Heterobasidion annosum sensu lato (Heterobasidion root rot)
Index
- Pictures
- Identity
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Description
- Distribution
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
- Growth Stages
- Symptoms
- List of Symptoms/Signs
- Biology and Ecology
- Natural enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Plant Trade
- Wood Packaging
- Prevention and Control
- References
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate reportPictures
Top of pageIdentity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Heterobasidion annosum sensu lato (Fr.) Bref. 1888
Preferred Common Name
- Heterobasidion root rot
Other Scientific Names
- Fomes annosus (Fr.) Cooke 1885
- Fomitopsis annosa (Fr.) P. Karst. 1881
- Oedocephalum lineatum B.K. Bakshi 1950
- Polyporus annosus Fr. 1821
- Spiniger meineckellus (A.J. Olson) Stalpers 1974
- Trametes radiciperda R. Hartig 1874
- Ungulina annosa (Fr.) Pat. 1900
International Common Names
- English: annosum root rot; annosus root rot; butt rot: conifers; conifers butt-rot; conifers heart rot; conifers red rot; Fomes root rot; heart rot: conifers; red rot: conifers; root rot: conifers; root rot: Hevea spp.
- Spanish: podredumbre de los arboles resinosos
- French: coeur rouge de l'epicea; le fomes; maladie du rond des pins; pourriture rouge des coniferes
Local Common Names
- Germany: Heterobasidion Stamm- und Wurzelfäule; Heterobasidion-Fäule; Kernfäule; Rotfaeule: Fichte; Rotfäule: Fichte; Stockfaeule; Stockfäule; Wurzelfaeule; Wurzelfäule; Wurzelschwamm; Wurzelschwamm: Nadelhoelzer
EPPO code
- HETEAN (Heterobasidion annosum)
Taxonomic Tree
Top of page- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Fungi
- Phylum: Basidiomycota
- Subphylum: Agaricomycotina
- Class: Agaricomycetes
- Subclass: Agaricomycetidae
- Order: Russulales
- Family: Bondarzewiaceae
- Genus: Heterobasidion
- Species: Heterobasidion annosum sensu lato
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Top of pageThese new species are treated separately in the Compendium, but the Northern Hemisphere taxa in the H. annosum complex are also treated as a collective species, H. annosum sensu lato, because their distribution is not well known. This complex includes the Eurasian species H. annosum sensu stricto, H. parviporum, H. abietinum and the North American intersterility groups 'P' and 'S'. The taxonomic relationships between the North American groups and the Eurasian species are not yet clear. In the Compendium, these groups are covered in the datasheets on H. annosum sensu stricto and H. parviporum, respectively.
All species and groups of the H. annosum complex show some sexual compatibility with other members of the complex in laboratory tests, but hybrids are very rare in nature (Gonthier et al., 2001). A case of hybridization has been reported in Europe (Schulze, 2000). Hybridization between the local S and P group appears to be more common in western North America. In greenhouse inoculation experiments, hybrid isolates showed lower pathogenicity than the parent groups (Garbelotto et al., 1998).
In addition to the Northern Hemisphere H. annosum sensu lato and Southern Hemisphere H. araucariae, the genus Heterobasidion includes another distinctly defined species, H. insulare, an almost non-pathogenic wood-decay fungus occurring in eastern and southern Asia. A number of other species have been described within this genus but their status as 'good' species has not been proved (Niemelä and Korhonen, 1998).
Description
Top of pageColonies growing rapidly on malt agar, 6-8 cm in 7 days, optimum temperature 26°C, strong reaction to tannic acid media (Campbell, 1938), mat floccose cottony, pale fawn, azonate, soon pulverulent due to conidial production (Cartwright and Findlay, 1946); cuticular cells and interlocking hyphae reported in some isolates forming pellicular crustose areas, test for extracellular oxidase negative (Nobles, 1965).
Pure cultures of H. annosum sensu lato originating from Europe or North America can be identified easily on the basis of typical conidiophores. Identification of cultures originating from eastern and southern Asia is more difficult because the local species H. insulare produces similar conidiophores, as does the Australian species H. araucariae.
