Caesalpinia decapetala (Mysore thorn)
Index
- Pictures
- Identity
- Summary of Invasiveness
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Description
- Plant Type
- Distribution
- Distribution Table
- History of Introduction and Spread
- Risk of Introduction
- Habitat
- Habitat List
- Biology and Ecology
- Latitude/Altitude Ranges
- Rainfall
- Rainfall Regime
- Soil Tolerances
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Impact Summary
- Economic Impact
- Environmental Impact
- Threatened Species
- Social Impact
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Uses
- Uses List
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- References
- Contributors
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate reportIdentity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Caesalpinia decapetala (Roth) Alston
Preferred Common Name
- Mysore thorn
Other Scientific Names
- Biancaea scandens Tod.
- Biancaea sepiaria (Roxb.) Tod.
- Bianceae decapetala (Roth) O. Deg.
- Caesalpinia benguetensis Elmer
- Caesalpinia decapetala var. japonica (Siebold & Zucc.) H. Ohashi
- Caesalpinia ferox Hassk.
- Caesalpinia japonica Siebold & Zucc.
- Caesalpinia sepiaria Roxb.
- Caesalpinia sepiaria var. japonica (Siebold & Zucc.) Gagnep.
- Caesalpinia sepiaria var. japonica (Siebold & Zucc.) Hand.-Mzt.
- Caesalpinia sepiaria var. japonica (Siebold & Zucc.) Makino
- Mezoneuron benguetense (Elmer) Elmer
- Reichardia decapetala Roth
International Common Names
- English: cat’s claws; cat's-claw; Mauritius-thorn; thorny poinciana; wait-a-bit; wait-a-while; woody wait-a-while
- Spanish: agarra ladrón; chembé bolé; chícara cimarrona; zarza de cercas
- French: brésillet du Japon; césalpinie du Japon
- Chinese: yun shi
Local Common Names
- Australia: Mauritius thorn; shoofly; tiger stopper; whoa back
- Germany: Cäsalpinie, Japanische; Mauritius-dorn
- Haiti: chembe bolo; ti-janvier; tijavier
- India/Indian Punjab: aila; chillari; gilo; karur; kurutu-gajjika; relan
- Indonesia: areuy matahiyang gunung
- Indonesia/Nusa Tenggara: secang lembut
- Italy: cesalpinia giapponese
- Japan: jaketsu-ibara
- Lesser Antilles: arrête-boeuf; caniroc
- Myanmar: sukyanbo
- South Africa: kraaldoring (Afrikaans); ubobo-encane (Zulu); ufenisi
- Thailand: kamchai
- Vietnam: vu'ôt hùm
EPPO code
- CAEJA (Caesalpinia japonica)
- CAESE (Caesalpinia sepiaria)
Summary of Invasiveness
Top of pageC. decapetala is an adaptable, vigorous, scrambling, very prickly shrub, climber or tree with showy yellow flowers. C. decapetala is capable of swamping native vegetation, changing the composition of the flora and creating a barrier to the movement of people and animals. It has become invasive in several countries where it was introduced intentionally. It is a declared category 1 weed in South Africa where it is invasive in forest edges and clearings, in manged plantations and along roads and rivers/streams (Henderson, 2001). In Australia, it is classed as a noxious weed (category W2) in New South Wales, where legislation states that it must be completely controlled and destroyed, and is prohibited in Western Australia until a weed risk assessment has been completed.
Taxonomic Tree
Top of page- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Plantae
- Phylum: Spermatophyta
- Subphylum: Angiospermae
- Class: Dicotyledonae
- Order: Fabales
- Family: Fabaceae
- Subfamily: Caesalpinioideae
- Genus: Caesalpinia
- Species: Caesalpinia decapetala
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Top of pageThe genus Caesalpinia has undergone much taxonomic change, with numerous synonymous genera having been described and/or postulated. It is a pantropical genus of trees, shrubs, woody scandent, and prickly climbers comprising approximately 157 species distributed throughout the world principally in tropical regions (ILDIS, 2014; Stevens, 2012). The leaves of all Caesalpinia are bipinnate, some very large with numerous leaflets, the flowers are in spikes from the upper leaf axils and may be quite showy, mostly in shades of red and yellow with separate petals and often conspicuous stamens. The seeds are in typical leguminous pods (Starr et al., 2003).
