Invasive Species Compendium

Detailed coverage of invasive species threatening livelihoods and the environment worldwide


Furcraea foetida
(Mauritius hemp)



Furcraea foetida (Mauritius hemp)


  • Last modified
  • 22 November 2018
  • Datasheet Type(s)
  • Invasive Species
  • Preferred Scientific Name
  • Furcraea foetida
  • Preferred Common Name
  • Mauritius hemp
  • Taxonomic Tree
  • Domain: Eukaryota
  •   Kingdom: Plantae
  •     Phylum: Spermatophyta
  •       Subphylum: Angiospermae
  •         Class: Monocotyledonae
  • Summary of Invasiveness
  • F. foetida is an evergreen perennial subshrub. From the 1690s to the 1920s, F. foetida was taken from its native Central America and spread worldwide for economic purposes (fibre). It is now also plant...

Don't need the entire report?

Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.

Generate report


Top of page
Furcraea foetida (Mauritius hemp); habit, with human for scale.  Maliko Gulch, Maui.  March 2013
CaptionFurcraea foetida (Mauritius hemp); habit, with human for scale. Maliko Gulch, Maui. March 2013
Copyright©Forest Starr & Kim Starr - CC BY 4.0
Furcraea foetida (Mauritius hemp); habit, with human for scale.  Maliko Gulch, Maui.  March 2013
HabitFurcraea foetida (Mauritius hemp); habit, with human for scale. Maliko Gulch, Maui. March 2013©Forest Starr & Kim Starr - CC BY 4.0
Furcraea foetida (Mauritius hemp); habit. Maliko Gulch, Maui.  March 2013
CaptionFurcraea foetida (Mauritius hemp); habit. Maliko Gulch, Maui. March 2013
Copyright©Forest Starr & Kim Starr - CC BY 4.0
Furcraea foetida (Mauritius hemp); habit. Maliko Gulch, Maui.  March 2013
HabitFurcraea foetida (Mauritius hemp); habit. Maliko Gulch, Maui. March 2013©Forest Starr & Kim Starr - CC BY 4.0
Furcraea foetida (Mauritius hemp)  Invasive, habit. Poelua West Maui, Maui.  July 2009
TitleInvasive, habit
CaptionFurcraea foetida (Mauritius hemp) Invasive, habit. Poelua West Maui, Maui. July 2009
Copyright©Forest Starr & Kim Starr - CC BY 4.0
Furcraea foetida (Mauritius hemp)  Invasive, habit. Poelua West Maui, Maui.  July 2009
Invasive, habitFurcraea foetida (Mauritius hemp) Invasive, habit. Poelua West Maui, Maui. July 2009©Forest Starr & Kim Starr - CC BY 4.0
Furcraea foetida (Mauritius hemp); habit in pasture. Keokea, Maui.  May 2009
TitleHabit in pasture
CaptionFurcraea foetida (Mauritius hemp); habit in pasture. Keokea, Maui. May 2009
Copyright©Forest Starr & Kim Starr - CC BY 4.0
Furcraea foetida (Mauritius hemp); habit in pasture. Keokea, Maui.  May 2009
Habit in pastureFurcraea foetida (Mauritius hemp); habit in pasture. Keokea, Maui. May 2009©Forest Starr & Kim Starr - CC BY 4.0


Top of page

Preferred Scientific Name

  • Furcraea foetida (L.) Haw.

Preferred Common Name

  • Mauritius hemp

Other Scientific Names

  • Agave commelyni Salm-Dyck
  • Agave foetida L.
  • Agave gigantea (Vent.) D.Dietr.
  • Agave madagascariensis (Haw.) Salm-Dyck
  • Aloe foetida (L.) Crantz
  • Fourcroya gigantea (Vent.) Hook
  • Funium piliferum Willemet
  • Furcraea atroviridis Jacobi & Goeff.
  • Furcraea barillettii Jacobi
  • Furcraea commelyni (Salm-Dyck) Kunth
  • Furcraea gigantea Vent.
  • Furcraea gigantea var. mediopicta Trel.
  • Furcraea madagascariensis Haw.
  • Furcraea viridis Hemsl.
  • Furcraea watsoniana Sander

International Common Names

  • English: cabuya; female karata; giant cabuya; green-aloe
  • Spanish: cáñamo de Mauritania; cocuisa; mayuey criollo; pita floja; pita gigante
  • French: aloès vert; chanvre de Maurice; choca vert; sisal de Maurice
  • Portuguese: cânhamo-da-mauritânia; furcroia; pita; piteira-amarela

Local Common Names

  • Comoros: agave; sisal
  • Cuba: henequén de Haiti
  • Germany: Mauritiushanf
  • India: gheequar; sisal; vilayati
  • Martinique: fausse salseparille
  • Sweden: mauritiushampa
  • Vietnam: agao to; thùa thoi

Summary of Invasiveness

Top of page

F. foetida is an evergreen perennial subshrub. From the 1690s to the 1920s, F. foetida was taken from its native Central America and spread worldwide for economic purposes (fibre). It is now also planted as an ornamental. It has established wild populations in many oceanic islands, and all continents in tropical to subtropical climates. F. foetida can establish dense impenetrable thickets (each plant can reach 3 metres across) on most well drained soils including rocks and sand. In the right conditions it can displace native vegetation. Due to its infrequent flowering, there is a lag-phase for establishment, but its reproduction by bulbils strongly promotes spread locally if it is not controlled.

Taxonomic Tree

Top of page
  • Domain: Eukaryota
  •     Kingdom: Plantae
  •         Phylum: Spermatophyta
  •             Subphylum: Angiospermae
  •                 Class: Monocotyledonae
  •                     Order: Liliales
  •                         Family: Asparagaceae
  •                             Genus: Furcraea
  •                                 Species: Furcraea foetida

Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature

Top of page

Most of the nomenclatural difficulties for Furcraea foetida seem to have been corrected before the 1920s. Furcraea gigantea and Agave gigantea are synonyms that have been used extensively in the literature, even recently. It is believed that much of the confusion about names up to 1915 is related to botanists observing the plant in different contexts, or without knowing the history of its human-mediated dispersal. This in turn has led to some confusion in determining the native range of F. foetida (see Distribution). For example, the common name (Mauritius hemp) and two synonyms (Agave madagascariensis and Furcraea madagascariensis) are presumably derived from its importance as a commodity in Madagascar and Mauritius, rather than being an indication of its native range.

