Trachemys scripta elegans (red-eared slider)
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Distribution Table
- Habitat List
- Biology and Ecology
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Causes
- Impact Summary
- Threatened Species
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Uses List
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- Principal Source
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.Generate report
PicturesTop of page
IdentityTop of page
Preferred Scientific Name
- Trachemys scripta elegans Seidel 2002
Preferred Common Name
- red-eared slider
Other Scientific Names
- Chrysemys scripta (Boulenger 1889)
- Chrysemys scripta var. elegans Boulenger 1889
- Emys elegans Wied 1839
- Emys holbrooki Gray 1844
- Emys sanguinolenta Gray 1855
- Pseudemys scripta (Jordan 1899)
- Pseudemys scripta elegans Stebbins 1985
- Testudo scripta Schoepff, 1792
- Trachemys lineata Gray 1873
International Common Names
- English: slider
- French: tortue à tempe rouge; tortue de Floride
- Russian: Krasnoukhaya cherepakha
Local Common Names
- Bahamas: red-eared slider terrapin
- Denmark: Nordamerikansk terrapin; rødøret terrapin
- Finland: punakorvakilpikonna
- Germany: Buchstaben-Schmuckschildkröte; Rotwangen-Schmuckschildkroete; Rotwangen-Schmuckschildkröte
- Latvia: sarkanausu brunurupucis
- Lithuania: raudonausis vežlys; raudonskruostis vežlys
- Norway: rødøreterrapin
- Poland: zólw czerwonolicy; zólw czerwonouchy; zólw ozdobny
- Spain: punakõrv-ilukilpkonn
- Sweden: rödörad vattensköldpadda
Summary of InvasivenessTop of page
The red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) has been the most popular turtle in the pet trade with more than 52 million individuals exported from the United States to foreign markets between 1989 and 1997. Despite the vast worldwide occurrence of T. s. elegans, little is known of their impact on native ecosystems - clearly research and education on the dangers of releasing pet turtles into the wild are needed. Their omnivorous diet and ability to adapt to various habitats, gives them great potential for impacting indigenous habitats. This species has been nominated as among 100 of the "World's Worst" invaders.
Taxonomic TreeTop of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Metazoa
- Phylum: Chordata
- Subphylum: Vertebrata
- Class: Reptilia
- Order: Testudines
- Family: Emydidae
- Genus: Trachemys
- Species: Trachemys scripta elegans
Notes on Taxonomy and NomenclatureTop of page
The red-eared slider is a subspecies of pond slider (Trachemys scripta). Previously T. scripta was considered a widely distributed New World species consisting of 13 to 19 subspecies, however, today the Latin American taxa are included in other species and T. scripta only consists of the three North American subspecies, i.e. the red-eared slider (T. s. elegans), the yellow-bellied slider (T. s. scripta), and the Cumberland slider (T. s. troostii) (Bringsøe 2001a, Seidel 2002, in Bringsøe 2006).
DescriptionTop of page
Adult: The red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) is a medium-sized freshwater turtle (carapace length: 125 to 289 mm; Somma & Fuller 2009; 150 - 350 mm; Obst 1983) It is characterised by prominent yellow to red patches (typically red) on each side of the head (Scalera 2006). Carapace and skin are olive to brown with yellow stripes or spots; males are usually smaller than females and have a long, thick tail (Scalera 2006).
Eggs: The eggs are ovoid in shape, 31 to 43 millimetres long, 19 to 26 millimetres wide and weigh 6.1 to 15.4 grams (Bringsøe 2006).
DistributionTop of page
Native Range: The pond slider (Trachemys scripta) is present in eastern USA and adjacent areas of Mexico. It ranges from Virginia south-westward through to Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas to Mexico. To the north, the distribution of T. scripta reaches through Kentucky and Tennessee to Ohio, Indiana, Illinois and Iowa, and west to Kansas, Oklahoma and New Mexico. The red-eared slider (T. scripta elegans) dominates within this species and has a western and central range. It occupies the Mississippi Valley from Illinois via parts of eastern New Mexico in the west to the Gulf of Mexico. T. scripta scripta has an eastern range and occurs from south-eastern Virginia to northern Florida. T. s. scripta overlaps with T. s. elegans in Alabama (and adjacent areas) and forms a zone of intergradation. T. scripta troostii has a small distribution and is found in the upper portions of the Cumberland and Tennessee rivers, from south-eastern Kentucky and south-western Virginia through Tennessee to north-eastern Alabama. (Native range description taken from Bringsøe 2006).
Known Introduced Range: The release of pond sliders has occurred in Europe (Warwick 1991, in Cadi et al. 2004), Africa (Newberry 1984, in Cadi et al. 2004), South America (Girondot Pers. Obs., in Cadi et al. 2004) and Asia (Warwick 1991, Moll 1995, Chen and Lue 1998, in Cadi et al. 2004). Pondslider generally have a scattered distribution in the North European and Baltic region, with occurrences in or near urban areas (Bringsøe 2006). T. s. elegans is found in Europe, South East and Far East Asia, the Caribbean, Israel, Bahrain, Mariana Islands, Guam and South Africa. In Europe, it occurs in several countries, but apparently breeds only in a few (e.g. Spain, Italy, and France) (DASIE, 2012).