Distribution
Top of pageDistribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
Last updated: 23 Apr 2020Continent/Country/Region | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | Reference | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Africa |
|||||||
Morocco | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Asia |
|||||||
Afghanistan | Present | Native | |||||
China | Present, Localized | ||||||
-Jilin | Present, Localized | Native | Original citation: Dai et al. (2003) | ||||
-Sichuan | Present | Native | |||||
-Tibet | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Xinjiang | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Yunnan | Present | ||||||
India | Present, Localized | ||||||
-Assam | Present | Native | |||||
-Himachal Pradesh | Present | Native | |||||
-Meghalaya | Present | Native | |||||
-Punjab | Present | Native | |||||
-Uttar Pradesh | Present | Native | |||||
Israel | Present | ||||||
Japan | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Kazakhstan | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
Kyrgyzstan | Present | Native | Original citation: Dai et al. (2003) | ||||
Malaysia | Present, Localized | ||||||
-Peninsular Malaysia | Present | ||||||
Myanmar | Present | Native | |||||
Nepal | Present | Native | |||||
Pakistan | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Philippines | Present | Native | |||||
Turkey | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Vietnam | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Europe |
|||||||
Albania | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
Austria | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Belarus | Present | ||||||
Belgium | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Bosnia and Herzegovina | Present | Native | |||||
Bulgaria | Present, Localized | Native | 1907 | ||||
Croatia | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Czechia | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Czechoslovakia | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Denmark | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Estonia | Present | Native | |||||
Faroe Islands | Present | ||||||
Finland | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
France | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Germany | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Greece | Absent, Eradicated | ||||||
Hungary | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Ireland | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Italy | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Latvia | Present | Native | |||||
Lithuania | Present | Native | |||||
Moldova | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
Netherlands | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
North Macedonia | Present | Native | |||||
Norway | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Poland | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Portugal | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Madeira | Present | ||||||
Romania | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Russia | Present, Localized | ||||||
-Eastern Siberia | Present | ||||||
-Russia (Europe) | Present | Native | |||||
-Russian Far East | Present | Native | |||||
-Siberia | Present | Native | |||||
-Western Siberia | Present | ||||||
Serbia | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Serbia and Montenegro | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Slovakia | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Slovenia | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Spain | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Sweden | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Switzerland | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Ukraine | Present | Native | |||||
United Kingdom | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-England | Present, Localized | ||||||
-Northern Ireland | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Scotland | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
North America |
|||||||
Canada | Present, Localized | ||||||
-British Columbia | Present | Native | |||||
-Nova Scotia | Present | ||||||
-Ontario | Present | Native | Invasive | ||||
-Quebec | Present, Localized | Native | Invasive | ||||
Cuba | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Dominican Republic | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Guatemala | Present | Native | |||||
Honduras | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
Jamaica | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Mexico | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
United States | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Alabama | Present, Widespread | Native | Original citation: Hodges (1969) | ||||
-Alaska | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Arizona | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Arkansas | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-California | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Colorado | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Connecticut | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Delaware | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Florida | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Georgia | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Idaho | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Illinois | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Indiana | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Iowa | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Kentucky | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Louisiana | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Maine | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Maryland | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Massachusetts | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Michigan | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Minnesota | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Mississippi | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Missouri | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Montana | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Nebraska | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Nevada | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-New Hampshire | Present, Widespread | Native | Original citation: Miller (1960) | ||||
-New Jersey | Present | Native | |||||
-New Mexico | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-New York | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-North Carolina | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Ohio | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Oregon | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Pennsylvania | Present, Localized | Native | Original citation: Stambaugh et al. (1962) | ||||
-Rhode Island | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-South Carolina | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-South Dakota | Present | Native | |||||
-Tennessee | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Texas | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Utah | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Vermont | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Virginia | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Washington | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-West Virginia | Present, Widespread | Native | Original citation: Ginns and Gillespie (1962) | ||||
-Wisconsin | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
-Wyoming | Present, Localized | Native | |||||
Oceania |
|||||||
Australia | Present, Localized | ||||||
-New South Wales | Present | ||||||
-Queensland | Present | ||||||
Fiji | Present, Widespread | ||||||
New Zealand | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Papua New Guinea | Present, Widespread |
History of Introduction and Spread
Top of pageHosts/Species Affected
Top of pageFor further information on hosts, see Sinclair (1964), Greig (1976), Delatour (1977), Wagn (1980) and Webb and Alexander (1985).
Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
Top of pageSymptoms
Top of pageIn coniferous genera such as Picea, Abies, Larix, Pseudotsuga and Tsuga, decay rises up the stem, usually as a heart rot. The tree may be asymptomatic for decades after infection. External symptoms only appear at an advanced stage of decay and include reduced growth, defoliation of the crown, and resin exudations on the stem. Wind-thrown trees with decayed roots or open gaps in the stand often indicate the presence of Heterobasidion root rot in the forest. In the field, Heterobasidion root rot can only be identified with assurance by the presence of basidiocarps, which usually hide under decayed roots, moss cover at the stem base of dead trees, in hollow stumps, or under the fallen trunks of diseased trees.
Stem decay caused by Heterobasidion remains relatively hard for long time and is usually light brown in colour. The first stage of decay often has a violet coloration. Advanced decay contains small, white cellulose pockets ('white pocket rot'), often with black spots.
