Fallopia convolvulus (black bindweed)
Index
- Pictures
- Identity
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Description
- Plant Type
- Distribution
- Distribution Table
- Habitat
- Habitat List
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
- Biology and Ecology
- Climate
- Soil Tolerances
- Natural enemies
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Causes
- Pathway Vectors
- Impact Summary
- Impact
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Uses
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- References
- Links to Websites
- Contributors
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate reportIdentity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Fallopia convolvulus (L.) Á. Löve
Preferred Common Name
- black bindweed
Other Scientific Names
- Bilderdykia convolvulus (L.) Dumort.
- Fagopyrum convolvulus (L.) H. Gross
- Fagopyrum volubile Gilib.
- Fallopia convolvulus var. subalatum (Lej. & Court.) D.H.Kent
- Helxine convolvulus (L.) Raf.
- Polygonum convolvulus L.
- Reynoutria convolvulus (L.) Shinners
- Tiniaria convolvulus L. Webb. & Moq.
International Common Names
- English: bear-bind; bind-corn; climbing bindweed; climbing buckwheat; wild buckwheat
- Spanish: chilillo; corregüela anual; poligono trepador
- French: faux liseron; renouée liseron; vrillée sauvage
- Portuguese: cipo de veado de inverno; corriola-bastarda
Local Common Names
- Argentina: enredadera
- Brazil: cipo-de-veado-de-inverno
- Chile: enredadera
- Denmark: snerle-pileurt
- Finland: kiertotatar
- Germany: Gemeiner Winden-Knöterich; Winden-Knöterich
- Iran: pichak band
- Italy: convolvolo nero; erba leprina; poligono convolvolo
- Japan: sobakazura
- Morocco: faux liseron
- Netherlands: wilde boekweit; zwaluwtong
- New Zealand: cornbind
- Norway: vindelskjedekne
- Sweden: aakerbinda
- Turkey: sarmasik coban
EPPO code
- POLCO (Polygonum convolvulus)
Summary of Invasiveness
Top of pageF. convolvulus is a weedy species of gardens, cultivated fields, open habitats, orchards, non-crop areas, waste areas, and disturbed sites. It is well-adapted to a wide range of climatic conditions and soils. This species is a prolific seed producer and has the potential to produce up to 30,000 seeds/plant. Seeds can be dispersed by farm machinery, and water. It is also a common contaminant of wheat and other cereal crops.
F. convolvulus is often a serious weed in cereals, vegetables and horticultural crops (FAO, 2015). Currently, it is listed as invasive in the Dominican Republic, Cuba, Australia, New Caledonia, and New Zealand (Webb et al., 1988; MacKee, 1994; Wilson, 2008; Acevedo-Rodriguez and Strong, 2012), but it is also ranked as a serious weed in 20 crops in more than 41 countries around the world (Holm et al., 1991).
Taxonomic Tree
Top of page- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Plantae
- Phylum: Spermatophyta
- Subphylum: Angiospermae
- Class: Dicotyledonae
- Order: Polygonales
- Family: Polygonaceae
- Genus: Fallopia
- Species: Fallopia convolvulus
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Top of pagePolygonaceae is a well-defined family of flowering plants including around 59 genera and 1580 species (the Plant List, 2013). Members of the Polygonaceae are very diverse in habit ranging from annual and perennial herbs to shrubs, lianas and trees. The most distinctive feature of the family is the presence of an “ocrea”, a membranous or hyaline sheath uniting the stipules (Maharajan and Rajendran, 2014). The genus Polygonum sensu lato was circumscribed by Linnaeus very broadly, causing further authors to divide it into several more naturally circumscribed genera (Holub, 1970). The genus Fallopia is often included in a broader concept of Polygonum but is distinguished by a syndrome of anatomical and morphological characters (Decraene et al., 2000). Molecular data confirm its close relationship to Polygonum in the narrow sense (Lamb Frye and Kron, 2003; Freeman and Hinds, 2005).
Description
Top of pageF. convolvulus is an annual or perennial climbing herb with a thin, spindle-formed and deep root, which is often profusely branched. The stem is slender, 5-250 cm long, with long internodes. It is freely branched from the base, smooth to slightly rough, greenish, sometimes with a reddish tinge, trailing on the ground or twining around other plants. The leaves are alternate, 2-6 cm long, long-petioled, elongate-ovate, pointed, heart- or arrow-shaped. The stipule sheath or ochrea with smooth margins. Flowers are small, inconspicuous, up to 5 mm in diameter, and grouped in short axillary clusters of 2 to 6 flowers or in terminal interrupted or spike-like racemes. The perianth is reddish green, white inside and along the margins; the short pedicels are articulate near the upper end. The fruit is a triangular achene, 3-4 mm long, with an obtuse base and pointed top, minutely pitted, brownish black, dull, after maturity enclosed by the somewhat enlarged outer perigon leaves (Korsmo, 1954; Holm et al., 1991; Conert et al., 1981).
The seedlings have long cotyledons, 7-33 mm in length. They are four times longer than wide, with obtuse points. The upper leaf surface is dull dark green; the lower leaf surface is light green, with a distinct central nerve. The expanded cotyledons generally assume a 120° angle, rather than being opposite, at the point of which the primary leaf appears. At the beginning, the primary leaf is often laterally rolled up, with a blueish or reddish green tinge (Schwär et al., 1970; Hume et al., 1983).
Distribution
Top of pageF. convolvulus is native to Eurasia, although due to its plasticity it occurs in most regions of the world. In Europe and North America it grows everywhere that crops are cultivated, but is less frequent in the south (Franzini, 1982). In Canada, it is reported as one of the most abundant weeds, occurring in 60-80% of all fields in the provinces of Alberta, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Prince Edward Island (Hume et al., 1983). It is found throughout South America. In Africa it occurs in North Africa, on the east coast and in South Africa. In Asia, its geographical distribution ranges from Japan to Iran, down to India and into Indonesia. F. convolvulus can also be found in Australia and New Zealand. It is not common in the humid tropics, and in warm areas, it is more often found at high altitudes or in cooler valleys (Holm et al., 1991).
Distribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
Last updated: 17 Feb 2021Continent/Country/Region | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | Reference | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Africa |
|||||||
Algeria | Present | Native | |||||
Egypt | Present | Native | |||||
Ghana | Present | ||||||
Kenya | Present | ||||||
Lesotho | Present | Introduced | |||||
Libya | Present | Native | |||||
Morocco | Present | ||||||
South Africa | Present | ||||||
Tanzania | Present | ||||||
Tunisia | Present | ||||||
Asia |
|||||||
Afghanistan | Present | Native | |||||
Armenia | Present | Native | |||||
Azerbaijan | Present | Native | |||||
Bhutan | Present | Native | |||||
China | Present | ||||||
-Anhui | Present | Native | |||||
-Gansu | Present | Native | |||||
-Guizhou | Present | Native | |||||
-Hebei | Present | Native | |||||
-Heilongjiang | Present | ||||||
-Hubei | Present | Native | |||||
-Inner Mongolia | Present | Native | |||||
-Jiangsu | Present | Native | |||||
-Jilin | Present | Native | |||||
-Liaoning | Present | Native | |||||
-Ningxia | Present | Native | |||||
-Qinghai | Present | Native | |||||
-Shaanxi | Present | Native | |||||
-Shandong | Present | Native | |||||
-Shanxi | Present | Native | |||||
-Sichuan | Present | Native | |||||
-Tibet | Present | Native | |||||
-Xinjiang | Present | Native | |||||
-Yunnan | Present | Native | |||||
Georgia | Present | Native | |||||
India | Present | ||||||
Iran | Present | ||||||
Israel | Present | Native | |||||
Japan | Present | ||||||
Jordan | Present | Native | |||||
Kazakhstan | Present | Native | |||||
Kyrgyzstan | Present | Native | |||||
Lebanon | Present | Native | |||||
Mongolia | Present | ||||||
Nepal | Present | Native | |||||
North Korea | Present | Native | |||||
Pakistan | Present | Native | |||||
Philippines | Present | ||||||
South Korea | Present | ||||||
Syria | Present | Native | |||||
Taiwan | Present | Native | |||||
Tajikistan | Present | Native | |||||
Turkey | Present | ||||||
Uzbekistan | Present | Native | |||||
Europe |
|||||||
Albania | Present | ||||||
Austria | Present | ||||||
Belarus | Present | ||||||
Belgium | Present | ||||||
Bosnia and Herzegovina | Present | ||||||
Bulgaria | Present | ||||||
Croatia | Present | ||||||
Cyprus | Present | Native | |||||
Czechia | Present | Introduced | Naturalized | Naturalized | |||
Czechoslovakia | Present | ||||||
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia | Present | ||||||
Denmark | Present | ||||||
Faroe Islands | Present | Introduced | |||||
Finland | Present | ||||||
France | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Germany | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Greece | Present | ||||||
Hungary | Present | ||||||
Iceland | Present | ||||||
Ireland | Present | ||||||
Italy | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Latvia | Present | ||||||
Lithuania | Present | ||||||
Malta | Present | ||||||
Moldova | Present | ||||||
Montenegro | Present | ||||||
Netherlands | Present | ||||||
North Macedonia | Present | ||||||
Norway | Present | ||||||
Poland | Present | ||||||
Portugal | Present | ||||||
-Azores | Present | Introduced | |||||
Romania | Present | ||||||
Russia | Present | ||||||
-Russian Far East | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Western Siberia | Present | ||||||
Serbia | Present | ||||||
Slovakia | Present | ||||||
Slovenia | Present | ||||||
Spain | Present | ||||||
-Balearic Islands | Present | ||||||
Sweden | Present | ||||||
Switzerland | Present | ||||||
Ukraine | Present | ||||||
United Kingdom | Present | ||||||
-Channel Islands | Present | Introduced | |||||
North America |
|||||||
Canada | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Alberta | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-British Columbia | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Manitoba | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-New Brunswick | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Newfoundland and Labrador | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Nova Scotia | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Ontario | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Prince Edward Island | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Quebec | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Saskatchewan | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Cuba | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Dominican Republic | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Greenland | Present | Introduced | |||||
Haiti | Present | Introduced | |||||
Saint Pierre and Miquelon | Present | Introduced | |||||
United States | Present | ||||||
-Alabama | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Alaska | Present | ||||||
-Arizona | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Arkansas | Present | Introduced | |||||
-California | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Colorado | Present | ||||||
-Connecticut | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Delaware | Present | Introduced | |||||
-District of Columbia | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Florida | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Georgia | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Hawaii | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Idaho | Present | ||||||
-Illinois | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Indiana | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Iowa | Present | ||||||
-Kansas | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Kentucky | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Louisiana | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Maine | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Maryland | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Massachusetts | Present | ||||||
-Michigan | Present | ||||||
-Minnesota | Present | ||||||
-Mississippi | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Missouri | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Montana | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Nebraska | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Nevada | Present | Introduced | |||||
-New Hampshire | Present | Introduced | |||||
-New Jersey | Present | Introduced | |||||
-New Mexico | Present | Introduced | |||||
-New York | Present | Introduced | |||||
-North Carolina | Present | Introduced | |||||
-North Dakota | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Ohio | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Oklahoma | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Oregon | Present | ||||||
-Pennsylvania | Present | ||||||
-Rhode Island | Present | Introduced | |||||
-South Carolina | Present | Introduced | |||||
-South Dakota | Present, Widespread | ||||||
-Tennessee | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Texas | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Utah | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Vermont | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Virginia | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Washington | Present | ||||||
-West Virginia | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Wisconsin | Present | ||||||
-Wyoming | Present | ||||||
Oceania |
|||||||
Australia | Present | ||||||
-New South Wales | Present | ||||||
-Queensland | Present | ||||||
-South Australia | Present | ||||||
-Tasmania | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Victoria | Present | ||||||
-Western Australia | Present | ||||||
New Caledonia | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
New Zealand | Present | ||||||
Norfolk Island | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
South America |
|||||||
Argentina | Present, Widespread | ||||||
Brazil | Present | ||||||
-Minas Gerais | Present | Introduced | Naturalized | Naturalized | |||
-Parana | Present | Introduced | Naturalized | Naturalized | |||
-Rio de Janeiro | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Rio Grande do Sul | Present | ||||||
-Santa Catarina | Present | Introduced | Naturalized | Naturalized | |||
-Sao Paulo | Present | Introduced | Naturalized | Naturalized | |||
Chile | Present | ||||||
Paraguay | Present | Introduced | |||||
Peru | Present |
Habitat
Top of pageF. convolvulus is most common on arable land, but it can also be found on waste ground, in thickets, on roadsides, along fences, and occasionally in pastures and on river banks (Hume et al., 1993). Because of its deep root system, it is rather unaffected by drought or low nitrogen levels. Nevertheless, high nutrient levels promote the growth and abundance of F. convolvulus (Bazdyrev et al., 1984; Mahn, 1984; Pulcher-Häussling and Hurle, 1986; Borowiec and Kutyna, 1988; Bräutigam, 1995). According to Karczmarczyk et al. (1983), who investigated the influence of irrigation on potato, sugar-beet and the weeds associated with these crops, F. convolvulus predominates on non-irrigated field plots. Haas and Streibig (1982) and Haman and Peeper (1983) reported that growth of F. convolvulus is stimulated by shading.