A variety of this species, var. japonica (Siebold & Zucc.) H. Ohashi has been described, based on the synonym Caesalpinia sepiaria Roxb. var. japonica (Siebold & Zucc.) Gagnep., but it is uncertain whether this is widely accepted.
Description
Top of pageC. decapetala is a robust and sprawling shrub or climber 0.5-10 m tall, with numerous straight to hooked thorns on the stems. Bipinnately compound leaves are dark green above, paler beneath, up to 30 cm long, with deciduous stipules 8-20 mm long. The leaf rachis is armed with downwardly hooked prickles. Each leaf consists of 3-15 pairs of pinnae, each pinna having 5-12 pairs of leaflets, elliptic-oblong to ovate, rounded at the apex, 10-22 mm long, 4-11 mm wide. Flowers are pale yellow, 25-30 mm diameter, borne in axillary and terminal racemes 10-40 cm long, petals 10-15 cm long and 8-15 mm wide. Fruits are dehiscent pods 6-11 cm long, 2-3 cm wide, containing 4-9 black ellipsoid, flattened, black seeds 8-12 mm long and 6-8 mm wide (Weber, 2003).
Distribution
Top of pageC. decapetala is very widely distributed in South and East Asia, approximately from the equator to 40°N. This species grows naturally in tropical and temperate regions from the Himalayas to Sri Lanka, and the native range extends east to China, Korea and Japan. C. decapetala has been widely cultivated and is now naturalized in tropical and subtropical regions in Africa, Australia, the Caribbean and on several islands in the Pacific Ocean (see distribution table for details).
Distribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
Last updated: 17 Feb 2021Continent/Country/Region | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | Planted | Reference | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Africa |
||||||||
Angola | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Botswana | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Burundi | Present | Introduced | Invasive | |||||
Cameroon | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Eswatini | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Ethiopia | Present | Introduced | Invasive | |||||
Kenya | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Liberia | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Malawi | Present | Introduced | Invasive | |||||
Mauritius | Present | Introduced | ||||||
-Rodrigues | Present | Introduced | Naturalized | Naturalized | ||||
Mozambique | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Nigeria | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Réunion | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Rwanda | Present | Introduced | Invasive | |||||
Sierra Leone | Present | Introduced | ||||||
South Africa | Present, Widespread | Introduced | Invasive | First reported: 1904-1908 | ||||
Sudan | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Tanzania | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Uganda | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Zambia | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Zimbabwe | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Asia |
||||||||
Bangladesh | Present | Native | ||||||
Bhutan | Present | Native | ||||||
Cambodia | Present | Native | ||||||
China | Present | Native | Planted | |||||
-Anhui | Present | Native | ||||||
-Fujian | Present | Native | ||||||
-Gansu | Present | Native | ||||||
-Guangdong | Present | Native | ||||||
-Guangxi | Present | Native | ||||||
-Guizhou | Present | Native | ||||||
-Hainan | Present | Native | ||||||
-Hebei | Present | Native | ||||||
-Henan | Present | Native | ||||||
-Hubei | Present | Native | ||||||
-Hunan | Present | Native | ||||||
-Jiangsu | Present | Native | ||||||
-Jiangxi | Present | Native | ||||||
-Shaanxi | Present | Native | ||||||
-Sichuan | Present | Native | ||||||
-Yunnan | Present | Native | ||||||
-Zhejiang | Present | Native | ||||||
Hong Kong | Present | Native | ||||||
India | Present | Native | ||||||
-Andhra Pradesh | Present | Native | ||||||
