Bothriochloa ischaemum (yellow bluestem)
Index
- Pictures
- Identity
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Description
- Plant Type
- Distribution
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Introductions
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat
- Habitat List
- Biology and Ecology
- Climate
- Air Temperature
- Rainfall
- Rainfall Regime
- Soil Tolerances
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Pathway Causes
- Pathway Vectors
- Impact Summary
- Economic Impact
- Environmental Impact
- Threatened Species
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Uses
- Uses List
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- Gaps in Knowledge/Research Needs
- References
- Contributors
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate reportPictures
Top of pageIdentity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Bothriochloa ischaemum (L.) Keng
Preferred Common Name
- yellow bluestem
Other Scientific Names
- Amphilophis ischaemum (L.) Nash
- Andropogon ischaemum L.
- Andropogon ischaemum f. songaricus (Rupr. ex Fisch. & C.A.Mey.) Kitag.
- Andropogon ischaemum var. ischaemum
- Andropogon ischaemum var. laevifolius Hack.
- Andropogon ischaemum var. songaricus Rupr. ex Schrenk
- Andropogon panormitanus Parl.
- Andropogon patulus Moench
- Andropogon pertusus var. panormitanus (Parl.) Hack.
- Andropogon taiwanensis Ohwi
- Andropogon undulatus Pers.
- Bothriochloa insculpta subsp. panormitana (Parl.) Giardina & Raimondo
- Bothriochloa ischaemum f. ischaemum
- Bothriochloa ischaemum f. songarica (Rupr.) Kitag.
- Bothriochloa ischaemum var. ischaemum
- Bothriochloa ischaemum var. songarica (Rupr.) Celarier & J.R.Harlan
- Bothriochloa panormitana (Parl.) Pilg.
- Dichanthium ischaemum (L.) Roberty
- Ischaemum dactyloideum Montandon
- Sorghum ischaemum (L.) Kuntze
International Common Names
- English: king ranch bluestem (B. ischaemum var. songarica); Texas yellow beard grass (B. ischaemum var. songarica); Turkestan bluestem (B. ischaemum var. ischaemum); yellow bluestem (B. ischaemum var. ischaemum)
- Chinese: bai yang cao
Local Common Names
- Brazil: capim-cola-de-zorro-amarelo
Summary of Invasiveness
Top of pageB. ischaemum is a warm seasoned perennial grass in the Poaceae family which is native to Europe, Asia and Africa. There are two varities of B. ischaemum, var. ischaemum and B. ischaemum var. songarica, which have different native ranges and have been introduced into different countries. This species was introduced into the North American Great Plains in the 1920s to tackle soil erosion and for forage production. This species has since been planted onto millions of hectares of marginal rangeland, roadsides and Conservation Reserve Program lands (Harmoney et al., 2004). B. ischaemum can readily escape original planting sites where it can invade native rangelands, with negative ecological and economic consequences such as the formation of monocultures and the loss of native biodiversity. This species is a particular problem in Texas where dense monocultures are displacing native grass species.
Taxonomic Tree
Top of page- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Plantae
- Phylum: Spermatophyta
- Subphylum: Angiospermae
- Class: Monocotyledonae
- Order: Cyperales
- Family: Poaceae
- Genus: Bothriochloa
- Species: Bothriochloa ischaemum
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Top of pageGrasses in the Bothriochloa genus are closely related to grasses in the Andropogon genus (bluestem grasses) and Erianthus genus (plume grasses). B. ischaemum was once classified as Andropogon ischaemum (Hilty, 2014).
A number of different cultivars of B. ischaemum have been widely released into the USA, full details of which can be found in Cook et al. (2005). In addition to this, two varieties exist; B. ischaemum var. ischaemum and B. ischaemum var. songarica. A number of common names relate specifically to a particular variety.