List of Symptoms/Signs
Top of pageSign | Life Stages | Type |
---|---|---|
Roots / rot of wood | ||
Stems / discoloration of bark |
Biology and Ecology
Top of pageHeterobasidion root rot is most damaging on soils with a high pH and in afforestations on former agricultural soil. The frequency of rot is very dependent on forest management practices.
Transmission
Heterobasidion spores may become airborne when daily temperatures rise above 0°C, and their number can be substantial above 10°C (Redfern and Stenlid, 1998). Long, dry periods will interrupt spore production by the fungus, and high temperatures on stump surfaces will prevent infection (Driver and Ginns, 1969). Spores deposited on the forest soil are carried down by rainwater and may remain infective for several months (Kuhlman, 1966). Spores may be introduced into disease-free areas on nursery seedlings (Jorgensen, 1961).
Physiological Specialization
Different members of the H. annosum complex show distinct physiological differentiation: for example, in enzymatic properties (Maijala et al., 2003) and wood-decaying ability (Daniel et al., 1998).
Natural enemies
Top of pageNatural enemy | Type | Life stages | Specificity | References | Biological control in | Biological control on |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Armillaria mellea | Pathogen | |||||
Bjerkandera adusta | Pathogen | |||||
Bjerkandera adusta | Pathogen | |||||
Fomitopsis pinicola | Pathogen | |||||
Gloeophyllum saepiarium | Pathogen | |||||
Hirschioporus abietinus | Pathogen | |||||
Hypholoma capnoides | Pathogen | |||||
Hypocrea rufa | Mycoparasite | Italy | ||||
Macrolepiota procera | Pathogen | |||||
Macrolepiota rachodes | Pathogen | |||||
Neonectria fuckeliana | Pathogen | |||||
Oidiodendron maius | Pathogen | |||||
Phlebia gigantea | Pathogen | |||||
Pleurotus ostreatus | Antagonist | |||||
Polyporus benzoinus | Pathogen | |||||
Resinicium bicolor | Pathogen | |||||
Scytalidium album | Pathogen | |||||
Scytalidium lignicola | Pathogen | |||||
Sistotrema brinckmannii | Pathogen | |||||
Tolypocladium niveum | Pathogen |
Means of Movement and Dispersal
Top of pageThe great majority of spores fall within a few hundred metres of the source (Möykkynen et al., 1997), but viable, airborne spores have been found 300 km from the nearest source (Rishbeth, 1959). Conidia may also have some role in the aerial dispersal of Heterobasidion spores (Hsiang et al., 1989; Möykkynen, 1997).
Vector Transmission
Insects and other animals can carry spores of Heterobasidion but appear to be of minor importance in spreading the disease (Otrosina and Cobb, 1989).
Plant Trade
Top of pagePlant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transport | Pest stages | Borne internally | Borne externally | Visibility of pest or symptoms |
---|---|---|---|---|
Roots | hyphae | Yes | Yes | Pest or symptoms usually invisible |
Stems (above ground)/Shoots/Trunks/Branches | fruiting bodies; hyphae | Yes | Yes | Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye |
Wood |
Plant parts not known to carry the pest in trade/transport |
---|
Bulbs/Tubers/Corms/Rhizomes |
Flowers/Inflorescences/Cones/Calyx |
Fruits (inc. pods) |
Leaves |
Seedlings/Micropropagated plants |
True seeds (inc. grain) |
Wood Packaging
Top of pageWood Packaging not known to carry the pest in trade/transport |
---|
Loose wood packing material |
Non-wood |
Processed or treated wood |
Solid wood packing material with bark |
Solid wood packing material without bark |
Prevention and Control
Top of pageDue to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
In healthy and slightly diseased stands in risky areas it is important to prevent infection by spores. This is done by performing cuttings during the seasons (cold winter or hot summer) when the risk of spore infection is low or absent. For cuttings carried out during the more risky warm season, the cut surface of fresh stumps can be treated with a protectant to prevent infection. The most commonly used protectants are urea and borax (Pratt et al., 1998) and the competitive fungus Phlebia gigantea (Holdenrieder and Greig, 1998). Care should be taken to avoid wounding the roots during logging operations, especially when cuttings are carried out during the warm season. Wide spacing and minimizing the number of thinnings during rotation will reduce the risk of infection.Little can be done to control the fungus in diseased stands. The only real possibility is to shorten the rotation time in heavily diseased stands.
