Datasheet
Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia)
Don't need the entire report?
Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.
Generate report
Pictures
Top of page| Picture | Title | Caption | Copyright |  | Title | Adult |
|---|
| Caption | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); adult fish, captive specimen. Cincinnati Zoo, Ohio, USA. |
|---|
| Copyright | ©Greg Hume - CC BY-SA 3.0 |
|---|
 |
| Adult | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); adult fish, captive specimen. Cincinnati Zoo, Ohio, USA. | ©Greg Hume - CC BY-SA 3.0 |
 | Title | Adult |
|---|
| Caption | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); adult, captive specimen. |
|---|
| Copyright | ©iStock Images |
|---|
 |
| Adult | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); adult, captive specimen. | ©iStock Images |
 | Title | Adult |
|---|
| Caption | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); adult male, ca. 250 mm total length. From the Gascoyne River, in the Indian Ocean drainage region of Western Australia. |
|---|
| Copyright | ©Mark Maddern |
|---|
 |
| Adult | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); adult male, ca. 250 mm total length. From the Gascoyne River, in the Indian Ocean drainage region of Western Australia. | ©Mark Maddern |
 | Title | Habitat |
|---|
| Caption | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); location of an introduced population of O. mossambicus. Chapman River, in the Indian Ocean drainage region of Western Australia. |
|---|
| Copyright | ©Mark Maddern |
|---|
 |
| Habitat | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); location of an introduced population of O. mossambicus. Chapman River, in the Indian Ocean drainage region of Western Australia. | ©Mark Maddern |
 | Title | Habitat |
|---|
| Caption | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); location of an introduced population of O. mossambicus. Gascoyne River, in the Indian Ocean drainage region of Western Australia. |
|---|
| Copyright | ©Mark Maddern |
|---|
 |
| Habitat | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); location of an introduced population of O. mossambicus. Gascoyne River, in the Indian Ocean drainage region of Western Australia. | ©Mark Maddern |
 | Title | Habitat and nests |
|---|
| Caption | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); nests of O. mossambicus. Males create the nests by clearing the substrate of debris and aquatic macrophytes. Two fish are visible in the top right of the picture. Gascoyne River in the Indian Ocean drainage region of Western Australia. |
|---|
| Copyright | ©Mark Maddern |
|---|
 |
| Habitat and nests | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); nests of O. mossambicus. Males create the nests by clearing the substrate of debris and aquatic macrophytes. Two fish are visible in the top right of the picture. Gascoyne River in the Indian Ocean drainage region of Western Australia. | ©Mark Maddern |
 | Title | Parental care |
|---|
| Caption | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); male, guarding a nest. Gascoyne River, in the Indian Ocean drainage region of Western Australia. |
|---|
| Copyright | ©Mark Maddern |
|---|
 |
| Parental care | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); male, guarding a nest. Gascoyne River, in the Indian Ocean drainage region of Western Australia. | ©Mark Maddern |
 | Title | Male |
|---|
| Caption | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); male. While guarding nests, male fish will aggressively strike fishing lures that ente their territory. Gascoyne River, in the Indian Ocean drainage region of Western Australia. |
|---|
| Copyright | ©Mark Maddern |
|---|
 |
| Male | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); male. While guarding nests, male fish will aggressively strike fishing lures that ente their territory. Gascoyne River, in the Indian Ocean drainage region of Western Australia. | ©Mark Maddern |
 | Title | Net catch |
|---|