Description
Top of pagePlants typically cespitose, occasionally stoloniferous or rhizomatous, especially when heavily grazed or under frequently mowed. Culms 20-80 cm long, stiffly erect; nodes glabrous or short hirsute. Leaves basal; ligules 0.5-1.5 mm; blades 5-25 cm long, 2.0-4.5 mm wide, flat to folded, glabrous or with long, scattered hairs at the base of the blade. Panicles 5-10 cm, fan-shaped, silvery reddish-purple; rachises 0.5-2 cm, typically with 2-8 branches; branches 3-9 cm, erect to somewhat spreading from the axillary pulvini, usually with only one rame; rame internodes with a central groove narrower than the margins, margins ciliate, with 1-3 mm hairs. Sessile spikelets 3.0-4.5 mm, narrowly ovate; lower glumes hirsute below with about 1 mm hairs, lacking a dorsal pit; awns 9-17 mm, twisted, geniculate; anthers 1-2 mm (Vega, 2000).
The culm node of the variety B. ischaemum var. songarica is ringed with short hairs (Harms, 2015).
Distribution
Top of pageB. ischaemum is native to parts of Europe, Northern Africa and Asia. Two distinct varieties of this species exist with different distributions. B. ischaemum var, songarica is restricted to a small area in southern China, Taiwan and northern Myanmar, whereas B. ischaemum var. ischaemum is native from here all the way from Japan to Portugal (USDA-ARS).
This species has been introduced into 17 states in the southern part of USA and into Puerto Rico where it is invasive (USDA-NRCS, 2015). It is present in cultivation in the states of Queensland and New South Wales, Australia (Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria, 2015). It is also present in a number of South American countries.
Distribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
Last updated: 10 Jan 2020Continent/Country/Region | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | Reference | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Africa |
|||||||
Algeria | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Tunisia | Present | Native | |||||
Asia |
|||||||
Afghanistan | Present, Widespread | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Armenia | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Azerbaijan | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Bhutan | Present | ||||||
China | Present, Widespread | Native | B. ischaemum var. songarica and B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Georgia | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
India | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Iran | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Iraq | Present | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | |||||
Japan | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Kazakhstan | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Kyrgyzstan | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Lebanon | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Mongolia | Present | Native | |||||
Myanmar | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var, songarica | ||||
Nepal | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
North Korea | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Pakistan | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Syria | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Taiwan | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. songarica | ||||
Tajikistan | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Turkey | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Turkmenistan | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Uzbekistan | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Europe |
|||||||
Albania | Present | Native | |||||
Austria | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Belgium | Present | Native | Original citation: Missouri Botanical Garden (2015) | ||||
Bulgaria | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Croatia | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Czechia | Present, Widespread | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia | Present, Widespread | Native | |||||
France | Present, Widespread | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Germany | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Greece | Present, Widespread | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Hungary | Present, Widespread | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Italy | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Moldova | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Poland | Present, Widespread | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Portugal | Present, Widespread | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Romania | Present, Widespread | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Russia | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Serbia | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Slovakia | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Slovenia | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Spain | Present, Widespread | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Switzerland | Present, Widespread | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
Ukraine | Present | Native | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum | ||||