F. foetida is also recorded as being in the Agavaceae family, and there are numerous Agave species that are similar. GRIN (2015) describes F. foetida in the family Asparagaceae (subfamily Agavoideae) as well as in the family Agavaceae.


Top of page

Following Wagner et al. (1999):

Leaves are bright green, rigid, straight or curved, up to 2-2.5 m long, 14-20 cm wide, with a few widely spaced marginal prickles, especially toward base; these are 4-10 mm long, apex with a short blunt spine. Flowers strongly fragrant, in inflorescences 6-12 m long, bulbils usually formed after flowering; sepals white to green-white or pale yellow-green, 2.5-3.3 cm long, outer ones 1-1.4 cm wide, inner ones 1.4-1.8 cm wide. Fruit an ellipsoid-trigonous capsule, loculicidally 3-valved, with numerous but rarely produced seeds. Seeds flat, black.

Other online descriptions of F. foetida are available from the Flora of North America (Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 2013), Vaughan (2011), Verhoek and Hess (2002) and Wagner et al. (1999).

Plant Type

Top of page Herbaceous
Vegetatively propagated


Top of page

This plant is native to Central America and most likely to the northern-most part of South America. The adoption of F. foetida as a fibre plant, an ornamental and a living fence, since as early as the 1600s (and perhaps even before by indigenous cultures) has caused it to be spread widely across all continents except Antarctica.

Its early spread probably led to it being described as native in the northern Caribbean Islands (e.g. Haiti, Cuba and Puerto Rico), Brazil and perhaps elsewhere in South America, where it is now regarded as introduced. Some or much of its distribution in Colombia and Venezuela may be largely attributable to human-mediated spread (Drummond, 1907). It may be native in the Antilles islands closest to South America, but this is unclear.

It can be confidently said that F. foetida is native in Central America, Colombia, the Guianas, and Suriname and most likely the islands closest to the coast of northern South America.  A checklist for Bolivia claims it is native there (Missouri Botanic Gardens, 2013), but it is most likely introduced there and in the rest of South America where it is known to occur.

Distribution Table

Top of page

The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.

Continent/Country/RegionDistributionLast ReportedOriginFirst ReportedInvasiveReferenceNotes


IndiaPresentPresent based on regional distribution.
-Andaman and Nicobar IslandsPresentIntroducedPandey and Diwakar, 2008
-KeralaPresentIntroduced Invasive Vikraman et al., 2008Garden escape
-West BengalLocalisedIntroducedDrummond and Prain, 1907Naturalized
IndonesiaPresentPresent based on regional distribution.
-SumatraPresentIntroducedSupardi, 2013Growing in Bengkulu
PakistanPresentIntroducedAkhter and Ghazanfar, 1984; Missouri Botanical Garden, 2013Present in checklist
SingaporePresent only in captivity/cultivationIntroduced Not invasive Chong et al., 2009In cultivation only
Sri LankaPresentIntroducedMabberley, 1997
TaiwanPresentIntroducedBoufford et al., 2003
VietnamPresentIntroducedBVN, 2013


AlgeriaPresentIntroducedDrummond, 1907
AngolaPresentIntroducedFigueiredo and Smith, 2008
BeninPresentIntroducedAkoegninou et al., 2006
Cape VerdePresent2013Introduced Invasive Duarte et al., 2005; Govaerts and Barker, 2013; Marrero and Almeida, 2013
ComorosWidespreadNative Not invasive Missouri Botanical Garden, 2013
CongoPresentIntroducedGovaerts and Barker, 2013
GhanaPresentIntroducedGBIF, 2013Herbarium record
KenyaPresentIntroduced Invasive Witt and Luke, 2017
MadagascarPresentIntroducedFischer and Theisen, 2000; Govaerts and Barker, 2013
MalawiPresentIntroduced Invasive Witt and Luke, 2017
MauritiusWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Kueffer et al., 2004
NigeriaPresentIntroducedBond, 1945Used as a live fence
RéunionWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Baret et al., 2006Much of the available habitat has already been invaded; Forms impenetrable thickets in forests
Rodriguez IslandWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Showler et al., 2002Almost 20% cover in 100 plots
RwandaPresentIntroduced Invasive Govaerts and Barker, 2013; Witt and Luke, 2017
Saint HelenaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Brown, 1982
Sao Tome and PrincipePresent1944Introduced Invasive Figueiredo et al., 2011
SenegalPresentIntroducedGovaerts and Barker, 2013
SeychellesWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Fosberg, 1983; Hill, 2002Common on some islands, found on 7
South AfricaLocalisedIntroduced Invasive Crouch and Smith, 2011; Department of Environmental Affairs, 2013Locally very abundant; An early detection and rapid response target
-Canary IslandsLocalisedIntroduced Invasive Elorza et al., 2005; Santos-Guerra et al., 2013Invasive in semi-urban areas; Naturalized
TanzaniaPresentIntroduced Invasive Harris, 1936; Witt and Luke, 2017
-ZanzibarPresentIntroducedFitzgerald, 1898Grows well in Zanzibar
UgandaPresentIntroducedWitt and Luke, 2017Naturalized
ZambiaPresentIntroducedWitt and Luke, 2017Naturalized
ZimbabweLocalisedIntroduced Invasive Hyde et al., 2013Forms fairly extensive colonies in secondary vegetation

North America

USAPresentPresent based on regional distribution.
-FloridaLocalisedIntroduced Invasive Wunderlin and Hansen, 2012South Florida, locally invasive
-HawaiiWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Imada, 2012All major islands