| Caption | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); juvenile and subadults. Ccollected by seine net from the Chapman River in the Indian Ocean drainage region of Western Australia. |
|---|
| Copyright | ©Mark Maddern |
|---|
 |
| Net catch | Oreochromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia); juvenile and subadults. Ccollected by seine net from the Chapman River in the Indian Ocean drainage region of Western Australia. | ©Mark Maddern |
Identity
Top of pagePreferred Scientific Name
- Oreochromis mossambicus (Peters, 1852)
Preferred Common Name
Other Scientific Names
- Chromis dumerilii Steindachner, 1864
- Chromis mossambicus Peters, 1852
- Chromis natalensis Weber, 1897
- Chromis niloticus (non Linnaeus, 1758)
- Chromis niloticus mossambicus Peters, 1852
- Chromis vorax Pfeffer, 1893
- Cromis mossambicus Peters, 1852
- Oreochromis mossambica Peters, 1852
- Oreochromis mozambica (Peters, 1852)
- Saratherodon mossambica Peters, 1852
- Sarotherodon mossambicus (Peters, 1852)
- Tilapia arnoldi Gilchrist & Thompson, 1917
- Tilapia dumerilii (Steindachner, 1864)
- Tilapia kafuensis (non Boulenger, 1912)
- Tilapia mosambica Peters, 1852
- Tilapia mossambica (Peters, 1852)
- Tilapia mossambica mossambica (Peters, 1852)
- Tilapia mossambicus (Peters, 1852)
- Tilapia natalensis (Weber, 1897)
- Tilapia vorax (Pfeffer, 1893)
International Common Names
- English: african mouthbrooder; common tilapia; java tilapia; kurper bream; largemouth kurper; mozambique cichlid; mozambique mouthbrooder; tilapia; tilapia, Mozambique
- Spanish: mojarra; tilapia del Mozambique; tilapia mozámbica
- French: tilapia; tilapia du Mozambique
- Russian: mozambikskaya tilapiya
- Arabic: boulti
- Chinese: lou fei; wu-Kuo yu
Local Common Names
- Cambodia: trey tilapia khmao
- Fiji: malea
- Germany: Mosambik-Maulbrüter; Mossambik-Buntbarsch; Weißkehlbarsch
- Hong Kong: fai chau chak ue; gam san tsak
- India: jelebi meen; jilebi; kolathile-meen; mandapa; thilapia; tilapia
- Indonesia: Java tilapia; mujair
- Japan: kawasuzume
- Kenya: chambo
- Malawi: mphende
- Malaysia: tilapia
- Martinique: lapia
- Mozambique: nkobue
- Portugal: tilápia-de-Moçambique
- South Africa: blou kurper
- Sri Lanka: tilapia
- Suriname: tilapia
- Sweden: mossambique-tilapia
- Tanzania: chambo
Summary of Invasiveness
Top of page
O. mossambicus is an important food fish and the most widely distributed of the tilapias. The fish is native to the southern and southeastern portions of the African continent, not quite reaching the Cape Regions of South Africa. Essentially most of the eastward flowing rivers in east Africa are native habitat. It has been widely introduced for fish farming, insect and weed control, and sport and bait purposes. Such introductions have often been associated with severe environmental change. Tilapia are often described as 'pioneer' species, meaning they thrive in disturbed habitats, opportunistically migrating and reproducing.
Taxonomic Tree
Top of page
- Domain: Eukaryota
- Kingdom: Metazoa
- Phylum: Chordata
- Subphylum: Vertebrata
- Class: Actinopterygii
- Order: Perciformes
- Family: Cichlidae
- Genus: Oreochromis
- Species: Oreochromis mossambicus
Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Top of page
Tilapia is a common name that is now applied to several genera and species of fish that were formerly classified in the genus Tilapia, in the Family Cichlidae. In the reclassification scheme developed by Trewavas (1983) the several hundred species of Tilapia were split into three genera, Oreochromis, Sarotherodon and some remained as Tilapia. The Oreochromis are maternal mouthbrooders, the Sarotherodon are paternal mouthbrooders and the Tilapia are substrate spawners.
Description
Top of pageThe tilapias have a continuous dorsal fin, three or more anal spines, a single nostril on each side and the lateral line is interrupted.
Distribution
Top of page
Mozambique tilapia have been introduced into more than 50 countries on all the continents except Antarctica (Pullin et al., 1997). For further detail on non-indigenous occurences in the USA see Nico (2011).
