, (North Island). This species has been subsequently reported from sites in the North, South and Stewart Islands, primarily in busy ports growing on harbour structures (Adams, 1991; Nelson, 1999). However, the record of Harvey (1855:230) of Conferva brodiaei Dillwyn from Port Pegasus, Stewart Island, New Zealand, was incorrect and based on material of P. muelleriana. J.Agardh (Adams, 1991:423).
It appears to increasing in abundance even in its native range. In a study comparing the macroalgal vegetation of the Swedish Skagerrak coast in 1960-61 with the flora present in 1997, it was found that P. brodiei increased in abundance, and this was considered to be a response to increased eutrophication at the study sites (Johansson et al., 1998).
IntroductionsTop of page
|Introduced to||Introduced from||Year||Reason||Introduced by||Established in wild through||References||Notes|
|Natural reproduction||Continuous restocking|
|Alaska||Yes||Scagel et al. (1989)|
|British Columbia||Yes||Scagel et al. (1989)|
|Japan||Yes||Yoshida et al. (1990)|
|New Zealand||pre 1940||Yes||Adams (1983)|
|Newfoundland and Labrador||Yes||South and Hooper (1980)|
|Nova Scotia||Yes||Lauret (1971)|
|South Australia||pre 1973||Yes||Womersley (1979)|
|Tasmania||pre 1940||Yes||Womersley (1979)|
|Victoria||pre 1959||Yes||Womersley (1979)|
|Washington||Yes||Scagel et al. (1989)|
Risk of IntroductionTop of page
P. brodiei is tolerant of a wide range of environmental conditions as demonstrated by its distribution in its native range from higher latitudes in Scandinavia through to western Africa, and it is able to grow on a wide variety of substrates such as rock, rope, wood, concrete and metal.
HabitatTop of page
In its native range, P.brodiei is typically found growing epilithically as well as on mussels and limpets, and as an epiphyte on non-geniculate corallines and smaller algae in mid-shore pools through to the upper subtidal zone (Maggs and Hommersand, 1993). It is less frequently found in the subtidal zone with some records to 8 m depth [e.g. www.weedseen.co.uk]. In the UK, it is reported from extremely exposed intertidal sites through to sheltered subtidal sites [www.weedseen.co.uk]. In Scandinavia, it is reported to grow mainly on rocks in the littoral in somewhat exposed localities (Kapraun and Rueness, 1983).
In its introduced range, P. brodiei has been recorded primarily from port environments. Itcolonises wooden surfaces such as jetties and pylons, as well as ropes, buoys, boat ramps, barges, slow moving vessels such as barges (Abbott and Hollenberg, 1976; Womersley, 1979; Adams, 1991).
Habitat ListTop of page
|Intertidal zone||Principal habitat||Natural|
|Intertidal zone||Principal habitat||Productive/non-natural|
|Benthic zone||Principal habitat||Natural|
|Benthic zone||Principal habitat||Productive/non-natural|
Biology and EcologyTop of page Genetics
The haploid chromosome number for P. brodiei has been reported to be 29-31 (Magne, 1964).Reproductive Biology
P. brodiei has a tri-phasic life history typical of red algae. The macroscopic diploid tetrasporophyte plant bears many tetrasporangia each of which release 4 microscopic spores that settle to form macroscopic, haploid male and female gametophyte plants. Male gametes are called spermatia (plural) or spermatium (singular) and are not motile. Fusion with carpogonia (reproductive structures of the female plant) takes place via a trichogyne – a hair-like receptive surface. The resulting zygote develops into a cystocarp (borne on the female plant) that produces and releases diploid carpospores which in turn settle and develop into tetrasporophyte plants.Phenology
Maggs and Hommersand (1993) noted that the seasonal behaviour of this species varies with habitat. Populations of P. brodiei growing in rock pools develop between February and April, becoming conspicuous and reproducing when still very small. In these rock pool populations, the plants reach their maximum size in June-July after which they die back or may become overgrown by epiphytes. However, large fertile plants of P. brodiei can be found year round in populations that are submerged or growing on floating structures in sheltered waters. In the UK, spermatangia have been recorded from March to October and December, cystocarps in April-October and tetrasporangia from March to October and December (Maggs and Hommersand, 1993). In Scandinavia, this species is reported to be a summer annual (Kapraun and Rueness, 1983).Nutrition
P. brodiei is photosynthetic. Observations by Johansson et al. (1998) suggest that it may be able to out-compete other species in the presence of nutrient enrichment or eutrophication.Environmental Requirements
P. brodiei appears to be tolerant of a wide range of growing conditions in terms of habitat type, substrate, and environmental conditions. In addition, in parts of its native range it has a demonstrated ability to reproduce throughout the year, indicating that growth and reproductive maturity are not under strict temperature and photoperiod control (Maggs and Hommersand, 1983).