North America |
|||||||
Belize | Present | Original citation: Missouri Botanical Garden (2015) | |||||
Canada | Present | Original citation: Missouri Botanical Garden (2015) | |||||
Costa Rica | Present | Original citation: Missouri Botanical Garden (2015) | |||||
Cuba | Present | Original citation: Missouri Botanical Garden (2015) | |||||
Dominican Republic | Present | Original citation: Missouri Botanical Garden (2015) | |||||
Mexico | Present | Original citation: Missouri Botanical Garden (2015) | |||||
Panama | Present | Original citation: Missouri Botanical Garden (2015) | |||||
Puerto Rico | Present, Localized | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
United States | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | |||||
-Alabama | Present | Introduced | Invasive | B. ischaemum var. songarica | |||
-Arizona | Present | Introduced | Invasive | B. ischaemum var. songarica | |||
-Arkansas | Present | Introduced | Invasive | B. ischaemum var. songarica | |||
-California | Present | Introduced | B. ischaemum var. songarica | ||||
-Colorado | Present | Introduced | Invasive | B. ischaemum var. songarica | |||
-Florida | Present | Introduced | Invasive | B. ischaemum var. songarica | |||
-Georgia | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Illinois | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Kansas | Present, Widespread | Introduced | Invasive | B. ischaemum var. songarica | |||
-Louisiana | Present, Widespread | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Mississippi | Present | Introduced | Invasive | B. ischaemum var. songarica | |||
-New Mexico | Present | Introduced | Invasive | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum and B. ischaemum var. songarica | |||
-New York | Present | Introduced | Invasive | B. ischaemum var. songarica | |||
-Ohio | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-Oklahoma | Present, Widespread | Introduced | Invasive | B. ischaemum var. songarica | |||
-South Carolina | Present | Introduced | Invasive | B. ischaemum var. songarica | |||
-Tennessee | Present | Introduced | B. ischaemum var. songarica | ||||
-Texas | Present, Widespread | Introduced | Invasive | B. ischaemum var. ischaemum and B. ischaemum var. songarica | |||
-Utah | Present | Introduced | Invasive | B. ischaemum var. songarica | |||
Oceania |
|||||||
Australia | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | |||||
-New South Wales | Present, Only in captivity/cultivation | Introduced | |||||
-Queensland | Present, Only in captivity/cultivation | Introduced | |||||
South America |
|||||||
Argentina | Present | Introduced | Original citation: Missouri Botanical Garden (2015) | ||||
Bolivia | Present | Original citation: Missouri Botanical Garden (2015) | |||||
Brazil | Present | Introduced | Original citation: Missouri Botanical Garden (2015) | ||||
Chile | Present | ||||||
Colombia | Present | Original citation: Missouri Botanical Garden (2015) | |||||
Ecuador | Present | Original citation: Missouri Botanical Garden (2015) | |||||
Guyana | Present | Original citation: Missouri Botanical Garden (2015) | |||||
Paraguay | Present | Original citation: Missouri Botanical Garden (2015) | |||||
Venezuela | Present | Original citation: Missouri Botanical Garden (2015) |
History of Introduction and Spread
Top of pageB. ischaemum was introduced into the North American Great Plains in the 1920s for soil erosion control and forage production on marginal rangelands (Celarier and Harlan, 1955). Today, B. ischaemum has been planted onto millions of hectares of marginal rangeland, roadsides and Conservation Reserve Program lands (Harmoney et al., 2004).
The two varieties of B. ischaemum have clearly differentiated introduced ranges in the USA (USDA-NRCS, 2015), with B. ischaemum var. ischaemum limited to two states and B. ischaemum var. songarica much more widespread.
Introductions
Top of pageIntroduced to | Introduced from | Year | Reason | Introduced by | Established in wild through | References | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural reproduction | Continuous restocking | |||||||
USA | Europe | 1920s | Habitat restoration and improvement (pathway cause) | Yes | No | Celarier and Harlan (1955) |
Risk of Introduction
Top of pageThere is some risk of B. ischaemum being introduced into new areas as a source of forage for cattle and for soil stabilization. The seeds may naturally disperse more locally into new areas by wind and water and can be accidentally introduced into new areas by being transported on vehicles, clothing and footwear (Hilty, 2014; Texas Invasives, 2015).
Habitat
Top of pageIn its native range, B. ischaemum is adapted to well drained, sandy soils (not deep sands), loams and clays. It prefers fine textured, calcareous soils and has some tolerance to low available iron. It also has some salt tolerance, growing naturally onto saline solonetz soils. B. ischaemum is often the dominant mid-successional grass species growing in dry stony places, borders of fields and slopes on waste ground, roadsides and in pastures (Bartha et al., 2014). The species may be found in pastures, grassy areas along roads, relatively open areas along streams and other disturbed areas (Texas Invasives, 2015).