Central America and Caribbean

Costa RicaWidespreadNative Not invasive Missouri Botanical Garden, 2013
CubaPresentIntroducedAcevedo-Rodriguez and Strong, 2012
Dominican RepublicPresentIntroducedGovaerts and Barker, 2013
GuadeloupePresentIntroducedAcevedo-Rodriguez and Strong, 2012
HaitiPresentIntroducedAcevedo-Rodriguez and Strong, 2012
JamaicaPresentIntroducedAcevedo-Rodriguez and Strong, 2012
MartiniquePresentIntroducedAcevedo-Rodriguez and Strong, 2012
Netherlands AntillesPresentNativeGovaerts and Barker, 2013
PanamaWidespreadNative Not invasive Missouri Botanical Garden, 2013
Puerto RicoWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Francis, 2003Refers to this species as native, but it is also believed to be introduced
Saint Vincent and the GrenadinesPresentIntroducedGovaerts and Barker, 2013
Trinidad and TobagoPresentNativeGovaerts and Barker, 2013

South America

BoliviaWidespreadIntroduced Not invasive Missouri Botanical Garden, 2013Reference claims it is native, but literature consensus is that it is invasive
BrazilPresentPresent based on regional distribution.
-AmapaPresentIntroducedSmithsonian, 2013Herbarium record
-BahiaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Pirani and Lopes, 2013Widely naturalized in: High altitude grassland, grassland, cerrado rock outcrop vegetation
-CearaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Pirani and Lopes, 2013Widely naturalized in: High altitude grassland, grassland, cerrado rock outcrop vegetation
-Espirito SantoWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Pirani and Lopes, 2013Widely naturalized in: High altitude grassland, grassland, cerrado rock outcrop vegetation
-GoiasIntroduced Invasive Pirani and Lopes, 2013Widely naturalized in: High altitude grassland, grassland, cerrado rock outcrop vegetation
-Minas GeraisWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Pirani and Lopes, 2013Widely naturalized in: High altitude grassland, grassland, cerrado rock outcrop vegetation
-ParaibaLocalisedIntroduced Invasive Leão et al., 2011Displacing native vegetation
-PernambucoLocalisedIntroduced Invasive Leão et al., 2011Displacing native vegetation
-Rio de JaneiroWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Pirani and Lopes, 2013Widely naturalized in: High altitude grassland, grassland, cerrado rock outcrop vegetation
-Santa CatarinaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Dechoum and Ziller, 2013Subject to control for conservation purposes
-Sao PauloWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Pirani and Lopes, 2013Widely naturalized in: High altitude grassland, grassland, cerrado rock outcrop vegetation
ChilePresentPresent based on regional distribution.
-Easter IslandLocalisedIntroduced Invasive Meyer, 2009
ColombiaPresentNativeGovaerts and Barker, 2013
French GuianaPresentNativeFunk et al., 2007
GuyanaPresentNativeFunk et al., 2007
PeruPresentIntroducedSmithsonian, 2013Herbarium record
SurinamePresentNativeFunk et al., 2007
VenezuelaPresentNativeJohnston, 1909Islands of Margarita and Coche


ItalyPresentIntroducedOliva et al., 2002Growing in western Sicily
PortugalPresentIntroduced Invasive Almeida and Freitas, 2006
SpainPresentPresent based on regional distribution.


AustraliaPresentPresent based on regional distribution.
-Lord Howe Is.LocalisedIntroduced Invasive Orchard, 1994
-New South WalesPresentIntroducedGroves et al., 2003
-QueenslandLocalisedIntroduced Invasive Batianoff and Butler, 2002Generally invasive
-Western AustraliaPresentIntroducedGroves et al., 2003
Cook IslandsLocalisedIntroducedMeyer, 2000
FijiLocalisedIntroduced Invasive Smith, 1979
French PolynesiaPresentIntroduced Invasive ISSG, 2013; Smithsonian, 2013Tabuai, Hiva Oa, Tahiti, Makatea; Herbarium record
GuamLocalisedIntroduced Invasive Wagner et al., 2012
NauruLocalisedIntroducedThaman et al., 1994Recent introduction (in 1994), found on ruderal sites
New CaledoniaLocalisedIntroduced Invasive Meyer et al., 2006
New ZealandLocalisedIntroduced Invasive Wilcox, 2005Locally abundant forming dense thickets
-Kermadec IslandsEradicated2002Introduced Invasive West and Thompson, 2013Eradicated from Raoul Island in 2002
NiueWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Space et al., 2004Widely naturalized on southern part of island
Northern Mariana IslandsPresentIntroducedGovaerts and Barker, 2013
SamoaPresentIntroducedGovaerts and Barker, 2013
TongaWidespreadIntroduced Invasive Drake et al., 1996
VanuatuLocalisedIntroduced Invasive Meyer, 2000

History of Introduction and Spread

Top of page

From the 1690s to the 1920s, F. foetida was introduced to tropical islands in the Caribbean and Indian, Pacific and Atlantic Oceans (Drummond, 1907; Rouillard and Guého, 1999). There was still much interest in the plant in 1915, when it was being sold for £35 per ton (approximately US$50, or equivalent to US$4500 today) (RBG Kew, 1917).

In Africa, F. foetida was introduced to most countries with a suitable climate before 1900 (Drummond and Prain, 1907). Fewer sites of introduction in Asia are known from the literature apart from India and Pakistan, where some plants were grown before 1907.

Its status as an invader is clearest on oceanic islands (especially Hawaii and the Indian Ocean archipelagos) and in Africa. It was well established in the hills above Port Louis, Mauritius, by the 1850s (Drummond, 1907), and wild populations were established in the Seychelles by 1900. In Hawaii and French Polynesia it was first recorded wild in the 1930s as evidenced by Bishop Museum specimens.