While in northern areas it is found in warm and well-drained locations, in hotter countries it is present on moist shady sites and at high altitudes. In China, F. convolvulus is found in thickets in valleys and along stream banks, at 100-3600 m (Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2015). In Pakistan, as well as being a weed on cultivated land, it is recorded in crevices in moist, shady places and at 1500-3500 m altitude (Flora of Pakistan Editorial Committee, 2013).
Habitat List
Top of pageCategory | Sub-Category | Habitat | Presence | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Terrestrial | ||||
Terrestrial | Managed | Cultivated / agricultural land | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Cultivated / agricultural land | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Managed | Managed forests, plantations and orchards | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Managed forests, plantations and orchards | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Managed | Managed grasslands (grazing systems) | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Managed grasslands (grazing systems) | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Managed | Disturbed areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Disturbed areas | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Managed | Rail / roadsides | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Rail / roadsides | Present, no further details | Natural |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Natural grasslands | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Natural grasslands | Present, no further details | Natural |
Hosts/Species Affected
Top of pageA list of crops in which F. convolvulus is, or could be, a problem weed includes almost every crop of the temperate zone. Worldwide, F. convolvulus is most troublesome in cereals, but it may also cause yield losses in potatoes, sugarbeet and vegetables, as well as vineyards and orchards. According to Holm et al. (1991), it is a weed of 25 crops in 41 countries and in 20 crops of these countries it is ranked as a serious weed.
Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
Top of pagePlant name | Family | Context | References |
---|---|---|---|
Allium cepa (onion) | Liliaceae | Other | |
Asparagus officinalis (asparagus) | Liliaceae | Other | |
Avena sativa (oats) | Poaceae | Main | |
Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera (sugarbeet) | Chenopodiaceae | Main | |
Brassica spp. | Brassicaceae | Main | |
Daucus carota (carrot) | Apiaceae | Other | |
Glycine max (soyabean) | Fabaceae | Main | |
Gossypium (cotton) | Malvaceae | Other | |
Helianthus annuus (sunflower) | Asteraceae | Other | |
Hordeum vulgare (barley) | Poaceae | Main | |
Linum usitatissimum (flax) | Main | ||
Medicago spp. | Fabaceae | Other | |
Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean) | Fabaceae | Other | |
Pisum sativum (pea) | Fabaceae | Other | |
Secale cereale (rye) | Poaceae | Main | |
Solanum tuberosum (potato) | Solanaceae | Main | |
Spinacia oleracea (spinach) | Chenopodiaceae | Other | |
Triticum aestivum (wheat) | Poaceae | Main | |
Zea mays (maize) | Poaceae | Main |
Biology and Ecology
Top of pageGenetics
F. convolvulus is polyploid and has a chromosome count of 2n = 40 (Mulligan, 1957, 1960; Clapham et al., 1962).
Reproductive Biology
Flowers of F. convolvulus are bisexual and self-compatible (Mulligan and Findlay, 1970). Each flower produces a single achene. In Asia, this species has been recorded flowering from July to September (FAO, 2015). In Europe, flowering plants can be found throughout the summer till mid-autumn (Hanf, 1982). As a result of the indeterminate flowering habit of F. convolvulus, flowers, immature seed and mature seed may be found at the same time on a single plant.
Longevity
F. convolvulus is a fast-growing herb that behaves as annual and perennial herb. It has a large, fibrous root system which may reach down as far as 80 cm in the soil (Kutschera, 1960), enabling it to evade dry conditions.
Physiology and Phenology
According to Hanf (1982), a single plant of F. convolvulus produces 100 to 1000 seeds. Grown without competition, Stevens (1932) reported fecundity of 11,900 seeds per plant, and Forsberg and Best (1964) obtained up to 30,000 seeds from plants that emerged early in the growing season. The seeds possess a deep primary dormancy for several months when mature (Zwerger, 1987, 1993) due mostly to the hard pericarp, which limits gas and water exchange, and acts as a barrier to germination (Ransom, 1935; Timson, 1966). Under field conditions, most seeds germinate in their first year (Chepil, 1946), but they may remain viable in the soil for several years (Holm et al., 1991). Chippendale and Milton (1934) found viable seeds of F. convolvulus after approximately 22 years in the soil under pasture.
Seedlings emerge throughout the growing season. They normally germinate at depths in the soil between 6 and 51 mm, although research has shown that seeds buried as deep as 19 cm can germinate (Forsberg and Best 1964). Light is not required for germination. Seeds germinate at temperatures between 2°C and 30°C, with maximum germination rates occurring between 5°C and 15°C.
Environmental Requirements
F. convolvulus occurs on a wide range of soil types (Hume et al., 1983), but according to Paatela and Erviö (1971) it is less common on peaty soils. In field observations in Finland, F. convolvulus was more abundant in clay than in coarse mineral or organic soil (Erviö et al., 1994). Higher rates of F. convolvulus emergence are recorded on soils with a high clay content. In field experiments in Poland, F. convolvulus predominated on plots fertilized with nitrogen plus calcium (Borowiec et al., 1995). However, Zwerger (1990) could only find a positive effect of nitrogen fertilization on seed production at low densities of this weed.