ClimateTop of page
|C - Temperate/Mesothermal climate||Preferred||Average temp. of coldest month > 0°C and < 18°C, mean warmest month > 10°C|
|D - Continental/Microthermal climate||Preferred||Continental/Microthermal climate (Average temp. of coldest month < 0°C, mean warmest month > 10°C)|
Water TolerancesTop of page
|Parameter||Minimum Value||Maximum Value||Typical Value||Status||Life Stage||Notes|
|Salinity (part per thousand)||Optimum||found in harbours - may be tolerant of lowered salinity|
Notes on Natural EnemiesTop of page
Although there are no specific known consumers of P. brodiei, fish, crabs and small crustaceans are known to feed on other Polysiphonia spp. (NIMPIS, 2002).
Means of Movement and DispersalTop of page Natural Dispersal (Non-Biotic)
It may be considered possible, if not likely, that P. brodiei is spread at least locally by tides and currents.Vector Transmission (Biotic)
There are no recorded instances of spread via biotic agents.Accidental Introduction
P. brodiei is considered to have been introduced to Australia, New Zealand, North America and Japan through shipping/vessel movements. As a small filamentous species, with a broad natural distribution range both geographically and ecologically, as well as the capacity to grow on a wide range of substrata, P. brodiei is an “ideal” fouling species. This species can be distributed long distances through vessel-hull fouling involving large and small commercial vessels as well as recreational craft. In addition this species can be translocated shorter distances via vessels as well as contaminated marine equipment, e.g. ropes, pontoons and marine farming equipment.Intentional Introduction
There is no known example of intentional introduction of this species.
Impact SummaryTop of page
ImpactTop of page
In a study conducted in Australia to identify and rank introduced marine species found within Australian waters, P. brodiei was considered to be a “medium priority species” based on its invasion potential from infected to uninfected bioregions. Based on its impact potential, both economic and environmental, P. brodiei was identified as one of the 10 most damaging potential domestic target species in Australia (Hayes et al., 2005). However, the nature of the impacts caused by P. brodiei are not clear. P. brodiei may have impacts on the settlement of other marine species as it may be able to colonise surfaces more effectively/competitively than native species. There is no information on either the palatability of this species or its nutritional value for grazers, relative to other equivalent filamentous/turfing red algae.
Risk and Impact FactorsTop of page Invasiveness
- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Has a broad native range
- Abundant in its native range
- Highly adaptable to different environments
- Is a habitat generalist
- Has high reproductive potential
- Modification of natural benthic communities
- Negatively impacts aquaculture/fisheries
- Reduced amenity values
- Competition - shading
- Competition - smothering
- Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
- Difficult to identify/detect in the field
Prevention and ControlTop of page
Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.Eradication
This is unlikely to be a viable option given the small stature of this species and the wide range of potential habitats and environmental conditions in which it can survive.Containment/zoning
Restricting the movement of vessels, rafts and pontoons from infected areas to uninfected areas is an option to reduce the likelihood of spread. Controlling the deployment of marine equipment which has been used in infected areas and requiring hull cleaning prior to movement from infected to uninfected regions are also methods which can be employed to minimize spread.Control
There are no recorded instances of attempts to control P. brodiei where it has become established and/or invasive.
