Rhinella marina (cane toad)
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Distribution Table
- Habitat List
- Biology and Ecology
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Causes
- Pathway Vectors
- Impact Summary
- Threatened Species
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Uses List
- Prevention and Control
- Principal Source
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Rhinella marina (Linnaeus, 1758)
Preferred Common Name
- cane toad
Other Scientific Names
- Bufo agua Clark 1916
- Bufo marinis Barbour 1916
- Bufo marinus Mertens 1969
- Bufo marinus Schneider 1799
- Bufo marinus marinus Mertens 1972
- Bufo strumosus Court 1858
- Chaunus marinus Frost et al. 2006
International Common Names
- English: bufo toad; giant American toad; giant toad; marine Toad; Suriname toad
Local Common Names
- Caribbean: crapaud; kwapp
- Dominican Republic: maco pempen; Maco toro
- Germany: Aga-Kröte
Summary of InvasivenessTop of page
Cane toads (Rhinella marina) were introduced to many countries as biological control agents for various insect pests of sugarcane and other crops. The cane toads have proved to be pests themselves. They will feed on almost any terrestrial animal and compete with native amphibians for food and breeding habitats. Their toxic secretions are known to cause illness and death in domestic animals that come into contact with them, such as dogs and cats, and wildlife, such as snakes and lizards. When threatened, they are able to squirt the toxic secretion over a metre, causing extreme pain if rubbed into the eyes. Human fatalities have been recorded following ingestion of the eggs or adults.
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Metazoa
- Phylum: Chordata
- Subphylum: Vertebrata
- Class: Amphibia
- Order: Anura
- Family: Bufonidae
- Genus: Rhinella
- Species: Rhinella marina
DescriptionTop of page
Cane toads are heavily built with short legs. They can sometimes grow up to 30cm long, with 20cm not uncommon for females and and average of 12-15cm in many regions. Males are slightly smaller. Fingers lack webbing, but the toes are heavily webbed. Adults have a rough, warty skin, coloured tan, brown or dark brown, dull green or black. The tympanum is distinct, about one half to two thirds the size of the eye. Venom glands are aggregated together to form large and distinctive parotoid glands, found above each shoulder. These glands are able to ooze venom. (Gautherot, 2000)
DistributionTop of page
Native range: Cane toads are indigenous to northern South America (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Colombia, Paraguay, Venezuela, the Guianas, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago), Central America, and Mexico northward to extreme southern Texas.
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
|Continent/Country/Region||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||Reference||Notes|
|British Indian Ocean Territory||Present||Introduced||Presumed to be between 1980 and 1989||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Chagos Archipelago||Present||Introduced||presumed to be between 1980-1989||ISSG, 2011|
|Japan||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-Bonin Island||Present||Introduced||1949||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|-Ryukyu Archipelago||Present||Introduced||first discovered in December 2000||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Taiwan||Absent, formerly present||Introduced||1935||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Thailand||Absent, formerly present||Introduced||1975||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Egypt||Absent, formerly present||Introduced||1937||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Mauritius||Absent, intercepted only||Introduced||1930s-1940s||ISSG, 2011|
|Bermuda||Present||Introduced||1885, C. 1875 or 1885 (maybe 1812)||Invasive||Schotman, 1989; ISSG, 2011|
|Mexico||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|USA||Present||Present based on regional distribution.|
|-Florida||Present||Introduced||early 1960s||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
Central America and Caribbean
|Antigua and Barbuda||Present||Introduced||before 1916||ISSG, 2011|
|Barbados||Present||Introduced||c. 1833||Invasive||Schotman, 1989; ISSG, 2011|
|Belize||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|British Virgin Islands||Present||Introduced||ISSG, 2011|
|Cayman Islands||Present||Introduced||Before 1887||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Costa Rica||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Cuba||Absent, formerly present||Introduced||1920||ISSG, 2011|
|Dominica||Absent, formerly present||Introduced||ISSG, 2011|
|Dominican Republic||Present||Introduced||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|El Salvador||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Grenada||Present||Introduced||c. 1870s||ISSG, 2011|
|Guadeloupe||Present||Introduced||Before 1914||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Guatemala||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Honduras||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Jamaica||Present||Introduced||1844||Invasive||Schotman, 1989; ISSG, 2011|
