Crypsis schoenoides (swamp pricklegrass)
Index
- Pictures
- Identity
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Description
- Plant Type
- Distribution
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat
- Habitat List
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Biology and Ecology
- Climate
- Latitude/Altitude Ranges
- Air Temperature
- Rainfall
- Rainfall Regime
- Soil Tolerances
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Causes
- Impact Summary
- Impact
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Uses List
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- Gaps in Knowledge/Research Needs
- References
- Contributors
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate reportIdentity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Crypsis schoenoides
Preferred Common Name
- swamp pricklegrass
Other Scientific Names
- Heleochloa schoenoides (L.) Host
- Pechea subcylindrica Pourr. ex Kunth
- Phleum schoenoides L.
- Phleum supinum Lam.
- Spartina phleoides (L.) Roth
- Spartina schoenoides (L.) Roth
International Common Names
- English: cowpond grass; swamp Timothy
- French: crypside faux choin; crypsis faux choin
- Chinese: lin zhuang yin hua cao
Local Common Names
- Italy: brignolo ovato
- Sweden: tittutgräs
Summary of Invasiveness
Top of pageC. schoenoides is an annual grass, with a native distribution ranging from southern Europe and North Africa, across Middle East, to northern India and China. It has been introduced into North America, Australia, Madagascar and Japan, where it has naturalized. However, it is only considered to be a major invader in California, where it is very abundant in wetlands and other waterbodies. Its dominance in these habitats, where it forms dense mats, means it is likely to have negative impacts on plant biodiversity in Californian wetlands.
Taxonomic Tree
Top of page- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Plantae
- Phylum: Spermatophyta
- Subphylum: Angiospermae
- Class: Monocotyledonae
- Order: Cyperales
- Family: Poaceae
- Genus: Crypsis
- Species: Crypsis schoenoides
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Top of pageThere are ten species in the genus Crypsis (Aiton), all of which are endemic to the Old World (Eurasia and Africa) (Peterson et al., 2014). Species in this genus are typically annuals and have short panicles that are often surrounded by the leaf sheath (Peterson et al., 2014). Crypsis is derived from the Greek kryptos, meaning hidden, and refers to the inflorescences that are contained within the uppermost leaf sheaths (Simon and Alfonso, 2011). C. vaginiflora was historically considered synonymous with C. schoenoides, but is now recognized as a separate species (Hammel and Reeder, 1979). Recently, Peterson et al. (2014) recommended subsuming Crypsis into the genus Sporobolus.
Description
Top of pageFollowing Hammel and Reeder (1979) and eMonocot (2015):
C. schoenoides is most easily identified by its pink- or purple-tinged stems and spikelets and its tendency to form mats or short clumps. It is an annual, tufted grass with culms that can be prostrate or erect, up to 75 cm tall, and sometimes much-branched from the base. Leaf blades are 0.5-12 cm long, 0.1-0.4 cm wide, mostly flat and the upper surfaces are often hairier than the lower leaf blade surfaces, although both may be glabrous. Inflorescences are compound, much-branched, ellipsoid or ovoid in shape, up to 3 cm long, and often are surrounded at the base by the enlarged leaf sheath. Spikelets are laterally compressed, up to 4 mm long and green to purple in colour. Upper and lower glumes are similar, up to 4 mm long and 1-nerved. Palea 2-nerved, slightly shorter or equal in length to lemma (up to 4 mm), which is 1-nerved. Three anthers up to 0.9 mm long. Caryopsis is 0.5-1.5 mm long.
Distribution
Top of pageThe native distribution of C. schoenoides encompasses a large range including Mediterranean Europe, the Balkans and south-eastern Europe, North Africa, the Middle East and extending through Asia to northern India and parts of China (eMonocot, 2015; USDA-ARS, 2015). It is also recorded as native to the eastern and southern African countries of Mozambique, Malawi and Tanzania (eMonocot, 2015; USDA-ARS, 2015).
C. schoenoides is considered as not native at the limits of its current continuous range (i.e. across Africa, Europe and Asia). For example, in parts of northern Europe (such as Belgium, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom) and in West Africa (Mali and Mauritania) it is considered to be introduced. There is also uncertainty as to the native status of this species in Senegal and Madagascar, with the USDA-ARS (2015) recording it as native in these two regions, but with eMonocot (2015) recording it as an introduced species.