Gaps in Knowledge/Research NeedsTop of page
Little is known about the ecology of P. brodiei in either its native or non-native range with respect to herbivores or associated fauna, and there are no data on its palatability, growth rates, or generation times, and there has been no detailed examination of the life history of this species in the field and how this might vary throughout its geographic and ecological range. Also, there is no information available about its competitive ability relative to other taxa living in shared habitats.
ReferencesTop of page
Benhissoune S; Boudouresque C-F; Perret-Boudouresque M; Verlaque M, 2003. A checklist of the seaweeds of the Mediterranean and Atlantic coasts of Morocco. IV. Rhodophyceae - Ceramiales. Botanica Marina, 46:55-68.
Dillwyn LW, 1809. In: British Confervae; or colored figures and descriptions of the British plants referred by botanists to the genus Conferva. London, UK: W. Phillips London, UK: W. Phillips, 100-109.
Feldmann J, 1954. [English title not supplied]. (Inventaire de la flore marine de Roscoff. Algues, champignons, lichens et spermatophytes.) Travaux Station Biologique de Roscoff, Nouvelle Série., 1-152.
Gómez Garreta A; Gallardo T; Ribera MA; Cormaci M; Furnari G; Giaccone G; Boudouresque C-F, 2001. Checklist of the Mediterranean seaweeds. III. Rhodophyceae Rabenh. Ceramiales Oltm. Botanica Marina, 44:425-460.
Hansen GI, 1997. A revised checklist and preliminary assessment of the macrobenthic marine algae and seagrasses of Orgeon. In: Conservation and Management of Native Flora and Fungi [ed. by Kaye TN, Liston A, Love RM, Luoma DL, Meinke RJ, Wilson MV] Corvallis, USA: Native Plant Society of Oregon, 175-200.
Hayes K; Sliwa C; Migus S; McEnnulty F; Dunstan P, 2005. National priority pests: Part II, Ranking of Australian marine pests. Australia: Dept. of the Environment and Heritag, . CSIRO, 106 pp. http://www.marine.csiro.au/crimp/reports/PriorityPestsFinalreport.pdf
John DM; Prud'homme Reine WFvan; Lawson GW; Kostermans TB; Price JH, 2004. A taxonomic and geographical catalogue of the seaweeds of the western coast of Africa and adjacent islands. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia, 127:1-339.
Lawson GW; Woelkerling WJ; Price JH; Prud'homme Reine WFvan; John DM, 1995. Seaweeds of the western coast of tropical Africa and adjacent islands: a critical assessment. Rhodophyta (Florideae) 5. Genera P. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Botany, 25:99-122.
Prud'homme Reine WFvan; Haroun RJ; Kostermans LBT, 2005. Checklists of seaweeds in the Atlantic Ocean and in the Cape Verde Archipelago. In: IV Simpósio Fauna e Flora das Ilhas Atlanticas, Praia, Cape Verde, 9-13 September 2002 Republic of Cabe Verde: Ministry of the Environment, Agriculture and Fisheries, 13-26.
Rueness J, 1997. Algae. Distribution of marine, benthic macro-organisms in Norway. A tabulated catalogue. Preliminary Edition. Research Report [ed. by Brattegard T, Holthe T]. Trondheim, Norway: Direktoratet for Naturforvaltninhg.
Scagel RF; Gabrielson PW; Garbary DJ; Golden L; Hawkes MW; Lindstrom SC; Oliveira JC; Widdowson TB, 1989. A synopsis of the benthic marine algae of British Columbia, southeast Alaska, Washington and Oregon. Phycological Contributions. University of British Columbia, 532 p.
South GR; Tittley I, 1986. A checklist and distributional index of the benthic marine algae of the North Atlantic Ocean. St Andrews and London, UK: Huntsman Marine laboratory and British Museum (Natural HIstory), 1-76.
Womersley HBS, 2003. The marine benthic flora of southern Australia. Part IIID: Ceramiales - Delesseriaceae, Sarcomeniaceae, Rhodomelaceae [ed. by Womersley HBS]. Canberra, Australia: Australian Biological Resources Study, 533 pp.
ContributorsTop of page
19/12/07 Original text by:
Wendy Nelson, National Institute for Water & Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Private Bag 14-901, Wellington, New Zealand
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/