Distribution Table
Top of pageThe distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be selected by going to Generate Report.
| Country | Distribution | Last Reported | Origin | First Reported | Invasive | References | Notes | SEA AREAS |
| Pacific, Western Central | Present | | Native | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
ASIA |
| Bangladesh | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Cambodia | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| China | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| -Fujian | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Guangdong | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Guangxi | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Hainan | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Hong Kong | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| -Macau | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Shandong | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| East Timor | Present | | Native | | | Froese & Pauly, 2011 | |
| India | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Indonesia | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Israel | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Japan | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Jordan | Present | | Native | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Korea, Republic of | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Kuwait | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Laos | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Lebanon | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Malaysia | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| -Peninsular Malaysia | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Maldives | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Myanmar | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Nepal | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Pakistan | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Philippines | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Saudi Arabia | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Singapore | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Sri Lanka | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Syria | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Taiwan | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Thailand | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Turkey | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| United Arab Emirates | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Vietnam | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Yemen | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
AFRICA |
| Algeria | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Angola | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese & Pauly, 2011 | |
| Benin | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Botswana | Present | | Native | | | Froese & Pauly, 2011 | |
| Cameroon | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Cape Verde | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Congo | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Congo Democratic Republic | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese & Pauly, 2011 | |
| Côte d'Ivoire | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Egypt | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Eritrea | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Ethiopia | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Kenya | Present | | Native | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Lesotho | Present | | Native | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Madagascar | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Malawi | Present | | Native | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Mayotte | Present | | | | | Froese & Pauly, 2011 | Questionable |
| Mozambique | Present | | Native | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Namibia | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Nigeria | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Réunion | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese & Pauly, 2011 | |
| Rwanda | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Senegal | Present | | | | | Froese & Pauly, 2011 | Questionable |
| Seychelles | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| South Africa | Present | | Native | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Spain | | | | | | | |
| -Canary Islands | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Sudan | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Swaziland | Present | | Native | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Tanzania | Present | | Native | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Zanzibar | Present | | Native | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Tunisia | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Uganda | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Zambia | Present | | Native | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Zimbabwe | Present | | Native | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
NORTH AMERICA |
| Canada | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Alberta | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -British Columbia | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Manitoba | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Ontario | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Mexico | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| USA | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| -Alabama | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Arizona | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Arkansas | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -California | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Colorado | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Connecticut | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Delaware | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Florida | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Georgia | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Hawaii | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| -Idaho | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Illinois | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Indiana | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Iowa | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Kansas | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Kentucky | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Louisiana | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Maryland | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Massachusetts | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Michigan | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Minnesota | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Mississippi | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Missouri | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Montana | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese & Pauly, 2011 | |
| -New Hampshire | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -New Jersey | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -New Mexico | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -New York | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -North Carolina | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -North Dakota | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Ohio | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Oklahoma | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Oregon | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Pennsylvania | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -South Carolina | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -South Dakota | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Texas | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Virginia | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Washington | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -West Virginia | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
CENTRAL AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN |
| Antigua and Barbuda | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Bahamas | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Barbados | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Costa Rica | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Cuba | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Dominica | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Dominican Republic | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| El Salvador | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Grenada | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004; Froese & Pauly, 2011 | |
| Guatemala | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Haiti | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Honduras | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Jamaica | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Martinique | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Netherlands Antilles | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Nicaragua | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Panama | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Puerto Rico | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Saint Lucia | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Trinidad and Tobago | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| United States Virgin Islands | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
SOUTH AMERICA |
| Argentina | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Bolivia | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Brazil | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| -Bahia | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Ceara | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Espirito Santo | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Minas Gerais | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Pernambuco | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Rio de Janeiro | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Sao Paulo | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Colombia | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Ecuador | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Guyana | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Paraguay | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Peru | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Suriname | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Uruguay | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Venezuela | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
EUROPE |
| Belgium | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| France | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Germany | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; NOBANIS, 2011 | |
| Hungary | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Italy | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Malta | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Netherlands | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| Russian Federation | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| -Northern Russia | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
| UK | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997 | |
OCEANIA |
| American Samoa | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Australia | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Caroline Islands | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese & Pauly, 2011 | |
| Cook Islands | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Fiji | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| French Polynesia | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004; Froese & Pauly, 2011 | |
| Guam | Present | | Introduced | | | Pullin et al., 1997; Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Kiribati | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Micronesia, Federated states of | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Nauru | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| New Caledonia | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Niue | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Northern Mariana Islands | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004; Froese & Pauly, 2011 | |
| Papua New Guinea | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Samoa | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Solomon Islands | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Tonga | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Tuvalu | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| US Minor Outlying Islands | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Vanuatu | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
| Wallis and Futuna Islands | Present | | Introduced | | | Froese Pauly, 2004 | |
History of Introduction and Spread
Top of page
The Mozambique tilapia was the first tilapia to be widely distributed as a farmed fish. It was transferred to the Island of Java in the 1930s. Its rapid spread and adoption as a popular food across Indonesia led to the common name of Java tilapia as many did not realize it was not native.