Its status as an invasive species is not well documented in the Caribbean islands, where it was long regarded as native. This is possibly because it is similar to other native Furcraea species in the region, and because it was introduced so long ago; most likely in the eighteenth century (Álvares de Zayas, 1996; Acevedo-Rodríguez and Strong, 2012). Considering that F. foetida is generally a poor disperser, it is likely introduced in the Greater Antilles (Acevedo-Rodríguez and Strong, 2012). This strongly suggests it was introduced in Puerto Rico too, contradicting the report from the USDA (Francis, 2003). It is sometimes said to be native in the Lesser Antilles, from Guadeloupe southwards, but no careful rationale for this claim could be found.


Top of page
Introduced toIntroduced fromYearReasonIntroduced byEstablished in wild throughReferencesNotes
Natural reproductionContinuous restocking
Australia 1890-1920 Horticulture (pathway cause) Yes No Groves et al. (2003); Randall (2007) Invasive: Queensland and Northern New South Wales
Cuba Haiti 1700s Horticulture (pathway cause) Yes No Álvares Zayas Ade (1996) Mainly near inhabited areas
Fiji 1907 Horticulture (pathway cause) No No
Florida Horticulture (pathway cause) Yes No
Guam   Horticulture (pathway cause) Yes No Wagner et al. (2012) Invasive
Jamaica < 1911 Horticulture (pathway cause) No No Missouri Botanical Garden (2013) Specimen
Mauritius Central America 1754 Horticulture (pathway cause) Yes No Rouillard and Gueho (1999)
Nauru   Horticulture (pathway cause) Yes No Wagner et al. (2012) Invasive
New Zealand 1850-1875 Horticulture (pathway cause) Yes No Wilcox (2005) Spread from Governor Gray’s plantings via bulbils
Portugal 1887 Horticulture (pathway cause) Yes No Almeida and Freitas (2006)
Réunion < 1825 Horticulture (pathway cause) Yes No Much of the available habitat already invaded
Saint Helena < 1915 Horticulture (pathway cause) Yes No Kew (1917)
South Africa India < 1888 Horticulture (pathway cause) Yes No Crouch and Smith (2011)

Risk of Introduction

Top of page

In general, the risk of introduction of F. foetida to isolated sites or islands is unlikely by natural means, but possible via intentional human dispersal. F. foetida is unlikely to spread long distances by natural means, although it may be possible along rivers or during flooding, and long-distance dispersal by bats is a potential mode of introduction (Francis, 2003). The different uses of F. foetida make it an attractive plant, and likely to be subject to further intentional introductions. Accidental spread via movement of garden waste or machinery is also possible.


Top of page

F. foetida grows well on rocky terrain, including lava, sand, and any well drained soil (xeric to mesic). It favours high to moderate light but tolerates some moderately closed forest canopies. Usually found in tropical areas, but also in some subtropical areas with infrequent frosts. It is recorded as invasive in coastal sites, coralline atolls, and inselberg habitats in and out of its native range.

Habitat List

Top of page
Terrestrial – ManagedCultivated / agricultural land Present, no further details Productive/non-natural
Managed forests, plantations and orchards Present, no further details Productive/non-natural
Disturbed areas Principal habitat Harmful (pest or invasive)
Terrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalRocky areas / lava flows Principal habitat Harmful (pest or invasive)
Scrub / shrublands Principal habitat Harmful (pest or invasive)
Coastal areas Principal habitat Harmful (pest or invasive)

Biology and Ecology

Top of page


The chromosome number of F. foetida is 2n = 60 (Francis, 2003). Variegated varieties have been produced for horticulture and landscaping.

Reproductive Biology

F. foetida is monocarpic, dying after flowering, which occurs after approximately 7–10 years. About 200 leaves are produced during its lifetime. The leaves continue to elongate for about 5 months after bending away from the central spindle. At flowering, long slender poles are produced, with many flowers which open few at a time over several weeks. Pollination is thought to be by moths and bees. The plants rarely set seed, but dozens of bulbils are formed in the inflorescence, which develop roots after they fall to the ground (Francis, 2003).

Physiology and Phenology

F. foetida uses the Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (CAM) photosynthetic pathway, fixing carbon dioxide during the night and incorporating it into carbohydrates during the day.

Environmental Requirements

This plant generally grows best in a well-drained, medium to light soil, but can tolerate a wide range, including heavy clay soils. It is also very drought tolerant. Soil pH preferencesranges from pH 5.5 to pH 8. It prefers annual daytime temperatures between 23°C and 30°C, but can tolerate a range of 16-34°C (FAO, 2007).


Top of page
As - Tropical savanna climate with dry summer Preferred < 60mm precipitation driest month (in summer) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25])
Aw - Tropical wet and dry savanna climate Preferred < 60mm precipitation driest month (in winter) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25])
Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all year Tolerated Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all year

Latitude/Altitude Ranges

Top of page
Latitude North (°N)Latitude South (°S)Altitude Lower (m)Altitude Upper (m)
21 36

Air Temperature

Top of page
Parameter Lower limit Upper limit
Mean annual temperature (ºC) 16 34


Top of page
ParameterLower limitUpper limitDescription
Mean annual rainfall7002500mm; lower/upper limits

Soil Tolerances

Top of page

Soil drainage

  • free
  • impeded

Soil reaction

  • alkaline
  • neutral

Soil texture

  • heavy
  • light
  • medium

Special soil tolerances

  • shallow

Natural enemies

Top of page
Natural enemyTypeLife stagesSpecificityReferencesBiological control inBiological control on
Scyphophorus acupunctatus Herbivore Leaves not specific Harris, 1936

Notes on Natural Enemies

Top of page

The sisal weevil (Scyphophorus interstitialis [= S. acupunctatus]) can feed on F. foetida, and it is therefore considered a secondary host of S. acupunctatus (Harris, 1936).

Means of Movement and Dispersal

Top of page

Natural Dispersal

Natural dispersal of F. foetida is mostly via gravity dispersed bulbils, a form of vegetative spread. Each bulbil is effectively a plantlet (Staples et al., 2000; Francis, 2003). Wind has been implicated in some spread in Australia (Harden, 1994). Flooded or riverside plants could conceivably have their bulbils transported downstream. Rare seeding events may occur, but it is unclear how these are dispersed.