The extraction of infected stumps before regeneration essentially reduces the risk of infection in the next generation of susceptible conifers. The spread of the disease from stumps can also be reduced by favouring the regeneration of resistant tree species close to decayed stumps. Heterobasidion infection can be cleared from a site by cultivating a rotation of a resistant tree species. Current knowledge suggests that pure broadleaved tree stands are practically resistant. Susceptible conifers should be avoided or cultivated in mixture with resistant trees in afforestations on former agricultural soils (Korhonen et al., 1998b).
References
Top of pageAnderson RL; Ritter W; Witmer RC, 1976. Fomes annosus found on eastern white pine in Iowa. Plant Disease Reporter, 60:981-984.
Anon., 1959. Reports on forest research for the years ended March, 1957, March, 1958. London, UK: HMSO.
Anon., 1985. Taxonomy and ecology of wood-destroying fungi. Rep. For. Prod. Aust. 1965/66, 1966 (39).
Anon., 2004. Cylindroselloides dybasi, Hall in Nova Scotia. World Wide Web page at http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/Environment/NHR/cylindroselloides.html.
Applegate HW, 1971. Annosus root rot mortality in once-thinned loblolly pine plantations in Tennessee. Plant Disease Reporter, 55:625-627.
Bakshi BK, 1950. Fungi associated with ambrosia beetles in Great Britain. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 33(1-2):111-120.
Bakshi BK; Sen M; Singh B, 1970. Cultural diagnosis of Indian Polyporaceae. II. Genera Fomes and Trametes. Indian Forest Records, 2:245-276.
Berry FH, 1968. Spread of Fomes annosus root rot in thinned shortleaf pine plantations. USDA Forest Service, Res. Note NE-87, 4 pp.
Berry FH; Bretz TW, 1964. Urea and other chemicals effective against colonization of Shortleaf Pine stumps by Fomes annosus in Missouri. Plant Disease Reporter, 48(11):886-887.
Berry FH; Dooling OJ, 1962. Fomes annosus on shortleaf pine in Missouri. Plant Disease Reporter, 46:521-522.
Binyamini N, 1982. Host index for Israeli wood-rotting fungi. Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 30 pp.
Campbell WA, 1938. The cultural characteristics of the species of Fomes. Bulletin Torrey botanical Club, 65(1):31-69.
Capretti P; Barzanti GP; Cech T; Tomiczek C, 1998. Intersterility groups (ISG) of Heterobasidion annosum in the Italian Alpine region and Austria. In: Delatour C, Guillaumin J-J, Lung-Escarmant B, Marçais B, eds. Root and Butt Rots of Forest Trees. 9th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots. Carcans-Maubuisson, France. INRA Editions, Les Colloques, no. 89: 437. (Abstr.).
Capretti P; Barzanti GP; Luisi N; Puddu A, 1998. Group dying of Silver fir (Abies alba) by Heterobasidion annosum in Central and Southern Italy. In: Delatour C, Guillaumin J-J, Lung-Escarmant B, Marçais B, eds. Root and Butt Rots of Forest Trees. 9th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots. Carcans-Maubuisson, France. INRA Editions, Les Colloques, no. 89: 440. (Abstr.).
Capretti P; Goggioli V; Mugnai L, 1994. Intersterility groups of Heterobasidion annosum in Italy: Distribution, hosts and pathogenicity tests. In: Johansson M, Stenlid J, ed. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Root and Butt Rots. Wik, Sweden and Haikko, Finland. Swedish Univ. of Agric. Sci., Uppsala, Sweden, 218-226.
Capretti P; Tegli S; Lakomy P; Zamponi L, 2003. Genetic variation in Heterobasidion abietinum (H. annosum F group) population. In: Laflamme G, Bérubé JA, Bussières G, eds. Root and butt rots of forest trees. 10th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots, Québec City, Canada. Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Information Report LAU-X-126:293-295.
Cartwright K St G; Findlay WPK, 1946. Decay of Timber and its Prevention. London, UK: HMSO.
Chang TT; Hsieh HJ; Chang RJ; Fu CS, 1999. Common tree diseases in Taiwan. Taiwan Forestry Research Institute. (In Chinese).
Cowling EB; Kelman A, 1964. Influence of temperature on growth of Fomes annosus isolates. Phytopathology, 54(4):373-378.
Dai Y-C; Korhonen K, 2003. First report of Heterobasidion parviporum (S Group of H. annosum sensu lato) on Tsuga spp. in Asia. Plant Disease, 87:1007.
Driver CH, Ginns JH Jr. , 1969. Ecology of slash pine stumps: fungal colonization and infection by Fomes annosus. Forest Science, 15:2-10.
EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm
Froelich RC; Kuhlman EG; Hodges CS; Weiss MJ; Nichols JD, 1977. Fomes annosus root rot in the South. Guidelines for prevention. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, August 1977.