Dispersal of the Mozambique tilapia accelerated in the 1940s and 1950s with Japanese occupiers and later post-war reconstruction efforts spreading the fish to several countries in Asia. Sixty individuals were sent from Singapore to Hawaii in 1951. Progeny of these fish were later sent to public aquariums in California and New York, who later shared further progeny with universities and resource agencies in Alabama, Arizona and California. Tilapias are important to aquaculture because of the ease with which they can be bred in captivity and the wide variety of water conditions in which the fish will grow.
Habitat
Top of page
Mozambique tilapia will grow in water ranging from acidic (pH of 5) to alkaline (pH of 9). The Mozambique tilapia is also the most saline tolerant of the major farmed tilapia. They can easily be acclimated to full strength seawater. However, viability of eggs and fry is greatly reduced (but not eliminated) in marine water. Tilapia can survive low dissolved oxygen (<2 mg/L) and high ammonia levels (50 mg/L) for longer periods than most other fish.
Biology and Ecology
Top of page
Reproductive Biology
Mozambique tilapia are maternal mouthbrooders. A female lays her eggs in a simple nest prepared by the male, the male fertilizes the eggs and then the female picks the eggs up and incubates them in her mouth. Even after eggs hatch, fry will remain in the mother’s mouth. Once the fry are free-swimming they will return to her mouth for protection. Females can produce several hundred to more than a thousand young per spawn. The high level of parental care allows breeders to quickly raise thousands of young for directed selection or for stocking into production units. Another advantage is that the adults become sexually mature in less than six months, when they are still a fraction of their potential size. This is an additional advantage for selective breeding, allowing several generations to be produced in the time it takes other fish to reach maturity. The drawback to this high potential for reproduction is that tilapia introduced to new (exotic) locations can quickly spread and impact native fish populations. Likewise in production ponds without predators, tilapia can over-populate ending up with large numbers of small, stunted fish. This can present a serious problem for aquaculturalists who are attempting to rear a large size fish for market. Several methods are used to avoid over-population and stunting including use of predator fish, sex-reversal, reduced fecundity hybrids, and hand removal of females.
Eggs of tilapia are relatively large and fry are hardy and omnivorous. Fry readily feed on a variety of foods including periphyton and phytoplankton (attached and floating algae), zooplankton and powdered feed. This allows the culturist to further manipulate spawning by removing the young from the female and raising them independent of the mother. Removal of fry will encourage the female to begin eating again (she eats little while brooding) and be ready to spawn again in several weeks. Sex of fry can be manipulated in several ways. Undifferentiated sexual organs of juvenile tilapia can be induced to produce phenotypic all male or all female populations. Males grow more rapidly and crops of primarily males will avoid problems associated with unwanted spawning.
Environmental Requirements
In nature, tilapia receive all of their nutrition from algae, higher plants, detrital matter and/or small invertebrates.