|Martinique||Present||Introduced||before 1844||Schotman, 1989; ISSG, 2011|
|Montserrat||Present||Introduced||c. 1900, Before 1879||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Nicaragua||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Panama||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Puerto Rico||Present||Introduced||c. 1920||ISSG, 2011|
|Saint Kitts and Nevis||Present||Introduced||before 1904||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Saint Lucia||Widespread||Introduced||before 1879||Invasive||Jn Pierre, 2008; Daltry, 2009; ISSG, 2011||Severely impacting on biodiversity|
|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines||Present||Introduced||before 1916||ISSG, 2011|
|Trinidad and Tobago||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|United States Virgin Islands||Present||Introduced||1934||ISSG, 2011|
|Argentina||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Bolivia||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Brazil||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|-Para||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|Colombia||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Ecuador||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|French Guiana||Present||Native||Not invasive||Schotman, 1989; ISSG, 2011|
|Guyana||Present||Native||Not invasive||Schotman, 1989; ISSG, 2011|
|Paraguay||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Peru||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Suriname||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Venezuela||Present||Native||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|American Samoa||Present||Introduced||1953||ISSG, 2011|
|Australia||Present||CAB ABSTRACTS Data Mining 2001|
|-Australian Northern Territory||Present||Introduced||1982-1983||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|-New South Wales||Present||Introduced||1964-1966||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|-Queensland||Present||Introduced||1935||Invasive||Greathead and Greathead, 1992; ISSG, 2011|
|-Western Australia||Present||Introduced||2000||Invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Caroline Islands||Present||Introduced||ISSG, 2011|
|Kiribati||Unconfirmed record||Introduced||ISSG, 2011|
|Line Islands||Unconfirmed record||Introduced||ISSG, 2011|
|Marshall Islands||Present, few occurrences||Introduced||Not invasive||ISSG, 2011|
|Micronesia, Federated states of||Present||Introduced||before 1954||ISSG, 2011|
|Northern Mariana Islands||Present||Introduced||1939-1941||ISSG, 2011|
|Palau||Present||Introduced||after WWII||ISSG, 2011|
|Papua New Guinea||Present||Introduced||1937||ISSG, 2011|
|Solomon Islands||Present||Introduced||ISSG, 2011|
HabitatTop of page
Cane toads' original habitat, before their dispersal by humans, was seasonal Amazonian savanna, with small fresh water lakes. Cane toads are found in rain forests, both in their native range and introduced range, such as in Hawaii and New Guinea, though not at high densities (Fred Kraus pers.comm). However, they can now be found in many places, such as man-made ponds, gardens, drain pipes, debris, under cement piles and beneath houses. Cane toads will usually stay on dry land and reproduce in any shallow water near its surroundings. Toads and tadpoles are able to tolerate very high levels of salinity. Tadpoles have been observed in water, metres from the open ocean.
Habitat ListTop of page
|Lakes||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Ponds||Principal habitat||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Rivers / streams||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Cultivated / agricultural land||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Disturbed areas||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Urban / peri-urban areas||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Natural forests||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Riverbanks||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
|Wetlands||Present, no further details||Harmful (pest or invasive)|
Biology and EcologyTop of page
Cane toads eat “almost any terrestrial animal”, although they are more likely to consume animals active at ground level during the night. The major diet items are insects, including grass-hoppers, caterpillars and ants, together with millipedes and land snails (Hinkley, 1962 in SPREP, 2000).
The cane toad is opportunistic in its feeding habits and will consume almost anything that it is able to catch (Zug and Zug, 1979 in Lever, 2001). Terrestrial arthropods make up the bulk of the diet, but snails, crabs, small vertebrates (mammals, birds, lizards and frogs), pet food and human faeces may also be consumed (Lever, 2001). Cane toads will gorge themselves if food is in abundance. Unusual items that cane toads have been observed eating include rotting garbage, a coral snake (Micrurus circinalis), fledgling birds and a lit cigarette butt (Lever, 2001).