Gilbertson RL; Martin KJ; Lindsey JP, 1974. Annotated check list and host index for Arizona wood-rotting fungi. Agric. Exp. Sta, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson. Tecnical Bulletin 209, 48 pp.
Gilmour JW, 1966. The pathology of forest trees in New Zealand. The fungal, bacterial, and algal pathogens. New Zealand Forest Service, Technical Paper, 48:1-82.
Ginns JH Jr., Gillespie WH, 1962. Fomes root rot found in five thinned, native white pine stands in West Wirginia. Plant Disease Reporter, 46:734.
Greig BJW, 1976. Host plants of Fomes annosus in Great Britain. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 66:517-519.
Hadfield JS, 1970. Color infrared photography effectively detects pines killed by Fomes annosus. In: Hodges CS, Rishbeth J, Yde-Andersen A, eds. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Fomes annosus, Aarhus, Denmark. Asherville, North Carolina, 37-42.
Hanso M; Hanso S, 2003. Heterobasidion root rot, a threat to the forests in Estonia. In: Laflamme G, Bérubé JA, Bussières G, eds. Root and butt rots of forest trees. 10th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots, Québec City, Canada. Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Information Report LAU-X-126:351-355.
Hanson JB; Lautz W, 1971. Photography as an aid in estimating annosus root rot-caused tree mortality. Plant Disease Reporter, 55:761-763.
Hartley C, 1910. Fomes annosus and two species of Gymnosporangium on Juniperus virginiana. Science (N.S.), 31: 639.
Hodges CS Jr., 1969. The impact of Fomes annosus on forest management in the Southeast. Alabama Forest Products Directory, 12(7):79-80, 83-84.
Holdenrieder O; Langenegger K; Sieber TN, 1998. Occurrence of Heterobasidion annosum intersterility groups in Switzerland. In: Delatour C, Guillaumin J-J, Lung-Escarmant B, Marçais B, eds. Root and Butt Rots of Forest Trees. 9th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots. Carcans-Maubuisson, France. INRA Editions, Les Colloques, no. 89: 437. (Abstr.).
Hussain SM, 1952. Fomes annosus (Fr.) Cke. a common root rot. Pakistan Journal of Forestry, 2:216-220.
Johannesson H; Stenlid J, 2003. Molecular markers reveal genetic isolation and phylogeography of the S and F intersterility groups of the wood-decay fungus Heterobasidion annosum. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 29:94-101.
Johnson DW; Cowling EB, 1965. Role of pinosylvins and borax in control of Fomes annosus by stump treatments. Phytopathology, 55(12):1341-1346.
Jorgensen E, 1961. On the spread of Fomes annosus (Fr.) Cke. Canadian Journal of Botany, 39(6):1437-1445.
Kentucky Division of Forestry, 2003. Major tree diseases in Kentucky. World Wide Web page at http://www.forestry.ky.gov/programs/health/Disease.htm.
Kobayashi T; Aoshima K; Hayashi Y; Abe Y, 1981. Possible antagonistic behavior of Heterobasidion insulare to H. annosum. XVII IUFRO World Congr., Kyoto, Japan, Sept. 6-17, 1981. Poster session.
Koenigs JW, 1960. Fomes annosus: a bibliography with subject index. Occ. Pap. sth. Forest Exp. Stn 181.
Korhonen K; Piri T, 1994. The main hosts and distribution of the S and P groups of Heterobasidion annosum in Finland. In: Johansson M, Stenlid J, ed. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Root and Butt Rots. Wik, Sweden and Haikko, Finland. Swedish Univ. of Agric. Sci., Uppsala, Sweden, 260-267.
Kotlaba F, 1984. Zemepisne rozsireni a ekologie chorosu (Polyporales s.l.) v Ceskoslovensku. [Geographical distribution and ecology of polypores (Polyporales s.l.) in Czechoslovakia]. Academia, Praha, 194 pp. (In Czech, English summary).
Kuhlman EC, 1966. Recovery of Fomes annosus spores from soil. In: Proceedings of the fifty-eighth Annual Meeting of the American Phytopathological Society, Denver, USA. Abstracted in Phytopathology, 56(8):869-907.
Kuhlman EG, 1970. Seedling inoculations with Fomes annosus show variation in virulence and in host susceptibility. Phytopathology, 60:1743-1746.
La Porta N; Apostolov K; Korhonen K, 1998. Intersterility groups of Heterobasidion annosum and their host specificity in Bulgaria. European Journal of Forest Pathology, 28:1-9.
Little S; Mohr JJ; Mook PV, 1968. Ten-year effects from row thinnings in loblolly pine plantations of eastern Maryland. USDA Forest Service, Res. Note NE-77, 8 pp.