-Bihar | Present | Native | ||||||
-Chandigarh | Present | Native | ||||||
-Delhi | Present | Native | ||||||
-Goa | Present | Native | ||||||
-Gujarat | Present | Native | ||||||
-Haryana | Present | Native | ||||||
-Jammu and Kashmir | Present | Native | ||||||
-Karnataka | Present | Native | ||||||
-Kerala | Present | Native | ||||||
-Madhya Pradesh | Present | Native | ||||||
-Maharashtra | Present | Native | ||||||
-Odisha | Present | Native | ||||||
-Punjab | Present | Native | ||||||
-Rajasthan | Present | Native | ||||||
-Tamil Nadu | Present | Native | ||||||
-Uttar Pradesh | Present | Native | ||||||
-West Bengal | Present | Native | ||||||
Indonesia | Present | Native | ||||||
-Java | Present | Native | ||||||
-Sulawesi | Present | Native | ||||||
-Sumatra | Present | Native | ||||||
Japan | Present | Native | ||||||
-Ryukyu Islands | Present | Native | ||||||
Laos | Present | Native | ||||||
Malaysia | Present | Native | ||||||
-Peninsular Malaysia | Present | Native | ||||||
Myanmar | Present | Native | ||||||
Nepal | Present | Native | ||||||
North Korea | Present | Native | ||||||
Pakistan | Present | Native | ||||||
Philippines | Present | Native | ||||||
South Korea | Present | Native | ||||||
Sri Lanka | Present | Native | ||||||
Taiwan | Present | Native | Planted | |||||
Thailand | Present | Native | ||||||
Vietnam | Present | Native | ||||||
Europe |
||||||||
Spain | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | ||||||
-Canary Islands | Present | Introduced | Casual alien | |||||
North America |
||||||||
Barbados | Present | Introduced | Naturalized | Naturalized | ||||
Cuba | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Dominica | Present | Introduced | Naturalized | Naturalized | ||||
Dominican Republic | Present | Introduced | Invasive | |||||
Guadeloupe | Present | Introduced | Naturalized | Naturalized | ||||
Haiti | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Jamaica | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Martinique | Present | Introduced | Naturalized | Naturalized | ||||
Puerto Rico | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Saint Lucia | Present | Introduced | Naturalized | Naturalized | ||||
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Present | Introduced | Naturalized | Naturalized | ||||
United States | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | ||||||
-California | Present | Introduced | ||||||
-Florida | Present | Introduced | ||||||
-Hawaii | Present | Introduced | Invasive | |||||
Oceania |
||||||||
Australia | Present | Introduced | ||||||
-New South Wales | Present | Introduced | Invasive | |||||
-Northern Territory | Present | Introduced | Invasive | |||||
-Queensland | Present | Introduced | Invasive | |||||
-Western Australia | Present | Introduced | Invasive | |||||
Fiji | Present | Introduced | ||||||
French Polynesia | Present | Introduced | Invasive | |||||
New Caledonia | Present | Introduced | Invasive | |||||
New Zealand | Present | Introduced | 1965 | Invasive | ||||
-Kermadec Islands | Present | Introduced | Invasive | |||||
Norfolk Island | Present | Introduced | ||||||
Timor-Leste | Present | Native | ||||||
South America |
||||||||
Peru | Present | Introduced | Casual alien |
History of Introduction and Spread
Top of pageC. decapetala was introduced around the world as an ornamental, hedge and erosion control species, and has been reported to tend towards weediness in some situations such as in South Africa, Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific islands. It is known to have been introduced to New Zealand in 1965 and has subsequently become invasive (Haley, 2003). ). In Hawaii, C. decapetala was first recorded in 1888 (Starr et al., 2003). In The West Indies, C. decapelata was first recorded in Puerto Rico in 1900 (US National Herbarium). In South Africa C. decapetala was introduced around 1904, and by 1961 it is reported as invasive in the Kruger National Park (Foxcroft et al., 2007).