Habitat List
Top of pageCategory | Sub-Category | Habitat | Presence | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Terrestrial | ||||
Terrestrial | Managed | Cultivated / agricultural land | Secondary/tolerated habitat | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Cultivated / agricultural land | Secondary/tolerated habitat | Productive/non-natural |
Terrestrial | Managed | Managed grasslands (grazing systems) | Secondary/tolerated habitat | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Managed grasslands (grazing systems) | Secondary/tolerated habitat | Productive/non-natural |
Terrestrial | Managed | Disturbed areas | Secondary/tolerated habitat | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Disturbed areas | Secondary/tolerated habitat | Productive/non-natural |
Terrestrial | Managed | Rail / roadsides | Secondary/tolerated habitat | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Rail / roadsides | Secondary/tolerated habitat | Productive/non-natural |
Terrestrial | Managed | Urban / peri-urban areas | Secondary/tolerated habitat | |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Natural grasslands | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Natural grasslands | Present, no further details | Productive/non-natural |
Biology and Ecology
Top of pageGenetics
B. ischaemum is reported as having a diploid chromosome number of 2n = 40, 50, 60 (FAO, 2015).
Reproductive Biology
B. ischaemum is an obligate pseudogamous apomict (Cook et al., 2005). In the northern hemisphere, B. ischaemum typically flowers from June/July to September/October (Vega, 2000). It produces an abundant seed bank (20-40kg of seed per hectare) which can survive a long time (Cook et al., 2005; Robertson and Hickman, 2012). B. ischaemum is cross pollinated (Bartha et al., 2014).
Physiology and Phenology
B. ischaemum is a C4 plant.
Environmental Requirements
B. ischaemum occurs naturally between 35-50º N in Asia and Europe. This distribution suggests that the species is best adapted to areas with an average annual temperature of between 10-17ºC, extending to about 20ºC. It is however able to tolerate extremely cold winters (Cook et al., 2005). In its native range it receives 350-500 mm of rain, however in its introduced range it can receive up to 1,000 mm of rain (Cook et al., 2005). B. ischaemum is drought resistant but cannot tolerate flooding (Cook et al., 2005). It is also tolerant of heavy grazing and fire (Hilty, 2014).
Climate
Top of pageClimate | Status | Description | Remark |
---|---|---|---|
As - Tropical savanna climate with dry summer | Preferred | < 60mm precipitation driest month (in summer) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25]) | |
B - Dry (arid and semi-arid) | Preferred | < 860mm precipitation annually | |
Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summer | Preferred | Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summers | |
Cw - Warm temperate climate with dry winter | Preferred | Warm temperate climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry winters) | |
Ds - Continental climate with dry summer | Preferred | Continental climate with dry summer (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, dry summers) | |
Dw - Continental climate with dry winter | Preferred | Continental climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, coldest month < 0°C, dry winters) |
Air Temperature
Top of pageParameter | Lower limit | Upper limit |
---|---|---|
Mean annual temperature (ºC) | 10 | 17 |
Mean maximum temperature of hottest month (ºC) | 20 |
Rainfall
Top of pageParameter | Lower limit | Upper limit | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Mean annual rainfall | 350 | 1000 | mm; lower/upper limits |
Soil Tolerances
Top of pageSoil drainage
- free
Soil reaction
- acid
- alkaline
- neutral
Soil texture
- heavy
- light
- medium
Notes on Natural Enemies
Top of pageHilty (2014) commented that B. ischaemum is generally free from insect damage and disease but may be susceptible to leaf rusts.
Means of Movement and Dispersal
Top of pageNatural Dispersal
Natural dispersal of B. ischaemum typically occurs via the translocation of seeds by winds and water movement (Hilty, 2014).