Distribution TableTop of page
The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.Last updated: 10 Jan 2020
|Continent/Country/Region||Distribution||Last Reported||Origin||First Reported||Invasive||Reference||Notes|
|Réunion||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|South Africa||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Bahrain||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Cambodia||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|China||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Hong Kong||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Indonesia||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011);|
|-Sulawesi||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Israel||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)||First reported: mid-1970s|
|Japan||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|-Ryukyu Islands||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Malaysia||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|North Korea||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Philippines||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Singapore||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|South Korea||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)||First reported: 1970s|
|Sri Lanka||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Taiwan||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Thailand||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Vietnam||Present||Introduced||1997||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Austria||Present, Localized||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Belgium||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Czechia||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)||First reported: 1960s|
|Denmark||Present||Introduced||1962||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Finland||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|France||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Germany||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)||First reported: 1980s|
|Gibraltar||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Hungary||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Italy||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Latvia||Present||Introduced||2005||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Lithuania||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Poland||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Spain||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|-Balearic Islands||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|-Canary Islands||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Sweden||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Switzerland||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|United Kingdom||Present||CABI (Undated); Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)||Present based on regional distribution.|
|Bahamas||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Bermuda||Present, Localized||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)||First reported: 1950s|
|British Virgin Islands||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Canada||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|-British Columbia||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Cayman Islands||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Costa Rica||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Dominican Republic||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Guadeloupe||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Martinique||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Mexico||Present||CABI Data Mining (2001)|
|Panama||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Puerto Rico||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Saint Lucia||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Krauss (2012)||Escaped/released from captivity; likely to impact aquatic ecosystems, e.g. through predation|
|Trinidad and Tobago||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|United States||Present||Native||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|-Arizona||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|-California||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|-Florida||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|-Georgia||Present||CABI Data Mining (2001)|
|-Hawaii||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Australia||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)||First reported: 1960s onwards|
|-New South Wales||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|-Queensland||Present||Introduced||Invasive||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Federated States of Micronesia||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|French Polynesia||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Guam||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|New Caledonia||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|New Zealand||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Northern Mariana Islands||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Brazil||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)||First reported: 2005-2007|
|Chile||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
|Guyana||Present||Introduced||Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) (2011)|
HabitatTop of page
Within their natural range pond sliders (Trachemys scripta) live in a wide variety of freshwater habitats including rivers, ditches, swamps, lakes and ponds (Bringsøe 2006). They prefer large quiet water bodies with soft bottoms, an abundance of aquatic plants and suitable basking sites (Carr 1952, Ernst et al. 1994, Bringsøe 2001b, in Bringsøe 2006). Although they prefer quiet waters, red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans) are highly adaptable and can tolerate anything from brackish waters, to manmade canals, and city park ponds (Ernst et al. 1994, Cox et al. 1998, Salzberg 2000, in Somma & Fuller 2009). Small pond sliders usually limit their activity to areas of heavy floating vegetation. It is thought that pond sliders do not feed or grow beyond a temperature range of 10°C to 37°C (Ramsay et al. 2007).
In Europe, T. s. elegans is generally released in freshwater areas that are frequented by humans, such as public ponds which are considered of low biological value (e.g. Kordges 1990, Thiesmeier & Kordges 1990 1991, in Bringsøe 2006). Natural habitats close to urban areas are also used for releases (Bringsøe 2006). Natural reproduction of the red-eared slider in Europe under Mediterranean climate conditions has been reported (Luiselli et al. 1997, Martinez-Silvestre et al. 1997, Cadi et al. 2003, in Cadi & Joly 2003). The occurrence of T. s. elegans in a tropical urban polluted river in Brazil supports evidence of its capacity to use anthropogenic environments. Polluted rivers can offer a high amount of organic residues and food items, which can represent an advantage for such a generalist freshwater turtle species (Moll 1980, Lindeman 1996, Souza & Abe 2000, in Ferronato et al. 2009).
Habitat ListTop of page
|Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-natural||Riverbanks||Present, no further details|
|Wetlands||Present, no further details|
|Lakes||Present, no further details|
|Rivers / streams||Present, no further details|
Biology and EcologyTop of page
The red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) is an opportunistic omnivore subsisting on a wide variety of plants and animals (Ernst et al. 1994, in Bringsøe 2006) including filamentous algae, macrophytes, snails, Diptera (larvae and pupae), terrestrial insects, crustaceans and small vertebrates (Chen & Lue 1998, Prévot-Julliard et al. 2007, in Ferronato et al. 2009). Juveniles are mainly carnivorous and as they grow older they become more herbivorous (Bringsøe 2006). Prévot-Julliard et al. (2007) found a decrease of invertebrate consumption with age of the turtle. Carr (2008) observed specimens of red-eared slider consuming grass blades (southern watergrass and teal lovegrass). Adult T. s. elegans will still opportunistically eat aquatic invertebrates (especially insects and molluscs), fish, frog eggs, tadpoles and aquatic snakes (Ernst et al. 1994, Brown et al. 1995, in Somma & Fuller 2009). T. s. elegans in seminatural basins in Milan (northern Italy) selected insects (40%) over most other food items (Agosta & Parolini 1999).
In northern Taiwan all feral T. s. elegans sampled were found to have ingested animal materials (mostly snails, fish, adult and larval flies and unidentifiable terrestrial insects) and 76.5% were found to have ingested plant materials (Chen & Lue 1998, in Outerbridge 2008). Conversely, Outerbridge (2008) found that only 77.8% of feral red-eared sliders examined in Bermuda had ingested animal materials whereas 86.1% had ingested plant materials. Most of the vegetative matter consisted of leaves, stalks, roots, seeds and flowers; however, filamentous and blue-green algae were also occasionally ingested. Nearly half of the animal material ingested comprised aquatic and terrestrial insects. Small fish, freshwater snails and bird remains occurred less frequently in the samples (Outerbridge 2008).
Prévot-Julliard et al. (2007) found fish remains in the stomachs of red-eared sliders. The size of fish scales found (some up to 12 mm in diameter) indicates that the scales would have belonged to fish of around 20cm (J.Y. Sire, Pers. Comm., in Prévot-Julliard et al. 2007). As it is unlikely that a slider turtle would be rapid enough to catch a 20 cm fish, perhaps the turtle acted as a necrophagous species, as other species of freshwater turtles do (Spencer et al. 1998, in Prévot-Julliard et al. 2007).
Prévot-Julliard et al. (2007) found four individuals which had ingested terrestrial ants, and the stomach of one turtle was full of them. Although terrestrial activity is known for this species (Bennett et al. 1970, Gibbons 1970, in Prévot-Julliard et al. 2007), only a few reports are available for terrestrial foraging (Cagle 1944, Chen & Lue 1998, in Prévot-Julliard et al. 2007). The terrestrial activity of T. s. elegans is a key component for the colonisation of new habitat (Parker 1990, in Prévot-Julliard et al. 2007) making further investigation into this aspect of the turtle’s behaviour warranted.