At higher weed densities, the effect of intraspecific competition became more important than nitrogen supply. Sirbu and Slonovschi (1989) found that nutrient reserves of F. convolvulus seeds increased with increasing phosphate fertilization. In a study concerning the distribution of several common weeds in Denmark, decreasing potassium content in the soil appeared to favour the occurrence of F. convolvulus (Andreasen and Streibig, 1990; Andreasen et al., 1991). According to Hanf (1982), it is one of the most frequent weeds on soils with a low pH.
Shade usually suppresses the growth of black bindweed (Haman and Peeper 1983), but in hotter countries it can be found in moist shady places and crevices (Flora of Pakistan Editorial Committee, 2013).
Climate
Top of pageClimate | Status | Description | Remark |
---|---|---|---|
Af - Tropical rainforest climate | Tolerated | > 60mm precipitation per month | |
Am - Tropical monsoon climate | Tolerated | Tropical monsoon climate ( < 60mm precipitation driest month but > (100 - [total annual precipitation(mm}/25])) | |
As - Tropical savanna climate with dry summer | Tolerated | < 60mm precipitation driest month (in summer) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25]) | |
Aw - Tropical wet and dry savanna climate | Tolerated | < 60mm precipitation driest month (in winter) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25]) | |
Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all year | Tolerated | Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all year | |
Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summer | Tolerated | Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summers | |
Cw - Warm temperate climate with dry winter | Tolerated | Warm temperate climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry winters) | |
Df - Continental climate, wet all year | Preferred | Continental climate, wet all year (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, wet all year) | |
Ds - Continental climate with dry summer | Preferred | Continental climate with dry summer (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, dry summers) | |
Dw - Continental climate with dry winter | Preferred | Continental climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, dry winters) |
Natural enemies
Top of pageNatural enemy | Type | Life stages | Specificity | References | Biological control in | Biological control on |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coleophora peribenanderi | Herbivore | Leaves | ||||
Coleophora therinella | Herbivore | Leaves | ||||
Gastrophysa polygoni | Herbivore | Leaves | ||||
Pegomya setaria | Herbivore | Leaves | ||||
Peronospora polygoni | Pathogen | Leaves | ||||
Puccinia polygoni-amphibii | Pathogen | Leaves |
Notes on Natural Enemies
Top of page
Insects that have been cited as using F. convolvulus as a host are Gastrophysa polygoni (Forsberg, 1955; Kjaer and Elmegaard, 1996), Coleophora therinella and C. peribenanderi (van der Wolf, 1992). F. convolvulus may serve as a habitat for a number of viruses, insects (Mamestra (Noctuidae) and Pegomyia (Anthomyiidae)), nematodes (species of Heterodera and Meloidogyne) and fungi (species of Ustilago, Puccinia and Peronospora). A review of arthropod natural enemies in Canada and Europe was presented by Hume (1983).
In a study on the internal and surface-dwelling pathogenic fungi of seeds of the 30 most widespread weed species in Lithuania, Grigaliunaite and Kacergius (1995) found that F. convolvulus seeds were the least damaged of all weeds investigated.
Means of Movement and Dispersal
Top of pageF. convolvulus spreads by seeds and may produce 11,900-30,000 seeds/plant (Stevens, 1932; Forsberg and Best, 1964). The hard seed coat allows seeds to remain dormant for several years (Chippendale and Milton, 1934, Roberts and Feast, 1973, Conn and Deck, 1995). Seeds can be dispersed by farm machinery and water over short distances. It is also a common contaminant of wheat and other cereal crops (Gooch, 1963, Rutledge and McLendon, 1996).
Pathway Causes
Top of pageCause | Notes | Long Distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crop production | Contaminant in cereals crops | Yes | Yes | Rutledge and McLendon, 1996 |
Pathway Vectors
Top of pageVector | Notes | Long Distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Debris and waste associated with human activities | Yes | Yes | Rutledge and McLendon, 1996 | |
Water | Seed | Yes | Rutledge and McLendon, 1996 | |
Wind | Yes | Rutledge and McLendon, 1996 |
Impact Summary
Top of pageCategory | Impact |
---|---|
Economic/livelihood | Positive and negative |
Environment (generally) | Positive and negative |
Impact
Top of pageF. convolvulus can reduce crop yields by competition, especially in highly infested fields (Friesen and Shebeski, 1960; Nakoneshny and Friesen, 1961; Dosland and Arnold, 1966; Fabricius and Nalewaja, 1968). Friesen and Shebeski (1960) showed that 56 and 210 plants per m² can reduce wheat yields by 15 and 25%, respectively. Crop seed weight and protein contents can also be negatively affected (Nakoneshny and Friesen, 1961; Gruenhagen and Nalewaja, 1969).
By climbing up the crop, F. convolvulus causes lodging in grain crops (Neururer, 1961; Hume et al., 1983), and can cause harvesting problems when its vines wrap around moving parts of machinery (Forsberg and Best, 1964; Fabricius and Nalewaja, 1968).
In addition, high weed densities can raise the moisture content of harvested grain (Neururer, 1961) and contribute to heating in storage when harvested with cereals as a seed contaminant (Holm et al., 1991). F. convolvulus produces large amounts of seed and they are often difficult to separate from grain crops, because of their similar size. Therefore, F. convolvulus is a serious contaminant of seed stocks in several places in the world (Gooch, 1963; Bogdan, 1965).
The general importance of this weed is due to its ability to emerge throughout the growing season. Forsberg and Best (1964) showed that late-emerging seedlings are likely to escape herbicide spraying and could be a potential source of re-infestations, especially where competition from other weeds has been eliminated.
Furthermore, F. convolvulus may serve as an alternate host for disease organisms affecting crops (Cooper and Harrison, 1973; Bendixen et al., 1979).