Lowe JL, 1957. Polyporaceae of North America. The genus Fomes. State Univ. College of Forestry at Syracuse University. Techical Publication No. 80, 97 pp.
Lushaj BM, 2001. Phytosanitary situation in forests of Albania. "Kristalina - K.H.", Tirana, 57 pp.
Lyubarskii LV; Vasilyeva LN, 1975. Wood-destroying fungi of the Far East. Izdatelstvo "Nauka", Novosibirsk. 164 pp.
Malençon G; Bertault R, 1967. Champignons du Maroc. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles et Physiques du Maroc, 47:237-281. (publ. 1968).
Mao XL, 1993. Economic macrofungi of Tibet. Beijing: Beijing Sci. Tech. Press, 651 pp.
Marinkovic P, 1980. Fomes annosus in southern Europe. In: Dimitri L, ed. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Problems of Root and Butt Rot in Conifers, Kassel, FRG. Hessische Forstliche Versuchsanstalt, Hann. Münden, FRG, 27-34.
Mason GN, 1969. An evaluation of the incidence of Fomes annosus in East Texas. Plant Disease Reporter, 53:936-939.
Miller OK Jr., 1960. The distribution of Fomes annosus (Fries) Karst. in New Hampshire red pine plantations and some observations on its biology. Fox Forest Bulletin, No. 12, 25 pp.
Morozova TI; Tkacz B, 1997. Diseases in the forest. Eastern Siberia and the Russian Far East. In: Hansen EM, Lewis KJ, ed. Compendium of conifer diseases. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, USA: APS Press, 77-79.
Mugnai L; Capretti P, 1989. Intersterility groups of Heterobasidion annosum (Fr.) Bref.: some morphological differences in the basidiocarps. / Gruppi interstrili di Heterobasidion annosum (Fr.) Bref.: alcune differenze morfologiche dei carpofori. Micologia Italiana, 18(3):87-94. (in Italian, English summary).
Munda A; Macek J; Javornik B, 1998. Distribution, ecology and genetic variability of Heterobasidion annosum (Fr.) Bref. in Slovenia. Root and butt rots of forest trees: 9th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots, Carcans-Maubuisson, (France), 1-7 September, 1997., 103-111; [^italic~Les Colloques^roman~ No. 89]; 15 ref.
Murrill WA, 1908. Additional Philippine Polyporaceae. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 35:391-416.
Negrutskii SF, 1986. Heterobasidion annosum. Moscow, USSR; Agropromizdat, Ed. 2:196 pp.
Nobles MK, 1965. Identification of cultures of wood-inhabiting Hymenomycetes. Canadian Journal of Botany, 43(9):1097-1139.
Otrosina WJ, Cobb FW Jr. , 1989. Biology, Ecology, and epidemiology of Heterobasidion annosum. In: Otrosina WJ, Scharpf RF, ed. Research and management of annosus root disease (Heterobasidion annosum) in western North America. Proc. of the Symposium, April 18-21, 1989, Monterey, California. USDA Forest Service, General Techn. Report PSW-116:26-33.
Pagony H; Szanto M, 1998. Biotypes of Heterobasidion annosum in Hungary. In: Delatour C, Guillaumin J-J, Lung-Escarmant B, Marçais B, eds. Root and Butt Rots of Forest Trees. 9th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots. Carcans-Maubuisson, France. INRA Editions, Les Colloques, no. 89: 437. (Abstr.).
Parmasto E, 1986. Preliminary list of Vietnamese Aphyllophorales and Polyporaceae s. str. Scripta Mycol. (Tallinn, Estonia), 14:1-88. (in Vietnamese, Russian and English).
Pearce, 1962. Pathology of Trees and Shrubs (biology, infection and disease, ecology).
Platt WD; Cowling EB; Hodges CS, 1965. Comparative resistance of coniferous root wood and stem wood to decasy by isolates of fomes annosus. Phytopathology, 55(12):1347-1353.
Powers HR Jr., Boyce JS Jr., 1961. Fomes annosus on slash pine in the Southeast. Plant Disease Reporter, 45:306-307.
Punter D, 1970. Fomes annosus in eastern Canada. In: Tousson TA, Bega RV, Nelson PE, ed. Root diseases and soil-borne plant pathogens. Berkeley, USA: Univ. of Calif. Press, 156-160.
Redfern DB; van Sickle GA, 1968. Fomes annosus in Eastern Canada. Plant Disease Reporter, 52(8):638.
Rishbeth J, 1951. Ann. Bot. N.S., 15:1-21, 221-246.
Rishbeth J, 1952. Control of Fomes annosus Fr. Forestry, 25(1):41-50.
Rishbeth J, 1957. Some further observations on Fomes annosus. Forestry, 30(1):69-89.