Cane toads breed between the months of April and September in the Northern Hemisphere and they can be heard calling their mates, beginning in late March. In the Southern Hemisphere, in Australia, it has been noticed that the male cane toad calls in any month of the year, peaking during the wet season. Every year the female cane toad produces two clutches of about 8,000 to 35,000 eggs. The eggs are externally fertilised by the male's sperm. The eggs can be found floating on the surface of water in a jelly-like string or wrapped around vegetation and other debris in the water. The age and size of the female will determine how many eggs the toad will produce (Honolulu Zoo).
Cane toad eggs hatch within 24 to 72 hours of laying into tiny, shiny black tadpoles. Tadpoles metamorphose after two to seven weeks (Alford et al. 1995), becoming very small (10-12mm) terrestrial juveniles. These small juveniles experience very high mortality, and unlike adults or larger juveniles they tend to be diurnal.
It has been estimated that less 0.5 percent of cane toads toad eggs survive to maturity. It takes a year for the toads to reach maturity, when they will be about 75mm long. Cane toads survival in the wild is unknown, but unlikely to be more than 5 years. Animals kept in captivity are estimated to live 10-40 years (Honolulu Zoo).
Means of Movement and DispersalTop of page
Introduction pathways to new locations
Acclimatisation societies: Cane toads have been introduced to many locations around the world as a biological control agent for crop pests (NRM, 2001).
Natural dispersal: Cane toads have spread over large areas of Australia under their own power (Lever, 2001). In the north of their Australian range, dispersal is primarily effected by adults hopping large distances (up to about 55km per year), in relatively straight lines. Cane toads in northern Australia are thus the fastest moving anurans yet recorded. This remarkable dispersal ability appears to be the result of strong selection operating on toads over the last seventy years (Philips et al. 2006).
Road vehicles (long distance): Cane toads have been transported in Australia by large freight trucks or 'road trains' (Sydney Morning Herald, 2002).
Seafreight (container/bulk): Cane toads have been found on Norfolk Islands
Local dispersal methods
Natural dispersal (local): Cane toads have spread over large areas of Australia under their own power (Lever, 2001). In the north of their Australian range (on the invasion front), dispersal is primarily effected by adults hopping large distances (up to about 55km per year), in relatively straight lines. Cane toads in northern Australia are thus the fastest moving anurans yet recorded.
This remarkable dispersal ability appears to be the result of strong selection operating on toads in the invasion front over the last seventy years (Philips et al. 2006).
Road vehicles: Cane toads have been transported in Australia by large freight trucks or 'road trains' (Sydney Morning Herald, 2002).
Water currents: Free-swimming cane toad tadpoles are liable to be swept away during flash floods.
Pathway CausesTop of page
Pathway VectorsTop of page
Impact SummaryTop of page
ImpactTop of page
Threatened SpeciesTop of page
|Threatened Species||Conservation Status||Where Threatened||Mechanism||References||Notes|
|Erinna newcombi (Newcomb's snail)||VU (IUCN red list: Vulnerable) VU (IUCN red list: Vulnerable); USA ESA listing as threatened species USA ESA listing as threatened species||Hawaii||Predation||US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2006|
|Peltophryne lemur (Puerto Rican crested toad)||CR (IUCN red list: Critically endangered) CR (IUCN red list: Critically endangered); USA ESA listing as threatened species USA ESA listing as threatened species||Puerto Rico||Predation||US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1992|
Risk and Impact FactorsTop of page Invasiveness
- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Highly adaptable to different environments
- Negatively impacts human health
- Negatively impacts animal health
- Reduced native biodiversity
- Threat to/ loss of endangered species
- Threat to/ loss of native species
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Difficult/costly to control
UsesTop of page
In the past, cane toads were introduced as a biological control agent for insect pests of sugarcane and other crops.
Bufotenine toxin produced by the cane toad is used as an aphrodisiac and hair-restorer in Japan. In mainland China it is used to lower the heart rate of patients undergoing cardiac surgery (Musgrave, 1996). The toxin is used by South American Indians on hunting arrows. The toxin is sometimes used as a narcotic by some people (Lever, 2001).