Vector Transmission (Biotic)

Dispersal of the bulbils by fruit bats has been suggested for the Caribbean, although there is no direct evidence (PIER, 2013).

Accidental Introduction

Accidental introduction over long distances is unlikely, but could occur via construction equipment, heavy machinery or vehicles. Local disposal of garden waste could lead to further accidental introductions.

Intentional Introduction

F. foetida is now underutilized as fibre crop, but has been promoted as a xeric ornamental and a permaculture plant (RBG Kew, 1917; Huxley et al., 1999; Nugent, 2011). It is also used as a live fence in some situations (Bond, 1945). It is easily transported intentionally via the bulbils, which can fit in luggage or a pocket. In the future, F. foetida may be considered as a biofuel crop (Davis et al., 2011).

Pathway Causes

Top of page
CauseNotesLong DistanceLocalReferences
Crop productionA fibre plant and ornamental Yes Yes Kew, 1917
Garden waste disposalGarden plant with bulbils could establish Yes Yes
Landscape improvementXeric landscaping plant Yes Yes
Nursery tradeXeric landscaping plant Yes Yes
Ornamental purposesXeric landscaping plant Yes Yes

Impact Summary

Top of page
Economic/livelihood Positive and negative
Environment (generally) Negative

Economic Impact

Top of page

The only known economic impacts of F. foetida are the control costs for labour and herbicides in natural areas.

Environmental Impact

Top of page

Impact on Habitats

F. foetida is mainly a weed of waste areas and is invasive in coastal areas and sites with little soil, such as lava flows in Hawaii and the Pacific. It has become dominant on many tropical islands (including atolls) around the world. It displaces and competes with surrounding vegetation. It is controlled for conservation purposes in New Zealand, Hawaii, South Africa, Florida and Brazil (Motooka et al., 2002; Wilcox, 2005; Howell and Sawyer, 2006; Howell, 2008; Crouch and Smith, 2011; Randall, 2012; Dechoum and Ziller, 2013; Department of Environmental Affairs, 2013). F. foetida has invaded inselberg plant communities in Africa, which are known to have a high diversity of rare plants (Barthlott and Porembski, 1996; Fischer and Theisen, 2000). In Biscayne National Park, south Florida, it is recognized as invasive (National Park Service, 2013). In Australia, it is regarded as an environmental weed that has not yet reached its full impact potential (Randall, 2001).

Impact on Biodiversity

F. foetida can threaten bromeliad species and coastal plants of conservation concern in Brazil (Dechoum and Ziller, 2013). A rare orchid, Eulophia guineensis, on Cape Verde is threatened by F. foetida (Marrero and Almeida Pérez, 2013). In Hawaii the subshrubs Schiedea apokremnos and S. spergulina var. leiopoda [Scheidea spergulina] can be outcompeted by F. foetida and several other invasive species that invade coastal cliffs (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2003; 2010a).

Threatened Species

Top of page
Threatened SpeciesConservation StatusWhere ThreatenedMechanismReferencesNotes
Eulophia guineensisNational list(s) National list(s)Cape VerdeCompetition - monopolizing resources; Competition - shadingMarrero and Almeida, 2013
Schiedea apokremnos (Kauai schiedea)CR (IUCN red list: Critically endangered) CR (IUCN red list: Critically endangered); USA ESA listing as endangered species USA ESA listing as endangered speciesHawaiiCompetition - shading; Competition - smothering; Competition (unspecified)US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2003; US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2010a
Schiedea spergulina var. leiopodaNational list(s) National list(s); USA ESA listing as endangered species USA ESA listing as endangered speciesHawaiiCompetition - monopolizing resources; Competition - shading; Competition - smotheringUS Fish and Wildlife Service, 2010b

Risk and Impact Factors

Top of page Invasiveness
  • Proved invasive outside its native range
  • Has a broad native range
  • Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
  • Pioneering in disturbed areas
  • Tolerant of shade
  • Benefits from human association (i.e. it is a human commensal)
  • Long lived
  • Fast growing
Impact outcomes
  • Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
  • Modification of nutrient regime
  • Modification of successional patterns
  • Monoculture formation
  • Reduced amenity values
  • Reduced native biodiversity
  • Threat to/ loss of endangered species
  • Threat to/ loss of native species
Impact mechanisms
  • Competition - monopolizing resources
  • Competition - shading
  • Competition - smothering
  • Competition
  • Herbivory/grazing/browsing
  • Rapid growth
  • Produces spines, thorns or burrs
Likelihood of entry/control
  • Highly likely to be transported internationally deliberately


Top of page

Economic Value

F. foetida has been utilized since the 1600s, possibly even earlier by indigenous cultures, as a fibre crop. It is now also used as an ornamental plant, for permaculture, as a hedge, as a live fence and for various medicinal uses (RBG Kew, 1917; Bond, 1945; IPK, 2003; Nugent, 2011; Vaughan, 2011). Other uses include fish poison and a fertilizer (derived from burnt leaves) (Vaughan, 2011), In the future it may be considered as a biofuel crop (Davis et al., 2011).

Environmental Services

F. foetida is sometimes planted for erosion control, for example to stabilise the contours of bunds and the edges of paths and roads.

Uses List

Top of page


  • Boundary, barrier or support
  • Revegetation


  • Biofuels


  • Botanical garden/zoo


  • Chemicals
  • Fibre
  • Pesticide

Medicinal, pharmaceutical

  • Source of medicine/pharmaceutical
  • Traditional/folklore


  • Potted plant

Similarities to Other Species/Conditions

Top of page

Furcraea foetida is similar to F. hexapetala, F. selloa, F. stricta, and F. tuberosa. Further information on how to distinguish it from similar species can be found in the Weeds of Australia factsheet (Queensland Government, 2013).