Accidental Introduction
Seeds can be accidentally transported on vehicles, clothing, including footwear and in contaminated seed of forage grass (Hilty, 2014).
Intentional Introduction
B. ischaemum is primarily spread by humans as it is intentionally introduced into new areas as a possible source of forage for cattle and for soil stabilization as a component of roadside vegetation.
Pathway Causes
Top of pageCause | Notes | Long Distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Forage | Yes | Yes | Texas Invasives, 2015 | |
Habitat restoration and improvement | Yes | Texas Invasives, 2015 | ||
Hitchhiker | Yes | Hilty, 2014 |
Pathway Vectors
Top of pageVector | Notes | Long Distance | Local | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clothing, footwear and possessions | Seeds | Yes | Yes | Hilty, 2014 |
Germplasm | Yes | Hilty, 2014 | ||
Land vehicles | Seeds | Yes | Hilty, 2014 | |
Machinery and equipment | Yes | Yes | Hilty, 2014 | |
Wind | Seeds | Yes | Texas Invasives, 2015 |
Impact Summary
Top of pageCategory | Impact |
---|---|
Economic/livelihood | Positive and negative |
Environment (generally) | Positive and negative |
Economic Impact
Top of pageB. ischaemum is regarded as an invasive and weedy species in many areas of North America, and control is often difficult to achieve and can be costly (Mittelhauser et al., 2011; Ruffner and Barnes, 2012).
Environmental Impact
Top of pageImpact on Habitats
B. ischaemum can form dense monocultures which may outcompete native plant species and decrease habitats occupied by native wildlife (Afflerbach, 2013). This reduction can potentially threaten endangered species and cause a loss to native species (George et al., 2013; Greer, 2013). An alteration of beneficial soil microbes has been reported as a result from invasion of B. ischaemum, including alterations to mycorrhizal associations (Wilson et al., 2012; Endresz et al., 2013). Potential allelopathic effects from B. ischaemum may facilitate its invasion and complicate restoration of native plant species (Greer et al., 2014).
Impact on Biodiversity
Several studies have been conducted to assess impacts of B. ischaemum on native biodiversity (McIntyre et al., 2003; Hickman et al., 2006; George et al., 2013; Greer, 2013). A study comparing native prairies with monocultures of B. ischaemum found grasshopper sparrows (Ammodramus savannarum) to become more abundant but savannah sparrows (Passerculus sandwichensis), cassin's sparrows (Peucaea cassinii) and horned larks (Eremophila alpestris) to become less abundant (George et al., 2013). In Texas, B. ischaemum is found to be displacing native grass species (Gabbard and Fowler, 2007).
Threatened Species
Top of pageThreatened Species | Conservation Status | Where Threatened | Mechanism | References | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Festuca ligulata (Guadalupe fescue) | USA ESA species proposed for listing | Texas | Competition (unspecified) | US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2014 |
Risk and Impact Factors
Top of page- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Has a broad native range
- Highly adaptable to different environments
- Is a habitat generalist
- Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
- Pioneering in disturbed areas
- Benefits from human association (i.e. it is a human commensal)
- Fast growing
- Has high reproductive potential
- Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
- Reproduces asexually
- Has high genetic variability
- Altered trophic level
- Conflict
- Damaged ecosystem services
- Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
- Modification of nutrient regime
- Modification of successional patterns
- Monoculture formation
- Negatively impacts agriculture
- Reduced native biodiversity
- Threat to/ loss of native species
- Damages animal/plant products
- Allelopathic
- Antagonistic (micro-organisms)
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Competition - shading
- Competition (unspecified)
- Herbivory/grazing/browsing
- Rapid growth
- Rooting
- Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
- Highly likely to be transported internationally deliberately
- Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant
- Difficult to identify/detect in the field
- Difficult/costly to control
Uses
Top of pageEconomic Value
The foliage of B. ischaemum is grazed by cattle, sheep and other hoofed mammalian herbivores and provides some economic value. It is however, usually considered less productive and desirable for forage than other grasses that are widely available. This species has also been proposed as a potential species for biofuel production (Porensky et al., 2014).