According to Holm et al. (1991), F. convolvulus is ranked as a principal or serious weed in 20 crops of 41 countries. It is one of the most important weeds of cereals in Argentina, Canada, Kenya, South Africa and the USA; maize in the former Soviet Union; and sugarbeet in Spain. It is a principal weed of cereals in Argentina, Australia, Canada, UK, Finland, New Zealand, Tanzania, and the USA; maize in Italy; flax in Australia, Brazil, Canada, and the USA; potatoes in Chile; sugarbeet in former Czechoslovakia, UK and Germany; beans in England; vegetables in Argentina, Bulgaria, Chile, UK and New Zealand; peas in Bulgaria and New Zealand; onions in Argentina and UK; and sorghum in Italy.
Risk and Impact Factors
Top of page- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Has a broad native range
- Abundant in its native range
- Highly adaptable to different environments
- Is a habitat generalist
- Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
- Pioneering in disturbed areas
- Tolerant of shade
- Highly mobile locally
- Benefits from human association (i.e. it is a human commensal)
- Fast growing
- Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
- Damaged ecosystem services
- Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
- Modification of successional patterns
- Monoculture formation
- Negatively impacts agriculture
- Threat to/ loss of native species
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Competition - smothering
- Pest and disease transmission
- Rapid growth
- Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
- Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant
- Difficult to identify/detect in the field
- Difficult/costly to control
Uses
Top of pageTkachuk and Mellish (1977) stated that although being comparatively low in protein, oil and fibre content, seeds of F. convolvulus may be promising as a nutritious food or feed, because its amino acid composition is similar to that of cultivated buckwheat. The high lysine content of the seeds makes them a reasonable supplement to feeds otherwise consisting largely of cereals.
The seeds are supposed to have been used as food or feed in neolithic to medieval times (Eggers, 1979; Willerding, 1981; Hanf, 1990), but are too small and low-yielding to be grown commercially today. According to Boatman (1987), F. convolvulus is a host plant for insects eaten by gamebird chicks in the UK, for example, the grey partridge (Perdix perdix).
Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
Top of page
Prior to flowering, F. convolvulus may be mistaken for Convolvulus arvensis, as both have twining greenish stems and leaves of similar shape. In contrast to F. convolvulus, C. arvensis is a deep-rooted perennial with extensive creeping white roots and rhizomes, blunt-tipped leaves and large funnel-shaped pink or white flowers. It has no ochrea or sheathing stipules as in F. convolvulus.
Two further Fallopia species which could be confused with F. convolvulus in Canada (Hume et al. (1983): Fallopia cilinode and F. scandens. Both are perennials. Fallopia cilinode has bristles at the base of the sheath, leaves with narrower spacing between the basal lobes and achenes that are shiny and smooth. The flowers of F. scandens are long-stalked. It has a strong, winged calyx and smooth, shiny achenes.
F. convolvulus is also closely related to Fallopia dumetorum and F. dentate-alata, but in both these species the pedicel is much longer (up to 10 mm long) and articulated above the middle (Flora of Pakistan Editorial Committee, 2013).
Prevention and Control
Top of pageDue to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Cultural Control
According to Holm et al. (1991), tillage implements and rotations have only limited success in controlling F. convolvulus because of its large seedbank, the ability of seeds to emerge from great depth, the persistent emergence of new seedlings throughout the growing season and the large quantities of seeds produced by the plants.
Nevertheless, there are several methods suggested which could be used to reduce possible yield losses caused by this weed. Koch (1964) observed a stimulation in emergence of F. convolvulus by harrowing, which could be taken advantage of in the control of this weed in cereal cultivation. Gruenhagen and Nalewaja (1969) and Messersmith and Nalewaja (1969) stated that higher seeding rates of the crop result in a reduction of relative yield losses through competition of F. convolvulus in wheat or flax. Moreover, Smith (1980) found out that a significant reduction of F. convolvulus could be attained by discing after barley harvest.
Different results have been published regarding the effects of tillage techniques as a means for weed control. Thompson et al. (1984) and Dessaint et al. (1993) concluded that no-tillage cultivation or reduced tillage resulted in increasing densities of F. convolvulus in comparison to conventional tillage, whereas Hoffman-Kakol et al. (1982) observed a reduction in the relative abundance of F. convolvulus in directly drilled maize after rye. Nielsen and Pinnerup (1982) also reported a decline in F. convolvulus populations caused by reduced cultivation in spring barley.
Although effective for the control of other weeds, harrowing in the dark showed no significant influence on emergence of F. convolvulus seedlings in comparison to daylight harrowing in Swedish field trials (Ascard, 1992).
According to Rajczyova (1978), monocultures of winter wheat and spring barley lead to an increase in F. convolvulus incidence.
Biological Control
Adkins and Sowerby (1996) revealed that the weed Parthenium hysterophorus has allelopathic potential against P. covolvulus. They used leachate from the leaves of P. hysterophorus to depress germination and seedling growth of F. convolvulus and several other weeds.
In a search for potential biological control agents for weeds, species of Botrytis were isolated from seedlings of F. convolvulus infected with pathogenic fungi in Canada (Mortensen and Molloy, 1993). In Argentina, the fungus Puccinia polygoni-amphibii was found to cause sufficient damage to warrant investigation as a biocontrol agent against F. convolvulus (Dal-Bello and Carranza, 1995).
Chemical Control
A considerable number of selective herbicides sprayed alone, in mixtures either pre- or post-emergence have been used to control F. convolvulus: aclonifen, atrazine, aziprotryne, benfluralin, benazolin, bentazone, bifenox, bromoxynil, chloramben, chlorbromuron, chloridazon, chlorsulfuron, chlorthal-dimethyl, clopyralid, cyanazine, cycloate, 2,4-D, desmedipham, dicamba, dichlorprop, dinitramine, diphenamid, ethalfluralin, ethofumesate, fluorochloridone, fluroxypyr, glufosinate-ammonium, haloxyfop, ioxynil, isopropalin, linuron, lenacil, MCPA, MCPB, mecoprop, metamitron, metolachlor, metobromuron, metsulfuron, metribuzin, napropamide, oryzalin, oxadiazon, oxyfluorfen, pendimethalin, phenmedipham, picloram, prometryn, propachlor, propyzamide, pyridate, sethoxydim, thifensulfuron, triasulfuron, tribenuron, trifluralin and triflusulfuron (Haas and Streibig 1982; Anderson et al., 1996; Fain, 1986; Nohl-Weiler and Hindersmann, 1986; Pimpini et al., 1986; Shalna and Melamed, 1986; Drazic et al., 1987; Kapros et al., 1988; Prochazka et al., 1988; Klingaman and Peeper, 1989; Milusher et al., 1989; Rapparini et al., 1989; Arends and Pegg, 1990; Lalova and Bogdanovske, 1990; Labza et al., 1990; Drazic and Glusac, 1991; Sysmans et al., 1991; Muller, 1992; Gvozdenovic-Varga et al., 1992; Meinlschmidt and Karch, 1992; Hallgren, 1993; Mitchell and Abernethy, 1993; Andersson, 1994; Rapparini, 1995, 1996; Bouma et al., 1996; Fields et al., 1996; Campagna and Rapparini, 1997; Toth and Peter, 1997).