Prevention and Control

Top of page

Rapid response

F. foetida has been put on surveillance lists in some parts of South Africa (Department of Environmental Affairs, 2013).

Physical/mechanical control

A related species, F. hexapetala, was uprooted manually from lava flows on Isabela Island, Galapagos, Ecuador. Plants were allowed to dry upside down in the sun. This could also be an option for F. foetida. However, non-target damage to surrounding plants is possible during uprooting or hacking. Bulbils (plantlets) from the inflorescence should be gathered and removed from the site after parent plants are removed. This is also the case when using herbicide on parent plants.

Movement control

F. foetida is a declared invasive species and is banned from sale and distribution in French Polynesia (ISSG, 2013).

Biological control

Small plants can be eaten by cattle (and probably other ungulates), but the adults are not vulnerable to herbivory (Francis, 2003).

Chemical control

Motooka et al. (2002) have shown that F. foetida can be treated with triclopyr in oil, applied to the bases of leaves around the whole meristem. The same method using water instead of oil was not effective. Another study found that applying 4% triclopyr to cuts in the base of the plants was 100% effective, but injection of 48% triclopyr to the base was not effective (Dechoum and Ziller, 2013). Triclopyr does not need to be sprayed (only dripped) onto plant bases, but it can affect other plants if they come in contact with the herbicide.

IPM programmes

Control measures should be followed by the planting of desirable, native plants where possible. This could pre-empt the common occurrence of other unwanted species colonizing control areas.

Ecosystem restoration

Ecosystem restoration appears to be practiced in valued sites on a small scale in Hawaii, New Zealand (Raoul Island) and Brazil, where F. foetida is tackled along with a suite of other invaders (West and Thompson, 2013).

Gaps in Knowledge/Research Needs

Top of page

It would be interesting to carry out phylo-geographic studies using DNA sequencing to determine the relationships and timing of F. foetida’s spread around the world. This could help to validate its history in South America and the Caribbean, where its status as a native species is unclear.


Top of page

Acevedo-Rodríguez P, Strong MT, 2012. Catalogue of the Seed Plants of the West Indies. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, 98:1192 pp. Washington DC, USA: Smithsonian Institution.

Akhter R, Ghazanfar SA, 1984. Agavaceae. In: Flora of Pakistan. Karachi, Pakistan: Department of Botany, University of Karachi and Islamabad, Pakistan

Akoegninou A, Burg WJ Van Der, Maesen LJG Van der, Adjakidje V, Essou JP, Sinsin B, Yedomonhan H, 2006. [English title not available]. (Flore analytique du Benin). Leiden, Netherlands: Backhuys, 1034 pp

Álvares de Zayas A, 1996. [English title not available]. (El genero Furcraea (Agavaceae) en Cuba.) Anales Del Instituto de Biologia, Serie Botanica, 67(2):329-346

Baret S, Rouget M, Richardson DM, Lavergne C, Egoh B, Dupont J, Strasberg D, 2006. Current distribution and potential extent of the most invasive alien plant species on La Réunion (Indian Ocean, Mascarene islands). Austral Ecology, 31(6):747-758

Barthlott W, Porembski S, 1996. Biodiversity of arid islands in tropical Africa: the succulents of inselbergs. In: The biodiversity of African plants. Proceedings of the XIVth AETFAT Congress, Wageningen, Netherlands, 22-27 August 1994 [ed. by Maesen LJG van der, Burgt XM van der, Medenbach de Rooy JM van]. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 49-57

Batianoff GN, Butler DW, 2002. Assessment of invasive naturalized plants in south-east Queensland. Plant Protection Quarterly, 17(1):27-34

Bond WE, 1945. Suitability of various hedge plants and live fencing poles in Northern Nigeria. Farm and Forest, 6:22-26

Boufford DE, Ohashi H, Huang TC, Hsieh CF, Tsai JL, Yang KC, Hsiao A, 2003. A checklist of the vascular plants of Taiwan. In: Flora of Taiwan, 2nd edn. Taipei, Taiwan: Editorial Committee, Department of Botany, National Taiwan University, 15-139

Brown LC, 1982. The flora and fauna of St. Helena. London, UK: Land Resources Development Centre, 88 pp

BVN, 2013. Furcraea foetida. Vietnam Plant Data Center, Botany Research and Development Group of Vietnam.

Chevalier A, 1910. Muséum national d'histoire naturelle (Herbarium specimen).

Chong KY, Tan HT, Corlett RT, 2009. A checklist of the total vascular plant flora of Singapore: native, naturalised and cultivated species. Singapore: Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, National University of Singapore, 273 pp

Crouch NR, Smith GF, 2011. Agavaceae: Furcraea foetida: an invading alien in South Africa. Bothalia, 41(1):196-199.

Davis SC, Dohleman FG, Long SP, 2011. The global potential for Agave as a biofuel feedstock. GCB Bioenergy [Agave for Bioenergy Workshop, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 12-13 May 2010.], 3(1):68-78

de Almeida JD, Freitas H, 2006. Exotic naturalized flora of continental Portugal - A reassessment. Botanica Complutensis, 30:117-130

Dechoum M de S, Ziller SR, 2013. Control techniques for invasive alien plants. (Métodos para controle de plantas exóticas invasoras.) Biotemas, 26(1):69-77.

Department of Environmental Affairs, 2013. Furcraea foetida (Mauritius Hemp). Mount Moreland Conservancy.

Drake DR, Motley TJ, Whistler WA, Imada CT, 1996. Rainforest vegetation of 'Eua Island, Kingdom of Tonga. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 34(1):65-77

Drummond JR, 1907. The literature of Furcraea with a synopsis of the known species. In: Missouri Botanical Garden Annual Report. 25-75

Drummond JR, Prain D, 1907. Notes on Agave and Furcraea in India. Whitefish, Montana, USA: Kessinger Publishing, LLC, 200 pp

Duarte MC, Rego F, Moreira I, 2005. Distribution patterns of plant communities on Santiago Island, Cape Verde. Journal of Vegetation Science, 16(3):283-292

Elorza MS, Vesperinas ES, Sánchez EDD, 2005. [English title not available]. (Aproximación al listado de plantas vasculares alóctonas invasoras reales y potenciales en las islas Canarias.) Lazaroa, 26:55-66

FAO, 2007. Ecocrop.

