Bromus rigidus (ripgut brome)
Index
- Pictures
- Identity
- Taxonomic Tree
- Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
- Description
- Plant Type
- Distribution
- Distribution Table
- Habitat
- Habitat List
- Hosts/Species Affected
- Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
- Growth Stages
- Biology and Ecology
- Rainfall
- Rainfall Regime
- Soil Tolerances
- Notes on Natural Enemies
- Means of Movement and Dispersal
- Plant Trade
- Impact Summary
- Impact
- Threatened Species
- Risk and Impact Factors
- Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
- Prevention and Control
- References
- Links to Websites
- Distribution Maps
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate reportPictures
Top of pageIdentity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Bromus rigidus Roth
Preferred Common Name
- ripgut brome
Other Scientific Names
- Anisantha diandra subsp. rigida (Roth) Tsvelev
- Anisantha rigida (Roth) Hyl.
- Bromus diandrus subsp. rigidus (Roth) Laínz
- Bromus diandrus var. rigidus (Roth) Sales
- Bromus maximus Desf.
- Bromus villosus Forssk.
International Common Names
- English: bronchograss; great brome; lesser bromegrass; rigid brome; ripgut bromegrass
- Spanish: barba de macho
- French: brome rigide
- Portuguese: espadana; fura-capa
Local Common Names
- Finland: villakattara
- France: brome rougeatre
- Germany: Steife Trespe
- Italy: forasacco purpureo
- Japan: higenagasuzumenochahiki
EPPO code
- BRORI (Bromus rigidus)
Taxonomic Tree
Top of page- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Plantae
- Phylum: Spermatophyta
- Subphylum: Angiospermae
- Class: Monocotyledonae
- Order: Cyperales
- Family: Poaceae
- Genus: Bromus
- Species: Bromus rigidus
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Top of pageBromus rigidus and B. diandrus are very closely related. In the USA, they are considered as one species. B. rigidus is treated as a subspecies of B. diandrus by Tsvelev (1984) (but in the genus Anisantha, as A. diandra subsp. rigida) and O'Connor (1990). A modern re-assessment of the taxonomy and nomenclature of the annual taxa within the mainly Mediterranean/southwestern Asiatic Bromus section Genea is given by Sales (1993) in which B. sterilis, B. diandrus and B. rigidus are considered as varieties of one species while recognizing that they have often been treated as separate species in recent floras. For the purposes of this Compendium, these three taxa are covered by separate species datasheets.
Description
Top of pageDistribution
Top of pageB. diandrus and other awned Bromus spp. were widespread weeds in Australia by the mid-1800s, but it was not until 1986 that B. rigidus was reported (Cooper and Moerkerk, 2000). It is widely distributed across southern Australia, often growing unrecognized in association with B. diandrus (Kon and Blacklow, 1988). In the eastern part of its range in Australia there appears to be a continuum between typical B. diandrus and B. rigidus types (Cooper and Moerkerk, 2000).
Distribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
Last updated: 10 Jan 2020Continent/Country/Region | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | Reference | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Africa |
|||||||
Algeria | Present, Widespread | Native | Invasive | ||||
Egypt | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Libya | Present | Native | |||||
Morocco | Present | Native | |||||
South Africa | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Tunisia | Present | Native | Invasive | ||||
Asia |
|||||||
Israel | Present | Native | |||||
Japan | Present | Introduced | |||||
Jordan | Present | Native | Invasive | Original citation: Cooper and Moerkerk (2000) | |||
South Korea | Present | Introduced | Original citation: Cooper and Moerkerk (2000) | ||||
Syria | Present | Native | Invasive | Original citation: Cooper and Moerkerk (2000) | |||
Thailand | Present | Introduced | |||||
Turkey | Present | Native | |||||
Europe |
|||||||
Cyprus | Present | Native | |||||
Czechoslovakia | Present | Introduced | |||||
France | Present | Native | |||||
-Corsica | Present | Native | |||||
Greece | Present | Native | |||||
-Crete | Present | Native | |||||
Hungary | Present | Native | |||||
Italy | Present | Native | |||||
-Sardinia | Present | Native | |||||
-Sicily | Present | Native | |||||
Portugal | Present | Native | |||||
-Azores | Present | Native | |||||
-Madeira | Present | Native | |||||
Romania | Present | Native | |||||
Serbia and Montenegro | Present | Native | |||||
Spain | Present | Native | |||||
-Balearic Islands | Present | Native | |||||
-Canary Islands | Present | Native | Original citation: Scholz and Böcker (1996) | ||||
North America |
|||||||
British Virgin Islands | Present | Introduced | Invasive | Original citation: Gleason and Cronquist (1991) | |||
Canada | Present | Present based on regional distribution. | |||||
-British Columbia | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
Mexico | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