Herbicide resistence has been reported for the following active ingredients: chlorsulfuron in Australia (Adkins et al., 1997); 2,4-D in Lithuania, Hungary and China (Aleksinas, 1984; Nemeth, 1985; Tu, 1989), 2,4-TB in Czechoslovakia (Bojas, 1987); MCPA in the former USSR and Hungary (Ryzhaya et al. 1984; Nemeth, 1985); metolachlor in the former USSR (Zuza, 1983; Veselovskii and Saulyak, 1984); metribuzin in Poland (Sawicka and Skalski, 1996); quinmerac in the UK (Boatman, 1991); simazine (Stryckers and van Himme, 1974); terbacil in Hungary (Nagy et al., 1978); and triazines in Czechoslovakia, Germany and the Netherlands (Valkova, 1975; Kees, 1988; van Oorschot, 1989).
Skorobogatova and Mirchinik (1985) revealed that the microbial metabolite citrin applied in wheat fields could decrease F. convolvulus incidence markedly, with negligible effects on wheat growth and yield. Gleason and Case (1986) showed that the algicide cyanobacterin inhibited the growth of F. convolvulus when sprayed onto the leaves of 1- to 2-week-old plants. Bryan et al. (1995) reported that a monic acid derivative of pseudomonic acid (derived from compounds produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens) was active against a range of broadleaved weeds, including F. convolvulus, in field trials performed in Canada. Barley was not affected by the monic acid derivative, although unacceptable damage to wheat did occur.
References
Top of pageAcevedo-Rodríguez P; Strong MT, 2012. Catalogue of the Seed Plants of the West Indies. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, 98:1192 pp. Washington DC, USA: Smithsonian Institution. http://botany.si.edu/Antilles/WestIndies/catalog.htm
Adkins SW; Wills D; Boersma M; Walker SR; Robinson G; McLeod RJ; Einan JP, 1997. Weed resistance to chlorsulfuron and atrazine from the north-east grain region of Australia. Weed Research, 37(5):343-349.
Andreasen C; Streibig JC; Haas H, 1991. Soil properties affecting the distribution of 37 weed species in Danish fields. Weed Research, 31:181-187.
Banaras M, 1993. Impact of weed competition on potato production. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 14 (1):64-71.
Bogdan AV, 1965. Weeds in Kenya wheat. Weed Research, 5:351-352.
Brendler F, 1995. Specific and effective weed control. Kartoffelbau, 46(4):172-173.
Chancellor RJ, 1964. The depth of weed seed germination in the field. Proceedings of the 7th British Weed Control Conference, 2:607-613.
Chippendale HG; Milton WEJ, 1934. On the viable seeds present in the soil beneath pastures. Journal of Ecology, 22:508-531.
Clapham AR; Tutin TG; Warburg EF, 1962. Flora of the British Isles. Second edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Conert HJ; Hamann U; Schulte-Motel W; Wagenitz G, 1981. Gustav Hegi: Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa Band III, Teil 1. Third edition. Berlin, Hamburg: Verlag Paul Parey.
Conners IL, 1967. An annotated index of plant diseases in Canada and fungi recorded on plants in Alaska, Canada and Greenland. Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Publ. 1251.
DAISIE, 2015. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe. European Invasive Alien Species Gateway. www.europe-aliens.org/default.do
Dochkova B, 1969. Vliyanie na khranitelnite rasteniga varkhu razvitieto i plodovitostta na grasinskata nastenka. Rastenievd Nauki, 6:127-134.
Dosland JG; Arnold JD, 1966. Leaf area development and dry matter production of wheat and wild buckwheat growing in competion. Abstracts of the Meetings of the Weed Science Society of America, 56.
Fabricius; LJ; Nalewaja; D, 1968. Competition between wheat and wild buckwheat. Weed Science, 16:204 208.
FAO, 2015. Polygonum convolvulus L. Online resources. http://www.fao.org/agriculture/crops/thematic-sitemap/theme/biodiversity/weeds/listweeds/pol-con/en/
Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2015. Flora of China. St. Louis, Missouri and Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden and Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2
Flora of Pakistan Editorial Committee, 2013. Flora of Pakistan, eFloras website. St. Louis, Missouri and Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden and Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=5
Forsberg DE, 1955. Gastrophysa polygoni L., a beetle that attacks wild buckwheat (Polygonum convolvulus). North Central Weed Control Conference, 12th Annual Report, 183.
Forsberg DE; Best KF, 1964. The emergence and plant development of wild buckwheat (Polygonum convolvulus L.). Canadial Journal of Plant Science, 44:100-103.
Freeman CC; Hinds HR, 2005. 29. Fallopia Adanson, Fam. Pl. 2: 277, 557. 1763, name conserved. In: Flora of North America North of Mexico. Volume 5. Magnoliphyta: Caryophyllidae, Part 2 [ed. by Flora of North America Editorial Committee]. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 541-546.
Friesen G; Shebeski LH, 1960. Economic losses caused by weed competition in Manitoba grain fields. I. Weed species, their relative abundance and their effect on crop yields. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 40:457-467.
Gaskin TA, 1958. Weed hosts of Meloidogyne incognita in Indiana. Plant Disease Reporter, 42:802-803.