Figueiredo E, Paiva J, Stévart T, Oliveira F, Smith GF, 2011. Annotated catalogue of the flowering plants of São Tomé and Príncipe. Bothalia, 41(1):41-82.

Figueiredo E, Smith GF, 2008. Plants of Angola/Plantas de Angola [ed. by Figueiredo E, Smith GF]. Pretoria, South Africa: South African National Biodiversity Institute, 279 pp

Fischer E, Theisen I, 2000. Vegetation of Malagasy Inselbergs. In: Inselbergs, 146 [ed. by Porembski S. Barthlott W] Berlin, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 259-276

Fitzgerald WWA, 1898. Travels in the coastlands of British East Africa and the islands of Zanzibar and Pemba: their agricultural resources and general characteristics. London, UK: Chapman & Hall, 824 pp

Forster PI, 1986. [Furcraea foetida]. Flora of Australia Online. Australian Biological Resources Study.

Fosberg FR, 1983. Natural History of Cousin Island. Atoll Research Bulletin, 273-281.

Francis JK, 2003. Furcraea foetida L (Haw). San Juan, Puerto Rico: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, 2 pp.

Funk V, Hollowell T, Berry P, Kelloff C, Alexander SN, 2007. Checklist of the plants of the Guiana Shield (Venezuela: Amazonas, Bolivar, Delta Amacuro; Guyana, Surinam, French Guiana). Contributions from the United States National Herbarium, 584 pp

GBIF, 2013. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF).

Govaerts R, Barker C, 2013. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Richmond, Surrey, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

GRIN, 2015. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN), ARS-USDA, National Genetic Resources Program. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory.

Groves RH, Hosking JR, Batianoff GN, Cooke DA, Cowie ID, Johnson RW, Moerkerk M, 2003. Weed categories for natural and agricultural ecosystem management. Canberra, Australia: Bureau of Rural Sciences, 200 pp

Harden G, 1994. [Furcraea foetida] in PlantNET. Sydney, Australia: The Plant Information Network System of The Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust.

Harris WV, 1936. The sisal weevil. East Africa Agricultural and Forestry Journal, 2(2):114-126

Hill MJ, 2002. Biodiversity Surveys and Conservation Potential of Inner Seychelles Islands. Atoll Research Bulletin, 495:272 pp.

Howell C, Sawyer JWD, 2006. New Zealand naturalised vascular plant checklist. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Plant Conservation Network, 60 pp

Howell CJ, 2008. Consolidated list of environmental weeds in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Science and Technical Publication, Department of Conservation, 42 pp

Huxley AJ, Griffiths M, Levy M, 1999. The new Royal Horticultural Society dictionary of gardening. London, UK: Folio Society

Hyde MA, Wursten BT, Ballings P, 2013. Furcraea foetida (L.) Haw. Flora of Zimbabwe.

Imada CT, 2012. Hawaiian Native and Naturalized Vascular Plants Checklist. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: Bishop Museum, 380 pp.

IPK, 2003. Mansfeld's World Database of Agricultural and Horticultural Crops. Gatersleben, Germany: Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK).

ISSG, 2013. Global Invasive Species Database (GISD). Invasive Species Sepcialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission.

Johnston JR, 1909. Flora of the islands of Margarita and Coche, Venezuela. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, 34(7):163-312

Kueffer C, Vos P, Lavergne C, Mauremootoo J, 2004. Case studies on the status of invasive woody plant species in the Western Indian Ocean. 1. Synthesis. Forest Health and Biosecurity Working Paper, No.4-1E:v + 36 pp.

Leão T, Almeida WR de, Sá Dechoum M de, Ziller S, Leão TC, Ziller SR, 2011. [English title not available]. (Espécies exóticas invasoras no Nordeste do Brasil: Contextualização, Manejo e Políticas Públicas). Centro de Pesquisas Ambientales do Nordeste.

Mabberley DJ, 1997. The plant-book: a portable dictionary of the vascular plants. Ed. 2: xvi + 858 pp. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Marrero Á, Almeida Pérez R, 2013. [English title not available]. (Las orquiídeas en Cabo Verde y reduscubrimiento de Eulophia guineensis Lindl. (Orchidaceae) en la Isla de Brava.) Botánica Macaronésica, 28:63-70

Meyer JY, 2000. Preliminary review of the invasive plants in the Pacific Islands (SPREP member countries). In: Invasive species in the Pacific: A technical review and draft regional strategy [ed. by Sherley G]. Samoa: South Pacific Regional Environment Programme, 190 pp

Meyer JY, 2009. [English title not available]. Plan de accion estratégico para luchar contra las plantes introducidas invasoras en Rapa Nui (Isla De Pascua). Papeete, Tahiti, French Polynesia: Ministère de l'Education, de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Gouvernement de Polinesia francesa., 65 pp.

Meyer JY, Loope L, Sheppard A, Munzinger J, Jaffre T, 2006. [English title not available]. Les plantes envahissantes et potentiellement envahissantes dans l'archipel Néo-Calédonien : Première évaluation et recommandations de gestion. In: Les espèces envahissantes dans l'archipel Néo-Calédonien. Paris, France: IRD Editions

Missouri Botanical Garden, 2013. Tropicos database. St Louis, Missouri, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden.

Motooka P, Ching L, Nagai G, 2002. Herbicidal weed control methods for pasture and natural areas of Hawaii. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: Cooperative Extension Service, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii, 36 pp.

National Park Service, 2013. Exotic plants in Biscayne National Park. Washington DC, USA: National Park Service, US Department of the Interior.

Nugent J, 2011. Permaculture plants: Agaves and Cacti (2nd edn.). Nannup, Western Australia: Jeff Nugent, 104 pp

Oliva SR, Valdés B, Raimondo FM, 2002. Plantas Raras de la Flora Ornamental de Sicilia Occidental (Italia). Lagascalia, 22:35-79

Orchard AE, 1994. Flora of Australia, Vol. 50, Oceanic Islands 2. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service, 606 pp

Pandey RP, Diwakar PG, 2008. An integrated checklist flora of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Journal of Economic & Taxonomic Botany, 32:403-500

PIER, 2013. Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: HEAR, University of Hawaii.