Sexual maturity is reached in the third to fourth year (Obst 1983, Pupins Unpub. Data, in Pupins 2007). Pond sliders exhibit complex courtship behaviour in the water. The female usually excavates a nest on the shore of a freshwater body or on beaches in places such as Costa Rica (Bringsøe 2006; Scalera 2006). Females may move as far as 1.6 kilometres to find a suitable nest site; the jug-shaped nest is generally up to 12 centimetres deep (Bringsøe 2006). Depending on body size and other factors, up to six clutches a year containing up to 30 eggs may be laid; mean values of natural populations are around 6 to 11 eggs per clutch (Bringsøe 2006; Scalera 2006). Mean annual fecundity for T. s. elegans in Illinois and Louisiana is close to the 30 eggs per year (estimated by Cagle 1950 and Thomhill 1982, in Tucker 2001). Mean annual fecundity estimates for T. s. scripta from South Carolina seem exceedingly low in comparison (Tucker 2001). Incubation of pond slider eggs takes 59 to 112 days (Scalera 2006). Hatching times of T. s elegans are weather dependent: temperatures between 22°C to 30°C for 55 to 80 days are preferred (Pendlebury 2006, in Pupins 2007). Hatching of eggs requires 50 to 60 days at 26 °C. Longevity of pond sliders is approximately 20 years in the wild and 40 years in captivity.
In its introduced range in Europe, egg deposition has been observed in Spain (de Roa and Roig, 1997; Martinez-Silvestre, 1997; Bertolero and Canicio, 2000; Capalleras and Carretero, 2000, in Cadi et al. 2004), and near Paris, France (Moran Pers. Comm., in Cadi et al. 2004). However, sex determination of the Trachemys embryos is temperature-dependent, with cooler incubation temperatures producing only males, and warmer incubation temperatures only females (Ewert et al. 199, in Cadi et al. 2004). Therefore, incubation temperature could be a limiting factor for the invasion of this species in parts of Europe, if hatchlings of only one sex are produced in the wild (Cadi et al. 2004). A strong bias towards female red-eared sliders has been detected in capture sampling in France. This may reflect a potential strong female bias amongst imported juveniles: incubating eggs at high temperature is favoured by pet traders because it leads to rapid hatching; however it tends to produce females. (Godfrey et al. 2003, in Prévot-Julliard et al. 2007).
Red-eared sliders can live for about 40 years (Scalera 2006). Therefore, even if reproduction may not occur in the introduced range, they remain there for many years.
Means of Movement and DispersalTop of page
Introduction pathways to new locations
Pet/aquarium trade: Since the 1970s, massive numbers of young pond sliders have been generated on turtle farms in the USA for the pet trade. The most commonly exported subspecies is the red-eared slider T. s. elegans, with more than 52 million individuals being produced for foreign markets between 1989 and 1997 (Telecky 2001, in Cadi et al. 2004). As pond sliders are often sold as small hatchlings (three to four centimetres carapace length), unsuspecting owners are rarely prepared to continue maintaining them in captivity when the turtles reach adulthood (up to 30 centimetres carapace length) (Cadi et al. 2004). Often, larger turtles are released by their owners;this has led to the introduction of many red-eared slider turtles into natural ecosystems (Cadi et al. 2004). This interest in pet turtles may have reached a peak during the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle television cartoon craze of the late 1980s and early 1990s (Somma & Fuller 2009).
Local dispersal methods
Intentional release: As red-eared sliders reach adulthood, many are released by their owners into natural ecosystems (Cadi et al. 2004).
Natural dispersal (local): Red-eared sliders may disperse up to 2 km to lay eggs (Gibbons et al. 1983, in O'Keeffe 2009).
Pathway CausesTop of page
Impact SummaryTop of page
ImpactTop of page
For a detailed account of the environmental impacts of red-eared sliders Trachemys scripta elegans please read: Trachemys scripta elegans (red-eared slider) Impacts Information. T. s. elegans has been the most popular turtle in the pet trade with more than 52 million individuals exported from the United States between 1989 and 1997 (Telecky 2001, in Bunnell 2005). Red-eared slider turtles became very popular because of their small size, their simple husbandry requirements and their reasonably low price (Teillac-Deschamps et al. 2008). Unsuspecting turtle owners were rarely prepared to maintain large adults (up to 30 cm carapace length) for a significant length of time (up to 50 years) in captivity (Teillac-Deschamps et al. 2008). Larger adult turtles were released by their owners to ponds in many places and because of this, red-eared sliders now occur in freshwater ecosystems in many developed countries with high densities in urban wetlands (de Roa & Roig 1997, Luiselli et al. 1997, Arvy & Servan 1998, Chen & Lue 1998, Lever 2003, Martinez-Silvestre et al. 2003, in Teillac-Deschamps et al. 2008).
Competition: The competitive advantages of the slider over native freshwater turtle species may include lower age at maturity, higher fecundity, and larger adult body size (Arvy & Servan 1998, in Cadi & Joly 2003). Red-eared sliders may compete for food, egg-laying sites, or basking places (Bury & Wolfheim 1973, Bury et al. 1979, Rovero et al. 1999, Lindeman 1999, in Cadi & Joly 2003). The red-eared slider has also been considered occasionally aggressive towards other individuals (Cadi & Joly 2003) and more recently, aggressive interactions with the Spanish terrapin (Mauremys leprosa) have been demonstrated (Polo-Caiva et al., 2011).
In a study by Cadi and Joly (2003), the endangered (now listed by IUCN as Near-Threatned) European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis galloitalica) was shown to shift basking activity towards places considered to be of lower quality, when in competition with the red-eared slider, which was able to occupy the better basking sites. A study by Polo-Cavia (2010a) suggested that an endangered turtle species, the native Spanish terrapin (Mauremys leprosa) was displaced from basking sites when competing with introduced T. s. elegans. Polo-Cavia et al. suggest that the red-eared terrapin’s competitive advantage might derive from its large body size, or behavioural adaptions related to high levels of interspecific competition in its native range. The decreased basking activity of native M. leprosa that results from competition with T. s. elegans may lead to ineffective thermoregulation and therefore, a loss in the efficiency of physiological functions, such as digestion or locomotor performance. This in turn could favour expansion of invasive T. s. elegans. Other studies have also shown red-eared sliders to compete with indigenous species for food and basking sites (Frank & McCoy 1995, Williams 1999, Salzberg 2000, in Somma & Fuller 2009).
Red-eared sliders probably compete directly for food with native freshwater turtles. Indeed, both native and invasive freshwater turtles are predators of amphibian tadpoles. Polo-Cavia (2010b) showed that tadpoles exhibited innate anti-predator behaviour in response to chemical cues from native freshwater species but that there was no such response to equivalent chemical cues of the red-eared sliders. This may allow red-eared sliders to more easily exploit their prey and hence outcompete native species.