Rishbeth J, 1959. Dispersal of Fomes annosus Fr. and Peniophora gigantea (Fr.) Massee. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 42:243-260.
Rishbeth J, 1963. Stump protection against Fomes annosus. III. Inoculation with Peniophora gigantea. Annals of applied Biology, 52(1):63-77.
Roll-Hansen F, 1940. Studies in Polyporus annosus Fr., especially in respect of its occurrence in Norway south of the Dovre Fell. Medd. norske Skogsforsoksv., 24(1): 100pp.
Rosnev B; Petkov P, 1986. Pathological causes of the deteriorating condition of some conifer plantations in Bulgaria. Gorskostopanska Nauka 23:74-82. (in Bulgarian, English summary).
Roy A; De AB, 1996. Polyporaceae of India. International Book Distributors, Dehra Dun, 287 pp.
Sinclair WA, 1964. Root- and butt-rot of conifers caused by Fomes annosus, with special reference to inoculum dispersal and control of the disease in New York. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, Memoir 391, 54 pp. Ithaca, N.Y.
Solov'ev AM, 1963. Bioecology of the fungus Fomitopsis annosa (Fr.) Karst. in the fir forests of the Altai. Trudy Kazakhskogo Nauchno-Issledovatel'skogo Instituta, 4:296-319. (in Russian. Translation in English: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem 1971.).
Stambaugh WJ, Cobb FW Jr. , Schmidt RA, Krieger FC, 1962. Effects of season and environment on inoculum dispersal of Fomes annosus and stump invasion of planted white pine. Phytopathology, 52:28. (Abstr.).
Stanosz GR; Guthmiller MA, 1995. Root rot of red pine caused by Heterobasidion annosum in Wisconsin. Canadian Journal of Botany, 65:2124-2127.
Stewart JL, 1965. Fomes annosus found in Nebraska. Plant Disease Reporter, 49:456.
Stoddard EM; McDonnell AD; Hicock HW, 1939. Fomes annosus on conifers in Connecticut. Plant Disease Reporter, 23:385-386.
Strong FC; Lemmien WA, 1964. Fomes annosus in southwestern Michigan. Plant Disease Reporter, 48:110.
Thapa M, 1990. New fungal records from Nepal. Banko Janakari, 2(3):282; 2 ref.
Thomsen IM, 1994. Occurrence of S and P types of Heterobasidion annosum in Denmark. In: Johansson M, Stenlid J, ed. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Root and Butt Rots. Wik, Sweden and Haikko, Finland. Swedish Univ. of Agric. Sci., Uppsala, Sweden, 268-271.
USDA Forest Service, 1997. Annual Northeastern Area forest health protection insect and disease conditions report. World Wide Web page at http://www.fs.fed.us/na/morgantown/fhp/pcond/pcond87.html.
USDA Forest Service, 2000. 2000 Forest Insect and disease conditions for the southern region. http://fhpr8.srs.fs.fed.us/2000conditions/
USDA Forest Service, 2003. Forest insect and disease conditions in the United States 2002. USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, June 2003, 136 pp. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/publications/annual_I_d_conditions/ConditionsReport_02_final.pdf.
Vesterholt J; Pedersen JH, 1995. Lignicolous Aphyllophorales from the Faroe Islands. Windahlia, 20:47-54.
Wagn O, 1980. Host plants of Fomes annosus in Denmark. In: Dimitri L, ed. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Problems of Root and Butt Rot in Conifers. Hessische Fortliche Forschungsanstalt, Kassel, FRG, 182-189.
Williams RD, 1959. Growth and yield of a thinned Shortleaf Pine plantation. Tech. Pap. Cent. St. For. Exp. Sta., 169, 12 pp.
Williams RE, 1989. Distribution and impacts of annosus root disease in forests of the northern Rocky Mountains. In: Otrosina WJ, Scharpf RF, ed. Research and management of annosus root disease (Heterobasidion annosum) in western North America. Proc. of the Symposium, April 18-21, 1989, Monterey, California. USDA Forest Service, General Techn. Report PSW-116:51-56.
Willis JC, 1973. A dictionary of the flowering plants and ferns. 8th edn. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
Wilson CL, 1963. Fomes annosus root rot on shortleaf, loblolly and slash pine in Arkansas. Plant Disease Reporter, 47:328.
Distribution References
Adhikari M K, 1988. Polypores (wood-rotting fungi) of Nepal. Banko Janakari. 2 (1), 9-20.
Berry F H, 1968. Research Notes. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, 4.
Binyamini N, 1982. Host index for Israeli wood-rotting fungi., Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv University. 30 pp.