United States | Present | Introduced | |||||
-California | Present | Introduced | Original citation: Jain (1982) | ||||
-Hawaii | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Oregon | Present | Introduced | |||||
Oceania |
|||||||
Australia | Present | Introduced | Invasive | ||||
-South Australia | Present | Introduced | |||||
-Victoria | Present | Introduced | Original citation: Cooper and Moerkerk (2000) | ||||
-Western Australia | Present | Introduced | |||||
New Zealand | Present | Introduced | Original citation: Cooper and Moerkerk (2000) | ||||
South America |
|||||||
Argentina | Present | Introduced |
Habitat
Top of pageHabitat List
Top of pageCategory | Sub-Category | Habitat | Presence | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Terrestrial | ||||
Terrestrial | Managed | Cultivated / agricultural land | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Managed forests, plantations and orchards | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Disturbed areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Rail / roadsides | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Managed | Urban / peri-urban areas | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Terrestrial | Natural / Semi-natural | Natural forests | Present, no further details | Harmful (pest or invasive) |
Hosts/Species Affected
Top of pageHost Plants and Other Plants Affected
Top of pagePlant name | Family | Context | References |
---|---|---|---|
Beta vulgaris (beetroot) | Chenopodiaceae | Main | |
Cicer arietinum (chickpea) | Fabaceae | Main | |
Helianthus annuus (sunflower) | Asteraceae | Main | |
Hordeum vulgare (barley) | Poaceae | Main | |
Lens culinaris subsp. culinaris (lentil) | Fabaceae | Main | |
Triticum aestivum (wheat) | Poaceae | Main | |
Triticum turgidum (durum wheat) | Poaceae | Main | |
Vicia faba (faba bean) | Fabaceae | Main |
Biology and Ecology
Top of pageThe chromosome number is 2n = 42 (Esnault and Huon, 1987). This compares with the very similar B. diandrus which is 2n = 56 (Kon and Blacklow, 1988).
Physiology and Phenology
Ungerminated seeds can remain viable in the surface soil for 2-3 years. Establishment is more rapid and uniform when seeds are incorporated into the soil but can be protracted when seeds emerge from variable depths of burial or have been left on the soil surface. Bromus spp. seeds germinated and emerged at a soil depth of 15 cm, but greater depths resulted in germination, but no emergence (Hamal et al., 1998).
Plant densities of Bromus species (including B. rigidus) in Morocco varied from 330 to 661 plants/m², with a maximum height of 102 cm and a leaf area index of 6. The net daily assimilation rate was 4 g/m² and daily growth rates varied from 3.2 to 7.7 g/m². Nitrogen content of leaves varied from 4.1 to 3.8% and the total protein content of seeds was 10.9%. The weight of 1000 kernels varied from 20 to 24 g (Hamal et al., 1998).
Reproductive Biology
B. rigidus germinates, grows and produces seeds during the winter, spring and early summer. In Australia, B. rigidus matured earlier than the similar species B. diandrus, but there was high genetic variation in the time of maturity of both species (Kon and Blacklow, 1988). Seed production can range from 600 to over 3000 seeds per plant (Cooper and Moerkerk, 2000) and 63-786 kg/ha (Hamal, 1993). The viability of stored seeds at 10°C was 38 months. Good germination of seeds stored for up to 6 years was observed in the dark at 20, 25 and 30°C (Fenni, 1995).
For further detail on the biology of B. rigidus (and B. diandrus), refer to Groves et al. (1995).
Rainfall
Top of pageParameter | Lower limit | Upper limit | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Mean annual rainfall | 250 | mm; lower/upper limits |
Soil Tolerances
Top of pageSoil drainage
- free
Soil reaction
- alkaline
Soil texture
- light
- medium
Special soil tolerances
- shallow
Notes on Natural Enemies
Top of pageMeans of Movement and Dispersal
Top of pagePlant Trade
Top of pagePlant parts liable to carry the pest in trade/transport | Pest stages | Borne internally | Borne externally | Visibility of pest or symptoms |
---|---|---|---|---|
True seeds (inc. grain) | seeds | Yes | Pest or symptoms usually visible to the naked eye |
Impact Summary
Top of pageCategory | Impact |
---|---|
Animal/plant collections | None |
Animal/plant products | None |
Biodiversity (generally) | Positive |
Crop production | Negative |
Environment (generally) | Positive |
Fisheries / aquaculture | None |
Forestry production | None |
Human health | None |
Livestock production | Negative |
Native fauna | None |
Native flora | Negative |
Rare/protected species | None |
Tourism | None |
Trade/international relations | None |
Transport/travel | None |
Impact
Top of pageIn addition, Bromus species can host cereal diseases and are contaminants of grain and wool and they damage animal hides. In pastures, the sharply pointed base of the 'seeds' penetrate eyes, mouth and feet of animals and working dogs (Cooper and Moerkerk, 2000), hence the name 'ripgut brome'.