Threat to Endangered Species: Competitive interactions between T. s. elegans and the European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis) and the Spanish terrapin (Mauremys leprosa) are of particular concern. In Washington (USA) they are a potential threat to the Pacific pond turtle (Clemmys marmorata), a declining species endemic to the Pacific states (Brown et al. 1995, Williams 1999, in Somma & Fuller 2009).
Disease Transmission: Continuous releasing of exotic pet turtles in natural ecosystems increases the risk of parasite transmission to native species, and highlights the impending need for regulation of pet turtle trade in Europe (Hidalgo-Vila et al. 2008); the red-eared slider is known to carry nematodes (Hidalgo-Vila et al. 2008).
Predation: Turtles introduced near Paris were revealed to have consumed aquatic plants and animals (mostly arthropods and molluscs, Prévot-Julliard et al. 2007, in Teillac-Deschamps et al. 2008).
Human Health: Reptiles, including turtles, are well-recognised reservoirs for Salmonella, and are a source of human salmonellosis (Nagano et al. 2006).
Ecosystem Change: The impacts of T. s. elegans on natural habitats and ecosystems are unknown; should the red-eared slider be released in natural habitats with high ecological value, it would be relevant to monitor any consequences on native fauna and flora, including invertebrates, amphibians, native turtles and nesting birds (Bringsøe 2006).
Threatened SpeciesTop of page
|Threatened Species||Conservation Status||Where Threatened||Mechanism||References||Notes|
|Emys orbicularis (European Pond Turtle)||NT (IUCN red list: Near threatened)|
Risk and Impact FactorsTop of page Invasiveness
- Is a habitat generalist
- Capable of securing and ingesting a wide range of food
- Negatively impacts human health
- Threat to/ loss of endangered species
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Competition (unspecified)
- Pest and disease transmission
- Highly likely to be transported internationally deliberately
Uses ListTop of page
- Pet/aquarium trade
- Ritual uses
Similarities to Other Species/ConditionsTop of page
Besides its distinctive red flashes the red-eared slider (like all turtles exotic to Australia) can also be identified by the way it retracts its head straight back into the shell; in comparison, all native Australian turtles wrap their heads around to the side of their shell (NRM&W).
Prevention and ControlTop of page
Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Preventative measures: With effect from 22 December 1997 the EU banned the import of the subspecies T. scripta elegans via the Protection of Species of Wild Fauna and Flora by Regulating Trade (Bringsøe 1998, 2001b, Bringsøe 2006). Although it is no longer allowed to import the red-eared slider within the EU, it is still legal to keep and distribute them within many EU countries.
After the legislation was passed the red-eared slider was semi-replaced in the market by other North American turtles which fetch higher prices and are imported in lower quantities (Adrados et al. 2002, in Bringsøe 2006). This may change if American turtle farmers manage to improve breeding success of these species in turtle farms. Unfortunately some of the species replacing the red-eared slider in the market are substantially better adapted to cold climates (such as Nova Scotia and Siberia, respectively) and probably represent a higher ecological risk; they are cryptic species and are significantly more carnivorous than the red-eared slider (P.P. van Dijk Pers. Comm. 2006).
In Australia, the red-eared slider is present in isolated populations but risk assessment by the Department of Agriculture & Food, Western Australia (DAFWA) indicates that populations could establish further and become widespread (National Animal Pest Alert, 2009). The Risk Assessment for the pond slider (Trachemys scripta), produced an establishment risk rank of EXTREME.
Physical: Red-eared sliders can be captured by hand or through various trapping devices. Please visit Fyke Net for Turtles for information about turtle nets. Floating boards used by sliders as basking sites seem very effective when equipped with baited cages on top (Scalera, 2006). Sniffer dogs can be used to detect and remove both turtles and their eggs; eggs can also be found and removed by following females at nesting areas (Scalera, 2006).
In parts of Asia animals are released into the wild as a part of a traditional Buddhist mercy ceremony to increase good karma, honour Buddha and repent for ones sins. The Ministry of the Environment (Republic of Korea) advised that people should consider taking care of injured birds and animals and then set them free for a more environmentally-friendly symbolic act.
Knowledge and Research: The ecological effects of introductions of T. s. elegans have been poorly documented (Platt & Fontenot 1992, in Ramsay et al. 2007). Competition of T. s. elegans with the 'Lower Risk/Near Threatened (NT)' indigenous European pond turtle (seeEmys orbicularis in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species) has been studied in France (see Cadi & Joly 2003). A French management project for the red-eared slider was initiated by the laboratory “Ecologie, Systématique and Evolution” (CNRS-University Paris-Sud) (Cadi et al. 2008).
BibliographyTop of page
Citations from GISD
Acuna-Mesen and Rafael Arturo, 1992. Potential exploitation of captive Slider Turtles (Trachemys scripta) in Costa Rica: A preliminary study. Brenesia. 0(38).157-158.
Agosta et al., 1999. Autoecology and synecological relationships in populations of Trachemys scripta elegans introduced in Lombardy. Preliminary data. Rivista di Idrobiologia. 38(1-3). Gennaio-Dicembre, 1999. 421-430.
Aliens 19 & 20, Double issue. 2004. Invasive Species Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission. ISSG, Auckland, New Zealand. http://www.issg.org/newsletter.html#Aliens
Aliens 19 & 20, Double issue. 2004. Invasive Species Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission. ISSG, Auckland, New Zealand. http://www.issg.org/pdf/aliens_newsletters/A19-20.pdf
Bacon, Jamie P; Gray, Jennifer A; Kitson, Lisa., 2006. Status and conservation of the reptiles and amphibians of the Bermuda islands. Applied Herpetology 3: 323-344
Bauer, A.M., Sadlier, R.A., Ineich I. (trad.) 2000. - The Herpetofauna of New Caledonia. Ithaca, Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, 310 p.
Bettelheim, Matthew P; Bury, R. Bruce; Patterson, Laura C; Lubcke, Glen M., 2006. Trachemys scripta elegans (red-eared slider). Reproduction. Herpetological Review. 37(4). DEC 2006. 459-460
Bodie J. R., 2001. Stream and riparian management for freshwater turtles. Journal of Environmental Management (2001) 62, 443–455
Bomford, M., 2003. Risk Assessment for the Import and Keeping of Exotic Vertebrates in Australia. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. http://www.feral.org.au/feral_documents/PC12803.pdf
Bouskila A, 1986. On the danger of spreading of the Red-eared terrapin, Chrysemys scripta, in natural habitats in Israel. Hardun no. 4: 27-30.
