Cookies on VetMed Resource

Like most websites we use cookies. This is to ensure that we give you the best experience possible.


Continuing to use  means you agree to our use of cookies. If you would like to, you can learn more about the cookies we use.

VetMed Resource

Veterinary information to support practice, based on evidence and continuing education

Sign up to receive our Veterinary & Animal Sciences e-newsletter, book alerts and offers direct to your inbox.

News Article

Environmental transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus

Survival of virus in the environment extends the transmission risk period

Scientists at The Pirbright Institute and Wageningen Bioveterinary Research have demonstrated that environments contaminated with foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) could potentially infect animals up to 14 days after removing infected cattle, providing evidence that should lead to more effective outbreak containment methods.

While FMDV is spread through direct contact between animals, the virus can also survive on surfaces for prolonged periods of time. Animals that move into contaminated areas can then become infected even after the original infected animal has been removed. Quantifying how this could affect transmission is essential for implementing appropriate biosecurity measures.

The collaborative study, published in mBio, introduced uninfected cows to an environment that infected cows had previously occupied. Seven out of ten uninfected animals developed clinical signs of FMDV as a result of the environmental contamination. The team established that while infectious virus is typically present in the secretions and excretions of infected cattle for 4-5 days, infectious virus can persist in the environment for up to 14 days.

As well as establishing transmission time frames, the study provides valuable data about the relationship between virus levels in the environment and the likelihood of animals becoming infected. This provides information for risk assessors and risk managers on how soon disinfection procedures need to be implemented in order to reduce the risk of transmission from a contaminated environment.

Researchers also found the cows could shed virus into the environment before they even displayed clinical signs, and that this could cause infection if animals were exposed to the contaminated area. This highlights there is a risk of environmental transmission even before FMD is clinically apparent in cattle, and that any spaces and locations occupied by animals both before and after development of clinical signs should be decontaminated to prevent disease spread.

Dr Claire Colenutt, first author of the publication, said: “Our study illustrates the importance of restrictions on animal movement during outbreaks and rigorous disinfection of areas where infected animals have been housed. Our results also support the current EU Directive, which requires 21 days between disinfection of an FMD contaminated space and repopulation with susceptible species. This, in addition to other control measures such as movement restrictions and vaccination, could help prevent the spread of FMD in livestock herds.”

Article: Colenutt, C., Brown, E., Nelson, N., Paton, D. J., Eblé, P., Dekker, A., Gonzales, J. L., Gubbins, S. (2020). Quantifying the Transmission of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus in Cattle via a Contaminated Environment. mBio, 11(4), e00381-20, doi: 10.1128/mBio.00381-20

Article details

  • Date
  • 10 September 2020
  • Source
  • The Pirbright Institute
  • Subject(s)
  • Food Animals