Threatened Species
Top of pageThreatened Species | Conservation Status | Where Threatened | Mechanism | References | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poa mannii (Mann's bluegrass) | CR (IUCN red list: Critically endangered); USA ESA listing as endangered species | Hawaii | Competition - monopolizing resources | US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2010a | |
Schiedea apokremnos (Kauai schiedea) | CR (IUCN red list: Critically endangered); USA ESA listing as endangered species | Hawaii | Competition (unspecified) | US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2010b |
Risk and Impact Factors
Top of page- Proved invasive outside its native range
- Highly adaptable to different environments
- Highly mobile locally
- Has high reproductive potential
- Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
- Negatively impacts agriculture
- Negatively impacts animal health
- Competition - monopolizing resources
- Competition (unspecified)
- Pest and disease transmission
- Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally
Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
Top of pagePrevention and Control
Top of pageDue to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Mechanical ControlDeep tillage decreased B. rigidus germination (Hamal et al., 2001), whereas shallow tillage increased seedling emergence and subsequent seedbank decline (Gleichsner and Appleby, 1989).
Chemical Control
Good to moderate efficacy was obtained with sulfosulfuron under greenhouse and field conditions (Tanji, 2001). In Australia, incorporation of metribuzin alone or mixed with pendimethalin at the time of sowing gave reliable control of B. rigidus (Gill and Bowran, 1990). In Morocco, metribuzin also gave good to excellent control of B. rigidus (Saffour and Bouhache, 1996; Hamal et al., 1998); sulfosulfuron is registered for Bromus control and is applied post emergence giving excellent selectivity in wheat fields (Hamal et al., 2000).
A short-awned ecotype of B. rigidus from Western Australia had 30% residual innate dormancy and this, together with the earlier maturity of ecotypes of B. rigidus, could make it more difficult to control than B. diandrus when both species coexist in the field (Kon and Blacklow, 1988).
References
Top of pageAli SI, Jafri SMH, El Gadi A, 1989. Flora of Libya. Tripoli, Libya: Al Faateh University.
Arnold TH, de Wet BC, 1993. Plants of southern Africa: names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa, No. 62. Pretoria, Republic of South Africa: Botanical Research Institute.
CalEPPC, 1999. Exotic pest plant list. California Exotic Pest Plant Council, USA. http://www.caleppc.org/info/plantlist.html.
Cheam AH, Gill G, Zaicou C, 1992. Managing brome grass [Bromus diandrus and B. rigidus] in the wheat:lupin [Lupinus sp.] rotation. Journal of Agriculture, Western Australia, 33(3):95-99
Clapham AR, Tutin TG, Warburg EF, eds, 1952. Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cooper J, Moerkerk M, 2000. Bromus diandrus, Bromus rigidus. Weed ID/ Management. Australia. http://weedman.horsham.net.au/weeds/bromus_spp/bromus.htm.
Davis PH, 1988. Flora of Turkey and the east Aegean islands. Edinburgh, UK: University Press.
Gibbs Russel GE, Watson L, Koekemoer M, Smook L, Barker NP, Anderson HM, Dallwitz MJ, 1955. Grasses of Southern Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Society of Southern Africa No.58. South Africa: Botanical Research Institute.
Gleason HA, Cronquist A, 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Second edition. New York, USA: The New York Botanical Garden.
Guinochet M, Vilmorin R de, 1984. Flore de France, Vols 1-5. Paris, France: Editions du CNRS.
Hamal A, 1993. Concurrence entre le blé dur (Triticum durum Desf.) et une communauté d’adventices dominée par le brome (Bromus rigidus Roth.) dans le Saïs (Maroc). Mémoire de 3ème Cycle, Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, Rabat, Maroc.
Hitchcock A, 1944. Poaceae. In: Abrams L, ed. Illustrated Flora of the Pacific States. 1. Ophioglossaceae to Aristolochiaceae. Stanford, California, USA: Stanford University Press, 103-255.
Hitchcock S, 1950. Manual of the Grasses of the United States. New York, USA: Dover Publications Inc.