Brejcha, Jindrich; Vojtech Miller; Lenka Jerabkova and Martin Sandera., 2009. Distribution of pond slider (Trachemys scripta) in the Czech Republic. Herpetologické informace, 2009, Vol. 8 (1)
Brett, B.D Gartrell and E.J. Ted Kirk., 2005. Euthanasia of Reptiles in New Zealand: Current Issues and Methods. Kokako 12 (1) 12-15, 2005 http://www.victoria.ac.nz/srarnz/files/Gatrell_Kirk_Euthanasia_Reptiles.pdf
Breuil, M. 2002. Histoire naturelle des Amphibiens et des Reptiles terrestres de l'archipel Guadeloupéen. In Patrimoines Naturels, MNHN, Paris.
Bringsøe, H. 2006. NOBANIS – Invasive Alien Species Fact Sheet – Trachemys scripta http://www.nobanis.org/files/factsheets/Trachemys_scripta.pdf
Buden, D.W., Lynch, D.B., and Zug, G.R. 2001. Recent records of exotic reptiles on Pohnpei, Eastern Caroline Islands, Micronesia. Pacific Science. 55 (1): 65.
Bunnell, Corey G., 2005. Field Survey of red-Eared Sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans) In The Lower Fraser River Valley, British Columbia, In 2005. Featrured Article Wildlife Afield http://www.wildlifebc.org/UserFiles/File/2_2_Bunnell.pdf
Burgin, Shelley., 2007. Confirmation of an established population of exotic turtles in urban Sydney. Australian Zoologist. 33(3). JUN 2006. 379-384
Cadi, A., and Bertrand, A. 2003. Conséquences des lâchés de Trachémyde â tempes rouges (Trachemys scripta elegans) dans les milieux humides européens. Manouria 6(18): 17-22.
Cadi, A., and Joly, P. 2003. Competition for basking places between the endangered European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis galloitalica) and the introduced red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans). Canadian Journal of Zoology 81: 1392-1398.
Cadi, A., Delmas, V., Prevot-Julliard, A.C., Joly, P. Pieau, C and Girondot, M. 2004. Successful reproduction of the introduced slider turtle (Trachemys scripta elegans) in the South of France. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 14: 237-246.
Cadi, A; Joly, P., Impact of the introduction of the red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) on survival rates of the European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis). Biodiversity & Conservation. 13(13). December 2004. 2511-2518.
Cadi, Antoine; Pauline Teillac; Virginie Delmas; Marc Girondot; Veronique Servais & Anne-Caroline Prevot-Julliard., 2008. Slider turtles Trachemys scripta elegans released in France: a case of integrated research and conservation program. Rev. Esp. Herp. (2008) 22:111-114 http://www.herpetologica.org/revista/rev22/Resumen11%20CADI%20ET%20AL%20segundo.pdf
Carr, John L., 2008. Terrestrial Foraging by Two Species of Semiaquatic Turtles (Testudines: Emydidae). Southeastern Naturalist. 7(4). 2008. 748-752.
Chen and Lue, 1998. Ecological notes on feral populations of Trachemys scripta elegans in northern Taiwan. Chelonian Conservation & Biology. 3(1). Aug., 1998. 87-90.
Chen, Tien-Hsi., 2006. Distribution and status of the introduced red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) in Taiwan. Pages 187-195. In Koike, F., Clout, M.N., Kawamichi, M., De Poorter, M. and Iwatsuki, K. (eds), Assessment and Control of Biological Invasion Risks. Shoukadoh Book Sellers, Kyoto, Japan and IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 2006. http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2006-061.pdf#page=196
CONABIO. 2008. Sistema de información sobre especies invasoras en México. Especies invasoras - Reptiles. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. Fecha de acceso. http://www.conabio.gob.mx/invasoras/index.php/Especies_invasoras_-_Reptiles
da Silva Eduardo and Manual Blasco 1995. Trachemys scripta elegans in Southwestern Spain. Herpetological Review. 26(3).133-134. http://www.freewebs.com/trachemysadoption/articles/DaSilvaBlasco.pdf
DAISIE (Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe)., 2009. Species Factsheet Trachemys scripta (Schoepff, 1792) http://www.europe-aliens.org/speciesFactsheet.do?speciesId=50003
De Lathouder, Raymonde; Darryl N. Jones & Stephen R. Balcombe., 2009. Assessing the abundance of freshwater turtles in an Australian urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst (2009) 12:215–231
de Sa, I.V.A. and Solari, C.A. 2001. Salmonella in Brazilian and imported pet reptiles. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 32 (4): 293-297.
Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts., 2009. Ecological Australia: Prioritisation of High Conservation Status Mainland Islands. Project No 09SUTNRM-0002. Prepared for Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts
Derraik, Jose´ G. B. & Simon Phillips., 2009. Online trade poses a threat to biosecurity in New Zealand. Biol Invasions DOI 10.1007/s10530-009-9595-0
Diesmos, Arvin C; Brown, Rafe M; Alcala, Angel; Sison, Rogelio V., 2008. Status and Distribution of Nonmarine Turtles of the Philippines. Chelonian Conservation & Biology. 7(2). DEC 2008. 157-177
Dolan, Chad R; Lamer, James T; Tucker, John K. ., 2006. Trachemys scripta elegans (Red-eared slider). Herpetological Review. 37(1). MAR 2006. 105.
Dupre, Alain; Servan, Jean; Veysset, Alain., 2006. Florida turtle, Trachemys scripta elegans: recuperation in France and international trade. Bulletin de la Societe Herpetologique de France.(117). 2006. 5-24.
Emer, S. 2004. Growth of an introduced population of Trachemys scripta elegans, at Fox Pond, Eckerd College, Pinellas County, Florida. Herpetological Review. 35 (1): 34-35.
Emer, Sherri., 2004. Growth of an introduced population of Trachemys scripta elegans at Fox Pond, Eckerd College, Pinellas County, Florida. Herpetological Review. 35(1). March 2004. 34-35.
Fattizzo, Tiziano., 2004. Distribution and conservational problems of Emys orbicularis in Salento (South Apulia, Italy). Biologia (Bratislava). 59(Suppl. 14). 2004. 13-18.