Gooch S, 1963. The occurrence of weed seeds in samples tested by the Official Seed Testing Station 1960-1961. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany, 9(3):353-371.
Goodney T, 1947. On the stem eelworm, Anguillulina dipsaci, attacking oats, onions, field beans, parsnips, rhubarb and certain weeds. Journal of Helminthology, 22:1-12.
Grigaliunaite B; Kacergius A, 1995. The fungi of weed seeds. Ekologija, No. 3:50-56; 13 ref.
Gruenhagen; RD; Nalewaja; JD, 1969. Competition between flax and wild buckwheat. Weed Science, 17:380-384.
Haas H; Streibig JC, 1982. Changing patterns of weed distribution as a result of herbicide use and other agronomic factors. In: LeBaron HM, Gressel J, eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 57-79.
Hallgren E, 1996. Occurrence of broad-leaved weeds on different soils in different crops in Sweden. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research, 26(3):115-123.
Hanf M, 1982. AckerunkrSuter Europas mit ihren Keimlingen und Samen. Ludwigshafen, Germany: BASF Aktiengesellschaf.
Hanf M, 1990. Farbatlas Feldflora - Wildkraeuter und Unkraeuter. Stuttgart, Germany: Ulmer.
Hilbig W; Mahn EG, 1971. The mapping of arable weeds as a basis for the objective use of herbicides. SYS Reporter, 3:2-23.
Holub J, 1970. Fallopia Adans. 1763 instead of Bilderdykia Dum. 1827. Folia Geobotanica Phytotaxonomica, 6:171-177.
Kazantseva AS; Tuganaev VV, 1972. The species composition and distribution of weed seeds in soils of field plant communities in the Tatar ASSR. Biologicheskie Nauki, 15(11):72-74.
Koch W, 1964. UnkrautbekSmpfung durch Eggen, Hacken und Meißeln in Getreide. I. Wirkungsweise und Einsatzzeitpunkt von Egge, Hacke und Bodenmeißel. Zeitschrift für Acker und Pflanzenbau, 120:369-382.
Korsmo E, 1954. Anatomy of weeds. Oslo, Norway: Grohndal & Sons, 172-175.
Kudsk P; Mathiassen SK; Noye G, 1997. Phenmedipham og triallat i spinat til fro. SP-Rapport Statens Planteavlsforsog, 7:139-148.
Kutschera L, 1960. Wurzelatlas mitteleuropSischer AckerunkrSuter und Kulturpflanzen. Frankfurt, Germany: DLG-Verlag.
Lamb Frye AS; Kron KA, 2003. rbcL phylogeny and character evolution in Polygonaceae. Systematic Botany, 28(2):326-332.
Lauer E, 1953. Uber die Keimtemperatur von Ackerunkrautern und deren einfluss auf die zusammensetzung von Unkrautgesellschaften. Flora Oder Allgemeine Botanische Zeitung, 140:551-595.
Maharajan M; Rajendran A, 2014. Taxonomic studies on selected species of the genus Polygonum L. (Polygonaceae) in South India. Journal of Science, 4:144-148. http://www.journalofscience.net/File_Folder/144-148.pdf
Melo E, 2015. Polygonaceae in Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil (Polygonaceae in the list of species of the flora of Brazil). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/jabot/floradobrasil/FB196
Messersmith CG; Nalewaja JD, 1969. Competition between wheat and wild buckwheat. Meeting of the Weed Science Society of America, Abstract No. 15.
Milusher V; Balinova A; V"lkov G, 1989. Weed damage to seed potatoes. Rasteniev'dni Nauki, 26(6): 99-105.
Mitich LW, 1975. Picloram plus 2,4-D on small grains in North Dakota. Down to Earth, 31(1):23-25
Mulligan GA, 1957. Chromosome numbers of Canadian weeds. Canadian Journal of Botany, 35:779-789.
Mulligan GA, 1960. Polyploidy in Canadian weeds. Canadian Journal of Genetic Cytology, 2:150-161.
Mulligan GA; Findlay JN, 1970. Reproductive systems and colonization in Canadian weeds. Canadian Journal of Botany, 48(5):859-860.
Nakoneshny W; Friesen G, 1961. The influence of a commercial fertilizer treatment on weed competition in spring sown wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 41:231-238.
Nati D, 1994. Weed control in wheat. Terra e Sole, 49(625):426-428
Nemeth I, 1985. Weed flora of vineyards. Novenyvedelem, 21(6):252-257
Neururer H, 1961. UnkrSuter, die den MShdrusch stören. Der Pflanzenarzt, 14:61-63.
Nowicka B, 1994. Response of some winter wheat cultivars to herbicides. Ochrona Roslin, 38(5):18-20
Oostenbrink M, 1955. Nematologische waarnemingen. II. Aphelenchoides fragariae (Ritzema Bos, 1891) Christie, 1932 in Lilium regale Wils,. L. henryi Bak., L. sulphurgale Wallace en in de bollen van L. pumilum D.C. Verslagen en Mededelingen van de Plantenziektenkundige Dienst te Wageningen, 127:235-237.
Paatela J; Erviö L, 1971. Weed seeds in cultivated soils in Finland. Ann. Agric. Finnae, 10:144-152.
Pammel LH, 1913. The Weed Flora of Iowa. Des Moines, USA: Iowa Geological Society.
Petersen HI, 1960. Ukrudtsplanter og Ukrudtsbekæmpelse. K¢benhavn: Landhusholdningsselskabets Forlag.
Petunova AA, 1995. Controlling weeds resistant to 2,4-D in Russian cereal crops. Resistant Pest Management, 7(2):23.
Ransom ER, 1935. The interrelations of catalase, respiration, after-ripening, and germination in some dormant seeds of the Polygonaceae. American Journal of Botany, 22:815-825.
Rapparini G, 1995. Post-emergence treatment in sugarbeet. Informatore Agrario, 51(10):81-91
Rapparini G, 1996. Weed control in sunflower. Informatore Agrario, 52(6):99-107.