C. schoenoides has been introduced into North America, Australia, Madagascar and Japan (eMonocot, 2015; USDA-ARS, 2015).
Distribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
Last updated: 10 Jan 2020Continent/Country/Region | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | Reference | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Africa |
|||||||
Algeria | Present | Native | |||||
Egypt | Present | Native | |||||
Libya | Present | Native | |||||
Madagascar | Present | Earliest record in 1955 | |||||
Malawi | Present | Native | |||||
Mali | Present | Introduced | |||||
Mauritania | Present | Introduced | |||||
Morocco | Present | Native | |||||
Mozambique | Present | Native | |||||
Niger | Present | Native | |||||
Senegal | Present | ||||||
Sudan | Present | Native | |||||
Tanzania | Present | Native | |||||
Tunisia | Present | Native | |||||
Asia |
|||||||
Afghanistan | Present | Native | |||||
Armenia | Present | Native | |||||
Azerbaijan | Present | Native | |||||
China | Present | Native | |||||
-Anhui | Present | Native | |||||
-Hebei | Present | Native | |||||
-Henan | Present | Native | |||||
-Inner Mongolia | Present | Native | |||||
-Jiangsu | Present | Native | |||||
-Ningxia | Present | Native | |||||
-Shanxi | Present | Native | |||||
-Xinjiang | Present | Native | |||||
Georgia | Present | Native | |||||
India | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | |||||
-Himachal Pradesh | Present | Native | |||||
-Jammu and Kashmir | Present | Native | |||||
-Punjab | Present | Native | |||||
-Uttarakhand | Present | Native | |||||
Iran | Present | Native | |||||
Iraq | Present | Native | |||||
Israel | Present | Native | |||||
Japan | Present | Introduced | Earliest record in 1998 | ||||
Jordan | Present | Native | |||||
Kazakhstan | Present | Native | |||||
Kyrgyzstan | Present | Native | |||||
Lebanon | Present | Native | |||||
Mongolia | Present | Native | |||||
Pakistan | Present | Native | |||||
Syria | Present | Native | |||||
Taiwan | Present | Introduced | |||||
Tajikistan | Present | Native | |||||
Turkey | Present | Native | |||||
Turkmenistan | Present | Native | |||||
Uzbekistan | Present | Native | |||||
Yemen | Present | Native | |||||
Europe |
|||||||
Albania | Present | Native | |||||
Austria | Present | Native | |||||
Belarus | Present | Native | |||||
Belgium | Present | Introduced | |||||
Bosnia and Herzegovina | Present | Native | |||||
Bulgaria | Present | Native | |||||
Croatia | Present | Native | |||||
Cyprus | Present | Native | |||||
Czechia | Present | Native | |||||
Czechoslovakia | Present | Native | |||||
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia | Present | ||||||
France | Present | Native | |||||
-Corsica | Present | ||||||
Greece | Present | Native | |||||
-Crete | Present | ||||||
Hungary | Present | Native | |||||
Italy | Present | Native | |||||
-Sardinia | Present | ||||||
-Sicily | Present | ||||||
Latvia | Present, Few occurrences | Introduced | Earliest record in 1963 | ||||
Moldova | Present | Native | |||||
Portugal | Present | Native | |||||
Romania | Present | Native | |||||
Russia | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | |||||
-Central Russia | Present | Native | |||||
-Northern Russia | Present | Native | |||||
-Southern Russia | Present | Native | |||||
-Western Siberia | Present | Native | |||||
Serbia | Present | Native | |||||
Slovakia | Present | Native | |||||
Slovenia | Present | Native | |||||
Spain | Present | Native | |||||
Ukraine | Present | Native | |||||
United Kingdom | Present | Introduced | |||||
North America |
|||||||
Canada | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | |||||
-Ontario | Present | Introduced | Earliest record in 1977 | ||||
Mexico | Present | Introduced | Present in Baja California. Earliest record in 1979 | ||||
United States | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | |||||
-Arizona | Present | Introduced | Earliest record in 1979 | ||||
-California | Present, Widespread | Introduced | Invasive | Earliest record in 1913 | |||
-Illinois | Present | Introduced | Earliest record in 1893 | ||||
-Indiana | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Iowa | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Massachusetts | Present | Introduced | Earliest record in 1908 | ||||