Cane toads were used for pregnancy testing in humans. A woman's urine was injected subcutaneously into the lymph glands of a male toad, resulting in spermatazoa becoming present in the toad's urine if the woman was pregnant (Berra, 1998 in Lever, 2001).
Uses ListTop of page
Drugs, stimulants, social uses
- Miscellaneous drugs, stimulants and social uses
- Biological control
- Source of medicine/pharmaceutical
Prevention and ControlTop of page
Physical: Cane toads can be excluded from garden ponds and dams by a 50cm high barrier, such as a thick hedge or a wire mesh fence. Toads may be killed humanely by putting them inside a plastic bag or container and placing them in a freezer (Brandt and Mazzotti, 1990).
Biological: In 1994, the CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology (Australia) was assessing the pathogenicity and specificity of viruses against cane toads. Scientists at the CSIRO Animal Health Laboratory in Victoria have been searching for biological controls of cane toads and in 2001 they began investigating gene technology as a mechanism of control. Environment Australia have launched a project for the development of a cane toad biological control. The aim is to develop a self disseminating viral vector to disrupt the development of the toad. Scientists at the University of Adelaide (Australia) have isolated a sex pheromone in a native Australian frog; they hope that a similar pheromone will be found in cane toads that could be used to disrupt the breeding cycle. These are long term solutions.
Scientists at Sydney University have identified a parasitic worm that attacks the cane toads' lungs, stunting their growth and, in most cases, killing them. They believe the parasite has the potential to reduce toad populations dramatically.
BibliographyTop of page
Aguirre, W. and Poss, S. G., 1999. Bufo marinus. Non-Indigenous species in the Gulf of Mexico Ecosystem.
Atkinson, I. A. E. and Atkinson, T. J. 2000. Land vertebrates as invasive species on islands served by the South Pacific Regional Environment Programme. In: Invasive Species in the Pacific: A Technical Review and Draft Regional Strategy. South Pacific Regional Environment Programme, Samoa: 19-84.
Bomford, M., 2003. Risk Assessment for the Import and Keeping of Exotic Vertebrates in Australia. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. http://www.feral.org.au/feral_documents/PC12803.pdf
Brandt, Laura A., Mazzotti, Frank J. 1990. Marine toads (Bufo marinus), University of Florida - Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/UW/UW04600.pdf
Breuil, M. & Ibéné, B. 2004. Les Hylides invasifs dans les Antilles françaises et le peuplement batrachologique naturel. Bull. Soc. Herpetol. Fr, 10 p.
Breuil, M. 2002. Histoire naturelle des Amphibiens et des Reptiles terrestres de l'archipel Guadeloupéen. In Patrimoines Naturels, MNHN, Paris.
Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (CEFAS)., 2008. Decision support tools-Identifying potentially invasive non-native marine and freshwater species: fish, invertebrates, amphibians. http://www.cefas.co.uk/projects/risks-and-impacts-of-non-native-species/decision-support-tools.aspx
CONABIO. 2008. Sistema de información sobre especies invasoras en México. Especies invasoras - Anfibios. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. Fecha de acceso. http://www.conabio.gob.mx/invasoras/index.php/Especies_invasoras_-_Anfibios
CSIROnline, 2001. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation.
Doody, J.S., Green, B., Sims, R., Rhind, D., West, P., and Steer, D. 2006. Indirect impacts of invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) on nest predation in pig-nosed turtles (Carettochelys insculpta). Wildlife Research 33, 349–354.
Eldredge, L. G. 2000. Non-indigenous freshwater fishes, amphibians, and crustaceans of the Pacific and Hawaiian islands. In Invasive Species in the Pacific: A Technical Review and Draft Regional Strategy. South Pacific Regional Environment Programme, Samoa: 173-190
Eldredge, L.G., 1994 Introductions of commercially significant aquatic organisms to the Pacific Islands. South Pacific Commission, Noumea, New Caledonia.
Florida Gardener, 2002. Bufo marinus - Giant Toad, Cane Toad, Marine Toad. © Copyright 1999-2002 FloridaGardener.com. http://www.floridagardener.com/critters/BufoMarinus.htm
Grant, G. S. 1996. Prey of introduced Bufo marinus in American Samoa. Herpetological Review 27: 67–79.