Rutledge CR; McLendon T, 1996. An Assessment of Exotic Plant Species of Rocky Mountain National Park., USA: Department of Rangeland Ecosystem Science, Colorado State University, 97 pp. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/plants/explant/index.htm
Sawicka B; Skalski J, 1996. Zachwaszczenie ziemniaka w warunkach stosowania herbicydu Sencor 70 WP cz. I. Skutecznosc chwastobojcza herbicydu. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych. Seria A, Produkcja Roslinna, 112(1/2):169-182.
SchwSr CH; Feyerabend G; Golz H, 1970. 100 wichtige AckerunkrSuter. Jena, Germany: Fischer.
Simmonds NW, 1946. Biological flora of the British Isles. Polygonum L. em. Gaertn. Journal of Ecology, 33:117-143.
Stevens OA, 1932. The number and weight of seeds produced by weeds. American Journal of Botany, 19:784-794.
Stevens OA, 1947. Studies on wild buckwheat. North Dakota Agriculture Experimental Station Bulletin, 346.
Stoimenova I; Taleva A; Mikova A, 1995. Herbicidal spectrum of some mixtures used in soybean growing. In: Proceedings, Soil Science and Strategy for Sustainable Agriculture Conference, Sofia, Bulgaria. Pochvoznanie, Agrokhimiya y Ekologyia, 30(1-6): 197-199.
Talasova N, 1987. Problems with weed control in lentils. Agrochemia, 27(3):79-82
The Plant List, 2013. The Plant List: a working list of all plant species. Version 1.1. London, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://www.theplantlist.org
Timson J, 1966. The germination of Polygonum convolvulus L. New Phytology, 65:423-428.
Toth E; Peter I, 1997. Weed control in sugarbeet with triflusulfuron-methyl based programmes: the Hungarian experience. Proceedings of the 49th international symposium on crop protection, Gent, Belgium, 6 May 1997, Part III. Mededelingen Faculteit Landbouwkundige en Toegepaste Biologische Wetenschappen, Universiteit-Gent, 1997, 62(3a): 791-798.
USDA-ARS, 1999. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx
USDA-ARS, 2015. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx
USDA-NRCS, 2015. The PLANTS Database. Baton Rouge, USA: National Plant Data Center. http://plants.usda.gov/
Wiesner K, 1962. Untersuchungen über den Wirtspflanzenkreis des Vergilbungsvirus der Beta-Rübe. (Corium betae Holmes). Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes, 16:45-53.
Willerding U, 1981. Ur- und frühgeschichtliche sowie mittelalterliche Unkrautfunde in Mitteleuropa. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, Sonderheft, 9:65-74.
Wilson KL, 2008. Fallopia convolvulus (L.) A.Löve. New South Wales Flora Online. http://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl?page=nswfl&lvl=sp&name=Fallopiãconvolvulus
Zuza VS, 1983. Effectiveness of herbicides applied to maize. Zashchita Rastenii, 1:27-28.
Zuza VS, 1986. On the joint action of herbicides. Agrokhimiya, No.4:79-85; 11 ref.
Zwerger P, 1987. Einfluß der Fruchtfolge, der Pflanzenbau- und Pflanzenschutz-IntensitSt auf die Populationsdynamik von UnkrSutern unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Windenknöterichs (Fallopia convolvulus (L.) A. Löve). Dissertation UniversitSt Hohenheim. Hohenheim, Germany: University of Hohenheim.
Zwerger P, 1993. Modellierung und Simulation der Populationsdynamik von annuellen UnkrSutern. Berichte aus dem Fachgebiet Herbologie der UniversitSt Hohenheim, 33.
Distribution References
CABI, Undated. Compendium record. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated a. CABI Compendium: Status as determined by CABI editor. Wallingford, UK: CABI
DAISIE, 2015. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe. http://www.europe-aliens.org/
Dosland JG, Arnold JD, 1966. Leaf area development and dry matter production of wheat and wild buckwheat growing in competion. In: Abstracts of the Meetings of the Weed Science Society of America, 56.
Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2015. Flora of China., St. Louis, Missouri; Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden and Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2
Melo E, 2015. Polygonaceae in the list of species of the flora of Brazil. (Polygonaceae in Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil)., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/jabot/floradobrasil/FB196
Mitich L W, 1975. Picloram plus 2,4-D on small grains in North Dakota. Down to Earth. 31 (1), 23-25.
Nati D, 1994. Weed control in wheat. (Il diserbo del frumento.). Terra e Sole. 49 (625), 426-428.
Petersen HI, 1960. (Ukrudtsplanter og Ukrudtsbekæmpelse)., København, Landhusholdningsselskabets Forlag.
Sawicka B, Skalski J, 1996. (Zachwaszczenie ziemniaka w warunkach stosowania herbicydu Sencor 70 WP cz. I. Skutecznosc chwastobojcza herbicydu. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych. Seria A). In: Produkcja Roslinna, 112 (1/2) 169-182.
Stoimenova I, Taleva A, Mikova A, 1995. Herbicidal spectrum of some mixtures used in soybean growing. [Proceedings, Soil Science and Strategy for Sustainable Agriculture Conference, Sofia, Bulgaria], 30 (1-6) Pochvoznanie, Agrokhimiya y Ekologyia. 197-199.
USDA-ARS, 2015. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysimple.aspx
USDA-NRCS, 2015. The PLANTS Database. Greensboro, North Carolina, USA: National Plant Data Team. https://plants.sc.egov.usda.gov
Wilson KL, 2008. Fallopia convolvulus (L.) A.Löve. In: New South Wales Flora Online, http://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl?page=nswfl&lvl=sp&name=Fallopiãconvolvulus
Zuza V S, 1986. On the joint action of herbicides. Agrokhimiya. 79-85.
Links to Websites
Top of pageWebsite | URL | Comment |
---|---|---|
GISD/IASPMR: Invasive Alien Species Pathway Management Resource and DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway | https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m93f6 | Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list. |
Global register of Introduced and Invasive species (GRIIS) | http://griis.org/ | Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list. |
Contributors
Top of page03/06/15 Updated by:
Julissa Rojas-Sandoval, Department of Botany-Smithsonian NMNH, Washington DC, USA
Distribution Maps
Top of pageSelect a dataset
Map Legends
-
CABI Summary Records
Map Filters
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/