Hedera helix (ivy)
Index
- Pictures
- Identity
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Description
- Plant Type
- Distribution
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat
- Habitat List
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Biology and Ecology
- Latitude/Altitude Ranges
- Air Temperature
- Rainfall Regime
- Soil Tolerances
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Vectors
- Impact Summary
- Impact
- Environmental Impact
- Impact: Biodiversity
- Threatened Species
- Social Impact
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Uses
- Uses List
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- References
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate reportIdentity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Hedera helix L.
Preferred Common Name
- ivy
Other Scientific Names
- Hedera hibernica Carr.
International Common Names
- English: Atlantic ivy; common ivy; English ivy
- Spanish: hiedra; yedra comun
- French: Bourreau des arbres; Herbe de St Jean; lierre; lierre commun
- Portuguese: hera
Local Common Names
- Finland: köynneliäs muratti
- Germany: Efeu; Gemeiner Efeu
- Italy: edera
- Netherlands: klimop
- Sweden: murgroena; murgröna
EPPO code
- HEEHE (Hedera helix)
- HEEHI (Hedera hibernica)
Summary of Invasiveness
Top of pageTaxonomic Tree
Top of page- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Plantae
- Phylum: Spermatophyta
- Subphylum: Angiospermae
- Class: Dicotyledonae
- Order: Araliales
- Family: Araliaceae
- Genus: Hedera
- Species: Hedera helix
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Top of pageDescription
Top of pageDistribution
Top of pageDistribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
Last updated: 25 Feb 2021Continent/Country/Region | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | Reference | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Africa |
|||||||
Algeria | Present | Native | |||||
Libya | Present | Native | |||||
Morocco | Present | Native | |||||
Tunisia | Present | Native | |||||
Asia |
|||||||
Armenia | Present | Native | |||||
China | Present | ||||||
-Yunnan | Present | ||||||
Georgia | Present | Native | |||||
Iraq | Present | ||||||
Israel | Present | Native | |||||
Japan | Present | Introduced | |||||
Jordan | Present | ||||||
Lebanon | Present | Native | |||||
Syria | Present | Native | |||||
Turkey | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Vietnam | Present | Native | |||||
Europe |
|||||||
Albania | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Andorra | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Austria | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Belarus | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Belgium | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Bosnia and Herzegovina | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Bulgaria | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Croatia | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Cyprus | Present | Native | |||||
Czechia | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Czechoslovakia | Present | ||||||
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia | Present | ||||||
Denmark | Present, Widespread | Native | Invasive | ||||
Estonia | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
France | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Corsica | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Germany | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Greece | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Crete | Present | ||||||
Hungary | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Ireland | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Italy | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Sardinia | Present | ||||||
-Sicily | Present | ||||||
Latvia | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Liechtenstein | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Lithuania | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Luxembourg | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Moldova | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Netherlands | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
North Macedonia | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Norway | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Poland | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Portugal | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Azores | Present | Native | |||||
-Madeira | Present | Native | |||||
Romania | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Russia | Present | ||||||
-Central Russia | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Southern Russia | Present | Native | |||||
Serbia and Montenegro | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Slovakia | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Slovenia | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Spain | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Canary Islands | Present | Native | |||||
Sweden | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Switzerland | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
Ukraine | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
United Kingdom | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
-Channel Islands | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
North America |
|||||||
Canada | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | |||||
-British Columbia | Present, Localized | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Ontario | Present, Localized | Introduced | Invasive | Original citation: Anon. (2002) | |||
Mexico | Present | ||||||
United States | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | |||||
-Alabama | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Alaska | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Arizona | Present | Introduced | |||||
-California | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Florida | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Georgia | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Hawaii | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Illinois | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Indiana | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Kentucky | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Louisiana | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Maryland | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Massachusetts | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Michigan | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Mississippi | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Missouri | Present | Introduced | |||||