-Michigan | Present, Few occurrences | Introduced | Earliest record in 1930. Only in Monroe and Wayne counties | ||||
-Missouri | Present | Introduced | Earliest record in 1926 | ||||
-Nevada | Present | Introduced | Earliest record in 1976 | ||||
-New Jersey | Present | Introduced | Earliest record in 1895 | ||||
-New York | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Ohio | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Oregon | Present, Few occurrences | Introduced | Earliest record in 1976 | ||||
-Pennsylvania | Present | Introduced | Earliest record in 1866 | ||||
-Utah | Present, Few occurrences | Introduced | Earliest record in 1973 | ||||
-Wisconsin | Present | Introduced | Earliest record in 1940 | ||||
Oceania |
|||||||
Australia | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | |||||
-Western Australia | Present | Introduced | Earliest record in 1958 |
History of Introduction and Spread
Top of pageIn the USA, C. schoenoides was first introduced into eastern states in the late 1800s and then into California probably in the early 1900s (Hammel and Reeder, 1979; GBIF, 2015). C. schoenoides is eaten by waterfowl such as the northern pintail in California, and it is possible that these birds have aided its spread by seed (Fleskes et al., 2005).
Interestingly, however, there are no records for this species in the eastern states of the USA after about 1955 (Hammel and Reeder, 1979; GBIF, 2015).
C. schoenoides was first recorded in Coolup, Western Australia in 1958 (GBIF, 2015). There are no records to indicate how C. schoenoides was introduced.
The species was first recorded as naturalized in Japan in 1998 (Koba and Tanaka, 2000; GBIF, 2015).
In Belgium this species is thought to have been introduced accidentally through imported grain in 1914 (Verloove, 2006).
Risk of Introduction
Top of pageC. schoenoides is known to be eaten by waterfowl, and the seeds are possibly spread by these birds (Naylor, 1999; Green et al., 2002; Fleskes et al., 2005). As these birds are migratory there is a risk that new introductions may occur, if populations transit from a site containing C. schoenoides to one which does not. In Michigan, USA, it has been suggested that the species has been spread along salted roadsides (Reznicek et al., 2011).
Habitat
Top of pageThis species often grows near waterbodies such as rivers, vernal pools and marshes and can tolerate saline conditions (Hammel and Reeder, 1979; Akhani, 2014; Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2015). In California this species is actively managed in wetlands to maximise seed production for waterfowl (Rahilly et al., 2012). In Australia, C. schoenoides is known as a weed of irrigated pastures (WSWA, 1998), and in China it is reported as weed on farmland (Randall, 2012). In Israel, it has been recorded as a weed in managed forests as a result of herbicide resistance (Heap, 2015). It also appears to be common along roadsides and other disturbed areas, especially in its introduced ranges (Reznicek et al., 2011).
Habitat List
Top of pageCategory | Sub-Category | Habitat | Presence | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Terrestrial | ||||
Terrestrial | Managed | Cultivated / agricultural land | Secondary/tolerated habitat | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Managed forests, plantations and orchards | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Managed grasslands (grazing systems) | Secondary/tolerated habitat | Natural |
Terrestrial | Managed | Disturbed areas | Principal habitat | Natural |
Terrestrial | Managed | Rail / roadsides | Principal habitat | Natural |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Riverbanks | Principal habitat | Natural |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Wetlands | Principal habitat | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Deserts | Principal habitat | Natural |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Arid regions | Principal habitat | Natural |
Littoral | Salt marshes | Secondary/tolerated habitat | Natural |
Hosts/Species Affected
Top of pageC. schoenoides can be highly invasive in wetlands, particularly in California (Hammel and Reeder, 1979; Calflora, 2015) and is thought to negatively affect native wetland species in this region, such as Scirpus maritimus, Schoenoplectus acutus, Juncus balticus, Xanthium strumarium and Zannichellia palustris.