Risk of Introduction
Top of pageHabitat
Top of pageWeber (2003) reports that C. decapetala is typically associated with woodland and grassland in its native range. In exotic locations it occurs in riparian habitats, in grassland and on forest edges or clearings (Weber, 2003). In South Africa, Wildy (2001) links invasion with high rainfall areas along disturbed woodland edges, and degraded or overgrazed veld, watercourses and indigenous forests. Geldenhuys et al. (1986) names it as a problem in both plantations and natural forests in South Africa. C. decapetala is naturalized in Hawaii and found along roads, around derelict buildings and on other disturbed ground (PIER, 2002).
Habitat List
Top of pageCategory | Sub-Category | Habitat | Presence | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Terrestrial | ||||
Terrestrial | Managed | Managed forests, plantations and orchards | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Managed grasslands (grazing systems) | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Disturbed areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Rail / roadsides | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Urban / peri-urban areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Natural forests | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Natural grasslands | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Riverbanks | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Biology and Ecology
Top of pageGenetics
The chromosome number reported for C. decapetala varies from 2n = 22 to 2n = 24 (Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2014).
Reproductive Biology
C. decapetala produces large numbers of yellow flowers which are visited by insects including bees, butterflies and ants. In Hawaii, C. decapetala is visited by Xylocopa sonorina, Lampides boeticus, Apis mellifera and Technomyrmex albipes (Starr et al., 2003).
Physiology and Phenology
In Australia, flowering occurs mostly during winter and spring (i.e. from June to November). In Hawaii, plants produce flowers during the winter and spring (Starr et al., 2003) and in Puerto Rico the species flowers and fruits from September to June (Acevedo-Rodriguez, 2005).
C. decapetala regenerates from seed. These seeds may be eaten and dispersed by birds, small mammals, and cattle and they may also be transported abiotically by water. The branches may root where they touch the ground and the plant resprouts vigorously when cut (Wildy, 2001). C. decapetala does not fix nitrogen (Weber, 2003).
Environmental Requirements
C. decapetala prefers sub-humid to humid conditions, though will also tolerate drier environments and up to a six month dry season, with annual rainfall in the range 300-3000 mm. It tolerates a range of soils including shallow soils, and is found at altitudes from sea level up to 1700 m altitude.
Latitude/Altitude Ranges
Top of pageLatitude North (°N) | Latitude South (°S) | Altitude Lower (m) | Altitude Upper (m) |
---|---|---|---|
40 | 0 | 0 | 1700 |
Rainfall
Top of pageParameter | Lower limit | Upper limit | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Dry season duration | 0 | 6 | number of consecutive months with <40 mm rainfall |
Mean annual rainfall | 300 | 3000 | mm; lower/upper limits |
Soil Tolerances
Top of pageSoil drainage
- free
Soil texture
- heavy
- light
- medium
Special soil tolerances
- shallow
Notes on Natural Enemies
Top of pageThere is limited information available on the natural enemies of C. decapetala, although Henderson (2001) reports that biocontrol has been attempted in South Africa, where seed feeders have been released.
Means of Movement and Dispersal
Top of pageC. decapetala seeds may be dispersed by water, birds, small mammals and livestock, notably cattle in South Africa (Dean et al., 1986; Weber, 2003). The species has been widely introduced to form a security barrier against people or wild animals, and is also regarded as a striking ornamental. For these and other reasons it has been widely introduced by man outside its native range and has subsequently become invasive in several tropical countries.
Impact Summary
Top of pageCategory | Impact |
---|---|
Animal/plant collections | None |
Animal/plant products | None |
Biodiversity (generally) | Negative |
Crop production | None |
Environment (generally) | Negative |
Fisheries / aquaculture | None |
Forestry production | Negative |
Human health | None |
Livestock production | Negative |
Native fauna | None |
Native flora | Negative |
Rare/protected species | None |
Tourism | None |
Trade/international relations | None |
Transport/travel | Negative |
Economic Impact
Top of pageC. decapetala is one of a number of species that can impede forestry operations in managed plantations, and constitute a fire hazard (Geldenhuys et al., 1986).