-New Jersey | Present | Introduced | |||||
-New York | Present | Introduced | |||||
-North Carolina | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Ohio | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Oregon | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Pennsylvania | Present | Introduced | |||||
-South Carolina | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Tennessee | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Texas | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Utah | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Virginia | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Washington | Present | Introduced | |||||
-West Virginia | Present | Introduced | |||||
Oceania |
|||||||
Australia | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-New South Wales | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Victoria | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
New Zealand | Present, Localized | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
South America |
|||||||
Argentina | Present, Localized | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Bolivia | Present | Native | |||||
Chile | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Ecuador | Present | Native |
History of Introduction and Spread
Top of pageRisk of Introduction
Top of pageHabitat
Top of pageHabitat List
Top of pageCategory | Sub-Category | Habitat | Presence | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Terrestrial | Managed | Managed forests, plantations and orchards | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Disturbed areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Rail / roadsides | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Urban / peri-urban areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Natural forests | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Riverbanks | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Littoral | Coastal areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Hosts/Species Affected
Top of pageBiology and Ecology
Top of pageThe respective chromosome numbers of H. helix and H. hibernica are 2n=48 and 2n=96, suggesting that H. helix is the more ancient species, and H. hibernica may have evolved from it via chromosome doubling or hybridization with another Hedera species. The amount of nuclear DNA is 3.6 pg (Grime et al., 1988).
Physiology and Phenology
H. helix exhibits strong heterophily and intermediate shoots and leaves are rare. If a reproductive shoot is detached and roots, it will continue to grow with leaves and shoots typical of that phase. However, 'reversion' to the juvenile vegetative phase can be induced by spraying the plant with the growth hormone gibberellic acid, and abscisic acid reverses the effects. This suggests that the balance of gibberellic acid and abscisic acid is involved in the change from juvenile to mature stage (Briggs and Walters, 1997). In Europe, at its northern, eastern and high altitude distribution limits, the species will remain at its juvenile phase (Andergassen and Bauer, 2002). Flowering and fruiting occur over a number of months with flowering taking place during autumn and early winter. On some plants the distal part of the inflorescence may bear fruits that are already fully-grown when the last flowers on the rest of the inflorescence are just at anthesis. Berry-like fruits ripen in the following spring, April to June in Western Europe (Grime et al., 1988). Germination is epigeal and it takes 6 days for 50% of samples to germinate, and is to some extent inhibited by light (Grime et al., 1988).
Reproductive Biology
A combination of sexual reproduction and vegetative propagation ensures the spread of this species. Age of first reproduction is variable but can be in the region of 10 years (Reichard, 2000). Flowers are insect pollinated and are visited by a variety of insect species, many of which visit the flowers for its nectar (Proctor and Yeo, 1973). A wide number of insects will visit the flowers as they are produced aseasonally when few if any other species are in flower, provided the weather conditions are conducive. In Britain, frequent visitors include the common wasp (Vespula sp.), the hornet (Vespa crabro), the blow-fly (Calliphora sp.), the crane fly (Tipulidae), Tilupa sp. and Dilophus febrilis. However, it is probably mostly pollinated by bees (Apis spp.). Green fruits are born through the winter, ripening in early spring and are readily dispersed by a variety of birds. Up to 70% of the seeds are viable but scarification appears to be essential for germination and this is achieved when seeds pass through a bird's digestive system (Reichard, 2000). Germination mostly takes place in spring (Grime et al., 1988).
Environmental Requirements
H. helix appears to be tolerant of a rather broad spectrum of environmental conditions in the temperate zone. It occurs from sea-level to altitudes of over 1000 m in Europe and has been found up to 3300 m in Bolivia (Missouri Botanical Garden, 2003). It is readily found across a variety of rainfall zones in Europe. It is often found in riparian zones but it does not grow well in areas where the water table is high and soil is waterlogged (Thomas, 1980). It is reported as growing well in acidic and basic soils (Reichard, 2000) and tolerates a wide range of soil pH, but is most frequent and abundant above pH 6 and is seldom found below pH 4 (Grime et al., 1988). In North America (Midwest and New England states) it is reported that severe winter cold inhibits its spread (Moriarty, 2001) and in late autumn, flowers are susceptible to frost (Grime et al., 1988). It is tolerant of salt deposition. The increased winter light under deciduous trees apparently allows this evergreen vine to grow rapidly upward in winter (Thomas, 1980). Although H. helix grows much better in higher light intensities, it is markedly tolerant of shade as well as drought (Thomas, 1980; Sack and Grubb, 2002). It is often considered as a nitrogen indicator species, and plant density has increased over time in forests where nitrogen deposition has increased since the late 1970s (Lameire et al., 2000).