Feldman, M. L., 2007. The red-eared slider turtle (Trachemys scripta elegans) in New Zealand. The Newsletter of Chelonian Conservationists and Biologists, Turtle and Tortoise Newsletter Apr 2007 : Issue 10, pg(s) 2-39
Ferri, Vincenzo; Soccini, Christiana., 2003. Reproduction of Trachemys scripta elegans in a semi-natural habitat in Lombardy (northern Italy). Natura Bresciana. 33 2003. 89-92.
Fidenci, Pierre., 2006. Trachemys scripta elegans (Red-eared Slider). Reproduction. Herpetological Review. 37(1). MAR 2006. 80.
Gianaroli, et al., 1999. Problems of conservation of the European pond turtle in Modena. The case of the Villa Sorra park. Atti della Societa Dei Naturalisti e Matematici di Modena. 130 1999. 115-124.
Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), 2009. Subspecies: Trachemys scripta elegans http://data.gbif.org/species/14835399
Goh, Ter Yang; O'Riordan, Ruth M., 2007. Are tortoises and freshwater turtles still traded illegally as pets in Singapore? Oryx. 41(1). JAN 2007. 97-100.
Group of experts on Invasive Alien Species. 2005. CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS, Group of experts on Invasive Alien Species, 6th meeting, Palma de Majorca (Spain), 9-11 June 2005, BELGIUM / BELGIQUE: Actions taken in Belgium in response to the threats of Invasive alien species.
Gulf States Marine and Fisheries Commission (GSFMC), 2009. Trachemys scripta elegans (Wied) http://nis.gsmfc.org/nis_factsheet.php?toc_id=208
Haffner, P., 1997. Assessment of recent introductions of amphibians and reptiles in inland aquatic systems in Metropolitan France. Bulletin Francais de la Peche et de la Pisciculture. 0(344-345). 1997. 155-163.
Hatzofe O, 2006. Invasive Species in Israel. Israel Nature & Parks Authority internal report.
Hidalgo-Vila, J; Diaz-Paniagua, C; Ribas, A; Florencio, M; Perez-Santigosa, N; Casanova, J. C., 2009. Helminth communities of the exotic introduced turtle, Trachemys scripta elegans in southwestern Spain: Transmission from native turtles. Research in Veterinary Science. 86(3). JUN 2009. 463-465.
Ibarra-Vidal, Hector., 2007. Record of the Red Eared Slider, Trachemys scripta elegans) (Wied-Neuwied, 1839), (Testudinata, Emydidae) in a wetland in Concepcion, Chile. Boletin de la Sociedad de Biologia de Concepcion. 78 2007. 49-50.
Ineich, Ivan., 2009. Herpetological survey of Maiao Island, Society Archipelago (French Polynesia). Bulletin de la Societe Herpetologique de France.(130-31). 2009. 51-63.
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org/
Iverson J B; Etchberger, C R ., 1989. The Distributions of the Turtles of Florida USA. Florida Scientist. 52(2). 1989. 119-144
Joglar, Rafael L; Alberto O. Álvarez; T. Mitchell Aide; Diane Barber; Patricia A. Burrowes; Miguel A. García; Abimael León-Cardona; Ana V. Longo; Néstor Pérez-Buitrago; Alberto Puente; Neftalí Rios-López; Peter J. Tolson., 2007. Conserving the Puerto Rican herpetofauna. Applied Herpetology 4: 327-345
Kitowski, Ignacy and Dorota Pachol., 2009. Monitoring the Trade Turnover of Red - eared Terrapins (Trachemys scripta elegans) in Pet Shops of the Lublin Region, East Poland. North-Western Journal of Zoology Vol. 5, No. 1, 2009, pp.34-39 P-ISSN: 1584-9074, E-ISSN: 1843-5629 Article No.: 051105 http://herp-or.uv.ro/nwjz/content/v5.1/nwjz.051105.Kitowski.pdf
Kosuge, Yasuhiro; Ogano, Hirokazu; Hasegawa, Masami., 2003. Spatial distribution of the fresh water turtles along Koito River, Boso Peninsula. Journal of the Natural History Museum & Institute Chiba Special Issue.(6). March 31, 2003. 55-58.
Krysko, Kenneth L; Sheehy, Coleman M. III., 2005. Ecological status of the Ocellated Gecko, Sphaerodactylus argus argus Gosse 1850, in Florida, with additional herpetological notes from the Florida Keys. Caribbean Journal of Science. 41(1). 05. 169-172.
Lamer, James T; Dolan, Chad R; Tucker, John K., 2007. Trachemys scripta elegans (Red-eared slider). Coloration. Herpetological Review. 38(3). SEP 2007. 336.
Leatherman, Brian M; Jennings, Mark R., 2007. Actinemys marmorata (Pacific pond turtle) and Trachemys scripta elegans (Red-eared slider). Reproductive behavior. Herpetological Review. 38(3). SEP 2007. 327.
Leberer, Trina., 2003. Records of freshwater turtles on Guam, Mariana Islands. Micronesica 35-36:649-652. 2003
Lee, D. S., 2005. Reptiles and amphibians introduced to the Bahamas; a potential conservation crisis. Bahamas Journal of Science [Bahamas J. Sci.]. Vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 2-6. May 2005.
Lorvelec, O., Pascal., M., Pavis, C., Feldmann, P. 2007. Amphibians and reptiles of the French West Indies : Inventory, threats and conservation. Applied Herpetology 4, 131-161
Mosimann, Denis; Cadi, Antoine., 2004. On the occurrence and viability of the European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis) in Moulin-de-Vert (Geneva, Switzerland): 50 years after first introduction. Biologia (Bratislava). 59(Suppl. 14). 2004. 109-112.
Nagano, Noriyuki; Oana, Shinji; Nagano, Yukiko; Arakawa, Yoshichika., 2006. A severe Salmonella enterica serotype paratyphi B infection in a child related to a pet turtle, Trachemys scripta elegans. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases. 59(2). APR 2006. 132-134.
Najbar and Bartlomiej, 2001.The red-eared terrapin Trachemys scripta elegans (Wied, 1839) in the Lubuskie province (western Poland). Przeglad Zoologiczny . 45(1-2). 2001. 103-109.