Hilgris, Ryan. 2000. Bufo marinus. The Animal Diversity Web, University of Michigan. http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/accounts/bufo/b._marinus.html
Hinkley, A. D. 1962. Diet of the giant toad, Bufo marinus (L.), in Fiji. Herpetologica 18: 253–259.
Hyatt, Alex and Humphrey, John. 1995. Biological Control of the Cane Toad in Australia. FROGLOG Number 15. CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory.
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org/
IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2006. Global Amphibian Assessment. Downloaded on 4 May 2006. http://www.globalamphibians.org/
Jackson, W. B. 1962. Area of study. In Storer, T. I. (ed.) Pacific Island rat ecology. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 225: 14–20.
Lever, C. 2001. The Cane Toad: the history and ecology of a successful colonist. Westbury Publishing, West Yorkshire. 230pp.
Lever, R. J. A. W. 1945. The giant toad in the Solomon Islands. Fiji Agricultural Journal 16: 1.
Lorvelec, O., Pascal., M., Pavis, C., Feldmann, P. 2007. Amphibians and reptiles of the French West Indies : Inventory, threats and conservation. Applied Herpetology 4, 131-161
Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle [Ed]. 2003-2006. Bufo marinus Inventaire national du Patrimoine naturel. http://inpn.mnhn.fr/isb/servlet/ISBServlet?action=Espece&typeAction=10&pageReturn=ficheEspeceDescription.jsp&numero_taxon=350746
Narayan, E.; Christi, K.; Morley, C.; Trevenen, P., 2008. Sexual dimorphism in the cane toad Bufo marinus: a quantitative comparison of visual inspection methods for sexing individuals. The Herpetological Journal, Volume 18, Number 1, January 2008 , pp. 63-65(3)
Natural Resources and Water (NRW), 2006. Fact sheet: Cane toad Bufo marinus Queensland Government Dept. of Natural Resources and Water
NatureServe, 1995. Bufo marinus. NatureServe Explorer. http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/servlet/NatureServe?searchName=BUFO+MARINUS
Pacific Invasives Initiative (PII), 2006. Viwa Island Restoration Project http://www.issg.org/cii/PII/demo/viwa.html
Pernetta, J. C. and Watling, D. 1978. The introduced and native terrestrial vertebrates of Fiji. Pacific Science 32: 223–244.
Phillips, B. L., Brown, G. P., Webb, J. K. , Shine, R, 2006. Invasion and the evolution of speed in toads. Short communications. Nature Vol 439|16 February 2006 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v439/n7078/pdf/439803a.pdf
Somma, Louis A. 2002. Bufo marinus (Linnaeus, 1758) USGS - Nonindigenous Aquatic Species. http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.asp?speciesID=48
Sullivan, John., undated. Cane Toad. http://www.wildherps.com/species/B.marinus.html
Sydney Morning Herald, June 17 2002. Bush Tucker. http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/06/16/1023864379000.html
Varnham, K. 2006. Non-native species in UK Overseas Territories: a review. JNCC Report 372. Peterborough: United Kingdom. http://www.jncc.gov.uk/page-3660
Villadolid, D. V. 1956. A study of Cotabato rats and their control. Araneta Journal of Agriculture 3: 1–45.
Wilson, Colin, Wildlife Management Officer, Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Environment, Parks & Wildlife Service, Northern Territory, Australia.
ReferencesTop of page
Daltry JC, 2009. The Status and Management of Saint Lucia's Forest Reptiles and Amphibians. SFA 2003/SLU/BIT-04/0711/EMF/LC., Finland: FCG Fauna & Flora, 80 pp. http://www.bananatrustslu.com/index.php?link=doccentre&project=sfa2003
Jn Pierre L, 2008. Mitigating the Threat of Invasive Alien Species in the Insular Caribbean (Saint Lucia). Report to CABI. 56 pp.
ContributorsTop of page
Principal sources: Lever, C. 2001. The Cane Toad: the history and ecology of a successful colonist. Westbury Publishing, West Yorkshire. 230pp.
Gautherot, J., 2000. Bufo marinus. 2001 James Cook University.
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/