Associations
The rootlets bear vascular-arbuscular mycorrhiza (Grime et al., 1988). In England, H. helix becomes established once a woodland canopy has been produced following tree establishment in open vegetation (Harmer et al., 2001) and often spreads from the woodland's edge (Grime et al., 1988).
Latitude/Altitude Ranges
Top of pageLatitude North (°N) | Latitude South (°S) | Altitude Lower (m) | Altitude Upper (m) |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 3300 |
Soil Tolerances
Top of pageSoil drainage
- free
- impeded
Soil reaction
- acid
- alkaline
- neutral
Soil texture
- heavy
- light
- medium
Special soil tolerances
- shallow
Notes on Natural Enemies
Top of pageMeans of Movement and Dispersal
Top of pageStem fragments may possibly be dispersed by running water but there are no documented cases of local dispersal by these means.
Vector Transmission (Biotic)
H. helix is bird-dispersed although its berries are mildly toxic. This mild toxicity can prevent consumption of too many fruits in one period of foraging and regulate seed retention time, thus ensuring better seed dispersal (Barnea et al., 1993). In North America, the fruits do not provide a valuable food source for native songbirds; however, starlings, cedar waxwings, robins and Stellar's jays consume them (Moriarty, 2001) and presumably disperse them.
Accidental Introduction
Vegetative material which can easily root can be readily dispersed accidentally to new suitable habitats. Careless dumping of surplus trimmings from gardens is a major risk (Auckland Regional Council, 2003) but soil movement or transport of logs bearing H. helix stems may also result in the establishment of new infestations. In the USA, recommendations have been given to the public for the safe disposal of garden clippings (Simon, 2002).
Intentional Introduction
The species is widely used as an ornamental and therefore likely to be introduced more widely unless legislation is set up to prevent further introductions.
Impact Summary
Top of pageCategory | Impact |
---|---|
Animal/plant collections | None |
Animal/plant products | None |
Biodiversity (generally) | Negative |
Crop production | None |
Environment (generally) | Negative |
Fisheries / aquaculture | None |
Forestry production | None |
Human health | None |
Livestock production | None |
Native fauna | Negative |
Native flora | None |
Rare/protected species | None |
Tourism | None |
Trade/international relations | None |
Transport/travel | None |
Impact
Top of pageEnvironmental Impact
Top of pageImpact: Biodiversity
Top of pageThreatened Species
Top of pageThreatened Species | Conservation Status | Where Threatened | Mechanism | References | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hexastylis naniflora (dwarf-flowered heartleaf) | NatureServe; USA ESA listing as threatened species | North Carolina; South Carolina | Competition - monopolizing resources | US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2011 |
Social Impact
Top of pageRisk and Impact Factors
Top of page- Invasive in its native range
- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Highly adaptable to different environments
- Highly mobile locally
- Has high reproductive potential
- Negatively impacts human health
- Negatively impacts animal health
- Reduced native biodiversity
- Threat to/ loss of endangered species
- Threat to/ loss of native species
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Highly likely to be transported internationally deliberately
- Difficult/costly to control
Uses
Top of pageSimilarities to Other Species/Conditions
Top of pagePrevention and Control
Top of pageDue to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Cultural ControlAlthough the palatability of H. helix to grazing animals in North America is unrecorded (Reichard, 2000), European deer species find it edible and its biomass decreases markedly when ungulate numbers are high (González-Hernández and Silva-Pando, 1996). Mammal herbivory could well decrease the plant's vigour in its invasive range.