Biology and Ecology
Top of pageGenetics
C. schoenoides has a chromosome number of 2n = 32 and is distinguished by ploidy from its sister taxon, C. vaginiflora, which has a chromosome number of 2n = 48 (Hammel and Reeder, 1979; IPCN Chromosome Reports, 2015). Peterson et al. (2014) suggested incorporating Crypsis into the genus Sporobolus, because of its embedded position in a paraphyletic Sporobolus clade.
Reproductive Biology
Like most grasses, C. schoenoides is wind pollinated and has bisexual flowers. C. schoenoides is a prolific seed producer, at least in Californian wetlands, being the most productive species in terms of mass of seed produced in these wetlands (up to 1268 kg.ha-1 seeds produced) (Naylor, 1999). C. schoenoides has small seeds up to 1.5 mm long and with an average 1000 seed weight of 0.242 g (eMonocot, 2015; Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, 2015).
Physiology and Phenology
C. schoenoides is an annual (eMonocot, 2015). It uses the C4 photosynthetic pathway (Osborne et al., 2014) and is tolerant of saline conditions (Flora of Pakistan, 2015). In Pakistan the species flowers from July to August at higher elevations and from September to November at lower elevations (Flora of Pakistan, 2015). In California this species flowers from June to October (Calflora, 2015) and elsewhere in the USA from June to September (Hammel and Reeder, 1979).
Environmental Requirements
C. schoenoides grows in sandy, clay or sandy clay soils in wetlands, vernal pools, moist environments in mountainous areas, seasonally-flooded mud-flats, and saline/brackish pools in deserts (Hammel and Reeder, 1979; CalFlora, 2015; Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2015; Flora of Pakistan, 2015). Climate preferences and tolerances are based on overlaying distribution records of this species in a global map of Köppen-Geiger climate zones (Kriticos et al., 2011) and global temperature and precipitation layers (Hijmans et al., 2005).
Climate
Top of pageClimate | Status | Description | Remark |
---|---|---|---|
Aw - Tropical wet and dry savanna climate | Tolerated | < 60mm precipitation driest month (in winter) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25]) | |
BS - Steppe climate | Preferred | > 430mm and < 860mm annual precipitation | |
BW - Desert climate | Preferred | < 430mm annual precipitation | |
Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all year | Preferred | Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all year | |
Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summer | Preferred | Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summers | |
Df - Continental climate, wet all year | Preferred | Continental climate, wet all year (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, wet all year) | |
Ds - Continental climate with dry summer | Preferred | Continental climate with dry summer (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, dry summers) |
Latitude/Altitude Ranges
Top of pageLatitude North (°N) | Latitude South (°S) | Altitude Lower (m) | Altitude Upper (m) |
---|---|---|---|
51 | 34 |
Air Temperature
Top of pageParameter | Lower limit | Upper limit |
---|---|---|
Mean annual temperature (ºC) | 8 | 27 |
Mean maximum temperature of hottest month (ºC) | 20.3 | 42.6 |
Mean minimum temperature of coldest month (ºC) | -19.3 | 17.6 |
Rainfall
Top of pageParameter | Lower limit | Upper limit | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Mean annual rainfall | 62 | 1559 | mm; lower/upper limits |
Soil Tolerances
Top of pageSoil drainage
- impeded
- seasonally waterlogged
Soil texture
- heavy
- light
- medium
Special soil tolerances
- saline
Means of Movement and Dispersal
Top of pageNatural Dispersal
The seeds of C. schoenoides are likely dispersed passively or by wind given their small size and low weight (Thomson et al., 2010).
Vector Transmission (Biotic)
C. schoenoides is a favourite forage species of waterfowl and may be dispersed by these birds (Naylor, 1999; Green et al., 2002; Fleskes et al., 2005).
Accidental Introduction
It is not known how this species was introduced into the USA or other non-native ranges, but given its small seed size and the lack of known uses by humans, it is probable that this species was introduced accidentally as a contaminant, possibly in imported pasture seed.