Holm L, Pancho J, Herberger J, Plucknett D, 1979. A Geographical Atlas of World Weeds. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Holmgren A, Holmgren N, 1977. Poaceae. In Cronquist et al., eds. Intermountain Flora. Volume 6. The monocotyledons. New York, USA: Botanical Garden and Columbia University Press, 175-462.
Hussey BMJ, Keighery GJ, Coussens RD, Dodd J, Lloyd SG, 1997. Western weeds: A Guide of the Weeds of Western Australia. Perth, Australia: Plant Protection Society of Western Australia, 44-47.
Jahandiez E, Maire R, 1931. Catalogue des Plantes du Maroc. Algiers, Morocco: Minerva.
Koyama T, 1987. Grasses of Japan and its neighbouring regions. An identification manual, Kodansha, Tokyo.
Lozano CC, Rivas Ponse A, 1993. Algunas consideraciones sobre la especies Bromus rigidus Roth en la Península Ibérica y Baleares. Bot. Complutensis [Madrid], 18:93-104.
Maire R, 1955. Flore de l’Afrique du Nord. Volume III, Encyclopédie Biologique, Lechevalier éditeur, Paris VI.
Meikle RD, 1985. Flora of Cyprus. Volume Two. 1985, xiii + 1136 (833 1970) pp.; many ref.
Mouterde P, 1984. Nouvelle flore du Liban et de la Syrie. In: Charpin A, Greuter W, Dar El Machreq. Beyrouth: Editions De L' Imprimerie Catholique.
O’Connor P, 1990. Poaceae. In: Wagner WL, Herbst DR, Sohmer SH, eds. Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawai`i. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press & Bishop Museum Press, 1481-1604.
Osorio-Tafall BF, Seraphim GM, 1973. List of the vascular plants of Cyprus. Nicosia, Cyprus: Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
Paterson JG, 1992. Grasses in south Western Australia. Illustrations and descriptions of Bromus species. Department of Agriculture WA Bulletin 4210:34-35.
Post GE, 1933. Flora of Syria, Palestine and Sinaï. JE Dinsmore, Beirut, Liban.
Quezél P, Santa S, 1963. Nouvelle Flore de l'Algerie. Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France.
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 2004. Flora Europaea Database. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, UK. http://rbg-web2.rbge.org.uk/FE/fe.html.
Scholz H, Böcker R, 1996. Additions and notes to the grass flora (Poaceae) of the Canary Islands. Willdenowia, 25(2):571-582.
Smith P, 1980. Bromus. In: Tutin et al., eds. Flora Europaea. Volume 5. Alismataceae to Orchidaceae. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 182-189.
Stace C, 1991. New Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Taleb A, 1997. Le brome: monographie. Revue de l’AMM, 1(1):2-6.
Tanji A, 2000. Mauvaises herbes du blé et de l’orge dans le périmètre du Tadla. Al-Awamia, No.102:49-57.
Tsvelev N, 1984. Grasses of the Soviet Union. Part 1. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Balkema, 1-568.
USDA-ARS, 2004. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx
Valdes B, Rejdali M, Achhal-El kadmiri A, Jury SL, Montserrat JM, 2002. Checklist of Vascular Plants of N Morocco. Vol. 2. Madrid, Spain: Editions CSIC.
Valdes B, Talavera S, Fernadez-Galiano E, 1987. Flora Vascular de Andalucia Occidental, Vol. 3. Barcelona, Spain.
Distribution References
Ali SI, Jafri SMH, El Gadi A, 1989. Flora of Libya., Tripoli, Libya: Al Faateh University.
CABI, Undated. Compendium record. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated a. CABI Compendium: Status inferred from regional distribution. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CABI, Undated b. CABI Compendium: Status as determined by CABI editor. Wallingford, UK: CABI
CalEPPC, 1999. Exotic pest plant list., USA: California Exotic Pest Plant Council. http://www.caleppc.org/info/plantlist.html
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 2004. Flora Europaea Database., Edinburgh, UK: Royal Botanic Garden. http://rbg-web2.rbge.org.uk/FE/fe.html
USDA-ARS, 2004. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysimple.aspx
Links to Websites
Top of pageWebsite | URL | Comment |
---|---|---|
GISD/IASPMR: Invasive Alien Species Pathway Management Resource and DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway | https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m93f6 | Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list. |
Global register of Introduced and Invasive species (GRIIS) | http://griis.org/ | Data source for updated system data added to species habitat list. |
Distribution Maps
Top of pageSelect a dataset
Map Legends
-
CABI Summary Records
Map Filters
Unsupported Web Browser:
One or more of the features that are needed to show you the maps functionality are not available in the web browser that you are using.
Please consider upgrading your browser to the latest version or installing a new browser.
More information about modern web browsers can be found at http://browsehappy.com/