Mechanical Control
Killing the aerial portion of H. helix, the seed-producing part of the plant, is easy and only requires the cutting of the stems around the host tree with pruning tools. However, when H. helix grows on tree-ferns, it is not sufficient to cut the stems to kill the plant. All parts of the plant must be removed as H. helix can root and sustain itself in the fibrous tree-fern trunks. The roots of young plants can be easily dug out, particularly when the soil is moist, from the ground around the base of the infected tree, whereas old individuals generally do not resprout. When the plant carpets the forest floor, individual stems can be readily pulled off the ground; however, it is essential to remove all runners. Any overlooked live shoot may restart an infestation, thus follow-up monitoring and control is essential. Small or young ivy plants can be pulled off supporting structures or trees, and roots dug out. Soil and native vegetation disturbance must be as limited as possible because this favours the establishment of other invasive species. To avoid rerooting and resprouting, all material must be carefully removed from the site and disposed of safely. If removal of the plants is not possible, all parts of the plant must be placed off the ground in such a way that they can dry out. Gloves should be worn as skin irritation may follow contact with the plant (Freshwater, 1991; Morisawa, 1999; Reichard, 2000). One form of prescribed burning has successfully been used to control H. helix. Plants and resprouts are repeatedly burnt with a blowtorch until the plant's resources are exhausted (Reichard, 2000).
Chemical Control
The mechanical control of H. helix by cutting stems is not always successful especially if the roots of younger individuals cannot be removed. Then it is advisable to strip the bark, notch the exposed section of the vine and paint on an undiluted herbicide such as glyphosate. This combination of cutting the vine less than 20 cm above ground and an immediate herbicide application may provide better control. Metsulfuron, picloram and glyphosate have all proved successful in Australia (Anon., n.d.). As H. helix leaves are waxy, this often prevents the herbicides, especially hydrophilic compounds such as glyphosate, from permeating the leaves. Thus this plant does not respond well to herbicide spraying, even when a surfactant is added, and non-target native species may be affected in the process. When desirable native vegetation must not be harmed then the stump treatments should be used wherever possible. It is apparent that older plants are more resistant to herbicide treatment and even two applications may not kill them but just reduce growth. In the western USA, immediate spraying of triclopyr following the removal of most leaves and young shoots with a string trimmer has proved successful. However, in other instance, applications of glyphosate, triclopyr and 2,4-D have proved ineffective or unsatisfactory (Morisawa, 1999; Reichard, 2000).
Biological Control
There has been no attempt to identify and introduce biological control agents, and in view of the species' importance in horticulture in the USA, it is extremely unlikely that any such attempts will be made in that country (Reichard, 2000). In view of the species' near immunity to pests and diseases in its native range, prospects for biological control are limited. Prasad (2002) has reported that the use of a bioherbicide in the form of the fungus Chondrostereum purpureum has been applied to H. helix but its efficacy has yet to be ascertained.
References
Top of pageAckerfield J, 2001. Trichome morphology in Hedera L. Edinburgh Journal of Botany, 58:259-267.
Ackerfield J, Wen J, 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia série 3, 24:197-212. http://www.mnhn.fr/publication/adanson/a02n2a6.pdf.
Adler M, Stephens R, 2001. The facts on hazardous plants. The Nursery Papers, 2001/14:1-4. http://www.ngia.com.au/np/pdf/2001No14.pdf.
Akerson J, Gounaris K, 2000. Strategic plan for managing alien invasive vegetation: Colonial National Historical Park Yorktown, Virginia. http://data2.itc.nps.gov/nature/documents/ACF34.pdf.
Andergassen S, Bauer H, 2002. Frost hardiness in the juvenile and adult life phase of ivy (Hedera helix L.). Plant Ecology, 161:207-213.
Anon, 2002. Native plant alternatives to English Ivy. King County Noxious Weed Control Program, Seattle. http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/LANDS/Weeds/ivy_alternatives.pdf.