Pirani JR, Lopes RC, 2013. Asparagaceae [Furcraea foetida (L.) Haw.]. List of species of the Brazilian flora. Brazil: Rio de Janiero Botanical Garden.

Queensland Government, 2013. Weeds of Australia. Biosecurity Queensland edition. Australia: University of Queensland.

Randall R, 2001. Garden thugs, a national list of invasive and potentially invasive garden plants. Plant Protection Quarterly, 16(4):138-171

Randall RP, 2007. The introduced flora of Australia and its weed status [ed. by Randall RP]. Glen Osmond, Australia: CRC for Australian Weed Management, iv + 524 pp

Randall RP, 2012. A global compendium of weeds (2nd edn). Western Australia: Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, 1124 pp

RBG Kew, 1917. A List of Economic Plants Native or Suitable for Cultivation in the British Empire. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information, 7/8:241-296

Rouillard G, Gueho J, 1999. [English title not available]. (Les plantes et leur histoire à l'Ile Maurice). Port Louis, Mauritius: MSM Limited, 752 pp

Santos-Guerra A, Padrón Mederos MA, Mesa Coello R, Ojeda Land E, Reyes-Betancort JA, 2013. Establishment of introduced plants in the Canarian wild vascular flora. I (ferns, gymnosperms and monocots). (Establecimiento de plantas introducidas en la flora vascular silvestre Canaria. I (Helechos, Gimnospermas y Monocotiledóneas).) Acta Botanica Malacitana, 38:176-182.

Showler DA, Cote IM, Jones CG, 2002. Population census and habitat use of Rodrigues warbler Acrocephalus rodericanus. Bird Conservation International, 12(3):211-230

Smith AC, 1979. Flora Vitiensis nova: A new flora of Fiji. Volume I. Lawai, Kauai, Hawaii,, USA: National Tropical Botanical Garden, 338-339

Smithsonian, 2013. Smithsonian Herbarium Record.

Soubeyran Y, 2008. [English title not available]. (Espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les collectivités françaises d'outre-mer: Etat des lieux et recommandations.) Collection Planète Nature. Paris, France: Comité français de l'UICN, 55 pp

Space JC, Waterhouse BM, Newfield M, Bull C, 2004. Report to the Government of Niue and the United Nations Development Programme: Invasive plant species on Niue following Cyclone Heta.

Staples GW, Herbst DR, Imada CT, 2000. Survey of invasive or potentially invasive cultivated plants in Hawaii. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers, 65:35 pp

Supardi NI, 2013. Spectacular Ornamental Plant: Furcraea foetida in Bengkulu, Indonesia. Gallery of Bengkulu, Indonesia.

Sykes WR, 1970. Contributions to the Flora of Niue. Bulletin. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Zealand, 200:321 pp

Thaman RR, Fosberg RF, Manner HI, Hassall DC, 1994. The flora of Nauru. Atoll Research Bulletin, 392:233 pp

US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2003. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; final designation or non-designation of critical habitat for 95 plant species from the islands of Kauai and Niihau, Hawaii; final rule. Federal Register, 68(39):9116-9479

US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2010. Schiedea apokremnos (maolioli). 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. In: Schiedea apokremnos (maolioli). 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation : US Fish and Wildlife Service.16 pp.

US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2010. Schiedea spergulina var. leiopoda (no common name). 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. In: Schiedea spergulina var. leiopoda (no common name). 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation : US Fish and Wildlife Service.11 pp.

Vaughan G, 2011. Furcraea foetida (L.) Haw. Prota 16: Fibres/Plantes à fibres [ed. by Brink M, Achigan-Dako EG]. Wageningen, Netherlands: PROTA.

Verhoek S, Hess WJ, 2002. Furcraea, Agavaceae. In: Flora of North America: Magnoliophyta: Liliidae: Liliales and Orchidales, 26 [ed. by Flora of North America Editorial Committee]. New York, USA: Oxford University Press USA, 461-462

Vikraman RR, Pandurangan AG, Thulasidas G, 2008. A study on the garden escaped exotics of Thiruvananthapuram district, Kerala. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany, 32(4):765-782.

Wagner WL, Herbst DR, Sohmer SH, 1999. Manual of the flowering plants of Hawaii. Revised edition. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: University of Hawaii Press/Bishop Museum Press, 1919 pp

Wagner WL, Herbst DR, Tornabene MW, Lorence DH, 2012. Flora of Micronesia. Washington DC, USA: Smithsonian Institution.

West C, Thompson A, 2013. Small, dynamic and recently settled: responding to the impacts of plant invasions in the New Zealand (Aotearoa) archipelago. In: Plant invasions in protected areas, 7 [ed. by Foxcroft LC, Pyšek P, Richardson DM. Genovesi P]. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 285-311

Wilcox M, 2005. The genus Furcraea (Agavaceae) in the Auckland region. Auckland Botanical Society, 60:159-162

Witt, A., Luke, Q., 2017. Guide to the naturalized and invasive plants of Eastern Africa, [ed. by Witt, A., Luke, Q.]. Wallingford, UK: + 601 pp. doi:10.1079/9781786392145.0000

Wunderlin RP, Hansen BF, 2012. Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants. Tampa, Florida, USA: Institute for Systematic Botany, University of South Florida.

Links to Websites

Top of page
eMonocot - Furcraea foetida
GISD/IASPMR: Invasive Alien Species Pathway Management Resource and DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway source for updated system data added to species habitat list.
Global register of Introduced and Invasive species (GRIIS) source for updated system data added to species habitat list.
ISSG - Furcraea foetida
PIER - Furcraea foetida
PROTA - Furcraea foetida


Top of page

23/12/13 Original text by:

Christopher E. Buddenhagen, Florida State University, USA

Distribution Maps

Top of page
You can pan and zoom the map
Save map