Pathway Causes
Top of pageCause | Notes | Long Distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitchhiker | Accidental dispersal via waterfowl movements | Yes | Green et al., 2002 |
Impact Summary
Top of pageCategory | Impact |
---|---|
Economic/livelihood | Positive |
Environment (generally) | Positive and negative |
Impact
Top of pageIn California, USA, C. schoenoides is very abundant in wetlands (Naylor, 1999; Calflora 2015). It is probably the most important forage species for waterfowl in this region (Fleskes et al., 2005; Rahilly et al., 2012), thereby having a positive economic (waterfowl popular for hunting) and biodiversity impact. However, because of its dominance in these habitats, it likely has a negative effect on plant biodiversity in Californian wetlands, with possible impacts on species such as Scirpus maritimus, Schoenoplectus acutus, Juncus balticus, Xanthium strumarium and Zannichellia palustris.
As a reported agricultural weed in Australian pasture (WSWA, 1998) and farmland in China (Randall, 2015), there may be economic impacts on livestock productivity.
Risk and Impact Factors
Top of page- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Has a broad native range
- Abundant in its native range
- Is a habitat generalist
- Pioneering in disturbed areas
- Fast growing
- Has high reproductive potential
- Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
- Monoculture formation
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
- Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant
- Difficult to identify/detect in the field
- Difficult/costly to control
Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
Top of pageThis species is very similar to C. vaginiflora. However, it is distinguished by having pink-tinged stems and spikelets (not observed in C. vaginiflora), being taller (culms up to 75 cm compared to 30 cm), having longer leaf blades (12 cm compared to 5 cm), no disarticulation of leaf blades, glabrous collars, larger panicles (up to 3 cm long compared to 1.5 cm) and longer anthers (up to 0.9 mm compared to 0.7 mm) (Hammel and Reeder, 1979; eMonocot, 2015).
Prevention and Control
Top of pageDue to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Control
There appears to be no specific literature for the control of C. schoenoides. Physical control methods such as hand pulling (especially in the early stages of an invasion) and covering with black plastic have been successfully used to control other wetland grasses such as Phalaris arundinacea and Spartina species (ISSG, 2015). Chemical control might be possible using imazapyr, because it has been successfully used on other wetland invasives (Tu et al., 2001; ISSG, 2015). However, it is interesting to note that herbicide resistance (against Group C1/5 herbicides) in C. schoenoides was observed in two managed forests in Israel in 1995 (Heap, 2015).
Monitoring and Surveillance
Remote sensing has been used to successfully map seed production of C. schoenoides (Rahilly et al., 2012). This however has not been used as a tool for mapping this species for control efforts, but rather to estimate seed production for the purposes of predicting forage availability for waterfowl (Rahilly et al., 2012).
Gaps in Knowledge/Research Needs
Top of pageIt would be useful to know more about the invasiveness of this species in other states of the USA, and to what extent it is problematic in regions such as Australia and Japan. More information is needed on the abundance of this species, both in its native and non-native ranges. It would also be useful to know where this species appears to have expanded beyond its historical native range (in much of Eurasia and Africa). Nothing is known about how C. schoenoides spreads outside of its native range. This knowledge would help prevent its introduction elsewhere. It would also be useful to confirm whether waterfowl are indeed dispersing the seeds of this species locally. More information is needed on whether and how this species impacts native biodiversity and what, if any, economic and social impacts it is having where it has become invasive.
References
Top of pageAkhani H, 2014. Crypsis schoenoides. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3. http://www.iucnredlist.org
Calflora, 2016. Information on California plants for education, research, and conservation. Berkeley, California, USA: Calflora Database. http://www.calflora.org
DAISIE, 2015. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe. European Invasive Alien Species Gateway. www.europe-aliens.org/default.do
eMonocot, 2015. eMonocot - An online resource for monocot plants. http://emonocot.org/
Fleskes JP; Gilmer DS; Jarvis RL, 2005. Pintail distribution and selection of marsh types at Mendota Wildlife Area during fall and winter. California Fish and Game, 91(4):270-285.
Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2015. Flora of China. St. Louis, Missouri and Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden and Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2
Flora of Pakistan, 2015. Flora of Pakistan/Pakistan Plant Database (PPD). Tropicos website. USA: St. Louis, Missouri and Cambridge, Massachusetts. http://www.tropicos.org/Project/Pakistan
GBIF, 2015. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. http://www.gbif.org/species
Hammel BE; Reeder JR, 1979. The genus Crypsis (Gramineae) in the United States. Systematic Botany, 4(4):267-280.