Environmental Services
B. ischaemum helps stabilize soils.
Uses List
Top of pageAnimal feed, fodder, forage
- Forage
Environmental
- Erosion control or dune stabilization
- Land reclamation
- Revegetation
- Soil conservation
Fuels
- Biofuels
Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
Top of pageB. ischaemum is similar to the closely related species of the same genus, B. bladhii. Morphological characteristics such as scattered hairs on the back of the outer bracts of B. bladhii can be used to differentiate between these species (Cook et al., 2005). B. bladhii has been reported as highly invasive on Pacific Islands (PIER, 2015).
Prevention and Control
Top of pageDue to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Control
Physical/Mechanical Control
It has been suggested that invasion by B. ischaemum may be decreased through habitat fragmentation, such as that caused by woody plant encroachment (Alofs and Fowler, 2010).
Chemical Control
Multiple applications of the herbicides imazapic, glyphosate, sulfometuron, bromacil and imazapyr have been shown to control B. ischaemum, although none of the herbicides resulted in complete eradication (Harmoney et al., 2004; Mittelhauser et al., 2011; Ruffner and Barnes, 2012; Robertson et al., 2013).
IPM
Techniques such as combining glyphosate with burning and mowing may successfully control B. ischaemum (Robertson et al., 2013). It has been suggested that the use of a herbicide followed by disking may also control B. ischaemum, however, more than one application will be necessary (Ruffner and Barnes, 2012).
Gaps in Knowledge/Research Needs
Top of pageB. ischaemum has been reported to be very difficult to eradicate once established. Further research is needed to determine the best management practices for successful eradication. Restoration efforts following eradication are difficult and allelopathic chemicals may be produced (Greer et al., 2014), therefore further research is also needed to determine the consequences of these allelopathic effects on native plant species.
References
Top of pageAfflerbach C, 2013. Invasion of Texas rangelands by king ranch bluestem (Bothriochloa ischaemum): the role of nutrient availability, niche partitioning and mycorrhizal fungi. BSc Honors thesis. San Antonio, Texas, USA: Trinity University.
Briske DD, 1991. Developmental morphology and physiology of grasses. In: Grazing management: an ecological perspective [ed. by Heitschmidt, R. K. \Stuth, J. W.]. Portland, Oregon, USA: Timber Press, 85-108.
Britton NL, Wilson P, 1926. Scientific Survey of Porto Rico and Virgin Islands. Volumen VI. New York, USA: Academy of Sciences, 629 pp.
Brooklyn Botanic Garden, 2015. New York Metropolitan flora database. New York, USA: Brooklyn Botanic Garden. http://www.bbg.org/research/nymf#
Bryson CT, Skojac Jr DA, 2011. An annotated checklist of the vascular flora of Washington County, Mississippi. Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, 5:855-866.
Carter R, Baker WW, Morris WM, 2009. Contributions to the flora of Georgia, USA. Vulpia, 8:1-54.
Celarier RP, Harlan JR, 1955. Tech. Bull. T-58 Oklahoma Agric. Exp. Stn. 31 pp.
Cook B, Pengelly B, Brown S, Donnelly J, Eagle D, Franco A, Hanson J, Mullen B, Partridge I, Peters M, Schultze-Kraft R, 2005. Tropical Forages: an interactive selection tool. Brisbane, Australia: CSIRO, DPI&F (Qld), CIAT and ILRI. http://www.tropicalforages.info/
Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria, 2015. Australia's virtual herbarium. Australia: Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria. http://avh.ala.org.au/#tab_simpleSearch
Doan S, 2002. Flora of the Seven Springs region, Tonto National Forest, Maricopa County, Arizona. MS Thesis. Arizona, USA: Arizona State University, 102 pp.