It is extremely thorny and aggressive. It climbs on vegetation, has a smothering habit, and makes walking impossible. In Hawaii, C. decapetala presents a huge problem for ranches and has the capability to take over large areas of land, which may make pasture unavailable to grazing animals and restrict movement through forests. In addition, C. decapetala can engulf native forest and water delivery systems (Starr et al., 2003).
Environmental Impact
Top of pageC. decapetala is regarded as a 'transformer' species in South Africa, Australia, and Hawaii for its ability to alter the environmental conditions of areas it has invaded. It is able to climb over and outcompete other vegetation, so changing the composition of the vegetative assemblage. C. decapetala can form dense thickets, and when it climbs over indigenous species its weight in the canopy may cause the physical collapse of the tree it grows over (Geldenhuys et al., 1986). In Australia, C. decapetala is listed as an environmental weed of subtropical rainforest and remnant and can engulf fences, sheds, bridges and other infrastructure. It is difficult and dangerous to remove due to its covering of sharp recurved thorns. Its dense thickets can restrict water flows and modify waterways (Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, 2011). In South Africa, this species invades riverine habitats, forest margins, and savannas, shading out native vegetation and causing the collapse of adult trees.
Threatened Species
Top of pageThreatened Species | Conservation Status | Where Threatened | Mechanism | References | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nototrichium humile (kaala rockwort) | EN (IUCN red list: Endangered); USA ESA listing as endangered species | Hawaii | Competition - monopolizing resources | National Tropical Botanical Garden, 2007; US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2008 |
Social Impact
Top of pageRisk and Impact Factors
Top of page- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Highly adaptable to different environments
- Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
- Highly mobile locally
- Has high reproductive potential
- Damaged ecosystem services
- Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
- Negatively impacts agriculture
- Reduced native biodiversity
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Produces spines, thorns or burrs
- Highly likely to be transported internationally deliberately
- Difficult/costly to control
Uses
Top of pageC. decapetala forms dense thickets and hedges useful for pasture demarcation and boundaries, and it is also used as a shade tree. The bark has tanning properties, while the seeds are locally important for medicinal uses including anthelminthic, antipyretic, analgesic and possibly contraceptive properties. This species is also used to treat dysentery, malaria and neuraligia. In South Africa, where it has become invasive, it is used for security hedging (because of the thorns) and as an ornamental (Henderson, 2001). It has been introduced and used in forestry in Botswana, but owing to its invasiveness in nearby South Africa, it has been recommended that production of this species should stop in Botswana until the risk has been evaluated (Buss, 2002).
Uses List
Top of pageEnvironmental
- Agroforestry
- Boundary, barrier or support
- Soil improvement
General
- Ornamental
Materials
- Dye/tanning
Medicinal, pharmaceutical
- Source of medicine/pharmaceutical
Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
Top of pageGeldenhuys et al. (1986) report that confusion between C. decapetala and indigenous South African species which has led to some invasions of this species in going undetected.
Prevention and Control
Top of pageDue to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Mechanical Control
Weber (2003) reports that mechanical control is problematic due to the sharp thorns. However, seedlings and saplings may be dug up or pulled up manually (Wildy, 2001), as rootstocks will coppice if roots are not removed.
Chemical Control
According to Weber (2003), herbicides may be sprayed onto the leaves. Wildy (2001) describes foliar and stalk immersion approaches. PIER (2002) cite other information on the use of foliar applications of glyphosate and triclopyr, and soil applications of tebuthiuron. The herbicide treatment has to be repeated intervals to gradually reduce coverage and gain control of the plant as ensuring that the spray contacts sufficient parts of the plant is difficult when the plant has established large thickets.