Neil F. Ramsay; Pek Kaye; Abigayle Ng; Ruth M. O'Riordan and Loke Ming Chou., 2007. Chapter 8: The red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) in Asia: a review In Biological invaders in inland waters: Profiles, distribution, and threats Vol2 Invading Nature - Springer Series In Invasion Ecology. Francesca Gherardi
NOBANIS. 2009. Trachemys scripta (Testudinidae, Reptilia & amphibia) http://www.nobanis.org/speciesInfo.asp?taxaID=713
Ota, Hidetoshi; Mitsuhiko Toda; Gen Masunaga; Akira Kikukawa and Mamoru Toda., 2004. Feral Populations of Amphibians and Reptiles in the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan. Global Environmental Research 8(2)/2004: 133-143 http://www.airies.or.jp/publication/ger/pdf/08-02-04.pdf
Outerbridge, Mark E., 2008. Ecological Notes on Feral Populations of Trachemys scripta elegans in Bermuda. Chelonian Conservation & Biology. 7(2). DEC 2008. 265-269.
Parham, J.F. and van Leuvan, T. 2002. Emys orbicularis (European Pond Turtle). Herpetological Review. 33 (2): 147.
Pascal, M., Barré, N., De Garine-Wichatitsky, Lorvelec, O., Frétey, T., Brescia, F., Jourdan, H. 2006. Les peuplements néo-calédoniens de vertébébrés : invasions, disparitions. Pp 111-162, in M.-L. Beauvais et al., : Les espèces envahissantes dans l’archipel néo-calédonien, Paris, IRD Éditions, 260 p.+ cédérom
Perez-Santigosa, Natividad; Diaz-Paniagua, Carmen; Hidalgo-Vila, Judith., 2008. The reproductive ecology of exotic Trachemys scripta elegans in an invaded area of southern Europe. Aquatic Conservation. 18(7). NOV-DEC 2008. 1302-1310.
Perry, Gad; Owen, Jennifer L; Petrovic, Clive; Lazell, James; Egelhoff, Jim., 2007. The red-eared slider, Trachemys scripta elegans, in the British Virgin Islands. Applied Herpetology. 4(1). 2007. 88-89.
Piovano, et al., 1999. Trachemys scripta elegans monitoring in Torino urban park. Rivista di Idrobiologia. 38(1-3). Gennaio-Dicembre, 1999. 499-508.
Polo-Cavia, Nuria; Lopez, Pilar; Martin, Jose., 2008. Interspecific differences in responses to predation risk may confer competitive advantages to invasive freshwater turtle species. Ethology. 114(2). FEB 2008. 115-123.
Polo-Cavia, Nuria; Lopez, Pilar; Martin, Jose., 2009a. Interspecific differences in heat exchange rates may affect competition between introduced and native freshwater turtles. Biological Invasions. 11(8). OCT 2009. 1755-1765.
Polo-Cavia, Nuria; Lopez, Pilar; Martin, Jose., 2009b. Interspecific differences in chemosensory responses of freshwater turtles: consequences for competition between native and invasive species. Biological Invasions. 11(2). FEB 2009. 431-440.
Powell, Robert and Sixto J. Incháustegui., 2009. Conservation of the herpetofauna of the Dominican Republic. Applied Herpetology 6 (2009) 103–122
Prevot-Julliard, Anne-Caroline; Gousset, Emeline; Archinard, Chloe; Cadi, Antoine; Girondot, Marc., 2007. Pets and invasion risks: is the Slider turtle strictly carnivorous? Amphibia-Reptilia. 28(1). JAN 2007. 139-143.
Probst J.-M. 1997. Animaux de la Réunion. Azalées Editions. 168 pp.
Puky, Miklos; Gemesi, Dorottya; Schad, Peter., 2004. Distribution of Emys orbicularis in Hungary with notes on related conservational and environmental education activities. Biologia (Bratislava). 59(Suppl. 14). 2004. 55-60.
Pupins, Mihails., 2007. First report on recording of the invasive species Trachemys scripta elegans, a potential competitor of Emys orbicularis in Latvia. Acta Universitatis Latviensis, 2007, Vol. 723, Biology, pp. 37–46 http://biologs.bf.lu.lv/grozs/LU/LU_Bio_Raksti/LUBioRaksti/2007/Pupins.pdf
Queensland Government, Department of Employment, Economic Developmentand Innovation (DEEDI) 2009. Red-eared slider turtle http://www.dpi.qld.gov.au/4790_8289.htm
Real, Raimundo; Marquez, Ana L; Estrada, Alba; Munoz, A. Roman; Vargas, J. Mario., 2008. Modelling chorotypes of invasive vertebrates in mainland Spain. Diversity & Distributions. 14(2). MAR 2008. 364-373.
Republic of Korea, 2002. Wetlands Part 1
Republic of Korea, 2002. Wetlands Part 2
Roll, Uri; Tamar Dayan & Daniel Simberloff., 2008. Non-indigenous terrestrial vertebrates in Israel and adjacent areas. Biol Invasions (2008) 10:659–672
Samedi & D. T. Iskandar. 2000. Freshwater turtleand tortoise conservation and utilization in Indonesia. In: Asian turtle trade: proceedings of a workshop on conservation and trade of freshwater turtles and tortoises in Asia. pp:106–111. P. P. van Dijk, B. L. Stuart & A. G. J. Rhodin (Eds). Chelonian Research Monographs No. 2
Scalera R., 2007. An overview of the natural history of non indigenous amphibians and reptiles. In: Gherardi F. (editor) Biological Invaders in Inland Waters: Profiles, Distribution and Threats. Springer. Pp. 141-160.
Scalera R., 2007. Virtues and shortcomings of EU legal provisions for managing NIS: Rana catesbeiana and Trachemys scripta elegans as case studies. In: Gherardi F. (editor) Biological Invaders in Inland Waters: Profiles, Distribution and Threats. Springer. Pp. 669-678.
Scalera, R. 2006. Trachemys scripta. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe.
Scalera, Riccardo., 2006. Trachemys scripta. Datasheet DAISIE (Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe) http://www.europe-aliens.org/pdf/Trachemys_scripta.pdf
Selman, Will; Qualls, Carl., 2009. Trachemys scripta elegans (Red-eared Slider). Maximum Basking Duration
Servan, J. and Arvy, C., 1997. The introduction of Trachemys scripta in France: A new competitor for the European pond turtles. Bulletin Francais de la Peche et de la Pisciculture. 0(344-345).173-177.
Servan, Jean; Dupre, Alain., 2003. Reintroduction and introduction and are two aspects of wild fauna and flora management. Bulletin de la Societe Herpetologique de France.(105). 2003. 9-40.
Shacham, Boaz; Hatzofe, Ohad., 2008. The red-eared slider, Trachemys scripta elegans, in Israel. Applied Herpetology. 5(2). 2008. 199-200.