Climate
Top of page| Climate | Status | Description | Remark | | A - Tropical/Megathermal climate | Preferred | Average temp. of coolest month > 18°C, > 1500mm precipitation annually | |
| B - Dry (arid and semi-arid) | Tolerated | < 860mm precipitation annually | |
| C - Temperate/Mesothermal climate | Tolerated | Average temp. of coldest month > 0°C and < 18°C, mean warmest month > 10°C | |
Air Temperature
Top of page| Parameter | Lower limit | Upper limit | | Mean annual temperature (ºC) | 24 | 30 |
| Mean maximum temperature of hottest month (ºC) | 20 | 35 |
| Mean minimum temperature of coldest month (ºC) | 14 | 20 |
Pathway Causes
Top of page| Cause | Notes | Long Distance | Local | References | | Aquaculture | | Yes | Yes | |
| Escape from confinement/ garden escape | Releases or escapes from fish farms, hatcheries and zoos | | Yes | Nico, 2011 |
| Hunting/angling/sport/racing | As a sport fish | Yes | Yes | Nico, 2011 |
| Intentional release | For aquatic plant control | Yes | Yes | Nico, 2011 |
Impact Summary
Top of page| Category | Impact | | Animal/plant collections | Positive |
| Biodiversity (generally) | Negative |
| Crop production | Positive |
| Environment (generally) | Negative |
| Fisheries / aquaculture | Positive |
| Human health | Positive |
| Native flora | Negative |
| Rare/protected species | Negative |
| Tourism | Positive |
| Trade/international relations | Positive |
| Transport/travel | Positive |
Environmental Impact
Top of page
Introductions of Mozambique tilapia were for farming, insect and weed control, and tuna bait purposes. Tilapia introductions were often associated with severe environmental change, especially construction of reservoirs and large-scale irrigation projects. Tilapia are often described as 'pioneer' species, meaning they thrive in disturbed habitats, opportunistically migrating and reproducing. Often they were introduced into areas that have severe environmental damage where natives were already at risk. The tilapia are better able to adapt to the new conditions and the natives have been forced to contend with environmental changes and competition from exotic species.
Many populations of tilapia are now so well established they are a permanent part of the fish community. However there are some steps that aquaculture operations can take to mitigate any additional harm. The eventual goal should be to develop fully domesticated strains of tilapia that will have little chance of surviving outside a culture setting, in much the same manner as most domestic farm animals. The industry is well on its way with tilapia. Red strains of fish are an important step. Red tilapia are only found in domesticated populations and they have very little chance of surviving in the wild. Predation is high from birds, fish and humans because they are so visible in the water. Strains that have been bred to have very large fillets and a more rounded body form are also unlikely to survive outside a farm. Finally, all male populations, developed from hybrids, sex-reversal or genetically male parentage, are less likely to be able to establish a breeding population off farm. All of these techniques should be considered as contributing to the reduction of the ability of tilapia to impact native communities.
References
Top of pageAlceste CC, Conroy G, 2002. Important diseases in modern tilapia culture. Aquaculture Magazine 28(3):59-64.
Avtalion RR, Shlapobersky M, 1994. A whirling disease of tilapia larvae. Israeli Journal of Aquaculture, 46(2):102-104.
Brock VE, 1960. The introduction of aquatic animals into Hawaiian waters. Internationale Revue der Gesamten hydrobiology, 45(4):463-480.
Chen SN, Kou GH, Hedrick RP, Fryer JL, 1985. The occurrence of viral infections of fish in Taiwan. In: Ellis AE, ed. Fish and Shellfish Pathology. New York: Academic Press, 313-319.
Froese R, Pauly D, 2011. FishBase. http://www.fishbase.org
Nico L, 2011. Oreochromis mossambicus. USGS Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database. Gainesville, Florida, USA: USGS. http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/factsheet.aspx?SpeciesID=466
NOBANIS, 2011. North European and Baltic Network on Invasive Alien Species. http://www.nobanis.org/
Paperna I, 1973. Lymphocystis in fish from East African lakes. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 9(No.4):331-335.
Plumb JA, 1997. Infectious diseases of tilapia. In: Costa-Pierce BA, Rakocy JE, eds. Tilapia Aquaculture in the Americas. Vol. 1. Baton Rouge, LA: World Aquaculture Society, 212-228.
Pullin RS, Palmares ML, Casal CV, Dey MM, Pauly D, 1997. Environmental impacts of tilapias. In: Fitzsimmons K, ed. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture. Ithaca, NY, USA: Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, 554-572.
Trewavas E, 1983. Tilapiine fishes of the genera Sarotherodon, Oreochromis and Danakilia. London, UK: British Museum of Natural History, 583 pp.
Contributors
Top of pageMain Author
Kevin Fitzsimmons
University of Arizona, Environmental Research Lab, Soil, Water & Environ Sci Dept, 2601 E. Airport Dr, Tucson, AZ 85706, USA
Distribution Maps
Top of page
- = Present, no further details
- = Evidence of pathogen
- = Widespread
- = Last reported
- = Localised
- = Presence unconfirmed
- = Confined and subject to quarantine
- = See regional map for distribution within the country
- = Occasional or few reports