Biological Control
Henderson (2001) reports that biocontrol has been attempted in South Africa where seed feeders have been released. A species that has recently been released as a biological control agent is the bruchid beetle Sulcobruchus subsuturalis (Coetzer, 2000). A further species under evaluation is the leafmining moth Acrocercops hyphantica (Anon, 2002).
Integrated Control
Wildy (2001) recommends that mechanical and chemical methods of control are used in combination. Due to the fact that cut plants are likely to coppice, Wildy (2001) recommends removing the entire rootstock or using herbicide after cutting operations. PIER (2002) note that it is the subject of an eradication programme on Raoul (Kermadec Islands).
References
Top of pageAcevedo-Rodríguez P, Strong MT, 2012. Catalogue of the Seed Plants of the West Indies. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, 98:1192 pp. Washington DC, USA: Smithsonian Institution. http://botany.si.edu/Antilles/WestIndies/catalog.htm
BioNET-EAFRINET (The East African Network for Taxonomy), 2011. Keys and Fact Sheets for Invasive Plants: Caesalpinia decapetala (Mysore Thorn). http://keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/eafrinet/weeds/key/weeds/Media/Html/Caesalpinia_decapetala_%28Mysore_Thorn%29.htm
Brandis D, 1921. Indian trees. Dehra Dun, India: Bisen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh
Broome R, Sabir K, Carrington S, 2007. Plants of the Eastern Caribbean. Online database. Barbados: University of the West Indies. http://ecflora.cavehill.uwi.edu/index.html
Buss CM, 2002. The potential threat of invasive tree species in Botswana. Department of Crop Production and Forestry, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of Botswana, 40 pp
DAISIE, 2014. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe. European Invasive Alien Species Gateway. www.europe-aliens.org/default.do
Dean SJ, Holmes PM, Weiss PW, 1986. Seed biology of invasive alien plants in South Africa and South West Africa / Namibia. In: Macdonald IAW, Kruger FJ, Ferrar AA (eds.), The Ecology and Management of Biological Invasions in Southern Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press, 157-170
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, 2005. Working for water programme. Biological control. http://www-dwaf.pwv.gov.za/wfw/Research/BioControl.asp
Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2014. Flora of China. St. Louis, Missouri and Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden and Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2
Foxcroft LC, Richardson DM, Wilson JRU, 2007. Ornamental plants as invasive aliens: problems and solutions in Kruger National Park, South Africa. Environmental Management, 41(1):32-51
Haley N, 2005. The big list of weeds. New Zealand. http://www.envbop.govt.nz/Weeds/Weed-Index.asp
Henderson L, 2001. Alien Weeds and Invasive Plants. Plant Protection Research Institute Handbook No. 12. Cape Town, South Africa: Paarl Printers
ILDIS, 2002. International Legume Database and Information Service. University of Southampton, UK. http://www.ildis.org/database/
ILDIS, 2014. International Legume Database and Information Service. Reading, UK: School of Plant Sciences, University of Reading. http://www.ildis.org/
National Tropical Botanical Garden, 2007. http://ntbg.org
NWSEC, 2002. Noxious weeds list for Australian States and Territories. National Weeds Strategy Executive Committee. http://www.weeds.org.au/docs/weednet6.pdf
PIER, 2002. Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk (PIER) (3.3). Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry. http://www.hear.org/pier/index.html
PIER, 2014. Pacific Islands Ecosystems at Risk. Honolulu, USA: HEAR, University of Hawaii. http://www.hear.org/pier/index.html
Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, 2011. Special edition of Environmental Weeds of Australia for Biosecurity Queensland., Australia: The University of Queensland and Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries. http://keyserver.lucidcentral.org/weeds/data/03030800-0b07-490a-8d04-0605030c0f01/media/Html/Index.htm
Starr F, Starr K, Loope LL, 2003. Caesalpinia decapetala. Plants of Hawaii. Hawaii, USA: US Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Haleakala Field Station. http://www.hear.org/pier/pdf/pohreports/caesalpinia_decapetala.pdf