CABI, Undated. Compendium record. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated a. CABI Compendium: Status as determined by CABI editor. Wallingford, UK: CABI
EPPO, 2014. EPPO Global database (available online). Paris, France: EPPO. https://gd.eppo.int/
Froelich RC, Kuhlman EG, Hodges CS, Weiss MJ, Nichols JD, 1977. Fomes annosus root rot in the South. Guidelines for prevention., USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station.
Hadfield JS, 1970. Color infrared photography effectively detects pines killed by Fomes annosus. [Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Fomes annosus, Aarhus, Denmark], [ed. by Hodges CS, Rishbeth J, Yde-Andersen A]. Asherville, North Carolina, 37-42.
Kentucky Division of Forestry, 2003. Major tree diseases in Kentucky., http://www.forestry.ky.gov/programs/health/Disease.htm
Kobayashi T, Aoshima K, Hayashi Y, Abe Y, 1981. Possible antagonistic behavior of Heterobasidion insulare to H. annosum. In: XVII IUFRO World Congr., Kyoto, Japan, Sept. 6-17, 1981. Poster session,
Kotlaba F, 1984. Geographical distribution and ecology of polypores (Polyporales s.l.) in Czechoslovakia. (Zemepisne rozsireni a ekologie chorosu (Polyporales s.l.) v Ceskoslovensku). In: Academia, Praha, 194 pp.
Little S, Mohr J J, Mook P V, 1968. Research Notes. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, 8.
Lushaj BM, 2001. Phytosanitary situation in forests of Albania Tirana., Tirana, "Kristalina - K.H.". 57 pp.
Mao XL, 1993. Economic macrofungi of Tibet., Beijing, Beijing Sci. Tech. Press. 651 pp.
Marinkovic P, 1980. Fomes annosus in southern Europe. [Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Problems of Root and Butt Rot in Conifers, Kassel, FRG], [ed. by Dimitri L]. Hann. Münden, FRG: 27-34.
Morozova TI, Tkacz B, 1997. Diseases in the forest. Eastern Siberia and the Russian Far East. In: Compendium of conifer diseases, [ed. by Hansen EM, Lewis KJ]. St. Paul, MN, USA: The American Phytopathological Society, APS Press. 77-79.
Negrutskiĭ S F, 1986. Kornevaya gubka. Moscow, USSR: Agropromizdat. 196 pp.
Parmasto E, 1986. Preliminary list of Vietnamese Aphyllophorales and Polyporaceae s. str. In: Scripta Mycol. 14 Tallinn, Estonia: 1-88.
Punter D, 1970. Fomes annosus in eastern Canada. In: Root diseases and soil-borne plant pathogens, [ed. by Tousson TA, Bega RV, Nelson PE]. Berkeley, USA: Univ of Calif Press. 156-160.
Roy A, De AB, 1996. Polyporaceae of India., Dehra Dun, International Book Distributors. 287 pp.
Solov'ev AM, 1963. Bioecology of the fungus Fomitopsis annosa (Fr.) Karst. in the fir forests of the Altai. [Trudy Kazakhskogo Nauchno-Issledovatel'skogo Instituta], 4 Jerusalem, Israel Program for Scientific Translations. 296-319.
Strong FC, Lemmien WA, 1964. Fomes annosus in southwestern Michigan. In: Plant Disease Reporter, 48 110.
Thomsen IM, 1994. Occurrence of S and P types of Heterobasidion annosum in Denmark. [Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Root and Butt Rots. Wik, Sweden and Haikko, Finland], [ed. by Johansson M, Stenlid J]. Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish Univ. of Agric. Sci. 268-271.
USDA Forest Service, 1997. Annual Northeastern Area forest health protection insect and disease conditions report., http://www.fs.fed.us/na/morgantown/fhp/pcond/pcond87.html
USDA Forest Service, 2000. 2000 Forest Insect and disease conditions for the southern region., http://fhpr8.srs.fs.fed.us/2000conditions/
Vesterholt J, Pedersen JH, 1995. Lignicolous Aphyllophorales from the Faroe Islands. In: Windahlia, 20 47-54.
Williams R D, 1959. Technical Papers. Central States Forest Experiment Station, 12 pp.
Williams RE, 1989. Distribution and impacts of annosus root disease in forests of the northern Rocky Mountains. In: Research and management of annosus root disease (Heterobasidion annosum) in western North America [Proc. of the Symposium, April 18-21, 1989, Monterey, California], 116 [ed. by Otrosina WJ, Scharpf RF]. USDA Forest Service. 51-56.
Wilson CL, 1963. Fomes annosus root rot on shortleaf, loblolly and slash pine in Arkansas. In: Plant Disease Reporter, 47 328.
Distribution Maps
Top of pageSelect a dataset
Map Legends
-
CABI Summary Records
Map Filters
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/