Auckland Regional Council, 2003. Pestfacts: Ivy - Hedera helix ssp. helix. Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland Regional Council. http://www.rnzih.org.nz/pages/u94830_2.pdf.
Benezra C, Ducombs G, Sell Y, Foussereau J, 1985. Plant Contact Dermatitis. Toronto, Canada: Decker.
Brickell C, 1999. New Encyclopedia of Plants and Flowers. London, UK: Dorling Kindersley.
Briggs D, Walters SM, 1997. Plant Variation and Evolution, 3rd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Büechi S, Bolli R, 2003. Efeu - Expektorans, Mukolytikum und Broncholytikum botanische und klinische Aspekte. Phytotherapie, 3:19-22.
González-Hernández MP, Silva-Pando FJ, 1996. Grazing effects of ungulates in a Galician oak forest (northwest Spain). Forest Ecology and Management, 88:65-70.
Harmer R, Peterken G, Kerr G, Poulton P, 2001. Vegetation changes during 100 years of development of two secondary woodlands on abandoned arable land. Biological Conservation, 101:291-304.
Hartvig P, 2002. Escaped woody garden plants - a problem in Danish nature? Dansk-Dendrologisk Arsskrift, 20:19-28.
Jordan M, 1976. A Guide to Wild Plants. London, UK: Millington.
Lameire S, Hermy M, Honnay O, 2000. Two decades of change in the ground vegetation of a mixed deciduous forest in an agricultural landscape. Journal of Vegetation Science, 11:695-704.
Le T, Sonu D, 2000. Competitive interaction between Hedera helix and native riparian vegetation. In: Kennedy K, Dudley T, Waggett C, Green D, Scholz A, Eds. Exploring the environment: research for environmental management. University of California, Berkeley. http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~es196/projects/2000final/Le-Sonu.pdf.
McAllister H, 1990. Hedera helix L. and Hedera hibernica (Kirchner) Bean Araliaceae in the British Isles. Watsonia, 18:7-15.
Missouri Botanical Garden, 2003. VAScular Tropicos database. St. Louis, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden. http://mobot.mobot.org/W3T/Search/vast.html.
Moriarty J, 2001. English Ivy (Hedera helix) in Hendricks Park, Eugene, Oregon. Bulletin of the Native Plant Society of Oregon, 34:81,87,91. http://www.npsoregon.org/arch/bull/01/NPSO_0107.PDF.
Morisawa TL, 1999. Weed Notes: Hedera helix L. The Nature Conservancy. http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/esadocs/hedeheli.html.
Murray C, Jones RK, 2002. Decision Support Tool for Invasive Species in Garry Oak Ecosystems. ESSA Technologies Ltd. for the Garry Oak Ecosystems Recovery Team. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Okerman A, 2000. Combating the 'Ivy Desert': the invasion of Hedera helix (English Ivy) in the Pacific Northwest United States. Restoration and Reclamation Review. On-line Student Journal, University of Minnesota, Volume 6. http://www.hort.agri.umn.edu/h5015/00papers/okerman.htm.
Pauchard A, Alaback PB, 2002. Roads as dispersal corridors for alien plants in protected areas of South Central Chile: How elevation, landuse and landscape context influence invasion patterns. http://www.forestry.umt.edu/personnel/faculty/palaback/forest_ecology_lab/pauchard/villa02.pdf.
Pennisi BV, Oetting RD, Stegelin FE, Thomas PA, Woodward JL, 2001. Commercial production of English Ivy (Hedera helix L.). Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin, 1206. The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. http://www.ces.uga.edu/pubcd/B1206.htm.
Prasad R, 2002. Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, British Columbia. IBG News, 11(2):6.
Proctor M, Yeo P, 1973. The Pollination of Flowers. London, UK: Collins.
Reichard S, 2000. Hedera helix L. In: Bossard CC, Randall JM, Hoshovsky MC, Eds. Invasive plants of California's wildlands. Berkeley, USA: University of California Press, 212-216.