Soccini, Christiana; Ferri, Vincenzo., 2004. Bacteriological screening of Trachemys scripta elegans and Emys orbicularis in the Po plain (Italy). Biologia (Bratislava). 59(Suppl. 14). 2004. 201-207.
Somma, Louis A; Ann Foster, and Pam Fuller. 2009. Trachemys scripta elegans. USGS Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL. http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.asp?speciesID=1261
Stitt, Eric., 2005. The Red-Eared Slider (Trachemys scripta elegans). Sonoran Herpetologist 18(6) 2005 http://tucsonherpsociety.org/Stitt%202005_18(6)65.pdf
Stone, Paul A; Hranitz, John M., 1997. Trachemys scripta elegans (red-eared slider). Colonization. Herpetological Review. 28(3). 1997. 150.
Teillac-Deschamps Pauline; Delmas Virginie; Lorrillière Romain; Servais Véronique; Cadi Antoine and Prévot-Julliard Anne-Caroline., 2008. CASE STUDY 12: Red-eared Slider Turtles Trachemys scripta elegans Introduced to French Urban Wetlands: an Integrated Research and Conservation Program. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Urban Herpetology. J.C. Mitchell, R.E. Jung Brown, and B. Bartholomew, editors Herpetological Conservation 3:xx-xx. http://www2.mnhn.fr/cersp/IMG/pdf/Tiellac_al-HerpetologicalConservation-2008.pdf
Teillac-Deschamps, Pauline; Lorrilliere, Romain; Servais, Veronique; Delmas, Virginie; Cadi, Antoine; Prevot-Julliard; Anne-Caroline., 2009. Management strategies in urban green spaces: Models based on an introduced exotic pet turtle. Biological Conservation. 142(10). OCT 2009. 2258-2269.
The Outlaws of the Ecosystem - Invasive Alien Species Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea.
The Reptile Database., 2007. Trachemys scripta http://www.tigr.org/reptiles/species.php?genus=Trachemys&species=scripta
Thirakhupt, Kumthorn; Van Dijk, Peter Paul., 1994. Species diversity and conservation of turtles of western Thailand. Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society. 42(2). 1994. 207-259.
Townsend, Josiah H; Krysko, Kenneth L; Reppas, Anthony T; Sheehy, Coleman M., 2002. Noteworthy records for introduced reptiles and amphibians from Florida, USA. Herpetological Review. 33(1). March, 2002. 75.
Tucker, John K., 2001a. Clutch frequency in the red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans). Journal of Herpetology. 35(4). December, 2001. 664-668.
Tucker, John K., 2001b. Nesting red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans) exhibit fidelity to their nesting areas.
Tucker, John K; Lamer, James T; Dolan, Chad R., 2007. Trachemys scripta elegans (Red-eared slider). Kyphosis. Herpetological Review. 38(3). SEP 2007. 337-338.
van Wilgen, Nicola J; Richardson, David M; Laard, Ernst H. W., 2008. Alien reptiles and amphibians in South Africa: Towards a pragmatic management strategy. South African Journal of Science. 104(1-2). JAN-FEB 2008. 13-20.
Varnham, K. 2006. Non-native species in UK Overseas Territories: a review. JNCC Report 372. Peterborough: United Kingdom. http://www.jncc.gov.uk/page-3660
VOV News 26th Feb, 2004 Invasive turtle species discovered in Hoan Kiem.
Walton, Craig pers. comm., April 2006.
Watkins-Colwell, Gregory J; Twan A. Leenders; Brian T. Roach; Daniel J. Drew; Gregg Dancho and Jeanne Yuckienuz., 2006. New Distribution Records for Amphibians and Reptiles in Connecticut, with Notes on the Status of an Introduced Species. Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History 47(1):47-62. 2006
Wilson, A., A. Wilke & Z. Saraç. 2009. Invasive plants and animals: Freshwater plants and animals. Queensland Government: Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries.
Witzell, W.N. 1999. Aquatic turtles (Testudines: Emydidae) in an urban south Florida man-made pond. Florida Scientist. 62 (3-4): 172-174.
Yasukawa, Yuichirou., 2005. Alien freshwater turtles which may become established in Japan in the near future. Bulletin of the Herpetological Society of Japan.(2). 2005. 155-163.
ReferencesTop of page
Delivering alien Invasive species Inventories Europe (DASIE), 2012. Species Factsheet. Trachemys scripta. http://www.europe-aliens.org/speciesFactsheet.do?speciesId=50003#.
Krauss U, 2012. 161 Invasive Alien Species present in Saint Lucia and their current status. Caribbean Alien Invasive Species Network (CIASNET), 12 pp. http://www.ciasnet.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/IAS-present-in-SLU-May-2012-revision.pdf
National Animal Pest Alert, 2009. Red-eared slider, Department of Agriculture and Food, Government of Western Australia. www.aelert.com.au/documents/Red-eared%20Slider.pdf.
Polo-Cavia N; Gonzalo A; López P; Martín J, 2010. Predator recognition of native but not invasive turtle predators by naïve anuran tadpoles. Animal Behaviour, 80(3):461-466. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00033472
Polo-Cavia N; López P; Martín J, 2010. Competitive interactions during basking between native and invasive freshwater turtle species. Biological Invasions, 12(7):2141-2152. http://www.springerlink.com/content/mn76n3628r595r56/?p=db8002a2a8eb48cb95789f32fb1f2078&pi=21
Polo-Cavia N; López P; Martín J, 2011. Aggressive interactions during feeding between native and invasive freshwater turtles. Biological Invasions, 13(6):1387-1396. http://www.springerlink.com/content/9701058662263671/
CABI Data Mining, 2001. CAB Abstracts Data Mining.,
CABI, Undated. CABI Compendium: Status inferred from regional distribution. Wallingford, UK: CABI
Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG), 2011. Global Invasive Species Database (GISD). In: Global Invasive Species Database (GISD), Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland. http://www.issg.org/database
Krauss U, 2012. 161 Invasive Alien Species present in Saint Lucia and their current status. In: Caribbean Alien Invasive Species Network (CIASNET), 12 pp. http://www.ciasnet.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/IAS-present-in-SLU-May-2012-revision.pdf
ContributorsTop of page
- Reviewed by: Paul Pendelbury, REPTRANS UK
- Last Modified: Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Distribution MapsTop of page
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/