Endresz G, Somodi I, Kalapos T, 2013. Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of roots of grass species differing in invasiveness. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 66(3):376-381.
FAO, 2015. Bothriochloa ischaemum (L.) Keng. http://www.fao.org/ag/agp/AGPC/doc/gbase/data/Pf000185.HTM
Gabbard BL, Fowler NL, 2013. Wide ecological amplitude of a diversity-reducing invasive grass. Biological Invasions, 9(2):149-160.
Greer MJ, 2013. PhD Dissertation. Stillwater, USA: Oklahoma State University.
Hannick VC, Mink JN, Singhurst JR, Holmes WC, 2013. Annotated checklist of the vascular flora of McLennan County, Texas. Phytoneuron, 29:1-37.
Harms B, 2015. Botriochloa ischaemum var. songarica - king ranch bluestem, morphological characteristics. Texas, USA: Texas State University. http://w3.biosci.utexas.edu/prc/DigFlora/KR/BOISS-morph.html
Hatch SL, Gandhi KN, Brown LE, 1990. Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Texas. Texas, USA: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.
Hilty J, 2014. Illinois wildflowers. Illinois, USA. http://www.illinoiswildflowers.info/index.htm
Invasive Plant Atlas of the United States, 2015. Invasive Plant Atlas of the United States. http://www.invasiveplantatlas.org/
Kearney TH, Peebles RH, Howell JT, McClintock E, 1960. Arizona Flora. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.
Kuhn B, Nelson BE, Hartman RL, 2011. A floristic inventory of the Cimarron National Grassland (Kansas) and the Comanche National Grassland (Colorado). Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, 5:753-772.
Larson J, Reif B, Nelson BE, Hartman RL, 2014. Floristic studies in north central New Mexico, U.S.A. the Sangre de Cristo Mountains. Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, 8:271-303.
McGregor RL, Barkley TM, Barker WT, Brooks RE, Churchill SP, Kaul RB, Kolstad OA, Sutherland DM, Bruggen Van, T, Weeden RR, Wilson JS, 1977. Atlas of the flora of the Great Plains. Ames, Iowa, USA: Iowa State University Press, 600 pp.
Missouri Botanical Garden, 2015. Tropicos database. St. Louis, Missouri, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden. http://www.tropicos.org/
Mittlehauser JR, Barnes PW, Barnes TG, 2011. The effect of herbicide on the reestablishment of native grasses in the Blackland Prairie. Natural Areas Journal, 31:226-233.
Robertson S, Hickman KR, Harmoney KR, Leslie Jr DM, 2013. Combining glyphosate with burning or mowing improves control of yellow bluestem (Bothriochloa ischaemum). Rangeland Ecology and Management, 66(3):376-381.
Smith EB, 1988. An Atlas and Annotated List of the Vascular Plants of Arkansas. USA.
Texas Invasives, 2015. Invasives database. Texas, USA: Texas Invasive Plant and Pest Council. http://www.texasinvasives.org/invasives_database/index.php
Thomas RD, Allen CM, 1997. Atlas of the Vascular Flora of Louisiana, Volumes 1-3. Baton Rouge, USA: Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries.
USDA-ARS, 2014. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx
USDA-NRCS, 2014. The PLANTS Database. Baton Rouge, USA: National Plant Data Center. http://plants.usda.gov/
Vega AS, 2000. [English title not available]. (Revisión taxonómica de las especies americanas del género Bothriochloa (Poaceae: Panicoideae: Andropogoneae).) Darwiniana, 38(1-2):127-186.
Vincent MA, Gardner RL, Riley BP, 2011. Additions to and interesting records for the Ohio vascular flora (with one new record for Indiana). Phytoneuron, 60:1-23.
Wunderlin RP, Hansen BF, 2008. Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants. Tampa, Florida, USA: University of South Florida. http://www.plantatlas.usf.edu/
Distribution References
Britton NL, Wilson P, 1926. Scientific Survey of Porto Rico and Virgin Islands., VI New York, USA: Academy of Sciences. 629 pp.