Heap I, 2015. The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. www.weedscience.org
IPCN Chromosome Reports, 2015. Index to Plant Chromosome Numbers (IPCN), Tropicos website. St. Louis, Missouri, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden. http://tropicos.org/Project/IPCN
ISSG, 2015. Global Invasive Species Database (GISD). Invasive Species Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission. http://www.issg.org/database/welcome/
Kriticos DJ; Webber BL; Leriche A; Ota N; Macdam I; Bathols J; Scott JK, 2011. CliMond: global high resolution historical and future scenario climate surfaces for bioclimatic modelling. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3:53-64.
Missouri Botanical Garden, 2015. Tropicos database. St. Louis, Missouri, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden. http://www.tropicos.org/
Naylor LM, 1999. Evaluating moist-soil seed production and management in Central Valley wetlands to determine habitat needs for waterfowl. Masters Thesis. Davis, California, USA: University of California.
NOBANIS, 2015. North European and Baltic Network on Invasive Alien Species. http://www.nobanis.org/
Osborne CP; Salomaa A; Kluyver TA; Visser V; Kellogg EA; Morrone O; Vorontsova MS; Clayton WD; Simpson DA, 2014. A global database of C4 photosynthesis in grasses. New Phytologist, 204(3):441-446.
Randall RP, 2012. A global compendium of weeds (2nd edn). Western Australia: Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, 1124 pp.
Reznicek AA; Voss EG; Walters BS, 2011. Michigan Flora Online. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: University of Michigan. http://michiganflora.net
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 2015. Flora Europaea. Edinburgh, UK: Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. http://rbg-web2.rbge.org.uk/FE/fe.html
Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, 2015. Seed Information Database (SID) Version 7. Richmond, Surrey, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. http://data.kew.org/sid/
Simon BK; Alfonso Y, 2011. AusGrass2. Grasses of Australia. Australia: CSIRO Publishing. http://ausgrass2.myspecies.info/
TALA, 2015. The Atlas of Living Australia. Canberra, Australia: ALA. http://www.ala.org.au/
Tu M; Hurd C; Randall JM, 2001. Weed Control Methods Handbook (April 2001 edition). Arlington, Virginia, USA: The Nature Conservancy. http://www.invasive.org/gist/products/handbook/methods-handbook.pdf
USDA-ARS, 2015. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx
USDA-NRCS, 2015. The PLANTS Database. Baton Rouge, USA: National Plant Data Center. http://plants.usda.gov/
WSWA, 1998. Western Weeds: A guide to the weeds of Western Australia (online edition). Perth, Australia: The Weeds Society of Western Australia (Inc.). http://wswa.org.au/western_weeds.htm#contents
Distribution References
CABI, Undated. CABI Compendium: Status inferred from regional distribution. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated a. CABI Compendium: Status as determined by CABI editor. Wallingford, UK: CABI
DAISIE, 2015. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe. http://www.europe-aliens.org/
eMonocot, 2015. eMonocot - an online resource for monocot plants.,
GBIF, 2015. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. http://www.gbif.org/species
Hammel BE, Reeder JR, 1979. The genus Crypsis (Gramineae) in the United States. In: Systematic Botany, 4 (4) 267-280.
Missouri Botanical Garden, 2015. Tropicos database., St. Louis, Missouri, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden. http://www.tropicos.org/
NOBANIS, 2015. North European and Baltic Network on Invasive Alien Species., http://www.nobanis.org/
Reznicek AA, Voss EG, Walters BS, 2011. Michigan Flora Online., Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: University of Michigan. http://michiganflora.net
Royal Botanic Garden, 2015. Flora Europaea., Edinburgh, UK: Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. http://rbg-web2.rbge.org.uk/FE/fe.html
USDA-ARS, 2015. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysimple.aspx
USDA-NRCS, 2015. The PLANTS Database. Greensboro, North Carolina, USA: National Plant Data Team. https://plants.sc.egov.usda.gov
Verloove F, 2006. Catalogue of neophytes in Belgium (1800-2005). Scripta Botanica Belgica. 89 pp.
Contributors
Top of page27/03/15 Original text by:
Vernon Visser, Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Distribution Maps
Top of pageSelect a dataset
Map Legends
-
CABI Summary Records
Map Filters
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/