Stevens PF, 2012. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/
Troup RS, Joshi HB, 1983. The Silviculture of Indian Trees. Vol IV. Leguminosae. Delhi, India; Controller of Publications
USDA-ARS, 2014. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx
USDA-NRCS, 2004. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5. Baton Rouge, USA: National Plant Data Center. http://plants.usda.gov
Wells MJ, Poynton RJ, Balsinhas AA, Musil KJ, Joffe H, van Hoepen E, Abbott SK, 1986. The history of introduction of invasive alien plants to southern Africa. In: Macdonald IAW, Kruger FJ, Ferrar AA, eds. The ecology and management of biological invasions in southern Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press, 21-35
Wildy E, 2001. Alien invader plants. Caesalpinia decapetala. Wildlife and Environmental Society of South Africa (WESSA). http://www.geocities.com/wessaaliens/species/mthorn.htm
Distribution References
BioNET-EAFRINET, 2011. Invasive plants key and fact sheets., http://keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/eafrinet/index.htm
Broome R, Sabir K, Carrington S, 2007. Plants of the Eastern Caribbean. Online database., Barbados: University of the West Indies. http://ecflora.cavehill.uwi.edu/index.htm
Buss CM, 2002. The potential threat of invasive tree species in Botswana., Department of Crop Production and Forestry, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of Botswana. 40 pp.
CABI, Undated. Compendium record. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated a. CABI Compendium: Status inferred from regional distribution. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated b. CABI Compendium: Status as determined by CABI editor. Wallingford, UK: CABI
DAISIE, 2014. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe. http://www.europe-aliens.org/
Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2014. Flora of China., St. Louis, Missouri and Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden and Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2
Henderson L, 2001. Alien Weeds and Invasive Plants. In: Plant Protection Research Institute Handbook No. 12, Cape Town, South Africa: Paarl Printers.
ILDIS, 2002. International Legume Database and Information Service., UK: University of Southampton. http://www.ildis.org/database/
ILDIS, 2014. International Legume Database and Information Service., Reading, UK: School of Plant Sciences, University of Reading. http://www.ildis.org/
NWSEC, 2002. Noxious weeds list for Australian States and Territories., National Weeds Strategy Executive Committee. http://www.weeds.org.au/docs/weednet6.pdf
PIER, 2002. Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk (PIER) (3.3). In: Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry, http://www.hear.org/pier/index.html
PIER, 2014. Pacific Islands Ecosystems at Risk., Honolulu, USA: HEAR, University of Hawaii. http://www.hear.org/pier/index.html
Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, 2011. Special edition of Environmental Weeds of Australia for Biosecurity Queensland., Australia: The University of Queensland and Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries. http://keyserver.lucidcentral.org/weeds/data/03030800-0b07-490a-8d04-0605030c0f01/media/Html/Index.htm
USDA-ARS, 2014. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysimple.aspx
USDA-NRCS, 2004. The PLANTS Database. Greensboro, North Carolina, USA: National Plant Data Team. https://plants.sc.egov.usda.gov
Wells MJ, Poynton RJ, Balsinhas AA, Musil KJ, Joffe H, van Hoepen E, Abbott SK, 1986. The history of introduction of invasive alien plants to southern Africa. In: The ecology and management of biological invasions in southern Africa, [ed. by Macdonald IAW, Kruger FJ, Ferrar AA]. Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press. 21-35.
Contributors
Top of page20/05/14 Updated by:
Julissa Rojas-Sandoval, Department of Botany-Smithsonian NMNH, Washington DC, USA
Pedro Acevedo-Rodríguez, Department of Botany-Smithsonian NMNH, Washington DC, USA
Distribution Maps
Top of pageSelect a dataset
Map Legends
-
CABI Summary Records
Map Filters
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/