Bryson CT, Skojac Jr DA, 2011. An annotated checklist of the vascular flora of Washington County, Mississippi. In: Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, 5 855-866.
CABI, Undated. Compendium record. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated a. CABI Compendium: Status inferred from regional distribution. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated b. CABI Compendium: Status as determined by CABI editor. Wallingford, UK: CABI
Carter R, Baker WW, Morris WM, 2009. Contributions to the flora of Georgia, USA. In: Vulpia, 8 1-54.
Cook B, Pengelly B, Brown S, Donnelly J, Eagle D, Franco A, Hanson J, Mullen B, Partridge I, Peters M, Schultze-Kraft R, 2005. Tropical Forages: an interactive selection tool., Brisbane, Australia: CSIRO, DPI&F (Qld), CIAT and ILRI. http://www.tropicalforages.info/
Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria, 2015. Australia's virtual herbarium., Australia: Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria. http://avh.ala.org.au/#tab_simpleSearch
Doan S, 2002. Flora of the Seven Springs region, Tonto National Forest, Maricopa County, Arizona., Arizona, USA: Arizona State University. 102 pp.
Greer MJ, 2013. PhD Dissertation., Stillwater, USA: Oklahoma State University.
Hannick VC, Mink JN, Singhurst JR, Holmes WC, 2013. Annotated checklist of the vascular flora of McLennan County, Texas. In: Phytoneuron, 29 1-37.
Hatch SL, Gandhi KN, Brown LE, 1990. Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Texas., Texas, USA: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.
Hilty J, 2014. Illinois wildflowers., Illinois, USA: http://www.illinoiswildflowers.info/index.htm
Invasive Plant Atlas of the United States, 2015. Invasive Plant Atlas of the United States., http://www.invasiveplantatlas.org/
Kearney TH, Peebles RH, Howell JT, McClintock E, 1960. Arizona Flora., Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.
Kuhn B, Nelson BE, Hartman RL, 2011. A floristic inventory of the Cimarron National Grassland (Kansas) and the Comanche National Grassland (Colorado). In: Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, 5 753-772.
Larson J, Reif B, Nelson BE, Hartman RL, 2014. Floristic studies in north central New Mexico, U.S.A. the Sangre de Cristo Mountains. In: Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, 8 271-303.
McGregor RL, Barkley TM, Barker WT, Brooks RE, Churchill SP, Kaul RB, Kolstad OA, Sutherland DM, Bruggen Van T, Weeden RR, Wilson JS, 1977. Atlas of the flora of the Great Plains., Ames, Iowa, USA: Iowa State University Press. 600 pp.
Smith EB, 1988. An Atlas and Annotated List of the Vascular Plants of Arkansas., USA:
Texas Invasives, 2015. Invasives database., Texas, USA: Texas Invasive Plant and Pest Council. http://www.texasinvasives.org/invasives_database/index.php
Thomas RD, Allen CM, 1997. Atlas of the Vascular Flora of Louisiana., 1-3 Baton Rouge, USA: Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries.
USDA-ARS, 2014. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysimple.aspx
USDA-NRCS, 2014. The PLANTS Database. Greensboro, North Carolina, USA: National Plant Data Team. https://plants.sc.egov.usda.gov
Vincent MA, Gardner RL, Riley BP, 2011. Additions to and interesting records for the Ohio vascular flora (with one new record for Indiana). In: Phytoneuron, 60 1-23.
Wunderlin RP, Hansen BF, 2008. Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants., Tampa, Florida, USA: University of South Florida. http://www.plantatlas.usf.edu/
Contributors
Top of page20/05/2015 Original text by:
Gail Wilson, Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma, USA
Distribution Maps
Top of pageSelect a dataset
Map Legends
-
CABI Summary Records
Map Filters
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/