Sack L, Grubb PJ, 2002. The combined impacts of deep shade and drought on the growth and biomass allocation of shade-tolerant woody seedlings. Oecologia, 131:175-185.
Schepens R, 1997. Hedera helix L. Poisons Information Monographs International. Programme on Chemical Safety, PIM 258. http://www.inchem.org/documents/pims/plant/pim258fr.htm.
Simon B, 2002. English ivy - Hedera helix. Weed Bulletin - King County Noxious Weed Control Program. http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/lands/weeds/ivy_bulletin.pdf.
Stace CA, 1997. New Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Starr F, Martz K, Loope LL, 2003. New plant records for the Hawaiian Archipelago. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers, 74:23-34.
Thomas LK, 1980. The impacts of three exotic plant species on a Potomac Island. National Park Service Scientific Monograph Series 13. U.S. Department of Interior, Washington, D.C.
Turton M, Matthes M, Haering R, Tuckey K, 2001. Epacris hamiltonii Recovery Plan. Hurstville, New South Wales, Australia: NPWS. http://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/PDFs/approved_epacris.pdf.
Urban Forest Associates, 2002. Invasive exotic species ranking for Southern Ontario. Urban Forest Associates Inc., Canada. http://www.serontario.org/pdfs/exotics.pdf.
USDA-ARS, 2003. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx
USDA-NRCS, 2002. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, USA. http://plants.usda.gov.
Zalba SM, Villamil CB, 2002. Woody plant invasion in relictual grasslands. Biological Invasion, 4:55-72.
Distribution References
Adler M, Stephens R, 2001. The facts on hazardous plants. In: The Nursery Papers, 2001, 14 1-4. http://www.ngia.com.au/np/pdf/2001No14.pdf
CABI, Undated. Compendium record. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated a. CABI Compendium: Status inferred from regional distribution. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated b. CABI Compendium: Status as determined by CABI editor. Wallingford, UK: CABI
Missouri Botanical Garden, 2003. Vascular Tropicos database., St. Louis, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden. http://mobot.mobot.org/W3T/Search/vast.html
Moriarty J, 2001. English Ivy (Hedera helix) in Hendricks Park, Eugene, Oregon. In: Bulletin of the Native Plant Society of Oregon, 34 81, 87, 91. http://www.npsoregon.org/arch/bull/01/NPSO_0107.PDF
Murray C, Jones RK, 2002. Decision Support Tool for Invasive Species in Garry Oak Ecosystems., Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: ESSA Technologies Ltd. for the Garry Oak Ecosystems Recovery Team.
Pauchard A, Alaback PB, 2002. Roads as dispersal corridors for alien plants in protected areas of South Central Chile: How elevation, landuse and landscape context influence invasion patterns., http://www.forestry.umt.edu/personnel/faculty/palaback/forest_ecology_lab/pauchard/villa02.pdf
Reichard S, 2000. Hedera helix L. In: Invasive plants of California's wildlands, [ed. by Bossard CC, Randall JM, Hoshovsky MC]. Berkeley, USA: University of California Press. 212-216.
Stace CA, 1997. New Flora of the British Isles., Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Starr F, Martz K, Loope LL, 2003. New plant records for the Hawaiian Archipelago. In: Bishop Museum Occasional Papers, 74 23-34.
Turton M, Matthes M, Haering R, Tuckey K, 2001. Epacris hamiltonii Recovery Plan., Hurstville, New South Wales, Australia: NPWS. http://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/PDFs/approved_epacris.pdf
USDA-NRCS, 2002. The PLANTS Database. Greensboro, North Carolina, USA: National Plant Data Team. https://plants.sc.egov.usda.gov
Zalba SM, Villamil CB, 2002. Woody plant invasion in relictual grasslands. In: Biological Invasion, 4 55-72.
Distribution Maps
Top of pageSelect a dataset
Map Legends
-
CABI Summary Records
Map Filters
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/